{"meta":{"query_hash":"6cecc3bffca9","filters":{"venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences"},"cohort_total":33,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":33,"exported":33,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6cecc3bffca9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Mathematical+Social+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1964733860","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.004","title":"On the coincidence of the prenucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Shapley value; Coincidence; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Game theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.08175354098697378,"score_gpt":0.2442883157406177,"score_spread":0.16253477475364392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964733860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24244685,0.0038945642,0.5217536,0.010847738,0.001230989,0.00013454192,0.00033207826,0.0002118368,0.21914779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453571,0.0013989196,0.04111901,0.0009689852,0.0009802161,0.00017879413,0.00018377922,0.00016104404,0.009652144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959722,0.0020239756,0.0001860891,0.00076126744,0.0006719635,0.00038448363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821675,0.0131241195,0.0012428002,0.0014674618,0.0010775873,0.00092046405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007676522,0.00074056594,0.002255672,0.0019621488,0.0036529673,0.0065166065,0.0024550706,0.0034839227,0.008246469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03199948,0.00084901706,0.0015617269,0.0019887222,0.009970058,0.015459247,0.003576562,0.0063191177,0.0007892765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010753596,0.000005243054,0.00003902028,0.000008403479,0.000003687676,0.000011879196,0.000032030424,0.00040547017,0.000047875717,0.99837935,0.00025618952,0.0008000775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045923643,0.0000030691888,0.000025979607,0.0000045547363,0.0000012778991,0.000011457913,0.00000998134,0.0015332866,0.000019947485,0.99808717,0.00029533022,0.0000034439072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009893422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007306725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008246469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025303734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002020467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040597856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973794372","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.01.002","title":"Network flow problems and permutationally concave games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Concave function; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Function (biology); Order (exchange); Flow network; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06490588326263746,"score_gpt":0.26044456421553025,"score_spread":0.19553868095289278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973794372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11477822,0.0012829787,0.85778826,0.0043223463,0.00016923281,0.00018980834,0.00044773542,0.00010827544,0.020913126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86509514,0.0028529724,0.09188973,0.0006506054,0.0005578864,0.00061971677,0.00072319765,0.0001510369,0.037459634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981402,0.0011396883,0.00007137631,0.00027277783,0.00019357164,0.00018235743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879111,0.009856638,0.0008937139,0.00036700928,0.000458854,0.00051266636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033568114,0.0012207836,0.0020022306,0.0014594384,0.0014876747,0.0035482093,0.0022113684,0.0036767267,0.0075295926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017040573,0.0010485027,0.001240851,0.0020697922,0.003840529,0.0072591067,0.0015145766,0.0027186302,0.0004924564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054240405,0.000058318965,0.0004315122,0.00007772003,0.00003418825,0.0001037561,0.00012503672,0.10934602,0.00026190645,0.8814725,0.002276303,0.0057585333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003138742,0.000012811941,0.00015978733,0.000010678767,0.000010065553,0.000043669053,0.00004409722,0.2157653,0.00008232084,0.782698,0.0011291037,0.000012822037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046156324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003073784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075295926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029361076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017257319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025188982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973828689","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.01.004","title":"The Arab Spring: A simple compartmental model for the dynamics of a revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Simple (philosophy); Context (archaeology); The Internet; Set (abstract data type); Social media","score_opus":0.036915987370808194,"score_gpt":0.3292665061235742,"score_spread":0.292350518752766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973828689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34783846,0.0028721287,0.46846956,0.019074405,0.0011720324,0.00022910029,0.0020435257,0.00049481704,0.15780607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92237025,0.0010474387,0.010172405,0.0007566345,0.00028881477,0.00020496878,0.00027066306,0.00010088007,0.064787835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994729,0.00023468143,0.00002035261,0.000103620834,0.000055685086,0.000112774396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985568,0.0007149035,0.00019401197,0.00010511995,0.00012749914,0.00030167805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110532,0.0007741997,0.0019262404,0.00090190297,0.0015300397,0.0039611054,0.0035646223,0.0053173653,0.013030869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046143574,0.000625069,0.0016275203,0.0009593346,0.002339963,0.0037319914,0.002666441,0.0027563272,0.0017161416],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019605912,0.00009502297,0.000886431,0.00007606138,0.00008579789,0.00038107546,0.0004363593,0.2869488,0.0010210468,0.70135623,0.0051505747,0.003366466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013068951,0.000054740678,0.00034544157,0.000023661958,0.00004138294,0.00008084117,0.00015498244,0.83985806,0.00007875737,0.15556775,0.003618135,0.00004551646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015707837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010812348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015707837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020655044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015580507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043592572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982865661","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.003","title":"Product filters, acyclicity and Suzumura consistency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Relation (database); Filter (signal processing); Property (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10485642638607866,"score_gpt":0.285984099229812,"score_spread":0.18112767284373332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982865661","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2567333,0.0012109958,0.7232274,0.00302374,0.00017500756,0.00011577293,0.00068879424,0.00039403976,0.014431074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86792976,0.0011470364,0.11209977,0.0008802847,0.0005788535,0.0003171819,0.0008213221,0.00025918634,0.015966516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996861,0.0011852029,0.0002170157,0.0009891362,0.0003443316,0.000403303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95041794,0.037609473,0.004031882,0.0042576394,0.0024237374,0.0012594011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072560557,0.000504705,0.0026869758,0.0038022196,0.0028525302,0.004395795,0.0018015981,0.0028352218,0.008742433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04210663,0.0010922992,0.0021616337,0.0032844485,0.004324949,0.008635564,0.0017048995,0.0025526602,0.000697934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010764072,0.000048861646,0.001974055,0.00006686797,0.00006421695,0.000059042297,0.00023279995,0.0065866923,0.00051233725,0.97916555,0.0015572845,0.009624701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040633186,0.000023376952,0.001194671,0.000020204303,0.000036685433,0.00006407243,0.00005395455,0.037545633,0.00033198917,0.95894796,0.0017087824,0.000032188556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036371215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044187265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008742433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016339833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019329011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038374186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992540444","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.003","title":"Trading