{"meta":{"query_hash":"6cecc3bffca9","filters":{"venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences"},"cohort_total":33,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":33,"exported":33,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6cecc3bffca9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Mathematical+Social+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1964733860","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.004","title":"On the coincidence of the prenucleolus and the Shapley value","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Shapley value; Coincidence; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Game theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.08175354098697378,"score_gpt":0.2442883157406177,"score_spread":0.16253477475364392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964733860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92727906,0.00012747997,0.00022738997,0.0059998757,0.000090529706,0.00021030774,0.0000055293003,0.0000083250425,0.06605151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991091,0.000006318565,0.000033962973,0.00034391912,0.00004545021,0.000009740458,2.150403e-8,0.0000027347116,0.00044877725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926585,0.00009808192,0.0002716174,0.00013239194,0.00009389525,0.0001381547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985741,0.0010597777,0.00021222359,0.00013025156,0.000009340584,0.000014330526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027744705,0.00006025305,0.0001911759,0.000013197919,0.00094329275,0.000040029332,0.00048339218,0.000031887692,0.00012404675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010967262,0.000025952837,0.00007950137,0.00021969939,0.0025797533,0.000044952732,0.00008711058,0.00008714949,0.00006799336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037352781,0.000014180345,0.0008154252,0.000007775933,0.000004335969,1.0847084e-7,0.0037537778,0.0000053809085,0.0000025294344,0.9951874,0.0001790885,0.000026285565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012526543,0.000021051756,0.0071018157,0.00002208217,0.0000026287116,0.000006554161,0.00035105657,0.0021496702,0.000033422697,0.9899414,0.00019734715,0.000047682868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006653254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030517451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07183003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010009553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012513666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973794372","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.01.002","title":"Network flow problems and permutationally concave games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Concave function; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Function (biology); Order (exchange); Flow network; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06490588326263746,"score_gpt":0.26044456421553025,"score_spread":0.19553868095289278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973794372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5276614,0.0010637193,0.0221264,0.0059532085,0.00027244733,0.00043678473,0.000021113327,0.0001245564,0.4423404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968899,0.0000034007624,0.0019594105,0.00044038607,0.00021468512,0.000006166006,8.0073465e-7,0.0000030868457,0.0004821631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918747,0.000021926198,0.0002993668,0.00020552448,0.000055519457,0.00023019924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996577,0.0001202865,0.00012817839,0.000042432464,0.000011694517,0.000039717583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013616042,0.000075294825,0.00022639103,0.000028555643,0.0003785894,0.00014182081,0.00013216244,0.000051638126,0.00020964714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014139926,0.0000672039,0.00003988588,0.00018803922,0.00026742136,0.00011820412,0.000017538132,0.000055805387,0.0001672853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8316654e-7,0.00002082007,0.0008152022,0.000012903053,0.0000034994687,3.258438e-7,0.001820545,0.00006718521,0.0000036218798,0.9962341,0.00028001604,0.00074085285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008631278,0.000059439022,0.007094913,0.000017130335,0.000001889389,0.0000031082322,0.00015682248,0.004423079,0.0000014692915,0.98667526,0.001379837,0.00010074521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059437752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014616186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46922854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015102761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000819262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2911842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973828689","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.01.004","title":"The Arab Spring: A simple compartmental model for the dynamics of a revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Simple (philosophy); Context (archaeology); The Internet; Set (abstract data type); Social media","score_opus":0.036915987370808194,"score_gpt":0.3292665061235742,"score_spread":0.292350518752766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973828689","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11592819,0.0000128180345,0.87336,0.0032431602,0.00007549541,0.00034899852,0.000032834072,0.000011698458,0.0069868453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985725,8.2590725e-7,0.0011509677,0.000034052373,0.00009749035,0.000035338853,0.0000016183092,0.000002969299,0.0001041826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934345,0.000024511633,0.00017650776,0.000091584916,0.00018526896,0.00017864992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999305,0.00046364192,0.00010410157,0.00007015355,0.000037543334,0.000019555735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006660341,0.00005839567,0.000110744346,0.000005845212,0.0012336273,0.00007009995,0.0002782897,0.00001732786,0.000010043747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033609052,0.000031405718,0.00010236049,0.000099945806,0.0006145671,0.00004512513,0.00004917635,0.000046132223,0.0000027381827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017244917,0.000027155911,0.00051121134,0.0000050256854,0.0000071604813,1.2444238e-9,0.00028879385,0.0005351713,0.0000071837503,0.9958889,0.00012589977,0.002601784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042484124,0.0000103206485,0.00021694077,0.0000025218603,0.0000053203626,1.0852168e-8,0.00044558942,0.5720953,0.0000037063855,0.42700917,0.00014203567,0.000026603184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054515556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002770475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88264436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019814759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031383297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94881886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982865661","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.003","title":"Product filters, acyclicity and Suzumura consistency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Ultrafilter; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Relation (database); Filter (signal processing); Property (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10485642638607866,"score_gpt":0.285984099229812,"score_spread":0.18112767284373332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982865661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8738452,0.00053878216,0.0003759335,0.0011697997,0.00021155945,0.00012799092,0.000009782162,0.0000365701,0.12368435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984803,0.0000035470864,0.0006397536,0.000115898445,0.00024322637,0.000007955151,3.4342938e-7,0.000004221536,0.00050473615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991327,0.000028048808,0.00029236422,0.00018748484,0.00004798005,0.00031143133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996011,0.00012078531,0.00013305934,0.00007289344,0.000007627491,0.0000645134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435178,0.000079004785,0.00024191441,0.000039565995,0.00040939002,0.000085224696,0.00014161156,0.000039251096,0.0003319009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038642384,0.00006817994,0.000045397777,0.00017646977,0.00049581006,0.00023161515,0.00005196822,0.00006152745,0.00038056023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7000177e-7,0.000048293074,0.027885767,0.000034026874,0.0000052204546,9.9315606e-8,0.0020008872,6.906464e-8,0.000024452227,0.9694164,0.0002429622,0.0003409728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001701227,0.000045246878,0.045118447,0.000024392935,0.000007415301,0.000012239636,0.0010458981,0.00018240079,0.00016594112,0.9459631,0.0069554755,0.00030932407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029711826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000103492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12463508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017138404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057703546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48914587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992540444","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.003","title":"Trading