{"meta":{"query_hash":"486508743cfa","filters":{"venue":"McGill Law Journal"},"cohort_total":426,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":426,"exported":426,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/486508743cfa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=McGill+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W104569882","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism & Private Copying","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Federalism; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02829671862949457,"score_gpt":0.2777541835690936,"score_spread":0.24945746493959903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104569882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01027417,0.0001200792,0.0002139569,0.0023665936,0.000836454,0.00012266901,0.0000050132867,0.000100160265,0.9859609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923595,0.000048062753,0.0010855355,0.0007245712,0.0011143665,0.000002280612,0.0000015729222,0.000021279897,0.004642806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814796,0.00027002586,0.00031600913,0.00016060956,0.0005622576,0.00054313865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933827,0.00008860486,0.00012642203,0.000110448396,0.00017660396,0.00015966951],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008241581,0.00012758312,0.000164932,0.00004713999,0.012072799,0.00035895227,0.0003481565,0.00010859784,0.0021498585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007939158,0.00009884988,0.00011166912,0.00015782856,0.00034595036,0.00042185732,0.00004034706,0.00038569735,0.00041934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000158199,0.00003700854,0.000032478547,0.000002298715,0.000013299111,0.00006311016,0.0004073727,0.000021293288,0.00025551385,0.98799866,0.010331721,0.0008213978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022896791,0.000030551877,0.000023384137,0.0000252178,0.000009304509,0.00006328718,0.00015064781,0.00003155772,0.0026405533,0.022404855,0.97422594,0.00016572348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016475819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03580726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98208535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026277843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021125206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496343264","doi":"10.7202/1002371ar","title":"Qu’est ce que l’interculturalisme ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03998965420852022,"score_gpt":0.23587534484845057,"score_spread":0.19588569063993036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496343264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015585953,0.005185719,0.000014942698,0.0047007906,0.00813541,0.0000677088,0.000102520404,0.0000258686,0.98020846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92094415,0.0058567133,0.00030944913,0.0014971248,0.0021508255,0.0000024673118,0.0000019470597,0.00002735434,0.06920996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831647,0.00026305168,0.00033534702,0.00018480232,0.0003501538,0.000550167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881005,0.000023728557,0.00020212827,0.00013764312,0.00017546586,0.0006509526],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005064779,0.00014267614,0.00020534871,0.00013993976,0.008830047,0.00038255792,0.00043469697,0.0002009554,0.021595893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004163799,0.00016762037,0.0002572202,0.00023362947,0.0014525225,0.00089842954,0.000039113824,0.0006136294,0.0017386955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009561121,0.00008157999,0.00001634524,0.00001374862,0.000047274036,0.00034178965,0.01188228,0.0000015786709,0.000011123985,0.9311635,0.0428927,0.013538527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018652754,0.000066166154,0.00017411505,0.00009976085,0.000061891114,0.0004796901,0.0024893098,0.0000022843335,0.000020518251,0.003821039,0.99237037,0.00022831734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8871604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014962724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012854234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501713685","doi":"10.7202/1007822ar","title":"Ronald Niezen, Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp 254. ISBN 978-0-52-176704-0","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04281848983061244,"score_gpt":0.26158348505680673,"score_spread":0.2187649952261943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501713685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005729861,0.0021852278,0.000056220408,0.009423847,0.0013078022,0.00023382128,0.00014250528,0.000048910635,0.9808718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797588,0.010171567,0.00036378534,0.0009043614,0.00043048934,0.0000013597851,0.000003192532,0.000014736311,0.008351704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781704,0.0006503913,0.00029640005,0.00024419735,0.00046678784,0.0005251819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858576,0.0001784832,0.00034953858,0.00023040899,0.0003810585,0.0002747213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013303226,0.00017915296,0.0003264493,0.000009416679,0.0075389454,0.000082501225,0.000691449,0.00027678272,0.00041476032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096246185,0.00012808765,0.00021024673,0.0001823813,0.005295305,0.0005925537,0.00018927491,0.0006399249,0.000012353754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009868839,0.0000870523,0.0001111221,0.000014599029,0.000112286856,0.000026724609,0.0025199614,8.7246076e-7,0.000012601789,0.9611118,0.035745855,0.00015845084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012007852,0.00006654531,0.00046503052,0.000019464433,0.00026230342,0.00009083257,0.009326108,0.000008439385,0.00015662827,0.00066110125,0.98756313,0.00017961067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03208995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013584126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97402894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006088276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513570606","doi":"10.7202/1009070ar","title":"Karounga Diawara, Le contrôle de la puissance de marché : contribution à une approche juridique du marché, Cowansville (Qc), Yvon Blais, 2011, pp 512. ISBN 978-2-89635-516-7","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015990480374547106,"score_gpt":0.23685897974025039,"score_spread":0.22086849936570327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513570606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01429681,0.079511166,0.0656193,0.13710803,0.013687412,0.0015076944,0.0007633335,0.0004016478,0.68710464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97754025,0.0052799527,0.0012384866,0.0029062151,0.0090293195,0.000042330073,0.00012174807,0.00010756687,0.0037341258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956767,0.00041434154,0.0009882975,0.00045761635,0.0007291274,0.0017339146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710965,0.0005152892,0.0008568833,0.0003351333,0.00088192796,0.0003011076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003685923,0.0005765361,0.00065302255,0.00016768894,0.002914534,0.00081803196,0.0007667855,0.00050076336,0.0010042134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009052438,0.00059286715,0.0004101107,0.00026238186,0.001109417,0.0028233028,0.00027446175,0.0013242578,0.0005460787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027910207,0.00097042194,0.010808314,0.00043338272,0.0003191331,0.00017448673,0.00008357214,0.0002488611,0.00069835444,0.8998038,0.084406786,0.0017737653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028643422,0.00006085033,0.008595169,0.00052797707,0.0002713129,0.0006397578,0.00021192586,0.0021156769,0.0012665873,0.016867446,0.9658844,0.00069454603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011531524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022042543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008154416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014303754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516890318","doi":"10.7202/1018395ar","title":"Hugo Cyr, Canadian Federalism and Treaty Powers: Organic Constitutionalism at Work, New York, PIE Peter Lang, 2009","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitutionalism; Treaty; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.035875792759122845,"score_gpt":0.26131932136063124,"score_spread":0.2254435286015084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516890318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11745017,0.0027463275,0.0000032635835,0.03613472,0.0011212578,0.00045559858,0.000068920635,0.0000847942,0.841935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97434914,0.00027650144,0.00038617925,0.0018732696,0.00065294036,0.000005586549,0.0000056316685,0.000013148533,0.0224376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983647,0.00014107791,0.00024077839,0.00021382405,0.00040072197,0.00063893833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985555,0.00008455066,0.000111799985,0.00008687129,0.00017741432,0.000983871],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025557753,0.00019138916,0.00023008647,0.000051206793,0.0067879446,0.00039441505,0.00020351457,0.00015500514,0.0050505865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012692643,0.00014602269,0.00009744692,0.00016901696,0.0005250721,0.00036621833,0.00005739184,0.00029911872,0.00058767636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027460797,0.00006310298,0.021970749,0.000010035898,0.0004113374,0.00020441334,0.014154007,0.0000074868913,0.00017742236,0.25966787,0.6976434,0.005662724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045385837,0.000018989731,0.009680217,0.000035399375,0.000030409712,0.00007077282,0.0014375496,6.2183886e-7,0.000014744797,0.0005952548,0.9874295,0.00023265762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72094977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9244452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85689896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096554466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008692509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525411563","doi":"10.7202/1005138ar","title":"Rafael Domingo, The New Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039053652070085564,"score_gpt":0.2564224902538364,"score_spread":0.21736883818375083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525411563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074615395,0.00004846236,0.000102706756,0.0010080655,0.0013557136,0.00011407625,0.00006575482,0.000043535987,0.98980016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303409,0.000043130407,0.0002483238,0.00055846246,0.0010064525,3.4784e-7,0.000001792164,0.000008239055,0.06779237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850017,0.00021806233,0.00018658343,0.00016625345,0.0005135741,0.00041538422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914676,0.00004674953,0.00016901577,0.00015820414,0.00020044686,0.00027882878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057319086,0.00012570512,0.000133244,0.000015837035,0.0077865203,0.00013448083,0.0007879753,0.00009084929,0.00037186657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017191078,0.000090690046,0.00016173502,0.00005417325,0.0005204171,0.0005395496,0.00009372511,0.0002974067,0.00012583798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059744285,0.00003847161,0.000028707664,8.205751e-7,0.00004666842,0.00007321653,0.00018671388,0.0000013011099,0.0000022228112,0.97099245,0.028451715,0.00011794611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045873527,0.000030789884,0.0012981616,0.000013983393,0.000038628306,0.00006140125,0.00012966535,0.000004229573,0.00011260326,0.008561297,0.9891523,0.00013816699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14384092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07185565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029043597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070199785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536473971","doi":"10.7202/1018390ar","title":"Constitutionnalité de dispositions conférant un statut, des privilèges et des droits à une langue minoritaire : le cas singulier du Nunavut et de sa Loi sur la protection de la langue inuit","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028459424082415766,"score_gpt":0.35840496566835484,"score_spread":0.3299455415859391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536473971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029436,0.0037735659,0.011796957,0.04433066,0.0006974762,0.001193137,0.0007497022,0.00023383168,0.13428107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849729,0.0011670957,0.009906647,0.001984144,0.0003102221,0.00023956862,0.000034042554,0.00006202601,0.0013233447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875988,0.0101032555,0.00080850197,0.00026353964,0.00026645057,0.0009594835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952074,0.0023752146,0.00046677457,0.00039133496,0.0010037287,0.00055554503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004282892,0.00031847184,0.0003607204,0.00012358048,0.0073352824,0.00020860345,0.00036923675,0.0006711552,0.00047252563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015691019,0.0003172833,0.000172426,0.00026386167,0.0012157637,0.00058062916,0.00015103651,0.0030089526,0.00008762775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101990656,0.00062193925,0.02157922,0.0009991929,0.0001766917,0.00017537744,0.053176705,0.00048089054,0.0010063706,0.90712756,0.0014633099,0.01309077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005171844,0.00080587197,0.21894543,0.024231372,0.0004619042,0.019921565,0.05603884,0.0034473871,0.002166488,0.15566906,0.51141095,0.0017293184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26500732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21810548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75145847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017925041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016068589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541653799","doi":"10.7202/045092ar","title":"D. Rhidian Thomas, ed., Legal Issues Relating to Time Charterparties (London, U.K.: Informa, 2008), pp. xi, 378","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012308847779432702,"score_gpt":0.2825213018514214,"score_spread":0.2702124540719887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541653799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05666875,0.00021627265,0.000007311339,0.005023596,0.0015266346,0.00013948146,0.000025994877,0.00009512887,0.9362968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95182997,0.00022228075,0.0009733183,0.0026015565,0.0028159583,0.0000041885546,0.000005124797,0.00003227837,0.04151531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980468,0.00015127858,0.00045921333,0.00016677813,0.0006614097,0.0005144837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884754,0.00009145921,0.00020542498,0.00015869414,0.0003179964,0.00037887762],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013352103,0.000163108,0.00019412172,0.00007136301,0.0038038832,0.0005337676,0.0005086923,0.00010030235,0.002470981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043475168,0.00014619337,0.00013320311,0.00012926476,0.0001915855,0.0015556392,0.00007018429,0.0007580734,0.002313002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034591296,0.00004170733,0.00024951683,0.000002512104,0.000036251527,0.00005783412,0.0011358658,0.000011841483,0.002412429,0.9568183,0.03576137,0.0034378245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021890068,0.00007805641,0.00035875125,0.00003971958,0.000009370699,0.000051792416,0.00019542206,0.000055956516,0.0010144534,0.00035639314,0.9974184,0.00020276838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020052989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009993496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96165705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067454814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036252255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575274493","doi":"","title":"« Qui dit contractuel, dit juste. » (Fouillée) …en trois petits bonds, à reculons","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02473961729008749,"score_gpt":0.2857636367444556,"score_spread":0.2610240194543681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575274493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025861608,0.005280854,0.000034401695,0.19004337,0.0042596147,0.00022352785,0.00013405092,0.00008304802,0.7740795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710419,0.0021835335,0.0005202389,0.0032748196,0.01367155,0.000005389293,0.000002737636,0.00004235836,0.009257434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959221,0.0008504937,0.0007276776,0.00037098734,0.001005468,0.0011232591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978858,0.00030116455,0.00036938663,0.00022436338,0.00030013287,0.00091911264],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014918501,0.00035222084,0.0004928573,0.00007485578,0.007740747,0.00035469356,0.0006430237,0.00038458416,0.0027470114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024338327,0.0003332329,0.00044280905,0.0004627936,0.00093279366,0.0018274676,0.00009448924,0.001207561,0.0012730916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044113727,0.00035015238,0.0002177357,0.000012678258,0.00012975992,0.00015522576,0.003984847,0.00006193047,0.000058770704,0.957452,0.004053232,0.03347956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009334873,0.00020115302,0.0005575589,0.00009977164,0.00014345712,0.00017427903,0.0015345351,0.00003095075,0.00009054454,0.029782828,0.96600616,0.00044525202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006846258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032246873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066322094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007097271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591040560","doi":"10.7202/1007820ar","title":"John Mark Keyes, Executive Legislation, 2d ed (Markham: LexisNexis, 2010), pp 611. ISBN 978-0-43-346025-1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06860858094544267,"score_gpt":0.3305393646357795,"score_spread":0.26193078369033684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591040560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005076994,0.00032333884,0.00030123733,0.02150558,0.004055559,0.00024870035,0.000040428775,0.00009840801,0.97291905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635235,0.0013224726,0.006530509,0.0035403229,0.0020631386,0.000030625375,0.000027226939,0.000053032323,0.030080311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707353,0.0006369821,0.0006521992,0.00030199156,0.0007399629,0.00059531943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974004,0.00028098922,0.0006177813,0.00030177372,0.0010066302,0.00039241233],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253096,0.00022438657,0.0002436515,0.00016468193,0.0073707835,0.000411153,0.0005307665,0.00021812871,0.010474056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008711504,0.00021446981,0.00015276475,0.00071947643,0.0004279548,0.0027958292,0.000056906254,0.0011933023,0.00087459566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260221,0.00023013388,0.00065334945,0.000003978323,0.00007553092,0.000017614018,0.007282096,0.0000010330289,0.000028286753,0.786868,0.20140001,0.0033773736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038431707,0.000056232326,0.0020713494,0.000030647305,0.000046296398,0.000056685647,0.0056395982,0.000004751877,0.0001340888,0.011666035,0.97962505,0.000284967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033779755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022282036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95584464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031974723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043435622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826707174","doi":"10.7202/1032675ar","title":"Propriété intellectuelle, Cour suprême du Canada et droit civil","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04597333529863941,"score_gpt":0.2884160321260291,"score_spread":0.24244269682738973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826707174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01795739,0.007724583,0.00015116,0.10014688,0.012525526,0.00026107178,0.00008801303,0.000045499513,0.8610999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97512466,0.0014480009,0.0002113519,0.0021235277,0.0018552656,0.0000037682164,0.000001969261,0.000033265907,0.019198187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959979,0.0006993456,0.0005821857,0.00032134136,0.0014771678,0.000922041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971553,0.00035519726,0.00029113286,0.0002186209,0.00073087896,0.0012488331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029423733,0.00028972578,0.00039817282,0.000044058706,0.0035352292,0.00026415358,0.00070148415,0.00018736848,0.002281019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008835291,0.0002792772,0.00016598878,0.00039067605,0.0006433392,0.00078935566,0.00013954255,0.0009622988,0.0002836041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099359786,0.00015441845,0.00028939347,0.00004006793,0.00007561818,0.001023386,0.0027530214,0.00020482599,0.0000064067967,0.75580233,0.23010552,0.0094456365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004156269,0.00021507384,0.000045940364,0.0002056155,0.000085530075,0.0012172536,0.004610829,0.00014096776,0.000087172186,0.0091120275,0.9834959,0.00036807932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95716727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018720508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013545606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829280546","doi":"10.7202/1032678ar","title":"Challenges to Assessing Same-Sex Relationships under Refugee Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Adjudication; Refugee law; Credibility; Identity (music); Cherokee; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.14159385034804242,"score_gpt":0.3402310838880431,"score_spread":0.19863723354000065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1829280546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10910733,0.0006276469,0.00027747088,0.012446967,0.0011330068,0.00018813748,0.000008195514,0.00003508915,0.8761762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976072,0.0001081686,0.00067216525,0.00078091497,0.0003468662,0.0000043679283,0.0000027681674,0.000010527477,0.00046702696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980815,0.00054988166,0.00032301588,0.00015704178,0.00059583806,0.00029273142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908096,0.0001129682,0.00011672351,0.000113524446,0.0002318191,0.00034399814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018482546,0.00009714494,0.00014335498,0.00006740496,0.002194631,0.0001513345,0.00017500513,0.00008572799,0.000063191954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031145898,0.00008716336,0.00003151996,0.0001897283,0.00005343737,0.000747654,0.000015462321,0.00039224193,0.0000210172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054790903,0.0000188775,0.00086354784,0.0000018178469,0.000006563774,0.0000076206047,0.004609897,0.00048527322,0.000007683195,0.9889267,0.0012225355,0.0038439762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020692707,0.000026671847,0.0035556576,0.000051707106,0.0000060581856,0.000012937678,0.034911823,0.00005446384,0.000062796345,0.017084103,0.9438758,0.0001510418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89043444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97184265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017612404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048345953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843977442","doi":"10.7202/1032676ar","title":"Private International Law Implications in Conflicts of Interest for Lawyers Licensed in Multiple Countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Political science; Private law; Face (sociological concept); Subject (documents); Common law; Comparative law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.23781578822940264,"score_gpt":0.4188271401048644,"score_spread":0.18101135187546175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843977442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21200867,0.00004786529,0.0003557771,0.16230296,0.0025250732,0.0007832041,0.00022719786,0.000041300107,0.621708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722075,0.000026511696,0.0012193806,0.001164623,0.00013387248,0.000025887464,0.000012005055,0.000006889173,0.00019007866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903226,0.00011228853,0.00041128098,0.00009827844,0.00016838688,0.00017749018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855804,0.00039417262,0.00025876876,0.00008742206,0.0005952711,0.000106339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013602576,0.00006147823,0.00011263439,0.00013296226,0.00055510766,0.000108938904,0.00025419288,0.00006517523,0.0000809114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001276878,0.00006252469,0.000034494053,0.0002695249,0.00021518885,0.0008096768,0.000021037189,0.0002827202,0.0000103405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047481255,0.000108205895,0.004728782,0.0000025676638,0.000010259475,7.669593e-7,0.004704894,0.000031063417,0.00006239422,0.98970985,0.00036610008,0.00022764727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096528727,0.0000235385,0.0022617849,0.00002736385,0.0000039538563,0.000005543862,0.0029576365,0.000031157233,0.00025197156,0.010226528,0.98317397,0.000071272756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012703472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2738666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026480012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001438623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99387103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849736915","doi":"10.7202/1032679ar","title":"Bedford and the Structure of Section 7","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Section (typography); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Individualism; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019719682270426406,"score_gpt":0.2825392223551058,"score_spread":0.2628195400846794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849736915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310152,0.0013906957,0.00001267951,0.0029776567,0.0016850613,0.000089378824,0.0000020702892,0.000017280247,0.36281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990613,0.0002185948,0.000085506435,0.000057828533,0.00037920597,7.3300605e-8,1.4713663e-7,0.0000024627293,0.00019486573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.00014113782,0.00009090286,0.000035905367,0.00018804718,0.00008537701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996943,0.00003693899,0.000070532835,0.00003437515,0.00009179067,0.00007210307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047122536,0.000031205876,0.00006895778,0.0000139807225,0.0014307958,0.000031368996,0.00007113109,0.000061717205,0.00005362169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006454149,0.00001668305,0.000024530784,0.000077843244,0.0003082593,0.00008358507,0.000011602249,0.00017421704,0.0000010996954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002497958,0.000025938485,0.0021147693,0.0000054762754,0.00012828845,0.0000099966355,0.065711334,0.00018326876,0.00015984611,0.91156554,0.002271143,0.017574575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008617414,0.00003592008,0.00010901034,0.000015150167,0.00002465309,0.00005575723,0.017719531,0.00001414356,0.00051749335,0.03275062,0.94785047,0.00004552035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021300972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026901683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019390918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072435746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858026720","doi":"10.7202/1035384ar","title":"The Future of Poison Pills in Canada: Are Takeover Bid Reforms Needed?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Pill; Period (music); Business; Tender offer; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Corporate governance; Medicine","score_opus":0.009927328229124534,"score_gpt":0.17566039766442168,"score_spread":0.16573306943529714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858026720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8823189,0.0019049506,0.000019837773,0.029341469,0.004079307,0.00021765688,0.00007333095,0.000023813098,0.0820207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756706,0.00024361361,0.000005742028,0.0010575948,0.0009338056,0.0000017977172,5.3739916e-7,0.0000124817425,0.00017739725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894506,0.00000835197,0.00034380628,0.00010651438,0.00032799094,0.00026827722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902415,0.000034638404,0.0006187225,0.00016741478,0.00013942827,0.000015622825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027716852,0.000116790616,0.0001599452,0.000039029608,0.0006386746,0.0000503928,0.00029893327,0.00003775506,0.00008004231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036456313,0.00005497926,0.000058499325,0.00021704705,0.000038632777,0.00072785246,0.00006382636,0.00017424091,0.000015911786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004912292,0.00012962647,0.13439244,0.00012622467,0.00009059005,0.00040712336,0.000022785747,0.000067961264,0.0013939645,0.6423636,0.047542453,0.17297198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051050575,0.0000061932287,0.06806843,0.00017950847,0.0000069909634,0.0000147496685,0.00037735762,0.000016009306,0.00025807213,0.003041001,0.9274007,0.00012047751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6330505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87985826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024611645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037157282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49122334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860163611","doi":"10.7202/1032677ar","title":"Le Tribunal des droits de la personne devant la Cour d’appel du Québec : appel à plus de déférence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03809411854686967,"score_gpt":0.30329950606908723,"score_spread":0.26520538752221756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860163611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43240282,0.015042313,0.0028502392,0.051305592,0.0017330294,0.0002657133,0.00011144092,0.00012505607,0.4961638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913205,0.0010695657,0.0019133941,0.0004350613,0.0011969995,0.0000068702707,0.0000012584557,0.000037654005,0.004018731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954608,0.001625045,0.0004935192,0.00034563866,0.0008470242,0.0012279433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696505,0.0007126269,0.0002987876,0.0001814703,0.00044157752,0.0014005109],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057615293,0.00032408582,0.000430674,0.000064068954,0.0054648696,0.00044666673,0.0007809406,0.0003420763,0.00031553925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114057,0.0003242764,0.00028196746,0.00028370897,0.0026826845,0.00094845786,0.00013923469,0.0009865898,0.00025988554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024556223,0.0003697092,0.0037353812,0.000092926064,0.00009265341,0.0018222197,0.017826376,0.00088247337,0.0001245054,0.9548123,0.008657148,0.011338737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011709085,0.0002289141,0.00072289683,0.00052535575,0.00016595669,0.005901035,0.015580317,0.0011630388,0.00020475504,0.016127016,0.95776504,0.0004447662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3702812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42028347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019911414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027551127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911260150","doi":"","title":"Faut-il codifier le droit privé européen des contrats ?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06255662421348222,"score_gpt":0.2779196856202078,"score_spread":0.21536306140672556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911260150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012350551,0.0056199143,0.00013218015,0.007206955,0.0028484059,0.00012511334,0.00009669658,0.00004964562,0.97157055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876978,0.0039736386,0.00029029595,0.0020192303,0.001607843,0.000001456581,0.0000020206105,0.000042404925,0.115085125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970391,0.0006540336,0.0005718613,0.00027276945,0.00071728585,0.000744973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983845,0.00016426924,0.00031175598,0.00016339427,0.00044125947,0.0005348459],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009589267,0.00023975465,0.00028394288,0.000055004824,0.005134908,0.0003935339,0.0006173322,0.00013783063,0.0075674127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021190847,0.00024382466,0.0002753572,0.00021817292,0.0012228275,0.0011736719,0.00006292777,0.0007356961,0.0025519251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015739624,0.00027286063,0.000059323967,0.000008825893,0.00009954188,0.000338222,0.000407029,0.00002875398,0.00011381875,0.9649207,0.0027412206,0.030993966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008124181,0.00016574314,0.00058216235,0.00014176957,0.000045595658,0.00024949663,0.0001753558,0.0004564383,0.0002456557,0.008229501,0.9885996,0.00029625627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019700283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007197612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002830128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021924445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964458389","doi":"10.7202/1017521ar","title":"Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09913062218168837,"score_gpt":0.3615921520979623,"score_spread":0.2624615299162739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964458389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008009641,0.009527033,0.00007804997,0.051000662,0.0013907168,0.0006774876,0.00004140594,0.00004986834,0.92922515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690551,0.12604895,0.0013099572,0.0026598054,0.00031370978,0.000012855845,0.0000012557055,0.00001656879,0.00058180944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789745,0.0002716605,0.00046933774,0.00014744814,0.0008889681,0.0003251215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984147,0.00031143,0.00023062715,0.00020420976,0.0005291367,0.00030992893],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014871277,0.00010756555,0.00029761693,0.00003820313,0.0022870784,0.00006633675,0.0003729908,0.000059626895,0.005527647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008889338,0.00008103008,0.00014957391,0.00019535812,0.00020250001,0.00036216676,0.000038726463,0.0002623982,0.00031000262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007976044,0.00012881593,0.000048031565,0.00007727782,0.00003054839,0.000035190755,0.0005168401,0.000006898303,0.00013448781,0.60213757,0.10638257,0.29042202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013054174,0.00022031719,0.0000675434,0.001733896,0.000027445105,0.00001897839,0.00049213757,5.130656e-7,0.0003679514,0.004101965,0.99273604,0.000102675025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014789761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006813668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92864335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014776681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964954328","doi":"10.7202/1013389ar","title":"Legislating Respect: A Pro-Choice Feminist Analysis of Embryo Research Restrictions in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Personhood; Legislature; Abortion; Sociology; Law; Commodification; Political science; Reproductive rights; Gender studies; Biology; Economics; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.09855584792101252,"score_gpt":0.3778822676782701,"score_spread":0.2793264197572576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964954328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83303726,0.0002785052,0.000003368554,0.005066188,0.0001041632,0.0003743039,0.000017912516,0.000021171238,0.16109714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998979,0.00007255934,0.000580324,0.000081455866,0.00008466017,0.000027128375,0.0000017807562,0.000010024673,0.00016308455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978721,0.00013585655,0.00056189887,0.00023651069,0.00075107894,0.00044253308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981519,0.0003143817,0.00018385111,0.0003864804,0.00079041685,0.00017294304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011943015,0.00008735875,0.0003661329,0.0007950722,0.0008612633,0.000019500165,0.0001474452,0.00006478157,0.00011819707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025998822,0.0000699237,0.000071778595,0.002607725,0.00012829306,0.000102585065,0.000057129742,0.001062329,0.000003523853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014348328,0.00026865976,0.9489676,0.0001445466,0.00068151054,0.00032778527,0.00016228326,0.00027107485,0.0021248956,0.02437244,0.0061825505,0.016353168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000764708,0.00033179318,0.88238096,0.00017597857,0.00017295442,0.0002256014,0.0026099163,0.00055237405,0.0016518384,0.00084168196,0.11016513,0.0001270358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97587705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16594173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011133093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005483527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66242284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965271865","doi":"10.7202/045700ar","title":"De Genève à Doha : genèse et évolution du traitement spécial et différencié des pays en développement dans le droit de l’OMC","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04047805258607436,"score_gpt":0.26800035544832734,"score_spread":0.22752230286225297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965271865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7538837,0.0014194481,0.013538509,0.006819733,0.0022928524,0.0006972667,0.00013207243,0.00013232045,0.22108409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203616,0.0009753986,0.0021785651,0.0022674073,0.0021531957,0.000016742659,0.000024519482,0.00006590019,0.00028211324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632454,0.00044544437,0.00080089376,0.00039706778,0.0005778588,0.0014542134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985108,0.00006386998,0.00047926593,0.00023102245,0.00047262374,0.00024244694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036306167,0.00048477054,0.00045230417,0.00015388771,0.0035182924,0.0007849378,0.00051958667,0.0002961865,0.0005942197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035303176,0.000504308,0.00044698024,0.00035107593,0.00044406633,0.0027077764,0.0002360477,0.00071370305,0.00004840531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023793677,0.0023301826,0.08879104,0.0005875186,0.00043709288,0.0004924943,0.017441,0.00036632092,0.00023031219,0.870436,0.0012289557,0.017421126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027053992,0.00024519055,0.543335,0.0003416269,0.0007114598,0.0002637872,0.02686676,0.00066306145,0.00024833676,0.19994184,0.22368574,0.0009917809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050309658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052585866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67049414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002904389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965374745","doi":"10.7202/1006417ar","title":"The Place of Legitimacy in Legal Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04223338448784949,"score_gpt":0.28434318212507254,"score_spread":0.24210979763722304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965374745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00850112,0.00041440636,0.0000134940465,0.00068210973,0.00031464227,0.000044617616,0.0000032314035,0.0000055209684,0.9900209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926865,0.00027253962,0.00004503,0.00008609474,0.00012652106,0.0000019188158,3.9991733e-8,0.00000175506,0.00019744356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924093,0.00017310219,0.0001553335,0.000046613946,0.0002117178,0.00017230479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996251,0.00014903242,0.00007172062,0.000037283695,0.00007514049,0.000041719893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011736952,0.00004028273,0.00007537301,0.000016147207,0.0036189323,0.000017914868,0.000182911,0.000022654142,0.00011411838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013262073,0.000025659067,0.000048751102,0.00009070651,0.0008421831,0.00014915537,0.000028699636,0.00013875288,0.000011638814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978103,0.000022122056,0.0005604954,3.0716313e-7,0.000012095646,0.0000113178385,0.00083624676,0.0000011127656,0.0000022222764,0.9950257,0.00007142603,0.003417174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016486195,0.000024796096,0.0033836763,0.000020208283,0.0000066898374,0.000011615201,0.005275445,5.189959e-7,0.00008813337,0.24540962,0.7455606,0.000053857035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01983494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10973263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99076754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044724948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031470638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965915331","doi":"10.7202/1019047ar","title":"La fiducie française ou le réveil chaotique d’une « belle au bois dormant »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021998887904576433,"score_gpt":0.2576017559694383,"score_spread":0.23560286806486186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965915331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056654323,0.0024514494,0.00003195979,0.115390666,0.0036008174,0.0002752961,0.000051147803,0.00005925121,0.8214851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774991,0.0010079663,0.00022164917,0.0017149514,0.0043714717,0.000016040905,0.0000029845792,0.000045664074,0.01512014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964511,0.00077417935,0.0006101894,0.00033454367,0.00079355313,0.0010364682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814427,0.00017651422,0.00033279296,0.00022679853,0.00032412534,0.00079547847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012801554,0.00034041633,0.000461337,0.00006571097,0.017292367,0.0002515766,0.0006355078,0.0005305157,0.002349143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074689604,0.0003112934,0.00045976302,0.00049925945,0.001366161,0.0015583964,0.00020976037,0.001361985,0.0016788726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129931595,0.00043034714,0.00011961301,0.000036254918,0.000111573194,0.00015419356,0.024885152,0.000019443969,0.00005552016,0.9432774,0.007090285,0.02380718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006753937,0.000112201094,0.00046001293,0.0001040836,0.000046158337,0.00009455889,0.002277326,0.000030493657,0.00013386307,0.06790798,0.9277664,0.0003915246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27580935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06985322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037678712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020607591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967674067","doi":"10.7202/038180ar","title":"La constitutionnalité de l’interdiction de publicité directe des médicaments d’ordonnance","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30806543988735535,"score_gpt":0.521439777332852,"score_spread":0.2133743374454966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967674067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17940356,0.029804723,0.0032643634,0.08417909,0.008680906,0.0006421474,0.0006662463,0.00030819964,0.69305074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645276,0.008825557,0.00069179136,0.0221227,0.0016307767,0.00001365633,0.0000099392155,0.000027355567,0.002150619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930407,0.003787104,0.0008185417,0.00038358377,0.00029264,0.0016774548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967002,0.00043170815,0.0003520811,0.00018152187,0.00034582074,0.001988622],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041399063,0.00042409552,0.000442261,0.00012480105,0.005761968,0.00016903554,0.0004451064,0.0015018485,0.003845605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031696472,0.00045217713,0.00028910986,0.00035907817,0.0016162607,0.00074624084,0.00006977297,0.0063041225,0.00017582533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078926823,0.001816025,0.010911625,0.0002110038,0.00051849487,0.0021496562,0.0006122279,0.0007117093,0.003766612,0.558631,0.009176839,0.41070554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023571057,0.00027812962,0.005856601,0.0005260621,0.00041450976,0.010547432,0.0001452191,0.0020348702,0.012831058,0.015133183,0.9494648,0.00041101806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034631655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94028795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014730304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022882127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967878830","doi":"10.7202/1009063ar","title":"Regulating Financial Institutions: The Value of Opacity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Business; Financial institution; Institution; Accounting; Financial regulation; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06110960476555873,"score_gpt":0.26779935175043434,"score_spread":0.2066897469848756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967878830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20645298,0.0004500534,0.0011423739,0.0024604534,0.0019479321,0.00016997874,0.0000036897272,0.00005037631,0.78732216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727315,0.0000065950926,0.00029186244,0.0007232513,0.0016433011,0.000002707605,7.1443895e-7,0.000005304799,0.000053122127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993047,0.000012749913,0.00023714325,0.000054820888,0.00020095341,0.00018960767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994833,0.00002027974,0.00024598785,0.000102699734,0.00013765077,0.000010071797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047651428,0.00007801974,0.00011281137,0.00004075801,0.00272816,0.000059121096,0.00014100378,0.000023532531,0.000060674676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012598532,0.00005044441,0.00008197549,0.00019030768,0.00012425349,0.0009278646,0.00008626891,0.00013021282,0.00003737321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008043707,0.000028421275,0.0057042064,0.000013708288,0.000011124691,3.6444322e-7,0.000019956013,0.00028578704,0.000039842504,0.989693,0.00065192854,0.0035436573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002794145,0.0000040094897,0.119510114,0.000059414728,0.00003217147,0.000023786692,0.00016736229,0.00036344814,0.00014021972,0.009529171,0.86978656,0.000104331026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001594712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016042052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9801638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019494342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038091105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969154315","doi":"10.7202/045701ar","title":"De Stockholm à Copenhague : genèse et évolution des responsabilités communes mais différenciées dans le droit international de l’environnement","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043465869626715205,"score_gpt":0.2945322813409201,"score_spread":0.25106641171420485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969154315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53792375,0.0011091123,0.0014750039,0.0035177814,0.00088442035,0.00018528645,0.00021964454,0.000030168774,0.4546548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846598,0.0016733452,0.005247607,0.00080406596,0.00039260765,0.000019165327,0.00001156623,0.000034642027,0.007157198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644697,0.0015252013,0.0005037368,0.0002501886,0.00048811742,0.000785789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987848,0.00018591795,0.00026482713,0.0002573822,0.000041129693,0.00046594234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025103758,0.00025469507,0.00023615231,0.00006230455,0.00502478,0.00014916857,0.00077232585,0.00021985333,0.005344072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010716581,0.0002741996,0.0002328793,0.00012222689,0.002278163,0.000979776,0.00021422909,0.0006049047,0.00021748456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012200744,0.0008602824,0.01900342,0.000016257973,0.00012463078,0.000060562987,0.015632361,0.00011292193,0.0009797245,0.9529125,0.0002556606,0.009919683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091810845,0.00035769792,0.19844669,0.00018188769,0.000104709485,0.00045346632,0.008855098,0.00012583073,0.0032117078,0.04227729,0.74461013,0.00045740165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11246476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17466377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020704747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086274486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969351015","doi":"10.7202/039837ar","title":"La Loi sur l’immunité des États canadienne et la torture","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Torture; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.036683292972897776,"score_gpt":0.31576733022498904,"score_spread":0.27908403725209124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969351015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56328523,0.0017567733,0.000007847734,0.009698284,0.0034674837,0.000070111266,0.00006505852,0.000027947874,0.42162126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903384,0.0019524862,0.0006981204,0.0006554212,0.0007886044,0.000002343612,0.0000018798366,0.000029400428,0.0055333497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712497,0.0010059176,0.0003610069,0.00022161765,0.00040769108,0.0008788124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764866,0.0007931264,0.00020136959,0.0002304142,0.00032580283,0.0008006028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00357547,0.00024367173,0.00027560693,0.000050352493,0.0058498373,0.00034673885,0.000623321,0.00041032716,0.0019509911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049771706,0.00022649142,0.00020384401,0.00027123856,0.0018763345,0.0010129627,0.00009311025,0.0022213708,0.00012172164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025237528,0.00012850949,0.0004900796,0.00004091496,0.0000476277,0.0008864403,0.004471888,0.000014086674,0.0004269361,0.88848543,0.0017720754,0.10321076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022585424,0.000087090295,0.0030966909,0.00024046554,0.000082917046,0.0022428797,0.0027446283,0.000008968415,0.00012284284,0.010013433,0.9808513,0.00028292663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27804995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94874066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97907925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018909978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013777943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973249466","doi":"10.7202/1005849ar","title":"Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Treaty; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Arbitration; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; State (computer science); Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Free trade agreement; Law and economics; International law; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Public international law; Judicial review; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02818626240530645,"score_gpt":0.2241302193366712,"score_spread":0.19594395693136477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973249466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119328424,0.00027677935,0.000102964055,0.008486422,0.00036082102,0.00032215135,0.00002241067,0.00004769221,0.8710523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98299474,0.00039982234,0.00009960097,0.015475616,0.0002913385,0.000010580361,0.000013430346,0.000013076217,0.00070179865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993133,0.000026358213,0.0001909959,0.000099619545,0.00018845685,0.00018130141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956214,0.000045512228,0.00014310353,0.00008539702,0.00014694397,0.000016901635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045169052,0.00011873836,0.0001102296,0.00005675548,0.0016891329,0.00037673776,0.00012545777,0.000021579664,0.0003101405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018031842,0.000054918983,0.00004403795,0.000095662785,0.00022854838,0.00057359255,0.000078889745,0.00010400022,0.000023057972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015665783,0.000025199713,0.00022485088,0.0000050832105,0.000069927766,0.000006669674,0.00012350339,0.00000761559,0.000007808337,0.9974357,0.0011433152,0.00079365954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018974328,0.000047646197,0.0004682715,0.00001646067,0.00006811812,0.000039359085,0.0005642083,0.0018225346,0.00015051001,0.038323157,0.9565084,0.00009388078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042731594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019349349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034669556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028954062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975145808","doi":"10.7202/1005133ar","title":"Sales or Plans: A Comparative Account of the “New” Corporate Reorganization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Creditor; Business; Insolvency; Plan (archaeology); Asset (computer security); Process (computing); Flexibility (engineering); Debtor; Realm; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Management; Political science; Debt; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.10628170172060088,"score_gpt":0.23255884491128231,"score_spread":0.12627714319068145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975145808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62788266,0.00033644412,0.0014667815,0.0014461519,0.0039864685,0.0007383989,0.00011972347,0.00014824183,0.36387512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984413,0.000019709745,0.00021663982,0.0005661329,0.0004382036,0.0000011747962,0.0000036962836,0.000013894862,0.00029928467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999134,0.0000149321795,0.00033347966,0.00011664908,0.0002491099,0.00015183887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983736,0.000017474405,0.0011621984,0.00016342608,0.0002695034,0.000013751764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020104283,0.00012604639,0.00017730756,0.00004292954,0.0007761381,0.00006693389,0.00034253474,0.000043585376,0.00046732157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004493366,0.000075204574,0.00006309568,0.00040396905,0.00008352256,0.0009191676,0.00009342544,0.000174412,0.000090509704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083840167,0.0002979202,0.032477845,0.000096505624,0.00012461722,0.00006766,0.00048411146,0.00013811405,0.0013026146,0.9388727,0.024198027,0.0011014725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016963466,0.00007622802,0.10828634,0.00045085457,0.00016070314,0.00014916285,0.00065124576,0.00041394655,0.009262667,0.050069936,0.82828844,0.00049414166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009963472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010216294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88880277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002603165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018711431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59695053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975384691","doi":"10.7202/1017519ar","title":"Le champ d’application de l’article XX(A) du GATT et le travail dangereux des enfants : une question relevant de la moralité publique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0134606267395159,"score_gpt":0.29500305383919095,"score_spread":0.28154242709967503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975384691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5484147,0.00083411054,0.005232907,0.07456651,0.0006141489,0.00034031132,0.00005719686,0.00009788851,0.36984223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199617,0.0012918533,0.0016452391,0.0015577949,0.0005367551,0.000047760346,0.000008982966,0.000032225485,0.0028832455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965901,0.0016889104,0.0004168953,0.00023335153,0.00045697278,0.00061376364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986489,0.0001770693,0.00024145126,0.00014258733,0.0004184821,0.00037154835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037785054,0.00017873183,0.0001849577,0.000055910037,0.0026697384,0.00039080676,0.00034283428,0.00023171755,0.0003489561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014810202,0.00018441309,0.00012401726,0.00028204868,0.00071145425,0.0014992709,0.000045755532,0.00046976766,0.00012897565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014568346,0.00035622308,0.0026230572,0.000014259615,0.000054949876,0.0000124960325,0.0024608162,0.00018621642,0.0028838504,0.9677837,0.00081516773,0.022794731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007529687,0.00010448885,0.037317056,0.00013806773,0.000029340901,0.00023821069,0.00165566,0.0016160723,0.0042148316,0.19766122,0.75597286,0.00029921593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29941335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11801712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77012247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049626856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023516967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975773252","doi":"10.7202/1000789ar","title":"Law, Economics, and Beyond: A Case for Retheorizing the Business Corporation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Theory of the firm; Corporation; Shareholder value; Principal–agent problem; Shareholder; Outsourcing; Corporate law; Economics; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Finance; Neoclassical economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05887725011325028,"score_gpt":0.21292028777657418,"score_spread":0.1540430376633239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975773252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09641508,0.001426264,0.0031729764,0.0015685479,0.0050021345,0.0008417886,0.0007866791,0.000049597616,0.89073694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971255,0.00041409206,0.0008882574,0.0008025983,0.00063088606,0.000023943316,0.0000057868688,0.000037183385,0.00007172195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998533,0.000025915964,0.00084073143,0.00029075178,0.000014840337,0.00029472902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868524,0.00007714332,0.00079775084,0.00023384283,0.00008236782,0.00012366395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014533635,0.0001426077,0.00039057218,0.00006962097,0.0022544877,0.00020199682,0.00018570677,0.00011538962,0.000083367944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004626805,0.0001512017,0.0001164078,0.00005832244,0.00024677033,0.0006020398,0.000047266116,0.00015254892,0.000041162286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037997193,0.000024261395,0.00036650087,0.000012305699,0.000058982954,0.000025001531,0.00035593435,0.000015614562,0.0000011987362,0.998238,0.00010978781,0.00075441407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074460375,0.00007723261,0.00014573392,0.000009526075,0.000017234684,0.0017208827,0.00030704256,0.00064927334,0.000063739426,0.64650524,0.34951514,0.0002443355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060274224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01453204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90071046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011392827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006597746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545274","doi":"10.7202/1006418ar","title":"Les théories constitutionnelles de Louis-Philippe Pigeon : L’efficience du partage législatif des compétences et l’incrédulité face à la protection législative des droits fondamentaux","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09068385154578733,"score_gpt":0.31561329607460303,"score_spread":0.2249294445288157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4579866,0.0065217502,0.035079636,0.0040039783,0.0018266636,0.00080464553,0.00015746073,0.00017192836,0.49344736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896214,0.003124971,0.005978339,0.00012856875,0.00031661915,0.000029767574,0.0000023046891,0.000025987738,0.0007720321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952088,0.001640677,0.00073786854,0.000523829,0.000802927,0.0010859276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767435,0.0005490594,0.0005786157,0.00020487956,0.00051273627,0.00048036466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031614879,0.00046544592,0.00046722812,0.00010379572,0.014055019,0.00050238194,0.00067455217,0.00030852295,0.0008500135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000565974,0.00042796854,0.0002670447,0.0005847306,0.011314864,0.002146857,0.00015969854,0.0008979993,0.00008072474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013121188,0.00039209658,0.006072318,0.000106548934,0.00008020872,0.00015707812,0.050373726,0.00062220433,0.0002061358,0.90943474,0.000050691964,0.032373026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010694155,0.0015235152,0.012086742,0.0031634357,0.00043115902,0.002532625,0.09185347,0.0011606022,0.004151478,0.33041498,0.5501533,0.0014592679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0615537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07891159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000686301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020776317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977942614","doi":"10.7202/1013387ar","title":"The 1969 African Refugee Convention: Innovations, Misconceptions, and Omissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Expansive; Political science; Silence; Refugee law; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.028266718191945466,"score_gpt":0.22151846478047924,"score_spread":0.19325174658853378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977942614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008382422,0.0004075231,0.000040800034,0.014698815,0.0008496949,0.000149032,0.000048325375,0.000044708464,0.9753787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679143,0.000053339714,0.00006358218,0.00058447354,0.000470505,0.00001678065,0.0000046940368,0.000009124063,0.030883247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991905,0.00006234629,0.0003069668,0.000092003786,0.00014327801,0.00020491617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993581,0.000091812566,0.000089639034,0.00010855149,0.00018861957,0.0001632622],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014369708,0.00008946079,0.00009967443,0.000028223838,0.006951181,0.00032028471,0.00012185183,0.000027665174,0.0017126461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036480556,0.000053110514,0.00005693606,0.000035221783,0.0004367213,0.00029381053,0.00003100962,0.00025390286,0.00014298754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027590274,0.000022892884,0.000009590213,0.0000022465306,0.000015572563,0.0000018716933,0.000200588,1.315574e-7,0.0000044274675,0.989706,0.005979259,0.004054701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014620853,0.000043514974,0.000071693044,0.0000126727355,0.000009244891,0.000024427181,0.0010498392,0.00007194634,0.0000016051715,0.07007531,0.9284133,0.00008024772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043774128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012404762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95953184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004725479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008542365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978273071","doi":"10.7202/1026130ar","title":"Tort Law, Risk, and Technological Innovation in England","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Action (physics); Function (biology); Industrial Revolution; Technological change; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.023972221821319688,"score_gpt":0.29210815694112313,"score_spread":0.26813593511980344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978273071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4765576,0.000024859022,0.00057402323,0.0031528408,0.000071095834,0.00010427764,0.000007080384,0.00004565466,0.5194626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896735,0.0000668709,0.00058882055,0.00018185632,0.0001367932,0.0000042417846,5.7693416e-7,0.0000028216864,0.000050684353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.000097292104,0.0001740315,0.00008538348,0.00013187643,0.00013969565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996955,0.00006364591,0.000084517,0.000057840225,0.000054066422,0.00004443644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014408656,0.000041411888,0.00006799817,0.000038156064,0.0019903851,0.00006201416,0.000101852864,0.000077597324,0.000031496755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019661509,0.000033390777,0.000012501839,0.0002306363,0.00020264275,0.00013018739,0.000028744538,0.0002758815,0.000007995875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019461497,0.000015765028,0.0028156047,5.356887e-7,0.0000012682214,9.295696e-7,0.00011945506,0.000003124982,0.00003475568,0.9766843,0.000009426946,0.02031292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020954943,0.000016353111,0.0036946028,0.0000048535007,0.0000022481322,0.000006285778,0.00013022072,0.000026081409,0.00007507715,0.043087162,0.9526987,0.000048884634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033264745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048597068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95268923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041115425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040764057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979443733","doi":"10.7202/039647ar","title":"La formalisation du devoir d’information dans les contrats de cyberconsommation : analyse de la solution québécoise","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009626085375818095,"score_gpt":0.24475935169760432,"score_spread":0.23513326632178622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979443733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29406562,0.00006652816,0.02559896,0.0032379404,0.00081853574,0.0001773594,0.00006760388,0.000057165063,0.6759103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725586,0.00044880083,0.0013664169,0.00027339792,0.00047737503,0.000012723649,0.000047290167,0.000011892753,0.00010626287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774516,0.00067732553,0.0006838899,0.000105264124,0.00029686055,0.0004915146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985564,0.00033650058,0.00046900613,0.00010613706,0.00022648292,0.00030548935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038474896,0.00019539907,0.00019021008,0.00013040344,0.003996342,0.0007321165,0.00022408484,0.0005001558,0.00021173453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023035448,0.00020845301,0.00019754515,0.00025477173,0.00063589873,0.009301707,0.000014987817,0.0007933867,0.00008730524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038845035,0.00009573039,0.001629049,0.000030263154,0.00004983002,0.0000064278634,0.016429024,0.0009264985,0.00016530069,0.7750214,0.00017614826,0.20543152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090070517,0.00006149126,0.0060711764,0.00010861545,0.00014594181,0.00062669197,0.008052683,0.010031829,0.0010506656,0.013983221,0.95864964,0.0003173365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016671868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18596175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007353636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019608295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981953899","doi":"10.7202/1017518ar","title":"Private Rights to Public Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Property law; Government (linguistics); Intangible property; Common law; Political science; Common property; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026804891793771348,"score_gpt":0.25307801412567693,"score_spread":0.22627312233190558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981953899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3890552,0.000041292275,0.00003572261,0.09007074,0.00023027834,0.0010634762,0.000016475791,0.00001670448,0.5194701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.000005345155,0.00009652976,0.0002814179,0.00007442693,0.00003293884,3.3664932e-7,0.0000040728073,0.000655141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989321,0.00015138774,0.00023999745,0.00008511128,0.0003373003,0.0002540755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994348,0.000028441606,0.00009652395,0.00013642415,0.00015129341,0.00015249397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430656,0.00005611975,0.00009661144,0.000024916872,0.002193652,0.000074176605,0.00039949818,0.00002536805,0.00015930153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036796337,0.00002325534,0.00002610369,0.00026996306,0.0000824079,0.00026792396,0.000054695858,0.00019187428,0.00002491894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043185905,0.00007980556,0.0053471867,0.000004180865,0.000011570689,0.0000024073304,0.0005760825,0.00008041507,0.00018878745,0.9824798,0.0042830673,0.0069423458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008209189,0.000013014154,0.007537916,0.0000148611425,0.0000022923766,0.0000035986359,0.00059681974,0.00009144787,0.00008226289,0.0030632862,0.98845387,0.000058569738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010195985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000244561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982913473","doi":"10.7202/1025140ar","title":"La place réservée à l’avis des peuples autochtones dans le cadre du processus de prise de décision concernant le Plan Nord ou l’exploitation du Nord québécois : perspective juridique interne et internationale","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0429744400604329,"score_gpt":0.29203643801589285,"score_spread":0.24906199795545997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982913473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6339016,0.008950267,0.01828538,0.044069808,0.0017869729,0.0004706307,0.00016866207,0.00015901645,0.29220766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848133,0.0073225438,0.0012933002,0.00036830385,0.0011121552,0.00003736122,0.00000616124,0.000045724086,0.005001183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670756,0.0011655648,0.0005036624,0.00038131792,0.0006012139,0.00064068777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975633,0.0007171465,0.00048733692,0.00011160928,0.0007779915,0.000342593],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019869192,0.00033863724,0.0004170306,0.000089433226,0.0046344968,0.00024515964,0.000561624,0.00026083837,0.00006621194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011476207,0.00033150116,0.0002506414,0.0002576131,0.0013134894,0.0009386525,0.00015192512,0.00066724076,0.00002000755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010343682,0.0003649033,0.00547124,0.000052690553,0.0001889825,0.00007811645,0.240291,0.0005147762,0.00006989663,0.743996,0.0018736771,0.0069952495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001390654,0.0003289482,0.012918562,0.0006038267,0.0001133834,0.0002669743,0.13331282,0.0018859138,0.0005390089,0.034904953,0.81319326,0.0005417004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5539512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8567675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007205093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983914936","doi":"10.7202/038181ar","title":"The Freedom of Association Mess: How We Got into It and How We Can Get out of It","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Statute; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Statement (logic); Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.020572218094692243,"score_gpt":0.278839828961172,"score_spread":0.25826761086647976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983914936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04370116,0.00048926426,0.000025211119,0.8872114,0.0009847526,0.0002851702,0.00010100849,0.00001554261,0.06718651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542135,0.0015547872,0.000096762815,0.0003422051,0.00018683699,9.548978e-7,5.6107973e-7,0.0000041851995,0.0023923318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987764,0.00022911807,0.00016913933,0.0000831028,0.0005329163,0.00020934314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904364,0.00013058375,0.0003855964,0.00009210494,0.000252443,0.00009562108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012412705,0.00007166975,0.00015382236,0.000029208779,0.0022243909,0.00013953587,0.00021226535,0.0000652246,0.000030910916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022474,0.000047775357,0.000058771788,0.000114084294,0.000109284585,0.00020234287,0.00002434459,0.00016439638,2.2025623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025728972,0.0002951394,0.0046263067,0.000006423327,0.00024342809,0.000007639315,0.025881916,0.000011413373,0.0009111632,0.89458877,0.042601548,0.030800534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040167788,0.00014811808,0.0058415337,0.000032864467,0.00003712943,5.249961e-7,0.012795193,0.000006285057,0.00018377432,0.0048301034,0.9756524,0.00007038551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031938588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27256665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95172024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014177641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026234962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984120339","doi":"10.7202/1018986ar","title":"Reframing the “Universality” of International Law in a Globalizing World","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legitimacy; Global justice; Political science; Politics; Global governance; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Legislature","score_opus":0.02024241819055068,"score_gpt":0.22217084463078968,"score_spread":0.201928426440239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984120339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17888454,0.000029435254,0.000022017686,0.0025175118,0.0006400853,0.00011600916,0.0000023355783,0.000023096043,0.81776494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977612,0.0000042793567,0.00011993853,0.0010612766,0.00060209754,0.0000017549046,0.000002619897,0.000009289768,0.00043755118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.000018752731,0.0002925185,0.00010111704,0.00024352461,0.00017077678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994283,0.000034378645,0.00024973074,0.000114684335,0.00016200374,0.000010921871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036218888,0.000092651695,0.00012411321,0.000118284755,0.00066383573,0.00025900343,0.0003722111,0.000026994663,0.00104674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067534306,0.000062425184,0.00006908793,0.0001891689,0.00008338495,0.0012786838,0.0001319663,0.00022476347,0.000097296375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093647395,0.000029747389,0.0013999932,0.000010205949,0.00001735124,0.000017915047,0.000021380414,0.00003337949,0.000059939524,0.9971642,0.0003278459,0.00090870645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049620983,0.0000040022032,0.006050899,0.00010495269,0.000016442762,0.000014681931,0.0002348148,0.0005689748,0.000044838707,0.1828332,0.8095107,0.000120295146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073231487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054848082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8188766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062944775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024073288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984964656","doi":"10.7202/1026129ar","title":"Epidemiological Uncertainty, Causation, and Drug Product Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Product liability; Epidemiology; Actuarial science; Liability; Context (archaeology); Economics; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pathology; Geography","score_opus":0.07926483891439622,"score_gpt":0.4198371947832955,"score_spread":0.3405723558688993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984964656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60511434,0.00022496431,0.0003341051,0.19450974,0.0020196757,0.0008582863,0.000019648432,0.0001547224,0.1967645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922458,0.00010697318,0.0011763196,0.0046274066,0.0013124387,0.000022347713,0.0000044703424,0.000010415287,0.0004938238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390906,0.00417133,0.00079869654,0.0003256071,0.00029736437,0.0004979463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938681,0.0046766475,0.00034219553,0.0003180708,0.00031287267,0.00048211476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012477372,0.00015372699,0.0004047931,0.00002928282,0.0039811525,0.000014577776,0.00015982558,0.00014950948,0.001789143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021575429,0.000098027995,0.000064010084,0.000085618994,0.00027043876,0.00022935093,0.00011393007,0.0016173583,0.00018997042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022949648,0.0003438677,0.2292329,0.0005080126,0.00005534371,0.000014160893,0.0014995111,0.00006155982,0.00007193788,0.7004161,0.036042605,0.031524535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041578276,0.000086164284,0.025239939,0.00007943349,0.000025288771,0.000025092459,0.0005734951,0.00015436592,0.0000109837365,0.02633359,0.9469391,0.00011676763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014281045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020697787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104555256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025433883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985805101","doi":"10.7202/1025138ar","title":"Aspects historiques et analytiques de l’appel en matière civile","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0214030097155126,"score_gpt":0.29355516637150614,"score_spread":0.2721521566559935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985805101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011797465,0.001810307,0.00015547712,0.05397611,0.003012995,0.00009250234,0.000046308505,0.00007993047,0.9396466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654045,0.0011882966,0.0009970544,0.003275154,0.009467182,0.0000035694052,0.0000030791582,0.00003808669,0.019623052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960671,0.0019113874,0.00043016844,0.00025149502,0.0006328545,0.00070700725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843234,0.00026956687,0.00028927065,0.00016112243,0.00032958706,0.0005181285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002701824,0.0002535108,0.00040558586,0.00006852345,0.0039005263,0.00023873086,0.00048302225,0.00035478198,0.0015566284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038081416,0.00024589722,0.0003413651,0.0002652892,0.00049890875,0.00087828597,0.00007839466,0.0009638388,0.0002884722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009778112,0.000115830844,0.00011627131,0.000027306982,0.000066854765,0.00004440417,0.006628015,0.000009557277,0.000017986093,0.97346133,0.013590254,0.0059124054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001732156,0.00012130265,0.00012473045,0.00010457013,0.00005055585,0.000028896588,0.00040915905,0.00003905634,0.000089656205,0.28673658,0.71189994,0.00022229971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022570329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065142594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96422476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013899282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008044609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987081262","doi":"10.7202/045697ar","title":"The Medium is not the Message: Reconciling Reputation and Free Expression in Cases of Internet Defamation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; The Internet; Common law; Political science; Damages; Privilege (computing); Statement (logic); Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06868534347314391,"score_gpt":0.3010099317483342,"score_spread":0.23232458827519026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987081262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67736226,0.0011399871,0.0008824221,0.0096370755,0.0024606779,0.00064344995,0.000021186252,0.00005578897,0.30779713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873227,0.00032314466,0.00057513005,0.00016718112,0.0000713599,0.000004790107,5.056027e-7,0.0000044961157,0.00012114262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998715,0.00035859869,0.00034448842,0.00009256036,0.0003564394,0.00013295266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989449,0.00042047308,0.00030762664,0.00013360001,0.00013801958,0.000055427252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020757716,0.000060159546,0.00008760551,0.000039375194,0.0014904832,0.000070006354,0.00023949498,0.00006464526,0.0001337597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089366565,0.000033484994,0.00003662633,0.00008864926,0.0002377356,0.00042610118,0.00005435276,0.00017842518,0.0000026296766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012544388,0.00027777193,0.0077121905,0.00008561827,0.000078885576,0.00008126166,0.24054407,0.00007606715,0.0122151775,0.59288967,0.023169264,0.12161561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043391,0.00047605997,0.028453194,0.0017545451,0.000084976265,0.00028067638,0.12216091,0.0022751112,0.31411368,0.15496401,0.37038034,0.0007173867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035380651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018794151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43792564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004098394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014584526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.18454920957132986,"score_gpt":0.3810247983716258,"score_spread":0.19647558880029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987155948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005147114,0.00002025168,0.000026336053,0.0040804264,0.00045026428,0.00008937185,0.000022895283,0.00006388705,0.99009943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941922,0.00013555185,0.0007782661,0.00041136277,0.0007214116,0.000008760228,8.185988e-7,0.000010039635,0.0037415922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.00008370904,0.00017361941,0.00012391123,0.00024265511,0.00028384782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994408,0.000024262807,0.000090257265,0.00013401941,0.00007292871,0.00023771478],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031757148,0.00007421827,0.00008320222,0.00004065883,0.006558875,0.00007038388,0.0002458541,0.000073335825,0.0009191912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021282707,0.000064765045,0.00009567285,0.00015177928,0.00014858191,0.000269437,0.000019863883,0.00030877074,0.00033838954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557602,0.00006625952,0.00004366647,6.592022e-7,0.00001137131,0.000005699898,0.0009362299,0.0000067700007,0.00003800419,0.9967393,0.0008563187,0.0012911299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009658309,0.00004272145,0.000663005,0.0000099871495,0.000012951825,0.00000896332,0.0012661815,9.1629914e-7,0.00050488056,0.016685018,0.98061657,0.000092245224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008245767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022862362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014047323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017655115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987189715","doi":"10.7202/1005131ar","title":"La controverse sur la nature du droit applicable après la conquête","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.014727469041714113,"score_gpt":0.20632554001606904,"score_spread":0.1915980709743549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987189715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002286085,0.004129877,0.000019376177,0.001381179,0.0025309795,0.00012397385,0.00019604343,0.000034667795,0.9892978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89961135,0.0038930476,0.000207167,0.0014972622,0.0014695607,0.000008092912,0.0000029046414,0.000048826903,0.0932618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977898,0.00056594633,0.00033516908,0.0002574936,0.00046559455,0.00058602507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984004,0.00030194205,0.00027172468,0.00018496788,0.00019309924,0.0006478471],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001620128,0.00018853831,0.00033451512,0.00015726173,0.0049044294,0.0005096784,0.0004773698,0.0007747474,0.00672825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288424,0.0002416532,0.00028680573,0.00025095546,0.0022300007,0.0007495655,0.000054668402,0.0017694482,0.0006365749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039431026,0.00015158369,0.00009938185,0.000022739652,0.000094293784,0.0010257636,0.0014893251,0.000002691277,0.000009660429,0.9287676,0.058650587,0.009646928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008855804,0.00004354367,0.00038776256,0.000078024415,0.00011961042,0.0006805236,0.0007969288,0.000009177741,0.000009722576,0.0070827277,0.98962456,0.00028183393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4486123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87121135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93097395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009811962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002436401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987397438","doi":"10.7202/1019046ar","title":"La fiducie civiliste : modalité de la propriété ou intermède à la propriété?