water along a river","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Distribution (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Welfare; Process (computing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management; Computer network; Market economy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06191056375167327,"score_gpt":0.2639435744076436,"score_spread":0.20203301065597035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992540444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795834,0.0002470176,0.06655996,0.0049326085,0.00014499608,0.00004249093,0.00016429237,0.000079254154,0.048245933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074835,0.00007355793,0.0023446288,0.000058704696,0.000015078424,0.000008305248,0.000019142199,0.0000073071546,0.006724827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995838,0.00020603479,0.00001844468,0.00008548351,0.00004647174,0.000059797025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.0004411631,0.00014614179,0.000087482214,0.0000976618,0.00012805416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050498755,0.0001294774,0.00038815767,0.00024675272,0.0009393373,0.0021559596,0.00059319206,0.0014125832,0.005598987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033370277,0.00020784386,0.00032338744,0.0004448288,0.0012682147,0.0022447524,0.00074382516,0.00070573774,0.00028332582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039511276,0.00019311393,0.02745201,0.00010246231,0.00020018623,0.0012127495,0.0008905141,0.23925838,0.0044526006,0.6873402,0.006138099,0.032364532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065800356,0.000088059336,0.004554501,0.000021131496,0.000051005383,0.00010167331,0.0015409308,0.5378947,0.0008027531,0.4470187,0.0078196395,0.000041162202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008604981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089228125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008604981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008088043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006838376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018730521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000470205","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.02.001","title":"On the centipede game with a social norm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Introspection; Simultaneous game; Computer science; Screening game; Non-cooperative game; Dominance (genetics); Ultimatum game; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.38645242231143884,"score_gpt":0.4546359428157334,"score_spread":0.06818352050429455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000470205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31434762,0.0012299033,0.45362988,0.0064989664,0.0007591391,0.00021143992,0.00043072083,0.00012457813,0.2227678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585726,0.0008655171,0.019756263,0.00035798762,0.00027117558,0.00019138648,0.00010534417,0.00004624544,0.019833438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820185,0.0010154305,0.00006195817,0.00017450702,0.00028317614,0.00026298207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938751,0.0046348628,0.0003274966,0.00021074672,0.0004031371,0.00054858887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018540871,0.0011837059,0.0016473307,0.0013925398,0.0013126595,0.004233913,0.0017521523,0.0028259554,0.009069224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010346549,0.00038544025,0.0008197165,0.0010800569,0.004143685,0.004826056,0.0025820287,0.0026971085,0.00047007485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010843418,0.000028408887,0.00018298869,0.000047644404,0.0000181098,0.00010115142,0.00008398377,0.04654105,0.00037011402,0.9475639,0.0015018057,0.0034525427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053365024,0.00006498683,0.00018520585,0.00004312775,0.000018390576,0.00005784151,0.00013345576,0.26402092,0.00014536889,0.7331055,0.0021325063,0.00003925531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065676956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035704428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009069224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002820128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020140288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030339599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010899313","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00055-4","title":"Separable and additive representations of binary gambles of gains","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Separable space; Representation (politics); Differentiable function; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Binary number; Additive function; Rank (graph theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.2351220511006282,"score_gpt":0.4872952272806448,"score_spread":0.25217317618001656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010899313","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09472302,0.0006371085,0.88407433,0.0010637323,0.00011821039,0.00006414361,0.00047129666,0.00019584081,0.01865241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83390886,0.0008484399,0.15050848,0.0002258739,0.00019637143,0.0002476461,0.0005212372,0.000092856484,0.013450239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693584,0.00139635,0.00017955678,0.00044412553,0.0006924188,0.00035175498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909566,0.0058067623,0.0010405304,0.0010049536,0.0007521309,0.00043901982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003429865,0.0011362588,0.0009833135,0.002192851,0.00043569287,0.005715153,0.0017270525,0.0017082756,0.008433752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01971528,0.00070624234,0.0012176365,0.0016700061,0.0018117385,0.008063372,0.0022529392,0.0026090331,0.00094840216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008837518,0.000054664055,0.00046710228,0.000067895184,0.000028674096,0.000049593276,0.00026876276,0.009968113,0.00075502216,0.96806026,0.0006221986,0.019569298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012334651,0.00002790376,0.000548322,0.000034228822,0.00002360781,0.00007017467,0.000069635804,0.07159734,0.00027695711,0.9265992,0.0007200254,0.00002020886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007997539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086327095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008433752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010300924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069638627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02821374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010912066","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.003","title":"Group strategy-proofness and voting between two alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Voting; Mathematical economics; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14575210552786322,"score_gpt":0.3308931207024684,"score_spread":0.18514101517460518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010912066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533288,0.00053975283,0.40361768,0.006265003,0.00015134618,0.00026875394,0.00028678295,0.000120694545,0.03542123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97863334,0.0001452491,0.01743305,0.00026134518,0.00008285165,0.00015039153,0.00012071201,0.00002135016,0.003151739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98859346,0.0065835956,0.0006579899,0.001573827,0.001331148,0.0012600765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.895355,0.08558776,0.008713911,0.0052315164,0.003029615,0.002082107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012232455,0.00070829206,0.0022120788,0.0014295916,0.0023857153,0.0051256325,0.0024729453,0.004306295,0.0068807695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0800528,0.0007143105,0.0013592914,0.001399651,0.006606853,0.006874119,0.0025830828,0.0037654603,0.00051858637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015295632,0.0000993793,0.001802836,0.00009764533,0.00009348553,0.00015255803,0.0006809784,0.00978662,0.0006798082,0.9779829,0.00094607804,0.007524798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006157367,0.000023265504,0.00031918255,0.000010982658,0.000014412055,0.000053781783,0.00009872381,0.02308208,0.00016413165,0.9758185,0.00034233317,0.000011023866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017157242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013195449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012232455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017107909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002488694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06469214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025285228","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00057-8","title":"An algorithm for verifying double implementability in Nash and strong Nash equilibria","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Best response; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Risk dominance; Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.13085629405195495,"score_gpt":0.3499587090694357,"score_spread":0.21910241501748076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025285228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020735217,0.000039003535,0.9712931,0.00034501986,0.00007283616,0.00030210603,0.00018499735,0.0029890921,0.004038608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2585141,0.000046428948,0.7365985,0.00020909021,0.000041725427,0.00049026374,0.0005502569,0.00045392607,0.0030957283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504846,0.0012025305,0.0005162503,0.0013464948,0.0012142534,0.00067194307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97606486,0.016298229,0.0010065236,0.003468958,0.0025256495,0.00063586805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045493604,0.0021208932,0.0023338776,0.0014917738,0.0023009072,0.0037540244,0.004003935,0.0038567467,0.010315147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024360124,0.001206477,0.0023318734,0.0014392718,0.0025189032,0.0058900802,0.0060594454,0.0031405974,0.0020982807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002669736,0.00074542046,0.0044535613,0.00084128435,0.0003981753,0.0005720474,0.0008314196,0.25662857,0.01563238,0.2501836,0.012182476,0.4548613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044857446,0.00014512503,0.00037642496,0.000053731655,0.000111641326,0.00015720066,0.00014825774,0.7552908,0.008040039,0.23255563,0.0026199399,0.000052566265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033898735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004222547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010315147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021964868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055011627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034507632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025307914","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.01.008","title":"Single-plateaued choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convexity; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Voting; Term (time); Independence (probability theory); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10565601980597178,"score_gpt":0.27020075092955526,"score_spread":0.16454473112358348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025307914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.517207,0.00073104026,0.39872608,0.005856066,0.00024193805,0.000194525,0.00072670035,0.00046365222,0.07585294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568952,0.00017420031,0.023755051,0.00038416113,0.00008638026,0.00011686603,0.0001976787,0.000053140706,0.01833746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997554,0.001212165,0.000094350165,0.00050902466,0.000251098,0.00037938906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850499,0.010440478,0.0006307779,0.0014957669,0.0010906819,0.0012924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003789493,0.00050952233,0.0021086903,0.00088169734,0.00152882,0.0039101443,0.0022725111,0.0031599274,0.016223308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024367955,0.0005857674,0.0013354975,0.0008596248,0.0031333847,0.004789841,0.0023219858,0.0035361568,0.0013538535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001680645,0.00008212624,0.001294505,0.00007553639,0.000055628352,0.00013106636,0.00022337002,0.012128146,0.00075636123,0.9725131,0.002473567,0.010098511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004059407,0.00003755251,0.000389396,0.000014197052,0.000010144947,0.000061616745,0.00007677343,0.076600835,0.00016429549,0.9218385,0.0007511003,0.000014877077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011442379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012998155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016223308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014728745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012222339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054272354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033203612","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2005.07.001","title":"Agreement and stochastic independence of belief functions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Action (physics); Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Foundation (evidence); Common knowledge (logic); Belief revision; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.13975764654364783,"score_gpt":0.41723075277335114,"score_spread":0.27747310622970334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033203612","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296439,0.0006073341,0.8406648,0.0044060093,0.00014326996,0.0002607012,0.00069695874,0.00014597537,0.02343103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439312,0.00067858695,0.04564938,0.00049528875,0.00032884403,0.000608068,0.00056033075,0.00007525789,0.007673146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97204643,0.01466052,0.0015408986,0.004561885,0.00456041,0.002629745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7238404,0.23845552,0.013128941,0.012640243,0.007937169,0.0039977576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027709575,0.0012944575,0.0051810155,0.0026217827,0.0024206294,0.00856869,0.0045556594,0.0047301017,0.0068032867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14505768,0.002310958,0.0038608573,0.0025240916,0.010296603,0.014539664,0.0046525323,0.0097380355,0.0010222329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001269662,0.000069665555,0.0006619853,0.00006180485,0.00012224354,0.000092177346,0.00041498817,0.016940612,0.00022403036,0.97701913,0.000511446,0.0037550458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049762788,0.000022776981,0.0004209792,0.0000135748405,0.000028731441,0.00004270509,0.000060370465,0.0456961,0.000093990144,0.9532491,0.00029655366,0.000025510908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058125425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032317624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027709575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003993625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044057295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14654398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089594468","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.03.002","title":"Size invariant measures of association: Characterization and difficulties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotonic function; Invariant (physics); Combinatorics; Row and column spaces; Discrete mathematics; Axiom; Association (psychology); Row; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.21697705825034277,"score_gpt":0.3810843418835992,"score_spread":0.1641072836332564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089594468","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08718323,0.0033822532,0.8929308,0.0076469956,0.000287103,0.0001559162,0.00077167014,0.0003236373,0.0073184283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8343667,0.0022798982,0.15334271,0.0020164845,0.0026136644,0.00088790833,0.0010394981,0.0002996508,0.003153535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95317984,0.028104916,0.0033609874,0.008526242,0.005731934,0.0010960145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50966275,0.41701758,0.020841505,0.0428262,0.006631798,0.0030202116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07137203,0.0010765854,0.0038459913,0.005661819,0.002630035,0.007496778,0.0082706865,0.004067023,0.0034750984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32436696,0.0017555676,0.0022827804,0.0068623996,0.017123252,0.022095611,0.0077767265,0.007210211,0.00050743966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060087525,0.000034828565,0.0044481885,0.00015108696,0.00011111551,0.00013429958,0.000593887,0.002186022,0.00027705127,0.9674686,0.0014801349,0.023054643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014161739,0.000027478474,0.001670558,0.000027488302,0.000025918574,0.00028188396,0.00012599479,0.016451463,0.00014316785,0.98038155,0.00082443206,0.000025968899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013607959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006412819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07137203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027995156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016941476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3774559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091587857","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.11.001","title":"Statistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical inference; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Computer science; Majority rule; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical model; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1709722279674939,"score_gpt":0.34039747293678774,"score_spread":0.16942524496929384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091587857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6665496,0.00066535204,0.32165703,0.0014632741,0.00020422241,0.00022594779,0.0008381003,0.0003781915,0.008018364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742727,0.00020876456,0.02272854,0.00018168753,0.000111321664,0.00016091096,0.00085789314,0.00010523674,0.0013730859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815993,0.012025479,0.0010778706,0.0021903764,0.0019692625,0.0011378222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6784496,0.28051704,0.009853258,0.022014072,0.006611014,0.002555109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029864836,0.00050028577,0.0023421259,0.004284966,0.0013951064,0.00510549,0.0025677788,0.002493093,0.0065741013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19034895,0.0006613365,0.0018678149,0.0028515658,0.0035656404,0.0060576624,0.0016786252,0.0022149486,0.00057825044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001385594,0.00035366978,0.03340681,0.00042878327,0.0008600584,0.00020705696,0.0011143333,0.11491572,0.0016589147,0.7605304,0.008893938,0.0762447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014253317,0.00017676852,0.011272931,0.000055440025,0.000118226715,0.00013985528,0.00031302817,0.4018622,0.00081505126,0.5839173,0.0011223786,0.00006426067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010518233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001248645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029864836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017085065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016440621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15794224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111063239","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00040-2","title":"Entry-deterring policy differentiation by electoral candidates","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Period (music); Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Physics","score_opus":0.039639559807926,"score_gpt":0.372542038194198,"score_spread":0.332902478386272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111063239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710614,0.00012080223,0.005629059,0.0008234867,0.000016550608,0.000039395265,0.00008053268,0.000024228953,0.022204556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533373,0.00003584195,0.0006602175,0.000053651216,0.000010690143,0.000008349823,0.000029810355,0.000003102328,0.0038644834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977843,0.0009997535,0.00011946628,0.00028977104,0.00022612265,0.0005806964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98597914,0.008133067,0.0022573275,0.00104857,0.000813563,0.0017683363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032931438,0.0002651246,0.0010773779,0.0010520131,0.0011521763,0.0028263882,0.00066269457,0.0011320189,0.014374531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017621567,0.00026810836,0.0004114541,0.00097320526,0.0012494969,0.001420307,0.0020458777,0.0013788214,0.00089020166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028992617,0.0011787073,0.1969473,0.00044678478,0.0002155322,0.0006377731,0.003923251,0.014607163,0.011932049,0.59376204,0.0051623695,0.16828771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051480264,0.0012321322,0.31132168,0.0001752853,0.00023581198,0.00091325864,0.010529929,0.07788699,0.0057030623,0.57893056,0.012450623,0.00010582095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013065136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032255354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014374531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008769609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010354108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048087597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145230123","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.002","title":"Expected multi-utility representations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constructive; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Von Neumann architecture; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.5449282112151731,"score_gpt":0.5456047661647843,"score_spread":0.0006765549496111634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145230123","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06790807,0.00055074034,0.9061062,0.0019047195,0.00009381422,0.000082708684,0.00071016466,0.0002259876,0.022417584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91506755,0.00062007055,0.07095008,0.00023145809,0.00016992459,0.00023106505,0.0006805981,0.00008515256,0.011964068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979335,0.0009905872,0.00010453425,0.00035939153,0.00035313232,0.0002588516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247545,0.0051329746,0.0004954139,0.00087969494,0.0006816367,0.00033488055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035890432,0.0009417165,0.00093365443,0.0014580076,0.00041221944,0.0037174574,0.0017978238,0.0017214572,0.012615561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019987693,0.00047701967,0.0013602613,0.0014649126,0.0010399256,0.0072379047,0.0014705635,0.0025994368,0.0009061784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060487662,0.00006947139,0.0006504668,0.00006681877,0.000053576943,0.00009959367,0.0001510254,0.03972263,0.0002602149,0.9346259,0.0017569088,0.022482846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010277542,0.000023041172,0.00026503706,0.000023646318,0.00001692597,0.00006951438,0.000038112357,0.17938891,0.00015201607,0.8192727,0.0007276324,0.000012198111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006951175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005426431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012615561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001310368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063298363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042203248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160350653","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00022-7","title":"On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Preference; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.52330821283842,"score_gpt":0.3133289289670274,"score_spread":0.20997928387139259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160350653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.637576,0.0009327088,0.34934202,0.0042213295,0.00007945209,0.0001312686,0.0014358166,0.0003514939,0.005929856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498154,0.0005862873,0.009555406,0.00034425798,0.000087225075,0.00006642584,0.0011470884,0.00011145197,0.003120287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944246,0.0037583339,0.00016359362,0.00091279583,0.0003329274,0.00040782403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84737504,0.13469324,0.0055298354,0.008558448,0.0026643018,0.00117917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01945613,0.00077507,0.00220689,0.0016649662,0.0010733237,0.0029402117,0.0027138456,0.002418736,0.0078017693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122033186,0.0010892075,0.0022106522,0.0015549666,0.0030141312,0.00621805,0.0018109444,0.003969292,0.00096392835],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001377956,0.0002636428,0.047976296,0.0003500317,0.000681624,0.00057690364,0.0010401863,0.39492494,0.0028281843,0.50132066,0.008785705,0.03987387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081258215,0.00007990494,0.0065273573,0.000051515875,0.0001028596,0.0001523638,0.00014028489,0.80594355,0.00069277943,0.18545438,0.0007202684,0.000053363263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009084011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019282785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001219716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10289508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166664207","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.10.002","title":"The zero discounting and maximin optimal paths in a simple model of global warming","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Economics; Discounting; Minimax; Exponential function; Global warming; Econometrics; Zero (linguistics); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Climate