water along a river","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream (networking); Distribution (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Welfare; Process (computing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Mathematics; Operations management; Computer network; Market economy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06191056375167327,"score_gpt":0.2639435744076436,"score_spread":0.20203301065597035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992540444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87174773,0.0000085330585,0.0010012471,0.0007391566,0.0003082897,0.00006696847,0.0000056077065,0.000037960865,0.12608452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982902,1.8217267e-7,0.0008272748,0.00008388972,0.0002253232,0.0000070253595,4.875124e-7,0.000005224351,0.0005604377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.000013352568,0.00028642072,0.0001977591,0.000049066166,0.00028008808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974215,0.00007161278,0.000069568996,0.00006922816,0.000006155525,0.00004126543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018840601,0.00007081618,0.00020130722,0.000049909435,0.00042853723,0.000115853334,0.0002521516,0.00006859225,0.0016285626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012951987,0.00005211143,0.00007558299,0.000120919845,0.0004635428,0.00014568704,0.000034419045,0.00012017216,0.0014781422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.859368e-7,0.000025993757,0.0024685322,0.00001203898,0.0000038337644,5.948286e-7,0.0039889724,1.8979355e-7,0.00033771788,0.9929211,0.00011083475,0.00012960761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007713467,0.000015664737,0.0014222637,0.0000049539944,0.0000017457327,0.000003828367,0.0001821812,0.0012548366,0.00043582395,0.9927703,0.0037097053,0.000121552286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036689493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068035397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12654243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010076135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043458754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000470205","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.02.001","title":"On the centipede game with a social norm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Introspection; Simultaneous game; Computer science; Screening game; Non-cooperative game; Dominance (genetics); Ultimatum game; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematics; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.38645242231143884,"score_gpt":0.4546359428157334,"score_spread":0.06818352050429455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000470205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66768,0.000004435001,0.0073980936,0.038685717,0.000060350227,0.00026756895,0.0000063800126,0.000058134552,0.2858393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692744,9.944539e-8,0.00040547852,0.00089327025,0.00016347348,0.000038772658,2.3882754e-7,0.000004612371,0.0015666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684787,0.00022514822,0.00029367098,0.000317203,0.0019978106,0.00031828214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761194,0.0018128817,0.00015044847,0.00018817662,0.00013747149,0.000099057994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051323795,0.00011358459,0.00020073778,0.00004979087,0.0011291187,0.0005071466,0.0011784636,0.000050763578,0.00089168455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018257343,0.00004908191,0.00008279181,0.0012382572,0.0017124078,0.00015709393,0.00011110542,0.00013123019,0.002031882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011398213,0.00008287121,0.00004420686,7.077046e-7,0.0000030471497,5.688824e-7,0.0042182505,0.000005867673,0.000015987926,0.98480654,0.008940586,0.0018699567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011295618,0.00007612703,0.0004875862,0.00000410371,0.0000064157957,0.000002384981,0.006695956,0.00034302924,0.0000672782,0.9873335,0.004778542,0.000092137314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056057916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012076696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32924744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029778526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001102923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010899313","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00055-4","title":"Separable and additive representations of binary gambles of gains","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Separable space; Representation (politics); Differentiable function; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Binary number; Additive function; Rank (graph theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.2351220511006282,"score_gpt":0.4872952272806448,"score_spread":0.25217317618001656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010899313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94734293,0.000026843167,0.0001228192,0.00039318626,0.000030197572,0.00008087639,0.00004277644,0.00000943169,0.051950924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954395,0.000014485098,0.0037211757,0.000030628726,0.000021827656,0.000004241952,6.0015594e-7,0.0000026997827,0.0007648092],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817455,0.00009181284,0.00059231644,0.00027532727,0.00070648955,0.00015948196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977807,0.0017126091,0.00020941129,0.0001435465,0.00010221791,0.00005151217],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017693602,0.00007459131,0.00031851575,0.0001085202,0.00028169644,0.00008629388,0.00041379587,0.00005251915,0.0037459624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009850292,0.000050605708,0.00009308315,0.0006976809,0.0013214435,0.00025897176,0.00007252752,0.000047457113,0.00009436172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047310365,0.0006596436,0.0063911127,0.000019380657,0.000018290017,0.0000053579365,0.008777833,0.00023938823,0.0017036677,0.078947805,0.010260388,0.8929298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013709432,0.00013356935,0.01600592,0.000034905894,0.00001584227,0.000004035885,0.0041578067,0.0024769937,0.00072464405,0.9749628,0.0012340173,0.00011241423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046262758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010586512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009176621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005535428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010912066","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.003","title":"Group strategy-proofness and voting between two alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Voting; Mathematical economics; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Social choice theory; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14575210552786322,"score_gpt":0.3308931207024684,"score_spread":0.18514101517460518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010912066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450878,0.0002693976,0.005594172,0.00020035273,0.0001127009,0.00009783668,0.000009359388,0.000034328266,0.048594072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987774,0.0000010662001,0.0005276291,0.000026096513,0.0004984026,0.0000072391217,5.490788e-7,0.000006027128,0.00015559036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.000040883526,0.00032504607,0.00018768889,0.000059322272,0.00034330995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995004,0.00020148756,0.00017523518,0.00004494456,0.000006443714,0.00007147717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026355642,0.00009129614,0.00027218103,0.00004846132,0.00041822673,0.00014397489,0.0001867966,0.000042595366,0.00013412171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014793056,0.00008014994,0.00004316969,0.00017300886,0.0003655965,0.00034074133,0.00006307287,0.00007671624,0.00017984552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5800672e-7,0.000024011277,0.10882985,0.000025956566,0.0000073014794,9.054667e-8,0.0016212551,3.7609755e-7,0.000009305896,0.888336,0.000006157906,0.001139238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001859927,0.00004226386,0.072667025,0.00002681569,0.000005823221,0.000002305413,0.0010612218,0.0005122593,0.000046389345,0.92489356,0.00033581967,0.00022053707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038609156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018042002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05368962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001772789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032658822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32684198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025285228","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00057-8","title":"An algorithm for verifying double implementability in Nash and strong Nash