{"meta":{"query_hash":"1472aa00662c","filters":{"venue":"Maine law review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1472aa00662c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Maine+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2253036634","doi":"","title":"Open Source Approaches in Biotechnology: Utopia Revisited","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Open source; Criticism; Open innovation; Management science; Business; Biotechnology; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Marketing; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.018379620787749785,"score_gpt":0.2947667808200521,"score_spread":0.2763871600323023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253036634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006587059,0.11768278,0.06265965,0.43061754,0.003538496,0.000067134824,0.00006072175,0.00028231964,0.3785043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6647009,0.115539216,0.05696562,0.08601469,0.017397873,0.00094048056,0.000094465555,0.0008143389,0.057532474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807098,0.010570811,0.0007125369,0.001969637,0.00499057,0.0010466451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95551157,0.03515859,0.0014640188,0.0040416843,0.002470096,0.0013540562],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02980093,0.0012471011,0.0016524643,0.0069402843,0.00864542,0.020930316,0.0033006729,0.017762078,0.008816345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02703109,0.0008673143,0.0013982308,0.005232171,0.09342548,0.030895311,0.015125776,0.02059087,0.0018654766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004997919,0.0000064799387,0.000022623852,0.000043271808,0.0000025561467,0.000023513869,0.0007077071,0.00009470027,0.00002933871,0.9932355,0.0014745524,0.0043547447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012640304,0.000012400027,0.00005276743,0.00017709676,0.0000023974262,0.00004996277,0.00043304192,0.0003007296,0.00005514159,0.95211387,0.046782244,0.000007684665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044225273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028110312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99669933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0144023085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009753921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15760428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621087158","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction in the Data Age: MacDermid v. Deiter's Adaptation of International Shoe Amidst Supreme Court Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.06082935640126188,"score_gpt":0.3381627950855944,"score_spread":0.2773334386843325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621087158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12274938,0.008427515,0.015275051,0.2782486,0.0010815552,0.000094440635,0.00018657012,0.000086435284,0.5738504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429141,0.000910776,0.0018466827,0.036937952,0.00029829168,0.000050917643,0.000023146247,0.000027015656,0.016991172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154097,0.003045155,0.00024307385,0.0016811105,0.0022001578,0.0012896099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301153,0.0047801477,0.0003142731,0.00067634904,0.0007701663,0.00044747966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011651748,0.00022890791,0.0004743198,0.0012624772,0.010242093,0.012930316,0.0024069462,0.010644618,0.003180643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074214,0.00040603997,0.0004595415,0.0013439768,0.029521259,0.01012632,0.005882789,0.012529767,0.00029701003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009153168,0.0000059650724,0.0002754225,0.0000056546455,0.0000024660121,0.00020313438,0.0057657994,0.00012094823,0.000059088365,0.9845955,0.006703889,0.0022529208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005364373,0.000040901832,0.0022192306,0.000338947,0.000032102074,0.00039947388,0.009027069,0.0017623011,0.0008462034,0.64959276,0.33557653,0.00011082004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14013849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15624835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14013849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015674768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010875468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27864563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763138432","doi":"","title":"Enforcement Dissonance: Lobsters, the Legislature, and Federal Waters in State v. Thomas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Legislature; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Fishery; Law; Economics; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04551994356527655,"score_gpt":0.2918166684997344,"score_spread":0.24629672493445787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763138432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08950237,0.0042884285,0.00093706796,0.7245574,0.003979695,0.00012848504,0.00018999165,0.00009937375,0.17631717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2983879,0.0012670803,0.0004644471,0.64361227,0.0016801207,0.00024469016,0.000087783286,0.000065193824,0.05419042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882609,0.0023609032,0.00044371415,0.0013099102,0.0015713318,0.0060532475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876816,0.006307993,0.00065249915,0.00037388044,0.00097622344,0.0029212849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013808561,0.0006148073,0.00079646043,0.001051434,0.03491651,0.018423554,0.0038480894,0.039777856,0.01045741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021224003,0.0011119377,0.0013940671,0.0010917687,0.010919963,0.00967335,0.0099860355,0.0362776,0.0011013671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001467984,0.00032187218,0.014885731,0.000120801225,0.00008224676,0.006048803,0.041175127,0.00038377388,0.0006146844,0.475987,0.43975925,0.020473812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030859478,0.00021782683,0.019513663,0.0013535158,0.00026387483,0.0015024163,0.0903002,0.0017159588,0.0013330284,0.095149055,0.78788066,0.00046119446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24716505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.343578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24716505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013461422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035904437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4914528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765267238","doi":"","title":"Rewriting Hockey's Unwritten Rules: Moore v. Bertuzzi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Law and economics; Programming