change; Ecology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.05136698368015062,"score_gpt":0.2767305326349314,"score_spread":0.22536354895478078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166664207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55937916,0.0025482564,0.39629006,0.010127753,0.00018014098,0.0000847331,0.00062988,0.00020665026,0.030553363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96623623,0.0013163782,0.02079077,0.00022824449,0.00008973064,0.000049365666,0.0001317895,0.00006817486,0.011089341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954396,0.00027234052,0.000014715921,0.00007139705,0.000036690733,0.000060764367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951297,0.0037077307,0.00044632074,0.0002016711,0.00019682512,0.00031782067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022755717,0.00070543546,0.0011064864,0.0006683936,0.0009681373,0.0025063357,0.0016373207,0.0029525822,0.004841254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013713887,0.0009370779,0.0010082873,0.00091975695,0.0025974335,0.0062262025,0.0014972826,0.0028217663,0.0002587679],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007409063,0.000027811056,0.00068036513,0.00005827172,0.000026830501,0.000097796095,0.00015439003,0.2279825,0.00020695597,0.7663532,0.0010486038,0.0032892057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034729583,0.000011210669,0.00028506352,0.00001196362,0.00001285192,0.000029710009,0.000033252567,0.19338942,0.000041604017,0.8056641,0.00046689613,0.000019156336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010475471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005916863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010475471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019164326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014961668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020828962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485494518","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.08.003","title":"Inferring probability comparisons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Interpretation (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Intersection (aeronautics); Binary relation; Semantics (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Mathematics; Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Probability measure; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.13503233844042034,"score_gpt":0.3585702472363137,"score_spread":0.22353790879589336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485494518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23297097,0.0021212376,0.69945437,0.0050637503,0.000440357,0.00029934634,0.0048879283,0.0019616997,0.052800413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8822663,0.0005170177,0.110679545,0.00030464245,0.00029703532,0.00011582071,0.00244776,0.0001806028,0.0031913088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98990226,0.0042589107,0.00051748974,0.0030669274,0.0018101716,0.00044428624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95418376,0.03820932,0.0018827033,0.003168182,0.0018381226,0.00071783696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055300174,0.0009859378,0.0012823708,0.0066855764,0.0016036234,0.006364759,0.0023246484,0.0023782707,0.021089641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078702696,0.0008746202,0.0019292478,0.004054159,0.0017832562,0.0143731935,0.0032134585,0.0035537397,0.0022208844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000972098,0.00043944505,0.037717216,0.0005658807,0.00047271297,0.0008361086,0.0011359879,0.022471381,0.0033482334,0.67735463,0.015021162,0.23966505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004803625,0.00008962567,0.005220167,0.000087347755,0.00015985717,0.0004379387,0.00034220866,0.10322778,0.0023843446,0.8794449,0.00851288,0.00004492402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002405544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031268217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021089641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020612394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015938309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07055187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584545229","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.004","title":"Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Per capita; Parliament; Representation (politics); Unitary state; German; Population; European union; Power (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Law; Sociology; International trade; Physics","score_opus":0.08968767137900256,"score_gpt":0.2712019785617748,"score_spread":0.18151430718277223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584545229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560164,0.0009590648,0.00782522,0.005300254,0.000071812254,0.00012768265,0.0021873508,0.00014658783,0.027365692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847093,0.0002929203,0.0011141581,0.00016863787,0.000017280756,0.00003670302,0.00035600035,0.00002377038,0.013281257],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976156,0.000547444,0.000046848523,0.00020605313,0.00018806297,0.0013960468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195707,0.0044537648,0.000556483,0.00026826112,0.0012591452,0.0015052758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040855547,0.00075420225,0.0025849962,0.0014264325,0.0040330794,0.0073334477,0.0039959527,0.0035349857,0.012758106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010331955,0.000809909,0.0018062509,0.002311975,0.0034527606,0.0024336595,0.0013495442,0.0024566362,0.0007844024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009667806,0.00041559586,0.02570396,0.0001367916,0.0001851567,0.00032182288,0.0012694229,0.6507192,0.00034643392,0.28917906,0.018184524,0.012571163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040684463,0.00012501348,0.01586196,0.00008007473,0.00022971714,0.000042380398,0.0033925893,0.90924025,0.00028765868,0.06415028,0.0060241357,0.000159001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95724237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96311253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04275763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03636094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028834384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26381832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626118440","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2021.01.002","title":"On the optimality of small research tournaments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Tournament; Attractiveness; Mathematical optimization; Marginal cost; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.67073704658052,"score_gpt":0.5729856259180536,"score_spread":0.09775142066246645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626118440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5145798,0.0039009342,0.33392605,0.009915622,0.00043603455,0.00032034534,0.00065464654,0.00023502724,0.13603157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96999276,0.00085611874,0.020290812,0.00034829002,0.00021363427,0.00013697756,0.00018318612,0.000064109416,0.007914143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080163,0.006894659,0.00030748866,0.0006433764,0.00065464905,0.0006982393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8895745,0.09955806,0.0036503463,0.0029393043,0.0019547693,0.0023230247],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011911749,0.0008946301,0.0030665684,0.0014581799,0.0012643785,0.0042923857,0.0019558512,0.0019548156,0.011732066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056108057,0.0008147307,0.0010286111,0.0014701952,0.0043036607,0.004171926,0.0022849794,0.0026612303,0.00052799325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001146646,0.00019936099,0.0036440664,0.00031163526,0.00016197303,0.00014226085,0.00031172563,0.07350006,0.0009905609,0.88780326,0.0058167633,0.025971638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025395933,0.00023824166,0.0024650688,0.00005282858,0.00005314952,0.00007293682,0.00017061684,0.10778981,0.00019114085,0.88623494,0.0024527952,0.000024561621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028523835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002288145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98808825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002852259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018924997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06299609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888256346","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2018.08.001","title":"Patent licensing in a Cournot oligopoly: General results","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Oligopoly; Monopoly; Innovator; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic surplus; Industrial