{"meta":{"query_hash":"486508743cfa","filters":{"venue":"McGill Law Journal"},"cohort_total":426,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":426,"exported":426,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/486508743cfa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=McGill+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W104569882","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism & Private Copying","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Federalism; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02829671862949457,"score_gpt":0.2777541835690936,"score_spread":0.24945746493959903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104569882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056454513,0.007371207,0.005905525,0.06702359,0.0004958887,0.000038742048,0.00016366452,0.000054237586,0.8624927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91172445,0.0023601071,0.001210647,0.0071282145,0.0011565755,0.00007663882,0.000042614127,0.000035294874,0.07626555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974952,0.0008922198,0.00008962591,0.0003877582,0.0005343977,0.0006008159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932841,0.004967819,0.00043739434,0.0007384314,0.00034301318,0.00022918098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00396684,0.00028303073,0.00051241566,0.0012971046,0.0076322933,0.010398148,0.00087635696,0.011838899,0.016955415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012666344,0.0004880434,0.00055985874,0.0016283758,0.021954013,0.008780707,0.002077997,0.006190185,0.0008187076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075022217,0.000010211129,0.00011533274,0.0000054411594,0.0000019798235,0.000015736352,0.00021272904,0.000055603025,0.000021647596,0.99552095,0.0026428683,0.0013899531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025330033,0.000015264859,0.0010033731,0.000045113484,0.000012581176,0.000041088086,0.00038536856,0.00035136563,0.00013286274,0.9665354,0.03143757,0.000014738821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031408988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048345514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96859103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059671244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049583265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062452376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496343264","doi":"10.7202/1002371ar","title":"Qu’est ce que l’interculturalisme ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03998965420852022,"score_gpt":0.23587534484845057,"score_spread":0.19588569063993036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496343264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062315498,0.045433804,0.019968297,0.35605973,0.004057688,0.00006499565,0.00021423124,0.00011656796,0.51176924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8661219,0.017287072,0.003893935,0.030554993,0.0010244838,0.00008961962,0.0001017304,0.00014613483,0.08078014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938246,0.0027013132,0.00012078537,0.00078367925,0.0009814422,0.0015881276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.0011268804,0.00034157195,0.00048252303,0.0012862963,0.0007331429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050371243,0.0007492361,0.000790463,0.0015416258,0.011802944,0.013353076,0.001700329,0.0035784729,0.010519026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053262273,0.000323091,0.000769109,0.0020925198,0.031949002,0.010023781,0.006596283,0.007000934,0.001457052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003897557,0.000030577805,0.003439643,0.00022771039,0.000042393567,0.00028481096,0.053175077,0.00020514458,0.00039281952,0.89798486,0.016793774,0.027384121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017343289,0.00003256786,0.0077545205,0.0011103441,0.000038358474,0.0002669668,0.07131543,0.00039827946,0.00058191165,0.19339734,0.72501457,0.00007232271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35027736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3694594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64972264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023603112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022674825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69647706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501713685","doi":"10.7202/1007822ar","title":"Ronald Niezen, Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp 254. ISBN 978-0-52-176704-0","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04281848983061244,"score_gpt":0.26158348505680673,"score_spread":0.2187649952261943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501713685","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021681625,0.91597307,0.0011814561,0.028117254,0.002232926,0.000024774194,0.00035825948,0.00012322071,0.05177217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011670667,0.83440316,0.0041189254,0.007179352,0.0025178327,0.00016402666,0.00049123156,0.00029013635,0.13916464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972543,0.0010343179,0.00025434245,0.00032601086,0.00094434107,0.00018667513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978923,0.001256498,0.00024031513,0.00012689467,0.00033075394,0.00015336637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031226554,0.0019712257,0.001081246,0.0049170903,0.0021272972,0.006494964,0.002346368,0.0045842556,0.05447205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005364283,0.0014656348,0.00073392456,0.0053445003,0.0045907293,0.016559893,0.0025333348,0.004114167,0.025137233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045682275,0.000027741753,0.0002069372,0.0009862304,0.00002182906,0.00008715236,0.0016791178,0.00015808396,0.00014185334,0.055806156,0.8512935,0.08954573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007509225,0.000005043215,0.0007555901,0.0009428861,0.000009048211,0.00011575835,0.0007293394,0.000050735078,0.00009411302,0.022796914,0.9744682,0.000024961524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038205832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08587887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05447205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006615321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054502334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1822272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513570606","doi":"10.7202/1009070ar","title":"Karounga Diawara, Le contrôle de la puissance de marché : contribution à une approche juridique du marché, Cowansville (Qc), Yvon Blais, 2011, pp 512. ISBN 978-2-89635-516-7","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015990480374547106,"score_gpt":0.23685897974025039,"score_spread":0.22086849936570327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513570606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001233026,0.4202162,0.0044798865,0.31347728,0.007137876,0.00010861681,0.0003018,0.00013392894,0.25291142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09209867,0.46540862,0.0060371305,0.07171025,0.0049856724,0.0002897839,0.00031347247,0.00025367358,0.35890266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939028,0.0018424809,0.00027555166,0.00087134034,0.002452134,0.0006557187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382246,0.0031470181,0.00036389605,0.0002516845,0.0020352188,0.0003796054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004905427,0.0011413688,0.0007087897,0.0019675659,0.0074958517,0.009477155,0.0034703873,0.009745023,0.029664785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831663,0.0010233124,0.0006530455,0.0026687675,0.0075342515,0.010362458,0.0039872415,0.011697607,0.0066786543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000268068,0.000021101083,0.0003732033,0.0004519448,0.000013658579,0.00019402824,0.005089376,0.00027833862,0.00010886937,0.2675848,0.685004,0.040853854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008334678,0.000006787868,0.00092700357,0.0007669718,0.000013568067,0.00011435122,0.0019984208,0.0001027313,0.00010552456,0.027700776,0.9682058,0.00004974811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23647398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.321374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23647398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025374843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024932347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4701951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516890318","doi":"10.7202/1018395ar","title":"Hugo Cyr, Canadian Federalism and Treaty Powers: Organic Constitutionalism at Work, New York, PIE Peter Lang, 2009","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitutionalism; Treaty; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.035875792759122845,"score_gpt":0.26131932136063124,"score_spread":0.2254435286015084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516890318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021320123,0.36795607,0.002061579,0.2228838,0.0039057436,0.00007269869,0.0017757132,0.0001425755,0.3990698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18506426,0.28790584,0.005655878,0.0828093,0.0053812633,0.00028299383,0.0014183683,0.00044006598,0.43104216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996951,0.00049601146,0.00011117918,0.00026814317,0.0015343284,0.00063942483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761367,0.0008664255,0.00018835696,0.00012534327,0.0009599543,0.0002462455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022577422,0.0010156953,0.0006061756,0.003077426,0.013342939,0.00855433,0.0022904626,0.0075859376,0.029235762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005890695,0.0007502607,0.0005842814,0.007985732,0.012366633,0.008778909,0.0022245466,0.006770633,0.0045894375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001896709,0.000013587835,0.00041951687,0.00011296378,0.00000711825,0.00008774978,0.0023026674,0.000106746214,0.00007719058,0.29184148,0.6893607,0.015651375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014211664,0.0000048928737,0.0041170516,0.00043684096,0.000012507876,0.000056582387,0.0022015867,0.000088628796,0.00012593316,0.05051032,0.9423833,0.00004820135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9712918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94851524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05148477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055423915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37354988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525411563","doi":"10.7202/1005138ar","title":"Rafael Domingo, The New Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039053652070085564,"score_gpt":0.2564224902538364,"score_spread":0.21736883818375083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525411563","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080366764,0.64466596,0.001073425,0.18685068,0.0027343768,0.000022180286,0.0005033139,0.00011939246,0.16322698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073680244,0.48248503,0.0034911667,0.082759365,0.007916039,0.00027688753,0.00079089275,0.0003430608,0.3482573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983198,0.00049951987,0.00007566186,0.00026319883,0.0006043049,0.00023743657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899,0.00044385277,0.00014408065,0.00008409674,0.000250285,0.00008761046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019420617,0.001467131,0.0005830642,0.0029165028,0.0047123805,0.006475234,0.0017443466,0.006779213,0.02572525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036042484,0.00077930704,0.00067421334,0.003130583,0.0063476046,0.011908607,0.0024903563,0.005760512,0.011587768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636175,0.00001743875,0.00021621819,0.00018879022,0.00001205622,0.00009515347,0.0012277049,0.00011903774,0.00006838976,0.18617243,0.7893152,0.022541119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001237023,0.0000044174603,0.0013129778,0.0004239581,0.000006705979,0.000111448935,0.0005605207,0.000045646997,0.00007932111,0.055447023,0.9419743,0.00002120771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08966045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18312462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08966045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008171302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006019943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1782772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536473971","doi":"10.7202/1018390ar","title":"Constitutionnalité de dispositions conférant un statut, des privilèges et des droits à une langue minoritaire : le cas singulier du Nunavut et de sa Loi sur la protection de la langue inuit","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028459424082415766,"score_gpt":0.35840496566835484,"score_spread":0.3299455415859391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536473971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4396205,0.002558729,0.006665229,0.015121224,0.00026590016,0.00016407309,0.0006753602,0.00006863708,0.5348604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545621,0.00046233195,0.0010078728,0.0006016682,0.000022476255,0.00006928768,0.000121857454,0.000023556015,0.04312884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693644,0.00075156696,0.00010211201,0.0004729528,0.0006723806,0.0010645371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971449,0.00060500856,0.0002233069,0.00021475379,0.0011024225,0.0007096293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027349554,0.00021269379,0.0002532394,0.0009680414,0.01058525,0.006083978,0.0011534052,0.0012496052,0.01029238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005947843,0.00032884342,0.00030155646,0.00089458673,0.008965659,0.0019654648,0.0032617548,0.0023878943,0.00046326107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007178907,0.00003399332,0.021094378,0.000070223585,0.000018394052,0.0003692843,0.07346147,0.0004305609,0.0009446738,0.87339276,0.0074759787,0.022636475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076964956,0.00015758217,0.17455506,0.0009495077,0.00011277301,0.00053102535,0.12757778,0.0020953035,0.0014605864,0.10288822,0.5893579,0.00023736221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87355417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93534654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12644583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03642239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046565775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26426417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541653799","doi":"10.7202/045092ar","title":"D. Rhidian Thomas, ed., Legal Issues Relating to Time Charterparties (London, U.K.: Informa, 2008), pp. xi, 378","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012308847779432702,"score_gpt":0.2825213018514214,"score_spread":0.2702124540719887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541653799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037172888,0.8379686,0.0013713354,0.065298595,0.004300615,0.000027166068,0.0006317324,0.00009235586,0.08993786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007790334,0.849766,0.0018463378,0.0110445395,0.003023096,0.000054191012,0.0006028343,0.00015996446,0.12571275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980908,0.0005339228,0.00015531106,0.00022635331,0.00081857515,0.00017504928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689,0.0019062463,0.00036043546,0.00008846993,0.00056043325,0.00019444175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020137872,0.0014385285,0.0008172083,0.0046500578,0.0027549567,0.006187062,0.0015873195,0.005026167,0.050497044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054249545,0.0010284132,0.00068217743,0.007118398,0.0033695323,0.013979694,0.0018924933,0.0041357744,0.026914533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001517997,0.0000079203655,0.00023087773,0.0004174576,0.0000058592636,0.0000669453,0.00080421485,0.00009237104,0.00004494229,0.018962221,0.9257045,0.053647544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037708242,0.0000050629656,0.0009917922,0.0012238481,0.000006652972,0.00023896994,0.0009214791,0.000063138206,0.000068105845,0.011255371,0.9852024,0.00001940707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045532912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092476025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050497044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006008683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073462403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16892946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575274493","doi":"","title":"« Qui dit contractuel, dit juste. » (Fouillée) …en trois petits bonds, à reculons","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02473961729008749,"score_gpt":0.2857636367444556,"score_spread":0.2610240194543681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575274493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0149119105,0.013327962,0.026393302,0.19437423,0.0072372216,0.000103114166,0.00033413948,0.000218962,0.74309903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47470862,0.004988115,0.011019,0.043364335,0.0021349872,0.00024430832,0.00013974032,0.0003613285,0.46303964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956409,0.0019901518,0.00015693007,0.00064166874,0.0011533663,0.00041713423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975872,0.0008415303,0.0002957332,0.00035973426,0.00072122586,0.00019447607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039948216,0.00044072093,0.00029527507,0.0010160378,0.0076559996,0.007794412,0.0010203049,0.0043471428,0.010635699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010259238,0.0004257121,0.00038802912,0.0010346496,0.0153336665,0.0084680375,0.0033870765,0.0065128137,0.0032843517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115943885,0.000005187844,0.0002518631,0.000033540233,0.0000043198156,0.00007666329,0.012834249,0.000024671675,0.00014531774,0.93720555,0.041287646,0.0081194965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056097024,0.000011206707,0.000640672,0.00015856308,0.000005758319,0.00024500786,0.0051728166,0.00011505913,0.00039618454,0.09573274,0.89749527,0.00002119239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03030364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049222097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03030364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005047394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046020234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060254455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591040560","doi":"10.7202/1007820ar","title":"John Mark Keyes, Executive Legislation, 2d ed (Markham: LexisNexis, 2010), pp 611. ISBN 978-0-43-346025-1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06860858094544267,"score_gpt":0.3305393646357795,"score_spread":0.26193078369033684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591040560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056919793,0.57067704,0.0017095534,0.05176078,0.006694803,0.000104007166,0.002099249,0.0006245634,0.36576074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034833695,0.23039632,0.0013522144,0.00822711,0.0018867382,0.00015027054,0.0010534053,0.0003002971,0.7531503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987955,0.00020566273,0.00014970032,0.00020012353,0.0005480878,0.00010097942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.00061352487,0.00020477008,0.000058839913,0.0003085756,0.00010267668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012355843,0.0017937082,0.00092711067,0.0043786806,0.0017236237,0.005099465,0.001528689,0.0047382102,0.22794951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038267097,0.0013004185,0.000439639,0.0048352643,0.0012923595,0.010192771,0.0018468122,0.0028045545,0.18426523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011623866,0.0000081415865,0.000071952694,0.0002943762,0.0000028803372,0.00003252823,0.00019152027,0.00003539699,0.000084237545,0.005165742,0.9526315,0.041470148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036327417,0.000003806449,0.0003270277,0.0005299481,0.000002640334,0.00006782194,0.00020452168,0.00002469581,0.00006381789,0.002106302,0.9966576,0.000008133336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022134004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056521248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22794951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037233233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035285722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826707174","doi":"10.7202/1032675ar","title":"Propriété intellectuelle, Cour suprême du Canada et droit civil","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04597333529863941,"score_gpt":0.2884160321260291,"score_spread":0.24244269682738973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826707174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042678274,0.0057000592,0.003322945,0.021015273,0.00033162744,0.00003219169,0.00027107872,0.000054309567,0.9265944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83138883,0.0039053888,0.001554536,0.003781244,0.00020607859,0.000042360967,0.00016092515,0.00007287301,0.15888773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518013,0.0007338518,0.000091590955,0.0005106702,0.0021567212,0.0013269742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973195,0.00065206224,0.00023230002,0.00016589864,0.0010746296,0.00055552606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847492,0.000468239,0.00039333742,0.0021876884,0.019440603,0.015445638,0.0010803909,0.0023613113,0.012755445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004279873,0.0002769064,0.00038681753,0.003453975,0.02825608,0.003807206,0.004643241,0.00456187,0.0007647977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009383309,0.0000050553253,0.0013439361,0.00002610064,0.000005936315,0.000096156204,0.007077522,0.00012603216,0.00008573967,0.97645694,0.0066753053,0.008091969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001732731,0.000024724119,0.024287988,0.00052013865,0.00003188661,0.00023618496,0.024953242,0.00062857184,0.00054157706,0.18000494,0.7686357,0.00011769912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8991708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9387506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06839606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07122446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4962505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829280546","doi":"10.7202/1032678ar","title":"Challenges to Assessing Same-Sex Relationships under Refugee Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Refugee law; Credibility; Identity (music); Cherokee; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.14159385034804242,"score_gpt":0.3402310838880431,"score_spread":0.19863723354000065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1829280546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62871516,0.016657323,0.012568959,0.18152189,0.0017943515,0.002020534,0.0017617261,0.0001174834,0.15484256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580839,0.00574227,0.009046606,0.012365219,0.000107271735,0.00030087685,0.0002703063,0.000041037252,0.014042544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96582776,0.00817802,0.002947187,0.0022548882,0.016256144,0.0045359693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92815864,0.024103034,0.004458151,0.0026600063,0.03520811,0.0054120137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411772,0.00039695855,0.00076830393,0.0048346696,0.028114997,0.010733888,0.006281479,0.0034535977,0.003919527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09930847,0.000835534,0.00063359266,0.0051046913,0.009096463,0.0034036136,0.00930373,0.006241679,0.00033931134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027745313,0.00019744088,0.13483778,0.0019838507,0.00021080223,0.010533762,0.43643498,0.0014613087,0.0030828302,0.10582206,0.041270517,0.2638872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056669614,0.00016663753,0.17025241,0.005515554,0.00020554216,0.0024921806,0.54340875,0.0030295579,0.0035563968,0.023814755,0.24712953,0.00037200496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98665327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11595962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11595962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29304945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843977442","doi":"10.7202/1032676ar","title":"Private International Law Implications in Conflicts of Interest for Lawyers Licensed in Multiple Countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Political science; Private law; Face (sociological concept); Subject (documents); Common law; Comparative law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.23781578822940264,"score_gpt":0.4188271401048644,"score_spread":0.18101135187546175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843977442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06228062,0.0045513273,0.013740386,0.40079457,0.001470209,0.0001209396,0.00006303177,0.00003791384,0.51694095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291682,0.002040475,0.0040219817,0.047164813,0.00080079015,0.00013540297,0.000041709016,0.000052339274,0.01657423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96672744,0.019630644,0.0012802654,0.002906406,0.0040483004,0.0054069976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9397897,0.040932268,0.005858083,0.002867998,0.005638186,0.004913724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025823906,0.00037395352,0.0005424863,0.00166071,0.018121539,0.018166179,0.0021374077,0.0130585255,0.013186852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08298632,0.00068114547,0.000845751,0.0021951955,0.04369343,0.019336127,0.013171441,0.015079964,0.0007856584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008978086,0.00004307862,0.0016035666,0.000026048245,0.000006950071,0.00055505737,0.0136254355,0.00019625144,0.0000689257,0.9682816,0.007955498,0.0076285754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039059694,0.000054418007,0.0046876,0.00095239223,0.000042547148,0.0014435987,0.06956931,0.00074352836,0.0004719524,0.76354945,0.1583724,0.00007367912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018120492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028734798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025823906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011405623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021000993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13657153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849736915","doi":"10.7202/1032679ar","title":"Bedford and the Structure of Section 7","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Section (typography); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Individualism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019719682270426406,"score_gpt":0.2825392223551058,"score_spread":0.2628195400846794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849736915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036713056,0.0018388038,0.003240348,0.02899711,0.0008500171,0.00008038254,0.00018467726,0.00010213117,0.9279935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5470825,0.0010317343,0.0036776604,0.043309316,0.00054916047,0.0002036784,0.0002970002,0.000116036244,0.40373296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925655,0.0012064674,0.0002067037,0.0009752452,0.0022402871,0.002805681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957638,0.0011661568,0.0002976188,0.00036388382,0.0018192924,0.00058929255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037681926,0.00030861096,0.00028779998,0.0012562625,0.0124089215,0.007793475,0.001990313,0.007499926,0.017917462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008158301,0.00075336004,0.00048476868,0.0009459818,0.010691044,0.0030240745,0.0036350111,0.0073274556,0.0019517981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010365355,0.000009751764,0.00050219806,0.000008952998,0.0000023489226,0.00006444081,0.0010840921,0.000052384014,0.00010477497,0.9791124,0.015633969,0.003414354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000469659,0.000073635056,0.008228329,0.0003409824,0.000026018442,0.0001677174,0.0023266221,0.00047352613,0.0009411212,0.18220964,0.80505866,0.00010685205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48097786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60915494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48097786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018478412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029819854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858026720","doi":"10.7202/1035384ar","title":"The Future of Poison Pills in Canada: Are Takeover Bid Reforms Needed?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Pill; Period (music); Business; Tender offer; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Corporate governance; Medicine","score_opus":0.009927328229124534,"score_gpt":0.17566039766442168,"score_spread":0.16573306943529714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858026720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31651455,0.020185756,0.0036447505,0.444087,0.0013996501,0.00032294134,0.0011974262,0.00034243427,0.21230552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911881,0.0076817367,0.0025817929,0.03328811,0.00042701594,0.000050813476,0.00039611923,0.00006624142,0.043627057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097157,0.00056709745,0.00016955276,0.0004248777,0.0040359474,0.0038310813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833745,0.0017311902,0.0010854574,0.000505046,0.0059824996,0.007321469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006288504,0.00028397026,0.00047420338,0.0012446406,0.009689519,0.013070422,0.002630898,0.004650124,0.0066431705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01639837,0.00051942095,0.0005555527,0.0021968726,0.006405453,0.003807347,0.0021575093,0.005152161,0.0005443245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065605494,0.000366932,0.052426018,0.00041890104,0.00011410162,0.0018723527,0.0068302606,0.0038731592,0.004292589,0.4790936,0.21771576,0.23234023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014516,0.00029918016,0.13809101,0.00050237356,0.00014094623,0.00039196282,0.01025998,0.006166282,0.0024090945,0.038703103,0.8021981,0.00043643807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99454135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.136381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.136381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2965533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98951805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860163611","doi":"10.7202/1032677ar","title":"Le Tribunal des droits de la personne devant la Cour d’appel du Québec : appel à plus de déférence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03809411854686967,"score_gpt":0.30329950606908723,"score_spread":0.26520538752221756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860163611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2391505,0.0056700483,0.003299023,0.041590914,0.0006698196,0.00010925264,0.00032374874,0.000066439345,0.7091202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7672545,0.0011017502,0.00069474685,0.0045564803,0.000070232585,0.00003785116,0.00008414835,0.000032636213,0.22616765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741274,0.0003804936,0.000056804845,0.00029078324,0.0006982309,0.0011609305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744475,0.0002431501,0.00010238813,0.00014328533,0.0012801512,0.0007862916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013351281,0.00026743105,0.00030408028,0.00083104504,0.018498462,0.0069383853,0.001332664,0.002352088,0.011741844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034446828,0.00020783077,0.00032441728,0.0010072126,0.008956783,0.0012784634,0.002075977,0.0033577175,0.0006916819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007424726,0.00003873321,0.016812403,0.00013249341,0.000035681413,0.0015685009,0.0937605,0.00059674913,0.0014557871,0.763445,0.07441652,0.04766337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022830425,0.000058374528,0.060705785,0.00052108546,0.000044904034,0.00039437303,0.055577476,0.00077801314,0.0005582402,0.016654596,0.8645812,0.000103056875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053286374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053286374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07543364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38662153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911260150","doi":"","title":"Faut-il codifier le droit privé européen des contrats ?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06255662421348222,"score_gpt":0.2779196856202078,"score_spread":0.21536306140672556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911260150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0671063,0.008399408,0.021640394,0.12782153,0.002798672,0.00007462769,0.00032486595,0.0002520821,0.7715821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6953334,0.0037142737,0.013507464,0.027371591,0.0012847986,0.00015243601,0.00031177927,0.00043751817,0.25788677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907217,0.0024118288,0.0005876255,0.0017466198,0.0033243839,0.0012077565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908552,0.0035072255,0.0007154978,0.0016785434,0.0029371437,0.00030645664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010956192,0.0005517201,0.001009939,0.0018448577,0.005428658,0.019274987,0.0020769048,0.011931757,0.013410629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024152946,0.0006197223,0.0009829313,0.0019116758,0.0072789923,0.019515699,0.0033533531,0.008488654,0.0030096578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022077651,0.0000138868545,0.00055704924,0.000033487577,0.000017780896,0.0000750921,0.001204173,0.00013597451,0.00022878344,0.97952604,0.008492481,0.009693183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068891655,0.00004812946,0.0037780956,0.0010772701,0.00012355982,0.00060310547,0.0054573645,0.0021007282,0.002710982,0.37825817,0.6056434,0.00013028097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06934172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05397551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06934172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00886845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009458954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13787621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964458389","doi":"10.7202/1017521ar","title":"Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09913062218168837,"score_gpt":0.3615921520979623,"score_spread":0.2624615299162739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964458389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037053265,0.01799593,0.010420972,0.9211258,0.008884988,0.00006463183,0.00022987077,0.00020445911,0.03736795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18659486,0.00992676,0.025032617,0.7485049,0.01175613,0.00025875986,0.00021481261,0.0003124179,0.017398719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85252297,0.03632264,0.0131098,0.015835136,0.07612557,0.006083915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7695147,0.12394721,0.006980751,0.016302552,0.079301834,0.0039530005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12793647,0.00068063935,0.0012498243,0.005658894,0.009511545,0.016145926,0.0051765097,0.016876396,0.0021752974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30101702,0.0011969107,0.0016382766,0.004374739,0.028611578,0.010372557,0.004419341,0.027199157,0.0009901894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043301763,0.000010607415,0.00070523284,0.00017745596,0.000043376283,0.00012870305,0.0017790713,0.00021629562,0.0002836809,0.7187369,0.24736851,0.030506937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572436,0.000051818897,0.002832769,0.00091240846,0.00008137157,0.00026389898,0.0009855351,0.0010785181,0.0010567709,0.1951624,0.7972622,0.0002365239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2593016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2706824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2593016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031570233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04147742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6766008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964954328","doi":"10.7202/1013389ar","title":"Legislating Respect: A Pro-Choice Feminist Analysis of Embryo Research Restrictions in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Personhood; Legislature; Abortion; Sociology; Law; Commodification; Political science; Reproductive rights; Gender studies; Biology; Economics; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.09855584792101252,"score_gpt":0.3778822676782701,"score_spread":0.2793264197572576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964954328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21973911,0.007002812,0.006126113,0.10667701,0.00031204254,0.00024520265,0.00038747536,0.00003930612,0.6594709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958311,0.0025569887,0.0013642658,0.009319699,0.000058305923,0.00008378808,0.000057541518,0.000025055335,0.028223341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875563,0.0025657895,0.00020736904,0.0009739163,0.0047577354,0.0039389143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901834,0.005564578,0.0004818481,0.00029564145,0.0024038928,0.0010707102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006464212,0.00032169712,0.0005618358,0.0017559989,0.03079342,0.012814034,0.0026616026,0.0052257176,0.004689468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011181732,0.00057330483,0.00054981373,0.002701558,0.027687801,0.0029344636,0.005529089,0.0072352877,0.00020626195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026006699,0.00001939785,0.0021011548,0.000045757977,0.000008732063,0.00024932774,0.023113182,0.0005904478,0.0003872499,0.963809,0.0042838953,0.0053658136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013713032,0.00009241594,0.030565266,0.0009055455,0.00016839273,0.00023303575,0.10180125,0.0045923362,0.0022504712,0.22542648,0.63346994,0.00035769463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98675543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99121594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18136977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18136977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23268496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.949495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965271865","doi":"10.7202/045700ar","title":"De Genève à Doha : genèse et évolution du traitement spécial et différencié des pays en développement dans le droit de l’OMC","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04047805258607436,"score_gpt":0.26800035544832734,"score_spread":0.22752230286225297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965271865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252166,0.0031165855,0.008480197,0.0071678907,0.00015559257,0.000042533884,0.00022814485,0.00006445102,0.055528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98092884,0.0011863358,0.003105825,0.00043300007,0.000035851925,0.000030383839,0.000107169915,0.000028769062,0.014143732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912983,0.00026110635,0.000026874546,0.00026763915,0.00014172355,0.00017281614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981457,0.00072705845,0.0003426536,0.00018240765,0.00031122382,0.0002908693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018125267,0.00034375145,0.00034230633,0.001081383,0.0019500776,0.0038418556,0.0005236394,0.0008436844,0.006846958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032187735,0.00019259736,0.0004373319,0.0019560459,0.0036514248,0.0027005791,0.002117349,0.0011985581,0.0005126211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029643485,0.00019777226,0.19971453,0.00034561474,0.00012753706,0.002052149,0.061535947,0.0017584042,0.020061597,0.554595,0.0028288534,0.15648623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039172715,0.00038456178,0.5239671,0.00045154803,0.00016642032,0.0022829205,0.048275717,0.0029175673,0.0062303734,0.15111965,0.2639873,0.00017761126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012641626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012252206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012641626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026650704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024520492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025136113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965374745","doi":"10.7202/1006417ar","title":"The Place of Legitimacy in Legal Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04223338448784949,"score_gpt":0.28434318212507254,"score_spread":0.24210979763722304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965374745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041464537,0.014352387,0.1975816,0.22202833,0.0021123842,0.00012256799,0.00011422391,0.00031686501,0.52190703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732731,0.0024194124,0.013040578,0.00316798,0.0024189036,0.00019894341,0.000055191824,0.00014517028,0.005280775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95243573,0.03041047,0.0017308242,0.0038207849,0.009357077,0.0022451654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87775093,0.09932054,0.0036988484,0.009718851,0.0071608443,0.0023498647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04036398,0.0010098034,0.0020533928,0.007673666,0.012602737,0.019976104,0.002891996,0.0099446075,0.004549343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076949015,0.0010277334,0.0013685505,0.0030611951,0.13285773,0.03672752,0.012772704,0.014290401,0.00099141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026300013,0.0000035764228,0.00006910577,0.000012014258,0.0000021257956,0.000011464161,0.00039586812,0.00008595825,0.00001140623,0.99833614,0.00017082486,0.00089899945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069789885,0.0000044958692,0.000042063082,0.000029691815,0.0000021223257,0.000012287899,0.0001234625,0.00028855618,0.000026291422,0.9967673,0.0026932291,0.0000035356225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034082863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018353715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04036398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012002074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009821362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21346772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965915331","doi":"10.7202/1019047ar","title":"La fiducie française ou le réveil chaotique d’une « belle au bois dormant »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021998887904576433,"score_gpt":0.2576017559694383,"score_spread":0.23560286806486186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965915331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045139335,0.015911674,0.0054022013,0.044547513,0.0022811836,0.000046556073,0.0003628764,0.00016706703,0.8861415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.548495,0.0054464187,0.0026173755,0.009767932,0.00072023633,0.00007574493,0.00023721783,0.00018757654,0.4324526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954358,0.0013460661,0.00012339062,0.0007621021,0.001319053,0.0010135467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996908,0.0009210509,0.00044565156,0.00049772166,0.000841622,0.00038592136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002864063,0.0006606253,0.000429025,0.0012756645,0.01020131,0.0079911165,0.0010239488,0.0035986188,0.020601174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063198484,0.0003860485,0.00051822566,0.0011285368,0.014394947,0.0036440126,0.003575918,0.00407901,0.0047098296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007451749,0.000018914587,0.0017430346,0.00014573726,0.000017262295,0.00022637851,0.012451971,0.00010452319,0.00070604036,0.89404804,0.054255717,0.03620794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000922248,0.000034548546,0.0026591688,0.00024709545,0.000010148976,0.00019902545,0.0028434193,0.000077339886,0.0004272149,0.015126215,0.97832835,0.000038254635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089550756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13531852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089550756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010926361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011984676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17805904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967674067","doi":"10.7202/038180ar","title":"La constitutionnalité de l’interdiction de publicité directe des médicaments d’ordonnance","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30806543988735535,"score_gpt":0.521439777332852,"score_spread":0.2133743374454966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967674067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051478665,0.008737857,0.016627623,0.11061643,0.0012552933,0.00019500866,0.00057045266,0.00008943315,0.81042933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958599,0.004013822,0.0034346483,0.020679984,0.00045312455,0.00015203712,0.0001489978,0.00005112342,0.075206414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98685014,0.002542788,0.0004181695,0.0020532513,0.00532258,0.0028130212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98772174,0.005180617,0.0010287776,0.0012717617,0.0040188027,0.0007783226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075741475,0.00036631865,0.0005944522,0.0018538118,0.011898003,0.014320463,0.001951903,0.005345879,0.009972627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013713191,0.0005850192,0.0007352897,0.0019039876,0.035980318,0.004163242,0.005237418,0.009002233,0.00078420324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936614,0.0000044262124,0.00049558183,0.000042125015,0.000007959262,0.000047639893,0.0031185122,0.00009185168,0.00008033994,0.9906961,0.0030245222,0.0023830822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078193916,0.000045180648,0.010338928,0.001127906,0.00012677778,0.0002722311,0.00957314,0.000800485,0.0011779666,0.31934524,0.65700245,0.000111524765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65700036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7284069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34299964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062245242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09922369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6900393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967878830","doi":"10.7202/1009063ar","title":"Regulating Financial Institutions: The Value of Opacity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Business; Financial institution; Institution; Accounting; Financial regulation; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06110960476555873,"score_gpt":0.26779935175043434,"score_spread":0.2066897469848756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967878830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37470755,0.004438576,0.16342111,0.06107668,0.00047869145,0.00048038145,0.00012322747,0.00031716668,0.39495668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926651,0.00030615274,0.0034334713,0.0015471294,0.00017974668,0.00008834874,0.0000075613048,0.00002262419,0.0017498098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9419446,0.02928944,0.0025376328,0.003426981,0.018305467,0.0044958596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7742753,0.15352456,0.03188368,0.024594665,0.01121511,0.0045066783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036468565,0.00047097343,0.00082811306,0.0020038062,0.0046873433,0.01060371,0.0020766587,0.0050175395,0.0029855133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106308565,0.000637109,0.0010160161,0.001530635,0.04647886,0.010115465,0.0074065784,0.0058276183,0.00036184522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006032993,0.00006996539,0.008829339,0.00013119512,0.000042813794,0.00011418623,0.003662907,0.0021839305,0.00085325976,0.9633584,0.00075176713,0.019941885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015778295,0.0003840309,0.015115982,0.00058419834,0.0001801529,0.00039959868,0.0041579455,0.0044361637,0.0035721157,0.9354255,0.035482343,0.0001042659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003977758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031208135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036468565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054359124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008124616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1928665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969154315","doi":"10.7202/045701ar","title":"De Stockholm à Copenhague : genèse et évolution des responsabilités communes mais différenciées dans le droit international de l’environnement","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043465869626715205,"score_gpt":0.2945322813409201,"score_spread":0.25106641171420485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969154315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408726,0.005110023,0.0039218036,0.0063051274,0.00038002196,0.000048224745,0.0035274292,0.0001620419,0.13967279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8755354,0.0029109751,0.0032295943,0.0004687788,0.000036545316,0.000058767986,0.0021294781,0.00011404124,0.115516335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999584,0.00009505777,0.000013035532,0.00013620398,0.00009364555,0.00007801913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987618,0.00034593605,0.00028465095,0.000084266336,0.00026584516,0.0002575281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518768,0.00033861768,0.00021962877,0.0009517945,0.0010762756,0.002451395,0.0002961993,0.00042489715,0.01740697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021418384,0.00020016379,0.00029400818,0.0021114806,0.0011644247,0.001152037,0.001068467,0.0007359287,0.0023963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009627875,0.00027465622,0.45877132,0.00056633534,0.00027701372,0.0039153444,0.047916707,0.0036403057,0.016546337,0.12242205,0.04073927,0.3039679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004139423,0.0001775795,0.59890443,0.0004004114,0.000077005185,0.0006544779,0.023066437,0.00068395486,0.0025317108,0.013589815,0.35976467,0.000108154956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029436415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04415046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029436415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020437886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017245256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05853015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969351015","doi":"10.7202/039837ar","title":"La Loi sur l’immunité des États canadienne et la torture","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Torture; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.036683292972897776,"score_gpt":0.31576733022498904,"score_spread":0.27908403725209124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969351015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16127042,0.019098364,0.009800534,0.09118561,0.0006741213,0.00007841148,0.00073159335,0.00009295349,0.717068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8579558,0.008821193,0.0015955067,0.00970223,0.00020921309,0.00004432043,0.00017447164,0.000036530706,0.121460654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956196,0.0006364661,0.00009200627,0.00048105035,0.0017861414,0.001384783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943764,0.0019920554,0.0006742948,0.00026901005,0.0020152777,0.00067297777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026889953,0.00034481788,0.00041226647,0.001756886,0.009165166,0.007157094,0.0011408573,0.0030219778,0.011003069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006036094,0.00029692057,0.00066700263,0.0022066378,0.014641067,0.0026015763,0.0033676573,0.0058747884,0.0005184446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002581961,0.000019296875,0.008910803,0.00009464564,0.000031499436,0.00023704852,0.011685806,0.0004265401,0.0003244206,0.95753455,0.0076717967,0.013037814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026111384,0.00009422101,0.08644418,0.0013649075,0.00016440461,0.0005479686,0.027596341,0.0012935643,0.0019752719,0.13480902,0.74547696,0.00020693852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86508363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91049695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13491637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043068644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050019983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31248635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973249466","doi":"10.7202/1005849ar","title":"Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Treaty; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; State (computer science); Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Free trade agreement; Law and economics; International law; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Public international law; Judicial review; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02818626240530645,"score_gpt":0.2241302193366712,"score_spread":0.19594395693136477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973249466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04974269,0.015760811,0.0039498475,0.22295853,0.0020332246,0.00007800653,0.000102874204,0.000104370425,0.70526963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63558286,0.004175415,0.0026749922,0.18431643,0.00080790906,0.0001730153,0.000093630384,0.00007626833,0.17209956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928677,0.0016196683,0.00023588417,0.0007860077,0.0030379412,0.0014528129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844545,0.0009045856,0.00010618688,0.00010940382,0.00031977682,0.00011463903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049462253,0.00047249554,0.00040032456,0.0012014667,0.010544706,0.0080984095,0.0016211678,0.01214974,0.0026303714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064585707,0.00046113963,0.00068791077,0.0010932003,0.009869352,0.0031382216,0.0033592626,0.009483062,0.00062257133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099785275,0.000008118422,0.00036570182,0.000016153326,0.000003929745,0.00021635514,0.0016669808,0.00011337533,0.0001728474,0.9727519,0.01984346,0.0048311283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006465412,0.000065543514,0.0031702032,0.00044427952,0.000035869904,0.00029903665,0.0023117769,0.0007753928,0.0011683159,0.20739125,0.78418106,0.00009261912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1813733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28653446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1813733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015929114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012208144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36063516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975145808","doi":"10.7202/1005133ar","title":"Sales or Plans: A Comparative Account of the “New” Corporate Reorganization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Creditor; Business; Insolvency; Plan (archaeology); Asset (computer security); Process (computing); Flexibility (engineering); Debtor; Realm; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Management; Political science; Debt; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.10628170172060088,"score_gpt":0.23255884491128231,"score_spread":0.12627714319068145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975145808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06503708,0.02349833,0.00092900475,0.0091990335,0.00039487652,0.000027422475,0.00010218842,0.000042368265,0.9007698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094444,0.024507701,0.00075048045,0.0031106463,0.00092864974,0.00003831082,0.00023900502,0.000052176303,0.06092856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974673,0.0004891782,0.00007008359,0.00016891345,0.0011218017,0.00068287156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978522,0.0008946599,0.00038294063,0.00021649314,0.00035509103,0.00029863176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017422878,0.00012618197,0.00017147227,0.004297653,0.0034587758,0.0065069934,0.00084965274,0.0012136162,0.0072646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029831452,0.00019901911,0.00025260137,0.0051497812,0.0076293214,0.0051571904,0.0022968955,0.0018376714,0.0003914439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005029989,0.00003659168,0.00410694,0.000099775265,0.000011261677,0.0003836037,0.007767594,0.00046921894,0.00014653879,0.9052212,0.027784294,0.053922754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013562778,0.000043915836,0.041249517,0.00022978344,0.000014997702,0.000441062,0.01390202,0.00053211395,0.0002911416,0.027703712,0.9155458,0.00003241095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052419793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15100428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052419793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011215312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004224742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10422933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975384691","doi":"10.7202/1017519ar","title":"Le champ d’application de l’article XX(A) du GATT et le travail dangereux des enfants : une question relevant de la moralité publique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0134606267395159,"score_gpt":0.29500305383919095,"score_spread":0.28154242709967503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975384691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11844973,0.016583735,0.014968203,0.34284484,0.005629846,0.00013993167,0.00023579929,0.0000659729,0.50108194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83468354,0.007331798,0.00663443,0.034064684,0.0015159701,0.0002558551,0.00008956041,0.000081568396,0.115342505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930307,0.003274388,0.00028393677,0.0007009899,0.0019774467,0.0007325598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893366,0.0069530024,0.0010540038,0.00050768035,0.0017370658,0.00041157712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065497966,0.0004552169,0.0004491538,0.0007758456,0.0048920214,0.0071974914,0.0013579872,0.00765616,0.0054079075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014026531,0.0002645928,0.0005144361,0.00077425904,0.013470779,0.003839683,0.0038147278,0.007139861,0.000885483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030580002,0.000017165086,0.0018255626,0.00023187415,0.000011302436,0.00051028293,0.08353762,0.00010338612,0.00051507587,0.8827278,0.014470251,0.016019164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017276621,0.00008800391,0.008375019,0.001940678,0.000037405047,0.0009928447,0.06042488,0.00031618218,0.0015573857,0.11813764,0.8080517,0.00006108871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018549172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016904142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018549172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005112024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007464956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03709048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975773252","doi":"10.7202/1000789ar","title":"Law, Economics, and Beyond: A Case for Retheorizing the Business Corporation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Theory of the firm; Corporation; Shareholder value; Principal–agent problem; Shareholder; Outsourcing; Corporate law; Economics; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Finance; Neoclassical economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05887725011325028,"score_gpt":0.21292028777657418,"score_spread":0.1540430376633239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975773252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075939572,0.08441199,0.008483314,0.81445026,0.005919106,0.000029995479,0.000028300816,0.00006360371,0.07901941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.630621,0.067167014,0.009976136,0.21845628,0.02779252,0.0002143938,0.00005789983,0.0003358361,0.045378875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883259,0.0066559855,0.0003193039,0.0009576994,0.0024600835,0.001281057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666666,0.02606246,0.0010577647,0.0019880412,0.00304578,0.0011793772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016228849,0.00075782504,0.0012448509,0.006789514,0.0098052975,0.022575194,0.0029166024,0.016008718,0.0046038018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026281837,0.0005505069,0.0008144372,0.003111587,0.10039914,0.044565395,0.00808861,0.023416694,0.0008176094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006145879,0.0000074544073,0.000057647187,0.000024382924,0.0000025427466,0.000052805877,0.0014730043,0.00008954853,0.000035188645,0.98413265,0.00959517,0.004523423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066139482,0.0000062940994,0.00009785503,0.00020616382,0.0000026727685,0.000049162714,0.0025535254,0.00023636078,0.000053224274,0.84376526,0.15300667,0.00001611915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014598127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011773287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022575194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012927249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011970293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09379417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545274","doi":"10.7202/1006418ar","title":"Les théories constitutionnelles de Louis-Philippe Pigeon : L’efficience du partage législatif des compétences et l’incrédulité face à la protection législative des droits fondamentaux","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09068385154578733,"score_gpt":0.31561329607460303,"score_spread":0.2249294445288157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23185118,0.0040884875,0.037917357,0.025297808,0.00031272916,0.00017908396,0.00020519744,0.00008807767,0.7000601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912706,0.0017391194,0.0062138615,0.0013747128,0.00006370316,0.00012203609,0.00008313983,0.000042986965,0.077654414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959478,0.0017259142,0.000091346315,0.000688529,0.00113428,0.00041223364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942115,0.0034267397,0.0005210479,0.00045354862,0.0010969588,0.00029020372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050630625,0.0004408842,0.00025689253,0.0017204955,0.005496279,0.0072157155,0.0010882361,0.0019816454,0.007363305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060414663,0.00040972914,0.0005364586,0.0013516492,0.017840272,0.0035441571,0.0022383812,0.003857688,0.0005944026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012411516,0.000012974674,0.0024446114,0.000047565954,0.000009385588,0.00009857117,0.02870599,0.00039546826,0.00025560832,0.95743424,0.0014158037,0.009167201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058725193,0.00014344142,0.049693394,0.0009926899,0.00011263023,0.00035241232,0.06630773,0.003678874,0.0035618346,0.28932253,0.58561176,0.00016399624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18075274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28187913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18075274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018175803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017823262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3594013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977942614","doi":"10.7202/1013387ar","title":"The 1969 African Refugee Convention: Innovations, Misconceptions, and Omissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Expansive; Political science; Silence; Refugee law; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.028266718191945466,"score_gpt":0.22151846478047924,"score_spread":0.19325174658853378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977942614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08231248,0.12930757,0.014085358,0.53517294,0.016330417,0.00013843305,0.00023367564,0.00011800742,0.22230105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8174803,0.057445556,0.011911669,0.06702194,0.006748751,0.00020057405,0.000101338774,0.000248454,0.038841374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837563,0.008506603,0.0012204788,0.0013761739,0.0040447763,0.001095731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979835,0.015246903,0.0013506415,0.001147685,0.00204847,0.0003713875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025716545,0.0005071017,0.00043405336,0.0034058578,0.0082067195,0.00961336,0.00177333,0.004948091,0.0016640011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041050073,0.0004219546,0.00039124413,0.0042246794,0.028343001,0.008327359,0.005093783,0.011542477,0.00038613885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665382,0.000012088339,0.0005540262,0.00018326183,0.0000046427435,0.00022787628,0.045390308,0.00016521753,0.00033666467,0.8973759,0.022950044,0.032783393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004386953,0.00001512921,0.0009934258,0.0017367275,0.000008102601,0.00028844245,0.020049257,0.00021545545,0.0009548227,0.04638528,0.9292972,0.000051823794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022231584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015325835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025716545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012510406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010301871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13600373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978273071","doi":"10.7202/1026130ar","title":"Tort Law, Risk, and Technological Innovation in England","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Action (physics); Function (biology); Industrial Revolution; Technological change; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.023972221821319688,"score_gpt":0.29210815694112313,"score_spread":0.26813593511980344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978273071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3813174,0.09150977,0.006615791,0.10875741,0.0007324385,0.00009600226,0.00025814777,0.00004820874,0.41066498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95798576,0.008344108,0.0006406198,0.0025283066,0.00029598587,0.000034224217,0.00002256825,0.000010367351,0.030138034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805886,0.0006042011,0.00013899316,0.00019162278,0.0005780825,0.0004281662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561065,0.0031649112,0.00054088136,0.00014838272,0.00031073848,0.00022448305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044368,0.00016241243,0.0003906007,0.0011691538,0.003427486,0.005762872,0.00065681274,0.0038997468,0.0041264873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006268183,0.00030699378,0.0002573485,0.0010579999,0.011520024,0.005556374,0.0034246808,0.003452283,0.000298092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001250952,0.00001668683,0.0008453063,0.00004151433,0.0000023913371,0.0004624596,0.005280566,0.0005608501,0.00010237151,0.9869218,0.0014077754,0.004345755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000694892,0.000093240786,0.012826261,0.00059633545,0.000020082558,0.0010129927,0.0072732894,0.002230652,0.0003688364,0.6722471,0.3031434,0.00011824006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13613534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12098902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023635766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063464562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2706859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979443733","doi":"10.7202/039647ar","title":"La formalisation du devoir d’information dans les contrats de cyberconsommation : analyse de la solution québécoise","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009626085375818095,"score_gpt":0.24475935169760432,"score_spread":0.23513326632178622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979443733","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044328477,0.0017189237,0.8637405,0.009022351,0.00035433398,0.0006706668,0.0006605342,0.00083234994,0.078671835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4155155,0.001457937,0.51425236,0.0007870866,0.00010379694,0.00059312745,0.00093237637,0.00050305587,0.06585473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074465,0.0031486922,0.0005044373,0.0014094182,0.003097896,0.0010949356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868666,0.0067963186,0.00066085736,0.0017223957,0.0035609007,0.00039285579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009667673,0.0009466517,0.0008487097,0.0023876613,0.003981521,0.01054283,0.0030511038,0.003293593,0.012230026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019636352,0.0014234823,0.0025829365,0.001978578,0.010561042,0.0064385324,0.004732994,0.0051797424,0.0014289579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034644585,0.00004773153,0.0010582322,0.00026374124,0.000028433247,0.00034126567,0.0043188557,0.027180135,0.0018447196,0.93380404,0.0023068003,0.028771339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011417465,0.00010778143,0.0027972658,0.0013088597,0.00012753536,0.00052778947,0.0081929695,0.2757082,0.010385123,0.3523654,0.3481822,0.00018268284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41881797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40910652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.581182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028489832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036065537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83276033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981953899","doi":"10.7202/1017518ar","title":"Private Rights to Public Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Property law; Government (linguistics); Intangible property; Common law; Political science; Common property; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026804891793771348,"score_gpt":0.25307801412567693,"score_spread":0.22627312233190558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981953899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15772024,0.007882176,0.008278948,0.11702442,0.00044093071,0.00011678956,0.0004185667,0.00008560151,0.70803237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524022,0.0025954791,0.0013861326,0.0071107815,0.000075248136,0.000029436582,0.0000822707,0.00003859647,0.036279958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119955,0.000650093,0.00014511113,0.0010307255,0.0036896656,0.003284883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309665,0.0018477759,0.00039737116,0.0004713116,0.0028619731,0.0013247848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031262052,0.00032223796,0.0006032605,0.0022553126,0.030347042,0.012800838,0.0022709374,0.0058052973,0.0075288797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010909282,0.0005839031,0.0006819204,0.0036652354,0.024972348,0.0061713043,0.0054092803,0.008796854,0.00029207874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012030157,0.000009455339,0.0012935292,0.000025121684,0.0000070524643,0.00028654878,0.0049058944,0.0002935383,0.00011746992,0.9797783,0.0059115235,0.0073595745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084483865,0.00004488822,0.025129935,0.00049482664,0.00008904098,0.00042758466,0.016142841,0.0039894897,0.00088339846,0.31759915,0.63487434,0.00024001423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99403906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21208693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21208693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20910028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982913473","doi":"10.7202/1025140ar","title":"La place réservée à l’avis des peuples autochtones dans le cadre du processus de prise de décision concernant le Plan Nord ou l’exploitation du Nord québécois : perspective juridique interne et internationale","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0429744400604329,"score_gpt":0.29203643801589285,"score_spread":0.24906199795545997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982913473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40272793,0.0050915303,0.013956504,0.065709904,0.0006436508,0.00017204722,0.0002756603,0.00009069555,0.5113321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396339,0.0011224374,0.0024442726,0.001788668,0.00003129301,0.000044328383,0.000048270227,0.000032729684,0.054854106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914635,0.0022152432,0.00022738756,0.00075852004,0.0031395797,0.0021958123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900671,0.0027553197,0.00095651526,0.00041463843,0.0039316714,0.0018748192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007208914,0.0003848288,0.00046283248,0.0015263901,0.01394456,0.011364446,0.0015311686,0.002304749,0.0066067493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011073293,0.00031931864,0.00028806654,0.0017296103,0.019217862,0.002764652,0.0036847128,0.004106997,0.00037286457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114485934,0.000060152553,0.022983834,0.00031700544,0.00004131856,0.0010138075,0.2238739,0.0023873835,0.0015035099,0.66856426,0.01710238,0.062037956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003158655,0.000120714096,0.04825894,0.0014118878,0.000052083724,0.00030657378,0.33280978,0.0014218226,0.0016364742,0.039210558,0.5745374,0.000202138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8701599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94506186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12984008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058845688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12965192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4269573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983914936","doi":"10.7202/038181ar","title":"The Freedom of Association Mess: How We Got into It and How We Can Get out of It","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Statute; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Statement (logic); Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.020572218094692243,"score_gpt":0.278839828961172,"score_spread":0.25826761086647976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983914936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00929965,0.020500548,0.03025554,0.689589,0.0030273339,0.000055931163,0.00015273599,0.00022150822,0.24689768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7453072,0.015701452,0.014757563,0.11780047,0.0025944104,0.00017549653,0.00020391513,0.00064454804,0.10281487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97690684,0.0075694486,0.0005621897,0.0022611455,0.007672941,0.0050275386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98227936,0.007616265,0.00068430253,0.0030636054,0.0032297892,0.003126624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024783961,0.0009335873,0.0014267551,0.003063545,0.031453937,0.031147674,0.003783568,0.011879695,0.012224301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03278374,0.00089605566,0.0012705771,0.0030202186,0.19619273,0.033504054,0.0154213095,0.025020117,0.0025569652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007778536,0.0000075200355,0.00026523,0.000030782106,0.000006120238,0.00004045175,0.0070337793,0.0001727882,0.00005605745,0.9654856,0.016321672,0.010572253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094770985,0.000011154467,0.00049210846,0.00028087228,0.000009536865,0.000033988224,0.0078045083,0.00017775824,0.000111375615,0.7007693,0.29025653,0.000043324384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55888915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4959278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55888915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04631463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080528475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88741726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984120339","doi":"10.7202/1018986ar","title":"Reframing the “Universality” of International Law in a Globalizing World","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legitimacy; Global justice; Political science; Politics; Global governance; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Legislature","score_opus":0.02024241819055068,"score_gpt":0.22217084463078968,"score_spread":0.201928426440239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984120339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063974,0.01707967,0.08403798,0.08671107,0.0014066465,0.00006974666,0.000049428785,0.00017714928,0.7464943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97426856,0.0033163622,0.0062600593,0.00798697,0.00078303146,0.000095682124,0.000027397104,0.0001186462,0.0071433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928549,0.0038352374,0.00022802394,0.0010951299,0.00096255605,0.0010240652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947076,0.0029670447,0.0004484958,0.0011696415,0.000390179,0.00031716458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010213272,0.00071631704,0.0008473675,0.0025175356,0.0073365485,0.0180869,0.0016397575,0.004588374,0.0026890144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009829512,0.000427031,0.0007334187,0.0021461076,0.09849525,0.0269,0.014938867,0.011877861,0.0002585536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010691684,0.0000015079157,0.000089224064,0.000009831476,0.0000017821386,0.000024846882,0.0036029608,0.00006493548,0.000027626122,0.99465585,0.00023278763,0.001287565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037856212,0.000012255311,0.0004125872,0.00012476597,0.000009189297,0.00007671413,0.006428794,0.00021593181,0.00011376985,0.93057853,0.06201244,0.000011272757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004001196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046503027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0180869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00629546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003742255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05401361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984964656","doi":"10.7202/1026129ar","title":"Epidemiological Uncertainty, Causation, and Drug Product Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Product liability; Epidemiology; Actuarial science; Liability; Context (archaeology); Economics; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pathology; Geography","score_opus":0.07926483891439622,"score_gpt":0.4198371947832955,"score_spread":0.3405723558688993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984964656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04255132,0.06096918,0.13754846,0.5491721,0.0023881167,0.00019400907,0.00019028835,0.00010085754,0.20688567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819468,0.020225756,0.024401449,0.061335333,0.0049645803,0.0002384917,0.00005221027,0.000027032966,0.0068084355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93237865,0.04070108,0.003738657,0.0045588515,0.01610078,0.0025219312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7438199,0.23366131,0.010061079,0.004898382,0.006243099,0.0013162654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061927456,0.0006637106,0.0012947028,0.0053282264,0.00852585,0.009760072,0.0029719337,0.018039962,0.0035918478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15957305,0.0009128851,0.0014644817,0.002650618,0.04612254,0.015083916,0.008334986,0.01169598,0.00040912905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073638903,0.0000093567405,0.0005664398,0.000053784686,0.000010756979,0.0001786082,0.00060329237,0.00034370174,0.000027787639,0.99261534,0.0010007041,0.004583002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021642327,0.00003494782,0.00081316667,0.00040255993,0.000027689908,0.00034909483,0.000546173,0.0008172252,0.000119982076,0.9772455,0.019586094,0.00003587091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061176033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004958032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061927456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066844365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00930974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32750762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985805101","doi":"10.7202/1025138ar","title":"Aspects historiques et analytiques de l’appel en matière civile","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0214030097155126,"score_gpt":0.29355516637150614,"score_spread":0.2721521566559935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985805101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10229739,0.035399694,0.0070057106,0.019622736,0.00051796524,0.00005274792,0.0005446206,0.00007184706,0.83448726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84064656,0.017169232,0.0016110791,0.0012308862,0.00044274222,0.000052079875,0.00016641578,0.00011323121,0.13856778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790996,0.00093067327,0.00007911178,0.0003296205,0.0003885209,0.0003620891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787164,0.0011872804,0.00025244738,0.0001774982,0.00038931635,0.00012184553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015858919,0.000469886,0.00026212633,0.003159459,0.008185404,0.00823171,0.00076736405,0.0015663898,0.014585018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028955291,0.00031472195,0.00032449124,0.004465248,0.017215697,0.005671212,0.0018008145,0.0028165984,0.0016316086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016256043,0.000009774983,0.0021496895,0.0000936173,0.000005967821,0.00028611918,0.1436954,0.00021042631,0.00017942282,0.8213989,0.008389617,0.02356477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024739788,0.000022386172,0.010732981,0.0006493212,0.000008189634,0.00032809016,0.04413193,0.0003515806,0.0004487374,0.042224087,0.9010744,0.000025786681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17552398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25332692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17552398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018965293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049663107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3490047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987081262","doi":"10.7202/045697ar","title":"The Medium is not the Message: Reconciling Reputation and Free Expression in Cases of Internet Defamation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; The Internet; Common law; Political science; Damages; Privilege (computing); Statement (logic); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06868534347314391,"score_gpt":0.3010099317483342,"score_spread":0.23232458827519026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987081262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36268836,0.009226575,0.06187633,0.1321813,0.0011945126,0.00026794474,0.000040759805,0.00017642812,0.43234774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845969,0.0009281519,0.0029665672,0.0051481794,0.00024380579,0.000072237846,0.000008756863,0.00002845233,0.006007013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644039,0.02015277,0.0012525079,0.0020605668,0.007171072,0.0049590277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519236,0.038513646,0.0043503,0.0020556184,0.0023074653,0.00084929576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029297037,0.0005418915,0.0008657793,0.0038499592,0.013749826,0.017327135,0.0046418174,0.02325199,0.0026120052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07841651,0.0007464393,0.0008965527,0.002771203,0.048213508,0.018822674,0.015247146,0.013899032,0.00027275024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025228364,0.000027171656,0.0022940924,0.000050437317,0.000013965271,0.007256525,0.034874894,0.00061079673,0.00017427954,0.9424048,0.0034349519,0.008832862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007477701,0.00014912128,0.007279008,0.0015701073,0.00020241692,0.015414952,0.120416634,0.010978362,0.0022067437,0.6848961,0.15651885,0.00029306833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034668706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048075292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034668706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015383936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008357873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15493941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.18454920957132986,"score_gpt":0.3810247983716258,"score_spread":0.19647558880029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987155948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027543537,0.015893657,0.0011724925,0.669997,0.0021643578,0.000053710835,0.000091164846,0.000052833268,0.2830313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36687544,0.012533406,0.0016131115,0.45056382,0.0024317012,0.000088857545,0.000041961728,0.00010630252,0.16574535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171317,0.002958652,0.00028974874,0.0009850155,0.0023452588,0.0017081088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951108,0.0027772589,0.00030650978,0.00021648886,0.0010157429,0.00057305745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155928,0.0005317869,0.0004895866,0.0015504091,0.019041024,0.008734627,0.0028891703,0.016003476,0.006217361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144233685,0.000709985,0.001046621,0.0019449772,0.015814962,0.006802829,0.0048230295,0.024182083,0.0008311222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004127845,0.00005626298,0.0010426939,0.00016740987,0.0000135053815,0.0014133988,0.052618146,0.0001932485,0.00069075415,0.76231927,0.16174027,0.019703707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014780871,0.00007531766,0.0063515264,0.00049021404,0.000025333544,0.0004759848,0.014151088,0.0003269428,0.0005419258,0.06375252,0.9136736,0.00012070061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47066152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50710684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47066152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025808437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013792472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93584394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987189715","doi":"10.7202/1005131ar","title":"La controverse sur la nature du droit applicable après la conquête","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014727469041714113,"score_gpt":0.20632554001606904,"score_spread":0.1915980709743549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987189715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058941074,0.05302919,0.00733889,0.20691562,0.0054666726,0.00010868116,0.00084140745,0.0001299766,0.6672285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5529823,0.021107731,0.002442492,0.05166635,0.0021449311,0.000104257466,0.00031520057,0.00022207647,0.36901465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918332,0.0013800238,0.00031548776,0.0019878978,0.0025186795,0.0019647174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518555,0.0014426732,0.0002846004,0.00027448405,0.00242815,0.00038463343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066460473,0.000544142,0.00041530668,0.0013744353,0.01451753,0.011285281,0.0036682298,0.0066458173,0.014388853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011230553,0.0006948373,0.0006997182,0.0019166424,0.021872496,0.005283902,0.003422299,0.011090825,0.0016389138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004931203,0.000017144448,0.0018984224,0.00026191582,0.000026803456,0.00051313534,0.039847214,0.00024066446,0.0009114817,0.84235334,0.07612566,0.03775483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009286329,0.000021787266,0.0033932317,0.0006637292,0.000018259807,0.00014717663,0.010074636,0.0000831805,0.00051556557,0.0129010575,0.97210693,0.00006519778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8144691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9046077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1855309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044051882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04552329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37324703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987397438","doi":"10.7202/1019046ar","title":"La fiducie civiliste : modalité de la propriété ou intermède à la propriété?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024284254074488372,"score_gpt":0.29912866188218906,"score_spread":0.2748444078077007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987397438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08082555,0.0044718767,0.023591435,0.08335434,0.00031407177,0.000053112144,0.00022261277,0.0000774992,0.8070895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96155536,0.0008919346,0.0015591343,0.0029492571,0.000102017875,0.000038800317,0.00004037693,0.000032972297,0.03283016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571913,0.0013714456,0.000095667536,0.0006782412,0.0009987956,0.0011367103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964893,0.0010243458,0.00032077305,0.0004871643,0.0011072169,0.00057130336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046679443,0.00039213913,0.0006108135,0.0014452375,0.009590447,0.011158173,0.0015539179,0.0048381053,0.008498264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006655983,0.00034725972,0.000510921,0.0015042702,0.039943986,0.008794741,0.0036443693,0.0062609604,0.00084417127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004405393,0.000002490137,0.00019751125,0.000009906956,0.000002427438,0.000029793617,0.0034222426,0.00005107264,0.00005135866,0.99381715,0.0009699832,0.0014417602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027010834,0.000043553857,0.0055141626,0.00041719194,0.000033016247,0.00023241897,0.022793777,0.0015986548,0.000492406,0.7747762,0.1939752,0.0000963944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41219595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39975905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41219595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030483179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021064518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8195934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988042322","doi":"10.7202/1027718ar","title":"Person(s) of Interest and Missing Women: Legal Abandonment in the Downtown Eastside","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Verdict; Jury trial; Abandonment (legal); Criminal justice; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032429851407596064,"score_gpt":0.24003776202481994,"score_spread":0.2076079106172239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988042322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569376,0.0011374903,0.0001721809,0.013368992,0.00011097153,0.00001607883,0.00001287487,0.00000587241,0.028237903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982104,0.00053043955,0.00012895236,0.002739411,0.000017828135,0.000007965125,0.000006588036,0.000012595817,0.01445226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996795,0.00088061974,0.000064622494,0.00032480797,0.0004442388,0.0014906483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850744,0.0005328153,0.00023582306,0.00008008584,0.0001578447,0.00048598822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022519834,0.0003182361,0.00054052164,0.0009852481,0.045895956,0.0050298832,0.0016473657,0.00284914,0.0037250111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003916267,0.00063270435,0.00020142585,0.00095238903,0.028725507,0.0024883163,0.009178603,0.0071336506,0.00035559267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034710978,0.000022536407,0.007766887,0.000031019736,0.0000051542065,0.003333473,0.9422152,0.00003130742,0.00053060736,0.03382565,0.003626296,0.008577162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006121587,0.000034713517,0.011657422,0.00014829663,0.000012845336,0.0011570901,0.92682636,0.00006011289,0.00036820132,0.0020453248,0.057648566,0.000035012043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62844163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8459773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37155837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01687574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014936636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7474931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","score_opus":0.03365458820360218,"score_gpt":0.3052021177948547,"score_spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988525678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06129048,0.0014067921,0.0049841683,0.0071810535,0.0001570921,0.00005428694,0.00012358378,0.000047909885,0.9247547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084729,0.00067494065,0.0019695472,0.004698294,0.00015875399,0.000066976994,0.000112773414,0.000031435822,0.08381432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.00041884542,0.000042760155,0.0002790406,0.0004179271,0.00040577407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.00009176293,0.000029550489,0.000039958024,0.000098817014,0.00010726169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014632313,0.00022266927,0.00025904633,0.0008311717,0.0048499964,0.0066301967,0.0007616575,0.0014492003,0.015304515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010896729,0.0001974198,0.00022910771,0.00060724746,0.0065081962,0.002850487,0.0051076026,0.0021019212,0.0019590177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074416535,0.000009965956,0.000449907,0.000007493206,0.0000057976604,0.00015977694,0.0013061127,0.00008156126,0.00013740493,0.98706853,0.0046412833,0.0061245845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497818,0.000037570608,0.0017387307,0.00010776172,0.000025389321,0.00075554906,0.004517048,0.001324695,0.00045495763,0.39893827,0.59200746,0.000037631497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010919592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01117733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015304515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028761278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05119866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988550489","doi":"10.7202/1009066ar","title":"Telecommunications Carriers and the “Duty to Serve”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Duty; Universal service; Business; Service (business); Telecommunications; Telecommunications service; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.027061477464600782,"score_gpt":0.3024665974693388,"score_spread":0.275405120004738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988550489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05517464,0.0046707173,0.0074643004,0.23858237,0.0006792416,0.00006331173,0.00009218842,0.000045860743,0.69322735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90680665,0.0019612934,0.0017146821,0.034723725,0.0004556807,0.00004729461,0.000057142606,0.00002944593,0.054204013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986647,0.0040846555,0.00041709322,0.00121064,0.0038236373,0.0038170426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375397,0.002415697,0.00058616104,0.00055236847,0.0015705657,0.001121211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059313276,0.00033443383,0.00028920855,0.0012450644,0.011035542,0.008284246,0.0013796397,0.008957672,0.0037834693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010328699,0.0004054043,0.00035344434,0.0014812251,0.04729812,0.0061923326,0.0045215585,0.0062130312,0.0004887445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023413083,0.0000034339896,0.00019607303,0.0000045669285,0.0000010637812,0.000026687416,0.0018795183,0.00005539843,0.000034074073,0.9911713,0.0051032016,0.0015222798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023525035,0.000032204378,0.003442091,0.00025022097,0.000015378955,0.00020177526,0.008719123,0.0006166475,0.00024601663,0.4055672,0.58082056,0.00006525173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43011972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41902453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97400993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025990048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051975682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989959054","doi":"10.7202/1019050ar","title":"Les défis du droit suisse de l’insolvabilité face au trust : séparation des patrimoines, publicité et poursuite pour dettes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03280326000870325,"score_gpt":0.29971933485262314,"score_spread":0.2669160748439199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989959054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45121163,0.003745469,0.03511831,0.068748586,0.0007429128,0.00021587021,0.000116573865,0.00009480453,0.44000587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974795,0.0005661382,0.0018527866,0.002029957,0.000098081786,0.00006882033,0.00002482906,0.00002890135,0.020535393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841936,0.0051306393,0.0009642249,0.0015522279,0.0046472233,0.0035121292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984355,0.0066473642,0.0030077924,0.0015905994,0.0028114198,0.0015878713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009775421,0.0004725897,0.00057846156,0.0013035751,0.008099497,0.012798065,0.001672677,0.006315585,0.0086993035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025680287,0.0004628173,0.0006738802,0.0011643198,0.024793005,0.010395562,0.009006761,0.008438618,0.0009411662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000827883,0.00003653521,0.006322018,0.000116746225,0.000020688154,0.00056904746,0.033337846,0.00053326157,0.00072026055,0.93562895,0.0030958708,0.01953598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103449725,0.00045612612,0.041368086,0.0017007792,0.000117578595,0.0017135695,0.15279183,0.003012473,0.0032588432,0.504446,0.2907498,0.00028132513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031113243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038592994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031113243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017644133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01218109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12801778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990204105","doi":"10.7202/1002370ar","title":"The Impossibility of a Critically Objective Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Impossibility; Scrutiny; Rationality; Epistemology; Law and economics; Interrogation; Criminal law; Sociology; Objectivity (philosophy); Situated; Law; Political science; Criminology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14421257838041202,"score_gpt":0.3054600711718459,"score_spread":0.1612474927914339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990204105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03264789,0.0039320416,0.19925497,0.13520475,0.0021995606,0.0002554582,0.00012582484,0.00027154174,0.626108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894844,0.0013222378,0.06290628,0.019639151,0.001196736,0.0006874083,0.00008828341,0.00019868732,0.024476875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98238695,0.0077734175,0.0007626072,0.0027606713,0.005156453,0.0011599252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97105634,0.014555166,0.0023589984,0.004766569,0.0056306133,0.0016322719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020364344,0.00069889374,0.0009527839,0.0017296143,0.005942582,0.012318817,0.002370996,0.00776713,0.004727465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04197062,0.00077819836,0.0009007526,0.00047913208,0.051484745,0.014548057,0.0100917015,0.016988948,0.0013369197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034048182,0.00000619152,0.00006603142,0.000021495813,0.0000031643553,0.000016836928,0.000424069,0.000099294346,0.000056413774,0.99635386,0.0011130223,0.0018363153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007429653,0.000008007036,0.00005946657,0.00006628081,0.000003139173,0.000024188173,0.0003205282,0.00022094046,0.0001392512,0.98301375,0.01612915,0.000007948514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016398637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017670754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020364344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004316243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007244733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990944375","doi":"10.7202/1025142ar","title":"“Sexualized Online Bullying” Through an Equality Lens: Missed Opportunity in AB v. Bragg?