{"meta":{"query_hash":"b892a1ad489c","filters":{"venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b892a1ad489c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Logic+and+Logical+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1993324392","doi":"10.12775/llp.2013.009","title":"Menger and Nöbeling on pointless topology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Topology (electrical circuits); Mathematics; Topological space; Lattice (music); Perspective (graphical); Product topology; Algebraic number; Space (punctuation); Partially ordered set; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.07013512424438542,"score_gpt":0.22757621518389176,"score_spread":0.15744109093950634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993324392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11041851,0.0008034895,0.000015470043,0.018525546,0.00030996476,0.0001676296,0.00000492706,0.000078949975,0.8696755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894191,0.00006991052,0.00009282472,0.0084308935,0.0006467713,0.000017369748,0.0000017041042,0.0000055602277,0.0013158577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991424,0.000037804923,0.00015338474,0.00033378357,0.00011272408,0.00021988715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995804,0.00008752793,0.000045663477,0.00011542482,0.00003742096,0.00013359205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009519839,0.00015269365,0.00019883715,0.00006222677,0.0005257117,0.000100045014,0.00011762303,0.000069587986,0.0034837527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022334434,0.00010216094,0.000037738297,0.000020138004,0.0013276776,0.00019021487,0.000065649765,0.00018466041,0.0003556847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116635265,0.000050102968,0.000021540312,0.000010097328,0.0000050100325,0.000006022958,0.0013225351,5.6247893e-7,0.00007240361,0.99537337,0.00088259263,0.0022441226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019948621,0.00049230317,0.0005162335,0.000012819067,0.0000069237894,0.000007787433,0.00024412274,0.000036327136,0.000004622163,0.9602347,0.038065698,0.00017900024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040185685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042916536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000984629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004180752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974272},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"opus","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1994230264","doi":"10.12775/llp.2013.030","title":"On the proof-theory of a first-order extension of GL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical proof; Converse; Peano axioms; Pigeonhole principle; Arithmetic function; Axiom; Order (exchange); Calculus (dental); Sequent; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06201604734210328,"score_gpt":0.2643847240193528,"score_spread":0.20236867667724953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994230264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050011,0.00031789235,0.003594192,0.004371323,0.000065185624,0.0006680989,0.0000048092706,0.000038621332,0.08593877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981096,0.000014064589,0.00077862846,0.0007937797,0.00005400257,0.000027203683,0.0000010800144,0.000008796275,0.000212852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898195,0.00017059964,0.00029435827,0.00020492826,0.00019185332,0.0001562963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972482,0.0021034128,0.00016170219,0.00032789144,0.000104424194,0.00005440302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051973725,0.0001499829,0.00030880515,0.000039983755,0.00008895705,0.00000629324,0.00017361202,0.00012686175,0.0015130633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001079199,0.00007350366,0.000090501235,0.00017193018,0.00040883292,0.000042471722,0.000101899124,0.00017406847,0.0000329885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008916859,0.00029065064,0.00008417168,0.00009512021,0.000025734022,0.0000018589475,0.00018462527,0.0000013532261,0.0001499362,0.99782926,0.0005505534,0.0006975774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002318327,0.0004368612,0.000825799,0.00006210194,0.000022908649,0.000005940252,0.00013587289,0.00003515823,0.00046915477,0.9976178,0.00006114014,0.00009546214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025130748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.357087e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093108475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004444179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004538063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471432156","doi":"10.12775/llp.2016.014","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Repairing Faults in Arguments from Expert