organization; Welfare; Business; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.324698797398399,"score_gpt":0.3016501887840523,"score_spread":0.02304860861434671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888256346","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23948923,0.02041917,0.44381845,0.021725636,0.00061525597,0.0005168319,0.0025324076,0.0013577843,0.26952532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92424035,0.013558232,0.014668055,0.0015016055,0.0013219592,0.00031611437,0.0008794859,0.00024359637,0.04327063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979159,0.0006502609,0.00011761169,0.0003123143,0.00031206541,0.0006917725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95744187,0.03284515,0.0033677623,0.0017586241,0.002739357,0.001847152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003995888,0.0023350548,0.0061277538,0.006047565,0.002806301,0.00809393,0.0034336646,0.004404713,0.029862328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02821616,0.0014395132,0.0043150177,0.006792084,0.006309271,0.015410082,0.004127595,0.004938611,0.0023747403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001805365,0.0005247357,0.0025848418,0.0010586825,0.00027983994,0.0006819988,0.00047078697,0.10474543,0.0012779005,0.8560487,0.013575117,0.018571412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012738396,0.000043814427,0.0012206627,0.00009084545,0.00018572404,0.00019389181,0.0002925276,0.10716573,0.000317325,0.887793,0.0025048954,0.0000642267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015010483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010620431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029862328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047090114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047272625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09989941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907987048","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2019.06.003","title":"Optimal sharing rule for a household with a portfolio management problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Portfolio; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Risk aversion (psychology); Function (biology); Merton's portfolio problem; Investment strategy; Portfolio optimization; Complete market; Project portfolio management; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Replicating portfolio; Financial economics","score_opus":0.02951246298213482,"score_gpt":0.25426801287440304,"score_spread":0.2247555498922682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907987048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30279574,0.00045056833,0.66148317,0.0043029673,0.00014507779,0.00034656355,0.0009853414,0.00028408808,0.029206438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132344,0.000323646,0.062151887,0.00023531234,0.00014308476,0.00027390168,0.00042821086,0.00006185136,0.023147719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986737,0.0006097318,0.0000732385,0.0002855677,0.00015502269,0.00020283255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964981,0.002263941,0.00029876796,0.00027543673,0.00028300946,0.0003807256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025789398,0.0007404432,0.0025366999,0.00068003795,0.00068796385,0.0026594554,0.0021633809,0.0030792712,0.0077141128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067522423,0.00053929765,0.00077136524,0.00081429526,0.0013465823,0.0026845746,0.0019161655,0.0016169208,0.0008871576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005176937,0.0004283216,0.0027080183,0.0002017583,0.00020897614,0.0008204023,0.00035699544,0.46167707,0.0021501642,0.47818226,0.00817911,0.044569165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001276959,0.00012740043,0.00048400174,0.00002738039,0.000033768985,0.00013587778,0.000103141305,0.82262814,0.0003118017,0.17469688,0.0012995009,0.000024350578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036821142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001885497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077141128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012187469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012811834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025806308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105359897","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.10.007","title":"Superset-robust collective choice rules","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Transitive relation; Social choice theory; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Preference; Choice function; Property (philosophy); Robustness (evolution); Social preferences; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Data mining","score_opus":0.16765298733793008,"score_gpt":0.27900365248936265,"score_spread":0.11135066515143258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105359897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23537004,0.00036019343,0.7351279,0.0015815534,0.00014879348,0.00012819671,0.0005150167,0.0004623965,0.02630584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489524,0.00021051477,0.038402032,0.00031324936,0.000109179884,0.00017181796,0.0003128908,0.0001550648,0.011372814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721825,0.0012735707,0.00014688984,0.0005678941,0.00045332243,0.00034000108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97355735,0.017029492,0.0025272544,0.0043925834,0.0015791515,0.0009141315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038838582,0.0005611901,0.002124757,0.001053604,0.000991632,0.0025972433,0.0023256217,0.0023838447,0.008487848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029190779,0.00061720476,0.0013371488,0.00078459753,0.0022899616,0.0034558347,0.0022447158,0.0029540774,0.0010505619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012376989,0.000047952803,0.00097216177,0.0000834851,0.00010350854,0.00013642815,0.00015252762,0.0628735,0.0011845997,0.9209649,0.003092218,0.010264869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023400837,0.000022796974,0.00033258836,0.000011962515,0.000013303267,0.000051505638,0.000033747987,0.25490567,0.00028193346,0.7436347,0.00067531806,0.000013081454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014210362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001359933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008487848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010107297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007716924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0283947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121826381","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.11.002","title":"Weak undominance in scoring rule elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Scoring rule; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Weighted voting; Mathematics; Political science; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.06647789912655191,"score_gpt":0.28902348318255816,"score_spread":0.22254558405600625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121826381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72426057,0.00068451214,0.23423694,0.0036446315,0.00032989535,0.00015223303,0.00022208979,0.00045761708,0.036011554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98617065,0.00015148554,0.00770265,0.00015449525,0.00015392787,0.00007483939,0.0000620258,0.0000673312,0.0054626744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98734945,0.0073501803,0.0008283022,0.0015850194,0.0013321381,0.0015548947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8578843,0.103608266,0.011707259,0.015942255,0.0059707193,0.0048871934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015131311,0.00083373825,0.0048430213,0.0017795187,0.003455438,0.0070164185,0.003525815,0.0034444113,0.008027558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13037287,0.0015586992,0.0011993062,0.0016534477,0.0071353703,0.009090607,0.0036293764,0.0064886813,0.0009032441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004693295,0.00015363858,0.0029418552,0.00016602567,0.0000798646,0.00031582636,0.0005975177,0.022147123,0.001328235,0.9541276,0.002521069,0.015151809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007169634,0.00005530314,0.0005890001,0.000017454659,0.00002549461,0.000081658334,0.00012355125,0.06579014,0.00045805215,0.93223774,0.000523348,0.000026503476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021038915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015316352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015131311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001598423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027680802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08002299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135141455","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.002","title":"Proportional resource allocation in dynamic <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e23\" altimg=\"si2.svg\"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>-player Blotto games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HEC Montréal; Universiteit Maastricht; Durham University; King's College London","keywords":"CONTEST; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Battlefield; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Theology; History","score_opus":0.03575639619963152,"score_gpt":0.3183540602306411,"score_spread":0.2825976640310096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135141455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29144657,0.00029710022,0.646251,0.001059915,0.00010316566,0.00033600113,0.0002460702,0.0002400241,0.0600201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470762,0.00011923531,0.038119115,0.00014900706,0.000034691147,0.00024073587,0.00006135028,0.0000624486,0.014137262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967836,0.0015932678,0.000104446466,0.0006322074,0.00036008938,0.0005264543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972193,0.0015728368,0.00043004073,0.0003194426,0.00015515772,0.00030315603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026906226,0.0010137449,0.001171467,0.0007447489,0.00104744,0.0025115388,0.00199811,0.0011635715,0.007106875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008883329,0.0007803741,0.000868424,0.00056584575,0.0021703113,0.004324064,0.0025967269,0.0013225323,0.0006493104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003445453,0.00023534756,0.00096171396,0.00013296593,0.00008604827,0.00016391282,0.0003340849,0.1566395,0.0033798206,0.81490636,0.0020603852,0.020755207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104734674,0.00017171021,0.00074504665,0.000022205013,0.00003030695,0.00012537873,0.00012203037,0.40530226,0.0009029912,0.5888378,0.0035904432,0.00004512997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025695404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031693864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007106875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013566194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023774862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315490316","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.01.001","title":"Can a negative population growth rate sustain a positive economic growth rate in the long run?