{"meta":{"query_hash":"1472aa00662c","filters":{"venue":"Maine law review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1472aa00662c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Maine+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2253036634","doi":"","title":"Open Source Approaches in Biotechnology: Utopia Revisited","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Open source; Criticism; Open innovation; Management science; Business; Biotechnology; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Marketing; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.018379620787749785,"score_gpt":0.2947667808200521,"score_spread":0.2763871600323023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253036634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073630296,0.7930563,0.03467832,0.010245277,0.00017027954,0.0038336534,0.00003293432,0.00017953395,0.08417337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93582815,0.04450046,0.0086312,0.0037682557,0.00036266661,0.00023015599,0.0005890472,0.000089074594,0.0060010133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919116,0.00003443289,0.00023870097,0.00029167495,0.00004965349,0.00019434861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949527,0.0000039149236,0.00004136388,0.00042270517,0.000011511613,0.00002523582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002748349,0.0001301316,0.00024173401,0.000021642629,0.000027088588,0.000021920006,0.00037343783,0.00010881285,0.000027376036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027711036,0.000118291035,0.000057157347,0.00016794016,0.00003971152,0.0000022697573,0.00029931028,0.00008392791,0.000014736097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006821462,0.00088132394,0.0040333336,0.010710108,0.00016571715,0.00006670866,0.000022517772,0.0015126099,0.27323908,0.46450147,0.063165896,0.18163301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023889933,0.000045956855,0.00031660072,0.0004691422,0.0000149794205,0.000019652063,0.0000017542402,0.00004765265,0.0206111,0.00014527646,0.97791994,0.00016907131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014277556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015335869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91475403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008645219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011016386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48237684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621087158","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction in the Data Age: MacDermid v. Deiter's Adaptation of International Shoe Amidst Supreme Court Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.06082935640126188,"score_gpt":0.3381627950855944,"score_spread":0.2773334386843325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621087158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094942376,0.21605399,0.0021554932,0.22285116,0.0037366233,0.010477379,0.00052109355,0.0003442997,0.4489176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750013,0.010039219,0.000064492146,0.0016406896,0.0003741573,0.00005266746,0.0001497966,0.0000057283974,0.00017309113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846846,0.00029504157,0.00035808195,0.00018919252,0.00052989676,0.00015935044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993207,0.000101899015,0.00016372126,0.00021035549,0.00016714045,0.000036176527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016089416,0.00008420253,0.00020663014,0.000024565636,0.00015989844,0.00008494692,0.00063829863,0.000044739045,0.0005552547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018201135,0.00005878348,0.000047052694,0.00026619658,0.00016974298,0.0005306508,0.00006599876,0.000114740746,0.000040434592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003582139,0.00055727264,0.00982916,0.0041694776,0.00015493731,0.00003665363,0.036124382,0.00007640041,0.00014642067,0.69305074,0.112054974,0.14376374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015120866,0.00002167342,0.002810078,0.001086115,0.000029955558,0.000002591762,0.0013197293,0.0007476181,8.3126446e-7,0.0013588266,0.992373,0.00009836359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10130682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048944235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008003359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101315534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763138432","doi":"","title":"Enforcement Dissonance: Lobsters, the Legislature, and Federal Waters in State v. Thomas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Legislature; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Fishery; Law; Economics; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04551994356527655,"score_gpt":0.2918166684997344,"score_spread":0.24629672493445787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763138432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007813633,0.13524295,0.000023283277,0.02080983,0.00036048127,0.0019641742,0.000009969762,0.00007102763,0.83370465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511259,0.1289171,0.00009934317,0.006391144,0.00007661602,0.000047325153,0.0000043813643,0.000009451814,0.013328737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989883,0.00017757714,0.00020489153,0.00015876886,0.00017864355,0.00029187519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968576,0.000020632664,0.00005285516,0.00015361478,0.000019927522,0.00006720969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079688133,0.00010338609,0.00020158268,0.000007586082,0.00029124808,0.00006299343,0.0001996888,0.000024984894,0.00027704437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018039815,0.00004761009,0.0000437358,0.00012302463,0.00024273574,0.0001780322,0.00005565063,0.00012332469,0.00001796534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013607375,0.000030191268,0.00047803269,0.00027827764,0.00001249923,0.00002413077,0.006431531,1.0424503e-7,0.0000035541009,0.9705443,0.0035113606,0.018672433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013840855,0.000024712985,0.00084934436,0.0005305037,0.000008941468,0.0000014448888,0.000053360123,0.0000015185466,0.000009116401,0.0030308657,0.9952563,0.000095484495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012680526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065828254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99174494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034322205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027004864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765267238","doi":"","title":"Rewriting Hockey's Unwritten Rules: Moore v. Bertuzzi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Law and economics; Programming