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024284254074488372,"score_gpt":0.29912866188218906,"score_spread":0.2748444078077007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987397438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044902477,0.001291959,0.000048314338,0.025560958,0.0018813391,0.0004442272,0.000050365496,0.000090853464,0.9257295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768195,0.0006059899,0.00070172217,0.0013028764,0.0029099705,0.00004004104,0.0000020708242,0.000062175495,0.017555622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318874,0.0036789123,0.00069829146,0.00041949953,0.00092943676,0.0010851418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765337,0.0004769636,0.00041535648,0.00027481015,0.00036876378,0.0008107669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035910974,0.00041069425,0.0005155191,0.00007951541,0.00465166,0.0009528251,0.00088708126,0.00079383486,0.001659418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000378937,0.00035475532,0.0005160111,0.00040739635,0.0026343563,0.0013581365,0.00022837507,0.0021795202,0.0006550867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027504952,0.0004104124,0.00022964884,0.00008040816,0.000137482,0.00028076177,0.006142035,0.0000127194135,0.00012232347,0.94117033,0.0021973331,0.04918904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006471042,0.00012402615,0.00051201525,0.0002506662,0.00008064989,0.00033585588,0.0012303701,0.000069219,0.00015360088,0.21273664,0.7834603,0.00039956495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015025646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031770745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006219852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021746673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988042322","doi":"10.7202/1027718ar","title":"Person(s) of Interest and Missing Women: Legal Abandonment in the Downtown Eastside","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Verdict; Jury trial; Abandonment (legal); Criminal justice; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032429851407596064,"score_gpt":0.24003776202481994,"score_spread":0.2076079106172239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988042322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5374015,0.0002944197,0.000012131612,0.006037473,0.00033191033,0.00006998215,0.000007122544,0.0000053049876,0.45584014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991112,0.00006067888,0.000032573633,0.0003705413,0.00013831952,0.0000011901138,9.908734e-8,0.0000028119896,0.00028262418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927264,0.00019153174,0.00012278487,0.00006385439,0.00016753067,0.00018167964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968493,0.000053000902,0.000072953066,0.00005452289,0.000018489745,0.00011609847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012398113,0.000039891853,0.00009100978,0.00010089442,0.0020653466,0.00023277088,0.00014285526,0.000030433288,0.00031393205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006802082,0.000035152912,0.000033938304,0.00006835796,0.00038178577,0.00017564128,0.000009590697,0.00017669275,0.0000038352014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035299658,0.000074044736,0.0005584055,0.000019554465,0.00002034023,0.00005526915,0.056131102,0.0000037255238,0.00014937621,0.85332566,0.0016278935,0.0879993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022076516,0.000032774045,0.0027700122,0.000028831528,0.0000042381234,0.00003446937,0.0061139925,0.00000419809,0.000005233701,0.0007880715,0.989949,0.000048448885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25622436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92950267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98832107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003530634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002709656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988525678","doi":"10.7202/1013031ar","title":"Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Israeli law; Common law; Supreme court; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Constitutional law; Municipal law; Precedent; Chinese law","score_opus":0.03365458820360218,"score_gpt":0.3052021177948547,"score_spread":0.2715475295912525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988525678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026806649,0.0006486297,0.000043737004,0.0021773498,0.0019634992,0.000044851222,0.0000047885524,0.000036631547,0.9682739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971432,0.00025573614,0.00009023897,0.00047033373,0.0017778884,0.0000027333685,3.8459532e-7,0.0000032505093,0.00025625384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.00009524574,0.00012752778,0.000055659548,0.00034791356,0.0003117675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.000036703073,0.00006248488,0.000033272318,0.00009332442,0.00019163499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059194735,0.00005808437,0.00008329411,0.000024218785,0.00800787,0.000036757305,0.0000891269,0.000047918504,0.0001924751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000816212,0.00004889824,0.00007259526,0.0001066645,0.00027539715,0.00037848676,0.000024254728,0.00014807179,0.0004150522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070035335,0.000039762002,0.0021413574,3.4757872e-7,0.000021242771,0.0000032993678,0.0003863849,5.868414e-7,0.000010685826,0.9930296,0.00057516206,0.0037845925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108236316,0.00001707798,0.0035691245,0.000008910728,0.00001701717,0.000037026384,0.00206629,2.4749102e-7,0.00006818229,0.017571298,0.97646487,0.000071743954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013880258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014120506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113972485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017089289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99328357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988550489","doi":"10.7202/1009066ar","title":"Telecommunications Carriers and the “Duty to Serve”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Duty; Universal service; Business; Service (business); Telecommunications; Telecommunications service; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.027061477464600782,"score_gpt":0.3024665974693388,"score_spread":0.275405120004738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988550489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02762418,0.0011162107,0.000017572722,0.18287952,0.0004560831,0.00019798442,0.000121782796,0.000016791722,0.7875699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914649,0.00021900555,0.00018630164,0.0067105186,0.00036189656,0.000003846507,1.2937721e-7,0.000003764835,0.0010496296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992967,0.00018455015,0.000089635476,0.000036196016,0.00013462781,0.00025823902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931324,0.00012513871,0.000050809598,0.00012159262,0.0000335222,0.0003556737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000958533,0.00003824967,0.00006157111,0.000013719648,0.0052954643,0.000062156345,0.0002280453,0.000027114607,0.00009409309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002189011,0.000027483578,0.000035153178,0.000109538465,0.00027467476,0.00019850844,0.00003304213,0.00016317179,0.000020232985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005878925,0.0000046204486,0.00032451015,4.6729497e-7,0.000008449932,3.7425082e-7,0.0045796083,0.0000021810745,0.0000012501978,0.9836181,0.009218669,0.0022358831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015898442,0.0000036804945,0.0029245736,0.000004792309,0.000006685468,0.000017022561,0.0007616636,9.942389e-7,0.000008739684,0.0014047736,0.99466497,0.000043094507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1457768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5548447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98544633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000930027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001766982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989959054","doi":"10.7202/1019050ar","title":"Les défis du droit suisse de l’insolvabilité face au trust : séparation des patrimoines, publicité et poursuite pour dettes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03280326000870325,"score_gpt":0.29971933485262314,"score_spread":0.2669160748439199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989959054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7185522,0.0015769992,0.0028021145,0.108344294,0.0006550547,0.00053499074,0.00013212465,0.00010030061,0.16730192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862162,0.0009501478,0.0032543272,0.000988474,0.0017027527,0.000052836218,0.000010250574,0.000042671152,0.006782372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967965,0.00068979984,0.0006489281,0.00035806297,0.00052271696,0.0009840159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975711,0.0004706588,0.00041948928,0.0002713613,0.0005858696,0.0006814917],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020577786,0.00030733927,0.00031589053,0.00008242802,0.007245992,0.00085643725,0.0006243398,0.00029095597,0.0018380327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890216,0.0002941841,0.00028014235,0.0004925665,0.00067839713,0.001922571,0.000115388524,0.000688973,0.0005205148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009822783,0.00038487054,0.027856123,0.000030713778,0.000065964,0.000010600399,0.0028964488,0.00046208562,0.00059246685,0.9128734,0.0033272041,0.051490325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052512856,0.00009286563,0.04835617,0.00007926293,0.00008679345,0.00018025105,0.003423141,0.001198977,0.000573013,0.059843715,0.8852135,0.000427177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15271601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8818863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013627899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020880606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990204105","doi":"10.7202/1002370ar","title":"The Impossibility of a Critically Objective Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Impossibility; Scrutiny; Rationality; Epistemology; Law and economics; Interrogation; Criminal law; Sociology; Objectivity (philosophy); Situated; Law; Political science; Criminology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14421257838041202,"score_gpt":0.3054600711718459,"score_spread":0.1612474927914339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990204105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29789948,0.000038916398,0.0000808104,0.0012374918,0.000911766,0.000107922286,0.000032832635,0.000021510456,0.69966924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975359,0.00001971685,0.000435526,0.0018887112,0.00006106855,0.0000026435246,8.5584574e-8,0.0000057557613,0.000050635914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987499,0.00020020001,0.00030133227,0.00018831049,0.00028720568,0.0002730556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992603,0.00019255787,0.00010272618,0.00017243071,0.00014556042,0.00012641173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047036,0.00009259433,0.000118269774,0.000015776388,0.0020317086,0.000019420277,0.00033969706,0.000043980795,0.00016689573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021005215,0.000055914225,0.000116857234,0.000056800578,0.0009126003,0.00015393166,0.0000592786,0.0003142415,0.00003690021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026263585,0.00026615866,0.000061534585,0.0000050856283,0.000008962349,0.000057903966,0.0001400294,5.517344e-7,0.011948903,0.98573714,0.00007329592,0.0014377731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013173658,0.001541949,0.028223988,0.000067186345,0.00007584474,0.0032476066,0.0005952568,0.000029414332,0.52706647,0.4024396,0.035070173,0.00032517486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018103023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038406186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034779063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000701985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990944375","doi":"10.7202/1025142ar","title":"“Sexualized Online Bullying” Through an Equality Lens: Missed Opportunity in AB v. Bragg?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"UNICEF","keywords":"Framing (construction); Interim; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08735101159838843,"score_gpt":0.3089600770320802,"score_spread":0.2216090654336918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990944375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5360295,0.00019018809,0.30345157,0.008040933,0.004181182,0.00063147396,0.00006288891,0.0010145203,0.14639771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95881486,0.000090273614,0.037215844,0.0034245776,0.00030804184,0.00000421877,0.000011069855,0.000024379031,0.000106734515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706066,0.0007627756,0.00065382826,0.00044263483,0.0005141537,0.00056595966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984076,0.00010304395,0.00029808746,0.0006561589,0.00017515627,0.0003599708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020260613,0.00024054579,0.00035341017,0.00010913996,0.0013720257,0.00024901069,0.0008958002,0.00015102152,0.00009753913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022912813,0.00021795124,0.00011129424,0.00036195773,0.00006848247,0.0019536451,0.00013779207,0.00072048523,0.00003895276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019534065,0.0018190505,0.00039033502,0.000063376705,0.00007982358,0.00041865755,0.0010311332,0.0005458232,0.009053649,0.79160583,0.0005988948,0.1941981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003160478,0.0008794374,0.0014472329,0.00012199984,0.000017622144,0.0011795457,0.00019521208,0.014457462,0.008248985,0.023184001,0.94634247,0.000765578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018189976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003510996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94574356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011943418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037589216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991470258","doi":"10.7202/1000616ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Art. 1053 C.C. Revolutionized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02704984100598097,"score_gpt":0.31607487544745744,"score_spread":0.2890250344414765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991470258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03285337,0.00025484466,0.0001401902,0.012836886,0.003308247,0.0001379537,0.0000123004465,0.00011091017,0.9503453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933591,0.00026343443,0.0014044163,0.00033081273,0.0011486462,0.000004164892,0.0000011240006,0.00001237681,0.00347592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998398,0.00016240448,0.00027893414,0.00016959339,0.00054547883,0.00044557542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998977,0.00011349931,0.00014270551,0.00017676015,0.00023553056,0.0003544834],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013532891,0.00010950541,0.00016590426,0.000040229766,0.007190615,0.00018085178,0.00038724145,0.0001148631,0.0020708789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032912596,0.00009724583,0.00014537583,0.00015511704,0.00038771567,0.0005198385,0.000039329116,0.0006660661,0.00067398197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045104433,0.00007380591,0.0003980559,0.000009855449,0.000023094259,0.00008060934,0.0006717313,0.000007424139,0.0010030272,0.9626458,0.023528218,0.011513255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002121647,0.00002513314,0.00046874752,0.000034072436,0.000027442627,0.00009562838,0.0006132408,0.0000098606215,0.00017754977,0.0036290751,0.99456495,0.00014212534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032978507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08706113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97103673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009164997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041427455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993354704","doi":"10.7202/1009067ar","title":"Le refus de soins psychiatriques est-il possible au Québec ? Discussion à la lumière du cas de l’autorisation de soins","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03378362267573656,"score_gpt":0.3688912479377364,"score_spread":0.3351076252619999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993354704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4321622,0.0047212197,0.0040555964,0.36115494,0.008915079,0.00087901554,0.00020118419,0.000244179,0.18766658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968248,0.003996646,0.0056723636,0.006719353,0.011161261,0.000030950967,0.000015686483,0.000116689305,0.004039015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039793,0.0049216812,0.0012317675,0.00031817856,0.0005596921,0.0025707453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541664,0.00084324647,0.000721482,0.0004047895,0.000253551,0.00236029],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009664283,0.00040955548,0.0005954887,0.000117405056,0.012462314,0.000058771904,0.00032905632,0.0017083789,0.00036920322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086314144,0.00031041235,0.0003644014,0.00029147367,0.00027457706,0.0009245235,0.00010975738,0.00534887,0.00016474832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019421654,0.0017611261,0.33119282,0.0015059165,0.00019041293,0.000145299,0.16533414,0.000069334936,0.00022857796,0.41033435,0.051844526,0.037199315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001861388,0.0003125843,0.06488843,0.0010994829,0.00018219286,0.0011718215,0.027661527,0.00038749631,0.00009643172,0.002102618,0.8998675,0.0003685521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46369013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69697833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84802294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056582284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015452859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995531446","doi":"10.7202/1029211ar","title":"Designated Inhospitality: The Treatment of Asylum Seekers Who Arrive by Boat in Canada and Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Charter; Politics; Immigration detention; Immigration; Asylum seeker; Law; Political science; Parallels; Hospitality; Immigration policy; Sociology; Criminology; Tourism; Economics","score_opus":0.0370038288997314,"score_gpt":0.2865894271646054,"score_spread":0.24958559826487398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995531446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925544,0.00018926966,0.000013594404,0.0006169999,0.00020178515,0.00014264358,0.00003488472,0.0000033273554,0.00624308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913245,0.00025389093,0.000026753314,0.00005471777,0.000050454826,0.0000033543054,0.0000033611152,0.0000031376112,0.00047186404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.0002312411,0.00020410566,0.00007591916,0.00028620794,0.00015371921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995313,0.000032429398,0.000115908006,0.000052248848,0.00013638826,0.00013168444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039642293,0.000069631125,0.000117982585,0.000018504456,0.00057329505,0.00003696797,0.000076242955,0.00003890876,0.00004264295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041784027,0.00004414438,0.000023546092,0.00010440705,0.0001117926,0.00018883873,0.0000031287657,0.00007392071,8.412936e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003365149,0.00080590375,0.43712372,0.000021008744,0.00047040213,0.0000947884,0.1597238,0.00046498587,0.0010884363,0.2757524,0.09821583,0.025902206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011525111,0.0005678828,0.015555854,0.000041976302,0.00003939225,0.000010057365,0.030919507,0.000118017815,0.0040882034,0.0024614658,0.9448377,0.00020741833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8466219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008157186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001726189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44093803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996343216","doi":"10.7202/1018985ar","title":"Privacy, Corrective Justice, and Incrementalism: Legal Imagination and the Recognition of a Privacy Tort in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Incrementalism; Appeal; Political science; Relevance (law); Privacy law; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to privacy; Seclusion; Sociology; Law and economics; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02071936939205474,"score_gpt":0.26659371555057937,"score_spread":0.24587434615852463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996343216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8119389,0.00018410198,0.000008826505,0.0029801296,0.00030768925,0.00038705402,0.00000537055,0.000008515222,0.1841794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986305,0.00035129784,0.00038268403,0.00029602248,0.00007955934,0.000010798437,0.0000019355355,0.0000034266284,0.00024373976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991649,0.00019404799,0.00018041619,0.00009101971,0.0002343478,0.00013528237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995104,0.000080467384,0.00013915043,0.000043005017,0.00016895539,0.000057987865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007699543,0.000063589585,0.00011483384,0.000007913133,0.0014191982,0.00011582644,0.00009646874,0.00006136865,0.00018689637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103903716,0.000043317574,0.000034732097,0.00007816763,0.00045900463,0.00073269906,0.000045960758,0.00028869565,0.000002565086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003359926,0.00035709733,0.024605907,0.00007034487,0.00017841013,0.000017158947,0.27201703,0.000003897006,0.0005930905,0.64976096,0.0048758206,0.047184277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008406784,0.00021352012,0.12686002,0.00032540064,0.0004054756,0.00024559945,0.105838746,0.00008730842,0.0008560109,0.12895754,0.6272704,0.00053320307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2166266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39202443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62239456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018573712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028382688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996534558","doi":"10.7202/1000784ar","title":"Pour que la tempête ne s’étende jamais hors du verre d’eau : réflexions sur la protection des convictions religieuses au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036239806676623014,"score_gpt":0.2557501509118467,"score_spread":0.2195103442352237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996534558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00820911,0.0006112136,0.0010912674,0.008856771,0.0032683583,0.00020620758,0.00049464166,0.000062961204,0.9771995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911886,0.000931566,0.001111804,0.0007709942,0.0014247041,0.000019315108,0.0000037572686,0.00003076023,0.0045185345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969657,0.0008436423,0.00051150995,0.0002671259,0.00061670895,0.00079532893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767697,0.000599863,0.0003351176,0.00017885027,0.00052368816,0.0006855367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008353887,0.00029246038,0.0003107613,0.000075267046,0.0089417435,0.00012062864,0.00039182982,0.00024902204,0.0010076374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004870266,0.0002917371,0.00020750726,0.0003811116,0.003025474,0.00065939804,0.000070224705,0.00086400984,0.000057781002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567225,0.00015983598,0.0013521614,0.000020022131,0.000122764,0.00022306635,0.00059673603,0.00014433276,0.0000079125675,0.9904625,0.0052675777,0.0016074637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036152522,0.000101744336,0.0023013668,0.00025006654,0.00014558666,0.0016111534,0.002049926,0.000017008362,0.00007515245,0.006640516,0.9861041,0.00034190656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018383352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100003565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996706811","doi":"10.7202/1013032ar","title":"“Dignitizing” Free Speech in Israel: The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution on Free Speech Protection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Free speech; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.027358065569301683,"score_gpt":0.2566332219396279,"score_spread":0.22927515637032622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996706811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73388034,0.0005052459,0.04809972,0.0061503225,0.007567243,0.00221001,0.00013446667,0.00027554674,0.20117708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754584,0.000014611933,0.0018980958,0.00010864867,0.00037342776,0.000009521093,5.2486826e-7,0.000008211935,0.00004113844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998057,0.00032137593,0.00038519365,0.00018246657,0.00061911007,0.00043487427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861974,0.00006864176,0.0003020159,0.00071679545,0.00018095628,0.00011183351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014519256,0.00017227407,0.00016119854,0.00012574004,0.0015758125,0.00009009521,0.0010652078,0.00011135671,0.00003054076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033479763,0.000096127806,0.00023644182,0.0005609258,0.00025757722,0.00071321084,0.00022445153,0.0007803084,0.000036147463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018428636,0.00066731474,0.0054252795,0.000022951981,0.00013218494,0.000045041153,0.00025307498,0.0018035301,0.011205948,0.91667867,0.002405361,0.061176386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011047055,0.003552571,0.24653819,0.001897303,0.00015472157,0.03389088,0.0006108715,0.015639434,0.37736794,0.20593967,0.10104792,0.0023134393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025148059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092412485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71073896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046069804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005529585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996733001","doi":"10.7202/1006419ar","title":"No Taps, No Toilets: First Nations and the Constitutional Right to Water in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Sanitation; Constitutional right; Human rights; Constitution; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Obligation; Right to health; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Business; International human rights law; Right to property; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.019659538043614914,"score_gpt":0.22625837017865014,"score_spread":0.20659883213503522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996733001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065497607,0.00001841967,0.000014397124,0.0032922518,0.00078372593,0.00012935088,0.000015513893,0.000004957294,0.98919165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970552,0.00003831921,0.00033439105,0.0008770317,0.00014044408,0.000007618691,9.130828e-7,0.000002152112,0.0015439605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916935,0.00006956448,0.00017738577,0.00008136644,0.0002788481,0.0002235102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999582,0.000073730116,0.000028214223,0.000044562483,0.00012801893,0.00014346563],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047958657,0.000057775844,0.00008377819,0.00003601278,0.0054908325,0.000050160637,0.00014141548,0.00002164426,0.0038485888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053752643,0.000028279614,0.000018108085,0.000051156312,0.00039739837,0.00012028181,0.00003062878,0.00011666997,0.00011481453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001550938,0.00001123399,0.00030526306,0.0000011761134,0.000009578795,0.000037363418,0.001967558,0.0000036010258,6.19483e-7,0.99506056,0.0025328998,0.000054630993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034697604,0.0000058114197,0.00059830316,0.000018161561,0.0000026616367,0.0000149302805,0.00019663239,0.000002393194,0.000034011508,0.002948142,0.9957642,0.000067757566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8187288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035081466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020516121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997374609","doi":"10.7202/045090ar","title":"Sustainability, Global Justice, and the Law: Contributions of the Hon. Justice Charles Doherty Gonthier","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sustainability; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.007963621028495576,"score_gpt":0.2977342751419543,"score_spread":0.2897706541134587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997374609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11034893,0.0004955926,0.00002905159,0.06725521,0.0021046083,0.00061428896,0.0005010604,0.00002704827,0.8186242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976932,0.0001790758,0.000043026714,0.0011950162,0.0005017671,0.000004648832,5.486213e-7,0.0000048028332,0.00037795983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985501,0.00042440998,0.00023424809,0.000110192035,0.000350667,0.0003303731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903077,0.00029717566,0.00016812704,0.00020229851,0.00013979027,0.00016185781],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014941075,0.000098920755,0.00015563265,0.000006554113,0.0077398946,0.00008967715,0.0003942866,0.00011515584,0.00013855367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057530665,0.000052620544,0.00012293394,0.00011390661,0.0034204978,0.00018971054,0.00013731842,0.0004800256,0.0000052454343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029553803,0.000042066877,0.00039000693,0.000013617773,0.000017299508,0.0000016047424,0.0004886004,0.000004941512,0.000034857767,0.99815184,0.00031820426,0.00050740433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092279236,0.000021232336,0.003978708,0.000011354177,0.00037889817,0.000049013215,0.0032510161,0.000007708776,0.00015266282,0.08010797,0.91101706,0.000101609476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01759221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08406493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91804385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015161096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004266578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000008918","doi":"10.7202/1005137ar","title":"Kuwait Airways Corp. c. Irak, 2010 CSC 40","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.07920427953899149,"score_gpt":0.22811765212940674,"score_spread":0.14891337259041526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000008918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050213705,0.000055603927,0.00085059326,0.0005855132,0.003530303,0.00007927081,0.000015512345,0.00009261775,0.9897692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194896,0.00003702024,0.0007023717,0.0026410324,0.003110989,0.000003021514,0.000009987743,0.000033233497,0.0015134072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987298,0.000010015263,0.00037296585,0.00018972023,0.00035753447,0.00033993096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.000023017874,0.00029367427,0.00016268615,0.00025505826,0.000039343195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003224037,0.00017526605,0.00018258768,0.00011697836,0.0011838416,0.00021855811,0.00044102603,0.000080397556,0.0041797603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007847746,0.00014907465,0.00014531825,0.000094023606,0.00016855224,0.0011300162,0.00010993137,0.00032669617,0.0014160915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006127304,0.00014240686,0.0031197318,0.000023177312,0.000051875948,0.000100597106,0.000016036018,0.00001647885,0.000048629783,0.9777336,0.017065598,0.0016205936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005805158,0.000027128634,0.00886619,0.000042793334,0.000052603322,0.00008432884,0.00006529544,0.0003973772,0.00020752371,0.035370164,0.95404863,0.00025744215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012769592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008176456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044105902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004122257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001310812","doi":"10.7202/1002368ar","title":"The Judicial System in the Digital Age: Revisiting the Relationship between Privacy and Accessibility in the Cyber Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Information privacy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Internet privacy; Copying; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Law; Privacy policy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0929479725175142,"score_gpt":0.2803846439826713,"score_spread":0.18743667146515713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001310812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36165163,0.00020065092,0.00003634273,0.0074612307,0.00023299425,0.00043542992,0.000007204324,0.000027152671,0.62994736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841136,0.0000069836733,0.0000034385835,0.00063055847,0.0009003874,0.000014346967,0.0000026106995,0.0000083863315,0.000021924932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987416,0.0001658608,0.0004257676,0.00013047045,0.0002954316,0.0002408572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986736,0.0007271165,0.00027713005,0.00025223065,0.000058625454,0.000011250333],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027480226,0.000112248235,0.00012351714,0.00004895545,0.0038707533,0.0013851669,0.000590199,0.0000459262,0.000012260348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004916494,0.000047111305,0.000077245895,0.00030625498,0.00015965868,0.0009573186,0.00012285747,0.000604551,0.000025596857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014954472,0.000021679893,0.2321593,0.000018767683,0.000011584454,0.00001581138,0.0003430421,8.189841e-7,2.0522755e-7,0.75049275,0.00019092309,0.016730169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002422201,0.0000030437375,0.7302665,0.00007761825,0.000027238078,0.000028757884,0.006131149,0.00004624136,1.8061378e-7,0.003917706,0.25919673,0.000062609084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006727556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022972806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74657506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049314523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005692642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001489085","doi":"10.7202/1002367ar","title":"A Theory of Fiduciary Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.07976588171203447,"score_gpt":0.30689945305939625,"score_spread":0.22713357134736178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001489085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029603608,0.000030621104,0.000107894935,0.00030229724,0.000108278145,0.000061169274,0.000012888421,0.000014927708,0.96975833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855095,0.000027789494,0.00090838794,0.00009023168,0.000106621716,0.0000023616992,1.5955567e-7,0.0000034035393,0.00031012192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932337,0.00015687608,0.00016227829,0.00006692293,0.0001545657,0.00013598741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995462,0.00006010333,0.00009406731,0.000113486574,0.000088836045,0.00009732114],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012699108,0.000036893114,0.0000727408,0.000013165425,0.0016614953,0.0000105793215,0.00021148636,0.00003756847,0.001128948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007905786,0.000030073137,0.000071251045,0.00007998574,0.0002502253,0.00013497272,0.000028761417,0.00013194897,0.00002650246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072579114,0.000064058826,0.0003530978,0.0000015808806,0.0000066081047,0.0000010976088,0.0014622346,3.6621202e-7,0.00002779941,0.9942233,0.00004483194,0.0038077892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008520119,0.000022550832,0.004475283,0.000007590058,0.0000112269945,0.0000045735555,0.0014013952,0.0000011631035,0.0007483623,0.20787007,0.78531563,0.000056985096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027992295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051999236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003293369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016786857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003043951","doi":"10.7202/1013033ar","title":"L’abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie 1","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06907063178431219,"score_gpt":0.33019011628675987,"score_spread":0.2611194845024477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003043951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04683813,0.018246055,0.00022336775,0.026922278,0.008664052,0.00012733736,0.000034462344,0.00005406445,0.89889026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831932,0.002437899,0.0005947886,0.0010304217,0.0044796467,0.0000037194213,6.6607623e-7,0.000024894103,0.0082347365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966234,0.00041877246,0.00044081654,0.00017336094,0.0006438285,0.0016998302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801236,0.00020507538,0.0002364279,0.00017837336,0.0001344048,0.0012333696],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027762032,0.00020717102,0.0002736647,0.000037175414,0.005759682,0.00016146222,0.0004376131,0.0002302849,0.004753867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001688329,0.00021453957,0.00026270445,0.0002498609,0.0007078165,0.0016568613,0.000071961425,0.00070572546,0.0014811653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026778873,0.00021340087,0.002159549,0.000029170491,0.00004325471,0.000088691755,0.0018916632,0.000016991558,0.00005129976,0.9605299,0.00741059,0.027538694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018415271,0.00009432002,0.0010493153,0.00017902482,0.00014807771,0.00095589814,0.0016414765,0.000025308822,0.00034962,0.0143839065,0.98070073,0.00028817108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005436417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01162674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97329015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071135577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047479167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003149431","doi":"10.7202/1017517ar","title":"Eco-terrorists Facing Armageddon: The Defence of Necessity and Legal Normativity in the Context of Environmental Crisis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Environmental law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Normative; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Invocation; Environmental degradation; Law; Resilience (materials science); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.012867708003598108,"score_gpt":0.2555190735708673,"score_spread":0.24265136556726918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003149431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649973,0.000109985944,0.0000054286593,0.0021199512,0.00005421964,0.0001319285,0.00003845206,0.000002052956,0.032540683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991932,0.0001902722,0.00003387442,0.00050229236,0.000044789325,0.000003230152,4.1553594e-7,0.0000032546882,0.000028703374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986741,0.00048824082,0.00025234526,0.00007571184,0.00031977182,0.00018982492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946433,0.00016041205,0.00020146751,0.0001061251,0.0000061062397,0.00006158578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093217957,0.000078405006,0.00013527196,0.000017738115,0.0013808599,0.000044249642,0.0002775111,0.000040545496,0.0002704323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017864295,0.00004654116,0.00005853482,0.000053643656,0.000606133,0.00050340535,0.000060362607,0.0002577483,0.000009457918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012779079,0.0014406143,0.30230314,0.00012454433,0.0001826178,0.00007189278,0.18572882,0.00009593801,0.014540426,0.4077665,0.0021869873,0.08543074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014005105,0.00027499176,0.5620166,0.00009998823,0.00007011062,0.00022243147,0.19111803,0.000057575842,0.010941212,0.0033284072,0.23001155,0.0004585839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024233706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019807583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40443808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004422941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003784538","doi":"10.7202/1000627ar","title":"Les rapports entre le droit administratif et les droits et libertés : la révision judiciaire ou le contrôle constitutionnel ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862416366487741,"score_gpt":0.32793883425570025,"score_spread":0.24169719760692615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015511154,0.0050151385,0.0007949555,0.043311782,0.0019045159,0.00027300938,0.000120212724,0.00009070788,0.9329785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893251,0.002054237,0.00077137793,0.0006577571,0.00032892072,0.000007127219,0.0000091634265,0.000031729607,0.0068145683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615204,0.0011544531,0.0007780526,0.00045172242,0.0007212386,0.000742479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788094,0.0003944192,0.000531955,0.00024315917,0.0003338918,0.00061562797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026645272,0.00036357433,0.00048835255,0.0000732226,0.006676908,0.0002931804,0.0005084594,0.0004536321,0.0015683195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024324661,0.0003693178,0.00035319306,0.00022950144,0.0020590173,0.0015644201,0.00011564816,0.001035318,0.0001139732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009199808,0.00054349983,0.0003797442,0.000039412353,0.00006806761,0.0007759803,0.002676617,0.000015271382,0.00003942239,0.96840215,0.0035756656,0.023392178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000871102,0.0002464072,0.0011884192,0.00093662966,0.00014696794,0.0012796323,0.008446843,0.000028169537,0.0006438411,0.045606803,0.9401079,0.00049729756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0810115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15231553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97381395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014095212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005856258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003991614","doi":"10.7202/038893ar","title":"The Confessions Rule and the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Silence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Charter; Bill of rights; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02090596218630384,"score_gpt":0.31377633744655514,"score_spread":0.2928703752602513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003991614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315149,0.00026253742,0.000009312928,0.14811905,0.0022084916,0.00013614795,0.0000046138066,0.00002162214,0.7960867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974494,0.00032665377,0.000037014273,0.00060480845,0.00047648308,0.0000030362535,5.676936e-8,0.0000032171865,0.00109934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.00016028872,0.00011045389,0.000059451802,0.00022518211,0.00020395835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.00043731334,0.00005951363,0.00009780523,0.00007271939,0.000116324496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017706556,0.000045612687,0.00006213779,0.0000056860313,0.016506804,0.00025084367,0.000248495,0.000038521128,0.0002283639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002023239,0.000019871657,0.000047253867,0.000034168475,0.0011468816,0.00015472913,0.00003690039,0.00041915767,0.00003595541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015373083,0.000004236443,0.000055540935,4.111222e-7,0.0000042930596,0.0000030276212,0.0007764714,4.620565e-8,0.000062581035,0.9909265,0.0011345631,0.0070169624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019015433,0.000005973328,0.00040885631,0.0000077516015,0.000010982043,0.00005213168,0.0019016335,0.0000051821025,0.000036014688,0.017981693,0.97936285,0.00003676418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018504855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052525856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000076642655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011630454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003998827","doi":"10.7202/045086ar","title":"Principles-Based Securities Regulation in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Business; Systemic risk; Financial market; Regulatory reform; Economics; Finance; Accounting; Financial system; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02600271453978982,"score_gpt":0.2259938378811224,"score_spread":0.19999112334133257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003998827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69007427,0.00034878563,0.00046440362,0.008973714,0.0023346748,0.0003353077,0.00053583377,0.000018528885,0.29691452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989025,0.000010009052,0.0002324234,0.00068702514,0.00012935192,0.000004621296,0.0000019911104,0.000005668323,0.000026388763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.000036938385,0.00059068785,0.00013426495,0.00010480882,0.00019540759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992097,0.000028256987,0.0004029236,0.00025686147,0.0000653841,0.000036849982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073364284,0.000101258454,0.00019156726,0.00004675981,0.0006659717,0.000055266137,0.00038544965,0.000101626436,0.00018034517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021545254,0.00007185149,0.0001754705,0.0003079842,0.000106936845,0.00014238064,0.000031734187,0.00028738216,0.000016921958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001471339,0.000050044604,0.019170355,0.0000059735257,0.0000028935167,0.0000014007156,0.000048582926,0.00032680682,0.0000061749365,0.9797625,0.00028262057,0.000327948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000380522,0.000023661272,0.4058732,0.0000139419635,0.000003798485,0.000025403944,0.000047372247,0.0002957279,0.00016403111,0.0785423,0.51454294,0.0000871202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005510851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009977131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070875554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017828366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5567473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004954045","doi":"10.7202/1019051ar","title":"Justifying Fiduciary Duties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Beneficiary; Corporation; Law; Law and economics; Business; Principal (computer security); Statute; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.040654380132251325,"score_gpt":0.3117595270626976,"score_spread":0.2711051469304463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004954045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011732243,0.00008406028,0.000060265924,0.009285775,0.00028613588,0.000104706145,0.000005205264,0.00004731862,0.97839427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964283,0.00009033878,0.00080404745,0.00051834085,0.00052880973,0.000010181882,4.8411636e-7,0.0000061164137,0.0016133888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926305,0.000058277405,0.00014264764,0.00007784651,0.00021688052,0.00024132125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995458,0.00004566357,0.00006491933,0.00008216524,0.00010461804,0.0001567915],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031916858,0.000051335654,0.00006634257,0.000019761805,0.006514066,0.00019363273,0.00020660683,0.00004359456,0.0021691285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040209743,0.000043418346,0.000055638044,0.00008876966,0.00012883457,0.0004182733,0.000035025227,0.00019911566,0.0005421481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.119379e-7,0.000016024887,0.0000968064,0.0000015818138,0.00000615255,0.0000019593401,0.00048150652,0.000009438272,0.000048714606,0.9875404,0.002733672,0.009063212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061028317,0.0000057221755,0.00059644575,0.000007818399,0.000005763854,0.0000095972655,0.0018446146,0.000015009555,0.000076664015,0.01433835,0.9829708,0.000068198635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009893162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074288417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98469603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006697773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012758924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005027983","doi":"10.7202/1007818ar","title":"Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.02575296900620931,"score_gpt":0.2818926077589995,"score_spread":0.25613963875279017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005027983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04305178,0.0011228027,0.0000017086753,0.0275946,0.0001770819,0.0001444581,0.0000085020865,0.0000032023208,0.92789584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810964,0.00026249734,0.000013385662,0.001378254,0.00021589373,0.000004367659,1.4047691e-7,0.0000016982341,0.0000141509845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990819,0.00021476907,0.00014915667,0.000041358184,0.0002480484,0.00026475557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.00018207876,0.00006349902,0.000039184266,0.000069054506,0.0001043468],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531163,0.00005046041,0.00010251001,0.000037801878,0.005766836,0.000032221415,0.00018090614,0.000028393777,0.000026701324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010724136,0.000025493962,0.000032767384,0.00025505963,0.0011873479,0.00020521093,0.000012754232,0.00016240397,0.0000034809707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006356661,0.000012760627,0.0033986329,0.0000013860631,0.0000106945445,0.000002339669,0.0042358777,0.0000016569539,4.799701e-7,0.99165046,0.000079633064,0.0005997066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007585281,0.000021473586,0.022853691,0.00005872446,0.00006338923,0.00011582656,0.026670268,0.000004108864,0.000020179326,0.43718886,0.51209915,0.0001457871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67274195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95505786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038863636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004511667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006227366","doi":"10.7202/1007817ar","title":"Jurisdiction of Mental Health Tribunals to Provide Positive Remedies: Application, Challenges, and Prospects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Autonomy; Sine qua non; Health care; Mental health; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Power (physics); Scope (computer science); Discretion; Mental health law; Law and economics; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.042127858172511294,"score_gpt":0.3703069044678005,"score_spread":0.3281790462952892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006227366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5495247,0.07384035,0.0034990509,0.12812665,0.011316062,0.007430086,0.000759882,0.00030804676,0.22519514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972006,0.0008693384,0.00075084384,0.00059977843,0.00047410533,0.000026008644,0.0000057457846,0.00001800939,0.000055550365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837536,0.00023381815,0.0004917658,0.00019919046,0.00028620852,0.000413669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988153,0.0000885745,0.00029678122,0.00017492178,0.00014171108,0.000482707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013967105,0.00011839905,0.0002557608,0.00010328486,0.00079010683,0.000009032546,0.000093220835,0.0000943947,0.000034032735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057122135,0.00009613215,0.00004644469,0.00009527408,0.00005689289,0.00010796678,0.000029458772,0.00027021978,0.00003643266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003101099,0.0005276281,0.0003234231,0.00006631927,0.0001283967,0.000017847728,0.014942606,7.6359254e-7,0.00026381257,0.10694465,0.001311113,0.8751633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011558568,0.0010998223,0.06283068,0.0004248748,0.000016990376,0.003543434,0.004259709,0.0000028860113,0.0004459819,0.0015871992,0.9244086,0.0002239313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030874336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041923433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92309755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014677976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017200577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60769427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008845298","doi":"10.7202/1013388ar","title":"Making Sense of the Shift in Paradigm on Cartel Enforcement: The Case for Applying a Desert Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Cartel; Mindset; Law and economics; Criminal law; Competition law; Competition (biology); Deterrence (psychology); Law enforcement; Political science; Enforcement; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economics; Sociology; Incentive; Market economy","score_opus":0.05943427094717804,"score_gpt":0.25690755046902214,"score_spread":0.1974732795218441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008845298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38681278,0.0007737866,0.0006908542,0.0025062158,0.0020069254,0.0025353888,0.00030099822,0.000017297116,0.60435575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991132,0.000022012162,0.000039328545,0.00044263364,0.00023405864,0.00009427082,4.1783775e-7,0.000021302583,0.00003278085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.00003861231,0.0007104834,0.00020333179,0.0000332629,0.00030689465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892646,0.00014210684,0.000585935,0.00025870028,0.000035930723,0.00005083881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000852353,0.00011599763,0.00033445825,0.00008229117,0.0011040706,0.00009865689,0.00021376592,0.000068750356,0.00010091496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006742044,0.00009459451,0.00021361149,0.00009561388,0.000112938294,0.00019915093,0.00004372464,0.00022727408,0.000043149157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019313871,0.00003096734,0.0015051266,0.000010688167,0.000050440685,0.000016333175,0.0010923593,0.0005666689,0.0000015707498,0.99641025,0.000059904793,0.00023636433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021903573,0.00021546189,0.0033012878,0.00015972038,0.00002257911,0.00096675806,0.005632438,0.00651382,0.00013303128,0.88360655,0.09681836,0.00043964485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015234657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009219281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61230046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003484471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067828396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009151479","doi":"10.7202/1013030ar","title":"African Customary Marriages in South Africa and the Intricacies of a Mixed Legal System: Judicial (In)novatio or Confusio?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legislature; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Legal history; Indigenous; Legal profession; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Marriage law; Common law; Legal realism; Public law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028546077294312085,"score_gpt":0.27755494852196305,"score_spread":0.24900887122765097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009151479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12277917,0.0033081672,0.000025682722,0.0016005244,0.0016537193,0.0007588598,0.00006868038,0.00006297526,0.8697422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988347,0.000030043922,0.00027071376,0.00006355188,0.00055666926,0.00001760304,3.4571528e-7,0.000015792966,0.00021053484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969894,0.00086591137,0.0007109836,0.00016494081,0.000622094,0.0006466611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.00053479645,0.00042213654,0.00017044117,0.00013559876,0.00019708577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004050003,0.00016867633,0.00049885706,0.00022107556,0.001346483,0.00010702915,0.0004433573,0.00013580968,0.0001067645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095553213,0.00010670486,0.00008303595,0.00092594256,0.0012030627,0.00048616572,0.00015059943,0.00051047973,0.00001258302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000445737,0.00008994402,0.004821182,0.000033263263,0.000036443253,0.00006492323,0.16106555,0.000005061498,0.000014889162,0.8325909,0.00019702403,0.00063511386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004292187,0.00011620579,0.0049167406,0.00023419352,0.00008230922,0.000059328624,0.12564915,0.00003378503,0.0000881824,0.0014141119,0.86271405,0.00039977604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047562025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007032184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057936853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010483338","doi":"10.7202/038890ar","title":"Le rayonnement intellectuel de Jean Carbonnier au Québec : le succès d’estime d’un honnête homme","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010187225118489754,"score_gpt":0.19996980867557326,"score_spread":0.1897825835570835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010483338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0971022,0.0038088807,0.0015609106,0.11595769,0.01487645,0.00055230886,0.00004520143,0.0001683209,0.76592803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98539764,0.000048419734,0.00039674557,0.0017007757,0.0062660645,0.00001519321,0.000009359794,0.00007349971,0.0060923235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727476,0.00006992045,0.00080180436,0.00038301072,0.00042764668,0.0010428625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998381,0.00007612848,0.00049256015,0.0004101917,0.0004465916,0.00019350994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233292,0.00042767302,0.0004540321,0.00021005736,0.008953786,0.0009329113,0.0005981025,0.0002775247,0.0015075641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003358433,0.00041570832,0.00037247824,0.0003829153,0.00048503478,0.0021711537,0.00029889576,0.0014560781,0.0008402167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004966299,0.0007143731,0.0038545511,0.00021918814,0.00030441568,0.0003331616,0.0002827465,0.00035453314,0.001418519,0.96400553,0.013580377,0.01488293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016836807,0.000038979986,0.00091760664,0.0002782382,0.0001752299,0.00048181988,0.00029353876,0.0018468183,0.00042952606,0.0010945537,0.9922272,0.0005327884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8357746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85955995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004530312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005987283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010539606","doi":"10.7202/1000787ar","title":"International Law and Human Rights: The Power and the Pity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Human rights; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Art; Physics; Literature","score_opus":0.011287098793801669,"score_gpt":0.28479012560725153,"score_spread":0.27350302681344985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010539606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14024733,0.000010224308,0.0000028207185,0.006875467,0.0009794435,0.00007289503,0.0000087051485,0.000011123361,0.851792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957613,0.000005570484,0.0000458353,0.0010143683,0.00074850005,0.0000024632384,7.036108e-7,0.000004246922,0.002417059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990832,0.0001313769,0.00015363755,0.00009867125,0.00038477898,0.00014828687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994421,0.00015046856,0.00009335836,0.0000840292,0.00014995807,0.00008010705],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011445434,0.000071563125,0.000077971126,0.000016839527,0.013271439,0.00039338582,0.00036084602,0.00005189433,0.0010644261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019649346,0.000033234668,0.00005342046,0.000014610055,0.0017456342,0.00027181493,0.000059383685,0.0004606361,0.000012480926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014102932,0.0000131314455,0.000028713628,2.5381067e-7,0.000027019596,0.000004819484,0.0006425816,8.713641e-8,0.000016091231,0.99907106,0.00014722892,0.00003488535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030910873,0.000007305155,0.0003770989,0.0000031574893,0.000006572539,0.00004343382,0.000040632505,0.000001910534,0.000021291033,0.3880547,0.61109716,0.000037630594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007644547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18873124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85551393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021913524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042568136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011668810","doi":"10.7202/1005132ar","title":"The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Constitution; Legislature; Separation of powers; Law; Political science; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.045927220303203405,"score_gpt":0.3189576571520233,"score_spread":0.2730304368488199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011668810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005381221,0.00024411772,0.00015998285,0.0010374347,0.00023023156,0.00009842014,0.000018113475,0.000003873711,0.9928266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930096,0.00019700488,0.00016807273,0.000114460556,0.00006609578,0.0000011718492,2.3376104e-7,0.0000011483077,0.00015084202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992074,0.00023751524,0.00019182704,0.00004255197,0.0002086063,0.000112142356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990675,0.00030945087,0.00022123306,0.000058059442,0.0002876663,0.00005608962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007564053,0.000042792908,0.0000924179,0.000010148574,0.0028761802,0.0000137281795,0.00012489698,0.000026480087,0.00004216156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019105295,0.00002324143,0.000047929883,0.00006536455,0.006921471,0.000113998634,0.00001344883,0.000096954165,0.0000014814298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004996346,0.000009612925,0.00011716777,0.0000010791883,0.000027515178,9.773856e-7,0.0014110813,0.0000032229202,0.0000032883395,0.9979628,0.00006533114,0.000348008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000640022,0.00009468012,0.00038327396,0.000034341618,0.00006029305,0.000057532554,0.008949845,0.000007613601,0.0009653531,0.02375406,0.9649775,0.00007551119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024774114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036580982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99391973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002308442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012115381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012229299","doi":"10.7202/1013029ar","title":"South Africa: A Diceyan Rechtsstaat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Liberal democracy; Rule of law; State (computer science); Democracy; Interpreter; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060937889761241405,"score_gpt":0.3179023034452359,"score_spread":0.2569644136839945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012229299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002374822,0.0012247697,0.00007941556,0.0006659234,0.001792479,0.00010329664,0.000019532477,0.00011285115,0.9936269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992992,0.000025440977,0.0019939884,0.00018622335,0.002183323,0.0000046372415,4.8883186e-7,0.00002318669,0.0025907308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750626,0.00038315973,0.0002861157,0.00013925372,0.0007524202,0.0009328009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998657,0.00011064886,0.00018395387,0.00019428587,0.00013481794,0.00071927754],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019651025,0.00013718267,0.00018735696,0.00006322701,0.00560981,0.00015436135,0.00045939052,0.00014364121,0.0011507948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036671452,0.00011689638,0.00013745122,0.00031928136,0.00034122218,0.00079172774,0.00008129762,0.0005287769,0.00076648814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022001448,0.00012120436,0.0021747379,0.0000041263706,0.00004948534,0.000034309178,0.19729826,0.0000021637068,0.000021756905,0.7952754,0.001988072,0.0030084967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018929661,0.000025771029,0.000090823174,0.0000142947965,0.000028973362,0.00001466197,0.007189402,8.934511e-7,0.000066287,0.0016835943,0.9905252,0.00017082675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060200767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000844481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025592596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001964421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014939371","doi":"10.7202/1013386ar","title":"Mental Capacity in the (Civil) Law: Capacity, Autonomy, and Vulnerability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Autonomy; Construct (python library); Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.07018616730346944,"score_gpt":0.2966239825638687,"score_spread":0.22643781526039924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014939371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.506793,0.000019100664,0.000012338665,0.012272235,0.00010451567,0.00029229018,0.000023261802,0.000018631874,0.48046458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986287,0.00001976935,0.00025735574,0.0008475314,0.00015760271,0.000026914533,6.1593363e-7,0.0000042137726,0.000057312758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988113,0.00031227246,0.00020783771,0.00013488115,0.000264206,0.0002694829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994876,0.00011057119,0.00007342586,0.0001357159,0.000056644792,0.0001360901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013276244,0.00007941688,0.00010313928,0.000015054317,0.004636169,0.00025586193,0.00028806803,0.000057620848,0.00026504148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035278987,0.000054410437,0.000049921033,0.00009969963,0.0005600319,0.00046058037,0.000051805,0.0004097994,0.000039318176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4862634e-7,0.000066549255,0.001381708,0.0000019872539,0.000004676191,7.373088e-7,0.0036818294,0.0000025501438,0.00007960968,0.99378467,0.00026050338,0.0007342407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021169288,0.00002015692,0.011277344,0.000007491844,0.000005838488,0.000028303555,0.0020469674,0.000057230034,0.00009468914,0.051728193,0.9344118,0.00011024265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10689558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32028237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018813577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015165328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99665964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015751754","doi":"10.7202/038657ar","title":"Quebec and Her Sisters in the Third Legal Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Wainwright; Jurisdiction; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Social science; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031135460406884606,"score_gpt":0.3149944510712077,"score_spread":0.28385899066432313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015751754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4948258,0.0005247171,0.000011681223,0.018483404,0.0003452492,0.00012435316,0.0000023319913,0.0000152490375,0.4856672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404633,0.0007208886,0.00006134939,0.0042544445,0.00025627285,5.961319e-7,2.8015126e-7,0.0000020231087,0.00065783865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907404,0.00020064175,0.00016103225,0.00007309722,0.00029318556,0.00019801558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997321,0.000031366737,0.000059450846,0.00005509417,0.00003988555,0.00008215406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011859828,0.000048738017,0.00008003677,0.000026570036,0.0030662345,0.00024258472,0.0001445271,0.000043610562,0.000028228831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025854157,0.00003429064,0.00003383563,0.00010208507,0.00009253843,0.0003606601,0.0000053302024,0.00020774042,0.000007871323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012801682,0.000055331824,0.0048164064,0.0000037055313,0.0000037562102,0.000026330614,0.009559633,0.0000038146247,0.000016062952,0.9752365,0.006042555,0.004223124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023794365,0.00005289786,0.2522896,0.000017313227,0.0000073444844,0.00002367629,0.008877661,0.00000552998,0.0000019984393,0.009587037,0.7288213,0.00007771349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16143525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9255062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083554216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032533328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016595766","doi":"10.7202/1029208ar","title":"De l’ombre à la lumière : l’hypothèse de la renaissance de la filiation romano-germanique de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021469752001563164,"score_gpt":0.3026347262711478,"score_spread":0.28116497426958464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016595766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06398324,0.0026609364,0.00020303996,0.010152229,0.000535997,0.00024425195,0.00008652039,0.0001284498,0.92200536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891638,0.0008925064,0.001523157,0.001485242,0.0027358101,0.000028530621,0.000004051334,0.000065456006,0.0041014133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167794,0.0058734925,0.0004632797,0.00032670493,0.0006681401,0.0009904391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971714,0.00095745595,0.00040412904,0.00019577639,0.00026553293,0.0010057134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063377353,0.00034401135,0.00039288882,0.000072109346,0.0030978047,0.0006021841,0.0006053724,0.0010240875,0.00016632174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010125835,0.000350374,0.00029579087,0.0004244341,0.0014972006,0.0009010115,0.00009457518,0.0017607048,0.000055315293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010807744,0.00053109054,0.0032407753,0.000096387885,0.00010884166,0.00092760706,0.021290826,0.00043808614,0.00048734454,0.9502224,0.019085603,0.0034630143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008012433,0.00010385669,0.002647841,0.0002660568,0.00010559823,0.0007282254,0.0010967501,0.0002490464,0.0004223208,0.1701693,0.82302314,0.0003866536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02793654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01997509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001629471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011062251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016771929","doi":"10.7202/1026131ar","title":"Peut-être. Incertitude du risque et dialectique de la responsabilité","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037286686764817376,"score_gpt":0.4102324211141937,"score_spread":0.37294573434937633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016771929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17561553,0.0029023706,0.0029932356,0.18971275,0.007884395,0.00085837697,0.00011655137,0.00016325303,0.61975354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403626,0.0066301124,0.0029721267,0.041405737,0.005674691,0.00003664139,0.0000048252414,0.00009446299,0.0028188217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674069,0.02899084,0.0012442083,0.0003936093,0.00054724107,0.0014171682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861684,0.011071875,0.00050477235,0.00048744117,0.00041048546,0.0013570229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029038642,0.00036672616,0.00068831013,0.000096618314,0.008782985,0.000059867707,0.00041506664,0.0017616976,0.0017284511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078337025,0.00032520088,0.00032762732,0.00030930465,0.0005972988,0.00036879996,0.0001474487,0.010061828,0.000367703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053860055,0.0011276458,0.017641991,0.0015497326,0.00026229103,0.0004505144,0.034790576,0.0002550597,0.00022878709,0.7618975,0.11260075,0.068656564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00187202,0.0004742796,0.016456626,0.0010618363,0.000097395045,0.0005787345,0.0018079825,0.00046496606,0.000058344227,0.008701416,0.96812797,0.0002984319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009940567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025919234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016095795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011247338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018588254","doi":"10.7202/1005848ar","title":"Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counterterrorism Law and Beyond","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deference; Political science; Parliament; Derogation; Human rights; Judicial deference; Covert; Judicial review; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03083224154445312,"score_gpt":0.28185435759528515,"score_spread":0.251022116050832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018588254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47949162,0.000052807685,0.00000744731,0.00018874352,0.00017066023,0.00006953376,0.000013562779,0.000011827042,0.5199938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990168,0.000032532687,0.00019461759,0.00040885655,0.00013908528,0.0000042721194,0.0000017863488,0.0000058613086,0.00019615421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902666,0.00008070809,0.00022816387,0.00017308055,0.00026769718,0.00022369795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00006194352,0.000104167266,0.000042345717,0.00012253382,0.00014710183],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036215177,0.00010373515,0.00015136103,0.0000605335,0.0036508392,0.00014990167,0.00010791486,0.00009384789,0.00013981681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000142593235,0.000083772364,0.000019968717,0.000037651,0.00046165852,0.00056528434,0.000028525368,0.00023821287,0.0000034829052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022005883,0.000028928656,0.00045694332,0.0000040224163,0.000011206038,0.00003612828,0.0072616315,1.7133955e-7,0.0000029708435,0.9920567,0.000018961262,0.00010028712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074702874,0.000098314194,0.004515484,0.00010867836,0.000028346594,0.00018148393,0.0007171493,0.00003247737,0.0001105672,0.93467265,0.058570847,0.00021697435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111825485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25750625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046084384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019631236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020489753","doi":"10.7202/1000785ar","title":"Rethinking Criminal Responsibility for Poor Offenders: Choice, Monstrosity, and the Logic of Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Retributive justice; Punishment (psychology); Aside; Power (physics); Sociological theory; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10910012745275058,"score_gpt":0.35258117390764354,"score_spread":0.24348104645489296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020489753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5791423,0.0012322795,0.010931303,0.0089327255,0.001594183,0.0010407079,0.00004765416,0.00008034271,0.39699852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938026,0.0002152545,0.005314969,0.00044926634,0.00015843094,0.0000059265617,2.9626298e-7,0.0000051882475,0.000048082296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836016,0.00064845744,0.00030223397,0.00014923874,0.0003215673,0.0002183521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740154,0.001545823,0.0003266511,0.00013696769,0.00049539213,0.00009365024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004368766,0.00008179993,0.00019391192,0.000061031114,0.0044234516,0.0000712539,0.00022000517,0.00007023362,0.000069921334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028021995,0.000055908356,0.0001725651,0.00017938777,0.00077024405,0.00038869225,0.000050133058,0.00027524677,0.0000013642443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023239888,0.00027155443,0.00043399533,0.000044083477,0.00020768183,0.000013654685,0.054740284,0.0000074636628,0.00006738106,0.9109292,0.00011683312,0.030843861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022170364,0.00052465126,0.0012676825,0.000093524795,0.0043620565,0.0002876602,0.8277748,0.00024186984,0.00063398737,0.085271575,0.07701322,0.00031190994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03740199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08908759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82565767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005961324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033697357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024782077","doi":"10.7202/1000624ar","title":"Legality as Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.05092749860751865,"score_gpt":0.28922524883468015,"score_spread":0.2382977502271615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024782077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012528741,0.0009269808,0.0000059334607,0.0023462863,0.00021939479,0.00006382036,0.000007784317,0.000007961761,0.9838931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881434,0.0004100585,0.000053700838,0.00044414736,0.00017998785,0.0000020073646,1.0693137e-7,0.0000017864019,0.00009387832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918556,0.00017048724,0.00016032427,0.000066392044,0.00027517913,0.00014203435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957895,0.000085768246,0.00009939271,0.000048830498,0.00011368792,0.00007338802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010712912,0.000052993637,0.00014352829,0.0000074579884,0.005168764,0.000025368829,0.00013476456,0.000033540106,0.00020275195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008953448,0.000031347892,0.00007215569,0.000053094627,0.0025787414,0.00015263625,0.000043741304,0.00012303954,0.000012369558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109510955,0.000020648406,0.00029675063,9.963617e-7,0.00003429696,0.0000053471745,0.0018576346,7.272921e-8,0.0000015535435,0.99641025,0.000033069795,0.0012298862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079910684,0.000023917202,0.0014687167,0.000020529742,0.000038374248,0.000029454246,0.0014870362,2.4960363e-7,0.000119022436,0.32385486,0.6720992,0.000059568287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13230835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045352653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98628557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018446299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015130112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99612635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025631202","doi":"10.7202/1000786ar","title":"L’équité judiciaire, de l’ombre à la lumière : archéologie d’une exception singulière aux règles de la publicité immobilière","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.07099168402152997,"score_gpt":0.30654151859586326,"score_spread":0.2355498345743333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025631202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060685895,0.0043628784,0.00017496,0.013020168,0.0020605712,0.00026327724,0.00011046969,0.00021167887,0.9191101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780255,0.0073831575,0.0021172157,0.0015499836,0.002658491,0.000022429467,0.000009927163,0.000067822024,0.008165452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400383,0.0024237926,0.00068257784,0.00049588457,0.000802395,0.0015915236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975416,0.00045505646,0.0004978342,0.00032286992,0.00042664923,0.0007559886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004125579,0.00047936136,0.0005288539,0.000032301086,0.008225549,0.0004164222,0.0010429787,0.0014526701,0.0019434079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039648742,0.00043944822,0.00068665756,0.0007943486,0.0037978096,0.0011551655,0.00020443315,0.0022318976,0.00012820229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006730946,0.00074316893,0.0026346853,0.00007927774,0.0002334407,0.00043622986,0.026546022,0.000044308606,0.00030688036,0.89311606,0.010613931,0.06517866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006865407,0.0002082965,0.0063895686,0.00028857146,0.00021756589,0.0011261142,0.023090739,0.000028616498,0.00038937817,0.12273735,0.84430903,0.0005282177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014450721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016486838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080545875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000326146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027872938","doi":"10.7202/1025141ar","title":"Corporate Liability for Foreign Corrupt Practices under Canadian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Liability; Language change; Business; Compliance (psychology); Enforcement; Corporate law; Law; Corporate liability; International law; Political science; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0955556092807517,"score_gpt":0.272727067309497,"score_spread":0.1771714580287453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027872938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005621289,0.00002836493,0.0015407352,0.004608037,0.00078379316,0.00024383706,0.000009209935,0.00004923362,0.9871155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99141943,0.0000030406666,0.0005152475,0.0064864326,0.0012073437,0.000012915225,0.000008052933,0.000018578468,0.00032896164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990477,0.000017344168,0.00025770516,0.00018233592,0.00017198588,0.00032295755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854696,0.00007314621,0.0007550005,0.0001601721,0.00041678123,0.000047956353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068930286,0.0001366318,0.00017901571,0.00006583895,0.0033133985,0.00038536225,0.00018156049,0.00004697517,0.00018356719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015348635,0.00011402607,0.000094682524,0.00012421055,0.00009855523,0.0010654383,0.00003816498,0.00013480346,0.000109867695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002429451,0.000017288823,0.0024009584,0.000029427654,0.000024681927,0.0000015219182,0.0000024565747,0.00022038918,0.000005783913,0.9934983,0.002241073,0.0015338247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003895239,0.00001438118,0.0049752626,0.000018415058,0.000034313278,0.000009538821,0.00012823837,0.002823467,0.000009673268,0.13918965,0.8522645,0.00014300425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05173615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5418512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98678654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007413742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101159885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028993133","doi":"10.7202/1026134ar","title":"Decreasing the Data Deficit: Improving Post-Market Surveillance in Pharmaceutical Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Postmarketing surveillance; Clinical trial; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Market failure; Promotion (chess); Drug control; Market access; Public economics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Marketing; Industrial organization; Medicine; Adverse effect; Pharmacology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.37458824715676464,"score_gpt":0.5135214404674004,"score_spread":0.1389331933106358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028993133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888695,0.0037655898,0.0013621846,0.06788968,0.009162942,0.0020387769,0.0011315964,0.0004097746,0.32536998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906475,0.00019779072,0.00028637258,0.0077196923,0.0009632961,0.000009112373,0.00004500768,0.00003546611,0.0000957644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426323,0.0031662642,0.0007866348,0.00047595578,0.0003577842,0.00095014344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652195,0.0017976456,0.00027394466,0.00053721695,0.00022261322,0.0006466193],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008313975,0.00029416312,0.00034606643,0.00009445326,0.003172377,0.00009642225,0.0010692581,0.0005020236,0.0019582023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010815428,0.00022409877,0.00009052022,0.00030576452,0.00034458557,0.00051917834,0.000359515,0.0042859856,0.00007217529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039710915,0.0010461254,0.061604053,0.00033904947,0.00033619115,0.00035190172,0.00031890982,0.0016698873,0.0149869025,0.14361365,0.0054313536,0.7663309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023395517,0.000092601316,0.0149561,0.000052496238,0.0000924852,0.00086361286,0.00013711413,0.11610742,0.0020404384,0.001236706,0.86171395,0.00036750306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027230076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022493198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8562826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001898655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050740306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029074563","doi":"10.7202/1027721ar","title":"Constituent Power, the Rights of Nature, and Universal Jurisdiction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Constitution; Sovereignty; Virtue; Power (physics); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Humanity; Universal jurisdiction; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.005816882349276584,"score_gpt":0.2510207941636611,"score_spread":0.2452039118143845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029074563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07968982,0.000111153444,0.000015267695,0.0014258876,0.00040423023,0.000049203743,0.00001541711,0.0000075269713,0.9182815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925655,0.00010637724,0.000047868136,0.00022633353,0.00013271531,1.9317984e-7,3.7698223e-7,0.0000021191959,0.00022749303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.00014151122,0.000087489374,0.00005144495,0.0001808486,0.00011110186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999718,0.00006302983,0.00007283134,0.00005229792,0.0000143898105,0.00007945511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038098177,0.000042266245,0.000060618997,0.000014649188,0.0025021515,0.000018406063,0.00009449081,0.000064899454,0.000107596294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011496074,0.000027064792,0.000032981814,0.000035455734,0.0005459204,0.00011085118,0.00001832414,0.00020283856,0.0000054019506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052586447,0.000011801096,0.00019287238,6.2100537e-7,0.000008121797,0.0000011737591,0.00026029872,0.000002272938,0.00002954461,0.9987919,0.00020290143,0.0004932437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016163875,0.00003658508,0.0011105251,0.000008051006,0.0000107411115,0.0000173647,0.00017583062,0.0000020183354,0.00024289149,0.007951693,0.9902461,0.00003651953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036321294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009201844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037694786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034948214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029513835","doi":"10.7202/039646ar","title":"The Grammar of Customary Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Normative; Indigenous; Legal history; Sociology; Legal realism","score_opus":0.012417714216767448,"score_gpt":0.2751842133774959,"score_spread":0.2627664991607284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029513835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006187856,0.00015786882,0.0000017644197,0.004184042,0.0015283905,0.00005875017,0.000008140193,0.000022926894,0.98785025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966262,0.00037512433,0.0003255642,0.0005140271,0.00069864216,0.000001678038,3.871873e-7,0.0000063611255,0.0014520239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989879,0.00011854256,0.00017257844,0.00006770181,0.00039938986,0.00025389256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934745,0.00011239745,0.00012535187,0.00012398152,0.00016391625,0.00012691233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011693935,0.00006073737,0.00008716194,0.0000016221352,0.010297337,0.00008659932,0.0004155471,0.00013150291,0.0002455081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064747845,0.000036005447,0.00015178112,0.00009631979,0.0010363838,0.00018509856,0.00003168845,0.0005926121,0.000021565802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004821554,0.000019075636,0.00003230998,0.000001309745,0.000016986036,0.0000034376758,0.0009205344,5.767507e-7,0.0003130276,0.99238944,0.003306095,0.0029923685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010898608,0.000012957677,0.00004212312,0.0000051269053,0.000010342404,0.00001874559,0.0022531548,6.949771e-7,0.0005326702,0.030557852,0.96640235,0.00005497111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016916227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0875062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99043834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022375165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015191626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032906683","doi":"10.7202/1022312ar","title":"Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Employment and Labour Law Contexts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Universitat Pompeu Fabra","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Labour law; Law; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04704999531085361,"score_gpt":0.35333205164371134,"score_spread":0.3062820563328577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032906683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3818835,0.000026143282,0.00008707199,0.0042641116,0.00022138101,0.00048113213,0.000013617202,0.000017465676,0.6130056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989245,0.000013054795,0.0000819397,0.000663446,0.00006320875,0.000020636317,4.6441627e-7,0.0000032782987,0.00022945323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987883,0.00034914262,0.00026615988,0.00007755219,0.00036760818,0.00015124014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954134,0.0000694497,0.00014438793,0.00006912374,0.00010011274,0.000075561395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027814948,0.00004827896,0.000103519895,0.000015962345,0.0014686342,0.00005302609,0.00012361773,0.00003283198,0.000088533736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010302056,0.000033471104,0.000032336095,0.00006717971,0.0003321801,0.0001581393,0.00003226609,0.00012192454,0.0000031723255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006427282,0.000043377408,0.00246918,0.0000066268135,0.000004767114,7.735554e-7,0.000627337,0.0000046156397,0.000017804832,0.9927777,0.000005298484,0.0040360847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000282847,0.000021356851,0.017144814,0.000023889597,0.000004561285,0.0000032406256,0.00042919454,0.000006150537,0.00015272056,0.060763914,0.92111343,0.00005384892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057415958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0695397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9320138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045756628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010004234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033495146","doi":"10.7202/1000788ar","title":"L’ordre juridique arbitral : réalité, utilité et spécificité","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495763181199125,"score_gpt":0.24754033909923343,"score_spread":0.19796402097932092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033495146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045668115,0.0012086855,0.00020186923,0.012256928,0.005644551,0.0002206195,0.00004863016,0.0000897282,0.9757622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159485,0.00032816143,0.0015135725,0.07038403,0.00304463,0.000011874661,0.000042029995,0.00008453347,0.008642665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736863,0.00010140818,0.00087453553,0.00037621427,0.00060203124,0.00067718327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983694,0.00003868605,0.0005655161,0.00025584083,0.00066167064,0.00010891077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010297297,0.00042281777,0.00033923532,0.00021636311,0.0018814309,0.0005875118,0.00051292946,0.0002200872,0.013063332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076893884,0.00040507416,0.0003935892,0.00026511817,0.0002514219,0.0039014989,0.00015745427,0.0009296622,0.002500368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009980806,0.00048081766,0.00044639208,0.00010695961,0.00015226546,0.00022917197,0.00007448641,0.000008271558,0.00006206187,0.9896687,0.00787595,0.0007950887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007751738,0.00006265567,0.0011801465,0.0002803102,0.0001106857,0.00027111883,0.0001274289,0.0005068442,0.0008889598,0.07202227,0.9233345,0.0004399222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049410346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050392104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001415065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040364615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033979548","doi":"10.7202/1000617ar","title":"L’héritage de l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis 1959-2009","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02911325364606312,"score_gpt":0.30967330317632874,"score_spread":0.28056004953026564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033979548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07193016,0.008727692,0.00014041773,0.0780063,0.0130907325,0.00020528403,0.0001630624,0.000101022706,0.82763535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113924,0.00243966,0.0020047645,0.0008710236,0.0034791878,0.0000040770765,0.0000017666634,0.000038860413,0.010021401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966517,0.0003886424,0.0005437063,0.000354208,0.0008114269,0.0012502837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787337,0.00026351944,0.00028457728,0.00030796783,0.00027024164,0.0010003211],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002125648,0.0003084568,0.00036904076,0.0000611442,0.008288468,0.00037753195,0.0008283966,0.00047440085,0.0049441108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024130178,0.00030768395,0.00039698218,0.0003384208,0.0012579188,0.0010659425,0.0000988706,0.0019157678,0.0006660716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031685344,0.0002064795,0.00066699134,0.000055026023,0.000050802075,0.0006315318,0.0015379142,0.000030332905,0.0007753686,0.9113113,0.013074834,0.071627736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002734692,0.00012238062,0.0004939815,0.0002365643,0.00014610756,0.0009195161,0.0029429635,0.00007270166,0.0006062015,0.008106716,0.985686,0.0003933834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017935237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15991856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028960238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010988221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035165792","doi":"10.7202/039838ar","title":"From Sham to Reality: Should a Wrong Be Taxed as a Right?