{"meta":{"query_hash":"e881a0a4dab4","filters":{"venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e881a0a4dab4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Loyola+of+Los+Angeles+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1493288650","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Damages; Harm; Duty; Trespass; Order (exchange); Breach of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04212962585686394,"score_gpt":0.3288795368211298,"score_spread":0.2867499109642659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493288650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042533748,0.0047541275,0.10672332,0.12233273,0.0006208764,0.00018879464,0.00018761757,0.00018406156,0.72247475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368024,0.0016598519,0.013206577,0.011413115,0.000768236,0.0002995018,0.00008222605,0.0000827978,0.03568537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937406,0.002136397,0.0002504389,0.0012510772,0.0016424333,0.0009789895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936557,0.0032706591,0.00079520984,0.0012012768,0.00066929864,0.0004080185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073403423,0.0004213764,0.00095656223,0.0021621534,0.0047041285,0.008564896,0.0017852596,0.007995045,0.0077594826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012662666,0.0004983746,0.00074554246,0.0013798953,0.049209505,0.013268781,0.0044731847,0.0077514574,0.0009674523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001738846,0.0000033501794,0.000025605284,0.000004090396,8.608536e-7,0.000008268708,0.00008313847,0.000060650407,0.000012447594,0.9988908,0.00031044404,0.0005985952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091788315,0.0000054127217,0.000060493683,0.00002092423,0.0000023574962,0.000013054124,0.000069605696,0.00027891633,0.00004126964,0.99256456,0.0069305515,0.0000036207325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051190546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038890238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008564896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007853886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077561415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056984186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572505345","doi":"","title":"Mr. Garland Goes to Ottawa: Comments on Restitution in Canada through the Lens of Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lens (geology); Political science; Law; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.03335572446463545,"score_gpt":0.3034290228093618,"score_spread":0.2700732983447263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572505345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005934772,0.010340945,0.0001611039,0.93143725,0.0031448314,0.000060005186,0.00046147202,0.000046854002,0.048412684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07998486,0.008338088,0.00042602688,0.79142445,0.0015953908,0.000089209,0.00015778275,0.000106130945,0.117878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917664,0.00088410504,0.00038977695,0.00072446634,0.0030945514,0.003140816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805833,0.008782056,0.00064558216,0.00029566715,0.007547638,0.00214567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058792206,0.0009387214,0.0010087842,0.0022730366,0.043684904,0.009451121,0.0066059795,0.0448214,0.0125204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023407515,0.0010476311,0.0011966212,0.004050462,0.012767341,0.0029443563,0.0025730822,0.023141304,0.0013544533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762052,0.000010389652,0.0012785319,0.00008925773,0.000015917336,0.00055944105,0.0056519085,0.00014483498,0.00013296028,0.02685419,0.9624602,0.0027648371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044967157,0.000022943817,0.009061169,0.0007213323,0.00009851985,0.00015879015,0.025658503,0.00027754833,0.0004752195,0.0051683816,0.958048,0.00026473118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99132043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09971341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09971341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14965768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7234748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576082661","doi":"","title":"Deference to the Majority: Why Isn't the Supreme Court Applying the Reasoning of Atkins v. Virginia to Juveniles","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031230243542506884,"score_gpt":0.3086106831929167,"score_spread":0.2773804396504098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576082661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07241479,0.022560252,0.0043504294,0.71892095,0.0060323947,0.00008226918,0.000099069526,0.00007534039,0.17546459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782892,0.0056337714,0.0014150251,0.17625697,0.0033911762,0.00008536615,0.000046074514,0.00006123559,0.030218424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846835,0.0043055336,0.00031069215,0.0014012831,0.0034952753,0.0020187735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904643,0.004027531,0.00059922517,0.00042974736,0.0028531027,0.0016260651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011317509,0.00019738235,0.0005081948,0.0010833483,0.011783211,0.006046605,0.0026497836,0.0073921774,0.0035398332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038186904,0.000381263,0.00042386013,0.0008197403,0.009671796,0.0046128025,0.0030184,0.010204777,0.00074501266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003728533,0.00004536294,0.002626753,0.00007966456,0.000023791737,0.0007403648,0.007905528,0.00016640789,0.00039927018,0.757178,0.18790872,0.042888816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011628725,0.00014821373,0.007219669,0.001088768,0.00006380456,0.00037205353,0.014740872,0.000452504,0.00078771653,0.29098716,0.68390846,0.00011443439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10347442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16324048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10347442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069908043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01158298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20574433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599027253","doi":"","title":"Civil Rights in Ordinary Tort Cases: Race, Gender, and the Calculation of Economic Loss","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Race (biology); Tort; Personal injury; Civil rights; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Law; Tort reform; Critical race theory; Sociology; Racism; Gender studies; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03129577137770614,"score_gpt":0.24995937433695262,"score_spread":0.21866360295924647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599027253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033315,0.009325566,0.07431999,0.026660256,0.0004639117,0.0001487265,0.0001424589,0.000060043963,0.18554752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923228,0.0007496594,0.0037696122,0.0005317493,0.00015574798,0.000029261444,0.000021684025,0.000014828936,0.0024045364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165195,0.0044668163,0.00027627204,0.00032018544,0.0027060192,0.0005786811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861568,0.009658688,0.0016781755,0.0008495921,0.0013100904,0.00034669836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010531307,0.00032168056,0.00053730275,0.0031741867,0.0016552765,0.00449658,0.000895654,0.0010983878,0.0027238436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04731441,0.0002415186,0.00046464754,0.0018771341,0.0096331835,0.0045150705,0.0028137083,0.0017319948,0.0002956187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012968373,0.00008491859,0.08400748,0.00006381038,0.000060276852,0.0005090079,0.002957663,0.004086155,0.0002985997,0.83232695,0.003476121,0.07199935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003116099,0.00015892355,0.098799616,0.00042457646,0.00007340086,0.00093297363,0.005259082,0.01754112,0.0013363129,0.8497218,0.025654834,0.00006627099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059161484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008687341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010531307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032788257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017770657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055695534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118329406","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada's Appraisal of the 1980 Ban on Advertising to Children in Quebec: Implications for Misleading Advertising Elsewhere","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Advertising; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.019455067928476635,"score_gpt":0.2972866898282507,"score_spread":0.27783162189977406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118329406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06959445,0.009122761,0.0016205703,0.5655756,0.0040865205,0.00026147606,0.0020909128,0.00021271399,0.3474349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35758707,0.005618727,0.0023814896,0.4263193,0.0019183432,0.00026531203,0.00035901545,0.00018684256,0.20536397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820317,0.001730098,0.00068216707,0.0012961245,0.008473876,0.005785966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96493226,0.014083853,0.0010946231,0.00077412894,0.016195297,0.0029199054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010422626,0.0010998846,0.0015816332,0.004217456,0.02730554,0.014168469,0.006822275,0.044614404,0.008691222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033130698,0.0019237971,0.002266673,0.003906274,0.009862598,0.0032269568,0.002558912,0.030532341,0.0009046428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001343814,0.00009818932,0.007883845,0.00023064559,0.00010202871,0.0016855107,0.008230667,0.0009702622,0.00088745035,0.45584637,0.51179045,0.012140169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038408244,0.000088627974,0.04739172,0.0020198452,0.000939463,0.00048701293,0.010538553,0.0032544893,0.0027062558,0.03345254,0.89811105,0.0006264287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99382246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1384933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1384933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2202895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}