equilibria","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Best response; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Risk dominance; Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.13085629405195495,"score_gpt":0.3499587090694357,"score_spread":0.21910241501748076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025285228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496448,0.00008633754,0.035546888,0.00045764082,0.00010258978,0.00031859596,0.000055462373,0.000021341795,0.013766354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895866,0.000011615157,0.010106968,0.000058378373,0.0001112795,0.000044655153,0.0000029686128,0.000007335095,0.0000701848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881756,0.000009758521,0.0004362294,0.00034690488,0.000030630064,0.00035891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964523,0.00008837097,0.00010902374,0.0000892245,0.000008189305,0.000059933074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016538695,0.000092463786,0.00029059104,0.000051900613,0.0002883855,0.00016921267,0.00020446791,0.000057721987,0.0003365642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027877342,0.00009475227,0.00005238317,0.00012984445,0.00025692288,0.00041482184,0.00006546921,0.00005199009,0.000013830641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074609507,0.00006533917,0.006925357,0.000016005928,0.0000044416183,2.1562208e-7,0.0010893849,0.0000052667033,0.000011419467,0.9830775,0.000018951876,0.008778653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006686445,0.0000878886,0.002194135,0.0000050865665,0.0000021870846,0.0000011908423,0.0014064607,0.05541757,0.00001923277,0.938452,0.0015757255,0.00016986807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018944757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093867246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055412304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007019281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001695704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38638857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025307914","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.01.008","title":"Single-plateaued choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Convexity; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Voting; Term (time); Independence (probability theory); Interval (graph theory); Mathematics; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Social choice theory; Economics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10565601980597178,"score_gpt":0.27020075092955526,"score_spread":0.16454473112358348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025307914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59477276,0.000051479463,0.0015698815,0.0015978675,0.00018848445,0.00016862444,0.000005495552,0.00007022075,0.40157518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674815,3.9978624e-7,0.0006598302,0.00018991478,0.0001793647,0.000020249046,4.9247865e-7,0.0000059588715,0.0021956675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907404,0.000021913433,0.00035093597,0.00021508042,0.000055440247,0.00028258166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995346,0.0001760938,0.00015131624,0.00007557414,0.000013457281,0.00004897932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008875184,0.00008118689,0.00023701794,0.00004931785,0.0003366743,0.0002140239,0.0002745977,0.000063821564,0.004334873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036400737,0.00007136413,0.00006933739,0.0002568633,0.0002969147,0.000229586,0.000038567647,0.000064348744,0.007149408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9299954e-7,0.000060451217,0.0026089053,0.000018099761,0.000005324633,1.5508121e-7,0.0007265123,8.360105e-7,0.00007234859,0.9950578,0.0008776786,0.0005715514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009430976,0.000041737396,0.004687503,0.000011287089,0.0000014976935,0.0000014839943,0.00023525853,0.00077866897,0.000057921894,0.984582,0.009357376,0.00015096241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008334482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076763245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40197533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020941943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047220506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033203612","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2005.07.001","title":"Agreement and stochastic independence of belief functions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Action (physics); Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Foundation (evidence); Common knowledge (logic); Belief revision; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.13975764654364783,"score_gpt":0.41723075277335114,"score_spread":0.27747310622970334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033203612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75095046,0.000058657763,0.1798861,0.0075600445,0.000052831423,0.00025258018,0.000013343737,0.000029690398,0.061196283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630815,6.4571134e-7,0.0022791508,0.00010026772,0.00006844577,0.00001525736,1.5051141e-7,0.0000016623586,0.0012262524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980181,0.00006958138,0.00038625937,0.0002513102,0.0011013927,0.00017335569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986104,0.00095509656,0.00014132827,0.0001330626,0.00009660501,0.00006354884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002895994,0.00006987314,0.0001742459,0.000075938224,0.0005411058,0.00010125758,0.00044818202,0.00004453461,0.0014357138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009896582,0.000046305166,0.000049272097,0.0006497351,0.001102298,0.00019266424,0.00012743902,0.00007148434,0.0004461098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036925067,0.00016172887,0.00019355743,0.000004324129,0.000004860983,9.9259275e-8,0.0022797468,0.00020370673,0.00062284054,0.9395968,0.00074196863,0.0561867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010083525,0.00005880101,0.0032027212,0.000009423076,0.000012028058,0.0000035959447,0.0030516963,0.0033776257,0.00017638023,0.98858386,0.0013285463,0.00009450049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004846716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014645405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2453577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011791757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003968029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089594468","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.03.002","title":"Size invariant measures of association: Characterization and difficulties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotonic function; Invariant (physics); Combinatorics; Row and column spaces; Discrete mathematics; Axiom; Association (psychology); Row; Mathematical analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.21697705825034277,"score_gpt":0.3810843418835992,"score_spread":0.1641072836332564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089594468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7617736,0.000023263286,0.21725142,0.0029264833,0.0001586358,0.00030645184,0.000034579793,0.00008016098,0.017445402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85683197,0.0000044494204,0.14252248,0.00008313954,0.00010836716,0.0000134678985,6.583372e-7,0.000006418551,0.00042905103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986331,0.00016381918,0.00030217375,0.00013620606,0.00059364527,0.00017109238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974305,0.0020947864,0.00020055965,0.000049979673,0.00015439121,0.00006975312],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019751915,0.00008436253,0.00027456973,0.00002029482,0.00014994327,0.000068878384,0.00012347088,0.00007405252,0.00009671658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01664449,0.00005876367,0.00002998007,0.00021049542,0.00031590404,0.000087711924,0.00005787803,0.000059454338,0.000006141072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004686954,0.000081984545,0.0012326165,0.000058557165,0.000011301321,3.7028863e-7,0.0029931539,6.768562e-8,0.001568881,0.98974925,0.00033274564,0.0039663725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017327772,0.00008002071,0.011074058,0.000031279662,0.000027379163,0.0000013146297,0.00086410146,0.00046972558,0.0006148033,0.9864176,0.00013878725,0.000107638225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008592692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021649155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09505835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037306356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052698906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091587857","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.11.001","title":"Statistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical inference; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Computer science; Majority rule; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical model; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1709722279674939,"score_gpt":0.34039747293678774,"score_spread":0.16942524496929384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091587857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8211612,0.00012680407,0.15578218,0.00030987337,0.00011592315,0.00019977737,0.000093045885,0.00002575911,0.022185449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903814,0.0000011543402,0.009365636,0.000014978546,0.00007297756,0.000012355329,0.0000026328637,0.0000036958108,0.00014517203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991836,0.000017341948,0.00044230395,0.0001445048,0.000055725737,0.0001565244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992565,0.00042736463,0.00022749923,0.000044809847,0.000019334157,0.000024495284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008838372,0.00005644916,0.00030854472,0.000042057905,0.00033063657,0.000020725873,0.00014465337,0.000046780107,0.00015246554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006077862,0.000051371968,0.00005904592,0.00011334943,0.00052209233,0.0000699964,0.000015574367,0.00003297091,0.00011113877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004148678,0.00007207242,0.0074718236,0.000050972878,0.0000049200116,7.46243e-8,0.0017056847,0.000003651115,0.000009511129,0.98998946,0.00029314402,0.0003945597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012974151,0.000093545656,0.0055477433,0.000014429985,0.000002881469,0.0000011277172,0.0003591342,0.0060374113,0.00025206574,0.9868509,0.00062165404,0.00008936974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001850339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014028001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16922021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013669827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010969823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25430226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111063239","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(99)00040-2","title":"Entry-deterring policy differentiation by electoral candidates","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Period (music); Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Physics","score_opus":0.039639559807926,"score_gpt":0.372542038194198,"score_spread":0.332902478386272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111063239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8424618,0.000035983325,0.00023936004,0.01015328,0.000069342575,0.00022684284,0.000008673763,0.00012825849,0.1466764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479526,0.000005519434,0.00005975777,0.0002828992,0.0006555198,0.000024121971,0.000003954964,0.000006363575,0.0041665807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997983,0.00023847898,0.00026703998,0.00021334298,0.0006289965,0.0006691386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995345,0.00015778896,0.00005924733,0.00005502481,0.000031108004,0.00016232817],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006021651,0.000109818095,0.00018349665,0.000043798074,0.0015540199,0.00029984338,0.00024584465,0.00010376654,0.0037093512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002325032,0.00009041223,0.0000708929,0.0006327992,0.0006108774,0.00027443605,0.000015419759,0.00008532215,0.00036537755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013892945,0.00025888777,0.017470805,0.000039667095,0.000020501579,9.114427e-7,0.01146311,0.000003283391,0.0012100566,0.9182425,0.014085614,0.037190765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026725,0.0003625103,0.017910978,0.00012782375,0.000077599536,0.0000017150611,0.0015188495,0.0026818921,0.00223268,0.8058605,0.16713992,0.0012828183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010149761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018273654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15305431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016743914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012852006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145230123","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.002","title":"Expected multi-utility representations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Subjective expected utility; Constructive; Mathematical economics; Utility theory; Von Neumann architecture; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.5449282112151731,"score_gpt":0.5456047661647843,"score_spread":0.0006765549496111634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145230123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372775,0.000030510735,0.014247752,0.0011082914,0.00044553785,0.00014793414,0.00001202325,0.000082266844,0.046648208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855073,5.4421736e-7,0.013566548,0.00013077963,0.00017749394,0.000014172362,7.3793865e-7,0.0000049670807,0.0005974716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970707,0.0002015065,0.0006679981,0.000393052,0.0011944388,0.00047224812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754906,0.0016633952,0.00020474957,0.00028957683,0.00012253346,0.00017071432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049407687,0.00012146727,0.0002927932,0.00012285155,0.0009790709,0.00046952,0.0008786733,0.000089387744,0.0044647446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055610402,0.00007989586,0.00017137725,0.0010659221,0.00080007577,0.00071355456,0.00021774913,0.000111716785,0.0022742404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019502613,0.002369085,0.13687336,0.000007760769,0.000017996372,0.000004176159,0.020078728,0.000013770521,0.00041921707,0.19841251,0.03152014,0.61026376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022146267,0.00003103133,0.084269606,0.000008331755,0.000017297481,0.000008242848,0.009295719,0.0033818015,0.00019166135,0.89503706,0.007246578,0.00029119113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028421495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014980162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6966246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003664483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049061913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160350653","doi":"10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00022-7","title":"On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Preference; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.52330821283842,"score_gpt":0.3133289289670274,"score_spread":0.20997928387139259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160350653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894726,0.00006232404,0.016600536,0.0008014194,0.0001401648,0.00023563136,0.0010685327,0.000034147764,0.086331286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977523,0.0000049218393,0.0014137613,0.00004769242,0.000027475211,0.0000057285924,0.0000053772874,0.0000041270505,0.0007386206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987981,0.00011461374,0.00048020188,0.0003219074,0.00010594499,0.00017926189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976149,0.0017230135,0.0002921929,0.00031555278,0.000022890814,0.000031440326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027798489,0.00008571172,0.00026361272,0.00003456357,0.0004240353,0.000076496595,0.0009862947,0.00007331364,0.0030916785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299917,0.000057233254,0.00003526135,0.0003533653,0.00047860912,0.00019184338,0.000128517,0.00012533982,0.0004239323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004808359,0.00006554028,0.004191506,0.000006779688,0.000010099027,1.1249173e-7,0.0007941029,0.000029957764,0.0000041032995,0.994215,0.00052506273,0.00015293217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070271264,0.00002440981,0.0060674027,0.000024554563,0.0000034675709,4.2345457e-7,0.00013936548,0.20799962,0.000009476724,0.7855517,0.000017921278,0.00009135508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032376507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016349186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20866327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019625788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001847198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166664207","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.10.002","title":"The zero discounting and maximin optimal paths in a simple model of global warming","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Economics; Discounting; Minimax; Exponential function; Global warming; Econometrics; Zero (linguistics); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Climate