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Equity (law); Neutrality; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Doctrine; Political science; Tax law; Common law; Database transaction; Economics; Business; Double taxation; Finance","score_opus":0.04399651806378684,"score_gpt":0.2913284978211279,"score_spread":0.24733197975734106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035165792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18465231,0.000018033863,0.000104434446,0.02072352,0.0020203737,0.00018246786,0.000029777922,0.000171333,0.79209775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98111725,0.000001406064,0.00065016624,0.012917474,0.0043491535,0.000006181919,0.000017850125,0.0000278717,0.0009126748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874824,0.000015163545,0.00032182058,0.00022408903,0.00039629286,0.00029436886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999211,0.000034911183,0.00025943073,0.00023213809,0.00019164335,0.00007086869],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040900687,0.00016938322,0.0002163278,0.00013532223,0.0013432868,0.0007019896,0.00031579382,0.00010198857,0.0068952055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022497117,0.00013720377,0.00011424477,0.00021834763,0.000038259284,0.0010994778,0.00011904397,0.0005557837,0.0012266049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010567846,0.00015078892,0.0006506683,0.000016581396,0.0000762807,0.00018728485,0.00016735888,0.000017498569,0.003748107,0.9396402,0.04557377,0.00966573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040723835,0.000010360215,0.0012768343,0.00002691393,0.00003793046,0.00001712863,0.00015768158,0.00011568529,0.00053446303,0.0062712184,0.99093896,0.00020559225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04694939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9453652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021717837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004634734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035605315","doi":"10.7202/1027720ar","title":"Les relations fiscales Canada — Nouveau-Brunswick de 1867 à 1917","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01386344679956529,"score_gpt":0.2228182480841039,"score_spread":0.20895480128453858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035605315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008588938,0.0036464902,0.00013910078,0.04185138,0.0051636603,0.000073689305,0.00013935509,0.000021841392,0.94037557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8807161,0.00069118786,0.00045296358,0.0012828248,0.0018673114,0.0000016196916,0.0000038135504,0.000025278452,0.11495891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801224,0.00042637996,0.0003336083,0.00016658635,0.00045976145,0.0006014109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986251,0.00017315062,0.00020448508,0.00014518536,0.0001272455,0.0007248412],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007430746,0.00012924634,0.00019701142,0.00012321198,0.016598249,0.00032980923,0.0003253196,0.0001867186,0.0050772633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017910084,0.00017238437,0.00014713116,0.0002343011,0.000905893,0.0003405747,0.00002607195,0.00065891794,0.00018839857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032784546,0.000030223988,0.00069767697,0.000014580967,0.000035698617,0.00006309319,0.0010926003,0.00023972338,0.000002312078,0.82590455,0.15263411,0.019282168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017345311,0.000025682612,0.0037613844,0.00007620231,0.00006489818,0.000108022,0.0007202284,0.0000830123,0.0000023520292,0.0026370292,0.9921405,0.0002072478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005163864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014655092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036660388","doi":"10.7202/038658ar","title":"Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Jurisprudence; Human sexuality; Law; Pleasure; Supreme court; Constitution; Liberalism; Politics; Mainstream; Sociology; Political science; Identity (music); Psychology","score_opus":0.10866045140832759,"score_gpt":0.3559120432329751,"score_spread":0.2472515918246475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036660388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18587685,0.00042169637,0.00004127764,0.095430456,0.00035403323,0.00028510642,0.000038673083,0.000045509747,0.7175064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.000042528016,0.00028488864,0.00045267554,0.00020540993,8.790864e-7,2.8931373e-7,0.0000030491153,0.00011214043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809736,0.00047198255,0.00033875834,0.00008705384,0.0005830191,0.00042184282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905264,0.0001725602,0.00019045643,0.00010417543,0.00029711434,0.00018305157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012484646,0.00008422299,0.00022330348,0.000013591729,0.0027858336,0.000043781747,0.00034551657,0.00006983675,0.000110040666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046656452,0.0000487188,0.00015299479,0.00016206069,0.00070281175,0.00021771263,0.000037914702,0.00023383895,0.0000043916884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003790385,0.000063848755,0.0012705721,0.0000027128237,0.000026978141,0.0000021334604,0.000769324,0.0000014672187,0.00005266569,0.9948517,0.00013715606,0.002817644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010843019,0.0003609918,0.112009466,0.00007275906,0.00012802344,0.000043507887,0.036446545,0.000025035359,0.005799172,0.11627184,0.7273013,0.00045708244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068710065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003658395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87857985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001508292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000180964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07964043449649322,"score_gpt":0.3457996897785181,"score_spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037174929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554178,0.025806852,0.00070531655,0.008573124,0.0011504766,0.0020545772,0.000490238,0.000018673718,0.0057829213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633511,0.034509476,0.0016742409,0.00015182275,0.00007582939,0.00003870587,0.000001476898,0.000017290258,0.0001800682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857616,0.000080933474,0.00043480934,0.00024743087,0.00023184188,0.00042880117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988133,0.00050642836,0.00019925692,0.00010218946,0.00020730516,0.00017154987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016647212,0.00014784094,0.00034403964,0.00009609955,0.0010096056,0.00034253186,0.0001916561,0.00011762381,0.00003720129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015082769,0.00011515952,0.00008466123,0.000093541596,0.00032254437,0.0023524528,0.000029811152,0.0001245037,2.0886566e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008639526,0.0013306043,0.015696842,0.0027295554,0.00029494814,0.00010191091,0.26985723,0.000036022808,0.001050486,0.5731142,0.005216166,0.12193251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030863306,0.00076240365,0.001631249,0.0021703297,0.000094270035,0.000014896756,0.23266691,0.00004783933,0.001925521,0.012467208,0.7447294,0.00040361108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019005276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1264575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7395133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010944914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035254645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8894824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040069261","doi":"10.7202/1000628ar","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Rule of law; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.057300528873199766,"score_gpt":0.31551749798359946,"score_spread":0.2582169691103997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040069261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06981707,0.0017684569,0.000047498637,0.002987326,0.0009967452,0.00077766035,0.00008009911,0.000017814136,0.92350733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932456,0.00016935563,0.00021507351,0.000052650845,0.000081688646,0.0000062714416,1.1826644e-7,0.000008402877,0.00014185607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976722,0.0008635106,0.0005160562,0.000112444024,0.0006038288,0.00023198339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980891,0.00059798476,0.00056517404,0.00032501266,0.0003691362,0.0000535877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027595279,0.0000960617,0.00024710147,0.000014662723,0.0027343454,0.0000359997,0.00077505514,0.00007796123,0.000051473147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064208865,0.000041426778,0.00016064817,0.00022133003,0.004601372,0.00014004455,0.00012114792,0.0002773895,9.788181e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057531,0.00005996781,0.0011512337,0.000020933801,0.000051293824,5.3595727e-7,0.059490927,0.000004646506,0.000020171292,0.9383906,0.000028637789,0.0006752972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030101854,0.0003933474,0.008794478,0.00047457794,0.00079936127,0.000021855058,0.070324495,0.00009336666,0.0141843315,0.11585555,0.78561205,0.00043642454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01088159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010832033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031864216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005009645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041536915","doi":"10.7202/1029209ar","title":"“Third Parties” and Democracy 2.0","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Parliament; Democracy; Political science; Campaign finance; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06332487778188535,"score_gpt":0.321419525430219,"score_spread":0.2580946476483337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041536915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017037056,0.0002150288,0.00008653346,0.0073294616,0.0007628707,0.00005130586,0.0000020011396,0.000042871303,0.9744729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707144,0.00008079045,0.0010003183,0.0004910112,0.00031795047,8.619621e-7,3.08612e-7,0.0000040485857,0.0010332426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914706,0.00014395239,0.00013793941,0.00006790038,0.0003340499,0.00016910343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.000040992072,0.00007673561,0.00005351145,0.00012390787,0.00035435928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008921515,0.000047145386,0.00007570054,0.000024995577,0.0025415602,0.000117104784,0.00009070077,0.000051492243,0.000113794944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025677768,0.000038177048,0.00002597061,0.000058835525,0.00015946152,0.00042814956,0.000024761861,0.00012816697,0.000068158144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028736966,0.000031646985,0.00081143645,0.0000020571658,0.000007984726,0.000020030453,0.0024740065,0.000010591224,0.00005534467,0.94220346,0.04632659,0.008028096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031826596,0.000027632894,0.00017118834,0.000013547965,0.000004329719,0.000026115124,0.0022091991,0.000027143047,0.000074707685,0.03744862,0.95961756,0.00006166713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009871041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037442183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043787295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016105378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043446721","doi":"10.7202/1002369ar","title":"Le contrat d’assurance contemporain et la réification des parties","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08525442262759401,"score_gpt":0.3078656402410028,"score_spread":0.2226112176134088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043446721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011710046,0.002651228,0.00036173503,0.004153546,0.0012896784,0.00010328438,0.00005080743,0.00003479054,0.9796449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258877,0.0020966665,0.0005658339,0.0011729889,0.000361409,0.0000039265515,0.0000022625575,0.000023427541,0.013184736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972015,0.0014460831,0.000452642,0.00017787892,0.00036372934,0.00035817217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986746,0.000247386,0.0003446434,0.00011490474,0.00038484324,0.00023362561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023285598,0.00015827248,0.0001994242,0.000032874294,0.0026309143,0.00019933491,0.00035161737,0.00010737233,0.00064255984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002362852,0.00015610385,0.00015782686,0.00011058319,0.0013647736,0.0013580084,0.000024715542,0.000425227,0.00025404527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054656375,0.00018521631,0.0002062814,0.000009863466,0.00006658575,0.000066498964,0.0019508498,0.000004585462,0.000115886956,0.9923358,0.00045066688,0.0045531387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052913005,0.00009762127,0.0024223092,0.00017469931,0.000022887038,0.00008135589,0.00095863355,0.000025225952,0.0007001166,0.02480412,0.96999556,0.00018833252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004706827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022028744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007938668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007578868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044500382","doi":"10.7202/1018393ar","title":"How the Charter Has Failed Non-citizens in Canada: Reviewing Thirty Years of Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031017378010037153,"score_gpt":0.2320557403653359,"score_spread":0.20103836235529876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044500382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7276403,0.0027743578,0.000023059032,0.09035488,0.0018752395,0.0007925119,0.00013769203,0.000008559481,0.17639343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.0003363012,0.000024291076,0.00035732536,0.00010507881,0.000004849919,2.1075661e-7,0.0000026760458,0.000055565764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.0001010597,0.00026185613,0.00007863494,0.00062186643,0.00026269048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993053,0.00011746096,0.00018172375,0.00007265734,0.00024127481,0.00008157638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047729618,0.00006785228,0.00022517689,0.000014920292,0.0014217678,0.000031617838,0.00026671228,0.00002327386,0.00010993408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014523024,0.000047951748,0.000047461446,0.00014559535,0.00035243027,0.00014497788,0.000037194248,0.00018041595,0.0000010693524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006305807,0.00017837553,0.18482833,0.00016272618,0.00070560904,0.00040189008,0.012165339,0.00024807116,0.001101518,0.62032765,0.13978925,0.040028155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039749325,0.000029234,0.27229342,0.00048572922,0.000037452137,0.000013437333,0.011718788,0.000023453247,0.0002643985,0.00369344,0.7107904,0.000252769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99945813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61663425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042228732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011914906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044569947","doi":"10.7202/038652ar","title":"Libres propos sur la culture juridique québécoise dans un monde qui rétrécit","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.007539120071047782,"score_gpt":0.21608094331895,"score_spread":0.2085418232479022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044569947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077011706,0.01158205,0.000020894937,0.028776916,0.0026715577,0.00020247778,0.00018594369,0.000070026654,0.94878894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73955196,0.015302734,0.0005906809,0.0035972793,0.0033998352,0.000005689345,0.0000068546237,0.00005931417,0.23748566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754304,0.0005075872,0.00041915622,0.00027977143,0.0005899251,0.0006605472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985426,0.000050223276,0.0002603207,0.00019687043,0.00018875497,0.0007612057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060924224,0.00023089994,0.00030644663,0.00016418776,0.008068423,0.0007901572,0.0005320794,0.00039612813,0.001740921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085968684,0.00026085592,0.0003319765,0.00040067238,0.0010597626,0.0011136922,0.000028178976,0.0009957438,0.00032145617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027527716,0.00027767435,0.00003186559,0.000025616799,0.00006704683,0.0009293151,0.010472877,0.000035191864,0.00024715258,0.86618584,0.093315326,0.02838459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034573599,0.0001581543,0.00042887265,0.00014837697,0.00009116264,0.0004601911,0.00095380336,0.0000052993287,0.0001212641,0.010063826,0.98688877,0.00033454548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69987226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89357346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014311682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059963675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046946144","doi":"10.7202/1005134ar","title":"L’immunité de l’acte de fonction et la responsabilité pénale pour crimes internationaux des gouvernants en exercice","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09762691681737933,"score_gpt":0.331073466025417,"score_spread":0.23344654920803765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046946144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54304624,0.00024983438,0.00043152555,0.0007790648,0.0011568142,0.00008133256,0.000047427442,0.000035865352,0.45417187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94078434,0.000661183,0.0042748326,0.00043919086,0.0007506354,0.000008093054,0.0000030633862,0.000036587353,0.05304208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957459,0.002334249,0.00049111736,0.0002342773,0.0005708527,0.00062358385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797356,0.00069178856,0.00033715967,0.00016374061,0.0005211969,0.000312541],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037859424,0.00024035874,0.00023151022,0.00012529313,0.0036669013,0.00020708615,0.0007145673,0.00027287105,0.0040332805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003289989,0.00022911704,0.00025846943,0.00009786065,0.00075109873,0.0012137904,0.000096193224,0.00084535853,0.00029904238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002246387,0.0003893173,0.001197186,0.000017642158,0.0001342134,0.0001537439,0.011026312,0.000021310552,0.00012884443,0.98057836,0.00030406777,0.005824381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006511482,0.00015640412,0.030735444,0.0003630567,0.00010187185,0.00090944645,0.0014632555,0.00011809326,0.0021193535,0.41191024,0.5511609,0.00031081904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03344434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052832358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5686681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013624565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022954152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047125366","doi":"10.7202/045087ar","title":"De Dunsmuir à Khosa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03396127961799788,"score_gpt":0.3236435114768137,"score_spread":0.2896822318588158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047125366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07630777,0.0019191767,0.00008513295,0.06339212,0.013462984,0.000091931375,0.000030511086,0.00004475154,0.84466565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797538,0.0007808217,0.0020509833,0.0012990538,0.0037108173,0.0000018243404,4.2720302e-7,0.00001955512,0.012382752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788713,0.00024612172,0.0003290279,0.00019588186,0.00051472586,0.000827084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998586,0.0001830004,0.00017531357,0.00018045721,0.00018185849,0.0006933892],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018654416,0.00017033971,0.00020223048,0.000033564433,0.006530996,0.00027641188,0.0005168187,0.0002731613,0.0065125935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022233797,0.0001642689,0.0002185893,0.00019975421,0.0009270465,0.0007333319,0.00006222458,0.0013885598,0.0008471815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014407714,0.00008544186,0.000261907,0.000015757818,0.000021008289,0.00024725546,0.0011999399,0.000007172006,0.0005823031,0.94350034,0.0060294364,0.04803503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015454485,0.00007288484,0.00037851516,0.00009072348,0.00006913505,0.0011379182,0.0011921109,0.000032395994,0.0005030343,0.016238183,0.9799165,0.0002140572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013886034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11999092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001552052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006326497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049285175","doi":"10.7202/1025144ar","title":"Of Justice and Its Scales: Looking Back on (Almost) Forty Years of Rod Macdonald’s Scholarship on Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09051163513513426,"score_gpt":0.4056112552012065,"score_spread":0.31509962006607223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049285175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4108371,0.000035999332,0.0000953097,0.024636038,0.001447094,0.00024801423,0.000036141537,0.00001686387,0.56264746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958329,0.000043976037,0.00053702603,0.0030558936,0.00029358428,0.0000018576452,0.0000010452203,0.000009839421,0.00022384756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985635,0.00027654276,0.0003254674,0.00013857288,0.00049870054,0.00019716205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981791,0.0007396568,0.0003265568,0.000116882846,0.00045471528,0.00018312948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018082898,0.00007932832,0.00014555898,0.000126246,0.0012059273,0.00016728375,0.00030423878,0.00007250482,0.00029787136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030074737,0.0000775834,0.000039629784,0.00040530917,0.00008103023,0.000919857,0.000039217757,0.0005017802,0.000050286053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011392808,0.00019226527,0.0005279548,0.00009686728,0.000027881058,0.000002197305,0.0017078888,0.00022313342,0.00028259328,0.98286426,0.0012240768,0.012736971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005274892,0.00027148906,0.020450898,0.00029497713,0.000193605,0.000015953005,0.0021793535,0.000031873653,0.0021118787,0.0019499967,0.97176343,0.00020904536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004349106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023538396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98091424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007016738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006138924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.927514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050516753","doi":"10.7202/1009064ar","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité dans une société démocratique égalitaire, pluraliste et multiculturelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250964000714904,"score_gpt":0.3233638978373402,"score_spread":0.29085425783019114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050516753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017720088,0.0068069636,0.0007567397,0.07152226,0.0030536135,0.00029046324,0.00009509255,0.00006379013,0.899691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889035,0.0012014301,0.0008770323,0.0019522865,0.0021819093,0.00001892824,0.0000056592053,0.000016921886,0.0048555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969702,0.000729405,0.00055723765,0.00019590707,0.0006384398,0.0009088464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985761,0.0000980502,0.00035847348,0.00010361872,0.00035181118,0.0005119378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018293901,0.0002513725,0.00032036286,0.000024647074,0.010801057,0.000105488034,0.0002584073,0.00023031308,0.00026203494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018559165,0.00021687499,0.000294502,0.00032588406,0.0017200866,0.0010540511,0.000099299265,0.00064084184,0.00014299559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016629827,0.00039592833,0.0019792123,0.000016897886,0.00016260387,0.000031848176,0.0076978193,0.00009260594,0.00010079239,0.9865895,0.0015136126,0.0014025369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041705556,0.00005001698,0.0051505156,0.00013349425,0.00010782273,0.00025753168,0.013686965,0.000013152458,0.00031588157,0.0427071,0.9368403,0.0003201908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07003341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1117331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97117025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057673885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025191743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99048674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051485425","doi":"10.7202/1000621ar","title":"Rand’s Legal Republicanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ayn Rand and Brontë studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Law; Ideal (ethics); Public law; Rule of law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Civil law (Civil law); Politics; Private law; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Common law","score_opus":0.07561284486922691,"score_gpt":0.2037043644261806,"score_spread":0.1280915195569537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051485425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005657727,0.0009728763,0.00040504584,0.00044449567,0.00078119745,0.000045302113,0.00005313977,0.000030455205,0.99160975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960651,0.00024410793,0.0009945227,0.0004612403,0.00024259475,0.00000352046,8.8111216e-7,0.00001531567,0.0019727554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905884,0.000009879667,0.0004434122,0.00017838326,0.000033472377,0.00027602975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994699,0.000010100294,0.00022837667,0.00014316854,0.000035829467,0.00011264567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041056433,0.00010989437,0.00027825413,0.00007194667,0.0012930598,0.00005568218,0.00018184134,0.00005277691,0.0017601337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029626015,0.00009959698,0.00015185613,0.0000702643,0.00006532057,0.00035108704,0.0000464753,0.00021484293,0.00039594065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021109969,0.00005460442,0.0018333801,0.0000029212647,0.00006145493,0.00003010187,0.00010353955,4.1252756e-7,0.0000018157493,0.9948588,0.0019080164,0.0011238186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078766333,0.000075153774,0.0048241694,0.000006632452,0.0000052273,0.00014965508,0.000070796865,0.000010091533,0.00010492909,0.033316284,0.9604861,0.00016330513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006578985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004155006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99040735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041289248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019854874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051885556","doi":"10.7202/1013035ar","title":"From the Backroom to the Front Line: Making Constitutional History or Encounters with the Constitution: Patriation, Meech Lake, and Charlottetown","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Negotiation; Front line; Commission; Constitutional amendment; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04472068094413539,"score_gpt":0.27718608990713883,"score_spread":0.23246540896300344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051885556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011066555,0.016970383,0.00852605,0.27393052,0.01022406,0.0016137097,0.0006488033,0.00013227771,0.67688763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993886,0.0002376216,0.00019720437,0.005975157,0.0034500023,0.00002376987,0.000002854562,0.0000036712552,0.00017087028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983884,0.00025983562,0.00022400286,0.00014286538,0.000641558,0.000343355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886173,0.0004903183,0.00016053615,0.0001189763,0.00023939645,0.00012901962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013531116,0.00014078035,0.00014832648,0.000018046298,0.011362547,0.000112428024,0.00032724335,0.000053855983,0.00070396805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002161175,0.00005809173,0.00006051311,0.00011657105,0.00340774,0.0003496507,0.00007871084,0.00031379514,0.000059686394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106901556,0.000026487678,0.0026420332,8.1689313e-7,0.00012180945,0.0000072966773,0.0053848284,0.00005079256,0.000003580324,0.9646397,0.02562294,0.0013927623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024859805,0.000026609643,0.002348312,0.00004991222,0.000078590216,0.000066124674,0.005816462,0.000002062501,0.0000030090243,0.0007427701,0.9905001,0.00011742921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046465555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14481841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032513367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022766904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053532955","doi":"10.7202/1019044ar","title":"Unauthorized Dispositions of Trust Property: Tracing in Quebec Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Property law; Subrogation; Express trust; Private law; Constructive trust; Common law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025638017804686802,"score_gpt":0.29157039951367225,"score_spread":0.2659323817089855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053532955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093938306,0.0000350814,0.00014522242,0.008978122,0.00013018855,0.0003696075,0.000022317305,0.000029484585,0.8963517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694693,0.000019888326,0.0006222628,0.0001333667,0.00011712829,0.00002425041,0.0000012444383,0.0000070728584,0.0021278674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990649,0.00011395139,0.00028710184,0.000094560026,0.000214606,0.00022488127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951893,0.00004380229,0.00010473828,0.000093307855,0.00010891962,0.00013030985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036474076,0.00006248137,0.00012902507,0.000032976735,0.002141099,0.00010824445,0.00019131381,0.000056215595,0.00044924434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024327861,0.000043559063,0.000070643066,0.00019090343,0.00020612066,0.00050810166,0.000022985732,0.0002189914,0.00004518114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033175465,0.00008097484,0.00011453048,0.0000034879151,0.0000061476694,0.0000019445267,0.0011582599,0.000026078218,0.00072995236,0.99292254,0.00006468001,0.004888078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005114974,0.00003013746,0.0019731584,0.00007750141,0.000015936328,0.000008742612,0.00404423,0.0001300149,0.00076065154,0.011716481,0.98057073,0.00016091026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.506631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66516244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98120606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012313605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002578835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055063704","doi":"10.7202/1027719ar","title":"Contesting Expertise in Prison Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Prison; Law; Supreme court; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology","score_opus":0.03551014631928558,"score_gpt":0.317418280182905,"score_spread":0.28190813386361946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055063704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23932195,0.00018022169,0.0013327224,0.0008822623,0.0006048486,0.000064442575,0.0000011908877,0.000048761347,0.7575636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877626,0.000040508272,0.0003123873,0.00040779167,0.00034195936,0.000002855001,2.4258247e-7,0.0000059346416,0.00011207616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989708,0.00021335349,0.00021744896,0.00010579444,0.00023969915,0.0002528918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949837,0.00011908336,0.00008781603,0.00007525764,0.00009517829,0.00012429738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563765,0.000063056694,0.00012729905,0.000058324124,0.0030801164,0.00010362111,0.00013867886,0.000046647583,0.00016012139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002536985,0.00005809778,0.00007820283,0.0002048067,0.00010766472,0.00023211463,0.000016049335,0.00021587993,0.00003347884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021133588,0.00012426422,0.0014970427,0.0000064588494,0.00001874365,0.000044024284,0.008132928,0.00023191165,0.00017226904,0.57416135,0.00012743246,0.41546246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004726917,0.000096117954,0.00024142515,0.00011953409,0.00009632297,0.0000609111,0.12016577,0.0018771141,0.0002625496,0.0014246762,0.8749301,0.00025277716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09433683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6279951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87480265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013499639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000723139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057113611","doi":"10.7202/045084ar","title":"Privacy and Private Law: The Dilemma of Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Autonomy; Harm; Tort; Political science; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Computer science; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023014139752591506,"score_gpt":0.28863128334764304,"score_spread":0.2656171435950515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057113611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52057225,0.00015662618,0.000017444963,0.013011399,0.0011684577,0.00022079365,0.00001991926,0.000037251564,0.46479586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984511,0.00020054144,0.00054548774,0.00024087058,0.00035134895,0.000001986722,6.011735e-7,0.0000043345262,0.00020371734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992809,0.00008982209,0.00014860641,0.000075287295,0.0002580805,0.00014730052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994795,0.00006161226,0.00013671388,0.00011817094,0.00012320827,0.00008080344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082875264,0.000052285544,0.00007314078,0.0000020133405,0.0045275935,0.000083587634,0.00026426732,0.000094488656,0.00014316995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008857444,0.00003167315,0.00005616854,0.00007643016,0.0006971711,0.00022718786,0.00003455042,0.0003795804,0.0000056293866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028608786,0.000016380687,0.00013312977,0.0000031602428,0.0000097219045,6.1641293e-7,0.0029876847,7.222464e-7,0.0016905849,0.99327314,0.00028268076,0.0015993171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108799635,0.000009789931,0.0011625438,0.000007743156,0.000016880738,0.000014825704,0.0010727884,0.0000023515718,0.00097302394,0.020728253,0.97585356,0.00004941676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006972059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006033407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013120402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007293448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","score_opus":0.02453393702755719,"score_gpt":0.2797557446958232,"score_spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057420653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229116,0.00020893665,0.0000019304505,0.00365227,0.00066651474,0.00021752475,0.000008462496,0.000016521586,0.9029367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986573,0.00019424515,0.0001414131,0.00010374422,0.00019587741,0.0000019360164,2.8653398e-7,0.000004435739,0.0007007832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989895,0.00015677018,0.00023490611,0.00009956406,0.00028530427,0.00023393583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995204,0.000045494657,0.0001158912,0.00010389379,0.00009904718,0.00011523817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794625,0.00006990865,0.00012145444,0.000018004966,0.0032276276,0.000039072253,0.0001899304,0.00007389172,0.0001875303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006836815,0.000029056977,0.000044702916,0.00009905135,0.0005991439,0.0004127649,0.0000374757,0.00044486325,0.0000045142433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049317798,0.000034223955,0.00060228084,0.0000025006273,0.0000053834106,0.000012109629,0.00018061585,0.0000016294118,0.00021931411,0.99357307,0.000067904846,0.0052516586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048493734,0.00007495374,0.0023864466,0.00004127307,0.000009188536,0.000049164046,0.0003779877,0.00006259081,0.00035988583,0.032688245,0.9633676,0.00009775125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016029356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13827355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003653054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027290715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057708753","doi":"10.7202/045085ar","title":"Responsibility for Another’s Debt: Suretyship, Solidarity, and Imperfect Delegation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Debtor; Analogy; Obligation; Creditor; Law and economics; Debt; Law; Joint and several liability; Delegation; Political science; Imperfect; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Liability; Philosophy; Strict liability; Epistemology; Finance","score_opus":0.031050345143335326,"score_gpt":0.33483015941588545,"score_spread":0.30377981427255013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057708753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7885607,0.000048594327,0.001185331,0.010962812,0.0005715876,0.0006288603,0.0001031579,0.000075084434,0.1978639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972196,0.00002090933,0.0019582086,0.00023443555,0.00037752045,0.000013413783,0.000001416845,0.000008757956,0.00016574463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916387,0.00010917618,0.00017617371,0.00014458875,0.00017705433,0.00022912325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923706,0.00023448496,0.00008936207,0.0001247916,0.00017435297,0.00013996461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018789426,0.00006703102,0.00009456355,0.00002285083,0.0051099015,0.00017882968,0.00015044847,0.00010145334,0.00009041591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032987,0.00005818901,0.00006591879,0.000079369165,0.00021652888,0.00026364988,0.000027681064,0.00029712537,0.000005626042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031995634,0.000031731077,0.0009551946,0.0000037678744,0.0000073328865,5.9254137e-7,0.00036536797,0.0000010325032,0.003944142,0.9883606,0.00015783015,0.006140458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003068857,0.00003850115,0.0026804227,0.000004238778,0.000014367764,0.000018445597,0.00017008826,0.00009467272,0.0015569883,0.05075479,0.9442559,0.000104696075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021602819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13514931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94409806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004443592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032822507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058799957","doi":"10.7202/1026135ar","title":"Le juge canadien, anglais et australien devant l’incertitude causale en matière de responsabilité médicale","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03841378771854598,"score_gpt":0.37969485897240374,"score_spread":0.34128107125385776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058799957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12606117,0.0010702559,0.00039954428,0.4643601,0.004649858,0.0008090642,0.0003872729,0.000113540984,0.4021492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95673496,0.0006015163,0.0051369206,0.009168267,0.002736101,0.000042457476,0.000017910303,0.00008410366,0.025477797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848433,0.010534783,0.0014505291,0.0005253996,0.0008199415,0.001826038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904982,0.005755669,0.00052460114,0.00071187346,0.00036854588,0.002141113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013926347,0.0004096758,0.0007435562,0.00012252972,0.0048554195,0.0000940304,0.00066904427,0.00088585174,0.011272585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010235434,0.00037509474,0.00023743905,0.0002721136,0.00065675756,0.0006943977,0.000247998,0.0046845144,0.0012897654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000391326,0.0009936985,0.0050535426,0.001087753,0.00018444212,0.0004914917,0.005824676,0.000071982984,0.00016143757,0.9098214,0.05754144,0.018376812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013594766,0.0005187588,0.0069395187,0.0010443523,0.00016859894,0.0005968404,0.0030681726,0.00021161792,0.00012877036,0.0076499362,0.9779129,0.00040103568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13779086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39869195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9203715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013070636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079109165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060872817","doi":"10.7202/1022313ar","title":"La relativité aquilienne en droit de la responsabilité civile — analyse comparée des systèmes germanique, canadien et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018883796378657232,"score_gpt":0.30866635993821934,"score_spread":0.2897825635595621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060872817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.601924,0.0020649135,0.0002980527,0.004857233,0.00044773315,0.00013616058,0.000052364732,0.00005715044,0.39016238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936718,0.00084794004,0.0013460013,0.0004188867,0.0004654804,0.000009177674,0.0000019879726,0.000041370717,0.0031973778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98837006,0.008925034,0.0006640708,0.00040621104,0.00060041016,0.0010342004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930267,0.0051519144,0.00036243608,0.0003454496,0.00022075942,0.0008927769],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012527198,0.00033377795,0.0005673291,0.00012991429,0.0038758873,0.00029574084,0.0006872632,0.0004153559,0.00062365644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015917529,0.00033423374,0.00033933495,0.00048368511,0.002297961,0.000905487,0.00011841846,0.0012594567,0.00010151586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009974879,0.00017361203,0.0058035534,0.00009890652,0.00010820819,0.0003269281,0.0134574305,0.00030186237,0.00009086537,0.95633686,0.0009962021,0.022205811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033097618,0.0002420967,0.018524775,0.00066703197,0.00026961317,0.0014911595,0.005279337,0.0005076471,0.00012676643,0.04588763,0.9262323,0.0004407044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53258485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9360324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92523605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019228796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027270298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061211677","doi":"10.7202/1007816ar","title":"Les droits environnementaux dans la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne du Québec : Pistes de réflexion","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017110801725969998,"score_gpt":0.29092144011961535,"score_spread":0.27381063839364533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061211677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4294079,0.0031910762,0.0000998209,0.006030675,0.00030155937,0.00009204813,0.000066287896,0.00003556587,0.5607751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824679,0.0032872332,0.0008161081,0.0011739233,0.001461292,0.000010294215,0.0000044115236,0.00006186043,0.010716962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959488,0.0018730205,0.0003653664,0.0002201758,0.0004320172,0.0011606538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982233,0.00051145,0.00023723576,0.00015400576,0.000015510324,0.0008585227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002442391,0.00032445538,0.00027724076,0.000048981445,0.00566795,0.00017576425,0.00038439123,0.00032813606,0.0026893013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007667308,0.0003276461,0.00026071502,0.00012186882,0.002489021,0.0009609003,0.000111970585,0.00070127036,0.0002954907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025403588,0.00053316,0.031902242,0.0000353922,0.00009155076,0.00006396782,0.031528942,0.000035895082,0.0012156591,0.92180336,0.00037571022,0.0123887295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005801753,0.00015095076,0.023719028,0.0001799528,0.00014270886,0.0013749893,0.004031972,0.000024270705,0.0014555677,0.008071092,0.95986915,0.0004001322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27397224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20070933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95949346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002905325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012922756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192305796101551,"score_gpt":0.29518315741207485,"score_spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061805555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4259848,0.000023065537,0.00024115558,0.0010745836,0.00008667537,0.00019147078,0.000043534095,0.000011855449,0.5723429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949116,0.00002373694,0.00018712145,0.00020096173,0.000065917535,0.000003127182,0.0000012911895,0.0000027318742,0.000023952593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999414,0.00007668336,0.00018152654,0.00006924231,0.00014611613,0.00011241644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.000040190007,0.00009209397,0.00009275705,0.000038621096,0.00007792967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033695615,0.000042102885,0.00008083261,0.000015423047,0.0013424084,0.000031943848,0.0001778543,0.000034306293,0.000081934995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000964013,0.000026380985,0.000018972754,0.000107822,0.00012285053,0.00015544302,0.0000386463,0.00010158737,0.000006028268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057467973,0.00002339583,0.00087456155,6.3080864e-7,0.000003930319,9.93812e-7,0.004020114,0.0000045554693,0.000047698017,0.99469936,0.0000300296,0.00028897793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014878012,0.000022260061,0.010147965,0.000025690077,0.0000071709187,0.0000014474111,0.00049447175,0.000007978015,0.0009372112,0.25091913,0.7372272,0.00006071437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19725037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6281805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74378026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030716074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038093167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061840250","doi":"10.7202/1005852ar","title":"Droit familial et parties « musulmanes » : des cas de kafálah au Québec, 1997-2009","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1760351401806906,"score_gpt":0.3651410594977428,"score_spread":0.18910591931705217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061840250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112252,0.0030662545,0.00009179861,0.0097796675,0.0037821305,0.00025950727,0.0002559752,0.000106090534,0.1714334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458535,0.0011166481,0.0013033887,0.0038112465,0.0018519216,0.000008333465,0.000006508218,0.000043428252,0.01727315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961272,0.0008720975,0.0007140007,0.0003216235,0.00063416216,0.0013309446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980325,0.00015377233,0.00037264964,0.00023103863,0.00044290532,0.0007671476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013228822,0.00036330684,0.0003742764,0.00007193671,0.006127078,0.00018219172,0.00049037335,0.00031621437,0.0015171262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002921889,0.00033639604,0.00031518715,0.00016139883,0.002696985,0.001120389,0.00007834078,0.00061131635,0.0003215416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056367804,0.00038103107,0.020899756,0.00006630945,0.00023355072,0.00020589233,0.3570802,0.000085380234,0.00008312288,0.60962516,0.0066889967,0.0045942194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052540837,0.00014725585,0.040568143,0.00012179932,0.00018827723,0.0005214801,0.046111766,0.00008175808,0.0013161474,0.005655971,0.90423185,0.0005301449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8223958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9737317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89754283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004464397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082045945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062369876","doi":"10.7202/039649ar","title":"Liberté de choix et protection juridique des conjoints de fait en cas de rupture : difficile exercice de jonglerie","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025196966567499333,"score_gpt":0.29717048251511724,"score_spread":0.2719735159476179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062369876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109119,0.0013449034,0.00126955,0.032511402,0.0021129097,0.0006785043,0.0000944849,0.00015511276,0.05092124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834398,0.0014832243,0.008726915,0.000894625,0.0020645794,0.00006861994,0.0000017349248,0.000051852534,0.0032686403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955622,0.0016740662,0.00046569802,0.00033657617,0.00050942635,0.0014520092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802494,0.0002777642,0.00035781227,0.00015896074,0.00041391555,0.00076662534],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189454,0.0003928385,0.00042700404,0.000041601783,0.0076249028,0.00037403492,0.0004756419,0.00076538324,0.0007527812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014435458,0.00034280063,0.00030450945,0.0002877011,0.0010953596,0.0008180942,0.00013644146,0.0027628215,0.00006603586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003741815,0.0019042388,0.012693462,0.00064030546,0.0011008556,0.0012043568,0.36520568,0.0013885144,0.09919236,0.344047,0.0073251375,0.1649239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007209372,0.00019149204,0.026851853,0.00030748788,0.00018742293,0.0011992017,0.007910824,0.00024076171,0.011405164,0.0060717654,0.9442863,0.00062683097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119427636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3302649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027156328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003399907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063574972","doi":"10.7202/038178ar","title":"Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Reasonable accommodation; Epistemology; Charter; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06003431359858567,"score_gpt":0.35270728800830425,"score_spread":0.29267297440971857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063574972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5147362,0.0016003542,0.000024627305,0.029706696,0.0007552106,0.00045012252,0.000017536044,0.00019703488,0.45251226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720323,0.0002539979,0.0011784919,0.00038658394,0.00078291487,0.000001583742,0.000002072716,0.000004838377,0.00018627595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872494,0.00015639926,0.00023350192,0.00015018755,0.0004320896,0.00030286712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942553,0.00006771874,0.0001257352,0.000049426857,0.00011512129,0.00021644549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003862406,0.0001246779,0.00017667993,0.000018836205,0.010688372,0.00017506965,0.00012616145,0.000094970055,0.00010674262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080231504,0.000089789624,0.00007024184,0.000090654066,0.00019519609,0.00056053145,0.00003721006,0.00021733278,0.000010385628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102656086,0.00037769455,0.0159086,0.000028762643,0.0004322757,0.00020801251,0.2927245,0.000060277293,0.020022385,0.45800176,0.008835444,0.20329764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089112524,0.000101829,0.04942743,0.00008207944,0.000049614784,0.000026583659,0.022233274,0.000010266439,0.0027543942,0.0010923212,0.9229337,0.0003973993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016096206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013772201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91409826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024541855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027726146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063968927","doi":"10.7202/038656ar","title":"L’impact de la culture sur le crédit, les institutions de financement et le droit de la faillite : quelques réflexions sur le cas canadien","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03649970762078716,"score_gpt":0.34073816904255494,"score_spread":0.3042384614217678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063968927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2940179,0.009520476,0.0013904206,0.09331431,0.000810923,0.0002692101,0.0005990929,0.000080481106,0.59999716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872187,0.006103525,0.0011687776,0.0014552922,0.0005227683,0.000006829147,0.0000041309563,0.000013377211,0.0035065962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967954,0.00095895206,0.0003618554,0.00028509097,0.00049705256,0.00110163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984815,0.00020679804,0.0003246406,0.00014937276,0.00019012997,0.00064755423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002342524,0.0002512239,0.00030156088,0.000043113596,0.008200178,0.0004813816,0.00055675796,0.00035582748,0.00010005773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004088028,0.00024160622,0.0003079691,0.0005495915,0.001331103,0.0011698334,0.000042588348,0.00081700116,0.00000702261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011529937,0.00037523248,0.0032375217,0.0000053189315,0.000038259088,0.00019401022,0.008378343,0.002514403,0.000079112906,0.9699486,0.0076946523,0.0075230366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056506647,0.00015660432,0.062999785,0.00015727417,0.00003329128,0.00031392166,0.0031175613,0.00010266806,0.0000999767,0.04879544,0.88334906,0.00030936804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9143696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91260594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9211531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028864748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004094166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064347324","doi":"10.7202/1005846ar","title":"Le bijuridisme canadien à la croisée des chemins ? Réflexions sur l’incidence de l’article 8.1 de la Loi d’interprétation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03711378500389355,"score_gpt":0.296828824594426,"score_spread":0.25971503959053244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064347324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45252723,0.0011496368,0.00064303837,0.005738028,0.00049294106,0.00009131634,0.000033959484,0.000045021246,0.5392788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943477,0.00077436096,0.0023695657,0.000419012,0.00031248815,0.0000070171013,6.608189e-7,0.000027333339,0.0017418868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973535,0.00069364096,0.0003988486,0.00024907026,0.0003542259,0.000950714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810404,0.0005047871,0.00020970056,0.00017008444,0.00022911989,0.000782263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025150164,0.00020022206,0.00021745637,0.000055473323,0.0043512657,0.0002241373,0.0005127214,0.00022646954,0.0007266523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053959247,0.00021577581,0.00018424533,0.00029883828,0.0019135033,0.0012433971,0.00007539049,0.0005769009,0.00009836062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058360223,0.00024054693,0.0028461022,0.00003887462,0.000040735024,0.0005851931,0.01866218,0.0000461775,0.0011894254,0.96701247,0.00086055626,0.008419387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006423482,0.00030256604,0.017539151,0.00091579295,0.0002650222,0.0042601535,0.011114557,0.00039452215,0.018242255,0.14447859,0.80116916,0.00067588675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40919784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6106522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083199743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005525988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064594549","doi":"10.7202/1005853ar","title":"L’évolution du dialogue entre le Canada et l’OIT en matière de liberté d’association : vers une protection constitutionnelle du droit de grève ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011150820460806144,"score_gpt":0.20533852227553456,"score_spread":0.19418770181472841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064594549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075883925,0.00019704468,0.0032038284,0.050970454,0.0073289475,0.0006317203,0.00042430699,0.00007658186,0.8612832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925697,0.000491448,0.00034294292,0.0010407363,0.0011745085,0.000015387956,0.000013444827,0.000017082233,0.0043347357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753505,0.00076310453,0.00038533032,0.00019030675,0.00048690563,0.0006392742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880004,0.00010984077,0.00040645947,0.00009503328,0.00028319878,0.00030544883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015143027,0.00017395537,0.00019229556,0.000048800262,0.0049476735,0.00009281334,0.00020825132,0.00025563044,0.00087468774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034450853,0.00018831325,0.00011177617,0.00035040185,0.00021820748,0.00071215496,0.00003794554,0.00051819405,0.00001472737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002464886,0.0002153194,0.0031452898,0.000008270178,0.00014009808,0.000053354233,0.0050727525,0.00031303207,0.000066834466,0.9830134,0.004713716,0.0032332714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009370175,0.00008725451,0.02225538,0.000100637655,0.00012431275,0.00008938692,0.0040570563,0.0003555045,0.00032321346,0.018811287,0.9525865,0.00027246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98859936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008613009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010931827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065382878","doi":"10.7202/1005851ar","title":"Guarding a Cultural Icon: Concurrent Intellectual Property Regimes and the Perpetual Protection of Anne of Green Gables in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada); Ontario Tech University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Intellectual property; Public domain; Goodwill; Political science; Law; Icon; Public property; Reputation; Order (exchange); Cultural property; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Cultural heritage; Property rights; History; Accounting","score_opus":0.05064961998424971,"score_gpt":0.20021216915584394,"score_spread":0.14956254917159423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065382878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.732226,0.00084049575,0.000053669442,0.0007300998,0.0006741441,0.00074434816,0.000006879073,0.000020141912,0.2647042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.000057765355,0.000015937838,0.00011216805,0.00017134687,0.000007337135,8.6599124e-7,0.000010280622,0.00019011938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989388,0.000048395472,0.00044589283,0.00013676913,0.00022973663,0.00020039818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992608,0.000048367878,0.0002805353,0.00009026175,0.00030465832,0.000015370462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046442638,0.00014229788,0.0002966048,0.00008849117,0.0004636963,0.000045503293,0.00019481481,0.000032945492,0.00085085735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024738003,0.0000638358,0.000067852125,0.00020996104,0.00023951266,0.0006399547,0.00011373004,0.0002743309,0.0000031758977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017241033,0.0012307528,0.011758936,0.00344792,0.001607995,0.0002002417,0.03417414,0.000075138305,0.008048377,0.19473426,0.07976155,0.6477197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013894663,0.0006886388,0.00406119,0.0023646373,0.00045066205,0.00073338166,0.037922744,0.09586158,0.031837896,0.004457402,0.80610526,0.0016219435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89791316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78337187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007645052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036685517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9316291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065922327","doi":"10.7202/1018987ar","title":"Libéralités et personnes âgées : entre autonomie et protection","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05680485743105025,"score_gpt":0.35448435213693424,"score_spread":0.297679494705884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065922327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14153501,0.006303378,0.00066495506,0.24890114,0.016911142,0.002629344,0.0002009906,0.0003841996,0.5824698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95805156,0.0014684345,0.0012047725,0.012306741,0.0025637902,0.00010742307,0.000012047431,0.00009318562,0.024192067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948803,0.0025879599,0.0008018572,0.00034603057,0.00040082925,0.0009830301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785894,0.00028371235,0.0005898223,0.00024253067,0.0005084481,0.00051657204],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014405384,0.00036760833,0.0005130861,0.000103838414,0.0076344893,0.00023227684,0.00026910182,0.00067790487,0.009973725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021549572,0.00033800004,0.00032710537,0.00016007478,0.00021299878,0.0013789684,0.00013582724,0.002924824,0.0023557928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007756771,0.00056812173,0.0018960134,0.0010632484,0.00048999966,0.00012594271,0.19444005,0.00006992699,0.00020672915,0.6953512,0.039856363,0.06585483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009523703,0.00022356964,0.0019630275,0.0011255395,0.00012593075,0.00010986905,0.08914424,0.00023632622,0.00010185609,0.017627124,0.8879537,0.00043646616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046246894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03621257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005419238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013349143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066127125","doi":"10.7202/1019048ar","title":"La fiducie-sûreté en droit français","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.009668256340696344,"score_gpt":0.19308817907708575,"score_spread":0.1834199227363894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066127125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06794965,0.015879957,0.00035870602,0.016422544,0.007798471,0.00039177277,0.00005553679,0.000109015215,0.89103436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821763,0.0006591487,0.0003461091,0.0028866793,0.003720351,0.000011830008,0.0000056341155,0.00006270281,0.010131261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779665,0.000071940434,0.0006050669,0.0003296908,0.0005083887,0.0006882605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844736,0.00012414169,0.0006109445,0.00030065086,0.00043866498,0.00007821076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008047049,0.00034528997,0.0003557224,0.00010402744,0.0021062694,0.0009782687,0.00055636675,0.00028737326,0.013092249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014952867,0.0003429686,0.00028232622,0.00039259068,0.00020749622,0.004365123,0.00022096375,0.0010590705,0.009048172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035001936,0.00036834003,0.00444572,0.00042912218,0.00015121013,0.00062167295,0.0000970803,0.00009284014,0.00012584838,0.7192618,0.07886639,0.19550496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068913325,0.000025414734,0.011772013,0.00050822843,0.00009714043,0.00029031967,0.00009877172,0.0007199736,0.00005815378,0.019384723,0.96592116,0.00043493693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015080377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035874802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91422665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012490602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013116455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066161035","doi":"10.7202/038654ar","title":"Culture et droit de la famille : de l’institution à l’autonomie individuelle","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011077030335838818,"score_gpt":0.25238250654408756,"score_spread":0.24130547620824874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066161035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00509909,0.0057079215,0.00022082853,0.009048982,0.0013581079,0.00007321334,0.00009095988,0.00003210426,0.9783688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348332,0.011490864,0.0015303706,0.0059527243,0.0014013737,0.0000021272124,0.0000048869774,0.000016543154,0.0447679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829876,0.0004736899,0.0002380983,0.00015719501,0.00028052914,0.00055171666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991111,0.000040921874,0.00015609019,0.00009831362,0.000062896266,0.00053066085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014415776,0.00012383447,0.00017237014,0.00014912184,0.008466922,0.0006209845,0.0002916,0.00034722508,0.0010594373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072245384,0.00016413996,0.00019337113,0.00023268067,0.0009678571,0.0006344975,0.000018346454,0.0008334212,0.000182703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006993634,0.00010897656,0.000038939837,0.000007937324,0.00002534516,0.00020065901,0.004305228,0.00030867275,0.0000383816,0.9360608,0.03178504,0.027113048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003454979,0.00006961639,0.0015698025,0.00008122639,0.00007114816,0.00039960016,0.00087648927,0.000031573087,0.000016920723,0.030616097,0.9657303,0.00019172873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18002717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7084421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93394524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004435859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054915046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066896834","doi":"10.7202/1019052ar","title":"La primauté du droit, l’égalité devant la loi et autres « principes non écrits de notre constitution »","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484115229888827,"score_gpt":0.29281962588639876,"score_spread":0.27233551065650996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066896834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.258213,0.002658913,0.000152737,0.03153,0.0017822483,0.0005682837,0.00008072899,0.00011120391,0.7049029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98741865,0.0038646332,0.002258358,0.0008156748,0.00075135246,0.00003038988,0.000003752594,0.000024051376,0.00483311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959179,0.0013711947,0.0006166267,0.00035459828,0.00078350614,0.0009561752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781185,0.00062101573,0.00039531098,0.00014159702,0.0005014439,0.0005287716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019699358,0.0003862266,0.0004754392,0.000043861743,0.006437594,0.0005618837,0.000442597,0.00045222967,0.000885397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057798176,0.00031742227,0.00030152543,0.0002528569,0.0022403544,0.001445037,0.00020228905,0.0011057637,0.00047200985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024161853,0.00037050567,0.0033761102,0.00011645084,0.00027775252,0.00026269723,0.011889941,0.0002564066,0.0004974579,0.9387445,0.0041759345,0.040008117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007676315,0.000082761326,0.022205265,0.0005238824,0.0001410166,0.0005833383,0.0041228468,0.00020535056,0.0004318075,0.004587955,0.9658746,0.00047351775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03887062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031781975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011921715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013421214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067126333","doi":"10.7202/039835ar","title":"The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact-Finding","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inference; Epistemology; Plaintiff; Causal inference; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03163596699700405,"score_gpt":0.372955400710208,"score_spread":0.34131943371320395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067126333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637715,0.00014397778,0.00002492426,0.001173449,0.0005312137,0.00012478195,0.000008721274,0.000008327672,0.0342131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995692,0.00011461297,0.00015620624,0.00003791317,0.000061224186,0.00000136485,1.07791884e-7,0.0000050161193,0.000054366647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843067,0.00025756154,0.00041555276,0.00012389419,0.0005533201,0.00021902632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728835,0.0017871155,0.00037439988,0.0001905882,0.00029433504,0.00006523582],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037982867,0.000084555024,0.00018271715,0.00005016456,0.002605139,0.00015744801,0.00044467772,0.00012866718,0.000044864155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033764539,0.000045934936,0.0000580538,0.00022733332,0.00085670024,0.00038240396,0.000080914586,0.0010195104,8.95019e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006731535,0.000022501723,0.026468543,0.00001035295,0.00001909743,0.0000045038882,0.0024317915,0.000031624913,0.00032524337,0.9592515,0.000009335468,0.011358168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027970178,0.00010952842,0.64961004,0.00036520182,0.00008936358,0.00012802592,0.010160911,0.00017065865,0.0062079593,0.16102989,0.16885784,0.00047359237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019769534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10610458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79822165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038256956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076331875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068868265","doi":"10.7202/1006421ar","title":"The Effect of Alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ... Seriously","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Separation of powers; Political science; Dominion; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06841505137502493,"score_gpt":0.30564085008465974,"score_spread":0.2372257987096348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068868265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034409344,0.00006249745,0.0000013849093,0.0047023916,0.0005646909,0.000144235,0.0000052713453,0.000007545978,0.9601026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995046,0.00004426475,0.000008797085,0.00021075785,0.000101435595,0.0000031308034,9.4084754e-8,0.000002581321,0.00012433606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891376,0.0003504232,0.00013279448,0.00006154019,0.00028666257,0.00025479152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.00031478456,0.00008797412,0.00011165842,0.00007523074,0.00016068181],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021534935,0.0000598754,0.00007595104,0.000017822389,0.011056598,0.000067583394,0.00032155067,0.000045568748,0.0001769908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002737168,0.000029072578,0.000071611685,0.00007826429,0.0007658526,0.000108646214,0.000010875587,0.00021656383,0.000052417425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003461206,0.000003171701,0.000574112,0.000001420069,0.000011534537,0.000016221793,0.00052602286,0.0000017892203,0.000010206363,0.9956265,0.0007431042,0.0024513246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010660549,0.00022097722,0.00090994424,0.000047852463,0.000026172667,0.000037714504,0.0005757965,0.0000018403763,0.0017010206,0.0023104209,0.99400073,0.000060915405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66194046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99331605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013808651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006301089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99023086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070785462","doi":"10.7202/1017516ar","title":"Common Ownership and Equality of Autonomy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Common ownership; Common-pool resource; Variety (cybernetics); Ethos; Common law; Business; Normative; Resource (disambiguation); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03387415718864782,"score_gpt":0.24655559908055505,"score_spread":0.21268144189190724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070785462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5638101,0.00003000457,0.000019700563,0.0017101988,0.00006618559,0.00008749128,0.0000071912373,0.000009410624,0.43425974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982779,0.000018239645,0.00092218374,0.0006580777,0.000026014564,0.0000020689533,7.0330896e-7,0.000006489251,0.0000882915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921685,0.00008324072,0.00022105138,0.0001092517,0.00021113487,0.00015844456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.00004862936,0.000111905334,0.000121240126,0.0000029588546,0.00014517813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036326185,0.00008278594,0.00011789724,0.000008652857,0.0005870833,0.000018271603,0.00013248737,0.00006218831,0.0024368626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075538137,0.00006459848,0.000042100994,0.00003538999,0.00043555925,0.0003361454,0.00013799247,0.00028125,0.00021660616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009360806,0.0010349618,0.36849797,0.00012361587,0.00015001625,0.00004142606,0.0019451167,0.0014505779,0.03347112,0.4528768,0.0016097182,0.13870506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012264177,0.00044427314,0.34693936,0.00006680601,0.000050986084,0.0002292218,0.00040124217,0.00034484072,0.019974764,0.37293872,0.2567651,0.0006182686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015635649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036320236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43446785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086850436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.804944e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071765154","doi":"10.7202/1022311ar","title":"Taxing by Default","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Presumption; Taxpayer; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Government (linguistics); Income tax; Property (philosophy); Economics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Accounting; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010708135362379629,"score_gpt":0.21009803534769328,"score_spread":0.19938989998531365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071765154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011212071,0.00006228823,0.0010094848,0.0012836747,0.0006277621,0.0000407262,0.0000016403752,0.00009574954,0.9856666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993651,0.000003045859,0.00019867305,0.0041101645,0.0014123281,0.0000011350925,0.0000045632623,0.000015595335,0.00060351775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993348,0.000010482429,0.00017669713,0.00009639738,0.00019404505,0.00018756837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999586,0.00001511569,0.00020252276,0.00008210844,0.00009568487,0.000018572353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030863978,0.000089523484,0.00010216251,0.000057377656,0.0013293674,0.00035454016,0.0001493773,0.000035895075,0.00073718006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008567322,0.000073906835,0.000056526795,0.00010265067,0.000023384477,0.000878066,0.00003878732,0.00017325443,0.0007615044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012638026,0.0000474593,0.0011320708,0.000021935444,0.00001779347,0.000008129152,0.000011601089,0.000049709342,0.0007112931,0.9307499,0.044094395,0.0231431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002851154,0.0000047886642,0.00026620066,0.000017279068,0.000011098957,0.000010757191,0.000033863864,0.00065325067,0.00020240454,0.0015453907,0.9968594,0.00011048825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014125997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007672001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014102967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.928061e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071869","doi":"10.7202/1000620ar","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dominion; Discretion; Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.07299705351343487,"score_gpt":0.2972038172188597,"score_spread":0.2242067637054248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030136079,0.000095666335,0.00032804965,0.0075008846,0.00047953718,0.00012930328,0.0000079832525,0.00003845118,0.96128404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893093,0.00028296033,0.00021186953,0.00008552078,0.0001844585,0.000010905334,5.3082334e-7,0.00000601339,0.00028678123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.00012696364,0.00019722435,0.00009107344,0.00022014552,0.0002762898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.000058928337,0.00010422193,0.00012162521,0.00007130935,0.00012562417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009497328,0.000053756365,0.000060253078,0.000021805701,0.0067678248,0.00014797981,0.00032209276,0.00004545399,0.0002280771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008174809,0.000036461366,0.00005303539,0.0001953667,0.00019240235,0.00026917254,0.000043774933,0.0002432366,0.000063179534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036265797,0.00002841137,0.0017246519,4.0302913e-7,0.0000042990578,0.000003107683,0.00041708112,0.0000010062478,0.0000053196495,0.9844626,0.00009238394,0.013257087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009327605,0.000008463289,0.006273909,0.0000044608605,0.0000034562127,0.0000056422437,0.0009782094,0.000015484195,0.00004208152,0.011874842,0.9806435,0.000056639816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005079569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11810461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012812072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015041043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99452525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073165043","doi":"10.7202/038891ar","title":"Canadian Bijuralism and the Concept of an Acquisition of Property in the Federal Income Tax Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Statutory law; Law; Common law; Tax law; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Double taxation; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.010875765973961962,"score_gpt":0.2258847571270298,"score_spread":0.21500899115306782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073165043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92839247,0.000023533863,0.0000010094064,0.006189897,0.00019691253,0.00014556744,0.000007341589,0.0000046864443,0.06503857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980986,0.0000019118565,0.000030138917,0.0015270879,0.00027924022,0.0000017748284,0.0000034019365,0.0000048343245,0.000053022086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994673,0.000038496888,0.0001913157,0.000054814293,0.00014021271,0.000107875574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956477,0.000020700703,0.00021280836,0.00008948215,0.00009752405,0.000014740196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059240067,0.00006010217,0.000109159155,0.000074426425,0.00059422466,0.00016022967,0.00017546085,0.000034721306,0.00018528268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040190534,0.000025899353,0.000030439453,0.000109579065,0.00013594206,0.0006568866,0.000018969198,0.00021944314,0.0000024760182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113393704,0.000054905373,0.009169498,0.00002936028,0.000020412388,0.000018173616,0.0011290235,0.000025353354,0.0007746068,0.9807475,0.0004081571,0.007509578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027433184,0.000036149286,0.10001364,0.00006958357,0.000032780477,0.000076786266,0.0016167163,0.0010489757,0.0006111942,0.005611731,0.8879554,0.00018367535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.521469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7664306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009112154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069446105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4817176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074006549","doi":"10.7202/038655ar","title":"Culture et droit processuel : le cas du Québec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0280657318761427,"score_gpt":0.32546794012100005,"score_spread":0.29740220824485736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074006549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005789052,0.013375264,0.00009386119,0.12835872,0.0010170124,0.00008914448,0.000030552354,0.000025399364,0.85122097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643045,0.0025976289,0.00018542094,0.003255733,0.0013146686,0.00000226862,0.000001493925,0.000007865759,0.028330442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847996,0.00017136596,0.0003139181,0.00018946915,0.0004959371,0.00034932996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.0000617564,0.00020935496,0.000068177746,0.0005231101,0.00018033673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043568137,0.00017880126,0.00025117196,0.000027709915,0.0052437778,0.00015570656,0.00032279096,0.000089009096,0.0005964217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090976,0.000157305,0.00017957627,0.00018405126,0.0004084758,0.00079672324,0.00004039759,0.00045990275,0.00024026149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018317694,0.000227499,0.00015540798,0.0000048995043,0.00008034032,0.000056101944,0.0054976568,0.00003867462,0.000016008013,0.9530761,0.033208977,0.007619998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031995669,0.00022034964,0.0013114641,0.00008945048,0.000032477637,0.00016284805,0.001965298,0.000030765244,0.00013591573,0.027929481,0.96760654,0.00019547083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11240808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67335576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044676848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015012929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99605125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074012095","doi":"10.7202/1013027ar","title":"Dualisme, mixité et métissage juridique : Québec, Hong Kong, Macao, Afrique du Sud et