{"meta":{"query_hash":"111bddd06fab","filters":{"venue":"Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/111bddd06fab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Logique+et+analyse%2FLogique+et+analyse.+Nouvelle+s%C3%A9rie"},"results":[{"id":"W2735368507","doi":"","title":"Quantification And Predication In Modal Predicative Propositional Logic","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Predicative expression; Propositional variable; S5; Modal logic; Intermediate logic; Dynamic logic (digital electronics); Propositional calculus; Tautology (logic); Well-formed formula; Intuitionistic logic; Predicate (mathematical logic); Predicate variable; Computer science; Linguistics; Modal; Mathematics; Sequent; Normal modal logic; Zeroth-order logic; Artificial intelligence; Multimodal logic; Description logic; Discrete mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.058029832904945684,"score_gpt":0.3185953043427358,"score_spread":0.26056547143779013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735368507","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07053382,0.008227628,0.7912324,0.008140467,0.00047442273,0.00007939988,0.00035136813,0.00061487505,0.120345645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570534,0.0029747174,0.12384086,0.0013471663,0.0006220095,0.00017556081,0.00021199387,0.000122054276,0.01365228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975299,0.0011672879,0.0001393805,0.00031088208,0.0005666869,0.0002859095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977054,0.00166955,0.00013439273,0.0001869128,0.00024163735,0.000062042694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949509,0.00050785166,0.00053815637,0.0017529682,0.0017043096,0.0040311757,0.0009171898,0.0010563713,0.002864221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003986291,0.0005840125,0.0012217485,0.002052617,0.009369641,0.009408891,0.0024523118,0.0025511647,0.00041176763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046711366,0.0000034921093,0.00004692548,0.000014869551,0.0000026966845,0.000029302242,0.0002808666,0.00041365117,0.00008702501,0.9973036,0.00026331886,0.0015496283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004123952,0.0000054025363,0.0000686316,0.0000126582245,0.000005781893,0.00003414697,0.000058762304,0.0030484595,0.00021762082,0.99191916,0.0046183295,0.0000067547494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033457645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019074461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040311757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036590917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012636123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026548624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753232813","doi":"","title":"Logical Pluralism and Logical Form","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Non-classical logic; Epistemology; Logical consequence; Meaning (existential); Logical connective; Pluralism (philosophy); Truth table; Logical form; Logical conjunction; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04883327870718967,"score_gpt":0.36441351452712717,"score_spread":0.3155802358199375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753232813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12417074,0.015023296,0.1898717,0.0971988,0.0013833201,0.000107694956,0.00018893195,0.0003371068,0.57171834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704062,0.0013845103,0.016935492,0.0022350382,0.0007857182,0.000085390835,0.000060785896,0.00010356255,0.008003472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97962636,0.012717313,0.0009102558,0.0029489829,0.002974552,0.0008225324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527145,0.009173746,0.0014522776,0.0020303251,0.0013605388,0.00071159744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014772278,0.000543658,0.0010669337,0.0033478818,0.006253731,0.014176477,0.0013932886,0.0038066981,0.0055968873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02062635,0.00062004157,0.0012236609,0.0021657692,0.05806556,0.020835195,0.0092538865,0.0067329565,0.0007038363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006361456,0.0000037882885,0.00008421458,0.000014815929,0.0000037912916,0.000015414196,0.0009220183,0.00007397233,0.00005068026,0.996944,0.00027589785,0.0016049561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061980804,0.0000037991401,0.00005180708,0.000014047635,0.0000022472204,0.000022606324,0.00021969379,0.0001313499,0.000031107902,0.99555165,0.0039619114,0.0000036795045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014467728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085912284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014772278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006093232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023093105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078124225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806823626","doi":"10.2143/lea.234.0.3159742","title":"Formal Philosophy and Legal Reasoning: The Validity of Legal Inferences","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Completeness (order theory); Normative; Hierarchy; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05553705934285063,"score_gpt":0.34542843117822586,"score_spread":0.2898913718353752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806823626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08062355,0.0013385321,0.8678725,0.00761341,0.00026727532,0.0006083277,0.00044497757,0.00063952716,0.040591918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62964725,0.0005519675,0.36525047,0.0008949334,0.0001945524,0.0007709129,0.00036162644,0.00016641711,0.002161849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8980122,0.07279509,0.003978612,0.005344804,0.01845539,0.0014139283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66326016,0.29883283,0.009089163,0.01674356,0.010672743,0.0014015307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056867022,0.00095759635,0.0015061701,0.008103735,0.004461805,0.008836536,0.003142972,0.0038887057,0.0066002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25222927,0.0009736129,0.0025460348,0.0030014692,0.02740131,0.018837253,0.007229734,0.006108976,0.000678984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013466632,0.00013462445,0.0031638062,0.00044561917,0.000119541,0.00013477563,0.0032074898,0.00411681,0.0008991794,0.95569444,0.00070159015,0.031247454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008013331,0.000072236275,0.001333365,0.00022001938,0.000049195227,0.00009689152,0.0011155433,0.020382028,0.0018761536,0.96907806,0.005651544,0.000044768294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048146597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031911905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056867022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005396612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007911561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30074513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}