{"meta":{"query_hash":"ee57e1254706","filters":{"venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ee57e1254706","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Marquette+intellectual+property+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1549218909","doi":"","title":"I'm Still Your Baby: Canada's Continuing Support of U.S. Linkage Regulations for Pharmaceuticals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Notice; Pharmaceutical industry; Status quo; Patentability; Business; Statutory law; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Political science; Patent law; Medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.33434652142021454,"score_gpt":0.4277973384479963,"score_spread":0.09345081702778174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549218909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029070403,0.01236692,0.00063365046,0.88899165,0.0040031755,0.00016447771,0.0008508849,0.00011359969,0.06380526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33610183,0.016968956,0.005934889,0.52720857,0.0024901452,0.00017504167,0.0010354645,0.00013537219,0.10994984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817655,0.0019657563,0.000365104,0.001052436,0.009839803,0.0050113644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207006,0.015918817,0.0034052017,0.0013383937,0.032363426,0.026273528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01732461,0.00036640174,0.00055156683,0.0015979367,0.014333567,0.012812671,0.0022644405,0.0074125053,0.00821637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04434458,0.0003687341,0.00064929837,0.0025293122,0.0051524052,0.003071161,0.0024723187,0.007129333,0.0007217254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014915742,0.00018402276,0.01868209,0.00035706555,0.000056660378,0.0008663261,0.0064684283,0.00042314717,0.001317595,0.046657216,0.83657295,0.088265315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013774182,0.000121840625,0.052959245,0.0004849964,0.00005867945,0.00012424393,0.006541601,0.000764725,0.0007100766,0.0043220106,0.9335701,0.00020472665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9713463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08279271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42741564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600076070","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights At The Intersection of Human Rights And Intellectual Property Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Indigenous; Human rights; Indigenous rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Jurisprudence; Law","score_opus":0.05394631974626652,"score_gpt":0.23076834848722894,"score_spread":0.17682202874096242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600076070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035742957,0.032629192,0.0012257115,0.22348167,0.0028123131,0.00012278144,0.00039184536,0.00007457554,0.70351905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5393865,0.037810255,0.0025979774,0.046993263,0.002383247,0.00023001213,0.00023559047,0.000042455187,0.37032065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996053,0.0011119017,0.00018632937,0.0003102904,0.0014632241,0.0008753232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99155444,0.0047232597,0.0004320545,0.00045686678,0.0022438006,0.00058954494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005176473,0.00014085407,0.00047596908,0.0008234446,0.004291041,0.0039703194,0.0013921169,0.003864349,0.020011539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014299122,0.00016380048,0.00028241373,0.0009808649,0.0046862196,0.0025297683,0.0024621836,0.0031493157,0.0016505277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009865506,0.00005783322,0.0044176728,0.0015714644,0.000052092182,0.0018863444,0.035378676,0.00020310112,0.0011138065,0.65658814,0.16809471,0.13053754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148110175,0.000052589796,0.011055706,0.0016732914,0.000058625657,0.0006700079,0.015959345,0.00012197807,0.0006795279,0.027389094,0.94229054,0.000034393586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06358748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109685905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06358748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019569201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012879445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12643474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602225646","doi":"","title":"U.S. v. RxDepot: The Battle Between Canadian Store-Front Companies, the FDA and Brand-Name Companies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Business; Advertising; Brand names; Intellectual property; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.09902926359137242,"score_gpt":0.2304771281758857,"score_spread":0.1314478645845133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602225646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012912775,0.016114876,0.0007655109,0.41706708,0.005144298,0.0001946458,0.0013370961,0.00024144526,0.5462222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10656127,0.012141267,0.0014958535,0.58121425,0.0011119803,0.00014812539,0.00055753975,0.0001279079,0.29664177],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547184,0.00021948728,0.00010656177,0.00036460024,0.0023570845,0.0014804044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600464,0.0008038349,0.00011311703,0.000093518676,0.0019671891,0.0010177448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025533147,0.0007120543,0.0005548328,0.0012465067,0.022571336,0.008801087,0.0017719294,0.020962235,0.010997809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061885715,0.0007837281,0.00096084067,0.001832247,0.0037271352,0.0020485509,0.0018431277,0.013015013,0.0020788338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059248097,0.000044830427,0.0023287882,0.00008747763,0.000024358915,0.0008929792,0.0009830709,0.00015057389,0.00065450836,0.07171213,0.90445864,0.01860331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061034076,0.00004218476,0.0045263665,0.00029529538,0.00006647864,0.0002761769,0.00087030185,0.00027111865,0.0004650141,0.004217567,0.98881406,0.000094431685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04740244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04740244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1545905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34393042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134481699","doi":"","title":"Tailoring