{"meta":{"query_hash":"4bb2cf3d323c","filters":{"venue":"Logica Universalis"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4bb2cf3d323c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Logica+Universalis"},"results":[{"id":"W1981966241","doi":"10.1007/s11787-013-0084-y","title":"A Reduction Theorem for the Kripke–Joyal Semantics: Forcing Over an Arbitrary Category can Always be Replaced by Forcing Over a Complete Heyting Algebra","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; The King's University; Western University","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Mathematics; Forcing (mathematics); Kripke semantics; Order (exchange); Algebra over a field; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Intermediate logic; Mathematical analysis; Description logic","score_opus":0.02164358199467545,"score_gpt":0.23439529236127887,"score_spread":0.21275171036660342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981966241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3152608,0.00030749437,0.67051816,0.0060233297,0.00075250043,0.0018702735,0.00006574045,0.000812689,0.0043890215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812746,0.000033162076,0.015808862,0.0019596582,0.00021202311,0.000057798108,0.00006540067,0.00003780696,0.000550711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.00015662695,0.0003527105,0.00083579007,0.00032821688,0.00073403004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980709,0.00038702166,0.00031205727,0.0009161466,0.00012858208,0.00018529235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039165784,0.0003563365,0.00034547923,0.00011526429,0.0009291789,0.0003261572,0.0011280978,0.00014906046,0.000110369605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006401156,0.00026197603,0.00019120063,0.0003876699,0.00019485713,0.0015151905,0.00031627537,0.00033056107,0.0000062100635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008277145,0.000111724636,0.00021257332,0.00004539206,0.00012833635,0.000024595578,0.006663002,0.0013197646,0.033987068,0.93848467,0.011503874,0.0074362257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027894273,0.00090373476,0.0016619207,0.00009076006,0.00014609429,0.00013940754,0.008137463,0.5739971,0.0048019923,0.39041337,0.015377366,0.0015413427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001254889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081354454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6660138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015976434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006864552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999258758","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0027-4","title":"On a New Idiom in the Study of Entailment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Logical consequence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16714349315005378,"score_gpt":0.22505007473399039,"score_spread":0.057906581583936606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999258758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35128352,0.0000105219615,0.000005655433,0.00019596888,0.00013670679,0.00013980876,0.0000018580605,0.000009709786,0.64821625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980915,0.000001394241,0.000006485939,0.00024199706,0.00004868721,0.0000011988456,2.925778e-7,0.0000013710554,0.0016070498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.000054966767,0.00008093786,0.00009566003,0.00014229884,0.0000737122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997778,0.000036875186,0.000032652257,0.00011872354,0.000011669422,0.00002231195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000088277135,0.00004691206,0.00007033549,0.000048931586,0.0000843148,0.000008832851,0.00023893318,0.000010328294,0.0011186847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000875132,0.000026811244,0.00002416924,0.00005749066,0.00008308402,0.00005972505,0.000017277474,0.000057625763,0.000022801447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026661652,0.0004928947,0.00007318679,7.2023596e-7,0.000003013815,0.000015318858,0.27674866,0.0000015527834,0.0000030696458,0.7201849,0.002243616,0.00020642138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024889284,0.009386343,0.0074976124,0.000033848286,0.000059615337,0.0000014448088,0.3000531,0.000021072723,0.000044205728,0.2473662,0.43262118,0.00042645176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029591748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094380626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.646808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023364966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008223688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073500481","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0028-3","title":"Curry’s Formalism as Structuralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Formalism (music); Epistemology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Philosophy; Computer science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0715885690738742,"score_gpt":0.28324054243324764,"score_spread":0.21165197335937344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073500481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15790285,0.00003439368,0.00016846234,0.00036403025,0.0005132349,0.0000803537,0.000013407579,0.00011260564,0.84081066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996555,0.0000066100115,0.00031916273,0.0010475032,0.00007878064,0.0000029218772,0.000004944621,0.000006967383,0.0019781352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990261,0.00008164162,0.000118280455,0.00028664185,0.00013693096,0.0003503844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.000041023166,0.0000550744,0.00032823443,0.00003352667,0.00017085423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109883746,0.00012448335,0.00012296806,0.00005518901,0.00011946255,0.000013072769,0.00048712612,0.000116913,0.022417078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026583679,0.00009467334,0.00007656526,0.00021982462,0.00039755934,0.0001942311,0.00009011561,0.00014844858,0.0011939837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058662605,0.000035592748,0.00007018513,9.67726e-7,0.00001435918,0.00012341501,0.0044667805,1.079076e-7,0.00008573883,0.99296594,0.00055653515,0.0016217149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038327486,0.0002123637,0.0074925367,0.00000434438,0.000019955532,0.00006252406,0.00090742507,0.000004577497,0.00045040186,0.9631056,0.027143294,0.00021370822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051226007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004845366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021771702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009730402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135096857","doi":"10.1007/s11787-014-0099-z","title":"Extracting