{"meta":{"query_hash":"b892a1ad489c","filters":{"venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b892a1ad489c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Logic+and+Logical+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1993324392","doi":"10.12775/llp.2013.009","title":"Menger and Nöbeling on pointless topology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Topology (electrical circuits); Mathematics; Topological space; Lattice (music); Perspective (graphical); Product topology; Algebraic number; Space (punctuation); Partially ordered set; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.07013512424438542,"score_gpt":0.22757621518389176,"score_spread":0.15744109093950634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993324392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062848724,0.06339797,0.24633361,0.04058412,0.0031113182,0.000058191225,0.00038139758,0.0002552405,0.58302945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8615286,0.016175345,0.042222567,0.005042139,0.0031700588,0.00014521103,0.000205306,0.00019332771,0.07131744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985569,0.0005991386,0.00006886629,0.00034700258,0.00032146525,0.00010645914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977658,0.0012076909,0.00015230542,0.00036980104,0.00032703494,0.00017741047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024518918,0.0006565076,0.0006469751,0.0019410593,0.0024104742,0.004041857,0.00053679466,0.0015921724,0.0047750683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004510777,0.00030361649,0.0006083507,0.0012891631,0.01490712,0.009658177,0.002957952,0.0027953987,0.0010304924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023420484,9.565778e-7,0.000017726648,0.000006658171,0.000001172198,0.000010508232,0.00010289974,0.00008118363,0.000031743584,0.9982046,0.0005574375,0.0009827459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002280427,0.0000058666687,0.000039367143,0.000013103366,0.0000016633645,0.000025671128,0.000036697955,0.00014547083,0.00006088331,0.9841868,0.015478617,0.0000035121463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008107295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006621567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047750683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021246863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007874986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"opus","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1994230264","doi":"10.12775/llp.2013.030","title":"On the proof-theory of a first-order extension of GL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Mathematical proof; Converse; Peano axioms; Pigeonhole principle; Arithmetic function; Axiom; Order (exchange); Calculus (dental); Sequent; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06201604734210328,"score_gpt":0.2643847240193528,"score_spread":0.20236867667724953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994230264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04661355,0.0012341352,0.9148311,0.0019086408,0.00011710689,0.00008834972,0.00041359942,0.0012011431,0.033592287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6276234,0.0010666574,0.3590734,0.0012238078,0.00028669296,0.00015827306,0.0005747431,0.00029767925,0.009695349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.0002985542,0.00007015128,0.00018136711,0.00047333536,0.00018220185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962495,0.0022745624,0.00021315165,0.000603371,0.0004790537,0.00018033036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002538195,0.0005169856,0.00049938745,0.0013774572,0.0010084108,0.0021984975,0.0012657546,0.00064144883,0.0035446638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032678547,0.00055900315,0.0016159188,0.0012529662,0.005972594,0.0055228444,0.0034840535,0.0035403462,0.00093055324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020573745,0.0000127377425,0.00018205258,0.00007968593,0.000008451827,0.00010403527,0.00038871303,0.0018482641,0.0014139469,0.9888698,0.00052653096,0.006545261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020119,0.000030514177,0.000197824,0.00003841626,0.000015478514,0.00014054523,0.00006410387,0.0062144967,0.0024157078,0.9773333,0.01351488,0.000014758844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013818456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011448588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035446638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017233924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012814654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013423383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471432156","doi":"10.12775/llp.2016.014","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Repairing Faults in Arguments from Expert