Israël","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04262096942041092,"score_gpt":0.33301564129025035,"score_spread":0.2903946718698394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074012095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0512959,0.02076839,0.00026278163,0.14264713,0.0058198376,0.00024680336,0.00024845125,0.0000607258,0.77865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690931,0.0076652016,0.00036719473,0.004288965,0.003014119,0.000016246731,0.0000071319014,0.00004192232,0.015506122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563515,0.0015829807,0.0006882983,0.00030050336,0.00085429504,0.0009387922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977336,0.0006112105,0.00046748124,0.00017482524,0.0004802785,0.0005325825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026964769,0.00040326844,0.0005096304,0.00008814669,0.004431597,0.00024776233,0.0005056938,0.00021061476,0.0038994513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023696106,0.00037141488,0.00039189364,0.00026797652,0.0007259399,0.0020146202,0.00024241471,0.0010246527,0.00058406085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029328034,0.00033617992,0.0051256875,0.00001575222,0.0002493321,0.00006763221,0.006394006,0.000018689147,0.000049914324,0.93487465,0.051944368,0.0008944474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043152797,0.00011747312,0.006568285,0.00018913258,0.00007306017,0.00028767096,0.0016316007,0.000016445021,0.0004734994,0.0037695349,0.98600113,0.00044065315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09691669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5584899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93405676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005944461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017269797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074531229","doi":"10.7202/1013034ar","title":"Les rapports entre la constitution et les accords politiques dans les États africains : Réflexion sur la légalité constitutionnelle en période de crise","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Global Politics and Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.049500103335349314,"score_gpt":0.27536018266857376,"score_spread":0.22586007933322444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074531229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13624047,0.01273427,0.006832034,0.0048687505,0.0020774992,0.00023402619,0.0021419278,0.00006792291,0.8348031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889874,0.006534786,0.0014396576,0.00044112682,0.00082484883,0.000015119063,0.000047054644,0.000041465224,0.0016685709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963863,0.0005282316,0.0012478564,0.00042038827,0.00010718626,0.0013100333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764055,0.00041190948,0.0007809162,0.00030967523,0.00015961948,0.00069731206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029299879,0.00046552933,0.000685888,0.00024399586,0.0024710107,0.0004173814,0.0003416612,0.0006580397,0.0011029355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035200233,0.00056133483,0.00043203024,0.00014260813,0.0010252928,0.0014181285,0.00015401299,0.0009854115,0.00016190058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025630514,0.00045381003,0.07328166,0.00008089716,0.00017708007,0.000094632094,0.0014051384,0.00054053264,0.000007861582,0.91909355,0.0024860248,0.0023531648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000915386,0.00007131249,0.011129119,0.00024254664,0.00008990728,0.0019600955,0.001994337,0.00034997682,0.000195275,0.040071584,0.94237447,0.0006060171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03347993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036562318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012012545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000170011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078000226","doi":"10.7202/045698ar","title":"Technological Self-Help and Equality in Cyberspace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Harm; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Function (biology); Inequality; Political science; Law; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.05209584677342662,"score_gpt":0.297116010147144,"score_spread":0.24502016337371738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078000226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14430572,0.00047395832,0.000017980734,0.0029260353,0.00020719471,0.00012264936,0.000006190085,0.00013849368,0.85180175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981463,0.00055528106,0.0010209192,0.00014021689,0.00006145941,0.0000031853817,9.41655e-8,0.000004482405,0.000068078945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.0002491017,0.00018236386,0.00015563812,0.00024548874,0.00034120664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995936,0.000066176515,0.00007536153,0.00008051105,0.00005927238,0.0001250643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014660956,0.00009210278,0.00016526105,0.000052407355,0.0026472441,0.000037475216,0.00018046987,0.00013696689,0.00016673031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015094658,0.00007854338,0.00004829417,0.00019061247,0.0007619288,0.00022436569,0.00009715812,0.00041530404,0.000016703925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108755985,0.00009692961,0.0086260745,0.0000026531718,0.000016948745,0.000050099825,0.011300753,4.6558224e-8,0.0000025385082,0.9750263,0.00008346017,0.004783296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045555906,0.00006930222,0.014682951,0.000031140447,0.000018792272,0.000051330888,0.04108247,0.0000010524469,0.000088881265,0.07696489,0.86631745,0.00023617285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006601593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11498289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89806145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100538615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000931689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078381184","doi":"10.7202/1006420ar","title":"L’arbitrage notarié, instrument idoine de conciliation des traditions juridiques après la Conquête britannique ? (1760-1784)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Conciliation; Philosophy; Law; Arbitration","score_opus":0.07486312368359893,"score_gpt":0.22613150956942416,"score_spread":0.15126838588582522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078381184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25859013,0.014820918,0.00061331684,0.077617146,0.0027905642,0.00045767115,0.0013058357,0.00020729663,0.6435971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650273,0.018738199,0.0014623496,0.0010576297,0.0015004924,0.00002541669,0.000023678616,0.000039312814,0.012125627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778825,0.00031009235,0.0006950684,0.0002565806,0.00032901036,0.00062100333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986216,0.000091353984,0.0003149897,0.00013315253,0.00044385018,0.00039507623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055999705,0.00033994686,0.000490822,0.00006121508,0.019079316,0.00027525838,0.00021991764,0.00019116934,0.003961395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035285557,0.0002851666,0.0005079517,0.000086287524,0.0011640495,0.0006422997,0.000036483732,0.0008382743,0.0000728524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036550537,0.0004346846,0.00014842219,0.00006890501,0.00056832493,0.000176572,0.043042663,0.000006259574,0.000027812004,0.9451948,0.0050915396,0.0052034566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048862764,0.00035718468,0.00047305363,0.00017367887,0.0005002647,0.00020091188,0.0029673118,0.000051272826,0.00018273629,0.039756726,0.95445174,0.00039647374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026506357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11489643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9493602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029558465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032729477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078418525","doi":"10.7202/1018391ar","title":"La protection d’une vitalité fragile : les droits linguistiques autochtones en vertu de l’article 35","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Obligation; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.017191283589911534,"score_gpt":0.2509550753440249,"score_spread":0.23376379175411335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078418525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21595304,0.003938131,0.0001765144,0.017684959,0.002883331,0.00043423654,0.000051152936,0.00012760879,0.75875103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97582626,0.0006063243,0.00031744447,0.00024162621,0.00142964,0.000025609292,7.4678684e-7,0.000025688065,0.02152666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979227,0.0006740656,0.00032383675,0.00018942385,0.00035840034,0.00053153426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893117,0.00010043915,0.00017080765,0.00011899443,0.00020727306,0.0004712887],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973033,0.00014091938,0.00019098059,0.00014916193,0.0068181404,0.0007340863,0.00024076838,0.0003171398,0.0033584205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028869833,0.00017712923,0.000165741,0.00028519082,0.000881983,0.0006656685,0.000035554527,0.0007137367,0.0004959532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017482773,0.00024398987,0.0002920672,0.00008457168,0.00009893553,0.00020995602,0.014404969,0.00006927207,0.00082061975,0.7773395,0.0081368545,0.19828176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020436954,0.00008283183,0.0028850397,0.00015291777,0.000046457724,0.00020541294,0.0015538642,0.00020857602,0.00022073892,0.014736774,0.9794872,0.00021585306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89552295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8915494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015481086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013139663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078724444","doi":"10.7202/1005135ar","title":"The Downside of Preclusion: Some Behavioural and Economic Effects of Cause of Action Estoppel in Civil Actions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Incentive; Economics; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Public economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Doctrine; Finance","score_opus":0.07155397311586166,"score_gpt":0.24123812288777446,"score_spread":0.16968414977191282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078724444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97599745,0.00081519794,0.00001366388,0.000056971647,0.0012144162,0.0001724546,0.0000821666,0.0000042012284,0.021643491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863666,0.001181607,0.000045752156,0.000011463072,0.000077802,0.000005748504,8.3309277e-7,0.000013521974,0.000026594946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862444,0.00003546715,0.0009858762,0.00014968477,0.00002512059,0.00017942337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.000105360254,0.0010605464,0.00018986271,0.000026678303,0.000068896785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005971512,0.00009295642,0.00043972564,0.00014096014,0.00035160905,0.000013975532,0.00015236421,0.00007931819,0.000050864917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035505174,0.000097560005,0.000118924516,0.00004587111,0.00020122791,0.00037245837,0.00005383526,0.00015611986,0.000008438771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010455852,0.00016092333,0.20866305,0.000101409525,0.00012058345,0.0000050687136,0.0006722237,0.00005854318,0.0002087683,0.78881633,0.000045375073,0.0010431724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042330674,0.0008185436,0.7742125,0.00029828752,0.000103679784,0.00024514913,0.0007528058,0.00048693563,0.032099146,0.17671737,0.009415922,0.00061661605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013738533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03717291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61209893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013545348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009785868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0273633526495178,"score_gpt":0.30415470072908285,"score_spread":0.27679134807956507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081632868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5354382,0.00030955224,0.000012202192,0.0010052288,0.0006851581,0.000049021695,0.0000036130664,0.000016140759,0.4624809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861944,0.00024613665,0.0000778884,0.00010265354,0.0007756972,7.9085646e-7,2.3245042e-7,0.0000048119487,0.00017233017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991384,0.00011818702,0.0001406179,0.00006720242,0.0002263392,0.00030926452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962854,0.000035577035,0.000057763937,0.000042814758,0.000030750634,0.00020453658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011357748,0.00005523365,0.000087194094,0.000040603318,0.0019544244,0.00010358294,0.00006882453,0.00004719348,0.00021006311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000352905,0.000051285464,0.00003432027,0.00008048337,0.000104417275,0.0007033519,0.00002424212,0.00023182102,0.000011428028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017847799,0.00008339003,0.085757926,0.000004046289,0.000011795654,0.000035309662,0.002306326,0.0000022694887,0.000074738535,0.86463237,0.00028216222,0.046791844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020135188,0.000013250405,0.047526333,0.000014477236,0.0000055021765,0.00006032255,0.0006136358,0.000004992054,0.0000676474,0.00040537975,0.9510138,0.00007328337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066717886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020199038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95073164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008386125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075438065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085925177","doi":"10.7202/1019045ar","title":"Réflexions autour de la diversité des modes de réception ou d’adaptation du trust dans les pays de droit civil","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031481138605264275,"score_gpt":0.27272276285760133,"score_spread":0.24124162425233706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085925177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4191052,0.0004329472,0.08527566,0.014814133,0.00022413372,0.00027485672,0.000114448805,0.00010743306,0.4796512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868707,0.0017948326,0.007974758,0.00026071066,0.00062904845,0.00002507934,0.000004597087,0.000022867856,0.0024173865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980546,0.0005104416,0.00029642257,0.00019410552,0.00031349124,0.00063094345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998824,0.00019328408,0.0002165868,0.00012549017,0.00018746633,0.00045319705],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010379541,0.00016762478,0.00015551466,0.000050607003,0.008561342,0.0003742562,0.0003728808,0.0002470836,0.0012381396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009151698,0.00017668454,0.00019083948,0.0002420426,0.0007900443,0.0009132223,0.00007213699,0.00050367316,0.00016626134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000677126,0.00018263608,0.004327737,0.000014319427,0.00004567018,0.0000136711,0.010391495,0.008424463,0.0011371663,0.9551322,0.0005437896,0.019780075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006330188,0.000106264124,0.045877956,0.00015270247,0.0002384384,0.00035661086,0.028232723,0.06083115,0.00046865913,0.44680265,0.4158419,0.0004579118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07257317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06685355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56776553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015085407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011351081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086577566","doi":"10.7202/1018392ar","title":"Two Roads Diverged: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Rights in a North American Constitutional Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Indian country; Constitutional law; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0370546408088331,"score_gpt":0.32390931528107086,"score_spread":0.2868546744722378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086577566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94476366,0.00009378708,0.000010543202,0.0002278611,0.000108393004,0.00023647376,0.00005877101,0.000013291416,0.054487232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946505,0.000033595898,0.00026123,0.00009966027,0.00006994047,0.000014407519,0.000005263058,0.000001539923,0.000049306644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981497,0.00035148914,0.00041874932,0.00015846893,0.000552083,0.0003695346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987419,0.00017277563,0.0003809668,0.000067686546,0.00045461705,0.00018201995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029817168,0.00013436416,0.00055821065,0.00014289221,0.0036794825,0.000059717036,0.00024171459,0.00003093314,0.0003834038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004957996,0.000097443524,0.00020244093,0.0011925121,0.0025859529,0.00035168248,0.000048264184,0.0002674033,0.00004071693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479669,0.00036035816,0.563162,0.0000032246767,0.0025341404,0.000036311627,0.07780435,0.0014816336,0.000024958692,0.35217422,0.00018711011,0.00218689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010318175,0.00011621824,0.892375,0.000020571184,0.00040515995,0.000005891141,0.029117031,0.000114932234,0.000057072437,0.00047859756,0.075907715,0.00036999196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47390527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9131936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43928835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040530114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000287128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086905955","doi":"10.7202/1007819ar","title":"“I Will Not Give You a Penny More Than You Deserve”:*Ontario v. Fraser and the (Uncertain) Right to Collectively Bargain in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Good faith; Jurisprudence; Underpinning; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to health; Faith; Health services; Sociology; Health care; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022253009406999456,"score_gpt":0.26693569428016517,"score_spread":0.24468268487316572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086905955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72442526,0.00011974563,0.000041656298,0.02704831,0.00031235212,0.0006834699,0.00010720147,0.000011068007,0.24725094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959905,0.000020392245,0.00020868915,0.0016004181,0.00020987734,0.000037117978,0.0000011233866,0.000009906503,0.0019219805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984945,0.0002092541,0.00022971653,0.00015270208,0.00040570082,0.0005081216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990782,0.00018272897,0.000101572325,0.00013026196,0.00010304396,0.00040419406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060262,0.00012046975,0.00018416335,0.000035825422,0.003867466,0.000106319385,0.00032810424,0.00005237119,0.00038898666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010364977,0.00008170675,0.00005366236,0.00029571704,0.00018082286,0.00046947857,0.000087813874,0.00039035664,0.0000081149965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021437329,0.000104732,0.0646624,0.0000047608123,0.00007931457,0.00003508487,0.025180148,0.00020073065,0.000034076613,0.90625316,0.0025011331,0.0007300634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076589937,0.000014549702,0.036052953,0.000015946203,0.000017715145,0.000012727904,0.006066574,0.00002576515,0.00006773154,0.0013171694,0.955485,0.00015796698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95298386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016244259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053490035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087067271","doi":"10.7202/038653ar","title":"La place des cultures juridiques et des langues autochtones dans les accords d’autonomie gouvernementale au Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021719227926288578,"score_gpt":0.2713344849880063,"score_spread":0.2496152570617177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087067271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1316341,0.006343947,0.000021249802,0.0063099335,0.0014557465,0.00011071923,0.00037381193,0.000054066957,0.8536964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581204,0.0045913244,0.00062838546,0.0010047625,0.0009402426,0.0000037285147,0.000008507444,0.000024729838,0.03467791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777675,0.0005143127,0.0003582899,0.00023300567,0.00046357093,0.00065404846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998902,0.0001072976,0.00022152279,0.00012601903,0.00013601876,0.00050711946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006668184,0.00023194142,0.00027495107,0.00011156915,0.01148977,0.0006038673,0.0004391037,0.00019644457,0.00087871635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008905239,0.00026528604,0.00017488572,0.00020313502,0.0020828256,0.00083511317,0.00003910186,0.0005343492,0.000023238033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036624693,0.0002374291,0.0013435527,0.00009210931,0.00015446664,0.0006565493,0.035053805,0.0002225963,0.00016052247,0.7864268,0.08501083,0.090604715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023768983,0.000086501335,0.012741949,0.00021999174,0.00009039828,0.00019324193,0.010698154,0.000006423071,0.00011807811,0.0022693397,0.9730205,0.00031775548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88800967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010589744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002713034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087973343","doi":"10.7202/1026133ar","title":"Portrait of Development Risk as a Young Defence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Portrait; Curiosity; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Subject (documents); Sketch; Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020679430430671067,"score_gpt":0.20089128139458112,"score_spread":0.18021185096391007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087973343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20256361,0.00042161412,0.0023586173,0.00007228586,0.0013702167,0.00011275036,0.000079061196,0.000020982816,0.7930009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786323,0.00017900617,0.0013678651,0.00013343735,0.00027646718,0.0000047863045,0.0000024661492,0.000024032008,0.00014870848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810594,0.00003127104,0.0012297159,0.00025718755,0.00005441123,0.0003214924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983099,0.00004025958,0.0012047599,0.00021411716,0.000056042754,0.00017492869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016693551,0.00012715305,0.0005045433,0.00011437827,0.00088726904,0.00005822928,0.00028820682,0.000098266755,0.00038600684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012097628,0.00016203335,0.00016340191,0.0000800965,0.00010404303,0.00023368423,0.000047097572,0.00021304571,0.0006364739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012877855,0.00004847039,0.041344326,0.000013892376,0.00008005199,0.0000036455529,0.00019297762,0.00006192863,0.0000050672816,0.9556046,0.0001101462,0.0025220194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096239353,0.000157343,0.020538725,0.00005785776,0.000013335488,0.00020565953,0.000098738754,0.00030026105,0.00066979555,0.1717173,0.8048477,0.0004308466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028391096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028001564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80473757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013653772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014417008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81807965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089023921","doi":"10.7202/1026132ar","title":"Risks and Uncertainties of Scientific Innovations in French Liability Law: Between Radical Departure and Continuity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Legal liability; Ambivalence; Phenomenon; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04999638034201236,"score_gpt":0.31920472577482045,"score_spread":0.2692083454328081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089023921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87740743,0.00006107617,0.000017497969,0.0025543633,0.00020904504,0.00009841832,0.000037462298,0.000011565006,0.11960311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938154,0.000011539764,0.00018660155,0.00008733385,0.00027255164,0.0000013859469,0.0000019738166,0.0000034009781,0.00005368702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998672,0.00034592763,0.0002941579,0.00015579621,0.00032385238,0.00020827864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924386,0.00022266092,0.00012521009,0.00007726617,0.00019470064,0.00013629065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024482894,0.00007406572,0.00022056437,0.00005661772,0.0029271215,0.00014463457,0.0001310276,0.00012099209,0.000018455034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040568592,0.000063225205,0.00003722937,0.00028827516,0.0021926484,0.00028720498,0.000051094612,0.0003462523,8.001538e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035360733,0.000029629635,0.089572415,0.000008781551,0.000008209123,8.221353e-7,0.0018116483,9.575441e-7,0.000017253562,0.90562373,0.000038740065,0.0028842618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054592756,0.00006374437,0.13139625,0.000038353133,0.000022198668,0.0000021812314,0.0004786108,0.000012482921,0.00009658064,0.4318773,0.43531653,0.00014985056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01892536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083062224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47374645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049246526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002516561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089038730","doi":"10.7202/1018394ar","title":"The Culture of Rights Protection in Canadian Refugee Law: Examining the Domestic Violence Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Harvard University","keywords":"Domestic violence; Refugee; Persecution; Refugee law; Law; Criminology; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health; Politics","score_opus":0.034162258210077075,"score_gpt":0.29174062494073694,"score_spread":0.25757836673065987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089038730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63149124,0.0012189088,0.0000053062818,0.0025701653,0.0010702242,0.0008210496,0.000012400486,0.000025259631,0.36278543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935913,0.0001487542,0.000012289815,0.00014679735,0.00018034654,0.000019514706,2.0337494e-7,0.000004054814,0.00012887947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.00033141777,0.0002015959,0.00009595008,0.0002827352,0.00037507017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.000106400985,0.000118289936,0.00011636203,0.00014972119,0.00017718511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009048142,0.00007627837,0.00008924941,0.000029935958,0.006433501,0.0001448051,0.00032260752,0.0000753836,0.000073525225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013934105,0.000040072693,0.000039057642,0.00016169013,0.00031358883,0.00020315686,0.000015670312,0.0003522147,0.00001601436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014271046,0.00004269323,0.0009194845,0.0000101759615,0.0000372716,0.000097410964,0.026907291,0.00004427571,0.0001270621,0.95409137,0.00023724002,0.017471436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027203013,0.00011258556,0.005388304,0.00014582674,0.000016193868,0.00021737658,0.01896239,0.000039845272,0.00020171933,0.05096298,0.92351925,0.00016150475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93500763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99113333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015542441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005831419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089297882","doi":"10.7202/1018984ar","title":"Clearing the Air? Information Disclosure, Systems of Power, and the National Pollution Release Inventory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Corporate governance; Clearing; Pollution; Business; Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.017023237672447247,"score_gpt":0.209207272900385,"score_spread":0.19218403522793776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089297882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21900797,0.0009203306,0.0006353072,0.023400988,0.0017748798,0.0010336433,0.000008278629,0.00008058899,0.753138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998447,0.00001999174,0.0000071713707,0.0012265679,0.00023216943,0.000009723923,0.0000012344528,0.0000036326032,0.000052531843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928,0.000021664608,0.00026409148,0.000040809304,0.00030457653,0.000088893095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992703,0.000021417476,0.0003186597,0.000054536064,0.0003277508,0.000007286426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049405807,0.00006359311,0.000087887,0.000052076946,0.0014571688,0.00020781899,0.000103452214,0.000018371196,0.000025199151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006559904,0.00003281303,0.000047693065,0.00010677665,0.00014163378,0.001601542,0.000067104,0.000102184866,0.00004331571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025577183,0.000007780342,0.001128536,0.000029508461,0.00003177765,8.551782e-8,0.000048590486,0.0010474048,0.000005644103,0.99388945,0.0025658873,0.0012197866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021948712,0.000012757076,0.25041646,0.00015229279,0.000050482566,0.00004120431,0.0028764573,0.027346302,0.000007644368,0.027673582,0.68904054,0.00018742189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007159822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006605579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96621585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021125694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023151376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091857827","doi":"10.7202/1000618ar","title":"Was Duplessis Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Politics; Appeal; State (computer science); Pluralism (philosophy); Surprise; Sociology; Persecution; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06726963279502593,"score_gpt":0.3042984447804934,"score_spread":0.23702881198546746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091857827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025374567,0.00024226157,0.000010547392,0.0017023307,0.00087356026,0.00009363767,0.0000075437147,0.000073773954,0.97162175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961668,0.00028579877,0.0014972993,0.00024050643,0.0004858255,0.0000041624926,3.1487298e-7,0.000009031733,0.0013102582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998582,0.00020291985,0.00022875867,0.00013209076,0.00043134825,0.00042290252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929106,0.00006224376,0.00013587871,0.00007944021,0.00018971828,0.00024166076],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006103424,0.00011270642,0.00018563704,0.000020271418,0.010227687,0.00007170308,0.00030336945,0.00008764179,0.0029519976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014576,0.00007774424,0.00015084009,0.00012147347,0.0003958428,0.00038611365,0.000057070305,0.00027585626,0.00027501507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002417083,0.00012877048,0.0024206857,0.000005598671,0.00015929602,0.00012928569,0.02275528,0.0000012010717,0.00004993755,0.9605916,0.004384314,0.009349843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020175599,0.000027270435,0.005231021,0.000018016115,0.00002934517,0.000015118004,0.004899778,0.000001071387,0.00038325827,0.0030812616,0.98595107,0.00016103659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01910819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050201412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019957928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007617253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092315164","doi":"10.7202/038659ar","title":"Rethinking Risk: The Relevance of Condoms and Viral Load in HIV Nondisclosure Prosecutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Condom; Harm; Plaintiff; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Culpability; Psychology; Sexual assault; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Family medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.01742867683697686,"score_gpt":0.28807912514836825,"score_spread":0.2706504483113914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092315164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95273453,0.0007020329,0.00022098843,0.0024158016,0.00016647039,0.00010914309,0.0000141113005,0.00001336275,0.043623567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843353,0.001018225,0.00023270624,0.0001038184,0.0001049625,0.0000013696741,3.1219741e-7,0.0000025094885,0.0001025452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00021281152,0.000232066,0.00009497935,0.00030152124,0.00017435935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994068,0.00014115477,0.00017808563,0.00008776657,0.00013281274,0.000053355532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011299499,0.000059652408,0.0001251328,0.00004682395,0.0030946801,0.000057101788,0.00013890004,0.000049690832,0.000034413282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028944048,0.000042250187,0.00006443468,0.0002827902,0.00024152301,0.00019693286,0.0000134811535,0.00039224335,0.0000026371013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018823991,0.00034506514,0.00871379,0.000018985626,0.00010457797,0.0000750456,0.083120435,0.0011575758,0.0007580476,0.736529,0.00040950507,0.16857973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025619175,0.0007489471,0.022670884,0.000572817,0.001382015,0.00029496703,0.487237,0.0014214017,0.00092283124,0.13175228,0.34966108,0.0007738435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008737404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17776775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60477674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008949681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026387681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092317233","doi":"10.7202/1005136ar","title":"An Exemption for Sincere Believers: The Challenge of Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sincerity; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Balancing test; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07338476443723861,"score_gpt":0.3212583960577365,"score_spread":0.24787363162049786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092317233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5655149,0.00086820615,0.0000860685,0.018025776,0.0017145373,0.0016472044,0.00014790696,0.00005287479,0.41194248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.00022549475,0.0006438259,0.00006395061,0.00023263694,0.000010877407,0.0000014445964,0.000008313849,0.00016341862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883413,0.00020581168,0.00029662016,0.000118799355,0.00029553976,0.00024909145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.00013964878,0.0003468483,0.000116139636,0.000278994,0.00008930263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007646239,0.00009812246,0.0002123276,0.000014725545,0.0026341483,0.000019731706,0.00034559323,0.0000981628,0.00021745288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106037965,0.00006233103,0.00012822161,0.00006926282,0.00048583403,0.0003486417,0.000033190794,0.00013364409,0.0000028363027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004948329,0.0006569241,0.0031627892,0.000095669624,0.00042018914,0.0000038912203,0.24661572,0.000012583728,0.0016336301,0.7230085,0.0012609952,0.022634245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020582562,0.0017771595,0.021475548,0.00023825301,0.00025526376,0.000009952081,0.05686655,0.000039855084,0.0045276284,0.013894766,0.8983363,0.00052045746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04800645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2295133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009580901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011007292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092943277","doi":"10.7202/038179ar","title":"Propositions de réforme pour une protection des titulaires de cartes de débit victimes de transferts de fonds non autorisés","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02652757727059565,"score_gpt":0.2996781091103998,"score_spread":0.2731505318398042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092943277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45010445,0.0014927017,0.041178674,0.037375275,0.0008432319,0.0005561988,0.000103139806,0.0001918894,0.46815443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881549,0.00096469047,0.004444593,0.0011670142,0.0014168532,0.000012265353,0.0000027990952,0.000032632826,0.0038042383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740195,0.0006078629,0.00040267353,0.00021019243,0.0003980045,0.0009793241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886924,0.00007877138,0.00015086742,0.00010072833,0.0002728627,0.0005275157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014416403,0.00023942553,0.00021748783,0.000090790134,0.004441556,0.0003111528,0.00033643388,0.00022316772,0.00034044433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013107575,0.00023953326,0.00027192946,0.0002608969,0.00030695062,0.0009037358,0.000012619228,0.0007257254,0.000047016732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016028486,0.00068941904,0.0013004503,0.000057034555,0.00017685659,0.0003871516,0.0060308063,0.0018026289,0.024498032,0.91666186,0.0005124173,0.047723077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019113813,0.0018295445,0.07074614,0.001548876,0.00046272334,0.0040734657,0.0015950974,0.011229427,0.049068544,0.1491295,0.7074426,0.00096272177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012877487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012922233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76753235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024532063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047255162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093515167","doi":"10.7202/1017520ar","title":"The Challenge of the Bad Man","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Criminal law; Discretion; Order (exchange); Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01997373043437266,"score_gpt":0.266053838732667,"score_spread":0.24608010829829435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093515167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037497673,0.00055865245,7.3225067e-7,0.048393503,0.0007011645,0.000115862735,0.0000028459606,0.000010675623,0.9464668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446577,0.0012640654,0.000033433535,0.0004873921,0.0003593501,0.0000040879813,5.545524e-8,0.000004158119,0.003381686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990418,0.000186937,0.00013778213,0.000054001215,0.00037155306,0.00020794275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994803,0.00006670519,0.00011764901,0.00012955038,0.00013740052,0.000068380636],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005988551,0.000049338156,0.000063532025,9.1811876e-7,0.009399,0.000079738515,0.00050662644,0.000072490526,0.0005883631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048835114,0.000021530537,0.00014878954,0.00008096265,0.0004972596,0.0001525624,0.000044218665,0.00028277547,0.000041963707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010022112,0.000017922215,0.000057443347,0.0000013573335,0.000020107675,4.2802625e-7,0.0032817144,0.0000014133474,0.00001924408,0.98186207,0.010207252,0.004530044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007100818,0.000009934191,0.0003909853,0.000011537944,0.0000062771146,0.0000033435433,0.00534952,0.0000012302135,0.000074388234,0.0349422,0.959103,0.00003659327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010735496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011300744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037805657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000093583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.06941978909998069,"score_gpt":0.31631197118256693,"score_spread":0.24689218208258623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097724759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07493787,0.0000805039,0.00016848785,0.0044246316,0.0004438673,0.00009043185,0.000015376547,0.000013777293,0.9198251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982049,0.000013659109,0.00014904766,0.00031065414,0.0004730326,0.0000022319564,1.1392055e-7,0.000003866959,0.00084251293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.00017938323,0.00013830613,0.00004393691,0.0002561131,0.00022855347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.00005255925,0.00010480885,0.00009437584,0.000059672275,0.00012051726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010358492,0.000044178913,0.00006889989,0.000008065828,0.0036642544,0.000048693335,0.0002760774,0.00003790708,0.00031529338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006167503,0.000027569095,0.000107288906,0.000090116584,0.00022042416,0.00026336964,0.000057548346,0.00020423262,0.000013336921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035474698,0.00003765034,0.0016158588,9.4989645e-7,0.000007887315,2.1812353e-7,0.0007808519,0.0000011509379,0.000038649534,0.996101,0.00014144478,0.001270756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008433366,0.000005478788,0.0059030927,0.000005839406,0.000008549359,0.000014546447,0.0010155544,7.3673715e-7,0.00051150756,0.011460994,0.9809439,0.000045451598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021060708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030405154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98464006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055864683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019045758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99763286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102433557","doi":"10.7202/1000619ar","title":"Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Charter; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06625086608774737,"score_gpt":0.33006917552828835,"score_spread":0.26381830944054097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102433557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036710676,0.00019200977,0.000020958794,0.00038513352,0.00032363008,0.000084075815,0.0000363569,0.0000123643185,0.9622348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986942,0.000017157095,0.0009386717,0.00012209706,0.0001342419,0.0000018939749,9.891129e-7,0.000003546711,0.00008722148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873614,0.000118798205,0.00028550392,0.00012742984,0.00031440382,0.00041774422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992422,0.000026729345,0.00011273421,0.000079404716,0.00015437792,0.00038458375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006975956,0.00009067419,0.00016384842,0.000076750286,0.0045950566,0.000039105726,0.00029435486,0.000108585366,0.00075540616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031143827,0.00007790772,0.00008388604,0.000151334,0.0011486224,0.0003850947,0.000018460569,0.0002766113,0.000011804666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060118737,0.000025070194,0.0011535351,0.000004654321,0.00000907343,0.00009307851,0.0016137572,0.000004436788,0.000067471745,0.99675906,0.00017765156,0.00008620783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559558,0.000044139342,0.0005109028,0.00017547542,0.000020210415,0.000050624025,0.000911157,0.0000017088312,0.0007813052,0.035283484,0.96189433,0.00014107711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95210534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035530835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008664377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105286613","doi":"10.7202/1000629ar","title":"Witnessing Arbitrariness: Roncarelli v. Duplessis Fifty Years On","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Principle of legality; Normative; Politics; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08032181496622609,"score_gpt":0.2892118379418761,"score_spread":0.20889002297565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105286613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039600052,0.00019592018,0.000040690637,0.0004614161,0.0008272536,0.000048604838,0.0000070298265,0.00004181873,0.9587772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985338,0.00018134729,0.0002548164,0.0004090731,0.00050203735,0.0000026863934,3.9012505e-7,0.0000061950354,0.00010964382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896103,0.00008472183,0.00016928808,0.00012262276,0.00038107566,0.00028125817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00003976215,0.000092231545,0.00006241616,0.00010035127,0.00013363292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003557565,0.00008749891,0.00013429801,0.000037340014,0.0053546806,0.000050958562,0.00018703002,0.000059696154,0.00045759353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055526103,0.00007511545,0.00009157116,0.00014121116,0.00052527216,0.00020848043,0.000033864646,0.0002327653,0.000107878055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022093565,0.000059161077,0.001531193,9.448908e-7,0.00003103999,0.00007272751,0.0011909866,0.0000042271595,0.000004038198,0.985078,0.0001497349,0.011855897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034952257,0.00007726187,0.031306528,0.000118394724,0.000042237123,0.00002843542,0.003584016,0.0000021612382,0.0001449797,0.07957382,0.8844906,0.00028204586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015635373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019524317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009789843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032000564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105618512","doi":"10.7202/038177ar","title":"The Constitution’s Peoples: Approaching Community in the Context of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Law; Declaration; Context (archaeology); Cornerstone; Political science; Doctrine; Section (typography); Negotiation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04724023654900858,"score_gpt":0.3060059065138428,"score_spread":0.2587656699648342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105618512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5883057,0.00053325883,0.000056095254,0.010682181,0.0010568404,0.00068078615,0.000031989515,0.000022545597,0.39863056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.00027891604,0.000030294863,0.00021875651,0.00012357834,0.0000039502015,7.547991e-7,0.0000013584715,0.000021134018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970859,0.0017841681,0.0003706437,0.000064270345,0.00047972126,0.0002152596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854946,0.0007000709,0.00037277775,0.00015668594,0.00018617712,0.00003482306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031152582,0.00009552396,0.00017384026,0.000016725517,0.015261163,0.00007303442,0.0005329515,0.00007438145,0.000007150851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008702064,0.000043515793,0.00013876248,0.0002396368,0.001954771,0.00025625856,0.000045813656,0.0008128747,9.4004497e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028742214,0.00012435814,0.0021888302,0.000007626333,0.00003483997,7.9139926e-7,0.04372867,0.00016299341,0.00020772408,0.9498731,0.00018429094,0.0034580529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013133391,0.00015828066,0.059544828,0.00033719616,0.000101797246,0.000089252426,0.5729109,0.000056131375,0.0009501385,0.0044270973,0.3598538,0.00025723292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0454494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27035582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026479992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053452055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98602086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110027607","doi":"10.7202/039839ar","title":"Penalty Clauses through the Lens of Unconscionability Doctrine: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.030636016975081126,"score_gpt":0.32612853735531183,"score_spread":0.2954925203802307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110027607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55516124,0.00045266747,0.0017276817,0.008208962,0.0036323369,0.0007285962,0.00016083619,0.00009765567,0.42983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834466,0.000062354244,0.0010831199,0.000070744805,0.0003272985,0.0000031573695,0.0000016250011,0.000010514529,0.000096506796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975018,0.0006381384,0.0005448852,0.00016775088,0.00084032904,0.00030708383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977584,0.00042189047,0.0007276451,0.0003255014,0.0006700949,0.00009647474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024022777,0.00011842028,0.00024394873,0.000039607083,0.0020749324,0.000038217884,0.00056886696,0.00015599196,0.00046611388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010983432,0.000079609454,0.00014719153,0.00041428616,0.0019243342,0.00052362453,0.00008564144,0.0007045065,0.0000136087965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050422845,0.00022801974,0.011608259,0.000023749808,0.000043781707,0.0000036289878,0.0132543305,0.000115262505,0.0007189285,0.9704609,0.0004068093,0.003085918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036012934,0.00012634699,0.004536327,0.000028991977,0.00003910152,0.000010520225,0.0023635726,0.000008550235,0.0033423738,0.019246891,0.9698035,0.00013369683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023307959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07331567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010622792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009816032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111170202","doi":"10.7202/039650ar","title":"Health Care and Human Rights after Auton and Chaoulli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Charter; Law; Legislation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislature; Health care; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.016849430216867467,"score_gpt":0.32019714360296353,"score_spread":0.30334771338609606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111170202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92177844,0.0012062353,6.734985e-7,0.006501184,0.00055309373,0.0001734645,0.000017907334,0.000043610788,0.06972538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986673,0.00009960996,0.00038095666,0.00023146368,0.00044737814,0.0000041743365,6.321819e-7,0.000005546346,0.00016295283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990453,0.00010007676,0.00015651959,0.00014086242,0.00025114242,0.00030607937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.00002867504,0.000088318564,0.00005199201,0.000097663135,0.0002788238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032203193,0.000099794815,0.00016627026,0.000016782864,0.012788369,0.00013304755,0.00008097069,0.00007946703,0.00010323992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017098137,0.00006936415,0.00003841764,0.00004054435,0.00045536246,0.00022121787,0.00005079253,0.0003935644,0.000005831872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031976466,0.00007594252,0.019068033,0.000072471616,0.00010671222,0.00007214762,0.09619809,4.1001002e-7,0.00025585125,0.86018634,0.0014412283,0.022490801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002461134,0.00006544205,0.035726707,0.000021205595,0.000008909811,0.00001898867,0.0021386137,3.7858098e-7,0.000029130073,0.0008145556,0.96081173,0.00011820609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035074983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5597618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009451936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057981774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98849684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113544308","doi":"10.7202/1005850ar","title":"International Law Issues Raised by the Transfer of Detainees by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Law; Afghan; Political science; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Geneva Conventions; International law; International human rights law","score_opus":0.024552230731480298,"score_gpt":0.2717437367127651,"score_spread":0.24719150598128478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113544308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036405474,0.00007993325,0.000015055489,0.0018565614,0.00037273677,0.00008796151,0.0001589752,0.000007522972,0.96101576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995333,0.00003826521,0.000048629074,0.00039508622,0.0001389823,0.000003444208,0.000009613439,0.000007699074,0.00402525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988843,0.00010946546,0.00026475382,0.000095478026,0.00039760838,0.000248403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995568,0.000041381143,0.000054208947,0.000059799608,0.00015177795,0.00013607621],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000525384,0.00008384836,0.000110265144,0.000054204083,0.0015873914,0.00006799162,0.00052801386,0.000061148465,0.004182867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012043334,0.000058932776,0.0000746304,0.000039251587,0.00035385022,0.00028707905,0.00000818405,0.00017412635,0.000008733944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019181709,0.000031971966,0.00008228895,9.900922e-7,0.000028912405,0.000008798463,0.0024599987,6.2964705e-7,0.00008066867,0.9960284,0.0011857955,0.000072348346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002820339,0.00003197074,0.00008438297,0.00001792208,0.0000059139784,0.0000062241415,0.0005119355,0.000004296506,0.002768888,0.050212394,0.9459875,0.00008650348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53758353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9530891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015573968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030218085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115453667","doi":"10.7202/038892ar","title":"Regulating Greenhouse Gases in Canada: Constitutional and Policy Dimensions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Ratification; Kyoto Protocol; Negotiation; Carbon tax; Constitution; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; Economic policy; Politics; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.01764415870632885,"score_gpt":0.267927565561959,"score_spread":0.25028340685563016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115453667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7866667,0.00009696365,0.000004260023,0.031731647,0.0005999085,0.000105496045,0.00039456785,0.00001369421,0.18038675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972764,0.000039177357,0.00015374194,0.0019357725,0.0004090456,8.692746e-7,3.359071e-7,0.00000327136,0.00018133168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992079,0.00004864349,0.0001469021,0.000083121835,0.00022650536,0.00028692413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.000107413485,0.000075605814,0.0000557857,0.00004098398,0.000297737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025536382,0.000055863096,0.00008391563,0.00004728947,0.0025244267,0.00003493209,0.00008658776,0.0000380352,0.00007534619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000426101,0.000055497352,0.0000188433,0.00013647719,0.0005282288,0.00016225144,0.000018397055,0.00029959084,0.000001699118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025151066,0.000004328976,0.003648756,7.8345937e-7,0.000002712011,0.0000474765,0.00011344513,0.000018420067,0.00004920926,0.99332374,0.001447459,0.0013411669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024334977,0.0000048545226,0.024217542,0.0000250269,0.0000028931474,0.00020615017,0.00017826908,0.000020053973,0.000054384163,0.005097045,0.9698517,0.00009875058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99873453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040278552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012360094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120059961","doi":"10.7202/038894ar","title":"Le droit à l’information des patients gardés en établissement : un instrument essentiel de promotion des valeurs démocratiques et du statut citoyen","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01870712304776276,"score_gpt":0.3177219189012796,"score_spread":0.2990147958535168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120059961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310973,0.000119184704,0.0027036453,0.010962001,0.004140281,0.0010885274,0.00023322378,0.00007109161,0.04958471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98160034,0.003795621,0.00950875,0.003703329,0.0007904098,0.000054633405,0.00014923257,0.000045020337,0.0003526804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943205,0.0021273773,0.0013961082,0.00023139491,0.00074937276,0.0011752596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967093,0.00034391775,0.00076495635,0.0002818398,0.0010038768,0.00089610665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060873297,0.0003225558,0.0004057768,0.00012636482,0.007994427,0.0001391817,0.0002935737,0.0008343599,0.0007915172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095580873,0.00030594922,0.00016973916,0.00022753725,0.00033632218,0.0027575013,0.00013518453,0.0041904845,0.000077283294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015102806,0.0034356434,0.12440085,0.0039211195,0.0003979035,0.00006088033,0.12863052,0.00006794587,0.0002428752,0.3298293,0.019342115,0.3895198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050533046,0.0012972964,0.15806472,0.0020421918,0.00016712595,0.00017785272,0.020812621,0.0005542123,0.0010083086,0.014631965,0.7956585,0.00053188344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008778524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01839535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7763164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010038648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009808159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125505034","doi":"10.7202/1022310ar","title":"Freedom of the Press as a Discrete Constitutional Guarantee","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Meaning (existential); Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Freedom of information; Supreme court; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Originalism; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.019057966154315636,"score_gpt":0.26755384469360893,"score_spread":0.2484958785392933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125505034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022923835,0.00013571174,0.006852625,0.001824859,0.002179709,0.00014656696,0.00005044868,0.000023006172,0.9864947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976358,0.000066249384,0.0001884292,0.00018176872,0.0007660493,0.000001855449,4.9569513e-7,0.0000046219834,0.0011547334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848914,0.0002858459,0.00025026329,0.0001075641,0.00061039446,0.0002568059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992763,0.000118075994,0.00018840848,0.00016043641,0.0001590129,0.00009778252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082727073,0.00008285472,0.00015100173,0.00001612383,0.004134768,0.0000642321,0.00050523324,0.00007722903,0.00029194745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017264248,0.00004851242,0.00016796545,0.00008004937,0.020298708,0.0002309226,0.000050279676,0.00021829679,0.000022251326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012503808,0.000024296802,0.00012801687,0.000002314821,0.000023108174,0.0000024886108,0.00036332445,0.00007109127,0.000032421834,0.99837935,0.000607747,0.00035334536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042640028,0.000033224784,0.000050960527,0.000038311588,0.00002500002,0.000046216188,0.00017070548,0.000049615595,0.00030948027,0.08561406,0.9131499,0.000086109234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001743327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044919658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046383804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004296264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128082881","doi":"10.7202/1000623ar","title":"Roncarelli’s Green Card: The Role of Citizenship in Randian Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Citizenship; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Dissenting opinion; Constitution; Political science; Originalism; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05244010886603593,"score_gpt":0.2818793899479775,"score_spread":0.2294392810819416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128082881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07308534,0.0010567285,0.00000238533,0.0016880811,0.0003540044,0.00020434942,0.000032681688,0.000017398519,0.923559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926543,0.00017998269,0.00012256847,0.0001140612,0.00019233396,0.0000052227597,5.5692317e-7,0.000004195947,0.00011566658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986559,0.00031295037,0.00026035638,0.000093159484,0.00039904276,0.00027858585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.0001203913,0.00013611431,0.000071410854,0.00016711024,0.00010034099],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088594446,0.00008737942,0.00017786543,0.000024334982,0.0029843475,0.000021879972,0.00028525313,0.000075146425,0.0002431726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320587,0.00005459236,0.00011709051,0.00013041375,0.0009703059,0.00011643434,0.00004161141,0.00027532896,0.000018612433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028081055,0.00002293704,0.01326591,0.0000029613007,0.00006439769,0.00001856828,0.021648047,0.000005271329,0.000026075744,0.96248806,0.00010136771,0.0023283334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001529165,0.00008509209,0.049532373,0.00011483648,0.000079352,0.000049563565,0.056826055,0.0000065042314,0.0009065059,0.079657316,0.8108472,0.0003659891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105060205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1283307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92618006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016282151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021674165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129730712","doi":"10.7202/1029207ar","title":"Less Evidence, Better Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Contextualism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Jury; Admissible evidence; Attribution; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2688049660234274,"score_gpt":0.4251731878246394,"score_spread":0.15636822180121202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129730712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023279479,0.0016693745,0.00027312836,0.004513634,0.002239405,0.000086203465,0.0000035923717,0.00008972688,0.96784544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947805,0.00010473787,0.0013638869,0.00059501926,0.001073119,0.0000024230221,1.4730313e-7,0.000014209376,0.0020659857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816614,0.0003187506,0.00026521523,0.00016178635,0.0007233984,0.0003646966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983857,0.00028770193,0.00013418087,0.00014329658,0.00062892766,0.0004201631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002521725,0.00009991764,0.00015523011,0.00008075704,0.0028896327,0.00025796174,0.00056125235,0.00009221621,0.00023363292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010441273,0.00008299726,0.00007523504,0.0003274231,0.00023058838,0.0008209742,0.00008134355,0.00031186317,0.000568599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066221386,0.00015525108,0.0019053622,0.000014759484,0.000038811475,0.00016243735,0.005585235,0.000029486695,0.0000171309,0.44751742,0.07840169,0.46610618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018259563,0.000035162568,0.00018571343,0.000104042614,0.000011630038,0.000046001373,0.0022256428,0.000003255018,0.00007323601,0.013731608,0.9832767,0.00012436272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034821942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011287553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018839414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100995574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140368457","doi":"10.7202/1017515ar","title":"Occupy, indignados, et le Printemps Érable : vers un agenda de recherche","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20452505044455238,"score_gpt":0.3844319061563458,"score_spread":0.17990685571179343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140368457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040207036,0.0030673507,0.0002865667,0.10720003,0.003298423,0.0002974881,0.000042763753,0.000051613762,0.84554875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627477,0.003605324,0.0051215705,0.004252175,0.0007181543,0.000011750459,8.7470255e-7,0.000026075877,0.023516353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955773,0.0018853025,0.00040248985,0.00030819143,0.000743488,0.0010832803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813175,0.0003785186,0.0004148389,0.0001689914,0.00020748276,0.00069842045],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053849434,0.00021905827,0.00027105561,0.000031401938,0.005347586,0.00044074457,0.00080424745,0.00046034763,0.0048978967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006611699,0.0002091365,0.00023724772,0.00069294975,0.00078867516,0.0015034998,0.000104014296,0.0013773228,0.0006141221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009588919,0.00018916848,0.0009153598,0.0000126916875,0.0000672414,0.000053954762,0.00665386,0.00006584855,0.00013351114,0.84711933,0.025693858,0.11908559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038724302,0.00007904227,0.0021610486,0.00009412699,0.000021207277,0.00005385242,0.009415047,0.00004862229,0.0003887808,0.044646166,0.9424302,0.00027466362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3712513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120393775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92254066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012849879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062129524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147255877","doi":"10.7202/1029210ar","title":"La réforme proposée du régime québécois de l’adoption et le rejet des parentés plurielles","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère des Transports","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033798242716662354,"score_gpt":0.2576203607506376,"score_spread":0.22382211803397525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147255877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04942891,0.011570851,0.00023668556,0.040632013,0.0030438947,0.0001850398,0.00013503015,0.0000681603,0.8946994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812008,0.005830505,0.0009215328,0.0006774353,0.001031618,0.0000054895822,0.0000052843016,0.000031816573,0.010295477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977187,0.00073056,0.0003291251,0.00018024864,0.00047686748,0.0005644853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984931,0.00006794152,0.00021682367,0.000121059435,0.0002527678,0.00084835873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022853757,0.00015055215,0.00020195926,0.00017405272,0.00607764,0.00059584,0.0002951058,0.0002589906,0.0004653237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019970498,0.00018303994,0.00017624791,0.00025538,0.0018763966,0.0011309824,0.00004497055,0.00058746483,0.00024484628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003801185,0.00020912707,0.00038306284,0.00003534271,0.00005630484,0.0002621497,0.019430503,0.00017316105,0.000010538707,0.93165606,0.025734529,0.022011233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050207507,0.00010758605,0.00052198203,0.00013551762,0.00005806237,0.00057367526,0.010583834,0.000036652764,0.00001253882,0.014623893,0.9726213,0.00022284851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9102451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002971118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013887362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147906309","doi":"10.7202/1019049ar","title":"Le fiduciaire, véritable pivot ou simple rouage de l’opération de fiducie ?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026763090328592566,"score_gpt":0.2897585710114977,"score_spread":0.2629954806829051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147906309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027237797,0.0014942028,0.0038601262,0.05811527,0.0007471925,0.00041824792,0.000097102864,0.000074356896,0.9079557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97291476,0.00044220308,0.0032356316,0.0015082664,0.0014226502,0.000040383875,0.000007651735,0.000029403715,0.020399066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976823,0.00030628158,0.0004385856,0.0002545679,0.00037221398,0.000946073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862397,0.00011384387,0.00024377258,0.00023923608,0.00024251456,0.0005366918],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011595916,0.00018270082,0.00020837272,0.000038443635,0.008286375,0.00051532546,0.00046583774,0.00021533639,0.0021247035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103876206,0.0001934938,0.00018516468,0.00034166643,0.00030447045,0.0013436507,0.00008557396,0.0005805663,0.00075844914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026324878,0.000202128,0.00015601901,0.000013670874,0.000027299322,0.000009206569,0.00063650595,0.00045553173,0.00040727016,0.9724374,0.011568776,0.014083562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002943796,0.000051160467,0.0006735221,0.00003313991,0.000034737088,0.00008389368,0.0011953,0.0012545871,0.00078268285,0.059366517,0.9360021,0.00022801256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09673927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049150422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046841873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023794355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157076830","doi":"10.7202/1000622ar","title":"Democratizing Common Law Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial review; Common law; Public law; Democracy; Administrative law; Sources of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09037132734554755,"score_gpt":0.3211790912281851,"score_spread":0.23080776388263757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157076830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028366765,0.00004125567,0.00020053273,0.0013727946,0.00023336556,0.00006905789,0.00001723151,0.000039535043,0.99518955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672794,0.000030717176,0.0018443054,0.0009063011,0.00026292456,0.000004207986,0.0000011644485,0.000004922753,0.00021753025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992026,0.00008566383,0.00018307516,0.00008620313,0.00022613305,0.00021628648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.000037776535,0.000088277186,0.00009003661,0.00009110762,0.0001777349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046470252,0.000059463495,0.00008436491,0.000014876048,0.008293311,0.00007370655,0.00022310826,0.000053728545,0.00064578216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013343354,0.000053024083,0.000063833206,0.000080292346,0.00048504845,0.00030418095,0.000033269804,0.00021670676,0.00012842231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023169998,0.000029762186,0.00012682095,6.7794406e-7,0.000008318594,0.000011305878,0.00047612542,0.0000019572312,0.00002126555,0.99851483,0.00018433678,0.00062227313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108478234,0.000008461529,0.00014702733,0.000009434079,0.000009545558,0.00004197934,0.0004328575,0.000004393349,0.00023888619,0.092957266,0.90596586,0.00007581567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013174704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06097383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007489581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021121576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99339664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158082041","doi":"10.7202/1005847ar","title":"East Asia’s Engagement with Cosmopolitan Ideals Under its Trade Treaty Dispute Provisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Treaty; East Asia; International trade; Political science; General partnership; International trade law; Negotiation; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06731588194997792,"score_gpt":0.2442919552572623,"score_spread":0.17697607330728438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158082041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070928903,0.000021721544,0.00032145364,0.002684735,0.00034165016,0.00025672978,0.000016232638,0.00008177673,0.98918283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860363,0.000007598485,0.000529397,0.012125314,0.00058482535,0.000015855247,0.000019177314,0.00003229424,0.0006492221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862385,0.000029806668,0.00035901822,0.00021087042,0.0004517269,0.0003247424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993715,0.000013071564,0.000271288,0.000138252,0.00015024058,0.00005564646],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032829205,0.00021063883,0.00016940247,0.00013725707,0.0016883039,0.0002525515,0.0002548115,0.000044659115,0.001533173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015477737,0.00014920939,0.00010541098,0.00015147049,0.00007317303,0.001605673,0.000059855818,0.00027936403,0.00028586067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059508086,0.00023015875,0.00019052904,0.000014338077,0.00008833771,0.000040972383,0.00003398291,0.0000144221885,0.00007900442,0.9968944,0.0020888632,0.00026546814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002100248,0.0001539838,0.009458628,0.00014743494,0.00016742709,0.00014008876,0.00072675466,0.00092328334,0.0009979656,0.032870132,0.95178676,0.0005272679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002480079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009132483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000968593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009921213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165498009","doi":"10.7202/1000630ar","title":"Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Relevance (law); Political science; Due process; Notice; Exemplification; Common law; Sources of law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.14430199994377327,"score_gpt":0.3167429412609803,"score_spread":0.17244094131720702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165498009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005490228,0.00033161815,0.00004743406,0.00021123169,0.00038072496,0.00003813621,0.000012204196,0.000017280201,0.99347115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874526,0.00011772478,0.00066516263,0.00020624304,0.00021133212,0.0000010717994,2.9500495e-7,0.000003269666,0.000049611277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991657,0.00007214831,0.0001918322,0.00006983703,0.00029603575,0.00020442127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.00003329469,0.000103721344,0.00004441738,0.00015997772,0.00009282901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035421582,0.000058294194,0.00013262579,0.000017853094,0.0046816827,0.000014144096,0.00016932526,0.00003699303,0.00048760214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025313097,0.000049944647,0.00008435639,0.00006874408,0.00083731156,0.00015577376,0.000037985534,0.00012355154,0.000039731654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009419977,0.000032265223,0.0004843671,0.000001342549,0.00002602263,0.000008996264,0.0011542516,0.0000010820137,0.000018284987,0.9970076,0.000045019136,0.0012113244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018103186,0.000039511895,0.0013722696,0.00003687375,0.000022333898,0.000014321968,0.0020960886,7.0457776e-7,0.00053454493,0.2164103,0.7791871,0.000104950435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064127155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053380117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99342155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050764567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015400845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21665667","doi":"10.3732/ajb.89.4.664","title":"Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05830837734920551,"score_gpt":0.3040873362336409,"score_spread":0.2457789588844354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21665667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030074803,0.00038848008,0.000023259154,0.00070731714,0.00036185625,0.00006513112,0.000009514417,0.000026819103,0.96834284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975228,0.00034120205,0.00034170452,0.00025518783,0.0006089493,8.463004e-7,2.824548e-7,0.0000029928667,0.0009260414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990306,0.000073816685,0.00020582137,0.00009013432,0.00038371532,0.0002158975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995007,0.00002972972,0.00010240631,0.00006731011,0.000094495925,0.00020538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024819045,0.0000676788,0.00013695219,0.000029600418,0.003730649,0.000034664678,0.00019895642,0.00004573832,0.00072214776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033339267,0.000053087748,0.00007580893,0.00013796784,0.0004001469,0.00035000467,0.000017081235,0.00013435271,0.000048372884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050794215,0.00008453405,0.0001269831,6.0167616e-7,0.000023044757,0.0000320363,0.0014881102,0.0000056405156,0.000015362473,0.9964476,0.0006416489,0.0011293313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021310533,0.000041836018,0.00047686932,0.000021885713,0.000014593242,0.000014031085,0.00026336426,0.000002406572,0.00004580147,0.057952665,0.94087535,0.00007810769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03451132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11581486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059069178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000095942705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169696031","doi":"10.7202/039648ar","title":"The Roots of Canadian Law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal history; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Israeli law; Public law; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Black letter law; Chinese law; Sociology; Sources of law; Private law; History","score_opus":0.021031489416687355,"score_gpt":0.2617595878260023,"score_spread":0.24072809840931492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169696031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24460733,0.0001173831,3.5435335e-8,0.013458924,0.0013885178,0.000105403946,0.000023479493,0.0000043364244,0.7402946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.000090822716,0.000045237444,0.00025978594,0.00015268812,0.000001960825,1.8682707e-7,0.000003840427,0.00015651638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988858,0.00009901678,0.0001993088,0.000065181135,0.000351286,0.00039937196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.00013676228,0.00008676269,0.00006826292,0.00013902778,0.0002616976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005977286,0.00006330312,0.00010922179,0.000023070403,0.0063809743,0.00004611625,0.00030327187,0.000045325673,0.00011512656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017570295,0.000039889,0.000038041973,0.00020085515,0.00031472655,0.00011075116,0.000020785768,0.00042717272,0.000003954658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003322809,0.000005808155,0.006354169,0.0000014022689,0.000019922552,0.000031103944,0.0010541149,0.000010729782,0.00008263498,0.9882954,0.0015518798,0.0025895613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093172166,0.0000041367407,0.019133074,0.000006399842,0.0000030995536,0.000003991538,0.0039574476,0.000001845281,0.000089071604,0.0004971091,0.97615016,0.000060489023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068890874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002932609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187960577","doi":"","title":"A Layered Approach to Internet Legal Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.023528547577304187,"score_gpt":0.2309727675822997,"score_spread":0.20744422000499552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187960577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024419941,0.00001654655,0.0140144,0.00038858491,0.0003043971,0.00006584479,0.0000033321833,0.00005083306,0.98271406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949026,0.0000022670838,0.0008816542,0.002176716,0.00028581405,0.0000069205826,0.0000065720355,0.000014183955,0.0017232421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904215,0.00001846991,0.00024402785,0.00017684084,0.00024659737,0.00027189052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995487,0.000007167518,0.000120752215,0.00014416753,0.00013035553,0.000048866557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030350342,0.00012271035,0.00018427402,0.00034867937,0.00086035527,0.0005053033,0.00018198733,0.00004187818,0.0008778087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000439246,0.00010587912,0.00023164533,0.0009777986,0.000020800795,0.00069404155,0.000047308185,0.00019360642,0.000445059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036115,0.00014907606,0.00033227945,0.0000061761284,0.00025073803,0.000008279605,0.000004317228,0.001199273,0.000016159118,0.9909939,0.0063107572,0.00071863947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025960596,0.000005029219,0.0007547399,0.0000051287134,0.00021782018,0.000038176007,0.00014224913,0.0025484033,0.000018966275,0.00026561282,0.99560255,0.00014172266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007270745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016923619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055858516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032351927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96113896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205560194","doi":"10.7202/1037248ar","title":"The Fractured Right to Vote: Democracy, Discretion, and Designing Electoral Districts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistricting; Gerrymandering; Discretion; Political science; Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Law; Public administration; Boundary (topology); Politics; Parliament; House of Commons; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012789670457348983,"score_gpt":0.2728497597679163,"score_spread":0.26006008931056734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205560194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15170896,0.00293707,0.1368683,0.31051204,0.005733756,0.0015468915,0.00032207303,0.0002901559,0.39008078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755406,0.000052090756,0.00018093882,0.00029862107,0.00046958445,0.0000027343401,8.400641e-8,0.000006444085,0.0014354312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869746,0.00019795151,0.00018582228,0.00011557069,0.0003609955,0.00044220706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990439,0.0003163134,0.00010212095,0.00007910202,0.00008341323,0.0003751923],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006962433,0.0000784713,0.000100042416,0.000010313593,0.0067467303,0.00018021291,0.00019402214,0.0000534791,0.00002969238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040135556,0.00003659991,0.00004286125,0.000091404676,0.00018369129,0.00023545916,0.000022318973,0.00012114235,0.000015138648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022614693,0.000011862868,0.002119378,0.00000146373,0.00001610153,0.000018505469,0.00015008797,5.621516e-7,0.00043623894,0.97690004,0.0024142363,0.017908879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015009599,0.00003087326,0.008258268,0.000046463545,0.0000058663145,0.000017369066,0.000023826731,0.0000013549803,0.00065816473,0.0149363205,0.97578204,0.00008934035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075346334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045083847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001564883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017811768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215504162","doi":"10.7202/1034055ar","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Notice; Plural; Majority opinion; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11519907970680078,"score_gpt":0.32922301917405444,"score_spread":0.21402393946725368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215504162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019364616,0.0005365782,0.000015942014,0.005454051,0.0004412435,0.00008957841,0.000017807719,0.000012985333,0.9740672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.00034752095,0.0000696462,0.000080310434,0.0001460374,0.0000027869746,1.8612879e-7,0.0000022184918,0.00029565764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988771,0.00016826711,0.00022470149,0.00006905013,0.00043831705,0.00022254267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922216,0.00021105989,0.00014514606,0.000048218826,0.0002652432,0.00010818982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014794992,0.00005563945,0.00011998801,0.00003750199,0.0027033577,0.00003928284,0.00022182394,0.000026018855,0.000020985548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006793569,0.000036471072,0.000037858536,0.00024909014,0.00060073426,0.000120106924,0.00003910088,0.00021488286,0.000014934363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023763827,0.000012932728,0.004130441,5.215301e-7,0.000012206732,0.000009339106,0.0005929808,0.000007771897,0.000002524641,0.9932707,0.00073512655,0.0012016945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022284543,0.000026375215,0.003209232,0.000043947854,0.000011205593,0.000009516585,0.0024183663,0.000005839199,0.0000075758103,0.12641533,0.8675686,0.00006116492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04815877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5039217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015337285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006234521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229519293","doi":"10.7202/1034056ar","title":"Unsteady Architecture: Ambiguity, the Senate Reference, and the Future of Constitutional Amendment in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Ambiguity; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Computer science","score_opus":0.027988025132148053,"score_gpt":0.26457264021381,"score_spread":0.23658461508166195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229519293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16312139,0.0023591516,0.000039197996,0.05335959,0.0016797105,0.00036567778,0.00020280054,0.000007038036,0.77886546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989646,0.000087266206,0.000012672532,0.000597687,0.00024370763,0.0000023389277,2.3611005e-7,0.0000014624895,0.00009002281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862796,0.0003377098,0.00020584789,0.00006617126,0.00054264313,0.00021963935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994763,0.00010530205,0.00012450035,0.00006905949,0.0000778759,0.0001469307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011924944,0.00005775571,0.00012999547,0.00000839173,0.0008872771,0.000030761574,0.00019856042,0.000028627166,0.000014324789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006963844,0.000027683356,0.000022601798,0.00008113551,0.0010043712,0.000048985265,0.00003918685,0.0002744585,8.113434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019235094,0.0000056197728,0.00057922374,0.0000019065434,0.000007825873,0.000007783001,0.00026822992,0.00003877966,0.0000011442374,0.9978574,0.0004107043,0.0008021691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006771258,0.0000086528435,0.0014807956,0.000031498177,0.000005502454,0.00005061743,0.0017157563,0.0000067092988,0.0000150296555,0.022334611,0.97362494,0.000048741967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96895254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99725693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97552276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034034683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042142783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6824308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232994027","doi":"10.7202/1034054ar","title":"De la structure constitutionnelle dans le Renvoi relatif au Sénat : vers une gestalt constitutionnelle?