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"UNICEF","keywords":"Framing (construction); Interim; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08735101159838843,"score_gpt":0.3089600770320802,"score_spread":0.2216090654336918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990944375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41483966,0.003654176,0.004622879,0.3707095,0.001100778,0.00012171808,0.0001003897,0.000036833557,0.20481408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92669624,0.0008333578,0.00050199206,0.059883844,0.00022250092,0.000046961955,0.000015547257,0.00001900959,0.011780569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975194,0.0040050806,0.0002591989,0.0008597673,0.0018353442,0.0032886304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948,0.0028542904,0.00043064562,0.00021954758,0.00066705234,0.0010284999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066512465,0.00032596616,0.0005073009,0.0010618829,0.028627977,0.0107265115,0.0021130654,0.012196849,0.0021712563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012955037,0.0004877778,0.00045947975,0.00083239353,0.024239585,0.0081896605,0.0068538226,0.019309713,0.00018155202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038811184,0.000113572656,0.010786994,0.000055878405,0.000016464655,0.0043468,0.34706938,0.00007649934,0.0005157291,0.5954731,0.025100566,0.01640619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004983481,0.00012608407,0.015738877,0.0009279928,0.000103865554,0.003594263,0.61592925,0.00076850114,0.0024593796,0.12755173,0.23256105,0.00018923398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42800742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5507614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5719926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011528552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01444699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85103226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991470258","doi":"10.7202/1000616ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Art. 1053 C.C. Revolutionized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02704984100598097,"score_gpt":0.31607487544745744,"score_spread":0.2890250344414765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991470258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006478658,0.021113658,0.0022746306,0.08630948,0.004607632,0.00024818102,0.0012782583,0.00031199696,0.8773775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2327876,0.008678809,0.0040488285,0.2603966,0.0045977873,0.0008641953,0.00060501933,0.00025584473,0.48776522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992477,0.0010737318,0.00038512002,0.0013194224,0.003198598,0.0015461665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978592,0.00079950655,0.00026201003,0.000282042,0.0006773105,0.0001198435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005205406,0.0011779061,0.00066897745,0.0016765624,0.0072580623,0.0071778432,0.0029860667,0.020962108,0.011477315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011037967,0.0010125214,0.0013900495,0.0013399528,0.006997597,0.003629373,0.0033500749,0.016243907,0.004819879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059339167,0.000023895824,0.00046871652,0.00011267793,0.000017139002,0.00021939828,0.0014925115,0.00009558091,0.0005006432,0.6442448,0.34077618,0.01198911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004903216,0.000038505685,0.001849411,0.0003966157,0.00005995024,0.00020829124,0.0002277001,0.00016406288,0.0012611034,0.031906556,0.96376073,0.000078113684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15539794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22263975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84460205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012420871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011758261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30898684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993354704","doi":"10.7202/1009067ar","title":"Le refus de soins psychiatriques est-il possible au Québec ? Discussion à la lumière du cas de l’autorisation de soins","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03378362267573656,"score_gpt":0.3688912479377364,"score_spread":0.3351076252619999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993354704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18888628,0.011033756,0.0033855,0.4304093,0.0007322541,0.00008863757,0.00031890057,0.00004113634,0.36510417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498613,0.002986241,0.0007017265,0.018254343,0.00008232413,0.00003254196,0.0000470611,0.00001540321,0.028019022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938672,0.002290374,0.00015059,0.00049764826,0.0015458935,0.0016483223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163884,0.0025589312,0.00054021407,0.0003711366,0.0037827026,0.0011081599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005124845,0.00029057526,0.00036437967,0.0010487984,0.017533937,0.0070308447,0.0019490978,0.0034860768,0.007170022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011731624,0.0002570116,0.00037028192,0.0012231737,0.021847207,0.0028340977,0.0026433973,0.0065367934,0.00042936477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058260062,0.000039684015,0.018454835,0.00033867033,0.00005134631,0.0016998714,0.13779938,0.0004470992,0.0007435071,0.7524889,0.049101774,0.038776644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005904481,0.000074022624,0.07265802,0.002871044,0.00012879893,0.00095161,0.26698625,0.0014225643,0.0012891531,0.090109,0.56322217,0.0002283143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98605376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06523081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06523081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09262704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47328484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995531446","doi":"10.7202/1029211ar","title":"Designated Inhospitality: The Treatment of Asylum Seekers Who Arrive by Boat in Canada and Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Charter; Politics; Immigration detention; Immigration; Asylum seeker; Law; Political science; Parallels; Hospitality; Immigration policy; Sociology; Criminology; Tourism; Economics","score_opus":0.0370038288997314,"score_gpt":0.2865894271646054,"score_spread":0.24958559826487398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995531446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568684,0.010098206,0.0003716997,0.09103422,0.00050610147,0.00015263284,0.00017701213,0.000014010284,0.040777683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653016,0.006051392,0.00037645863,0.0141648585,0.00007296191,0.000041955638,0.00008907745,0.000015591198,0.013886051],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701893,0.00038454024,0.000066175766,0.00015272385,0.0005258855,0.0018517101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641466,0.0003605934,0.0003262475,0.00003781649,0.0006714899,0.0021891005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014691408,0.00026967347,0.00032329344,0.001518738,0.024143884,0.0034624345,0.0020665072,0.0026076857,0.0022749202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004425732,0.00031154588,0.0003064601,0.00244772,0.008375161,0.0011973424,0.0046433047,0.004535589,0.00011432629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034437023,0.0003937975,0.16192953,0.0007936745,0.000066907334,0.008032707,0.488907,0.0010481271,0.0018950915,0.14899574,0.064679034,0.12291412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005089573,0.00018338196,0.27485043,0.0011803366,0.000060787646,0.0016376494,0.5102643,0.0009887471,0.0004477648,0.004569305,0.20556267,0.00020373015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99431866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14136769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14136769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22964308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996343216","doi":"10.7202/1018985ar","title":"Privacy, Corrective Justice, and Incrementalism: Legal Imagination and the Recognition of a Privacy Tort in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Incrementalism; Appeal; Political science; Relevance (law); Privacy law; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to privacy; Seclusion; Sociology; Law and economics; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02071936939205474,"score_gpt":0.26659371555057937,"score_spread":0.24587434615852463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996343216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34412533,0.0042945896,0.0049664844,0.14613228,0.00030126682,0.00009477476,0.0000638694,0.000039210903,0.49998224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848083,0.0009523751,0.00052139885,0.0017208421,0.0000319857,0.0000150886735,0.000008917739,0.000010155475,0.01193094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475795,0.0014217165,0.00014262243,0.00046286325,0.0018184724,0.0013962764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959525,0.0022965535,0.00035968533,0.00025155657,0.00069098384,0.00044871078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004008534,0.0002579218,0.0002727453,0.00088993757,0.032646663,0.011291273,0.0020086372,0.0048360582,0.0021345862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009534465,0.0003553827,0.00033381648,0.0013796831,0.06606977,0.005623496,0.0070438,0.0053338977,0.000105709434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002854277,0.000018990842,0.0018725834,0.000035370947,0.0000046224036,0.00079560914,0.21288757,0.00027771093,0.00041272354,0.77225006,0.003993233,0.0074230297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047728216,0.000039043825,0.010717774,0.00028004745,0.000040064708,0.0004972176,0.2855772,0.0012603243,0.0012271779,0.32209158,0.37808418,0.00013769245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91008645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9468492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12290819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12290819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09414766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8917655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996534558","doi":"10.7202/1000784ar","title":"Pour que la tempête ne s’étende jamais hors du verre d’eau : réflexions sur la protection des convictions religieuses au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036239806676623014,"score_gpt":0.2557501509118467,"score_spread":0.2195103442352237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996534558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5925473,0.006207245,0.0012518512,0.15114577,0.00053156656,0.000067783716,0.00014897715,0.000020932976,0.24807855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96923953,0.0013112426,0.00018423967,0.004776413,0.000022977058,0.00001542633,0.00001734067,0.000011553943,0.024421219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672526,0.00091746374,0.000049075006,0.00019527179,0.00080021966,0.001312735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951292,0.0015609727,0.0003335333,0.00015208879,0.0015877924,0.0012363316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003279828,0.00020846547,0.00028503517,0.0008186681,0.031076852,0.0072322465,0.0012990042,0.0021168885,0.0057309144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070200674,0.00023233057,0.0002518338,0.0012119868,0.01864811,0.0018617033,0.003841575,0.004921077,0.00025092563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009315751,0.000053168464,0.025147565,0.00013668113,0.00003393578,0.0013245298,0.6390429,0.0002432676,0.0008358099,0.2652175,0.033565585,0.034305807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022172833,0.000033761393,0.04517567,0.0006679464,0.00003488935,0.00019125892,0.6788506,0.00022805847,0.00046004908,0.011576795,0.26267606,0.00008278183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9770066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06817199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06817199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120736755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49462473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996706811","doi":"10.7202/1013032ar","title":"“Dignitizing” Free Speech in Israel: The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution on Free Speech Protection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Free speech; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.027358065569301683,"score_gpt":0.2566332219396279,"score_spread":0.22927515637032622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996706811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36675417,0.016266035,0.022576787,0.07466701,0.00083322835,0.000098266486,0.00019125217,0.0000828955,0.5185303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987112,0.0016972733,0.0012156068,0.0043217735,0.00038395124,0.000031858995,0.000047434918,0.000017262513,0.0051728804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935707,0.0027188337,0.00021750099,0.0005782394,0.0020538422,0.0008609262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98280615,0.013656321,0.0010209302,0.00084868446,0.0012285151,0.0004394022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012248709,0.00026540103,0.00037518548,0.0021264802,0.003267479,0.008169958,0.001037653,0.00288466,0.004301293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021391336,0.00020573869,0.00033987904,0.0011391606,0.027024845,0.0058208373,0.0035724775,0.004338687,0.0003478656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038855665,0.000031619875,0.0015958505,0.000057822712,0.000010615297,0.00014375,0.005805138,0.000669462,0.0004594353,0.95160604,0.0018640239,0.037717372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073974836,0.00018934759,0.017022967,0.000950437,0.000051346386,0.00034497294,0.014224663,0.0034343407,0.003912226,0.7712426,0.18843456,0.00011855647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011593941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01298482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008656299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00591008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06477815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996733001","doi":"10.7202/1006419ar","title":"No Taps, No Toilets: First Nations and the Constitutional Right to Water in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Sanitation; Constitutional right; Human rights; Constitution; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Obligation; Right to health; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Business; International human rights law; Right to property; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.019659538043614914,"score_gpt":0.22625837017865014,"score_spread":0.20659883213503522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996733001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05360361,0.009698533,0.002504826,0.14237478,0.0008565944,0.00015956361,0.00059200154,0.00006480548,0.79014516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7966962,0.006011051,0.0022679411,0.049014986,0.00022675811,0.00013455219,0.00018548557,0.00005877769,0.14540413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927443,0.00076921267,0.00014367652,0.00072761433,0.0021817223,0.003433529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971854,0.00090046134,0.00013613341,0.00013463304,0.0008644902,0.0007789696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030931672,0.00046725964,0.00050231494,0.0010777572,0.035802234,0.010898621,0.0020758456,0.0072511868,0.006252093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006790997,0.00053945807,0.00045391812,0.0018557619,0.024155378,0.0035873367,0.004566439,0.00916203,0.00035059848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012446832,0.00001080005,0.00095122436,0.00002306658,0.000004888136,0.00022489681,0.0050216187,0.00025041937,0.000110254165,0.971396,0.01838268,0.0036116922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009165627,0.000035381287,0.010520432,0.0005917811,0.00007145977,0.00024337192,0.018408136,0.0014526214,0.00060834654,0.17872198,0.78898513,0.0002697352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12380683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12380683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23878776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8982856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997374609","doi":"10.7202/045090ar","title":"Sustainability, Global Justice, and the Law: Contributions of the Hon. Justice Charles Doherty Gonthier","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sustainability; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.007963621028495576,"score_gpt":0.2977342751419543,"score_spread":0.2897706541134587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997374609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063192484,0.13481806,0.00054151495,0.80912006,0.0056574843,0.000014911705,0.00004272269,0.000015438936,0.049157884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110995285,0.17349575,0.0024885878,0.5333031,0.0186423,0.00014475927,0.00007081069,0.00014336506,0.16071615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993313,0.0026549,0.00017853969,0.0007411615,0.0023541185,0.0007581546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917176,0.0054719546,0.00038408712,0.00034464992,0.0012905797,0.00079100544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072944313,0.0007815209,0.00082761963,0.0017841571,0.009274373,0.009295387,0.001618572,0.01399911,0.0055762855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013658827,0.00062201824,0.0004932922,0.0019965672,0.017994719,0.0107056135,0.0066594174,0.014779429,0.00119631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010866367,0.000017186163,0.00023990785,0.00009350234,0.000007956177,0.00007953928,0.0024685045,0.0001225867,0.000049708287,0.34700787,0.6344311,0.015471295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094145635,0.0000069148923,0.0005312428,0.0005762221,0.000008181762,0.00009515511,0.0026987023,0.00009565489,0.00006921282,0.13988884,0.85599244,0.000027974536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09568658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15311614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90431345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013523425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020383945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19025928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000008918","doi":"10.7202/1005137ar","title":"Kuwait Airways Corp. c. Irak, 2010 CSC 40","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.07920427953899149,"score_gpt":0.22811765212940674,"score_spread":0.14891337259041526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000008918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015355679,0.007136942,0.00054130476,0.009674666,0.0013657103,0.00031318967,0.0084488625,0.0006990152,0.9564645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012081625,0.0009501257,0.00014474354,0.0006644701,0.000060730177,0.000044801793,0.0006815005,0.000060820308,0.98531127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945253,0.000037199075,0.00004092175,0.0000922903,0.000223727,0.000153368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994248,0.000050460345,0.000042412117,0.000048713966,0.00038252573,0.000051038118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060213427,0.0011297368,0.00026756572,0.0015850592,0.00628014,0.0060877963,0.00095905125,0.00426667,0.18997842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015292852,0.00085895223,0.00037189934,0.0017633414,0.0010415537,0.0029633502,0.0015847568,0.00239893,0.09259315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000224359,0.000099611796,0.002665089,0.00022398637,0.000016198306,0.0006019055,0.00090521027,0.00045961078,0.0016682894,0.021779617,0.906432,0.064924285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016017153,0.00002461179,0.006388311,0.00013064724,0.0000096242,0.00008889517,0.0006590551,0.00017969617,0.0008919685,0.00065585796,0.99093074,0.000024721505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29099473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46768284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29099473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009127699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008110254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63554114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001310812","doi":"10.7202/1002368ar","title":"The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Information privacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Internet privacy; Copying; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Law; Privacy policy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0929479725175142,"score_gpt":0.2803846439826713,"score_spread":0.18743667146515713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001310812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4081103,0.013654961,0.026403673,0.08557349,0.0005497798,0.0000880691,0.00008108951,0.000039644252,0.465499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943948,0.0016815373,0.00085016596,0.0012844243,0.00016285603,0.00001748878,0.0000058124706,0.000009087937,0.0015938333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98771775,0.008469859,0.00040702787,0.0007140994,0.0015359818,0.0011552077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588962,0.03324865,0.0032409457,0.0020484081,0.0016754166,0.0008903723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008232546,0.00024536037,0.00036525037,0.0025277224,0.009260183,0.017363433,0.0014515228,0.0040494525,0.0065874816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023945736,0.0003890082,0.0005772427,0.0021471698,0.054102656,0.02473981,0.01095037,0.0051421574,0.00038055182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018617093,0.000039008602,0.0020100316,0.00005557083,0.0000056519275,0.0003018547,0.024837987,0.00035168667,0.000105521794,0.96517235,0.0005636574,0.0065380507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004365957,0.00008894744,0.007859959,0.0006279577,0.0000447234,0.0008337494,0.06791591,0.0020125986,0.00068671437,0.84384596,0.07598661,0.00005324374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006804093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006231014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017363433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005360117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04353839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001489085","doi":"10.7202/1002367ar","title":"A Theory of Fiduciary Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.07976588171203447,"score_gpt":0.30689945305939625,"score_spread":0.22713357134736178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001489085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074589276,0.0066443775,0.34177667,0.031701274,0.0007465104,0.0001681798,0.00019062846,0.00013025197,0.6111831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6950474,0.010801919,0.13350478,0.01397223,0.0024447157,0.0010898752,0.0003337261,0.0001288232,0.14267658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442816,0.0017889371,0.00030065718,0.0007503463,0.0021469763,0.00058492617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964007,0.001939979,0.0003304583,0.00048701654,0.0006600245,0.0001817938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053566713,0.0008195091,0.0008554962,0.0029130273,0.004518604,0.006341081,0.0024700945,0.007633474,0.006667614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070122937,0.0005756851,0.0015491947,0.001861403,0.021301443,0.008799738,0.0038785161,0.006190895,0.0018497354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.403959e-7,0.0000013615058,0.000007905032,0.000002577797,4.2714845e-7,0.00000875692,0.000035935736,0.00010930674,0.000004885514,0.9989208,0.00046654,0.00044125438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003723474,0.00000561574,0.00003092306,0.000039979877,0.0000020351592,0.00006192618,0.000035241494,0.00083954254,0.000032393837,0.97914827,0.019795587,0.000004728991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004534078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026709132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007633474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072371066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070555094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05250913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003043951","doi":"10.7202/1013033ar","title":"L’abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie 1","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06907063178431219,"score_gpt":0.33019011628675987,"score_spread":0.2611194845024477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003043951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026468279,0.003956536,0.0050291475,0.008617509,0.00017735177,0.000033321954,0.00009178777,0.000031062053,0.9555951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75956947,0.00286922,0.0018699646,0.003157846,0.00025945713,0.00007605899,0.000108968066,0.000098262666,0.2319908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972664,0.0009533685,0.000079670055,0.00040929654,0.000715741,0.00057548087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988182,0.0005795705,0.00009436979,0.00013567648,0.0002649689,0.00010713382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016052374,0.00045151007,0.00030384873,0.0014772142,0.006328124,0.006641018,0.00085940043,0.002636122,0.012811363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025462783,0.00032812287,0.0005829603,0.0013007326,0.016519738,0.0043053934,0.0032142682,0.0041280673,0.0015328629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004487768,0.0000041791677,0.0002569606,0.0000151715,0.0000017113495,0.00005624374,0.003637629,0.000046725767,0.000068841255,0.9912708,0.0021253128,0.0025120426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014374908,0.000044410495,0.004758019,0.0004735812,0.000016320004,0.00038581513,0.008654909,0.0005891753,0.0005780453,0.25438496,0.73006,0.000040441348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07408409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077469505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07408409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049643293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14730579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003149431","doi":"10.7202/1017517ar","title":"Eco-terrorists Facing Armageddon: The Defence of Necessity and Legal Normativity in the Context of Environmental Crisis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Environmental law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Normative; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Invocation; Environmental degradation; Law; Resilience (materials science); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.012867708003598108,"score_gpt":0.2555190735708673,"score_spread":0.24265136556726918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003149431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4340738,0.004939329,0.0052407193,0.23658241,0.0004799796,0.00006534919,0.000063996915,0.00004437627,0.31851012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893909,0.00042762596,0.0004882873,0.0044638542,0.00003356455,0.0000091105,0.0000062643803,0.000007679878,0.0051727523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416476,0.0019967416,0.000112971305,0.00048605987,0.0011403231,0.002099167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937774,0.0028563302,0.0005484159,0.00032240603,0.0013889374,0.0011066077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067904107,0.00020380437,0.00039283396,0.0009612925,0.027052185,0.01154096,0.0016666189,0.007615813,0.0027517867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011061285,0.0002411576,0.00032863097,0.00085528597,0.04751178,0.0046501197,0.005759004,0.007411663,0.00012659295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042887503,0.000022357885,0.0041488553,0.000051938146,0.000010691683,0.0010238987,0.09406267,0.00046460098,0.0005406134,0.8838872,0.007213969,0.008530396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005087719,0.000066695655,0.0241124,0.00072503166,0.00006861025,0.00063148676,0.2745939,0.0025809023,0.0011976213,0.35532236,0.3404014,0.00024867017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88491213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9179711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88491213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054392617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06635774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39464796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003784538","doi":"10.7202/1000627ar","title":"Les rapports entre le droit administratif et les droits et libertés : la révision judiciaire ou le contrôle constitutionnel ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862416366487741,"score_gpt":0.32793883425570025,"score_spread":0.24169719760692615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0700768,0.017943578,0.01629313,0.20968607,0.0011869299,0.00011044453,0.00016918532,0.00013288794,0.68440104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607372,0.0037184532,0.0030470658,0.02336373,0.0004547401,0.00008415738,0.000043402717,0.00007805481,0.10847318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031395,0.0028662635,0.00025875907,0.0013387277,0.003077189,0.0021450242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953803,0.001950562,0.0005493869,0.0005477996,0.0011427468,0.00042921223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067717903,0.0004908075,0.0006086071,0.00096844364,0.008284222,0.012609664,0.001962914,0.006744006,0.006894906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009841577,0.00033254785,0.00060639036,0.0010786889,0.022269823,0.0063720997,0.0040359707,0.009242933,0.0009959788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012756291,0.000007996092,0.00047013734,0.00002223432,0.0000052613427,0.00009093868,0.0053928196,0.00009473331,0.00021420633,0.98247004,0.005407059,0.0058119665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004341515,0.00006181869,0.0072629945,0.0006210615,0.000043708656,0.00021982317,0.014405794,0.0008320174,0.0021074153,0.3486271,0.62565243,0.00012235796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2604135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3184528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024656316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03171979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51779544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003991614","doi":"10.7202/038893ar","title":"The Confessions Rule and the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Silence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Charter; Bill of rights; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02090596218630384,"score_gpt":0.31377633744655514,"score_spread":0.2928703752602513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003991614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009359814,0.0058884607,0.015359883,0.10901466,0.004605004,0.00037147762,0.0010175755,0.0003061864,0.85407686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37873134,0.006486927,0.030099278,0.106095344,0.003507661,0.000681429,0.0012749754,0.00033149333,0.47279155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716727,0.003039261,0.0010844499,0.002532924,0.016727546,0.004943069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858825,0.0038268736,0.00061148516,0.0010114476,0.007634746,0.0010329718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009578248,0.00065553235,0.0006395162,0.0015624483,0.009136008,0.010938308,0.003553978,0.011850663,0.007176664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026603306,0.00080830767,0.001008066,0.0013693151,0.015956666,0.0032491279,0.0022924251,0.01495245,0.0021961953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132539635,0.000006054095,0.000114258546,0.000026893995,0.0000026115233,0.00008795541,0.00053842703,0.00014184276,0.00016760087,0.94425505,0.04914101,0.005505094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006576662,0.000049505812,0.001954686,0.00029833426,0.00003738299,0.00020310393,0.0007309413,0.0011555414,0.001177664,0.15519944,0.8389417,0.00018595273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87441105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86729604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12558895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033577364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12160953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25265712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003998827","doi":"10.7202/045086ar","title":"Principles-Based Securities Regulation in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Business; Systemic risk; Financial market; Regulatory reform; Economics; Finance; Accounting; Financial system; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02600271453978982,"score_gpt":0.2259938378811224,"score_spread":0.19999112334133257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003998827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08465805,0.005678876,0.028932177,0.5106597,0.0027924923,0.0001265238,0.0000811662,0.0002296886,0.36684135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754793,0.0022455107,0.007536687,0.08488074,0.0011416822,0.0001463464,0.0000446919,0.00008260918,0.028442498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889614,0.004152284,0.0005836485,0.0011788231,0.0037202502,0.0014035305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777384,0.006104516,0.0015023605,0.001396874,0.002666792,0.0005555104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014278088,0.00025343723,0.00041545636,0.00067119626,0.0036328835,0.00601881,0.0010872104,0.010662989,0.0014275141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025030244,0.00036913366,0.0006871651,0.00067277526,0.015358294,0.004373385,0.0038076204,0.011646077,0.00035562943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015699326,0.000016532606,0.00056809216,0.000021942578,0.000004621346,0.00013871153,0.001307863,0.0011322383,0.00027519886,0.9755333,0.013718992,0.0072668237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051117808,0.00006075811,0.0023525956,0.00021980346,0.000017466724,0.00015790685,0.00076174934,0.0025727435,0.00072886475,0.80729747,0.18572971,0.000049812188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007499361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014278088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006300646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007698477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07551062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004954045","doi":"10.7202/1019051ar","title":"Justifying Fiduciary Duties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Beneficiary; Corporation; Law; Law and economics; Business; Principal (computer security); Statute; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.040654380132251325,"score_gpt":0.3117595270626976,"score_spread":0.2711051469304463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004954045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046792403,0.0034992332,0.2356991,0.07293125,0.0017450504,0.00033442784,0.0002570247,0.0002448367,0.63849664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92104197,0.0013744688,0.04140588,0.009008847,0.0014539147,0.00046622808,0.00012216387,0.0001576854,0.024968795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775326,0.008120936,0.0016708289,0.0028760321,0.007964122,0.0018355156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767602,0.013989967,0.0018088071,0.0031286723,0.0038541986,0.00045811397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023528442,0.0008848445,0.0014574475,0.0034211332,0.009226807,0.007854165,0.0028715434,0.012571357,0.0049947784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042734545,0.00087166415,0.0011528685,0.0012608927,0.04075658,0.010184462,0.0062790117,0.012921932,0.0013114373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015329987,0.0000031608333,0.000033660588,0.000008079695,0.0000014559362,0.000018617278,0.00021339879,0.000060034756,0.000019189523,0.9986733,0.00038019905,0.00058738614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010992652,0.0000075120533,0.0001014789,0.00007434614,0.0000057258558,0.000045910867,0.00017594887,0.0006231998,0.00019269143,0.98282856,0.015920248,0.000013399526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042979326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023528442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074900887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072778245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12443179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.02575296900620931,"score_gpt":0.2818926077589995,"score_spread":0.25613963875279017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005027983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11886904,0.0035978216,0.018466815,0.027856026,0.0002527482,0.00022021784,0.00045860937,0.00017247358,0.83010626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97363937,0.0008853565,0.003478695,0.00094771356,0.000039380022,0.00004960216,0.00008597073,0.000030196818,0.020843726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865556,0.0014885721,0.00032231474,0.0014163798,0.0056497697,0.0045672795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938226,0.0013744453,0.00062059844,0.0006683445,0.0024844247,0.001029668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045098932,0.0003791409,0.0004201969,0.0033975116,0.024772791,0.009852796,0.001374303,0.0018452615,0.005224592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014641934,0.00037997199,0.0005024643,0.004059214,0.031210726,0.003635812,0.0041799624,0.005798413,0.00030133026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069767916,0.0000026692376,0.00061302603,0.000011889697,0.0000021823237,0.000032949294,0.0025846602,0.0003823756,0.00007278239,0.98974913,0.0014911272,0.0050502713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056968747,0.000022145721,0.015525808,0.00024304591,0.000035066078,0.00016018917,0.008834325,0.0046371818,0.0006787285,0.689232,0.28045842,0.00011603982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13724777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13724777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1128443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006227366","doi":"10.7202/1007817ar","title":"Jurisdiction of Mental Health Tribunals to Provide Positive Remedies: Application, Challenges, and Prospects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Autonomy; Sine qua non; Health care; Mental health; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Power (physics); Scope (computer science); Discretion; Mental health law; Law and economics; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.042127858172511294,"score_gpt":0.3703069044678005,"score_spread":0.3281790462952892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006227366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06197079,0.016071748,0.0088249305,0.48801506,0.001271834,0.00019592009,0.00012381213,0.000079774705,0.42344606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995178,0.0052910815,0.003921854,0.05416269,0.0010381573,0.00015882585,0.000048811333,0.000050979685,0.0358098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97247946,0.006347627,0.00080428267,0.0030617644,0.007988552,0.009318323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613495,0.021813288,0.0014402984,0.0019627598,0.009406972,0.0040271697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031887725,0.0005604888,0.0009567423,0.0028536425,0.024787322,0.022641575,0.007842781,0.019449534,0.010275041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042556617,0.00082787045,0.0012691965,0.002468368,0.047496654,0.010925856,0.009696308,0.015956644,0.00081085425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012443841,0.00003354756,0.00074617745,0.00005627581,0.0000088221705,0.00018507942,0.00409507,0.00027003296,0.00016319625,0.9751152,0.008878159,0.010435962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017448585,0.00014027017,0.007928811,0.0015225464,0.00014736486,0.00041721793,0.038882256,0.0036609692,0.00091215246,0.58390903,0.36197624,0.00032859104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6443556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71353674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6443556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058278285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10581936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7154777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008845298","doi":"10.7202/1013388ar","title":"Making Sense of the Shift in Paradigm on Cartel Enforcement: The Case for Applying a Desert Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Cartel; Mindset; Law and economics; Criminal law; Competition law; Competition (biology); Deterrence (psychology); Law enforcement; Political science; Enforcement; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economics; Sociology; Incentive; Market economy","score_opus":0.05943427094717804,"score_gpt":0.25690755046902214,"score_spread":0.1974732795218441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008845298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028933179,0.009980233,0.08838032,0.64175737,0.0016745239,0.00006711897,0.00007053462,0.00008926877,0.22904743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8481635,0.004721735,0.024084534,0.10199386,0.0033598305,0.00017880942,0.00004202767,0.00013875912,0.017317025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828802,0.008962771,0.00045857992,0.0019610415,0.003973596,0.0017637704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406685,0.017027812,0.0020946155,0.0024718053,0.0030122218,0.001326677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021854928,0.0005579125,0.0010420439,0.0023023568,0.007564741,0.0132984985,0.0040373644,0.014397587,0.003033973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02789014,0.0004369798,0.0010130014,0.0017431695,0.052358814,0.01340774,0.005517162,0.016486822,0.0005098782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027689973,0.000005021266,0.000060171722,0.000007284137,0.0000017325794,0.000019977702,0.00035108166,0.00013653544,0.000012766088,0.9966492,0.001517344,0.0012362112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010479276,0.00000947938,0.00013325625,0.00005871845,0.000002778687,0.000035373596,0.00043571022,0.00074368546,0.000048405986,0.9706998,0.027811587,0.000010694812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008219071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008438342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021854928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008625255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009542137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115581274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009151479","doi":"10.7202/1013030ar","title":"African Customary Marriages in South Africa and the Intricacies of a Mixed Legal System: Judicial (In)novatio or Confusio?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legislature; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Legal history; Indigenous; Legal profession; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Marriage law; Common law; Legal realism; Public law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028546077294312085,"score_gpt":0.27755494852196305,"score_spread":0.24900887122765097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009151479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707,0.03480077,0.0018705486,0.070595704,0.0003306865,0.00006508884,0.000027302849,0.000010659868,0.22159922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899115,0.0053847143,0.00025504196,0.0014135006,0.000060244423,0.00001638745,0.0000038039539,0.000003244027,0.0029515564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877197,0.0005418441,0.000051970394,0.00008194584,0.00015003352,0.00040229087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989127,0.0005493537,0.00026232464,0.000055230303,0.000074991956,0.00014532261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001689343,0.00020770518,0.00021974459,0.0010178976,0.011969553,0.0048818714,0.0006571859,0.002150983,0.0026117705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043706824,0.0003019808,0.00014823045,0.0019697468,0.018268622,0.0042315633,0.0046531,0.002936039,0.00012695923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083100485,0.000017144544,0.0024119995,0.00010863614,0.000004831383,0.0018438392,0.12505324,0.00006584328,0.00042498182,0.85543084,0.0017810718,0.012849296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003437775,0.00006411814,0.04087742,0.0019238103,0.00003354151,0.0059903087,0.43648538,0.0005639182,0.0009870732,0.20785247,0.30512175,0.00006590875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026730971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06174178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026730971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045651104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006101953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053150773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010483338","doi":"10.7202/038890ar","title":"Le rayonnement intellectuel de Jean Carbonnier au Québec : le succès d’estime d’un honnête homme","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010187225118489754,"score_gpt":0.19996980867557326,"score_spread":0.1897825835570835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010483338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8763018,0.0035067429,0.0010414154,0.014166652,0.00017793414,0.000040727566,0.001410197,0.000034644738,0.103319824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94436604,0.0010073404,0.00024672766,0.000597343,0.000028701888,0.000016393944,0.00031979659,0.000019550544,0.05339819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988367,0.00020431254,0.000024133285,0.00013863214,0.0004212512,0.00037487407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99304104,0.00080808875,0.0005617767,0.0002093229,0.004346528,0.0010332005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022603646,0.0003721336,0.00034216474,0.0018542337,0.006066005,0.003919434,0.00079680927,0.0008148561,0.009577697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075932327,0.0001813695,0.00024300128,0.0022744471,0.00222614,0.0011353549,0.0016100223,0.0018825749,0.0008707096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000389672,0.00009617429,0.5829391,0.00021874548,0.00018488891,0.0012380667,0.1325131,0.0030840135,0.00060968817,0.040075585,0.08200436,0.15664658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017024955,0.00009724884,0.6906843,0.0006449714,0.000095672134,0.00016159515,0.08177965,0.002905753,0.0006498964,0.0016796181,0.221163,0.000121246136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98757267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037460733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037460733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020205516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2717979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010539606","doi":"10.7202/1000787ar","title":"International Law and Human Rights: The Power and the Pity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Human rights; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Art; Physics; Literature","score_opus":0.011287098793801669,"score_gpt":0.28479012560725153,"score_spread":0.27350302681344985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010539606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051868865,0.10329334,0.004506095,0.32689598,0.0022183424,0.000020728763,0.00011233845,0.000055131663,0.55771124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71219975,0.06866423,0.0032624668,0.06306935,0.009126311,0.000121196725,0.00012644118,0.00018333313,0.14324692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952343,0.0021604318,0.00012388758,0.00048107724,0.0014619008,0.0005383906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571276,0.0025752517,0.00040966098,0.0005253187,0.00047215674,0.00030484583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040361737,0.0004792086,0.0005094538,0.001270343,0.0046173655,0.012785877,0.00095437566,0.0067601516,0.012223944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012331378,0.0003208756,0.00026898427,0.0024985182,0.045906022,0.016068453,0.005912602,0.00676109,0.0015835696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038310827,0.0000035507696,0.000073644245,0.000025329193,0.00000140896,0.00001956036,0.0011895966,0.000022939108,0.000017145456,0.9708406,0.022133779,0.005668641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010629473,0.000008660247,0.00065230206,0.00037152824,0.0000055823007,0.000084555475,0.002448288,0.00013971867,0.00009228888,0.7522408,0.24393085,0.000014762798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02068672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031290084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02068672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065956116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007577331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04785472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011668810","doi":"10.7202/1005132ar","title":"The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Legislature; Separation of powers; Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.045927220303203405,"score_gpt":0.3189576571520233,"score_spread":0.2730304368488199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011668810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037866388,0.006836645,0.07887689,0.06443116,0.0009415025,0.00008800106,0.00011503034,0.00008020263,0.81076425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338773,0.0020314401,0.013198988,0.010003343,0.0008494031,0.00032601808,0.00006584233,0.00008263568,0.03956499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912913,0.0037092145,0.00032370072,0.0013160778,0.0019068063,0.0014529108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318236,0.004027806,0.0005867915,0.0010557292,0.00072220166,0.00042505958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008502008,0.00038334695,0.00052000774,0.0015392489,0.005973168,0.010304322,0.0013575986,0.0069687106,0.004639256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017326454,0.0005138524,0.0005934278,0.0013585907,0.034209136,0.01201298,0.005049983,0.009263618,0.0008742065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015722783,0.0000013417945,0.00001859802,0.0000014555766,3.3476917e-7,0.000007084168,0.00014597831,0.00003543138,0.000007835598,0.99902666,0.00025910969,0.00049470284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016010426,0.000008606611,0.00014649188,0.0000456903,0.0000030760891,0.00003218604,0.00016331364,0.00037906866,0.00007944589,0.9710941,0.028020892,0.000011259896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005842348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005427031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010304322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006988259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008310247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050703585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012229299","doi":"10.7202/1013029ar","title":"South Africa: A Diceyan Rechtsstaat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Liberal democracy; Rule of law; State (computer science); Democracy; Interpreter; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060937889761241405,"score_gpt":0.3179023034452359,"score_spread":0.2569644136839945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012229299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06747731,0.053740636,0.0049617235,0.4408258,0.0040164883,0.00009827323,0.000088604,0.00005319828,0.4287379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670513,0.014936399,0.0026430155,0.050645694,0.0007081685,0.000099175995,0.000044895794,0.000052894316,0.06381854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984321,0.0004881565,0.00006667515,0.00026280404,0.00029113676,0.00045909124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994031,0.00029331257,0.00006431128,0.000065121385,0.00008294978,0.000091198395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024469143,0.0003967548,0.00030229104,0.00077066803,0.0067648,0.0044355527,0.000462267,0.0035999084,0.0043288623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044811377,0.00026136494,0.00024539008,0.0011619177,0.012469156,0.006968146,0.0036380738,0.0063983616,0.000484877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015740852,0.0000052142896,0.00024401228,0.00006155497,0.000003442283,0.0004587044,0.010850303,0.0000470439,0.0003823798,0.96992,0.008221161,0.009790533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024424722,0.000024221408,0.0014456748,0.0004353146,0.000011235784,0.0005297995,0.009856564,0.000114755705,0.0006874379,0.17365727,0.8131845,0.00002886261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022684412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03419188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022684412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005983211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068400837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0451048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014939371","doi":"10.7202/1013386ar","title":"Mental Capacity in the (Civil) Law: Capacity, Autonomy, and Vulnerability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Autonomy; Construct (python library); Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.07018616730346944,"score_gpt":0.2966239825638687,"score_spread":0.22643781526039924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014939371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33291125,0.0077247657,0.03894711,0.13405709,0.0004175176,0.00008781132,0.00007118003,0.00006399196,0.48571923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954412,0.00050724,0.0009065374,0.0014664312,0.000060835173,0.000026422937,0.0000073918154,0.0000049529663,0.0015788695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963846,0.0021930882,0.0001122346,0.00024445422,0.0005026791,0.0005629714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931257,0.004248483,0.0007780934,0.00052864116,0.00037938208,0.0009396645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041156947,0.00021813763,0.00023051309,0.0013628127,0.0028750298,0.0063391165,0.00092504505,0.0021039685,0.0027804833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010215609,0.00016200086,0.00028730568,0.0006856442,0.059847742,0.008024517,0.007009455,0.0033086909,0.00015208783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063742527,0.0000144266805,0.001523337,0.00001420475,0.0000028268719,0.00008475313,0.007737863,0.00017778245,0.000059246886,0.98489445,0.00066739763,0.0048173354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010556774,0.000024298126,0.0032122398,0.00014721692,0.0000053802487,0.00029876505,0.00982735,0.00063982705,0.00015026404,0.96353155,0.022127708,0.000024789582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004476826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029296067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063391165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042049205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039701066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030508935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015751754","doi":"10.7202/038657ar","title":"Quebec and Her Sisters in the Third Legal Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Wainwright; Jurisdiction; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Social science; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031135460406884606,"score_gpt":0.3149944510712077,"score_spread":0.28385899066432313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015751754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19351459,0.01896386,0.00189979,0.45829394,0.006297828,0.000087205415,0.00060736865,0.00016025228,0.32017514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56672734,0.0051033776,0.0010307301,0.042462915,0.00028481553,0.000039916966,0.000118799784,0.0000642949,0.38416782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991924,0.00017768737,0.000010263969,0.00009397684,0.00017374862,0.0003518371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988224,0.000102975995,0.000039278988,0.000029386189,0.00034674944,0.0006592321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008210939,0.0003142228,0.00033366156,0.0004203189,0.025272543,0.0029119833,0.00079533376,0.0021557258,0.013412774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001718923,0.00020786666,0.00028456,0.0005377803,0.0034919314,0.0013168838,0.0016657837,0.0039087813,0.0012361322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081260674,0.00008596682,0.016877552,0.00005818381,0.000024419876,0.008963828,0.09530289,0.00021599547,0.000958407,0.13541058,0.6755405,0.066480465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008854545,0.000031809566,0.009704388,0.00017839458,0.000012928678,0.0031687352,0.07644007,0.00018462456,0.00035087115,0.004011106,0.9058499,0.000058360572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96264875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032098137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033298545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23288935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016595766","doi":"10.7202/1029208ar","title":"De l’ombre à la lumière : l’hypothèse de la renaissance de la filiation romano-germanique de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021469752001563164,"score_gpt":0.3026347262711478,"score_spread":0.28116497426958464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016595766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14750302,0.001570777,0.011913652,0.0178719,0.00020162783,0.00007294471,0.00015698868,0.000053047155,0.820656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93314743,0.0005061065,0.0012341195,0.0010812853,0.0000439956,0.000034719644,0.00005116742,0.00003924377,0.06386196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981206,0.00054141536,0.0000327196,0.00031281303,0.0004168496,0.00057558005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981013,0.00051183684,0.00018779976,0.00029596992,0.00066403806,0.00023917116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022275776,0.00035217963,0.00031578986,0.0012010181,0.008250163,0.005597633,0.0010269735,0.0016508845,0.013845504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042869216,0.00024062887,0.0003210589,0.0013792141,0.025128378,0.0035188294,0.0024772685,0.0026872812,0.0009288285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019904703,0.000009403786,0.002135292,0.00003100828,0.0000064999554,0.00012600089,0.023609089,0.00016625918,0.00023908855,0.9637821,0.002265755,0.007609557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007144387,0.00007485932,0.04149108,0.0007194872,0.00006689383,0.0004257232,0.070605524,0.0022453272,0.0013970387,0.24697188,0.6358103,0.00012035884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72408915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7633483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27591085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027815422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022807589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5550715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016771929","doi":"10.7202/1026131ar","title":"Peut-être. Incertitude du risque et dialectique de la responsabilité","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037286686764817376,"score_gpt":0.4102324211141937,"score_spread":0.37294573434937633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016771929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076132335,0.00508615,0.023921004,0.02238847,0.00058161234,0.00007370912,0.0004719593,0.00008460679,0.8712601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207876,0.001926673,0.003599815,0.00362598,0.00022336129,0.00009835102,0.00016920568,0.000063388135,0.06950558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982151,0.0007014788,0.00007925145,0.00041568774,0.00039506622,0.0001934448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984854,0.0007373892,0.00020165012,0.00020351098,0.0002736842,0.00009840481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015518604,0.00044032373,0.00021249636,0.0009736235,0.0024799213,0.0043094284,0.0006631931,0.0019615476,0.012567546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003285165,0.0002726933,0.00037047488,0.00061209063,0.0116650555,0.005145544,0.0023128837,0.0034069165,0.001739245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017792174,0.00001563181,0.001391703,0.00006711886,0.000008554342,0.000098485274,0.016049366,0.000049536524,0.00037522157,0.97424084,0.0016344925,0.0060512754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032584936,0.00011333858,0.01728363,0.00038342425,0.000052066905,0.0016783401,0.022990067,0.0005160861,0.0017569875,0.50021863,0.45489347,0.00008133437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062021473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054687588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012567546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024927834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015214079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042042673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018588254","doi":"10.7202/1005848ar","title":"Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counterterrorism Law and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Political science; Parliament; Derogation; Human rights; Judicial deference; Covert; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03083224154445312,"score_gpt":0.28185435759528515,"score_spread":0.251022116050832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018588254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19793439,0.018243494,0.09529645,0.13506682,0.0013530774,0.00013942113,0.00004295585,0.00016355571,0.55175984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454756,0.0008135087,0.0031834815,0.004884381,0.00034909463,0.00005755984,0.000004345075,0.000025170215,0.00613501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811732,0.010920736,0.00065332203,0.0016142664,0.0031568166,0.0024816848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797815,0.015349851,0.0012257755,0.0019129085,0.0011980645,0.0005319095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016548846,0.0004518246,0.00072584185,0.0014319051,0.0058314293,0.015553341,0.0019144318,0.01202823,0.0024278343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031557232,0.0005865607,0.00062669,0.0007317254,0.05276855,0.011909892,0.007995968,0.010071015,0.0003247218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008944701,0.000007195677,0.00010774906,0.00001616969,0.0000032345054,0.00014335658,0.004261199,0.00016409038,0.0002233196,0.9916972,0.00049250736,0.0028750638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003103409,0.000067098044,0.0006000172,0.00024499852,0.000016299213,0.00024662426,0.0023257043,0.001094098,0.0009585382,0.947138,0.04722533,0.00005232548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007261733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076552066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016548846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007190376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053324434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087519705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020489753","doi":"10.7202/1000785ar","title":"Rethinking Criminal Responsibility for Poor Offenders: Choice, Monstrosity, and the Logic of Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Aside; Power (physics); Sociological theory; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10910012745275058,"score_gpt":0.35258117390764354,"score_spread":0.24348104645489296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020489753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22242568,0.0071386416,0.08863094,0.2841507,0.00054173917,0.00016872871,0.000045552475,0.00010475295,0.39679328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306244,0.0004450974,0.0026630005,0.001471378,0.000054855704,0.00003965162,0.000003161153,0.000013926674,0.0022465992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97493047,0.01772177,0.0005534698,0.0017477988,0.0029074706,0.0021389923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841547,0.010631601,0.0013698769,0.0014873539,0.0014276868,0.00092882215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019152598,0.00059070333,0.00079957827,0.002660691,0.01408253,0.014798451,0.002894527,0.006146033,0.0016460262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022617888,0.00046610614,0.00054493424,0.0020418803,0.22117914,0.01565754,0.0133708585,0.00811991,0.00015497115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058219703,0.0000054422208,0.0004083749,0.000015773472,0.0000026458138,0.000059685808,0.019364195,0.00016440034,0.000030476387,0.97676736,0.00038442342,0.0027914082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010088494,0.00001586268,0.00071239565,0.00012312944,0.000007941616,0.000069890986,0.020894598,0.00065714854,0.000121063254,0.9606064,0.016762333,0.000019128134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047084626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04527031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047084626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027643304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018673887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20056719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024782077","doi":"10.7202/1000624ar","title":"Legality as Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05092749860751865,"score_gpt":0.28922524883468015,"score_spread":0.2382977502271615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024782077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05125379,0.062252067,0.0053298664,0.2536247,0.0008215587,0.000052200878,0.00013428988,0.00006407031,0.6264674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92000514,0.0136903655,0.0023122318,0.020965658,0.00039610697,0.00004122034,0.00006222786,0.000049946728,0.04247703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949785,0.0012614083,0.00010649565,0.0005544322,0.0015236529,0.0015754377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958087,0.0022091472,0.0002812931,0.0001798625,0.0009438467,0.00057711656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041915025,0.00034771278,0.00063295284,0.0016784166,0.01736549,0.017274925,0.0018109229,0.0059058904,0.0021101355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007576438,0.0003602109,0.00043671325,0.0021221228,0.05870387,0.006593825,0.0033520989,0.008611049,0.0003004049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047327526,0.0000048133975,0.00026918724,0.000013356046,0.0000021188494,0.000062955616,0.0040894183,0.00009527915,0.000016768236,0.9876957,0.0053494875,0.002396052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033890552,0.000015609492,0.0036453418,0.00040896464,0.000024431993,0.0001724124,0.014232117,0.00072593096,0.00024509334,0.66892654,0.31149426,0.000075363496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90003335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9069813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90003335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07452166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07306632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.540695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025631202","doi":"10.7202/1000786ar","title":"L’équité judiciaire, de l’ombre à la lumière : archéologie d’une exception singulière aux règles de la publicité immobilière","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.07099168402152997,"score_gpt":0.30654151859586326,"score_spread":0.2355498345743333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025631202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027186124,0.018268665,0.0076256148,0.078422494,0.0007936488,0.000038809398,0.00014796581,0.000039689592,0.86747706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78127104,0.0041142767,0.0017010086,0.0096530635,0.00039188337,0.000064536194,0.00004906954,0.00006887035,0.20268624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.0007523588,0.000056498044,0.00053269044,0.0007396393,0.0007179092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.00030325018,0.00011411372,0.00012029534,0.0004745701,0.00017177007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019496295,0.00045512087,0.00039733696,0.0010771167,0.01550418,0.009430145,0.0014876873,0.004843081,0.00847401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031125615,0.00027297763,0.0004020588,0.001231888,0.031920288,0.004060458,0.002652498,0.0062686694,0.000702479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049661735,0.0000029013854,0.0002674146,0.000011849844,0.0000022295837,0.000058475016,0.0051120277,0.000063685824,0.000037526366,0.98313993,0.008674698,0.0026242887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019505722,0.000023642744,0.007935303,0.0003856754,0.000014660807,0.00020443177,0.013418649,0.00063987763,0.00026849812,0.35804254,0.61899984,0.00004733677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7478345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8287994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2521655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048620645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02977461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027872938","doi":"10.7202/1025141ar","title":"Corporate Liability for Foreign Corrupt Practices under Canadian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Liability; Language change; Business; Compliance (psychology); Enforcement; Corporate law; Law; Corporate liability; International law; Political science; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0955556092807517,"score_gpt":0.272727067309497,"score_spread":0.1771714580287453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027872938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22795404,0.023756849,0.0032331706,0.05750731,0.0002591326,0.00014427537,0.00058753387,0.00007960595,0.686478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587537,0.011873976,0.001534962,0.004934351,0.000074433745,0.000020250747,0.00016401285,0.000015420037,0.022629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98929846,0.0010044372,0.0002499312,0.0005744519,0.0071383403,0.0017344148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98744327,0.003258864,0.001703449,0.00044735725,0.006358371,0.00078871724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047898726,0.00023019507,0.00030006457,0.0035136333,0.0121894,0.006609517,0.001150637,0.0021144946,0.0028918628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014986496,0.00021264025,0.00031158066,0.0049002944,0.009970053,0.0017236039,0.0020503777,0.0018283641,0.0002151118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023951483,0.000046442503,0.027161783,0.00039514544,0.00002717773,0.00078151666,0.046186436,0.000927425,0.0008575528,0.79133934,0.039515693,0.09273757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015241474,0.00007001284,0.14557138,0.0020193006,0.000092977505,0.0008733778,0.041361414,0.0014640798,0.0012216658,0.04646677,0.7606385,0.00020532691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98562443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07356302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07356302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1477787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53373957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028993133","doi":"10.7202/1026134ar","title":"Decreasing the Data Deficit: Improving Post-Market Surveillance in Pharmaceutical Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Postmarketing surveillance; Clinical trial; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Market failure; Promotion (chess); Drug control; Market access; Public economics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Marketing; Industrial organization; Medicine; Adverse effect; Pharmacology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.37458824715676464,"score_gpt":0.5135214404674004,"score_spread":0.1389331933106358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028993133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05009211,0.029531326,0.19826493,0.65628684,0.0040752646,0.0029982103,0.00078136916,0.0015912157,0.056378704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61890274,0.012767988,0.13737263,0.20749351,0.010550609,0.004395169,0.00096409424,0.0006196982,0.006933506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.51715016,0.2932201,0.054255486,0.036630154,0.086369745,0.01237432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11263652,0.6342348,0.10745462,0.052727103,0.080999024,0.0119479485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5739746,0.0014297843,0.0033035604,0.018485619,0.0072322707,0.035476223,0.0117151225,0.019905724,0.0054257363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.667853,0.0028123027,0.0023970536,0.013092547,0.025152309,0.051345717,0.021604214,0.024630828,0.001853376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061438483,0.00078203,0.060954124,0.00442589,0.000488656,0.00091826636,0.015813753,0.0050573936,0.0031833253,0.36275092,0.06242092,0.48259032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012435723,0.0024408924,0.10618392,0.017619405,0.000619174,0.0019672166,0.008252174,0.018138092,0.007705682,0.36104366,0.47341773,0.0013684855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013694328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009057926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026806546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07622205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52536523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029074563","doi":"10.7202/1027721ar","title":"Constituent Power, the Rights of Nature, and Universal Jurisdiction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Constitution; Sovereignty; Virtue; Power (physics); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Humanity; Universal jurisdiction; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.005816882349276584,"score_gpt":0.2510207941636611,"score_spread":0.2452039118143845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029074563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052818555,0.003979888,0.09544083,0.033431817,0.00048822843,0.000087526634,0.000090555994,0.00009160998,0.813571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679685,0.00081173464,0.00666003,0.0042495993,0.0003539908,0.00013441114,0.000037637248,0.000037112794,0.019746896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99010676,0.003636909,0.00039280808,0.0015214657,0.0025354766,0.0018065122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235934,0.00452421,0.00054962863,0.0012799232,0.0009023675,0.0003844933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008069359,0.00038024885,0.00067483465,0.0013983966,0.0064298534,0.0060311034,0.0019308598,0.007356686,0.0058926046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014841971,0.00048967154,0.0010513489,0.0010003523,0.043943763,0.0118240025,0.009510992,0.007791336,0.0006726422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019825998,0.0000018805674,0.00006098692,0.000005251756,0.0000016096242,0.000029808522,0.00044248442,0.00008882842,0.00003037833,0.9982698,0.00026478505,0.0008022313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071922773,0.000009037747,0.00020772789,0.00005014561,0.000006519891,0.000095491654,0.0002707983,0.0002735677,0.00016277669,0.9703995,0.02850693,0.000010383948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007597381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066910507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008069359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039301454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00494769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042675316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029513835","doi":"10.7202/039646ar","title":"The Grammar of Customary Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Normative; Indigenous; Legal history; Sociology; Legal realism","score_opus":0.012417714216767448,"score_gpt":0.2751842133774959,"score_spread":0.2627664991607284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029513835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027150718,0.0056314277,0.062109802,0.026741577,0.00044824174,0.00004829331,0.0002384111,0.00024288578,0.8773886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94672656,0.0020356467,0.011715366,0.0026259664,0.00032349705,0.000087883294,0.00015250033,0.0001482917,0.03618427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967828,0.0012795434,0.00018257737,0.0005615433,0.0008777432,0.00031566975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.001500522,0.00020663733,0.00063311576,0.00037895617,0.00011546378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328269,0.00027321768,0.00034029922,0.0014757012,0.0036813726,0.0058481167,0.0010589169,0.001781535,0.004479415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957354,0.0003411968,0.00048893184,0.0015569549,0.033428244,0.0067072078,0.0027496598,0.002673048,0.00057769514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.108694e-7,8.6244296e-7,0.000044442797,0.0000045475667,7.933446e-7,0.000007455104,0.00084763765,0.00005552442,0.000013141614,0.9969495,0.0007324388,0.001343135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024874246,0.0000027721928,0.00024293795,0.00003980274,0.0000023815708,0.000048470683,0.00053993263,0.000264029,0.00004865153,0.9405568,0.05824545,0.000006340979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016482957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012771861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016482957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046179728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044032997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033505917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032906683","doi":"10.7202/1022312ar","title":"Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Employment and Labour Law Contexts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Universitat Pompeu Fabra","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Labour law; Law; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04704999531085361,"score_gpt":0.35333205164371134,"score_spread":0.3062820563328577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032906683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045624472,0.0047024097,0.12595224,0.053348407,0.00088253623,0.0001973192,0.00010185018,0.0000931566,0.76909757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578931,0.0015867101,0.016339295,0.0068909843,0.0003189364,0.00012823378,0.000021254607,0.000039032486,0.016782485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854709,0.005878087,0.00038341948,0.0015167341,0.0040957388,0.0026550714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505025,0.002909971,0.00033427041,0.0005151719,0.00087684946,0.0003134543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010440982,0.00052941515,0.00048965384,0.0016266512,0.0134938955,0.009219997,0.002308468,0.004851898,0.002848999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015252423,0.00054264074,0.0007532753,0.001586916,0.061806407,0.0074890507,0.008983968,0.0072415615,0.0002889619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014207386,0.0000022407528,0.00010514886,0.0000061275755,0.0000013384755,0.000031542673,0.0016568969,0.0000812956,0.000025622156,0.99608326,0.0003207136,0.0016842824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008402332,0.000010530507,0.0007263136,0.00009048757,0.000008971256,0.000060192186,0.001963179,0.0005221751,0.0002113677,0.95416754,0.042210154,0.000020678577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3208609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33186713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3208609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02557104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031259805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63798654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033495146","doi":"10.7202/1000788ar","title":"L’ordre juridique arbitral : réalité, utilité et spécificité","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495763181199125,"score_gpt":0.24754033909923343,"score_spread":0.19796402097932092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033495146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1322697,0.00871566,0.022690892,0.027604438,0.00023090787,0.00005970728,0.00013743856,0.00009177989,0.80819947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96274865,0.0019878678,0.0028943198,0.00095207087,0.000115369505,0.000055754157,0.000056610555,0.00006728327,0.031122137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909751,0.0052060517,0.00034648392,0.0008342414,0.0018743458,0.00076378696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928289,0.0039550043,0.00069416955,0.00075800705,0.0012289091,0.0005350031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008756101,0.00037750887,0.00038916952,0.0017856489,0.0056182514,0.01858406,0.0012928883,0.0028438277,0.010735963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013194257,0.00038422743,0.00038472202,0.003381486,0.016471807,0.011047148,0.0047667027,0.0037415973,0.0011770782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026584463,0.000012571355,0.0026301183,0.000085559506,0.0000093911185,0.00012256933,0.029631605,0.00016984284,0.00024211976,0.9480788,0.0022024114,0.016788572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033169512,0.000060366514,0.021568587,0.0011041252,0.000051497016,0.00091349706,0.082713574,0.0020967566,0.0012618925,0.42499444,0.4650488,0.00015328213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01678235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018006876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01858406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00651945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050486894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047302127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033979548","doi":"10.7202/1000617ar","title":"L’héritage de l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis 1959-2009","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02911325364606312,"score_gpt":0.30967330317632874,"score_spread":0.28056004953026564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033979548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019422874,0.043566268,0.002170417,0.07766478,0.0055744937,0.00013829047,0.0014963428,0.0001348666,0.84983176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32082564,0.017850285,0.0015420981,0.045647096,0.0031670213,0.00014910317,0.000647206,0.00017251528,0.60999906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949608,0.00054856396,0.00022855183,0.0008081697,0.0024968644,0.0009570925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969392,0.001009748,0.00042772383,0.00032817715,0.001050209,0.00024496752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033281078,0.00055129087,0.0004070346,0.0020214058,0.008476927,0.004828459,0.0015911048,0.005420659,0.015702419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010563827,0.00070871203,0.00049007544,0.0014220956,0.0045213825,0.0038335342,0.0034193504,0.010253421,0.0032901762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007754524,0.000027178943,0.0025741663,0.00016949816,0.000019115245,0.0006503282,0.004588059,0.00009135416,0.00047885516,0.49714988,0.4389726,0.055201426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007230487,0.000015621727,0.0032877265,0.00029345497,0.000015560156,0.00022164984,0.00031962263,0.00003950301,0.0006841775,0.00419972,0.99089116,0.000024604191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29796544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43822297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016581558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013650215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035165792","doi":"10.7202/039838ar","title":"From Sham to Reality: Should a Wrong Be Taxed as a Right?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Equity (law); Neutrality; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Doctrine; Political science; Tax law; Common law; Database transaction; Economics; Business; Double taxation; Finance","score_opus":0.04399651806378684,"score_gpt":0.2913284978211279,"score_spread":0.24733197975734106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035165792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037107877,0.01757204,0.022070842,0.6665205,0.003858926,0.000050436018,0.00007592109,0.00006139547,0.252682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845516,0.00942645,0.0033280347,0.07305774,0.0018587477,0.00005787751,0.00005170576,0.000073188734,0.027594673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928276,0.0030465294,0.00031462865,0.0007125971,0.00204496,0.0010537169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935056,0.003966597,0.00047110542,0.00052631815,0.0011296889,0.00040071405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008179778,0.0005251114,0.00078061473,0.0012903743,0.009168453,0.012857125,0.0021907694,0.014377523,0.0041016564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020269884,0.0005416922,0.0006585518,0.0012985757,0.075712614,0.026470916,0.004614666,0.016471118,0.0007119617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073073297,0.000009974695,0.00030160364,0.000031531094,0.0000035238747,0.00021612522,0.004621005,0.00007983283,0.000055325017,0.9809771,0.007965291,0.0057313326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014744748,0.00001796152,0.0005038065,0.00035156522,0.0000097826605,0.00024902416,0.01192112,0.00026944018,0.0001502995,0.92046225,0.066023834,0.00002612905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041457888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05453547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041457888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020667437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015102098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14995342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035605315","doi":"10.7202/1027720ar","title":"Les relations fiscales Canada — Nouveau-Brunswick de 1867 à 1917","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01386344679956529,"score_gpt":0.2228182480841039,"score_spread":0.20895480128453858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035605315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51258516,0.017295193,0.0005295878,0.051291384,0.0007096434,0.00015263143,0.00622097,0.00006832848,0.4111471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84003174,0.004583988,0.00032970312,0.0021832506,0.000062871186,0.00006022416,0.00074161205,0.000040404986,0.1519662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981103,0.00010295265,0.00005075852,0.00013668776,0.00041691726,0.0011823007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826753,0.00027995254,0.00018252249,0.00008022542,0.00072396087,0.0004657185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008709581,0.000315136,0.0003274316,0.0022119116,0.01902705,0.0061965277,0.0012412652,0.0014318676,0.00862479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033072112,0.00048433794,0.0002090397,0.005875688,0.0046378314,0.0010985396,0.0019677316,0.0028967091,0.00050856714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029188604,0.00007283733,0.07222512,0.00035136347,0.00007075698,0.0020944297,0.09846079,0.0012450865,0.0024873405,0.64138687,0.10715259,0.07416084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004182206,0.00001724448,0.12714048,0.0003180268,0.000025295098,0.00016696501,0.034115054,0.00020291358,0.0006849888,0.004778804,0.83243185,0.00007656633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19989717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19989717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19222653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9280059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036660388","doi":"10.7202/038658ar","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Law; Pleasure; Supreme court; Constitution; Liberalism; Politics; Mainstream; Sociology; Political science; Identity (music); Psychology","score_opus":0.10866045140832759,"score_gpt":0.3559120432329751,"score_spread":0.2472515918246475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036660388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06997896,0.0024287547,0.00623366,0.07449616,0.00026414153,0.000027690885,0.000035971905,0.000028477078,0.8465062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871093,0.00044375812,0.0003097609,0.0024228175,0.00006763674,0.000014981609,0.000007975452,0.00001540899,0.009608376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383485,0.0027713524,0.00008979764,0.0004182363,0.001529758,0.0013559808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601126,0.0022418557,0.00036424928,0.00037753463,0.00057615235,0.00042901209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052738315,0.00019830064,0.00021909607,0.0010864458,0.012783025,0.011020626,0.00093562686,0.0035795048,0.0034120118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010041925,0.00026513246,0.00033453142,0.0008636905,0.08603063,0.0059606903,0.0045504533,0.004901706,0.0002462028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019247686,0.0000037918749,0.00019195098,0.0000041205817,7.974396e-7,0.000027045311,0.0109571135,0.000033488035,0.00003055906,0.98619634,0.0008608341,0.001691957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017134884,0.0000126623945,0.002167257,0.00010732153,0.000007765565,0.00012927348,0.031165136,0.00038751806,0.00025385362,0.833558,0.13217038,0.00002363881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15119171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14363208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15119171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016153025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017144943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30062336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07964043449649322,"score_gpt":0.3457996897785181,"score_spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037174929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06041097,0.093133844,0.0012623508,0.4770701,0.0018511892,0.00007682192,0.00032722473,0.000039021517,0.36582842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7553086,0.031439863,0.00089805044,0.17396882,0.0015747523,0.00007720176,0.00016889983,0.000030813408,0.03653289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547464,0.0007989603,0.00016053439,0.00066401274,0.0017202824,0.0011815336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438053,0.0033557857,0.0006164531,0.00019261772,0.0009139792,0.0005407056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402265,0.00040833477,0.00072127476,0.0024415604,0.012175446,0.009808049,0.002228606,0.014239069,0.0024297384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012359291,0.00041471602,0.00058581657,0.00198233,0.021144744,0.00726976,0.0028149006,0.013266795,0.00035037426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026779977,0.000026938842,0.0030878366,0.00008339556,0.000015846832,0.00054127024,0.006879505,0.00011898723,0.00011450465,0.90993303,0.06321676,0.015955092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007071778,0.00009971854,0.030332481,0.0031555938,0.00016235342,0.0006832591,0.014630158,0.0005861226,0.0013673883,0.24056552,0.70811737,0.00022935604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7287629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7698148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27123708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04601696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028548304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54566884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040069261","doi":"10.7202/1000628ar","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Rule of law; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.057300528873199766,"score_gpt":0.31551749798359946,"score_spread":0.2582169691103997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040069261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041148964,0.014041959,0.007884685,0.359218,0.0009641286,0.00013213734,0.00020482877,0.00009094511,0.57631433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8777327,0.004523017,0.0039203023,0.05290372,0.0006161921,0.00016196696,0.000057361052,0.000052582174,0.060032263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996115,0.0022144383,0.00019565818,0.0011360013,0.004438703,0.0020540156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598265,0.001960773,0.0002382121,0.0003167723,0.00082080916,0.0006808038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00575857,0.0005363439,0.0005734819,0.0014427595,0.013699919,0.011755336,0.0027232817,0.008537818,0.002061935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008080492,0.00045087613,0.00050928077,0.001162054,0.04940428,0.0058926353,0.004565041,0.014568936,0.00030347123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057400484,0.0000043097425,0.00019837817,0.000007234723,0.0000013974469,0.00006558665,0.0016422643,0.0000620302,0.00004028237,0.987805,0.007729655,0.0024380544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047406626,0.00003721031,0.0033416976,0.00040678773,0.00003140453,0.00020290611,0.004994864,0.0015358562,0.00082908274,0.6047128,0.38372165,0.00013833551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8487437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88677365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06047361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07495343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4387688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041536915","doi":"10.7202/1029209ar","title":"“Third Parties” and Democracy 2.0","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Parliament; Democracy; Political science; Campaign finance; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06332487778188535,"score_gpt":0.321419525430219,"score_spread":0.2580946476483337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041536915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008026714,0.0052604377,0.010042948,0.052337937,0.0010726309,0.000054775508,0.000058676276,0.00010076074,0.9230451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79917747,0.00365611,0.0047252118,0.026976727,0.0011741053,0.00024866618,0.00009500236,0.00016718176,0.16377945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98601365,0.0062202006,0.0002895433,0.0014941371,0.0030268342,0.0029556802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956909,0.0016747401,0.0005651367,0.0007221638,0.0006354569,0.0007116427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009254778,0.0003966699,0.00045129278,0.0008371881,0.008568209,0.013039783,0.0012453473,0.0070286547,0.010545657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078244535,0.0002825406,0.00051666534,0.0014737851,0.031782847,0.0045327265,0.0068765706,0.009039032,0.0019267392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029695377,0.0000024631013,0.000047791265,0.000006252908,8.244111e-7,0.000011629613,0.00041377055,0.00004060036,0.0000130479475,0.995522,0.0021415208,0.001797179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020514462,0.000010502723,0.000416084,0.00010648869,0.0000040908276,0.000060741666,0.00060660735,0.00018693964,0.00014305097,0.7384021,0.26002634,0.000016507007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04987965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04177932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014432814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014704676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10471791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043446721","doi":"10.7202/1002369ar","title":"Le contrat d’assurance contemporain et la réification des parties","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08525442262759401,"score_gpt":0.3078656402410028,"score_spread":0.2226112176134088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043446721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059673637,0.0030905802,0.023102602,0.016876683,0.0004512945,0.0000499151,0.000089889,0.00006984185,0.8965957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83711255,0.001211864,0.003524155,0.0017230712,0.00026153764,0.00005734463,0.0000616505,0.00008238104,0.15596536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917635,0.0032449644,0.00026099695,0.0013792269,0.0024407534,0.0009104977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300075,0.0026323393,0.0011307565,0.001424696,0.0012863851,0.000525143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005676563,0.0003686585,0.0003394304,0.0012447117,0.0064084735,0.008816504,0.0010827143,0.0029681441,0.017694604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013364501,0.00032907643,0.00050754537,0.0013578436,0.015948918,0.0071737906,0.0053352914,0.0045245406,0.0019381607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010586073,0.0000037941527,0.00032910425,0.0000128061565,0.0000031973227,0.000037037542,0.0047089616,0.00006696458,0.00007983318,0.9894253,0.00085553614,0.004466959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025085259,0.000057751397,0.003950928,0.0002672693,0.000025509422,0.00033800924,0.008188914,0.00068697246,0.0008639398,0.47560403,0.5099446,0.00004693691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015805954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01534705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017694604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006798697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005701502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059194326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031017378010037153,"score_gpt":0.2320557403653359,"score_spread":0.20103836235529876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044500382","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2112757,0.3881095,0.0014372943,0.11752018,0.0030040594,0.00017261082,0.0010562205,0.00008521516,0.2773392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85814476,0.10437193,0.0010433504,0.017681118,0.0005906196,0.00004579749,0.00035176476,0.00010866965,0.017662028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779449,0.0017952736,0.00076645974,0.0013997335,0.012578418,0.0055151405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952723,0.017166022,0.0018297005,0.00080216676,0.024682581,0.0027965107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014890219,0.0005103817,0.0011032573,0.011259117,0.036556724,0.016405055,0.004237847,0.004523821,0.001887704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035549644,0.00091179245,0.00087522087,0.017621038,0.022477722,0.0034817893,0.0027576697,0.0078042424,0.00019773384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009408414,0.00009110064,0.020452997,0.0012205939,0.00015097823,0.002050307,0.12104412,0.0017404581,0.0005884747,0.5822579,0.14913912,0.121169865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020576988,0.000046790396,0.07233447,0.003248247,0.00019040814,0.00029335477,0.050474703,0.0007575311,0.0006773002,0.009566871,0.86211216,0.00027765293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99730265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.325088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.325088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3909802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7828023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044569947","doi":"10.7202/038652ar","title":"Libres propos sur la culture juridique québécoise dans un monde qui rétrécit","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.007539120071047782,"score_gpt":0.21608094331895,"score_spread":0.2085418232479022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044569947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14135464,0.038783826,0.0054392866,0.11159282,0.003240507,0.00010214329,0.000976862,0.00010592665,0.698404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65720093,0.017991958,0.0024331787,0.0107057635,0.00043110744,0.00009202534,0.00025620704,0.000091644535,0.31079718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921334,0.00018745291,0.000020896643,0.000095380325,0.00026267325,0.00022032946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998757,0.00033526774,0.000083301515,0.000047106358,0.0005265305,0.00025085144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008374087,0.0005494742,0.0003683989,0.0022406774,0.019820886,0.0072499826,0.000993413,0.0018312007,0.013349231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334888,0.00018635312,0.000225423,0.0039957133,0.010720532,0.0027616473,0.002212365,0.0032917808,0.0007328622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029474368,0.000024224177,0.008728106,0.00025435467,0.000022578102,0.00084312505,0.21390459,0.00030623996,0.0005929903,0.60590065,0.11890163,0.050492145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046004616,0.00001057218,0.013576295,0.00048717353,0.000015665477,0.00020246039,0.098019116,0.00019320563,0.00024014695,0.012843841,0.874358,0.000049091672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9539336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053771496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053771496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040717606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3901413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046946144","doi":"10.7202/1005134ar","title":"L’immunité de l’acte de fonction et la responsabilité pénale pour crimes internationaux des gouvernants en exercice","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09762691681737933,"score_gpt":0.331073466025417,"score_spread":0.23344654920803765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046946144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34452614,0.0044381954,0.00433597,0.044589605,0.0004381731,0.00006583671,0.00012674152,0.000035256126,0.6014442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94412804,0.001128452,0.00074655045,0.003393285,0.00014308438,0.000042699983,0.00005416533,0.000015503714,0.0503483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963846,0.0014188914,0.000107940316,0.00034761714,0.00080538495,0.000935494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959086,0.0012917871,0.0010190275,0.00028868343,0.0007277468,0.00076416536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003129919,0.00030190567,0.00020533516,0.00078109105,0.0022565124,0.004126693,0.0005427294,0.0017805549,0.012076776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073503894,0.00016239291,0.00033545087,0.0003964467,0.008464508,0.0018867411,0.0031188962,0.003093051,0.00080066436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010135583,0.00022732839,0.053956136,0.00015936235,0.000047521557,0.0006274725,0.04135972,0.00051002105,0.0018322528,0.8184253,0.009833224,0.07292037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041216015,0.0006597488,0.31062376,0.0013524882,0.00010075949,0.002030902,0.04526133,0.0011374882,0.0026972585,0.10944973,0.5265003,0.00014508978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027615217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045233935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027615217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003653865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004894808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05490899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047125366","doi":"10.7202/045087ar","title":"De Dunsmuir à Khosa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03396127961799788,"score_gpt":0.3236435114768137,"score_spread":0.2896822318588158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047125366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17669488,0.011092984,0.004722695,0.053486697,0.0020880145,0.0003154349,0.00070776505,0.00020805457,0.7506835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6035689,0.0034612278,0.0027128146,0.011089111,0.00017231239,0.00012590725,0.00025526082,0.00009973437,0.37851474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966781,0.00066180184,0.00011675126,0.0005245368,0.00100545,0.0010134011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713373,0.000642944,0.0002952671,0.00026629408,0.0010696391,0.0005920018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219883,0.00035862377,0.00041165206,0.00081188756,0.008622275,0.006556061,0.0007842854,0.0020544406,0.021875706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00472545,0.0003590894,0.00043631528,0.0013941481,0.0042707156,0.0014951861,0.0026453126,0.0044931727,0.0020663803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040848853,0.0001012201,0.018382143,0.0004417926,0.00006739112,0.001228,0.03528146,0.00074338913,0.0030381905,0.7694365,0.073756926,0.097114444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004484606,0.00007389537,0.029907405,0.00035440747,0.000032198557,0.00023423709,0.00958219,0.00029649254,0.0011068551,0.0075242785,0.95077574,0.00006745082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62311906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7256806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62311906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025280267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037315384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75820094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049285175","doi":"10.7202/1025144ar","title":"Of Justice and Its Scales: Looking Back on (Almost) Forty Years of Rod Macdonald’s Scholarship on Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09051163513513426,"score_gpt":0.4056112552012065,"score_spread":0.31509962006607223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049285175","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055674245,0.15861705,0.0008625159,0.78443676,0.0074854284,0.000012752975,0.00015273207,0.000020309195,0.04284503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4444309,0.17326993,0.002667741,0.3126382,0.016160721,0.00020157907,0.00034216908,0.00024110787,0.050047655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98283535,0.0073227533,0.00087222015,0.0010124494,0.006349729,0.0016074592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953704,0.023950642,0.0033877695,0.0024780182,0.010339985,0.006139509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016553713,0.00044826858,0.00079695624,0.004806821,0.008042347,0.01091311,0.0019567283,0.0054689143,0.007550674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06509124,0.00030708275,0.0004434718,0.005285672,0.034312885,0.029722165,0.011706331,0.016880851,0.0010064063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052217583,0.000040390045,0.0024923105,0.00043751317,0.00002340755,0.00010042747,0.024563223,0.000067688474,0.000093316776,0.51735294,0.34481972,0.109956905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010635952,0.000044974488,0.009305582,0.00384278,0.000015610789,0.000117275486,0.017716777,0.000087117,0.000106363026,0.17653637,0.7921119,0.00010464393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05891443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10286766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05891443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014240588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015452806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117143035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050516753","doi":"10.7202/1009064ar","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité dans une société démocratique égalitaire, pluraliste et multiculturelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250964000714904,"score_gpt":0.3233638978373402,"score_spread":0.29085425783019114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050516753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024389379,0.0044452525,0.059710234,0.03430685,0.0007237372,0.000075238495,0.00027388692,0.00013401282,0.8759415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.813464,0.002883269,0.016500216,0.007188837,0.00054834975,0.00019840838,0.0001617081,0.0001750993,0.15888019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618274,0.0016363402,0.00010497169,0.0007716192,0.0008228258,0.00048145073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987179,0.0003849904,0.00014499141,0.00028422562,0.0003617138,0.00010625678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027087722,0.00042854782,0.00030057537,0.0007987844,0.0052081645,0.0075213052,0.0008339054,0.002279004,0.007091696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033877075,0.00030477074,0.00061606406,0.0009427498,0.020446291,0.004368527,0.0026615683,0.004737655,0.0013487225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031864445,0.0000021219619,0.0001061362,0.000010702593,0.0000018719497,0.000007901463,0.0012378694,0.000060629693,0.000049000904,0.9961223,0.001116509,0.0012816524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019796445,0.000027554324,0.0014585142,0.00013266222,0.00001505322,0.000119731165,0.0019168536,0.00044189708,0.0005150612,0.64071417,0.35460922,0.000029432718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030359862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04355063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030359862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071520875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008728795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060366273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051485425","doi":"10.7202/1000621ar","title":"Rand’s Legal Republicanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ayn Rand and Brontë studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Law; Ideal (ethics); Public law; Rule of law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Civil law (Civil law); Politics; Private law; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Common law","score_opus":0.07561284486922691,"score_gpt":0.2037043644261806,"score_spread":0.1280915195569537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051485425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012146969,0.0097212875,0.002356997,0.3907895,0.0023032713,0.00005101049,0.00012491764,0.00010392306,0.58240217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5326838,0.003224858,0.0037356599,0.28008157,0.0036435907,0.00023166521,0.00009911019,0.00013633659,0.17616345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937835,0.0022958254,0.00026752253,0.0012801067,0.0015249421,0.00084809226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947601,0.002924035,0.0003146215,0.000631982,0.0009135567,0.00045571776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006515946,0.00046885244,0.0005393529,0.0011962604,0.006618339,0.007990417,0.001359019,0.015624797,0.0047085467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019580724,0.00041667162,0.00066402066,0.00057591195,0.010729791,0.0037579818,0.002362546,0.013043612,0.0012061226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016180684,0.000012807277,0.00029534005,0.000013333116,0.0000050443646,0.00009851286,0.00056587957,0.00008437501,0.000069303394,0.91293645,0.08068427,0.005218399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004446649,0.00003075135,0.0012443856,0.00027703244,0.000021405815,0.00019941543,0.00056348805,0.00044924175,0.00054953713,0.28681338,0.70975727,0.000049600756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04512815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046923473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04512815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065074284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055139917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08973098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051885556","doi":"10.7202/1013035ar","title":"From the Backroom to the Front Line: Making Constitutional History or Encounters with the Constitution: Patriation, Meech Lake, and Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Negotiation; Front line; Commission; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04472068094413539,"score_gpt":0.27718608990713883,"score_spread":0.23246540896300344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051885556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15799463,0.012198567,0.0016277065,0.3438892,0.0016027165,0.00006115966,0.00007249638,0.00010809205,0.4824454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956513,0.0035423168,0.00048748188,0.0150676,0.00030020144,0.000027707792,0.000026883707,0.00007297191,0.08482346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961681,0.0014385951,0.00002370897,0.00023957477,0.0007578623,0.0013721542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814665,0.00079179544,0.00014130848,0.00006582777,0.00020494526,0.00064945495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363234,0.0003346826,0.00029960036,0.0009590636,0.05875053,0.018243078,0.0015380724,0.0043722386,0.0063641854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062622596,0.00046402655,0.0001810286,0.0016013371,0.063499115,0.0078059044,0.0050962702,0.010488527,0.0007628447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040870404,0.000038677725,0.0008341443,0.000032817254,0.0000034849247,0.00074888073,0.51634604,0.00006910869,0.00045014144,0.34759533,0.11600539,0.017835107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011448031,0.00001825899,0.0028139201,0.00016060166,0.0000054399948,0.00015220854,0.45899665,0.00012650354,0.0003545319,0.02337833,0.5139301,0.00005201219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7263406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8531851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044097178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027709099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55054206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053532955","doi":"10.7202/1019044ar","title":"Unauthorized