language; Law; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.040414497346018305,"score_gpt":0.35957113208346725,"score_spread":0.31915663473744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765267238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015316725,0.08444555,0.000017124448,0.031881683,0.00029961142,0.0005987275,0.0000111844265,0.00012105492,0.8810934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93255514,0.053832155,0.0002047621,0.0059241313,0.0020969626,0.000062931,0.000008854406,0.000028258151,0.0052867974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844253,0.00015825545,0.00034689475,0.00026567685,0.00038930224,0.0003973473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.00006582994,0.00031661888,0.0005031231,0.00015946702,0.00016015713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015387434,0.0001380905,0.0004328814,0.000012502602,0.0025167228,0.00037329222,0.0007273312,0.00008364126,0.00033307256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011216832,0.00011601331,0.00013326098,0.000090161455,0.00035945984,0.00047584652,0.000127664,0.00014854167,0.00036934248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018281373,0.00002517026,0.0007603373,0.0022926326,0.000019437228,0.00002817941,0.00053475046,4.3961357e-8,0.000006183902,0.944157,0.017950289,0.034224156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098387645,0.000012910849,0.00028446078,0.004836328,0.000036089506,0.000002417816,0.00016389143,7.6948487e-7,0.0000048931092,0.005574704,0.988814,0.00017115829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045086477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011409077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057749814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114144736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852858962","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Lawyers and Nation-Building: Using Experience to Serve the World Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20485384766202344,"score_gpt":0.4550879058964419,"score_spread":0.25023405823441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852858962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21722797,0.010325846,0.00025442688,0.527236,0.0006968154,0.0010554362,0.000006518635,0.00010748675,0.24308953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928508,0.0027958727,0.0024344125,0.060406763,0.00017576036,0.000058111953,0.0000033577169,0.000008697967,0.0056090127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890804,0.0005018846,0.0001771116,0.000083208506,0.00019751422,0.00013222247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00035904383,0.00008169011,0.00021285132,0.0001849833,0.00007040677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013659628,0.00006065852,0.000105014355,0.000026405945,0.0021813794,0.00008544009,0.00022483425,0.000016726875,0.0003737788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095675,0.000046163925,0.000024494508,0.0009988997,0.00026558051,0.00040131205,0.000051027746,0.00025670332,0.00002114915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014098866,0.000047021953,0.0010862176,0.00008995037,0.0000075056364,8.3464175e-7,0.029721277,0.0000034509176,0.00003092827,0.9493869,0.018285349,0.001339184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002142278,0.000003908232,0.00039172062,0.00018896704,0.000009560317,0.0000045983656,0.0011641427,0.000007022578,0.00000817949,0.0002901483,0.9978459,0.00006445506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02806616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017886296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97956055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006489469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012726153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124387999","doi":"","title":"Legal Institutions of Farmland Succession: Implications for Sustainable Food Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Craft; Diversity (politics); Business; Agriculture; Control (management); Sustainable development; Property rights; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Ecology; Political science; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.031077504005598562,"score_gpt":0.2607271036489926,"score_spread":0.22964959964339404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124387999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7258274,0.15085292,0.00035647082,0.041136518,0.00053868763,0.019102782,0.00057758164,0.0004208138,0.06118686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929891,0.0028221237,0.0001329507,0.0006702838,0.00013178008,0.0010321187,0.00028944894,9.85518e-7,0.0019312068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990632,0.000037034435,0.00035523588,0.00018805225,0.000097883676,0.0002586124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992675,0.000071678485,0.00013792109,0.00007615838,0.00035549077,0.00009125999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016965382,0.00012566953,0.00029376152,0.000004795911,0.00028511323,0.00006291283,0.00023595599,0.00005230733,0.00011911234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044419397,0.00003762203,0.00010190102,0.0003261908,0.000040215436,0.00021296048,0.00006821655,0.000049551145,0.00002282179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012891899,0.000048547452,0.0006612291,0.000886822,0.000015634516,2.8715553e-7,0.0000031304048,0.0000018384507,0.00019054016,0.96897954,0.02631437,0.0028967806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008823783,0.00011195544,0.029577607,0.00052484823,0.000028871942,0.000009660346,0.000051674266,0.0000016980651,0.000050938375,0.004738318,0.9646791,0.00013709601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011192034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025730577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033504966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019241104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21928893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006317170","doi":"","title":"The Use of American Precedents in Canadian Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Pretext; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Gloom; Limiting","score_opus":0.03465251296274413,"score_gpt":0.2982047500476032,"score_spread":0.2635522370848591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006317170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04214192,0.11693664,0.0000048198144,0.08231728,0.002097861,0.0027995494,0.00015352402,0.00006386382,0.75348455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7164145,0.2312052,0.00017023031,0.018928884,0.00054770854,0.000059343052,0.000009022723,0.000027855696,0.032637276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992511,0.00014875454,0.00014354764,0.00007601393,0.00013689266,0.0002436916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994902,0.000049866252,0.00006708975,0.00015791264,0.00005920364,0.00017572183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005638314,0.000034628927,0.00012819153,0.00005721335,0.000517576,0.00008327653,0.00018651651,0.000015264248,0.0003289896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025617718,0.00003293929,0.000035573372,0.00029953368,0.0013346436,0.00007689545,0.0000106773505,0.00004639941,0.0000782045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030036276,0.00001797424,0.0027114123,0.000207142,0.000013690582,0.000011467107,0.0017791953,2.3724388e-7,0.0000013929729,0.5403719,0.35726455,0.09761802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018735906,0.000009664033,0.0019224049,0.0002746031,0.0000066686193,2.5910725e-7,0.000020337146,5.996784e-7,1.6966383e-7,0.00010327821,0.9976047,0.000038554186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72084725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005104431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070553203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49175498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}