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Population growth; Endogenous growth theory; Human capital; Per capita; Population; Growth rate; Investment (military); Capital deepening; Per capita income; Capital accumulation; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Capital formation; Economic growth; Demography; Financial capital; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04005157796497166,"score_gpt":0.26623831393809905,"score_spread":0.22618673597312738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315490316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72509336,0.008002514,0.058965832,0.096574,0.0019648415,0.000041707033,0.0010805742,0.0003535742,0.107923605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207497,0.0018475375,0.00090510526,0.0011950409,0.00038722943,0.00001796877,0.00007973468,0.000041780553,0.0034507755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996699,0.00006179796,0.000015388174,0.000085874024,0.000043207645,0.00012375957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593544,0.0015015152,0.0013079622,0.00024545315,0.0005157387,0.00049388275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019429456,0.00043077674,0.00071088003,0.0006737181,0.00083072984,0.0031065326,0.0011413031,0.002505015,0.0074941237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015237013,0.000281272,0.0005712626,0.00064102316,0.0026001823,0.006094783,0.0012287719,0.0017490144,0.0012614789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004651332,0.00015648418,0.05155928,0.00061689573,0.0002046265,0.0018147187,0.0007510936,0.03398419,0.0043981327,0.841954,0.013056633,0.051038884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069839436,0.00012013904,0.024842473,0.0001374392,0.000090861184,0.00054205756,0.0019479571,0.031650424,0.0011977663,0.924277,0.015046697,0.00007732534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00601954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004060396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074941237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014893699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013423068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02507031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385376359","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.006","title":"When is frugality optimal?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Frugality; Product (mathematics); Time horizon; Consumption (sociology); Decision maker; Mathematical optimization; Path (computing); Instant; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Operations research; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12841629108476346,"score_gpt":0.29865309509528104,"score_spread":0.17023680401051758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385376359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33398646,0.0053977743,0.08059017,0.073989205,0.0016762617,0.00013010424,0.0006547963,0.00050552475,0.5030697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824827,0.00089564844,0.0071332757,0.0021764224,0.00074666383,0.000043619602,0.00010362071,0.00016727929,0.006250771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967901,0.0011435781,0.00016514224,0.00053808023,0.0005510115,0.0008120741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695487,0.00867009,0.00138545,0.0010360829,0.0010670695,0.00088636205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036332896,0.0004074236,0.0013765803,0.0014247857,0.0017815814,0.005719073,0.0009391396,0.003963115,0.019626895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036599744,0.0003863296,0.0006350629,0.001079915,0.008441447,0.012546835,0.0018337963,0.0022062096,0.0016950066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083302155,0.000033902103,0.000492714,0.00007751792,0.000019122894,0.000058108202,0.00015612661,0.00058322976,0.00022575562,0.9767696,0.004677688,0.01682299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014242275,0.000011776695,0.0002709296,0.000018888726,0.000005579632,0.000047504098,0.00022442975,0.0007953858,0.00009093493,0.99604464,0.0024681825,0.000007653951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020352374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016491573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019626895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002098857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015870233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06565845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389505461","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.12.001","title":"Relational utility and social norms in games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Social dilemma; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.18194833104617708,"score_gpt":0.4092279424954562,"score_spread":0.2272796114492791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389505461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226291,0.0012837028,0.12126212,0.004316238,0.00007338863,0.00010502847,0.00016431104,0.000047283414,0.050118804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939972,0.0002685118,0.0042533996,0.00005589655,0.000032265616,0.000046343674,0.000025606127,0.00000741713,0.0013134388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526936,0.0036238835,0.00012479091,0.0002920832,0.0004436479,0.0002462265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96038306,0.0340124,0.002506514,0.0012440498,0.0009838279,0.0008700751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061338814,0.0005718226,0.0007658409,0.0009196671,0.0008508903,0.0038472833,0.0009659473,0.0011071623,0.0040531904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03806162,0.00039499602,0.00039642927,0.0010866827,0.0045455247,0.005083709,0.0011945621,0.0013109235,0.00019048252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111225905,0.00015452868,0.0032974517,0.00007285613,0.00004447189,0.00004185492,0.0009845779,0.008287824,0.0002774472,0.9779774,0.00038740106,0.008363012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004505602,0.000043758635,0.0026807445,0.0000144335745,0.000016915243,0.00002627939,0.00043437709,0.020210218,0.00010072114,0.97584504,0.000570071,0.000012414428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003612282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026046813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061338814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021618302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011664435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392505032","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.02.005","title":"The core in an N-firm dynamic Cournot oligopoly","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Oligopoly; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Industrial organization; Computer