Dispositions of Trust Property: Tracing in Quebec Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Property law; Subrogation; Express trust; Private law; Constructive trust; Common law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025638017804686802,"score_gpt":0.29157039951367225,"score_spread":0.2659323817089855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053532955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19434376,0.0021749237,0.017832698,0.02157147,0.0001412384,0.00013641335,0.0003588342,0.0002511695,0.76318955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91661894,0.00082692056,0.0025058712,0.0020863968,0.00001903366,0.000030480573,0.00007122545,0.000051854342,0.07778933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976376,0.00052062713,0.000078777724,0.00029069488,0.0006641456,0.0008082941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350363,0.0032259766,0.00041882385,0.0009064307,0.001584931,0.0003602925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026755307,0.0001957917,0.00021431787,0.0016688324,0.011056054,0.008644374,0.0015559174,0.0040226616,0.009499791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009562112,0.00045050104,0.00045569628,0.0020030024,0.011026293,0.005695669,0.0032433278,0.005067169,0.00041765784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014137671,0.000018160854,0.0071871215,0.000025894766,0.0000067647493,0.000612828,0.014628333,0.00072671997,0.000189064,0.9509476,0.008288436,0.01735496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030879328,0.00006324147,0.03364937,0.00077844475,0.00009819347,0.0011323453,0.027453426,0.014957734,0.0018042864,0.27514997,0.6446913,0.00019077174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96736175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06605657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06605657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044546746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47927624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055063704","doi":"10.7202/1027719ar","title":"Contesting Expertise in Prison Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Prison; Law; Supreme court; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology","score_opus":0.03551014631928558,"score_gpt":0.317418280182905,"score_spread":0.28190813386361946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055063704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15477559,0.011680959,0.015500636,0.13017404,0.0006812568,0.00005179495,0.00005225149,0.000082863575,0.6870007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984239,0.0008167571,0.00074814947,0.004738815,0.00054012984,0.000025095416,0.000008912516,0.00002253352,0.008860666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.982806,0.008776954,0.000613595,0.0018990611,0.002251585,0.0036528257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755297,0.017961849,0.0011117212,0.0014507844,0.0019416556,0.0020042995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015045137,0.0003811771,0.0006783268,0.00260824,0.015264082,0.015523652,0.0019007291,0.010213281,0.008266944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03498223,0.00048905675,0.0006837995,0.00095685397,0.06362346,0.01528125,0.017759973,0.009729992,0.0005365975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073909896,0.000008740507,0.00026279275,0.00001584938,0.00000423169,0.00022344616,0.008151408,0.0001887529,0.000055979774,0.9864265,0.0017214082,0.002933634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027445416,0.000022890861,0.00063059415,0.00023277801,0.0000110408955,0.00022789197,0.006150496,0.0007648272,0.00014827063,0.9498376,0.04191708,0.000029086386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01649099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012298376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01649099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012381271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073368023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08983284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057113611","doi":"10.7202/045084ar","title":"Privacy and Private Law: The Dilemma of Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Autonomy; Harm; Tort; Political science; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Computer science; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023014139752591506,"score_gpt":0.28863128334764304,"score_spread":0.2656171435950515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057113611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034333397,0.011900693,0.13175443,0.5308238,0.0012106058,0.000107905675,0.00008421048,0.000112994276,0.28967193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484172,0.0031993373,0.017811688,0.01851477,0.0018264364,0.00026398135,0.000041309617,0.000072991264,0.009852173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96075284,0.026740286,0.0011827343,0.0023946338,0.006907916,0.0020214852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96422744,0.028970737,0.0012404105,0.0028595456,0.0019819057,0.00072001695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024893796,0.00060152396,0.0012067575,0.0024311047,0.009247292,0.015335942,0.00262437,0.020246858,0.0030058345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040676408,0.0006791661,0.0012011261,0.0019310004,0.087078914,0.021759948,0.008534419,0.012901779,0.00061890157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016932927,0.0000029801,0.000017360113,0.000006352068,9.758971e-7,0.000013167076,0.0004313065,0.000049556344,0.000012758717,0.9981002,0.0004082321,0.00095532014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008876377,0.0000036172605,0.000023124794,0.000041076884,0.000001730373,0.00002342909,0.00033501332,0.00022213515,0.00003813085,0.9905032,0.008795172,0.0000045915103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041220067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024785672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024893796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010092445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011557403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13165253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","score_opus":0.02453393702755719,"score_gpt":0.2797557446958232,"score_spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057420653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19811495,0.0043390915,0.038028315,0.18714988,0.0006999877,0.000039931307,0.000056427107,0.000083423765,0.5714881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900843,0.0003239807,0.0011150404,0.0023833737,0.00017584716,0.000019899648,0.000006095297,0.000013872083,0.005877472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618477,0.002212228,0.00008983005,0.00036001066,0.0006832394,0.0004700348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504626,0.0033016608,0.0004296687,0.0005376168,0.0003614693,0.00032341052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005529637,0.00021318067,0.000551642,0.0007714994,0.0042791693,0.00731436,0.0011491544,0.005595855,0.0039032209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012356893,0.00021631707,0.00052519346,0.00078659185,0.047130227,0.0114669055,0.0058931853,0.008050323,0.00030757178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032342705,0.0000039733754,0.000036455014,0.0000031383881,5.532177e-7,0.00002354312,0.00049172615,0.00006093485,0.000016246015,0.9985043,0.00038325775,0.00047271684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691318,0.000004952363,0.00009685337,0.00001493892,0.0000011970782,0.00002978383,0.00036938902,0.00043532695,0.00003792869,0.99397874,0.0050175423,0.0000036462877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032236485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021041387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00731436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004922354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027434637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035714388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057708753","doi":"10.7202/045085ar","title":"Responsibility for Another’s Debt: Suretyship, Solidarity, and Imperfect Delegation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Debtor; Analogy; Obligation; Creditor; Law and economics; Debt; Law; Joint and several liability; Delegation; Political science; Imperfect; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Liability; Philosophy; Strict liability; Epistemology; Finance","score_opus":0.031050345143335326,"score_gpt":0.33483015941588545,"score_spread":0.30377981427255013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057708753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15052366,0.002571278,0.03971157,0.07855078,0.00028273364,0.000117590556,0.00009213501,0.00009472278,0.7280555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96104807,0.0003641055,0.0020667964,0.0041221003,0.00012677233,0.000056206136,0.000015739177,0.000020942914,0.032179132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925795,0.0024862688,0.00029721955,0.00088747585,0.0017995441,0.0019498968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939296,0.002339783,0.0007642982,0.0011506123,0.000946713,0.0008689763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006672363,0.00027929427,0.000445343,0.0007429258,0.008707231,0.008645866,0.0020424577,0.0058857957,0.0028338146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011341722,0.00048103143,0.00051450916,0.00087826245,0.037539784,0.0065276125,0.006805871,0.007098276,0.0003014449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021051617,0.000006088967,0.0002390631,0.000003875716,0.0000013181533,0.00006770489,0.0010197636,0.00018294204,0.000020233496,0.9963116,0.0011077529,0.0010376048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001978926,0.000019190693,0.0026863161,0.000102103855,0.0000073838405,0.00014435333,0.0016880773,0.0016070693,0.00014622913,0.954142,0.03940854,0.000028918417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14388123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14548035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14388123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019347465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2860875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058799957","doi":"10.7202/1026135ar","title":"Le juge canadien, anglais et australien devant l’incertitude causale en matière de responsabilité médicale","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03841378771854598,"score_gpt":0.37969485897240374,"score_spread":0.34128107125385776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058799957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39044312,0.01676545,0.004590643,0.119335845,0.0014380853,0.00011350502,0.00024978287,0.00004404576,0.46701944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504173,0.0046987585,0.0010955354,0.0057530873,0.00018515311,0.000038917497,0.000038935093,0.000017398708,0.03775492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976489,0.0006413311,0.00004367625,0.00022182745,0.000755244,0.0006890988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568945,0.0019502385,0.00052873016,0.00022007608,0.0009703945,0.00064102776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021874125,0.00030732204,0.00031862681,0.0010318407,0.009615381,0.004941032,0.000732982,0.001983117,0.006143397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058047445,0.00021275159,0.00031744948,0.001501,0.015318583,0.0014603352,0.0024433334,0.0040174993,0.0004085612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008294459,0.000062038554,0.02531101,0.0002451425,0.00004780564,0.0010723019,0.2114505,0.000411455,0.0010868328,0.6985889,0.01611559,0.04552548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035684097,0.00011185221,0.11067092,0.0010163249,0.00009841108,0.0008353685,0.16417783,0.00065672357,0.0010281536,0.082043186,0.6391993,0.0001262385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47800407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6666768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5219959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014673716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022750985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95044357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060872817","doi":"10.7202/1022313ar","title":"La relativité aquilienne en droit de la responsabilité civile — analyse comparée des systèmes germanique, canadien et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018883796378657232,"score_gpt":0.30866635993821934,"score_spread":0.2897825635595621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060872817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37793744,0.0041753515,0.0045767566,0.008352288,0.00007290551,0.00009223716,0.00081507576,0.00005568364,0.6039223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97504276,0.0010230679,0.0006892023,0.0003104349,0.000009149266,0.000026524469,0.00020312933,0.00002444229,0.022671213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830294,0.00037460832,0.00003868834,0.00018372403,0.0004927033,0.0006073461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.00038868806,0.00020472951,0.00015295352,0.00082814455,0.00020418198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015550333,0.0003602765,0.00039236856,0.003766206,0.004715332,0.006125541,0.0009005033,0.0008031027,0.011639915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033158092,0.00026525685,0.00042628488,0.00604504,0.009200059,0.002500902,0.0019708541,0.0013743037,0.00043964278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002552569,0.00001199724,0.015500795,0.00010943313,0.000044696175,0.00013590824,0.023608599,0.0012207084,0.00040464383,0.94145036,0.0052579404,0.012229286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781304,0.000057255806,0.28319174,0.0008617414,0.0001794224,0.00021733873,0.12635225,0.0062358626,0.0010997267,0.11575374,0.4658511,0.00016204672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07952643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07952643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028665842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57700735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061211677","doi":"10.7202/1007816ar","title":"Les droits environnementaux dans la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne du Québec : Pistes de réflexion","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017110801725969998,"score_gpt":0.29092144011961535,"score_spread":0.27381063839364533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061211677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4018512,0.023419188,0.007944691,0.14461157,0.002121798,0.00020117566,0.001645384,0.00015181444,0.41805318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9261557,0.0047027734,0.0014598198,0.0031657545,0.00009608852,0.00005409275,0.00015357084,0.000035898087,0.06417639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821115,0.00053795165,0.000058023357,0.00022572029,0.00047710713,0.00049009174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965354,0.00063715235,0.0002170605,0.00011850818,0.0020160016,0.0004759248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024846473,0.00034669542,0.00032484502,0.0016600443,0.011401934,0.008538245,0.0009858744,0.0012941689,0.0075421818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004111491,0.00024445064,0.00025166263,0.002806868,0.011185855,0.0022171184,0.0019640333,0.0034854228,0.0003121438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009731942,0.000045975874,0.029826632,0.0004739549,0.0000485898,0.0008698078,0.3112103,0.0013631831,0.0013747548,0.4929981,0.07136053,0.09033092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102769445,0.000035117315,0.08081612,0.0009082676,0.00003719038,0.00013588532,0.19830851,0.00056330307,0.00057441654,0.009057035,0.7094286,0.00012527729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98868144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99338657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082677275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082677275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09149496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192305796101551,"score_gpt":0.29518315741207485,"score_spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061805555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037112582,0.008240807,0.07006382,0.10589686,0.00082212145,0.000114292525,0.00014814225,0.00011815357,0.7774832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95646834,0.002546773,0.012690452,0.00436617,0.0006128724,0.00017036356,0.00005884532,0.000078451245,0.02300789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844094,0.008679833,0.00043056684,0.0011750613,0.0038711939,0.001434018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99021614,0.0061603584,0.0006682228,0.0013439858,0.0009815532,0.0006297747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013092528,0.00047495207,0.0005429436,0.0020785104,0.008353393,0.014230589,0.0021893627,0.005229784,0.003326346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018927252,0.00055070006,0.0005675872,0.0016260582,0.10488447,0.020416353,0.007577012,0.00712528,0.0005447673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014361758,0.0000021936355,0.000030270423,0.0000047038234,6.0029254e-7,0.000014048515,0.001830699,0.00005605479,0.00001326522,0.99641955,0.00058561645,0.0010416828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049623186,0.000005010481,0.000111997324,0.000045106415,0.000001585948,0.00001713809,0.0011549516,0.00017151442,0.000047952148,0.9777931,0.020640144,0.00000663193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033432666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0257085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033432666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011909179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01428981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08640748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061840250","doi":"10.7202/1005852ar","title":"Droit familial et parties « musulmanes » : des cas de kafálah au Québec, 1997-2009","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1760351401806906,"score_gpt":0.3651410594977428,"score_spread":0.18910591931705217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061840250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97824323,0.0015015499,0.00013779252,0.0031737194,0.00005178778,0.00003482947,0.00073788164,0.000009858529,0.016109377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98470324,0.0005470565,0.00008139562,0.00036801893,0.0000074091945,0.000023195274,0.00021724902,0.0000062260315,0.014046243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991047,0.00008344487,0.000022611255,0.00008195844,0.00015939142,0.00054789474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985512,0.00015201404,0.0002743692,0.000052623454,0.00051986985,0.00044998588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063220796,0.0002527777,0.0003582467,0.00093318266,0.011678047,0.002024049,0.0015285566,0.0009485549,0.009629186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015156261,0.0003349945,0.00023923344,0.002805112,0.00319177,0.0011220168,0.0019738823,0.002141933,0.00046429955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020926294,0.00015947282,0.5129536,0.0004184495,0.0001008595,0.005174662,0.36295062,0.00043261203,0.0012733274,0.028214393,0.033701103,0.05441176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011582385,0.000030896143,0.61428505,0.00028894434,0.000032695378,0.00054174435,0.3137142,0.00027876385,0.00022875381,0.00033575765,0.07020336,0.000048325983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060130723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060130723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03991146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43628097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062369876","doi":"10.7202/039649ar","title":"Liberté de choix et protection juridique des conjoints de fait en cas de rupture : difficile exercice de jonglerie","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025196966567499333,"score_gpt":0.29717048251511724,"score_spread":0.2719735159476179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062369876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39010528,0.009191042,0.006389153,0.13572389,0.0015870513,0.00020409474,0.0006189285,0.00009927323,0.45608133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7956217,0.0018569651,0.0014431893,0.009898862,0.00013922452,0.00008207598,0.00013624877,0.000050219816,0.19077143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940289,0.001263726,0.000140754,0.0006010288,0.0017433482,0.0022222716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993457,0.0014262847,0.00050943554,0.00040199677,0.0024247856,0.0017803328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050075133,0.00027643977,0.0004758865,0.0010434133,0.019607008,0.006875633,0.0016644518,0.0039510024,0.016862627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012966297,0.0004702292,0.00047642278,0.0010006317,0.010214149,0.0026934901,0.004259438,0.0058383252,0.0011296517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017974315,0.00010353743,0.06936399,0.00025333563,0.00006996058,0.0020089801,0.12263961,0.0007112359,0.0017050724,0.6055515,0.10308742,0.09432562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045560962,0.00010920119,0.10339201,0.0008418991,0.000066888,0.00064693956,0.078181215,0.0009275704,0.0011484713,0.017299483,0.7971652,0.0001754398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89330363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89330363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03735635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07104238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27104056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06003431359858567,"score_gpt":0.35270728800830425,"score_spread":0.29267297440971857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063574972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708384,0.0010699171,0.0164015,0.017214071,0.0003218771,0.00021552693,0.000023678487,0.000041744606,0.29387325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542326,0.00017535317,0.0016018874,0.00069336855,0.0000405651,0.00018021758,0.0000055350633,0.0000112774105,0.0018685288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97813046,0.018530443,0.00021377495,0.0011090111,0.0010418142,0.0009745079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97355574,0.02074266,0.0015894783,0.0026143338,0.0006794064,0.0008183763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020498807,0.00045435037,0.0006860871,0.0012418044,0.011015586,0.007968449,0.0024429266,0.0020330565,0.004093064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922544,0.00033006808,0.0005605991,0.0009829341,0.086892985,0.008037395,0.019609919,0.004310777,0.00017018255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011212136,0.00031498156,0.001158574,0.000068215755,0.0000107960495,0.00013528972,0.11804755,0.00022937525,0.0006762206,0.8723957,0.00035745554,0.0064936774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024257296,0.0005276307,0.002168596,0.00025682704,0.00003568546,0.00015457465,0.123049356,0.0015292199,0.0021377176,0.832167,0.037679162,0.0000516313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045635547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004941114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99543643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063773617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004940059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108409405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063968927","doi":"10.7202/038656ar","title":"L’impact de la culture sur le crédit, les institutions de financement et le droit de la faillite : quelques réflexions sur le cas canadien","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03649970762078716,"score_gpt":0.34073816904255494,"score_spread":0.3042384614217678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063968927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7347175,0.019355932,0.0016320451,0.07054778,0.00038906522,0.00004292886,0.0017455994,0.00003717778,0.171532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834163,0.003967015,0.00021191587,0.0013159242,0.000053217576,0.000014828543,0.00016684593,0.00001796591,0.010835853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977285,0.00053190644,0.00005018032,0.00027731224,0.00055331254,0.0008587633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922524,0.002243642,0.0009979315,0.0003338424,0.0026241078,0.0015480849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002092948,0.00044333236,0.0006708966,0.0023465224,0.006751996,0.007523484,0.001238188,0.001118891,0.015071885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076526855,0.00023825417,0.00045921595,0.0054662824,0.008008834,0.0029897701,0.0031417364,0.002154983,0.00042867425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002123943,0.000111460686,0.5608788,0.0004796965,0.0003395626,0.0009923597,0.098402455,0.0014930842,0.00038809513,0.23689705,0.02465829,0.07514665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032306336,0.00006110901,0.6800541,0.0016239356,0.00029886357,0.0002404984,0.15219165,0.0011181831,0.00048334585,0.02942812,0.13431229,0.0001555552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9592449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040755093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038856454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0446628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2819246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064347324","doi":"10.7202/1005846ar","title":"Le bijuridisme canadien à la croisée des chemins ? Réflexions sur l’incidence de l’article 8.1 de la Loi d’interprétation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03711378500389355,"score_gpt":0.296828824594426,"score_spread":0.25971503959053244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064347324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045789924,0.020861652,0.012814199,0.29021153,0.0025963122,0.00008291991,0.0002384292,0.000064231004,0.62734073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7500579,0.014158535,0.0054046176,0.04286299,0.0011968749,0.00013079704,0.00011440309,0.00015465738,0.18591928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884058,0.0046234215,0.00024906118,0.0013205275,0.003636781,0.0017644728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806447,0.0051531377,0.00079530245,0.0008497165,0.0043723704,0.00076502014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008768762,0.00047135967,0.0006125669,0.0020497697,0.012366347,0.015142194,0.0021723,0.0056475075,0.012441782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01869362,0.00037798964,0.0005373719,0.0025883964,0.036228947,0.0054229917,0.0036953785,0.009320948,0.0009950512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018069586,0.0000099248,0.0010915314,0.00007240302,0.000008486849,0.00010127516,0.017079195,0.00011881395,0.00008368459,0.95738214,0.014821154,0.009213385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021392652,0.0000291244,0.0060921567,0.0010710694,0.000045202807,0.0001609712,0.04153288,0.0007419506,0.00093987153,0.22104155,0.72824043,0.000083298306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5849852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6920734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038552828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052932832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064594549","doi":"10.7202/1005853ar","title":"L’évolution du dialogue entre le Canada et l’OIT en matière de liberté d’association : vers une protection constitutionnelle du droit de grève ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011150820460806144,"score_gpt":0.20533852227553456,"score_spread":0.19418770181472841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064594549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12466156,0.009397667,0.004476628,0.123363875,0.0005225272,0.00005257154,0.00015379407,0.00005080183,0.7373206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8549781,0.0021288956,0.0009953346,0.01009876,0.00009419388,0.000037757498,0.000034452703,0.00005242654,0.13158013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945088,0.0011022452,0.00007297397,0.0005215471,0.0015449364,0.0022495496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982639,0.00052146794,0.00013698782,0.000085049236,0.000487829,0.0005048662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026214023,0.00024184976,0.0003385996,0.0010009754,0.022751542,0.014164054,0.001578171,0.005272661,0.007926234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042042835,0.00030128605,0.00030860747,0.002105585,0.025758939,0.0031615037,0.004219018,0.006400275,0.00047694735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016799864,0.000009036499,0.001055949,0.000022043829,0.0000030046365,0.00013632227,0.03466787,0.000118710115,0.00016345448,0.9461194,0.00882061,0.008866853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021111791,0.000021550535,0.008304598,0.0004533644,0.000013309531,0.000102491336,0.060760316,0.0004442109,0.00044826188,0.057047933,0.87232006,0.000062723615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09241142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09241142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12015766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6704949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065382878","doi":"10.7202/1005851ar","title":"Guarding a Cultural Icon: Concurrent Intellectual Property Regimes and the Perpetual Protection of Anne of Green Gables in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada); Ontario Tech University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Intellectual property; Public domain; Goodwill; Political science; Law; Icon; Public property; Reputation; Order (exchange); Cultural property; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Cultural heritage; Property rights; History; Accounting","score_opus":0.05064961998424971,"score_gpt":0.20021216915584394,"score_spread":0.14956254917159423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065382878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37889105,0.0055152634,0.0027693582,0.047566768,0.00033193562,0.00006860793,0.00016622314,0.00009115819,0.5645996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95364773,0.0008527881,0.0007892904,0.0021838371,0.000017805805,0.000012487274,0.000016903274,0.000035933503,0.042443108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997047,0.00047386286,0.000052412153,0.0003278101,0.00088421657,0.001214768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732506,0.00078563817,0.00022474077,0.00024121835,0.0008201873,0.00060314796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019544964,0.00025719445,0.00029748926,0.0012966124,0.033237807,0.0083141625,0.0016009825,0.0027515644,0.0053705787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062861657,0.00036441078,0.00024144819,0.0016384021,0.02992721,0.0021005864,0.005068542,0.0035725944,0.0002549544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045822984,0.000009351343,0.0030377656,0.00003688552,0.0000090009235,0.001143563,0.09598328,0.00039653404,0.00056492415,0.8692923,0.0129879275,0.01649275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021420163,0.000021912178,0.009194397,0.00029165807,0.00003000151,0.00044834148,0.07439792,0.000544264,0.0011569052,0.048786223,0.8649881,0.00011886293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10972402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10972402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12523112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79610723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065922327","doi":"10.7202/1018987ar","title":"Libéralités et personnes âgées : entre autonomie et protection","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05680485743105025,"score_gpt":0.35448435213693424,"score_spread":0.297679494705884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065922327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2167251,0.018200321,0.008251311,0.14271556,0.0011027199,0.000054438162,0.00009974531,0.000045368342,0.6128055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94476986,0.00379624,0.0009354411,0.0092168925,0.00041199249,0.000050126644,0.000020558871,0.000027603815,0.04077122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942386,0.0035595386,0.00012675699,0.00055363646,0.0007424813,0.00077910017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502474,0.0028856453,0.00068773795,0.00030535858,0.0004043431,0.000692098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003763849,0.0003090591,0.00031489696,0.0006241329,0.00543443,0.005603016,0.0005207138,0.0030270088,0.0062255803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006379652,0.00022695158,0.00032592515,0.000664758,0.025051938,0.0058505735,0.005000244,0.006750221,0.0008298181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026301313,0.00002253381,0.0019270524,0.000039756735,0.000005286283,0.00016126357,0.07314833,0.000057362715,0.00019948596,0.91227585,0.0029919501,0.009144844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029416515,0.00016899501,0.018826965,0.00070836564,0.000023634151,0.00066324376,0.087155916,0.00024001105,0.0005820039,0.4042321,0.48728254,0.0000867899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008636365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009227793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008636365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036529205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038482116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026503861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066127125","doi":"10.7202/1019048ar","title":"La fiducie-sûreté en droit français","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.009668256340696344,"score_gpt":0.19308817907708575,"score_spread":0.1834199227363894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066127125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.482082,0.0066747526,0.0031462212,0.020325162,0.0004245997,0.00006553455,0.0021977467,0.00013487686,0.4849491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184994,0.0016979483,0.0006830185,0.0015176738,0.000039446564,0.000025895653,0.0006054302,0.00005227914,0.17687899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.00036356592,0.00010159549,0.00032489077,0.0007209213,0.0010843272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973943,0.00039515042,0.0004092936,0.00020675278,0.0009963128,0.000598115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015272952,0.00034575272,0.00022855155,0.00085068034,0.0049664024,0.0059109763,0.0004988099,0.0015373175,0.023869118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035617,0.0003847015,0.00036263018,0.0018526723,0.0026699405,0.002165859,0.0020041182,0.002353002,0.0022844514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030194054,0.00009473214,0.07418534,0.00036310035,0.00013854187,0.0023665696,0.037108056,0.001821737,0.0028248797,0.65990627,0.09940392,0.121485084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002422059,0.00006232294,0.11603716,0.00033877726,0.00002284082,0.00050171564,0.011306682,0.0005517141,0.00077001913,0.006217362,0.86405146,0.00011579013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7358132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74313074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7358132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020900963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01659071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53148526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066161035","doi":"10.7202/038654ar","title":"Culture et droit de la famille : de l’institution à l’autonomie individuelle","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011077030335838818,"score_gpt":0.25238250654408756,"score_spread":0.24130547620824874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066161035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5429908,0.006369104,0.003048747,0.049186986,0.0002101048,0.000029817005,0.0001767006,0.000045190747,0.39794257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975355,0.0007860149,0.00026564574,0.00069317326,0.000017643204,0.0000071104514,0.000014199173,0.000008729115,0.022852428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873286,0.00041131242,0.000017756984,0.00011634551,0.00020308151,0.00051857985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986613,0.00017990424,0.00014030372,0.00007456287,0.00045338174,0.0004905509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013921314,0.00016683196,0.00017580927,0.00074878254,0.010663316,0.0043228385,0.0005857786,0.000799981,0.006668975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017338152,0.00017809392,0.00013429139,0.00073358935,0.015313781,0.0014675411,0.0019862414,0.0018929383,0.00032148007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007180753,0.000045520534,0.03666918,0.00008491113,0.000025756755,0.00074104225,0.1859413,0.0006819201,0.0010349681,0.69982827,0.020584254,0.054290976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028751117,0.00006800099,0.22298017,0.00075284846,0.000050290484,0.00046294898,0.1862755,0.000977613,0.00081064826,0.045894016,0.5415761,0.00012308104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9349781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9635774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06502187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043418687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039624885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3150261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066896834","doi":"10.7202/1019052ar","title":"La primauté du droit, l’égalité devant la loi et autres « principes non écrits de notre constitution »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484115229888827,"score_gpt":0.29281962588639876,"score_spread":0.27233551065650996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066896834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040617518,0.0036966086,0.011156826,0.028700413,0.00047150574,0.00008692567,0.00017008932,0.00009012457,0.9150099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452898,0.0020307354,0.0044825724,0.003957947,0.0003070221,0.00017418744,0.000113480055,0.00009329977,0.1435509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921611,0.0026972496,0.00032401722,0.0012602657,0.0020717029,0.0014856413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935899,0.0021838439,0.00088492595,0.0011191729,0.0012813259,0.00094092765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058770557,0.0004415643,0.00049376686,0.0018508504,0.0101101,0.015460671,0.001693842,0.004041882,0.0113305515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009732914,0.0004961816,0.0006256382,0.0013160286,0.031558756,0.005302169,0.006331072,0.006144556,0.0019191297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059680087,0.0000062556655,0.0006677577,0.000026078402,0.000004166468,0.00003309771,0.0039030542,0.0000633491,0.00008684117,0.9902407,0.0017087026,0.0032541105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030137628,0.00005561198,0.008491659,0.00043756148,0.00003892511,0.00027674748,0.008415518,0.00036547182,0.000744381,0.40608898,0.57496774,0.00008726053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065027185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091189034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010309862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022719748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12929738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067126333","doi":"10.7202/039835ar","title":"The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact-Finding","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inference; Epistemology; Plaintiff; Causal inference; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03163596699700405,"score_gpt":0.372955400710208,"score_spread":0.34131943371320395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067126333","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07519246,0.01951959,0.42594117,0.2972866,0.0017627159,0.00028277532,0.00026369977,0.0001499962,0.17960101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93034303,0.0041363323,0.04753083,0.01262845,0.0012949209,0.00025309317,0.000104420455,0.000051891715,0.003656999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554602,0.031172894,0.0017510939,0.0041907066,0.005932357,0.001492813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7864114,0.19378789,0.007955257,0.0071513345,0.0038797678,0.00081439334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052984405,0.00070614245,0.0015306917,0.004476915,0.0059666377,0.009078077,0.0035961475,0.008776271,0.0038512908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12202151,0.000928675,0.001693951,0.0023437599,0.0669281,0.026938148,0.007185221,0.009081917,0.00033645701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019248173,0.000013589978,0.0008273196,0.00006935904,0.000022119086,0.0001648818,0.0029730212,0.00042037724,0.000048783008,0.98941326,0.0008154454,0.00521257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016497064,0.000008505699,0.00035594634,0.000099532925,0.000018039997,0.0001209332,0.0006439159,0.0011120063,0.00015665598,0.99093574,0.006515945,0.000016277492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063381405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045093475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052984405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005426341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00702762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28021163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068868265","doi":"10.7202/1006421ar","title":"The Effect of Alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ... Seriously","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Separation of powers; Political science; Dominion; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06841505137502493,"score_gpt":0.30564085008465974,"score_spread":0.2372257987096348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068868265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02421696,0.013853304,0.00064322556,0.43637586,0.004276241,0.00007803818,0.0012672567,0.00008475036,0.5192043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53419393,0.016797245,0.0018316775,0.19392957,0.0021716193,0.00008102437,0.00057099963,0.00020414322,0.2502197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961276,0.0007724815,0.00014901208,0.00063071103,0.0054774475,0.0033575888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908743,0.0014875605,0.00025580276,0.00030800665,0.005769411,0.0013049039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003891548,0.0005191935,0.00046868555,0.0023787143,0.032041304,0.008849483,0.0017325059,0.005513793,0.012757668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015699597,0.00048910803,0.0007244491,0.002515338,0.014852064,0.0025602449,0.0031208154,0.008326907,0.0010275558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008086388,0.000026993945,0.005226612,0.00009236081,0.000039570867,0.00029945374,0.006136551,0.00033257584,0.0004910284,0.5539655,0.39125752,0.04205091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046852405,0.000028941336,0.020145815,0.00026468822,0.000095233605,0.000073720636,0.0041307257,0.00026042757,0.0005644961,0.01801694,0.956225,0.00014716516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12999512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12999512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20013371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94318503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070785462","doi":"10.7202/1017516ar","title":"Common Ownership and Equality of Autonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Common ownership; Common-pool resource; Variety (cybernetics); Ethos; Common law; Business; Normative; Resource (disambiguation); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03387415718864782,"score_gpt":0.24655559908055505,"score_spread":0.21268144189190724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070785462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067272276,0.0031318523,0.0588084,0.022319289,0.00035561272,0.00013075177,0.00008376312,0.00006632924,0.8478318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96827376,0.0005762271,0.0036282293,0.0030549462,0.00018829064,0.00020992222,0.000033381584,0.000036856745,0.023998326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97671163,0.009899031,0.0010630279,0.004388019,0.0045186155,0.0034196211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284947,0.003036181,0.0007611231,0.001652359,0.00091098633,0.00078980887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012310823,0.00045386466,0.0007529505,0.0009711249,0.008872503,0.008818579,0.0018428401,0.0047704997,0.004710424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011700076,0.000469663,0.0008180236,0.00087995833,0.06689859,0.010721372,0.015029699,0.0065874313,0.00063772436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037156083,0.0000042227293,0.00013798756,0.000006710872,0.0000029490957,0.000025876063,0.001766368,0.00007727944,0.000043570042,0.996067,0.0003493447,0.001514966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022956847,0.000033400425,0.0006345965,0.0001275628,0.000013990691,0.000095992844,0.0015012448,0.00037013055,0.00028329153,0.9351173,0.061771847,0.00002763837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011183651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008524218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012310823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006855507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007676346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06510663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071765154","doi":"10.7202/1022311ar","title":"Taxing by Default","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Presumption; Taxpayer; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Government (linguistics); Income tax; Property (philosophy); Economics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Accounting; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010708135362379629,"score_gpt":0.21009803534769328,"score_spread":0.19938989998531365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071765154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075720064,0.00093025237,0.03957505,0.02039297,0.0006486085,0.00034485842,0.0019438446,0.00055879535,0.8598857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84785074,0.0006470219,0.0056897197,0.010227119,0.00033351572,0.00015731543,0.000685435,0.00012809892,0.13428096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941777,0.00085552345,0.00031309464,0.0010560044,0.0021231188,0.0014745512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958727,0.0009348569,0.00037076318,0.0014467953,0.0010705183,0.00030445374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044743805,0.00028223015,0.00056462194,0.00076704164,0.0034783466,0.0033762148,0.0015778458,0.0032208534,0.024993125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013920609,0.0002912301,0.00053600094,0.0009165106,0.0036923687,0.0044670417,0.002181073,0.0051685427,0.002937395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031195523,0.000023786797,0.0016195389,0.00001833614,0.000006744356,0.00008761734,0.0004662144,0.000381255,0.00018420418,0.95796204,0.021054069,0.018165123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062109415,0.00007299458,0.0048382077,0.00013909787,0.000036179557,0.00042411452,0.0007651916,0.0046183476,0.0015794364,0.65473634,0.3326694,0.00005862685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058741286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067216285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058741286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007360187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096465135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1167987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071869","doi":"10.7202/1000620ar","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dominion; Discretion; Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.07299705351343487,"score_gpt":0.2972038172188597,"score_spread":0.2242067637054248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04587944,0.0052795587,0.0051256027,0.09904939,0.0010427722,0.00015962025,0.0001792389,0.00009503948,0.8431894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8604165,0.0011760973,0.0012900233,0.052983392,0.00070449745,0.00026444442,0.00007312914,0.000053515483,0.08303852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247336,0.0018100775,0.00026939317,0.0011835838,0.0020800163,0.0021835577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971022,0.0018437657,0.00022003909,0.00021835776,0.00039737983,0.00021826594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056082467,0.0005327965,0.00061065255,0.0011033267,0.013289229,0.00916691,0.0021425213,0.014068633,0.0030126355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008627734,0.0007450347,0.00060572114,0.0010714475,0.017234974,0.00445222,0.003800163,0.014247779,0.00046180788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008323267,0.0000061503106,0.00017628803,0.0000059799268,0.0000017414333,0.0000957798,0.0011802242,0.000034329434,0.00006022091,0.9899942,0.0070641623,0.0013726158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010948392,0.000086275206,0.00419928,0.00033968737,0.00007123249,0.00040364388,0.002064914,0.0012179241,0.0019296176,0.5295853,0.45985118,0.00014142947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18947834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22112662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81052166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018203374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012895908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073165043","doi":"10.7202/038891ar","title":"Canadian Bijuralism and the Concept of an Acquisition of Property in the Federal Income Tax Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Statutory law; Law; Common law; Tax law; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Double taxation; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.010875765973961962,"score_gpt":0.2258847571270298,"score_spread":0.21500899115306782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073165043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027645772,0.004877108,0.006749579,0.048034165,0.0006598059,0.00012237269,0.00030765106,0.00004996044,0.9115536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90008926,0.0030350948,0.0073450836,0.013348478,0.00016675153,0.00009586096,0.00015151309,0.000037989445,0.07573005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902686,0.0014765549,0.00037502867,0.0007556897,0.0050663413,0.0020577735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585503,0.0011858087,0.00027934954,0.00032135245,0.0019783503,0.00038007807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032506366,0.0003545705,0.00037190397,0.002511817,0.016345387,0.009028856,0.0020167977,0.0044942414,0.0029555259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496022,0.00044067512,0.00044896375,0.0031970218,0.03166952,0.0035714472,0.0033287671,0.005884647,0.00029660453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002989004,0.0000017275881,0.0001316975,0.000005119485,6.929289e-7,0.00002423608,0.0009202551,0.000057933885,0.00002194508,0.99535346,0.0022161352,0.0012637794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003117204,0.000026952464,0.009431706,0.0003670245,0.0000398419,0.00024344171,0.004920301,0.0016721989,0.000413121,0.45297575,0.52972364,0.0001548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9740064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100724936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100724936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13136825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074006549","doi":"10.7202/038655ar","title":"Culture et droit processuel : le cas du Québec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0280657318761427,"score_gpt":0.32546794012100005,"score_spread":0.29740220824485736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074006549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59926546,0.0037387724,0.0016892211,0.043997485,0.00048896176,0.00006854354,0.0003917062,0.000042355336,0.3503174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94763166,0.0012332518,0.00037761062,0.0026403375,0.00002981468,0.000026565514,0.00012019258,0.000033304925,0.047907215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747306,0.00051833584,0.000044180353,0.00023944519,0.0006882825,0.0010366791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971724,0.00046906626,0.00023534028,0.00013327513,0.0011992783,0.0007905452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016591626,0.00027659585,0.00030818055,0.0013637772,0.0221841,0.007763341,0.0013323702,0.0014837704,0.012043074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003178982,0.00022350137,0.00027328075,0.003173197,0.007382111,0.002832616,0.0026516581,0.0036183058,0.00046483293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007805587,0.00014746311,0.043543212,0.00016434971,0.000038752718,0.0017240029,0.2455551,0.0007108556,0.00081412564,0.5853212,0.047336023,0.07456685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029523497,0.000051912986,0.10366834,0.00067544996,0.000059365924,0.0003290735,0.281635,0.0015131247,0.00049971696,0.015616547,0.5958056,0.000116375915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98714393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99449867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07644868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07644868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074095085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5546766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074012095","doi":"10.7202/1013027ar","title":"Dualisme, mixité et métissage juridique : Québec, Hong Kong, Macao, Afrique du Sud et Israël","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04262096942041092,"score_gpt":0.33301564129025035,"score_spread":0.2903946718698394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074012095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5797106,0.021287436,0.0015923388,0.037355885,0.0007942374,0.00009641145,0.0010363419,0.00004938239,0.35807738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492435,0.0026065535,0.00031362617,0.0011720478,0.00006151982,0.000043301243,0.00011800776,0.000014089113,0.046427395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915624,0.0001479606,0.000032592023,0.0000861807,0.00024949535,0.00032742447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998831,0.00027803544,0.00014405017,0.000052210034,0.00049217936,0.00020247968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012564654,0.0002823082,0.00026833086,0.0016060958,0.009129868,0.0059459237,0.00084959046,0.0009285012,0.006820595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020649128,0.000224254,0.00016751692,0.003958491,0.009892116,0.0018178524,0.0017752022,0.0024643312,0.0002762477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014763835,0.00003898228,0.04400191,0.00036569184,0.0000532693,0.0006868299,0.1993403,0.00040156263,0.0005564341,0.65416235,0.050382797,0.04986219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007007149,0.00005024891,0.23946336,0.0009005363,0.00008335588,0.00030685053,0.18688722,0.0009211027,0.0009158306,0.01685281,0.5533901,0.00015855848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97267365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05520498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05520498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043284986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40054202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074531229","doi":"10.7202/1013034ar","title":"Les rapports entre la constitution et les accords politiques dans les États africains : Réflexion sur la légalité constitutionnelle en période de crise","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Politics and Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.049500103335349314,"score_gpt":0.27536018266857376,"score_spread":0.22586007933322444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074531229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466734,0.036099736,0.0036904465,0.08658848,0.00060745014,0.000054572007,0.00010699506,0.000023744493,0.22615516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873143,0.0037698825,0.00038982762,0.0007693545,0.00006626554,0.000015117694,0.000013343735,0.000007179907,0.0076546986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742496,0.0015241813,0.00006927062,0.00021221023,0.0002647702,0.0005046098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949768,0.0031473744,0.00090847886,0.00018069765,0.00043434885,0.0003523054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036250062,0.00023220699,0.00021025623,0.0014813169,0.007608918,0.006225368,0.00057677337,0.0017715658,0.0045395712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075932504,0.0002591296,0.0001523565,0.0019817755,0.017867884,0.005445836,0.0028782757,0.0039993683,0.00021243923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006699397,0.000026974316,0.009424222,0.00020466789,0.00001234755,0.0012258077,0.41894862,0.00021706709,0.001112333,0.5385213,0.0033784087,0.02686121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027819966,0.000079976875,0.074235044,0.0017860176,0.00003317003,0.0011480624,0.3916528,0.00043504802,0.0013253678,0.07693869,0.45225355,0.0000844162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06025634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080904774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06025634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077638933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009185445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11981118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078000226","doi":"10.7202/045698ar","title":"Technological Self-Help and Equality in Cyberspace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Harm; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Function (biology); Inequality; Political science; Law; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.05209584677342662,"score_gpt":0.297116010147144,"score_spread":0.24502016337371738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078000226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08546803,0.008809067,0.03955207,0.043465022,0.00063552917,0.00008771828,0.000031679145,0.00006722471,0.8218836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98424375,0.0014617216,0.0024268127,0.002143836,0.00015507644,0.00006482105,0.000008755124,0.000018805355,0.009476401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834488,0.010018909,0.00061531377,0.0014218132,0.0027420754,0.0017531841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891344,0.00690718,0.001147028,0.0014210067,0.00069637405,0.000693981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009151394,0.00047197606,0.00062564027,0.0023857153,0.011162578,0.015290803,0.0017013346,0.007250744,0.005919652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012971706,0.00034712203,0.0007358449,0.0017428899,0.09051974,0.019216513,0.019506339,0.005969475,0.00055708596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022091954,0.0000047922745,0.00009562427,0.000014922291,0.0000013901578,0.000036227797,0.0033201233,0.0001318386,0.00002685938,0.99385095,0.00024885123,0.0022662084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010299737,0.000027682916,0.0006328445,0.00031378097,0.0000063301195,0.00016169916,0.00722584,0.00036679205,0.00031063697,0.9245143,0.066405185,0.000024657293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035830983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030301865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074056145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005084208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05373168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078381184","doi":"10.7202/1006420ar","title":"L’arbitrage notarié, instrument idoine de conciliation des traditions juridiques après la Conquête britannique ? (1760-1784)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Conciliation; Philosophy; Law; Arbitration","score_opus":0.07486312368359893,"score_gpt":0.22613150956942416,"score_spread":0.15126838588582522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078381184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2225075,0.012375962,0.0018705585,0.019288471,0.0012177493,0.00006437238,0.00026224912,0.000044242784,0.7423689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81109256,0.0018777106,0.0005572151,0.001075905,0.00014710675,0.000050442293,0.00006435327,0.000024364259,0.18511045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978461,0.0005980758,0.000102761594,0.00037146368,0.0005167008,0.0005648192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871004,0.00027208138,0.00026082,0.00018542558,0.00036523468,0.00020633977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028098337,0.0002529267,0.00019876934,0.0012395929,0.0071291877,0.008029108,0.0010212911,0.0018189523,0.010692885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039423164,0.00035955233,0.00020138937,0.0016558691,0.009927533,0.0021953888,0.0024029594,0.002725093,0.0010514787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009736818,0.00001757559,0.0042462456,0.00009086824,0.000015577467,0.00023729855,0.032154948,0.0002485023,0.00058838946,0.93523496,0.007981215,0.01908707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032539498,0.000044973505,0.03899482,0.00027668913,0.000027703725,0.00020836253,0.010842771,0.00033407495,0.0011654019,0.021907166,0.9260841,0.000081400234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21634817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.379527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7836518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02174424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016496452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43017775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078418525","doi":"10.7202/1018391ar","title":"La protection d’une vitalité fragile : les droits linguistiques autochtones en vertu de l’article 35","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Obligation; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.017191283589911534,"score_gpt":0.2509550753440249,"score_spread":0.23376379175411335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078418525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18386337,0.00822083,0.009955628,0.049474053,0.00051979773,0.00007276833,0.00016137109,0.00009050553,0.7476416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89005953,0.001485541,0.0010390007,0.0040644803,0.00010233545,0.00003309699,0.000030317362,0.000042205887,0.10314361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976107,0.0004733767,0.000047139376,0.00029110652,0.0008052493,0.00077250943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998643,0.0005231723,0.000101446196,0.00013633826,0.00043315897,0.00016286709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015897606,0.00039599114,0.00039032503,0.0008447619,0.01030314,0.007882962,0.0009941402,0.0030261844,0.004355983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00223678,0.00022502443,0.00034076886,0.00082900247,0.023624249,0.0025381916,0.003086609,0.00522994,0.000358947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014180329,0.000007067034,0.0009870507,0.00003247198,0.0000050610147,0.00031603684,0.0575725,0.00017895154,0.0005149267,0.9280964,0.005066381,0.007208804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145741315,0.000034301167,0.010822486,0.000365316,0.00003867744,0.00044425367,0.053215683,0.00068766024,0.001780955,0.13705242,0.795451,0.000092657494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.662822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.817376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.337178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026615756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026510386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6783274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078724444","doi":"10.7202/1005135ar","title":"The Downside of Preclusion: Some Behavioural and Economic Effects of Cause of Action Estoppel in Civil Actions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Incentive; Economics; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Public economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Doctrine; Finance","score_opus":0.07155397311586166,"score_gpt":0.24123812288777446,"score_spread":0.16968414977191282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078724444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045335,0.002777142,0.20552048,0.015584804,0.00028489833,0.00043469743,0.00012287934,0.00010396222,0.27063763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881981,0.00039078505,0.0070658284,0.0007463112,0.000082859595,0.00010008997,0.00001150662,0.00002075338,0.0033838712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815638,0.008721274,0.0012237497,0.0019446911,0.0047959485,0.0017506117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118254,0.067084804,0.00964885,0.0073871794,0.0031306832,0.0009230981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018139457,0.00052498776,0.0010580311,0.001310994,0.002542117,0.0047910158,0.00211313,0.0044058254,0.00643177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055974457,0.0005833274,0.0020314471,0.0010618804,0.016273834,0.0064502503,0.0065955026,0.007552979,0.0003538894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563964,0.00008721429,0.0042097485,0.00009608744,0.000035240173,0.0001706715,0.00064293866,0.00834647,0.0004595809,0.97186553,0.00030491565,0.013695883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007013599,0.00030775426,0.009201894,0.00014664902,0.00011015518,0.00030251496,0.00067849725,0.013907092,0.0013789354,0.96624714,0.007576894,0.00007240928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004011143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039050996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018139457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033016722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026696536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09593171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0273633526495178,"score_gpt":0.30415470072908285,"score_spread":0.27679134807956507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081632868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574136,0.0006012275,0.00028259188,0.0011751585,0.000016962029,0.000038175345,0.000026872418,0.000009533083,0.04043593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771,0.00007987701,0.00010126485,0.00012598817,0.0000014890222,0.000013988609,0.000009981308,0.0000015622777,0.0019557688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788696,0.0006024516,0.00006990704,0.00020808578,0.00026767838,0.00096485193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852896,0.00042565007,0.00025230166,0.00015905789,0.00024882538,0.0003852141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015126365,0.00020908535,0.00026091453,0.0016251798,0.010365456,0.005543087,0.0011942288,0.0007388572,0.0034624464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029419942,0.00032678017,0.00027256046,0.0025169046,0.012403003,0.0021622765,0.0054563163,0.0014895698,0.00011099461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022166267,0.00008522515,0.11187131,0.00018368632,0.00009502223,0.015152584,0.27610713,0.0010356659,0.0015772288,0.5697212,0.0023953533,0.021553988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112956164,0.00022966237,0.23208305,0.00048145818,0.0001747225,0.004265721,0.5950761,0.0038442693,0.0021275156,0.033896174,0.12755999,0.00014840558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5108503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58317506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5108503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03528231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014572433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98406076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085925177","doi":"10.7202/1019045ar","title":"Réflexions autour de la diversité des modes de réception ou d’adaptation du trust dans les pays de droit civil","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031481138605264275,"score_gpt":0.27272276285760133,"score_spread":0.24124162425233706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085925177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4940718,0.005609469,0.017718157,0.06592519,0.00026368804,0.00008100005,0.00036672357,0.000091599795,0.41587237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98555183,0.00061163225,0.0008393214,0.0008125224,0.000033311146,0.000017376387,0.000024617206,0.000025771807,0.012083595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232423,0.0034033174,0.00016198542,0.0006818423,0.0018769415,0.0015517349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819274,0.004446498,0.0012579908,0.0013283971,0.0038046932,0.0009697481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008058877,0.0002774701,0.00040915655,0.0024398144,0.009125904,0.010444396,0.0012070162,0.0018235085,0.007347544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017785577,0.00029892186,0.00032158583,0.0029875066,0.023282256,0.004342551,0.003933004,0.002893696,0.000467652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048690537,0.000010476558,0.014966879,0.00010291599,0.000029353218,0.00033103532,0.12584051,0.0006044124,0.0004052589,0.82407826,0.0072800107,0.026302181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030691033,0.000063216765,0.13363397,0.0014889437,0.000103426086,0.000641164,0.3066701,0.0038154651,0.0014787042,0.18423139,0.36761662,0.00022636053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6873731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7451311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037215605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022540534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62893605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086577566","doi":"10.7202/1018392ar","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0370546408088331,"score_gpt":0.32390931528107086,"score_spread":0.2868546744722378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086577566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.715053,0.0017868908,0.00019669555,0.0027622788,0.00003300887,0.000022780345,0.00003392773,0.000005520967,0.2801059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489826,0.00052718894,0.00008752265,0.0002027139,0.00000988033,0.000013914032,0.000015110598,0.000005650269,0.0042398917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960336,0.0015677578,0.00007155806,0.0002681505,0.00071230636,0.0013465662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958449,0.0023767466,0.00036559202,0.00019181977,0.0007878084,0.00043310112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029134788,0.00014682557,0.00038279826,0.0038178838,0.021788528,0.0069395322,0.0013184776,0.0012515957,0.007443108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006450168,0.00021915665,0.0002740102,0.0056359386,0.016709898,0.005751752,0.0052123633,0.0022978014,0.00019675944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006360496,0.00009056759,0.016291913,0.00014728805,0.000027119871,0.00093709875,0.6292681,0.00016504685,0.00036826808,0.32931024,0.00216848,0.021162253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006268339,0.000032304408,0.06010248,0.0002204429,0.000037423233,0.00015260927,0.8749201,0.00014135346,0.00013481316,0.010777423,0.053452257,0.00002265757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39280197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7291962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020619415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011954545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78103125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086905955","doi":"10.7202/1007819ar","title":"“I Will Not Give You a Penny More Than You Deserve”:*Ontario v. Fraser and the (Uncertain) Right to Collectively Bargain in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Good faith; Jurisprudence; Underpinning; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to health; Faith; Health services; Sociology; Health care; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022253009406999456,"score_gpt":0.26693569428016517,"score_spread":0.24468268487316572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086905955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05095417,0.002979117,0.0025862649,0.49130717,0.00063147227,0.00008890281,0.00028257715,0.000043635788,0.45112672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77012795,0.001761714,0.0016827836,0.10637457,0.00037155542,0.00007304153,0.0000633627,0.00004553923,0.119499564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952083,0.00057421875,0.00010470722,0.0004531696,0.0018167108,0.0018427785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973053,0.0010638366,0.00019619803,0.000102715894,0.0007946043,0.0005373117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029548486,0.00035312504,0.00032392034,0.0004485599,0.02443659,0.005891669,0.001858571,0.0107166795,0.0056969975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007563495,0.00048712455,0.00048783177,0.0008439654,0.015161449,0.0021748128,0.0019368569,0.0066136634,0.0004907954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645918,0.000018465567,0.0034983028,0.00006244647,0.000019081403,0.0008874273,0.015291977,0.00044686397,0.00047234067,0.7914622,0.18050179,0.007302515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006191913,0.000043966567,0.010581307,0.0004432867,0.000071700284,0.0004998048,0.019891815,0.0018939223,0.0011240805,0.101037376,0.8641386,0.00021229955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97777265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05746418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05746418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08781286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41693377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087067271","doi":"10.7202/038653ar","title":"La place des cultures juridiques et des langues autochtones dans les accords d’autonomie gouvernementale au Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021719227926288578,"score_gpt":0.2713344849880063,"score_spread":0.2496152570617177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087067271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82452875,0.0009884936,0.0013536861,0.003553771,0.000058108955,0.000021501975,0.00015456667,0.000029336008,0.16931182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765421,0.00025544086,0.00023358695,0.00017252984,0.0000051709826,0.00000537325,0.000029001234,0.000009630955,0.022747219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830437,0.0002518137,0.000027836006,0.00017996554,0.0005282444,0.0007077069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983041,0.000327508,0.00016836303,0.000083055245,0.0005979322,0.0005190364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010919408,0.0001533068,0.00024252124,0.0009585261,0.013186418,0.0051405546,0.0005080078,0.0005541917,0.0041291732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021053688,0.00019661896,0.0001530061,0.0018948492,0.0066929404,0.0009945949,0.0018561302,0.0021100843,0.00020738915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023320247,0.00004935557,0.091137215,0.00014026891,0.00004352927,0.0009067414,0.25298548,0.0016260109,0.003913264,0.5541222,0.00763811,0.08720465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036175734,0.0000718843,0.34467503,0.00044067993,0.00007934037,0.0002790446,0.2077537,0.0014963963,0.0021868672,0.013856244,0.42894623,0.00017838903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056135908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08253531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40729642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087973343","doi":"10.7202/1026133ar","title":"Portrait of Development Risk as a Young Defence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Portrait; Curiosity; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Subject (documents); Sketch; Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020679430430671067,"score_gpt":0.20089128139458112,"score_spread":0.18021185096391007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087973343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011811385,0.014835828,0.057148162,0.08094612,0.00091642956,0.000052403928,0.00010230205,0.00006279248,0.83412474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207304,0.014663242,0.014409472,0.017728727,0.0031332124,0.00024063,0.00008158249,0.00019507192,0.12881768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979631,0.00081085926,0.000055253993,0.0003406162,0.00066062645,0.00016967536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977724,0.0013280843,0.00018627048,0.00025526623,0.00029581063,0.00016211974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029582137,0.00047842128,0.00032412825,0.001706988,0.0037520686,0.0074504246,0.0012195818,0.0045092897,0.0050081597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051027224,0.00023857513,0.00044096136,0.0011249402,0.02450628,0.006822869,0.0032695807,0.008222353,0.0010901428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.166169e-7,0.0000013512977,0.000017661203,0.0000024312435,2.3265123e-7,0.000013736246,0.00031832108,0.000050813233,0.000011746532,0.9983736,0.000637524,0.00057190575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003678566,0.000007944149,0.000078744415,0.00004902547,0.0000014899392,0.000094857074,0.00031386566,0.0003870471,0.000049357328,0.86836904,0.13064012,0.0000048770735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002446022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017373867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004645562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033496355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03370601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089023921","doi":"10.7202/1026132ar","title":"Risks and Uncertainties of Scientific Innovations in French Liability Law: Between Radical Departure and Continuity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Legal liability; Ambivalence; Phenomenon; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04999638034201236,"score_gpt":0.31920472577482045,"score_spread":0.2692083454328081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089023921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38707328,0.026474461,0.09432746,0.104418404,0.00044023967,0.00010534823,0.00007425347,0.00011292875,0.38697368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325514,0.0012092346,0.0022834376,0.0010330246,0.00016429958,0.000020643673,0.000007652851,0.000008039163,0.0020185031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748951,0.014127168,0.0008301754,0.0015261619,0.00647729,0.002144091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94376534,0.04615861,0.004615063,0.001756959,0.0030753799,0.00062868645],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01889235,0.0004813553,0.00069952616,0.0039538653,0.006785226,0.014950617,0.0015544158,0.008197577,0.0013599679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03353038,0.0004675535,0.0011632729,0.0025898768,0.053752404,0.009625031,0.0070270444,0.0070205824,0.00016809293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093125,0.000007837792,0.00051519426,0.000017393462,0.0000075863672,0.00017553612,0.011177916,0.00082418387,0.00008713833,0.9830997,0.00020267225,0.0038755157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023355477,0.00008901833,0.0049519264,0.00029197842,0.000041980646,0.0005158218,0.010847953,0.003005011,0.00041655602,0.9396475,0.04006941,0.00009956487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016684249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01040996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024968363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007806495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18115902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089038730","doi":"10.7202/1018394ar","title":"The Culture of Rights Protection in Canadian Refugee Law: Examining the Domestic Violence Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Harvard University","keywords":"Domestic violence; Refugee; Persecution; Refugee law; Law; Criminology; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health; Politics","score_opus":0.034162258210077075,"score_gpt":0.29174062494073694,"score_spread":0.25757836673065987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089038730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9400932,0.0036633923,0.00027729836,0.0061601237,0.00008304841,0.00008358411,0.000112908245,0.000006494626,0.049519815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624217,0.0015600619,0.00019487918,0.00044973206,0.000009446079,0.000016572172,0.0000519305,0.000004054877,0.0014710989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98865336,0.0016636557,0.00030047115,0.00045906825,0.0046216585,0.004301933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890708,0.0032094275,0.0017870947,0.00044297657,0.0038950068,0.0015947027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004852932,0.0004894268,0.000607176,0.009543372,0.039104126,0.007332719,0.0029413637,0.0022020587,0.0016927199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020929579,0.00053877896,0.0005692174,0.011421973,0.020877168,0.0019356443,0.007594763,0.0027539597,0.000102637154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008387414,0.000121937024,0.14074814,0.00033670897,0.00005656933,0.0065733693,0.6680516,0.0005623401,0.00097110076,0.13274544,0.0059873844,0.043761455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012623155,0.000049675444,0.23679273,0.00047984387,0.000052874904,0.0016358057,0.70919824,0.00046447892,0.00042427448,0.0022729915,0.04849849,0.00011794435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99374974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99664885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1931932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1931932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16212143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93578154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089297882","doi":"10.7202/1018984ar","title":"Clearing the Air? Information Disclosure, Systems of Power, and the National Pollution Release Inventory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Corporate governance; Clearing; Pollution; Business; Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.017023237672447247,"score_gpt":0.209207272900385,"score_spread":0.19218403522793776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089297882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17912126,0.010590566,0.026608955,0.2773398,0.00031426948,0.00008863977,0.00019972128,0.000080120764,0.5056567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98898435,0.002043338,0.0011445349,0.0033637811,0.00019510399,0.000034149318,0.00001855965,0.000007710928,0.004208573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862164,0.007684983,0.0006725035,0.0008419805,0.0031644555,0.0014196902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541843,0.03399974,0.0062819324,0.0020710202,0.0029256998,0.00053732697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01686183,0.0001771141,0.0003773937,0.0015380877,0.004708826,0.014179697,0.0014850391,0.0044462746,0.00357663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035372768,0.00025636939,0.0003000008,0.0036040551,0.026230132,0.012065949,0.0028533957,0.003990993,0.00021148694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063446214,0.000008334084,0.0008547961,0.0000147908495,0.0000020977766,0.000023261904,0.0016114942,0.00031228238,0.000017906506,0.9919229,0.0013970955,0.0038286676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022050594,0.000039865536,0.0052354457,0.00033435106,0.000017784341,0.00010406665,0.0067587523,0.00334127,0.00045401807,0.9232563,0.060381494,0.000054578657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0490094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010919994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010131039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09744829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091857827","doi":"10.7202/1000618ar","title":"Was Duplessis Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Politics; Appeal; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); Surprise; Sociology; Persecution; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06726963279502593,"score_gpt":0.3042984447804934,"score_spread":0.23702881198546746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091857827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10262527,0.013943572,0.001796168,0.45907262,0.0027228866,0.000035546578,0.00016138231,0.00004452497,0.419598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83410186,0.002604945,0.0004029402,0.0673786,0.00055429805,0.000022824783,0.00004359979,0.000026097865,0.09486486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982577,0.00041659805,0.000043410222,0.00046354867,0.00031452347,0.000504225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924195,0.00028073162,0.00007586071,0.0000575333,0.00021312562,0.00013085624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002236314,0.00023089255,0.0003196016,0.00037826775,0.012582988,0.0057165027,0.0008579902,0.0051106564,0.0046276664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047134613,0.00015572022,0.00021184981,0.00037254996,0.01475765,0.003404225,0.001807522,0.005014615,0.000740119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038306112,0.000011711015,0.0017941261,0.00003324939,0.0000067909236,0.00081053836,0.025027258,0.000023595794,0.00022608312,0.9030008,0.052389916,0.016637536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001653879,0.000034302066,0.0030449477,0.00023081504,0.00002079611,0.0009231044,0.026864242,0.00011936946,0.0008386577,0.08931228,0.87855184,0.000043127253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18809688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24567543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8119031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012206499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37400407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092315164","doi":"10.7202/038659ar","title":"Rethinking Risk: The Relevance of Condoms and Viral Load in HIV Nondisclosure Prosecutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condom; Harm; Plaintiff; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Culpability; Psychology; Sexual assault; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Family medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.01742867683697686,"score_gpt":0.28807912514836825,"score_spread":0.2706504483113914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092315164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42667076,0.041974504,0.019680494,0.33599555,0.0022335562,0.00022751038,0.00009239592,0.00007771766,0.1730475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98233217,0.0045297467,0.0021012137,0.0076209833,0.00080586213,0.000031765678,0.00000957245,0.000019632067,0.0025489498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97829413,0.013296603,0.00083683385,0.0007766835,0.005219023,0.0015766504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903819,0.08953448,0.010702805,0.0023856512,0.005379394,0.0016158064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157158,0.0006200082,0.00084847765,0.0029399907,0.0045681214,0.008791479,0.002665244,0.0062900544,0.0010481522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12708722,0.00054163666,0.0006880203,0.0019725452,0.035112794,0.009558325,0.0053587905,0.008231822,0.00012145882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019378487,0.0002069746,0.117620125,0.00029843676,0.00009216028,0.0030369782,0.038231757,0.0020090237,0.00028842513,0.7312484,0.009523393,0.09725062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006079512,0.0004825745,0.16110821,0.0027813672,0.00040489345,0.0036344097,0.04573996,0.0115722325,0.001114512,0.7012642,0.07151197,0.00032489176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08155818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13431267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08155818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009675273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013442507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1621669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092317233","doi":"10.7202/1005136ar","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Balancing test; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338476443723861,"score_gpt":0.3212583960577365,"score_spread":0.24787363162049786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092317233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15307686,0.003965048,0.00262167,0.23225544,0.00096483895,0.00013626173,0.00014414139,0.00010411991,0.60673165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80249673,0.0011877761,0.0022279,0.08147149,0.000245412,0.000061333514,0.00007234792,0.000037747872,0.112199314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992226,0.0009099165,0.00013525023,0.00057765626,0.0041081714,0.0020430738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455595,0.001875536,0.00019604791,0.00032926007,0.0017582179,0.0012849431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038334993,0.0002793012,0.00035404647,0.0006881282,0.014607418,0.0066003343,0.0033533578,0.007955395,0.0028331762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010673346,0.00048468783,0.00039032113,0.000579583,0.010121651,0.0015771938,0.0025626363,0.009962262,0.00033495744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048116326,0.00005569473,0.0059932843,0.000048113205,0.000018412402,0.0011554528,0.010578453,0.00041986382,0.0010715368,0.8649302,0.08947159,0.026209252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016844473,0.00014596972,0.03167505,0.0006157579,0.00014438268,0.00078134914,0.020830601,0.0022041118,0.0027254433,0.1398331,0.8006,0.00027582367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025332566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07525554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18380153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092943277","doi":"10.7202/038179ar","title":"Propositions de réforme pour une protection des titulaires de cartes de débit victimes de transferts de fonds non autorisés","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02652757727059565,"score_gpt":0.2996781091103998,"score_spread":0.2731505318398042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092943277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0383532,0.0071624108,0.12863289,0.18437909,0.0015773061,0.0010632275,0.00032980146,0.00031287884,0.6381892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66967684,0.003507189,0.0908818,0.030474504,0.0011419305,0.001855303,0.000247678,0.00015812798,0.2020566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863707,0.005301088,0.0005683965,0.0017812077,0.002888033,0.0030906675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551416,0.00666574,0.0012287697,0.0020839795,0.0035554224,0.0009519305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016474416,0.00094686635,0.00088074134,0.00232634,0.007985758,0.011169533,0.0042429953,0.016343884,0.020363007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029046545,0.0009930392,0.0027328413,0.0015425993,0.01624419,0.012062675,0.005818376,0.0111496905,0.0030738336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104401315,0.000032149313,0.00015851544,0.000038165585,0.0000057479433,0.00008514257,0.001005338,0.0006344365,0.000099859426,0.99186045,0.0035734377,0.0024963121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014619651,0.00013624493,0.0018224329,0.00094928115,0.000082811704,0.00032207588,0.0035420645,0.00603542,0.0010711467,0.71141464,0.27436683,0.00011075821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04460056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05267369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04460056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017430639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02963444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12646872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093515167","doi":"10.7202/1017520ar","title":"The Challenge of the Bad Man","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Criminal law; Discretion; Order (exchange); Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01997373043437266,"score_gpt":0.266053838732667,"score_spread":0.24608010829829435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093515167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029606936,0.007914061,0.006770081,0.77146995,0.002777641,0.000016616561,0.000035918583,0.000059157977,0.18134964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86263627,0.002430365,0.0020170696,0.087835036,0.001306719,0.00003042205,0.000017526918,0.00006963384,0.043656986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293375,0.004269088,0.00011965579,0.0007673169,0.0010819628,0.000828184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294347,0.003020995,0.00044139626,0.0007690442,0.0011060515,0.0017189907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005879834,0.00032431554,0.0005232956,0.00074504106,0.014873665,0.009145562,0.0009587572,0.005142972,0.0050514666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01023787,0.0002989424,0.0002909251,0.0004179179,0.047132477,0.00871676,0.004895939,0.010126224,0.00089791283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015416073,0.000014536995,0.00059137883,0.000022702925,0.000004593534,0.0000899435,0.00830412,0.00011347675,0.000070785696,0.9247124,0.05615209,0.00990864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008751187,0.000021837726,0.00058144087,0.00008835124,0.0000047143644,0.00017433938,0.012717333,0.00031998864,0.00015778259,0.67948693,0.30641642,0.000022125905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01877144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014873665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062923343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073881475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045654237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.06941978909998069,"score_gpt":0.31631197118256693,"score_spread":0.24689218208258623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097724759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036353085,0.0029803095,0.10816081,0.077493384,0.00036708565,0.00008985163,0.00043914793,0.00022530672,0.7738911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004603,0.0018748783,0.022351542,0.0063453517,0.00035720132,0.0001963652,0.00035040622,0.00008627953,0.06797769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776447,0.0006654766,0.00005795819,0.00038870363,0.00049970637,0.0006237401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889463,0.00029080454,0.000096949676,0.00015989774,0.00039338798,0.00016432523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021381483,0.00023408227,0.0005656699,0.0028541146,0.009012295,0.010210982,0.0016733364,0.0036308407,0.008951532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021612954,0.0004045877,0.0007868145,0.0024206948,0.01613671,0.0052097267,0.0038264822,0.005195895,0.0009485861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2968287e-7,0.0000012237117,0.000039504142,0.0000016625775,3.7088486e-7,0.000003001789,0.00008327682,0.00019546656,0.0000038557337,0.998718,0.00059919554,0.00035407252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009025995,0.0000050415956,0.00053910585,0.000037406426,0.0000062477484,0.00001627655,0.0004940121,0.002728306,0.000054288965,0.92659366,0.069506936,0.000009714168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18206358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17006706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18206358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022600658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018092137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36200768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102433557","doi":"10.7202/1000619ar","title":"Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Charter; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06625086608774737,"score_gpt":0.33006917552828835,"score_spread":0.26381830944054097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102433557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17428961,0.015163852,0.0021371823,0.2583551,0.00081635267,0.000078474855,0.00022308786,0.00009241423,0.5488438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436088,0.003300531,0.0007282507,0.021196906,0.00012944118,0.000017709364,0.00003612883,0.000037289366,0.030944932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964031,0.00062126684,0.00005114906,0.00034506642,0.0012750574,0.001304306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739957,0.0011517593,0.0001263503,0.000093423965,0.0007213722,0.00050754915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035513141,0.00034000754,0.00031422518,0.0016277862,0.031052541,0.010942849,0.0014711567,0.004278335,0.003256629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068462933,0.00032748998,0.00024710444,0.0017724895,0.021752417,0.003202841,0.003201071,0.006832725,0.00021417692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050581348,0.000018553756,0.0034330494,0.000075047676,0.000009934179,0.0009584205,0.08034517,0.0003267581,0.0007603816,0.83989495,0.05347318,0.020653993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048259168,0.000038694583,0.01934555,0.00045560653,0.00007811111,0.00033734165,0.13682166,0.001094773,0.001749132,0.06412442,0.7756389,0.00026756484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99150765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11886509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11886509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1248558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86243063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105286613","doi":"10.7202/1000629ar","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08032181496622609,"score_gpt":0.2892118379418761,"score_spread":0.20889002297565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105286613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109823026,0.014294878,0.0020092244,0.20046948,0.0011551603,0.0000943717,0.0001579639,0.0000726829,0.67192316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763194,0.0032842767,0.0005204039,0.05652784,0.0005452977,0.00006128836,0.000049404356,0.00004710498,0.062644884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924064,0.0016703312,0.00012321118,0.001012154,0.002003125,0.0027848613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967397,0.0018948076,0.00020648175,0.00022197979,0.0005960918,0.00034093412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073996475,0.00037072838,0.00059950957,0.0011720267,0.026823698,0.008195891,0.0027758952,0.012450674,0.003901933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012952939,0.00048825023,0.0005930549,0.0011069587,0.018354198,0.004851074,0.004144968,0.016285174,0.0004048109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036866157,0.000021536756,0.0014135316,0.000025981386,0.000010133312,0.0009896489,0.021146996,0.00010340483,0.00026561486,0.9246611,0.04348014,0.007845064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006910641,0.000075858734,0.0067485357,0.0005833075,0.00009687706,0.0006356883,0.015787276,0.0008133928,0.0016079732,0.1311269,0.8422222,0.00023286874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74122447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7930165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25877553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032363687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027160425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105618512","doi":"10.7202/038177ar","title":"The Constitution’s Peoples: Approaching Community in the Context of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Declaration; Context (archaeology); Cornerstone; Political science; Doctrine; Section (typography); Negotiation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04724023654900858,"score_gpt":0.3060059065138428,"score_spread":0.2587656699648342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105618512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0601565,0.018548664,0.005082765,0.20443949,0.0011748448,0.00012986854,0.00013898633,0.000031363394,0.7102975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91361564,0.005545667,0.0030152202,0.017726146,0.0005159757,0.0002784448,0.00011587287,0.000047670554,0.05913923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081504,0.0054482324,0.00015112979,0.00042882323,0.0014178941,0.0017388472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967843,0.0021407874,0.00015902518,0.00008853263,0.00034942947,0.00047785582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058870073,0.00045186162,0.0004700058,0.0025745365,0.03469824,0.016386162,0.0020922031,0.010105496,0.0028009296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009645625,0.0005516694,0.00037313075,0.0037506926,0.052995775,0.009921386,0.008697729,0.009627644,0.00021907872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000329281,0.000008319841,0.0003022471,0.000012217065,0.0000011781411,0.00023519798,0.06336006,0.00008194679,0.00003362214,0.9251405,0.008354794,0.0024666209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001879717,0.000018801364,0.0028328365,0.00036429169,0.000009479324,0.00014998956,0.17938952,0.00040761285,0.000079358215,0.42124414,0.3954538,0.000031391468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47492835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6452751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5250716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053006005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051762916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110027607","doi":"10.7202/039839ar","title":"Penalty Clauses through the Lens of Unconscionability Doctrine: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.030636016975081126,"score_gpt":0.32612853735531183,"score_spread":0.2954925203802307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110027607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18322529,0.022596762,0.0070923073,0.14419314,0.0011270717,0.00018889204,0.00016455924,0.00009454096,0.6413174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275808,0.004062929,0.0009290236,0.01602779,0.00024892183,0.00005335748,0.000033380198,0.000018539726,0.051045265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810755,0.00038513457,0.00005100513,0.00010848652,0.00062546245,0.00072233187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931955,0.0003351068,0.0000764039,0.0000233538,0.0001742656,0.000071396615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014611105,0.0003308759,0.00023598455,0.0011618154,0.0073864455,0.0036576074,0.0015009427,0.0064158835,0.00204159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038462288,0.00030578766,0.00034657642,0.0011212961,0.007788297,0.0022057572,0.0009937481,0.004743043,0.00025875308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020665013,0.000027379774,0.0015740136,0.00006672447,0.00000803335,0.0013967147,0.009608022,0.000572356,0.00036527225,0.9529889,0.024885591,0.008486313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092207876,0.00016717259,0.029408744,0.00074898265,0.000117100164,0.0015913757,0.035289418,0.002684685,0.0026060964,0.23518948,0.69186765,0.00023699502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61880285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8030073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61880285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021649832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015914671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7668842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111170202","doi":"10.7202/039650ar","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Law; Legislation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislature; Health care; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.016849430216867467,"score_gpt":0.32019714360296353,"score_spread":0.30334771338609606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111170202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005032399,0.065892994,0.0017597268,0.58933836,0.0113697145,0.00009006849,0.00016033568,0.00004919655,0.32630727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22228236,0.018943373,0.0016262174,0.50774175,0.006686555,0.00021257368,0.00009393659,0.00008246901,0.2423307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935051,0.0016675082,0.00017016545,0.0009983531,0.0025613948,0.0010974321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510455,0.0032962223,0.00014599395,0.00021549918,0.00095797924,0.00027970795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054890034,0.0007418451,0.0005926235,0.0010455262,0.013163511,0.010775958,0.0016621927,0.014942474,0.0031490673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009060198,0.00043068925,0.00057620025,0.0018644371,0.030647472,0.0051422347,0.002810033,0.022025192,0.00072754716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010683619,0.0000118977005,0.00013292434,0.000029080053,0.0000041004496,0.00014796293,0.0032130382,0.000073359646,0.0000697009,0.85277104,0.13678521,0.006751096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017930648,0.000025269512,0.0012751006,0.00042102564,0.000008986438,0.00012549554,0.0025353832,0.0002281077,0.00019210132,0.13990882,0.8552082,0.00005364116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50023717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59628016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49976283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037494764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02035665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113544308","doi":"10.7202/1005850ar","title":"International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Law; Afghan; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Geneva Conventions; International law; International