language; Law; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.040414497346018305,"score_gpt":0.35957113208346725,"score_spread":0.31915663473744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765267238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039610416,0.0053249854,0.0028926535,0.16827561,0.007027017,0.00017855443,0.00013481261,0.00015783196,0.7763982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4554127,0.002874038,0.0018234146,0.22288758,0.002380911,0.00027721227,0.00011707687,0.00021805066,0.31400907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469537,0.0008164441,0.00019295048,0.0010171601,0.0018241237,0.0014540526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711514,0.0012566324,0.00015382029,0.0002130823,0.00066273514,0.0005984875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045516393,0.0005054672,0.00034169125,0.0010787422,0.011712306,0.0077011734,0.0031568334,0.010005826,0.0068449024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016791621,0.0007738435,0.00048425532,0.0005388773,0.00784657,0.0036309666,0.0040763994,0.014582222,0.001699087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005726095,0.00007061888,0.0022719356,0.00007158308,0.00002664985,0.0014887168,0.012397379,0.00046260134,0.00044705268,0.5345775,0.4198336,0.028295096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051882696,0.00008561397,0.0044962033,0.00047073024,0.000053663138,0.0005966206,0.005869766,0.0006765066,0.0008085682,0.04340292,0.94335747,0.00012993572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34771338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47017214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34771338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014269788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014152687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69137895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852858962","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Lawyers and Nation-Building: Using Experience to Serve the World Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20485384766202344,"score_gpt":0.4550879058964419,"score_spread":0.25023405823441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852858962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30629796,0.025114566,0.007644393,0.47908413,0.009871044,0.00059288694,0.00008284519,0.0003652841,0.1709469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207106,0.014024045,0.008104534,0.06437733,0.0023764537,0.0006322939,0.00012480897,0.00028683935,0.08936313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857907,0.01094726,0.0001466931,0.00035677527,0.00064199703,0.0021166315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799947,0.006885795,0.00080784346,0.0008258408,0.0011275538,0.010358241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016579442,0.00040091656,0.00050785317,0.001195458,0.017436683,0.014178703,0.0021820716,0.0046530515,0.010043224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600678,0.00039192164,0.0003421228,0.0011672465,0.009951474,0.009017177,0.01571603,0.0054578483,0.0015068967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250747,0.0007842115,0.004490735,0.000314228,0.000014536242,0.001865624,0.6048186,0.00009155446,0.00070231763,0.05686188,0.20986173,0.12013218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030819923,0.00016196142,0.0008568985,0.00022678432,0.000005619988,0.000509106,0.2769464,0.000073535855,0.00016544857,0.0059309597,0.71507204,0.000020518006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015748814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017436683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026056687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010448897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08768147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124387999","doi":"","title":"Legal Institutions of Farmland Succession: Implications for Sustainable Food Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Craft; Diversity (politics); Business; Agriculture; Control (management); Sustainable development; Property rights; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Ecology; Political science; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.031077504005598562,"score_gpt":0.2607271036489926,"score_spread":0.22964959964339404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124387999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21814373,0.022097152,0.010523492,0.27439776,0.00036757402,0.00013884545,0.00043334847,0.00008109224,0.47381696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008144,0.0067584827,0.0015326116,0.0022955062,0.000112699345,0.000042665233,0.00006316484,0.000013516565,0.009099894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818736,0.00049347617,0.000046084868,0.00013021311,0.00031948448,0.0008234118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940937,0.0018931526,0.001044629,0.0002861541,0.0013873616,0.001295023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033634368,0.00021503694,0.00042190554,0.001375475,0.006987164,0.010170311,0.0020191194,0.0029280318,0.007397725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068450742,0.00026491136,0.0003207343,0.002002976,0.0425095,0.00901863,0.0042379755,0.0022676727,0.00031317424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011650334,0.0000253806,0.0041742963,0.00005141089,0.0000035943522,0.00017351027,0.005909053,0.001077073,0.0000656204,0.9789916,0.0032558101,0.006260979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023958435,0.000022721886,0.029608855,0.000572217,0.000012497401,0.0001429544,0.052329924,0.0025307362,0.00019087864,0.80396616,0.110542364,0.00005674686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5378853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6223261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5378853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05707541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046314873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92967236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006317170","doi":"","title":"The Use of American Precedents in Canadian Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Pretext; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Gloom; Limiting","score_opus":0.03465251296274413,"score_gpt":0.2982047500476032,"score_spread":0.2635522370848591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006317170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015119776,0.0051598325,0.00339842,0.039909475,0.00081516703,0.0000661128,0.00027453402,0.000071399685,0.9351854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545718,0.009585895,0.008099844,0.071938954,0.0006559231,0.0002431614,0.00033680638,0.00012466413,0.15444285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868421,0.0025299923,0.0004555015,0.0016896953,0.004573259,0.003909387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824216,0.007221215,0.0005960369,0.00079638883,0.0076239775,0.0013408395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011293573,0.0005810454,0.0005009312,0.0040217177,0.039342936,0.014882519,0.003041494,0.008173414,0.010075361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023673216,0.0009488997,0.00065159384,0.005295805,0.016339883,0.005843181,0.004578656,0.012192576,0.0009837109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005593305,0.00000584754,0.00041934112,0.00001572769,0.0000033131337,0.000094188756,0.003282149,0.00011705972,0.00004051012,0.9710287,0.021144534,0.0038430018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026166668,0.000011573513,0.0027107839,0.0005153712,0.000054206503,0.00013781077,0.0055515342,0.0010057429,0.00032491036,0.14431517,0.8452209,0.00012582455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11536632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11536632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10352289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83704513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}