change; Ecology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.05136698368015062,"score_gpt":0.2767305326349314,"score_spread":0.22536354895478078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166664207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95623094,0.00017929291,0.020560628,0.0013278343,0.000024576495,0.0000883046,0.000022576032,0.000007188671,0.021558646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716246,0.00001728142,0.0026982296,0.00006486393,0.000019735191,0.000003480687,1.9032557e-7,0.0000021403623,0.00003159758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.0000067082874,0.00039609493,0.00017908461,0.000035200697,0.0002479356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967796,0.00007850073,0.00015108877,0.000060866947,0.000006019994,0.000025557263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010534972,0.000069662245,0.00022533526,0.00001702832,0.0002874879,0.00009517973,0.00019764055,0.000040067236,0.0000127706935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011289247,0.0000544181,0.000046009016,0.0001301717,0.0003266213,0.00015878015,0.00005690075,0.000046256984,0.000005143118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002839811,0.000021996226,0.0010449243,0.0000056053273,0.0000017924074,1.3988613e-7,0.0009010798,0.0003944722,0.0000044927356,0.9939127,0.000014672449,0.0036952905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008164098,0.000020302314,0.0007655884,0.0000048388524,0.0000010382751,4.5593237e-7,0.0004600255,0.17992523,0.0000048858014,0.8186349,0.000039697792,0.00006136057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005146856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019008834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17953077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004106362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001621649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22191057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485494518","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.08.003","title":"Inferring probability comparisons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Interpretation (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Intersection (aeronautics); Binary relation; Semantics (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Mathematics; Computer science; Measure (data warehouse); Probability measure; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.13503233844042034,"score_gpt":0.3585702472363137,"score_spread":0.22353790879589336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485494518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09365603,0.000027983668,0.3261303,0.005474995,0.0003659882,0.00024550752,7.4405e-7,0.00026186515,0.5738366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800804,6.777881e-7,0.031577405,0.000064562555,0.00012153037,0.00001321045,6.991692e-8,0.000002292871,0.00021223008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862194,0.00005493975,0.00019491586,0.00034689726,0.00039771016,0.00038360024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917084,0.00014692846,0.00014674068,0.00039686912,0.000050476698,0.000088166],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011692836,0.00010892997,0.00021808014,0.000023663752,0.0030220002,0.0011985204,0.0023593982,0.000060640457,0.000064824104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007855918,0.00007691907,0.000089790454,0.00014072431,0.001044356,0.00064499147,0.00073478423,0.000109316774,0.00022252242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3787163e-7,0.00008148508,0.004791501,0.000014812206,0.000002792124,0.0000011276153,0.0011645897,9.34889e-7,0.000018467748,0.9890923,0.00053202134,0.0042996258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012337885,0.000046200064,0.039639607,0.000019205949,0.0000047537305,0.0000033835029,0.000078422985,0.018994221,0.00017530927,0.93849367,0.0022206956,0.0002011598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033977085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034289355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.874352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000358716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008585353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584545229","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.004","title":"Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Per capita; Parliament; Representation (politics); Unitary state; German; Population; European union; Power (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Law; Sociology; International trade; Physics","score_opus":0.08968767137900256,"score_gpt":0.2712019785617748,"score_spread":0.18151430718277223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584545229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517121,0.000042951553,0.0001606775,0.00082828477,0.00007233398,0.00009050091,0.000005392132,0.0000041549256,0.04708364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995112,0.000002160548,0.00012601783,0.00009001741,0.000030639963,0.0000089151235,2.5262872e-7,0.0000026263456,0.00022821753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999207,0.000021692164,0.0002988825,0.0002033269,0.000049735085,0.0002193239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.00006691235,0.00014242988,0.000077760145,0.000004786773,0.00003539462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846778,0.000065756285,0.00023380866,0.000031366966,0.00044250785,0.00022335509,0.00021012563,0.00004744478,0.00014656993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117835596,0.000061121405,0.00001829087,0.000062525156,0.00034324187,0.00026384517,0.000054862998,0.00007703313,0.00001768545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024128083,0.000025695366,0.06676821,0.00003492396,0.0000021247392,0.0000033748456,0.002386643,0.000043147298,0.0000031713407,0.9304442,0.000032661093,0.00025343962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017776956,0.000011700494,0.14554195,0.000022097203,3.4143756e-7,0.0000018311562,0.0005760993,0.03393069,0.0000037126842,0.8195442,0.000071393166,0.00011820317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24717487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5630938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3159189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012572644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062990075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75783825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626118440","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2021.01.002","title":"On the optimality of small research tournaments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Tournament; Attractiveness; Mathematical optimization; Marginal cost; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.67073704658052,"score_gpt":0.5729856259180536,"score_spread":0.09775142066246645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626118440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7296604,0.0000124019525,0.012004333,0.022386601,0.00006546147,0.00014853785,0.000006337101,0.00001240677,0.23570354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591774,0.0000010455681,0.0012941293,0.0002385457,0.000055587025,0.000017500046,1.3488787e-7,0.0000018262596,0.0024735082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665946,0.000747591,0.0003672811,0.00025815243,0.0017593021,0.00020822056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925771,0.0066577974,0.000115550145,0.00025466518,0.00035066807,0.000044215714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01390095,0.00005058083,0.0001450849,0.000049855964,0.0013204621,0.00021828097,0.0008889144,0.000039545703,0.0040461468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00915704,0.000025670477,0.00009155169,0.0017777219,0.0016179995,0.00006713938,0.00019167502,0.0001573748,0.0005329439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022923773,0.00011040928,0.000053661883,0.000001429883,0.0000024257165,4.226365e-7,0.0006424574,0.000011813392,0.00025866044,0.9942316,0.0023131722,0.002371659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029499586,0.00002385896,0.00075826416,0.0000070003457,0.0000017004352,0.0000011551077,0.004919763,0.00034219006,0.0023632136,0.99006116,0.0014598416,0.00003233076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003834193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034947652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26625735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018873701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010475482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888256346","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2018.08.001","title":"Patent licensing in a Cournot oligopoly: General results","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Oligopoly; Monopoly; Innovator; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic surplus; Industrial