human rights law","score_opus":0.024552230731480298,"score_gpt":0.2717437367127651,"score_spread":0.24719150598128478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113544308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1476446,0.017956441,0.0031909635,0.18363158,0.0019490813,0.00024472686,0.0003280651,0.00012391093,0.6449306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555148,0.012293703,0.0032984365,0.04682914,0.00068705995,0.00010994436,0.00017778414,0.000065806234,0.08102327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825234,0.001508269,0.00038205195,0.00080113305,0.0046529723,0.0044032326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941613,0.0024449818,0.0004260565,0.00022865999,0.0020948602,0.0006441479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005969413,0.00063721277,0.00036147304,0.0025998657,0.04350359,0.01579034,0.0033984368,0.00969797,0.003228529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013165957,0.00053036545,0.0006811195,0.0043685376,0.022691913,0.002936124,0.005739858,0.008516495,0.00028627543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034631445,0.000048203223,0.0049502132,0.00017867309,0.000028264149,0.0032417234,0.09342011,0.0008262922,0.00091958075,0.78284556,0.06544906,0.048057605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021311174,0.000036273592,0.01317785,0.0006388724,0.00008884367,0.0012648823,0.105635606,0.0006408813,0.0008651493,0.025460012,0.8519214,0.00024897984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12167185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12167185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17812862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88279516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115453667","doi":"10.7202/038892ar","title":"Regulating Greenhouse Gases in Canada: Constitutional and Policy Dimensions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; Negotiation; Carbon tax; Constitution; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; Economic policy; Politics; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01764415870632885,"score_gpt":0.267927565561959,"score_spread":0.25028340685563016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115453667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07774832,0.01677265,0.0076121134,0.32795855,0.0007943934,0.00022778015,0.0010728971,0.00019216751,0.5676211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90743923,0.010774313,0.0061053154,0.041671626,0.00037455128,0.00015799086,0.00026131488,0.00005305993,0.03316264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98317724,0.0018988347,0.00044768525,0.0010869196,0.0077406354,0.00564869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888793,0.004481106,0.000751207,0.00050909613,0.0040137777,0.0013655104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746034,0.00048235818,0.0005892751,0.0029125577,0.02070029,0.014278181,0.0029410028,0.007191479,0.004340469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016777448,0.00068589486,0.0007266669,0.0042580445,0.024595242,0.0031087792,0.0033410946,0.0063985293,0.0001888394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001169554,0.00001915594,0.0021067678,0.00011023324,0.000023284081,0.00012028162,0.001928997,0.0020813993,0.00060943124,0.97030723,0.013483288,0.009198119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009243395,0.00004984945,0.030408992,0.000911685,0.00024686384,0.00014822098,0.008915384,0.005818988,0.002127,0.26977125,0.6811488,0.0003606255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99105537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18056796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37314132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.950425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120059961","doi":"10.7202/038894ar","title":"Le droit à l’information des patients gardés en établissement : un instrument essentiel de promotion des valeurs démocratiques et du statut citoyen","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01870712304776276,"score_gpt":0.3177219189012796,"score_spread":0.2990147958535168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120059961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11180942,0.0065002427,0.02223944,0.23191147,0.0013243724,0.00027086204,0.0003405611,0.0002057468,0.62539786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910209,0.0033989872,0.0055104755,0.01374316,0.0008307395,0.0002519887,0.00012978492,0.00012741602,0.0657985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97580904,0.014297404,0.00086208136,0.001316812,0.005181721,0.0025328775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432908,0.03840124,0.0047621997,0.003804615,0.004560358,0.0051806998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01576586,0.0004034054,0.00049499917,0.0026860393,0.0075729075,0.016189393,0.0012837431,0.005749499,0.023208782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042366825,0.0004932889,0.00057447207,0.0026331174,0.020081189,0.009989302,0.011146689,0.006850536,0.0037964804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024087052,0.00017989325,0.011323242,0.0004290412,0.000047844995,0.00082825037,0.121572606,0.0003209753,0.0012155245,0.72138333,0.026768383,0.1156901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011755544,0.00031328198,0.01780775,0.0015829016,0.00010023168,0.0012078466,0.06659935,0.00054945826,0.0021105595,0.15354112,0.7558977,0.00017227765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008057867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008624655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008109889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020554492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08337885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125505034","doi":"10.7202/1022310ar","title":"Freedom of the Press as a Discrete Constitutional Guarantee","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Meaning (existential); Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Freedom of information; Supreme court; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Originalism; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.019057966154315636,"score_gpt":0.26755384469360893,"score_spread":0.2484958785392933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125505034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048987415,0.0014248091,0.24021131,0.03696351,0.00059328723,0.00024147601,0.000576389,0.0003378889,0.67066383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474647,0.0005345163,0.024553211,0.0024461849,0.0005035621,0.0002793669,0.00013760255,0.00007199411,0.024008969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046993,0.0031167166,0.0005001884,0.0019263126,0.0029166394,0.0010702399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654515,0.0071569807,0.000941379,0.0034657384,0.00124863,0.0006420666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009658314,0.0004723359,0.00071550347,0.0018696685,0.0050193775,0.014144777,0.00212689,0.005486193,0.006480712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014874155,0.00062615535,0.0010799571,0.0011634346,0.04951855,0.011610291,0.0058855335,0.009189785,0.0010574457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025866814,0.0000024314252,0.000024694258,0.0000048322436,8.293242e-7,0.000008596876,0.00021066969,0.00012327293,0.000054432472,0.9987062,0.0001707844,0.0006907073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002795099,0.000022943603,0.00021932635,0.00006301953,0.000013482679,0.000040205538,0.0003061923,0.00083289255,0.00041423686,0.97150695,0.02653074,0.000022092017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008494411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014144777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064620688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011327091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051078677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128082881","doi":"10.7202/1000623ar","title":"Roncarelli’s Green Card: The Role of Citizenship in Randian Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Dissenting opinion; Constitution; Political science; Originalism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05244010886603593,"score_gpt":0.2818793899479775,"score_spread":0.2294392810819416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128082881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047707193,0.017090967,0.008392002,0.27818784,0.001279624,0.000038664664,0.00006326915,0.000072858464,0.64716756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913305,0.004803286,0.004008803,0.039684143,0.0011537186,0.000063267624,0.000041172992,0.00008139924,0.058833655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554884,0.0021924987,0.00009389679,0.00060911104,0.0009607194,0.0005949527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956862,0.0029300458,0.00020750017,0.00033536818,0.00059070974,0.0002502176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059559452,0.00026401549,0.00036802012,0.0010796491,0.008722761,0.0071572326,0.00091896555,0.0036189763,0.0022543697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086744195,0.0001933571,0.00029292091,0.0011601372,0.03065797,0.006515835,0.002434075,0.0054793237,0.00030338066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004604125,0.00000376692,0.00021083042,0.000007900914,0.0000011366508,0.000024945248,0.002687902,0.000043638673,0.000032070096,0.98517007,0.008866724,0.0029464702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019228635,0.000019028064,0.0020858876,0.00020668532,0.000011223561,0.000108325476,0.00469848,0.00040111307,0.00046427533,0.45556417,0.5363754,0.000046098074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15255782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16840276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84744215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011335258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007018509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30333966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129730712","doi":"10.7202/1029207ar","title":"Less Evidence, Better Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Contextualism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Jury; Admissible evidence; Attribution; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2688049660234274,"score_gpt":0.4251731878246394,"score_spread":0.15636822180121202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129730712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023290236,0.022863979,0.0481683,0.50630593,0.0041238912,0.00016097089,0.00035301797,0.00018410436,0.3945497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74372935,0.013210219,0.033793334,0.14118735,0.0064430297,0.00032852162,0.0004013513,0.00034476613,0.060562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97945446,0.008600538,0.0013154594,0.0037834106,0.005385301,0.0014608817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94122094,0.03238464,0.0058072824,0.009598167,0.006434037,0.004554998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029127898,0.00081204274,0.0015919525,0.0040772646,0.0038553015,0.0143853165,0.0020524275,0.010007309,0.036041126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06906935,0.00058863766,0.0008923486,0.002052957,0.033106364,0.041766666,0.012418451,0.011739261,0.0050478084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073703035,0.00008198529,0.0010877862,0.00042714557,0.00005866929,0.00021670108,0.0031392032,0.00024892428,0.0002837431,0.945068,0.016057098,0.03325707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062605715,0.00007977164,0.0010222959,0.0006649473,0.000033975804,0.00032686527,0.001913856,0.00021582676,0.00035212914,0.7983818,0.19690384,0.00004213777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028418677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003179653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036041126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006027837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008835359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15404487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140368457","doi":"10.7202/1017515ar","title":"Occupy, indignados, et le Printemps Érable : vers un agenda de recherche","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20452505044455238,"score_gpt":0.3844319061563458,"score_spread":0.17990685571179343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140368457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13495627,0.09595561,0.005417761,0.39210653,0.002580668,0.00006308522,0.000962405,0.000092453854,0.3678652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77994615,0.07815139,0.003245682,0.018915456,0.002320579,0.00019448588,0.000499099,0.00013955611,0.116587676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969338,0.001485681,0.0000637371,0.00044678483,0.0005192142,0.0005507573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99170685,0.0046932506,0.0006353714,0.00076113804,0.0014474364,0.0007559873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072954325,0.0007172204,0.001092409,0.0038343319,0.009294983,0.018963087,0.0017232095,0.004241583,0.011732885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007824043,0.00032244914,0.00030778826,0.0077561415,0.027205333,0.017630508,0.005958507,0.0060754805,0.0014787335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049532,0.000038958726,0.003061486,0.00037151182,0.000012331595,0.00018981383,0.061179303,0.00020701592,0.00024288119,0.9027356,0.012669809,0.01924175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019282,0.00003255121,0.006167325,0.0029299192,0.000031613115,0.0001434736,0.29178402,0.00038462298,0.0005237216,0.15187238,0.54606324,0.000047857997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20614491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24519977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025419699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032999914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40989006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147255877","doi":"10.7202/1029210ar","title":"La réforme proposée du régime québécois de l’adoption et le rejet des parentés plurielles","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère des Transports","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033798242716662354,"score_gpt":0.2576203607506376,"score_spread":0.22382211803397525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147255877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4232865,0.006424222,0.022848781,0.0745756,0.0011425747,0.00043121714,0.00044261527,0.00015592105,0.4706925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732575,0.0013139591,0.0053830366,0.0034635644,0.00008872739,0.0001778369,0.00008253292,0.00003423569,0.11619857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520195,0.0013945064,0.00011851304,0.0006493437,0.001318913,0.0013168303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946489,0.0011539244,0.00049319846,0.00057923223,0.0022677337,0.0008570291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046087867,0.00038223254,0.00042229006,0.0011316846,0.0083973035,0.0047303955,0.0014668173,0.002748904,0.007023997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009932685,0.00033755178,0.0004013651,0.0012704876,0.008982767,0.00230049,0.002382618,0.0041322527,0.00049543654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044510187,0.000040443167,0.010510794,0.000081818675,0.000019749654,0.0003760147,0.03342627,0.00071075174,0.0010517592,0.9015365,0.009662655,0.042538818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007371839,0.00016356778,0.06432688,0.0008727758,0.00007203419,0.00032770212,0.02689484,0.0027155182,0.001540776,0.053460807,0.8493842,0.00016732072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.882017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9327295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11798298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05332721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08284749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38691783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147906309","doi":"10.7202/1019049ar","title":"Le fiduciaire, véritable pivot ou simple rouage de l’opération de fiducie ?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026763090328592566,"score_gpt":0.2897585710114977,"score_spread":0.2629954806829051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147906309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14224583,0.008176708,0.019884182,0.090720296,0.0011640473,0.000067128836,0.00018358105,0.00010350699,0.7374547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9027652,0.0016083285,0.001981569,0.0041934457,0.00023064106,0.00004410169,0.000052116553,0.0000656418,0.08905898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527353,0.0014768158,0.00015261737,0.0008751952,0.00084776233,0.0013742364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973508,0.0008615531,0.00034277816,0.00042506494,0.00066101435,0.00035876266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053224573,0.00041875057,0.00045402866,0.00093561085,0.008500445,0.012236531,0.001309615,0.0039068307,0.01403378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076336013,0.0003927347,0.0004061193,0.00086379424,0.020249719,0.007637836,0.0044999626,0.0044810865,0.0021858644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021381116,0.0000073135134,0.0008749912,0.000031918134,0.000004699084,0.00011664062,0.007423228,0.00008344042,0.00021611758,0.97835827,0.003788721,0.0090733105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039547183,0.00009221568,0.008437304,0.0008493684,0.000041499872,0.00043101318,0.032606225,0.0007087472,0.0015295879,0.28582072,0.6693102,0.00013359121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121416606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1398801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121416606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013100147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016849637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24141973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157076830","doi":"10.7202/1000622ar","title":"Democratizing Common Law Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial review; Common law; Public law; Democracy; Administrative law; Sources of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09037132734554755,"score_gpt":0.3211790912281851,"score_spread":0.23080776388263757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157076830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053350545,0.004303507,0.24562667,0.09476063,0.0011202338,0.0003070872,0.00015513347,0.00047816974,0.59989804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361366,0.0015659366,0.03156034,0.008538964,0.0010885523,0.00030915593,0.000086073145,0.00015481173,0.020559577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826151,0.0075280485,0.0006775776,0.0030121787,0.004015263,0.0021519046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921824,0.011656333,0.0011202197,0.0048599048,0.0022028028,0.0009423943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023507154,0.00048585972,0.0007876765,0.002176575,0.004913132,0.009395652,0.0017259743,0.004331549,0.0040563853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03171413,0.00046126582,0.0009685308,0.0013326076,0.032746248,0.010078258,0.008652317,0.0086188475,0.00095792755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018234795,0.000005334925,0.000049510647,0.000008656795,0.0000027908936,0.000015358863,0.00033115607,0.0005088944,0.000057510963,0.996445,0.0007351234,0.0018388858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008492529,0.0000068503723,0.00005901345,0.000026995378,0.000004066786,0.000012304124,0.000104478575,0.0007153845,0.00012519065,0.97748667,0.021443723,0.000006764787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071726907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00680789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023507154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009393859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012945692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124319196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158082041","doi":"10.7202/1005847ar","title":"East Asia’s Engagement with Cosmopolitan Ideals Under its Trade Treaty Dispute Provisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Treaty; East Asia; International trade; Political science; General partnership; International trade law; Negotiation; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06731588194997792,"score_gpt":0.2442919552572623,"score_spread":0.17697607330728438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158082041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07673208,0.0015502418,0.008987583,0.013214186,0.00021516584,0.000041714826,0.00004088049,0.00004140571,0.8991768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450639,0.00071060425,0.003177237,0.0037971283,0.000110078116,0.00006305702,0.00003379715,0.000026965976,0.047017217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729115,0.0010357676,0.00021708655,0.00033792402,0.0006989212,0.0004191634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980971,0.0005547498,0.00034153098,0.00044165834,0.00038933824,0.00017568943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070605716,0.0002499474,0.00021597084,0.0005267652,0.0037020994,0.0069597843,0.0007079526,0.00207306,0.002890609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039314036,0.00020345219,0.00036731389,0.0009938764,0.012227958,0.00488984,0.0049539316,0.005112179,0.00042212443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060652524,0.0000052179344,0.000392492,0.000011806891,0.0000027947815,0.000066727865,0.007038481,0.00008078262,0.00011858162,0.9879269,0.0013603076,0.0029898514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003040662,0.000079475445,0.006441872,0.00031411034,0.000038904273,0.00046122487,0.010733417,0.0012801079,0.0014539309,0.51692593,0.46219012,0.000050485884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007327653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008922956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007327653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037462711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048970543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037340343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165498009","doi":"10.7202/1000630ar","title":"Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Relevance (law); Political science; Due process; Notice; Exemplification; Common law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.14430199994377327,"score_gpt":0.3167429412609803,"score_spread":0.17244094131720702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165498009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01563848,0.004479203,0.017985929,0.18210186,0.0034342129,0.00018564417,0.0002343613,0.00023597406,0.7757045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71854186,0.0019774358,0.015550326,0.14268328,0.0048166965,0.00041968684,0.00020318425,0.00019739885,0.11561021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889434,0.0028062414,0.00045315694,0.0025796883,0.0039544776,0.0013120762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99434596,0.002576473,0.00034603558,0.0009679805,0.00149347,0.0002701371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009896064,0.0007156364,0.00071471016,0.0020739033,0.0056894184,0.010081712,0.0029377914,0.011860277,0.004467124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020667722,0.00042372255,0.0008776092,0.00074350514,0.02664114,0.006970232,0.0036673967,0.014890114,0.0017128534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057172865,0.000005927917,0.00009434005,0.000008106791,0.000001975924,0.00004995981,0.0009498956,0.000040084233,0.00006371058,0.9814269,0.0154647,0.0018886355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028174833,0.000028469296,0.0007011994,0.00016622084,0.000014817333,0.00013845581,0.0004950686,0.00075493666,0.00054237375,0.67617327,0.32090822,0.000048881044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037307255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03312283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037307255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010240635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006791816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0743013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05830837734920551,"score_gpt":0.3040873362336409,"score_spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21665667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007303651,0.020341037,0.011558755,0.14149694,0.009663717,0.00007569551,0.00026378562,0.00019833501,0.8090981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28678536,0.017426437,0.00844147,0.08206616,0.02052504,0.00033023994,0.0002542823,0.00070928014,0.58346164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330467,0.0021069276,0.00046753348,0.0016489408,0.0016224454,0.00084944133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923971,0.0026860558,0.00041754602,0.002390873,0.0011914313,0.000917038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069169085,0.0004812812,0.00082571054,0.0008028834,0.0060024234,0.00975341,0.0015816491,0.007102442,0.02648468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210409,0.0003818996,0.0004090912,0.00086775643,0.034270473,0.017613018,0.0067867143,0.011097616,0.008606479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147769615,0.00001181315,0.00036267505,0.0000363838,0.0000055537457,0.00013982123,0.0020641696,0.00002848627,0.00015736422,0.9199992,0.050503217,0.026676431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007752806,0.000014312154,0.00029615097,0.00014943561,0.0000049302257,0.00041597988,0.00069479534,0.00005481796,0.00008558579,0.09756603,0.9006963,0.0000139528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003850826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005857508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02648468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026653442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034280382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08860004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169696031","doi":"10.7202/039648ar","title":"The Roots of Canadian Law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal history; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Israeli law; Public law; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Black letter law; Chinese law; Sociology; Sources of law; Private law; History","score_opus":0.021031489416687355,"score_gpt":0.2617595878260023,"score_spread":0.24072809840931492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169696031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065309964,0.022757817,0.0015449564,0.19750285,0.0012094659,0.00006079092,0.0004023784,0.00012165403,0.7110902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531233,0.016645262,0.0017037339,0.021159131,0.00029153822,0.000046757275,0.00016790415,0.000109498054,0.10675295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346584,0.00057373126,0.000098012504,0.0006321754,0.002314288,0.0029159186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932941,0.0011064579,0.00031462766,0.00015167591,0.0031329195,0.0020003195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027512554,0.00034019852,0.00047602577,0.003819912,0.041803345,0.013417034,0.0023783443,0.0031649002,0.011905942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008215842,0.0004606968,0.00038924228,0.007112126,0.023013247,0.003598171,0.0046791765,0.005914881,0.000522357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017144406,0.000017940642,0.0030559376,0.000081445396,0.000010209634,0.00035467706,0.024114527,0.000303676,0.00012312862,0.89502937,0.052777175,0.024114773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017032142,0.000012828256,0.0128453355,0.00043765278,0.000032544118,0.00014651482,0.027035246,0.00057561684,0.00018319646,0.048761383,0.9098546,0.00009809007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71636975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28363025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37982765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8308874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187960577","doi":"","title":"A Layered Approach to Internet Legal Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.023528547577304187,"score_gpt":0.2309727675822997,"score_spread":0.20744422000499552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187960577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009848254,0.00049931015,0.92128223,0.004207134,0.00006431953,0.00010850998,0.0002469446,0.0005406713,0.06320263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36429054,0.001183736,0.60754395,0.0009946012,0.00035107307,0.00046617576,0.00048860995,0.0004893374,0.024192043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934127,0.0031953878,0.00041442114,0.00038828535,0.002019977,0.0005693358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98505485,0.0077943564,0.0008114442,0.0036225163,0.002115906,0.0006008964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006104079,0.00077306473,0.0007743303,0.008967884,0.0034232459,0.014217386,0.003641024,0.002851376,0.017388133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022351444,0.0015476237,0.0027655053,0.005908192,0.007850717,0.02403448,0.007070521,0.005553163,0.0026815173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006674212,0.00002154236,0.0003216076,0.000013966041,0.000015248835,0.00004157288,0.0003920868,0.0023080478,0.00010768972,0.98706657,0.0011228062,0.008582236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037643385,0.0000045911515,0.00017470142,0.0000455732,0.000026941296,0.00004289981,0.0002630645,0.02183743,0.00024397869,0.9701084,0.0072369585,0.000011703417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010581017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009776778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017388133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047658226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058169127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205560194","doi":"10.7202/1037248ar","title":"The Fractured Right to Vote: Democracy, Discretion, and Designing Electoral Districts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistricting; Gerrymandering; Discretion; Political science; Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Law; Public administration; Boundary (topology); Politics; Parliament; House of Commons; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012789670457348983,"score_gpt":0.2728497597679163,"score_spread":0.26006008931056734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205560194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35704944,0.004093749,0.12767436,0.025045443,0.00030242425,0.00039540912,0.0003789247,0.0003606674,0.48469955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805891,0.0002636516,0.008027673,0.0002998591,0.000024076908,0.00005836453,0.000045998127,0.000056037054,0.010635222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98500246,0.007453493,0.00040137587,0.0011219161,0.002166825,0.003853971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942053,0.002506411,0.00041028197,0.0009273549,0.00084959227,0.0011010668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007991983,0.00021472818,0.00063264766,0.0017046648,0.0125132045,0.01163941,0.0018555288,0.001416276,0.0049695773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021356357,0.0004593703,0.00033575366,0.0020281284,0.020523705,0.0034775613,0.006937235,0.0020465322,0.00050657947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057100402,0.00001805814,0.006543794,0.0000682756,0.000011141935,0.000093167946,0.014518621,0.004163753,0.00022965664,0.91512865,0.003857169,0.055310618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111898116,0.00008410174,0.018407881,0.00033765697,0.00004636038,0.00014939546,0.028062824,0.008373524,0.0012458775,0.6826433,0.260398,0.00013917436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.405097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63838786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.405097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02390019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032822907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80547816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215504162","doi":"10.7202/1034055ar","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Notice; Plural; Majority opinion; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11519907970680078,"score_gpt":0.32922301917405444,"score_spread":0.21402393946725368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215504162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19046587,0.012071077,0.015230224,0.099773064,0.0007798561,0.00011439461,0.00014715703,0.00009926953,0.68131906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98101074,0.0009787524,0.0013913038,0.0023046397,0.00010967555,0.000038208877,0.000030456908,0.00004542699,0.014090924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98739225,0.0066802264,0.00025174726,0.0010673082,0.0030249758,0.0015834821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952247,0.0022920505,0.00029518476,0.0003432498,0.001241476,0.0006033766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548118,0.00086213247,0.0007439091,0.002782818,0.03340712,0.025327044,0.003461109,0.0090259295,0.0023276848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010309385,0.0005047358,0.00051656715,0.004501887,0.07710594,0.010341823,0.007377832,0.010521751,0.00021309103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068869863,0.0000066882476,0.00018049497,0.000015019854,0.0000025772067,0.00020114786,0.117627315,0.000110604386,0.00009474715,0.87789077,0.0021213018,0.001742455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021213706,0.00004050767,0.0016714899,0.0004959401,0.000023517558,0.00023140316,0.27444568,0.0012679157,0.0004176888,0.46829084,0.25298885,0.000104937215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5747269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55145925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078748845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033989917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229519293","doi":"10.7202/1034056ar","title":"Unsteady Architecture: Ambiguity, the Senate Reference, and the Future of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Ambiguity; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Computer science","score_opus":0.027988025132148053,"score_gpt":0.26457264021381,"score_spread":0.23658461508166195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229519293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1515272,0.011983702,0.008152143,0.16538921,0.0006557455,0.000113846785,0.00021545334,0.00006755886,0.66189516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679993,0.0019685396,0.0014525977,0.008078269,0.000104104096,0.000029593733,0.000038419905,0.000027125727,0.020302184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98448074,0.0033521743,0.00041543788,0.0011188245,0.00545393,0.005178906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916304,0.0035467187,0.0004650078,0.00049350876,0.002944166,0.0009201278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011680898,0.0002884018,0.00064319075,0.0021076067,0.036988355,0.018494116,0.0025557894,0.00583415,0.0041004587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017993748,0.00051409344,0.0007132779,0.0034440854,0.04328607,0.00511594,0.0069611357,0.0100978,0.00022885423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008324121,0.0000028942848,0.00054035586,0.000010677319,0.0000035900853,0.00008014392,0.0042150556,0.00035565937,0.000046125864,0.9892558,0.0024910057,0.0029902477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007920319,0.00003299439,0.009020866,0.00054718205,0.00008001402,0.00013861594,0.02288637,0.00370554,0.00075442885,0.5713695,0.391115,0.00027025872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98382723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18407014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18407014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23845762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.946363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232994027","doi":"10.7202/1034054ar","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif au Sénat : vers une gestalt constitutionnelle?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025203701991743193,"score_gpt":0.2691724840328691,"score_spread":0.2439687820411259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232994027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09245378,0.0028246574,0.054334942,0.0109115755,0.0002826146,0.0000659079,0.0001314858,0.00009399913,0.83890104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95090145,0.0010554709,0.005449873,0.00068251975,0.000079619844,0.00008008758,0.000068920286,0.00011572042,0.041566532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665254,0.0015417166,0.0000937149,0.00063230784,0.0005767299,0.00050297927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998456,0.0006062728,0.00020804744,0.00030338118,0.00028384908,0.00014237265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027713743,0.0003985469,0.00053931255,0.0015540052,0.007016757,0.00979219,0.0011574742,0.0017749742,0.013148585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037632394,0.00039740247,0.0006375946,0.0019850782,0.036023073,0.009439669,0.0052849147,0.0041795657,0.0012316926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586434,0.000002373757,0.00025556472,0.0000144949045,0.0000036686413,0.00003648616,0.0076502054,0.0001398464,0.00011771969,0.9898106,0.00020775599,0.0017555018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019276627,0.00003941721,0.004851557,0.0003100318,0.000028883744,0.00019646059,0.024461778,0.0008476578,0.00088251726,0.79495984,0.17333572,0.00006686996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026205372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04250779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97379464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008454705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007088413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06134349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234089456","doi":"10.7202/1034049ar","title":"Constitutionalizing the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Political science; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Law; House of Commons; Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Legislation; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Law and economics; Referendum; Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06944750153965605,"score_gpt":0.31411167005757473,"score_spread":0.24466416851791867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234089456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037825584,0.007069436,0.046585564,0.37057585,0.0055057085,0.0003917118,0.00031076994,0.0002139753,0.5315213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83576405,0.0028324008,0.017340017,0.06791383,0.0034586075,0.00071052124,0.00010761726,0.00010126699,0.071771614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97892857,0.011195836,0.0007920013,0.0026452993,0.0038721666,0.0025661602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953855,0.005199276,0.00032490116,0.0017862647,0.0023061023,0.0008448804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029853394,0.0006569633,0.00073935237,0.001855096,0.013829855,0.011992437,0.002085735,0.011337712,0.0045578135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030758671,0.0006125029,0.0011603611,0.0014816005,0.033373628,0.009379311,0.008824053,0.020053789,0.0010988393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005597866,0.0000046996915,0.000045316367,0.000008238781,0.0000025247252,0.0000205566,0.00041821678,0.00011135814,0.000054835324,0.99674314,0.0016021318,0.0009832501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067567016,0.00004392692,0.00042677898,0.00014705295,0.000039795104,0.00007937399,0.00083430833,0.0010564035,0.0007089338,0.7734175,0.22311956,0.00005890131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042711716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053673357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98748547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012514531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028868567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15788168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237358327","doi":"10.7202/1034050ar","title":"The Politics of the Senate Reform Reference: Fidelity, Frustration, and Federal Unilateralism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Divided government; Legislature; Political science; Opposition (politics); Public administration; House of Commons; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Law; Parliament","score_opus":0.041385389732462294,"score_gpt":0.2745266911746466,"score_spread":0.2331413014421843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237358327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3268126,0.004442982,0.005296903,0.14808151,0.0012292968,0.00006352898,0.00011848024,0.00010642107,0.5138483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96524006,0.00055173255,0.00033646385,0.009346572,0.00019969893,0.000025649,0.000021739583,0.000057889294,0.02422019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686543,0.019372676,0.00080255594,0.0021686603,0.004509289,0.0044925357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98200905,0.00986094,0.0015667881,0.0015373601,0.003589914,0.0014359021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022226894,0.0002367736,0.00042842852,0.0015275372,0.03565413,0.015629858,0.0015788234,0.0057845227,0.00687227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04104838,0.0005543169,0.000446625,0.0030691382,0.026964488,0.0065707667,0.009635013,0.009004131,0.000851577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040823557,0.000018241308,0.0045772176,0.000045140263,0.000019203026,0.0008782778,0.12644705,0.00016051179,0.00040790066,0.82689995,0.026061753,0.014443969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029788924,0.000082336184,0.016466405,0.00044246746,0.000046657897,0.0008913313,0.16028947,0.0007588023,0.0020776812,0.05707071,0.7616633,0.0001810107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25868598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31567827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026292348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016453978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51436055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237497123","doi":"10.7202/1034053ar","title":"Le fédéralisme comme principe matriciel dans l’interprétation de la procédure de modification constitutionnelle","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07391410305977508,"score_gpt":0.3328778617831355,"score_spread":0.2589637587233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237497123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02680037,0.008293466,0.049627434,0.06656995,0.0018129231,0.00013625644,0.0005553653,0.00019300931,0.8460114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974965,0.0027684867,0.016225625,0.016182503,0.0006217302,0.00022374532,0.00017659784,0.00012910567,0.1661757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173474,0.00286898,0.00030167509,0.0017897623,0.00200192,0.0013029673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980995,0.00068642694,0.0001418244,0.00033671304,0.00062375056,0.00011187204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004120717,0.0005051729,0.00044319293,0.0009401768,0.0067862608,0.006895712,0.0015623613,0.0043664724,0.008114609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056765657,0.00041875936,0.0008584809,0.0008777714,0.022857483,0.0032398906,0.0024163786,0.0073492066,0.0009885154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063399684,0.000002389818,0.00010158549,0.000012878518,0.0000035712592,0.000015767671,0.00086876086,0.00009754755,0.00007301189,0.9948186,0.002391265,0.0016082949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003627205,0.00003924383,0.0024591773,0.00018976761,0.000040833445,0.00009561737,0.0015336834,0.00073384395,0.0012306867,0.50470406,0.48885858,0.00007833605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24625617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31874615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24625617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026487034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024477353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4896456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239712587","doi":"10.7202/1034048ar","title":"Introduction : les silences du Renvoi relatif à la réforme du Sénat","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Art; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03296298567573755,"score_gpt":0.21773440213022702,"score_spread":0.18477141645448947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239712587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005136802,0.078717396,0.0025974647,0.60214967,0.06316046,0.00008518549,0.0027213919,0.00026874646,0.24516296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17408943,0.032872677,0.001657952,0.35890862,0.06812569,0.00048981793,0.0017266428,0.0009750408,0.36115417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504304,0.002091266,0.00023446535,0.0007249077,0.001340885,0.00056544883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333835,0.00450911,0.00043741698,0.000229757,0.001205871,0.00027956956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038611712,0.00068246876,0.0006800308,0.0013720687,0.0060824724,0.005902669,0.0015452838,0.008341216,0.027969033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012890247,0.00054051337,0.00083418674,0.0018121438,0.006615528,0.004422208,0.003666599,0.015047732,0.0074084257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004503082,0.0000100716425,0.00019078555,0.00025873395,0.000006694383,0.00010570499,0.008873948,0.000070035974,0.000277652,0.1555703,0.8232008,0.011390241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047841527,0.000011770525,0.0007642132,0.00045973796,0.0000031558657,0.00006500714,0.0016848767,0.000023805225,0.00016076032,0.0057642916,0.99103653,0.00002094706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025793275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0262159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97420675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060165366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038887593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09356576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244223146","doi":"10.7202/1034052ar","title":"The Senate Reference: Constitutional Change and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Constitution; Separation of powers; Political science; Deliberation; Law; Status quo; Institution; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.15372066724890415,"score_gpt":0.3311755309311911,"score_spread":0.17745486368228697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244223146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030170435,0.016694913,0.011290849,0.112370595,0.0011087384,0.00004607457,0.00008980258,0.000076362376,0.8281521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365668,0.0043867542,0.0020021067,0.015321954,0.00087366946,0.00010873858,0.000049016806,0.00006544665,0.04062559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745427,0.018985063,0.00061687274,0.0017070055,0.002575786,0.0015724929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98964906,0.0067192167,0.0006849262,0.0011776043,0.0013206472,0.00044849192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015720338,0.000331098,0.0006104393,0.0017140108,0.01179919,0.012363465,0.0013516151,0.008151741,0.007747945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018106265,0.00033894856,0.0005527841,0.003023126,0.04730345,0.009566978,0.0061054276,0.008825472,0.0010604045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034247485,0.0000026348712,0.000064231026,0.000009088454,0.0000017126052,0.000031488056,0.0009833905,0.00006486185,0.00002797872,0.99577624,0.0015780412,0.0014570311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023965273,0.000024177547,0.0005792281,0.0001789796,0.000011445633,0.0000877197,0.0018011089,0.00025130788,0.00027255417,0.8459149,0.15083054,0.00002409057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015853178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015853178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009463516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009353973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257098781","doi":"10.7202/1035387ar","title":"The Treatment of Ipso Facto Clauses in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Business; Supreme court; Law and economics; Restructuring; Obligation; Payment; Law; Security interest; Context (archaeology); Accounting; Political science; Economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.020956114937984358,"score_gpt":0.19619245339213648,"score_spread":0.17523633845415212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257098781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062993474,0.008764146,0.005981524,0.029527644,0.0006177742,0.00013994431,0.00060680346,0.00006813352,0.8913007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953738,0.008655084,0.0038922145,0.013818167,0.0002887026,0.0001063885,0.00028881495,0.000081641796,0.07749512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128,0.00060737785,0.00033368816,0.0007781238,0.004738694,0.0022620908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920265,0.0028201777,0.0005599373,0.00053077977,0.003496478,0.00056612917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035633384,0.00042797197,0.00057329686,0.0024380381,0.0144998785,0.0112758875,0.0026044783,0.0042011184,0.007964123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013256935,0.0006576502,0.0007142883,0.0042279665,0.01183079,0.003271121,0.0034168684,0.0073158736,0.00040550556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073620126,0.000004687003,0.00080460403,0.00002875725,0.000005665446,0.00023684469,0.002095674,0.00029909323,0.00009105471,0.9844669,0.006416956,0.0055424045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061839586,0.000035999605,0.012785884,0.0013135667,0.0001540392,0.0006857874,0.008888864,0.0041363672,0.0013273965,0.26599857,0.70439136,0.0002202847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98017704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09668518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09668518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15613502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7015034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275351047","doi":"10.7202/1035385ar","title":"Situating Canada’s Commercial Surrogacy Ban in a Transnational Context: A Postcolonial Feminist Call for Legalization and Public Funding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Commodification; Political science; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Sociology; Public sphere; Politics; Law; Economy","score_opus":0.04825611166336533,"score_gpt":0.30618289372166796,"score_spread":0.2579267820583026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275351047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1247321,0.006880995,0.0055869315,0.40853232,0.0010404245,0.00010585482,0.00046456748,0.000054398373,0.4526024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857335,0.003543995,0.0025304793,0.08118752,0.00018950064,0.00007449592,0.00013841003,0.00006369111,0.054936867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928261,0.0010073192,0.00009747592,0.000691098,0.0019926745,0.003385265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945932,0.0022071642,0.0002996479,0.00020261543,0.0016454281,0.001052012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050396128,0.0003390667,0.0004953527,0.0011976629,0.032623015,0.017721219,0.0030790353,0.009183262,0.0072412733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075975917,0.00043192744,0.0005638497,0.0022876335,0.02781637,0.0045223054,0.0061208955,0.010821419,0.00026742773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017318303,0.000017351265,0.0021497982,0.00006119178,0.000008154259,0.0006099729,0.035279162,0.00023939919,0.00037613348,0.93283206,0.021083042,0.0073264916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025827429,0.000029917202,0.00986528,0.00065694057,0.000062503845,0.00032964157,0.11537685,0.0010411706,0.0009938483,0.07391267,0.79754496,0.00016044916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16665027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16665027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29373738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317286660","doi":"10.7202/1035386ar","title":"Sur les traces du principe de proportionnalité : une esquisse généalogique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02879911441345414,"score_gpt":0.25894408508404215,"score_spread":0.230144970670588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317286660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06572373,0.01414526,0.14582157,0.032704316,0.0011591668,0.00010827238,0.0005813207,0.00032332068,0.73943317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858845,0.0078249285,0.028275521,0.0026714501,0.00073022034,0.00015992568,0.0002405038,0.00047505222,0.100777425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742645,0.0012402273,0.00008781378,0.00061615923,0.00046497057,0.00016420487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947925,0.0031288115,0.00046142447,0.00070375873,0.0007898052,0.00012370145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030374986,0.00045616174,0.0003658109,0.0018793537,0.003725733,0.0054847156,0.0009955743,0.0014180182,0.009309313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009240252,0.00034731865,0.00040305464,0.002056158,0.02529112,0.00786896,0.0023887916,0.004380456,0.0014762784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011844084,0.0000033433143,0.0005493543,0.00002693012,0.0000040053255,0.000047245263,0.0056360466,0.00013114752,0.000110753805,0.9836812,0.0016330526,0.00816491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013000846,0.00004687038,0.0030342448,0.00021370465,0.00001769596,0.0005580524,0.004135873,0.001033362,0.00077655667,0.5633277,0.4267915,0.000051326697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015478544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01154863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015478544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034638285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031142771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321269879","doi":"10.7202/1035388ar","title":"R. v. Spencer: Anonymity, the Rule of Law, and the Shrivelling of the Biographical Core","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anonymity; Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Possession (linguistics); The Internet; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03204187655207375,"score_gpt":0.26880271401588235,"score_spread":0.2367608374638086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321269879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05732544,0.007678821,0.009598037,0.3328496,0.0021497915,0.00015758291,0.00036947732,0.00027721107,0.58959407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66916573,0.0032998684,0.004336824,0.18024777,0.0016299299,0.00019997265,0.0001361164,0.00011473382,0.14086916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815316,0.0030728106,0.0006751283,0.0020828738,0.0076429136,0.004994561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98889065,0.005855804,0.0008501091,0.00081517285,0.0028175933,0.0007707876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010141928,0.0006149026,0.00085051096,0.0011899349,0.018740444,0.010595818,0.0033615718,0.021160936,0.00303736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023002984,0.0008169101,0.0012350596,0.0011082598,0.02189458,0.0048181294,0.0027493276,0.016702894,0.00085262477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022113769,0.000010629809,0.0003663137,0.000018298007,0.000006838007,0.0003358188,0.0025492052,0.00027275353,0.00018902062,0.9562881,0.036361214,0.0035797074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011988019,0.00009103685,0.004403821,0.0006357558,0.00011570158,0.00048957224,0.0049323393,0.0031319072,0.0021795775,0.48862532,0.49495178,0.00032331157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7380282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75781065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7380282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029905785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056024503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52702916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328097639","doi":"10.7202/1013037ar","title":"Alberico Gentili, The Wars of the Romans: A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis Romanis, ed by Benedict Kingsbury & Benjamin Straumann, translated by David Lupher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) Benedict Kingsbury & Benjamin Straumann, eds, The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) Martin Loughlin, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Economic Justice; Classics; Theology; Law; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.033002702378724526,"score_gpt":0.26852506554591155,"score_spread":0.23552236316718703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328097639","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000957678,0.70095474,0.0013537469,0.15336375,0.02074636,0.000067336514,0.00043319483,0.00007485942,0.12204828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07403888,0.4931244,0.004201876,0.08451963,0.03345737,0.00052211474,0.00084179227,0.00043699268,0.30885693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973437,0.0010854502,0.00012494896,0.00032901025,0.00090674724,0.00021012421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848676,0.0007636765,0.00018235586,0.00010090412,0.000384778,0.00008141611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024307685,0.0022552824,0.00077678176,0.0036223189,0.0040685725,0.0075133853,0.0019026698,0.005182212,0.0143713625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005500983,0.0007744,0.00061141286,0.004206001,0.007265415,0.007739792,0.0024736936,0.0067457054,0.0057840543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016232527,0.000012492741,0.000077860655,0.00029133423,0.0000045746274,0.000054353524,0.0028761257,0.000060039605,0.000065049615,0.093898356,0.8866022,0.016041327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052387777,0.0000038700077,0.00039866834,0.0005601796,0.0000022743486,0.00004829671,0.00080630323,0.00002592306,0.000060489154,0.011460448,0.98661834,0.000010031012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032255273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050791908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032255273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013077522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007827608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094884515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345748993","doi":"10.7202/1037249ar","title":"Victim Pays Damages to Tortfeasor: The When and Wherefore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Damages; Nuisance; Liability; Order (exchange); Economics; Payment; Law and economics; Ex parte; Unjust enrichment; Compensation (psychology); Tort; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.02669648984948547,"score_gpt":0.20792027386574397,"score_spread":0.1812237840162585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345748993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30953312,0.016163094,0.055410035,0.1886869,0.0016205532,0.000114796516,0.00024194068,0.000065388434,0.42816427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746147,0.0026857322,0.0027844168,0.0062490352,0.0006423444,0.00003766622,0.000044582906,0.00001644226,0.012925091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995235,0.0017157333,0.00018477473,0.0010048329,0.0009791087,0.00088055315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969574,0.0012727871,0.00077618717,0.00030980952,0.00056397775,0.00011991152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004839874,0.00033946615,0.00064012874,0.0011075089,0.0045069293,0.007644745,0.0018721608,0.0062931245,0.0049458896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008311415,0.00038208807,0.000683069,0.00072778924,0.0171431,0.0104592955,0.0022951434,0.005292699,0.00063808396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039084753,0.000024330333,0.0017858411,0.00004325644,0.00001395634,0.00034692502,0.0033649171,0.00021981978,0.00022487562,0.98676586,0.0018855145,0.005285555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057088462,0.00018324319,0.008165712,0.0006497229,0.000118031996,0.0015260198,0.015819859,0.00240517,0.0011371205,0.85588545,0.11393377,0.00011871032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01242024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010343317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01242024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00548878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029594768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03982407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16717484330532556,"score_gpt":0.3585139573750075,"score_spread":0.19133911406968196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400367739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547926,0.008799265,0.11578008,0.06526762,0.00055340806,0.00014139878,0.00008195936,0.00007193739,0.7438251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97315073,0.0013609164,0.009109046,0.0047415453,0.00032105073,0.00014887903,0.00001988481,0.000033473112,0.011114498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816134,0.009692714,0.0008547591,0.0020031908,0.0039481805,0.0018876599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798765,0.013054755,0.002123657,0.0020930418,0.0018407872,0.0010113094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015259732,0.0003814435,0.00073000963,0.001408682,0.005867274,0.0094150845,0.0019376038,0.008340446,0.003096719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027704392,0.0004899227,0.00064377213,0.0011340367,0.055785604,0.0093592275,0.005461644,0.0073916456,0.000506451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033077818,0.0000053345884,0.0001206104,0.0000078052035,0.0000015772125,0.000046539335,0.00072528573,0.00015195893,0.000026830377,0.99685353,0.00066065707,0.0013965224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071630716,0.000006112216,0.000279981,0.000048823895,0.000003241323,0.00008065945,0.00041540302,0.00053444155,0.000063526306,0.98836786,0.010181851,0.000010947971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007596478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054850588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015259732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068901503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008388628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080702126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508860223","doi":"10.7202/1040054ar","title":"Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10968278335432045,"score_gpt":0.40261673163454215,"score_spread":0.2929339482802217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508860223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0795927,0.027068254,0.011444628,0.5795721,0.0018743324,0.00026806266,0.0003780093,0.00017326816,0.29962862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906308,0.0076112216,0.0072240946,0.07003377,0.00072545855,0.00012383485,0.00020184458,0.00008414841,0.02336482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9145345,0.014426733,0.0039893594,0.0066676806,0.04670192,0.013679776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134379,0.039306756,0.0051535163,0.003889796,0.033554006,0.004658057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041310836,0.0004482677,0.00105413,0.006724658,0.036955602,0.025524484,0.006111255,0.013230763,0.0021059287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12763609,0.0012682594,0.0014655195,0.010511828,0.034868043,0.0069841305,0.006886823,0.014720278,0.00025198603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019161078,0.000011906044,0.0016321887,0.00009589104,0.000023625757,0.0003657085,0.010128771,0.00068512035,0.00020349193,0.9503882,0.023886157,0.012559835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099991885,0.000062991894,0.025228217,0.00091494207,0.00016517364,0.0004974909,0.016662184,0.0034901742,0.0008635691,0.20501655,0.74634725,0.0006515286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76784164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23215836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28075013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89058745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509948352","doi":"10.7202/1037251ar","title":"Les lois spéciales de retour au travail : enjeux institutionnels et constitutionnels","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06786440598440643,"score_gpt":0.3296096366399392,"score_spread":0.2617452306555328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509948352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48781717,0.0018054001,0.0060015824,0.015572526,0.000102370155,0.000095406285,0.00017047567,0.0000699915,0.4883652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629321,0.00048026745,0.0005803956,0.000485625,0.000013573217,0.00002784868,0.000030989977,0.000021578135,0.03542766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616665,0.00090155314,0.00007727787,0.00040390634,0.0009677951,0.0014826885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724233,0.0006416945,0.00034341865,0.00025250312,0.0008532154,0.0006668299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024721927,0.0002043418,0.0003272759,0.0011601825,0.020059116,0.008977937,0.00095059635,0.0014492404,0.0047814604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035619098,0.0002418899,0.00022568926,0.002197321,0.031485803,0.002442499,0.003399128,0.0032195111,0.00032829808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026153284,0.000022182145,0.015982302,0.000052882348,0.000011041686,0.00039612319,0.36977997,0.00033120476,0.00090657256,0.5944397,0.003374592,0.014677251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014517595,0.000036707825,0.07554319,0.0003408575,0.00002809737,0.00027082843,0.4281092,0.0004334662,0.00073963834,0.033930816,0.46044615,0.000106448104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8899419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9390046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11005813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039231073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053758297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2846427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514133952","doi":"10.7202/1037250ar","title":"L’interaction entre le droit civil et le droit du travail et ses effets pratiques sur le travail atypique : le rôle du contrat dans l’accès aux régimes de protection des travailleurs","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017765731588386856,"score_gpt":0.25216132560667553,"score_spread":0.2343955940182887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514133952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8179629,0.0020010155,0.0035605184,0.0124772135,0.00008875523,0.000096257485,0.00028373871,0.000022829712,0.16350669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97707224,0.0006467318,0.00060859247,0.0006974962,0.00002095493,0.00005516715,0.00008125714,0.000014597305,0.020802828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387217,0.0025550972,0.0001815761,0.0007035778,0.001598346,0.0010890848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818602,0.009007684,0.0036735558,0.00096460944,0.0025922193,0.0019017913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039113574,0.00032351882,0.0004912901,0.0010215095,0.00664004,0.006090882,0.001561579,0.0020446486,0.02168286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012578929,0.0002565166,0.0005003418,0.0014081174,0.008975876,0.0024181895,0.0041825837,0.0028598774,0.0010137053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031980558,0.00033433578,0.26913792,0.0007390295,0.00025885322,0.0013606151,0.3584156,0.0014878802,0.0022758325,0.29267466,0.006634434,0.06636107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035973644,0.00024847867,0.48913994,0.0012575354,0.00014159534,0.0003766529,0.36254922,0.0010285281,0.00095260155,0.02145787,0.12267107,0.00014050699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4469561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5373963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98844814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011551849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015037825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88870907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529753270","doi":"10.7202/1037966ar","title":"Can Better Law Be Married with Corrective Justice or Evil Laws?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04167411055314016,"score_gpt":0.3097435729707871,"score_spread":0.26806946241764695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529753270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032453153,0.01903558,0.06880933,0.38599917,0.0037316661,0.000079857586,0.000116230454,0.0001427373,0.4896322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90868783,0.005714768,0.009629674,0.04474279,0.0026386,0.00015635998,0.00006236927,0.00017918128,0.02818841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479915,0.006215096,0.0004771118,0.0024021163,0.0038014303,0.002305109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98378825,0.009636244,0.0021188194,0.002162071,0.0012664258,0.0010280815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015733492,0.0006196839,0.0014555876,0.0028059017,0.008214373,0.015565407,0.0027022029,0.009304771,0.011922023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03491047,0.0005312881,0.0010619977,0.0020855216,0.085315555,0.035422336,0.009639154,0.012572879,0.0013391051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025386666,0.0000043402583,0.00006890241,0.000011139879,0.0000015300652,0.000007687692,0.00043618467,0.000026455584,0.000007819838,0.99722254,0.0007160017,0.0014947163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005004488,0.0000072344815,0.00010844889,0.00006458098,0.0000024942854,0.000024036162,0.00076228235,0.00009764111,0.000035462897,0.9732337,0.025650283,0.000008946924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075413147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065053203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015733492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072132493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075642643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08320767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544458016","doi":"10.7202/1040051ar","title":"Contracting out of Access to Justice: Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses in Consumer Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Redress; Scrutiny; Legislature; Enforcement; Forum shopping; Business; Inherent powers; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economic Justice; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.11023356699088067,"score_gpt":0.4130816228741907,"score_spread":0.30284805588331004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544458016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6659081,0.0014407302,0.06402422,0.02179128,0.00014942604,0.0007719221,0.00020808127,0.000101832185,0.24560446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912027,0.000171578,0.0042785597,0.0012196942,0.000031874963,0.00007291981,0.000024833456,0.000010906883,0.002986882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95584744,0.015070523,0.002793821,0.0035777166,0.015548987,0.0071615158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9144686,0.060879696,0.008673178,0.006475091,0.008054521,0.001448911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041088466,0.00026298544,0.00055836525,0.00298673,0.009121844,0.009451912,0.0027154656,0.005873287,0.003891036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11297012,0.0005293084,0.00063106965,0.0032299045,0.02112677,0.009543638,0.0051082885,0.0057122386,0.00020144775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045580768,0.000074974596,0.016534314,0.00007871978,0.000020866006,0.00095812476,0.030604606,0.0006443499,0.00066566595,0.926288,0.0024333133,0.021651475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023881925,0.00018201397,0.09658608,0.0013851324,0.00024335567,0.0015237976,0.06597565,0.014862753,0.0058274833,0.6799343,0.13285895,0.00038155934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22468704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2998623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22468704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016823629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03259473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44675845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559154843","doi":"10.7202/1037965ar","title":"Resisting Criminal Organizations: Reconceptualizing the “Political” in International Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Refugee; Persecution; Political science; Law; Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); State (computer science); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Criminology","score_opus":0.034033548979893004,"score_gpt":0.32113766672828636,"score_spread":0.28710411774839334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559154843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07895318,0.02375075,0.04598818,0.24634115,0.0035753406,0.00020791935,0.000043330492,0.00017391326,0.60096633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561968,0.006313854,0.0072333105,0.01771339,0.0017120542,0.0002861648,0.00003996343,0.00017581244,0.010328633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97865534,0.014955164,0.0007364103,0.001066515,0.002133615,0.0024529623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98347485,0.012431887,0.0010030093,0.001202918,0.0010085456,0.0008788012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027855113,0.001009269,0.0008826459,0.007678261,0.018050905,0.041073628,0.0043627345,0.0157581,0.0030935218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026361436,0.0009636516,0.0009696383,0.0038058553,0.1390246,0.029024689,0.024553528,0.018286308,0.0003552157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020592975,0.000007143959,0.00010213122,0.000021079204,0.0000016035317,0.00006483607,0.030253973,0.00008385732,0.00002368984,0.96678114,0.00066282594,0.0019955821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028440501,0.000051657484,0.00094470405,0.0011114033,0.0000220928,0.00024381414,0.12622763,0.0009489642,0.0003014153,0.640329,0.22972271,0.00006814913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012124275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016648708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041073628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015407985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016997343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14731365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559357288","doi":"10.7202/1037968ar","title":"Les expulsions pour arriérés de loyer au Québec : un contentieux de masse","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04347201838576451,"score_gpt":0.2402706934209313,"score_spread":0.1967986750351668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559357288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8928179,0.003709055,0.0011327072,0.021637073,0.00014276414,0.00013160982,0.0012149148,0.000051216062,0.07916289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122762,0.0021668135,0.00057889195,0.0023866463,0.00004335917,0.00004659197,0.0003134363,0.000016804248,0.082171276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989992,0.00013492655,0.00003146732,0.00009554959,0.00033838043,0.00040057942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972772,0.0003428073,0.00034766784,0.00008658083,0.0013289991,0.0006167736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009791711,0.00023777488,0.00019814566,0.0008721981,0.005879915,0.002504436,0.0009976783,0.0009641213,0.009663693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032452908,0.0002198123,0.00024345859,0.0012653852,0.0027972867,0.00079329655,0.0009940165,0.0012569375,0.00044832673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051308813,0.00028928474,0.51642174,0.0007720405,0.00015224068,0.004391767,0.094110444,0.0030983037,0.0079760095,0.053242758,0.11118568,0.20784672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003269171,0.00013782048,0.74287134,0.00040821751,0.00006335513,0.00028607712,0.04997778,0.0011294441,0.0010606651,0.00084309326,0.20308864,0.000100840356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99198663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044295035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044295035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048769016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3213845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559598677","doi":"10.7202/1037969ar","title":"La philosophie politique et le Code civil du Québec : l’exemple de la notion de patrimoine","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016440420598486754,"score_gpt":0.2810855813019206,"score_spread":0.2646451607034338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559598677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15499745,0.010314377,0.0122592775,0.045454703,0.00037861223,0.00005686676,0.00045463114,0.00007539558,0.7760086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175799,0.0027685014,0.0015770452,0.0019042598,0.000056901383,0.000036462512,0.00007169901,0.00003159726,0.07597364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987488,0.0003554157,0.000023956527,0.00016571232,0.00042104704,0.0002852062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.00031247857,0.000103055594,0.000092487215,0.00042694793,0.00015483792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007777691,0.0003169526,0.00023878041,0.0013464624,0.010424396,0.0053626243,0.0007453372,0.0018143643,0.008945265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018805775,0.00019333627,0.00018001033,0.002316855,0.01922762,0.0023732753,0.0017975954,0.0029173254,0.00040560376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082828,0.0000056626855,0.0017831317,0.000047321748,0.000005869743,0.00011640666,0.028100878,0.00021469081,0.00023663245,0.9524224,0.006329461,0.010726718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016478492,0.000027022676,0.023535958,0.00054640515,0.000030223753,0.00024027648,0.04377741,0.0013979529,0.00045226363,0.12604587,0.8038614,0.00006876825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91770756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9516203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08229244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04405597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035851214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31964993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559617377","doi":"10.7202/1037967ar","title":"Non-Linear Innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Intellectual property; Doctrine; Genius; Law and economics; Counterintuitive; Creativity; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.120673692885338,"score_gpt":0.2408732141158239,"score_spread":0.12019952123048591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559617377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060894705,0.0031800962,0.19133022,0.016796006,0.00048056548,0.0002217161,0.0001418063,0.0003253294,0.72662956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932929,0.0018070065,0.020591283,0.0017177679,0.00030308234,0.00024359066,0.00005168687,0.00005018213,0.042306468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952879,0.0012200586,0.00022143,0.0011292202,0.0016655149,0.0004759686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919602,0.0037180078,0.0006699767,0.0025043215,0.0008003441,0.0003470575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044917245,0.0004182814,0.00039918075,0.0010829669,0.0020024546,0.00494402,0.0016447135,0.002036616,0.010001033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009862668,0.00022434063,0.0008725039,0.0007379108,0.016878098,0.0072812666,0.0061243773,0.0029999798,0.0016474687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004414673,0.000009843373,0.00018319902,0.000032451255,0.0000038277367,0.000049286806,0.00024318651,0.0004463078,0.0001658994,0.99242544,0.0004500721,0.0059861033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011942598,0.000038950482,0.00035490413,0.00008545534,0.000007749129,0.00015942185,0.00023209771,0.0022866689,0.00052041316,0.9617648,0.034526587,0.000011043423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00111935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010963492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010001033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003643803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003156571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033456802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589003308","doi":"10.7202/1038493ar","title":"Toward a Bijural Interpretation of the Principle of Respect in Aboriginal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Flourishing; Politics; Political science; Supreme court; Colonialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0343078951375821,"score_gpt":0.34587883658361923,"score_spread":0.31157094144603714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589003308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04958385,0.005122452,0.13770789,0.05462092,0.000995929,0.00012539665,0.00004237854,0.00006680076,0.7517342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549939,0.0013288314,0.0286389,0.0033574994,0.00031298646,0.00013262618,0.000023112567,0.00004335748,0.011168938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039966,0.006324463,0.00039033638,0.00064532564,0.0016145116,0.00062567595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946602,0.0027439345,0.00048966444,0.0006868068,0.0010591989,0.0003600924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011449637,0.0003455583,0.0005768588,0.0021525105,0.008049638,0.011610417,0.0020048458,0.0034006243,0.0013417188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009555621,0.00045576945,0.0005903148,0.0014803692,0.070120715,0.008831084,0.0066656535,0.00897554,0.000281876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010574805,0.0000019442662,0.00002814474,0.0000032286064,4.2853438e-7,0.0000085365655,0.0018072013,0.00003195388,0.00001438974,0.9975496,0.0001125063,0.0004410891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044260933,0.000007859348,0.0001670173,0.00004129921,0.0000034730206,0.000027818462,0.0023571618,0.00023914906,0.00006680625,0.97672355,0.020352224,0.000009162862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015624775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015746169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98437524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00866512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06055218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.06392293215609136,"score_gpt":0.36531756448323294,"score_spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589511104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6463505,0.0044748634,0.05001454,0.04947301,0.0014129867,0.0005185583,0.00019003564,0.00042551535,0.24713996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589135,0.0018338702,0.013747096,0.0029222022,0.00020979537,0.00022245872,0.000068829504,0.00018904006,0.021893313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760611,0.019412424,0.00031180913,0.0007127206,0.0019949742,0.0015068897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97527766,0.017549757,0.0014231111,0.001500557,0.0010532334,0.0031956395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014704325,0.0011177976,0.00059188914,0.0020354271,0.01661893,0.012808238,0.003008013,0.0043543866,0.0062516103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023578603,0.0006189941,0.0007086401,0.0011930288,0.0292651,0.016913723,0.01782336,0.00539866,0.0014093067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008617422,0.000034089007,0.0006088273,0.000067941,0.000004455873,0.0005541924,0.982088,0.000040677827,0.00029764604,0.00823959,0.0019562317,0.006099664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005944534,0.00004006555,0.00046860642,0.00027588083,0.000011562894,0.000756709,0.90909857,0.000209754,0.0006085752,0.006637153,0.08186177,0.00002532884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060713585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013208657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01661893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042526824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005085035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07776487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590094020","doi":"10.7202/1038714ar","title":"Une autre voie pour la gouvernance d’entreprise ? Lorraine Talbot, Great Debates in Company Law, Londres, Palgrave, 2014, pp 208. ISBN 9780230304451","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014592482464588377,"score_gpt":0.21185589060172555,"score_spread":0.19726340813713716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590094020","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026868056,0.34523815,0.0015782893,0.35336518,0.0050167637,0.000013600047,0.00012872103,0.00009448753,0.2918781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19054446,0.19614346,0.0025773281,0.06956365,0.010827201,0.00006988909,0.0002533203,0.00039568482,0.52962506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735826,0.0011274564,0.00009358113,0.0003128222,0.0007849708,0.0003228671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998044,0.001055368,0.00020164231,0.00017613705,0.00030187992,0.00022099828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027446968,0.0005685542,0.00039176363,0.0013518969,0.0035616392,0.014519966,0.0010423666,0.0050988332,0.039579183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004252832,0.0004342497,0.0003156165,0.0020396458,0.010615854,0.016050106,0.0032098591,0.005457165,0.00790043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018897006,0.00001751044,0.0001979331,0.00019958598,0.0000053451213,0.00010658634,0.005315364,0.00005437993,0.00016122291,0.3690868,0.57461643,0.050219953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003708324,0.0000059550557,0.0005364058,0.00037168892,0.000002556942,0.000088449946,0.0031123194,0.000041977142,0.000097034295,0.03908794,0.95664316,0.000008739268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024899973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039579183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060319263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004293947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13240558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590277711","doi":"10.7202/1038709ar","title":"La qualification juridique des swaps comme site d’une lutte globale pour le droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0550804915230735,"score_gpt":0.26506539018876163,"score_spread":0.20998489866568812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590277711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19196482,0.024829533,0.06703289,0.09387551,0.0029288305,0.00017604147,0.00026487105,0.00014995947,0.61877763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89817137,0.0057724724,0.0050130878,0.0059431912,0.0007658567,0.00010250767,0.00006636786,0.00010571503,0.084059425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156296,0.0040817373,0.0004123354,0.0011104061,0.0020167206,0.0008159322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99126804,0.0054598693,0.00088692934,0.00073038304,0.0012965,0.00035820648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010620311,0.00048092694,0.00068731117,0.0015157235,0.00768676,0.01140475,0.0011749208,0.00626921,0.014424257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016547192,0.000461014,0.00070194993,0.0021850804,0.018083762,0.0090712765,0.0051093693,0.009124879,0.0013904666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028569608,0.000008756246,0.00074909,0.000064630585,0.000007652571,0.00014723852,0.012891733,0.00031311437,0.00028934632,0.9721318,0.0037343223,0.009633585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005704059,0.00013302527,0.00877782,0.0011601526,0.00004730969,0.0006889855,0.025256172,0.0020272476,0.0023554987,0.38788873,0.57147324,0.00013478099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011658301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016137347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014424257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077848225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073887073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05648315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590326123","doi":"10.7202/1038710ar","title":"Une théorie de l’agence des régimes complémentaires de retraite","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.057839643375325524,"score_gpt":0.35214275156775954,"score_spread":0.294303108192434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590326123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30571046,0.0056872866,0.036865372,0.013828959,0.00014646296,0.00016435958,0.0005005564,0.00007341255,0.6370231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95017976,0.0012892794,0.0026776507,0.00060789834,0.000062703926,0.0000986429,0.000094085226,0.000014953948,0.044975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982169,0.0004884945,0.00005787183,0.00036159618,0.0003908896,0.00048423224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683976,0.00087990967,0.0009083449,0.0002664622,0.0006789546,0.00042655243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021977036,0.00033109772,0.00040174407,0.002140534,0.0040569976,0.0035349522,0.001008824,0.001379854,0.021184718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048550023,0.00029810623,0.00053518766,0.0020655105,0.0063690543,0.0029538148,0.0019965274,0.001755424,0.00085695216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039044844,0.000032051994,0.01435697,0.00008123106,0.000033036962,0.0001764917,0.007029748,0.0012180256,0.0002694942,0.95768017,0.001612781,0.017470965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012771504,0.00018135097,0.16570617,0.00086940196,0.00016818865,0.00053823786,0.016341899,0.008464578,0.0007470017,0.5213503,0.28541243,0.00009274318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28128898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3306694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28128898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01916709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008035407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590376912","doi":"10.7202/1038491ar","title":"Comprendre la normativité innue en matière d’« adoption » et de garde coutumière","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023889337970982614,"score_gpt":0.31239047031030565,"score_spread":0.288501132339323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590376912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8841268,0.0007071991,0.011486547,0.00516476,0.00009729178,0.00031877297,0.00033787734,0.00004938545,0.09771147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895355,0.00018893096,0.0025986214,0.00022582058,0.000010884021,0.0001521528,0.000074264186,0.000019439112,0.0071944175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721076,0.015266009,0.0009283874,0.0023535863,0.007231016,0.0021133858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92070615,0.033507574,0.009030604,0.006173098,0.027749848,0.0028328076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029431852,0.0003169236,0.0005655004,0.0015316489,0.005707896,0.008967092,0.0014882414,0.0009262118,0.005530959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049584366,0.00032785485,0.00034708696,0.0027224335,0.01202133,0.0035229714,0.0043138335,0.0021039676,0.00047028658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029508577,0.00015657688,0.20239896,0.0006767757,0.000114994655,0.00052853115,0.57048666,0.00088713225,0.0029427332,0.13452466,0.00284236,0.08414555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038198843,0.00024204749,0.44439247,0.0009756812,0.00010652797,0.00016268318,0.44002146,0.0017814824,0.0032618737,0.013414626,0.095454805,0.00014827667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46222112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53994566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53777885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028462518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039646372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91906136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590702858","doi":"10.7202/1038712ar","title":"Interjurisdictional Information Sharing and National Security: A Constitutional and Legislative Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Federalism; Duty; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Order (exchange); Public administration; Information sharing; Political science; Information flow; Work (physics); Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025570518939634853,"score_gpt":0.31731578424350615,"score_spread":0.2917452653038713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590702858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09647635,0.0036982915,0.012840826,0.0448316,0.00015893183,0.00014993844,0.0003582725,0.00008220738,0.84140354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742731,0.0014434601,0.002959168,0.0027087203,0.00009449282,0.00010857362,0.00007917414,0.000018103437,0.018315345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676366,0.0023907933,0.0003421828,0.00095156976,0.005808534,0.0037432339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877934,0.0058587384,0.00086270564,0.0010874055,0.003720695,0.00067712285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010673603,0.00030336707,0.0004960612,0.0032999183,0.021039685,0.012649301,0.0024186082,0.0037418813,0.0050367014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01571251,0.00048122957,0.0005757696,0.0052631535,0.02639764,0.0049754023,0.003720282,0.003739314,0.0003240266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023817124,0.0000042831794,0.00035225434,0.000007289228,0.0000017241067,0.000021219104,0.0011369071,0.00018172257,0.00003535258,0.99647397,0.00066967047,0.0011131974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049418188,0.00004210225,0.015576045,0.00079688407,0.00014560178,0.0002093251,0.014295716,0.006660979,0.0013355699,0.6396788,0.32106432,0.0001453576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8434028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8451143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06825129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10981944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4952001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591072610","doi":"10.7202/1038708ar","title":"The Sexual Assault of Older Women: Criminal Justice Responses in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sexual violence; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Economic Justice; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency; History","score_opus":0.040271916191205466,"score_gpt":0.3240103263803403,"score_spread":0.2837384101891348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591072610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646636,0.0019844235,0.000051082818,0.01495631,0.00017673887,0.00010011942,0.00020616023,0.000006950062,0.017854491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769354,0.003951968,0.00010565011,0.0076480233,0.00006760491,0.000032302287,0.00011627267,0.000009466717,0.0111332545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975374,0.000264534,0.000108940185,0.00013648324,0.00078604376,0.0011666736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953798,0.00046280093,0.0005619541,0.000046646895,0.001706607,0.0018421542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014369881,0.0002461249,0.00050686946,0.0020576252,0.024825187,0.0028158338,0.0014110223,0.0022287641,0.0037665945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077138566,0.0003666327,0.00027612684,0.0032480515,0.0030568196,0.00095459074,0.0038730595,0.0030591208,0.00020646735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014512589,0.00025393188,0.22520885,0.00030937465,0.00003886288,0.007945239,0.6857735,0.00019578892,0.0013775951,0.0068549095,0.024691885,0.04720496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001755237,0.00010041374,0.23809256,0.0003592701,0.000025093692,0.001043936,0.69235456,0.00021384998,0.00022305525,0.00051737216,0.0669717,0.00008064239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05666644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05666644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07821722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41114575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591491183","doi":"10.7202/1038711ar","title":"La contribution des blogues juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04938963240995386,"score_gpt":0.40459479334492676,"score_spread":0.3552051609349729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591491183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34707955,0.014458799,0.0045570694,0.0476318,0.002184453,0.00010762482,0.001302558,0.00020895258,0.5824692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832869,0.0072453017,0.0012163494,0.0030975833,0.000359758,0.00006190276,0.00027149485,0.00015137055,0.15472734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978562,0.00065223454,0.00004835866,0.00023506343,0.0008070414,0.00040112328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372214,0.0022648522,0.00047696946,0.00041516408,0.002034542,0.0010863076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393124,0.00046547301,0.00040307673,0.0033557394,0.018523006,0.014542548,0.0010337721,0.001697197,0.018283665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077046463,0.00028922016,0.00018883977,0.006226719,0.011499902,0.005121192,0.0036709672,0.0031332327,0.0015213426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015619604,0.000051975127,0.024851505,0.00074354146,0.0000408356,0.0014521707,0.5349363,0.0002929201,0.0023809886,0.2678602,0.06266588,0.10456755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010996308,0.000021850843,0.033129748,0.0007321273,0.000027957036,0.00029496668,0.18923545,0.00017694398,0.0005955929,0.005641583,0.77006286,0.00006989283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6684589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8550388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022878218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033100482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66698724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03365580843012047,"score_gpt":0.31255796152186643,"score_spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604334801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08359757,0.020415189,0.017646814,0.18138663,0.0013503307,0.000108489025,0.000043952918,0.00020803916,0.69524294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369811,0.0074096033,0.0046622804,0.010715573,0.0003011673,0.0000820027,0.00003206657,0.000108485605,0.039707683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953589,0.0019044951,0.00009125062,0.00033983088,0.0009944815,0.001311026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962011,0.001981559,0.00021207338,0.00044014596,0.0006853821,0.0004797548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075564045,0.000522233,0.0005034493,0.002435357,0.024333505,0.016358057,0.0025886218,0.005387567,0.004044549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636509,0.00030097683,0.00052187004,0.001706525,0.1149556,0.01905897,0.009673482,0.009668235,0.00038951472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017041801,0.000007186248,0.00009968191,0.000019142959,9.394597e-7,0.000069762624,0.063435026,0.00006173497,0.00006046538,0.9308353,0.0016301197,0.0037787715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060117086,0.00001968077,0.0008837714,0.00031722803,0.000007824514,0.0001451192,0.15471655,0.00042680817,0.0003294971,0.5128417,0.330269,0.00003682583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34260768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04323096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038935315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68122697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.023274437226089406,"score_gpt":0.3214301690673661,"score_spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612798282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5808972,0.006836529,0.0025050556,0.0606778,0.00027720662,0.00007777333,0.00002911653,0.000067185676,0.34863222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97581476,0.0020626043,0.0010380514,0.0018317039,0.00002072786,0.000013015166,0.0000082246415,0.000009293009,0.019201694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980416,0.0006795224,0.00002483227,0.000098462435,0.00047538802,0.00068001763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.00040877514,0.00008816047,0.00003768213,0.0001501161,0.00053095055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021262174,0.00019192898,0.00016576512,0.00083392777,0.021456216,0.00490864,0.0009106571,0.001499046,0.0045271316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029015034,0.00018952703,0.00014832645,0.00073839055,0.016595684,0.0026281383,0.004051899,0.0026085863,0.00019728151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023391121,0.000158417,0.01151978,0.00021575327,0.000007585734,0.001135411,0.71086985,0.00023785247,0.000807307,0.17800792,0.013802433,0.08321443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010612952,0.000073443036,0.029193738,0.0006091241,0.00002501644,0.0005079176,0.69053525,0.00051414996,0.0008058147,0.014897107,0.2627813,0.00004647361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8607326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030672641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043279503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2801751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613195635","doi":"10.7202/1038488ar","title":"WSÁNEĆ Legal Theory and the Fuel Spill at SELEKTEL (Goldstream River)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Geography; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009143001664717643,"score_gpt":0.25115827124197965,"score_spread":0.242015269577262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613195635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10819919,0.0021827675,0.007362297,0.041930813,0.00013784073,0.000042758445,0.00009865229,0.000041507537,0.84000415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195294,0.0008849747,0.0015272876,0.0033957777,0.000042446492,0.000049247385,0.00006835907,0.000024952124,0.052054115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763405,0.00072246924,0.00007298289,0.00036437405,0.00058810855,0.0006179595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.0005020972,0.00015176406,0.00011431842,0.00044820772,0.00019975302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002339872,0.0002484747,0.00027149584,0.0019205166,0.013719538,0.009469396,0.0016399496,0.0044682845,0.0064844717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00295344,0.0002459466,0.0002938176,0.0017996671,0.046115406,0.004554509,0.004860145,0.0041792262,0.00038879277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001034453,0.000004048924,0.00029454048,0.000006169116,8.094512e-7,0.000075244294,0.0033682717,0.0001371334,0.000020178486,0.9937251,0.001312638,0.0010547865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001766298,0.000016433967,0.0039212178,0.0003301979,0.000016575515,0.00021135899,0.03644928,0.0024507027,0.00027971293,0.6740999,0.28216827,0.00003866705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49598023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49361652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50401974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034881193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021470135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613551187","doi":"10.7202/1038492ar","title":"Des compétences législatives personnelles en matière d’activités de chasse, de pêche et de piégeage dans les ententes de revendications territoriales : les limites de la cogestion","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04601645851486295,"score_gpt":0.338646535648106,"score_spread":0.292630077133243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613551187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3506402,0.004020936,0.012125433,0.04689855,0.00067389815,0.000110046414,0.000119730495,0.00007647872,0.58533466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91083527,0.0013493847,0.0017280979,0.001900256,0.00012583435,0.00010834997,0.000068421876,0.000037821694,0.083846435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288356,0.003213465,0.00025164607,0.00086427527,0.0015044046,0.0012826816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127054,0.004148039,0.0009867368,0.0005742657,0.0013976939,0.0016227247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00701088,0.00032638537,0.00027834738,0.0012822963,0.008033499,0.006314131,0.0010094392,0.0026580011,0.012768742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010841666,0.00028090482,0.00027101298,0.0011005186,0.010637189,0.0050465204,0.004697529,0.0036482932,0.0015478993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055306118,0.000055203465,0.0108006615,0.00017398404,0.0000111503905,0.00044098654,0.35928094,0.00035449272,0.0013776914,0.56631553,0.010239597,0.05089443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017449209,0.000103418795,0.043436665,0.0007102564,0.000020681904,0.00044401822,0.19400784,0.00050218846,0.0014994079,0.035500385,0.7236755,0.000082182836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033973075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0527376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063364115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014708414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06755066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624634460","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Perspective on the International Criminal Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal court; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02818016512065683,"score_gpt":0.3121881790722094,"score_spread":0.28400801395155256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624634460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012026863,0.028638503,0.0007757951,0.21969402,0.0017999224,0.000014439621,0.0002174262,0.00001636698,0.7368167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71353126,0.03027711,0.0014055588,0.16335715,0.003373219,0.00011649591,0.00016329013,0.000056600526,0.087719396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718636,0.0009591204,0.00008925856,0.00033764468,0.0004654975,0.0009621198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838674,0.0007474992,0.00016916722,0.00008517821,0.0003192799,0.0002921281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022913804,0.00049582677,0.00044975468,0.0023183885,0.01069238,0.013885628,0.000919163,0.013652244,0.013133949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041351872,0.0003649841,0.0010178966,0.0030168549,0.009657648,0.0053944876,0.0022577345,0.010201936,0.0012919768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013583217,0.000014709036,0.00036671976,0.000016664279,0.0000043967943,0.00014730633,0.00091391825,0.00014884103,0.000054493266,0.95852256,0.034318775,0.0054780473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000379568,0.00006900832,0.004824166,0.0010876242,0.000045087243,0.0003739725,0.006828235,0.0007345992,0.00025657265,0.39012077,0.59555656,0.00006545925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14781074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28389576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14781074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012908997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095565235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2939008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625627503","doi":"10.7202/1038494ar","title":"The Tricksters Speak: Klooscap and Wesakechak, Indigenous Law, and the New Brunswick Land Use Negotiation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Indigenous; Jungle; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Duty; Sociology; Political science; Negotiation; Corporate governance; Ecology; Geography; Anthropology; Management; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.015035218628888056,"score_gpt":0.2457457717365032,"score_spread":0.23071055310761512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625627503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28018907,0.024019936,0.0009993063,0.37232563,0.0010778042,0.00010386916,0.000095831856,0.00003305745,0.32115555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055718,0.0041516176,0.0004980585,0.035688534,0.00010516502,0.00006573394,0.000025621282,0.00003950027,0.053853966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230874,0.0027286445,0.0002080681,0.00054196245,0.0012003779,0.0030121747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509335,0.0030568268,0.00027539517,0.00015315309,0.00058652996,0.0008347473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072802254,0.0005510516,0.0005025901,0.0017166123,0.044349954,0.018361961,0.0031829781,0.00863545,0.0055636293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089567285,0.00057836017,0.0003734085,0.0026870996,0.047740843,0.008045363,0.009915608,0.011231314,0.0004044971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047872905,0.000032560387,0.0031249002,0.00010002914,0.000014514033,0.0032432955,0.52654886,0.0001762437,0.00047332593,0.43366063,0.022954317,0.009623461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026412328,0.0000110692345,0.003936246,0.00044700128,0.00001924461,0.00032325776,0.69117904,0.00015408886,0.00039317698,0.027149176,0.27625874,0.000102535734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9176926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95073384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09823975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09823975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070910074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625982006","doi":"10.7202/1054352ar","title":"Drawing the Line Between Lay and Expert Opinion Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Queensland","keywords":"Scrutiny; Expert opinion; Public opinion; Political science; Opinion leadership; Law; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16107188385438675,"score_gpt":0.43328687821239353,"score_spread":0.2722149943580068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625982006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08268097,0.016837712,0.20496105,0.31380013,0.0029163524,0.0007011538,0.0003805264,0.0001544703,0.3775677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977831,0.0052312287,0.050849836,0.03367201,0.001196326,0.00038738127,0.00016983814,0.00011007275,0.010600195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8977996,0.04250614,0.0043550474,0.007066762,0.041955557,0.0063169044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8204741,0.13550918,0.007931471,0.008765508,0.02378316,0.003536671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08201141,0.0009551657,0.0018326098,0.011895283,0.017367069,0.029471293,0.0070481338,0.011547242,0.0051562027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19548436,0.0012852938,0.0009587498,0.0062292893,0.07412226,0.025118647,0.016294045,0.014915595,0.000901668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027192424,0.000018252596,0.0020719308,0.00017453055,0.000022834856,0.0003030384,0.012634128,0.00029947478,0.000103931205,0.96245694,0.0035761022,0.018311746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006301413,0.000052586045,0.0053148307,0.0021445472,0.000068013185,0.00021887984,0.0239514,0.0031705084,0.0005820676,0.8658094,0.0985125,0.000112277216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26078528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27086326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26078528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03631624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05535549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51853466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2647001222","doi":"10.7202/1040053ar","title":"Requiem pour un cadavre","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.09880787226597074,"score_gpt":0.4255891246347663,"score_spread":0.3267812523687955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2647001222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051454883,0.003951015,0.007802959,0.07454972,0.002852284,0.00028375286,0.000709909,0.00015745839,0.85823804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29549953,0.0015125254,0.0037597402,0.017963491,0.00054905645,0.00013272506,0.00030642925,0.000080759346,0.6801956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167836,0.0013134902,0.00044965037,0.0015783256,0.0027227364,0.002257428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022454,0.0015270292,0.00055223826,0.0014184728,0.004620921,0.0016568112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00635231,0.0004863432,0.00071696105,0.0012238864,0.022575699,0.006875161,0.0019903157,0.007680427,0.042390972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013820441,0.0006977461,0.0007535294,0.0009681304,0.0097039575,0.0041467734,0.0051738876,0.007818907,0.0066202707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076769844,0.00004797742,0.0065831235,0.00017672486,0.000034545967,0.0015869814,0.025988247,0.00023339297,0.0015315023,0.8126504,0.111781254,0.039309073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014328129,0.000063794876,0.0067285276,0.00045224384,0.00004037006,0.00052482117,0.008313905,0.00011635214,0.00045183772,0.014031488,0.969202,0.000060360504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51635456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51635456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013483757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044729814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9729875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660585010","doi":"10.7202/1040049ar","title":"The Complainant: The Canadian Human Rights Case on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Human rights; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Welfare; Indigenous; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.024123111739882384,"score_gpt":0.3123006633558495,"score_spread":0.2881775516159671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660585010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17164579,0.008249095,0.0015229022,0.1562088,0.0010847796,0.00018751292,0.00024566008,0.00008019809,0.6607753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587182,0.0043197116,0.000683463,0.047634915,0.00020865824,0.00008138619,0.00006960181,0.00006023753,0.088223696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209046,0.0007331918,0.00008187442,0.0004592645,0.002177584,0.004457568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979802,0.0005812459,0.00012575719,0.00007404626,0.00055728876,0.00068160833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028763372,0.00058148144,0.0004354151,0.0011512609,0.06888465,0.0075400225,0.002816545,0.00818556,0.0050566318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065262853,0.0005157706,0.000552516,0.0026411328,0.022796081,0.002169829,0.00473636,0.010458195,0.0003051036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047700836,0.000050034312,0.0049889986,0.000103907994,0.000018250348,0.0113028595,0.14747447,0.00043290167,0.00053492736,0.72821033,0.09273442,0.014101226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044508353,0.000037137583,0.009446618,0.0005157971,0.00005652446,0.0029015264,0.18044937,0.00053476874,0.00075093313,0.017668365,0.7873809,0.00021350649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99494666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10232166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10232166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14311428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7423991},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2681970254","doi":"10.7202/1040050ar","title":"Les catégories juridiques et la qualification : une approche cognitive","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08395338748938169,"score_gpt":0.3679676200492846,"score_spread":0.28401423255990293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2681970254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0107632475,0.0029161323,0.8981311,0.008479881,0.0005588294,0.00018489921,0.00022412381,0.00037245898,0.078369476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4149191,0.00339633,0.55189955,0.002506074,0.0007906956,0.0008469437,0.0004964706,0.000313039,0.024831735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107236,0.004989273,0.00038604942,0.0013997881,0.0017266211,0.00042586698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984983,0.009861174,0.0006609221,0.0020137418,0.0020509756,0.00043012784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011064503,0.0013289757,0.0011889158,0.008480502,0.0042097513,0.013303586,0.0034930182,0.0038523541,0.01705346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020887073,0.0009836893,0.002586552,0.005897014,0.025015203,0.020535192,0.0066451943,0.00541598,0.0024725772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020086056,0.000017068807,0.00061376375,0.00019176716,0.000025706657,0.000060424332,0.0068563446,0.0005069489,0.000231215,0.9647241,0.0012468797,0.025505736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017083605,0.000020070978,0.000543699,0.00024332658,0.000031696127,0.0001513201,0.0038619833,0.0029520246,0.00029187885,0.9305579,0.061297014,0.00003212623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00995707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008856873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01705346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047360295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061806613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05851537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2684633609","doi":"10.7202/1040056ar","title":"The Boundaries of Corporate Law and Trust Law: An Analysis of Locking v. McCowan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Corporate law; Duty of loyalty; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Constructive trust; Business; Economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06008812866721274,"score_gpt":0.3362650276703774,"score_spread":0.27617689900316467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2684633609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25359878,0.0061346055,0.01271565,0.05041744,0.0001839877,0.00018435056,0.00010061522,0.00004573731,0.67661875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862454,0.0006900059,0.0005604342,0.0027846168,0.000062175255,0.00006544421,0.000016611903,0.000016174834,0.009559163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947678,0.0017669222,0.00014528021,0.00038680658,0.0011469339,0.0017862573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923574,0.005006734,0.0007788904,0.00031803493,0.00071206735,0.00082691817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004981967,0.00025491355,0.00046292183,0.0024191192,0.012629264,0.012061578,0.0016644178,0.0070323995,0.0055248225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012933385,0.00046706598,0.00094758836,0.0019305577,0.023982842,0.011577003,0.0063229958,0.0073718247,0.00036400228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005698191,0.000010837063,0.0005625503,0.000007360896,0.0000014792244,0.0003870613,0.003680638,0.00014302912,0.00003739994,0.9930354,0.0012489946,0.0008794633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044367156,0.000062616964,0.005267077,0.0006026942,0.000052492807,0.000670806,0.023237275,0.0047665243,0.0004385016,0.8766797,0.08808134,0.00009660559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09095845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07997991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09095845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020249723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011233068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18085802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2713442250","doi":"10.7202/1040052ar","title":"Le rôle des normes comptables dans la responsabilité civile des auditeurs de sociétés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999221718854669,"score_gpt":0.3817974042466343,"score_spread":0.29180518705808756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2713442250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42100382,0.0028871675,0.08040405,0.03706893,0.0006705593,0.00032309757,0.0005370131,0.00027836103,0.45682698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97033125,0.0006826367,0.007186363,0.0009885104,0.00006948506,0.00013266217,0.000107127606,0.000058700974,0.020443099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613528,0.018767962,0.0018724804,0.002816204,0.012564701,0.0026257443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277305,0.02764009,0.010455741,0.007599984,0.021810878,0.004762671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027850183,0.0004520566,0.0004470064,0.002596538,0.0055495645,0.012851438,0.0013075231,0.0017055357,0.00896097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06279064,0.0005121561,0.00048374716,0.002513183,0.0112033,0.006969849,0.0040899846,0.0028777707,0.0011943403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018552569,0.00009983041,0.061096847,0.00038488547,0.00009358892,0.00021201948,0.050206527,0.001538015,0.0018713766,0.79874396,0.0058465498,0.07972087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092502094,0.00032141275,0.1780973,0.0016642797,0.0001573263,0.00047042788,0.09877649,0.0057306327,0.005994636,0.38670546,0.32167113,0.00031838974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048175663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04604207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048175663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010409307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023300527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1472876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766864120","doi":"10.7202/1070285ar","title":"Property Law and Collective Self-Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Land tenure; Corporate governance; Collective action; Common ownership; Property rights; Alienation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Economic system; Geography; Sociology; Law; Economics; Agriculture; Politics","score_opus":0.01837056544580271,"score_gpt":0.18246988319895727,"score_spread":0.16409931775315456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766864120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09724144,0.0034012352,0.010807928,0.03221765,0.00013345422,0.00004042411,0.000035732686,0.00003816169,0.8560839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973977,0.0004761785,0.00080439576,0.001268386,0.000073653035,0.00003283144,0.0000091976735,0.000009187206,0.023349311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963678,0.0014083119,0.00011590651,0.0005937184,0.0005912904,0.00092299737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730515,0.0012475632,0.0004277421,0.00044908372,0.0003162086,0.0002541731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035641596,0.00014642961,0.00028457004,0.0006830101,0.005684856,0.0067002503,0.00070395134,0.003329362,0.0034263004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044385875,0.00017432828,0.00027523897,0.00090856024,0.042801287,0.0033616358,0.003266018,0.0023056495,0.00036776796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018288777,0.0000038386447,0.00020919033,0.0000051760885,0.0000013508737,0.00002378073,0.0010154954,0.00017893901,0.00004103162,0.9963277,0.0005326616,0.0016590841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016220216,0.000029314235,0.0023951288,0.00009198786,0.000008036468,0.000057362144,0.0022539864,0.0010053861,0.0001955924,0.91135025,0.08257962,0.000017046432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032061365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032597873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032061365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007829249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06374949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.265366381501558,"score_gpt":0.35988028068368266,"score_spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771094306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11476459,0.027255043,0.06674871,0.12293612,0.0009085657,0.000055490742,0.00006571577,0.00006219079,0.6672036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97101945,0.005822478,0.006216171,0.004889493,0.0004918737,0.000057380304,0.00003448975,0.00003234375,0.011436341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920333,0.0045373607,0.00029577885,0.0008001352,0.0013925876,0.0009408181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876138,0.008289567,0.0013037712,0.0008725702,0.0011022355,0.0008180861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011068381,0.00040263796,0.0004995841,0.002728773,0.006942934,0.011954151,0.0013540785,0.0055614454,0.0034377312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019279484,0.00037925312,0.00046620614,0.0016105467,0.047977027,0.020416673,0.0071212365,0.0062668966,0.0006558148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024690798,0.00000469757,0.00027754364,0.000012233403,7.147923e-7,0.000029168337,0.010077526,0.000081829596,0.00002506892,0.98423356,0.0006510533,0.004604098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004418223,0.000012720545,0.0010886884,0.00028118267,0.0000042698184,0.000166951,0.009480133,0.0005700349,0.000111443085,0.9033102,0.08495232,0.000017782055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008978535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007923741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011954151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009341772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007999213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782777112","doi":"10.7202/1042770ar","title":"Accès à la justice pour protéger l’environnement au Québec : réflexions sur la capacité à agir des particuliers et des groupes environnementaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04340311684650424,"score_gpt":0.3134151355222334,"score_spread":0.27001201867572916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782777112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7356278,0.003031661,0.0022160667,0.078079104,0.0003334492,0.00009657966,0.00011636994,0.00003366166,0.1804653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825665,0.0005458012,0.00023102699,0.0025356177,0.000018504177,0.000021134249,0.000014935917,0.0000070043166,0.014059528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941607,0.0020620113,0.00013533767,0.0004441895,0.0015537136,0.0016439678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880512,0.0034663896,0.0008180453,0.00034539457,0.0045221737,0.0027968145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006225583,0.00025492063,0.00027253525,0.001635859,0.02310184,0.005742776,0.0015278705,0.0026637374,0.0088406755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017538497,0.00027549468,0.00021322335,0.0016038669,0.012708778,0.0027506459,0.0036211605,0.0032509845,0.00037530102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006778992,0.00013599635,0.06194805,0.00023554334,0.00003521761,0.0012751532,0.7067481,0.00033805828,0.00086592574,0.14002699,0.030333407,0.057989653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887431,0.00009968535,0.16926141,0.000782789,0.000053181855,0.00021074909,0.6452569,0.00065773766,0.0005108991,0.0077371798,0.17529517,0.00011548628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048037205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048037205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06901853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3485359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783016775","doi":"10.7202/1042771ar","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Common Law Property Rights and Remedies in Addressing Environmental Challenges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Tort; Legislature; Common law; Natural resource; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0478007788444951,"score_gpt":0.3046406056797497,"score_spread":0.25683982683525464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783016775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027187426,0.046940424,0.09394818,0.45844093,0.0026521618,0.00018047965,0.0000791861,0.00012512873,0.3704461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8271444,0.03569142,0.04041371,0.058913317,0.0053477124,0.0003499239,0.0000644435,0.00014248806,0.031932537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702234,0.011460378,0.0012601669,0.004347414,0.010178806,0.0025298109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536808,0.033069227,0.002972445,0.004395786,0.0040460615,0.0018356757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03134077,0.0006942651,0.0014111411,0.0029253813,0.008954942,0.016869664,0.0042462703,0.017341968,0.0049259216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0369355,0.0005518058,0.0013203714,0.0030250105,0.12219737,0.031734694,0.011016314,0.020359106,0.00055643724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010381038,0.0000063981074,0.000060893213,0.000024903733,0.000002338694,0.000030327052,0.0006332079,0.00017104622,0.000024342316,0.99437934,0.0009780435,0.0036881105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007050545,0.000022275659,0.00028242404,0.00043918172,0.000007367869,0.00011349016,0.0015764169,0.0007470041,0.00011584295,0.8918725,0.104782976,0.000033428983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020963889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021782639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03134077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01590169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023771329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16574776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783681570","doi":"10.7202/1042775ar","title":"“Legalizing” the Great Bear Rainforest Agreements: Colonial Adaptations Toward Reconciliation and Conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Government; Institute of Science and Technology Austria; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Colonialism; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental governance; Indigenous rights; Rainforest; Human rights; Geography; Law; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.03721140324976968,"score_gpt":0.2390502351249021,"score_spread":0.2018388318751324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783681570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10634762,0.0043719136,0.020889666,0.10664304,0.00075761665,0.00026557504,0.000052271986,0.00012866863,0.76054364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292254,0.002558465,0.0114354985,0.013097492,0.00016311707,0.00012468892,0.000050853232,0.00008670158,0.04325785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870408,0.006214919,0.0004864147,0.0009340943,0.0025538083,0.0027700171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912191,0.0039509535,0.0007400062,0.001188232,0.0018758295,0.0010258822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361235,0.00020635262,0.00023114297,0.00096403586,0.020629382,0.010216665,0.0019653477,0.003318631,0.0028330092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020836838,0.00030343098,0.00023006188,0.0016585112,0.05449167,0.0045920038,0.009223809,0.0068896576,0.00021267269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035678836,0.000009185775,0.001133562,0.000027099224,0.0000025410661,0.00022622361,0.0807658,0.00023198713,0.00019704609,0.8944022,0.0070897103,0.015911069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010981622,0.0000167958,0.0045215767,0.00045269137,0.000012098669,0.0002937718,0.08086677,0.0007565337,0.0005081893,0.13176993,0.78073454,0.000056108413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6282073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7695686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37179267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039394476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087802336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7479645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783974646","doi":"10.7202/1042772ar","title":"L’environnement à l’épreuve du droit des biens","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0713709872215503,"score_gpt":0.26876592223596624,"score_spread":0.19739493501441593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783974646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09369098,0.0027564603,0.011817445,0.020883078,0.00040997297,0.00008469477,0.00046982436,0.00017159763,0.86971587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4917527,0.0020367142,0.005090419,0.0025366046,0.000061238075,0.000082596496,0.00030685015,0.00017101568,0.49796188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800545,0.0004244814,0.000043613676,0.00029667118,0.0007323918,0.0004973023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977399,0.00027586494,0.00015682583,0.00028380324,0.001109793,0.00043376678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015157055,0.0004635235,0.00033962703,0.001182941,0.010812699,0.0080977855,0.0013147471,0.002284083,0.03652109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032845344,0.00038984852,0.00044257144,0.0016438578,0.007908096,0.0037439298,0.003528577,0.0037977917,0.004287184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010208503,0.000089687084,0.009089413,0.00030189508,0.00004529931,0.0006360224,0.029569052,0.001428742,0.0046453453,0.8518706,0.03532353,0.06689833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015373293,0.000054117034,0.025850562,0.0005325121,0.000026985343,0.00025665076,0.020272812,0.00073953456,0.001304432,0.024001515,0.9268526,0.000092935195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7068505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8394428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020420836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03503185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5897517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784043650","doi":"10.7202/1042773ar","title":"Les services écologiques ou le renouveau de la catégorie civiliste de fruits?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03671347033134123,"score_gpt":0.307017876009089,"score_spread":0.2703044056777477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784043650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32528386,0.011791618,0.027799059,0.054114025,0.00061220356,0.0001224177,0.0009659065,0.000183004,0.57912797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661718,0.002678207,0.003748343,0.0012534009,0.00016058762,0.000064914886,0.0002280724,0.00006293934,0.025631703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978618,0.0007819413,0.00006509385,0.0003345085,0.0005124879,0.00044422658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958983,0.0011336311,0.00057508395,0.00044746784,0.0010752556,0.0008702663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027975927,0.00044609484,0.00039729945,0.0025746296,0.0024571281,0.00711154,0.00077665853,0.0013620165,0.011841616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005594783,0.00018248697,0.0004172587,0.002507323,0.010769311,0.0073456382,0.0023040825,0.001360047,0.0014347313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047738515,0.000034031844,0.02299864,0.00017132837,0.000033396147,0.00017201157,0.013631309,0.00039837396,0.0010490187,0.90552247,0.0046484624,0.051293314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020530168,0.00013407078,0.11983086,0.0005099021,0.000039611637,0.0005801361,0.040539164,0.0012561708,0.00090803177,0.41569042,0.42039016,0.000100924364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026347946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030431224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026347946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051585613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004398567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052389145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784255215","doi":"10.7202/1042776ar","title":"“Sacrifice Zones” in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Sacrifice; Capitalism; Framing (construction); Grassroots; Resistance (ecology); Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.038001274829251745,"score_gpt":0.31177183093792893,"score_spread":0.2737705561086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784255215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27330336,0.008729466,0.07614402,0.11322733,0.00050884276,0.00013906907,0.00012288989,0.000077401164,0.52774763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906002,0.0005818971,0.003710422,0.0016325008,0.0000733641,0.000034589964,0.000012850449,0.0000237925,0.0033304095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961211,0.0019590473,0.000080961356,0.00038440453,0.0005290547,0.00092543475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974644,0.0010900851,0.00043228854,0.0003013687,0.00038716258,0.00032461103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548904,0.0006277628,0.0005455098,0.0024705317,0.0085168015,0.01312728,0.0024549272,0.004080416,0.0031552147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003425882,0.00028361363,0.0005977767,0.0016357665,0.08024341,0.009678454,0.00780644,0.0057825623,0.00022705311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060475663,0.000011462221,0.00086760597,0.000017801693,0.0000033025806,0.0000782904,0.010935212,0.00029691876,0.00009043248,0.9853957,0.00033623175,0.0019610026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061791848,0.000014903408,0.003168314,0.00012689031,0.00001010082,0.00006123773,0.023298463,0.0011785834,0.00019837583,0.9328438,0.03907132,0.000021899887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038315613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06552679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038315613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01340059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007139202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09722853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784283951","doi":"10.7202/1042777ar","title":"Le « dialogue » des parties et la vérité plurielle comme nouveau paradigme de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06243198502734576,"score_gpt":0.342602126200495,"score_spread":0.28017014117314926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784283951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027298762,0.009919417,0.024231866,0.18282676,0.0010966958,0.00014165849,0.000177977,0.00007265222,0.7542342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81974626,0.0026683784,0.007093046,0.01971854,0.00030259404,0.00023448397,0.000090455265,0.000080349295,0.15006588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860162,0.0062117367,0.00021335289,0.0015470615,0.0035184622,0.0024931792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476886,0.0019194583,0.00034173022,0.00060929934,0.001483947,0.00087668264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009227004,0.00055841927,0.00051935756,0.0014583735,0.02060704,0.015010031,0.0022242693,0.010523618,0.009888269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008779864,0.0004207312,0.00065793324,0.0015343487,0.05220056,0.009474129,0.0063087335,0.011316656,0.0009532956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005751548,0.0000039019933,0.000107859785,0.000012839798,0.0000024414371,0.000048898877,0.004391596,0.00004774091,0.00006923814,0.9882427,0.0041072587,0.002959743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002570432,0.000024652578,0.0023101866,0.00033853666,0.000015711761,0.00016380122,0.012422209,0.00045293177,0.00030118861,0.40918395,0.57469714,0.00006400004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6836777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74338686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31632233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044460595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786157410","doi":"10.7202/1043161ar","title":"Le contrat de prestations logistiques","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04590899149200575,"score_gpt":0.34707412050680136,"score_spread":0.30116512901479564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786157410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06982386,0.0023575022,0.038815513,0.012491732,0.00050434464,0.00011192764,0.00010824155,0.00020416758,0.87558275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74711514,0.0014304519,0.009688785,0.002354888,0.00044619126,0.00020374337,0.00011845051,0.00018306056,0.23845927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918498,0.0025614412,0.0002802801,0.0013631529,0.0028332511,0.0011121676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322766,0.0027123268,0.0012744667,0.0010692411,0.0012111556,0.0005052135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039964155,0.0006185616,0.0004102681,0.0017008471,0.0070219096,0.009919376,0.0013566396,0.0029781046,0.018246647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076062474,0.00039502405,0.0005167624,0.0016460732,0.013958959,0.0060015246,0.003967897,0.0047478266,0.0027700355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029984536,0.000017358368,0.0010046785,0.00007132483,0.0000083200775,0.00024761603,0.010823925,0.00019877878,0.0006848817,0.9691348,0.0027377976,0.015040586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028856055,0.000085688676,0.0077937506,0.00042167108,0.000026905163,0.0007965896,0.013495469,0.0010201915,0.0023024864,0.30372328,0.67024624,0.000058975413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007246284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010785549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018246647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064864624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062564644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061041117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790519403","doi":"10.7202/1043162ar","title":"Le Marchand de Venise : le pari et la dette, le jeu et la loi","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02361544593520406,"score_gpt":0.30124232987756916,"score_spread":0.2776268839423651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790519403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0322393,0.010535847,0.0070846663,0.030694935,0.0014429272,0.00002870397,0.00012435863,0.00006207471,0.9177873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6300146,0.003921714,0.0021589235,0.0018679881,0.00056704984,0.000061433304,0.0001042907,0.00019194988,0.361112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882036,0.00048354795,0.000021055788,0.00021514294,0.00023432386,0.00022552164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995208,0.00015617139,0.000049955896,0.000060621558,0.00007067481,0.00014187598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009875562,0.00047394444,0.00026569804,0.000803381,0.00968839,0.009190971,0.0010318285,0.0022755165,0.01794018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024301012,0.0003244931,0.00030567223,0.0010527555,0.015936866,0.005044481,0.004153833,0.0056203455,0.0017558493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002151695,0.0000069294438,0.00047166733,0.00002682436,0.0000025768593,0.00015033282,0.017079728,0.00008550673,0.000095746196,0.9591995,0.013116797,0.009742814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009209604,0.00002320905,0.0023374213,0.00028120299,0.0000060700927,0.00022251395,0.01603429,0.0002600685,0.00023616495,0.13120699,0.84935766,0.000025294032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045466933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09682614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045466933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00754942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049574864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09040457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790988331","doi":"10.7202/1043159ar","title":"Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants : une atteinte injustifiée aux droits à la liberté d’expression, de réunion pacifique et d’association","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016116249900525025,"score_gpt":0.3280149736920107,"score_spread":0.3118987237914857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790988331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4207481,0.004275647,0.01332046,0.068522185,0.0006135151,0.00010260467,0.0016857496,0.00019356728,0.49053818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795528,0.0010325129,0.0008698652,0.00087923463,0.00012124479,0.00008060931,0.0001439105,0.00003700565,0.017282862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949936,0.0022845445,0.00020935838,0.00059010694,0.00091847376,0.0010039991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949227,0.0019530773,0.0015860253,0.00058234984,0.00067542907,0.00028049017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018775495,0.0004054576,0.00042804214,0.0022276943,0.007390047,0.010963976,0.0010234407,0.002922637,0.015612311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988289,0.00030311267,0.0003915639,0.0033659022,0.02328584,0.006191984,0.006408793,0.002528966,0.0013931672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005048869,0.000022028538,0.010157616,0.000110354864,0.000014023251,0.0006523676,0.049358647,0.00034353565,0.00043617695,0.92291003,0.0061553707,0.009789328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056539106,0.00010939882,0.09291445,0.00065420754,0.00008871494,0.0016728827,0.3086192,0.000827036,0.0018453693,0.24412131,0.34891355,0.00017741599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05383542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06372648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055714543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1070441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792813114","doi":"10.7202/1043163ar","title":"Les luttes de clocher en droit comparé","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.16210317677247382,"score_gpt":0.4184525204309658,"score_spread":0.256349343658492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792813114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047404338,0.0580218,0.045857325,0.179898,0.006068409,0.00022643604,0.00044770542,0.00028476783,0.66179115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71405214,0.027845811,0.028583921,0.0419412,0.0053203674,0.00092334143,0.00048473128,0.00084789185,0.18000065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9501776,0.03131751,0.0016137249,0.0052809287,0.009962552,0.0016476656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525222,0.0318617,0.0030353896,0.0048669237,0.0066048466,0.0011089094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03103943,0.0008729097,0.0016169316,0.007065525,0.011565756,0.024583478,0.0034992807,0.005712081,0.021677751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0667962,0.0006064993,0.001154357,0.008882116,0.038119692,0.025563527,0.009538947,0.0090697715,0.0034636834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004460416,0.00001027964,0.00051545614,0.00015442897,0.000016301878,0.00006670295,0.021877877,0.000093665105,0.00008456823,0.94774646,0.0097440025,0.01964572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020627154,0.000074531505,0.0021633755,0.0012514819,0.000032435288,0.00019715415,0.027962714,0.00031676178,0.0005397202,0.42184165,0.54553705,0.00006249353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011884331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014319225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03103943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019262714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01011974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16415417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060235","doi":"10.7202/1043165ar","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Gourd; Race (biology); Law; Critical race theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059374484762862896,"score_gpt":0.406693800985672,"score_spread":0.3473193162228091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004605889,0.017869877,0.004361442,0.8802847,0.003192442,0.000043161246,0.000050548366,0.00014824807,0.0894437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35626164,0.023390021,0.015008902,0.30185574,0.0048431386,0.00039931128,0.00008712637,0.00075980835,0.29739434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419045,0.003564426,0.000082613755,0.0002750188,0.0011644248,0.00072306156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821485,0.0068565514,0.00057988387,0.00043164162,0.0012131687,0.0027040336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007190285,0.0005598144,0.00036452437,0.00088274723,0.011533759,0.007394053,0.001743206,0.00785544,0.02095702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018046482,0.00048692472,0.0003613948,0.0007964757,0.025811536,0.012896413,0.0075500705,0.014488143,0.0032652416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029127135,0.00007165955,0.0005699639,0.00016360838,0.0000050812027,0.00017068988,0.025543269,0.00013641093,0.00047730297,0.2141493,0.6996647,0.05901879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000307188,0.00004057434,0.001681957,0.00083345256,0.000008247417,0.00010110716,0.022563942,0.00031747358,0.0008613115,0.20359586,0.76990646,0.000058968086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15780737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3396659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84219265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016434975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023651546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31377763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794287810","doi":"10.7202/1043166ar","title":"Kenneth M. Smookler, Farr & Beyond: Lawyers for the Otherworldly (Toronto: Wall & Emerson, 2016), p 118, ISBN 978-1-895131-26-0","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07585044040862375,"score_gpt":0.39133732355541206,"score_spread":0.3154868831467883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794287810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008589795,0.5529807,0.0016135206,0.16763915,0.0054076645,0.000045190332,0.0005931284,0.00034833685,0.27051333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013585043,0.22059594,0.0021188173,0.014887869,0.0018374603,0.00005145253,0.00035092482,0.00032740907,0.746245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.00018367819,0.000053126416,0.00010531648,0.00041555712,0.00008862839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985556,0.00062663574,0.00015522345,0.00005279983,0.00026833048,0.00034140027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011035206,0.0008183589,0.00039646143,0.0017029803,0.002376604,0.0055894265,0.00093519955,0.0053806566,0.12459742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029698561,0.0008033579,0.00020753077,0.0026001218,0.002063636,0.0092322705,0.0017412356,0.0032427239,0.055915978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004001546,0.000004842287,0.000070531736,0.00010045904,0.0000011113981,0.000020160423,0.00048227693,0.000010521016,0.000049909384,0.005711821,0.9590598,0.0344847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002357329,0.0000031731165,0.00063927996,0.0002994898,0.0000018021258,0.00007677229,0.00089517405,0.00002073436,0.00005550523,0.0025930265,0.99540615,0.0000066293373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05922307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22209053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94077694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052438164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067663663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41681993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800807448","doi":"10.7202/1066339ar","title":"Explaining International Acts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; International law; Law; Ex-ante; Law and economics; Customary international law; State (computer science); Transparency (behavior); Proposition; Public international law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02178960889279507,"score_gpt":0.3030804993075395,"score_spread":0.2812908904147444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800807448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007006985,0.0045346864,0.014769525,0.058920413,0.0013172008,0.000028596198,0.00012172193,0.00009505831,0.9132059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75568813,0.0068340357,0.0056646205,0.019996589,0.0020289859,0.00019299432,0.00030541743,0.0002876375,0.20900165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976882,0.0012678254,0.00007392745,0.00027820378,0.00032779665,0.00036406345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773324,0.001528582,0.00017547137,0.0002734254,0.00019626126,0.00009303815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030756125,0.0007430146,0.0002315539,0.001420311,0.0050041834,0.0070488476,0.0012173576,0.0059266263,0.018458748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005408403,0.00030757883,0.000645258,0.0013203281,0.0142333405,0.00890219,0.004925779,0.0056812237,0.0018440472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7582364e-7,9.703027e-7,0.000031199415,0.0000032212747,3.033263e-7,0.000013099236,0.0012011809,0.000038909442,0.000004159105,0.99352986,0.004408299,0.0007683492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033708457,0.000004064787,0.00019220739,0.00016673726,0.000003016677,0.000069193855,0.003805151,0.00054324506,0.00009404991,0.5341715,0.46093914,0.000008274398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008316659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008782806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018458748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005212307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025987457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06175071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804742156","doi":"","title":"Negotiating an Institution for the Twenty-First Century: Multilateral Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Negotiation; Institution; Political science; Criminal court; Law; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.033468720515043474,"score_gpt":0.3182715107814587,"score_spread":0.28480279026641525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804742156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12690908,0.0075040627,0.011584205,0.12121947,0.00067721575,0.000054826778,0.000055640117,0.00006641048,0.731929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696418,0.0006610701,0.0011910679,0.0059230034,0.00015781054,0.000050050818,0.000012148322,0.000027389255,0.02233575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937524,0.0024285733,0.0001080386,0.00057286624,0.0006553425,0.0024827607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961365,0.0015996342,0.00043612055,0.00026198055,0.00037682362,0.0011889644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010092711,0.00044160517,0.00062440184,0.0014922539,0.016964002,0.02730758,0.001809496,0.013880106,0.009450648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013615884,0.00043095314,0.00053327053,0.0013414238,0.033345547,0.017427847,0.013534154,0.013794677,0.0005209017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733743,0.0000067516303,0.000096935684,0.0000032486932,0.000002039081,0.00003191869,0.0011484713,0.00010815597,0.000020163103,0.9959674,0.0013286625,0.0012785235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036234796,0.00002088045,0.00049350364,0.00015044809,0.000011544902,0.000079014884,0.005798472,0.00082776294,0.00020200109,0.89964,0.09269496,0.000045096393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023829974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038248822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02730758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016799662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017284457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121890604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884620965","doi":"10.7202/1054350ar","title":"Separate but Unequal: Immigration Detention in Canada and the Great Writ of Liberty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Political science; Immigration; Appeal; Tribunal; Immigration law; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Petitioner; Constitution; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.024730076698154517,"score_gpt":0.27758648343863157,"score_spread":0.25285640674047705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884620965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17672041,0.051072847,0.004149225,0.3465013,0.0024922276,0.00015572515,0.0004400016,0.00010953134,0.41835874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8589349,0.025926238,0.0025640791,0.06508602,0.00042138572,0.000044086002,0.0001721191,0.00005862092,0.046792578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968166,0.0007109226,0.00023530198,0.0006412965,0.0048623113,0.0038686174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995685,0.0012311392,0.00027464487,0.00013136887,0.0015757552,0.0011020233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032829582,0.00033634302,0.00039077873,0.001680593,0.025902534,0.009341635,0.002516476,0.0046484554,0.0033341788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430363,0.00039187944,0.00062524,0.0030213099,0.018383812,0.002465451,0.0049005086,0.009688988,0.00018405358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035463687,0.000035692574,0.008531581,0.00029815082,0.000029971838,0.0019357974,0.029277392,0.00078207057,0.00052190095,0.8289251,0.06964565,0.05998125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058807862,0.000061870145,0.05381837,0.0021393641,0.00014785903,0.0011901305,0.053741466,0.0016393989,0.0010218183,0.06693499,0.8189221,0.00032388774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99492055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14369556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14369556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31935865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885453387","doi":"","title":"The Precautionary Principle in International Law: Lessons from Fuller's Internal Morality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Precautionary principle; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03336236246078287,"score_gpt":0.3443268035583912,"score_spread":0.3109644410976083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885453387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029047295,0.0031640406,0.056151614,0.11429888,0.00047491468,0.000051738036,0.0000978891,0.00006203724,0.79665154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951097,0.0021179663,0.010825487,0.009875244,0.0010638485,0.00017132139,0.000057231846,0.00015205602,0.024639884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949508,0.00204289,0.0001819185,0.00069182744,0.0013465141,0.00078600144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907527,0.0064350944,0.00046539068,0.00089582906,0.0010544781,0.0003965628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009151428,0.0005394848,0.0010502092,0.0017323269,0.0068455376,0.013450377,0.001856253,0.008988236,0.007690358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016967786,0.00052747864,0.0009300356,0.001922716,0.048738156,0.015046684,0.0053691245,0.012197109,0.00059986394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001376562,0.000004168135,0.0000340826,0.000006510277,0.0000015757048,0.0000075161424,0.0003926825,0.0001332512,0.000005530303,0.9974595,0.0010499567,0.0009038301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051429643,0.0000023591024,0.00008241033,0.000035999834,0.0000034553264,0.0000120202685,0.00029594518,0.0002432805,0.000029692941,0.99079996,0.008484901,0.00000482046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010838286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008804316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013450377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077040666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067167827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055897176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886224766","doi":"","title":"Anger, Provocation, and the Intent for Murder: A Comment on R. V. Parent","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Provocation test; Psychology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.12326596862208378,"score_gpt":0.3549516836329563,"score_spread":0.23168571501087254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886224766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031134984,0.0025792,0.0008173882,0.9801727,0.004055322,0.000026380456,0.00021622455,0.000056768673,0.008962502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041718487,0.0023374772,0.00095438975,0.9366121,0.0092163,0.00017137069,0.00007627233,0.00005921667,0.008854384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430865,0.0015926878,0.00051062996,0.0012491627,0.0015722062,0.00076666847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538866,0.040091194,0.0013938416,0.0007308712,0.0026496644,0.0012477206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00965076,0.0011038817,0.0019913514,0.0009051356,0.0092581585,0.004447396,0.0070803063,0.07936723,0.005922602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042215746,0.0019746723,0.002719781,0.0010677222,0.009804098,0.005550446,0.002760799,0.058706332,0.0032448296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003837,0.00004526614,0.002433996,0.00017887678,0.00006721097,0.0015335757,0.0045020576,0.00018603772,0.00036324686,0.06258932,0.9197048,0.0081953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086103374,0.00066450244,0.022734722,0.0029915147,0.0011036718,0.00429514,0.013571339,0.0025376915,0.0037653628,0.09902696,0.84796256,0.00048544502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065851375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10328515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003966559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009758394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1309362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886416514","doi":"","title":"Gay Male Pornography and Sexual Violence: A Sex Equality Perspective on Gay Male Rape and Partner Abuse","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sexual violence; Sexual abuse; Gender studies; Domestic violence; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency; Medicine; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.052523424515744634,"score_gpt":0.36156825109880697,"score_spread":0.3090448265830623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886416514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15213698,0.1136556,0.0059426245,0.29761368,0.0019159096,0.00008752545,0.00012924339,0.000014191054,0.42850423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412126,0.03538502,0.0006609162,0.012121542,0.0022758103,0.00007814848,0.000030954176,0.00001174412,0.008223336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973592,0.00179324,0.00004259942,0.00011945673,0.00020440079,0.00048110678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950206,0.0036780492,0.00038932296,0.00011614211,0.00031199795,0.0004838955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029671227,0.0006378119,0.0007873721,0.0038980243,0.009332791,0.009369374,0.0015095724,0.007660222,0.0061594923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033936938,0.0004643409,0.0006465048,0.0030330082,0.029074086,0.0100333635,0.0054031755,0.0066102813,0.00021379377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021347112,0.00010901452,0.003856491,0.00006429183,0.0000092828805,0.00048796763,0.023745632,0.00018549743,0.00007396086,0.9621849,0.0023429235,0.00691883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038936047,0.00020052149,0.020453453,0.0010320599,0.00006081026,0.0015577116,0.1994445,0.0008838669,0.00020581932,0.690402,0.08566616,0.000054252676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024772504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040470548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024772504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051781945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051086764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049256623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887140835","doi":"","title":"Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03715039055804624,"score_gpt":0.31997361363144877,"score_spread":0.2828232230734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887140835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35950005,0.07648935,0.0075814943,0.11555804,0.0017792239,0.00008936724,0.0002827792,0.00004463019,0.43867514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809184,0.011262372,0.0006561964,0.0026302056,0.00047873225,0.0000380941,0.000025947758,0.000017285527,0.0039726924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862456,0.00090807496,0.000030061588,0.000056388868,0.00014749185,0.00023335342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996136,0.0024740319,0.00044828997,0.00010286351,0.00026583998,0.0005729496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017223933,0.0005617419,0.0004383382,0.0026083656,0.0030795245,0.009772694,0.0008835113,0.002372317,0.0053807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055556674,0.00024171789,0.0004232857,0.003296011,0.013800399,0.0074061155,0.0036557019,0.0030984636,0.00017074932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038947725,0.00014766157,0.036818568,0.00018049084,0.000029660509,0.00041804838,0.06701725,0.00061708083,0.00010342017,0.84563637,0.009812902,0.039179537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017547505,0.00012512463,0.0721939,0.0011282222,0.00008383616,0.0005965569,0.2838083,0.0017328179,0.00017580112,0.52385443,0.11623331,0.00005017322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028243188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064288855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028243188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036045313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064232014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05615759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887236326","doi":"","title":"Agriculture et Culture: Le Defi De l'OMC De Prendre En Compte Les Considerations Non Commerciales","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.03136252151050602,"score_gpt":0.28144274032579913,"score_spread":0.25008021881529313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887236326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072334507,0.008835723,0.0032626113,0.6267558,0.0044794576,0.00003908806,0.000051984054,0.00004259112,0.34929943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37551758,0.0052494314,0.0045486772,0.4474012,0.0088514285,0.0004515726,0.000052348805,0.00022795194,0.1576999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798748,0.007976265,0.0010441166,0.0024001552,0.0056791212,0.0030255737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771015,0.0148833385,0.001254976,0.0016752732,0.0034059659,0.0016789102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018276483,0.00085281045,0.0017495963,0.0011420415,0.016727895,0.021672321,0.003394497,0.04380092,0.007012384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02317809,0.000867492,0.0009600327,0.0013853045,0.06115802,0.013492716,0.00939982,0.03883736,0.0015496492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009606276,0.0000197067,0.0001245661,0.000028737795,0.0000034679263,0.00008084833,0.0031873703,0.00003296706,0.000114009104,0.9689754,0.023950588,0.0034726774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037711372,0.000037134356,0.0010884204,0.00057325925,0.000021420285,0.0002426152,0.004824435,0.00019483546,0.0002976984,0.45527944,0.53733945,0.00006357689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063636854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084248126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063636854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009766402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026419908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12653285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887804744","doi":"","title":"The Changing Scope of the Fundamental Principle of Equality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07654335096606173,"score_gpt":0.3755302857204677,"score_spread":0.29898693475440596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887804744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028659696,0.01790276,0.022261582,0.42528406,0.0028767919,0.000028744988,0.00016374582,0.00007096678,0.5027517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90492266,0.005497601,0.008018036,0.051285617,0.005651805,0.00012740634,0.000060909035,0.00015894172,0.024276936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98759264,0.005609264,0.00039466188,0.0018883382,0.0032922905,0.0012227999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97610986,0.018037532,0.00068736763,0.0020840203,0.0019049522,0.0011763081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016966945,0.00030091286,0.0010816101,0.0018600948,0.006083248,0.009617207,0.0024101175,0.010988155,0.008573427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030647883,0.0005145518,0.00076575,0.0015608892,0.06102265,0.018281791,0.0057218717,0.016010972,0.00073210767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003440792,0.0000032205219,0.000029768731,0.00000742349,0.0000011522374,0.000007199788,0.0004322389,0.000032048058,0.00003083931,0.9953896,0.002308704,0.0017542896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059818635,0.000003454748,0.00017017902,0.000032788026,0.0000016434304,0.000012824249,0.00021661054,0.00007882551,0.000036778987,0.9767446,0.022690311,0.0000059341805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009095118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011885636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99090487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007968789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008252879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0897308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888316458","doi":"","title":"Kraft Canada c. Euro-Excellence : l’insoutenable légèreté du droit","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020952591014374855,"score_gpt":0.2339473526485747,"score_spread":0.21299476163419984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888316458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019782513,0.04934626,0.0022915034,0.23866832,0.0061043967,0.000083684085,0.0027450249,0.0002952914,0.6806831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14663461,0.0072725154,0.0013272001,0.034339517,0.00063553895,0.00007102422,0.0004277308,0.00029181057,0.809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552035,0.0003861785,0.00016690978,0.0005238883,0.0019736195,0.0014291761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817026,0.00044102166,0.0001370693,0.00010992548,0.00090279506,0.00023895763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021419208,0.0007703244,0.0006737097,0.001626134,0.01036464,0.011931397,0.0016244325,0.01448235,0.041169204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069643133,0.00062770414,0.0007716593,0.0028272914,0.0034913903,0.0046380623,0.0027219898,0.009015345,0.0034762528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007485688,0.000027470609,0.0007542108,0.00009343352,0.000024143768,0.00025787993,0.0015548161,0.00027754664,0.0003152473,0.4906413,0.48827234,0.01770668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020085743,0.000009885045,0.0034320704,0.00020456004,0.00002117364,0.00007383507,0.0010962408,0.00013597752,0.0004422409,0.010686098,0.9838329,0.000044923494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89810616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9304544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89810616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033345997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05615377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2419433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890213531","doi":"","title":"E-Legislation: Law-Making in the Digital Age","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03652537517308075,"score_gpt":0.3070949287537616,"score_spread":0.27056955358068085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890213531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018959252,0.01667156,0.015254272,0.26446545,0.0016846722,0.000046701927,0.0001500318,0.00015685293,0.6826113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.798499,0.016443165,0.008174417,0.059169415,0.0033641148,0.000109665816,0.00011944892,0.00018148766,0.113939285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932788,0.0037157673,0.00027033244,0.000643946,0.0013549922,0.000736221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734812,0.019930977,0.0013691392,0.001641113,0.0017314226,0.0018461562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009124184,0.00031835353,0.00041267005,0.0020302131,0.006292836,0.025129013,0.0017031757,0.01423435,0.023176048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025025427,0.00038655687,0.0005032783,0.0028996016,0.02567759,0.027762836,0.006533936,0.0076137376,0.0020309126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922562,0.000020705778,0.00035498774,0.000037693553,0.0000024611088,0.00009258029,0.001780959,0.00012502994,0.00009734027,0.96213955,0.018868942,0.016472774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000921622,0.000019065208,0.0009903533,0.0005222771,0.0000070423976,0.00019502989,0.005856122,0.0005769603,0.00046239866,0.59195054,0.39938337,0.000027692293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006645657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025129013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057942388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009458723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077531576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890283622","doi":"","title":"Le Controle Judiciaire De la Constitutionnalite Des Lois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01894259619003049,"score_gpt":0.28404580529669704,"score_spread":0.26510320910666657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890283622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08733064,0.007746904,0.07439156,0.054040853,0.0017295128,0.000108957625,0.00019931732,0.0003783204,0.7740739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663585,0.0015770729,0.0070853587,0.0025235799,0.0014216416,0.00018552825,0.000063228064,0.0002068618,0.12057824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853882,0.005383152,0.00043732856,0.0020434905,0.005152302,0.0015954513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787635,0.013892008,0.0009343242,0.0025682293,0.002942042,0.00089990464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015048811,0.00074044603,0.0012591442,0.0021508827,0.007742697,0.019057896,0.0021729697,0.0073014055,0.014051514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036527783,0.0011984132,0.0011068359,0.0017029105,0.017592806,0.008042255,0.0031353184,0.017863289,0.0021226439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015000658,0.000009375452,0.00023210829,0.000011919646,0.000012153279,0.00003831407,0.0006289889,0.00040343744,0.00026926704,0.9931322,0.0017769014,0.0034703522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019638769,0.00006598628,0.0051570125,0.00018806256,0.000041674175,0.0002482078,0.001135791,0.0058697835,0.0019052863,0.7501689,0.23491606,0.00010670308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06408675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06408675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016196884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010847451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1274274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890377513","doi":"","title":"Does International Law Impose a Duty upon the United Nations to Prevent Genocide","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Duty; Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.01805281861258426,"score_gpt":0.30298447276460716,"score_spread":0.28493165415202293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890377513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024047999,0.001287421,0.002037023,0.099798724,0.0022878218,0.000060314775,0.00022314541,0.000068068875,0.8701894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64607877,0.0032585952,0.0037086813,0.23109245,0.0034220284,0.00028975,0.00034066854,0.00013384725,0.1116753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906849,0.0018458066,0.00059465977,0.0009992192,0.002239803,0.0036356475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835587,0.0069235656,0.0028477232,0.00273704,0.0026991018,0.0012337965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012025273,0.00040900565,0.00079409225,0.0018889371,0.007293022,0.010950149,0.0018186624,0.02633621,0.013031477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034441765,0.00055612944,0.0013105383,0.0015409419,0.010555304,0.008278873,0.0047326167,0.010626801,0.0030761226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035263132,0.00007096444,0.0024499805,0.00008704858,0.000040036102,0.00019479325,0.00191004,0.00013440178,0.0002491306,0.9545796,0.032205123,0.008043576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120373916,0.00016697735,0.011826005,0.002236845,0.0002551949,0.0005285183,0.0066608125,0.0004859464,0.0019709351,0.31768423,0.6579124,0.0001516805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029590469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038717013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029590469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027927852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012945972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06359643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844950","doi":"","title":"Misrepresenting the Supreme Court's Record? A Comment on Sujit Choudhry and Claire E. Hunter, \"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05152245062291007,"score_gpt":0.26822321045992514,"score_spread":0.2167007598370151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051914477,0.0024327615,0.0005619172,0.97517043,0.0020576334,0.0000198946,0.00046729247,0.000041847776,0.014056776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102772675,0.0026354755,0.00095606106,0.8745089,0.00782143,0.00008541856,0.00021651959,0.00011531402,0.010888182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547042,0.014405095,0.0019999493,0.004016063,0.021123374,0.0037512176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8321875,0.12335271,0.008079725,0.004045605,0.028833475,0.0035010357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039961603,0.00072597293,0.0015753673,0.003942833,0.016910283,0.015475703,0.008992701,0.03695503,0.0041814256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17126,0.0011115437,0.0012600932,0.008326532,0.020125683,0.010226125,0.0039673094,0.030692637,0.0018989949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006021793,0.000026511978,0.0043008775,0.00010982896,0.00005352135,0.00025575235,0.012949373,0.00015503379,0.00017985042,0.08603713,0.8848519,0.011020163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012037843,0.000068455854,0.026153238,0.0022162413,0.0003383229,0.0003424964,0.03782163,0.0013909754,0.002813713,0.06641209,0.8619369,0.00038543364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52436715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71313995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47563285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01911686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03090903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891016535","doi":"","title":"Lock-Ups, Squeeze-Outs, and Canadian Takeover Bid Law: A Curious Interplay of Public and Private Interests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lock (firearm); Business; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.01932801093397525,"score_gpt":0.28377992968871857,"score_spread":0.26445191875474333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891016535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28111872,0.004445633,0.00472508,0.08869956,0.00021540506,0.000111937436,0.00039000093,0.00010326282,0.6201904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97513855,0.0008098862,0.00036841718,0.0029519678,0.000058892078,0.000018425972,0.000029258894,0.000026612746,0.020597912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387425,0.0005293208,0.000116004536,0.0006090795,0.0023745804,0.0024968034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918119,0.0038753657,0.00056615594,0.00039523715,0.002020204,0.0013312052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046463977,0.00040019045,0.00083722913,0.0019626485,0.014669533,0.015326017,0.0024669582,0.0077953893,0.014808194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022969773,0.0006081031,0.0006789109,0.002608347,0.014175657,0.0059581087,0.003308233,0.008787561,0.00032933065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056451754,0.00003004232,0.004572289,0.000035065867,0.000020956786,0.00010793593,0.0033851773,0.0006784914,0.00018850785,0.9707535,0.011946301,0.008225181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024547387,0.00009147678,0.07259354,0.0004880555,0.00035079272,0.00020523668,0.023139305,0.009819844,0.0012079076,0.65009445,0.24128175,0.00048227224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98828006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09134536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09134536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09311098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895524770","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Business Income Trust Governance and Corporate Governance: Is There a Need for Legislation or Further Regulation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Legislation; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.033569913730193544,"score_gpt":0.2488389206145213,"score_spread":0.21526900688432773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895524770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48215035,0.008016607,0.009536547,0.04645764,0.00035635626,0.00009314142,0.00018582832,0.000031451167,0.45317206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442494,0.0008215459,0.00027017505,0.00077728013,0.00006988196,0.000015588492,0.000029577075,0.000007020001,0.0035839444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960453,0.0017141778,0.00014005209,0.0001798469,0.0009500183,0.0009705691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820987,0.01081728,0.0024531141,0.00084701035,0.002311662,0.0014723073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00411616,0.00012673376,0.00040520818,0.0019031487,0.0014846411,0.006093333,0.0007990021,0.002049213,0.00923447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027300961,0.00012700452,0.00056162407,0.0026274682,0.007869444,0.009353663,0.0022407146,0.002334704,0.00030707105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009550857,0.000044625263,0.013545524,0.000044686632,0.000014052304,0.00009956535,0.0024382316,0.0002759897,0.000055230692,0.97282785,0.00191608,0.008642489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015536223,0.0003244964,0.18526684,0.0005855369,0.00015510168,0.0003803911,0.037499484,0.0049997675,0.0007838952,0.7113871,0.05840068,0.00006132334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019582367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028756993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019582367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064972267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004909329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047140837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908624351","doi":"10.7202/1054351ar","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor’s Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Obligation; Economic Justice; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.04453274096055949,"score_gpt":0.3485523148975887,"score_spread":0.3040195739370292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908624351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21607353,0.005527963,0.03305776,0.14049438,0.0006936052,0.00028438825,0.000054768752,0.00009982548,0.6037137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97112095,0.0009738562,0.00555921,0.0075691543,0.0001577802,0.000042094005,0.000012852376,0.00003282539,0.014531265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97237283,0.011393173,0.00090723,0.0016008537,0.007102215,0.006623731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834704,0.0095624905,0.0012105737,0.0009760434,0.0028885556,0.0018918912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023238316,0.0003883209,0.00048992014,0.0014443651,0.023470908,0.014526143,0.0021686885,0.008101558,0.0048230295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064206265,0.00055862207,0.0004817188,0.0011792823,0.023267373,0.006306701,0.0072911168,0.009727644,0.0006593249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083501676,0.00007251092,0.008779505,0.000086001666,0.000028349577,0.0028142002,0.0691814,0.0009506426,0.0016342693,0.8453571,0.014902701,0.056109764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007574636,0.000115804694,0.047435388,0.0010713581,0.00011717936,0.0023888466,0.1109319,0.0056540035,0.0031980344,0.54390264,0.2847183,0.00039088077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3224745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57844776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3224745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028290328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063003115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.641195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909073991","doi":"10.7202/1054353ar","title":"The Regulation of Hateful and Hurtful Speech: Liberalism’s Uncomfortable Predicament","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Harm; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010978276933889202,"score_gpt":0.22115124661875163,"score_spread":0.21017296968486243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909073991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09906801,0.0055946372,0.023993744,0.459258,0.0008982402,0.000042153442,0.00004085254,0.00012611762,0.41097826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94938165,0.0008409606,0.00241875,0.030144233,0.00092625106,0.00010414989,0.000012053938,0.00007558309,0.016096469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986249,0.007921694,0.00040822933,0.0012994217,0.0029095563,0.0012122117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97286475,0.01917825,0.0016456309,0.0028932448,0.0018964052,0.0015216651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016104536,0.00035070046,0.0005973684,0.00091800815,0.008575401,0.015762553,0.0022295201,0.009639673,0.0019971556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017388508,0.0003681073,0.0005672216,0.0005830036,0.08670648,0.008098789,0.007280777,0.016007794,0.0006101444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008126676,0.000012710641,0.00015217761,0.000012851924,0.0000025892036,0.000037510235,0.009264181,0.000097265394,0.0002053155,0.98498327,0.0019681072,0.0032559077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820637,0.000023950704,0.000454913,0.00011034632,0.000008733363,0.00006182393,0.0063027246,0.0005946205,0.00075391564,0.938662,0.052975383,0.00003335946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005572236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049347766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016104536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007120849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005754697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08516991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910596530","doi":"10.7202/1054354ar","title":"« Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? » L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08803811472317494,"score_gpt":0.3690641221948028,"score_spread":0.28102600747162787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910596530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08587085,0.03291717,0.012612558,0.56482434,0.006993871,0.00015227307,0.00015303286,0.00010972285,0.29636613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74338067,0.024386669,0.003861694,0.0731534,0.0021075439,0.00018346457,0.00010604553,0.00016834193,0.15265217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276537,0.003321968,0.00024817983,0.0006694551,0.0015873128,0.0014078015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539065,0.0016372016,0.0006362269,0.0003275687,0.0010696425,0.0009387744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801832,0.0004077946,0.00042893403,0.000714716,0.012765586,0.008557551,0.0014489113,0.007345552,0.008575065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010807447,0.00038296307,0.00046915936,0.0007631152,0.025011994,0.0077793067,0.0066682803,0.013742644,0.0020611128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004284345,0.00008565883,0.005006199,0.0003014544,0.0000180962,0.0013168305,0.25352657,0.00009567204,0.000936749,0.6184456,0.08479234,0.03543203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007810383,0.000043054188,0.0040720594,0.0006007301,0.000010981754,0.0014186673,0.1274922,0.00008311838,0.0004743351,0.046791818,0.81896126,0.00004393376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023273539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04370542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023273539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058970363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011738686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046276093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923088215","doi":"10.7202/1074154ar","title":"When Data Comes Home: Next Steps in International Taxation’s Information Revolution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Taxpayer; Politics; Information revolution; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Information exchange; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Public economics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1042520552874442,"score_gpt":0.24980569914797265,"score_spread":0.14555364386052844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923088215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026846033,0.03511735,0.00852244,0.76370406,0.0041893246,0.000041438394,0.00036137746,0.00015291867,0.16106503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77886194,0.035841875,0.012054956,0.13479821,0.0056638927,0.00012383591,0.0006093479,0.0002832754,0.031762622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914085,0.0036420885,0.00051572366,0.00077295577,0.0023048308,0.0013558553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98334485,0.009923821,0.0010694356,0.002254684,0.0018110131,0.0015962142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017271502,0.00032561645,0.0006948258,0.0024204096,0.004985131,0.023164414,0.0015618852,0.008288207,0.008122043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033554588,0.0003740441,0.00075658096,0.0041878894,0.012884921,0.035052843,0.007460025,0.011158079,0.0015310344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029462864,0.000040806015,0.0011422562,0.00006884016,0.0000063854177,0.00011127359,0.002476965,0.00028294942,0.00005665273,0.9314946,0.029856142,0.03443365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017557355,0.00003708295,0.0021697101,0.0007851555,0.0000088154775,0.0001911061,0.0063102376,0.0006543446,0.00035461775,0.4101812,0.57924396,0.00004621743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006007515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004186122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023164414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008689128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074992226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091341555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926525404","doi":"10.7202/1058196ar","title":"Expanding the Parameters of Participatory Public Law: A Democratic Right to Public Participation and the State’s Duty of Public Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Duty; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Public administration; Public law; Deliberation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07749659188114771,"score_gpt":0.32268579658395175,"score_spread":0.24518920470280403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926525404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253629,0.0054867477,0.07533043,0.10889062,0.00033131428,0.0002491751,0.00012663903,0.00012733683,0.7369214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175086,0.0011614527,0.008433491,0.00482736,0.000108548345,0.00012500904,0.000031510117,0.00002955109,0.013532296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98088753,0.0070689623,0.00039721958,0.0015560128,0.005894862,0.004195485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914506,0.004464362,0.00052566756,0.0012338276,0.0014982331,0.000827298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011520496,0.00042575347,0.0005403076,0.0015302438,0.014253646,0.013463165,0.0024025135,0.006008671,0.005926039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016167589,0.00042952425,0.00071605766,0.0016343497,0.05301705,0.010811745,0.010226217,0.008296274,0.00053330406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005213261,0.0000050582858,0.00022795328,0.000017170549,0.0000019343004,0.000041787247,0.0034462584,0.00027512913,0.00008533977,0.99067664,0.00082105567,0.004396455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003185458,0.000020088095,0.0023125017,0.00032761157,0.000020120018,0.00014343444,0.007382208,0.0016028692,0.00055555615,0.83522284,0.1523246,0.000056259694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46270743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55628973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46270743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03778911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926861112","doi":"10.7202/1058192ar","title":"Law Enforcement Access to Encrypted Data: Legislative Responses and the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Encryption; Enforcement; Charter; Law enforcement; Law; Legislature; Perpetuity; Context (archaeology); Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07273824518349938,"score_gpt":0.34704594891788465,"score_spread":0.2743077037343853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926861112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047287155,0.004056854,0.026525434,0.6758965,0.0039528864,0.0003209075,0.00013545563,0.00040103722,0.24142376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7275233,0.0031742726,0.016089804,0.20850363,0.004558939,0.00059946923,0.00010367007,0.00020746108,0.039239403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94167876,0.02698385,0.004025668,0.006727791,0.014858433,0.005725569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88284826,0.08107431,0.010191022,0.009903718,0.0132324835,0.00275009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07480142,0.0006192927,0.00071540795,0.0023184812,0.014131637,0.020594379,0.0040302034,0.027306655,0.005686551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13092858,0.0010962187,0.0015622259,0.0017942548,0.03439748,0.017112043,0.009191496,0.024322713,0.0010159333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026511005,0.00006309952,0.0008590242,0.000047910642,0.000010655113,0.00027812205,0.0057127,0.00044543023,0.00042879567,0.9621272,0.021645712,0.008354933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016069808,0.000283467,0.0040410827,0.0010949721,0.000098518074,0.0005957431,0.010212323,0.0038643496,0.002888829,0.41429904,0.5620843,0.00037663602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016301744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013474201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07480142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009671481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018796712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39559245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927641725","doi":"10.7202/1058193ar","title":"Origines et évolution du droit québécois de l’absence : de l’existence incertaine aux présomptions de vie et de mort","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Legal Studies and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024222988003820636,"score_gpt":0.31339820951676034,"score_spread":0.28917522151293973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927641725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.725427,0.001913984,0.0031569789,0.013252129,0.00014990494,0.00005371085,0.0005100553,0.00003826867,0.25549808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95447284,0.0004703014,0.00042099837,0.0004319315,0.000014853191,0.000013538127,0.00009110039,0.000021113721,0.04406318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876994,0.00020605481,0.000022820166,0.00019677758,0.00032344094,0.00048086236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831307,0.00019121844,0.00022319144,0.00010950382,0.0006169823,0.0005460861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095647114,0.0002558561,0.00030812062,0.0011964815,0.009262962,0.0038057144,0.00091242633,0.0008754468,0.008846406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019357197,0.00022796787,0.00021526402,0.0011915007,0.011238588,0.0014251494,0.0025780175,0.002376977,0.00043686692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016078517,0.000063862855,0.088481314,0.00018462948,0.00006231617,0.0012201052,0.20121285,0.0010291022,0.0024677874,0.6278038,0.013848652,0.063464835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022674807,0.00007891486,0.30021697,0.0006326708,0.000049292048,0.0004801241,0.12611976,0.0011482373,0.0009568786,0.017024728,0.5530893,0.00018049292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9370683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06293172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034859575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02751117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2529251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934123938","doi":"10.7202/1058194ar","title":"Le concept d’autonomie dans l’arrêt Carter c. Canada : Au-delà du libre-choix","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018683003179403454,"score_gpt":0.2876177974635624,"score_spread":0.26893479428415895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934123938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14764762,0.0059732087,0.016403439,0.06565959,0.0007955661,0.00011629266,0.00057418365,0.00010362674,0.7627264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80676067,0.0025032505,0.0042314506,0.0043007433,0.000079087265,0.000060741797,0.00011566277,0.00008721414,0.18186119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980471,0.0003274908,0.00003647789,0.0002899682,0.0007941775,0.00050476886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997914,0.00038215096,0.00016346997,0.000091423106,0.000992964,0.0004559961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001209387,0.00033961603,0.00025744102,0.0012853434,0.015219506,0.0069160145,0.0009657601,0.0019621565,0.011012641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025924635,0.00027947858,0.00033408488,0.00193446,0.015890598,0.002838377,0.0022428008,0.003823054,0.0006361933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028924256,0.000008420249,0.0022478753,0.000044140663,0.000006643069,0.00018695406,0.02316672,0.00027805008,0.0003514916,0.94957745,0.013014508,0.011088748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021254991,0.000035304867,0.017182311,0.00039239958,0.00004131267,0.00025546143,0.05569169,0.0009163244,0.0010936145,0.07653236,0.84765524,0.00018271811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9563324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069482125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069482125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08859217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934581520","doi":"10.7202/1058195ar","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.019515672917165435,"score_gpt":0.24858846533777462,"score_spread":0.22907279242060918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934581520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045611504,0.016019477,0.0043431,0.47029,0.001565814,0.000076915145,0.00039367392,0.00015611938,0.46154344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014517,0.009691223,0.002992944,0.11158794,0.0008184735,0.00007839648,0.00013693323,0.000117300915,0.07312511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899149,0.00088222226,0.00020258415,0.0011308955,0.004562595,0.0033067926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073607,0.004004858,0.00041222342,0.0003181121,0.002867168,0.0016616383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056455024,0.00046598952,0.00078928354,0.0023532216,0.03069929,0.016044829,0.0037739018,0.015121842,0.012956718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017311562,0.00082617265,0.00066504505,0.002747323,0.028575465,0.0060079847,0.0051992885,0.016098803,0.00057799974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012149479,0.000012316443,0.0008482063,0.000034150733,0.000006543435,0.00022352312,0.0027411985,0.00021368732,0.00007703734,0.9494879,0.035591193,0.0107521005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016177127,0.00004635669,0.008250225,0.00094506657,0.00011268979,0.0003606225,0.011507806,0.003382184,0.0006230038,0.3748215,0.59951025,0.00027840235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98976654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99272776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15550499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27536583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941441854","doi":"10.7202/1066340ar","title":"Extra-Territorial “Fiduciary” Obligations and Ensuring Respect for International Humanitarian Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Human rights; International law; Political science; Law; Treaty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; International humanitarian law; Sociology; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.029423599918070833,"score_gpt":0.3045859863553015,"score_spread":0.2751623864372307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941441854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03746423,0.0023523306,0.064198196,0.044280052,0.00041867033,0.00015285674,0.000052040865,0.00013686591,0.8509448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513109,0.0007279588,0.014410226,0.0075287027,0.0002215258,0.00021298669,0.000054384862,0.00007563627,0.025457703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755249,0.014210745,0.001402904,0.002428206,0.0037146856,0.0027184528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833897,0.00706384,0.002034386,0.0037430967,0.0024636772,0.0013053251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025723116,0.0004039555,0.0006647209,0.0009405791,0.0052396343,0.012920344,0.0021616512,0.007530351,0.0053928685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028458653,0.00046659468,0.00063025876,0.00067313504,0.046364922,0.009796458,0.010149916,0.005927691,0.001517731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036691054,0.0000060094494,0.0001497619,0.000018814999,0.0000023999557,0.00004079191,0.0032523528,0.00017008078,0.00014150277,0.99142283,0.0012442841,0.0035474678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616634,0.000028788438,0.0006678531,0.0003222801,0.000011716571,0.00018570479,0.0029507799,0.00043961033,0.0004619259,0.89343035,0.10145331,0.000031414434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053171865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058878777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025723116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047635566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011761538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13603848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946420703","doi":"10.7202/1067518ar","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; State (computer science); Federal law; Competition (biology); Consolidation (business); Political economy; Law; Economics; Legislation; Accounting; Politics; History","score_opus":0.07637408542294566,"score_gpt":0.2640928476731368,"score_spread":0.18771876225019113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946420703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39456782,0.04089215,0.0009913387,0.059958942,0.000994887,0.000053890795,0.0015952736,0.00005883466,0.5008868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753983,0.012105893,0.00034005215,0.0031147276,0.00011692984,0.00001283729,0.00032191226,0.000030484158,0.0085587725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965132,0.00035132124,0.000058613048,0.00028663754,0.0011974183,0.0015929261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957222,0.0008133882,0.0003629881,0.000076800476,0.002214777,0.0008097699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016512249,0.00024666826,0.00030867365,0.0061960365,0.026614718,0.009714154,0.001013755,0.0015739369,0.00375823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005765924,0.00026269726,0.00025217157,0.011803961,0.012131303,0.0027822794,0.0027245318,0.003511802,0.00016427315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009475775,0.00005129397,0.027028374,0.00024651038,0.000051151528,0.0011903913,0.15858561,0.00064452604,0.00045661264,0.70436335,0.04936556,0.057921883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011546206,0.000031600437,0.09521678,0.00077815616,0.00006448469,0.0005008496,0.14684726,0.00038093148,0.0004273495,0.009632283,0.7459832,0.00012551153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19276525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19276525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13541582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93627787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.13267640555325838,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.23636146091734722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946648245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474949,0.005282845,0.0029575634,0.12490142,0.0025948093,0.00026792692,0.000097938464,0.00009898139,0.3163036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315285,0.0018479202,0.0011317395,0.025557645,0.0012038966,0.00014098333,0.000040500632,0.00020263607,0.0383462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97121227,0.015381742,0.000838932,0.0025657467,0.005929635,0.0040717116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611871,0.028510354,0.0020535234,0.00095115876,0.003192021,0.004105795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015042932,0.0010485112,0.001155614,0.0055621234,0.07246704,0.0253062,0.0043713404,0.015168727,0.0077979965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053638767,0.0009644065,0.0010176764,0.0052034557,0.028402472,0.010828118,0.016940298,0.020403832,0.0012156409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025901705,0.00008051419,0.0014111141,0.000077485594,0.000009178404,0.017183883,0.89915574,0.0000507665,0.00044351578,0.0561168,0.019024244,0.0064208847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014719684,0.00003592721,0.0016310549,0.00034687063,0.000016160924,0.0033393586,0.7721323,0.00021478943,0.00040894002,0.0076433285,0.21415456,0.000062121006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05005175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10488929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07246704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018577985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008846222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13479334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947703422","doi":"10.7202/1066342ar","title":"The Private Law State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Commercial law; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Liability","score_opus":0.018253781736423332,"score_gpt":0.29304985253850757,"score_spread":0.27479607080208424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947703422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013539182,0.0028746007,0.02546976,0.04609429,0.0007290288,0.00005070758,0.00020972615,0.00011618708,0.9109165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8449132,0.0027632138,0.0055146897,0.014121147,0.001093624,0.00014713006,0.00022869134,0.00013205191,0.13108627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958967,0.0012847392,0.00014992639,0.0012022243,0.0009122216,0.00055413845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705005,0.0010545371,0.000235407,0.0007833132,0.0005937038,0.00028287095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033711866,0.00035750517,0.00041754916,0.0010548045,0.00470585,0.011401413,0.0008439432,0.0035913647,0.015079049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066487077,0.00030757088,0.00045461764,0.00088596233,0.024849076,0.011691274,0.005091075,0.0053845136,0.0022274517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001317871,0.0000022782451,0.00006294665,0.000004078474,0.0000010833379,0.000006283973,0.0005672762,0.000022369677,0.000020567386,0.994752,0.0022925748,0.002267346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052276446,0.000007671568,0.00028590165,0.000079165206,0.000006540984,0.00004389456,0.0012220221,0.00023455001,0.00012144078,0.7489389,0.24904524,0.00000937836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007487271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051199966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015079049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00661174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007320963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050444424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998893351","doi":"10.7202/1066335ar","title":"La compétence concurrente en matière d’immigration : rendre aux provinces canadiennes ce qu’elles ont perdu","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Immigration; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.011676544188732764,"score_gpt":0.23550787436310855,"score_spread":0.2238313301743758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998893351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2591716,0.004127443,0.0032968256,0.034679156,0.00041859425,0.00007840716,0.00023824503,0.0000429933,0.6979467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364551,0.0012670687,0.00097060483,0.0014658597,0.000047456724,0.00003465035,0.000054883225,0.0000196051,0.059684813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625057,0.000566559,0.000084280015,0.00043517957,0.000931137,0.0017323294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735993,0.0006749291,0.00020636508,0.0001586762,0.0008457329,0.0007543195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020580296,0.00024503213,0.0003653463,0.0014546541,0.014835502,0.0073842006,0.0010514696,0.0020452207,0.0065081683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056653987,0.0002321574,0.00041186318,0.0028208538,0.014738845,0.0028623953,0.0042705573,0.0034878994,0.00045858804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041337273,0.000021282236,0.007557084,0.00007656168,0.000007907178,0.00033871373,0.13834514,0.00027115218,0.00030195975,0.8233399,0.007590128,0.022108844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037979928,0.000050161485,0.07092173,0.0006476275,0.000037078335,0.00038336607,0.15214968,0.00062778895,0.00062603684,0.04509408,0.72931385,0.00011060503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9228422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058483772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08547752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42433143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999232322","doi":"10.7202/1066334ar","title":"Droit et culture : une approche distributive de l’identité","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05964993740228157,"score_gpt":0.3674861599701538,"score_spread":0.30783622256787224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999232322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15657493,0.017820776,0.22502762,0.053805675,0.0017691206,0.0007593449,0.0011862637,0.00020359899,0.5428526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92175436,0.006445181,0.040237144,0.0032064486,0.0006695192,0.0006879732,0.000364105,0.00017060748,0.02646471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98148143,0.01197496,0.0006081499,0.0024726896,0.0028778985,0.00058480934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765742,0.014668084,0.001873308,0.0022603648,0.0039762757,0.0006477845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01624919,0.0010430779,0.00088247855,0.0074550835,0.0067674653,0.0158507,0.0035403515,0.0027745652,0.016169408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03021268,0.00082806457,0.0010367814,0.007827823,0.020279825,0.017402543,0.00828331,0.0039007806,0.0013830311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848479,0.000056885718,0.041982863,0.0003361056,0.00014446618,0.00023014582,0.08774325,0.00055857346,0.00014024139,0.7492507,0.00533516,0.11412304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005325607,0.0001348967,0.05131432,0.0029322873,0.00026461566,0.0008582546,0.13397378,0.0051610074,0.00045660153,0.53829765,0.2664412,0.00011221877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026908105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033217687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026908105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008693828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061502163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000048186","doi":"10.7202/1066337ar","title":"David a déjà vaincu Goliath ... L’efficacité de la protection contre les clauses abusives selon un paradigme de prévention : inspirations du droit belge","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021551056165149518,"score_gpt":0.2801893528066505,"score_spread":0.258638296641501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000048186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0479804,0.050250072,0.010221784,0.31046283,0.0058882637,0.00009588384,0.00045843105,0.00020840508,0.5744339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5704231,0.017109975,0.0048315697,0.030666294,0.00068476907,0.000071538954,0.00017970044,0.00021393628,0.3758192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997844,0.0008607995,0.000042021507,0.00025795778,0.00061515515,0.00038016148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822634,0.00054241106,0.00021289987,0.0000805742,0.0006876669,0.00025006814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017135824,0.00048647952,0.00028566198,0.0011496586,0.00763022,0.0064802947,0.00076173147,0.0025614798,0.016392082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031787222,0.00028086948,0.0003004903,0.001044883,0.009567263,0.0023392276,0.0015365903,0.0031201567,0.003064394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007179469,0.00004018052,0.004671618,0.0002731478,0.000026139756,0.00030254174,0.02479213,0.00047722517,0.0006179119,0.6513571,0.23989856,0.07747171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013595533,0.000020205038,0.0049327253,0.00036623777,0.00001521665,0.00014669208,0.0069169234,0.00025087598,0.00046989412,0.01599969,0.97083586,0.00003219037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36552548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4581667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36552548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015318325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014712804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7267958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000221256","doi":"10.7202/1066336ar","title":"Is “Truthtelling” Decontextualized Online Still Reasonable? Restoring Context to Defamation Analysis in the Digital Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Harm; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04838881685359261,"score_gpt":0.3310091419049802,"score_spread":0.2826203250513876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000221256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10523415,0.0034737613,0.22341244,0.08094993,0.0011317704,0.00015240154,0.00022295311,0.00044188777,0.5849807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97108996,0.0006553322,0.009821269,0.0042064656,0.00047488295,0.000089841786,0.00006814444,0.00012847428,0.013465664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233294,0.004218009,0.00038063497,0.0010544767,0.0012602406,0.00075366267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879589,0.0074479477,0.0007508597,0.0023138847,0.0012285645,0.0002997937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007218859,0.00030812764,0.000492413,0.0013078904,0.0047235223,0.017028093,0.0020460335,0.006051086,0.0072952253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019726088,0.00031260093,0.00066572294,0.0008049453,0.027910264,0.018946847,0.0051740226,0.0071498333,0.0011070352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058653713,0.0000037401014,0.00010001888,0.0000135163355,0.0000015832101,0.00009466031,0.003669868,0.00009947258,0.00009499673,0.992912,0.0007067918,0.0022973462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008383921,0.000016420934,0.00021368368,0.00017162372,0.000015180741,0.00016832844,0.004670678,0.0013221288,0.00085367577,0.91821444,0.074326046,0.00001946712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042840443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028753893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017028093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004447607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034388294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03817737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008263108","doi":"10.7202/1067517ar","title":"🗨, 📖, ⚖ : que pensent les tribunaux des émojis, émoticônes et autres pictogrammes?