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025203701991743193,"score_gpt":0.2691724840328691,"score_spread":0.2439687820411259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232994027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017650403,0.005135918,0.0018258748,0.016793681,0.0061954297,0.00019447955,0.00031133395,0.000071111215,0.95182174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944509,0.00081390917,0.00085988187,0.00040139837,0.001678797,0.00000434223,0.000009373753,0.000015434593,0.0017659407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964625,0.0009288233,0.00057507615,0.00035441812,0.00081969594,0.00085945445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.00031469148,0.00032800052,0.00016786372,0.00045501767,0.00083306094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889447,0.00034470373,0.00042450218,0.000090342284,0.016153645,0.00019538472,0.0004071981,0.00045612807,0.0002313131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005787634,0.0003351783,0.0002404929,0.0007282732,0.014774871,0.0007931059,0.00013200194,0.0010437266,0.00017403418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055292345,0.00013776125,0.0014489065,0.000009670418,0.00019889839,0.00034033312,0.0038961302,0.0044246367,0.000055677265,0.9842785,0.0036796492,0.0014745647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011332456,0.00007157589,0.0005675538,0.00017754319,0.00014777372,0.0011289823,0.014697175,0.000035362198,0.000095722324,0.24093868,0.74066305,0.0003433536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15773371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12628536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025039867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002105631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234089456","doi":"10.7202/1034049ar","title":"Constitutionalizing the Senate: A Modest Democratic Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Constitution; Political science; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Law; House of Commons; Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Legislation; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Law and economics; Referendum; Sociology; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06944750153965605,"score_gpt":0.31411167005757473,"score_spread":0.24466416851791867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234089456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034397685,0.00070979935,0.00032892617,0.016073136,0.00095738325,0.00014275135,0.000009169461,0.000044130546,0.9782949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998069,0.000060782928,0.0003090978,0.0006753428,0.00071011117,0.0000062421664,4.88132e-7,0.0000032802873,0.000165668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864334,0.00020154551,0.00018433294,0.00009284007,0.000606773,0.00027115617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992812,0.00006357275,0.00008235664,0.000054692697,0.0003270414,0.00019112013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011258095,0.000080959464,0.00010726308,0.000019557003,0.011015175,0.000105754625,0.00021176624,0.00004217372,0.000035461326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028154545,0.00005044324,0.000064863496,0.00015113385,0.0015118506,0.00025798538,0.00004886079,0.00022609023,0.000083823055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009879343,0.000022038685,0.00019686288,5.9209873e-7,0.000028394727,0.0000264564,0.00045166316,0.000083448016,0.0000069481152,0.99736005,0.0013708126,0.00044287601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023793017,0.000018224258,0.000047480968,0.000028904878,0.000025472544,0.00015466259,0.003131622,0.000026514936,0.000029893585,0.2865539,0.70964485,0.00010053909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007512083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034882598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019338529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027696873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237358327","doi":"10.7202/1034050ar","title":"The Politics of the Senate Reform Reference: Fidelity, Frustration, and Federal Unilateralism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Divided government; Legislature; Political science; Opposition (politics); Public administration; House of Commons; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Law; Parliament","score_opus":0.041385389732462294,"score_gpt":0.2745266911746466,"score_spread":0.2331413014421843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237358327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17215241,0.00054223294,8.319613e-7,0.028609954,0.0012343959,0.00010934705,0.00005187998,0.000013512465,0.79728544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175143,0.00020791631,0.000014821068,0.00028494862,0.00017780089,4.6425507e-7,4.2123398e-7,0.0000031102913,0.007559071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916035,0.0001387416,0.00017417535,0.0000498472,0.00030555375,0.0001713305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993711,0.000017087736,0.00011177191,0.00009148729,0.00023065667,0.0001778887],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000769718,0.000038867853,0.00006104617,0.000023179811,0.009563839,0.00036493607,0.0001946524,0.000053516393,0.00002244594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007219997,0.0000259343,0.000032219203,0.00007060535,0.000689644,0.00018582949,0.000031890442,0.00020302141,0.0000032324933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002974902,0.0000042285083,0.00010830364,0.0000017008274,0.0000069022653,0.0000020692844,0.0014316402,9.213839e-7,0.0000060433063,0.9933635,0.004582388,0.0004893368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010613012,0.000010484997,0.0010620477,0.000010795956,0.0000061182354,0.000022321217,0.0022983397,0.0000015495958,0.000017691296,0.03307985,0.96334624,0.0000384116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4544429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95573395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96028364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005760022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017320077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99172556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237497123","doi":"10.7202/1034053ar","title":"Le fédéralisme comme principe matriciel dans l’interprétation de la procédure de modification constitutionnelle","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07391410305977508,"score_gpt":0.3328778617831355,"score_spread":0.2589637587233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237497123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015232556,0.0026316592,0.021874046,0.02273054,0.0014534548,0.0002159073,0.00007222413,0.000062177896,0.9357274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571526,0.0005821361,0.0014618755,0.00059611286,0.000821018,0.000014272668,0.000005422611,0.000009881635,0.0007940103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997865,0.0006714572,0.00036801797,0.00017693092,0.00045507745,0.00046350068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987456,0.00013919252,0.0002484882,0.000086458196,0.0004067796,0.00037348596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018174244,0.00016069348,0.00020015822,0.000051089773,0.005909437,0.00015235899,0.0002718299,0.00021064236,0.00004927655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030550724,0.00016448229,0.00012263226,0.00030726645,0.00226834,0.0005137889,0.00006239078,0.00043981822,0.00009994911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032446347,0.00022076671,0.0011254239,0.000010128979,0.00005633201,0.00004287053,0.0042296685,0.002113683,0.000074456235,0.9892751,0.0015924969,0.0012266256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006709143,0.00006674143,0.0007214275,0.00012248247,0.00009285975,0.0005678481,0.011613585,0.0007935152,0.00018212968,0.19426872,0.79067284,0.00022697037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030271033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015149277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009875451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007546705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239712587","doi":"10.7202/1034048ar","title":"Introduction : les silences du Renvoi relatif à la réforme du Sénat","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Art; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03296298567573755,"score_gpt":0.21773440213022702,"score_spread":0.18477141645448947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239712587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050976654,0.004489711,0.000042808893,0.028873317,0.00525483,0.00005683364,0.00009837019,0.00005950966,0.956027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8306508,0.002038386,0.00029731504,0.0005375631,0.029090852,0.000002592317,0.000014165196,0.00007273711,0.13729562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729383,0.0007473047,0.0006726268,0.00029641547,0.00049746357,0.0004923396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982319,0.00018030655,0.0003206157,0.0002450386,0.00051460555,0.00050756003],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015467062,0.00027965088,0.00034968025,0.00022753619,0.00546877,0.00035257853,0.0002965978,0.00012915306,0.006210623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004097723,0.00024421889,0.00029610796,0.00010967317,0.0013410791,0.0011127112,0.00008219337,0.00089625915,0.0016521483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003814471,0.00014359353,0.00006898903,0.000026492098,0.0001330365,0.00025205675,0.0017058126,0.00020239066,0.0000015506363,0.84711957,0.14823581,0.0020725578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003798737,0.000254664,0.000045342254,0.00008964327,0.00034378993,0.0013265434,0.0023624531,0.0001617909,0.000023799175,0.01081021,0.983902,0.00029992897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028366542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004835231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8363094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035215606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022037806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244223146","doi":"10.7202/1034052ar","title":"The Senate Reference: Constitutional Change and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Parliament; Constitution; Separation of powers; Political science; Deliberation; Law; Status quo; Institution; Constitutional court; Judicial review; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.15372066724890415,"score_gpt":0.3311755309311911,"score_spread":0.17745486368228697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244223146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056951246,0.0027940203,0.00002117825,0.023243159,0.00097054173,0.00010357175,0.000018652301,0.000028079674,0.96712565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972712,0.0013558981,0.000050472343,0.00051575253,0.00069104414,0.000004832168,4.6761372e-7,0.0000015490871,0.00010880266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990521,0.000113452494,0.00012773488,0.00007916628,0.0003988046,0.0002287417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934554,0.000081926984,0.00006492486,0.000036348763,0.00026710902,0.00020415359],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088659493,0.00006214629,0.00007853869,0.000014140504,0.014646414,0.00010795205,0.00012141552,0.00004047407,0.00001935554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019610496,0.000039303795,0.00002612303,0.00007883086,0.0026272074,0.00025000272,0.00005350042,0.00017937509,0.00004015358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001110931,0.000007261175,0.0005961527,2.814763e-7,0.000015370319,0.000011406185,0.00023818458,3.5720194e-7,0.0000011055532,0.9940127,0.00050311745,0.004602913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016099068,0.00001348124,0.0006364273,0.000012153991,0.000008568744,0.00006131835,0.0014978405,0.000001302847,0.0000041970807,0.13936985,0.8581758,0.000058050824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004495276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025806025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008599968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067524496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257098781","doi":"10.7202/1035387ar","title":"The Treatment of Ipso Facto Clauses in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Business; Supreme court; Law and economics; Restructuring; Obligation; Payment; Law; Security interest; Context (archaeology); Accounting; Political science; Economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.020956114937984358,"score_gpt":0.19619245339213648,"score_spread":0.17523633845415212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257098781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504952,0.0005299983,0.0000124037615,0.0042805374,0.0009923674,0.00011598535,0.000026911357,0.000009452143,0.04353715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907726,0.0003441918,0.000005391159,0.0002115581,0.00021505907,0.0000023800806,2.5334643e-7,0.000006464112,0.00013742525],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999344,0.000006679794,0.00022776196,0.00007202742,0.00017365358,0.00017586135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950594,0.00006478541,0.00025179161,0.00010538285,0.00006291366,0.00000920951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008704236,0.00008081738,0.00010872387,0.000021023412,0.0004940443,0.00002368712,0.00013786113,0.000014400406,0.00006789593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001867184,0.00003786137,0.00004272262,0.00009079681,0.00003004387,0.00032207288,0.00001600678,0.00004049122,0.000011862072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032365898,0.00033402813,0.26966456,0.000036832116,0.00011357116,0.00036916332,0.000025678773,0.00012124213,0.0006429382,0.34458473,0.0056979135,0.3780857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048617466,0.0000158996,0.04431864,0.00004815182,0.0000071857366,0.000005282188,0.00004170745,0.0000099873605,0.0005025708,0.0016667472,0.95283204,0.00006561964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83884484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94713414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026080452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003155977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3799839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275351047","doi":"10.7202/1035385ar","title":"Situating Canada’s Commercial Surrogacy Ban in a Transnational Context: A Postcolonial Feminist Call for Legalization and Public Funding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Commodification; Political science; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Sociology; Public sphere; Politics; Law; Economy","score_opus":0.04825611166336533,"score_gpt":0.30618289372166796,"score_spread":0.2579267820583026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275351047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7517622,0.00014579971,0.000801189,0.24199474,0.00047525033,0.0007036974,0.00014068102,0.000048015132,0.0039283945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985143,0.000010439733,0.00049074553,0.0007525283,0.00016728717,0.000018373436,0.000007756535,0.000012771235,0.000025779256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988854,0.00004154258,0.00034412515,0.00018425456,0.00021697883,0.00032772974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992744,0.00015709705,0.00012504224,0.000077805875,0.00021036052,0.00015531029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000517186,0.000099234836,0.00021552945,0.00011274069,0.0008646984,0.000028524371,0.000058643607,0.000075697746,0.00001692111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007574318,0.00007128571,0.000034541063,0.00009332633,0.00009127441,0.00017223197,0.00001465409,0.00017944825,1.855948e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005731995,0.000118931974,0.10670744,0.00009560748,0.000042603664,0.000072475064,0.00013540266,7.4724574e-7,0.0012759687,0.80523807,0.0007311556,0.08500838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009417854,0.00075331127,0.13987896,0.0002191068,0.0000419694,0.0013804004,0.0005784046,0.000094531424,0.001562084,0.0016902239,0.8441156,0.00026751016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028141797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8418958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042837326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027311585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317286660","doi":"10.7202/1035386ar","title":"Sur les traces du principe de proportionnalité : une esquisse généalogique","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02879911441345414,"score_gpt":0.25894408508404215,"score_spread":0.230144970670588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317286660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10927949,0.006850328,0.0030492477,0.18419968,0.0056520198,0.0003105499,0.00009247642,0.00012906209,0.69043714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593044,0.0028767649,0.00071323855,0.00043421108,0.0026832202,0.0000072449975,4.7548608e-7,0.000026704685,0.03395377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972854,0.0007179524,0.00066893897,0.00028384314,0.00031301772,0.0007308381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998267,0.00025755414,0.00044525875,0.0001533172,0.00026460108,0.0006122877],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024062488,0.00021963257,0.00033967057,0.0000440514,0.004179158,0.00009639047,0.0004116027,0.00033364142,0.0028699806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004935642,0.0001575498,0.00027197256,0.00023938702,0.0010138911,0.0009155769,0.00004226251,0.00049114396,0.00035278747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598741,0.00019943345,0.0013971665,0.000018853163,0.00005122617,0.00017506919,0.0010051345,0.000014175625,0.000112414375,0.87971956,0.0021720154,0.115098976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000432982,0.00013048293,0.0008663149,0.00016291715,0.000040878225,0.0002530009,0.00034729217,0.0000134683505,0.00024662667,0.012985248,0.9842516,0.00026914052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014541376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04546369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014456224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001511985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321269879","doi":"10.7202/1035388ar","title":"R. v. Spencer: Anonymity, the Rule of Law, and the Shrivelling of the Biographical Core","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anonymity; Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Possession (linguistics); The Internet; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03204187655207375,"score_gpt":0.26880271401588235,"score_spread":0.2367608374638086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321269879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22721644,0.002197536,0.002288391,0.055278465,0.0030640883,0.0010464917,0.00017027794,0.00004564042,0.70869267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981003,0.0011315566,0.00005019851,0.00030056437,0.00026554507,0.0000012227612,5.887028e-8,0.000005282712,0.00014530965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862283,0.0003069728,0.00027011297,0.000096456875,0.00048615696,0.0002174827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988321,0.0005201217,0.00025108625,0.00019362886,0.00013063931,0.00007243251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017285023,0.000077254284,0.0001724159,0.000017900962,0.0036005008,0.000040556697,0.0006220261,0.00007090468,0.00015675838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007046931,0.000024090952,0.00019174331,0.0001688981,0.029292779,0.00013530366,0.000090783855,0.00018286936,0.0000022711042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000314981,0.000018735333,0.0014011787,0.000002044872,0.00002906055,0.000001176433,0.0010650016,9.2398335e-7,0.00014297882,0.996226,0.0000762483,0.00100516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016372044,0.000059203685,0.0010092035,0.00014220743,0.0000918108,0.00004302123,0.0010934114,0.00001628586,0.0016866288,0.44854668,0.5455422,0.00013214842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019145439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077945767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77088386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015614029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016911185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328097639","doi":"10.7202/1013037ar","title":"Alberico Gentili, The Wars of the Romans: A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis Romanis, ed by Benedict Kingsbury & Benjamin Straumann, translated by David Lupher (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) Benedict Kingsbury & Benjamin Straumann, eds, The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) Martin Loughlin, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Economic Justice; Classics; Theology; Law; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.033002702378724526,"score_gpt":0.26852506554591155,"score_spread":0.23552236316718703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328097639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6580337,0.00990036,0.022002684,0.021792067,0.002744316,0.006800723,0.025814975,0.00014557232,0.25276557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99198246,0.005472035,0.00084327837,0.00010321007,0.00013804,0.000004467793,0.00022655848,0.000031227588,0.0011987009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949748,0.0016255097,0.0010939015,0.0004016951,0.001184566,0.0007195365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994685,0.0017574861,0.001619732,0.0006645829,0.0009907547,0.00028242217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019359497,0.00041841678,0.0006599606,0.000108432454,0.004788917,0.00007609526,0.0013218215,0.00034467093,0.00023277385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023964392,0.00030067193,0.00047773615,0.0005044964,0.008715789,0.001765967,0.0002521458,0.00068963034,1.5153469e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030265635,0.0006315411,0.002760539,0.00023550248,0.00054806983,7.2572556e-7,0.0025193824,0.00028735184,0.00022195894,0.98800856,0.004011262,0.00047247458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017148781,0.00011274608,0.0048439833,0.00018747659,0.0020841942,0.000022600758,0.005011739,0.00033143695,0.00036962942,0.0007627924,0.984256,0.00030251459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023247933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02654495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98724574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019953378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003896099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345748993","doi":"10.7202/1037249ar","title":"Victim Pays Damages to Tortfeasor: The When and Wherefore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Damages; Nuisance; Liability; Order (exchange); Economics; Payment; Law and economics; Ex parte; Unjust enrichment; Compensation (psychology); Tort; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.02669648984948547,"score_gpt":0.20792027386574397,"score_spread":0.1812237840162585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345748993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12581925,0.0020098712,0.0008575476,0.02040353,0.002826776,0.00040462046,0.0005222333,0.0000567382,0.8470994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644667,0.00057064905,0.00017132585,0.0010816057,0.0007818599,0.000009730519,6.3726185e-7,0.000029792802,0.000907722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870145,0.000026656458,0.00060802745,0.0002759437,0.000039122937,0.00034878138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906427,0.00006252128,0.00031704392,0.00028761884,0.000036369554,0.00023219716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084951485,0.00013211038,0.00034805955,0.00006977322,0.0012126165,0.0001603837,0.00031379046,0.000083302504,0.00061249087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059441714,0.00009578422,0.000107037595,0.000048773567,0.00012731328,0.0003657077,0.000095308365,0.00013177909,0.00067329744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018653222,0.000019158382,0.015014928,0.000005729502,0.00007193213,0.0000073992824,0.00026117964,0.0000033992924,0.000014399115,0.9736754,0.0039217332,0.006986104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046490534,0.00008368396,0.0037794681,0.00003256186,0.0000052708765,0.00008994618,0.000108745284,0.000010548397,0.00005021588,0.108708374,0.88647455,0.0001917518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010778419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004429872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8825528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017384237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003620951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16717484330532556,"score_gpt":0.3585139573750075,"score_spread":0.19133911406968196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400367739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23822403,0.00043993726,0.000013871914,0.0036429921,0.00020772673,0.00025547197,0.000054762328,0.000009544887,0.75715166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862194,0.00052285125,0.0002132674,0.000028033148,0.00006568118,0.0000027661774,2.5016044e-7,0.000003601354,0.00054163433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948364,0.000027455862,0.00018414407,0.00006760888,0.0001284837,0.00010868762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939364,0.000015834974,0.00024472683,0.0001596192,0.00009954786,0.00008663723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042095143,0.00004399238,0.00011976075,0.000014931579,0.0022964366,0.000057128764,0.00025950006,0.000034151988,0.00011946577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038870246,0.000033839704,0.00004069834,0.000016638922,0.0004119126,0.0001807835,0.000087126704,0.000101856735,0.0000025659367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017399278,0.00006764623,0.0008266331,0.000017333146,0.000017640841,0.000002527857,0.0011197074,0.0000012857602,0.00040309358,0.983586,0.0003299157,0.013610815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643169,0.000039407023,0.0036882549,0.0001238449,0.00002301976,0.0000056599356,0.0007783762,0.000007058693,0.0042095296,0.0027022194,0.9880882,0.00007009369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00578844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066907713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019712867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016393564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508860223","doi":"10.7202/1040054ar","title":"Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10968278335432045,"score_gpt":0.40261673163454215,"score_spread":0.2929339482802217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508860223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02947534,0.002186195,0.0000026504226,0.01744755,0.00013243796,0.00041693298,0.00054195645,0.0000074629716,0.94978946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913757,0.008054052,0.00016407388,0.00029729528,0.000042276864,0.0000065660734,9.617323e-7,0.0000038064443,0.00005530959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991857,0.000085374515,0.00019305541,0.000110145294,0.00020179262,0.00022392249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.000046068526,0.00019401168,0.00014810888,0.0001714597,0.00027482735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084858993,0.00006425698,0.00018012845,0.000017025684,0.0035180307,0.000107913904,0.00023361974,0.000038986902,0.0001466169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026779142,0.000055343244,0.000024082728,0.000050449402,0.00025642064,0.00018544824,0.000023471921,0.00017254973,0.000001519986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014417638,0.00001629149,0.00049866806,0.00003990521,0.000007599053,0.000044923272,0.00022574207,0.000002384831,0.0000023216244,0.9808571,0.000071585666,0.018219082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001453827,0.00008544362,0.0011935909,0.00061167806,0.000016840315,0.000017778168,0.0004753875,0.0000014143234,0.00020056468,0.0016398572,0.99552613,0.00008594343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6746251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98404145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99545455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021644065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509948352","doi":"10.7202/1037251ar","title":"Les lois spéciales de retour au travail : enjeux institutionnels et constitutionnels","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06786440598440643,"score_gpt":0.3296096366399392,"score_spread":0.2617452306555328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509948352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16830434,0.0033953423,0.014076776,0.08217529,0.011473888,0.000385884,0.0011087788,0.00012461892,0.7189551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478895,0.004454537,0.00077026914,0.0015406865,0.002232672,0.000005496973,0.000002571513,0.000019689393,0.0061851083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969377,0.0007208038,0.0005904618,0.00029034287,0.00056994776,0.000890779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983014,0.00020257152,0.0003210752,0.00018197164,0.00041356866,0.0005794409],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020455134,0.00026703268,0.0002977654,0.000086248205,0.009122632,0.0001798972,0.00044458505,0.00030312123,0.0039182287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003573508,0.00019291238,0.00024008835,0.00031426182,0.0025214367,0.0012419148,0.00007502634,0.00042431624,0.00010313021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015334233,0.00018654396,0.00088213757,0.000007497687,0.00009802181,0.00008425623,0.0017933311,0.000036245157,0.0004069849,0.9305059,0.0019522278,0.06403157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009919048,0.000087607965,0.0048621357,0.00049277284,0.00009101103,0.00014179367,0.0019579628,0.0000027746526,0.00056551106,0.033921063,0.9565656,0.00031987304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058723286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21829705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025341718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005675817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514133952","doi":"10.7202/1037250ar","title":"L’interaction entre le droit civil et le droit du travail et ses effets pratiques sur le travail atypique : le rôle du contrat dans l’accès aux régimes de protection des travailleurs","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017765731588386856,"score_gpt":0.25216132560667553,"score_spread":0.2343955940182887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514133952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290775,0.001767328,0.0124530215,0.05856419,0.0021061224,0.0012433338,0.00043516958,0.00026903872,0.09408429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98089457,0.0054000015,0.00026145892,0.0006882027,0.00065005926,0.000068693545,0.000012669908,0.00008781749,0.011936547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947002,0.0021796862,0.00086980016,0.00058049517,0.00062709,0.0010427189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762154,0.0003328786,0.0006597221,0.00026499713,0.0005880383,0.00053282257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025741288,0.00049726904,0.0005635023,0.00013146109,0.006115956,0.0005681201,0.0004956126,0.00042120987,0.00059156003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031354296,0.00043198912,0.0003934187,0.00033806404,0.000983644,0.003514442,0.000067548055,0.0007858574,0.000020568667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026236434,0.002327344,0.0018045153,0.00004980496,0.00041653364,0.00010892826,0.010489113,0.00013123383,0.022615368,0.88723236,0.0032006484,0.0713618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005977516,0.0009400451,0.041060403,0.0009462547,0.00017577421,0.0006761836,0.023967743,0.00030252713,0.045444775,0.013102383,0.86640346,0.0010029386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17980935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74998516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87412995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008202336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010545983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529753270","doi":"10.7202/1037966ar","title":"Can Better Law Be Married with Corrective Justice or Evil Laws?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04167411055314016,"score_gpt":0.3097435729707871,"score_spread":0.26806946241764695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529753270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010120383,0.000013853042,0.00035005144,0.05839433,0.0004051846,0.0002265702,0.00014737969,0.000067162844,0.9302751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125576,0.000037090496,0.0006196507,0.0037672843,0.00062020315,0.000015449717,7.4539395e-7,0.000015709562,0.0036681155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879605,0.00012336521,0.00017389754,0.00017158853,0.00037594797,0.00035914066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990511,0.0001961296,0.00013325065,0.00014541365,0.00019920051,0.00027491784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038961883,0.00010692232,0.00013291127,0.000017948701,0.00494748,0.00011433829,0.00027220283,0.00006428342,0.00088741846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057479945,0.00005683517,0.00005221287,0.00014129275,0.0004029117,0.00030164482,0.000038539205,0.00020396017,0.000057291345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006642867,0.00003724895,0.00012866654,0.0000030835906,0.00003145555,0.000028496643,0.0006248961,0.0000019874205,0.000086655455,0.9930236,0.0016335833,0.004333945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045846676,0.000072845534,0.0001857513,0.00004375974,0.000063251144,0.00004601816,0.0011539058,0.0000014801298,0.00034787375,0.0022351572,0.9952475,0.00014403698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008239143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30560094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020741588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005231513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544458016","doi":"10.7202/1040051ar","title":"Contracting out of Access to Justice: Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses in Consumer Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Redress; Scrutiny; Legislature; Enforcement; Forum shopping; Business; Inherent powers; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economic Justice; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.11023356699088067,"score_gpt":0.4130816228741907,"score_spread":0.30284805588331004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544458016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11652104,0.000049312057,0.00015693743,0.0010606293,0.001365898,0.00026920263,0.000026256783,0.000010077895,0.88054067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989684,0.00012201742,0.00012209633,0.0003895924,0.00017751926,0.0000022342977,5.362132e-7,0.000008510499,0.00020908951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985776,0.00012658714,0.0004914366,0.00010691021,0.00043951249,0.00025796104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983345,0.00020680614,0.0007363509,0.00010930363,0.00048531432,0.00012771339],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011350474,0.00008242116,0.00021079097,0.00008323625,0.0017643961,0.000195489,0.0005198575,0.00005373237,0.00030560247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014469626,0.000076861535,0.00007228672,0.0000402325,0.00016865441,0.0010277028,0.000058885922,0.00023339159,0.000009901826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019333322,0.00012186974,0.0073682815,0.000013826066,0.00005859402,0.000015035815,0.0004584684,0.00021927341,0.0025839135,0.9841224,0.00020227274,0.0046427418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015077183,0.00016525883,0.014489713,0.00032763238,0.00006612065,0.0000072713447,0.0009842921,0.000097679775,0.019002322,0.0010974061,0.9620612,0.00019335457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058237608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060221188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98302495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011602517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036384616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559154843","doi":"10.7202/1037965ar","title":"Resisting Criminal Organizations: Reconceptualizing the “Political” in International Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Refugee; Persecution; Political science; Law; Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); State (computer science); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Criminology","score_opus":0.034033548979893004,"score_gpt":0.32113766672828636,"score_spread":0.28710411774839334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559154843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070469186,0.00021745934,0.0021302903,0.049211305,0.003044109,0.00034043682,0.00005879327,0.00012882616,0.8743996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963338,0.00013832323,0.0005175721,0.0012613712,0.0009803845,0.0000056823274,0.000002843179,0.000012076075,0.000747975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.00039592216,0.00042119983,0.0001539009,0.0004375856,0.000339701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988766,0.00027430107,0.00015930206,0.0001140548,0.00045707324,0.00011871043],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011323736,0.000092183946,0.0001019802,0.00006427614,0.0041062296,0.00017964371,0.00034958206,0.00008181507,0.0011032206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016237313,0.000054363387,0.000050368948,0.00021885881,0.00035729958,0.00072941673,0.000028227063,0.00020540359,0.000056098936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007415037,0.000019115927,0.0003458534,0.0000010300594,0.0000075767584,0.0000028310803,0.0024236704,0.000001164301,0.00021514967,0.9929807,0.00031096552,0.003684524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022221393,0.000021288417,0.00024878132,0.00011361626,0.000011098329,0.000021398546,0.008872398,0.000015730324,0.000917006,0.031999845,0.9574469,0.00010975378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047136424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18504658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96098083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044902664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048067664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559357288","doi":"10.7202/1037968ar","title":"Les expulsions pour arriérés de loyer au Québec : un contentieux de masse","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04347201838576451,"score_gpt":0.2402706934209313,"score_spread":0.1967986750351668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559357288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6583212,0.016260378,0.015861802,0.03917286,0.0055046463,0.00021042759,0.00096420036,0.00006758173,0.2636369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495988,0.004828941,0.0035102882,0.0010719085,0.001214054,0.000010279321,0.0000017097568,0.00009370617,0.039670337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703455,0.00011272628,0.0010545902,0.00044430848,0.00008854473,0.0012652735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980031,0.00017657313,0.0007758584,0.00040077727,0.00012663839,0.00051702175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010157074,0.0003648459,0.00065022317,0.00019962023,0.0026819576,0.00014032568,0.00047692785,0.00038733962,0.0028367864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009370129,0.00034790495,0.0004904893,0.0001591319,0.00029940036,0.000544839,0.000103084305,0.0005842551,0.0009308236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083419676,0.0004700799,0.06684965,0.000052397274,0.00029810713,0.0005675383,0.0010999095,0.000046728568,0.000514251,0.79882157,0.006642958,0.124553375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019176162,0.00011392953,0.016152048,0.00039385795,0.00004825868,0.0011468456,0.00015385864,0.000116475734,0.0013692181,0.0070727435,0.9709847,0.00053047267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12783974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.152071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022994045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016120746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559598677","doi":"10.7202/1037969ar","title":"La philosophie politique et le Code civil du Québec : l’exemple de la notion de patrimoine","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016440420598486754,"score_gpt":0.2810855813019206,"score_spread":0.2646451607034338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559598677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010024942,0.0019944154,0.00044748536,0.28052872,0.0005617933,0.00008789398,0.00020514295,0.00006506413,0.70608455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98486686,0.007608848,0.0004939143,0.0027694686,0.0026263888,0.000006835032,0.000001991872,0.00003309022,0.0015925957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620295,0.0021443483,0.00033474286,0.00022128932,0.00039305483,0.00070364226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834317,0.0006232902,0.00025223536,0.00014172497,0.00018158133,0.00045797572],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031955242,0.00021643387,0.00024416688,0.000010064475,0.0039665992,0.00013104279,0.0003731796,0.0005863551,0.0012555756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029887655,0.000162627,0.00034514593,0.0001775388,0.0014611244,0.0006463824,0.00006859591,0.0007625984,0.00008057083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020668795,0.00024728983,0.00069253106,0.000018991972,0.00006926086,0.00010517841,0.0041429913,0.000012270852,0.00058121583,0.978555,0.009903137,0.0056514298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008785801,0.000063817,0.00040354254,0.00020109833,0.000055523287,0.0006727639,0.0022410078,0.0000062768595,0.00069655036,0.11920613,0.87534386,0.00023083278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11267429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3666712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97484195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010898173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055080635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559617377","doi":"10.7202/1037967ar","title":"Non-Linear Innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Intellectual property; Doctrine; Genius; Law and economics; Counterintuitive; Creativity; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.120673692885338,"score_gpt":0.2408732141158239,"score_spread":0.12019952123048591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559617377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10111683,0.000010087962,0.002190377,0.0026002668,0.0015590404,0.00010876128,0.0000032496687,0.00006812667,0.8923433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414414,0.000005653836,0.00009440417,0.0029731959,0.001648289,0.0000014297816,0.0000021063584,0.000015350985,0.0011154001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929583,0.000004287883,0.00023472229,0.00009620264,0.00017539122,0.0001935435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943733,0.000012855818,0.0001378732,0.00008026631,0.0003240188,0.000007660571],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032284844,0.0000884639,0.000085941385,0.00013556928,0.0011103654,0.000083323874,0.0001464508,0.000043958404,0.0015435171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008595776,0.00004863981,0.00004069506,0.00028186562,0.000031298143,0.0010239964,0.000054114895,0.00011977172,0.0027660837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033792152,0.00019312135,0.0026706418,0.000073482595,0.000103232735,0.00009826838,0.000024539653,0.00003313265,0.014583302,0.80479306,0.03215769,0.14493161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054033246,0.000014986847,0.00025049184,0.00007555689,0.000009993611,0.000027036333,0.000010103051,0.00034372488,0.0020987599,0.0038023235,0.9927019,0.00012478718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015743423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102917715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023632876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019312242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589003308","doi":"10.7202/1038493ar","title":"Toward a Bijural Interpretation of the Principle of Respect in Aboriginal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Flourishing; Politics; Political science; Supreme court; Colonialism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0343078951375821,"score_gpt":0.34587883658361923,"score_spread":0.31157094144603714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589003308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633728,0.00012684271,0.000024177905,0.0050581032,0.0005523072,0.00020878768,0.000024832596,0.000013143643,0.13061899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999446,0.000081805694,0.00018584017,0.00004758625,0.00008732271,0.000002753851,6.229236e-8,0.000003898463,0.00014475254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871206,0.00026802043,0.00031881925,0.00008448915,0.00041922685,0.00019738237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00012991639,0.0002556361,0.000072876115,0.00020621423,0.000048263897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064916426,0.00006997732,0.00016799427,0.00002098235,0.00082953647,0.00001626802,0.00027384696,0.000047158563,0.000078092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021847933,0.000033680455,0.0001133186,0.00016042974,0.00056684564,0.0002883126,0.000043391836,0.0001335279,0.000003988117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007803307,0.000041978357,0.006838776,0.000009913508,0.00003137962,0.000003475177,0.008059154,0.0000102210615,0.0015453282,0.98112935,0.000025359057,0.0022270493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018127832,0.00019358732,0.067673765,0.0007986401,0.0000461437,0.00001689697,0.005345883,0.000021985026,0.015222424,0.010728124,0.8978511,0.00028865653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009872903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066491134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026586745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019911939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.06392293215609136,"score_gpt":0.36531756448323294,"score_spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589511104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14363948,0.000045208366,0.0021188145,0.07491281,0.0015636878,0.00018149565,0.000059711456,0.00014724812,0.77733153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944599,0.00007103518,0.0027189893,0.001261643,0.0008189054,0.000007775615,0.0000018693152,0.000013114136,0.0006467174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.00031938133,0.00020266746,0.00012361762,0.00037078964,0.000289198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989987,0.0002142779,0.00016513254,0.00013251294,0.00032352016,0.00016587184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177623,0.000086488966,0.00009244288,0.000059369333,0.010913796,0.000381308,0.0002000114,0.000052774005,0.00065598387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000156176,0.000057574594,0.000032195698,0.00032483874,0.00028960823,0.0047731022,0.000004434313,0.0004947185,0.000040304294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130666795,0.000099115234,0.0005522942,9.88887e-7,0.000025504014,0.000018136883,0.027313553,0.0000038035867,0.00011432811,0.96657795,0.00065621664,0.004625031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023772393,0.0000844908,0.0008791558,0.000022217835,0.000016878646,0.00012763905,0.013949426,1.8249574e-7,0.00019853472,0.005092041,0.97926795,0.00012375567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014210793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089694574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024236328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031845673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590094020","doi":"10.7202/1038714ar","title":"Une autre voie pour la gouvernance d’entreprise ? Lorraine Talbot, Great Debates in Company Law, Londres, Palgrave, 2014, pp 208. ISBN 9780230304451","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014592482464588377,"score_gpt":0.21185589060172555,"score_spread":0.19726340813713716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590094020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20455821,0.05467802,0.0009078961,0.1720483,0.013147579,0.0020350865,0.00088301924,0.0006655415,0.55107635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94823915,0.0037764194,0.0003560397,0.001284633,0.0030292864,0.000013605638,0.000034314075,0.00015907722,0.04310748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548423,0.00018581317,0.0013182161,0.0008462755,0.0007422794,0.0014232066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970384,0.00029132317,0.0012178384,0.0006546439,0.00058624404,0.0002115493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008904659,0.0008526095,0.00095803785,0.00024315986,0.0023806079,0.0009142538,0.0009277369,0.00037923997,0.006780361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004661437,0.0006340451,0.00044457716,0.00049207994,0.0007279774,0.002076845,0.0004239319,0.0008923778,0.003910727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026290765,0.0004599811,0.009115658,0.00031077283,0.00017718923,0.0035308816,0.000048092883,0.00011729334,0.00018633067,0.8692844,0.10620101,0.010305479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004176522,0.000039737668,0.0076062097,0.0022986124,0.00017237503,0.00036285148,0.000043678127,0.00040378532,0.000118869175,0.15353017,0.8303841,0.0008631095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016478479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14235727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74368095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003983989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043316915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590277711","doi":"10.7202/1038709ar","title":"La qualification juridique des swaps comme site d’une lutte globale pour le droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0550804915230735,"score_gpt":0.26506539018876163,"score_spread":0.20998489866568812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590277711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09617054,0.00961573,0.011636868,0.018558772,0.0034803005,0.0002858113,0.0012371092,0.000034244884,0.85898066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975637,0.012415996,0.0022675754,0.000581654,0.0007108757,0.000011681545,0.000016473592,0.00005068569,0.0083080465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771893,0.00009885492,0.0009925648,0.00041925703,0.000097812044,0.00067255547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972988,0.00005655364,0.0015336506,0.0007783772,0.00014736869,0.00018525324],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021113893,0.0002867991,0.00059289,0.00012544963,0.0071458668,0.00077067624,0.00079568604,0.00029070722,0.00018764815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017448398,0.00038396555,0.00033913605,0.00013041373,0.00048475104,0.0013010657,0.00018048644,0.00065160374,0.0015769573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039342638,0.0003097137,0.010938895,0.00008639228,0.00010073818,0.000113843875,0.00027563178,0.00014592055,0.000007567315,0.93556696,0.0031459203,0.04926905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010607876,0.000071409784,0.084852844,0.00020959898,0.000026543847,0.00011242769,0.00013113655,0.00033235786,0.00009619258,0.1271811,0.78554785,0.0003777608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027502691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02235194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8794665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045060448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004205703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590326123","doi":"10.7202/1038710ar","title":"Une théorie de l’agence des régimes complémentaires de retraite","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.057839643375325524,"score_gpt":0.35214275156775954,"score_spread":0.294303108192434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590326123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15396,0.00479779,0.00037435477,0.09279293,0.0051389565,0.00014714559,0.00010993313,0.00004109206,0.7426378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824139,0.0043148133,0.0027782957,0.00094793126,0.0016254174,0.000002843091,3.17384e-7,0.000015941316,0.007900566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971452,0.0003136871,0.00032490236,0.0002684257,0.0007461377,0.0012016824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981954,0.00010976362,0.00064875034,0.00026618913,0.00013678195,0.0006430774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019945642,0.00020388604,0.00025887656,0.00001690916,0.02434785,0.0008745416,0.001446424,0.0001938748,0.0006855819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003534402,0.00019425822,0.00022357625,0.00020120761,0.004153712,0.0014931008,0.00013705605,0.0005093016,0.00007740376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020127749,0.0001076001,0.029054062,0.000017672757,0.00006406126,0.00024035072,0.006489384,0.000034052668,0.000111647634,0.8678527,0.008497852,0.087510474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028211004,0.00010259838,0.09871936,0.0002119213,0.000054223332,0.00013530796,0.0037875979,0.000121421086,0.00028632153,0.21545658,0.6805672,0.00027537197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28523898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33184543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8284539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082554726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014745073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590376912","doi":"10.7202/1038491ar","title":"Comprendre la normativité innue en matière d’« adoption » et de garde coutumière","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023889337970982614,"score_gpt":0.31239047031030565,"score_spread":0.288501132339323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590376912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052878827,0.0014436371,0.0025336354,0.046789348,0.0034996332,0.0002802337,0.00042181477,0.00008072393,0.89207214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658996,0.012778023,0.0009300167,0.0009296688,0.0020328118,0.0000041858098,0.0000055742544,0.000025235247,0.017394891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964217,0.001743283,0.0005033494,0.00017724944,0.0005898118,0.0005646409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985469,0.00031481005,0.00035714623,0.00014407974,0.00025721028,0.0003798387],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002875675,0.00018579345,0.00027220158,0.00007763668,0.0034716083,0.00023054502,0.00030581764,0.00027641756,0.0021081162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011989742,0.00015067888,0.00015189582,0.0001445495,0.00036493322,0.0011926626,0.000052983705,0.0005125206,0.0006511768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024875195,0.00018064181,0.006719758,0.000117469426,0.000051118044,0.000034526496,0.014684628,0.00002204036,0.000082697545,0.93465096,0.02315864,0.020272652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057825807,0.00008328944,0.020634491,0.0004435371,0.00004845086,0.00021938689,0.0015696386,0.000031871936,0.000041059968,0.019534098,0.95660514,0.00021076077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010735785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25369254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079816347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016275873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590702858","doi":"10.7202/1038712ar","title":"Interjurisdictional Information Sharing and National Security: A Constitutional and Legislative Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Federalism; Duty; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Order (exchange); Public administration; Information sharing; Political science; Information flow; Work (physics); Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025570518939634853,"score_gpt":0.31731578424350615,"score_spread":0.2917452653038713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590702858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022644637,0.00005440822,0.00071527465,0.0019401265,0.00023768848,0.00006101885,0.00017518173,0.000011669139,0.97416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936223,0.00004485706,0.00008395781,0.00016183518,0.00023850423,0.0000022145898,0.0000026187831,0.00000105066,0.0001027203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.000034999855,0.00018714073,0.000085075204,0.00043959823,0.00015751956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.00004695995,0.00022194721,0.000049880106,0.00021627788,0.0001607502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007024799,0.000057795067,0.00011196279,0.00005828422,0.006825251,0.0005336743,0.00011936681,0.00005093566,0.00006866783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003179893,0.000052183106,0.000049506776,0.000047300575,0.00097141287,0.0018722777,0.00006806233,0.00014833342,0.0000053126273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005195107,0.0000055658343,0.014317346,0.00000207984,0.00009399417,0.0000016994546,0.00050082325,0.0000048871293,3.7689622e-7,0.984738,0.000049768427,0.00028025656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035901865,0.000013664521,0.04344026,0.000033954428,0.00005488629,0.000050618906,0.00021155202,0.00090623426,0.000002730195,0.0949226,0.8598965,0.00010801673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008406081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013513166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012200266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032006832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591072610","doi":"10.7202/1038708ar","title":"The Sexual Assault of Older Women: Criminal Justice Responses in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sexual violence; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Economic Justice; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency; History","score_opus":0.040271916191205466,"score_gpt":0.3240103263803403,"score_spread":0.2837384101891348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591072610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305827,0.00021413618,0.0000015942338,0.0017400613,0.0007017714,0.00005902393,0.000010472019,0.000003939192,0.06668629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985529,0.00036869518,0.0000234369,0.00023232822,0.00019731074,0.0000029268672,7.866904e-8,0.0000057043553,0.0006166237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840534,0.00030902785,0.00022711318,0.00009077251,0.0005634928,0.00040422945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998886,0.0004168919,0.00021720864,0.00020175734,0.00013910963,0.00013907101],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014167207,0.000069527436,0.00012539286,0.000023202962,0.008828263,0.00012221088,0.00057109125,0.0000459909,0.00008722822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006645538,0.00004962715,0.000024987517,0.000050117407,0.00024325293,0.0002126891,0.000042246025,0.00032771696,0.0000025368265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003313054,0.0006736612,0.0815197,0.00028183803,0.00056145334,0.0035868774,0.171225,0.00016344494,0.0027471015,0.31026664,0.025877627,0.39978358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012185994,0.0001958845,0.048709627,0.00020491132,0.0000998908,0.000081886,0.1509236,0.00001712465,0.0013845717,0.000919853,0.79591984,0.00032424502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91903114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7700422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043970053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050351414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591491183","doi":"10.7202/1038711ar","title":"La contribution des blogues juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04938963240995386,"score_gpt":0.40459479334492676,"score_spread":0.3552051609349729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591491183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046379897,0.0006135035,0.0015987136,0.2261858,0.0013632674,0.00013689045,0.00020049667,0.00004948302,0.76521385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870384,0.0073408615,0.0006924934,0.0015501322,0.0006713197,0.000020860874,0.000019553838,0.000018723507,0.0026477082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966023,0.0019507227,0.00052818086,0.00016334179,0.0003560391,0.00039939274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648947,0.0011644257,0.000538073,0.00021101037,0.0013345277,0.00026250162],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004870387,0.00018487709,0.00023347662,0.000084139974,0.016207557,0.00216416,0.00044618538,0.0003470445,0.0011753007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029517119,0.00019375485,0.00016217884,0.00019536237,0.0025080938,0.0065443385,0.000029298351,0.0015453543,0.000106840394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016730044,0.00026690183,0.00021724246,0.00002279757,0.0000637601,0.000031966058,0.005194097,0.0000051750153,0.000023420273,0.9749582,0.009066508,0.010133229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047923,0.000043827327,0.0023895737,0.00021930596,0.00008112849,0.0004984831,0.0016827929,0.000024518245,0.00023446514,0.12460197,0.8695421,0.00020260563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010501913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040975157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98240036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024963077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005857003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604334801","doi":"10.7202/1038490ar","title":"The Lifeworlds of Law: On Revitalizing Indigenous Legal Orders Today","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Indigenous; Law; Constitutionalism; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Democracy; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.03365580843012047,"score_gpt":0.31255796152186643,"score_spread":0.278902153091746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604334801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09197352,0.001247651,0.000013653134,0.030554472,0.0017843988,0.00043812997,0.000032884993,0.000079541765,0.87387574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.0009021559,0.000092753944,0.0003992701,0.00043871847,0.0000048441852,1.4148863e-7,0.000011124238,0.0012661614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980646,0.00032182748,0.0003356825,0.00013464889,0.0006578902,0.0004853934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987549,0.0004756796,0.00026145388,0.0001239978,0.00023450599,0.00014947026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012120124,0.000128575,0.0002038948,0.000017359853,0.011931054,0.00011512918,0.0003971156,0.00007740319,0.00008028853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041800228,0.000059688173,0.00016059815,0.000113259586,0.00079952774,0.00032708957,0.000059969097,0.00023527048,0.000045365614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032859927,0.000037408696,0.0002710682,0.0000043848527,0.00009320278,0.000013573169,0.0038583197,0.000002971039,0.00017509941,0.9781104,0.00084980374,0.016550923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026372058,0.00008435412,0.0003688835,0.0001139966,0.000016766622,0.000006510044,0.0018462342,1.2279871e-7,0.00052318827,0.0014550845,0.99520254,0.00011860987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015850656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071416855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031271303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001916223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99070287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.023274437226089406,"score_gpt":0.3214301690673661,"score_spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612798282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022138,0.00088911026,0.00006460082,0.07579504,0.001987973,0.00029023923,0.000030885098,0.000054463337,0.8306663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457306,0.00040125888,0.0004347981,0.0024754198,0.00037757502,0.0000056408917,0.0000014388528,0.000008673901,0.0017221497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990113,0.00019636212,0.00020976209,0.00013552661,0.00022746022,0.00021959779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.00015287902,0.00016269628,0.00008606124,0.00020452238,0.00021515293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006234858,0.000083388135,0.000094884286,0.00007151877,0.0038762093,0.00041197435,0.00009855837,0.00007326911,0.00015689344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014866961,0.000061826744,0.000024756964,0.00016672236,0.0002957975,0.0017535263,0.0000175805,0.00024758285,0.000014971952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013034111,0.00006407988,0.00062447187,0.0000040843256,0.000021828548,0.000004521611,0.0046414975,5.5343772e-8,0.00006315169,0.91896856,0.0011014225,0.07449332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025350953,0.000035091805,0.00037201427,0.000029010389,0.000019521398,0.000154071,0.008290742,1.3951099e-7,0.000046123863,0.00197253,0.98872507,0.00010217533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0202833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027574513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98762363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014849186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002256433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613195635","doi":"10.7202/1038488ar","title":"WSÁNEĆ Legal Theory and the Fuel Spill at SELEKTEL (Goldstream River)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Geography; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009143001664717643,"score_gpt":0.25115827124197965,"score_spread":0.242015269577262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613195635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1287591,0.00048341617,0.000012373327,0.008244394,0.00034139046,0.00013681286,0.000048660142,0.000029491825,0.8619444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019724,0.0014146751,0.00005188495,0.0010496879,0.00053600007,0.0000029045925,3.5461633e-7,0.000011470848,0.006735799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841976,0.0005895744,0.00017277112,0.00013452841,0.00033005525,0.00035328415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991105,0.00041977016,0.000107208856,0.00012702093,0.000017234406,0.0002182292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015239547,0.00011187088,0.0001363936,0.00001773012,0.0042075384,0.00006399623,0.00024480003,0.00007304543,0.0008070685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008464009,0.00005495019,0.00009885338,0.00004652941,0.0019012713,0.00025690018,0.00010485585,0.0001456586,0.00014640529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010823392,0.000015178489,0.0007154071,0.0000014647825,0.000023809986,0.000013371376,0.0007747319,2.2378103e-7,0.00008769923,0.99180233,0.0003786762,0.006078867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011518134,0.000034237546,0.0018239811,0.000017995268,0.000024350913,0.00010302473,0.0002534231,2.0159122e-7,0.00024137125,0.0514163,0.9448233,0.00010999544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022186968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009388428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94444466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016394178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008740321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613551187","doi":"10.7202/1038492ar","title":"Des compétences législatives personnelles en matière d’activités de chasse, de pêche et de piégeage dans les ententes de revendications territoriales : les limites de la cogestion","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04601645851486295,"score_gpt":0.338646535648106,"score_spread":0.292630077133243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613551187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5145916,0.011494955,0.05617175,0.20974337,0.0013321884,0.00048023,0.00088292087,0.00023353261,0.20506948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95043147,0.019389328,0.024737123,0.00018834177,0.002702092,0.0000314728,0.0000024182514,0.00003904651,0.0024787027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993683,0.004151773,0.00043827196,0.0002959849,0.00037662935,0.0010543796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468344,0.0042027365,0.0004256105,0.00014157419,0.00012169941,0.00042492605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032293883,0.00034683052,0.0003805153,0.00011482954,0.008253007,0.00019621174,0.000505227,0.0003727684,0.00017599453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019035344,0.0002598645,0.00027686622,0.0002047763,0.0038937689,0.0006181641,0.00011229199,0.0006232889,0.000016891241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057925612,0.00046883503,0.38721532,0.00010505692,0.0004908124,0.0000645098,0.1414022,0.00005559079,0.0061370144,0.44158694,0.002713972,0.019701833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009969446,0.00032439834,0.29604593,0.0030540994,0.00053717976,0.0011127507,0.16742182,0.00022926042,0.0037042485,0.103729814,0.4220388,0.0008047444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05673508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08354695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016246544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034605782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624634460","doi":"","title":"The U.S. Perspective on the International Criminal Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal court; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02818016512065683,"score_gpt":0.3121881790722094,"score_spread":0.28400801395155256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624634460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020727545,0.000019548444,0.0000019186825,0.04324777,0.0008648089,0.00006284975,0.000010269302,0.000015506155,0.9350498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97041154,0.00009265955,0.000018493989,0.0019128236,0.001531272,0.0000041671706,5.2015207e-7,0.000006532186,0.026022008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985877,0.00014873219,0.00014834618,0.00010356363,0.00078850944,0.0002231182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991751,0.00028430397,0.000069031565,0.00009126195,0.00030624375,0.00007406615],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008907589,0.00007519687,0.000054299453,0.000018741128,0.013512776,0.00037613438,0.0007245072,0.00003437894,0.008705946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006236929,0.00003734003,0.00010728879,0.00002563276,0.00041567843,0.00016010768,0.000015162532,0.0003500092,0.000505214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004645714,0.00002827507,0.0000021435683,8.741992e-8,0.00003655607,0.000013859899,0.0009780036,0.000010077479,0.0000011727615,0.993864,0.0038253742,0.00119401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009494916,0.000027476255,0.00012411925,0.000008376243,0.000007289214,0.000024313198,0.0012554667,0.000013134696,0.000032840002,0.21257155,0.7857913,0.000049191392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017987115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01844359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94968396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003861262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025855508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625627503","doi":"10.7202/1038494ar","title":"The Tricksters Speak: Klooscap and Wesakechak, Indigenous Law, and the New Brunswick Land Use Negotiation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Indigenous; Jungle; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Duty; Sociology; Political science; Negotiation; Corporate governance; Ecology; Geography; Anthropology; Management; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.015035218628888056,"score_gpt":0.2457457717365032,"score_spread":0.23071055310761512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625627503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40829387,0.015738683,0.0005138905,0.19673029,0.004248259,0.0022291413,0.00006186426,0.00024732447,0.37193668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824263,0.010591281,0.00010632208,0.0019838118,0.0007396205,0.0000016683907,3.9574127e-7,0.000011416161,0.0041391705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998698,0.00035293732,0.00018178482,0.00012484196,0.00033079562,0.0003116707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990087,0.0004720215,0.00015565204,0.00010729458,0.00007206792,0.00018422822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012388416,0.000100980615,0.00012384576,0.0000038493135,0.010228052,0.00048609226,0.0002065973,0.00011240443,0.000032577245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113421134,0.000041266278,0.00007691753,0.0000908716,0.0008937404,0.00050100416,0.00004264959,0.00020960027,0.000008301778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008745206,0.000014270279,0.0017172098,0.0000024845815,0.0000719596,0.0000056697404,0.019803941,9.689024e-7,0.000023346787,0.96093816,0.001912454,0.015422087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015103961,0.00002774593,0.0014168713,0.000023724813,0.00003786798,0.00005673847,0.002866248,0.0000011121933,0.000035173594,0.01358376,0.9803412,0.000099144236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012094991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16931862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006391842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004706051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99448353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625982006","doi":"10.7202/1054352ar","title":"Drawing the Line Between Lay and Expert Opinion Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Queensland","keywords":"Scrutiny; Expert opinion; Public opinion; Political science; Opinion leadership; Law; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.16107188385438675,"score_gpt":0.43328687821239353,"score_spread":0.2722149943580068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625982006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20119467,0.02686063,0.01048638,0.14716414,0.012800458,0.0010833323,0.00003755726,0.0005416174,0.5998312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940815,0.0012030727,0.0008957566,0.0006589541,0.0030242726,0.0000013618974,1.1337857e-7,0.000008640309,0.00012632157],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986398,0.00023244011,0.00021395303,0.0001441135,0.00051532243,0.00025433613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986879,0.0006829695,0.00012648715,0.00012329017,0.00024498827,0.00013436326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020609803,0.00007833564,0.00011135199,0.00003327395,0.0074814395,0.00029043583,0.00040077153,0.00006235527,0.00016627563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095413584,0.000050067887,0.000037907874,0.0001941176,0.00052234053,0.0005518332,0.000093592505,0.00022267418,0.000046632445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007287643,0.000044928085,0.0053503728,0.000014338886,0.000071542585,0.00002340228,0.017591657,0.0000083672,0.00025977686,0.16217452,0.008441544,0.80594665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857208,0.000070413254,0.0016254638,0.00017771014,0.0000048797992,0.000021433261,0.000873078,0.000005060197,0.00034325576,0.0041380306,0.99257076,0.0000841992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000514152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020083094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024027577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2647001222","doi":"10.7202/1040053ar","title":"Requiem pour un cadavre","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.09880787226597074,"score_gpt":0.4255891246347663,"score_spread":0.3267812523687955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2647001222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024172632,0.0055688913,0.00014171701,0.23023191,0.018888935,0.00046356468,0.00018173495,0.000050409253,0.7203002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065518,0.008998851,0.003772607,0.029933482,0.012667061,0.000010659059,0.0000054076604,0.00010363249,0.037956513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99415106,0.0020001286,0.0011857757,0.0003583172,0.00066941255,0.0016352944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995069,0.0006725346,0.0012250834,0.0010333324,0.00047645072,0.0015235536],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060322955,0.00033687556,0.00066500285,0.000044662815,0.048106324,0.000111320296,0.0008702611,0.0016752324,0.007280814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016478383,0.00029054773,0.00033651516,0.00007085208,0.00047303527,0.0007245915,0.00025454728,0.009053325,0.0023328115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008952549,0.00042024252,0.004229252,0.0010573128,0.00030048317,0.0016712657,0.009532918,0.0000036614008,0.000049472474,0.47100532,0.29765972,0.21398082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024909307,0.00020580342,0.007315364,0.0017531598,0.00011984823,0.0005236931,0.0066455575,0.000067092915,0.000036737594,0.00525801,0.9753039,0.000279934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008814552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010682745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8823792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006228288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004423298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660585010","doi":"10.7202/1040049ar","title":"The Complainant: The Canadian Human Rights Case on First Nations Child Welfare","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Human rights; Law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Welfare; Indigenous; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.024123111739882384,"score_gpt":0.3123006633558495,"score_spread":0.2881775516159671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660585010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028944071,0.00003366112,1.8368196e-7,0.02514676,0.0015437667,0.00027159278,0.00003543576,0.000011282707,0.9700629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997866,0.00020736115,0.000006385483,0.000024646124,0.001123006,0.0000022018166,0.0000022186935,0.000007969615,0.00076023006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985822,0.00023107918,0.00019969318,0.00011508951,0.00033743132,0.00053451234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986484,0.00015683734,0.00023041126,0.00037073818,0.00022548891,0.0003681028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012110558,0.00009530623,0.00008363088,0.000059560753,0.9524801,0.0007669897,0.00071902986,0.00008503558,0.00015395152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017399678,0.000046965924,0.00007102668,0.00006554963,0.00066819286,0.00019413712,0.0000021195683,0.00044140997,0.00005779805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013271047,0.000021972477,0.00002873381,0.0000015110668,0.000011333104,0.00012273726,0.013721738,0.0000028521124,3.6902487e-10,0.98598665,0.00004006014,0.000061055915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104710336,0.000026067992,0.001101677,0.00002712728,0.000009774178,0.000548912,0.0013192282,0.0000015376819,0.000002515112,0.0006289092,0.996145,0.000084508865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99610496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056265626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095947384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73960996},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2681970254","doi":"10.7202/1040050ar","title":"Les catégories juridiques et la qualification : une approche cognitive","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08395338748938169,"score_gpt":0.3679676200492846,"score_spread":0.28401423255990293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2681970254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023147746,0.0023472388,0.00026315745,0.0093483385,0.0011350719,0.00007674112,0.00057300495,0.000023223753,0.9839184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97241807,0.0024335296,0.00022224222,0.00022487197,0.0038296834,0.000007240345,0.00004145677,0.000035813708,0.020787073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998409,0.0002738901,0.00044806875,0.0002334884,0.00031827044,0.0003173032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977716,0.00020906606,0.00072191557,0.00029892672,0.0008241644,0.0001743121],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089881016,0.0002513387,0.00032803064,0.00006994179,0.014614363,0.0024397392,0.00033893564,0.00013559769,0.00098761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040664963,0.00021751587,0.00026418376,0.000019113395,0.0012904212,0.0005026839,0.00008444216,0.00054403837,0.00009729772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030488196,0.00020997664,0.00008535902,0.0000507917,0.00035389836,0.000079502715,0.0049785636,0.0000045269694,0.000003144146,0.9778982,0.00086369953,0.015441868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037416603,0.00007800943,0.00027207148,0.00031949484,0.0006470364,0.000046391,0.009682443,0.000053603137,0.00021273059,0.042294852,0.9457221,0.00029711382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03395672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053201612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004870424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036811572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2684633609","doi":"10.7202/1040056ar","title":"The Boundaries of Corporate Law and Trust Law: An Analysis of Locking v. McCowan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Corporate law; Duty of loyalty; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Constructive trust; Business; Economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06008812866721274,"score_gpt":0.3362650276703774,"score_spread":0.27617689900316467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2684633609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37676513,0.00013875884,0.00007739443,0.002739423,0.00017310235,0.00011514008,0.000121476536,0.000012842367,0.6198567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995186,0.00007305769,0.00015523701,0.00007750125,0.00007533567,0.0000012957356,0.0000010598218,0.0000042398665,0.00009367627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916744,0.00008743698,0.00024310983,0.00009050468,0.00025396686,0.00015751785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987056,0.000055606106,0.00067438534,0.0002717672,0.00018848594,0.0001041071],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009922968,0.000057339254,0.00017473577,0.000021162743,0.021506874,0.00053757,0.00040944296,0.000040356852,0.000027217735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000433278,0.000039803963,0.00008704168,0.0000928184,0.002642933,0.0003786466,0.00006585323,0.0001233301,6.803644e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007451718,0.000017236292,0.0026279883,0.0000016481711,0.00010093479,9.899225e-7,0.0005667107,0.000020453039,0.000063714106,0.9957484,0.000004641479,0.0008398354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001747511,0.00003907468,0.010444869,0.000012683318,0.00029041327,0.0000029315477,0.0020193919,0.00024438716,0.0006097537,0.034798425,0.9512704,0.00009294121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05040689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4693512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96094996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024820427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024528941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97976696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2713442250","doi":"10.7202/1040052ar","title":"Le rôle des normes comptables dans la responsabilité civile des auditeurs de sociétés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999221718854669,"score_gpt":0.3817974042466343,"score_spread":0.29180518705808756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2713442250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3493311,0.0036315792,0.00022701408,0.013680942,0.0017072279,0.00012439823,0.00008961979,0.000048393154,0.6311597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856689,0.0036391912,0.002655512,0.00009431681,0.00076749397,0.0000065342897,8.66776e-7,0.00003534077,0.007131828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963597,0.0011720336,0.00047665366,0.0003303138,0.00056330505,0.0010979977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973514,0.00084079243,0.00045304067,0.0004515392,0.00029547155,0.0006077352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038304068,0.0002802165,0.00040785735,0.000044277956,0.036652517,0.00098536,0.0012973264,0.00026110426,0.0010244063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012353327,0.0002804167,0.0003642292,0.000119704026,0.009091099,0.002141686,0.00023586213,0.0006403631,0.000121619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012695658,0.00030770153,0.013690809,0.00012509547,0.00008351494,0.0003034522,0.0048924237,0.0000883218,0.000685354,0.93293005,0.0026076003,0.044158693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041010673,0.00016197737,0.012401154,0.00062447326,0.00012584413,0.0006636632,0.017121967,0.000042565724,0.0012844465,0.08114584,0.885658,0.00035991354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04778475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3360623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88305044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054010615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002469852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766864120","doi":"10.7202/1070285ar","title":"Property Law and Collective Self-Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Land tenure; Corporate governance; Collective action; Common ownership; Property rights; Alienation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Economic system; Geography; Sociology; Law; Economics; Agriculture; Politics","score_opus":0.01837056544580271,"score_gpt":0.18246988319895727,"score_spread":0.16409931775315456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766864120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14604916,0.00012648475,0.0000015490531,0.032157995,0.00033219904,0.0003517534,0.000115584786,0.00010925964,0.820756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963814,0.00008139739,0.000071883325,0.0023129452,0.00034083525,9.595504e-7,9.939006e-7,5.823909e-7,0.00080900604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941605,0.000024130604,0.00010665724,0.000112760856,0.00019709108,0.00014328751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971724,0.000013878151,0.000046539113,0.000011134838,0.00002564069,0.0001855647],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000069190064,0.00007483929,0.00009947956,6.786632e-7,0.0018941013,0.00006587715,0.000080535065,0.00004062174,0.00015108412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000025855438,0.000009374804,0.000043175485,0.000055828004,0.000039455525,0.00010371924,0.000041993873,0.0001287793,0.000009439469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012557959,0.0016619065,0.006140575,0.00011043729,0.0010223907,0.00097585126,0.0029946212,0.000023439572,0.089721754,0.3079001,0.013159016,0.5750341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018640961,0.0005089742,0.0011037107,0.000006964248,0.000009070013,0.00010540818,0.00008098327,0.0000390586,0.0020982476,0.0006512893,0.9951208,0.00008906359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018693645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014200512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037011283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012061404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.265366381501558,"score_gpt":0.35988028068368266,"score_spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771094306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017085342,0.00006864239,0.0010848095,0.007825783,0.00029417896,0.00008617387,0.000013317584,0.000046785837,0.97349495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980286,0.000055582193,0.0006056097,0.00022156663,0.000624014,0.000001670092,5.7100505e-7,0.000005346279,0.0004570661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.000100956386,0.00013949804,0.00010276417,0.0001951888,0.00022092818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.00013174351,0.00007174979,0.00007920626,0.0000731587,0.00014903078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805277,0.00005345402,0.00006643667,0.000030793977,0.0123115545,0.00015407678,0.000113261085,0.000062195475,0.00023987422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000138536,0.000049293754,0.000031608477,0.00012447826,0.00048558973,0.00032065762,0.00003742952,0.00021632592,0.00003393369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026591993,0.000009306361,0.00249536,0.0000011425932,0.000005035624,0.000001199392,0.0010222843,7.1708087e-7,0.000004002702,0.9957137,0.0005311091,0.0002134988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113574446,0.000021021713,0.004352907,0.00001370215,0.000011343471,0.00001721111,0.0028145646,0.000019334437,0.000030261908,0.23544367,0.75707555,0.00008687692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017095278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037004177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98094326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017938942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020923731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782777112","doi":"10.7202/1042770ar","title":"Accès à la justice pour protéger l’environnement au Québec : réflexions sur la capacité à agir des particuliers et des groupes environnementaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04340311684650424,"score_gpt":0.3134151355222334,"score_spread":0.27001201867572916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782777112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3019755,0.001389052,0.00018408993,0.017059224,0.0009132422,0.00046150904,0.00017937536,0.000058205296,0.6777798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803797,0.002172548,0.0028560378,0.0024514294,0.0018410167,0.00005427459,0.000006069169,0.00007954557,0.0101594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949634,0.0015797012,0.0007238082,0.0004900899,0.0007836859,0.0014593122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976522,0.0005900753,0.00038084583,0.0003204288,0.00007461413,0.000981857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021152014,0.0005291333,0.00041524964,0.0000762436,0.013043644,0.0002880737,0.0006196391,0.00033128075,0.0045879604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021033951,0.0004947288,0.0003387207,0.0002446565,0.009525407,0.0013690026,0.0002492231,0.00080060214,0.0012453204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008185472,0.001455003,0.0057338,0.00014368317,0.00037716495,0.00015098532,0.029555324,0.000113533315,0.0014535504,0.931025,0.0020621386,0.027847935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010397306,0.00042781918,0.0089104995,0.0002954789,0.0005506517,0.0003299423,0.0072689406,0.00002778907,0.0016413485,0.006960405,0.97193366,0.0006137166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23627324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6743109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023081377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026092824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783016775","doi":"10.7202/1042771ar","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Common Law Property Rights and Remedies in Addressing Environmental Challenges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Tort; Legislature; Common law; Natural resource; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0478007788444951,"score_gpt":0.3046406056797497,"score_spread":0.25683982683525464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783016775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46836206,0.0038096441,0.0000043795776,0.0075860433,0.00021229203,0.0002586609,0.000013345592,0.000018328677,0.5197352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792594,0.0015976416,0.00013156983,0.00003295846,0.00016741459,0.0000029620296,1.3111418e-7,0.000003522603,0.0001378776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999303,0.00010979338,0.00017372337,0.00008003925,0.00017546458,0.00015802486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963367,0.00010829947,0.000111957735,0.00007570348,0.000020659154,0.00004973826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245243,0.00004753684,0.000086530825,0.000008391201,0.0029309085,0.00004669275,0.00014048813,0.000031971536,0.000010400088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017471548,0.000025650794,0.000019387222,0.000027154261,0.0010198662,0.00017272227,0.000046505913,0.00014474,0.000002574825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017221877,0.000047498368,0.00019729638,0.000005107472,0.000008984213,0.0000033266913,0.007368962,7.9439695e-7,0.0006752453,0.95489115,0.000028339255,0.036756083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015261557,0.00003128498,0.0009031718,0.00009616721,0.000004052383,0.0000070348656,0.0019704914,0.000018745597,0.0012560688,0.012295581,0.9832119,0.000052899217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030054278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21848825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98318356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004063044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024496758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783681570","doi":"10.7202/1042775ar","title":"“Legalizing” the Great Bear Rainforest Agreements: Colonial Adaptations Toward Reconciliation and Conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Government; Institute of Science and Technology Austria; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Colonialism; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Political science; Environmental governance; Indigenous rights; Rainforest; Human rights; Geography; Law; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.03721140324976968,"score_gpt":0.2390502351249021,"score_spread":0.2018388318751324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783681570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5283812,0.0004013564,0.006736878,0.009031639,0.0024675722,0.0005744052,0.00005546288,0.00031237805,0.45203906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823815,0.00006785937,0.00065161893,0.00042286303,0.00031317037,0.000006789754,0.000004570565,0.000012638326,0.00028233283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938846,0.000031946453,0.00020079016,0.000070885675,0.00015601492,0.0001519289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996848,0.000033186036,0.00005688494,0.00008686094,0.00008102978,0.000057209698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030311552,0.00008611232,0.00007597299,0.000042966803,0.001246247,0.00009821636,0.00008441871,0.00003878731,0.000108210625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031779684,0.00006287562,0.000028321963,0.00008156657,0.00008804738,0.00012575058,0.00002218175,0.00013564275,0.00003538371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031574068,0.00013662527,0.010863376,0.00031085956,0.0019169652,0.000111566194,0.03185027,0.035678737,0.0013741349,0.49877107,0.14340629,0.27526435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042483927,0.000083901694,0.005883316,0.00003614033,0.000034446242,0.00004773459,0.00041517479,0.023981268,0.000121131496,0.0001382286,0.96873623,0.000097563054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017216339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013249419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82532996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028507884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783974646","doi":"10.7202/1042772ar","title":"L’environnement à l’épreuve du droit des biens","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0713709872215503,"score_gpt":0.26876592223596624,"score_spread":0.19739493501441593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783974646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019895552,0.0135647515,0.00014825935,0.0057712994,0.008528309,0.00014246734,0.000048422728,0.00004293625,0.951858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96129966,0.008744976,0.00079006836,0.00082736986,0.008514705,0.000004700208,7.8717375e-7,0.000026933138,0.019790819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973366,0.00036242531,0.00043028826,0.00026193509,0.000661715,0.0009470084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875563,0.00011535825,0.00023370358,0.00013933987,0.0002952754,0.00046070854],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011649552,0.00024113656,0.00032043984,0.000044052784,0.019809688,0.00016311217,0.0004033751,0.00024244812,0.0047418093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017065118,0.00023768107,0.00026471098,0.00034277863,0.0055897795,0.00043704043,0.00014413234,0.0004982146,0.0011625218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008935903,0.00020081966,0.0005064024,0.0000105727595,0.00017356027,0.00006455554,0.012603787,0.000002586462,0.0000080532245,0.93955946,0.013988803,0.032872457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003888116,0.0003633824,0.001764964,0.00009846922,0.0000921326,0.000043850832,0.004139748,0.000019356416,0.000064771906,0.04160183,0.95114136,0.00028135467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016667213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1618921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013440499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022615324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784043650","doi":"10.7202/1042773ar","title":"Les services écologiques ou le renouveau de la catégorie civiliste de fruits?