BB′IW Inhabitants of Simple Types From Proofs in the Sequent Calculus $${LT_\\to^{t}}$$ L T → t for Implicational Ticket Entailment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sequent; Sequent calculus; Natural deduction; Combinatory logic; Decidability; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Cut-elimination theorem; Simple (philosophy); Calculus (dental); Logical consequence; Curry–Howard correspondence; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Proof calculus; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032789485307420055,"score_gpt":0.27328893104258684,"score_spread":0.2404994457351668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135096857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12413395,0.00010266816,0.8635916,0.0024953277,0.0003643002,0.0014949882,0.00003297735,0.0001093797,0.00767478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340266,0.000001852464,0.0060365647,0.00032367793,0.000091140995,0.000046785426,0.000027290514,0.0000057788593,0.00006426613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878126,0.00013655945,0.00024794246,0.00033495505,0.00024523883,0.00025403663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988962,0.00036235366,0.00015911568,0.00042740934,0.00009424415,0.000060693656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005302604,0.000118832635,0.00018011578,0.00006971684,0.000096572076,0.00006783265,0.00081111985,0.000062333,0.000016698437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012071782,0.00008169143,0.00006754264,0.00026960115,0.000038423972,0.00015760935,0.00013866277,0.000077613266,0.00001676974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480027,0.0002477511,0.005959874,0.000032638894,0.000043952965,0.000009563346,0.006036114,0.00027777095,0.0033187652,0.9439291,0.0015524237,0.038557295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036490078,0.0020603605,0.08193592,0.000060127808,0.00010945561,0.00004004406,0.0049254275,0.050813578,0.011220567,0.2569682,0.5868784,0.001338908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007973445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021544694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007947208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044579796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.333128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320353775","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0144-1","title":"A Square of Oppositions in Intuitionistic Logic with Strong Negation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Intuitionistic logic; Falsity; Law of excluded middle; Negation as failure; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Paraconsistent logic; Axiom; Axiomatic system; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Propositional calculus; Epistemology; Autoepistemic logic; Linguistics; Computer science; Multimodal logic; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01645153217185681,"score_gpt":0.21973946768171043,"score_spread":0.20328793550985363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320353775","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03416709,0.000037962316,0.9153161,0.0011404319,0.000071453906,0.00018821172,0.000014753385,0.00012681307,0.048937198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917759,0.000016251677,0.00782542,0.000042183594,0.00001675284,0.0000056628523,0.0000051009774,0.0000036545277,0.000309094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923337,0.00007665238,0.00013159144,0.00024607065,0.00013114922,0.00018119141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.00012197256,0.00009516973,0.0002694558,0.00010952199,0.00005536426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008650443,0.00009688747,0.00013581525,0.00013342529,0.00007359915,0.000030816052,0.00036657552,0.000055555814,0.00008209575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041219293,0.000059135742,0.000036503614,0.00041318848,0.00011725613,0.0003905085,0.000086866596,0.00005396669,0.000022105301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016806462,0.00009717343,0.0022647593,0.000008994944,0.000008142166,0.00003689956,0.0005769967,0.000070365,0.0008770333,0.99241114,0.00012306278,0.0035086253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016442256,0.008435993,0.34424448,0.0022492148,0.00018812211,0.0002685102,0.0039904355,0.019996095,0.012401683,0.5782824,0.010454496,0.0030462858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007396211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015500248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010000174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006330455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24114856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417553771","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0150-3","title":"The Klein Group, Squares of Opposition and the Explanation of Fallacies in Reasoning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Phenomenon; Propositional calculus; Inference; Binary number; Binary opposition; Computer science; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Political science; Law; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.006441353353435574,"score_gpt":0.18692809829889934,"score_spread":0.18048674494546377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417553771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57381296,0.0013085409,0.40168765,0.013121094,0.00013993784,0.00032691297,0.000014416879,0.00008426504,0.00950421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805355,0.00014500554,0.0017212433,0.000024442861,0.000005259603,0.0000014681419,0.0000010224051,0.0000013214702,0.00004670823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999455,0.00015676368,0.00010984643,0.00009484973,0.000102078506,0.00008150188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989546,0.00074383535,0.00010795778,0.00014810222,0.000033497858,0.000012039528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004977834,0.000044535776,0.00007634171,0.000043274584,0.00009080379,0.000021640524,0.0002597281,0.000026835674,0.0000019412287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007577075,0.000020130843,0.000019464806,0.00013584696,0.0001408742,0.0001771314,0.000066631845,0.000034925197,3.2150777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096669646,0.000011566947,0.0047196136,0.000010559721,0.000011565157,0.000004102333,0.0044695595,0.00013784152,0.00298377,0.96142673,0.00020420822,0.02592382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02646638,0.0030459282,0.31506363,0.005136784,0.00016361558,0.00009860367,0.023535911,0.1835367,0.04886892,0.36571297,0.026369078,0.0020014765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002819147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007008376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59571373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013696953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896430270","doi":"10.1007/s11787-018-0214-7","title":"Pecularities