{"meta":{"query_hash":"4bb2cf3d323c","filters":{"venue":"Logica Universalis"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4bb2cf3d323c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Logica+Universalis"},"results":[{"id":"W1981966241","doi":"10.1007/s11787-013-0084-y","title":"A Reduction Theorem for the Kripke–Joyal Semantics: Forcing Over an Arbitrary Category can Always be Replaced by Forcing Over a Complete Heyting Algebra","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; The King's University; Western University","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Mathematics; Forcing (mathematics); Kripke semantics; Order (exchange); Algebra over a field; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Intermediate logic; Mathematical analysis; Description logic","score_opus":0.02164358199467545,"score_gpt":0.23439529236127887,"score_spread":0.21275171036660342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981966241","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056037806,0.0013936826,0.78154814,0.009050178,0.0020074253,0.00017918975,0.0009900976,0.0015917259,0.14720175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8065155,0.0012962054,0.14519203,0.0044107838,0.0016110659,0.00055057846,0.0012289139,0.0015310732,0.037663925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692494,0.0004791568,0.00024314462,0.0011098968,0.0006607957,0.0005821358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974483,0.0010308094,0.00008719749,0.0006881992,0.0004945519,0.0002509759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028659087,0.0012978832,0.0021386365,0.002158615,0.0040860884,0.0037510116,0.0027395384,0.0028827076,0.009031215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004833037,0.0013264625,0.0056828884,0.0018459896,0.008954824,0.018435165,0.011149164,0.010213459,0.0021711828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003592471,0.000021425902,0.00009179323,0.00004659989,0.000023865763,0.0000661419,0.0002761954,0.0003799225,0.00088629837,0.99300545,0.00165578,0.0035106475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027244121,0.000014695026,0.00011331405,0.000017276474,0.000033097884,0.00010297564,0.00007058356,0.0016655014,0.0008965486,0.9909875,0.006042145,0.000029119723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002708249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017084164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009031215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019524754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015382079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030212402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999258758","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0027-4","title":"On a New Idiom in the Study of Entailment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Logical consequence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16714349315005378,"score_gpt":0.22505007473399039,"score_spread":0.057906581583936606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999258758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027512284,0.016874127,0.6465073,0.05130452,0.0023266426,0.000076268094,0.0003796897,0.00029545123,0.25472373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74923444,0.011018363,0.18691142,0.009959128,0.0073957737,0.00035725292,0.00048187058,0.00068846677,0.033953317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966899,0.002020717,0.00015315643,0.00047347005,0.00045508944,0.00020770736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923976,0.005912176,0.0002484383,0.0008433262,0.00035967573,0.0002387973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058398284,0.000830608,0.0014505796,0.004546992,0.0041210046,0.008646912,0.0030402797,0.004249227,0.010418816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083195865,0.0007977156,0.0016528307,0.0044499342,0.023896279,0.03117478,0.0057050497,0.008704058,0.0012259801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003338626,0.00000256207,0.000023754157,0.000008916648,0.0000012027114,0.000010448416,0.00024519616,0.000037564772,0.000025446554,0.99825233,0.00037210734,0.0010170419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005626934,0.000004652071,0.000043860426,0.000022556775,0.000003236754,0.000030848925,0.0001553222,0.00045291285,0.00004579609,0.989408,0.009822738,0.0000044993885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020781138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026105512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010418816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032083383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001449865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034854352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073500481","doi":"10.1007/s11787-011-0028-3","title":"Curry’s Formalism as Structuralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Formalism (music); Epistemology; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Philosophy; Computer science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0715885690738742,"score_gpt":0.28324054243324764,"score_spread":0.21165197335937344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073500481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01675717,0.00503551,0.4190358,0.025433285,0.0016871993,0.00012310232,0.00058671564,0.0006440957,0.53069717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7536163,0.004381229,0.15905987,0.004691928,0.0028829954,0.00049637305,0.0004160949,0.000841787,0.07361348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982268,0.0006519282,0.0001135982,0.0003949217,0.00042280878,0.00018987324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875116,0.00065881805,0.00006599093,0.00030342137,0.00016187476,0.000058655558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025167644,0.0011180674,0.0013792004,0.0036910851,0.003411858,0.00501929,0.002245393,0.003054208,0.012041679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038797266,0.0013090295,0.002137904,0.0034854892,0.013640183,0.017020345,0.0041002855,0.007178398,0.002057076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015828546,0.0000010686847,0.0000038278845,0.0000072534012,0.0000016915185,0.0000036204272,0.000057766407,0.000038974296,0.000017726597,0.9987198,0.00044915112,0.00069762504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044631433,0.000001573995,0.000011658923,0.0000072443477,0.0000037727184,0.000009862428,0.000012754243,0.00020319516,0.00005449826,0.9919144,0.0077735493,0.0000031257196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034117962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026549743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012041679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038031428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017948219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04028344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135096857","doi":"10.1007/s11787-014-0099-z","title":"Extracting