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03671347033134123,"score_gpt":0.307017876009089,"score_spread":0.2703044056777477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784043650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02066167,0.018106816,0.00011924624,0.009221451,0.0027892971,0.00011775017,0.000049835187,0.00009191048,0.94884205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720473,0.008584642,0.0015843138,0.0013080919,0.005008016,0.000008546897,0.0000012185004,0.00002970083,0.011428114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964036,0.0015364386,0.00039490088,0.00025986365,0.00041414573,0.000991051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983761,0.00041401346,0.00030692274,0.00013919074,0.0003532164,0.00041058453],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025094005,0.00026163328,0.0003729185,0.000045106302,0.013063911,0.0003095424,0.00057828124,0.00050585804,0.0006487045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018781783,0.00025429894,0.00023251098,0.00029863612,0.00320237,0.00042911927,0.00013537041,0.0007294032,0.0000822053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001616246,0.00019201523,0.0022680545,0.000048658534,0.00016737802,0.00010496749,0.02239388,0.000005332718,0.00003574708,0.94271654,0.008484164,0.023567101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030223862,0.00023874488,0.0036111227,0.00015210756,0.0000792545,0.00006571294,0.011581861,0.000027954531,0.00019691998,0.050558876,0.932905,0.00028020993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.220419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53502965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012136765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016313803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784255215","doi":"10.7202/1042776ar","title":"“Sacrifice Zones” in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Sacrifice; Capitalism; Framing (construction); Grassroots; Resistance (ecology); Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.038001274829251745,"score_gpt":0.31177183093792893,"score_spread":0.2737705561086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784255215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08113396,0.0019155159,0.0013791487,0.024667343,0.0023738295,0.00038960238,0.00008970406,0.00007248328,0.88797843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809224,0.0013881217,0.00088504376,0.014446157,0.0021533943,0.000009930868,0.0000031960499,0.000014826413,0.00017693966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981781,0.00045625566,0.00030053878,0.00019997387,0.0003386803,0.00052645215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.00019051957,0.000121967576,0.00018520895,0.0000106298185,0.00023677837],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010198982,0.000130822,0.00014726253,0.000042599488,0.0049879705,0.00013301235,0.0005298583,0.00015052964,0.0010578139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026993574,0.00010666997,0.000057679208,0.00008620129,0.0007189483,0.0006456196,0.000045290584,0.0004315115,0.00013484096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004017704,0.00021419837,0.00083304284,0.000027197993,0.000011657606,0.000047893172,0.017018273,0.000006662943,0.000006350389,0.97576094,0.00035080998,0.0056828256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019122424,0.00019040974,0.0036117616,0.000045951794,0.000056941142,0.000040958505,0.06612514,0.000021445408,0.00002424017,0.01797,0.91154176,0.00018015591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010933694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06805417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025957878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018824874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784283951","doi":"10.7202/1042777ar","title":"Le « dialogue » des parties et la vérité plurielle comme nouveau paradigme de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06243198502734576,"score_gpt":0.342602126200495,"score_spread":0.28017014117314926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784283951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055999037,0.0043491614,0.00010541163,0.045833565,0.0012933111,0.00019725652,0.000117362804,0.00006108104,0.8920438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898535,0.004416634,0.0005246465,0.00083397265,0.00085423654,0.00001654021,0.0000020772427,0.000038258408,0.0034601334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625206,0.0015632024,0.0004452412,0.00030148792,0.0005084149,0.00092960685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755055,0.00079216436,0.0004696799,0.0004167259,0.00016670368,0.0006042086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033908612,0.00030205425,0.00041250768,0.000037305195,0.018811006,0.0012458161,0.0010722288,0.00037009796,0.00023926648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007071799,0.00029625525,0.00029354953,0.0000873377,0.004424602,0.0017090297,0.00021079349,0.0010315364,0.00011063303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006895683,0.00030959267,0.0020529944,0.00009192001,0.00006349205,0.0004251658,0.010454369,0.000081908,0.000039775332,0.97516364,0.0049463264,0.0063018734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047794732,0.00013233168,0.0026546458,0.0005689562,0.000106555904,0.00063618436,0.0032762,0.000041808777,0.00026038446,0.062965766,0.9285204,0.0003588683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18009573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56329304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93385446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017901997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003516925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786157410","doi":"10.7202/1043161ar","title":"Le contrat de prestations logistiques","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04590899149200575,"score_gpt":0.34707412050680136,"score_spread":0.30116512901479564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786157410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071757208,0.002420439,0.0014729458,0.05929872,0.0036009408,0.00009692593,0.00007235561,0.000032792257,0.9258292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98303044,0.001231561,0.0015224818,0.0012513096,0.003040336,0.0000026493833,3.1699219e-7,0.000008808926,0.0099120755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821985,0.0003504122,0.00024594658,0.00016268219,0.0004101234,0.0006109766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989139,0.00013657572,0.0002460895,0.00008356173,0.00028180875,0.00033807792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010300776,0.000105199746,0.00014400456,0.0000139113645,0.009185293,0.00022666556,0.00037907035,0.00013909015,0.0008383659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024106304,0.00010380452,0.00011146712,0.00029076549,0.0027321219,0.0006860164,0.000030699623,0.00026826593,0.00014009817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006350815,0.00005988454,0.00032779347,0.0000024172816,0.000015019051,0.000020673066,0.0027104907,0.000009673198,0.00001834806,0.973404,0.01219371,0.011231665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018150557,0.00012935442,0.0018743025,0.00004595576,0.000018995743,0.000040371262,0.0032242762,0.0000738104,0.00015716793,0.06923256,0.9248866,0.0001351007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19820742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.623069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97585475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022994571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026633494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790519403","doi":"10.7202/1043162ar","title":"Le Marchand de Venise : le pari et la dette, le jeu et la loi","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02361544593520406,"score_gpt":0.30124232987756916,"score_spread":0.2776268839423651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790519403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015039557,0.0029891247,0.00026803208,0.034659974,0.0012529974,0.000071709794,0.00005590779,0.000031794716,0.9456309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602627,0.0011739922,0.0011955111,0.0029737847,0.0012430295,0.0000049175387,0.0000014547496,0.000022550454,0.03312203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970116,0.001560435,0.00029491968,0.00021549631,0.00034901936,0.00056853436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989096,0.00033324017,0.00014491988,0.00011383277,0.00013487875,0.0003635306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019232898,0.00017417745,0.00026765798,0.0000404551,0.0061037927,0.00014733103,0.00029850515,0.00017975224,0.00018911279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014916642,0.00016512396,0.00017107668,0.00024249929,0.0013292971,0.0005717999,0.0001290735,0.0006389217,0.00011626651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034811877,0.00025966106,0.00028128852,0.000014933039,0.000055580887,0.00016278824,0.0076986398,0.0000044579206,0.00004141743,0.96518916,0.011595014,0.01466223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051207346,0.0001543266,0.000547246,0.000090394955,0.00002454,0.00014226827,0.000688756,0.0000111227555,0.00007591943,0.016729131,0.9808177,0.00020651717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016653938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04503588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96922266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001177499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026481738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790988331","doi":"10.7202/1043159ar","title":"Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants : une atteinte injustifiée aux droits à la liberté d’expression, de réunion pacifique et d’association","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016116249900525025,"score_gpt":0.3280149736920107,"score_spread":0.3118987237914857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790988331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26658386,0.001546285,0.0013903226,0.18933089,0.0023388716,0.001251979,0.000718789,0.00046500663,0.536374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686581,0.009363479,0.0023121214,0.0041312957,0.0017347642,0.000055654727,0.000060497292,0.000066024884,0.0136180585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937312,0.0034661326,0.00063766737,0.00039142676,0.0007253469,0.0010482266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697953,0.0005742047,0.0007609186,0.00021005225,0.0009000758,0.0005752417],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048947707,0.00037186124,0.00034844514,0.00004576587,0.0058987737,0.0005127793,0.00047475268,0.0011240257,0.00037962012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005648533,0.00035883588,0.0003858649,0.00072100945,0.00093199627,0.0016193015,0.0000956252,0.0014158251,0.000045733297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007242027,0.00035327813,0.002858669,0.00007316869,0.00021552453,0.00006781675,0.058992907,0.00006261992,0.0055950307,0.89151216,0.038940277,0.0012561611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007571172,0.00024529736,0.005842525,0.0011905269,0.0002475301,0.0003506031,0.010611503,0.00012553102,0.0046464596,0.14408801,0.831366,0.0005289047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005508081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036502026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017592672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005246956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792813114","doi":"10.7202/1043163ar","title":"Les luttes de clocher en droit comparé","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.16210317677247382,"score_gpt":0.4184525204309658,"score_spread":0.256349343658492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792813114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39661485,0.0019228532,0.0003393381,0.031964358,0.0055900826,0.00025229252,0.000113441354,0.00009439877,0.5631084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551849,0.00028614004,0.0023071175,0.0043073883,0.006069354,0.0000023066589,0.0000034835216,0.000029553648,0.031809755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703074,0.00078115816,0.0004905912,0.00023902918,0.0005504654,0.0009080139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829966,0.00018256226,0.0002655924,0.00017431067,0.00055442465,0.00052342657],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157261,0.00023259196,0.0002694532,0.000045989622,0.0051933024,0.00023874381,0.0004486013,0.00029738832,0.004785557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001968713,0.00021743542,0.00020067013,0.0001433543,0.0020928374,0.00049652735,0.00006001755,0.000529736,0.00070888083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010972236,0.00013632144,0.0046296623,0.000017252018,0.00013159098,0.000024392122,0.025910601,0.00003062129,0.00020521149,0.94472325,0.019126838,0.005053313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036098837,0.00007356314,0.00956322,0.00007885037,0.000083931496,0.00019445951,0.009269217,0.00029588243,0.0013379357,0.0030228924,0.9754243,0.00029475478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04641047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12793371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95629746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024166848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114463444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060235","doi":"10.7202/1043165ar","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Gourd; Race (biology); Law; Critical race theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059374484762862896,"score_gpt":0.406693800985672,"score_spread":0.3473193162228091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028329147,0.000109589666,0.00008035055,0.3827903,0.001087759,0.00023018963,0.000016522004,0.000020180987,0.58733594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903024,0.000048212,0.0002794802,0.006000291,0.00041895427,0.000009556948,3.3366894e-7,0.000010598588,0.0029301844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755365,0.0014154844,0.00023891158,0.00016510053,0.00034607513,0.00028079524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720883,0.0019603346,0.00023278724,0.00023030538,0.00019091886,0.00017681706],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008146728,0.000111749985,0.00015920216,0.000028136248,0.04849325,0.0011801341,0.00039575194,0.00006639016,0.000053088766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070866193,0.000065347944,0.000060019593,0.0000500349,0.0007358598,0.0012606208,0.00018727384,0.0009115612,0.00002311929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091766095,0.000016638978,0.0001948553,0.0000014671864,0.000032316708,0.000005301843,0.006608227,6.7451094e-7,0.000020471147,0.98826295,0.0008448888,0.0039204406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738221,0.000021444781,0.0014049638,0.000036051202,0.000047893158,0.0001084286,0.016821504,0.000009258099,0.000024706123,0.041766796,0.9390673,0.00011783995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008401516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96197325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009629121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032443335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794287810","doi":"10.7202/1043166ar","title":"Kenneth M. Smookler, Farr & Beyond: Lawyers for the Otherworldly (Toronto: Wall & Emerson, 2016), p 118, ISBN 978-1-895131-26-0","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07585044040862375,"score_gpt":0.39133732355541206,"score_spread":0.3154868831467883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794287810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045781772,0.0009763781,0.00096461864,0.25614867,0.005721566,0.0005964017,0.00007676057,0.00011248818,0.7349453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75798696,0.004662965,0.015594904,0.025982914,0.008063396,0.00019947629,0.000030468855,0.00022234714,0.18725659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976751,0.00027569127,0.0004883222,0.0002824428,0.0006246284,0.0006538022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967585,0.00064580265,0.00087350595,0.00072286144,0.00069660303,0.0003026857],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313619,0.00021951839,0.00022475568,0.000046282184,0.025072869,0.0014948342,0.0013153381,0.0001669348,0.0044677584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014346319,0.00016530296,0.00023193499,0.0001211818,0.000571547,0.0023089617,0.00006747349,0.00081782835,0.00047416892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067740206,0.00017740008,0.0001783415,0.0000090976055,0.00018659905,0.0000017689767,0.005228963,0.000014392606,0.00009172662,0.5626168,0.4179737,0.013453447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051426695,0.00002677062,0.0005307783,0.000020820007,0.000061997576,0.00001276416,0.0017823844,0.0000093408,0.00001590737,0.005239447,0.99153847,0.00024705235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12475183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.651659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75752914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037888193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029202565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800807448","doi":"10.7202/1066339ar","title":"Explaining International Acts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; International law; Law; Ex-ante; Law and economics; Customary international law; State (computer science); Transparency (behavior); Proposition; Public international law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02178960889279507,"score_gpt":0.3030804993075395,"score_spread":0.2812908904147444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800807448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07647742,0.0000056362455,0.0000147060355,0.0011619446,0.0028974288,0.000045396504,0.000005787019,0.000026699045,0.919365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840115,0.000010406843,0.00027842817,0.00044259022,0.0010174952,0.0000010634468,0.0000025959557,0.000007531885,0.014228391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891025,0.00006380902,0.00016199803,0.00010162226,0.0005511996,0.00021111075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948597,0.00005881579,0.00009907959,0.00005873213,0.00018479988,0.00011261142],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049093785,0.00006233243,0.00007723114,0.00005219256,0.0023161152,0.00016157361,0.00035558952,0.00004894784,0.0074956054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028852204,0.000053430977,0.0000762056,0.00002292983,0.0000683841,0.0005143639,0.000029291186,0.00020445057,0.0009322508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010303559,0.000016381311,0.00014981664,5.4788956e-7,0.00002237087,0.000017636568,0.0004171222,0.000011705673,0.000025373627,0.99879456,0.00019001777,0.0003441918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024002545,0.0000187617,0.00024548432,0.000022035709,0.0000029278547,0.000026401327,0.00020475764,0.000015476036,0.00011978704,0.042129863,0.9568938,0.00008069661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042202874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040685236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015980948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016321575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804742156","doi":"","title":"Negotiating an Institution for the Twenty-First Century: Multilateral Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Negotiation; Institution; Political science; Criminal court; Law; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.033468720515043474,"score_gpt":0.3182715107814587,"score_spread":0.28480279026641525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804742156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50513285,0.00044219286,0.0030949851,0.033756457,0.010956533,0.0014099281,0.00011524522,0.00012067171,0.4449711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965461,0.00023453693,0.00022210594,0.0005794695,0.0019226499,0.000014266815,0.000005397732,0.000007729509,0.0004677792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886626,0.00009547109,0.00022578357,0.0001260061,0.000452829,0.0002336266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991654,0.00025484987,0.0001556018,0.000073624615,0.0002605951,0.00008992288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010280864,0.000093221584,0.00009068077,0.0000314795,0.011414641,0.00056186126,0.00042873513,0.000042632884,0.00014479832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008364436,0.00005039943,0.000082470484,0.000024132149,0.00051210413,0.00062028895,0.000040513227,0.00020959444,0.000005482397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017957274,0.000033726523,0.00016005822,0.0000012667987,0.000040441355,0.0000064603123,0.0018753443,0.00020026897,0.0000024242815,0.9965042,0.00007034092,0.0009259006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015210734,0.000034496254,0.0013479494,0.000021858066,0.000050706512,0.000104415914,0.0010117606,0.005376447,0.0000074850295,0.029575635,0.9608502,0.00009799532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030911984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019746555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96692854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012746219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017710008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884620965","doi":"10.7202/1054350ar","title":"Separate but Unequal: Immigration Detention in Canada and the Great Writ of Liberty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Political science; Immigration; Appeal; Tribunal; Immigration law; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Petitioner; Constitution; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.024730076698154517,"score_gpt":0.27758648343863157,"score_spread":0.25285640674047705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884620965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8605784,0.00030264206,0.000043751406,0.004814144,0.0011225169,0.00018560843,0.000020639838,0.000010280871,0.13292202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.0001947056,0.000035518216,0.00030057642,0.00021703646,0.0000011809102,6.0178326e-7,0.0000038489547,0.0003544262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.00032724557,0.00022521561,0.00007631462,0.00029454086,0.00016101301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947006,0.00011460248,0.00014582287,0.00006132137,0.00013869019,0.00006948222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012097707,0.000053899785,0.00011333019,0.000018344123,0.0014412791,0.00003880211,0.000104454215,0.000057384357,0.00006917696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006998143,0.00003533382,0.00003237697,0.00008651413,0.0004455169,0.00017560873,0.000013149504,0.00019848997,0.0000014619834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028261167,0.00003161434,0.012546345,0.000016435923,0.000052190113,0.000024542138,0.009786856,0.000029668083,0.00018686106,0.9571533,0.0008439662,0.019045582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024117716,0.00013689873,0.027764335,0.00011721492,0.00006066218,0.000032993135,0.009116769,0.00047808533,0.0013981882,0.026719833,0.9314738,0.0002894406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97937346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93062985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014147162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011653099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885453387","doi":"","title":"The Precautionary Principle in International Law: Lessons from Fuller's Internal Morality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Precautionary principle; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03336236246078287,"score_gpt":0.3443268035583912,"score_spread":0.3109644410976083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885453387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14242034,0.00015907541,0.000038725928,0.038082503,0.0014559533,0.00012988593,0.00015105995,0.000029211353,0.81753325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997398,0.0002868147,0.00029431362,0.00068580994,0.0006317872,0.0000061357728,0.0000067807136,0.00000819027,0.0006821439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861413,0.00019383024,0.000280711,0.00014511454,0.00046564353,0.0003005531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994884,0.00009974598,0.00012059013,0.00011774416,0.000022167422,0.00015131767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006944488,0.00009411041,0.00009553363,0.000021291413,0.0032543535,0.0001403054,0.00052909285,0.00007373154,0.00043964406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004175618,0.00007249832,0.000092535585,0.00005746678,0.00046710164,0.0003546936,0.00011654823,0.00039402142,0.000087481094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028110218,0.000081420636,0.0013333965,3.5855106e-7,0.00002402088,0.000025060734,0.00064245326,0.00020849735,0.000027541593,0.996187,0.000037253005,0.0014048868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000493139,0.000017738397,0.011063437,0.000031212214,0.0000046336504,0.00001882584,0.00049373694,0.0000060575803,0.00017437965,0.08650955,0.901092,0.000095311785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06164762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28597662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90967745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006436926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002640173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886224766","doi":"","title":"Anger, Provocation, and the Intent for Murder: A Comment on R. V. Parent","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Provocation test; Psychology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.12326596862208378,"score_gpt":0.3549516836329563,"score_spread":0.23168571501087254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886224766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010457314,0.0016963889,0.0020529493,0.5401895,0.0020460526,0.0017782083,0.00009241086,0.000060599865,0.44162658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577236,0.00030233548,0.00006796681,0.002912009,0.00019456593,0.00004392832,8.5733825e-7,0.0000046689656,0.0007013305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934876,0.00011296082,0.00016401437,0.000072933595,0.00015669169,0.00014464393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.00008769456,0.00008141302,0.00006776003,0.0000995444,0.00006957191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006006385,0.000050596445,0.000074035015,0.000018860212,0.0032976957,0.0001112036,0.00011004866,0.000019723862,0.0007068087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006304916,0.00003118861,0.00009735662,0.000033006738,0.00016256384,0.00007035682,0.000017647037,0.000099495126,0.00001296318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037213784,0.00025224438,0.0001792881,0.00000782218,0.000045885838,0.0000010835307,0.0034092767,0.0000033969723,0.0000022576482,0.85155874,0.09843063,0.046072148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075751846,0.000109250395,0.00010692971,0.000040502066,0.00001678814,0.0000061815913,0.0019157708,0.00014985236,0.000021606424,0.0024000194,0.99442947,0.000046109013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013321112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005665347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061464576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001493223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886416514","doi":"","title":"Gay Male Pornography and Sexual Violence: A Sex Equality Perspective on Gay Male Rape and Partner Abuse","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sexual violence; Sexual abuse; Gender studies; Domestic violence; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency; Medicine; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.052523424515744634,"score_gpt":0.36156825109880697,"score_spread":0.3090448265830623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886416514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356545,0.0007826972,0.00004238724,0.00054951216,0.0004915828,0.0002271055,0.000085691536,0.000104650724,0.062061854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973845,0.0001900388,0.00026570255,0.00078400923,0.00020068523,0.000024858931,0.0000044129188,0.000038737755,0.0011070834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976376,0.00029152125,0.00045526444,0.00065480865,0.00030747533,0.0006532837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877745,0.00009546383,0.00022689711,0.0004610402,0.00013842536,0.00030074693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000723045,0.00033792784,0.00042896435,0.00025322495,0.0012371424,0.00007508508,0.0002443059,0.00038125634,0.0008547551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022172853,0.00029663456,0.000096533455,0.00024541904,0.0006991184,0.00016868526,0.000069900096,0.0009582315,0.00005749535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005348616,0.0015694812,0.093157865,0.00002241954,0.00036111884,0.0012597212,0.0077163954,0.000005132292,0.00083894335,0.876928,0.0002741123,0.01733196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030781897,0.011527338,0.27862546,0.000481568,0.00093359704,0.061596006,0.20764247,0.000010187271,0.0054772063,0.076198585,0.3226682,0.004057482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018097103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015015691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8007294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115799005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010862813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887140835","doi":"","title":"Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; War crime; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03715039055804624,"score_gpt":0.31997361363144877,"score_spread":0.2828232230734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887140835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16371502,0.0005846482,0.000027020185,0.0011113809,0.0013193365,0.00013614856,0.000015774616,0.00012664411,0.832964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894383,0.0009083214,0.00096737803,0.003971427,0.0016783373,0.000018195058,0.000009096527,0.000043928718,0.0029650405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627495,0.00044174356,0.0006713862,0.00045847133,0.0011909101,0.00096253987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834394,0.00013226767,0.00022262309,0.0002541998,0.00043068072,0.0006162992],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013492948,0.00035459254,0.00036816706,0.00013840276,0.006558941,0.00051075174,0.0010401523,0.00021851111,0.008766034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017966448,0.00032439985,0.0002794128,0.00019195127,0.0005825105,0.0009952283,0.00010309705,0.00081627147,0.00048406795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012520867,0.00030117427,0.00012911264,0.000027605487,0.0002685768,0.00020008936,0.13472794,0.000039665003,0.00032559937,0.8024361,0.0022788774,0.059140027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000558375,0.0001089358,0.00014312105,0.00005036587,0.00004722803,0.000101218066,0.09566726,0.000035776313,0.0006752468,0.024329538,0.87786406,0.00041887845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014483886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009374011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8755852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058430026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001546402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887236326","doi":"","title":"Agriculture et Culture: Le Defi De l'OMC De Prendre En Compte Les Considerations Non Commerciales","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.03136252151050602,"score_gpt":0.28144274032579913,"score_spread":0.25008021881529313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887236326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1342989,0.02123178,0.0011730344,0.36290962,0.0022894829,0.0013448257,0.0006985407,0.00024243146,0.4758114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97630095,0.0033404208,0.004034321,0.002331716,0.0017096797,0.000008448646,0.000117627074,0.000006084389,0.012150759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966272,0.0006369024,0.00061491225,0.00035552616,0.00055299123,0.0012124592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980576,0.00051638647,0.00025283315,0.0000721984,0.00042840999,0.0006725595],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019529734,0.00040766952,0.00040242157,0.000030601084,0.0067733875,0.00044417306,0.00043333642,0.0006437348,0.0013544892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012994799,0.0001664257,0.0003199658,0.00040642463,0.0003388914,0.00050950894,0.00017880615,0.0016033405,0.0001610391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694537,0.0008203265,0.0064988495,0.000064602624,0.00026260316,0.00068041193,0.0014784322,0.00016450988,0.061511192,0.6142965,0.27722433,0.036921304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004382601,0.0002823962,0.12857403,0.0002499262,0.00006053744,0.003521362,0.003107296,0.000011519622,0.011440413,0.005757539,0.84607255,0.0004841737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070485896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09649096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84200203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003683254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061645296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887804744","doi":"","title":"The Changing Scope of the Fundamental Principle of Equality","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07654335096606173,"score_gpt":0.3755302857204677,"score_spread":0.29898693475440596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887804744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23009126,0.000050968156,0.0000306143,0.0027316585,0.0005381963,0.000104300205,0.000010887669,0.0000079322135,0.7664342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984983,0.00011480864,0.00002916758,0.0001489432,0.00008650673,0.000001044768,1.7984313e-7,0.0000034573918,0.0011175768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985624,0.0003638354,0.0002781491,0.000054493066,0.0005183164,0.00022279892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00008757874,0.00025211103,0.00012366501,0.00011636481,0.00006121767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025754098,0.000046150722,0.00008816622,0.000018112078,0.00421135,0.000046354173,0.000357193,0.00002907004,0.00018559504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011836837,0.000026136338,0.000108801345,0.00020927415,0.00045541904,0.00014202321,0.000077063305,0.00011291349,0.0000046685313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010417331,0.000038378694,0.0009045778,0.0000036146669,0.00001124684,4.5668008e-7,0.0020644309,0.0000043899754,0.000059501068,0.9934408,0.000022050346,0.0034401063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021557909,0.000023736155,0.0035201535,0.0000441775,0.000012206591,0.0000060335915,0.006165837,0.0000058533637,0.0018421864,0.0072020735,0.9809047,0.000057438207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013642496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017124739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006664271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001903119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888316458","doi":"","title":"Kraft Canada c. Euro-Excellence : l’insoutenable légèreté du droit","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020952591014374855,"score_gpt":0.2339473526485747,"score_spread":0.21299476163419984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888316458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034210715,0.004536696,0.000052548847,0.043959986,0.004732846,0.00011654369,0.00019416603,0.00004122366,0.9121553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105027,0.008013695,0.00018862513,0.0038029635,0.0030660443,0.0000022938204,0.0000028887087,0.000033986937,0.07438685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959903,0.0005718872,0.00066888536,0.00035958228,0.0011827574,0.0012265998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775356,0.00024758978,0.00038799903,0.000302667,0.00035140716,0.0009567682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092292647,0.00031775844,0.0004883273,0.00006940039,0.014550919,0.000105229716,0.00078693917,0.00021178323,0.0045878007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013961327,0.0003241536,0.00035208938,0.0007759652,0.0009824722,0.00060124084,0.00009310124,0.000847203,0.00031879146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022716978,0.0002269995,0.0031552103,0.000039713545,0.00039210488,0.004229949,0.0021578711,0.00091241766,0.00002248277,0.84769344,0.13755208,0.0035950018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033459277,0.000062074294,0.00023420533,0.00006699186,0.00014983451,0.001111765,0.0005951215,0.00016063564,0.00014845145,0.0019772225,0.994759,0.00040010567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97630584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98866993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87629193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008887428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005291539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890213531","doi":"","title":"E-Legislation: Law-Making in the Digital Age","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03652537517308075,"score_gpt":0.3070949287537616,"score_spread":0.27056955358068085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890213531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029300407,0.00011727054,0.000009507796,0.0043150247,0.00026720532,0.0000626836,0.000004134092,0.000020270132,0.99227387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962612,0.0001300535,0.000090235684,0.0019537965,0.0008136342,0.000002099411,0.0000012320107,0.000004783638,0.00074299815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989292,0.00012575857,0.00015756433,0.00008438907,0.00043641077,0.0002666671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996904,0.0000657694,0.00007080364,0.000080529055,0.000041549167,0.00005093873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007397518,0.00006643048,0.00007907623,0.0000035990638,0.0047393646,0.000488564,0.00032286928,0.00008752106,0.00023109927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044679073,0.000043370776,0.000100799894,0.00022075072,0.0002465012,0.00054313627,0.000018811745,0.00036382698,0.000034040346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038344815,0.000031216365,0.0003041199,6.1270646e-7,0.0000064424903,0.00015663593,0.009487544,0.000016552001,0.0000015319058,0.98594284,0.0010204678,0.0030281881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013824772,0.000010346462,0.0002226379,0.000018530924,0.000004015164,0.000086656226,0.00948261,0.0000021437895,0.000001180874,0.020720696,0.96924335,0.00006958691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037881092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027482443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99333113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077424564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070611327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99655634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890283622","doi":"","title":"Le Controle Judiciaire De la Constitutionnalite Des Lois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01894259619003049,"score_gpt":0.28404580529669704,"score_spread":0.26510320910666657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890283622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005629236,0.007324971,0.00033036852,0.009254665,0.0015555462,0.00008719321,0.00004133122,0.00003195401,0.9757447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926838,0.00089077983,0.0005184994,0.0018049916,0.0011966452,0.00000307472,5.706519e-7,0.000015324851,0.0028862793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966447,0.0018013616,0.0003457113,0.00016962584,0.00039632447,0.00064232474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879587,0.00022011221,0.00018472646,0.00008887219,0.0002281053,0.00048230682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214133,0.00017354911,0.0002840665,0.00003463142,0.012418193,0.00024095854,0.0002203088,0.00028875054,0.00047039258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003758979,0.00017780757,0.00028484405,0.00029166508,0.0046861027,0.0006550256,0.000020418875,0.00065843173,0.00015012815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012384584,0.00018183293,0.00040721142,0.000011240726,0.00008982368,0.00016119616,0.0025467696,0.000046204423,0.0000304432,0.9928666,0.00045391617,0.0031924108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005500465,0.00003242713,0.00007357803,0.000069606554,0.000046338784,0.00018607843,0.0010135558,0.0000030283022,0.000088982306,0.38769498,0.6101044,0.00013699001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019884204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012000827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062977785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035561153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890377513","doi":"","title":"Does International Law Impose a Duty upon the United Nations to Prevent Genocide","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Duty; Political science; Law; International law","score_opus":0.01805281861258426,"score_gpt":0.30298447276460716,"score_spread":0.28493165415202293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890377513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061923385,0.0000073888723,0.00002955862,0.02337613,0.001194368,0.0002060183,0.00007229744,0.000043729087,0.91314715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631354,0.000066807406,0.00046709809,0.0025831857,0.001227196,0.0000137511115,0.000012114591,0.000011726599,0.03248272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983633,0.00021184587,0.0002872193,0.0001468574,0.0007165397,0.00027420622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914664,0.00013402563,0.00009132432,0.00011604054,0.0003307512,0.00018120826],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006864699,0.00010503693,0.000089130735,0.0002003534,0.0076915505,0.00029111176,0.00064681,0.000056891782,0.0077185244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043099466,0.000056194658,0.00012512991,0.00022963913,0.0001557945,0.00040042342,0.00003600916,0.00026094812,0.0003067224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021169097,0.00005800177,0.000002833949,5.655748e-7,0.00005779509,0.000014985203,0.0010877464,0.00012143139,0.000017559112,0.9975728,0.00035708662,0.0006880627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013557059,0.000022392487,0.00006960049,0.0000193835,0.000012826923,0.000019943942,0.00011147851,0.00001383479,0.0001941088,0.15349083,0.84581745,0.00009257521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009750292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24853882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90121204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024410074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024102499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844950","doi":"","title":"Misrepresenting the Supreme Court's Record? A Comment on Sujit Choudhry and Claire E. Hunter, \"Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05152245062291007,"score_gpt":0.26822321045992514,"score_spread":0.2167007598370151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31428352,0.0002934143,0.000018820307,0.25423303,0.0018030222,0.0004568429,0.000050105096,0.000030405556,0.42883083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958075,0.00019579718,0.000010448293,0.0031679596,0.0007639719,0.000007326852,4.1525658e-7,0.0000088793995,0.000037654107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978208,0.00024268517,0.00031714395,0.00018200901,0.0010062368,0.00043113902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893224,0.00038870476,0.00023423138,0.00013626461,0.00017736424,0.00013120564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012423651,0.00015683896,0.0002294814,0.000029020877,0.010074673,0.0000878354,0.00034371504,0.000054354725,0.000055847497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002515479,0.00009706581,0.000100454774,0.00012858678,0.000665958,0.00011945046,0.00008943832,0.0005042181,0.0000027022254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019730016,0.00019429045,0.002653481,0.000007233178,0.0002666777,0.00004246664,0.0019940156,0.00032106487,0.000111300855,0.9819114,0.008356869,0.0039438517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012219239,0.00021938929,0.013654813,0.0006361796,0.00009389737,0.000043919066,0.012238753,0.000017585526,0.0011678607,0.03344788,0.93689,0.0003677858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65694207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89515215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94846356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044726965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020942428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891016535","doi":"","title":"Lock-Ups, Squeeze-Outs, and Canadian Takeover Bid Law: A Curious Interplay of Public and Private Interests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lock (firearm); Business; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.01932801093397525,"score_gpt":0.28377992968871857,"score_spread":0.26445191875474333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891016535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5066416,0.00047299065,0.00008382327,0.009351036,0.00021338042,0.00022776116,0.00015473962,0.00002894478,0.48282573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988875,0.00007856876,0.00015444167,0.0003455383,0.00016993243,0.000003003721,0.0000023871735,0.000009606464,0.0003490361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990386,0.000077017045,0.00024464796,0.00013851869,0.00017826226,0.00032297763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.000037812744,0.00012570427,0.0000994199,0.0000906699,0.00035697295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039748088,0.00009018329,0.00013408478,0.00006902375,0.0017788553,0.00021462483,0.00018510516,0.0000740373,0.00011045193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000249553,0.000079408244,0.000039153947,0.000117005955,0.000367511,0.00029579172,0.000057890993,0.00020963237,0.000008270118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027271535,0.000022363121,0.0021180464,0.0000044980843,0.000011852272,0.00000975508,0.00030933908,0.0000014979148,0.00008537882,0.9951735,0.00041474914,0.0018462918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022286756,0.000025340492,0.0030907763,0.00002590131,0.000010065479,0.0000459636,0.00018394759,0.000015504687,0.00012100648,0.0067828028,0.9893733,0.00010252184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5115847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96683455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98895854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012563591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049657265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895524770","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Business Income Trust Governance and Corporate Governance: Is There a Need for Legislation or Further Regulation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Legislation; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.033569913730193544,"score_gpt":0.2488389206145213,"score_spread":0.21526900688432773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895524770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315942,0.0012407805,0.00205144,0.004748173,0.00097584585,0.0008802051,0.00029428114,0.00009083856,0.058124226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971491,0.000054786044,0.0004389875,0.00031130319,0.0009808943,0.000010277741,0.00001893426,0.000040008053,0.0009957186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.000010797122,0.00061745866,0.00023454257,0.0003922054,0.00026184757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683255,0.00004130452,0.0023862948,0.00018332395,0.0005400527,0.00001650001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027872904,0.00022605147,0.0004028105,0.000041660605,0.00075650617,0.00021898767,0.00018542222,0.000095283765,0.00031697325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003693268,0.0001786805,0.000089936635,0.0004824362,0.000105976396,0.001546525,0.00006445605,0.00014187576,0.0000128859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014848282,0.0003220915,0.2115618,0.00040957867,0.00008643097,0.00002026305,0.000060763236,0.0016400506,0.0010371881,0.7599506,0.010537376,0.0128890285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002522776,0.00004334896,0.4963162,0.00028817795,0.00009230633,0.000022199276,0.00007511736,0.007952812,0.00038575983,0.014964336,0.47699207,0.00034488365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027793767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007965058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001564074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72863793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908624351","doi":"10.7202/1054351ar","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor’s Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Obligation; Economic Justice; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.04453274096055949,"score_gpt":0.3485523148975887,"score_spread":0.3040195739370292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908624351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14122158,0.00034009467,0.00069893274,0.059564434,0.0024944602,0.00037861185,0.000034639914,0.00021113253,0.7950561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995604,0.00007076382,0.0003862051,0.0014698928,0.0019462956,0.0000057630336,7.9553683e-7,0.000014979107,0.0005013083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979046,0.00036669374,0.0003056034,0.00019410554,0.0006969532,0.00053203973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987757,0.00038161376,0.0001625787,0.0001520579,0.00028950052,0.00023853814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020782116,0.00011947775,0.00013367127,0.000029960958,0.021774804,0.0003663958,0.0004840186,0.00017233887,0.00035543734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081797625,0.00008897032,0.00008807174,0.00023995878,0.0007949998,0.00041877895,0.00008830569,0.0010667351,0.0001126762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003441742,0.000029902165,0.00026847774,0.00001561699,0.000029145313,0.000028231349,0.0094004525,0.00001149467,0.0017718825,0.98249376,0.004918136,0.0009985099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022774964,0.000075406075,0.0005734973,0.00014581352,0.00010434397,0.00012915696,0.010229192,0.00009720388,0.00077204657,0.0057996036,0.9816342,0.00021177591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002306465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013835966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001669506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043156706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909073991","doi":"10.7202/1054353ar","title":"The Regulation of Hateful and Hurtful Speech: Liberalism’s Uncomfortable Predicament","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Harm; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.010978276933889202,"score_gpt":0.22115124661875163,"score_spread":0.21017296968486243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909073991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5430967,0.0011512717,0.10894245,0.014518809,0.009738091,0.0010794257,0.000024629646,0.0004983347,0.32095027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917097,0.000067852714,0.009983936,0.00012093233,0.00022152568,0.0000018305909,3.5967315e-7,0.000006638139,0.00042595316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989554,0.00007167978,0.000273017,0.0001472077,0.00033096713,0.0002217282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924845,0.000042428182,0.00018978043,0.0002649908,0.00014812379,0.000106258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007023998,0.00008471667,0.00009932058,0.00003921814,0.0020139238,0.00019384199,0.0003270007,0.00004664319,0.000024946534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002115191,0.00005631968,0.000042145224,0.00015292357,0.00014798011,0.00044108898,0.00010673892,0.00014534195,0.000011164876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009084351,0.00008946294,0.0004012918,0.00001847414,0.0001145904,0.00002124506,0.00044132886,0.00007241537,0.007226272,0.58011675,0.0034944594,0.40791288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067150756,0.00068939524,0.0030623593,0.00008061081,0.00001937908,0.000973457,0.000059125723,0.007940629,0.12366347,0.032789905,0.8298575,0.00019264918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015089537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043594895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003492144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009386298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910596530","doi":"10.7202/1054354ar","title":"« Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? » L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08803811472317494,"score_gpt":0.3690641221948028,"score_spread":0.28102600747162787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910596530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58695966,0.039590765,0.0064521576,0.09285492,0.007963489,0.0006338934,0.00017007087,0.0003169661,0.2650581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790362,0.009097267,0.0031338164,0.0019507017,0.0026389563,0.000011161838,0.0000024710955,0.000037920458,0.0040914873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957674,0.0010533339,0.0006777289,0.0004887728,0.0008025993,0.0012101765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759287,0.00037648567,0.00048942585,0.00025422467,0.00071023183,0.00057677214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023311917,0.0004266909,0.0004670822,0.000097624936,0.010357741,0.0005304385,0.00086526276,0.0005273763,0.0015868995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043257212,0.0003850281,0.0002658873,0.00044719523,0.0039756917,0.0017304391,0.000121871366,0.00075268705,0.00030914572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036389113,0.00056595815,0.010313637,0.00032780925,0.00041467228,0.00029120166,0.045273986,0.0006718288,0.0016705629,0.6507256,0.018010017,0.27137086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027873096,0.00076774706,0.0010605798,0.00085355056,0.00022720214,0.0004324804,0.045172542,0.0003381021,0.0043327105,0.03164302,0.91433954,0.00055379566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03372574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1358888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8963295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052526616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001656496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923088215","doi":"10.7202/1074154ar","title":"When Data Comes Home: Next Steps in International Taxation’s Information Revolution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Taxpayer; Politics; Information revolution; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Information exchange; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Public economics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1042520552874442,"score_gpt":0.24980569914797265,"score_spread":0.14555364386052844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923088215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021291358,0.0029154446,0.040114455,0.110710405,0.0058096247,0.0006895977,0.0033571548,0.00019706781,0.8149149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995564,0.0004441692,0.0017164374,0.0018889057,0.00019508129,0.000004886906,0.00011692929,0.0000065091576,0.00006308477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989757,0.000014857808,0.00063948525,0.00015339981,0.00007433275,0.00014221075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.000017300024,0.00081062707,0.0001660223,0.000067805064,0.00006965635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000316516,0.000087964436,0.0001857048,0.00016023342,0.00040652422,0.00015247401,0.00043609997,0.000040096893,0.00060786103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027152494,0.00009750692,0.00003982332,0.00017328089,0.000028200979,0.0026100373,0.00015985774,0.00020609105,0.0006534802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006982306,0.000062164734,0.05857403,0.000026540349,0.000091440845,0.000005184846,0.0012530106,0.00060208107,0.0000021605351,0.9084717,0.021085445,0.0097564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006954081,0.000024975634,0.056907587,0.000015669455,0.0000021389499,0.000011021748,0.00038343098,0.008242225,0.0000023531281,0.008742296,0.924844,0.00012887544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026046575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004713672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013877563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004516684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83993834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926525404","doi":"10.7202/1058196ar","title":"Expanding the Parameters of Participatory Public Law: A Democratic Right to Public Participation and the State’s Duty of Public Consultation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Duty; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Political science; Law; Liberalism; State (computer science); Public administration; Public law; Deliberation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07749659188114771,"score_gpt":0.32268579658395175,"score_spread":0.24518920470280403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926525404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456212,0.00025354864,0.00019104918,0.015357029,0.0003110004,0.00043314035,0.000016039909,0.000013516247,0.0378035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925256,0.00009388178,0.00005989505,0.00048102497,0.00004339557,0.000035382225,8.6587e-7,0.000004419565,0.000028567049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977609,0.0007551323,0.00045828754,0.00012333343,0.0005551999,0.00034713937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980768,0.0008463172,0.00034109328,0.00010686889,0.00046762527,0.00016129714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868155,0.000093748844,0.00023547842,0.000057060755,0.0031741525,0.00015259426,0.00021460313,0.000038371567,0.00006884024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010494695,0.000052675405,0.00007608851,0.00034692412,0.0016635204,0.0005127378,0.000062025894,0.00014956013,0.000009443264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036508878,0.000046975627,0.006042736,0.0000061361584,0.00010059236,7.427255e-7,0.005209975,0.000029124336,0.00007075887,0.9860022,0.000041752548,0.002412476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008934863,0.0007248282,0.04621853,0.00033969007,0.00043942864,0.000037969126,0.07042675,0.0007349662,0.0038597062,0.66912645,0.19812007,0.0010367255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004528368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03754583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31687576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075933945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007471216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926861112","doi":"10.7202/1058192ar","title":"Law Enforcement Access to Encrypted Data: Legislative Responses and the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Encryption; Enforcement; Charter; Law enforcement; Law; Legislature; Perpetuity; Context (archaeology); Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07273824518349938,"score_gpt":0.34704594891788465,"score_spread":0.2743077037343853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926861112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046812785,0.00012084928,0.0007754061,0.007183919,0.0012359594,0.00058979436,0.00008917404,0.000030967363,0.9852927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301565,0.00015726665,0.00010382205,0.0026911907,0.00053521997,0.000005780638,0.0000032683777,0.0000090678195,0.0034787392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828315,0.00042689065,0.0002354713,0.00021753188,0.0004969952,0.00033993775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892545,0.0003107273,0.00012173347,0.00033342827,0.00011364085,0.00019502449],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019755382,0.00010902631,0.00019383813,0.000035228346,0.0037984059,0.0005110076,0.0008758459,0.000057172143,0.00090063707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000733213,0.000062158535,0.000047431928,0.00012605145,0.0036482634,0.0012623516,0.00026516526,0.00021031394,0.00010311391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020367668,0.000013188412,0.00009754803,0.0000017376997,0.00003867657,0.0000066208536,0.003949469,0.0000028608695,0.000013149733,0.9938971,0.0009897873,0.00078620313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010673226,0.000056989047,0.00006378899,0.00002347935,0.000021799935,0.000013136107,0.0010339299,0.000027494429,0.00006929145,0.010689605,0.9868143,0.00011882943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043339888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018807296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98833436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059231388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023201894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927641725","doi":"10.7202/1058193ar","title":"Origines et évolution du droit québécois de l’absence : de l’existence incertaine aux présomptions de vie et de mort","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical Legal Studies and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024222988003820636,"score_gpt":0.31339820951676034,"score_spread":0.28917522151293973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927641725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.343285,0.0065195,0.00609255,0.051872194,0.003874027,0.00046293784,0.00013392391,0.00015125293,0.58760864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693003,0.01269034,0.004626062,0.0040041152,0.001169869,0.000016541275,0.0000024906017,0.000028975926,0.008161271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967816,0.0006634454,0.00046453482,0.0003164916,0.0005816598,0.0011922814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982399,0.00034007855,0.00028812073,0.0001816297,0.0003189981,0.0006312877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028459583,0.00025677242,0.00037704068,0.000033569282,0.0054370863,0.00013443817,0.00048319064,0.00028760225,0.00040029496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004027791,0.00025955515,0.00036172982,0.00048559406,0.0006166255,0.0006087054,0.00010215071,0.0010071999,0.0001226196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020882808,0.00022272635,0.016581155,0.000044714547,0.00008701988,0.00006970494,0.010430933,0.0017260935,0.00016073338,0.9658602,0.0033022587,0.0014936117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034396586,0.00015416401,0.012188778,0.00017036058,0.0000703156,0.00025657227,0.0023693775,0.0017641551,0.000012865367,0.009558179,0.9727905,0.00032078134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.464014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49974233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065921214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014026818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934123938","doi":"10.7202/1058194ar","title":"Le concept d’autonomie dans l’arrêt Carter c. Canada : Au-delà du libre-choix","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018683003179403454,"score_gpt":0.2876177974635624,"score_spread":0.26893479428415895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934123938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12748237,0.002055183,0.000092163646,0.14043738,0.025484541,0.0009560023,0.0005713165,0.000056751272,0.7028643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157488,0.00046349133,0.00028904225,0.045426056,0.0053297984,0.000013018549,0.000025375815,0.000102991886,0.03260143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931704,0.0020857311,0.0015126726,0.00048544558,0.0007250406,0.0020207164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549836,0.0011057692,0.0006403448,0.000595332,0.000379698,0.0017805074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253108,0.00044443872,0.0009075776,0.00004577556,0.008159691,0.000040110015,0.0005470373,0.0011314715,0.005274491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019726226,0.0004153034,0.00028818857,0.00023264007,0.0003042819,0.0005639568,0.00015527551,0.0059817857,0.0006486176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007932893,0.00028893296,0.0137277385,0.0010054512,0.00037486193,0.0006048457,0.03636557,0.00030365607,0.000060924922,0.36796442,0.56682926,0.01239501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029664694,0.0002560753,0.0054112794,0.0007127043,0.00009682041,0.00028283658,0.04022481,0.00033969572,0.00003592694,0.00016485882,0.949111,0.00039751697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93438524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030421775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010480846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934581520","doi":"10.7202/1058195ar","title":"Cabinet Immunity in Canada: The Legal Black Hole","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Principle of legality; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Statutory law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.019515672917165435,"score_gpt":0.24858846533777462,"score_spread":0.22907279242060918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934581520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3083154,0.0001476124,6.0636125e-7,0.0058747097,0.00054618437,0.00006789598,0.00001051769,0.000004121238,0.68503296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875003,0.00009672949,0.0000044920403,0.0006772246,0.0001797902,0.0000011096724,3.4094532e-7,0.0000021062021,0.00028816063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907553,0.00014193506,0.0001390551,0.000059472168,0.00034458414,0.00023941338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996835,0.0000759034,0.000052328684,0.00006021955,0.00006912556,0.000058953185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005041636,0.00005430446,0.00009882544,0.000012040138,0.0029166266,0.000036159396,0.00023127817,0.000021357237,0.0002673483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046185232,0.000036263733,0.000035219353,0.00013013165,0.0002813496,0.0001302704,0.000043748936,0.00029932093,0.000057010184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009430579,0.000014536506,0.0097753825,7.1585026e-7,0.000016783739,0.000023849949,0.00032843975,0.00035442374,0.000006350317,0.9876164,0.0010258617,0.00082780403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016641752,0.000010212272,0.025129214,0.000013541114,0.0000043930363,0.0000050416074,0.0062200413,0.000010114948,0.00001103735,0.0028500685,0.96550906,0.000070863454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98476636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034842757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941441854","doi":"10.7202/1066340ar","title":"Extra-Territorial “Fiduciary” Obligations and Ensuring Respect for International Humanitarian Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Human rights; International law; Political science; Law; Treaty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; International humanitarian law; Sociology; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.029423599918070833,"score_gpt":0.3045859863553015,"score_spread":0.2751623864372307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941441854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14098871,0.000027460934,0.00006871469,0.0019622084,0.013550756,0.0003256445,0.00010720624,0.000049202972,0.8429201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885816,0.000009063006,0.00074979133,0.0002015745,0.0065581095,0.000007666046,0.000010965426,0.000013860573,0.0038673864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987843,0.00007353522,0.00026756883,0.00018314207,0.00044652,0.00024492925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912584,0.00015403917,0.00013000297,0.000080443526,0.0003897211,0.00011997037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066677446,0.00009693745,0.00012157039,0.00007191865,0.0043103043,0.0003452346,0.0002887152,0.00007843815,0.00070650794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005956148,0.00009063522,0.00009951557,0.000022476048,0.00015675611,0.0005815991,0.00003285718,0.00020144154,0.000042411593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000358404,0.000027263022,0.00008388768,0.0000025683225,0.00004364186,0.0000052441987,0.00049819355,0.0000053326585,0.00008212699,0.9988361,0.00027358654,0.00010620706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005234295,0.000046006386,0.00021906084,0.000028547165,0.000010784087,0.000014119745,0.00009681169,0.00001464618,0.00015425468,0.27375013,0.72503793,0.000104290804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002792026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054952048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8475929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018871149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002276916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946420703","doi":"10.7202/1067518ar","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; State (computer science); Federal law; Competition (biology); Consolidation (business); Political economy; Law; Economics; Legislation; Accounting; Politics; History","score_opus":0.07637408542294566,"score_gpt":0.2640928476731368,"score_spread":0.18771876225019113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946420703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38478544,0.0004888772,0.00012770637,0.37620676,0.0005002876,0.0004823962,0.0000502248,0.00005888073,0.23729944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932115,0.00007014328,0.000026685364,0.0065016174,0.000106802254,0.0000029528526,0.0000024345513,0.000004371147,0.00007349433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.00016600978,0.00019016901,0.000082235885,0.00019792715,0.0001678425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994716,0.000117159994,0.00012247631,0.000042050124,0.00005899345,0.00018768692],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034757357,0.000056003915,0.00013123528,0.000008811239,0.0030284121,0.00011895613,0.00015708295,0.000022454407,0.000019162355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003451105,0.00003944836,0.000020906986,0.00015842418,0.00018865796,0.00008362291,0.000037858565,0.0002788394,0.0000015953053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019987083,0.000006070774,0.00068062445,0.0000014672594,0.0000059963622,0.000013676819,0.0012950015,0.00017757945,0.0000015264065,0.99646884,0.0012132014,0.00011601439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005850971,0.000006211411,0.0002089015,0.000005471085,0.0000051077027,0.0000047129174,0.0013776217,0.0010108759,0.000005681546,0.003586856,0.9931438,0.000059674152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035377496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004194886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.13267640555325838,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.23636146091734722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946648245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89470935,0.00029675246,0.0000324539,0.005127698,0.0011719936,0.00036233576,0.000025910482,0.000051844356,0.09822168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800247,0.00006168004,0.00020067362,0.0008826001,0.0007927546,0.0000037214072,3.329578e-7,0.000009332177,0.000046423185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978711,0.0003338911,0.0004624177,0.00022835577,0.00074409676,0.00036013403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.00014922062,0.00024166802,0.00011191134,0.00019292014,0.00042360253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007753392,0.00012736651,0.00025600943,0.00003693074,0.0044089113,0.000104719926,0.00033156542,0.00005667783,0.00027605525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025282474,0.0001109924,0.00009340083,0.0003028645,0.0002252628,0.000613923,0.00010242322,0.00032402272,0.000030022225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010292041,0.0038168966,0.007053419,0.0004011663,0.00048337164,0.10764513,0.6732554,0.00029650534,0.00038730173,0.14301944,0.009728752,0.05288345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017332315,0.0025129465,0.00024192804,0.00020790407,0.000731189,0.0033747023,0.2548732,0.00008909948,0.00012995914,0.0015279788,0.7340718,0.00050608534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013137615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030340549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.724343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036957204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947703422","doi":"10.7202/1066342ar","title":"The Private Law State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Commercial law; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Liability","score_opus":0.018253781736423332,"score_gpt":0.29304985253850757,"score_spread":0.27479607080208424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947703422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024150107,0.000047426398,0.000023979908,0.006986487,0.00034425594,0.00013347434,0.000010305881,0.000026960708,0.968277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995218,0.00015717249,0.00012298641,0.000529461,0.0001674957,0.000003213046,2.9018568e-7,0.0000064177684,0.0037949737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918145,0.00008087201,0.00014149673,0.00007597422,0.0002618964,0.00025828337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.00008226904,0.000085301,0.00013674083,0.00006354671,0.000113894035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070999016,0.00004753544,0.00005694661,0.0000057628267,0.007748602,0.00022541598,0.0003282541,0.000024469662,0.000177747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001372051,0.000030089393,0.00005592495,0.00007705152,0.00016988516,0.0001881166,0.00004426417,0.00020989556,0.00051662786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027537542,0.000007902966,0.00007477248,5.0587187e-7,0.00000678455,0.000001098689,0.0001641716,0.00001551018,0.000041857482,0.997396,0.00015899425,0.0021296707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009538113,0.000010394731,0.00015647817,0.0000040643336,0.0000026367495,0.000004091473,0.00020489481,0.000008710327,0.00012583024,0.029840188,0.9694974,0.000049973667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027157597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026582658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006022827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000106499865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99354315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998893351","doi":"10.7202/1066335ar","title":"La compétence concurrente en matière d’immigration : rendre aux provinces canadiennes ce qu’elles ont perdu","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Immigration; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.011676544188732764,"score_gpt":0.23550787436310855,"score_spread":0.2238313301743758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998893351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120555095,0.015746582,0.000012861745,0.019842383,0.011843991,0.0004885773,0.0006925848,0.0000544882,0.83076346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323897,0.0034193548,0.00011040303,0.00023275542,0.00096611015,0.0000049537675,0.0000101669975,0.00002335485,0.06284323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741024,0.000673162,0.00044284225,0.00030344469,0.0005639501,0.00060635066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985745,0.00018051361,0.00033741555,0.00017668663,0.00023420052,0.00049668294],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088309887,0.00020807928,0.00032319935,0.0002071789,0.0056531895,0.0006211673,0.00049756095,0.00023886125,0.0038867993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006936525,0.00024463888,0.00020227379,0.00026615002,0.0011081288,0.00097390445,0.00005141946,0.00075100997,0.0006886027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019876328,0.000095833864,0.00062748883,0.00014204066,0.00007974849,0.00018329803,0.021752201,0.000049905957,0.000034075878,0.8861766,0.02422089,0.06661808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027307632,0.000113924805,0.00075853907,0.0003574872,0.000061351246,0.00022623542,0.016131358,0.00012586622,0.0000068494364,0.0005431878,0.98109996,0.00030215716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.932768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027247837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065912306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999232322","doi":"10.7202/1066334ar","title":"Droit et culture : une approche distributive de l’identité","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05964993740228157,"score_gpt":0.3674861599701538,"score_spread":0.30783622256787224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999232322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31419042,0.0022944217,0.0008155541,0.03921473,0.006562814,0.0007681665,0.0008908346,0.00010987199,0.6351532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585013,0.0007153232,0.0009167439,0.0048885453,0.0011565731,0.000004747447,0.000049231792,0.000031362004,0.13373616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685085,0.0006091531,0.0004997857,0.00033344032,0.00075714855,0.0009496199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981875,0.00009576527,0.0003866479,0.0002192547,0.00057515583,0.0005357233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010691884,0.00028882388,0.0003307545,0.000034444234,0.002559279,0.00033447237,0.000493432,0.00038014454,0.0012921588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018673344,0.00025693342,0.00030064795,0.00029862547,0.00072178076,0.0009929636,0.0000868953,0.0009330241,0.00078957103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011264283,0.00013917564,0.0021214907,0.000034791956,0.0001398166,0.000037728536,0.026402347,0.0001184145,0.00021276048,0.95833415,0.0120255435,0.0004225009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059807027,0.00006680619,0.0029058482,0.00012335414,0.000109822606,0.00029659396,0.034606468,0.00013670471,0.0005685976,0.00473592,0.95548993,0.0003618912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01979876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04072234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95359826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026632769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001741568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000048186","doi":"10.7202/1066337ar","title":"David a déjà vaincu Goliath ... L’efficacité de la protection contre les clauses abusives selon un paradigme de prévention : inspirations du droit belge","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021551056165149518,"score_gpt":0.2801893528066505,"score_spread":0.258638296641501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000048186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88532794,0.0031260604,0.0037365532,0.014933781,0.0016334313,0.0010133396,0.00008161585,0.00014037441,0.090006895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933829,0.0017892469,0.0006611613,0.00026430964,0.0009789243,0.000033764765,0.0000040786526,0.000033799264,0.00285186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648106,0.0013228406,0.000550478,0.00035193563,0.00054946163,0.00074420543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984001,0.00030191353,0.00048569473,0.00018968689,0.00025071437,0.00037190714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002135628,0.00027730776,0.00033459757,0.0000954635,0.006075738,0.00038572005,0.00035905073,0.0004056177,0.0008447627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028099222,0.0002887605,0.00029675674,0.00039794325,0.00057034375,0.0011729709,0.000052574032,0.00087176776,0.00018188833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682303,0.00061920204,0.0063633,0.00017300478,0.00015188393,0.00013432665,0.005782077,0.0010937166,0.0021438838,0.9315464,0.00033331703,0.05149066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010825124,0.0005659512,0.015257324,0.0009975827,0.00032633866,0.0010614789,0.00379343,0.00080190576,0.0012609382,0.025709553,0.9486359,0.00050708844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011575223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028390191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94830257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008439024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012834217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000221256","doi":"10.7202/1066336ar","title":"Is “Truthtelling” Decontextualized Online Still Reasonable? Restoring Context to Defamation Analysis in the Digital Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Harm; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04838881685359261,"score_gpt":0.3310091419049802,"score_spread":0.2826203250513876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000221256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67915434,0.00013433199,0.00047635284,0.0029557939,0.0006111855,0.00042690907,0.00006332388,0.000046247365,0.31613153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709547,0.000043032323,0.00042340308,0.0012841237,0.00017838967,0.000003994495,0.00001279228,0.000009089171,0.0009497387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801373,0.00028562793,0.00043933172,0.00020055354,0.0007479162,0.00031281947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890804,0.00032266625,0.00021142985,0.00022799252,0.00015665137,0.00017320571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014679211,0.00011847391,0.00025508952,0.00023068824,0.0010007379,0.00047993366,0.00040410698,0.00009197919,0.000594852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048823285,0.00008667357,0.00018635512,0.00080982794,0.000060691807,0.0006075965,0.000034000957,0.00026292444,0.00016468787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005907058,0.0007514381,0.038996153,0.00003073766,0.0004726117,0.00014033113,0.078418255,0.0041795042,0.00038210492,0.77967715,0.0071237357,0.089237295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093667064,0.000074013646,0.0074957623,0.00011528741,0.00006999195,0.0000078010635,0.020843495,0.00057144364,0.00006731171,0.0023833096,0.9671925,0.00024246589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035576187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05468383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001708112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017089686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008263108","doi":"10.7202/1067517ar","title":"🗨, 📖, ⚖ : que pensent les tribunaux des émojis, émoticônes et autres pictogrammes?