of Some Three- and Four-Valued Second Order Logics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Order (exchange); Mathematics; Propositional calculus; Many-valued logic; T-norm fuzzy logics; Truth value; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Description logic; Calculus (dental); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Programming language; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.02407551781598009,"score_gpt":0.21851114767710342,"score_spread":0.19443562986112334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896430270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4087488,0.0014340153,0.3176508,0.0008437323,0.0009141611,0.00041088313,0.000027751865,0.00046279706,0.26950705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782375,0.0000483303,0.019295339,0.00033676391,0.00013268518,0.0000014795531,0.0000025459426,0.000007540412,0.001937796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898165,0.00006303569,0.00015203956,0.0003579697,0.00017164786,0.0002736582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905807,0.000074331336,0.00010709978,0.00041750201,0.00024772232,0.00009527427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018244106,0.00015636586,0.00023600871,0.00009687833,0.00016553208,0.000075850454,0.00057605206,0.000119460514,0.0002551182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869078,0.00012512959,0.00006069627,0.00030552072,0.00045555388,0.000443035,0.00042388614,0.00010114273,0.000027126764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012377563,0.000048258018,0.0012961702,0.000023168026,0.000035249293,0.000039093506,0.0017253532,0.0000019183565,0.00059417734,0.99284774,0.0015217637,0.0018547329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048517706,0.0037178616,0.06464217,0.00013669087,0.00014707855,0.00024371078,0.0020109273,0.03487867,0.01277475,0.7141636,0.16028246,0.0021503072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006558934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016966647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024918405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000578313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202309894","doi":"10.1007/s11787-021-00289-y","title":"The Role of the Common in Cognitive Prosperity: Our Command of the Unspeakable and Unwriteable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Principal (computer security); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Inference; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0354634357098894,"score_gpt":0.24073988237091842,"score_spread":0.205276446661029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202309894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6929137,0.0018753635,6.714643e-7,0.0027794463,0.00020771757,0.0003116792,0.00009378891,0.000008219376,0.3018094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993943,0.00017166091,0.000004100568,0.00020078299,0.00003597588,0.0000032273117,0.0000039231427,0.0000052318833,0.005632149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912256,0.00032863423,0.00015278318,0.00011807687,0.00014499732,0.00013294541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913216,0.00024170712,0.00013327465,0.0002498373,0.0002268024,0.000016216118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032122832,0.00008224663,0.00018749556,0.000013740929,0.0003904974,0.000036360412,0.00021633768,0.0000519781,0.000039910283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008339694,0.000041432908,0.000077019344,0.000079762154,0.00083357864,0.00006646477,0.00017992438,0.00023445542,5.8891015e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042866515,0.0001566947,0.0335932,0.000044013952,0.000082894476,0.0000038580665,0.0377598,0.000008774629,0.00044187444,0.9261999,0.0005187804,0.0011473336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015609885,0.00013350155,0.022478875,0.00032712866,0.00026494742,0.000007825725,0.45247546,0.00016781462,0.014818605,0.15733725,0.35017046,0.00025716654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014900425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01799152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76886266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016153554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006575856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244393162","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0033-8","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0547482475818036,"score_gpt":0.2133557363061642,"score_spread":0.1586074887243606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244393162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5684758,0.000057020236,0.00015713926,0.0001946084,0.000062168736,0.00011482333,0.000041270003,0.0005951244,0.43030205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561126,0.00003268711,0.0010696234,0.00014293943,0.000040075356,0.000001285292,0.000016570884,0.000027154287,0.013058397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.000056733337,0.00007852624,0.00022240226,0.00018918225,0.00024395049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994726,0.000032951346,0.000047224552,0.00029546092,0.0000515993,0.00010014857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005329929,0.00010983353,0.000116939096,0.00007694043,0.00016128004,0.0000071668464,0.00024399937,0.00006260605,0.0015232298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038091453,0.00009816555,0.00006022299,0.0003428479,0.00017919368,0.00018639726,0.00006865476,0.00009609806,0.0075642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036104812,0.000594889,0.033636708,0.000014374956,0.0001698352,0.0031273651,0.007608715,0.00094723207,0.067016736,0.09165549,0.7940013,0.0008663356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090674416,0.00011603512,0.03794445,0.0000061916485,0.000022906694,0.00014558085,0.00043261767,0.0001196802,0.0034678488,0.00055804447,0.9559335,0.00034641565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013250535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014180773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41724366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009499371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031424683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255435609","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0015-x","title":"On