{"meta":{"query_hash":"e881a0a4dab4","filters":{"venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e881a0a4dab4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Loyola+of+Los+Angeles+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1493288650","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Damages; Harm; Duty; Trespass; Order (exchange); Breach of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04212962585686394,"score_gpt":0.3288795368211298,"score_spread":0.2867499109642659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493288650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101581225,0.42987788,0.00010110578,0.03044657,0.00033165744,0.0041409046,0.00079348544,0.00011876974,0.5240315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057135,0.09033274,0.00041856235,0.0017791281,0.00015408368,0.000022573728,0.0000063702223,0.000008708894,0.0015643348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00012608395,0.00036483756,0.00015350341,0.0003510264,0.00017629702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910307,0.00009768426,0.0002490429,0.00035336037,0.00013335774,0.00006347987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031046945,0.000091949056,0.00024029272,0.0000088267525,0.00045954584,0.00002554931,0.00034744304,0.00005559618,0.00074997783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062950676,0.000051599833,0.00010532312,0.0003008862,0.00050396274,0.0001200475,0.000043972883,0.00009502923,0.000012228156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024563492,0.000038647173,0.0000135223445,0.00043546027,0.00001413807,7.451995e-7,0.0002132936,3.4035455e-7,0.00020440946,0.98446494,0.01120786,0.0034041826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006597499,0.000023402608,0.000033772834,0.000699335,0.00006102408,0.000001191212,0.000042360487,0.000005110379,0.0004398632,0.0032897359,0.995268,0.00007024296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002402587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014276011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004354825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040567153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82117313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572505345","doi":"","title":"Mr. Garland Goes to Ottawa: Comments on Restitution in Canada through the Lens of Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lens (geology); Political science; Law; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.03335572446463545,"score_gpt":0.3034290228093618,"score_spread":0.2700732983447263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572505345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480505,0.21838169,0.000025627567,0.011329536,0.00076259073,0.0031518235,0.0002540512,0.00002556145,0.6180186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851932,0.012182534,0.000028039376,0.0024614183,0.000038175378,0.000019888328,0.000004168933,0.0000065396175,0.000066039625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998355,0.0003881384,0.00044967423,0.00015955116,0.00041571414,0.00023195508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992172,0.00019498866,0.00022179916,0.00019341843,0.000116175484,0.00005642664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007268569,0.00011282329,0.00042598168,0.000015055258,0.00017476009,0.000014997254,0.00021431196,0.00004178163,0.00006370547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037096426,0.00007514492,0.000053086744,0.00034104293,0.00019245545,0.00011599606,0.000017124714,0.00009954337,0.0000036046686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021377673,0.00014060107,0.03257565,0.0033582393,0.000055051485,0.000012842934,0.0013358117,0.000015373247,0.00007939366,0.9137709,0.046686377,0.0019483789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001492497,0.000039984705,0.00095051434,0.003693004,0.000030050784,7.9967435e-7,0.000319746,1.9153843e-7,0.00017062161,0.00055518566,0.99398965,0.00010100164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015400503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005828696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3064321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576082661","doi":"","title":"Deference to the Majority: Why Isn't the Supreme Court Applying the Reasoning of Atkins v. Virginia to Juveniles","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031230243542506884,"score_gpt":0.3086106831929167,"score_spread":0.2773804396504098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576082661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03793263,0.4808814,0.0013549678,0.05152636,0.0012530886,0.013251047,0.000268935,0.00015374261,0.41337782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831193,0.009009254,0.00023126081,0.00680564,0.00028040798,0.00029565155,0.0000013946116,0.000019179499,0.00023792095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975595,0.0006761398,0.00050702714,0.00023902286,0.0006738941,0.00034444945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984139,0.00040696515,0.00029533956,0.0004946247,0.000285143,0.000104010425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031905754,0.00016462163,0.00048213365,0.000018681745,0.000772191,0.00008790315,0.000921869,0.00006030487,0.00012481157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010080971,0.000080669255,0.00016396545,0.0008099555,0.000314913,0.00012753034,0.00010230073,0.00018224529,0.00002393666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074850227,0.000046138557,0.0013850523,0.0011867643,0.000048495993,0.000001544515,0.0033468585,0.000010036457,0.00015818719,0.9459134,0.03736676,0.0105293095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040577237,0.000035419656,0.00024533347,0.0027256636,0.00007930098,0.000001988098,0.0010912551,9.536599e-7,0.00017051765,0.00082735723,0.99466354,0.00011808109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022165684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044060204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000378829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001607529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599027253","doi":"","title":"Civil Rights in Ordinary Tort Cases: Race, Gender, and the Calculation of Economic Loss","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Race (biology); Tort; Personal injury; Civil rights; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Law; Tort reform; Critical race theory; Sociology; Racism; Gender studies; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03129577137770614,"score_gpt":0.24995937433695262,"score_spread":0.21866360295924647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599027253","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3509742,0.49463266,0.00006556263,0.00053487543,0.00037879698,0.0015243924,0.00043180765,0.000019980418,0.15143773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96799964,0.031267088,0.00009420371,0.00031502385,0.00019212178,0.00003141245,0.000015871861,0.000015336405,0.000069322916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797463,0.000062603816,0.0014196768,0.00031632188,0.000029931136,0.00019684303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858713,0.0001320642,0.0008268789,0.00037764254,0.00002285132,0.00005342316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212279,0.00014912916,0.0011317909,0.00007809641,0.000060470153,0.000018393395,0.00020159848,0.00009150259,0.00017940822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031295167,0.00014369164,0.00019766066,0.00009301176,0.00033415112,0.0002656786,0.00005952763,0.00008702915,0.000044346376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026940808,0.000048992813,0.010572346,0.0010648223,0.0000523455,0.00000305898,0.00009437838,0.0000441463,9.516547e-7,0.9861634,0.0012445003,0.0006841545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003376019,0.00011155876,0.012437532,0.0019259965,0.000101451755,0.000089589936,0.000029329694,0.0016994996,0.000064623295,0.08658667,0.8928924,0.0006853254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052633607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008348477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89957666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011236589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019855195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7956662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118329406","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada's Appraisal of the 1980 Ban on Advertising to Children in Quebec: Implications for Misleading Advertising Elsewhere","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Advertising; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.019455067928476635,"score_gpt":0.2972866898282507,"score_spread":0.27783162189977406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118329406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6336562,0.06891356,0.0006224267,0.04409611,0.00071867846,0.012420548,0.0013693477,0.000098208824,0.23810494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781203,0.00039709714,0.00044170493,0.0007469721,0.0000796589,0.000032742417,0.000010894062,0.000021945438,0.0004569358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998266,0.00020648084,0.00064254995,0.0002216555,0.00034181302,0.0003215251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987554,0.00037104165,0.00027428402,0.00032836501,0.00021420058,0.000056697245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056529883,0.00013968273,0.00046859565,0.000037688333,0.00020099683,0.0000124359985,0.00048615475,0.00006352567,0.00003270244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005673642,0.000105854175,0.00015617146,0.00045678686,0.00020289248,0.00009291249,0.000050421826,0.00010096087,5.85294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007192813,0.0003940932,0.015183817,0.0042812633,0.00009960865,8.2874493e-7,0.0016694019,0.00035107616,0.010146862,0.84810823,0.074353665,0.045339204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008727029,0.00024527137,0.107527405,0.036081158,0.00030608798,0.0000056367453,0.00039608259,0.00007524602,0.02323925,0.001843065,0.8284364,0.00097171887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84880245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98474264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022692326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047449977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4316608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}