organization; Welfare; Business; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.324698797398399,"score_gpt":0.3016501887840523,"score_spread":0.02304860861434671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888256346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71713895,0.000006285137,0.00016673631,0.00242127,0.00023107372,0.00012626286,7.111075e-7,0.000051473286,0.27985725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954649,7.523577e-7,0.00038409472,0.0020002292,0.0016505223,0.0000038138915,0.0000011568853,0.00000652589,0.00048795514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987493,0.000016293361,0.00028076663,0.00022601907,0.00035301162,0.0003745751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971354,0.000052306234,0.000087442764,0.000059062007,0.00007764832,0.0000099713525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009314848,0.00010473363,0.00015746009,0.00010374379,0.00061025884,0.00032584785,0.00025396337,0.000059200665,0.000493353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043005607,0.00007213472,0.000047911202,0.0006422243,0.00053102337,0.0003951449,0.00013059012,0.00008865489,0.0014461543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005427265,0.0011855914,0.0043262043,0.00035927433,0.00004484601,0.00005468722,0.015516307,0.000027437605,0.002927228,0.856434,0.054953195,0.06362853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028322956,0.0002685271,0.012673677,0.00056746375,0.00006963426,0.000010744724,0.00362458,0.31753778,0.0017309772,0.5871236,0.072004125,0.0015566001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005694559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018268787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31751037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002721934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021806836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907987048","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2019.06.003","title":"Optimal sharing rule for a household with a portfolio management problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Portfolio; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Risk aversion (psychology); Function (biology); Merton's portfolio problem; Investment strategy; Portfolio optimization; Complete market; Project portfolio management; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Replicating portfolio; Financial economics","score_opus":0.02951246298213482,"score_gpt":0.25426801287440304,"score_spread":0.2247555498922682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907987048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90507317,0.000008767289,0.0008816342,0.00035573757,0.000057890033,0.0008891257,0.0000019996244,0.00013400565,0.09259769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975039,9.154734e-7,0.02111697,0.0006281531,0.0004044185,0.00012928068,0.000009091976,0.000026714642,0.0026454306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815416,0.0000038710396,0.0003046093,0.00045574695,0.0006173356,0.0004642652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.000033861434,0.00020310283,0.00014035261,0.00007665141,0.00001402877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007690965,0.00018118025,0.00029701716,0.00017516149,0.0005309044,0.000581274,0.0004629447,0.00004771104,0.0005828755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023169148,0.00013024868,0.00012948086,0.00090223766,0.00015996033,0.0007887582,0.00024274924,0.000060836042,0.00027480783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050200015,0.00021472854,0.0835747,0.0007752366,0.000030580937,0.000006491396,0.00020699223,0.00025489,0.00005817208,0.91194266,0.0021631478,0.0007221944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004703665,0.00036164036,0.09418506,0.0012559814,0.0012730815,0.0000072471357,0.004482128,0.11785627,0.00014278984,0.7048215,0.06780112,0.0031094723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005462601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013648581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20712112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003286216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000146852335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6382078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105359897","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.10.007","title":"Superset-robust collective choice rules","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Transitive relation; Social choice theory; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Preference relation; Preference; Choice function; Property (philosophy); Robustness (evolution); Social preferences; Relation (database); Mathematics; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Epistemology; Data mining","score_opus":0.16765298733793008,"score_gpt":0.27900365248936265,"score_spread":0.11135066515143258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105359897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48205695,0.00014491695,0.006708045,0.00815145,0.00018627799,0.00025179717,0.000058397545,0.00011873722,0.50232345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974285,0.0000010986873,0.0009560089,0.0005814436,0.00030634308,0.000011678953,7.6693783e-7,0.000007076303,0.00070711673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.00003217786,0.00031986533,0.00028272904,0.00006614642,0.00025519135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995266,0.00021139719,0.00012204395,0.000050562827,0.0000132387695,0.0000761481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080472,0.00009141782,0.00029904567,0.000034827422,0.0004842826,0.00013473428,0.00030174956,0.000062491905,0.0011007093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007959979,0.000084738764,0.00008741956,0.00041454902,0.00035280036,0.00013883809,0.00005182405,0.00008756481,0.0020957133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023330886,0.00003265243,0.0025449628,0.00003248913,0.000010125743,5.6544263e-7,0.005612791,0.000009220247,0.0000126402465,0.99052507,0.0011506865,0.00006646161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029877303,0.00014176985,0.0040000235,0.000019236877,0.000006632942,0.0000017869877,0.0024641813,0.0066486658,0.000056325905,0.9752791,0.010751861,0.00033164036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030616564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024183394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5153715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004133022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022710277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121826381","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.11.002","title":"Weak undominance in scoring rule elections","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Bullet voting; Scoring rule; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Weighted voting; Mathematics; Political science; Machine learning; Law","score_opus":0.06647789912655191,"score_gpt":0.28902348318255816,"score_spread":0.22254558405600625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121826381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.606816,0.00020967792,0.002399273,0.0012332705,0.00013904201,0.00011252302,0.00000209766,0.000040021183,0.3890481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981931,0.000004682215,0.0006223061,0.00008040014,0.00010267304,0.0000075782914,1.3823676e-7,0.0000028146283,0.0009862959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.00001995015,0.0003409017,0.00020453751,0.000042956588,0.00026453094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971956,0.0000775241,0.00011113443,0.00006015614,0.000005769162,0.00002585675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013954064,0.00006707544,0.00023390548,0.00008856907,0.00026296263,0.000071696755,0.00019494774,0.00004728797,0.0001323598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023605909,0.00006619373,0.000054554464,0.00044645063,0.0001375696,0.00015193323,0.000014429013,0.00008364211,0.00043298316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014337613,0.000054842007,0.0013739509,0.0000063158445,0.0000010979891,3.6675544e-7,0.000706615,0.0000072949083,0.00003353614,0.99683595,0.00004036588,0.0009382137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278324,0.000034334204,0.015775407,0.000024047793,7.423163e-7,0.0000016836614,0.00024045311,0.0006480363,0.00004670498,0.98232704,0.0006735185,0.00010017353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027059643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008769369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39137712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050178194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009810602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5565267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135141455","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.002","title":"Proportional resource allocation in dynamic <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e23\" altimg=\"si2.svg\"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>-player Blotto games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HEC Montréal; Universiteit Maastricht; Durham University; King's College London","keywords":"CONTEST; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Battlefield; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Theology; History","score_opus":0.03575639619963152,"score_gpt":0.3183540602306411,"score_spread":0.2825976640310096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135141455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830656,0.00007034745,0.000045468867,0.0031185898,0.00025818447,0.00012659104,0.000023900517,0.00016065403,0.013130686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977992,0.000056467612,0.0009722047,0.00024735168,0.00026814014,0.00027852663,0.000036483623,0.000031940883,0.00030969578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705786,0.000111916204,0.00058467477,0.0005318114,0.000990469,0.00072328525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989426,0.00036870805,0.00031667898,0.00018521829,0.000040301227,0.00014648563],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018658158,0.00020955077,0.0002245028,0.000110873836,0.0016581086,0.0003501705,0.0006120958,0.00027386748,0.000114259215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004938954,0.00022191682,0.00019643831,0.0006924486,0.0018556683,0.00046920235,0.00037717668,0.00024128532,0.0011498767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016642138,0.00014240592,0.00014141816,0.000045647594,0.00002189226,0.000015940856,0.01106565,0.000051858373,0.00048448268,0.98696357,0.00033915692,0.00071133696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009651232,0.00060006295,0.0042932983,0.00047437387,0.00019271302,0.00002932615,0.09826462,0.78860635,0.002212231,0.095839724,0.0070913415,0.0014308363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087660237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016824631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89112383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009364249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032927972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315490316","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.01.001","title":"Can a negative population growth rate sustain a positive economic growth rate in the long run?