*","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.06660858882000344,"score_gpt":0.3112146181658438,"score_spread":0.24460602934584036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008263108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020181188,0.04518264,0.00048011102,0.30200294,0.004980751,0.00051129,0.00038276272,0.00029338017,0.6259849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551891,0.021900684,0.0028909128,0.008182493,0.003327098,0.000007744778,0.000011805342,0.000055002816,0.008435137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612993,0.0010811992,0.00059020397,0.00039006746,0.00084574806,0.0009628349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979254,0.00022142405,0.00034087614,0.00015366093,0.0003986531,0.00095999375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010418625,0.0003814663,0.00047330974,0.000008078593,0.010283499,0.00052474404,0.0006487777,0.0004818226,0.0059868083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031869224,0.00032501933,0.0006674806,0.00055224175,0.0020222568,0.0008322027,0.00014252882,0.001348895,0.00026166867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039908457,0.00026522606,0.00064042746,0.00011418166,0.0002525713,0.0001881351,0.024696395,0.00018284464,0.000068902395,0.9003344,0.044029176,0.029187823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065986364,0.00023335314,0.00032326925,0.00021240952,0.00016883134,0.00015157634,0.021149606,0.000042220465,0.00025625434,0.013421459,0.9629741,0.0004071061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047490187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04791048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9350079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028797952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008486213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008613337","doi":"10.7202/1067520ar","title":"King Rex v. Judge Judex: Adjudicating Transnational law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977516048451073,"score_gpt":0.31569036282098006,"score_spread":0.28591520233646933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008613337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008843598,0.000014407375,0.0005803413,0.008303443,0.0010404576,0.00007213977,0.000021099746,0.000051700958,0.9810728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946852,0.000006683878,0.001489031,0.0013268092,0.0020208962,0.0000028442043,0.000006121668,0.000011413436,0.00045102683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984114,0.00014427863,0.00028621766,0.00014413649,0.0007289223,0.0002850201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991206,0.00009318859,0.00017744474,0.000066339824,0.0004114336,0.00013101102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010839925,0.00008362357,0.00009481462,0.000045785666,0.00715254,0.00014472043,0.00026870522,0.000079716665,0.00067750056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007276889,0.00008124328,0.0000916163,0.0001253293,0.00032786597,0.00055278343,0.000017036798,0.0002273058,0.00006173543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008397947,0.000024493347,0.0001501373,0.000001145922,0.000016368827,0.000004234866,0.00041719875,0.000004922784,0.0001880609,0.9975525,0.00014364226,0.0014888574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588308,0.000040564784,0.00089583563,0.000023323848,0.000011313982,0.000024898001,0.00016893912,0.00007477796,0.0011424418,0.044265196,0.9529696,0.00012427622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003542748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085160054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001927283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028257955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008912886","doi":"10.7202/1067516ar","title":"Hybrid Torts and Explanatory Tort Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Law and economics; Cause of action; Delict; Argument (complex analysis); Equity (law); Action (physics); Sociology; Political science; Private law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.07165384993003572,"score_gpt":0.3877047057562384,"score_spread":0.3160508558262027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008912886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35696727,0.0014858431,0.00031182752,0.07435937,0.0025338752,0.0005957928,0.00006391255,0.00019682788,0.56348526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799434,0.00019182582,0.00022968749,0.01822628,0.0011651544,0.000008111698,0.0000021433775,0.000015769065,0.00021766302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.0007703399,0.00041787224,0.00017538875,0.00028698286,0.00033355202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810964,0.0007993745,0.00017306415,0.0001272232,0.00008530885,0.00070536276],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015096689,0.00010845171,0.00022315004,0.000017907414,0.0024140447,0.000012894122,0.00012347054,0.00008849665,0.0048831096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012727618,0.000081698396,0.000047101177,0.000035578087,0.00008830225,0.00025873585,0.00008920104,0.0011859335,0.0002846667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063386606,0.00015142749,0.014557808,0.00056829356,0.00015892493,0.0009661063,0.0044847163,0.0000015980431,0.00020515585,0.8638576,0.09172799,0.022686495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042602402,0.00010574834,0.00095579633,0.000072006784,0.000029613651,0.000059381677,0.0025143928,0.000010755245,0.00006579297,0.0042172656,0.9914447,0.00009852411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080976046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007107514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89971673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002795493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009004270","doi":"10.7202/1067519ar","title":"L’importation interprovinciale des boissons alcoolisées à des fins personnelles : R c. Comeau et la confirmation de règles de droit de la période de la prohibition","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0184787787578569,"score_gpt":0.28177919435788495,"score_spread":0.26330041560002804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009004270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123308,0.0028808634,0.0075824526,0.0073478883,0.00029482314,0.0002480231,0.00041108,0.00011044417,0.16879363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991587,0.002956539,0.003278566,0.0010768265,0.00045768623,0.000012227324,0.000014864442,0.000032193948,0.0005840864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662614,0.001943761,0.00035934598,0.00019339913,0.00029750125,0.0005798806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841464,0.00043766783,0.00029596663,0.00007187321,0.0001366354,0.0006431949],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024293445,0.00017159226,0.00022199446,0.00017423353,0.0052509345,0.00110419,0.0002470991,0.0003249586,0.00044414305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007300311,0.00023773445,0.00020102496,0.00026820318,0.0025398056,0.0009145158,0.000029505052,0.0006883597,0.00003192039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012148607,0.0003225075,0.006639309,0.00037734088,0.0001372916,0.0005516889,0.23985203,0.0013108661,0.002189342,0.7104387,0.009699424,0.028359987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072007906,0.00015628811,0.01710715,0.0005623663,0.00020059032,0.00087293517,0.020923575,0.0016943332,0.0004364819,0.03474894,0.92218417,0.00039311036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30717847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8567776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030541343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087531446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043009569","doi":"10.7202/1070287ar","title":"Who’s Afraid of the Lucky MOOSE? Canada’s Dangerous Self-Defence Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self defense; Law; Honour; Property (philosophy); Accident (philosophy); Homicide; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Philosophy; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.04184741893304051,"score_gpt":0.269954528803408,"score_spread":0.22810710987036747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043009569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20922703,0.00035183798,0.00019139826,0.15504897,0.0020648253,0.00040562192,0.000078918354,0.000090967085,0.63254046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970666,0.000044532815,0.00021082896,0.0022233105,0.0003039922,0.0000010386907,3.3313287e-7,0.0000064329693,0.00014291078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985033,0.00014826586,0.00029823414,0.00011525734,0.0006946596,0.00024024714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914783,0.0000714811,0.0002410713,0.000105928244,0.00030879438,0.00012487287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050445384,0.00007904112,0.00013304687,0.00001566902,0.0024979238,0.000047082594,0.00047375902,0.000046466026,0.00011497737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003449607,0.000058646085,0.00005045987,0.00048754382,0.00014744165,0.00024585,0.000060182938,0.00027470515,0.000004930515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037262856,0.000041570293,0.0028932202,0.00004494212,0.00003988276,0.000043459146,0.006373589,0.00012827663,0.0005819584,0.958842,0.024181206,0.006792667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095007184,0.000031532374,0.0012870533,0.000044217904,0.000019551733,0.000015858024,0.0015208775,0.000020866946,0.0009853825,0.0005871388,0.99530315,0.00008933607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45103085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88644725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97112197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001877343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028242747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043381337","doi":"10.7202/1070284ar","title":"Le droit à l’égalité et l’accès aux professions réglementées : bilan contrasté de la jurisprudence canadienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11022199512322442,"score_gpt":0.4429821479100602,"score_spread":0.3327601527868358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043381337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01958147,0.005914747,0.00066997885,0.69063663,0.005422128,0.0013723454,0.0012932995,0.00013797333,0.27497143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682538,0.0017160682,0.0014359974,0.023477579,0.0021997287,0.00006573252,0.000016367227,0.000103013524,0.0027317211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813528,0.013701496,0.0017066969,0.0005351644,0.0005507269,0.0021531342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912582,0.00347061,0.0012203142,0.0003834301,0.00053627027,0.0031311666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00987039,0.00044019942,0.000792238,0.000104294,0.010723383,0.00018785661,0.0006707481,0.00085816457,0.002598152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025468958,0.00041706764,0.0002334119,0.00042250153,0.0002998976,0.0011152715,0.00024844197,0.0056837667,0.00032367633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016582268,0.00025450907,0.004669573,0.001147871,0.00020967264,0.00090758543,0.013340361,0.000025794778,0.00021968337,0.94197124,0.016795859,0.020292025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015300955,0.0003860422,0.0032709886,0.0020862755,0.00010750858,0.00058132317,0.01747661,0.00020923518,0.000059073787,0.0040563056,0.96981436,0.00042215886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25218967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50979704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95301855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068062544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029824753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045858969","doi":"10.7202/1074155ar","title":"I Robot: U Tax? Considering the Tax Policy Implications of Automation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Revenue; Tax revenue; Automation; Income tax; Business; Capital (architecture); Economics; Human capital; Basic income; Public economics; Finance; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.08154816508986898,"score_gpt":0.2643592183264339,"score_spread":0.1828110532365649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045858969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010377376,0.0016777387,0.03263835,0.23587535,0.00051135354,0.00036291796,0.00070047926,0.00010359221,0.7177529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968992,0.00013101862,0.0010004558,0.0017208996,0.0001625738,0.0000068509817,0.0000011685144,0.00000789022,0.00006993915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993051,0.000011828236,0.00042675994,0.000104525614,0.000028552537,0.00012323147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921584,0.000031553704,0.0005202477,0.00011872233,0.00005507439,0.00005855414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014525671,0.00006661135,0.0001684042,0.000046631012,0.0009409204,0.00003907909,0.00016072903,0.000023219687,0.00019268964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015749483,0.000057921734,0.00008251286,0.00020115105,0.00006290391,0.00014049729,0.00004446926,0.00012373592,0.00012543357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023948733,0.00001160288,0.0026365595,0.0000069437597,0.000036321893,3.4312583e-7,0.0002074011,0.00059195526,0.000063030624,0.9940649,0.0011459755,0.0012325629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044692887,0.00006281302,0.09125769,0.000015383459,0.0000083761815,0.000042636733,0.0003059908,0.0009711157,0.00039208532,0.06563006,0.8407044,0.00016255565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026561474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022284934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98652184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004242204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057828993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7236894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081936494","doi":"10.7202/1075519ar","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Common law; Law; Political science; Cornerstone; Legal culture; Comparative law; Public law; Legislature; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.16479050332137934,"score_gpt":0.3890236582032524,"score_spread":0.22423315488187306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081936494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007666124,0.0014723308,0.0006792007,0.010854564,0.0016056033,0.00004414217,0.000034758403,0.000037113416,0.98450565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886193,0.0006255942,0.004617157,0.0050898218,0.00084866927,0.0000035579303,0.000004048452,0.000004152686,0.00018769629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982417,0.00064270815,0.00024852646,0.00014976798,0.00040197145,0.00031529774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990258,0.00035220827,0.000091310954,0.000074854535,0.0003403037,0.00011549396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008159848,0.00009341925,0.00022990821,0.000012488688,0.011589614,0.000067343135,0.00016252822,0.00009426896,0.0007622978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018892117,0.00008492859,0.00013319492,0.00016301723,0.0020718588,0.0002806329,0.00007626906,0.00028809547,0.00009117849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920819,0.0000388708,0.00009478238,0.000001044749,0.00006326039,0.00019819393,0.00032046536,0.000011849117,0.00003167359,0.9979284,0.0005614145,0.0007421336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013390348,0.000007545141,0.00004612477,0.000012415868,0.000018983417,0.00018695947,0.0010445095,2.0236683e-7,0.00023907823,0.38795918,0.6102803,0.000070828566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024524327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17469962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98969716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091886512","doi":"10.7202/1071748ar","title":"Eligible Non-participation in Canadian Social Welfare Programs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Welfare; Odds; Government (linguistics); Revenue; Intermediary; Public administration; Politics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Finance; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03711161722281342,"score_gpt":0.32092134555345386,"score_spread":0.28380972833064044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091886512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08248259,0.000034718785,0.0000045740885,0.3589749,0.0003116303,0.0002683589,0.00014140976,0.000027654523,0.55775416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471873,0.000010293629,0.000031562195,0.004501491,0.00060343725,0.0000062828476,0.0000020711736,0.000008052481,0.00011805954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881184,0.00007579329,0.00017512984,0.00010774382,0.00024330261,0.0005861969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990546,0.000007684575,0.00007442193,0.000034701578,0.00005059193,0.0007779721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030468125,0.0000666404,0.00010524415,0.000041758216,0.0031894867,0.000109272,0.00017399143,0.000079214755,0.0002296776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008785728,0.0000729153,0.000054257398,0.00033459568,0.00009012116,0.00024149979,0.000008887218,0.0002367345,0.000041378476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018337076,0.000031241638,0.0056578773,0.000008702546,0.000012577462,0.00016950612,0.011577008,0.000025317977,0.000008050969,0.95208204,0.009294584,0.021114733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002065614,0.000025620271,0.006449114,0.000007643226,0.0000039878046,0.0000024946794,0.0005327442,0.000034190096,0.000017109025,0.00034598864,0.992279,0.000095568554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96692425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049794535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014868322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092071758","doi":"10.7202/1071747ar","title":"A Tale of Two Metaphors: A Narrative Take on the Canadian Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Narrative; Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07055643361135451,"score_gpt":0.3173559824964412,"score_spread":0.2467995488850867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092071758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06952176,0.00018851344,0.000006254421,0.10546995,0.00042537248,0.0003857414,0.00008189742,0.00002630734,0.8238942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801296,0.00002448394,0.000099358345,0.0015800481,0.00022199553,0.0000047262956,5.789941e-7,0.0000028772843,0.000052987107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.00027801792,0.00017600371,0.00009594602,0.0003842827,0.0002402797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999239,0.00010092693,0.0001339703,0.000043753087,0.00021149246,0.00027085858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046880514,0.000083275685,0.00015032633,0.000014841471,0.008960365,0.00006709289,0.00019701403,0.000042654636,0.0004055766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049614505,0.00004913126,0.000100763995,0.00018527317,0.000777985,0.00014652952,0.000017674369,0.00028699514,0.000032785847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125365,0.000013615747,0.00016179091,0.0000021298245,0.00009952283,0.00001881386,0.05012746,0.000057840283,0.00010584737,0.94715315,0.0018308559,0.00041644185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033418604,0.00009468627,0.0002569144,0.000035040608,0.000035853773,0.0000058045052,0.046034202,0.000021546124,0.00082929083,0.0009894143,0.9512334,0.00012969351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5545964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030761617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007113613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99232984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092308306","doi":"10.7202/1071749ar","title":"L’évolution récente du concept d’indépendance judiciaire et les menaces internes à la détermination de la peine juste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035899695317970604,"score_gpt":0.3385506678202538,"score_spread":0.3026509725022832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092308306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14731632,0.0146232005,0.0027205423,0.31012082,0.0051228725,0.00039128034,0.00017840153,0.00018764251,0.5193389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074197,0.004488767,0.0004321352,0.001503386,0.0016592067,0.0000041292474,0.0000041462913,0.000024445044,0.0011418103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641925,0.0017573051,0.00045215338,0.00029842346,0.00057430624,0.0004985703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0005575399,0.0003993762,0.000090170666,0.00021779086,0.0003794253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018279871,0.00024034291,0.0002997753,0.000036785532,0.0027947365,0.00031076765,0.00044288227,0.00026961882,0.000439232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005486003,0.00023976271,0.00019563417,0.00024769362,0.00148569,0.0012111733,0.00010858377,0.0008858146,0.000068130794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010997915,0.00013897681,0.0015065066,0.0001037791,0.00006341567,0.00041901317,0.010591861,0.00033227447,0.00032084802,0.9167979,0.008399947,0.061215505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048682158,0.00021735266,0.0018970908,0.0006512637,0.00012896738,0.00044644237,0.004631995,0.0011368126,0.00066138944,0.0017480336,0.98771334,0.00028050886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00862022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010679783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030584662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007351514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092406708","doi":"10.7202/1071746ar","title":"Avoir conscience de l’internormativité : contribution à l’étude de la conscience du droit en contexte pluraliste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conscience; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04628976683547152,"score_gpt":0.39218532525408223,"score_spread":0.3458955584186107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092406708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2008158,0.009820652,0.03014439,0.58678514,0.009074388,0.0020730086,0.0015242327,0.00027675656,0.15948565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750646,0.0017932378,0.0009999543,0.020236684,0.0014219725,0.000023211234,0.0000039645397,0.00003403265,0.00042239408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794019,0.016304078,0.0014655831,0.00045169916,0.0007149901,0.0016617454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873349,0.008368541,0.0013837824,0.0002570782,0.0007173455,0.0019383217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01931918,0.00035933044,0.00068257004,0.00007659298,0.008944229,0.0003160328,0.0007594406,0.0006615475,0.0012646927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010092949,0.00033901967,0.00021555314,0.00041916416,0.0011657779,0.0017146749,0.00024294811,0.0039595016,0.00055337185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040021885,0.00023784721,0.012654052,0.0010702934,0.00015424793,0.0015191541,0.029993394,0.00017599063,0.002633334,0.9161536,0.012946196,0.022061655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017868932,0.0003913166,0.0036175428,0.0015076393,0.00007500802,0.003837545,0.005723623,0.0048788628,0.0004145377,0.001726232,0.9756726,0.00036818103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088039795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007190365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012870948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077631895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093446389","doi":"10.7202/1075597ar","title":"It’s the End of Working Time as We Know It: New Challenges to the Concept of Working Time in the Digital Reality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Labour law; Work (physics); The Internet; De facto; Incentive; Law and economics; Sociology; Telecommuting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.06978912799647338,"score_gpt":0.2857603874172603,"score_spread":0.2159712594207869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093446389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015418235,0.0010024895,0.000017620456,0.14676917,0.00014203644,0.00015035008,0.000013203475,0.000006960765,0.85035634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972853,0.0008467669,0.000019612167,0.0008117355,0.0002611066,0.0000023363266,0.0000022989093,0.000005733905,0.0007651243],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985277,0.0002944509,0.00042067943,0.000110895,0.00039533054,0.00025093302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893737,0.00055117236,0.00020046871,0.0001720577,0.00006364105,0.00007526869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016570773,0.00009472346,0.0001835483,0.000025526642,0.0010065171,0.00024701058,0.00051582756,0.00006136485,0.00028596385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012762935,0.00005406957,0.0001310388,0.0002934419,0.00024074395,0.0004317938,0.0000468227,0.00026731408,0.000053073567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432844,0.00007621379,0.00004235053,0.000004991131,0.00005415892,0.000009287371,0.04682164,0.0002998555,0.0000033914305,0.2773581,0.0018908338,0.6734049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014980313,0.000032244563,0.00010008958,0.0002723356,0.000011487305,0.000018819304,0.014269566,0.000012305939,0.00013721455,0.005266903,0.97965723,0.00007200489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022769882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011216032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99574345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005593732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074183336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109580876","doi":"10.7202/1075599ar","title":"The Presumption of Restraint and Implicit Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Statute; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042840599871330924,"score_gpt":0.3357891345843867,"score_spread":0.29294853471305576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109580876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14215131,0.0016856221,0.00003368593,0.019337833,0.00059071905,0.00010083868,0.000014953144,0.00001933208,0.8360657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841547,0.00093957805,0.00013275455,0.000111194175,0.00014711318,7.9162743e-7,1.9871257e-7,0.0000029057253,0.00025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.00015134271,0.0001594979,0.00007369707,0.00024543024,0.0001658216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994441,0.00016880949,0.000078413825,0.00008031247,0.00013781845,0.0000904918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007914411,0.000040102033,0.00007074062,0.0000053930776,0.0039977343,0.00010222727,0.00011069839,0.000034855868,0.000059961712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011261886,0.000028262799,0.00004436954,0.000049252638,0.0003604587,0.00016274182,0.000033756587,0.00013193347,0.0000033745414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001022439,0.000008762346,0.00004664287,0.0000040322802,0.0000069325692,0.0000150133255,0.0003351907,0.0000022216873,0.0007100054,0.9928055,0.00015143353,0.00590408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008602494,0.000026398247,0.0010823997,0.00003970527,0.00001561294,0.000093105395,0.0019520068,0.000002715483,0.001645712,0.024459131,0.9705508,0.000046430967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041191718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087390386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028347185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015418766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05094792858388508,"score_gpt":0.3716267187745402,"score_spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121429145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002554926,0.000061656916,0.0018513412,0.00744567,0.0006285085,0.00013333741,0.0001557674,0.000022979179,0.98714584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982001,0.000021845139,0.000121391175,0.0007028195,0.00084845134,0.000003208659,0.000006200002,0.000004328433,0.00009164731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986889,0.000043067037,0.00029473836,0.00011245036,0.0005709708,0.0002899119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.00016483226,0.00014315158,0.00010429127,0.00037088455,0.0002076412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010926994,0.00007356925,0.000111437665,0.000035596568,0.00421672,0.00011079146,0.00037963383,0.000121471116,0.00032330593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021827384,0.00006399325,0.00010405041,0.00011069086,0.0007517654,0.00063002517,0.00004406861,0.00037384668,0.000031115298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074810755,0.00007293025,0.00004139087,0.0000019069181,0.000028713988,0.0000045933402,0.00048498364,3.6175226e-7,0.000014814321,0.99875456,0.000055900407,0.0005323817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095593445,0.0000121,0.00014416405,0.00001874163,0.000008990531,0.0000040913583,0.00028653882,7.1813287e-7,0.0005137292,0.5286148,0.47025156,0.000048961247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054735276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06410047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001956806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012009141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471502","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Theme (computing); Pedagogy; Politics; Legal education; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04796488995796207,"score_gpt":0.36687485666668146,"score_spread":0.3189099667087194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015492456,0.00079838454,0.000007257781,0.25149846,0.0046324893,0.000052044146,0.0000097697275,0.000009706466,0.7414426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92877066,0.0008893202,0.0023639912,0.008312373,0.004244922,0.0000041624344,0.0000017703126,0.000012388884,0.05540044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983458,0.0003788803,0.00042600196,0.00012522729,0.0003372643,0.0003868241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897283,0.00021738716,0.00022154873,0.00010059563,0.00028949106,0.00019816088],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014049186,0.00010077739,0.0001234104,0.00007805991,0.002662282,0.00022924728,0.00021258974,0.0001315783,0.013959481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047955776,0.00010521463,0.00006671132,0.00061846036,0.00021656428,0.0020733594,0.00001863388,0.0012009969,0.0036888998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008214633,0.00027889706,0.00018722069,0.000003861482,0.000012914658,0.00001483695,0.0016256494,0.00006196696,0.000007822363,0.8976375,0.028506493,0.07165464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002540387,0.000026347632,0.00036443802,0.0000491842,0.000011152566,0.00007620408,0.0008447599,0.00004737111,0.000022758577,0.002002191,0.99617046,0.00013108566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011835901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08281024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045717045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014130182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121482348","doi":"10.7202/1074417ar","title":"Un droit promotionnel de la diversité culturelle « en montagnes russes » : l’Union européenne et le Canada du cycle d’Uruguay à l’Accord Canada‒États-Unis‒Mexique (ACEUM)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0061720111706889055,"score_gpt":0.18742078583475166,"score_spread":0.18124877466406275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121482348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0642431,0.0022774134,0.00028672724,0.11234248,0.0035840957,0.0002434973,0.00015373151,0.000052458487,0.8168165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96863735,0.0006034282,0.00035227597,0.02088113,0.0010812825,0.000006216847,0.00012696344,0.00005022523,0.0082611535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765205,0.00035549348,0.0004928306,0.000332005,0.0006478,0.00051981397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984238,0.00014700281,0.0003919045,0.00016836927,0.0007351923,0.00013370225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069796946,0.00033097385,0.0002763627,0.000070665905,0.0037467768,0.00061861845,0.00038245734,0.00013572398,0.0019529278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022457115,0.0003477265,0.00014028404,0.00028567112,0.00011855917,0.0016729321,0.00023556368,0.00065792986,0.000029308092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025096773,0.00031823732,0.0015585751,0.00010108893,0.00018382556,0.0013643502,0.00007116882,0.001331857,0.00020376663,0.95354104,0.04084373,0.00045729245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011061664,0.000019778032,0.007139353,0.0002202881,0.000110244124,0.0006446707,0.00095552846,0.0020923535,0.0015265004,0.009116388,0.97664845,0.000420284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087386376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007229326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121549881","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism, and the Constitutionality of Canada's Private Copying Levy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Copying; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010743120386991588,"score_gpt":0.24142404904333215,"score_spread":0.23068092865634054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121549881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117369205,0.000461691,0.00015645027,0.014935972,0.0007214028,0.0001800839,0.00004750981,0.00001820671,0.8661095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991496,0.000071822906,0.00007496907,0.00023226869,0.00022913817,0.0000010380433,9.938265e-7,0.0000023718894,0.00023774827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989854,0.00016544796,0.0002282915,0.00006817017,0.00038460002,0.00016805505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947876,0.00012017787,0.00015491436,0.00005260145,0.0001245953,0.000068929505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097078824,0.000055560406,0.00012243653,0.0000117530535,0.0062176213,0.00007465839,0.00009661565,0.000034233246,0.00011190338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032953038,0.00003653154,0.000040810504,0.000058501348,0.00082256866,0.00011158174,0.000017400129,0.00012955753,3.4878573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023323184,0.000008114927,0.0005950503,0.0000022815238,0.000011166262,0.000005314056,0.00010913112,0.00001633224,0.000014243481,0.9982781,0.0007093,0.00022764182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006064716,0.0000056186936,0.002661072,0.000016630836,0.000013631649,0.00002870724,0.00014253183,0.00002058255,0.00017473433,0.011058612,0.9852167,0.0000547464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8517678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108474276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108824715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.023678146374099533,"score_gpt":0.2768374858055749,"score_spread":0.25315933943147534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122182973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00829422,0.0001945054,0.000048288464,0.031256933,0.00020583067,0.0002163641,0.000009601052,0.000018063836,0.9597562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0000566048,0.00017483789,0.0005434541,0.0002056611,0.000008861629,2.2029138e-7,0.0000047819003,0.00036857763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991707,0.00013362916,0.000217946,0.00007125291,0.00023274163,0.00017373438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916834,0.00032297874,0.00016050586,0.00007910061,0.00015106563,0.00011801465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064705196,0.000056462846,0.00014617426,0.000007895818,0.0032811402,0.00012195464,0.00016626844,0.00004854395,0.00022152207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000955503,0.000034679244,0.00006278722,0.000043999957,0.0010002023,0.00029716938,0.000026293552,0.00023993061,0.000008775348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009022902,0.000016739868,0.000048165588,0.000001105025,0.0000133717695,7.7250957e-7,0.0011072113,0.0000011983059,0.00006852115,0.9970854,0.00017322857,0.0014752803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052908016,0.000012737375,0.00030081533,0.0000064191927,0.000018665105,0.00001131855,0.000746641,0.000049769264,0.00008447346,0.03285235,0.965335,0.00005269996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018245861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027499836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005415936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000135979635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122476906","doi":"10.7202/1042774ar","title":"“The Earth is Our Mother”: Freedom of Religion and the Preservation of Indigenous Sacred Sites in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Worship; State (computer science); Supreme court; Religious persecution; Persecution; Law; Political science; Faith; Indigenous rights; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Human rights; Theology","score_opus":0.011550450499905109,"score_gpt":0.24821970703139423,"score_spread":0.23666925653148913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122476906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683853,0.0016575677,0.0000055735936,0.0025972722,0.00020281778,0.00018073746,0.000014209426,0.000003205315,0.02695333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454695,0.0048759454,0.000064060834,0.00011177608,0.00014472184,0.0000011666467,1.8091731e-7,0.0000043380624,0.0002508652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891645,0.00021738974,0.00025153463,0.00006398125,0.00037160874,0.00017901722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930346,0.00013715992,0.0002512709,0.00010330705,0.00015700347,0.000047781956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010328675,0.00005299696,0.00013027308,0.00002292383,0.0017396807,0.00003895211,0.00023099188,0.00003774634,0.000004366741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001108812,0.000029971274,0.000030722,0.00013695669,0.000298928,0.0001156939,0.000024157172,0.00011106402,5.720127e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018838219,0.00018628118,0.26031247,0.00008757825,0.00044462085,0.000050777337,0.16143529,0.00043299733,0.001422389,0.40485147,0.14644396,0.02244835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021321783,0.00024591913,0.011284185,0.0001160236,0.000039646562,0.000018567736,0.016229767,0.00045813827,0.0031225367,0.025823245,0.9403188,0.00021099347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79387486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048760012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013201387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602294","doi":"10.7202/1074419ar","title":"Les avis consultatifs au Canada : omniprésents, déterminants, banalisés et déroutants : Essai critique de Carissima Mathen, Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions, Oxford, Hart, 2019 et Kate Puddister, Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Politics; Ex parte; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027945566024496472,"score_gpt":0.31434958007070196,"score_spread":0.28640401404620547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07578846,0.09265873,0.00007921043,0.2768767,0.014646949,0.0020801944,0.061466075,0.000046830533,0.47635686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98525715,0.0063618748,0.000051039668,0.006041418,0.00026397125,0.000010539083,0.000019995543,0.000025574329,0.0019684169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471873,0.0020674549,0.0008540487,0.00031175633,0.0010322334,0.0010157854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604493,0.0014197333,0.0007194087,0.0004369529,0.0009889667,0.0003900053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878089,0.00037867957,0.0005333474,0.000026983202,0.012269708,0.00021026786,0.0008654626,0.00020303456,0.00007741788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005373487,0.00021714292,0.00017283726,0.00022401148,0.0042221337,0.000301976,0.00030277023,0.0010790324,8.761268e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014791665,0.000074610674,0.0050678686,0.000056676312,0.00030301983,0.00011971383,0.0044914125,0.000089479225,0.0000029981513,0.9660201,0.023564257,0.00019508795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047822943,0.00004424375,0.007507309,0.0008605717,0.00040887523,0.00051861786,0.01981734,0.00007304137,0.000053765867,0.012635457,0.9572988,0.00030376308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95338464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009292107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006744266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122673644","doi":"10.7202/1074151ar","title":"Strategic Games and Algorithmic Secrecy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Construct (python library); Outcome (game theory); Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Public relations; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.10617122104491088,"score_gpt":0.3475608397624484,"score_spread":0.2413896187175375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122673644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032048475,0.00039182056,0.000047080106,0.06903778,0.0003428379,0.000097930024,0.000018025667,0.00005891728,0.89795715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945971,0.00090264453,0.00038252174,0.0031516252,0.00086572825,5.090549e-7,4.130118e-7,0.00000857919,0.000090909445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901736,0.00016159854,0.00014449272,0.00010629511,0.0003019209,0.00026832081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916106,0.00007710143,0.00007594524,0.00003565186,0.0001487985,0.0005014509],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006520349,0.000074655254,0.00012668023,0.000014643368,0.0040332694,0.00035331564,0.00015040908,0.00010845992,0.00022360323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017422062,0.0000670261,0.000054582597,0.00010114727,0.0002769796,0.00039145263,0.000027429021,0.00047499235,0.000019722696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586507,0.000010885462,0.000048562768,0.0000043324326,0.000019216073,0.0000377447,0.0047279615,0.0000019588904,0.000056198834,0.9902004,0.00018409242,0.004702805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005135356,0.00020779629,0.00016305312,0.000028535625,0.000027106713,0.000026840396,0.020006709,0.000080704565,0.00008936835,0.23952182,0.739075,0.00025953958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021407106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005492828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035599765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000396639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122989730","doi":"10.7202/1074418ar","title":"Criminal Law and Digital Technologies: An Institutional Approach to Rule Creation in a Rapidly Advancing and Complex Setting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Normative; Institution; Political science; Emerging technologies; Strengths and weaknesses; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028449072122355895,"score_gpt":0.29416837875582025,"score_spread":0.2657193066334643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122989730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23160581,0.0006527438,0.00073460763,0.0046295216,0.00018640854,0.00023011025,0.000056823166,0.0001442818,0.7617597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984584,0.00011645122,0.0146390265,0.0004950498,0.0001034901,0.0000046174555,0.000011455119,0.000004799651,0.000041144554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990644,0.000075058524,0.00017278099,0.00019172406,0.00024668226,0.00024939454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996239,0.00003849437,0.00005396889,0.00005787942,0.00010479333,0.00012095096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004603386,0.00008430579,0.000121957586,0.00001159812,0.0036189836,0.00032543042,0.00010061583,0.00010924151,0.000015393229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015255724,0.00007685926,0.000030408457,0.00017960339,0.00040357126,0.0008941399,0.00007132475,0.00026120627,0.0000012387508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011879011,0.000099534445,0.00093621557,0.00001879338,0.000011391516,0.000030277357,0.0070331017,0.00009319257,0.00026732107,0.976853,0.00007534971,0.014569944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009667148,0.00008839778,0.0023601903,0.00015389557,0.000029015437,0.00067183655,0.19684672,0.00026792998,0.0002819632,0.03694994,0.76097995,0.00040344542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023718915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039554383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011717194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028582654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123801536","doi":"","title":"Measuring Judicial Activism on the SupremeCourt of Canada: A Comment onNewfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.05662370584923329,"score_gpt":0.2501783787137477,"score_spread":0.19355467286451442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123801536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391559,0.00017355621,0.000015652982,0.014932021,0.0009926803,0.000133101,0.000017599672,0.000010666316,0.9445688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830574,0.00008324894,0.000020085856,0.0012587963,0.00027189057,0.000004061827,1.6781584e-7,0.0000051476013,0.000050887775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981266,0.00030979287,0.0002267886,0.00010508433,0.00089620735,0.00033548567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.0002541318,0.00014569153,0.00007902499,0.0001897295,0.0001283909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011510724,0.00010575261,0.00018400693,0.000023415807,0.007802678,0.000035154324,0.00019199043,0.00003887671,0.00019849635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003391158,0.00007264281,0.00008528674,0.000120474724,0.00034076566,0.00008101965,0.00002213399,0.00026697278,0.000004465871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029197732,0.00006413201,0.0011883174,0.0000011740711,0.00010352987,0.000015486405,0.00027728386,0.000027716533,0.00002205209,0.99476993,0.0029009774,0.0006002015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002968996,0.000048702866,0.002651946,0.000065187836,0.000030115581,0.000013633132,0.0022548798,8.3698876e-7,0.0004240766,0.019767195,0.9743128,0.00013373772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74292535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033379695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124583437","doi":"10.7202/1074153ar","title":"Tax Cryptographia: Exploring the Fiscal Design of Cryptocurrencies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Corporate governance; Politics; Economics; Business; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.18266736516594512,"score_gpt":0.23967625535358264,"score_spread":0.05700889018763752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124583437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019096013,0.014718245,0.49278897,0.0603922,0.0047751274,0.00096111913,0.00052592135,0.00019816463,0.40654424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969657,0.0005975031,0.0017078216,0.0005182609,0.0001680987,0.000015128458,3.415958e-7,0.00000945496,0.000017679055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991804,0.000023676283,0.00044167403,0.00013132663,0.000052235733,0.00017073854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935836,0.000053479565,0.00037360087,0.000101259124,0.00004177717,0.00007154057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002678381,0.00009472227,0.00023489469,0.00004533693,0.0009539145,0.000041105417,0.0002400699,0.00002017468,0.00019842606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010062741,0.00007501554,0.00013049896,0.00021653977,0.00010584945,0.00020749198,0.00005335283,0.0002060436,0.00008624145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025030446,0.000028551689,0.0035532408,0.000014244865,0.000085288826,0.000003086473,0.00049849664,0.00083813374,0.000019347399,0.9912471,0.0019696446,0.0017177884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054403645,0.00018275097,0.016284253,0.000027480684,0.000010633422,0.00001720935,0.00078926265,0.0005969142,0.00035003308,0.036797617,0.9441827,0.00021711466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003178071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027289985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015870004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017260137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7336835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888583","doi":"10.7202/1074152ar","title":"Governing A.I.’s Professional Advice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Professional association; Legal profession; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06806531519421341,"score_gpt":0.3834765777206284,"score_spread":0.31541126252641494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124888583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082390185,0.00002089063,0.000039991464,0.23687626,0.0009828438,0.000042120395,0.000007542726,0.00004951134,0.7611569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797316,0.000021093176,0.0013068529,0.015181445,0.0012688189,0.0000024364415,0.0000022656081,0.0000069314387,0.0024785157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900967,0.00019086302,0.00017373131,0.0000800574,0.00038001523,0.00016569292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992476,0.00012602014,0.00015549756,0.000038512866,0.00020687527,0.00022547386],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597613,0.000047291007,0.000059175618,0.000015569669,0.005357824,0.00014864517,0.00016326024,0.000044656856,0.003500188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084455096,0.000042825963,0.00003651928,0.00028112603,0.00006364209,0.00089921395,0.000019998937,0.0006909184,0.0004695537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014692267,0.000042958414,0.00025325007,0.0000029431521,0.000012250256,0.000007785841,0.0060763187,0.0000074401746,0.0000479312,0.9425692,0.048034422,0.002930785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011753942,0.0000133725125,0.0001823262,0.000008105173,0.0000057595335,0.000009515358,0.005680171,0.00001536327,0.000020231728,0.00046454964,0.99342203,0.00006105311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018738756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035686458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97890776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007565058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015010173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124941131","doi":"10.7202/1066341ar","title":"In Praise of Jus Cogens’ Conceptual Incoherence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal positivism; Jurisprudence; International law; Political science; CLARITY; Positivism; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.025326618857296496,"score_gpt":0.3071694049722342,"score_spread":0.28184278611493774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124941131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4785492,0.000017326372,0.00000210157,0.00023534351,0.0005320491,0.00006981592,0.0000121133,0.000004066979,0.52057797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542385,0.000007400361,0.00010627587,0.00019300698,0.0001815297,0.0000010695101,6.8582386e-7,0.0000041752096,0.00408201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990141,0.00011144338,0.00022773337,0.00008413252,0.00038766835,0.00017491737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994874,0.00008061316,0.0001363376,0.00005734826,0.00016877629,0.00006952567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044989522,0.000054180186,0.00012180922,0.000045895526,0.0005758199,0.000022446651,0.00023323928,0.00005362897,0.0032591508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028473376,0.000045622928,0.000053173604,0.00004484236,0.00026641702,0.0002892773,0.000019932058,0.00017328748,0.00016300908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015927846,0.00003341275,0.00054195104,0.0000018120154,0.0000075131657,0.000017459835,0.0010466303,0.000011065314,0.00009005036,0.9980708,0.0000951662,0.000068257985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000660183,0.0000931906,0.00096412335,0.000059407655,0.000005271865,0.000018279543,0.00060686684,0.000007720237,0.00094852626,0.07027533,0.92624134,0.00011973963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003281811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027910387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008669125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003351309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125361809","doi":"","title":"A Legal and Epidemiological Justification for Federal Authority in Public Health Emergencies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Public administration; Epidemiology; Public authority; Law; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.4445633343673583,"score_gpt":0.5121437152608671,"score_spread":0.06758038089350882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125361809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6145571,0.0019117207,0.026545672,0.25662425,0.00831565,0.0050832555,0.00058739726,0.00033007318,0.0860449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963976,0.00021357788,0.0064451494,0.003090051,0.00044815536,0.000036272155,0.000026518748,0.000010625054,0.00008989711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675506,0.0007354396,0.0011737068,0.00022497207,0.00017725969,0.0009335418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800044,0.0007297918,0.00042875198,0.00011533711,0.00020852768,0.00051714043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010785592,0.000126924,0.00034096467,0.00014976806,0.010438742,0.00001953176,0.00011773932,0.0002460721,0.00013538895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010597396,0.000108666434,0.00006789487,0.00017910553,0.000088200366,0.00031140848,0.000055237575,0.0011167895,0.000015423004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008805422,0.00009400279,0.030681876,0.00015033662,0.000008207746,0.000003601066,0.00089481956,0.0000055245446,0.0000049822097,0.9615509,0.0020433369,0.0044743554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008938771,0.00022455229,0.17898074,0.00007543718,0.000004587666,0.000026807073,0.003663832,0.0003884491,0.000001190756,0.01125264,0.80435884,0.0001290558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034946185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07873672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95029825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040196948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012628952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99084955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125620752","doi":"10.7202/1074416ar","title":"Causation, Fault, and Fairness in the Criminal Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Innocence; Supreme court; Blame; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Conviction; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0488158441860651,"score_gpt":0.2732423416107337,"score_spread":0.22442649742466858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125620752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5773253,0.00036162924,0.00011819967,0.0069106445,0.0008723861,0.00012990658,0.00003623611,0.00002935415,0.41421637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965445,0.000089110996,0.000066983856,0.0030531394,0.0001119022,0.0000024667356,5.3766564e-7,0.0000061058863,0.00012530103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989951,0.00021336331,0.00018279895,0.00016506836,0.0002510388,0.00019257725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996153,0.0001105133,0.000051534164,0.00012114876,0.00004255463,0.00005892112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002538018,0.00007994589,0.00008664927,0.000020628006,0.0013557777,0.00012388847,0.00016702614,0.000031104235,0.00011093463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011919703,0.00005215819,0.000034238816,0.00015525383,0.00011891527,0.00024804447,0.00004155616,0.00028154862,0.000015612512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008676024,0.000080586586,0.00015792018,0.00001226253,0.0000018332029,0.0012165739,0.00043570914,0.000030739826,0.015766427,0.9789065,0.00017976687,0.0032029895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287477,0.00012736504,0.0076236166,0.00009334386,0.0000378943,0.013937043,0.0017175371,0.0002593539,0.14462878,0.033923786,0.7959878,0.0003760277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019572885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039100917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001770659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006532653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01975974329420483,"score_gpt":0.274742387572499,"score_spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125842437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009752969,0.00004818097,0.000025476353,0.012191919,0.000042736032,0.00008806366,9.1355594e-7,0.0000057655348,0.977844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.000083414874,0.00022061255,0.0006136704,0.00007366208,0.0000030878484,5.161456e-8,0.0000019100803,0.00021440865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994051,0.0001433667,0.00013149715,0.000052010764,0.00014997191,0.000118052296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967855,0.00010173574,0.00007601741,0.000053206317,0.000039891616,0.00005062194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015775933,0.0000305351,0.00007605083,0.000008161371,0.0017110021,0.000050679464,0.00016403335,0.00002365308,0.000031339143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063369094,0.000014035604,0.000024569976,0.00006748479,0.0005234175,0.00018815437,0.000027876838,0.00013332232,0.000003238534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005215094,0.000010168716,0.0001718412,0.0000013799415,0.0000018729293,1.5914844e-7,0.0019060612,0.0000017924374,0.000012748765,0.9953514,0.000014060481,0.0025233433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003065871,0.000011620374,0.00028720906,0.000017092834,0.0000039822226,0.0000036801312,0.0010356117,0.00008765071,0.000071407136,0.024658773,0.97348285,0.000033519074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037889153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049785484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001371394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006123397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126051783","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Accountability of Credit Rating Agencies : The Case for a Disclosure-based Model","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Credit rating; Business; Accounting; Financial system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03555714488539851,"score_gpt":0.24653110756551314,"score_spread":0.21097396268011462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126051783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752706,0.00069338124,0.112611435,0.0010916119,0.00041109626,0.0005144976,0.00044328722,0.000022710816,0.008941381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971819,0.0000023696941,0.002484455,0.00006952177,0.00018908206,0.000024115616,0.0000028445668,0.00001734677,0.000028349297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837303,0.000049071903,0.0009885153,0.0002301896,0.000078356876,0.00028083252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981701,0.00051538175,0.0007111494,0.0004062339,0.00016858679,0.000028553039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035872462,0.00013399567,0.00026413277,0.000051499777,0.002676419,0.00010849375,0.00030923937,0.00006106004,0.000051944753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003402398,0.00008985811,0.000233442,0.00018498811,0.00023566576,0.00021807798,0.000038643815,0.00020259358,0.0000023114649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030706833,0.00016043951,0.0051612984,0.00007298189,0.000027492444,0.000004478919,0.00049507146,0.1681356,0.0001895713,0.82515407,0.000103614635,0.0004646844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011652298,0.00013103297,0.008225934,0.000046422603,0.00005167533,0.00028003918,0.0008579966,0.6691487,0.0038673265,0.30467597,0.011128183,0.0004214692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016659286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016169151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52047807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019175227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024880857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134230150","doi":"10.7202/1075516ar","title":"“A Constitution Similar in Principle to That of the United Kingdom”: The Preamble, Constitutional Principles, and a Sustainable Jurisprudence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Preamble; Constitutionalism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Common law; Liberal democracy; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06545829340970336,"score_gpt":0.3183575097178903,"score_spread":0.2528992163081869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134230150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3681509,0.0013736838,0.0008020162,0.024609622,0.0009803475,0.0009965153,0.000076455384,0.000036656882,0.6029738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871933,0.00023746766,0.00013838499,0.0006372084,0.00009092931,0.000011294057,9.993004e-7,0.000002089024,0.0001623157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983412,0.0003152368,0.000267379,0.00015807139,0.00055678363,0.00036135534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00019832505,0.00013635457,0.00012077443,0.0004624875,0.00010152082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012843829,0.00009982785,0.00015938203,0.000057402973,0.0066314866,0.00007867372,0.00026221693,0.000060668874,0.000040380248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008206445,0.0000632136,0.00006505523,0.00070160895,0.0029167116,0.00020426858,0.0002974532,0.0002775793,0.0000023374162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018376457,0.000044237197,0.014370506,0.000006389515,0.000022243508,0.00004585035,0.0003213703,0.0007699879,0.00002938023,0.98425233,0.000060243707,0.000059101218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029724126,0.0000149798925,0.01330014,0.00014054083,0.000023513934,0.00009917417,0.0031461783,0.000011802991,0.00048898096,0.013675795,0.96870005,0.00010159252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00969872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033632766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022290564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043859315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135434455","doi":"10.7202/1075517ar","title":"The Unwritten Principle of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Constitutionalism; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Liberal democracy; Secession; Federalism; Relevance (law); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03076628031883912,"score_gpt":0.31313489364016056,"score_spread":0.28236861332132146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135434455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012215947,0.001258765,0.000026450094,0.013259004,0.00054382125,0.000036186742,0.000007937516,0.000010657856,0.9726412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806625,0.00095894997,0.00011458004,0.00017682799,0.00028205127,8.281277e-7,1.9538516e-7,0.0000018131276,0.00039849838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920005,0.000110638044,0.00015615002,0.000053483393,0.00031366627,0.00016600756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993866,0.000135086,0.00007657249,0.000051008683,0.0002910654,0.000059639235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004818438,0.000036754922,0.000077759185,0.0000063590082,0.010712201,0.000037048492,0.00013807291,0.000023165783,0.00009433991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025496882,0.000024370318,0.0000722186,0.0001223334,0.0004744065,0.00008135775,0.000052158317,0.00011376557,0.000015131419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037424495,0.00001557319,0.0007695724,4.8019155e-7,0.00002670497,0.000016845252,0.00008779036,0.0000028899108,0.000028927287,0.9952476,0.00014947941,0.0036503656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007315416,0.0000069321304,0.0016815751,0.000011006594,0.000009438322,0.000018849796,0.001146555,5.6611293e-7,0.00031008816,0.08373584,0.9129722,0.00003381167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014134808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0334499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98585033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004281071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058945778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99057573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135600008","doi":"10.7202/1075514ar","title":"Unwritten Constitutional Principles: The Challenge of Reconciling Political and Legal Constitutionalisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06804872899419606,"score_gpt":0.31988490502979905,"score_spread":0.251836176035603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135600008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06997751,0.00072748057,0.000028980901,0.025085201,0.0007163433,0.0002914021,0.0000671754,0.000026508664,0.9030794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851346,0.00017612179,0.00035235926,0.00029769106,0.00032661873,0.0000033888339,0.0000011584385,0.0000030692233,0.0003261612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844897,0.00019116321,0.00032053917,0.00014781715,0.0005314068,0.0003600802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989594,0.00034745169,0.00014118687,0.00007740444,0.00030458067,0.00016997199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010217029,0.00010523674,0.00020666653,0.00001840661,0.003960414,0.000066831264,0.00019339407,0.00008576843,0.00031754305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033339503,0.00006623026,0.00009664387,0.000066948036,0.003997463,0.0002982075,0.00007965108,0.00033409995,0.000025305573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009376563,0.000021744561,0.0013938481,0.000008092972,0.000052131054,0.000007279105,0.00042427584,0.000024026174,0.000018271103,0.9978723,0.000021410038,0.00014727216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005425061,0.00004655441,0.0016053092,0.00008241517,0.000031963147,0.00012018463,0.008385097,0.000023804347,0.00006440023,0.004799031,0.9841451,0.0001536524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028042137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036096945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021324905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008177561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674495","doi":"10.7202/1075515ar","title":"Rethinking the Invisible Constitution: How Unwritten Constitutional Principles Shape Political Decision-Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Law; Scholarship; Political science; Warrant; Constitutional law; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Constitutional review; Judicial review; Constitutional economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0724215343438571,"score_gpt":0.3227976483686118,"score_spread":0.2503761140247547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135674495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026192528,0.0012805894,0.00221874,0.04590409,0.0016376997,0.00012821847,0.000050484294,0.00006866868,0.94609225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315536,0.00021701786,0.0020629594,0.0030156698,0.0014562751,0.000006271207,0.0000024904264,0.000004467764,0.00007946461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733084,0.0003204879,0.00035261665,0.00026192184,0.0010979761,0.0006361463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977679,0.0009692228,0.00013731736,0.00014529754,0.0007410521,0.00023916452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310691,0.00016207651,0.00023562842,0.00004705709,0.022384424,0.00045915303,0.00037423492,0.00013161104,0.00066497596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002097227,0.0001187185,0.00020051858,0.0003758216,0.0059830737,0.0004439466,0.00021831969,0.0006007995,0.00006162298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013476527,0.00003772505,0.0010120377,0.0000019816366,0.000068785914,0.00027091033,0.00021345359,0.000046061064,0.000007364136,0.9952582,0.00043565323,0.00263433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018173062,0.000009975471,0.00050650473,0.00019269035,0.000036213347,0.0005736625,0.0025005443,0.000025330843,0.00002811801,0.32760605,0.66819495,0.00014419833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046050825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011470147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99053615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037681343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061303814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135866945","doi":"10.7202/1075518ar","title":"The Structural and Administrative Demands of Unwritten Constitutional Principles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial independence; Constitutionalism; Duty; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06304416415205462,"score_gpt":0.32959686365015195,"score_spread":0.26655269949809735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135866945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059948936,0.002858483,0.000051810384,0.007204767,0.0005200332,0.000070384354,0.00006569996,0.000011015789,0.9292689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.00058178883,0.00017281872,0.00008063063,0.00019247335,0.0000012837546,7.867696e-7,0.0000010030127,0.00010433991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.00010289029,0.00018029616,0.000073191455,0.0002892966,0.00014512059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.00019393125,0.0000924793,0.000033211887,0.00029682936,0.000074721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032595982,0.00005280916,0.000097789605,0.000007857355,0.00892022,0.00005557402,0.00008337291,0.000030013773,0.000053625416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022781918,0.000034550972,0.000047509406,0.000077286575,0.0034757312,0.00010334663,0.00004667409,0.00011773161,0.0000013472959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010451459,0.000005922685,0.0023830463,9.353227e-7,0.000046532426,0.0000195044,0.00017498193,0.0000036631047,0.00001638146,0.99627745,0.000024986162,0.0010361199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000264871,0.000033404678,0.014637689,0.000034637833,0.000030033001,0.0002154602,0.0067994003,0.000004161221,0.0004104872,0.11579321,0.86168116,0.00009549058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046319937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025604384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93891597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034808578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015992654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140323263","doi":"10.7202/1075600ar","title":"Concevoir la matrice juridique dans un monde en constante évolution : essai sur l’approche fonctionnelle du droit","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05942678100522503,"score_gpt":0.2505382918762784,"score_spread":0.19111151087105338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140323263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01850266,0.0067982366,0.100910775,0.008379296,0.0047740713,0.0002114359,0.00015722173,0.00014842191,0.86011785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97220486,0.0016527836,0.0044239033,0.0007981644,0.00090822956,0.0000042129154,0.000011056017,0.00003266437,0.019964142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698186,0.00056369486,0.00068120664,0.00051831844,0.0005564483,0.00069847045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.00040931205,0.00036761732,0.00037866252,0.0009635935,0.0006105034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070100924,0.00037149023,0.0004104803,0.000059755974,0.0023911314,0.0017975029,0.000505717,0.00029583697,0.0002418161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024153403,0.00032269344,0.00032068774,0.0006504089,0.0003656255,0.0041051363,0.0003568927,0.00085650035,0.0001331636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029744484,0.0004083037,0.000043315125,0.000043365937,0.00015716167,0.0034013672,0.0011761766,0.0005808755,0.0023968683,0.9817827,0.0035292902,0.0064508626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015853732,0.00019469205,0.0008953352,0.00030490884,0.0001223648,0.04631683,0.000612214,0.005556096,0.019102419,0.04926493,0.8754416,0.0006032485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015028458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019422472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005152079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025455852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144802035","doi":"10.7202/1075598ar","title":"Regards croisés entre le droit innu et le droit québécois : territorialités en conflit","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023453889889101093,"score_gpt":0.3052383744384828,"score_spread":0.2817844845493817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144802035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07549376,0.018264294,0.0004455395,0.18559963,0.0428522,0.0005487089,0.0007483062,0.00015665205,0.6758909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243272,0.009432197,0.0005041302,0.0023226,0.011817795,0.000008008438,0.0000484717,0.000056167595,0.051483415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518865,0.0013993961,0.00095215626,0.00047761138,0.0011053989,0.0008767779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748653,0.00019652175,0.00046904915,0.00034087,0.0008003464,0.0007066754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027866154,0.00028738347,0.000560502,0.0000907495,0.006817634,0.0007029215,0.00050943886,0.0004550602,0.0026947216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003457547,0.00034598523,0.00038854463,0.00047143275,0.00044162737,0.0012704413,0.00012186379,0.0010570561,0.00016270937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024365743,0.00037831313,0.0015561224,0.0000894042,0.00010724341,0.00019192044,0.011609105,0.00001391055,0.0000479806,0.97180676,0.010883763,0.0032910986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010085407,0.000089046596,0.0019496955,0.0001870924,0.000081435544,0.00025520546,0.011383384,0.000017273367,0.00030923146,0.07530608,0.9090741,0.0003388829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7252879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96369374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8981904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009429159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018197371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147646974","doi":"10.7202/1075601ar","title":"Sustainable Democratic Constitutionalism and Climate Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilemma; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Climate change; Political science; Precautionary principle; Human rights; Sustainable development; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020110500968505345,"score_gpt":0.2503070662450858,"score_spread":0.23019656527658047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147646974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49822825,0.00061576837,0.00043316002,0.030800503,0.0002743518,0.000094801384,0.000018122653,0.000055901837,0.4694791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992641,0.00016654881,0.0011031455,0.005334317,0.00002117091,0.0000016761568,0.000002524866,0.0000036350834,0.00072602456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992851,0.00007333944,0.00015740393,0.00013067556,0.00013155652,0.0002219064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996891,0.000032730164,0.000053770484,0.00008210779,0.00003572283,0.00010656709],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020096688,0.000067865694,0.00009307052,0.00001522485,0.0022196828,0.00004726746,0.00006301505,0.000043144828,0.0032110075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005587087,0.000060407983,0.000037567148,0.00009139234,0.00023168746,0.00026539192,0.000112120426,0.00013681203,0.00010213564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012424993,0.00006975423,0.04285117,0.000013778756,0.00004574518,0.00097528676,0.000068024485,0.00024123567,0.00034366312,0.93948686,0.015251984,0.00064006017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007467961,0.000036934387,0.04578024,0.00001708242,0.00012500126,0.0045944974,0.0023859558,0.00020613977,0.0021292886,0.03209642,0.9116038,0.00027782153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029648247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001235946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005613389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067008086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160771878","doi":"10.7202/1076906ar","title":"Lines Drawn in Blood: A Comparative Perspective on the Accommodation of Blended Families in Succession Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Family law; Spouse; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Law; Sociology; Sibling; Birth certificate; Nuclear family; Estate; Genealogy; Political science; History; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04915868878168021,"score_gpt":0.34692650563327665,"score_spread":0.2977678168515964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160771878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386751,0.00013870372,0.0000017462942,0.00445266,0.00020039534,0.00012183899,0.000012758386,0.000008501574,0.45638826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919957,0.00022664806,0.00011540431,0.00028968355,0.00009357936,0.0000047781077,0.0000014853127,0.0000045899715,0.0000642427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983493,0.0006856806,0.00028805604,0.00013761723,0.00033949397,0.00019983796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999065,0.00039641256,0.00015071429,0.00009833298,0.00024236135,0.000047168327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077951,0.00009055392,0.00021464034,0.00006578417,0.0016988261,0.000082293824,0.00020006702,0.00007617788,0.00008257282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015050411,0.000064561,0.00006803302,0.0004079802,0.00039083188,0.0003007307,0.000042733755,0.00036991696,0.0000052683104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057643767,0.0002054442,0.00049609,0.000003203581,0.00001315794,0.00002801089,0.008638919,0.00014283214,0.0008886251,0.9893688,0.000027594759,0.0001296575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042043957,0.00043614217,0.017513994,0.001155455,0.000083354964,0.000035183904,0.49858332,0.0001349475,0.11497247,0.1869288,0.17529905,0.0006528934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036494665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5366867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80244005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014858841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008951006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161277672","doi":"10.7202/1076910ar","title":"Fixing the Broken Mirror: Diversity and Survival in the Global Village","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05742837569248844,"score_gpt":0.285498864827917,"score_spread":0.22807048913542854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161277672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7374788,0.00012509475,0.000020087917,0.019499995,0.00023426297,0.000104736806,0.000014730721,0.000012258833,0.24251004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997854,0.00014883105,0.00002093086,0.0017519405,0.0002039959,4.7189172e-7,2.781598e-7,0.0000016381749,0.00001790446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990448,0.0003504683,0.000117397634,0.00008869391,0.00022165559,0.00017699886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966353,0.00010320488,0.000060899118,0.000052170017,0.000028666373,0.00009151985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012284727,0.000053544965,0.00008005141,0.0000058602595,0.008413199,0.0001014556,0.0003255205,0.000037488415,0.00011562167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008504507,0.000033059452,0.000045524514,0.00012287285,0.00015369839,0.0002187391,0.00014122484,0.00017811342,0.000010453237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034559187,0.000035531502,0.5655379,0.000007444817,0.000032775693,0.000037332054,0.12870012,0.000016788585,0.000003992015,0.30282474,0.0011028809,0.0016658918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043028465,0.00004228391,0.179136,0.000008596629,0.000021093161,0.000018105606,0.050701424,0.000061120336,0.000005276462,0.0055553694,0.7638796,0.00014083304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022493415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4141717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76277673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058816542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000848489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163599923","doi":"10.7202/1076908ar","title":"Going Circular: Indigenous Legal Research Methodology as Legal Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Wonder; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Traditional knowledge; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.16709179580478842,"score_gpt":0.4591151140518464,"score_spread":0.29202331824705796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163599923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007340115,0.0022716979,0.00013695279,0.015519876,0.0013645755,0.00013404599,0.000008380465,0.000054524135,0.9731698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94018954,0.0043146703,0.023918038,0.0069999304,0.004121271,0.000016127986,0.000007667802,0.000052654585,0.020380076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907936,0.0062420755,0.00032665458,0.00031281583,0.001409652,0.0009152407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964586,0.0013820104,0.00016649411,0.0002184283,0.0014087625,0.00036569533],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117408885,0.00012778332,0.00025013526,0.000017942722,0.017254433,0.00062279135,0.0004876249,0.00035685842,0.00099721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004650955,0.00011814301,0.00023878242,0.0006524795,0.0006074792,0.0011765911,0.00013948462,0.0021133565,0.00028330972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029420999,0.00012781302,0.000024164601,0.000008975812,0.00013167487,0.0022939248,0.015474309,0.000010397766,0.00084652763,0.97543705,0.0024097334,0.0032060372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025380604,0.00006205904,0.000013015657,0.000022732427,0.000037572736,0.0026960925,0.052683733,6.6650387e-7,0.0014524494,0.009160755,0.9334701,0.00014704168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087499805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018817512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000453304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000465158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163783173","doi":"10.7202/1076909ar","title":"Predicting Employment Notice Period with Machine Learning: Promises and Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Predictability; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Period (music); Law; Machine learning; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07561691443842182,"score_gpt":0.31730003399062057,"score_spread":0.24168311955219873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163783173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33998242,0.00068111904,0.0007079375,0.012408263,0.0006295643,0.00031268183,0.000015323623,0.00017259445,0.6450901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962143,0.00020600705,0.002312785,0.00015087001,0.00022238649,0.0000051323555,0.0000014874594,0.000013842589,0.00087320164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870014,0.00026158546,0.00021226675,0.00016304616,0.0003897501,0.00027318153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.00026593098,0.00011709416,0.00006943684,0.00030409216,0.00019707705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053310895,0.00008805952,0.00011546153,0.000025264437,0.0071345693,0.00026154614,0.00010315639,0.000049179747,0.0002206332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008311692,0.00007491106,0.000035660643,0.00016855837,0.00033005478,0.00034919873,0.000040705916,0.0003701463,0.000014301652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012393403,0.00039084215,0.06529995,0.00002585356,0.00020312244,0.000734477,0.04528294,0.0029799056,0.0006836744,0.8273578,0.00006398938,0.056853484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019668762,0.00023340705,0.00062835583,0.00009338041,0.00007173468,0.0003135798,0.02927901,0.0006110747,0.0021309275,0.0011080261,0.96511185,0.00022195246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013688281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10918147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000789785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050475403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163852477","doi":"10.7202/1076907ar","title":"Noli me tangere : affiner le régime québécois d’immunité de saisie pour les objets culturels","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04376201874589994,"score_gpt":0.25601587578228513,"score_spread":0.2122538570363852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163852477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2509749,0.13363378,0.0027945081,0.1251042,0.0028185563,0.0005354801,0.0012237419,0.00015626958,0.48275858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644584,0.011854786,0.0066192495,0.0011031269,0.0011428375,0.000002867115,0.00006269938,0.00001590472,0.014740137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627995,0.0012535593,0.00042101555,0.00033262678,0.0005982837,0.0011145312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980594,0.0003983148,0.00016601225,0.00024281383,0.00033979022,0.0007936542],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011813074,0.0002840355,0.00033648222,0.000072980656,0.004812379,0.00018380668,0.00044255407,0.00036930616,0.0178599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043019452,0.00022450704,0.00028483346,0.0003607515,0.00041867362,0.0005226957,0.00011965357,0.001882053,0.0007518498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065425335,0.00040150827,0.010320858,0.00032666515,0.000627423,0.010183792,0.0020585048,0.0040463787,0.005000255,0.059416562,0.012983936,0.89397985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006518208,0.00041794282,0.013636456,0.00021865797,0.000038696944,0.0057196645,0.0023944906,0.0006450552,0.0048965802,0.01924501,0.95178163,0.00035398526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11012145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47421813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9387977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007221155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028870703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205482211","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Canada Labour Code: Are Replacement Workers an Endangered Species?