BB′IW Inhabitants of Simple Types From Proofs in the Sequent Calculus $${LT_\\to^{t}}$$ L T → t for Implicational Ticket Entailment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sequent; Sequent calculus; Natural deduction; Combinatory logic; Decidability; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Cut-elimination theorem; Simple (philosophy); Calculus (dental); Logical consequence; Curry–Howard correspondence; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Proof calculus; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032789485307420055,"score_gpt":0.27328893104258684,"score_spread":0.2404994457351668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135096857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056509104,0.00022524493,0.9289407,0.0005534737,0.000095636475,0.00016771123,0.00071307085,0.004615483,0.008179496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3818716,0.00027633787,0.6071045,0.00018670228,0.00007494673,0.00011899728,0.0018453305,0.0017814689,0.0067400294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972783,0.0005356916,0.0002444302,0.000516518,0.00096212263,0.00046294372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944419,0.002685733,0.00032510108,0.0014455918,0.0008351258,0.00026651882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002693521,0.0005945366,0.00092220475,0.0023312531,0.0016118545,0.0048204185,0.0018760418,0.00112497,0.009719683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013987485,0.0016938201,0.0023182353,0.0021315222,0.0018826624,0.0068444093,0.0049053314,0.0028034253,0.003083195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007234255,0.00027486245,0.005610342,0.00072934484,0.0001359586,0.0010568461,0.0024720312,0.012004292,0.025408106,0.67393875,0.0077792336,0.26986682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008191182,0.00007683566,0.0013780639,0.00014990475,0.0001894276,0.00035683377,0.00068746,0.07840572,0.036072556,0.86285096,0.019657161,0.000093133196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028392556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053999065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009719683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012017917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022061488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032515526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320353775","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0144-1","title":"A Square of Oppositions in Intuitionistic Logic with Strong Negation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Intuitionistic logic; Falsity; Law of excluded middle; Negation as failure; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Paraconsistent logic; Axiom; Axiomatic system; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Propositional calculus; Epistemology; Autoepistemic logic; Linguistics; Computer science; Multimodal logic; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01645153217185681,"score_gpt":0.21973946768171043,"score_spread":0.20328793550985363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320353775","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23739117,0.0012123561,0.42073292,0.008559802,0.0012552919,0.00012088128,0.00045758247,0.0007620671,0.329508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331007,0.00021599446,0.045081098,0.000762508,0.00025730507,0.000071966264,0.00019338957,0.0001403424,0.020176817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975222,0.00082437193,0.00016378614,0.0005268619,0.00065754814,0.00030524668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961184,0.0024865079,0.00021026975,0.00029950152,0.00058293244,0.00030238787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022679316,0.00038665897,0.00074547215,0.0011735746,0.002995552,0.004910869,0.0011680896,0.0016518019,0.011360948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007755313,0.00073535205,0.0012634961,0.0011646404,0.0055082524,0.009715617,0.0033855287,0.0038948485,0.0015004878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007412405,0.00001539478,0.00014452578,0.000027591146,0.000008467472,0.000096768315,0.00024240684,0.00032250167,0.0006826055,0.99301493,0.0011428674,0.0042278757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024488549,0.000019171797,0.00009678289,0.000009557213,0.0000137232,0.0001107243,0.00014993516,0.0035720211,0.0005872336,0.9914328,0.0039731916,0.0000103342945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001099541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013104322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011360948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010643931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000753499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038006127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417553771","doi":"10.1007/s11787-016-0150-3","title":"The Klein Group, Squares of Opposition and the Explanation of Fallacies in Reasoning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Phenomenon; Propositional calculus; Inference; Binary number; Binary opposition; Computer science; Mathematics; Calculus (dental); Philosophy; Discrete mathematics; Political science; Law; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.006441353353435574,"score_gpt":0.18692809829889934,"score_spread":0.18048674494546377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417553771","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16303673,0.007723859,0.568029,0.029004144,0.00057186006,0.00012868071,0.00041599135,0.0006850687,0.23040472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95337886,0.00079333707,0.040497366,0.00038518527,0.00015499337,0.00008449593,0.00011469756,0.00007182054,0.0045192144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695694,0.0019672418,0.00014653799,0.00031195287,0.0004211288,0.00019624307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432385,0.004254919,0.0003450288,0.0006835207,0.00023771606,0.0001550509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003341571,0.0006896651,0.0011026432,0.0024591475,0.0021120794,0.0043860725,0.001968718,0.0030174789,0.0065402724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125842625,0.00068865594,0.0014875082,0.002522715,0.020875603,0.013762778,0.0038833087,0.0034374553,0.00056906167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019337578,0.000004736289,0.000094915405,0.000028022765,0.000007539845,0.000020905976,0.00038037068,0.0016205608,0.000046160858,0.9947772,0.0004736501,0.00252657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005121699,0.0000012157841,0.0000143517545,0.000002523513,0.0000012105444,0.000004796355,0.00004232246,0.00083538156,0.000011834424,0.9986084,0.0004712844,0.0000016116511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003269551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021112051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065402724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020836152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012044073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021879375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896430270","doi":"10.1007/s11787-018-0214-7","title":"Pecularities