Preserving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Consistency (knowledge bases); Generalization; Relation (database); Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Rule of inference; Natural language processing; Theoretical computer science; Data mining; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027928240086627205,"score_gpt":0.3093205292949134,"score_spread":0.2813922892082862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255435609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08571969,0.0000127220865,0.0021127295,0.0006348552,0.00022795038,0.00004614659,0.0000026353885,0.00006986371,0.9111734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960415,8.8866864e-7,0.0001063116,0.00093666284,0.00006896721,4.845775e-7,0.0000011450991,0.000003451297,0.002840639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934095,0.000038747894,0.00006613322,0.00019250257,0.00011152098,0.00025016535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.00025443817,0.000023065879,0.00022417011,0.000014006037,0.00009972094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027662606,0.00006022129,0.00005980383,0.000045700835,0.00007500568,0.000008208492,0.0002806211,0.000063867265,0.0055149924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057584897,0.00004680123,0.000034777415,0.00020067379,0.00014890442,0.00004469723,0.000046019217,0.00010298945,0.00059815095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007599344,0.000056905636,0.00007419449,4.9245364e-7,0.000005188191,0.000109457724,0.00035408643,0.0000022864322,0.000163645,0.9964478,0.0011626596,0.0015473155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003570137,0.0002823857,0.014669502,0.000008078261,0.0000069613548,0.0000072349226,0.00039948404,0.000010844914,0.00038503358,0.94774014,0.03598141,0.00015189304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000440429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005261452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002151717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002903192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415695681","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00380-8","title":"Understanding Money as a Communication Technology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"National Identity and Symbolism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Currency; Digital currency; Moment (physics); Financial transaction; Information and Communications Technology","score_opus":0.08552511407630911,"score_gpt":0.33461502990207553,"score_spread":0.24908991582576642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415695681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015561117,0.00017087522,0.0031338714,0.043209486,0.00011503401,0.00011502206,0.0000024790093,0.00017429634,0.9375178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839273,0.00040671826,0.0002823908,0.0003679679,0.000012799809,0.0000020264276,0.000005030819,0.0000016009533,0.014994147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.00010459804,0.00006872276,0.00009688092,0.00013415286,0.00011706637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996237,0.00010915268,0.000034737597,0.00013833623,0.00006851142,0.000025529413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023552484,0.00003894861,0.000066361354,0.0002507582,0.000746517,0.000053939457,0.00032939957,0.00012491288,0.00024111387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002359862,0.0000425746,0.00002852495,0.00078055245,0.00032785133,0.0001709595,0.000073978816,0.00010065977,0.000044399578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033063516,0.000015371721,0.0006346514,0.0000010046894,0.0000102551685,0.0000022293889,0.0013226448,0.000004448437,0.00003921451,0.9939865,0.0038166104,0.00016378883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013389367,0.000005849751,0.00031178113,0.000013693813,0.000010154417,2.0832277e-7,0.023394091,0.0000118297785,0.000031528198,0.75540984,0.22062716,0.000049993145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026358617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026034452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003168241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117986136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.574168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416215139","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00404-3","title":"Defining without Essences: Ibn Taymiyya’s Critique of Aristotelian Logic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Dialectic; Focus (optics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.024828358279122022,"score_gpt":0.2568095182743967,"score_spread":0.23198115999527466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416215139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00873576,0.0004232243,0.00038130858,0.0055629076,0.00044326176,0.00011714111,0.00005241443,0.000111301066,0.9841727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844449,0.000058048914,0.00021886137,0.0017329714,0.00012325392,0.000003693249,0.000017632436,0.000006799708,0.013393833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.00006740361,0.00022617854,0.0002365867,0.00015749107,0.00020088248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937683,0.00013090762,0.00009339873,0.00019999933,0.00013551093,0.00006337212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001044594,0.00014702244,0.0002816935,0.00012247029,0.00020542898,0.000045057826,0.00027048733,0.000076901284,0.0016289977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089677786,0.00011075356,0.00011185966,0.00009572706,0.00060141704,0.00012565366,0.00007187207,0.00017060233,0.00005114034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032388394,0.00007290298,0.00015186035,0.00005712751,0.000032022694,0.0000136572635,0.002336591,0.0000052342275,0.00008811362,0.9918586,0.004712726,0.0006387848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048541062,0.00022810664,0.00016278856,0.00023018103,0.00009176636,0.0000010888335,0.007880553,0.000086182,0.00041262756,0.4785812,0.51157624,0.00026384895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006019305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003869258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97570914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029575009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053484786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}