Opinion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Software; Graph; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.07192412517072126,"score_gpt":0.29018618548193964,"score_spread":0.21826206031121836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471432156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3603129,0.0019867432,0.6221141,0.008209728,0.0013468667,0.001700452,0.000079545505,0.00021954048,0.0040300805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923301,0.00010761833,0.007093947,0.00020560483,0.0001900061,0.00004970137,0.0000074999593,0.000003116008,0.00001245667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999075,0.000057541703,0.00026845958,0.00033969895,0.00011826334,0.00014102113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994519,0.00018477964,0.00010853013,0.0001828454,0.000023237983,0.00004872108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015562706,0.00009861903,0.00019308714,0.0000456812,0.000037317768,0.0000104966575,0.0001936303,0.0000859018,0.000007953972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006887427,0.000055664143,0.00005028585,0.00006324818,0.00003699926,0.0001575014,0.00009592649,0.000031366504,0.0000050202734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018626134,0.0005659817,0.040449884,0.00010351629,0.0000406285,0.000011212238,0.0014110177,0.000014604766,0.035158478,0.868046,0.00057190255,0.053440537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003162967,0.00061269035,0.10759345,0.00042219332,0.0000027860835,0.0000025212457,0.000021405885,0.0039968835,0.0041250368,0.8768283,0.00284273,0.0003890022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005165532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001912936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63201714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016526668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055778332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22699179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744706430","doi":"10.12775/llp.2017.022","title":"Normative Consistency: An Xstit Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Normative; Deontic logic; Consistency (knowledge bases); Modal; Wright; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0910927138969125,"score_gpt":0.3501028008940281,"score_spread":0.25901008699711564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744706430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056505684,0.0001794126,0.00031495988,0.0077304957,0.000422073,0.00016405655,0.00002419582,0.0000813726,0.93457776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464065,0.000017676939,0.0002157295,0.004462336,0.00046963207,0.000022632405,0.000005076775,0.000006912906,0.0001593466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985233,0.00012995933,0.00022458636,0.0005361011,0.00020465977,0.0003814063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986241,0.0001271029,0.00014846296,0.00072748703,0.000051677605,0.00032115864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035472887,0.00020694322,0.00028336706,0.00003276423,0.00094877864,0.00015633425,0.00066944736,0.00020421992,0.0016934649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018496957,0.00013687732,0.00007487201,0.000052190127,0.0023433566,0.00034353684,0.0002170731,0.00029752374,0.00047938517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000830195,0.0001879263,0.0007753731,0.000004457791,0.000015588716,0.00008184173,0.00029832573,3.1588127e-7,0.000030969786,0.99546075,0.000077526645,0.0029839328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040536883,0.00046657133,0.054337457,0.000009687599,0.00001614867,0.000037379985,0.00006232955,0.000022763437,0.0000074542486,0.9432632,0.0011543229,0.00021732172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035448586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018666084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93813497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000132142995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010681992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171570572","doi":"10.12775/llp.2022.025","title":"An Epimorphism between Fine and Ferguson’s Matrices for Angell’s AC","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epimorphism; Surjective function; Homomorphism; Mathematics; Image (mathematics); Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Materials science","score_opus":0.04358547427203284,"score_gpt":0.2763734622509362,"score_spread":0.23278798797890332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171570572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3461321,0.009316832,0.58781874,0.044914115,0.00064127595,0.001734549,0.00024142748,0.0010272473,0.008173689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776522,0.00005937679,0.019683337,0.0020464798,0.00034946707,0.000094955016,0.000027439397,0.000009455275,0.00007729416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984335,0.00011578485,0.00022987778,0.00068606477,0.00018581352,0.00034900673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990963,0.00024541654,0.00010178524,0.00031789741,0.000027785469,0.0002108174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028483174,0.00021600032,0.00032074525,0.00008569517,0.00062346505,0.000086961845,0.00059977575,0.00007903538,0.000059114118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026666235,0.00016426547,0.00006652159,0.00024492267,0.00009871543,0.00032238028,0.00052751217,0.0002375684,0.000004582876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003913497,0.00014708686,0.002304532,0.000029515842,0.000016969927,0.000032780525,0.00020183495,0.00008771867,0.00018326659,0.9634386,0.0003456796,0.03317292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051674485,0.0015187054,0.007634331,0.0000028364782,0.000015058707,0.000031195952,0.00002242527,0.0013088562,0.000015634354,0.97958946,0.009057471,0.00028729485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055585338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.553181e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6315201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032211825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115050825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6698552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}