science","score_opus":0.06944367946040358,"score_gpt":0.32177016032705447,"score_spread":0.2523264808666509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392505032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770563,0.0007579977,0.25606704,0.0017922249,0.00009982109,0.00008769916,0.00023299413,0.00017019485,0.06373571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853029,0.00024673372,0.008402321,0.000076804856,0.00005209585,0.000027461774,0.00003941318,0.000021346781,0.005830815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944824,0.00024799834,0.000019585073,0.00010387641,0.00008397659,0.00009637931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603313,0.0021942607,0.00056000496,0.00022182583,0.00037048498,0.0006203468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011187025,0.00051567866,0.0014894089,0.00093888235,0.0009755772,0.002714251,0.0011084419,0.0016456329,0.004407872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056917816,0.0007215525,0.00064253854,0.00095600466,0.0026923069,0.0031694514,0.0015786211,0.001369276,0.00031780286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018637525,0.000118296615,0.0007318267,0.000102307305,0.00003751116,0.00024014893,0.0001872118,0.119066745,0.0019152963,0.86972547,0.0016490129,0.0060398974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040506613,0.00006201151,0.0006544023,0.000023358938,0.000013423737,0.00005431183,0.00006627918,0.49579152,0.00021316425,0.5024677,0.0005953306,0.000018003317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003576348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025385488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004407872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012163613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013302934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0147458315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401630317","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.08.005","title":"Some further results on random OBIC rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07150923516328772,"score_gpt":0.2876934689098715,"score_spread":0.2161842337465838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401630317","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08450255,0.00855163,0.57931316,0.0176512,0.0019381143,0.00021445984,0.0010467304,0.0003600398,0.30642208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545424,0.010638996,0.08872087,0.008026732,0.005668655,0.00062720507,0.0013302863,0.000640683,0.12980407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735296,0.0010432634,0.00018355376,0.00043271147,0.00061216514,0.00037535565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97907525,0.015535031,0.0011147981,0.0020629985,0.001382333,0.0008296601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00424886,0.0015841413,0.0024983422,0.00290123,0.002829267,0.004338436,0.0029544241,0.002997391,0.026742797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02334431,0.0008516406,0.0032829582,0.004399599,0.0040113847,0.009115864,0.0029408392,0.006698446,0.0021802098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029877858,0.000053748197,0.0002471493,0.00013444787,0.000020822967,0.00007302989,0.00012727884,0.004333072,0.00036853,0.9825617,0.0036412864,0.008409049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013110751,0.000011156234,0.00014466548,0.000025100473,0.0000119753995,0.00003925145,0.000033233195,0.0080798,0.00014640733,0.98819786,0.0032878143,0.000009657789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019250079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018584376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026742797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020359512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013143447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08946353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236827","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102415","title":"On weighted-egalitarian values for cooperative games with transferable utility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Game theory","score_opus":0.05455303857679177,"score_gpt":0.29429639156703175,"score_spread":0.23974335299023997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10467309,0.0008294074,0.854843,0.0017879135,0.00013331481,0.00017707233,0.00020258177,0.00007962664,0.037273962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002794,0.0014306806,0.07669291,0.00060025166,0.00033495174,0.00049638527,0.0002695649,0.0001538921,0.01974198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407476,0.0034097258,0.00026792623,0.0007662473,0.000740481,0.0007408331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711604,0.023306957,0.0016457367,0.0012681866,0.0015154748,0.0011032444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008325505,0.0020365606,0.003076073,0.002384533,0.0018950395,0.0058380784,0.0046419012,0.0036678168,0.00829072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03683987,0.0011795902,0.0018882379,0.0030979319,0.0083320225,0.01300209,0.004119445,0.0052222754,0.0007485132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003347651,0.000028802879,0.00012248002,0.000040817387,0.000020982096,0.00003725454,0.00017078777,0.02756421,0.00023266177,0.9684535,0.000524595,0.0027704374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010998541,0.0000110150095,0.000044583867,0.0000142655235,0.0000060503603,0.000011409884,0.00003100005,0.0652331,0.000053846,0.9342665,0.00030704806,0.000010250614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030524533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022432148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008325505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002657517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04403001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410487845","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102420","title":"Condorcet efficiency: Weighted Bucklin vs. weighted scoring and Borda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.033509841781106386,"score_gpt":0.2733664417933629,"score_spread":0.2398566000122565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410487845","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2906278,0.0022397498,0.64262605,0.003446664,0.00024139127,0.0007245652,0.0008920884,0.0008688814,0.05833276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931954,0.00038611636,0.09523064,0.0006128087,0.00014370054,0.00047369947,0.0007602419,0.00041737108,0.008780002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657993,0.02373563,0.0012173203,0.0036480487,0.00391022,0.001689543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703541,0.092580184,0.0077585597,0.022276426,0.0052970103,0.0017337066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051941212,0.0013454139,0.0030426376,0.004657709,0.0024652153,0.00543393,0.0033938242,0.0026940934,0.008662999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1394015,0.0008024276,0.0022062673,0.0042957743,0.0055798115,0.00906046,0.0029393882,0.0032353848,0.0017775224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011065764,0.00032274524,0.01581933,0.00040106525,0.0006705008,0.00009404715,0.0006204683,0.16729403,0.0010727863,0.675733,0.01055502,0.12631038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001858234,0.0004807396,0.0071154255,0.00016217452,0.00013784748,0.00018251882,0.00036100665,0.42180026,0.0029535864,0.56090087,0.005606513,0.00011328249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036857142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036940041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051941212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040728175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030597828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27469468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414871809","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102469","title":"Note on intertemporal preference with loss aversion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Monotonic function; Preference; Monotone polygon; Extension (predicate logic); Loss aversion; Intertemporal choice; Time preference","score_opus":0.2307279006708502,"score_gpt":0.45048028913524263,"score_spread":0.21975238846439243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414871809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050284468,0.008187643,0.52230144,0.068042755,0.010236258,0.00016189563,0.00152786,0.00034289525,0.33891472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7564676,0.010871876,0.10707646,0.014176041,0.015730295,0.00035155207,0.00047074415,0.0003943412,0.094461165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987985,0.00042920496,0.0000794731,0.00022006793,0.0003715924,0.000101182835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076045,0.0070328126,0.00036474995,0.0007103586,0.000892747,0.00023887673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222945,0.0011015518,0.00117382,0.0011079436,0.0010522768,0.0017341743,0.0014415708,0.00232499,0.017517203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010756787,0.0004089029,0.0014288041,0.001584897,0.0025629813,0.0049243094,0.001682004,0.0061743148,0.001269948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108242166,0.00005462737,0.0003031705,0.00015681819,0.00004813801,0.00035225725,0.00017250149,0.002188444,0.0011979139,0.9687881,0.011832857,0.014796905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001299344,0.000020329046,0.00026796784,0.000019355055,0.000016096821,0.00011635737,0.000018488952,0.0031689808,0.00028957136,0.9882378,0.007817611,0.000014339709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018395021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011602676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017517203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010054656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005719584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058600903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}