of Some Three- and Four-Valued Second Order Logics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Order (exchange); Mathematics; Propositional calculus; Many-valued logic; T-norm fuzzy logics; Truth value; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Description logic; Calculus (dental); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Programming language; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.02407551781598009,"score_gpt":0.21851114767710342,"score_spread":0.19443562986112334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896430270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43795803,0.0033453496,0.21800861,0.017921716,0.0002630907,0.00008856575,0.00087120314,0.00037289798,0.32117054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681247,0.0008424558,0.017704295,0.0008591422,0.0001828867,0.00006651031,0.00029675505,0.000046947873,0.011876255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980895,0.0005984682,0.000118212214,0.000252412,0.00058066915,0.00036071552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318427,0.004630244,0.0005009998,0.00055458845,0.00057940144,0.00055044424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003664664,0.00048769743,0.0009341434,0.0017819707,0.0030278177,0.0075877584,0.0013907844,0.0017858504,0.009070878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077773673,0.0006339061,0.001490148,0.0022199547,0.0065623997,0.011561756,0.0030741831,0.0043025347,0.0005693012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018138375,0.000006338204,0.000066750945,0.0000068030267,0.0000030963024,0.000020365285,0.00008243482,0.00023992865,0.00006631952,0.99842095,0.00022736359,0.00084154675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000988105,0.0000025545194,0.000045744047,0.000004584972,0.0000037347045,0.000022157494,0.000042082516,0.0018011461,0.0000951877,0.9971222,0.000846925,0.000003889071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019849034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015111465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009070878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037856535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001562789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030345082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202309894","doi":"10.1007/s11787-021-00289-y","title":"The Role of the Common in Cognitive Prosperity: Our Command of the Unspeakable and Unwriteable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Principal (computer security); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Inference; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0354634357098894,"score_gpt":0.24073988237091842,"score_spread":0.205276446661029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202309894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16285533,0.0072715348,0.24313262,0.15262294,0.0009653553,0.00009333474,0.0002867971,0.0003001935,0.4324719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819462,0.00052907364,0.011186414,0.0016638541,0.0002532932,0.000064721935,0.000040020317,0.00012271188,0.0041936333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930219,0.003652792,0.00027830654,0.0015578609,0.00083346735,0.00065561815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980354,0.010410351,0.0013252321,0.004519698,0.0019079319,0.0014826446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010907913,0.00071996445,0.0012622542,0.0027417878,0.008060139,0.010543214,0.0034941337,0.0052994136,0.0070995335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019208487,0.0007570797,0.0010007885,0.001813274,0.11707219,0.03637431,0.009241492,0.0077939252,0.0007186161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014973307,0.0000073504066,0.00015894914,0.000028894963,0.000008919092,0.00002689513,0.0057543963,0.0001767398,0.00007725337,0.99128926,0.0005419191,0.001914509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005288997,0.0000029611201,0.00006218363,0.000017303839,0.000004163291,0.000017046572,0.0008930781,0.00021905635,0.000066124594,0.99578357,0.0029234965,0.0000056534045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007975094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006336375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010907913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044303862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004947113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057687283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244393162","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0033-8","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0547482475818036,"score_gpt":0.2133557363061642,"score_spread":0.1586074887243606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244393162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012015206,0.01296705,0.01870764,0.03594327,0.123324454,0.00025683086,0.0058052335,0.0013483104,0.8004457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012578187,0.006433186,0.004493104,0.0068959263,0.03015509,0.00020798807,0.0040201624,0.0012385157,0.9339777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918526,0.00016896879,0.00004234715,0.00015410202,0.00038280638,0.00006643641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707234,0.0007527821,0.00009532793,0.00036748985,0.0014399395,0.00027203342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012964408,0.0010180552,0.0008103302,0.0039286935,0.0033509282,0.0039501186,0.0012561986,0.001038782,0.2734881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073820865,0.00037113114,0.0007105938,0.0029265678,0.0013495436,0.0046099005,0.001944957,0.00438797,0.15689935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029121611,0.000022882354,0.00007672934,0.000110919085,0.0000034808916,0.000027629856,0.00012981798,0.00007144025,0.00013904875,0.05415476,0.90623003,0.039004147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004724058,0.0000073790184,0.00019170178,0.000106684376,0.0000028626694,0.000032634165,0.000082750434,0.00005934483,0.00013057637,0.021499123,0.9778751,0.000007208359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004369355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052478253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2734881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030291032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016425765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255435609","doi":"10.1007/s11787-007-0015-x","title":"On