*","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.06660858882000344,"score_gpt":0.3112146181658438,"score_spread":0.24460602934584036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008263108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26005414,0.007768179,0.046084218,0.047325883,0.0019156138,0.000074540025,0.00023830592,0.0002775553,0.6362615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96069354,0.0014060679,0.003805329,0.0016523796,0.00023118808,0.000053016283,0.000041532163,0.00008701236,0.03202985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958395,0.0028528336,0.00013650977,0.00031176492,0.0006397593,0.00021970994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962613,0.001902858,0.00053370965,0.00042809383,0.000703848,0.00017019922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050196396,0.00034827608,0.00031613448,0.0015996842,0.0030712937,0.007860272,0.0004672982,0.0009995835,0.005071811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012353309,0.00021530694,0.00019321687,0.0017493863,0.015055854,0.00575467,0.002017651,0.0020363822,0.001093495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008299208,0.000017844426,0.0074259485,0.00020095783,0.000020925072,0.00021691433,0.1971927,0.00014189183,0.002296969,0.7127086,0.009466878,0.07022741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022961098,0.000121518904,0.045806162,0.0009422462,0.000063303254,0.0012651345,0.29611844,0.0013162176,0.0038950178,0.1632773,0.48703408,0.00013765141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008809552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010432924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008809552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019489977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015860904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026546657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008613337","doi":"10.7202/1067520ar","title":"King Rex v. Judge Judex: Adjudicating Transnational law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977516048451073,"score_gpt":0.31569036282098006,"score_spread":0.28591520233646933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008613337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07984665,0.0062654167,0.010220724,0.16737875,0.0026444634,0.00015138484,0.00030617346,0.00018550533,0.7330009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752857,0.001856957,0.003564733,0.09524635,0.00092737004,0.00014484956,0.000092722454,0.00011883984,0.14519104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076825,0.002899588,0.0005981116,0.0012116458,0.0024667461,0.0020556666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882633,0.007976716,0.0004994177,0.0009092216,0.0018915192,0.00045982705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010125522,0.0003962419,0.00071131915,0.0011189502,0.009068937,0.0096648205,0.0019426701,0.026011616,0.005175587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033783887,0.00053651846,0.0006125914,0.0013239898,0.010413871,0.007401658,0.005027455,0.012868882,0.0015604494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005974346,0.000012805951,0.001018687,0.000044105705,0.000013841069,0.00041526218,0.0061846836,0.00012165855,0.0003868728,0.93206847,0.053726777,0.0059471168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013242458,0.00008415308,0.005086122,0.0009093895,0.00019982191,0.0005396684,0.013763893,0.0018780368,0.0037285786,0.49486482,0.47864157,0.00017153824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089022845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13092196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089022845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056955474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013188218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17700934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008912886","doi":"10.7202/1067516ar","title":"Hybrid Torts and Explanatory Tort Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Law and economics; Cause of action; Delict; Argument (complex analysis); Equity (law); Action (physics); Sociology; Political science; Private law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.07165384993003572,"score_gpt":0.3877047057562384,"score_spread":0.3160508558262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008912886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11865308,0.012024715,0.34282348,0.095321074,0.0007209584,0.000112760084,0.00033696237,0.00031497222,0.42969206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97679454,0.0016078888,0.009506777,0.0021944365,0.00029886796,0.0000823614,0.000114474264,0.000043944638,0.009356623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977704,0.001157172,0.00006246715,0.000268131,0.00052519585,0.00021661914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948965,0.0034797941,0.00050679425,0.0005901265,0.0003246234,0.00020215099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003935108,0.00049897877,0.0004600451,0.0028252192,0.0026035197,0.004046703,0.0018096399,0.0033957828,0.0074185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005811383,0.00034289784,0.0008843935,0.0019596433,0.022360919,0.008232266,0.0035332008,0.0038972911,0.0005122264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010187383,0.0000027622573,0.00013674141,0.0000061247015,0.0000016444873,0.000017055834,0.0002585859,0.00026860874,0.0000044898375,0.9983449,0.00024717516,0.00071090687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037230911,0.0000032479634,0.00016476132,0.000028294477,0.0000028773632,0.000047817957,0.00033652637,0.0014385569,0.000018224853,0.98981863,0.008133798,0.0000035230462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002600129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019396851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037402534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015627653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027137578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009004270","doi":"10.7202/1067519ar","title":"L’importation interprovinciale des boissons alcoolisées à des fins personnelles : R c. Comeau et la confirmation de règles de droit de la période de la prohibition","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0184787787578569,"score_gpt":0.28177919435788495,"score_spread":0.26330041560002804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009004270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5659757,0.013089388,0.003820649,0.18206054,0.00086235773,0.00019050376,0.0013493018,0.000055995286,0.2325956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764797,0.005118895,0.0021250853,0.009151422,0.00009311702,0.000055301807,0.00027975856,0.000031679112,0.10666511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852604,0.0002581245,0.00004508002,0.00021137683,0.0003534623,0.00060602505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683243,0.0009524598,0.000430916,0.00009925502,0.0013021611,0.00038285294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018244113,0.00021479289,0.00017487735,0.00090264314,0.006013971,0.003608695,0.00081703346,0.0012349226,0.006097082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042366376,0.00021333722,0.0003415188,0.0014678926,0.003988539,0.0012822041,0.0015427609,0.0018921035,0.00029773216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000588408,0.00012440539,0.28918257,0.000796961,0.000121841156,0.0037215352,0.13586184,0.0013763903,0.0047657704,0.37545282,0.07803038,0.10997709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037481313,0.00010062099,0.3114047,0.0008153779,0.00009864958,0.00039268678,0.107909076,0.000770017,0.0047231964,0.0093450425,0.56420773,0.00019541562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96407497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039109595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039109595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05753664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28376132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043009569","doi":"10.7202/1070287ar","title":"Who’s Afraid of the Lucky MOOSE? Canada’s Dangerous Self-Defence Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self defense; Law; Honour; Property (philosophy); Accident (philosophy); Homicide; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Philosophy; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.04184741893304051,"score_gpt":0.269954528803408,"score_spread":0.22810710987036747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043009569","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06651567,0.010820197,0.0020735164,0.5776172,0.0011260968,0.00003509066,0.000252807,0.000069058115,0.34149036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8553791,0.007461132,0.0013802175,0.066435635,0.00021359332,0.000024347813,0.00010207207,0.00007337952,0.068930395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993519,0.0010009755,0.00009450614,0.00063069595,0.00284228,0.0019125408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887106,0.0029465521,0.00040646034,0.0005213542,0.0051401425,0.00227488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055377902,0.00026183733,0.00036995782,0.0011119578,0.022647401,0.0105689075,0.0017656839,0.0044521634,0.0072549297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017045604,0.00025300725,0.00034416758,0.0014957936,0.022331411,0.0039118365,0.0035761679,0.008156561,0.0004953789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004252993,0.000020709116,0.007310439,0.00011711039,0.000027394593,0.00062310405,0.026762357,0.00026381973,0.00031390766,0.7470268,0.16673943,0.05075238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014518621,0.000026517004,0.01082192,0.000548879,0.00004516876,0.00031915668,0.029220076,0.00042867454,0.000525769,0.054395553,0.90352225,0.00013149517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98462844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99166507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08719477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08719477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14860652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6326453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043381337","doi":"10.7202/1070284ar","title":"Le droit à l’égalité et l’accès aux professions réglementées : bilan contrasté de la jurisprudence canadienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11022199512322442,"score_gpt":0.4429821479100602,"score_spread":0.3327601527868358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043381337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2936737,0.010864585,0.0035006984,0.09048315,0.00043088532,0.000058248293,0.000079308156,0.000026277858,0.60088307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548432,0.0024090535,0.0005885642,0.0059139207,0.00006957869,0.000028668275,0.000019726183,0.000019633133,0.03610774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910601,0.0029478753,0.0001802961,0.00085873884,0.0029630405,0.001990016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929645,0.0032282702,0.0005093725,0.00037840713,0.0016833829,0.0012361394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050205234,0.0002971168,0.00053304643,0.0018278038,0.023949068,0.014375767,0.0013839469,0.00429325,0.005814199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008329903,0.00028338685,0.00031168852,0.0026089326,0.05253145,0.003031084,0.0067998115,0.0067570694,0.0005144204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023205932,0.00002364098,0.003308894,0.0000771213,0.000009258506,0.0004275349,0.2709209,0.0001005742,0.00027098352,0.7098003,0.0036238392,0.011413763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028796581,0.000057634894,0.023376402,0.001095514,0.000040980685,0.00048791358,0.4073903,0.00033401512,0.00043755292,0.071394615,0.49525252,0.000103839215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75968397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8456224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045232695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06992044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48346257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045858969","doi":"10.7202/1074155ar","title":"I Robot: U Tax? Considering the Tax Policy Implications of Automation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Revenue; Tax revenue; Automation; Income tax; Business; Capital (architecture); Economics; Human capital; Basic income; Public economics; Finance; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.08154816508986898,"score_gpt":0.2643592183264339,"score_spread":0.1828110532365649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045858969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007944274,0.0024093192,0.001090487,0.93875927,0.0036437255,0.000020843901,0.00006216925,0.000052729214,0.046017148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26370555,0.006067468,0.0021306688,0.65832174,0.0051307287,0.00008048682,0.00011122243,0.0001770228,0.06427507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460876,0.002283272,0.000197152,0.00047803967,0.0010867071,0.0013460178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935529,0.0035279538,0.00039021327,0.00018620801,0.0012006721,0.0011420436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067906557,0.0004106853,0.0003945457,0.0008027029,0.0145215625,0.011174622,0.0013821668,0.016177822,0.008608712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016526643,0.0003799778,0.0006115236,0.0012452994,0.008634087,0.016882403,0.0032486322,0.018361475,0.0018297179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023599443,0.00006257827,0.0026872363,0.000056822424,0.000009423276,0.00038960032,0.013435256,0.00029762485,0.00015352636,0.24081548,0.715628,0.026440896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013470466,0.00004126462,0.0015089546,0.00019479381,0.000007521241,0.00019827447,0.023476684,0.00060067186,0.00019619077,0.033285983,0.9404204,0.00005587684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03743695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042016547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03743695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008433743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008714765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074438095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081936494","doi":"10.7202/1075519ar","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Common law; Law; Political science; Cornerstone; Legal culture; Comparative law; Public law; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.16479050332137934,"score_gpt":0.3890236582032524,"score_spread":0.22423315488187306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081936494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010507312,0.0070545278,0.5983639,0.0685713,0.001119752,0.0002930117,0.00018832402,0.00029191584,0.31361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76679313,0.0044227485,0.18126805,0.010993098,0.0014409146,0.0012501888,0.00018029237,0.0003037217,0.033347838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95612305,0.031836588,0.0014407309,0.004506907,0.004662149,0.0014305767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96552837,0.022330256,0.0019309035,0.0068557323,0.0025481924,0.0008065201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061314527,0.0007221262,0.0010673093,0.0031121091,0.006247754,0.014948637,0.0027235849,0.004190987,0.0045317863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040304944,0.00053921796,0.00129566,0.00220113,0.06854255,0.0149708,0.008608912,0.008465364,0.00096020283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9531227e-7,0.0000019555735,0.000023629844,0.000010045623,0.000001986917,0.0000052043447,0.00030537718,0.00009555194,0.000009017979,0.99823904,0.0002883788,0.0010189108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005168362,0.0000049580985,0.000024131454,0.00003798594,0.0000027623043,0.000010829143,0.000114970135,0.00025944773,0.00005158147,0.98187286,0.017611336,0.0000039357915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033449393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061314527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011034766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016053721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32426608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091886512","doi":"10.7202/1071748ar","title":"Eligible Non-participation in Canadian Social Welfare Programs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Welfare; Odds; Government (linguistics); Revenue; Intermediary; Public administration; Politics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Finance; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03711161722281342,"score_gpt":0.32092134555345386,"score_spread":0.28380972833064044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091886512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029858,0.00096431177,0.0019935751,0.008374016,0.000076254386,0.0008288604,0.0045795785,0.00008077984,0.18011683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812728,0.00040066266,0.0006548736,0.00066989736,0.000018006374,0.0001862869,0.0007802558,0.00001238912,0.016004857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844619,0.0016761204,0.00026591698,0.00060853915,0.0061211498,0.0068663876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904516,0.0019589171,0.0013618623,0.00042175452,0.003313954,0.0024919722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050519314,0.00033819152,0.00043201415,0.00330873,0.006895448,0.0033184388,0.0018954653,0.0009571093,0.0062015885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01586073,0.00030286887,0.00058607344,0.004043397,0.0022849904,0.00084220007,0.0040633646,0.0015948586,0.00027267847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004681497,0.0004832889,0.5178465,0.0006901255,0.0001816448,0.0010242522,0.04768493,0.0029301718,0.0020897007,0.17919779,0.04419194,0.20321162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046925903,0.0001192076,0.8639338,0.00038635402,0.00011408298,0.00016187914,0.020694114,0.0030630494,0.0010415638,0.0055888984,0.10472992,0.00012018829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96965754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98818076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04452789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08287643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32307398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092071758","doi":"10.7202/1071747ar","title":"A Tale of Two Metaphors: A Narrative Take on the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07055643361135451,"score_gpt":0.3173559824964412,"score_spread":0.2467995488850867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092071758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24025108,0.009334264,0.011256523,0.108992726,0.0012881702,0.00012157462,0.0005165264,0.0001472232,0.62809193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671252,0.001708204,0.0021727146,0.0021754722,0.000059528196,0.000034551947,0.000082187,0.00007386796,0.026568454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635845,0.0016823467,0.000041812113,0.00026907114,0.00093189266,0.00071644405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979722,0.00086881197,0.00012876617,0.00011823034,0.00046923882,0.00044280454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025977672,0.0008518323,0.00041007885,0.0031854936,0.03734144,0.011305282,0.0019139224,0.002927038,0.005690284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005641954,0.00036446602,0.0004411608,0.0032694764,0.03942823,0.007192296,0.0046791057,0.0047691213,0.00031021395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028348388,0.000009089318,0.00089764106,0.000048669644,0.0000052257424,0.0007807555,0.5262675,0.00019189695,0.0003515877,0.4489315,0.015327727,0.0071601113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008903516,0.000011610293,0.0015017352,0.00023975903,0.00001485727,0.0003752997,0.51381636,0.00043293982,0.00026413592,0.030552432,0.4527232,0.00005872579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9068074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9415409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09319258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068661965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035871096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49817973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092308306","doi":"10.7202/1071749ar","title":"L’évolution récente du concept d’indépendance judiciaire et les menaces internes à la détermination de la peine juste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035899695317970604,"score_gpt":0.3385506678202538,"score_spread":0.3026509725022832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092308306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056802034,0.06183598,0.31342277,0.08658572,0.0056056953,0.00016892626,0.00036459358,0.00018766889,0.4750266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7973767,0.02939102,0.09822699,0.010561574,0.0041086706,0.00035013273,0.00038875465,0.00033380694,0.05926237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98820114,0.0047412664,0.00076781516,0.0023449392,0.0033657246,0.00057910936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824354,0.009755106,0.001449403,0.0016772259,0.0040331422,0.0006498199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130291,0.0007162416,0.0007991456,0.0035887382,0.0041657123,0.011966875,0.00204882,0.004197506,0.0067026727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014626593,0.00070572464,0.0012717902,0.004794712,0.034341015,0.016806003,0.004293279,0.011954607,0.0009649723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062040604,0.000004516844,0.00025116012,0.000066189205,0.000008877978,0.000039114057,0.002739256,0.00010141942,0.000102952814,0.9887629,0.0008842291,0.007033163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013750394,0.000042561347,0.0031927302,0.00063112023,0.000035771478,0.0006446494,0.004553123,0.0011917431,0.00062170165,0.66556436,0.323427,0.00008146261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013055662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012864286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013055662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009138358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007977048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06630373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092406708","doi":"10.7202/1071746ar","title":"Avoir conscience de l’internormativité : contribution à l’étude de la conscience du droit en contexte pluraliste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conscience; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04628976683547152,"score_gpt":0.39218532525408223,"score_spread":0.3458955584186107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092406708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66564673,0.0079395855,0.0075962776,0.02294928,0.00027279303,0.0000314949,0.00003455111,0.000018936835,0.2955103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402905,0.001029175,0.00026053056,0.00051990035,0.00005531095,0.000008500145,0.0000067503447,0.00000558973,0.0040851254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997154,0.0016139703,0.00007827601,0.0002922592,0.00048823789,0.00037322243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490017,0.0029515566,0.0007762789,0.0003531572,0.00056509464,0.00045380826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038504514,0.00033632971,0.00024045687,0.0014872603,0.005424885,0.0065139676,0.0008561821,0.0014960428,0.0030362413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049153636,0.00014831996,0.00027188903,0.0016125566,0.03283006,0.0046535837,0.0043677287,0.0025945615,0.0001711601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024889932,0.000032941618,0.010006122,0.00011781534,0.000010897941,0.0006369548,0.60767734,0.00015048866,0.0003719192,0.3628444,0.0012044524,0.016921738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015926427,0.00007333664,0.045705587,0.00083353865,0.00003238013,0.001072664,0.6030501,0.0007103599,0.00060483976,0.14331333,0.20450836,0.000079573605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04268098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044366885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04268098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058056195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004669872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08486509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093446389","doi":"10.7202/1075597ar","title":"It’s the End of Working Time as We Know It: New Challenges to the Concept of Working Time in the Digital Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Labour law; Work (physics); The Internet; De facto; Incentive; Law and economics; Sociology; Telecommuting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.06978912799647338,"score_gpt":0.2857603874172603,"score_spread":0.2159712594207869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093446389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059617717,0.028059512,0.11218117,0.36928892,0.003766323,0.00006119491,0.00015359087,0.000098336925,0.42677325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366332,0.01197035,0.014156232,0.015509393,0.0028354912,0.00019976703,0.00010050484,0.00014998903,0.018445028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884122,0.0064543565,0.0004525716,0.0013374183,0.0023904613,0.0009529641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98465216,0.009683127,0.0010545972,0.0019066663,0.0012300002,0.0014735585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009743726,0.00042334304,0.00063999,0.0016919231,0.0077677285,0.019346116,0.002404615,0.005110608,0.004154707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012800855,0.0004177028,0.0007001751,0.001823657,0.07848138,0.029876685,0.008587832,0.010718702,0.00073799095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009243718,0.000008576184,0.00013997193,0.00002182337,0.0000016521736,0.00002670499,0.009346202,0.00008544676,0.000040147053,0.9831619,0.0012276853,0.0059306016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010800201,0.000022680884,0.00043779233,0.00026531907,0.0000045307165,0.00010550021,0.0136861205,0.00037427602,0.00010905019,0.864677,0.12027339,0.000033524077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010158672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066604773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019346116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009308021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071938736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067534745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109580876","doi":"10.7202/1075599ar","title":"The Presumption of Restraint and Implicit Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Statute; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042840599871330924,"score_gpt":0.3357891345843867,"score_spread":0.29294853471305576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109580876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09252226,0.0040542865,0.13288015,0.05016133,0.0006325415,0.000129154,0.00027352045,0.00010832051,0.7192385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660701,0.0009202366,0.010574927,0.0032590157,0.00033447976,0.00016767753,0.00007806562,0.00004364554,0.018551957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855261,0.0057825814,0.0010595917,0.0022022168,0.0043522627,0.0010771974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98057073,0.010266642,0.0017461057,0.0049234955,0.0020440246,0.00044897085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010703782,0.0004251403,0.0007581291,0.0018185255,0.0041713356,0.007320477,0.0036834893,0.006403366,0.0070082843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034323983,0.00070902717,0.000831051,0.0011850523,0.047029,0.013552419,0.008330297,0.009393176,0.0015394314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004652817,0.000006347952,0.00014525336,0.00001784427,0.0000026016116,0.000045169454,0.0008600767,0.00007189534,0.00009762699,0.9969086,0.00029038388,0.0015497238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018443445,0.000013510174,0.00037044115,0.00012181662,0.0000076255574,0.00008888655,0.00035027356,0.00043383185,0.00034875845,0.9856493,0.012584375,0.000012829855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006748262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004445912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010703782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046050497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045785713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056607723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05094792858388508,"score_gpt":0.3716267187745402,"score_spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121429145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015170686,0.006587342,0.031475898,0.083776236,0.0005947658,0.00006984131,0.00007065427,0.000056219615,0.8621983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94240534,0.006007369,0.011259811,0.012397634,0.001814769,0.00040891225,0.00008152742,0.00009469972,0.025529958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919115,0.003762299,0.0002799086,0.000951006,0.0019469998,0.0011483761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359715,0.003886468,0.00039477146,0.0010280105,0.0006252709,0.00046824393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010992183,0.00075491046,0.0009166818,0.0027780805,0.006149671,0.017711867,0.002432399,0.007851241,0.0068312823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011488021,0.00047165988,0.0011963419,0.0035222,0.05997504,0.022890901,0.009329335,0.007541354,0.00064579106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013126722,0.0000027929154,0.000056627297,0.0000036179047,7.353108e-7,0.000009290595,0.0003201971,0.00003698017,0.0000050130047,0.99833626,0.00028225544,0.0009450844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041208514,0.0000024074338,0.00013575786,0.00003765178,0.0000020593327,0.000023844941,0.00046999307,0.00025315856,0.000023623847,0.9876182,0.011425211,0.0000039504152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060397508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042595733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017711867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007987484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042833383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058132946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471502","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Theme (computing); Pedagogy; Politics; Legal education; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04796488995796207,"score_gpt":0.36687485666668146,"score_spread":0.3189099667087194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1843161,0.00093199377,0.0022053877,0.041023992,0.0011278131,0.00010466028,0.0002719444,0.00023895211,0.76977915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6439781,0.0006927134,0.0010158212,0.004439219,0.000047612015,0.000042451407,0.00012921025,0.00008802774,0.349567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870384,0.0001985326,0.000016640553,0.00014865323,0.00037025163,0.0005619902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896324,0.00011352318,0.000072044066,0.000046500594,0.00025018642,0.00055453856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005809164,0.00016804918,0.0001438674,0.00029692057,0.008073722,0.0037585602,0.0008555578,0.0009148686,0.02355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023065556,0.00014880755,0.00014467022,0.00031511916,0.004567506,0.0022275397,0.0034540899,0.0021554786,0.0017466124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006902261,0.00012410036,0.010579185,0.00018677587,0.000007292455,0.0007202452,0.07685002,0.00036922877,0.0024510238,0.42345458,0.3341256,0.15106292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006745616,0.00006166801,0.0070391158,0.00010243279,0.000004451535,0.00018262482,0.028805872,0.0001429263,0.00073169847,0.0056767045,0.9572258,0.000020000616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32218218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6862519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32218218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011338936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020894397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64061373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121482348","doi":"10.7202/1074417ar","title":"Un droit promotionnel de la diversité culturelle « en montagnes russes » : l’Union européenne et le Canada du cycle d’Uruguay à l’Accord Canada‒États-Unis‒Mexique (ACEUM)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0061720111706889055,"score_gpt":0.18742078583475166,"score_spread":0.18124877466406275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121482348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7019719,0.011755188,0.0029668242,0.017137552,0.00021968408,0.000052044667,0.00012041036,0.000028790955,0.26574764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772435,0.0015850392,0.0004746586,0.0005119241,0.000017770804,0.0000164779,0.000024203142,0.000012065151,0.020114351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983975,0.00046889205,0.00002860306,0.00015669591,0.00036462836,0.00058359234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848217,0.0003014042,0.0002543879,0.0000550058,0.00056435243,0.00034280948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015508735,0.00021320017,0.00023210696,0.00076238066,0.0070436765,0.0055977763,0.0005454778,0.0010394115,0.0037806882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002783142,0.00017957899,0.00016030014,0.001647831,0.0070089144,0.001616536,0.0022146737,0.0016730656,0.00015561587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019109897,0.000052424675,0.047238965,0.0002433371,0.000029015338,0.0006406385,0.12484574,0.00092598825,0.0013198497,0.7496538,0.006264827,0.0685943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045444784,0.00011850511,0.21522623,0.0012393012,0.00006927111,0.0003839804,0.18374547,0.0013071372,0.0013935689,0.027736733,0.5686058,0.00012860713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83905023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.889483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16094977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026125211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031739075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3237952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121549881","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism, and the Constitutionality of Canada's Private Copying Levy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Copying; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010743120386991588,"score_gpt":0.24142404904333215,"score_spread":0.23068092865634054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121549881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12060879,0.003442377,0.0029247412,0.083966516,0.00033810985,0.00012914345,0.0009366413,0.0001403341,0.7875132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334317,0.0010344597,0.0011409804,0.0083833365,0.00024053034,0.00008813421,0.00012405196,0.000060243423,0.05549649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962224,0.0009415536,0.00029100096,0.000961814,0.003866504,0.004316883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810612,0.009472025,0.0007745411,0.0013324786,0.005244525,0.0021151153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069574346,0.00041557438,0.0011226438,0.002767109,0.023235144,0.01809648,0.0033415346,0.011995449,0.015128539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03002274,0.0008576689,0.0008673349,0.0034546626,0.022509305,0.005068809,0.003429314,0.009683148,0.0005132131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022860164,0.000017036613,0.00081136654,0.000014211672,0.000010832146,0.00004638187,0.0007688874,0.0004643346,0.00008136865,0.9855774,0.009336207,0.0028490962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020918636,0.000040711733,0.01473191,0.0003408001,0.00019117954,0.000092147704,0.0035686926,0.0049091056,0.00087432226,0.74066645,0.23411079,0.00026469468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98496115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100379385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100379385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16084215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72830683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.023678146374099533,"score_gpt":0.2768374858055749,"score_spread":0.25315933943147534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122182973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07351072,0.019020347,0.038406026,0.05048405,0.00081010844,0.000051020324,0.0000800906,0.00005354875,0.817584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766236,0.0027047275,0.002556039,0.0016672387,0.00027910675,0.00003802919,0.00002349827,0.00004423748,0.016063578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940843,0.0031295957,0.00018948967,0.0005317,0.0015016946,0.0005632466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949191,0.0034165413,0.0002840156,0.0005396798,0.00054454885,0.0002961121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065385248,0.00034100914,0.000334689,0.0021040316,0.007623865,0.008093087,0.0013823865,0.003518764,0.002981489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011785071,0.00039536084,0.00031908034,0.0020440647,0.06919432,0.01120236,0.003922449,0.0048847566,0.0002965788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018292071,0.000001178907,0.000021516575,0.0000037017592,3.6523065e-7,0.00001071262,0.0021007375,0.00003630813,0.000005587725,0.99693584,0.00027974686,0.0006024959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046537043,0.000004396309,0.00012914899,0.00005625103,0.000001780557,0.000039936825,0.0017362017,0.00032272766,0.00004447947,0.9544254,0.04322835,0.000006556069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017011229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103239035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01888249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007549184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476906","doi":"10.7202/1042774ar","title":"“The Earth is Our Mother”: Freedom of Religion and the Preservation of Indigenous Sacred Sites in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; State (computer science); Supreme court; Religious persecution; Persecution; Law; Political science; Faith; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Human rights; Theology","score_opus":0.011550450499905109,"score_gpt":0.24821970703139423,"score_spread":0.23666925653148913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122476906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29227227,0.019756166,0.0020115173,0.1335226,0.0009931908,0.00020089188,0.00055273855,0.000057107707,0.5506334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009512,0.006679815,0.0014521946,0.016985418,0.00007771484,0.00003369467,0.00010806845,0.00003632209,0.073675595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959785,0.0003951881,0.00009128974,0.00030383284,0.0012833814,0.001947806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687564,0.0006352624,0.00016252242,0.00010571603,0.0009768751,0.0012439862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019220436,0.0002783962,0.00040424426,0.001210845,0.044019897,0.011308341,0.0022500267,0.0039989543,0.006307618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004245623,0.0004106193,0.00039458898,0.00192045,0.018133132,0.0022996902,0.004992786,0.0067222505,0.000240572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339445,0.00007911175,0.016719334,0.00023133395,0.000039568687,0.0027783806,0.07436311,0.0010152737,0.00082134374,0.778554,0.079275236,0.04606005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004949295,0.000049974697,0.053179804,0.0008397292,0.00009452821,0.00082999555,0.12319674,0.0014144595,0.0009999449,0.053790208,0.76525015,0.00030494982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99827313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15750204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15750204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26035526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602294","doi":"10.7202/1074419ar","title":"Les avis consultatifs au Canada : omniprésents, déterminants, banalisés et déroutants : Essai critique de Carissima Mathen, Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions, Oxford, Hart, 2019 et Kate Puddister, Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Politics; Ex parte; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027945566024496472,"score_gpt":0.31434958007070196,"score_spread":0.28640401404620547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041170444,0.072842576,0.0016410525,0.39745882,0.0010430941,0.00006688215,0.0009796042,0.00008171122,0.4847158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64855546,0.028398672,0.0011949965,0.048686888,0.00039411124,0.000065744054,0.00025854705,0.00014625919,0.27229932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298406,0.00093460875,0.00011077747,0.0005302689,0.0029856567,0.002454636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932968,0.0021166261,0.00031932758,0.00015750513,0.0030708995,0.001038809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024467702,0.00052222284,0.0004803412,0.003489572,0.03621869,0.019965624,0.0023669614,0.006737235,0.0139464885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009445797,0.00067700486,0.00036231885,0.007961901,0.019734766,0.005140021,0.0037789408,0.0057668644,0.0009422739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025174068,0.000020506464,0.002663334,0.00013852488,0.000016441303,0.000501596,0.050840463,0.0001852973,0.00014478237,0.65283877,0.26138514,0.031240026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400094,0.000007904807,0.01216554,0.0005140162,0.000025686133,0.00013214833,0.049455635,0.00036951806,0.00014719623,0.029814245,0.90728754,0.0000666952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99441916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15326925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15326925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21001725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122673644","doi":"10.7202/1074151ar","title":"Strategic Games and Algorithmic Secrecy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Construct (python library); Outcome (game theory); Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Public relations; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.10617122104491088,"score_gpt":0.3475608397624484,"score_spread":0.2413896187175375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122673644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1373465,0.0019205218,0.39339662,0.042503204,0.00036052082,0.00018927909,0.00019665045,0.00021257912,0.42387417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97508496,0.00052796124,0.015870318,0.0014918128,0.00014059953,0.00013380502,0.00003551998,0.000034094992,0.006680933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98819214,0.007252013,0.0005092278,0.0009650672,0.0019116998,0.0011698062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96788377,0.02228388,0.0034331882,0.0042155506,0.0014045149,0.00077914726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009860325,0.00061125087,0.00058485975,0.0011935437,0.0026601586,0.006228283,0.0013060669,0.0029975465,0.005578272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034269307,0.0003354494,0.0011065813,0.0010088831,0.02194594,0.007553008,0.0060328413,0.004711911,0.00077907904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037414256,0.000003897672,0.00015732452,0.000009715799,0.0000031159734,0.000016810658,0.00026663445,0.0011140463,0.00003893873,0.99703515,0.00018627776,0.0011642883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059761965,0.000005870888,0.00007925185,0.000018915853,0.0000034242203,0.000026385373,0.00013087573,0.0032785886,0.00011086494,0.9933304,0.0030046208,0.0000047435888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022023942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018093565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009860325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003202296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039907447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05214697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122989730","doi":"10.7202/1074418ar","title":"Criminal Law and Digital Technologies: An Institutional Approach to Rule Creation in a Rapidly Advancing and Complex Setting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Normative; Institution; Political science; Emerging technologies; Strengths and weaknesses; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028449072122355895,"score_gpt":0.29416837875582025,"score_spread":0.2657193066334643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122989730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056249067,0.0035353429,0.18473111,0.1298755,0.00037730773,0.00044494148,0.00013621281,0.00026155188,0.62438893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95686775,0.0010667532,0.024704149,0.0036149828,0.00016588972,0.0001799643,0.00003831789,0.000060516762,0.0133016445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716547,0.014265082,0.0011145902,0.0028911207,0.0062070885,0.003867388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671299,0.018519612,0.0029061662,0.004823464,0.00421627,0.0024045722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028151305,0.0004839215,0.0007212637,0.005924845,0.017069725,0.034807313,0.0057021375,0.00885068,0.004694318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040084828,0.0008563877,0.0011003944,0.0045714835,0.12617484,0.015546354,0.012054188,0.009948397,0.0005332555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017503877,0.00000493267,0.00023346662,0.000007301348,0.0000034435752,0.00003804135,0.0021156236,0.00040717184,0.000029765317,0.99506193,0.0003798755,0.0017165904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020060457,0.000017359105,0.00095727143,0.00018037925,0.000023503608,0.000085962296,0.0058784555,0.0028908637,0.00034657278,0.93926716,0.05028715,0.0000453164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23578726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2413364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23578726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052748047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0996036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.05662370584923329,"score_gpt":0.2501783787137477,"score_spread":0.19355467286451442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123801536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40948707,0.0067729475,0.0024666027,0.2701373,0.0010297762,0.00038727396,0.009165891,0.00013749892,0.30041564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355409,0.0014516502,0.0020503923,0.02907512,0.00026782596,0.000112499925,0.0011509088,0.00007603716,0.030274771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235095,0.0017087393,0.0005888009,0.0012192038,0.010383125,0.0037491603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462154,0.018575097,0.0036587769,0.0012445572,0.02626087,0.004045346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083782775,0.0005740922,0.0006483646,0.003968022,0.022312982,0.010150911,0.0033388867,0.0047337287,0.005194856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06020153,0.00047185956,0.0006234712,0.01165802,0.006824727,0.002487307,0.0021847873,0.0056490074,0.0004376754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652948,0.00016015893,0.35658324,0.00035976424,0.00026924998,0.00035332228,0.036783513,0.0014317485,0.0010432919,0.10770357,0.43580127,0.059245605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064730564,0.00009594827,0.70888245,0.0006970757,0.00040421588,0.000083476014,0.05119633,0.0013994096,0.0044700806,0.0057164747,0.22678904,0.0002007974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99571806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10517562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10517562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7631061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124583437","doi":"10.7202/1074153ar","title":"Tax Cryptographia: Exploring the Fiscal Design of Cryptocurrencies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Corporate governance; Politics; Economics; Business; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.18266736516594512,"score_gpt":0.23967625535358264,"score_spread":0.05700889018763752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124583437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27859885,0.0015347365,0.46983954,0.017456617,0.0003644245,0.00040551662,0.00020352713,0.00039507967,0.23120162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562507,0.00053537154,0.033311434,0.00031943212,0.000054826454,0.00010428223,0.00004989288,0.000067351626,0.009306694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966247,0.0020261833,0.00018146064,0.00025778342,0.0005907331,0.00031915685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917823,0.003908854,0.0011745384,0.0016475893,0.001135107,0.00035162753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051501207,0.00036865292,0.0003625237,0.0012424304,0.0021596455,0.0065653534,0.00091223686,0.0014207392,0.0074067228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020578086,0.0003990668,0.0004935257,0.0012240176,0.007604822,0.011398726,0.0022218355,0.0022497368,0.0006652711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020122352,0.000015987145,0.00044858595,0.000016841177,0.0000032926368,0.000029557637,0.00029623462,0.0019416707,0.00013639175,0.9919932,0.0003026962,0.0047953688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008924845,0.00006729262,0.0006058011,0.0001096264,0.000020495278,0.00015228307,0.0012451032,0.029589694,0.0017377057,0.93498063,0.0313779,0.000024135434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003388928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028489234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074067228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005264711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003756395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03819835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888583","doi":"10.7202/1074152ar","title":"Governing A.I.’s Professional Advice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Professional association; Legal profession; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06806531519421341,"score_gpt":0.3834765777206284,"score_spread":0.31541126252641494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124888583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0234039,0.0024488631,0.027737292,0.45840794,0.0016365552,0.00021956167,0.00012765253,0.00032535568,0.4856928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71626407,0.0018389989,0.016385691,0.17730968,0.0017909878,0.00039627837,0.000080254176,0.00022618205,0.08570792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966223,0.010812193,0.0018474025,0.005893275,0.009915167,0.0053090057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957832,0.02046731,0.0034793578,0.0037141952,0.0105399685,0.003967192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039098497,0.00030635143,0.0006649506,0.0010839413,0.008404652,0.009731802,0.0027005149,0.019048922,0.0064743725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07558633,0.00057606,0.00068870885,0.00076326285,0.020349715,0.006449517,0.00398738,0.015435525,0.0019786337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017020986,0.00003657477,0.0009317991,0.000032564047,0.000011888344,0.000121180165,0.0055712247,0.00023065736,0.00032202134,0.95172596,0.031062728,0.009936443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006206193,0.00006279458,0.002014781,0.00052678335,0.0000417985,0.00018205648,0.001989652,0.0019247842,0.00087491225,0.5086478,0.483574,0.00009856829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049551584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03870573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049551584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009788386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023858996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20677513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124941131","doi":"10.7202/1066341ar","title":"In Praise of Jus Cogens’ Conceptual Incoherence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal positivism; Jurisprudence; International law; Political science; CLARITY; Positivism; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.025326618857296496,"score_gpt":0.3071694049722342,"score_spread":0.28184278611493774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124941131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077919755,0.011367875,0.040996734,0.7575358,0.0084597515,0.00002841062,0.00013726516,0.00028215538,0.17340006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6285552,0.0052478863,0.03484973,0.24628112,0.01726874,0.0003079729,0.00012564275,0.0004559982,0.06690781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991041,0.0044337963,0.0003009728,0.0013143133,0.0023445904,0.00056520733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98208284,0.0125060035,0.0008585796,0.0016120768,0.0022387,0.00070181635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010772904,0.00074041495,0.000673834,0.0019246083,0.005287758,0.009064464,0.0029810145,0.008074444,0.0043269037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022132652,0.00031631353,0.0005905944,0.0011308936,0.04386537,0.013501858,0.0043156203,0.018101806,0.0010313748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004702397,0.0000048780707,0.000053764124,0.000015338857,0.0000021374665,0.00003215415,0.0018305358,0.000056779947,0.000021088394,0.97419655,0.021887366,0.0018947166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069605117,0.000008846079,0.00012729096,0.00006782186,0.0000034162395,0.00007625634,0.0007670465,0.0006248137,0.000103479804,0.82605076,0.17214495,0.000018393786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056925532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009125714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010772904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004737981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047090696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05697322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125361809","doi":"","title":"A Legal and Epidemiological Justification for Federal Authority in Public Health Emergencies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Public administration; Epidemiology; Public authority; Law; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.4445633343673583,"score_gpt":0.5121437152608671,"score_spread":0.06758038089350882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125361809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030765012,0.0013456398,0.011105299,0.80971855,0.0045148963,0.00018691983,0.00037677743,0.00011317589,0.14187387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7303417,0.00073055684,0.0075593158,0.23142122,0.007176663,0.00039379718,0.00016986325,0.00008944185,0.02211756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660199,0.010204652,0.002912786,0.0037371875,0.008685041,0.008440355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87213176,0.09451687,0.007188581,0.0054658274,0.014153273,0.006543773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041177567,0.0006149556,0.0015496012,0.0034294378,0.02035354,0.012657177,0.004123888,0.06955342,0.01052407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1422915,0.0017774565,0.002305703,0.0018027794,0.03708891,0.011051379,0.007412487,0.036679313,0.0012943108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061916144,0.00010190086,0.0022784423,0.000042011303,0.000024388777,0.00030188487,0.0016550912,0.00025686494,0.00018915358,0.9637197,0.028378228,0.0029904007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006021288,0.00021912772,0.015579976,0.0017620033,0.00035904642,0.0018438922,0.0059812367,0.0044803354,0.0020372428,0.6972369,0.26951787,0.00038024204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0579883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06797814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06955342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009177615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031718742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2177704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125620752","doi":"10.7202/1074416ar","title":"Causation, Fault, and Fairness in the Criminal Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Innocence; Supreme court; Blame; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Conviction; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0488158441860651,"score_gpt":0.2732423416107337,"score_spread":0.22442649742466858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125620752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14826307,0.015412924,0.09000207,0.10701052,0.0010670085,0.00017958009,0.00016954646,0.0001915553,0.6377038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833693,0.00093530637,0.003736243,0.0021814373,0.00015324709,0.000028257655,0.000015654472,0.000016837297,0.0095637785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98700154,0.0040853852,0.0003904794,0.0014169423,0.004658478,0.0024470838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937942,0.002884799,0.0006267484,0.0005877266,0.0015155609,0.0005909786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013267414,0.00044925994,0.0008039093,0.0021826946,0.01134433,0.00735212,0.0019327337,0.0051689567,0.003362208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022406287,0.00038453762,0.0005266889,0.0012446162,0.043575253,0.005590018,0.004548868,0.0038765455,0.0002886758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005530471,0.000004525675,0.0005721582,0.000014911809,0.000005268995,0.000044928147,0.0011572362,0.00043336078,0.00003392383,0.9923793,0.00074813224,0.0046006353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013513834,0.000007948981,0.0014309867,0.00005850129,0.000012234374,0.00004330134,0.0006659858,0.0007422144,0.0000794856,0.98169804,0.015228445,0.000019272607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3255436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32562357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3255436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025557768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03719156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01975974329420483,"score_gpt":0.274742387572499,"score_spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125842437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146354,0.0052808356,0.046549924,0.04787404,0.00035260286,0.00007816845,0.00021473406,0.00010394035,0.8380823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563277,0.0015748548,0.0057516675,0.0035297975,0.00042816563,0.00015508464,0.00008397971,0.000050136536,0.03209856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931791,0.0030849604,0.00033813628,0.00091152516,0.0014503159,0.0010359129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98949534,0.0068951068,0.00075489585,0.0015790425,0.00084935426,0.00042623884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824301,0.0002999579,0.0006375366,0.0016548865,0.005013711,0.008016941,0.0014511385,0.0061178384,0.00960321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014102518,0.0004700121,0.0009507395,0.0013862012,0.039035127,0.014398615,0.0043888846,0.005257535,0.0010784643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015268022,0.0000025117174,0.000045497836,0.0000047694302,0.0000010141966,0.00001614127,0.00012042162,0.000063003245,0.000011792268,0.99886286,0.00028486634,0.0005856181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067524375,0.0000060534694,0.0001634559,0.000028281203,0.0000027454498,0.000035522953,0.00011745789,0.00023871634,0.000046098834,0.98778266,0.0115664005,0.0000058021265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009538731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049905977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00960321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053233914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003730242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038624108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126051783","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Accountability of Credit Rating Agencies : The Case for a Disclosure-based Model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Credit rating; Business; Accounting; Financial system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03555714488539851,"score_gpt":0.24653110756551314,"score_spread":0.21097396268011462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126051783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12160816,0.001589212,0.6343314,0.12564261,0.00075123453,0.00033189135,0.00049165287,0.0006199798,0.114633836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142935,0.0005166343,0.016650114,0.0024988914,0.00055780786,0.00011042663,0.00004901339,0.0000459234,0.008141945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727472,0.018386783,0.00088873337,0.0025856674,0.0031754472,0.0022161992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8730101,0.08798565,0.013299485,0.013129225,0.009225934,0.0033496146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037825175,0.0010764238,0.002271628,0.0012213994,0.001931493,0.009711315,0.0036999036,0.0094526615,0.008553129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11468916,0.00075906306,0.0012642768,0.0013168788,0.0066255755,0.016236397,0.004346794,0.008212668,0.0012682956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014191344,0.00019886481,0.0025517466,0.00007499044,0.000069927446,0.00013807937,0.00043902316,0.051073432,0.00031240092,0.92445916,0.0040619653,0.01647841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011909367,0.00007813906,0.00070552283,0.00004349347,0.000046150617,0.00006387239,0.00010268248,0.1203367,0.00024086001,0.87417865,0.0040464415,0.00003835409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004648482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039375983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037825175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004350161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062595746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20004106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134230150","doi":"10.7202/1075516ar","title":"“A Constitution Similar in Principle to That of the United Kingdom”: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Preamble; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Common law; Liberal democracy; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06545829340970336,"score_gpt":0.3183575097178903,"score_spread":0.2528992163081869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134230150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048544087,0.091245666,0.030414877,0.23977725,0.0056119836,0.000221627,0.00042823816,0.00010487725,0.5836514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557742,0.015802352,0.017287929,0.042238448,0.0010096222,0.00024048478,0.0002921344,0.000102751954,0.06725204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953544,0.0017856801,0.00015882902,0.00057809433,0.0013175849,0.0008054012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988506,0.00046193466,0.00009863966,0.000118004995,0.00033927453,0.0001315792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038220899,0.00045167212,0.00038666412,0.0016113112,0.007937555,0.009788317,0.0013286126,0.0053420677,0.0026468087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005037521,0.00035081114,0.00026118284,0.0014220767,0.030365782,0.005524052,0.0030626,0.0069188275,0.00056948845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027688895,0.000002850587,0.00006873407,0.000016195976,8.9156146e-7,0.00007658895,0.003057108,0.000064010404,0.00008017937,0.9867286,0.0063659996,0.0035360968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000953153,0.000019262226,0.0013728166,0.00041186484,0.0000055828145,0.00017567023,0.0062548933,0.00018133392,0.00023857977,0.2827502,0.70853853,0.000041738796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26796904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35181072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26796904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021471288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023630073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53281856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135434455","doi":"10.7202/1075517ar","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Liberal democracy; Secession; Federalism; Relevance (law); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03076628031883912,"score_gpt":0.31313489364016056,"score_spread":0.28236861332132146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135434455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029138558,0.0031839851,0.0617253,0.037241295,0.00038269963,0.000087311106,0.00014397585,0.00008996572,0.868007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403074,0.0020974877,0.010968805,0.0034782612,0.00028599869,0.00006378427,0.00009204453,0.00006732375,0.042638928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920334,0.0021858988,0.0002214314,0.00088276394,0.0033811189,0.0012953485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962702,0.0015052463,0.00027247638,0.0005294269,0.0011780541,0.00024463184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00547603,0.00029751932,0.0005272598,0.0016307484,0.0070519256,0.006773529,0.0015802837,0.001815027,0.004231007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010747567,0.00028213626,0.00034188724,0.0015306628,0.038615428,0.0048240414,0.0037585176,0.0043304595,0.0005340722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001292287,7.318648e-7,0.000054607164,0.0000059695512,7.219641e-7,0.000009642166,0.0012260668,0.00006852579,0.000031044245,0.9958263,0.0004746878,0.002300462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007404136,0.0000068375266,0.00074471114,0.00009363549,0.0000061103556,0.000043931213,0.001307672,0.0005290761,0.00017050102,0.89482015,0.10225342,0.000016524982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31327266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30646634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31327266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020634914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026664373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6228984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135600008","doi":"10.7202/1075514ar","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: The Challenge of Reconciling Political and Legal Constitutionalisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06804872899419606,"score_gpt":0.31988490502979905,"score_spread":0.251836176035603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135600008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026740324,0.032271788,0.076581255,0.54158044,0.0024977152,0.00008842746,0.00011830285,0.000098043216,0.32002363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847131,0.008940655,0.03133023,0.04987793,0.0035510818,0.00032356917,0.0000892129,0.0002052657,0.020968964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95021605,0.032681342,0.0012005664,0.004094482,0.008868456,0.0029390536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95925564,0.02892074,0.0023699924,0.0048418194,0.0031850582,0.0014268031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056287933,0.0006308152,0.0014251432,0.0027066232,0.01024747,0.016719004,0.003956756,0.012385679,0.0030529988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061617162,0.000714207,0.00081064686,0.0025598295,0.10982884,0.026524799,0.010699778,0.021475576,0.00050690066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017824798,0.0000031968693,0.00002468198,0.000008601095,0.0000017972069,0.000013093283,0.0012243097,0.000069090675,0.000014963555,0.9952923,0.0014134431,0.0019328026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006343527,0.0000042026554,0.00006203139,0.000053866934,0.000002025362,0.000021656751,0.0008408076,0.00012405137,0.000028540333,0.97973204,0.019116782,0.000007650615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009683651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011888684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056287933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011813047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019378453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29768258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674495","doi":"10.7202/1075515ar","title":"Rethinking the Invisible Constitution: How Unwritten Constitutional Principles Shape Political Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Law; Scholarship; Political science; Warrant; Constitutional law; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Constitutional review; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0724215343438571,"score_gpt":0.3227976483686118,"score_spread":0.2503761140247547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20558856,0.004698283,0.039640825,0.14870492,0.0007333081,0.00006909369,0.00011969452,0.00012588591,0.6003194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888881,0.0004754946,0.0020564466,0.003049749,0.000081967686,0.000016686688,0.000012009139,0.00006293239,0.0053566378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842478,0.009106906,0.00024833935,0.0016496294,0.002777653,0.0019695733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841345,0.010935332,0.00075173314,0.0018946471,0.0014545602,0.0008292839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021529522,0.00021811143,0.0005340152,0.0013575352,0.009144684,0.015495921,0.0023190803,0.003839736,0.00704234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266857,0.00038945608,0.0005636431,0.0011552551,0.06724965,0.010146429,0.0064688786,0.008504082,0.000521113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772568,0.000010398692,0.0005129596,0.000014549625,0.0000071227623,0.00004180403,0.007712049,0.00034050594,0.000181983,0.985213,0.0011588606,0.004799008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002690871,0.000018442533,0.0018882301,0.00011363628,0.00002235044,0.000029557496,0.0068874476,0.0009018539,0.0003950878,0.94184357,0.047840916,0.000032029056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04776511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07408733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04776511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015543545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016040245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11386037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135866945","doi":"10.7202/1075518ar","title":"The Structural and Administrative Demands of Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Constitutionalism; Duty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06304416415205462,"score_gpt":0.32959686365015195,"score_spread":0.26655269949809735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135866945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15023574,0.002331146,0.21381989,0.05583529,0.00040624625,0.00032599812,0.00022779682,0.0002378178,0.57658005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692449,0.00048403806,0.018682592,0.0023192896,0.00032418032,0.00028409113,0.00007056888,0.00007552964,0.008514766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580679,0.017079625,0.0021232655,0.0053440523,0.013258861,0.0041262447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94982314,0.02930294,0.0030199825,0.013034087,0.0036744876,0.0011453823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030802721,0.00040453026,0.00081000937,0.0016631808,0.007000022,0.01298584,0.0035944274,0.0045444095,0.003986159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055425562,0.0010683531,0.0010003509,0.0015722908,0.07003964,0.0116847195,0.006839028,0.010975617,0.00081167603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003097421,0.0000061069395,0.000099102785,0.000009437618,0.0000020452292,0.000016539687,0.0007905561,0.00023949289,0.00010888931,0.9971124,0.00015063916,0.0014617842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026808328,0.00003181079,0.0007365246,0.00007365449,0.000012933344,0.00007114513,0.0008714191,0.00071282964,0.00038124144,0.9743075,0.022756994,0.000017113516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057924422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01038851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030802721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009511662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014971312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16290236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140323263","doi":"10.7202/1075600ar","title":"Concevoir la matrice juridique dans un monde en constante évolution : essai sur l’approche fonctionnelle du droit","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05942678100522503,"score_gpt":0.2505382918762784,"score_spread":0.19111151087105338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140323263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056191094,0.007929878,0.7817581,0.02343483,0.0007607842,0.00029784898,0.0009968502,0.00054208847,0.12808844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62843853,0.005535651,0.30798832,0.0013213261,0.00054496236,0.0005940436,0.00072928955,0.00051520026,0.05433272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98840976,0.005421911,0.00053449883,0.0028884816,0.0020849546,0.0006603659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808095,0.010875642,0.0015041988,0.0029602586,0.0031845453,0.0006657813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011933595,0.00089923386,0.0014272818,0.0038283097,0.0046459017,0.013187958,0.0035326402,0.003450689,0.023737177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041677065,0.0010262615,0.0024603806,0.0048635458,0.008641616,0.017487578,0.0060984665,0.0052870736,0.0028724885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003954301,0.000026990432,0.0033151216,0.00020935177,0.00005705505,0.000079611986,0.00336902,0.010223698,0.0002748292,0.93374944,0.0029466723,0.045708764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037379094,0.00006236438,0.0054970966,0.0006113199,0.00010191183,0.00024722016,0.0043471367,0.04289928,0.0007827264,0.8090681,0.13622177,0.00012368691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036256317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038071994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036256317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00739707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079408705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144802035","doi":"10.7202/1075598ar","title":"Regards croisés entre le droit innu et le droit québécois : territorialités en conflit","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023453889889101093,"score_gpt":0.3052383744384828,"score_spread":0.2817844845493817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144802035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58725804,0.00618151,0.0047216197,0.017153613,0.00028396054,0.00011406179,0.00051243557,0.000042553096,0.38373223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93034774,0.0013994697,0.0008368534,0.00089041766,0.000028913846,0.000045316272,0.000114401424,0.000021632703,0.06631524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983681,0.0003642084,0.000041246152,0.00019358554,0.000510982,0.0005218741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821055,0.00042009636,0.00022071582,0.00008136937,0.00065147755,0.0004157814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141064,0.00033586734,0.0003368574,0.0019328881,0.014489261,0.006077649,0.0011312298,0.0014599214,0.016243458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029811943,0.00023640321,0.0002538786,0.002676625,0.01116798,0.0025474133,0.0036979425,0.0025899038,0.0004603976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007763473,0.00003683988,0.04946577,0.00025854784,0.000056861645,0.0012411053,0.34325895,0.0008077867,0.0012826569,0.52938455,0.014872453,0.059256807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012070346,0.000048452097,0.13609053,0.0007359115,0.000048366364,0.00037813568,0.45989612,0.0006010644,0.00064790726,0.013072988,0.3883426,0.00012598334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96052676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04442446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04442446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04045046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3223235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147646974","doi":"10.7202/1075601ar","title":"Sustainable Democratic Constitutionalism and Climate Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilemma; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Climate change; Political science; Precautionary principle; Human rights; Sustainable development; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020110500968505345,"score_gpt":0.2503070662450858,"score_spread":0.23019656527658047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147646974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10799019,0.003311147,0.012861504,0.16043445,0.00071840663,0.00010158532,0.00016971437,0.000078312565,0.7143346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982024,0.00063661096,0.0014181943,0.008616024,0.00017062761,0.00009692472,0.000033553773,0.000023353065,0.006980614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071056,0.0053659393,0.0001924585,0.0009564288,0.0015486206,0.0012259164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869019,0.0079002,0.0013021817,0.0019606857,0.0011468355,0.0007882472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123860175,0.00027352784,0.00036029503,0.00090561394,0.007825909,0.0064931153,0.0010387701,0.003641071,0.00688146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024032865,0.00019089432,0.00041526728,0.001148238,0.033736244,0.0083641,0.0056629605,0.006516714,0.00037449884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995997,0.00001210925,0.00020613887,0.000008472142,0.0000026887499,0.000011870835,0.00074723375,0.00012991422,0.000031527004,0.9954585,0.0020035417,0.0013800998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024302593,0.00001669522,0.000521756,0.00003772048,0.000006790881,0.00002139934,0.0015026968,0.00036315844,0.00015348979,0.96206045,0.035282385,0.000009163926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063478965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076349047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123860175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076053473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008958357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06550431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160771878","doi":"10.7202/1076906ar","title":"Lines Drawn in Blood: A Comparative Perspective on the Accommodation of Blended Families in Succession Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Family law; Spouse; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Law; Sociology; Sibling; Birth certificate; Nuclear family; Estate; Genealogy; Political science; History; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04915868878168021,"score_gpt":0.34692650563327665,"score_spread":0.2977678168515964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160771878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19071391,0.005910704,0.0039986293,0.02865741,0.00035951368,0.00005184158,0.00008139811,0.00004879429,0.7701778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981987,0.0009908346,0.0005921551,0.0020899782,0.000032777203,0.000020930647,0.000017512359,0.000019210558,0.014249594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284416,0.0032551182,0.00008872812,0.00040128658,0.0011352056,0.0022755226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620867,0.0017556151,0.0002916732,0.00020319202,0.0009912316,0.0005496103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047289412,0.0003282915,0.00045390075,0.0028206836,0.040338296,0.01165689,0.0024817772,0.0040510064,0.0059699984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009331328,0.00029095367,0.00030584278,0.00354682,0.04977292,0.005793195,0.005678953,0.0045631453,0.00026844803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001275978,0.0000134120055,0.0013116208,0.000026514246,0.000003415907,0.000659265,0.24442329,0.00011516869,0.000077314486,0.74261564,0.0034405834,0.007300921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017899658,0.00003506268,0.007866573,0.0005005634,0.000029371666,0.0005018736,0.61379385,0.0003792418,0.00024967772,0.057268687,0.31930387,0.000053414562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8850207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92359114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07686422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044033248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5576916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161277672","doi":"10.7202/1076910ar","title":"Fixing the Broken Mirror: Diversity and Survival in the Global Village","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05742837569248844,"score_gpt":0.285498864827917,"score_spread":0.22807048913542854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161277672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82292295,0.0006914808,0.001366999,0.026558803,0.00016714075,0.000018684,0.000061169536,0.000016405878,0.14819644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665266,0.000057814985,0.00008000846,0.00033150034,0.000016825503,0.0000038783674,0.00000447224,0.0000044228523,0.0028483206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.00051503815,0.000013346147,0.00010077108,0.00007479956,0.000576525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984225,0.0003639782,0.00016994428,0.0001681025,0.00016412152,0.0007113148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020406672,0.0001293968,0.00030194828,0.000653562,0.00929938,0.004760208,0.0009047148,0.0015369093,0.0084516145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048679463,0.000090647016,0.00015138712,0.0007377698,0.014661278,0.0038493143,0.007000102,0.0024159944,0.00032827054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016808024,0.00011139513,0.045273148,0.000054310367,0.0000349235,0.0009463828,0.1465013,0.0006160404,0.0006280796,0.7115915,0.014266329,0.07980862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004660766,0.00025131716,0.06332149,0.00027739513,0.00004162393,0.0004946395,0.39051732,0.0008865992,0.00057408604,0.4443316,0.09919113,0.0000661939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013658115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027546624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013658115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018717626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024975082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028273463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163599923","doi":"10.7202/1076908ar","title":"Going Circular: Indigenous Legal Research Methodology as Legal Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Wonder; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Traditional knowledge; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.16709179580478842,"score_gpt":0.4591151140518464,"score_spread":0.29202331824705796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163599923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022255525,0.017464597,0.2669464,0.3920742,0.006577833,0.0015709947,0.00018862214,0.00036379078,0.29255807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68402845,0.009857596,0.1936634,0.049043734,0.0040061884,0.0050229602,0.00017388543,0.0004691004,0.05373463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79543316,0.1820285,0.003407415,0.006137867,0.010437234,0.002555833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8021397,0.15311576,0.0063953823,0.019583816,0.015559798,0.0032054414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17752612,0.00062318606,0.0013108379,0.004923749,0.020071823,0.026111104,0.0049122814,0.010479182,0.008614408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14781639,0.0008292039,0.0011908936,0.0051915273,0.12628825,0.031155463,0.014289454,0.014759271,0.0015345928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007928863,0.000018248902,0.00017074004,0.00015288407,0.0000057249817,0.000074529715,0.06455542,0.000063282896,0.0000612377,0.92410994,0.003236778,0.0075432635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023428971,0.00005795955,0.00042538004,0.0018298726,0.000023040588,0.00019396062,0.056507025,0.0007888436,0.0003740229,0.7663859,0.173347,0.00004364611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014549636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013062226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014781414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033149205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93885905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163783173","doi":"10.7202/1076909ar","title":"Predicting Employment Notice Period with Machine Learning: Promises and Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Predictability; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Period (music); Law; Machine learning; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07561691443842182,"score_gpt":0.31730003399062057,"score_spread":0.24168311955219873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163783173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5031332,0.01797537,0.42667544,0.027081836,0.0010045948,0.00034628078,0.0066817203,0.002830063,0.014271645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770831,0.001803882,0.11196138,0.0009969148,0.00080700516,0.0001333674,0.0056970804,0.00012929876,0.0013879957],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321544,0.0035272986,0.00047713084,0.0014002906,0.0010280847,0.00035178688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410202,0.04595811,0.002792609,0.0063534244,0.002907997,0.0009676891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015853409,0.0016438304,0.0013403951,0.003521589,0.0012281173,0.0044155456,0.0032207633,0.0028686586,0.0013203211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044930313,0.0005666774,0.0011995907,0.004390904,0.0015956181,0.005795362,0.0019623563,0.005218895,0.0011137791],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034449983,0.00065181224,0.14605922,0.0004090506,0.00032138886,0.0002264298,0.00052735594,0.46480972,0.00068346405,0.010373027,0.018021878,0.3575721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703896,0.000032845866,0.006333936,0.000109004686,0.000024780074,0.000044081662,0.00022593144,0.96789396,0.0005164855,0.020902999,0.0038633577,0.000035664732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01903663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017264081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01903663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019397496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002393898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0838418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163852477","doi":"10.7202/1076907ar","title":"Noli me tangere : affiner le régime québécois d’immunité de saisie pour les objets culturels","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04376201874589994,"score_gpt":0.25601587578228513,"score_spread":0.2122538570363852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163852477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22023591,0.0074458057,0.006080336,0.1086906,0.0010131279,0.00016708944,0.00033340073,0.00007309615,0.6559607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75131047,0.0019762984,0.0020885214,0.012424779,0.00012443478,0.00008588174,0.00007409996,0.000035880064,0.23187971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840564,0.0004304119,0.000022124697,0.00018871641,0.00041763802,0.0005355362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827445,0.00034785672,0.00014360294,0.000106358,0.0007580176,0.0003696048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018331576,0.00028870662,0.00024721518,0.00074166636,0.00915138,0.0053984364,0.0008915629,0.0027040038,0.011260753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003950004,0.00016484555,0.00027517782,0.0007531665,0.0061441073,0.0020561686,0.0016715028,0.0030187746,0.00072863867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010492056,0.0000626584,0.017257797,0.00018658895,0.000031386004,0.0007958171,0.06579271,0.0006790072,0.0021493642,0.7995422,0.057818912,0.055578668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034989513,0.00009224806,0.04894154,0.000801618,0.000048836067,0.00022186361,0.03998561,0.0010793374,0.0015510209,0.030693354,0.87644696,0.00010268104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8847434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94610995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11525661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038145788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03735697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2767684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205482211","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Canada Labour Code: Are Replacement Workers an Endangered Species?