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Population growth; Endogenous growth theory; Human capital; Per capita; Population; Growth rate; Investment (military); Capital deepening; Per capita income; Capital accumulation; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Capital formation; Economic growth; Demography; Financial capital; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04005157796497166,"score_gpt":0.26623831393809905,"score_spread":0.22618673597312738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315490316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95914465,0.000022394534,0.00017012705,0.021008346,0.00016089536,0.0004133468,0.000076644756,0.00004471916,0.018958874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991503,0.000010725608,0.000055874178,0.00030659256,0.00023355326,0.000060265782,0.00001172484,0.000011018384,0.00015995598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.00018091591,0.0005274845,0.00049611094,0.00005118308,0.0005129759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889016,0.00065346353,0.0002675431,0.00011607516,0.000019532705,0.000053242646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004888179,0.00016449792,0.00038874883,0.00022855646,0.00057170214,0.00025879333,0.0004312074,0.00008460965,0.00016880596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078114006,0.00014091388,0.000109385954,0.00080854795,0.00034850495,0.00041116454,0.00008467842,0.0001710677,0.0006382629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000775664,0.000030380037,0.07348405,0.000028011384,0.000011765809,0.000004261879,0.0054802517,0.00002014252,0.0000021795079,0.92058074,0.00019851912,0.0001519524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001447256,0.000025933175,0.37678683,0.0000058024125,0.000002616064,7.8630063e-7,0.0008086618,0.0018038456,0.000022336611,0.62025833,0.000008322592,0.00013184467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025378047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091402826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30330276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002265472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004986066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82037914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385376359","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.006","title":"When is frugality optimal?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Frugality; Product (mathematics); Time horizon; Consumption (sociology); Decision maker; Mathematical optimization; Path (computing); Instant; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Operations research; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12841629108476346,"score_gpt":0.29865309509528104,"score_spread":0.17023680401051758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385376359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6392035,0.0000835561,0.0074994625,0.014730022,0.0003039822,0.00017962862,0.00009255506,0.00018475461,0.33772254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924438,0.000013639953,0.0022151049,0.0006698285,0.00018055816,0.000022512344,0.0000019809627,0.000010087113,0.004442509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894136,0.000008750518,0.00036214275,0.00030309756,0.00004638761,0.00033826163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963075,0.00008258747,0.00011749723,0.000110169596,0.0000063433254,0.000052659194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013351435,0.000086494765,0.00026795742,0.00006741187,0.00040808745,0.00013804826,0.00032947114,0.00006708397,0.0026323674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010111696,0.00008314575,0.00011007127,0.000275311,0.00034893746,0.00018298364,0.00010899769,0.00006107654,0.005440098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.72572e-7,0.000017284468,0.00059176364,0.00001034624,0.0000073428228,4.1906176e-7,0.003788064,0.0000054508837,0.0000018149925,0.9864965,0.0086567765,0.000423374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072744166,0.000015369034,0.0005118857,0.0000028559054,0.000001478925,3.8424074e-7,0.00046513753,0.005950979,0.000021083486,0.9714732,0.021362547,0.00012229683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007327529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027691872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35324028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003517531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001352723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389505461","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.12.001","title":"Relational utility and social norms in games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Social dilemma; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.18194833104617708,"score_gpt":0.4092279424954562,"score_spread":0.2272796114492791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389505461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899662,0.000023347058,0.00000904401,0.009027941,0.00007619891,0.00015732058,0.0000052456376,0.0000878973,0.10064679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894625,0.00001345011,0.0003035215,0.00009431021,0.000114576134,0.00002962457,0.000001354542,0.00000395646,0.00049292785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867934,0.00009529488,0.00022580627,0.00024221504,0.00037403204,0.00038332824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999621,0.00023626944,0.000054108357,0.000029043988,0.000018656496,0.000040929663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016293945,0.00008379134,0.00018932146,0.00007616333,0.0017469646,0.000102884966,0.00017302383,0.00008740019,0.0002578083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016898917,0.000075157535,0.00004822662,0.0005757503,0.0023293043,0.00025890354,0.00013971658,0.00009159453,0.00014805126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032442613,0.00005944551,0.045224845,0.000010529431,0.0000034118361,0.0000017624192,0.06537351,3.5156626e-7,0.000045306326,0.8854717,0.0007970926,0.003008805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029117777,0.000032526117,0.27037147,0.000014024912,0.000008242724,4.2886256e-7,0.082994506,0.00043561743,0.000036214293,0.64063084,0.0048722276,0.0003127659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046227837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007727522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24484089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009536902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000735602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392505032","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.02.005","title":"The core in an N-firm dynamic Cournot oligopoly","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Oligopoly; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Industrial organization; Computer science","score_opus":0.06944367946040358,"score_gpt":0.32177016032705447,"score_spread":0.2523264808666509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392505032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78668076,0.0031724796,0.0060458453,0.010641425,0.0005630181,0.00016509081,0.000028252756,0.000108684435,0.19259444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986989,0.00004430935,0.0001503797,0.00012812184,0.000052110496,0.000012324612,0.0000010061528,0.0000042367265,0.00090861705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920535,0.000010147806,0.00030467665,0.00020570624,0.00007096863,0.00020313312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972653,0.000112148795,0.000042261625,0.00007647308,0.000007040741,0.000035566114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010525433,0.0000611403,0.0001558021,0.000084805906,0.0003836604,0.00031452128,0.0002827026,0.000035267625,0.0010508675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058147376,0.000043861404,0.000081635815,0.0006103795,0.00029128473,0.00012745046,0.000028232022,0.000084620566,0.00070028665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.236616e-7,0.00002524604,0.0006662705,0.0000084504345,0.0000049204837,0.0000013657099,0.00064657594,0.00000361615,0.0000045215334,0.99732345,0.00018755141,0.0011274985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002937738,0.000017623744,0.0022259303,0.000009467973,0.0000024801402,7.382501e-7,0.0005269083,0.08526649,0.0000016368908,0.90712684,0.0047123213,0.00008018025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039284703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017756484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21201812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046027293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001836078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401630317","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.08.005","title":"Some