Preserving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Consistency (knowledge bases); Generalization; Relation (database); Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Rule of inference; Natural language processing; Theoretical computer science; Data mining; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027928240086627205,"score_gpt":0.3093205292949134,"score_spread":0.2813922892082862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255435609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0617023,0.0021486757,0.27860945,0.014023276,0.0017489888,0.00015227727,0.0009123105,0.0012873778,0.6394154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7302134,0.0019044882,0.029184712,0.003121084,0.0011221467,0.00014068438,0.0009501781,0.0011937345,0.2321696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789244,0.00044505394,0.00010679797,0.00064828,0.0005057374,0.00040167605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735415,0.0006604221,0.00012278243,0.0011534161,0.0005255423,0.00018374383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014638418,0.00093388575,0.0009772182,0.0018196347,0.0039635347,0.005218106,0.0013511594,0.0014734939,0.027424376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045345384,0.00056912,0.0013733472,0.0017708061,0.004951236,0.015051901,0.005835782,0.0055235727,0.004264606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020525276,0.000014762386,0.00006157222,0.000017464454,0.0000051719194,0.000017238022,0.00015671863,0.000099225785,0.00019719895,0.9893534,0.0020151944,0.008041614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005030476,0.0000072779403,0.00006041366,0.000008445104,0.000007669668,0.000040834173,0.000084549225,0.00037291102,0.0003390967,0.9860103,0.013059524,0.0000039745114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017807846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016601433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027424376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002110975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001439788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09174365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415695681","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00380-8","title":"Understanding Money as a Communication Technology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"National Identity and Symbolism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Currency; Digital currency; Moment (physics); Financial transaction; Information and Communications Technology","score_opus":0.08552511407630911,"score_gpt":0.33461502990207553,"score_spread":0.24908991582576642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415695681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13476554,0.004078404,0.100484475,0.046346705,0.00046281124,0.000047431524,0.00016396407,0.00010932385,0.7135414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835829,0.00067489047,0.0052762143,0.00046188972,0.00013166248,0.000042348896,0.000023964853,0.00002556135,0.009780565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792826,0.0012894188,0.00007168987,0.0002299714,0.00025514525,0.00022543884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967476,0.002124713,0.00036387568,0.00033450313,0.00025665312,0.00017274031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022219857,0.0003837819,0.0004592341,0.0021039865,0.003549514,0.010994354,0.0010596425,0.0028987003,0.007518704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044801445,0.00027986523,0.00040673124,0.0019277381,0.027910987,0.019481393,0.0033914496,0.003042107,0.0006099659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001853867,0.0000023071066,0.000045690584,0.0000058444853,0.0000010255078,0.000014320295,0.00085660734,0.00006711401,0.000020465004,0.99819225,0.00011548527,0.0006772003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002782763,0.000003143843,0.000080263126,0.000015280099,0.000002744775,0.000029638792,0.0011819544,0.0003483618,0.00006290175,0.9936255,0.0046440866,0.0000032918676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026562146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016601203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010994354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034969838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023288901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025372565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416215139","doi":"10.1007/s11787-025-00404-3","title":"Defining without Essences: Ibn Taymiyya’s Critique of Aristotelian Logic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logica Universalis","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Dialectic; Focus (optics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.024828358279122022,"score_gpt":0.2568095182743967,"score_spread":0.23198115999527466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416215139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047441714,0.019064771,0.0887651,0.12006264,0.003128049,0.0000778473,0.00025691203,0.00020440946,0.7209986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9177998,0.002736248,0.015353878,0.012666148,0.0014166648,0.00013459694,0.000074806536,0.00020422484,0.049613673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851197,0.00078095903,0.00005760592,0.0002451407,0.00022949118,0.00017484395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894816,0.00063108845,0.00006992555,0.00013425275,0.00016446668,0.000052152063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027143902,0.00052822276,0.00079131924,0.001434581,0.0048301523,0.00632243,0.0010775723,0.0032277005,0.003651182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00472259,0.00042927335,0.00067447394,0.0012158378,0.022948636,0.009092071,0.0035933773,0.0066052293,0.0007321788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739612,0.000003347778,0.000029797924,0.0000066078164,0.0000015815607,0.000009954504,0.00074421713,0.000047202837,0.00001927862,0.9971871,0.0012230513,0.00072208635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009272536,0.000003914043,0.00005946152,0.000019758236,0.0000035686132,0.000017523165,0.00031565368,0.00016077518,0.000051421834,0.9819063,0.017446905,0.0000054934185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040610516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038497217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00632243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039621685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027685054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028747737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}