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Fishery; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Population; Programming language","score_opus":0.030567477407914066,"score_gpt":0.29318341432141165,"score_spread":0.2626159369134976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205482211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09289746,0.0027123652,0.0042601395,0.13858534,0.0015524374,0.00012203496,0.0006840513,0.00009818718,0.7590879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5625339,0.0018674524,0.003430165,0.13437958,0.0004908297,0.00013028535,0.00025651307,0.00007893718,0.29683235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942853,0.00045664396,0.0001703181,0.00060208375,0.0024284,0.0020572313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950647,0.0012978606,0.0002824386,0.00035169613,0.0022465768,0.00075682544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666077,0.00038367326,0.00053670746,0.0010386736,0.016589567,0.0057143755,0.0033900978,0.014925988,0.008063041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110206725,0.00059003517,0.00064362393,0.0011643226,0.01590898,0.0024401254,0.0023173508,0.008099524,0.0011860642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007739183,0.000047133497,0.009414203,0.000058600213,0.00002658191,0.0005278535,0.0078885965,0.0005125053,0.0011647104,0.83870363,0.12270286,0.018875914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000623259,0.00005520826,0.019854164,0.00043327446,0.00010651478,0.0005148162,0.008722845,0.0012131034,0.0012590465,0.07709874,0.89051634,0.00016351754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94499594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97875184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027335415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07878755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1983332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205734119","doi":"10.7202/1082058ar","title":"Contract Variation and Changed Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Estoppel; Variation (astronomy); Law and economics; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Equity (law); Law; Business; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.03381956063807098,"score_gpt":0.31442457339696034,"score_spread":0.2806050127588894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205734119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22442874,0.0016335165,0.13581258,0.05915554,0.00040276698,0.00015226693,0.00017234978,0.00016253699,0.5780797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899588,0.000099909215,0.0028326502,0.0019603202,0.0000604099,0.000060702463,0.000019014074,0.00002234723,0.004985899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783222,0.009147141,0.00081773795,0.0027368818,0.006749531,0.00222645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883747,0.0051255543,0.0014670184,0.0025407001,0.0015387357,0.0009531943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056811,0.00031571492,0.00036275655,0.0006342164,0.003874688,0.0068718665,0.0021890688,0.0050179423,0.0035982018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162547,0.00033701738,0.0007132208,0.00054767134,0.023502268,0.008130195,0.0055327397,0.0076201065,0.00046526737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015827976,0.000011238025,0.00052968063,0.000006220394,0.0000041411117,0.00008283749,0.0012560936,0.00079940073,0.00014641088,0.99368614,0.0005498507,0.0029121016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021200356,0.00005091282,0.00082798186,0.00004475515,0.000007920211,0.00012297185,0.0007062494,0.0033694238,0.00032329533,0.97911936,0.015368486,0.00003744918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004601117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00292926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013056811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008793698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048648105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205894304","doi":"10.7202/1092012ar","title":"Why De Minimis is a Defence: A Reply to Professor Coughlan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Supreme court; Statutory law; Harm; Legislature; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054853185311162345,"score_gpt":0.35023954790170503,"score_spread":0.2953863625905427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205894304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008679776,0.0018943798,0.00007031403,0.9957262,0.0017622445,0.0000012421531,0.0000041665944,0.0000032255523,0.00045144698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004118256,0.0022571227,0.0002787799,0.98182917,0.009403843,0.000016491747,0.0000068867535,0.000022584649,0.0020669503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384166,0.0057470324,0.0013002416,0.0031931126,0.0046084644,0.0013094998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90007925,0.079069525,0.0026418576,0.0020942618,0.011956223,0.0041589215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027135242,0.0008654927,0.0023455177,0.0016023536,0.008011691,0.008814308,0.0075528976,0.056257,0.005973304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08454947,0.0010876677,0.0016726579,0.0015895367,0.033990715,0.026080487,0.005774525,0.11808083,0.0028741318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027373326,0.000022777802,0.0002314088,0.00011747971,0.00001354667,0.00030984383,0.0014503078,0.000055747132,0.00007949718,0.073146604,0.9169132,0.0076321373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006369783,0.000050599854,0.0007050253,0.00093605503,0.000023897963,0.0013126725,0.0043172245,0.00038407085,0.00031404852,0.1267291,0.86500186,0.00016172245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017237406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022050211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008763686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013589997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14350659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207879926","doi":"10.7202/1082059ar","title":"Lost in Translation? Bill 21, International Human Rights, and the Margin of Appreciation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin of appreciation; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Margin (machine learning); Political science; Invocation; Law and economics; Sociology; Fundamental rights; History","score_opus":0.0245095349894542,"score_gpt":0.3019822488769632,"score_spread":0.277472713887509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207879926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044011003,0.014326889,0.0016686884,0.28907886,0.026172223,0.000048858295,0.00054264424,0.0002110806,0.6635496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22745582,0.008162165,0.0013210847,0.13822652,0.007342212,0.00009590741,0.00040806172,0.00029159282,0.61669666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970498,0.0006006393,0.000117298674,0.00046302332,0.0011595361,0.0006096613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977742,0.00065318524,0.00014954296,0.00033324695,0.00092859764,0.00016131623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022538065,0.0004443249,0.00047636533,0.0008852016,0.0061894218,0.009554092,0.0014300293,0.0058550015,0.029360661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008740429,0.00031161186,0.00047535516,0.0012408686,0.009694682,0.0046344516,0.0022947404,0.006231123,0.007510706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021085332,0.000011460191,0.00027943455,0.000085821295,0.0000056174845,0.00017257726,0.00235772,0.00006815756,0.00021395547,0.6107037,0.3678337,0.018246736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049838864,0.000008805396,0.0009382244,0.00018670104,0.0000048498523,0.00007466614,0.0013996832,0.00006574281,0.00013688864,0.021010863,0.97615016,0.00001838876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27425465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2765907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7257453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015166569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5453166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334677990","doi":"10.7202/1034051ar","title":"Constitutional Amendment by Stealth","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Political science; Constitution; Deliberation; Law; Democracy; Politics; Convention; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07335461904596215,"score_gpt":0.3288064311958844,"score_spread":0.25545181214992224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334677990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035019793,0.0018456241,0.09428502,0.015748061,0.0008930194,0.00020242773,0.0001843616,0.0002550341,0.8515667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90441567,0.000885173,0.013222583,0.0063004126,0.00047476098,0.00027494488,0.00015622503,0.00013001841,0.07414025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98751044,0.004735635,0.0006798444,0.0025193403,0.0026827317,0.0018720601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900591,0.0042796987,0.00076957355,0.0033639215,0.0012022881,0.00032553432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011269007,0.0003599052,0.0004690856,0.0015611374,0.005644327,0.006638682,0.0011870074,0.004082812,0.006672511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021996949,0.00035540623,0.00074979686,0.0011537442,0.030715384,0.0054163705,0.005130892,0.00632852,0.0011779218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027932172,0.0000028629984,0.00008446599,0.0000054041298,0.0000016752775,0.000013405001,0.00035095538,0.000091151305,0.000068478745,0.99684674,0.0007191633,0.0018128164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023779734,0.000046048874,0.0005756983,0.00012586114,0.000014424514,0.00012326009,0.00052187603,0.00069298607,0.0009883898,0.7981872,0.19866602,0.000034433142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007980279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009381426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011269007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051534665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008477264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059596896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205521505","doi":"10.7202/1084133ar","title":"Domestic Contracts and Family Law Exceptionalism: An Historical Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Family law; Ideology; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.04775251357453432,"score_gpt":0.33325647215850085,"score_spread":0.28550395858396654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205521505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32872725,0.059876032,0.0062446794,0.07190415,0.0004665373,0.000044629283,0.00035571982,0.000052203548,0.5323288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869522,0.007115203,0.00027250772,0.0010013214,0.00007842476,0.000007433117,0.000027086155,0.000009152792,0.004536737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748373,0.0007733243,0.000054847656,0.00027306078,0.00047739325,0.0009375912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.00078281504,0.0002354227,0.00010855372,0.00053292495,0.00043232285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289441,0.00016961344,0.00022136424,0.002099843,0.015077448,0.00483707,0.0012116203,0.0015178409,0.0023631959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003931475,0.00016582267,0.00012949185,0.0026849206,0.033875287,0.003524542,0.0027082968,0.0028346665,0.000085082975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000465638,0.000008918922,0.0019670725,0.00003130019,0.000002371429,0.0003346689,0.05879173,0.00018972483,0.000037642065,0.9231086,0.0034877406,0.012035557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052016853,0.00002738594,0.02066545,0.0007730823,0.000012528909,0.0011870638,0.11806122,0.00070940703,0.0003158423,0.14486773,0.7133107,0.0000643931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78042096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75765043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78042096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05240458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021968694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44174433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205553498","doi":"10.7202/1084134ar","title":"Creative and Responsive Advocacy for Reconciliation: The Application of Gladue Principles in Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Alienation; Indigenous; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Creativity; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07833572260904663,"score_gpt":0.37257740844483894,"score_spread":0.2942416858357923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205553498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14377524,0.006051263,0.090051934,0.25924867,0.00081137783,0.0006483821,0.00005319479,0.00022684639,0.49913308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567225,0.0006436372,0.019591123,0.013342553,0.000101704245,0.00013843797,0.000010674693,0.000033622822,0.00941561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94031906,0.03970593,0.001440647,0.0023809816,0.008944149,0.0072092693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473993,0.035701115,0.0043020374,0.004183972,0.0057875034,0.002626031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053618055,0.00039461604,0.0005700282,0.003527702,0.017398704,0.016090255,0.0035629815,0.008473509,0.0034881728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07444741,0.00040023623,0.00078664394,0.0021160115,0.060147837,0.00914822,0.015654836,0.008349996,0.00038573047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013710201,0.00005572642,0.002739901,0.00012714586,0.000014408647,0.00039518435,0.05731281,0.0005503135,0.00023276453,0.89914614,0.0060401307,0.0333718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048381793,0.00006190309,0.007178882,0.0009537435,0.000031762796,0.00041178797,0.088869095,0.0020832738,0.0008153663,0.69034463,0.20906886,0.00013237553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07764979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18846342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98280895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017191036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048005104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28356278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206122656","doi":"10.7202/1084132ar","title":"L’indépendance du Québec et le choix autochtone de la continuité canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008877052856781607,"score_gpt":0.22605596557220387,"score_spread":0.21717891271542225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206122656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6835996,0.0014875206,0.0040310086,0.0060857534,0.00008766364,0.000092541995,0.00076812954,0.000032121563,0.3038157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97161496,0.0003254826,0.0004175879,0.00019003783,0.000008360236,0.00001918152,0.000100732264,0.0000062060676,0.027317444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987961,0.000223961,0.000025303707,0.00014494096,0.00044610104,0.0003634445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958839,0.00086065027,0.0005015207,0.00021472534,0.001912963,0.00062628003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012870578,0.00018213272,0.00023594114,0.0011436718,0.006027317,0.0026084152,0.0005787238,0.00048096039,0.013903184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003979527,0.00014456474,0.00021612615,0.0020444053,0.0028371867,0.00088987395,0.0013532282,0.0010725213,0.00044986015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024103808,0.00013011105,0.47548032,0.00038726913,0.00019018466,0.0009187818,0.09167353,0.003442691,0.002468318,0.25976613,0.014862813,0.15043885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002654635,0.00010083832,0.73312706,0.0005111532,0.00009929551,0.00018957107,0.07218672,0.001998605,0.0012205447,0.0082771955,0.1821462,0.00011616529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9483479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051652074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022320146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026636574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16194475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206144704","doi":"10.7202/1084135ar","title":"Religious Challenges to Anti-Discrimination Law: The Mobilization of the “Minority Label”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Dissent; Framing (construction); Minority rights; Dissenting opinion; Religious discrimination; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Mores; Freedom of religion; Christian right; Free Exercise Clause; Religious organization; Establishment Clause; Politics; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.044487308850188416,"score_gpt":0.31325564632754593,"score_spread":0.2687683374773575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206144704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32874474,0.005414406,0.0059711714,0.2789016,0.0011038274,0.0000587518,0.00003656017,0.000047799833,0.37972113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984239,0.0003974976,0.0004249368,0.00932834,0.00017362868,0.000019074734,0.0000057502602,0.000016677024,0.0053950455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857481,0.008794842,0.00019953829,0.0008660468,0.0027544284,0.0016370654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887422,0.008170182,0.0008238279,0.00045678587,0.0008494126,0.0009576578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012116785,0.0004580681,0.00035614683,0.0014426042,0.03675567,0.014278148,0.0025162867,0.008793208,0.0028769812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013987559,0.0003645388,0.00032209884,0.0009334827,0.089783415,0.008144635,0.008762995,0.012532309,0.00032591555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017434573,0.000019632,0.00053180003,0.000032409887,0.000003102219,0.00041706086,0.32687366,0.000041504307,0.00047109454,0.6627249,0.003556556,0.0053109652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006437535,0.00005526849,0.0020528755,0.0005793591,0.000021138312,0.00038964886,0.4864018,0.0005566297,0.0015563512,0.18480621,0.32343727,0.00007902363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110924214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11242638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110924214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019006314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011118814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22055715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206479119","doi":"10.7202/1025143ar","title":"Abdelwahab Biad et Paul Tavernier, dir, Le droit international humanitaire face aux défis du XXI si[è]cle, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Eric David, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 5 éd, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Eric David, Françoise Tulkens et Damien Vandenmeersch avec la collaboration de Sylvie Ruffenach, Code de droit international humanitaire, 5 éd, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Marco Sassòli, Antoine A Bouvier et Anne Quintin avec la collaboration de Juliane Garcia, Un droit dans la guerre? Cas, documents et supports d’enseignement relatifs à la pratique contemporaine du droit international humanitaire, 2 éd, Genève, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, 2012","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0096699279536382,"score_gpt":0.272502906801112,"score_spread":0.2628329788474738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206479119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002281913,0.18023244,0.0014557285,0.3806168,0.03653081,0.00008865008,0.001119213,0.00029443146,0.39738002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018414957,0.04794322,0.0015015857,0.04189036,0.0040309913,0.00014320329,0.00046228108,0.00037152375,0.8852419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726117,0.0007013801,0.00016379858,0.00039190298,0.0010999828,0.00038175253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997497,0.0006021071,0.00018068554,0.00012035781,0.0011477807,0.00045207693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024774992,0.0010121043,0.0005734302,0.0011399905,0.0069643003,0.008488425,0.0009191993,0.004775685,0.07060952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00788235,0.0006873433,0.0003262065,0.0019617009,0.002845095,0.0068979105,0.0024850257,0.008217132,0.029737135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069439684,0.0000068765517,0.00014512104,0.00005827025,0.0000014661227,0.000034236436,0.0012084895,0.00001777817,0.000050738203,0.0133282,0.9666254,0.018516567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017129506,0.0000025475374,0.0004155676,0.0001414648,9.047403e-7,0.000044350738,0.0013405639,0.000008975768,0.000033308177,0.0006284744,0.9973762,0.0000059581575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078014895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14032812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078014895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006251495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012136549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23621231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210671644","doi":"10.7202/1013040ar","title":"Volume 57 Index","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0438126836695408,"score_gpt":0.2122546217933364,"score_spread":0.1684419381237956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210671644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003150325,0.002358697,0.00045517436,0.0017741437,0.006905078,0.00015443859,0.004012229,0.00089764135,0.9831276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006593379,0.0009284318,0.00011586028,0.00053347525,0.0015308887,0.000053334956,0.0011391392,0.00031081017,0.99472886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895775,0.00009154631,0.000054868702,0.0001592952,0.00063735526,0.000099177545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741036,0.0004333982,0.00014513063,0.00036039756,0.0010654536,0.00058525417],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007152423,0.0018260246,0.0017090531,0.010781831,0.002375017,0.008778337,0.0016676951,0.0020681196,0.7693049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005811578,0.0006196632,0.00086683256,0.0075347866,0.0010703722,0.003481786,0.002743143,0.0021692675,0.7842082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014281274,0.000028651775,0.00010175369,0.000092599206,0.0000023125144,0.000014404449,0.000016146592,0.000037425023,0.00009853244,0.0027169795,0.9611603,0.035716627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007973049,0.000011657767,0.00037965985,0.00015744245,0.000002953133,0.000020864769,0.000025680534,0.00007117634,0.000069609414,0.0016835257,0.99756277,0.000006728582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064044124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011053208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23069513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019431685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021993616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3290586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213318394","doi":"10.7202/1000793ar","title":"Cumulative Index","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04107253690065777,"score_gpt":0.2237001291058561,"score_spread":0.18262759220519834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213318394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036409781,0.0027563837,0.010072731,0.0029034347,0.00604032,0.0002574418,0.021416713,0.002011587,0.95090044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04477154,0.0049627144,0.0039331736,0.0010109779,0.0048930724,0.00037298212,0.022834865,0.0010355,0.9161852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982584,0.00012648372,0.00010078277,0.0003146401,0.0010263257,0.00017340205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920087,0.0010084527,0.00043433532,0.001490253,0.0035045156,0.0015537273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535903,0.0011431663,0.0011428099,0.011502575,0.002075248,0.0071169524,0.0016637238,0.0013331891,0.47935855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016614962,0.00026475659,0.0006241796,0.010683073,0.00084987504,0.0035709315,0.0019846268,0.0017624275,0.3499838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099840276,0.00007775316,0.001303044,0.00022883939,0.00001477031,0.00005900427,0.00006564905,0.0005293118,0.00043019326,0.06848016,0.708333,0.22037844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016853077,0.000040939958,0.0021764042,0.00010848883,0.0000137165425,0.00017214484,0.00006105094,0.00070726336,0.00032699923,0.050252344,0.9461032,0.000020718018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017925211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025053727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52064145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019117749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023961698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7426318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229901152","doi":"10.7202/1082051ar","title":"Nom","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"African Studies and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06486304100930937,"score_gpt":0.2942549291433563,"score_spread":0.22939188813404696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229901152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010683313,0.0003452207,0.002115556,0.002248458,0.002919473,0.00028342643,0.0132156275,0.0013113188,0.9764925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008612184,0.00045981063,0.00151414,0.0014564696,0.00079401076,0.00029531293,0.009402147,0.0009410933,0.97652483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882835,0.0003170079,0.00006490517,0.00021841332,0.0004010636,0.00017032074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736375,0.00039595144,0.00011833519,0.00057908596,0.001131051,0.0004118649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473879,0.00080871757,0.0006738963,0.0020019086,0.0028019208,0.0048197373,0.0014995807,0.0015316746,0.7387535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051505654,0.00042473924,0.0005298475,0.0013536228,0.00063844136,0.0032318856,0.002968899,0.001806754,0.61753994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011711646,0.000046917336,0.00051165564,0.00026690826,0.0000069468424,0.00010423679,0.00022661178,0.000048000962,0.000759917,0.033622436,0.89736056,0.06692867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066487164,0.000008234957,0.00024293648,0.0000286955,0.0000019118283,0.000028132563,0.00005612297,0.000023876113,0.00014069528,0.0013893081,0.99806935,0.0000041665335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003405989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005425093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7387535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012543184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00182067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231706792","doi":"10.7202/1082033ar","title":"Confiance légitime","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06720885702840718,"score_gpt":0.30387813111177286,"score_spread":0.2366692740833657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231706792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004457656,0.00071095536,0.00969571,0.035917018,0.0013719951,0.00011554155,0.00016397634,0.00013078847,0.94743633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5456604,0.0009390292,0.0073509295,0.033797286,0.0034910503,0.0009956881,0.00037473562,0.00066072424,0.4067302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717585,0.0075841593,0.001428288,0.0070829364,0.008753849,0.0033921725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580594,0.017482474,0.0021055073,0.012398278,0.008735241,0.0012192008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014958976,0.0011815593,0.0018939729,0.0040128217,0.011622543,0.018637057,0.0030341519,0.014850298,0.052718047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07109985,0.0011034318,0.001519789,0.0024040362,0.03695647,0.015943486,0.01038476,0.02082176,0.013221086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008189454,0.000008533212,0.00011272668,0.000012855051,0.0000056546937,0.00003945319,0.0007109804,0.000028928613,0.000040435614,0.986845,0.009750088,0.0024371755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028189437,0.000010334909,0.00024563487,0.00013276546,0.00001650012,0.00012614256,0.0008529924,0.0002864764,0.00029187615,0.8388361,0.15915114,0.000021945434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070532043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007566764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052718047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008528136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008234115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17635942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236046461","doi":"10.7202/1000791ar","title":"Books Received","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019258898512942813,"score_gpt":0.2587199996775364,"score_spread":0.23946110116459357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236046461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038981886,0.0019163638,0.00014500314,0.000934301,0.0011632206,0.00003833139,0.0009851166,0.00028771991,0.9941402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003422239,0.00037393987,0.000041087435,0.00016888943,0.00006536203,0.0000048348306,0.00017363777,0.00005421784,0.9987759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971646,0.000021060372,0.000008964829,0.000050484025,0.00015488014,0.000048151156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953294,0.00007837802,0.000016834781,0.00006239331,0.00018250341,0.00012692425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023355144,0.0011144069,0.0010850059,0.0028591745,0.0026099898,0.0052476707,0.0011145045,0.0015733225,0.8153283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012206284,0.0006284704,0.0005583397,0.002771203,0.000728564,0.0022325793,0.0019369232,0.0019285547,0.7361148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021967615,0.000029563025,0.00010642978,0.00008898599,0.0000030839979,0.00004877351,0.000042724983,0.000052887375,0.00015976561,0.0041814507,0.92320055,0.07206395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006882558,0.0000084727335,0.00038469312,0.000077969926,0.0000024795172,0.000028948478,0.000048936425,0.00003732179,0.00007280847,0.0010602681,0.99826705,0.0000041593853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009826274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045505237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1846717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014462563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013409033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26341176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239058175","doi":"10.7202/1070289ar","title":"Errata","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04083248249083185,"score_gpt":0.2945841422803666,"score_spread":0.25375165978953473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239058175","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011026727,0.0019741978,0.0013680999,0.21689038,0.54026496,0.00029179797,0.0062631997,0.0013908609,0.23045377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074761235,0.0012882514,0.0011605385,0.14617325,0.03214861,0.0003358881,0.0019441054,0.0007483188,0.80872494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197125,0.0009948496,0.00073127565,0.00117308,0.0040782904,0.0010513065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98066574,0.0049149133,0.0006620471,0.002073998,0.0109983515,0.00068498746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042712125,0.001153626,0.0015665032,0.005061756,0.0076003065,0.009022014,0.003403827,0.011793171,0.18313186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051239215,0.00095405924,0.0016712293,0.003061901,0.0022550754,0.0038434458,0.0031731382,0.014272726,0.13416363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011961242,0.000006006219,0.00006281813,0.000028779637,0.0000025991594,0.000051153696,0.000035475936,0.000009046307,0.000021866388,0.002796098,0.99444467,0.0025296148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138513615,0.0000075188273,0.00058909314,0.00017095807,0.000017422994,0.00007906179,0.00020207297,0.0000678335,0.00021373185,0.0020398481,0.99657476,0.000023896266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05270437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06867853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18313186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008593347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007883425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239436074","doi":"10.7202/1082043ar","title":"Human Dignity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12375924527347418,"score_gpt":0.3229760982008795,"score_spread":0.19921685292740535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239436074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034643451,0.0048311595,0.0013490816,0.117885634,0.005147249,0.00009995941,0.00011446062,0.000070435475,0.8670376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10178173,0.0028740847,0.0013095948,0.26136506,0.004159495,0.00024365907,0.00011341453,0.00010769274,0.6280453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408937,0.0013149919,0.0002862552,0.0008867845,0.00209899,0.0013236118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994862,0.0019041708,0.00023143014,0.0006196594,0.001070511,0.0013123433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004519048,0.00057095016,0.0009062457,0.00093566655,0.009640165,0.011647597,0.0019796914,0.021665856,0.033425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014251039,0.0006710054,0.00082400616,0.0005113286,0.01877008,0.004165591,0.0069079683,0.02083326,0.012534612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029858353,0.00006833843,0.00037831292,0.000070303875,0.0000212163,0.0004078458,0.0019233836,0.00008597832,0.00040185146,0.7183916,0.2587796,0.019441744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032174587,0.00004800601,0.0008824968,0.0003597537,0.000021401174,0.00046986304,0.0011567733,0.000096235104,0.00028668172,0.11093664,0.8856688,0.00004105518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028094564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06706295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056208917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018089546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11181778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239898427","doi":"10.7202/1082040ar","title":"Fact","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03740942683929351,"score_gpt":0.2178782109676895,"score_spread":0.18046878412839598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239898427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027221942,0.001526299,0.00074386375,0.12895744,0.004993287,0.000052534448,0.0014538222,0.00009659026,0.859454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046580553,0.0008112143,0.0007082066,0.15956035,0.0031509965,0.00013804875,0.0007269509,0.00010546819,0.78821826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736255,0.00028363612,0.00009454678,0.000804478,0.00086124206,0.00059351197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725443,0.0009995452,0.00013055014,0.00042172134,0.00095185573,0.00024192511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019925183,0.00045718343,0.00058796117,0.0011111377,0.0055706725,0.008375648,0.0015032236,0.010915364,0.11670807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092107495,0.00041520278,0.0008558742,0.0009296378,0.0040667313,0.004802354,0.0025817035,0.009030258,0.038797375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033709548,0.000018424758,0.0003077624,0.00004319493,0.000010355618,0.00014100634,0.0005511003,0.000039744795,0.00018025681,0.4786833,0.51270026,0.0072909496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014118042,0.0000056200224,0.0005616283,0.000051718882,0.000008783707,0.000067204295,0.00026798554,0.000034598594,0.00013613212,0.037426595,0.9614132,0.000012448546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052613147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07146195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11670807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004952312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048769885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240967118","doi":"10.7202/1005857ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1524809317547152,"score_gpt":0.26777412055092964,"score_spread":0.11529318879621445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240967118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030668427,0.028231848,0.0037854675,0.06435218,0.011653346,0.00029075643,0.0091792755,0.000684081,0.8787562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013415018,0.023210522,0.0010745352,0.009783181,0.005210076,0.0002916393,0.005345907,0.00034863033,0.94132054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706835,0.0004255121,0.00011504082,0.00048360543,0.0014703854,0.00043707047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090683,0.0018320528,0.00042486048,0.0009377431,0.0038115154,0.002086976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027558634,0.0007193698,0.0010035038,0.008074226,0.003734872,0.0076969913,0.001976233,0.001711133,0.47525224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014034783,0.0004416891,0.0007248524,0.008325351,0.0014426166,0.0039823097,0.003756104,0.0022088028,0.33498716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030243404,0.00005016233,0.00050809386,0.0002128893,0.0000040237946,0.000017706621,0.0001456894,0.00005680885,0.00012177879,0.02890744,0.89490664,0.075038426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042085326,0.000013466636,0.00080203917,0.0001808397,0.0000025867012,0.000024359266,0.0002018377,0.000050140185,0.00006267894,0.0024990533,0.9961551,0.0000036957008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055113826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010350192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47525224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043024225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076291915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.748489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242010750","doi":"10.7202/1009068ar","title":"Haldane Unrevealed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.02299706649959036,"score_gpt":0.25962499732187266,"score_spread":0.2366279308222823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242010750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012564181,0.0077325297,0.0039870744,0.19923519,0.007948338,0.00006740811,0.00033265457,0.0002778932,0.7678548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16256665,0.00095916167,0.0013733762,0.097447075,0.0006548076,0.00007848869,0.00010412222,0.00018815443,0.7366282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688464,0.0005315127,0.0000963556,0.00093502493,0.0010028273,0.00054955564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979517,0.0006957505,0.000054260578,0.00025103983,0.00083350006,0.00021378235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016571813,0.00055831444,0.00039577717,0.0006228766,0.008889814,0.006757034,0.0011401116,0.0067985235,0.018523473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00937482,0.00030707076,0.0004421325,0.00034041,0.011460776,0.0034267176,0.003956433,0.010377647,0.0045532403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031390926,0.000010121057,0.00036368755,0.000032468222,0.0000070728915,0.0001823399,0.0029301364,0.00007452313,0.0003310846,0.7448002,0.23923063,0.012006361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049424316,0.000005949357,0.00020248079,0.000058346504,0.0000034108612,0.000052903146,0.0007434332,0.00009031421,0.0003959828,0.021943672,0.97648495,0.000013730665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17073447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2580724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82926553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012472368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0117973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33948135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242696983","doi":"10.7202/1082055ar","title":"Security","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03461927708207098,"score_gpt":0.2559655689517222,"score_spread":0.2213462918696512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242696983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005660058,0.00013899237,0.000684258,0.002855923,0.0002725312,0.00003661212,0.00033661607,0.00022604647,0.99488306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011540692,0.00023959276,0.00033366322,0.0022058727,0.00015336026,0.00004755258,0.00037373602,0.00012537175,0.98498005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837166,0.00017724012,0.0000421097,0.00025741252,0.0008095532,0.00034206308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873894,0.00020195001,0.000055519733,0.0003525347,0.00045020526,0.00020097035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012033615,0.0007712021,0.0003234192,0.0016619388,0.0034829276,0.0061808433,0.0010396225,0.0029149377,0.3589163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004093527,0.0004337274,0.000569796,0.0008047463,0.0012941813,0.003794917,0.0030523357,0.003500944,0.22891876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027617498,0.000028544082,0.00032488268,0.000035561206,0.0000040228256,0.0000702405,0.0002915411,0.00006705887,0.00053273566,0.2938556,0.66284573,0.04191638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003924851,0.000007150894,0.0002653002,0.00003262036,0.0000025349493,0.00004954633,0.00010081996,0.00006673269,0.00025555334,0.011872372,0.98733705,0.0000063254824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016613413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3589163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026321523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004550481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243080737","doi":"10.7202/mlj","title":"McGill Law Journal","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06950990085544063,"score_gpt":0.3569736682425543,"score_spread":0.28746376738711366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243080737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047838973,0.0038718318,0.0002445194,0.021557847,0.0018907044,0.000053447147,0.0008290867,0.00018821741,0.97088605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00463596,0.0009649637,0.00013605478,0.010735156,0.0008482292,0.000054248183,0.00013143815,0.00011302304,0.982381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978866,0.00029198482,0.00009756734,0.00033111626,0.0010682316,0.00032449953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676263,0.0011691878,0.00013394062,0.00045261043,0.0010659442,0.00041562872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017425879,0.0010011862,0.0009087421,0.0029402282,0.007547177,0.013663061,0.0021521028,0.013108971,0.3607959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946603,0.00095540547,0.00075565436,0.002477628,0.0038213928,0.004064297,0.002787261,0.008068446,0.13398385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011291648,0.000025834024,0.00008465449,0.000047551537,0.0000036462347,0.00005404846,0.00013374395,0.000043140946,0.000068401314,0.08760254,0.89141726,0.020507809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009113017,0.000008009588,0.00036017565,0.00012609849,0.0000058642554,0.000020510295,0.00012004562,0.00007210053,0.000049149112,0.009170047,0.9900456,0.00001326747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17734039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35742173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63920414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009715617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011186525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9117471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243966434","doi":"10.7202/1000792ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03529479715523773,"score_gpt":0.27410540374403114,"score_spread":0.2388106065887934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243966434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031782668,0.027014522,0.0036610072,0.060153604,0.010859626,0.00028982156,0.009746249,0.00068909983,0.8844077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01323935,0.021904811,0.001003311,0.009040816,0.0047944374,0.00028555884,0.005436147,0.0003376987,0.943958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972256,0.00040009595,0.00010991974,0.00045597105,0.0013885493,0.00041985916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991454,0.0017272745,0.0004026309,0.00088892464,0.0035647638,0.0019623796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002591079,0.00070513075,0.0009969871,0.00798872,0.0036553163,0.0073910053,0.0019088436,0.0016639004,0.48205987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01324102,0.00043402793,0.0007052033,0.00837001,0.0013670543,0.0038623433,0.0036098785,0.0021148208,0.34405565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003054873,0.00005080651,0.0005377177,0.00020839629,0.000003931153,0.000017592083,0.0001450247,0.000054615655,0.00012384265,0.027301379,0.89711726,0.07440897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004208542,0.000013696632,0.0008610575,0.00016956165,0.000002558752,0.000024694176,0.000200444,0.000050221995,0.00006278264,0.002343295,0.9962638,0.0000036135702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053450908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010091616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51794016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004068775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007192191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7387787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244914561","doi":"10.7202/1000615ar","title":"Préface","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03498694623141116,"score_gpt":0.27133033883974544,"score_spread":0.23634339260833429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244914561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013568376,0.0056788498,0.0042642704,0.02605994,0.13685082,0.00059884216,0.01598639,0.0011270609,0.80807704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045192656,0.001784868,0.001232567,0.00402835,0.01203863,0.00024279804,0.0054370905,0.00047904652,0.97023743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927765,0.00012273026,0.000040675754,0.00011253301,0.0003805908,0.0000659143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953774,0.0007508978,0.00015050788,0.00044234726,0.0028030584,0.00047577452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013406186,0.0007114157,0.00051316177,0.003437478,0.0033220302,0.0029635415,0.0011250125,0.0009233271,0.45334947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010602309,0.0002483153,0.0004826772,0.0022440988,0.0006285758,0.0019160633,0.0017073537,0.002339931,0.2703235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015125644,0.000010606646,0.00006573871,0.000041210016,0.0000010434018,0.000020327301,0.000057206584,0.00002945546,0.00004903486,0.0052115144,0.9744692,0.02002956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032004402,0.0000059440167,0.00027969122,0.000063774576,0.0000011339724,0.000016737122,0.000076216165,0.000017463874,0.000051382955,0.0024144594,0.99706656,0.0000034135244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013334656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01582846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026314163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025454406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245833113","doi":"10.7202/1013385ar","title":"L’Abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie II","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02833235345135241,"score_gpt":0.2663384078659922,"score_spread":0.23800605441463982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245833113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043649834,0.00505181,0.0042678444,0.011251749,0.00047006455,0.000047457765,0.00018053842,0.00005166695,0.93502903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.594368,0.0028747402,0.0014415673,0.00409081,0.00051503314,0.000101805985,0.00016096137,0.00019776679,0.39624932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824035,0.0006305782,0.000053703316,0.0002877407,0.0004220151,0.00036572237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990459,0.0005114936,0.000082905106,0.000110961206,0.0001530072,0.000095750365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010741205,0.00043885014,0.00027564864,0.0010463918,0.005185667,0.0065249777,0.0005507234,0.0017153388,0.012113451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019201218,0.00027888687,0.00045786158,0.0010673327,0.0109313,0.0043541864,0.0023123513,0.004077226,0.0023226861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024733243,0.000010609915,0.00073440047,0.000046814836,0.0000049121427,0.00018336634,0.029806204,0.000070159535,0.00046401093,0.94622177,0.013320444,0.00911249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009179119,0.000036348534,0.004421563,0.00029692185,0.000008637999,0.00032857698,0.016247245,0.0002160371,0.00069336616,0.04923423,0.92847764,0.000030208774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04435704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047651872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04435704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006698966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029178886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08819771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247094163","doi":"10.7202/1038495ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05455015795959885,"score_gpt":0.2704894063709857,"score_spread":0.21593924841138684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247094163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036745202,0.027497351,0.004092696,0.07573776,0.011863431,0.000325485,0.009795454,0.0006826653,0.86633056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017753243,0.025076794,0.0013349759,0.013732505,0.0060901428,0.00038635882,0.0063320706,0.00041699022,0.928877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963617,0.0005628269,0.00014389123,0.0006087392,0.0017794576,0.0005433859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882437,0.002611953,0.0005645402,0.0011627038,0.00479357,0.0026234589],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034322012,0.00073033455,0.0010303594,0.008410328,0.004039002,0.008470052,0.0021111378,0.0018074017,0.45795083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018329782,0.0004564036,0.00075150793,0.008499698,0.0016252534,0.004258077,0.004109582,0.0023958827,0.31511393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035286193,0.00005542125,0.0006231298,0.00025042583,0.0000047572757,0.00001987381,0.00020128078,0.00005901486,0.00012610637,0.034584213,0.88953316,0.074507356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004852469,0.000015261247,0.0009079903,0.00022935434,0.0000029129294,0.000027346974,0.00028643056,0.000052835076,0.00006668408,0.002811635,0.99559045,0.000004245221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054937825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010396783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54204917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046245838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00851406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7731674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247559517","doi":"10.7202/1082046ar","title":"Land","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"African history and culture analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03833604699059707,"score_gpt":0.2599741710894557,"score_spread":0.22163812409885864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247559517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011184209,0.00023408634,0.0008416539,0.00084542716,0.00034891706,0.000042815755,0.0012908067,0.00041357626,0.9948643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061147385,0.0001925034,0.00038956944,0.00032122948,0.000066846456,0.000025303067,0.0006519132,0.00016543474,0.9920725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949574,0.000053340802,0.000020184578,0.00009416976,0.00025885465,0.00007772284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00004921637,0.00001969407,0.00012501806,0.00016519375,0.00006934044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037029744,0.00039202906,0.00032856327,0.0015928388,0.0019342869,0.0040508546,0.00078053924,0.0010199642,0.63461995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012900468,0.00023179511,0.00032796868,0.0015380058,0.00094675267,0.0022471084,0.0018709076,0.0011782796,0.36363643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079181715,0.00006744129,0.00092323835,0.00012973305,0.000008743941,0.00019422616,0.00070474425,0.00012178834,0.0020020294,0.18612136,0.5916925,0.21795508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027898748,0.000004520336,0.00029458158,0.0000119580045,0.0000011004937,0.00003173263,0.00009451098,0.00002434787,0.00019320789,0.0028030577,0.9965354,0.0000026754026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009567141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017348908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63461995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014748065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016020524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247751161","doi":"10.7202/1082032ar","title":"Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04743022982172887,"score_gpt":0.31088208614180773,"score_spread":0.26345185632007884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247751161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016092005,0.0023165282,0.0056617255,0.011147414,0.0005358733,0.00008651311,0.0003131802,0.000100389116,0.9782292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18044974,0.0025180178,0.005023008,0.020466158,0.0015845441,0.00046446547,0.00057300855,0.00022491421,0.7886962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445796,0.0016743429,0.0002991335,0.0012563292,0.0016678869,0.0006443422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946845,0.0019655507,0.00026080236,0.0011614591,0.0015625459,0.0003651424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043866807,0.0006724195,0.0009295413,0.0024162165,0.0068507683,0.009568565,0.0017655258,0.0068409326,0.06674953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015993621,0.0006240285,0.0009204316,0.002161282,0.008428777,0.0064401524,0.0031591915,0.0067833746,0.014748395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045234983,0.000011110525,0.000087124514,0.000013303925,0.0000041823073,0.000018464085,0.0002688578,0.000060314054,0.000040633015,0.9537445,0.041246846,0.0045001796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012660661,0.000014722439,0.00043406335,0.00012649794,0.000011532622,0.0000760849,0.00030851658,0.00021522988,0.00012681512,0.43772718,0.5609246,0.000022105742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033526663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03756866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06674953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063649127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009133666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248690335","doi":"10.7202/1082057ar","title":"Values","year":2020,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07869017682017865,"score_gpt":0.3218544515099699,"score_spread":0.24316427468979124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248690335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010303673,0.00009178144,0.0019773347,0.0024449623,0.00014605385,0.00004007283,0.00010850571,0.000031448217,0.99412954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15994143,0.00046549324,0.0038470586,0.0035931359,0.0002819771,0.00024033434,0.0004570223,0.00017706396,0.8309965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969695,0.0009166923,0.00008508245,0.0004295764,0.0012508179,0.00034823045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770004,0.00038169572,0.00012582434,0.00048113856,0.00096310483,0.00034811193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246871,0.00043451184,0.00025008732,0.001314908,0.003293222,0.008202107,0.0009669261,0.001583342,0.12238522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006790343,0.00022751122,0.00025286883,0.0013129152,0.004485162,0.0049228515,0.0028378128,0.0021554623,0.027829198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007870141,0.000014638412,0.00019998426,0.000017853066,0.000002590475,0.000020818317,0.001070915,0.000035981808,0.00008092735,0.93852943,0.04062912,0.019389765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007966024,0.000009147325,0.0003879465,0.00006552051,0.000003730774,0.00004711481,0.0013728841,0.00006269146,0.00018751479,0.24976258,0.74808514,0.000007709162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006435873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12238522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042610117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249121885","doi":"10.7202/1076911ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.104789511380864,"score_gpt":0.2739727588133116,"score_spread":0.16918324743244761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249121885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002423334,0.019371642,0.0026868898,0.053874817,0.00952043,0.00027889464,0.009368987,0.0006180335,0.90185696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009873833,0.01542671,0.00078785577,0.008163832,0.003573379,0.00026216527,0.004832675,0.00029306734,0.95678633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969553,0.0004267691,0.00011002815,0.00047186174,0.001555773,0.0004801732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136096,0.0015642411,0.00038350874,0.00083039945,0.003701337,0.0021594856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027421464,0.00070034934,0.0009491167,0.0076176943,0.0038399273,0.008041643,0.0019439452,0.0017700773,0.5109155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01311571,0.0004552189,0.0007052634,0.007951873,0.0013003233,0.0038211115,0.0036890707,0.0022205368,0.37714365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000246582,0.00004148814,0.00043724215,0.00017395825,0.0000031314871,0.000015621923,0.0001349657,0.000042620668,0.00010627559,0.023299709,0.915086,0.06063443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037573886,0.0000116731135,0.00073645357,0.00015714746,0.000002033356,0.00002048367,0.00019943736,0.000038202495,0.000050351417,0.001854088,0.99692315,0.0000032583487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006626476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013031746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5109155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044250726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008383691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6976197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249241366","doi":"10.7202/1005858ar","title":"Volume 56 Index","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.07016168886116168,"score_gpt":0.1988758323296316,"score_spread":0.12871414346846993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249241366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033078602,0.0023965556,0.0004657434,0.0015657953,0.0065977727,0.00015615497,0.0038120158,0.00090217503,0.98377305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006149201,0.00083003874,0.0001078334,0.00044013717,0.0012875972,0.000045782977,0.0009908113,0.00027275283,0.99541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990428,0.00008848613,0.000053788837,0.00015953089,0.0005649532,0.000090296526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997681,0.00038469688,0.0001342639,0.00035433384,0.00091954024,0.0005260473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006898959,0.0018383248,0.0016958001,0.010034742,0.0023597572,0.008447085,0.0016211647,0.001991389,0.779531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053676628,0.00063431676,0.0008800397,0.006997451,0.0010904798,0.0034983165,0.0027035484,0.0021569312,0.790774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017961616,0.000031313546,0.00011116437,0.00010683592,0.0000027642081,0.000016982005,0.000018717548,0.000043475673,0.0001309373,0.0029657464,0.95564765,0.040906496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083312225,0.000011703426,0.00035958926,0.00014564283,0.0000029838657,0.000021158627,0.000023797087,0.000069507194,0.00006969184,0.0015376238,0.9977435,0.0000065370573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060093524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010065369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.220469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017904473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019608645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31447226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251416039","doi":"10.7202/1043167ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.12152293080750302,"score_gpt":0.3525396561079604,"score_spread":0.23101672530045736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251416039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005180419,0.21394521,0.011587819,0.17341177,0.020652853,0.00023796201,0.00409674,0.0004712201,0.57041603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060721524,0.29059914,0.00805066,0.043554667,0.022625295,0.00047505117,0.008201377,0.00069673476,0.5650756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954171,0.0009839996,0.000236385,0.00093911635,0.0019071948,0.0005162749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242676,0.006231138,0.00087248633,0.0013415961,0.0070661255,0.002061923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006775127,0.00066258025,0.00079730863,0.0050570876,0.002883793,0.008540005,0.0019443987,0.0020413839,0.14283755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029661829,0.00045341364,0.00081933377,0.006984012,0.0022304018,0.007022594,0.0030149464,0.0030520149,0.06643991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063926374,0.00008507627,0.0011699544,0.0012968939,0.000025349389,0.000065087566,0.0007472916,0.00020941091,0.00027651704,0.13624614,0.6430095,0.21680489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003847259,0.000016376234,0.0008074799,0.00057680084,0.0000053282333,0.000076613556,0.00047794695,0.000053783187,0.00008004506,0.0077331257,0.9901626,0.0000060649995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064063063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011336087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14283755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004887226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009812536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47783923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251540984","doi":"10.7202/1082039ar","title":"Écriture doctrinale","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05515462320492757,"score_gpt":0.3106479485017094,"score_spread":0.2554933252967818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251540984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042369124,0.0045650606,0.019866005,0.045572445,0.00605323,0.000078673715,0.00031062367,0.00015834812,0.9191587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45786467,0.007627512,0.024232116,0.0813691,0.017210836,0.0008232274,0.00085458625,0.00046950032,0.40954852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934223,0.0019618007,0.00029294612,0.0013823457,0.0021970915,0.00074336614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936155,0.0022536963,0.00025121967,0.0016334093,0.0020468433,0.00019934535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004938079,0.0011441192,0.0011906589,0.0024285945,0.0060685817,0.009326942,0.002905015,0.009170575,0.036156476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015700856,0.00045714944,0.001028769,0.0012684145,0.013724798,0.006463915,0.0049822247,0.012280579,0.015000023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012395975,0.000029919336,0.00006444968,0.000043135562,0.000006943241,0.000050137816,0.00024258261,0.00006178972,0.000115987066,0.9756722,0.019642347,0.00405814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030283225,0.000021601121,0.00039363862,0.00026459194,0.000021586584,0.0002583055,0.0004763614,0.0006170938,0.0007027333,0.6191628,0.37802956,0.000021356427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006606271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005705377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036156476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004148613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023759322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12095547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252796054","doi":"10.7202/038651ar","title":"Préface","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044468064966668136,"score_gpt":0.2783238082275402,"score_spread":0.23385574326087208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252796054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013657172,0.0056539797,0.004386312,0.026299832,0.13587996,0.00060673483,0.016084261,0.0011482218,0.8085749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045236656,0.0017717336,0.0012683517,0.0040081567,0.011826618,0.0002466279,0.0054649096,0.00048148748,0.9704085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992774,0.00012263289,0.00004068746,0.00011384471,0.00037991838,0.00006544951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536777,0.0007496091,0.0001504172,0.00044372774,0.0028105746,0.0004778735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013446598,0.00070691336,0.0005137047,0.0034196475,0.0033232048,0.0029745756,0.0011301565,0.0009195493,0.45461136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010644855,0.00024843798,0.0004821959,0.0022136064,0.00063076953,0.0019265183,0.0017315594,0.0023486968,0.27149054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149974385,0.000010651808,0.00006657121,0.000041073137,0.0000010447303,0.000020210804,0.000058063713,0.000029404304,0.00004889534,0.005249701,0.9740616,0.020397816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003203518,0.000005950198,0.00027802004,0.00006456123,0.0000011403708,0.000016763972,0.00007657891,0.000017605409,0.000051176426,0.002460805,0.9970208,0.000003422671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01310159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015492778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45461136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026233415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025513067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256323219","doi":"10.7202/1082052ar","title":"Possession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047720769174089524,"score_gpt":0.27618795393430684,"score_spread":0.22846718476021732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256323219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016344227,0.000104092585,0.0009528081,0.000839358,0.0001000103,0.000029772356,0.00021586861,0.00006494606,0.9960588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09511899,0.00025997972,0.0005342384,0.0014573593,0.00018208749,0.000069907226,0.00032982134,0.00007286727,0.9019748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.00016314245,0.00005123166,0.00029542463,0.00062606804,0.00027705904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998931,0.00024443542,0.00005585881,0.00036196117,0.00030010095,0.00010672331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008821943,0.0004852904,0.00045552646,0.0015655197,0.0039578504,0.0049775043,0.001195622,0.0019401569,0.23486838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035426451,0.0004063499,0.000565519,0.0009376746,0.003295566,0.0039745835,0.004151173,0.0031168968,0.055433124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024403122,0.000026879605,0.00048624448,0.00003623779,0.000005405662,0.0002008557,0.00076547865,0.000049078753,0.00033960733,0.88070995,0.09351199,0.023843937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124174,0.000030829382,0.0012917855,0.000079668614,0.000014160427,0.0005211583,0.00079438515,0.00019587427,0.0007575787,0.13360539,0.86267626,0.000020434249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008582953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23486838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018197777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024314888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256381084","doi":"10.7202/1082050ar","title":"Mère","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.050794543863275234,"score_gpt":0.2708410450271359,"score_spread":0.22004650116386068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256381084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006646876,0.0007859622,0.001009555,0.002448167,0.0019279963,0.0000330619,0.00035501193,0.00031512597,0.9924604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005901088,0.00040068253,0.00038696197,0.0015461602,0.00048378092,0.000030599305,0.0001918174,0.00017054052,0.99088836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863845,0.00026532705,0.000056203575,0.00023662836,0.00063712173,0.00016626273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885035,0.0002368958,0.00006796888,0.00028507668,0.0003997007,0.00015993853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010167892,0.00062500854,0.00044215546,0.0021655746,0.0029448199,0.0065635187,0.0009371726,0.0023876012,0.43632844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003474405,0.00042087844,0.00047161404,0.0010376119,0.0017915359,0.0036036728,0.0031556468,0.002933738,0.265658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059341175,0.000034739627,0.0003726942,0.0001348238,0.0000078205885,0.0001909381,0.0012111778,0.000037467045,0.0010448949,0.31595674,0.58541155,0.09553789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017629038,0.0000036020112,0.00011363996,0.00002049492,0.0000013031407,0.000049064238,0.00007983843,0.000008804925,0.0000736031,0.0029982275,0.9966472,0.0000026068046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076845856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43632844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015103157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015715746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256496727","doi":"10.7202/1043168ar","title":"Volume 62 Index","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.052348473508332306,"score_gpt":0.22878961820035926,"score_spread":0.17644114469202696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256496727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003541785,0.0025971087,0.00053115434,0.0020944565,0.0089148255,0.00016224447,0.0036851382,0.0009682125,0.9806927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007256454,0.00089170743,0.00013337283,0.00062439096,0.0019363381,0.000050977196,0.0011222394,0.00034018667,0.99417514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882466,0.00010557538,0.00006407002,0.0001773405,0.0007199345,0.00010845478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700505,0.00047712706,0.00017373999,0.00038213455,0.0011871334,0.0007748012],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007783474,0.0019164763,0.0016897693,0.011006125,0.0025008556,0.009952531,0.0015785324,0.0021977162,0.7809292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006365286,0.00062778255,0.000875854,0.0074701756,0.001159131,0.004053772,0.00300531,0.00232778,0.7909276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015623637,0.000031884498,0.00011234481,0.00009913478,0.0000025766847,0.00001734036,0.000018189847,0.000037058868,0.000112809576,0.0025915094,0.9581142,0.03884736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008525245,0.000012835778,0.00035643042,0.00016069645,0.0000027665178,0.000024483787,0.000029773233,0.000070889175,0.000068016554,0.0018329128,0.9974256,0.000007002344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004937559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009137731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21907079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001763066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021386377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3124779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285547894","doi":"10.7202/1088287ar","title":"Les impasses théoriques et pratiques du contrôle de constitutionnalité canadien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04619538886680562,"score_gpt":0.34984692042985843,"score_spread":0.3036515315630528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285547894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03874751,0.0113016,0.027469913,0.14083831,0.0009999418,0.00006258031,0.00022241389,0.00010715273,0.78025055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89085966,0.0058998773,0.0028110456,0.008393729,0.0009531959,0.00022183674,0.00006288828,0.000077103345,0.09072062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992712,0.0029175656,0.00014792604,0.0015195981,0.0016457574,0.0010571884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888812,0.008653413,0.00060986634,0.00092385535,0.0007016421,0.00023011783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008938356,0.00070222525,0.000753556,0.0019136482,0.005520095,0.010983404,0.0028780499,0.0058128815,0.019763138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016668407,0.0005427894,0.0010465618,0.0017810854,0.023904234,0.0078365905,0.0042016613,0.0089533,0.0012599449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025615893,0.0000031838965,0.00005206851,0.000006289169,0.0000025939905,0.000010599313,0.00047987665,0.0001417825,0.000007154632,0.997635,0.000867193,0.00079164165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022903138,0.0000145916465,0.0004924758,0.00013360396,0.000020540738,0.00002918815,0.0008774593,0.0014342905,0.00015970139,0.92507106,0.071720175,0.000024023899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024612498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016684398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014279611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006566361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10360634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303437222","doi":"10.7202/1092013ar","title":"L’extinction des droits ancestraux des non-signataires de la Convention de la Baie-James : le test de la condition 14","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.05458531008092042,"score_gpt":0.3699084595960679,"score_spread":0.31532314951514745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303437222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75071424,0.0016319139,0.0037299406,0.011277477,0.0003468057,0.00010052871,0.0013797011,0.000028169396,0.23079117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588611,0.0005561507,0.0015119956,0.0020362139,0.00007846815,0.00005911338,0.0004822718,0.000020636386,0.036394086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973584,0.00036835714,0.00009323996,0.00076214154,0.00051192025,0.000905936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952643,0.001038849,0.001102052,0.0006145654,0.0013516183,0.000628623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003927322,0.00029752697,0.0006759127,0.00087788515,0.004911356,0.003633861,0.0014111445,0.0016530078,0.016469024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010977361,0.00019147182,0.00040636424,0.0008497998,0.0095393965,0.0019188063,0.0020528222,0.002453643,0.0007421404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006721509,0.00014135778,0.25182244,0.00024041686,0.00024293647,0.00162641,0.015954917,0.0016342736,0.0036527752,0.6572984,0.012685774,0.054028127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026720075,0.00083772757,0.57232136,0.0008069041,0.00034527437,0.0026332063,0.03084612,0.0049517923,0.004336356,0.10181896,0.28058103,0.00025408535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43631908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5619415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5636809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072383843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010056925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86755884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303437248","doi":"10.7202/1092014ar","title":"Expressive Voting and Irrational Outcomes in Corporate Elections","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Shareholder; Corporate governance; Voting trust; Disapproval voting; Value (mathematics); Politics; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Accounting; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.029217076321107305,"score_gpt":0.21553605361736117,"score_spread":0.18631897729625385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303437248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7819595,0.001700918,0.029492067,0.008958413,0.00026721045,0.000090611255,0.00017749792,0.00009155537,0.1772622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972499,0.00014926169,0.00039862187,0.00014093226,0.00008206195,0.000017408745,0.000023273273,0.000008446159,0.0019300294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932561,0.004106025,0.00026868877,0.0005335601,0.00075935863,0.0010763286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683943,0.0205332,0.0065675345,0.0020067974,0.0011930533,0.0013050102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008125696,0.0002126127,0.00060783315,0.0010042867,0.0019435476,0.003589988,0.00050565007,0.001260302,0.008206805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037775647,0.0002158543,0.00040290153,0.0010018818,0.005696276,0.0029593941,0.0024517472,0.0023800046,0.00058634614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032093617,0.00021900247,0.04635438,0.00010633298,0.00006326356,0.00059416785,0.004346836,0.0058042,0.0006614539,0.9056973,0.004304534,0.03152765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007799633,0.0000986425,0.031624146,0.00006215991,0.00003167789,0.00023846696,0.0022128527,0.014069666,0.0002759625,0.94500417,0.006257626,0.00004654914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016143642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021532562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008206805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001439692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006893336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04297328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312410912","doi":"10.7202/1093269ar","title":"De la fiducie de données en droit civil québécois : étude exploratoire pour un outil en construction","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028089620729622483,"score_gpt":0.2831094994036393,"score_spread":0.25501987867401676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312410912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49220023,0.024508968,0.15462726,0.07404419,0.0005591983,0.0010616978,0.0033882353,0.00050234253,0.2491079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176111,0.0052049523,0.043747056,0.0014180447,0.000058625254,0.00035655792,0.000837596,0.00013313016,0.030632835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96840537,0.012769521,0.0013628722,0.0026921625,0.013010344,0.001759706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9137418,0.04525138,0.0057954527,0.009187091,0.024228005,0.0017962139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037221313,0.00082086906,0.0010146328,0.0068842303,0.009957644,0.018680759,0.0038481697,0.0032716542,0.007003557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08529821,0.000941251,0.0011329995,0.009956337,0.015540643,0.0122272605,0.006841493,0.0047093267,0.0007212472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021083462,0.00010956994,0.04203048,0.0014504639,0.00018761973,0.0012444672,0.12940563,0.0046869437,0.0021219198,0.61743474,0.013461743,0.18765551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063507374,0.00023663613,0.10062046,0.005821093,0.0003041022,0.0022205256,0.16531508,0.035270292,0.0068731033,0.0857552,0.5969723,0.0005476688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87619483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8533863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92049015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07950987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08200233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5768872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393004","doi":"10.7202/1098445ar","title":"Vers une théorie de la fin de non-recevoir en droit privé québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015576148114654527,"score_gpt":0.29426636034274894,"score_spread":0.2786902122280944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11433566,0.008651171,0.009179614,0.112507395,0.00030977,0.000048837297,0.0005374381,0.000036597125,0.75439346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89071333,0.0021140722,0.0011495202,0.0061006583,0.00010618778,0.00004214608,0.00012786234,0.00005555229,0.09959077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979367,0.00046550977,0.000038965354,0.00034326455,0.0003925206,0.00082297705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.0015402002,0.00026084794,0.00031502877,0.00091075525,0.00044531847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037257718,0.0004691341,0.0006460404,0.0012044092,0.009323335,0.0053458232,0.0018714382,0.005646884,0.022554211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008487153,0.0005438314,0.00073636963,0.0015656219,0.01784481,0.007423561,0.0032277927,0.0074253324,0.00090797397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015135199,0.0000130610515,0.0011133049,0.000018840587,0.00000988454,0.00011438062,0.0041497825,0.00036222287,0.000038307524,0.98459077,0.0067110597,0.0028632162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057504567,0.000030996365,0.010020418,0.00058022054,0.00008553199,0.00020057384,0.011045,0.0022107377,0.0002671561,0.8412392,0.13420185,0.000060830138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84387755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8581635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15612245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03733829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025712268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31408376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393007","doi":"10.7202/1098443ar","title":"Rééquilibrer le rôle de la Cour suprême du Canada en procédure criminelle","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014494343375557108,"score_gpt":0.26251071006144366,"score_spread":0.24801636668588656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07938446,0.089972995,0.006255498,0.29949114,0.0039296923,0.00018619606,0.00071261305,0.00010895058,0.51995844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004276,0.029025806,0.0036926193,0.04766939,0.0013376506,0.000096896714,0.00025075662,0.00014082264,0.11735842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823357,0.0021901312,0.0002474053,0.0009130739,0.0048930524,0.0035226634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856871,0.0059335725,0.0006900284,0.0004493373,0.0058232364,0.0014168094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094445795,0.00034612935,0.0004832393,0.0014122698,0.008437389,0.009139475,0.002104993,0.005266907,0.01350938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02962973,0.00033784154,0.00053478155,0.0019633577,0.010103574,0.0049156947,0.002784311,0.006720913,0.0010064638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012497511,0.00004414419,0.008033068,0.0003817956,0.00004803433,0.00032844482,0.01097843,0.0005698055,0.00061731413,0.75708926,0.11282944,0.1089553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666539,0.000099867415,0.037621614,0.0020819579,0.00015779673,0.0003525728,0.011895787,0.0010098874,0.002048448,0.04835452,0.8961336,0.0001772959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96514577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07245362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057953104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1267831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42048115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393008","doi":"10.7202/1098444ar","title":"The Limits of the Declaratory Judgment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Summary judgment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04791834975192315,"score_gpt":0.3076115822506873,"score_spread":0.25969323249876414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019237151,0.03591197,0.035814643,0.16166118,0.0013403939,0.00011080324,0.00013657057,0.00013922248,0.745648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703872,0.015369685,0.015580741,0.04542588,0.002214382,0.000299024,0.00008387882,0.00019712493,0.050442055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532756,0.014998281,0.0027952788,0.0073144697,0.017779967,0.0038363345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946309,0.04098648,0.0016050416,0.0037349863,0.005729984,0.0016344459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040898927,0.0005839162,0.0013597407,0.0023848973,0.012663631,0.02043021,0.004432309,0.01039909,0.005215191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060753535,0.0008920876,0.0010404314,0.0018904347,0.08585132,0.014618314,0.00817878,0.018898506,0.00095374166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004726052,0.000002718697,0.00008701486,0.000019451854,0.0000028036739,0.000036655645,0.0018397232,0.000051815547,0.000040449657,0.99165267,0.002002384,0.0042596725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026661,0.000023174702,0.00059550384,0.0006647679,0.000020620697,0.00017656742,0.0029383095,0.00045506257,0.000240309,0.74823856,0.24656092,0.00006588342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1691004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13439575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1691004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031026168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03192869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33623224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058606","doi":"10.7202/1098593ar","title":"Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel à combler","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07040641311657626,"score_gpt":0.34513133532927864,"score_spread":0.2747249222127024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058795526,0.12254859,0.014477557,0.42362994,0.010853677,0.00024767133,0.0005024427,0.00015160297,0.421709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.294808,0.08324594,0.02741315,0.079687476,0.018584663,0.0010894533,0.00055849843,0.00024544736,0.4943674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848,0.0052810907,0.0007264766,0.0012240345,0.006328117,0.0016404208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108934,0.004117723,0.00082404463,0.00084270217,0.002152171,0.0009740117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014265758,0.00084310054,0.00118641,0.0019903167,0.011020829,0.017564554,0.002318166,0.012751951,0.015558641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01744899,0.0011910979,0.00069540576,0.0030554992,0.01783968,0.016221877,0.009088889,0.012038655,0.002609439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019290424,0.0000142265535,0.00020932179,0.00015099044,0.0000046253767,0.00006143401,0.0034393806,0.00011087605,0.000162937,0.84993315,0.123730056,0.022163767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018729364,0.000026592186,0.0013615654,0.00063977315,0.00001207454,0.000079890575,0.0022934813,0.00018169115,0.0001934858,0.08447244,0.91067016,0.000050180297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089339115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14100364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089339115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014541543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031765703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17763817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058610","doi":"10.7202/1098594ar","title":"Making Meaning: Indigenous Legal Education and Student Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Internship; Meaning (existential); Legal education; Practice of law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Action (physics); Legal research; Legal profession; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10166086787338059,"score_gpt":0.4433395643533455,"score_spread":0.3416786964799649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16521725,0.013690032,0.0019978927,0.36045894,0.00102455,0.000032904027,0.000045701894,0.000040227333,0.4574926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711827,0.0030107703,0.00037035384,0.0061800745,0.00018032882,0.000033102686,0.000011174207,0.000011495934,0.0190201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951691,0.003519171,0.000064586035,0.00016994486,0.00044466593,0.0006326134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953908,0.0028203644,0.00042858583,0.00016426419,0.00027461792,0.0009214585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159624,0.00020341222,0.00020121664,0.00049042056,0.007149806,0.007354183,0.0007474939,0.0043598893,0.008744248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103162285,0.00012540877,0.00017941896,0.00076099613,0.026903035,0.007844554,0.0078031644,0.0040623634,0.0005322544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028326464,0.0001560534,0.0024843123,0.0001320516,0.000005752478,0.000299068,0.32955354,0.000095819145,0.00012269455,0.5989581,0.02620552,0.0419587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742648,0.000075204945,0.009888344,0.0008089273,0.000019166207,0.00020007753,0.4030018,0.0003501884,0.00040484863,0.37011465,0.2150679,0.000041460724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023634382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046918284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023634382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005311288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010409252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046993613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058617","doi":"10.7202/1098591ar","title":"Are Tents a “Home”? Extending Section 8 Privacy Rights for the Precariously Housed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Denial; Political science; Trespass; Sociology","score_opus":0.039203409888685155,"score_gpt":0.29823716596560423,"score_spread":0.2590337560769191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032516826,0.0040286584,0.0048653856,0.14541262,0.0023811078,0.00017036448,0.0012031986,0.00016060221,0.8092611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4260107,0.0035149818,0.004186525,0.17469132,0.0020737702,0.00054760324,0.0007636602,0.00014571792,0.38806576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196917,0.0017760355,0.00039512815,0.00075572834,0.0027617135,0.0023423948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951126,0.002026846,0.00066415936,0.0007118601,0.001089957,0.00039459494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509761,0.00037710692,0.00047539413,0.00041387026,0.0049428493,0.005208891,0.001764615,0.012849181,0.018334528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012220099,0.0007469282,0.0006540312,0.00048637687,0.005229293,0.0061205034,0.004219511,0.0073810737,0.0054028244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010890797,0.00006548105,0.002149669,0.00010725826,0.000010913321,0.00048321052,0.008443346,0.00014052066,0.0012075466,0.70582336,0.26352546,0.017934343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066398956,0.00008870515,0.007138561,0.00073222874,0.000046912606,0.0004303853,0.0045414246,0.00026887684,0.0016826596,0.07200722,0.91287535,0.00012119771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10536156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037020417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013969662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12737042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058618","doi":"10.7202/1098596ar","title":"Volume 67 Index","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Business; Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034308601976959875,"score_gpt":0.19876164890807563,"score_spread":0.16445304693111576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032652848,0.0017090995,0.00037169966,0.0013023128,0.0055306903,0.00016073971,0.003897819,0.0008410537,0.9858601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061795523,0.0007765597,0.00010537121,0.00047039046,0.0012092725,0.000053269167,0.0011483207,0.00027906097,0.99533975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903715,0.000082831604,0.000049576898,0.00014368376,0.0005739578,0.000112901784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975885,0.0003485994,0.00013015747,0.00029771242,0.00097607117,0.0006589404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006649962,0.0020853558,0.001710782,0.010538141,0.002512142,0.008468967,0.0015307203,0.002110211,0.7851413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00481355,0.00068798393,0.00087543105,0.007171855,0.0010591021,0.0032144564,0.0026828083,0.0021571028,0.8220919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017698343,0.000035979807,0.00012591261,0.00010207806,0.0000025357301,0.000020452659,0.000017068312,0.00004179777,0.00012157925,0.002398431,0.9587657,0.03835075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009994806,0.000015569387,0.0004596394,0.00016299167,0.0000029373355,0.000026728132,0.000030131543,0.000073219824,0.00007482006,0.0014959889,0.9976405,0.0000075439216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006800295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011782789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21485871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017438178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023870377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30646986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058620","doi":"10.7202/1098592ar","title":"La gravité en droit international pénal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015556108719102171,"score_gpt":0.28349082950056625,"score_spread":0.2679347207814641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059391934,0.013814975,0.010332419,0.032278843,0.001516369,0.000051764473,0.00028084562,0.00012845855,0.8822045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521566,0.010173119,0.0034179012,0.008389494,0.0013739329,0.00012278685,0.00022263231,0.00018894904,0.1239546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304986,0.0020571533,0.0003461545,0.00075688073,0.002889639,0.0009002787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939713,0.0022670948,0.0014135337,0.00045529127,0.0013937354,0.00049902825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002814886,0.0007415907,0.00038005353,0.0028270776,0.004283963,0.00990185,0.0011013629,0.003397526,0.01206455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426246,0.00030384873,0.00060931745,0.0022991113,0.015492036,0.006245108,0.0061828555,0.005703619,0.0017272606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014169021,0.000011339747,0.0019266552,0.00009603506,0.000012085703,0.00020561603,0.015025685,0.00013874714,0.00021700675,0.95971626,0.008208566,0.014427861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012858495,0.0001155791,0.021918979,0.0012933912,0.000040723382,0.0019057854,0.019038368,0.0005107265,0.00069211895,0.15359417,0.8007559,0.0001214201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012943091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012413901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012943091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055292463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031137087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040359914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058623","doi":"10.7202/1098595ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05493260154688672,"score_gpt":0.26743574794179537,"score_spread":0.21250314639490864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002759982,0.020227108,0.0028228082,0.06156781,0.010375261,0.00029845664,0.010010874,0.000628959,0.8913088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0115742665,0.016966911,0.0008709221,0.009727029,0.0041504144,0.00030007065,0.005402632,0.00031382873,0.95069385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967415,0.00045932815,0.00011867702,0.0005091019,0.001660674,0.0005107841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903347,0.0017863759,0.00043522974,0.000901626,0.004140216,0.0024017624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029451558,0.0006956125,0.0009540392,0.007824457,0.0039219665,0.008243143,0.0020017836,0.0017915606,0.4968701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014353534,0.00045606718,0.00071811635,0.008084628,0.0013485297,0.0038309016,0.0037746315,0.002285398,0.36178774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002640967,0.00004330791,0.0004887898,0.00018248725,0.0000033639362,0.000016885497,0.00014474156,0.00004474158,0.000107231455,0.024266185,0.91417533,0.06050066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040927102,0.000012537341,0.0008101763,0.0001677668,0.0000021554197,0.000022018474,0.00022497775,0.00004116752,0.000053568794,0.001910324,0.996748,0.0000034316818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065160664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012523337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5031299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045436784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008566321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71765375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310830","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1192","title":"télétravail transfrontalier face aux défis de coordination des règles de conflit et des normes minimales d'emploi","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0653927825808888,"score_gpt":0.34275278575370416,"score_spread":0.27736000317281534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097907186,0.0011605696,0.052271057,0.013138214,0.00026284135,0.00010566289,0.00015641718,0.00021271437,0.8347854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86954314,0.0006247945,0.006824604,0.00085919077,0.000086260996,0.00012685168,0.000068800684,0.00010066099,0.12176566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971752,0.0007228405,0.00008542461,0.0006055606,0.0008792057,0.0005317007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741757,0.00050209503,0.00037690523,0.0005325907,0.00081631314,0.0003545262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024595312,0.0003875258,0.0003229004,0.0011062593,0.0049928427,0.007915533,0.0013731713,0.0017595517,0.01870057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040655513,0.00026873767,0.00029170304,0.001166208,0.020312384,0.004838877,0.004055106,0.0029957572,0.0015466287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024355782,0.000009704012,0.0007757677,0.000049558825,0.000006515985,0.00009750233,0.012461227,0.00036942845,0.0005440537,0.9706315,0.002313657,0.012716641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005423674,0.00014126288,0.014317725,0.00055351533,0.00005740623,0.0004875122,0.05306465,0.003317931,0.0024827335,0.27194512,0.65349185,0.00008608701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14897786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17250384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14897786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016425196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016588712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29622144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310854","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1181","title":"No Country for Old Men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02349347345522424,"score_gpt":0.3100334944892338,"score_spread":0.28654002103400955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004247146,0.012079054,0.0002695129,0.07381208,0.025269978,0.00007029893,0.0008360463,0.00013686753,0.88327897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0130697,0.0037734255,0.00020264283,0.034339104,0.002177925,0.00005251543,0.00024212542,0.000050114442,0.9460923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993618,0.000111626534,0.000024183399,0.00013382122,0.00015194794,0.00021668279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991233,0.00006977591,0.000053669777,0.00008024153,0.00019404633,0.0004789995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080581906,0.0005023355,0.0004434336,0.0005315221,0.004539578,0.003516474,0.00071771437,0.0028634437,0.20957717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022027704,0.00022488159,0.00024875393,0.00038653772,0.0014060892,0.0030989589,0.004474627,0.0037276559,0.12778701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041550844,0.000062774976,0.0013733528,0.00010086735,0.000004579823,0.00027889866,0.0011547946,0.0000093017115,0.00023924818,0.043581076,0.8693702,0.08378325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002514923,0.000012107128,0.0004286664,0.00006167118,0.0000010112753,0.000079541045,0.00030068416,0.0000024692147,0.0000129634245,0.00048893096,0.998607,0.0000023856544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060827606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013943478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20957717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008797227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002250653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7011055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310893","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1191","title":"Five Linguistic Methods for Revitalizing Indigenous Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06066495592786393,"score_gpt":0.418206220004975,"score_spread":0.35754126407711107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045063224,0.012111983,0.29431805,0.06115874,0.0014858015,0.0009629524,0.00010293673,0.0012574666,0.58353883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.579999,0.007893121,0.32466736,0.0051479847,0.00038310245,0.0017235804,0.00010213,0.00059597794,0.07948776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98106444,0.013799119,0.0007099964,0.0009640611,0.0027102977,0.00075209973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879731,0.007812848,0.0008277404,0.0017052231,0.0012499782,0.00043108992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023845676,0.0010011394,0.0005709806,0.007505805,0.008675899,0.013015644,0.0038702402,0.0041768556,0.0068437224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018823158,0.00050678855,0.0011072109,0.0030306214,0.046393257,0.013843221,0.013169521,0.00559866,0.0010519811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012090213,0.000049092123,0.00038065176,0.00035377927,0.00001033477,0.00010872209,0.05259254,0.0002473688,0.00048278208,0.8931705,0.0020139224,0.050578255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004582896,0.00012420282,0.0011282442,0.0018975814,0.000054458178,0.00045256456,0.07968724,0.0019579795,0.0029995048,0.52351207,0.3880439,0.00009642109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014913781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023845676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0134496745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010687448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12610948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404855","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1291","title":"To Whom Are Directors’ Duties Owed? Evidence from Canadian M&A Transactions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.059363609441009005,"score_gpt":0.2420850855850166,"score_spread":0.18272147614400758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7916011,0.005141603,0.00039958712,0.01608583,0.00007506151,0.00014302526,0.0044538598,0.00002671695,0.18207331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799825,0.0023422968,0.0002082923,0.0018156286,0.00003289433,0.000031544696,0.0015121691,0.000013272335,0.014061362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98850363,0.0011907055,0.0005178074,0.0011134673,0.0058138086,0.002860541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9314745,0.023305723,0.015734604,0.002497839,0.020640383,0.006346917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007138229,0.00041673955,0.00047718795,0.004164751,0.013488114,0.0068090768,0.0027972802,0.0022792395,0.012461929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042316396,0.0006623814,0.0003739154,0.009004259,0.0045057293,0.0028169064,0.0027401496,0.00270794,0.0011068301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005094859,0.00042444342,0.66836774,0.00084591366,0.00014983786,0.0014010376,0.117855504,0.0004175673,0.0011087485,0.057268348,0.0845298,0.06712156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004937919,0.000034967405,0.8445526,0.00054793974,0.00009148211,0.00014495493,0.067968175,0.00034636122,0.00046433086,0.0011541962,0.08456163,0.00008409421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99110997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055911385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055911385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057428252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40566736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404882","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1292","title":"Cooperative Difference in Insolvency Proceedings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Political science; Financial system; Business; Law","score_opus":0.03022051615031474,"score_gpt":0.2287096506447834,"score_spread":0.19848913449446867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21780343,0.0011603142,0.008245598,0.019773524,0.00028453508,0.00014557377,0.00006713482,0.000058785325,0.7524612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831713,0.00016217977,0.0005472077,0.002263494,0.00008828247,0.000048061833,0.00001817574,0.00001113545,0.013690224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98169965,0.006300907,0.0007903131,0.0020635296,0.005133674,0.0040118922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97514933,0.01659207,0.0017332406,0.0017059152,0.0031160968,0.0017032897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134236505,0.0001843606,0.00047849378,0.0015703322,0.0105785355,0.009959022,0.0016830756,0.0069744415,0.012042564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036404587,0.00035439784,0.00046500465,0.0014906661,0.011231352,0.005386624,0.0075569944,0.0066197687,0.0006680466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020650357,0.0000389229,0.0017796782,0.000020265357,0.000011750397,0.00048599858,0.010519937,0.00019249928,0.00026096767,0.9754024,0.005518991,0.0057478393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015790007,0.00031279752,0.021513121,0.0005105936,0.00016708233,0.0014782706,0.03359179,0.004192012,0.002699014,0.5175072,0.41769633,0.00017394057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019076442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036106627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019076442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006976037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072019347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070991874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404908","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1307","title":"The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634585772018647,"score_gpt":0.3563337948703247,"score_spread":0.24998793715013823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08682684,0.010655937,0.03553997,0.13134274,0.0005428532,0.00009348623,0.00019260954,0.00012454488,0.7346811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707771,0.0011961326,0.004550274,0.0077685667,0.00030397496,0.00009471482,0.000042813303,0.00004133485,0.015225065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743963,0.003590319,0.00035766626,0.0015346585,0.0043477225,0.0027300648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079984,0.0047327,0.00065694406,0.0010669556,0.00181315,0.0009303757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010655119,0.00038810697,0.0007120323,0.0018692235,0.009458365,0.014248984,0.002462625,0.0075900634,0.0036208148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015779894,0.00053844036,0.0007769983,0.00096017815,0.09045373,0.0068586343,0.005658835,0.012834848,0.00045119366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018094308,0.0000027326803,0.000065990134,0.000005468648,0.000001164147,0.000017891958,0.00059762155,0.00009256364,0.000039239014,0.9977983,0.0004652668,0.00091192435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015290345,0.000009131622,0.00073963817,0.000104570485,0.0000061278406,0.000039866198,0.0007192747,0.0005553128,0.00012543386,0.9598053,0.037855458,0.000024680226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28986484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25080362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28986484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04143647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041259687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5763553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404962","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1320","title":"Les pratiques de détention de l’Agence des services frontaliers du Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03095077767715222,"score_gpt":0.3081492589224672,"score_spread":0.277198481245315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88823605,0.0026266684,0.0022189342,0.032228183,0.00026149163,0.00015479486,0.00061494275,0.000048219328,0.073610626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97632515,0.0021061709,0.00093839935,0.0017593461,0.000025020541,0.000052468247,0.00012875942,0.00001477777,0.018649984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957527,0.0008841225,0.00009212947,0.00031112175,0.0010069843,0.0019529952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138325,0.0017008397,0.00078833755,0.00020136032,0.0029650668,0.0029610882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002982124,0.00028791334,0.00035537322,0.001030865,0.019670205,0.004437806,0.0016373782,0.0013879185,0.006719596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010247915,0.00027219485,0.00033198495,0.0019707922,0.007621044,0.0016633327,0.004268855,0.0034185313,0.0003482221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015435996,0.00014562141,0.13611808,0.00035620556,0.000048903054,0.0016500084,0.64332646,0.0013836189,0.0011492603,0.05926256,0.030667618,0.1257373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018975285,0.00008717816,0.12408816,0.0008130103,0.00002721814,0.0002385614,0.70634735,0.0006219606,0.0003316639,0.0027118106,0.16460937,0.00010473838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99479985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084330715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084330715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21074188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61186504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404971","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1306","title":"Recoding Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788317923485174,"score_gpt":0.3306276168105635,"score_spread":0.26274443757571175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06641639,0.013201736,0.07505414,0.08004314,0.0022228109,0.0001469715,0.0010055469,0.00043814452,0.7614712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081156,0.0028561158,0.00711175,0.0061194496,0.000323611,0.000070291004,0.00020231215,0.00010652056,0.07509432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621886,0.0012654483,0.00010489704,0.0005657619,0.0010220695,0.0008230735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553204,0.0010335636,0.00026768542,0.0005787389,0.0022714909,0.00031637514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038624757,0.00061152154,0.00041535418,0.0033028538,0.010231823,0.0076196953,0.0023557732,0.0027336706,0.009581356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058469,0.0002606418,0.00040642274,0.0017596806,0.023599887,0.0062474906,0.0036747134,0.004050029,0.00054261147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002730733,0.0000024571966,0.00067582814,0.000014555668,0.00000193686,0.00016006449,0.0094130365,0.00018944968,0.00004157282,0.9738709,0.007111654,0.008515895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009187004,0.000010392562,0.0038076187,0.00040762595,0.000015948375,0.0005012929,0.022114426,0.0017139498,0.00026463062,0.20052557,0.77057546,0.000053893775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88408005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8703746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88408005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066575736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037535183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48304302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393405017","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1293","title":"La Loi 101 et l’égalité linguistique au sens de la Charte canadienne","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.035056688069745004,"score_gpt":0.2961415734090242,"score_spread":0.2610848853392792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393405017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07370349,0.0050001577,0.0069603543,0.029940298,0.00095423596,0.00008293071,0.0007033451,0.00008435864,0.8825708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8500635,0.0022772946,0.003074128,0.0032072705,0.0002023597,0.00015180487,0.00042499194,0.00010215246,0.14049646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655044,0.0012337257,0.00012347933,0.00044099538,0.00096944394,0.00068201416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576616,0.0024257142,0.00032660965,0.0003893008,0.00087689224,0.00021544717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028020288,0.00043411684,0.00035930445,0.0016035334,0.0046660793,0.0097220875,0.00082278455,0.0020444929,0.012564806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069578,0.00023665601,0.000382901,0.0024922772,0.010927614,0.0036762168,0.0018826303,0.004496023,0.0013562952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035811394,0.00001292173,0.0028227933,0.00012234497,0.000008168649,0.00016295335,0.042401444,0.00017080035,0.00040408567,0.92182434,0.01404232,0.017992014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019063855,0.000030402916,0.018061472,0.0005978685,0.000018214952,0.00020665447,0.031660136,0.00033673976,0.00075264915,0.055005398,0.89324486,0.00006657456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.286717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33188406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.713283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019193975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014633941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57009625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067209","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1366","title":"réclamations d’actionnaires pour pertes par ricochet en arbitrage investisseur-État sous les traités d’investissement canadiens","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0270083501788192,"score_gpt":0.22940533773529634,"score_spread":0.20239698755647714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12410909,0.0043626786,0.24039789,0.022683715,0.0012125898,0.00029752686,0.00056412746,0.0004294497,0.605943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70940566,0.0014498926,0.021346373,0.0018387494,0.000294778,0.0002753391,0.00018656811,0.00012108503,0.26508152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969404,0.00085616723,0.00011974993,0.00067926827,0.00092787517,0.00047654475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970656,0.0010413725,0.00050602626,0.0006400371,0.00049014884,0.00025686604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029314416,0.00071129645,0.00074024143,0.0010912005,0.001973809,0.0057596816,0.00163987,0.0034148782,0.027680915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007749771,0.00042257857,0.0015263995,0.001252783,0.0043779216,0.004816465,0.002876255,0.004800962,0.0028011443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053106854,0.000020542559,0.0005851671,0.000042693442,0.00002354767,0.00017706388,0.00057304313,0.0050648106,0.00030115215,0.9831201,0.002334737,0.0077039935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011629537,0.00012646361,0.0023845597,0.00016449948,0.000094015806,0.00036205057,0.0011039255,0.025470205,0.0012453818,0.8291426,0.13969609,0.0000939527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016894912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012864384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98310506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038451601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004267918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092601836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067264","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1367","title":"Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025843342562406908,"score_gpt":0.28535590776704206,"score_spread":0.25951256520463517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31293383,0.009727582,0.00072820275,0.47868243,0.0012356623,0.00008530856,0.000086453205,0.00002188904,0.19649857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96201396,0.0016726296,0.00017308058,0.02540814,0.00054553273,0.000049767263,0.000016237698,0.000012490191,0.01010812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97700626,0.010541562,0.00055763,0.0014898046,0.0025300859,0.007874681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763591,0.013066578,0.0034466863,0.001023132,0.0018969966,0.0042075017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013271934,0.0004197541,0.0007960249,0.0021292455,0.035484355,0.013337724,0.003509255,0.02315805,0.006073039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047560647,0.00086803065,0.0008340513,0.002662832,0.033077117,0.0077899694,0.012017894,0.021507997,0.0006726335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018815993,0.0002615885,0.019069452,0.000121991616,0.0000396736,0.019690702,0.18909495,0.00025731296,0.00025788412,0.61913335,0.12306068,0.02882439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000256223,0.0002636347,0.03922726,0.002480345,0.00015438642,0.011853716,0.5795978,0.0010376511,0.0008060461,0.18046217,0.18347836,0.00038244034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23827411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39984664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018584868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025968906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47377437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067284","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1365","title":"Modernizing Non-Profit Law in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Profit (economics); Law; Business; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.042705371106519466,"score_gpt":0.30109568127793307,"score_spread":0.2583903101714136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3659167,0.01570552,0.008447397,0.17722248,0.0009387594,0.00063739397,0.0008442117,0.00053926336,0.42974833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062873,0.006001377,0.006461389,0.018142134,0.0001237712,0.00007207093,0.00026968474,0.000065322754,0.06257692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914835,0.00069556787,0.0002000675,0.00060040836,0.0036739225,0.003346499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961323,0.0020663482,0.00054827944,0.00045397622,0.0050782664,0.0022398585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004289057,0.00030246112,0.00040567105,0.0022202833,0.014943682,0.008320015,0.0024279775,0.0026255497,0.0038822263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010867418,0.00051026494,0.0005189518,0.003385501,0.009423974,0.0019928624,0.0036234031,0.0039094407,0.00019787982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006909041,0.00014433666,0.019225297,0.00027211598,0.000053095453,0.0007099007,0.008688724,0.0054120007,0.0016742428,0.8022629,0.05789227,0.10359599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011500183,0.00012031933,0.13326235,0.0006327611,0.00013423924,0.00023159361,0.0136794485,0.010952046,0.0024362786,0.06130851,0.7768402,0.00028720658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99726045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2997924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2997924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47717813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81214154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236269","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1369","title":"Volume 68 Index","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.04876373161328179,"score_gpt":0.21814754224226915,"score_spread":0.16938381062898736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032898976,0.0018878543,0.00038402365,0.0014695803,0.0060448884,0.00016186164,0.0035522953,0.00088353525,0.9852871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00059076643,0.0007340711,0.000104036444,0.0004930386,0.0013568024,0.000052775165,0.000989149,0.0002659868,0.99541336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.00007766883,0.000045398854,0.00014169948,0.00054005976,0.000105435865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.00034166165,0.0001226216,0.0002840659,0.00088462385,0.0005968043],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064079626,0.002083064,0.0017380766,0.01014615,0.0024432822,0.008262224,0.001578767,0.0021857354,0.77528346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047377497,0.00066582416,0.00088753516,0.00659093,0.0010231775,0.0032209975,0.0026494497,0.0021972654,0.804345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001792888,0.00003466699,0.00011492174,0.00009464986,0.0000024683156,0.000020231726,0.000016010687,0.000039317965,0.00011765073,0.0022880228,0.95974225,0.037511896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010546983,0.000015536925,0.00044028068,0.00015223713,0.0000028342322,0.000026920185,0.000026817866,0.00007080217,0.00006724385,0.0015311483,0.99764854,0.0000071231525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064687124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011492446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77528346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017221703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002121294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32053083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236305","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1368","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09180876579044982,"score_gpt":0.3043602332821735,"score_spread":0.21255146749172366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028332202,0.019887265,0.0027765057,0.060988788,0.010172432,0.00030456766,0.010136954,0.0006312452,0.8922691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011624795,0.01655652,0.0008445895,0.00952658,0.004031275,0.00029677976,0.0053456975,0.0003082471,0.9514655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967158,0.0004615069,0.00011964101,0.0005041952,0.0016843904,0.0005145389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902418,0.0018008411,0.00044001674,0.0009135527,0.004204126,0.0023996392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029489892,0.00069228304,0.000954834,0.007881008,0.003909426,0.008152642,0.0019736898,0.0017829032,0.49674392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01434731,0.00045862125,0.00071891234,0.008155875,0.0013260987,0.0037801242,0.003763248,0.0022710282,0.36052588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026311667,0.000043168395,0.00049724843,0.00018020518,0.000003349025,0.00001642837,0.00014413253,0.000043150983,0.000107160675,0.022939965,0.9156059,0.060392823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000418668,0.000012870046,0.0008558933,0.00016842749,0.0000022081767,0.000022101982,0.000228677,0.000041204807,0.00005449445,0.0018429722,0.99676347,0.0000034544314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065686917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012656051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49674392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045098206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008532289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7178337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236501","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1363","title":"“Must the Police Refuse to Look?”