further results on random OBIC rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07150923516328772,"score_gpt":0.2876934689098715,"score_spread":0.2161842337465838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401630317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51665044,0.0016343639,0.0012571253,0.009311875,0.0013997785,0.000324578,0.00012794555,0.00029303168,0.46900085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960692,0.000008130527,0.00016193543,0.00015223512,0.0006026934,0.000013528186,0.0000011439149,0.000009224169,0.002981901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988762,0.000037412778,0.00042365806,0.00032295962,0.0000800039,0.00025976993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.00042363597,0.00008505165,0.00008914191,0.00000546733,0.000039052375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708744,0.000100624726,0.00027445186,0.000095299714,0.00026947126,0.00028888218,0.00024532925,0.00007081559,0.00033766872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033564653,0.00007895885,0.00012374697,0.00024036286,0.00029317106,0.00015973859,0.000029181552,0.0001017205,0.0066500003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011122332,0.0000321751,0.000018591052,0.00004190445,0.000010773436,0.0000019697013,0.002316814,0.000003347878,0.000008639513,0.99618757,0.0008621542,0.0005049494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022722722,0.00005445962,0.00014913181,0.00006672434,0.0000027951116,0.0000014637145,0.00023242705,0.0015371054,0.000029487317,0.98815465,0.009417663,0.00012683825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015018871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.001248e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47941875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035100133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012915483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236827","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102415","title":"On weighted-egalitarian values for cooperative games with transferable utility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Game theory","score_opus":0.05455303857679177,"score_gpt":0.29429639156703175,"score_spread":0.23974335299023997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3904631,0.00012683075,0.12234858,0.004170759,0.00023453328,0.00071242836,0.00008471586,0.00007928297,0.48177975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995716,0.0000010187363,0.0009846749,0.00023590661,0.00004474483,0.000059933802,0.0000011474833,0.000004493147,0.0029521107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903244,0.00004106869,0.0003160849,0.00030796893,0.000052592368,0.00024983578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935675,0.0004332058,0.0000663039,0.000086828855,0.00002815339,0.000028735725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017203304,0.00010628794,0.00034022782,0.000065745204,0.00065080007,0.00013037864,0.00021780387,0.00006280551,0.00027469176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002223368,0.000079598736,0.00007825423,0.00033226245,0.0004374231,0.000107986234,0.000011237845,0.000070050904,0.00006698383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002510819,0.00009112417,0.00033744727,0.00006053039,0.000021289074,1.327644e-7,0.0015004757,0.000004994668,0.000002436523,0.9972767,0.000447665,0.00023206898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027992067,0.00017695931,0.00044351438,0.000053699972,0.000006325434,2.3996202e-7,0.0007057142,0.0030583832,0.00015623604,0.99299955,0.0020024746,0.00011695934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003246877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011325748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60525286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032060823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003278011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5005494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410487845","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102420","title":"Condorcet efficiency: Weighted Bucklin vs. weighted scoring and Borda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Voting; Political science","score_opus":0.033509841781106386,"score_gpt":0.2733664417933629,"score_spread":0.2398566000122565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410487845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7900607,0.00039495857,0.006298476,0.0017686766,0.00026028068,0.00019791088,0.000009045534,0.0000808847,0.20092906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744576,0.00000761237,0.00057394634,0.00026526637,0.000080994876,0.000014130698,6.590482e-7,0.000005497321,0.0016061156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986864,0.000041582676,0.0004887757,0.00037343174,0.00007160726,0.0003382352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994021,0.0002617497,0.00016233072,0.000105119754,0.00001813185,0.000050569186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019729512,0.00012572312,0.00040755374,0.00014612399,0.000644709,0.00020669478,0.00030286206,0.000092270915,0.00025689782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024799586,0.00011258355,0.00006613697,0.0006524127,0.0005802812,0.0001264748,0.000094247094,0.00011207375,0.0001974094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040984937,0.000043742944,0.0054130442,0.00006597404,0.000010746927,6.7006033e-7,0.0006515068,4.929987e-7,0.000022258306,0.99329644,0.00019162205,0.00029938284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031718466,0.00003877897,0.0032356482,0.00007656321,0.0000073318174,0.0000016655248,0.0003495172,0.008323932,0.00014898715,0.9839412,0.0033622503,0.00019697243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004326451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027580702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20738508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003661476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025836482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49586454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414871809","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102469","title":"Note on intertemporal preference with loss aversion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Monotonic function; Preference; Monotone polygon; Extension (predicate logic); Loss aversion; Intertemporal choice; Time preference","score_opus":0.2307279006708502,"score_gpt":0.45048028913524263,"score_spread":0.21975238846439243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414871809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468238,0.0000039195465,0.011435938,0.004148853,0.00023023027,0.00014475682,0.0000061273026,0.000050277362,0.1371561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952786,6.9620967e-7,0.0022489629,0.0005428239,0.000039525657,0.0000071145387,4.152023e-7,0.0000037335758,0.0018781348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740225,0.000102224745,0.00048160387,0.00055325025,0.0011590726,0.0003015909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797976,0.0014074879,0.00016974327,0.00025683336,0.0001167939,0.000069370864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022792632,0.00015142978,0.0003333314,0.00021257317,0.00069477386,0.0006135226,0.0011891825,0.0000952447,0.0006006139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001115146,0.000084014624,0.000105990504,0.0011110897,0.00087032054,0.00028055185,0.00021724933,0.0001576531,0.0009453761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001738552,0.0005183491,0.0055022174,0.000013831241,0.000010941905,0.000020418849,0.0020163516,0.000074233234,0.0000770133,0.27231538,0.018315151,0.70096225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002393746,0.00024631867,0.0022616338,0.00011849903,0.000011607626,0.0000028092013,0.0009705904,0.002397636,0.00024805407,0.98725414,0.0060669505,0.00018239995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016677759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030476702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71493876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007417843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014083432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}