Patent Policy to Specific Industries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent troll; Business; Patent law; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2373789672555741,"score_gpt":0.2545659620955213,"score_spread":0.01718699483994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134481699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074116886,0.01151178,0.09148445,0.3440395,0.0021764846,0.0011115187,0.00037039426,0.00084659294,0.47434235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866024,0.0051515843,0.03345535,0.13962038,0.0027507166,0.00072922575,0.00014156842,0.00016184157,0.031386837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593999,0.015613229,0.0036803372,0.0051921397,0.009653115,0.0064613707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224156,0.059268493,0.004487873,0.0046479157,0.0070655486,0.0021146976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045414206,0.0006331375,0.0010242688,0.005925651,0.004999506,0.011873747,0.002714912,0.02152901,0.0040262225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09478333,0.0011289454,0.0013431087,0.0027196517,0.008521985,0.010703307,0.0043200646,0.010072242,0.0014536253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005650793,0.00013600534,0.0023096215,0.0002005269,0.000053075943,0.00035237375,0.0012217348,0.0031558594,0.0028058398,0.9080498,0.038452122,0.043206584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016797382,0.0005601104,0.00886023,0.0009948685,0.00020309915,0.000513687,0.001775673,0.008659735,0.007786652,0.6709788,0.29923022,0.00026897105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006947335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011927452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045414206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007450802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013076038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24017614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124276848","doi":"","title":"Emerging Scholars Series: A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: The Cultural Divide in Intellectual Property Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Law and economics; Fair use; Equity (law); Tangible property; Political science; Instrumentalism; Sociology; Law; Indigenous; Intangible property; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2838458954655239,"score_gpt":0.26832599245085775,"score_spread":0.015519903014666159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124276848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010780479,0.20021114,0.006422082,0.4844077,0.019423047,0.00015991039,0.00024491866,0.000071026225,0.2782798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32250693,0.27970102,0.0066917897,0.09532629,0.03126525,0.00034570647,0.00041088284,0.0002368619,0.26351523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973348,0.0008957241,0.00019216356,0.00056068733,0.0008015853,0.00021505867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98704183,0.0089548,0.0008907531,0.0005545299,0.0021574306,0.00040074965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061966865,0.00037057293,0.0005069192,0.0025252432,0.002522146,0.0074169617,0.0013641891,0.006179203,0.011511589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117131565,0.00023209413,0.00059522607,0.0032338582,0.006524638,0.006045456,0.0021261263,0.0070794183,0.0022270032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023475555,0.000050432544,0.00092378136,0.00050045084,0.00001171011,0.0003619592,0.00210587,0.00019013524,0.00023882803,0.74678063,0.19168754,0.057125047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015424232,0.00005334446,0.0021554315,0.0011112625,0.000014916623,0.0003608784,0.0025381534,0.0003620463,0.00056560617,0.07965315,0.91314787,0.000021862166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067912824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008326005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011511589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054685795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005874435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0396775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61319265","doi":"","title":"One View of Compulsory Licensing: Comparative Perspectives From India and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette intellectual property law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Intangible property; Law and economics; Property rights; Tangible property; Business; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.10332328223162596,"score_gpt":0.231398186279903,"score_spread":0.12807490404827704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61319265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17007127,0.018972693,0.0010923139,0.099773996,0.00024387221,0.00004072852,0.00052419066,0.000030243638,0.7092507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720496,0.00627863,0.00027428754,0.004532487,0.000056648223,0.000011128717,0.00010255008,0.000019926916,0.016674766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577457,0.0004664104,0.000071905386,0.00022019548,0.0015255681,0.0019412705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066293,0.003666206,0.00053819804,0.00026588558,0.0038606205,0.0010062719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022033227,0.00021085911,0.0003934497,0.0042071934,0.01406962,0.0137981735,0.0019432757,0.0032511542,0.012343963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007500159,0.00017365803,0.0004514944,0.0069946414,0.012498313,0.0034564263,0.002504422,0.0042925733,0.00038870977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007468873,0.000034386885,0.007146975,0.0002014395,0.000032569522,0.00067154696,0.019261155,0.0003599746,0.0002175562,0.9326367,0.017166052,0.022196988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008319183,0.00010599814,0.08560927,0.0022403123,0.0002945179,0.0008634785,0.23627165,0.0014568693,0.0012795983,0.1436659,0.52787143,0.00025780266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9313778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97269654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06862217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047402874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0752317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34393352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}