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10311175227853549,"score_gpt":0.4080619500246245,"score_spread":0.304950197746089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14787212,0.0037992722,0.0031744442,0.6562471,0.001403502,0.000084611165,0.000108952496,0.00009127541,0.18721877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874757,0.0017886587,0.0007136443,0.0994641,0.00017982752,0.00002295669,0.00003269139,0.000053165633,0.022988075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876935,0.0038235462,0.0003578404,0.0008550415,0.004046178,0.003223878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951346,0.0026832744,0.0012877294,0.000554422,0.004226717,0.0017343799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065579307,0.00036288693,0.00035235495,0.001009522,0.029855795,0.008240793,0.002396888,0.0088032,0.0044115563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027541522,0.0005073611,0.00040920434,0.0010950711,0.0466658,0.00678826,0.0038927142,0.01116262,0.0010467023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039822433,0.00006058175,0.015024473,0.00013807311,0.000021413844,0.0023704162,0.5220124,0.00014250846,0.0010976752,0.21717247,0.19504288,0.046877302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011991048,0.00004012113,0.0064936574,0.00039689345,0.000017772243,0.0005637017,0.6526815,0.000152469,0.0003937652,0.01858477,0.32055187,0.00011143876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7946737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79002523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019727323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05376905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41307104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272772","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1370","title":"Mathur v. Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027966647036996067,"score_gpt":0.3052310094489832,"score_spread":0.2772643624119871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014437712,0.0041552936,0.0005732053,0.05268115,0.0011366189,0.00019063479,0.0014655112,0.00015965727,0.9252001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14333388,0.002843319,0.0006849269,0.062432695,0.00038842089,0.0001565767,0.0007089937,0.00010393854,0.7893472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365425,0.00022545097,0.000113691814,0.0005161453,0.002962117,0.0025282842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798703,0.00030461463,0.00007062096,0.000082714716,0.0011500224,0.00040488836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531222,0.0005290852,0.00041159475,0.0012370764,0.026560381,0.0053939433,0.0016590853,0.007832654,0.03288166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048775207,0.00077484146,0.0010244792,0.0013087502,0.0028039692,0.0015338792,0.0018550617,0.0057654213,0.002740968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012634025,0.00002987338,0.0060017197,0.00020598779,0.000041001225,0.0020888671,0.0034769047,0.00023909101,0.0013729049,0.3062969,0.65544724,0.024673082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036641028,0.000020796611,0.007303337,0.00015376642,0.00004941265,0.00019539244,0.0009927144,0.00021598703,0.00045437252,0.0049240766,0.9855864,0.00006703752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97982395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99454874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06887633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06887633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10265624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49973512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272975","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1439","title":"droits et la justice au guichet","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.13111102307223022,"score_gpt":0.43760386653234945,"score_spread":0.30649284346011924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08291661,0.008726854,0.0009083566,0.047890127,0.0009349561,0.000052279116,0.00034206331,0.00007360187,0.85815513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51962954,0.0028631454,0.0004011686,0.006365243,0.00016014051,0.00002576,0.00014681715,0.000047258458,0.47036102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981534,0.00039107405,0.00003419539,0.0001723191,0.0004389864,0.00081004965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904495,0.00013204153,0.000068608555,0.000059563252,0.0003713594,0.0003234615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009093249,0.00034848115,0.00027014362,0.00088432274,0.012984423,0.0058970754,0.0008370023,0.0018678735,0.03484392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018963612,0.0001805704,0.00022379884,0.0011459822,0.008283748,0.0014162037,0.0032633073,0.0031389974,0.0020271007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038183483,0.00004083742,0.0076862094,0.00009985166,0.000017598613,0.0007555633,0.05837445,0.0002527364,0.00042604696,0.7551461,0.11369048,0.063471995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009352505,0.000021380798,0.0215652,0.00020636825,0.000009180529,0.00016231416,0.023967566,0.00015817312,0.00012501382,0.009100407,0.9446508,0.000024194946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93956906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060430944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033106454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031374652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24020529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402273831","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1438","title":"Transgender Erasure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Erasure; Transgender; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.061052604928635006,"score_gpt":0.38472717382733546,"score_spread":0.32367456889870044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402273831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8567457,0.00830148,0.0028468166,0.051706158,0.0015296078,0.000115766416,0.00027462383,0.000062636085,0.07841714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96258414,0.004115617,0.00089202763,0.012261299,0.00015224633,0.00005744596,0.00009006767,0.000041819738,0.019805174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425936,0.002354619,0.00021294162,0.00040559832,0.0012320484,0.0015353122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937178,0.0023508053,0.0009081262,0.0005363391,0.0010060158,0.0014809632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065798187,0.0003219905,0.00048350397,0.001530404,0.020114517,0.0042465827,0.0008670288,0.001558386,0.010348858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013372067,0.00026290875,0.00047035338,0.0012168636,0.010729953,0.0031217663,0.009462816,0.0040027336,0.0008566827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000882163,0.00007419126,0.03379373,0.000292749,0.00003184403,0.0060323803,0.82561857,0.000088940666,0.0010300707,0.04568825,0.02059015,0.06667084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070298815,0.00007792705,0.011028239,0.000871753,0.000023681407,0.0050089145,0.8306123,0.00010125892,0.00031475513,0.0044504157,0.14745939,0.00004427929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13281773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21370777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13281773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062629515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014979887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26408935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402274817","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1440","title":"Jacques-Yvan Morin, GOQ, L D’H (1931-2023)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morin; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05073938416259463,"score_gpt":0.2901225430192741,"score_spread":0.23938315885667946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402274817","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054198354,0.19090012,0.0012134947,0.5109192,0.1123955,0.000055583434,0.000940648,0.0001414991,0.17801417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0709314,0.0349722,0.0006479964,0.06696952,0.019159172,0.00011210006,0.00025290248,0.00022854806,0.8067262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990396,0.00025348295,0.000034892037,0.0002566028,0.00027118225,0.00014424785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914265,0.00036029122,0.000067678826,0.00002773915,0.00024527678,0.00015636842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015742907,0.00067678746,0.00057150004,0.00094112457,0.007726251,0.0034972264,0.000538808,0.0036784355,0.034663748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052384865,0.00037043763,0.0003830328,0.00098273,0.001692305,0.002430891,0.0017099304,0.0052962922,0.0076353746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003959155,0.000012309934,0.0006594251,0.00006557474,0.000007658399,0.00017085983,0.0010713039,0.00004135786,0.00008751703,0.053367794,0.92221665,0.022259979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039690353,0.000004777072,0.00093732023,0.000062045496,0.0000022715478,0.00009435642,0.00029378445,0.000023201253,0.00005011041,0.0028086428,0.99571157,0.00000790577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06895004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13766298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93104994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007229488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003962208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13709742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190084","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1525","title":"Enjeux et défis de la profession notariale au regard de l'instrumentation des directives médicales anticipées :","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06061619030765158,"score_gpt":0.4463631183410778,"score_spread":0.3857469280334262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47012734,0.0059259557,0.052386552,0.16503654,0.0019463055,0.0021523833,0.00092860556,0.00017568888,0.30132073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515203,0.001396218,0.011965793,0.011292406,0.0001223133,0.0015914773,0.00016205828,0.00009426066,0.021855293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8901528,0.06857787,0.003875664,0.0067794006,0.025067812,0.0055464595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78389126,0.14137638,0.017705768,0.013743255,0.03674066,0.006542589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096564725,0.0006879354,0.0010637854,0.004233292,0.016786851,0.01932961,0.0035797379,0.0044811056,0.008732876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21617684,0.000879874,0.0006289696,0.005065316,0.04615981,0.012868665,0.011829018,0.00853653,0.0009239039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001103848,0.000085599946,0.026232395,0.00078639045,0.000053333162,0.00023200277,0.64151293,0.00023671573,0.00041664665,0.28376424,0.009581513,0.03698788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005587197,0.00013180179,0.047541056,0.0036699262,0.000106957035,0.00024306458,0.63335466,0.0014692114,0.0011517261,0.09629989,0.21576288,0.00021293588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31990117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35672846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31990117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053673696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087840326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63607824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190491","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1518","title":"Front Matter - v. 69, no 2","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.034505521292223666,"score_gpt":0.2178121629543866,"score_spread":0.18330664166216293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073397375,0.00043179336,0.00015874977,0.004381013,0.0015440737,0.000065434026,0.0010364735,0.00022699877,0.9914215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038566187,0.00018598113,0.00008112533,0.004343902,0.00066208903,0.000036624544,0.00026259554,0.00009801592,0.9904731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998808,0.00011354549,0.00004924626,0.00021996595,0.00055057264,0.00025858107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891853,0.00033556702,0.00003839226,0.00014951585,0.0003261637,0.00023191683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009659606,0.00080493226,0.00074568536,0.0016007341,0.0039022814,0.008088816,0.0013929496,0.0076336768,0.66709834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002981196,0.0006111984,0.00062630547,0.0010783308,0.0023202521,0.0017180183,0.0022700788,0.005828585,0.5503712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057067773,0.00009227218,0.0005613972,0.00008225044,0.000010844561,0.00016354721,0.00006863307,0.00010336773,0.00052042806,0.021412723,0.9425484,0.034379188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002213633,0.000023651064,0.0013401571,0.00016287825,0.0000053614335,0.00008516522,0.00009177249,0.00022430644,0.00022918051,0.00443453,0.99336547,0.000015281914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02511082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050621312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33290166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003446684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025343613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4748438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190545","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1519","title":"Armand LC de Mestral, CM (1941-2023)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medicine and Dermatology Studies History","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02831791314258961,"score_gpt":0.3053116320846598,"score_spread":0.27699371894207014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032832085,0.11370166,0.0006163159,0.16867445,0.23372132,0.00022108968,0.014221657,0.00047035984,0.46509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015218548,0.016643481,0.00032056772,0.022228036,0.012848042,0.00017519655,0.0016366028,0.00014270382,0.9307869],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951446,0.000049864382,0.000031054053,0.00009059099,0.00021432654,0.00009965712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922156,0.00019159057,0.00007961133,0.000038239443,0.00030999468,0.00015906763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009291162,0.0005245051,0.00041904347,0.001351933,0.0021196816,0.0019202087,0.0007287029,0.0036960875,0.1376207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048061935,0.00029085518,0.00040017883,0.0009939906,0.0004881281,0.001119768,0.0015598676,0.003159626,0.033894107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019315907,0.000004288755,0.00018583925,0.000038376034,0.0000023059529,0.00008329227,0.000040032915,0.0000148247855,0.000042242358,0.0023854668,0.97381973,0.02336421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033915878,0.000004629848,0.001255366,0.00012634967,0.000002091219,0.00008748063,0.00003624746,0.000015751268,0.00003977623,0.00033463573,0.99808997,0.0000042851284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05125715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12663557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1376207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038177695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041635167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4603871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190781","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1526","title":"Tort of Malicious Prosecution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Tort; Computer security; Political science; Law; Criminology; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01997209891688215,"score_gpt":0.32142806533975266,"score_spread":0.3014559664228705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051383678,0.0051214406,0.055369888,0.09001677,0.0015008608,0.00013432124,0.00024080965,0.00031872964,0.79591364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91309553,0.0015547228,0.006115188,0.023716835,0.00073699333,0.00009431678,0.00008160126,0.00009341321,0.054511357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98960924,0.0017581584,0.00030196528,0.0009910536,0.0058644167,0.0014751032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925202,0.0030593001,0.00061937806,0.0013746752,0.0019854216,0.00044111977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004972606,0.0006565449,0.0005027748,0.0017017898,0.008120137,0.0053180614,0.002257088,0.010099516,0.0027863826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015416306,0.000461387,0.00065795204,0.0007954843,0.029752906,0.0033194197,0.0039933687,0.010019699,0.0006251232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047341273,0.0000043906875,0.0002618918,0.000008772397,0.0000031614652,0.00012679027,0.0009354793,0.00018155323,0.00011691601,0.9915686,0.004890173,0.0018975162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004106784,0.000055033615,0.0029969295,0.00044212575,0.000057678037,0.0015752171,0.0017113495,0.0039167837,0.0019712807,0.56101626,0.42611566,0.000100644764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18814178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17866041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18814178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009600934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013821619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3740933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190849","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1523","title":"Genderfucking as a Critical Legal Methodology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1876565163983834,"score_gpt":0.4665047721174801,"score_spread":0.27884825571909666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02186345,0.013052577,0.39920425,0.14623713,0.004845954,0.0006029467,0.000105687504,0.00022862642,0.41385937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81821686,0.006705689,0.10976236,0.020981649,0.00310109,0.00170721,0.00008365807,0.00034956136,0.039091904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724152,0.021827487,0.0005091326,0.0017508111,0.0025808366,0.0009164492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96561486,0.026700312,0.0015355882,0.002418663,0.002718235,0.0010124174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0403084,0.0012475537,0.00075924787,0.005646667,0.012760087,0.013721436,0.0032762634,0.0051204413,0.006907546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032929633,0.0005438987,0.00072448736,0.002376129,0.10972009,0.020466829,0.00865816,0.007999164,0.0009903215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002153465,0.0000046877385,0.00003884799,0.000021117983,9.23192e-7,0.000025234309,0.00688781,0.000044840715,0.000025888585,0.9895862,0.000999987,0.0023623316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047793633,0.000008307304,0.000030131037,0.00018686184,0.000002175364,0.000041370484,0.0068327803,0.00021680056,0.0001800311,0.9240856,0.06840421,0.0000068777813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019278876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0403084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0125383055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009965192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21317375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967390","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1577","title":"Front Matter - v. 69, no 3","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03518274874064444,"score_gpt":0.21799326378196876,"score_spread":0.1828105150413243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007385498,0.00041409396,0.00016253605,0.004364729,0.0015504427,0.000068295696,0.0010498347,0.00023215456,0.9914193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039157104,0.00019162851,0.000084615844,0.004537452,0.0006402144,0.00003709822,0.00026674315,0.00009842718,0.99022806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988367,0.000103696686,0.000049557028,0.00021088053,0.00053947023,0.00025968524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988932,0.00033212677,0.00003783334,0.0001554604,0.00034648413,0.00023484723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782298,0.00078858744,0.0007639199,0.0015308267,0.004001922,0.007989941,0.0014312044,0.007709475,0.65649146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029990987,0.0006081226,0.00065824715,0.0010601837,0.0023484374,0.0016532535,0.0022480087,0.0059097125,0.5499346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054460994,0.000089665205,0.0005671276,0.00007883025,0.000010953355,0.00015409476,0.00006808605,0.0001020869,0.00053034094,0.021274153,0.9434369,0.03363327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021254878,0.000023614313,0.0013705002,0.00016321232,0.000005576213,0.000082480554,0.00009258789,0.0002200606,0.00024005603,0.004458308,0.9933072,0.000015215113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0279291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05639361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34350854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034913188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026991295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48997325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967463","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1575","title":"What's the Problem with Substantive Review?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.033778265212269634,"score_gpt":0.25234841417542064,"score_spread":0.21857014896315102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036853417,0.030735033,0.036527637,0.89406234,0.0038194775,0.00010850514,0.000035847766,0.00012589889,0.030899938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44752485,0.030350307,0.04514381,0.43151215,0.022616114,0.0008482705,0.000116347626,0.00029554867,0.021592537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80334574,0.11821396,0.007276918,0.012098213,0.051893312,0.0071718143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66515785,0.2414339,0.0126105705,0.014400612,0.06134012,0.005056946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13353464,0.00044287468,0.0019963859,0.004142585,0.010455047,0.0209388,0.005228199,0.018950824,0.0029720103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.321727,0.00083921803,0.0017708013,0.003968302,0.03466012,0.024517132,0.0065399804,0.017179318,0.0016168971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028871871,0.00003283026,0.00088596746,0.00043992812,0.000049352726,0.00013078736,0.002698901,0.00037562178,0.00017012465,0.8901531,0.05119627,0.0538382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000993625,0.00011706434,0.0013325425,0.0013792637,0.00006203623,0.00048718558,0.0022902258,0.0012505072,0.00050629006,0.7273664,0.2650074,0.00010172521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014688313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138775995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13353464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140097635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034294564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70620716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967499","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1576","title":"Difficult Road to Justice:","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03545290557287269,"score_gpt":0.2487168181805813,"score_spread":0.2132639126077086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016395561,0.014409689,0.0010699786,0.60892254,0.0066307453,0.00008265792,0.00012023859,0.00007390051,0.35229474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45155764,0.015404904,0.0009797848,0.21643324,0.0027757443,0.00023245066,0.00023856247,0.00026023088,0.3121174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991619,0.002719785,0.00016429916,0.00084865594,0.0013070664,0.0033412268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929075,0.00085598906,0.00034864218,0.00026589195,0.0010784975,0.0045433603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004165099,0.0005596224,0.0007122287,0.0012828667,0.035203718,0.016574288,0.0020766933,0.009975811,0.045437302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01255927,0.00038392335,0.00052828825,0.0012170057,0.020618,0.016644713,0.018016787,0.019722844,0.00667474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024083476,0.000112303656,0.0025349942,0.0001314025,0.0000083617715,0.001014033,0.072370306,0.000039813523,0.000086461834,0.37174192,0.51438344,0.03755288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013255905,0.00002736407,0.0028653818,0.0007264787,0.0000067645296,0.0005736015,0.15688725,0.00011241395,0.000067214794,0.082604736,0.75608265,0.000032840642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050310593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14499633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050310593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012550309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030462665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15200293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967537","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1574","title":"autorité internationale des fonds marins :","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04425639751111356,"score_gpt":0.2579566329581496,"score_spread":0.21370023544703604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07423749,0.004305689,0.010476775,0.010810843,0.00022517845,0.000040654857,0.00007371577,0.00008888394,0.89974076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634573,0.002248325,0.003771809,0.0014028633,0.00013673613,0.00009606259,0.00007659092,0.00007695568,0.12873337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998171,0.00047205255,0.000057505626,0.0002869069,0.00063386053,0.00037875507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.00021122128,0.00013889348,0.00015232962,0.0002625662,0.0001440371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016995838,0.00035048154,0.00021073612,0.0011737206,0.0039067916,0.006550585,0.00087212195,0.0019265596,0.007762989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023277493,0.0002112729,0.0003442286,0.0013093842,0.008479773,0.0037344515,0.0037066771,0.0027188356,0.00061406184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021828055,0.000013776658,0.002764904,0.000054949876,0.000009229817,0.00017665412,0.013360465,0.00029153467,0.00049959484,0.9601407,0.003522324,0.019144153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014024289,0.00005083974,0.01665691,0.00045549378,0.000025535659,0.00045367493,0.014884376,0.000667275,0.0013092573,0.112057686,0.8533777,0.00004712843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06158748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087081686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06158748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061249025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008319845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12245798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967564","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1572","title":"Overbreadth Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03170321817163785,"score_gpt":0.3405854726422747,"score_spread":0.30888225447063683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018750785,0.008047982,0.007937057,0.046060782,0.0017066646,0.00003489247,0.00011652263,0.000052924002,0.9172924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7052042,0.004374058,0.0035366337,0.060023535,0.0016308662,0.00018163296,0.00017302705,0.00021626649,0.22465983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893995,0.0030477927,0.00035813,0.0022615255,0.002860205,0.0020729348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649966,0.0014217922,0.00021848966,0.00068186043,0.0008439098,0.00033426477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072624306,0.0006022138,0.0006930583,0.0020486729,0.012352629,0.009384288,0.0023418774,0.007387109,0.014125164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011142811,0.00044455533,0.0008861772,0.0018405207,0.033360973,0.010713152,0.007265491,0.01828537,0.0017541393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004813332,0.0000032553326,0.000073163756,0.000008173375,0.0000014940473,0.000030884235,0.0012989593,0.00002874017,0.000023467428,0.99206626,0.0038124141,0.002648233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020847345,0.000020036407,0.0006690443,0.00031137836,0.000011409456,0.0002277719,0.0026236195,0.00024379701,0.00025350394,0.5996549,0.3959359,0.000027836903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07066504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06670913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07066504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0153808165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010504262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14050746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410088868","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1627","title":"Responsible AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0526171416579714,"score_gpt":0.4110048174458746,"score_spread":0.3583876757879032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410088868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023514621,0.002674468,0.02974268,0.06343486,0.0017429513,0.00010748502,0.00007668082,0.00022250271,0.89964676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4133155,0.006038674,0.022490563,0.06428164,0.0033714937,0.0005198982,0.000285798,0.0005441709,0.48915225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871668,0.004269873,0.0005189974,0.0024564741,0.0041178907,0.0014700108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98792636,0.004212495,0.0008891726,0.0029124375,0.0027264955,0.0013331166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012536813,0.00062587677,0.00047112675,0.0012846721,0.0064918757,0.009718021,0.0021966603,0.0073323515,0.028385192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021024892,0.0003626765,0.00071716914,0.00077696494,0.018958,0.008546718,0.007210006,0.0062928502,0.008136784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027097672,0.000007709667,0.00011313143,0.000018487794,0.0000028378813,0.000018747101,0.00044865895,0.00008551091,0.00004409384,0.97746277,0.015599928,0.006195433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064350074,0.000011884619,0.00015067926,0.00012974493,0.000005336844,0.00007918166,0.0004538557,0.0003399676,0.00020374735,0.42647716,0.5721306,0.0000113675815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054712435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050197137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028385192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006062011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011502938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09495795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089313","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1645","title":"Reasonable Apprehension of AI Bias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Apprehension; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.051438074584039026,"score_gpt":0.2931065987156708,"score_spread":0.24166852413163176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11253042,0.0064344746,0.121255636,0.17676115,0.0025126615,0.00030613955,0.00022063257,0.00037467314,0.5796042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95371723,0.0008879212,0.016127488,0.02192826,0.0008833426,0.0001571661,0.00007308693,0.000060738374,0.0061647524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9447796,0.031374093,0.0029082792,0.0049888087,0.013463106,0.0024860958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9010263,0.077802606,0.005542119,0.0068649035,0.0074394234,0.0013247782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03432273,0.000630069,0.00076233165,0.0036638724,0.004887752,0.0093678655,0.0024239914,0.0071556303,0.0042298357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10430435,0.0003838584,0.0013016484,0.0012696118,0.03813264,0.008522618,0.00563136,0.009406456,0.0008174598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005580143,0.000019617422,0.0022091363,0.000078402736,0.000043516553,0.00070009404,0.009164081,0.00048735095,0.0002793216,0.96434,0.007844959,0.014777684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003555886,0.00006442674,0.0012723163,0.00030034586,0.00003137233,0.001205241,0.005233019,0.0019935912,0.0009579939,0.8833598,0.105498575,0.00004783644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042794924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029551268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03432273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004549708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028858506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18151808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089364","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1683","title":"Abortion in the Age of AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03578763188535195,"score_gpt":0.34869899902118706,"score_spread":0.3129113671358351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0195714,0.05077428,0.0035438405,0.31612584,0.0063154674,0.00006006317,0.00017107434,0.00006417546,0.60337377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51944685,0.037063666,0.0023424535,0.31144205,0.009356696,0.00016738613,0.00017426172,0.00006877339,0.11993796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981065,0.0007144074,0.00008811012,0.00022107536,0.00037360284,0.0004962067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981511,0.0010623969,0.00016749967,0.00014280218,0.0001550548,0.0003210801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003704561,0.00013020776,0.0002090678,0.0005918533,0.0037860472,0.0022448602,0.00040597218,0.004127401,0.006880033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010881564,0.00016184831,0.00032345898,0.00022671002,0.0050653545,0.003036186,0.0031785849,0.0074677225,0.00093200355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044495537,0.000026904232,0.0022477175,0.00006703994,0.000006756751,0.0016664962,0.0056189056,0.000045652654,0.00034540563,0.869532,0.064377315,0.056021303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001389458,0.00005198221,0.0016637011,0.0004380496,0.00001063709,0.004053571,0.0019163478,0.00009529968,0.0002480647,0.09854845,0.8929419,0.000018060975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009242234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013151493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009242234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021359029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033192334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023016036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089437","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1706","title":"Directors’ Duties and the Collective Governance of Algorithmic Management Systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Public administration; Accounting; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.007591168040252254,"score_gpt":0.21402590809311056,"score_spread":0.2064347400528583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21756433,0.0022354063,0.18553363,0.044409387,0.0007208777,0.00055675214,0.0000725094,0.0002761216,0.548631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95947134,0.00040173493,0.008839818,0.0019570626,0.00019700085,0.00015454149,0.000025277986,0.000035374378,0.028917897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760448,0.01300373,0.0013323256,0.0029384198,0.0040255007,0.0026551804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623848,0.017942552,0.0050762594,0.005165688,0.005452272,0.003978395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029067155,0.0003514629,0.00033356008,0.0015048096,0.006153584,0.008300158,0.0013625402,0.0036234183,0.005784501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037827376,0.00047107085,0.00042465827,0.0007527554,0.012155945,0.0047313613,0.0059600067,0.0032872108,0.0009443086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031,0.0000579659,0.006271528,0.00006808189,0.000022999548,0.00025849853,0.0073616463,0.002582066,0.00090798875,0.9409317,0.0058280025,0.035678476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014238998,0.00022436088,0.014871954,0.0005829582,0.000082985505,0.00053091405,0.0075834394,0.015476516,0.0042012804,0.61701727,0.33910236,0.00018347532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007045111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065945275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029067155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047755847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009798202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15372366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089674","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1646","title":"Algorithmic Price Personalization and the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03136850153275612,"score_gpt":0.2382527671274877,"score_spread":0.20688426559473158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118104674,0.0043361606,0.26375404,0.08293725,0.00074423105,0.00023854752,0.00014720444,0.0004624717,0.5292755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584644,0.0007102416,0.02233702,0.010906597,0.0005731152,0.00024080992,0.00002843425,0.00009723942,0.0066421563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693448,0.010294897,0.0016352038,0.0056146914,0.010606802,0.0025036063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9217836,0.05273647,0.0058916216,0.013207743,0.0052787936,0.0011017799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028978938,0.00049458107,0.0011207787,0.0013598806,0.00422353,0.010145701,0.003516068,0.01091011,0.005178612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068974465,0.0007828492,0.0013314151,0.00094124733,0.03841152,0.012424195,0.00585254,0.015326217,0.00082219986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006438935,0.000019935205,0.00029676175,0.000018118006,0.0000071248464,0.00004596531,0.00023188637,0.00047445824,0.00015270669,0.9949067,0.00062049564,0.0032192655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002388558,0.000026925649,0.00034846473,0.00008457568,0.0000108662125,0.000071558985,0.000104505874,0.002716455,0.00037341748,0.9865051,0.009710301,0.000024016874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034405247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021949795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028978938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043654568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005565848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15325713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090255","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1708","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.12418554398247822,"score_gpt":0.3967832414877197,"score_spread":0.2725976975052415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035863335,0.17151675,0.006754274,0.10897005,0.017126806,0.00045590592,0.0064081424,0.0005386032,0.68464303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03581614,0.24464445,0.0066603823,0.02103922,0.014207682,0.00072280224,0.009535709,0.0005669256,0.66680676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968545,0.00057979126,0.00018503553,0.0005884165,0.0013242085,0.0004681446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081147,0.00234867,0.00046715655,0.0008569758,0.0039352374,0.001580585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005032932,0.00079337024,0.0009097527,0.007046665,0.003459175,0.008312645,0.002121713,0.0019214335,0.19930951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016469356,0.00049683,0.0009213731,0.00841997,0.0019606021,0.005256076,0.0040893434,0.002455817,0.096561514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049907747,0.000080937374,0.0010164145,0.0013146878,0.000017981683,0.000053395925,0.0005934808,0.00021282023,0.00019449375,0.08884377,0.69237083,0.21525127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035836028,0.000011887046,0.00064253225,0.00059555576,0.0000035346281,0.000037342463,0.0003012081,0.000037621237,0.000045223955,0.0030670795,0.99525046,0.0000038983126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105648795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017929994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19930951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006396956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013845244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66675675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090280","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1712","title":"Volume 69 Index","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.016417245645898686,"score_gpt":0.23911616869422578,"score_spread":0.22269892304832709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002596852,0.0019844172,0.00022437605,0.0025234702,0.008392669,0.0001367494,0.0026927425,0.00052781275,0.9832582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000925731,0.0011875012,0.00010834746,0.0010401779,0.0034462912,0.000056390705,0.001325126,0.00026210127,0.9916483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.000110970796,0.00008371771,0.0002771492,0.000979886,0.00017628523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972899,0.00032351623,0.00014906624,0.00031968005,0.0013309629,0.0005869094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171596,0.001755322,0.0014503718,0.0061017047,0.0026762064,0.010954239,0.0013026163,0.0020344732,0.786994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045669004,0.0005823969,0.00076107593,0.005576156,0.0012307127,0.0037274803,0.0029829224,0.0025160236,0.7792659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011414027,0.00001743666,0.00008907375,0.00007331543,0.000001503192,0.000021747986,0.00001939354,0.00001830889,0.00013178466,0.0017173166,0.97466147,0.023237227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041959993,0.000008050179,0.00030045336,0.000099432174,0.0000011364415,0.000029059087,0.00002399938,0.00002495298,0.00004076557,0.0006022797,0.9988612,0.0000045099864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006082922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008038308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21300602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019138831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026213264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30382723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090284","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1626","title":"Legal Definitions of Intimate Images in the Age of Sexual Deepfakes and Generative AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Transformation in Law","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04972453206467995,"score_gpt":0.2506951116949812,"score_spread":0.20097057963030127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054018408,0.0064171324,0.019305151,0.014928366,0.00029726943,0.000057834826,0.00009619784,0.0000477494,0.9048319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780587,0.0013498339,0.0036181407,0.0011086777,0.00009213174,0.000046156787,0.0000421137,0.000026527512,0.015657669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691796,0.0013097747,0.00013541475,0.00025123483,0.0008265992,0.0005591122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965983,0.0014342729,0.00046428954,0.00048507244,0.00064373814,0.0003744314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028024537,0.00033167144,0.00019237878,0.0029319227,0.0060385405,0.008417303,0.0014347784,0.002461474,0.003654061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062753237,0.00020715652,0.00026094538,0.001803181,0.05571971,0.005861817,0.0047734776,0.00382955,0.00034155525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014580725,0.0000016156916,0.00016478883,0.0000057798707,3.4107626e-7,0.000046136138,0.011631589,0.000025937226,0.000028378281,0.9862118,0.00029460562,0.0015876307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007180497,0.00002055083,0.0045872186,0.0003705028,0.000009174007,0.0011399258,0.056619667,0.0007307944,0.00041599324,0.5422309,0.3938302,0.00003788039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0960507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06978361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0960507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012900074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062732664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19098324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090285","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1644","title":"New Jim Crow","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0600957320603762,"score_gpt":0.3759033197245683,"score_spread":0.3158075876641921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037100476,0.007936426,0.0038432274,0.02504576,0.012483008,0.00008703098,0.00075923343,0.0006006283,0.9455346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010981631,0.0037718576,0.0018014228,0.0035213546,0.00074493035,0.000046716836,0.00033490232,0.00022289908,0.97857416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999059,0.00012955516,0.000041462765,0.0002926411,0.0003405559,0.00013688124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988825,0.00018126049,0.000059458336,0.00017279592,0.00036208166,0.00034190927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078785396,0.0008750845,0.000535063,0.0014707961,0.0036306183,0.0075635416,0.0012577029,0.0026841252,0.31954193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034462446,0.000401917,0.00049742346,0.0011909073,0.0018940594,0.0045965416,0.003993164,0.0036128447,0.10953868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007211057,0.000059827275,0.0013883892,0.00028268746,0.000015446632,0.00062520907,0.0017139103,0.00024775258,0.0012358049,0.09684733,0.6278917,0.26961976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014129281,0.0000060659186,0.00029661684,0.000064145315,0.0000015878148,0.00010609323,0.00033041343,0.00004299279,0.000087574146,0.002203461,0.9968555,0.00000418856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011268815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026139975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31954193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025491877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002921371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97059083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090288","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1625","title":"AI’s Democratic Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05650542861783929,"score_gpt":0.3881377428373882,"score_spread":0.3316323142195489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045399326,0.0071969,0.008835149,0.7459584,0.003002666,0.000025171541,0.00008032585,0.00007200232,0.23028949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6724999,0.009939443,0.008050111,0.20972702,0.016844649,0.00031885848,0.00017270588,0.0002940186,0.082153246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736831,0.013221462,0.0006935605,0.003821006,0.006031269,0.002549731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972272,0.018141072,0.00094344665,0.0032066863,0.0030556857,0.0023811099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02574558,0.000626961,0.0008995236,0.0015630316,0.011418592,0.015128092,0.0018799852,0.0108022485,0.011117404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037548993,0.00038145063,0.00094406755,0.001028614,0.046427146,0.016705925,0.009956492,0.020240001,0.0027720318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005423258,0.000013010179,0.000082650935,0.000017022527,0.000004469171,0.00001863679,0.000861791,0.00016116613,0.000032993805,0.9748531,0.019040158,0.004909642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009763922,0.000009432262,0.00011545428,0.000057553134,0.0000028134525,0.000037995418,0.0005507152,0.0003471188,0.00006779684,0.80079865,0.19799286,0.000009757909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047276397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031672327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02574558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008543224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010859496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13615727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090337","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1667","title":"Déléguer l’autorité au système ? L’extériorisation de la fonction judiciaire et le dé-agencement des juges","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03235038342470889,"score_gpt":0.326134854124114,"score_spread":0.29378447069940516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2592291,0.0038986455,0.5399041,0.032480303,0.0008695844,0.00033268626,0.0007368477,0.0024711713,0.16007751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94651496,0.0010818439,0.029225104,0.000945981,0.00021721883,0.00012272359,0.0002848605,0.00040463137,0.0212026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943164,0.0023153615,0.00025654456,0.0012836026,0.0010537868,0.0007744175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887977,0.0039967615,0.0010709376,0.0034063093,0.0018625649,0.0008657858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065405816,0.0008413158,0.0010828489,0.0008934435,0.0019602533,0.012106116,0.0016600499,0.0019356249,0.022941932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024999425,0.0006010022,0.0010760644,0.0010388329,0.003676739,0.00995937,0.004063274,0.0028597494,0.0037714324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003973431,0.00029639222,0.05092573,0.00073374325,0.00041134504,0.0006804024,0.007155437,0.15167013,0.004703668,0.50350606,0.022414299,0.25710547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104534454,0.00024905842,0.019251715,0.00052958186,0.00018630145,0.00048366562,0.004615944,0.4025205,0.0042289365,0.42829037,0.13936098,0.00017853072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0203793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013433568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022941932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003757771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058611277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07674837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157873","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1719","title":"Risks, Benefits, Opportunities, and Electronic Formalities in the Law of Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07881980587268692,"score_gpt":0.3379319718446832,"score_spread":0.25911216597199627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32179826,0.007954558,0.028062861,0.0759712,0.00043867825,0.00015435489,0.00007572357,0.00009179285,0.5654526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977066,0.0010124312,0.0019372702,0.0016226808,0.00022607668,0.000063442356,0.000011631388,0.000022368746,0.018038016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97591406,0.010181288,0.0009963643,0.0014048087,0.008557184,0.0029463626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96719867,0.020749202,0.0035572476,0.003838233,0.0034130285,0.0012436319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01380571,0.00041536608,0.00035703258,0.0019207287,0.008972568,0.020171706,0.0019169305,0.0070097805,0.005250145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03318843,0.0007847373,0.00055384135,0.0020747394,0.06312469,0.013140142,0.013528222,0.006444636,0.0005095952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013564346,0.000009101071,0.0009447287,0.00001803754,0.0000034657246,0.00012729934,0.004872445,0.00033683184,0.00008129571,0.98868924,0.0005714428,0.004332547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003216495,0.00009107125,0.0043869936,0.0006632494,0.000038968763,0.0004983499,0.016289584,0.0016271468,0.0006056604,0.87532866,0.10034115,0.00009695566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030417467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0274903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030417467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126214605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011400167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09157556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157910","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1716","title":"Entre affirmations française et britannique de souveraineté, le titre ancestral autochtone en jeu","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Identity and Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02153919192672603,"score_gpt":0.2630787357891686,"score_spread":0.24153954386244259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37806028,0.0051805866,0.0031869612,0.012939361,0.0003455597,0.00004109821,0.00010433233,0.000023309014,0.60011846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711363,0.00063281413,0.00040205917,0.0006738536,0.000022209046,0.0000129819255,0.000017583081,0.000008092279,0.027094113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708015,0.0008561297,0.0000828956,0.00044774965,0.00077250367,0.00076057063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748635,0.000809787,0.00035468728,0.00021389675,0.0007325524,0.0004026553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018031141,0.00028876387,0.00026640142,0.0009731153,0.010052274,0.00842435,0.0008418282,0.0017739588,0.00947768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029218532,0.00024150917,0.00023558755,0.0012301994,0.0235437,0.0024672681,0.003840998,0.0029087549,0.00038522063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039167207,0.00001524705,0.007072611,0.00008068375,0.000019047495,0.00030087747,0.081045434,0.00016461304,0.0008696303,0.8984698,0.0016187599,0.010304199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003720926,0.000089395144,0.07992317,0.0008017492,0.00009911792,0.00052371057,0.1555087,0.0005011862,0.00171326,0.09759867,0.6630284,0.00017546993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38776407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.664442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38776407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020872053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016887167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77101403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158578","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1718","title":"Words that Wound and Laws that Silence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Political science; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0486106615398621,"score_gpt":0.32876601826763774,"score_spread":0.28015535672777564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06150935,0.017672928,0.012706725,0.10553355,0.0047992193,0.000081095066,0.00015815592,0.0001978788,0.7973411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83527935,0.00522175,0.0011373546,0.033678718,0.00091755454,0.000107451,0.00011084357,0.00021484574,0.12333211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943651,0.0022680168,0.00028765987,0.0005228835,0.0014928816,0.0010635031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467033,0.0027320841,0.0007378801,0.0006149241,0.0008934091,0.0003513223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034329807,0.00045086426,0.00047598768,0.0014177746,0.009064905,0.0082059475,0.0010932997,0.005152173,0.011752639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016651222,0.00033011247,0.00041139015,0.0012109205,0.03445758,0.009259908,0.005896514,0.0064765997,0.0030601434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016402397,0.000011997069,0.00034172786,0.000064165826,0.0000047719636,0.00041111698,0.052877754,0.000046361354,0.00023845112,0.91218835,0.02253199,0.0112669375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012259835,0.000020203375,0.0004828829,0.00084116496,0.000012548173,0.00043087814,0.054430585,0.000074869175,0.0004819958,0.15150398,0.7916803,0.000028347626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013256562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01623632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004853353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042772642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039316475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158590","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1717","title":"Judicial Review of Rulemaking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030213038833962876,"score_gpt":0.344318470434393,"score_spread":0.31410543160043014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014315966,0.050907843,0.043567494,0.19599134,0.020772887,0.0010913422,0.00064889813,0.00054415915,0.6721601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51617914,0.032833,0.034799796,0.13271731,0.022610338,0.00122834,0.0009770008,0.00047615878,0.25817892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9231926,0.024447555,0.0066917343,0.007986453,0.03190583,0.0057757534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85913706,0.06456818,0.004319534,0.01570583,0.052476823,0.0037926084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06503052,0.0005073528,0.001414874,0.004486276,0.006370844,0.00969906,0.0034318308,0.009899041,0.008092172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15383346,0.0007873999,0.0010053148,0.0025980177,0.009750988,0.0041722134,0.0037935006,0.013548633,0.0028144927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039345738,0.000041694893,0.0007587544,0.0002833347,0.000044802706,0.00030814263,0.0019821266,0.00048152154,0.0007709614,0.7166954,0.21421117,0.064382754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004018321,0.0000440679,0.0012261595,0.00068022014,0.000037559825,0.00010915672,0.00048469676,0.000670397,0.00069836486,0.111294374,0.88465375,0.00006112325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020473178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030429384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01184742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037980348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34391838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411733541","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1694","title":"DAO","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.043452150111251,"score_gpt":0.3348709416515023,"score_spread":0.2914187915402513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411733541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022067267,0.0027344886,0.015421406,0.0062367446,0.004298489,0.000457926,0.010832568,0.006346064,0.9514655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029483253,0.0043376703,0.01431507,0.004929509,0.0013405291,0.00061669835,0.021257713,0.0034129857,0.9203066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996635,0.0005848583,0.0002723335,0.0007065312,0.0012801493,0.0005211864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951652,0.0005508743,0.00024875248,0.0012112393,0.0021122715,0.0007116795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026336533,0.0010887946,0.0007710037,0.002648088,0.0027152319,0.008978077,0.0028327773,0.0029230719,0.4637588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007869965,0.00061531673,0.0009947105,0.0030571683,0.001033718,0.006636217,0.0056184833,0.0026501995,0.34906065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000266056,0.00010179937,0.0012217422,0.0007514406,0.000035804496,0.00025843745,0.0005475659,0.00043786893,0.00119919,0.102274016,0.66744167,0.22546437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009488514,0.000010184476,0.00022455325,0.00007352128,0.000004427123,0.00006821554,0.00010052292,0.00010679292,0.0001909368,0.0029878395,0.9962155,0.000007988429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062928502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057920087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027368197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050876583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223206","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1883","title":"The Republic of Dissent","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Scrutiny; The Republic; Harm; Academic freedom; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.020378398649814024,"score_gpt":0.325977240519526,"score_spread":0.305598841869712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030089831,0.0026001094,0.051840644,0.043739054,0.0012992962,0.00009201531,0.00010052815,0.00011191296,0.8701266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92296517,0.0008345219,0.00697217,0.013521615,0.0007974326,0.00022207158,0.00006757104,0.00011199917,0.05450734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866149,0.0064150244,0.0004815372,0.0020011575,0.0029685707,0.0015189098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926483,0.0033622175,0.0007483785,0.001582973,0.000983908,0.0006741483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010768987,0.00042877338,0.00047908118,0.0013127177,0.0057329154,0.007184024,0.0012105545,0.003157809,0.0060068117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015440231,0.00021966752,0.000725661,0.0008050101,0.03713397,0.0066962475,0.0066260654,0.0059962105,0.0013641339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035580267,0.0000029278526,0.00006504004,0.0000064602336,0.0000011644639,0.0000121161265,0.00065727084,0.00006757227,0.000031303065,0.996381,0.0011933814,0.0015782183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101719,0.000013618751,0.00019581111,0.000055844277,0.000002951681,0.0000644507,0.00067410286,0.00036044297,0.00019661836,0.9193234,0.07908848,0.000014142056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001852719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013793614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99521774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047822455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054009487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056952596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223219","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1880","title":"The Administrative Law of Section 33 of the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Legislation; Context (archaeology); Administrative law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03244499481277436,"score_gpt":0.2638348400428245,"score_spread":0.23138984523005013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023469659,0.0025010908,0.04682181,0.039561804,0.0020025813,0.00061529817,0.00055687525,0.0004092434,0.88406163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73858845,0.0025764261,0.044006,0.030104298,0.0013162347,0.00082713,0.00052726315,0.00028396785,0.18177018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96526885,0.0062573934,0.0016077904,0.0036413593,0.01776616,0.005458436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768897,0.0077440445,0.0017805689,0.002956918,0.009402722,0.0012259409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01892943,0.0005288258,0.0006016501,0.0015760537,0.009004931,0.013485056,0.0019926766,0.005776239,0.0054047364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033038743,0.0008675932,0.0010370857,0.0017829626,0.021322533,0.004348852,0.0031536224,0.009921185,0.0010807187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005829192,0.000004718765,0.00026874457,0.000011383622,0.0000019968334,0.000037352307,0.00087159907,0.0001821489,0.00015621546,0.9857077,0.0084635485,0.0042888294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004703955,0.000095532145,0.006561923,0.0005405484,0.000046471614,0.00019898367,0.0015515371,0.0019551674,0.0015018965,0.26795667,0.71927464,0.0002695581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68928975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.667809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31071025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032280438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13723621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6250801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223230","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1877","title":"The Discriminatory Use of the “KGB Procedure” by Police Against Women in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Witness; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Criminal justice; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.018862102587175435,"score_gpt":0.2550471595667021,"score_spread":0.23618505697952666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.825446,0.0042462805,0.002831599,0.05759371,0.0005715818,0.00038733942,0.00052215526,0.00009073681,0.10831057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758394,0.0015697881,0.0011351056,0.008617904,0.000029411483,0.00006588077,0.00007712356,0.00003074429,0.012634616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992285,0.0010428706,0.00026427992,0.00082342856,0.0026795766,0.0029048163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930178,0.001912214,0.0008332199,0.00040939427,0.0023028941,0.0015244213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004473353,0.0003942156,0.0003907141,0.0018492594,0.024145287,0.003913922,0.002414059,0.0025802082,0.0028283347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019254275,0.00091735803,0.00044673463,0.0025604677,0.008835476,0.0014617376,0.0041769706,0.0044581294,0.00018920093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041303042,0.00020180373,0.19757822,0.0005274916,0.00014209705,0.008190143,0.2923797,0.0011145483,0.006543706,0.22096235,0.06783432,0.20411259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017595485,0.00031465344,0.3697368,0.0013828324,0.00026806534,0.0026838523,0.21788709,0.0030636997,0.007486363,0.011790985,0.3846433,0.0005664573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99507695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07812965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07812965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18454057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56687295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223234","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1874","title":"Contributions civilistes à l’interprétation des lois constitutionnelles canadiennes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Code (set theory); Relevance (law); Civil code","score_opus":0.01602313191760216,"score_gpt":0.29804034634127163,"score_spread":0.28201721442366945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044147797,0.021227812,0.008906537,0.07746063,0.0017237054,0.000051975647,0.00028527633,0.00016802413,0.84602827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912192,0.0067508994,0.0029575387,0.00377563,0.0005439868,0.000030107354,0.00010611988,0.00009031237,0.07355332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432194,0.001745238,0.00009699405,0.00045402723,0.0021076447,0.0012741545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525994,0.00215308,0.00018249117,0.00028855097,0.0017781969,0.00033775606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050955983,0.0006692309,0.00040715103,0.0037809897,0.016548635,0.014714621,0.001619786,0.0026701244,0.008433441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009136617,0.00034630165,0.00053076574,0.0033255336,0.029233346,0.003358873,0.002833016,0.004337301,0.00060874654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008377702,0.000006126114,0.0003705336,0.0000415661,0.000006095821,0.00009864762,0.012126023,0.00026060926,0.00007340566,0.9682861,0.010016733,0.008705715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020456002,0.000010123656,0.004299008,0.0003351014,0.00003625894,0.00016949236,0.022007711,0.0011114865,0.00043450663,0.1883422,0.78317684,0.000056802077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9560562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11593195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11593195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090475194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8411491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223254","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1871","title":"Reflections on Equity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Charter; Equity (law); Racism; Harassment; Ambivalence; Normative","score_opus":0.23436625003309317,"score_gpt":0.5488728815015316,"score_spread":0.3145066314684384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005571911,0.009460439,0.0012593414,0.8311995,0.0025667273,0.000021650772,0.00003329838,0.000015703441,0.14987141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5381101,0.008178885,0.0012432958,0.3737531,0.0052650436,0.000076113254,0.00003906919,0.00007677308,0.073257685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496426,0.008422835,0.00029124934,0.0011785439,0.0071039004,0.008039171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821186,0.010668011,0.00048333334,0.00059728196,0.002926774,0.0032060165],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021540564,0.000540811,0.0006226027,0.0017011637,0.025812993,0.023093529,0.0025355406,0.013166838,0.010372443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026372649,0.00032877855,0.00056737434,0.0021860225,0.080188274,0.014619159,0.01517184,0.0221484,0.00067484425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056478652,0.00001116024,0.00019250782,0.000022700762,0.0000021770513,0.00003358954,0.007391859,0.00008209712,0.000021035677,0.93957835,0.0458046,0.006854318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021575795,0.000017155473,0.0010059167,0.00045476347,0.000005858382,0.00004627011,0.02483391,0.0001391736,0.00019173363,0.36057845,0.6126762,0.00002902867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40778282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41152856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056750897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074011266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81081855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223277","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1886","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 2","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03001437855804403,"score_gpt":0.2164328161907774,"score_spread":0.18641843763273336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064505683,0.0004992927,0.0001513563,0.00456059,0.0015344035,0.00006015969,0.0010067078,0.00022311679,0.99131924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037035595,0.00021779195,0.00007956745,0.0043052584,0.00065482524,0.00003583432,0.0002696038,0.00010550368,0.990628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880636,0.00011551424,0.000049567145,0.0002235555,0.0005553521,0.00024973025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988752,0.00033913506,0.00004135468,0.00015408006,0.0003423257,0.00024791737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010357255,0.0008245686,0.0007495589,0.0016283334,0.0036951818,0.008675531,0.0013592138,0.0074699926,0.688905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030931747,0.0005920296,0.000588703,0.0011106927,0.0024342095,0.0018245354,0.0023403664,0.0057054586,0.58064806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004780027,0.00008180256,0.00050033524,0.000078660276,0.000009380664,0.00013356633,0.00005993251,0.00009156971,0.00042723335,0.019210547,0.9453054,0.034053683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018682402,0.000020031786,0.0011940242,0.00015896161,0.000004591261,0.00007448917,0.00008346418,0.00020657132,0.00019046581,0.0039197486,0.9941155,0.00001352152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024583856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04849918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.311095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035960518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027136987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44373924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124422838","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2209","title":"Constitutional Labour Rights in the Gig Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Collective bargaining; Charter; Gig economy; Section (typography); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.017406432847769205,"score_gpt":0.26686586436557835,"score_spread":0.24945943151780914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124422838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049361043,0.0006671225,0.006047143,0.015176436,0.00022953494,0.000113153845,0.0003899884,0.00009280721,0.9279227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525632,0.0005589171,0.0050423024,0.012208268,0.00035470616,0.00063789083,0.0003042644,0.000070500086,0.12825997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942774,0.0012282399,0.00030428855,0.0010304543,0.001588415,0.0015713129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969897,0.0012783183,0.00015372969,0.0007720536,0.00048809877,0.00031803356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007468709,0.00031500237,0.00045181383,0.0007228942,0.006784593,0.008695389,0.0015605757,0.0066062086,0.009445993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009023818,0.00041167243,0.00049583317,0.0009899569,0.015590803,0.004436523,0.0064068134,0.0061133723,0.0015446219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005519596,0.000006267592,0.00017563243,0.0000059543204,0.0000010730729,0.000034677247,0.00054990244,0.00006873085,0.000097368706,0.9952369,0.002233144,0.0015849186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004337489,0.000032207117,0.0014358306,0.00014157097,0.000013910516,0.00008311075,0.0013350926,0.00059299625,0.00045470826,0.75737184,0.23845366,0.000041607742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040143028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03315947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040143028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008926397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107950205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079818726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124425451","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2233","title":"Bending the Rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Anthropocentrism; Rule of law; Supreme court; Indigenous; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Common law","score_opus":0.0267978589757836,"score_gpt":0.32182136860832095,"score_spread":0.2950235096325373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124425451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011240061,0.010108037,0.012688274,0.19250968,0.0038685428,0.000059078586,0.00023420961,0.0002486369,0.76904356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55893373,0.013035103,0.007712122,0.085566916,0.0018391922,0.00013104918,0.0004716945,0.0004964673,0.3318137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943017,0.0010461028,0.00013497155,0.0012441872,0.0017602025,0.0015128789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637836,0.0010488017,0.00027954485,0.0005546833,0.0010598942,0.0006786698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053094067,0.00061509275,0.000565277,0.0015930178,0.011911687,0.014442876,0.0026164998,0.005440671,0.03304489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012357022,0.0003315115,0.0005494517,0.0014105687,0.031348977,0.011712622,0.0050530555,0.0076540797,0.0069911256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080058,0.000008327287,0.00039748452,0.000027806773,0.0000040307855,0.00009946817,0.0033803151,0.00008380807,0.00006459636,0.9396404,0.038149584,0.018136252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079686015,0.0000103539,0.0005819311,0.00021523915,0.0000065421154,0.00014023522,0.0061610304,0.0002053946,0.00015380689,0.31848186,0.67401147,0.00002407528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22361912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2483557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22361912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014899854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020457687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44463497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124427986","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2239","title":"Corporations in the Crosshairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; The Internet; Legislation","score_opus":0.02884166200132041,"score_gpt":0.237129053474099,"score_spread":0.20828739147277858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124427986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26173934,0.030774228,0.001524491,0.10342107,0.00087482005,0.000018924751,0.000049170798,0.000030609237,0.60156745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94719595,0.0025121106,0.00021855766,0.010762999,0.00020548243,0.000010983655,0.000019208794,0.000011047275,0.039063632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982621,0.000658814,0.000029170955,0.00025224625,0.00023986782,0.0005577514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988462,0.0003415364,0.00021669929,0.00007493163,0.00013746908,0.00038308234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016804273,0.00021404667,0.00015814039,0.0006353729,0.0058311387,0.009260009,0.00036512312,0.0034787052,0.00788611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002563581,0.00025871536,0.00015261503,0.0007347678,0.008045116,0.009656964,0.006957191,0.003592295,0.00039286952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022859143,0.000014988705,0.0014290101,0.000021632079,0.000005806298,0.00026165598,0.01805926,0.00006554581,0.00029255266,0.95591706,0.014684459,0.009225181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021547201,0.00006813838,0.009999146,0.00034465594,0.000022445538,0.0005609255,0.04479162,0.0003144265,0.0007504832,0.111970715,0.8311281,0.000027633454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02274746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036433436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02274746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034691293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030360953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04523009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124434997","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2236","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Limiting; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03810785600891519,"score_gpt":0.3240699980064703,"score_spread":0.2859621419975551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124434997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010184239,0.00072073715,0.018021895,0.009437944,0.00020841771,0.00021727059,0.0003499896,0.00008080503,0.9607787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76708823,0.0010671848,0.022378793,0.012769162,0.00035609124,0.00057517894,0.00064041564,0.0001430512,0.19498181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621176,0.0071952725,0.0014543335,0.005452534,0.016668905,0.007111354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829904,0.006458496,0.0005536114,0.0035329296,0.005309003,0.0011556235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024693301,0.0009686665,0.0012718872,0.0027960327,0.013725444,0.016368303,0.0047630393,0.007806491,0.02549938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031133633,0.00067460985,0.0012823713,0.0028516203,0.025678985,0.008663511,0.008569404,0.0074047595,0.0021506238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029466269,0.0000033222075,0.00009311362,0.000008990274,0.0000029276803,0.00002912849,0.0007922832,0.000062609346,0.00008129658,0.99477094,0.0017906497,0.0023617581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037168087,0.000030337502,0.0010694761,0.000293406,0.00006066624,0.00019852445,0.0030586047,0.0011926511,0.000734886,0.65502214,0.33821914,0.00008296212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2706052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35301048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03310501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056853313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5380602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124448299","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2203","title":"Vers la reconnaissance d’une compétence autochtone en matière de justice pénale adolescente","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychodrama and Leishmaniasis Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Harm; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Juvenile delinquency; Criminal law","score_opus":0.038554576599683914,"score_gpt":0.3252695876632608,"score_spread":0.2867150110635769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124448299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70630413,0.007666814,0.001471541,0.048355933,0.00046471274,0.00007514868,0.000098067336,0.00004398736,0.23551974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95266056,0.0015367419,0.0003445942,0.0018745905,0.000056512417,0.000011801174,0.000014435431,0.0000091573775,0.04349152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998497,0.00033005796,0.000025837177,0.000079083926,0.0003841445,0.0006839188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982888,0.00035388354,0.00020195662,0.000040387393,0.00045749178,0.0006575554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013108418,0.0001477108,0.00014144264,0.00043121076,0.008373913,0.0033969835,0.00067410927,0.0010355074,0.0032707558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028608812,0.00014611718,0.00013676287,0.00035102823,0.0061656423,0.0012269282,0.0013754087,0.0028614034,0.00026911046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055052486,0.00022095906,0.046688013,0.00015163254,0.000015031649,0.003147008,0.34314546,0.00035528612,0.0027257297,0.42629686,0.03718773,0.14001133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015597643,0.00011651126,0.13358226,0.00050033344,0.000014415066,0.0017558641,0.13385737,0.00058773544,0.0014385746,0.005016165,0.7230522,0.0000629844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92873865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9628422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07126135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02088371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04586513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15152264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124464459","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2200","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 3","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03160965413123776,"score_gpt":0.2099555058256226,"score_spread":0.17834585169438485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124464459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021564427,0.0010361349,0.00024320954,0.0078497315,0.0021729716,0.000062824234,0.0008224549,0.0003451332,0.98531115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012759247,0.0006318966,0.00018471331,0.0061164033,0.0010329781,0.000031104682,0.0003519977,0.000172154,0.9787194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896145,0.000086834974,0.000043253145,0.00022462443,0.00046439466,0.0002194501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986247,0.0003192117,0.000058651935,0.00019388384,0.000380632,0.00042301626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010540532,0.00062890357,0.00063740043,0.0015074278,0.0036510364,0.0083124135,0.0012258306,0.0059947213,0.73592234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002852853,0.00051065424,0.00063604116,0.0009144102,0.0029160867,0.0016431685,0.0024321724,0.003957275,0.544144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008253628,0.0001267284,0.0017636579,0.000119220625,0.000025349185,0.00030134554,0.00009805652,0.00011620061,0.0010540691,0.02355147,0.89565396,0.077107504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024631798,0.000030262952,0.0025074168,0.00022946371,0.000010609393,0.00021650254,0.00014995076,0.0002407524,0.00035598854,0.004732148,0.99148667,0.000015644475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014235783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027943192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26407766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002631634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025478192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3766747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127895132","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2636","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Survey data collection; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.035446457258888994,"score_gpt":0.29519129439691977,"score_spread":0.25974483713803076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127895132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002876038,0.019936968,0.0028068211,0.058762714,0.009985962,0.0003099624,0.010257636,0.00063520053,0.8944286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011645085,0.016369727,0.00084157195,0.009098435,0.003978904,0.00030022173,0.0053613978,0.0003073594,0.95209724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967644,0.00045410244,0.0001171503,0.0005003628,0.0016545611,0.00050933775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057406,0.0017350801,0.00043188944,0.0008855131,0.004018966,0.002354633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029169798,0.0006983252,0.0009537502,0.007897273,0.003886876,0.008098103,0.001976043,0.0017603072,0.49845707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014002218,0.00045840512,0.0007184203,0.008074849,0.0013198352,0.0037461233,0.0037513108,0.002258091,0.36232057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027309385,0.00004402468,0.0005008101,0.00018427867,0.0000034155441,0.000017036547,0.00014727848,0.000044721848,0.00011273264,0.02360761,0.91394824,0.06136249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042035726,0.000013059576,0.00086195057,0.0001681457,0.000002192128,0.000022599079,0.0002265014,0.000042169493,0.00005639389,0.0018670862,0.99673235,0.0000034986638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006378606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012435825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49845707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045271316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7153901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127917038","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2609","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 4","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02449971408508544,"score_gpt":0.20899364216719815,"score_spread":0.1844939280821127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127917038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022087356,0.0010798933,0.00022087514,0.008028139,0.0021358428,0.00006520855,0.00089951727,0.0003408484,0.985021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012021307,0.0005801438,0.00016748009,0.0053958492,0.0010087168,0.000029554887,0.0003533317,0.00015476852,0.98028874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989303,0.000094434035,0.0000444881,0.00022366429,0.000473846,0.00023320504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858344,0.00033443453,0.000060908773,0.00019474956,0.00039705675,0.00042949576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010409108,0.00067555986,0.0006579596,0.0016205689,0.0037523895,0.00793621,0.001296742,0.005922835,0.7442081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029016978,0.0005488796,0.000633675,0.0009182763,0.0029657616,0.0016302399,0.0024588972,0.004007677,0.5410571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008935508,0.00013663474,0.0017796031,0.000121134006,0.000028079789,0.00030455523,0.00009402246,0.00012468873,0.0010318197,0.02234687,0.89768666,0.07625656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026939064,0.000032244294,0.002599955,0.00022373974,0.000011401649,0.00020471685,0.00014336164,0.00024086278,0.00035647335,0.0043558935,0.99178797,0.000016344915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016181579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030663319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029194315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025803237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36485606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127921007","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2624","title":"Best Interests or Autonomy?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Family law; Autonomy; Best interests; Health law; Welfare; Common law","score_opus":0.05996678990084643,"score_gpt":0.4103966385545401,"score_spread":0.3504298486536937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127921007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090016285,0.008077986,0.0063496926,0.2673687,0.001260322,0.00003155123,0.00007716488,0.000029775656,0.70780313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83154315,0.0049251863,0.002933751,0.09336263,0.0021816783,0.00013198047,0.000092010414,0.000071934126,0.06475764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893111,0.0055884,0.00032838975,0.0015346445,0.0016295679,0.0016079333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412787,0.003242831,0.0004765739,0.0006189919,0.000673926,0.0008598139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008057223,0.00035916385,0.0005330302,0.0008138504,0.0050155926,0.0074486095,0.0016630746,0.007789888,0.010134367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015269543,0.00022554942,0.00041718312,0.00066806475,0.039821014,0.010724949,0.006181839,0.008626274,0.0015732087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028834465,0.000003984161,0.00014282907,0.0000080532245,0.0000014443194,0.000050188904,0.0016580357,0.000017206496,0.000016070813,0.98889357,0.0063749347,0.002830699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013314703,0.000013891841,0.00039655872,0.00023556982,0.0000062472823,0.00028007364,0.0043914565,0.00012354323,0.00009557394,0.7635795,0.2308534,0.0000107739625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008245373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010134367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058795414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006779142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042659223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127943489","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2630","title":"Comparer sans harmoniser","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04964689509831655,"score_gpt":0.3971692641415429,"score_spread":0.34752236904322636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127943489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011656015,0.0028974146,0.0006810574,0.005359518,0.0039200443,0.000060958864,0.0019150514,0.0018578962,0.98214227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032361858,0.00046333743,0.00038847636,0.00075596006,0.00032418445,0.000039675746,0.00036111125,0.00048851804,0.99394256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982253,0.00025555972,0.00009375024,0.0002974235,0.0009016656,0.00022629228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805605,0.00050708256,0.00015841382,0.00037126683,0.00062591594,0.00028137004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545325,0.0009382997,0.0015672491,0.002876728,0.0028787684,0.0049486035,0.0014846602,0.002263594,0.7447965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056668366,0.00054999295,0.00051767123,0.002312688,0.00093484455,0.0025458073,0.0030302268,0.002297373,0.5714535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104090344,0.000036004065,0.00024756647,0.00016612854,0.0000046463797,0.00014166212,0.00014505128,0.00006318458,0.00038408072,0.016065806,0.8366329,0.14600892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009440042,0.0000139131325,0.0003601929,0.0000621976,0.0000018803518,0.00011360317,0.000118232405,0.000045858877,0.00017435964,0.0013419508,0.9977527,0.000005724086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006282741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010642731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7447965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013032567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017650737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36401677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127953218","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2615","title":"Do Pre-1970 Precedents Still Matter?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Assertion; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.023953914497859267,"score_gpt":0.31364878628662035,"score_spread":0.2896948717887611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127953218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6942321,0.046390165,0.0017551719,0.032163646,0.00077763974,0.00008858944,0.0042608846,0.00009210904,0.22023967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97513187,0.01097525,0.0005066789,0.001801111,0.00024610406,0.000018362169,0.0009705383,0.000044681667,0.010305397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994103,0.00042166788,0.00026247403,0.00079829094,0.0031550084,0.0012595841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656016,0.013671072,0.003781135,0.0009355285,0.013146596,0.0028641084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054367245,0.00021378437,0.00050435105,0.010147057,0.007003487,0.009623431,0.001502734,0.0011986421,0.0087734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03669277,0.00022430043,0.00027583845,0.022699164,0.0073980014,0.0048609776,0.0015754154,0.0021012332,0.00077011815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025583277,0.00012550992,0.2980774,0.0015354153,0.00020448458,0.0017547389,0.0918044,0.0011163158,0.0019757624,0.35627174,0.03802422,0.20885418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017268423,0.00003666311,0.56078124,0.0013435716,0.00013284979,0.00034613378,0.035878755,0.00035118818,0.0011753872,0.019054942,0.3807758,0.00010617599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8879616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94628924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04486241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05407211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32550102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128013358","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2612","title":"compétence autochtone en matière de justice pénale adolescente :","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Human rights; Citizenship","score_opus":0.021664595628800895,"score_gpt":0.31217743937395115,"score_spread":0.29051284374515024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128013358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82725656,0.0034367214,0.0012829286,0.020096822,0.00018691858,0.00005411638,0.00017317901,0.00001251288,0.1475003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961484,0.001236095,0.00024929238,0.0006003223,0.00003650887,0.000017698349,0.00003911992,0.0000085607535,0.008197574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794,0.00065210584,0.00006285116,0.00018495177,0.00050116103,0.00065892143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996258,0.00078613206,0.00069333677,0.00015019777,0.001091619,0.0010207042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017339579,0.00021659858,0.0002472786,0.00094236765,0.004130036,0.0040953914,0.0006072532,0.0007634043,0.006618571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057120677,0.00014857063,0.00025512633,0.00086849387,0.0053801006,0.0035417038,0.0030052727,0.0028443902,0.0004068891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007176949,0.000115808056,0.14649762,0.00025068084,0.000034386718,0.0015373178,0.46476096,0.00023726188,0.0005662427,0.32625955,0.007931374,0.05173704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017644634,0.00009064909,0.34365758,0.0017624545,0.000062276726,0.0015187102,0.44122428,0.0006770459,0.0008370605,0.016847666,0.19323279,0.0000717896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2006032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30926752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2006032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007530886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011780896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39887106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128018999","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2618","title":"Newcomers to Canada:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Crimes against humanity; Reputation; Subject (documents); Human rights; Impunity; Humanity","score_opus":0.013527246190820033,"score_gpt":0.299786377440348,"score_spread":0.28625913124952795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128018999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1478306,0.014963414,0.0011875308,0.34289187,0.013345769,0.00023074308,0.002622374,0.00028625823,0.47664148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2999739,0.011704061,0.00095768546,0.08228398,0.0012889445,0.000075887,0.0010787426,0.00029440894,0.60234237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963497,0.00021071467,0.000057732734,0.0003364343,0.0012746087,0.0017708732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989885,0.0003402035,0.00031946556,0.00019486067,0.0029049295,0.0063556437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014432748,0.00040546805,0.0006053356,0.0013763844,0.02677324,0.010084031,0.001898067,0.0035605715,0.056362297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051415744,0.00033525773,0.0005023638,0.0021677322,0.004133132,0.0027497816,0.004996051,0.006500699,0.00387596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007137332,0.00008873993,0.034962755,0.00019458907,0.000030894378,0.0026605674,0.03213652,0.00009619051,0.0005807435,0.040983833,0.7912599,0.09693389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076121632,0.000015347472,0.011512681,0.00013443663,0.000016163218,0.00035823506,0.03302623,0.00006405175,0.00010277304,0.0007445298,0.95397353,0.00004434019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056362297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044643346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14705202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3239116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128070020","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2639","title":"Volume 70 Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.027644247522276722,"score_gpt":0.2094466425353837,"score_spread":0.18180239501310697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128070020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027410503,0.002124151,0.00035550227,0.0014193021,0.006307853,0.00013768178,0.0030404357,0.0008276375,0.9855134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005287744,0.00087018276,0.00010231227,0.0005400149,0.0012295487,0.00004531216,0.0009602164,0.0002670766,0.9954566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989581,0.00008859836,0.000049141996,0.00014933525,0.00063928514,0.00011556473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975551,0.0003525812,0.0001277431,0.00027833146,0.0010196487,0.00066669047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070993457,0.0020915063,0.001736249,0.010336974,0.0026831413,0.0089273425,0.0016169702,0.0021616686,0.7856818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049107294,0.0006386531,0.00087922375,0.0073062945,0.0010325689,0.003603045,0.002869353,0.0022472122,0.8172048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014520957,0.000030677198,0.00009558046,0.00008940111,0.0000020783782,0.000017421557,0.00001507374,0.000033566877,0.00009959072,0.0022909143,0.9616583,0.03565285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007731277,0.000011545734,0.00033848392,0.00014128139,0.0000023902871,0.000023341738,0.000027865039,0.00005755041,0.000058082212,0.0013807628,0.99794465,0.000006383601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006974518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013380456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7856818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018328356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026347858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30569887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}