Opinion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Software; Graph; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.07192412517072126,"score_gpt":0.29018618548193964,"score_spread":0.21826206031121836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471432156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062032426,0.000088957,0.9885542,0.0004058598,0.00005342658,0.00023892785,0.00014255976,0.0012925104,0.0030203585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19139563,0.000098253964,0.80519867,0.0001812547,0.000056856246,0.00042867172,0.00046314456,0.00038028118,0.0017972037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9673638,0.022064094,0.002330516,0.0035734407,0.0037393556,0.0009289494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91944337,0.05267189,0.004913893,0.016325342,0.0047749286,0.0018706452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025490804,0.0014828157,0.0011793908,0.0055598263,0.002661238,0.006365965,0.0035128486,0.0044948687,0.0062866067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10740401,0.001506787,0.002480938,0.0025129488,0.005928599,0.017134756,0.008432655,0.0041599222,0.002200891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077468687,0.00023562102,0.004282299,0.00049640326,0.000102889084,0.00059955125,0.013982257,0.023840172,0.004858653,0.6830714,0.0061407536,0.26161528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009256114,0.00024164883,0.0009681078,0.00042487017,0.00012417864,0.00080274,0.0026484863,0.33469805,0.008041142,0.6055293,0.046264607,0.00016422171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022816968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002036075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025490804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024899854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003412795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13480985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744706430","doi":"10.12775/llp.2017.022","title":"Normative Consistency: An Xstit Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Normative; Deontic logic; Consistency (knowledge bases); Modal; Wright; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0910927138969125,"score_gpt":0.3501028008940281,"score_spread":0.25901008699711564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744706430","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03729332,0.0015428117,0.5038599,0.015398743,0.0009191256,0.000111540074,0.00020899849,0.00061971415,0.44004592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88772386,0.0008568301,0.071708284,0.0033588065,0.0007956112,0.00025882726,0.00027894505,0.00041019125,0.034608662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381304,0.0021481952,0.00044885074,0.0007345069,0.0024913761,0.00036400903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344385,0.0023797192,0.0006485713,0.0014864411,0.0017730928,0.00026824104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006911614,0.00042300377,0.0006133076,0.0018211674,0.0029988948,0.0051337676,0.0025567915,0.0024214045,0.00923717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013440427,0.0005551502,0.00091380446,0.0013143646,0.008358422,0.011009007,0.0047091013,0.004031321,0.0009304163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038486655,0.0000045351476,0.00012790898,0.000012541903,0.0000038676144,0.000024396262,0.0002495251,0.00022118002,0.000054566535,0.99693286,0.00053574005,0.0018290953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008251468,0.000009162585,0.00018609135,0.000033123553,0.000011227262,0.000094679854,0.00024118992,0.0033930745,0.00026967612,0.9798615,0.015883498,0.000008548691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021255175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018882665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00923717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002428354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018292249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036552608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171570572","doi":"10.12775/llp.2022.025","title":"An Epimorphism between Fine and Ferguson’s Matrices for Angell’s AC","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epimorphism; Surjective function; Homomorphism; Mathematics; Image (mathematics); Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Materials science","score_opus":0.04358547427203284,"score_gpt":0.2763734622509362,"score_spread":0.23278798797890332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171570572","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18529761,0.0012954687,0.53127944,0.004654964,0.0004528977,0.00015197265,0.00075802556,0.0007812135,0.27532834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92365956,0.00026155787,0.055568263,0.00058706576,0.0001370104,0.00007756717,0.0002647839,0.00007268314,0.019371439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991252,0.00019944108,0.000066195134,0.00021088593,0.00025430493,0.00014402527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888486,0.00042693887,0.00011962382,0.00013511286,0.0002839596,0.00014942515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011350423,0.00035882965,0.0002953046,0.0013809142,0.0013998282,0.0024802515,0.000542605,0.00061742275,0.006671292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021690042,0.0003138674,0.00055374496,0.0006303843,0.002932967,0.004796954,0.0013193061,0.0018731545,0.0005868915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021605616,0.000006472117,0.0000812121,0.000011212534,0.0000017734834,0.0000578188,0.00024247976,0.00015445928,0.00084969494,0.9946636,0.00049593125,0.0034135617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017058217,0.00003393364,0.0004257354,0.000018434273,0.000008938971,0.00025957287,0.00026016394,0.0039307475,0.0029497906,0.9725625,0.019509483,0.000023637975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002335735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019726595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006671292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022657209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006417692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022317648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}