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Fishery; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Biology; Sociology; Computer science; Population; Programming language","score_opus":0.030567477407914066,"score_gpt":0.29318341432141165,"score_spread":0.2626159369134976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205482211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25760812,0.00003385324,0.000008721454,0.02773942,0.0016254842,0.00026357107,0.00043899613,0.000033308283,0.7122485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955081,0.00004665083,0.00008995391,0.005917098,0.0006902441,0.000007970388,0.000005235447,0.000011620681,0.038150255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980125,0.00019649665,0.00023613656,0.0001671773,0.0009760861,0.00041161675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992318,0.000035512912,0.00009978998,0.00016086944,0.00015467107,0.00031735934],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065676705,0.00010861055,0.00011005454,0.000022236914,0.004380522,0.00018751467,0.00048971974,0.000033751014,0.00907969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030195406,0.00008037236,0.000046485675,0.00016371215,0.00006624307,0.00021046273,0.000023625616,0.00019611166,0.00007267021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046310422,0.00024096834,0.006699431,0.0000044729854,0.0002320703,0.00020929729,0.0031490054,0.00161921,0.000051863142,0.83238155,0.14724465,0.0077043553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021320794,0.000047102618,0.0036075378,0.000022049597,0.000008158592,0.000008685435,0.0022184865,0.0000034836783,0.00010707249,0.00016491282,0.99348503,0.00011425829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71031946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99485326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008478365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008338275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205734119","doi":"10.7202/1082058ar","title":"Contract Variation and Changed Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Estoppel; Variation (astronomy); Law and economics; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Equity (law); Law; Business; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.03381956063807098,"score_gpt":0.31442457339696034,"score_spread":0.2806050127588894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205734119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040863317,0.0005964056,0.001684974,0.038887244,0.0005011237,0.00019358165,0.00005648499,0.00007138675,0.9171455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982125,0.00013210614,0.0008687389,0.0002417902,0.00028029742,0.0000055140704,0.000002046233,0.0000034533502,0.00025354416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994926,0.00008166024,0.000099992074,0.0000718937,0.00013827169,0.000115623516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959695,0.00006223958,0.000056318557,0.000048397193,0.00013447161,0.0001016157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020789709,0.000032662305,0.000052565607,0.000012574718,0.0039007005,0.00012285546,0.000047187306,0.000031943742,0.00027390246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008002351,0.000031558106,0.000026264328,0.000096001815,0.000046427605,0.00019368481,0.000013195817,0.00010400783,0.000017647479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010700784,0.0000246466,0.000057031,6.880665e-7,0.000008716754,0.000006578131,0.0028223952,0.000002135501,0.00036793167,0.9942677,0.000051289608,0.0023897858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023326612,0.000007927282,0.0060341605,0.000006927581,0.000016185995,0.00003499576,0.003086921,0.000048837177,0.00028880328,0.006956666,0.98321337,0.00007191602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012872813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021747949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98731107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041284486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019103358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205894304","doi":"10.7202/1092012ar","title":"Why De Minimis is a Defence: A Reply to Professor Coughlan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Supreme court; Statutory law; Harm; Legislature; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054853185311162345,"score_gpt":0.35023954790170503,"score_spread":0.2953863625905427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205894304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18826449,0.00044514006,0.00014967022,0.47397584,0.002443884,0.00071166235,0.00015968047,0.0001710051,0.3336786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94778395,0.000044232424,0.0010677222,0.048512653,0.00037109587,0.000041528132,6.0401015e-7,0.00001435399,0.0021638589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978045,0.00038487863,0.00024826647,0.00021166122,0.00080780196,0.00054286415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.00011299642,0.00011864546,0.00016658734,0.00012616346,0.00040107648],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018946719,0.000094806834,0.0001486492,0.00004313952,0.010684853,0.0001208765,0.00055485504,0.000035043427,0.0024464824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021859707,0.00009759923,0.00011473233,0.0003165275,0.0001116934,0.00021740932,0.00015312339,0.00042558435,0.00005713467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002727485,0.00026085004,0.0017800223,0.000027477785,0.000056460623,0.0006316822,0.04565399,0.0000799897,0.00038000286,0.23300049,0.71096563,0.0068906834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013000947,0.00015783373,0.00010711274,0.000026829803,0.000021237809,0.00018833604,0.01641015,0.000006069456,0.0001610869,0.0021475921,0.98050064,0.00014313262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014391528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025761092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75951946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000427503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008440325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207879926","doi":"10.7202/1082059ar","title":"Lost in Translation? Bill 21, International Human Rights, and the Margin of Appreciation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin of appreciation; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Margin (machine learning); Political science; Invocation; Law and economics; Sociology; Fundamental rights; History","score_opus":0.0245095349894542,"score_gpt":0.3019822488769632,"score_spread":0.277472713887509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207879926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012965302,0.00016143426,0.00014814433,0.0073337657,0.00030597823,0.00006686028,0.000044910383,0.000004205331,0.9789694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985806,0.000051550516,0.00034511564,0.00014652312,0.00019590861,9.77182e-7,0.0000049436235,0.000001976968,0.0006724181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991305,0.00022442675,0.00021258724,0.00006531621,0.00026226623,0.00010493538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00018570774,0.0000993238,0.00004168236,0.00013229442,0.00004534784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055121287,0.000042404237,0.00009453882,0.000031686395,0.0011994162,0.000034745844,0.0000971761,0.000033993187,0.00035371628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041848565,0.000027759836,0.00004504698,0.00009877712,0.0006691585,0.0001453346,0.000012160073,0.00012944233,0.0000026370465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001072988,0.000021676222,0.0006417125,0.0000010627563,0.000014186477,0.000005692166,0.00035321063,0.000024010038,0.000013593833,0.9983112,0.000046337318,0.0005565401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070731854,0.0000060837724,0.0008871434,0.000020177984,0.00001078242,0.000023347964,0.00039188896,0.000023088027,0.000085989486,0.03522549,0.9625691,0.000049556093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007117323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042843286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057934456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050187322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334677990","doi":"10.7202/1034051ar","title":"Constitutional Amendment by Stealth","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Legitimacy; Political science; Constitution; Deliberation; Law; Democracy; Politics; Convention; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07335461904596215,"score_gpt":0.3288064311958844,"score_spread":0.25545181214992224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334677990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012816517,0.00079424045,0.00030220102,0.0060718004,0.0010790421,0.00007117015,0.000056197678,0.000032365988,0.9903113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.00020363055,0.00016990572,0.0009434197,0.0005376121,0.000003587052,0.00000255593,0.0000017404654,0.00022973542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869937,0.00011170775,0.00017907601,0.00009619749,0.00063676725,0.0002768676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926376,0.000035063564,0.000081264625,0.00003682311,0.00022456388,0.00035854208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007652648,0.00007163506,0.000111614376,0.000013476561,0.0059270984,0.00005559104,0.00013653382,0.000040164818,0.00017032774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000906207,0.000061011462,0.000050634764,0.00009097888,0.0015400887,0.0001999979,0.000032056156,0.00015968399,0.00013993194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010469572,0.00004403355,0.00028410388,3.398586e-7,0.000021068267,0.000012210962,0.00018352368,0.000008342047,0.0000042425877,0.98144084,0.016674737,0.0013160618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030208743,0.00003528153,0.000019401195,0.0000101891565,0.000008726599,0.000027456623,0.0018312496,4.5204533e-7,0.000023690036,0.029937526,0.9677217,0.00008221199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011897144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99662614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037155204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012129877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205521505","doi":"10.7202/1084133ar","title":"Domestic Contracts and Family Law Exceptionalism: An Historical Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Family law; Ideology; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.04775251357453432,"score_gpt":0.33325647215850085,"score_spread":0.28550395858396654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205521505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15887696,0.008029599,0.0000424242,0.029013231,0.0022234328,0.0002556915,0.000044123204,0.00013332252,0.80138123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961374,0.0005574873,0.0007807179,0.0009530645,0.0008168599,0.0000040022896,0.0000013780005,0.000009097218,0.00073999795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983531,0.00035807228,0.00020241807,0.00022465603,0.0005273862,0.00033434553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986283,0.0001858934,0.00009872126,0.00006839319,0.000666318,0.0003523837],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044220747,0.0001232754,0.00022848093,0.000014168292,0.0071381624,0.00017700101,0.000119441786,0.00009886949,0.0001821299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371416,0.00010179934,0.000087689536,0.00011129329,0.00042590557,0.0005282535,0.000047260975,0.0003498462,0.000018258608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013097693,0.00009524706,0.00011844929,0.0000019676968,0.000052089534,0.00021973113,0.006217305,0.000004631617,0.00032903595,0.9917635,0.0005081724,0.0006768127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057061104,0.000065085835,0.008326436,0.000020646214,0.000051201827,0.00016148463,0.023913514,0.0000037010616,0.000023507253,0.01478095,0.951859,0.00022386115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031368725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060948826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97698253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016397123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028554254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205553498","doi":"10.7202/1084134ar","title":"Creative and Responsive Advocacy for Reconciliation: The Application of Gladue Principles in Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Alienation; Indigenous; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Creativity; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07833572260904663,"score_gpt":0.37257740844483894,"score_spread":0.2942416858357923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205553498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12325148,0.0005853322,0.0035925284,0.03713474,0.00017430184,0.0017427996,0.00026776476,0.00002965001,0.8332214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973581,0.00012905298,0.0017217867,0.00025439964,0.00011619746,0.00008358412,0.0000052120095,0.0000052617306,0.00032643837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999021,0.00022673982,0.00029045268,0.0001449123,0.00017342063,0.00014348279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.0005359717,0.00022394251,0.00011851466,0.0004421827,0.0000694953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089472457,0.0000648751,0.0001282221,0.000016822472,0.0020445022,0.00005410864,0.00013341988,0.000054758882,0.00002686245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381368,0.000050604576,0.000052609837,0.00018370643,0.00031309447,0.00016727668,0.00003227151,0.00014836044,0.0000015955422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040584197,0.000038820068,0.0001468896,0.0000048865672,0.000012614222,0.0000014896531,0.003244311,0.000019836529,0.00016024157,0.9939398,0.000015791,0.0023746996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040720782,0.00005503989,0.002622904,0.000026243384,0.000017315213,0.000013865841,0.015089654,0.00009216963,0.0037930345,0.02658275,0.9512202,0.00007960507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023432581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096324734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009429046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013902194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206122656","doi":"10.7202/1084132ar","title":"L’indépendance du Québec et le choix autochtone de la continuité canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008877052856781607,"score_gpt":0.22605596557220387,"score_spread":0.21717891271542225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206122656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012531942,0.015744189,0.00005841849,0.10617655,0.0031222317,0.00006925865,0.00022878872,0.000029308354,0.8620393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84494215,0.003424546,0.00039882457,0.0036775891,0.001413925,0.000004694036,0.0000032930316,0.00003822757,0.14609675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976,0.0008211299,0.0003193065,0.00023237606,0.00027550754,0.0007516507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983678,0.00020052516,0.00019668973,0.00016098085,0.0002233681,0.00085064216],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015827308,0.00014300483,0.00026977318,0.000110115085,0.007939786,0.00068180636,0.0003152519,0.00021153486,0.0059795026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034946887,0.0002062233,0.00021550363,0.00032284338,0.0017025021,0.0005176228,0.00005048545,0.0008086124,0.00019017121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064436945,0.00012185142,0.00011711363,0.000017449553,0.00007156422,0.0022100585,0.0039641224,0.000072082315,0.00006530082,0.9431493,0.026998019,0.023206642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005194795,0.000024918372,0.0014401048,0.00011219134,0.000055051558,0.0015236152,0.0016807992,0.000025150186,0.000039710878,0.0014390657,0.9929061,0.00023379893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041343523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044548265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206144704","doi":"10.7202/1084135ar","title":"Religious Challenges to Anti-Discrimination Law: The Mobilization of the “Minority Label”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Dissent; Framing (construction); Minority rights; Dissenting opinion; Religious discrimination; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Mores; Freedom of religion; Christian right; Free Exercise Clause; Religious organization; Establishment Clause; Politics; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.044487308850188416,"score_gpt":0.31325564632754593,"score_spread":0.2687683374773575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206144704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016180651,0.0008838541,0.00008360033,0.023527073,0.00071455835,0.000120992765,0.000037446473,0.000014047793,0.9584378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972754,0.00086361566,0.00015531537,0.0011253377,0.0002617689,0.0000022172198,0.0000010006303,0.000003469624,0.00031184484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00032885687,0.00017872399,0.00009041415,0.00041045583,0.00017155189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991194,0.00013266598,0.000115710354,0.00014276052,0.0004108616,0.00007859455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004996946,0.000058282705,0.00009431764,0.000011033954,0.0031016197,0.000037082,0.00022806291,0.000043796284,0.000039386166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022177014,0.000036600515,0.00006452196,0.0001570532,0.00056046894,0.000103288156,0.00005248687,0.00014260452,0.0000061252617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017392227,0.000036202542,0.00009503557,0.0000046363525,0.000009657559,0.0000028797613,0.00075247424,0.000057838035,0.00006259205,0.99770045,0.00021838804,0.0010580767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092090966,0.00002054544,0.0006910151,0.000030656505,0.000028247778,0.000032503063,0.0031331643,0.0000046127716,0.00095379824,0.009152668,0.9857949,0.00006579936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003893898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039595447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008269859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013586208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206479119","doi":"10.7202/1025143ar","title":"Abdelwahab Biad et Paul Tavernier, dir, Le droit international humanitaire face aux défis du XXI si[è]cle, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Eric David, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 5 éd, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Eric David, Françoise Tulkens et Damien Vandenmeersch avec la collaboration de Sylvie Ruffenach, Code de droit international humanitaire, 5 éd, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2012 Marco Sassòli, Antoine A Bouvier et Anne Quintin avec la collaboration de Juliane Garcia, Un droit dans la guerre? Cas, documents et supports d’enseignement relatifs à la pratique contemporaine du droit international humanitaire, 2 éd, Genève, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, 2012","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0096699279536382,"score_gpt":0.272502906801112,"score_spread":0.2628329788474738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206479119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57242936,0.033652402,0.061063934,0.020036507,0.00861478,0.0056573628,0.017111624,0.0010558771,0.28037816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064049,0.034334023,0.0063014138,0.0023812414,0.0022952107,0.000353979,0.0054360568,0.0005002524,0.041992936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98047644,0.0073575685,0.0037644547,0.0020929351,0.0037846004,0.002523988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875908,0.003148297,0.0037613288,0.0009677257,0.0030090017,0.0015228505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014612437,0.0019907549,0.0019171328,0.0012579546,0.004328541,0.0037287204,0.003620004,0.0016912875,0.002658646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015554135,0.0023743075,0.00091314496,0.00081497105,0.0026698075,0.0076990463,0.0010159347,0.0034562484,0.00019353649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014540727,0.0045619314,0.009210845,0.00027798585,0.0031140288,0.0030930166,0.02265163,0.00213329,0.00078037096,0.8915872,0.059177276,0.0019583353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009772345,0.00055566675,0.026117433,0.0018980011,0.00071313,0.0070902565,0.0025363022,0.006704866,0.00031859367,0.071567655,0.87032187,0.0024038618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015170854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17721386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82001954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009096679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035554268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210671644","doi":"10.7202/1013040ar","title":"Volume 57 Index","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0438126836695408,"score_gpt":0.2122546217933364,"score_spread":0.1684419381237956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210671644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022478101,0.032438356,0.00022662908,0.0020674353,0.050583143,0.00008426093,0.0010453764,0.000017741408,0.9112893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5420587,0.002074235,0.00046669377,0.0005385932,0.0017048478,0.0000029795956,0.0000028096024,0.000028559096,0.45312256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976299,0.000032380027,0.0008614587,0.00032383567,0.00006421184,0.001088229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860466,0.000035590805,0.00060220517,0.00028611225,0.00005877979,0.00041264726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017252327,0.00024408323,0.00054403656,0.00017603631,0.0025532383,0.00023236213,0.00034889037,0.00019093769,0.06222266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069259746,0.0003053832,0.00033728033,0.0001757006,0.0003600927,0.0014343124,0.0002033117,0.00049105845,0.0786996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011296363,0.00020440617,0.044439703,0.000021500353,0.00025251688,0.000012298265,0.00034654385,0.00008286946,2.2146455e-7,0.6712913,0.2772047,0.006132649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056536164,0.000036450878,0.0067937355,0.00003711951,0.000027835886,0.000197622,0.0006016886,0.00042304507,0.00000683773,0.0021933387,0.9887479,0.00036904507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084547134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024006612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71154326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043065104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000481793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213318394","doi":"10.7202/1000793ar","title":"Cumulative Index","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04107253690065777,"score_gpt":0.2237001291058561,"score_spread":0.18262759220519834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213318394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014801112,0.00007351592,0.000085037136,0.00021099909,0.0053708786,0.000041357376,0.00018135,0.000017775474,0.97921795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976343,0.000026873975,0.00041564286,0.00022761058,0.0002345293,0.000001929644,9.624744e-7,0.000010492412,0.022738963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.0000044650346,0.0003769407,0.00021329107,0.000028002149,0.00024962315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994185,0.00002196376,0.00024683116,0.00016191712,0.000034304805,0.000116478375],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005897982,0.00009506707,0.00021994913,0.00009711489,0.0013146935,0.00010310952,0.00020572716,0.000060345446,0.013965575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054445773,0.00009738117,0.000112846064,0.00007622547,0.0001287659,0.00032380945,0.000069604066,0.00034661923,0.011040661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055239652,0.000028024926,0.003619467,0.0000013559307,0.00004898589,0.0000066543203,0.0000929174,0.00003031917,0.0000055842124,0.9837927,0.011850671,0.00051775423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003554665,0.000013063925,0.0020805115,0.000002247473,0.000002310254,0.00003533021,0.000112407004,0.00033260934,0.00003329729,0.028920962,0.9679781,0.00013368033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025609875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054100115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000386192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018190791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229901152","doi":"10.7202/1082051ar","title":"Nom","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"African Studies and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06486304100930937,"score_gpt":0.2942549291433563,"score_spread":0.22939188813404696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229901152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013794386,0.008863358,0.00007462921,0.15472408,0.002439064,0.000054546625,0.000035357414,0.000029064982,0.83240044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98449713,0.0033518753,0.00056344416,0.00668393,0.0036645352,0.0000010707696,3.1590633e-7,0.00001648961,0.0012212043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998488,0.00018263707,0.0002628982,0.00016159897,0.00039191428,0.000512941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904144,0.00006147066,0.00014986836,0.00006184587,0.00011022029,0.00057515805],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003489609,0.00013356075,0.00022281772,0.000017315566,0.008540881,0.00007497087,0.00027547177,0.00009778281,0.0016905722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046450317,0.00012394629,0.0002716462,0.0005242667,0.00081963476,0.00025981962,0.00008329149,0.00050326897,0.0005064297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002179228,0.00006385644,0.00038247544,0.000018521678,0.00018974845,0.00015523961,0.015626205,0.000024308934,0.0000055488113,0.8731558,0.056984216,0.053372297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020546315,0.00014500746,0.0000748015,0.000025823641,0.00005402102,0.000018417664,0.016851919,0.00002030504,0.0000071795444,0.0016394822,0.9808029,0.0001546757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022025825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003921431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065545275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010654447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231706792","doi":"10.7202/1082033ar","title":"Confiance légitime","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06720885702840718,"score_gpt":0.30387813111177286,"score_spread":0.2366692740833657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231706792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020514731,0.0056952415,0.000110868925,0.27634233,0.004095498,0.00010583014,0.00009006193,0.000034955538,0.71147376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97028357,0.0022422178,0.0005118291,0.011430791,0.0051274914,0.0000019838121,4.1677148e-7,0.000016982574,0.01038474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762905,0.0002467409,0.00034248963,0.00026845018,0.0008179397,0.0006953411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851716,0.00008816028,0.00033294864,0.000080075035,0.00014557496,0.00083609106],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005652251,0.00016456624,0.00025702865,0.000007906311,0.005416466,0.00021927043,0.00060701696,0.00015875055,0.0054202573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001783648,0.00016225743,0.00021255521,0.00056807627,0.0011602046,0.00078527926,0.000059417103,0.0005409762,0.00119225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012116008,0.00003594794,0.00018046437,0.00000953273,0.000023971974,0.000117331074,0.003242004,0.000035308472,0.00001907751,0.92464584,0.032306846,0.039371584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268928,0.000121893536,0.00028371788,0.000057952464,0.000022734423,0.000033263535,0.0026509059,0.00012617983,0.00006635912,0.0047216467,0.9914244,0.00022204104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020948905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025609393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001841511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006688507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236046461","doi":"10.7202/1000791ar","title":"Books Received","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019258898512942813,"score_gpt":0.2587199996775364,"score_spread":0.23946110116459357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236046461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12526162,0.000021674157,0.000011449205,0.00031963328,0.0017237944,0.000078039986,0.00006265284,0.00015402926,0.8723671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573773,0.0000043723167,0.0026932792,0.00028741744,0.0005193369,0.0000023634486,0.00000181319,0.00008567328,0.0006680302],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986467,0.000080402475,0.00029517768,0.00016407996,0.00038660658,0.00042704475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893266,0.000040649655,0.00018741708,0.00028688286,0.00019187579,0.0003605292],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074827543,0.00015309262,0.00016749007,0.00008146297,0.0024639831,0.000105899926,0.00033516515,0.00010142852,0.002345949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011062568,0.00012916738,0.00012853836,0.00009375606,0.00013296228,0.00030969054,0.00004947229,0.0013557546,0.006785819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019468811,0.00023271133,0.0008511456,0.000006580832,0.00015037096,0.00053451554,0.00011217599,0.000025747033,0.52606994,0.43602005,0.017126352,0.018675769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070426223,0.000047416823,0.0008779225,0.000012242731,0.000021339305,0.0023381067,0.00002316846,0.00004485668,0.022042423,0.002330419,0.9713745,0.00018330282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013641859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050801695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061445804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007901433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239058175","doi":"10.7202/1070289ar","title":"Errata","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04083248249083185,"score_gpt":0.2945841422803666,"score_spread":0.25375165978953473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239058175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002815758,0.0053478465,0.00010526744,0.0057467837,0.015725791,0.00013025894,0.0008464338,0.00009859283,0.96918327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95997894,0.00024482206,0.0048727677,0.0013655411,0.012589166,0.000001932337,0.0000062903814,0.00029127175,0.020649262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963615,0.0005205157,0.000705412,0.00036381627,0.00077815034,0.001270591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720186,0.00006303564,0.0004543032,0.0005742748,0.0007990521,0.0009074936],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016465068,0.0003840793,0.0003788447,0.00014010431,0.008104839,0.00033268335,0.0007137747,0.0002742211,0.024418985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001625987,0.00038247573,0.00027862587,0.00047718914,0.0014947439,0.0011600713,0.00021648714,0.0012825241,0.1442585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018351381,0.0004290999,0.000139852,0.000026140704,0.00035213557,0.0009994737,0.00016519096,0.000014299786,0.0021126803,0.69328165,0.27712658,0.025169391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011798048,0.0005952269,0.00026211343,0.00031012594,0.00018016493,0.0127859665,0.00009989628,0.00028163884,0.0059091835,0.004863257,0.97308904,0.00044360792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010103937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016911674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006425682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032556396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239436074","doi":"10.7202/1082043ar","title":"Human Dignity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12375924527347418,"score_gpt":0.3229760982008795,"score_spread":0.19921685292740535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239436074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28023177,0.000079545585,0.00008544556,0.007023821,0.0001698591,0.00012784427,0.000021776781,0.00008098266,0.71217895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936517,0.000008121326,0.0003205905,0.0055450387,0.0003843182,6.384218e-7,0.000004558221,0.000010632806,0.00007439883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930525,0.000039461087,0.00018474789,0.00009271176,0.00021269661,0.00016515327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993784,0.000012784282,0.00006479369,0.000091112175,0.00006556113,0.00038736544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010495877,0.00007842016,0.00015947765,0.000018902734,0.0010999235,0.00001904444,0.00008986215,0.00004371227,0.000697604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077070494,0.000064021166,0.000100362304,0.000076251585,0.000039208735,0.00011775587,0.00003883116,0.00042798958,0.00018731922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025662782,0.003709879,0.0778916,0.001048121,0.001831794,0.009975583,0.004714938,0.00007787525,0.09770099,0.61375326,0.0910402,0.09568949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018789996,0.00077853474,0.0056450875,0.000056232544,0.000075214506,0.00042419895,0.00006516733,0.00002165903,0.006385581,0.001258932,0.98328185,0.00012854507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028480947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025080202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89224166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027505981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005239057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8459834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239898427","doi":"10.7202/1082040ar","title":"Fact","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03740942683929351,"score_gpt":0.2178782109676895,"score_spread":0.18046878412839598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239898427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023015093,0.0048275176,0.000013890786,0.65167767,0.006103643,0.0001881587,0.00037750285,0.00007701737,0.31371948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700224,0.002381131,0.000105518586,0.005367367,0.005826759,5.0114215e-7,0.000007696126,0.000002279253,0.016286377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893594,0.00006041808,0.00024858405,0.00016276282,0.00021679232,0.0003755259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999254,0.00002501802,0.00010579929,0.000022485216,0.00005554311,0.00053715974],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012131429,0.00014611245,0.00018784961,0.0000029468695,0.0029274076,0.00013356227,0.0002436322,0.00014550431,0.008953732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008665123,0.000024241463,0.00021455139,0.0001271768,0.00013087844,0.00025075825,0.000054520086,0.00040532617,0.0007548811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060301325,0.00017216755,0.0003851076,0.000029743263,0.00010970976,0.000494226,0.00014045465,0.000038152266,0.0022713086,0.18829757,0.0129773235,0.7950239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018291436,0.0004768824,0.0009095591,0.000034120218,0.000019810897,0.0003594049,0.00010741613,0.00006575437,0.0008496748,0.00198852,0.99484193,0.00016400937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000795761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016342782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98186463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027107051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021573571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240967118","doi":"10.7202/1005857ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1524809317547152,"score_gpt":0.26777412055092964,"score_spread":0.11529318879621445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240967118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077028826,0.00006766606,0.000027197028,0.000022115564,0.00045446557,0.00006381027,0.00024136434,0.000110507375,0.9219841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982453,0.000011280525,0.0012725187,0.00012091341,0.000101795755,0.0000014903703,0.0000024249994,0.00007918297,0.00016511732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983637,0.00045426554,0.00029285686,0.00014852738,0.00034012794,0.0004005758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990175,0.00007876601,0.00018310489,0.00025219924,0.00020642683,0.00026200063],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020527411,0.00014621462,0.00018241383,0.000079209545,0.0016246784,0.000041646228,0.00035821617,0.00006128893,0.003451829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014577647,0.00011560787,0.00011516293,0.00018508745,0.000090517155,0.0003142506,0.000051869312,0.0003423242,0.00881327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002416303,0.002539046,0.27131873,0.000029538221,0.0015935474,0.0024098475,0.0015507329,0.000032885742,0.006639116,0.6236438,0.05035381,0.03747264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009167427,0.00016127429,0.43698436,0.00003114551,0.00005746627,0.0015586906,0.00006987745,0.000017297629,0.015577074,0.003253198,0.5409364,0.0004364281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032850865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019533828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9218189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009374819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005370177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242010750","doi":"10.7202/1009068ar","title":"Haldane Unrevealed","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.02299706649959036,"score_gpt":0.25962499732187266,"score_spread":0.2366279308222823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242010750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035725872,0.00061852223,0.000008013896,0.0012678502,0.0016002846,0.0000332792,0.00000904778,0.000022415126,0.992868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98655766,0.00018837831,0.00014618562,0.00046053287,0.0013473069,9.548661e-7,4.4372374e-7,0.000006829876,0.011291686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916255,0.00010492319,0.00010899067,0.000044700722,0.00024134998,0.00033750432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938154,0.000023232762,0.000057098852,0.00005887506,0.00004570816,0.00043353846],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069787866,0.000038019552,0.00007156852,0.000102443926,0.008216185,0.0001665326,0.00013372177,0.000050246264,0.0031660823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005528909,0.000045429013,0.00006633071,0.000101733654,0.00025854062,0.00042982324,0.000010298622,0.00017480053,0.0004948266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036435247,0.00003720304,0.00033887714,0.0000024072724,0.000012741574,0.000020952066,0.0018725047,6.3147274e-7,0.000016437045,0.9625482,0.025248082,0.009898343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009132771,0.000005858247,0.0007016423,0.000005729644,0.000009157793,0.000038931317,0.00044050283,1.2427792e-7,0.0000049581417,0.0004917297,0.9981457,0.00006436124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28669605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005960478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037087746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242696983","doi":"10.7202/1082055ar","title":"Security","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03461927708207098,"score_gpt":0.2559655689517222,"score_spread":0.2213462918696512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242696983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03680179,0.00016265477,0.00004873605,0.005320949,0.00040763366,0.00010324968,0.00023990562,0.0002904853,0.9566246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970713,0.0000068954746,0.00032998572,0.0019804277,0.00054595555,7.601198e-7,0.0000017322277,0.000050891405,0.000012013488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988548,0.00010219798,0.00023463117,0.00014544025,0.000364723,0.00029821703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991565,0.000019676081,0.00011916661,0.000105553525,0.00009744122,0.00050170906],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027458518,0.00011624093,0.00015476275,0.000022422922,0.0014582638,0.000066486275,0.00024822666,0.000044562046,0.0014667844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085730804,0.00010209661,0.00011669585,0.0001822744,0.0000551202,0.00028401898,0.00006617252,0.0005604192,0.008565008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005121222,0.00033093712,0.0014985037,0.000048082406,0.0003233453,0.002319309,0.0010512535,0.00041321607,0.01571781,0.8565856,0.117289074,0.003910753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005920854,0.000083680075,0.00011798205,0.000008954795,0.000019274472,0.00055887795,0.000059673617,0.00029180764,0.0045577995,0.0019611327,0.99160904,0.00013971758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047136113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032274882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072572686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043945824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243080737","doi":"10.7202/mlj","title":"McGill Law Journal","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06950990085544063,"score_gpt":0.3569736682425543,"score_spread":0.28746376738711366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243080737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002710695,0.025459986,0.000029458983,0.00884063,0.038014624,0.00022719426,0.0011755241,0.000041097424,0.9259404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6236243,0.03355063,0.00047303614,0.0030634739,0.021563208,0.000025043737,0.000034601337,0.00016909614,0.3174966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285376,0.0010672128,0.0017312815,0.0007085307,0.0022520742,0.0013871337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555033,0.0005051728,0.0011225475,0.00026425836,0.00167537,0.0008822905],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018693964,0.00092757493,0.0012783069,0.00024753477,0.034805253,0.0011605591,0.0014885258,0.00056788226,0.025137566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109485365,0.0007808604,0.0014048726,0.0005802413,0.0020067329,0.0012313047,0.00046425304,0.0044974866,0.03677406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004631798,0.00015229195,0.000003381469,0.00004912696,0.0011750958,0.00049420586,0.00041842728,0.00011239074,0.000009335222,0.7629249,0.23102492,0.003589625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005154701,0.000379837,0.000009937875,0.0012055524,0.00038788424,0.0021253107,0.0014075061,0.000040077364,0.00014127867,0.027493546,0.9654449,0.0008486489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010706674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12741165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001899251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091101254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243966434","doi":"10.7202/1000792ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03529479715523773,"score_gpt":0.27410540374403114,"score_spread":0.2388106065887934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243966434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49188748,0.00002359823,0.000011645586,0.00019690557,0.0016115186,0.000078031764,0.00040244852,0.00013490526,0.50565344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982544,0.0000042278257,0.0010099013,0.00014479396,0.00031598177,0.0000014066649,0.000004333905,0.000081346814,0.00018360415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984793,0.00027590766,0.00027596366,0.00015400081,0.00041178297,0.00040305243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.00017863343,0.00017092106,0.00030320833,0.00024527864,0.0003022695],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026508742,0.00014657776,0.00017693655,0.000077086435,0.0021708535,0.00011429066,0.00038393465,0.00009256341,0.0024162235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037957096,0.00011583125,0.000113756,0.00018703127,0.00011376038,0.00029470254,0.00005098141,0.0009650703,0.007308051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073270994,0.0012013373,0.13970311,0.000017517139,0.0006693765,0.00091294217,0.00017630354,0.0000795719,0.2389631,0.5184866,0.05572707,0.043330353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004824295,0.000035893925,0.123061985,0.0000071530935,0.00001921958,0.0012300484,0.000010335233,0.0000259685,0.0103258025,0.0009525955,0.86363596,0.00021262112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08503473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8079089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004608077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075381936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244914561","doi":"10.7202/1000615ar","title":"Préface","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03498694623141116,"score_gpt":0.27133033883974544,"score_spread":0.23634339260833429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244914561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036639194,0.0114961015,0.000015038423,0.016707743,0.025927491,0.00008493275,0.000029175235,0.00003491716,0.9420407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91742396,0.0037724636,0.0012452046,0.0008956673,0.0076480657,0.0000030866663,5.421338e-7,0.000024441557,0.06898657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982239,0.00018477289,0.00028569554,0.0001647722,0.00051219837,0.00062867196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990079,0.0001135041,0.00017005071,0.00011023582,0.00020230169,0.00039602016],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084868475,0.00016559273,0.00023636302,0.00002418577,0.011221681,0.00015123922,0.000337291,0.0002563449,0.004199543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017422102,0.00015853028,0.00021502156,0.00024312193,0.0015418736,0.00039261754,0.000064143,0.0012334962,0.00068686233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027731992,0.000079903024,0.00007359905,0.000005384481,0.000055582645,0.00004361085,0.0019903262,0.0000015218722,0.00003303177,0.9417711,0.024756728,0.031186465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021747455,0.000049526476,0.00022856198,0.000025498828,0.000039306608,0.000053456013,0.0010668436,0.0000065084837,0.000055496563,0.025617205,0.97244483,0.00019529076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016354961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22500902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021289264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026012023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245833113","doi":"10.7202/1013385ar","title":"L’Abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie II","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02833235345135241,"score_gpt":0.2663384078659922,"score_spread":0.23800605441463982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245833113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037305314,0.0017785832,0.000019968573,0.067170836,0.0037209147,0.0001870294,0.000028159187,0.000052448748,0.8897368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665437,0.0008128564,0.00024577833,0.0028338332,0.005306694,0.000011207106,0.0000010991215,0.00003027455,0.024214596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969602,0.0004178627,0.0004948448,0.000243404,0.0006757312,0.0012079314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982726,0.00009246391,0.0002631409,0.00016117812,0.00027945093,0.0009311684],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000983059,0.0002345297,0.00033883718,0.00004209404,0.012688649,0.0002964209,0.00051870995,0.00034649426,0.007723486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100567224,0.0002340452,0.0003589631,0.0003382802,0.00092764234,0.0013723588,0.000117787036,0.0009408396,0.0020751269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007315651,0.00020681662,0.00015253449,0.000011516812,0.000077651486,0.00007030333,0.0027529139,0.00001337544,0.0000518393,0.9733413,0.0066682245,0.016646214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025836335,0.00012809009,0.00022634365,0.00004938179,0.000043843553,0.00006871297,0.00058242754,0.000035619563,0.000065272754,0.3681774,0.6301439,0.00022067141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02083596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008539597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9292383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006816721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007599362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247094163","doi":"10.7202/1038495ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05455015795959885,"score_gpt":0.2704894063709857,"score_spread":0.21593924841138684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247094163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2047938,0.00017018082,0.00028121693,0.0014756257,0.0013106236,0.000168427,0.0017107152,0.0003191866,0.78977025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872994,0.000025086774,0.00028456637,0.00012473205,0.00018539585,0.0000014734914,9.840703e-7,0.00007568432,0.00057212525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998242,0.00049149705,0.00028193294,0.0001581255,0.0004062876,0.00042011702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987818,0.00031762428,0.00017280686,0.00025396328,0.00021525515,0.00025857205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002134606,0.00014035398,0.00017635422,0.00007174697,0.0014567483,0.00005185705,0.00031609967,0.0000567172,0.0020873249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035314832,0.0000766007,0.00011219524,0.00014457622,0.00010275328,0.000364337,0.00005040399,0.00016532543,0.013582166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015232791,0.000921833,0.15820636,0.000015688625,0.0010628295,0.0010462643,0.000100115074,0.000021785254,0.1126653,0.3872091,0.111907616,0.22531983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096624007,0.000062639236,0.093030475,0.000052711468,0.000018681616,0.0006818867,0.000006820302,0.0000020090515,0.012508532,0.0014760764,0.89096755,0.00022639279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004750299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79393613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018347429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062643007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247559517","doi":"10.7202/1082046ar","title":"Land","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"African history and culture analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03833604699059707,"score_gpt":0.2599741710894557,"score_spread":0.22163812409885864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247559517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008120169,0.0070080287,0.00010025071,0.05591191,0.0010911236,0.000032883003,0.000030145182,0.000023896126,0.93498975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753163,0.0007444479,0.00026212743,0.0056941807,0.0031685974,6.54831e-7,0.0000010933403,0.000011615398,0.014801019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986791,0.00029173086,0.00022601134,0.00014831506,0.00035435733,0.00030051352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911773,0.000029305207,0.00015288795,0.000059941827,0.00009603166,0.000544075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003035055,0.000110401015,0.00020658498,0.000012637043,0.0051196357,0.00006107119,0.0002514335,0.0001104569,0.0072565153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050607752,0.0000989226,0.00024301512,0.00037984358,0.00038810653,0.00032831504,0.000024330831,0.00042943133,0.0010429906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028120696,0.000084688814,0.00043893978,0.00001640707,0.0002594815,0.00036266688,0.013971106,0.00013576218,0.000023832881,0.9134114,0.052111093,0.01915654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001489155,0.00007397404,0.0000142558265,0.000014901997,0.0001712229,0.00003118683,0.0024132533,0.00003103949,0.000014014954,0.00089455466,0.9960582,0.00013444579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011917119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008937262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97450423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013467338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015133568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247751161","doi":"10.7202/1082032ar","title":"Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04743022982172887,"score_gpt":0.31088208614180773,"score_spread":0.26345185632007884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247751161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005620383,0.00006562056,0.00003299067,0.022538586,0.00040365246,0.00004945372,0.0000068122763,0.00006208861,0.97122043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436647,0.00007826179,0.000099699915,0.004358266,0.0009596147,6.9308146e-7,6.384109e-7,0.000006856547,0.00012950492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991453,0.000108217835,0.00015574836,0.00008298455,0.00030632876,0.00020138065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994985,0.000029791145,0.0000699117,0.000049313032,0.000059201986,0.000293281],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032974055,0.000056263012,0.0001011375,0.000009357114,0.0045329607,0.000111979425,0.00016376449,0.00005301882,0.00074389897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015763866,0.000051888394,0.00007831731,0.00009262917,0.00013811806,0.00024348588,0.000024392339,0.00023311177,0.00011065651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001182417,0.000014270322,0.00010679699,0.00000143664,0.000009620814,0.000024082256,0.0013290423,0.000004487562,0.00004739175,0.99017036,0.0008279754,0.007452742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017739943,0.000054622888,0.00009246375,0.0000066998455,0.000009056295,0.0000103662005,0.00047706833,0.000015928426,0.00014354014,0.0022628806,0.9966807,0.000069295944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050602076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031423192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045573066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070675346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248690335","doi":"10.7202/1082057ar","title":"Values","year":2020,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07869017682017865,"score_gpt":0.3218544515099699,"score_spread":0.24316427468979124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248690335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005436855,0.0013555896,0.0000624003,0.031107062,0.001991318,0.00018627933,0.00005111395,0.00019509326,0.9596143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98318493,0.0011200146,0.00044149987,0.010167614,0.004581449,0.000002156309,9.46155e-7,0.000046369834,0.0004550006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953889,0.0017967587,0.0006165698,0.0004106766,0.0008925902,0.00089446397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975572,0.0005498196,0.0003934727,0.00017037118,0.00020173748,0.0011273983],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021150014,0.00030097953,0.00052212086,0.000026979282,0.008697532,0.00025310702,0.00097119756,0.00042351667,0.0050180336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011055281,0.0002520275,0.00048265222,0.00037670144,0.0013702271,0.0004391546,0.00022367126,0.0014813951,0.002667001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000636033,0.000086945176,0.00012520496,0.000012887681,0.000112702706,0.00017301583,0.0049845534,0.000028587934,0.00007932923,0.98704433,0.0036360791,0.0036527368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005599503,0.00036847393,0.00016804678,0.000050700477,0.00007934212,0.000031742755,0.0099862525,0.00003536327,0.00009260386,0.18230276,0.8059452,0.00037957056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003966831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020701971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023583636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036858433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249121885","doi":"10.7202/1076911ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.104789511380864,"score_gpt":0.2739727588133116,"score_spread":0.16918324743244761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249121885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11670708,0.000316974,0.00017365359,0.00529813,0.0007466662,0.00023143236,0.0015601525,0.0004942156,0.8744717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771345,0.000011294712,0.00047702907,0.001391916,0.0002882085,8.961712e-7,0.000005052564,0.000078366735,0.000033805434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998348,0.00044470368,0.0002850977,0.00016922133,0.00041607706,0.000336893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989619,0.00012278455,0.00015357009,0.0001390767,0.00015812687,0.00046449236],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010219603,0.00014074153,0.00020525849,0.00003154379,0.0014622171,0.000089815854,0.00033508646,0.000048987313,0.0013898814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038278938,0.00011590661,0.00011907372,0.00028137397,0.00005771094,0.00024974032,0.00006294462,0.00042129174,0.00946803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004297627,0.0013020007,0.14197211,0.00011087943,0.0024574117,0.0046068905,0.0016898027,0.0023910908,0.05032176,0.32758996,0.40918204,0.05407842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000658075,0.000108888955,0.028298175,0.000011992322,0.000028205744,0.00030668877,0.000039044946,0.00017182334,0.0047018966,0.00022068118,0.965223,0.00023154316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043180468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003149425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88100636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000735737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063730045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249241366","doi":"10.7202/1005858ar","title":"Volume 56 Index","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.07016168886116168,"score_gpt":0.1988758323296316,"score_spread":0.12871414346846993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249241366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009628749,0.010501693,0.00034564506,0.00076176244,0.030087702,0.0000855273,0.00095910503,0.000019861589,0.9562758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39059365,0.0026886372,0.001795074,0.00055339205,0.0007986168,0.000003970134,0.0000022952945,0.000037855258,0.60352653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977937,0.000027484562,0.0009214248,0.00046489385,0.000054381195,0.00073815265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986645,0.00001912959,0.0006475864,0.00032303398,0.00007830125,0.0002674288],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011034795,0.00024595542,0.00054767105,0.00019412118,0.002278306,0.00017149256,0.0004678034,0.0001896488,0.11385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049174152,0.00030978982,0.00045615694,0.00017192887,0.00047238838,0.0008167124,0.00020575133,0.00047223447,0.06219709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026203295,0.00020245605,0.012638318,0.000021257723,0.00040539334,0.00008729727,0.0007171758,0.00002125675,1.0134847e-7,0.7732409,0.20410213,0.008537501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000630124,0.00008322504,0.0035024663,0.00004399119,0.0000323646,0.00014591188,0.0007027544,0.00045612888,0.0000096099175,0.0125588225,0.9814638,0.00037082203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024049531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080892583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77736163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029121627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066464263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251416039","doi":"10.7202/1043167ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.12152293080750302,"score_gpt":0.3525396561079604,"score_spread":0.23101672530045736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251416039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07749861,0.00011343225,0.25271976,0.011862274,0.013699712,0.00022581196,0.000018811636,0.00019960546,0.643662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925826,0.000016057873,0.006904698,0.00016482415,0.00018568613,0.0000013175446,2.2740308e-7,0.000005562851,0.00013903376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913013,0.00010808477,0.00018971418,0.00014802675,0.00021844571,0.00020560595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.0001024542,0.00023170564,0.00070362195,0.00018998852,0.000114263894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011064545,0.0000716074,0.00008423171,0.000030505475,0.005818946,0.00074812165,0.0017535874,0.000036345267,0.00006202152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037948016,0.000060314982,0.000050201463,0.000040869254,0.000081150254,0.0011042695,0.0001599148,0.00017023734,0.0003254024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006560891,0.00009822948,0.00831614,0.0000017456749,0.000021492513,0.000029464414,0.00021922248,0.000056844714,0.00014986606,0.7219899,0.0012940409,0.26781645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017616672,0.00016016174,0.30434406,0.00006320453,0.000013368096,0.00055889064,0.000108245855,0.009012843,0.057996277,0.11320166,0.51369727,0.0006678447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018291642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006294138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.915084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050726216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011986052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99547535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251540984","doi":"10.7202/1082039ar","title":"Écriture doctrinale","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05515462320492757,"score_gpt":0.3106479485017094,"score_spread":0.2554933252967818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251540984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022291266,0.0033465293,0.000060678412,0.09257478,0.0019955663,0.000060653932,0.000072654475,0.00003280282,0.8996272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697822,0.0008071587,0.0003370518,0.019121828,0.0050675143,9.055722e-7,4.1956667e-7,0.00001159642,0.0048713256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.00051276846,0.00030929747,0.00018362941,0.0003972763,0.0006827557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844784,0.00014584565,0.00010064825,0.00008856141,0.00011281381,0.0011042912],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006121586,0.00014728858,0.00021359212,0.000012586131,0.004096551,0.000121721714,0.0004342483,0.00017359616,0.004111864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033200503,0.00013817899,0.00019365763,0.0002777008,0.0009653456,0.000737326,0.00006199922,0.00087068137,0.0015765951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024785812,0.000040145067,0.00001917853,0.000018968216,0.00002469908,0.00019355431,0.00078865734,0.000016708522,0.000037366066,0.9876463,0.001716272,0.009473391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021313505,0.00015021914,0.000023850549,0.00006446953,0.000033966066,0.00012608712,0.0006784774,0.000020307702,0.0004412081,0.08507704,0.91300535,0.00016588141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044959655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017477776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011053335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025157751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252796054","doi":"10.7202/038651ar","title":"Préface","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044468064966668136,"score_gpt":0.2783238082275402,"score_spread":0.23385574326087208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252796054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049134635,0.052229706,0.00003402314,0.037075315,0.005869351,0.00008002984,0.000016132715,0.00003594905,0.9041681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91709995,0.0119985,0.00073523424,0.003095473,0.004607613,0.0000010186567,5.299587e-7,0.000013036194,0.062448643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809897,0.00025768558,0.0003030171,0.00016079954,0.00052971055,0.00064983644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991836,0.00006514135,0.00016421136,0.00008639517,0.00015962996,0.00034102466],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006278937,0.00016948274,0.00026237709,0.00002512101,0.009875676,0.00013380432,0.00027928557,0.00017614367,0.0013051856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008754972,0.00016425832,0.00022598075,0.00029556133,0.00066471973,0.00040942436,0.000025172882,0.00052214,0.0004176656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042992447,0.00010342716,0.000012243834,0.0000026759499,0.000038639122,0.00006319679,0.0020716651,0.000008158079,0.0000031480804,0.8767376,0.03613819,0.08481677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023818803,0.00016621622,0.00036691825,0.00005779114,0.00004013746,0.000035581223,0.001133878,0.000006525627,0.000019762254,0.058224082,0.93951935,0.00019160357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005172064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017402843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91660863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056796276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018859115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256323219","doi":"10.7202/1082052ar","title":"Possession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047720769174089524,"score_gpt":0.27618795393430684,"score_spread":0.22846718476021732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256323219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049909152,0.0001965386,0.00022596812,0.007909102,0.0006531088,0.00012702534,0.0001307203,0.00036333228,0.94048506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643767,0.000007688767,0.0012076806,0.0017777892,0.00047922027,6.304198e-7,0.0000019821657,0.000056041037,0.00003132716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989091,0.00009001567,0.00023102756,0.00013675453,0.00036837658,0.00026471014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992119,0.000019389001,0.00012978894,0.000095704854,0.00009422501,0.00044898075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021982532,0.00010925155,0.00013652269,0.000026424028,0.0016973575,0.00007110587,0.00021983474,0.00004357922,0.0013096307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007802558,0.00008668381,0.000095780575,0.00018282604,0.000039321923,0.00033450348,0.00006291932,0.0004406662,0.007729667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010923876,0.00048109985,0.0027287102,0.000063453845,0.0003131014,0.0038311384,0.00070874806,0.0011102866,0.29941913,0.512871,0.14234757,0.035033334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064695894,0.000108624,0.00036472664,0.000024309133,0.000017148353,0.00065449654,0.0000628675,0.00023463219,0.011117674,0.00045177102,0.9861804,0.00013637928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002896131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000819102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006662966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047208378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256381084","doi":"10.7202/1082050ar","title":"Mère","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.050794543863275234,"score_gpt":0.2708410450271359,"score_spread":0.22004650116386068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256381084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047240284,0.012666346,0.000028425218,0.16641502,0.0034712665,0.000039465376,0.000038039547,0.000026447302,0.81684256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355425,0.0027523187,0.00074470975,0.0124106165,0.00846593,0.0000015269012,8.2986986e-7,0.000019141868,0.04006238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986355,0.00022526906,0.00025675353,0.00014776339,0.00036006156,0.00037465183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999157,0.00006275202,0.000098549586,0.000045794197,0.00008917358,0.0005467029],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021675485,0.00011893219,0.00020711885,0.000010300746,0.006069101,0.000050385126,0.00022552274,0.00008707583,0.0030739766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008197918,0.000104008344,0.00016941667,0.0002943786,0.0003965752,0.0003760987,0.000054332922,0.00045803998,0.0010504662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014401341,0.00005524905,0.00010927196,0.000018429926,0.000059712893,0.00021099686,0.012112645,0.0000061194037,0.0000045049783,0.87659043,0.06712875,0.043689486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016335965,0.00013753083,0.000026624213,0.000029943334,0.000030593597,0.000024677205,0.0008936525,0.000015102433,0.0000078755,0.0014507928,0.9970833,0.00013652253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001233165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012498777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93507016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015702305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009889829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256496727","doi":"10.7202/1043168ar","title":"Volume 62 Index","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.052348473508332306,"score_gpt":0.22878961820035926,"score_spread":0.17644114469202696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256496727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017624671,0.0071958457,0.0001057052,0.006430531,0.043621562,0.00008429038,0.00138766,0.0000128533775,0.93939906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44125518,0.0024146235,0.0002643882,0.00029811525,0.0009194315,0.0000023003672,0.0000015118075,0.000024098712,0.55482036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789333,0.000019160878,0.0008073859,0.00048763055,0.000062852516,0.0007296378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975783,0.000022685934,0.0013129102,0.0007416948,0.00008287939,0.00026153395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013230826,0.00024277624,0.00059800746,0.0001283212,0.0109741725,0.001274978,0.0009671807,0.00019320016,0.038106486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000174167,0.00030735251,0.00036545316,0.000045110235,0.00081349234,0.0014116847,0.00042669204,0.000506491,0.04890984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017861807,0.000113502996,0.03142849,0.000024205823,0.00031445504,0.00009660458,0.00014344817,0.00008346254,2.0444881e-7,0.6917921,0.26353586,0.012449833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085017405,0.00004744205,0.014132464,0.00006635437,0.00002352998,0.00012710885,0.0002108188,0.001148641,0.0000050120157,0.008953073,0.97407377,0.00036158971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025905003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015414507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031654583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075311273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285547894","doi":"10.7202/1088287ar","title":"Les impasses théoriques et pratiques du contrôle de constitutionnalité canadien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04619538886680562,"score_gpt":0.34984692042985843,"score_spread":0.3036515315630528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285547894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035968125,0.022234498,0.0006135188,0.16349751,0.0027152244,0.00013237573,0.00015013317,0.00006370159,0.77462494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818441,0.009564815,0.0013226726,0.0021617417,0.0011734461,0.0000054849274,0.000003465432,0.000014350042,0.003909881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968703,0.0013236323,0.00044648504,0.00024862727,0.00042822878,0.0006827554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788,0.0004287754,0.00024184579,0.00014574603,0.0007464526,0.00055719225],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001841201,0.00020905177,0.00031601902,0.00003105315,0.0055299136,0.00043361334,0.00027863507,0.00021100431,0.0014816491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007762337,0.00020422367,0.00020448373,0.00020399017,0.0010111947,0.000997248,0.00006610472,0.00059415057,0.000033594544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014987402,0.00009522318,0.0015840405,0.000045420562,0.00007442847,0.0014493816,0.0021905522,0.000034467655,0.0000718439,0.9844378,0.0050183064,0.0049835006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022349964,0.00010258383,0.00060765,0.00053544133,0.000112458,0.0029403702,0.006190577,0.000021581705,0.0013791998,0.017113648,0.9705196,0.00025336744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31669822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8674748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087281625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079382904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303437222","doi":"10.7202/1092013ar","title":"L’extinction des droits ancestraux des non-signataires de la Convention de la Baie-James : le test de la condition 14","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.05458531008092042,"score_gpt":0.3699084595960679,"score_spread":0.31532314951514745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303437222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89418155,0.0014634597,0.0011691246,0.0016355555,0.0008487446,0.00024496616,0.0002431569,0.000093542,0.10011988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993073,0.00076476566,0.0014993357,0.000690998,0.0006831018,0.0000356056,0.00003342841,0.000037355247,0.0031824403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939884,0.0038769746,0.0004975434,0.00028034815,0.00056003046,0.0007966943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762595,0.0011770352,0.0004223625,0.000118793,0.00028157825,0.00037429255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004183092,0.00025422877,0.00023720298,0.00009905243,0.009499,0.00050207454,0.00030935658,0.00028352166,0.0011769553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006257745,0.00028048002,0.00021802598,0.00026924358,0.0036233477,0.0010523298,0.00006755925,0.00088180916,0.000018361177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795228,0.0017573385,0.06881697,0.00026428912,0.00030501117,0.0004478194,0.059021633,0.010889785,0.012834684,0.8132165,0.013479826,0.018878173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015273264,0.00024504095,0.11195534,0.00020491016,0.00020178818,0.0024428812,0.04667461,0.0015238962,0.0069719325,0.051206574,0.77651566,0.0005300434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022299146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01070294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76303583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042542573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005730574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303437248","doi":"10.7202/1092014ar","title":"Expressive Voting and Irrational Outcomes in Corporate Elections","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Shareholder; Corporate governance; Voting trust; Disapproval voting; Value (mathematics); Politics; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Accounting; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.029217076321107305,"score_gpt":0.21553605361736117,"score_spread":0.18631897729625385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303437248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744492,0.000059904873,0.00013656732,0.0019565558,0.0006564305,0.00012396227,0.00003337247,0.000033317447,0.022550657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981906,0.0000055366363,0.000072758325,0.0011996699,0.00023401828,0.000016943612,0.0000051734114,0.000011433888,0.00026386944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.000013613265,0.00022426546,0.00013769994,0.00022189897,0.00017654212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993777,0.000021721431,0.0004699437,0.00005408799,0.0000672183,0.0000093011395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025942156,0.000092439455,0.00012815926,0.000104274026,0.0023983743,0.00011224425,0.00010642505,0.000016134272,0.000236599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031268777,0.000089709814,0.00003877868,0.0002767077,0.000025620662,0.0008460127,0.00011290436,0.00031247866,0.000014242528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044686796,0.00010642705,0.6810214,0.000012440545,0.00001725788,0.00015033115,0.000017035862,0.003299166,0.00017746422,0.31255165,0.0016330432,0.0009691208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010768854,0.000020970716,0.63532615,0.000021917285,0.000014862044,0.00011882829,0.000154232,0.0017148376,0.00001553218,0.0070159035,0.3542929,0.0002269941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062011706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003244474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35265985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056819288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006515878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312410912","doi":"10.7202/1093269ar","title":"De la fiducie de données en droit civil québécois : étude exploratoire pour un outil en construction","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028089620729622483,"score_gpt":0.2831094994036393,"score_spread":0.25501987867401676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312410912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54460806,0.022678781,0.0036539207,0.10197874,0.0071653435,0.00023698567,0.00015953404,0.0001708145,0.31934783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798008,0.008793745,0.0067029833,0.00086324033,0.0018801448,0.0000062437825,0.0000021450664,0.000032464126,0.001918214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956219,0.0020715771,0.0004869962,0.0003546907,0.0006129841,0.0008518527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978912,0.00078531745,0.00025260603,0.00021288176,0.00030179461,0.0005562413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025976927,0.00026202144,0.00035261625,0.00005048197,0.004399187,0.00042554256,0.00045366827,0.00038581318,0.0020922564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007046411,0.00028691837,0.00030965614,0.00036305317,0.00089432095,0.0008227342,0.0001261925,0.0009876435,0.00013411009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035250065,0.00020893029,0.0018828547,0.000072859,0.0001306258,0.0015380206,0.011319917,0.00011938862,0.00077087345,0.8689837,0.001036827,0.11390078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042953077,0.00007055794,0.0012535853,0.0006093583,0.00024128822,0.0054267906,0.033679824,0.00008427395,0.0034847546,0.06910462,0.88523656,0.000378885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02402027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18864673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011350916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063324627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393004","doi":"10.7202/1098445ar","title":"Vers une théorie de la fin de non-recevoir en droit privé québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015576148114654527,"score_gpt":0.29426636034274894,"score_spread":0.2786902122280944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16155298,0.0036526558,0.0003022722,0.11145855,0.00734329,0.00028509725,0.0001845029,0.00007976993,0.7151409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888181,0.0014380417,0.0008258481,0.0011232141,0.0014637061,0.000015313819,0.0000021446724,0.00003323548,0.006280375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960606,0.0014462513,0.00040625746,0.00028419413,0.0008462059,0.0009565052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813235,0.0007980385,0.00024885318,0.00019659685,0.00008292656,0.00054125185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039774827,0.00022099764,0.00029180554,0.000060877195,0.008934005,0.00017417832,0.00083909265,0.00017840786,0.0027666283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002475086,0.0002516139,0.00029078347,0.0005449874,0.0006863543,0.0004631934,0.00021584226,0.001482427,0.00011620838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012517821,0.00030136356,0.0008644861,0.000046492358,0.00010292065,0.001187233,0.015933504,0.0024834494,0.00021505138,0.9369422,0.012899809,0.028898269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038143923,0.00024692307,0.0004948108,0.00009275821,0.00012972268,0.0009519839,0.010744863,0.00013909752,0.00015818085,0.02567333,0.96069366,0.00029324825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25214937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1975481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94779384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030863632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057880895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393007","doi":"10.7202/1098443ar","title":"Rééquilibrer le rôle de la Cour suprême du Canada en procédure criminelle","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014494343375557108,"score_gpt":0.26251071006144366,"score_spread":0.24801636668588656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2421885,0.008822604,0.000038843285,0.21786344,0.00750118,0.0003618906,0.00040606488,0.00006951914,0.52274793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98094654,0.0003973499,0.00021062556,0.0011278297,0.0013724035,0.000014849795,0.0000027327976,0.00003435957,0.015893312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957789,0.0016474075,0.00040124863,0.00028249895,0.0010412645,0.0008486331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984244,0.0005394593,0.0002084794,0.00017191183,0.00013960998,0.0005161433],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520966,0.00022356026,0.0002818668,0.000035508645,0.011408737,0.00016479145,0.0007880019,0.000122034675,0.0048533254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020595173,0.0002407839,0.00017010105,0.0002889646,0.0004570154,0.00048824056,0.00026992572,0.001203122,0.000024092147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007947014,0.0002933197,0.0008149007,0.00007133395,0.000069924616,0.0018405908,0.0035608078,0.0017433172,0.00017517715,0.77881765,0.20994973,0.0025838008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003457769,0.00011823293,0.00020738893,0.00004648307,0.00008608,0.002465416,0.017489742,0.0001782609,0.00016242018,0.0026999598,0.97590405,0.0002962198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92063653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9278668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016161217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014036762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393008","doi":"10.7202/1098444ar","title":"The Limits of the Declaratory Judgment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Summary judgment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04791834975192315,"score_gpt":0.3076115822506873,"score_spread":0.25969323249876414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039049268,0.00042001196,0.00001293698,0.036407124,0.0009355911,0.0002400183,0.000039121787,0.000015083248,0.9228808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855447,0.00006211721,0.00002135381,0.00044487536,0.00010149866,0.000012971056,8.5409944e-8,0.0000030951971,0.00079955766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990835,0.00020701051,0.00013074177,0.000045856395,0.00040005328,0.00013283652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.00007675222,0.00011762709,0.0001249796,0.000045100154,0.00004732271],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187596,0.00002918408,0.00003851269,0.0000053802655,0.019214133,0.000035826943,0.0004874475,0.000011218498,0.00014308044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026551672,0.000016264821,0.000074030686,0.00012717077,0.00016069303,0.000041503285,0.000105362065,0.00024613767,0.00000460901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021258668,0.000021724605,0.000110746645,2.8900482e-7,0.000007106271,4.1642005e-7,0.00032947434,0.00008601688,0.00006358269,0.99609,0.0012445961,0.0020439508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005522061,0.000010099853,0.00047741676,0.0000013917235,0.0000053747103,0.0000045984166,0.0016754633,0.000005453679,0.00023337519,0.0037065574,0.99380106,0.000024004521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007199859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99255645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106919695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032879314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058606","doi":"10.7202/1098593ar","title":"Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel à combler","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07040641311657626,"score_gpt":0.34513133532927864,"score_spread":0.2747249222127024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007271637,0.0011261934,0.00057111983,0.12419528,0.0035823253,0.00038614747,0.001211726,0.00007991033,0.86157566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97777295,0.00069098163,0.0005492455,0.0013493337,0.000630632,0.000101387624,0.000012324401,0.000026173188,0.01886695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971781,0.0009011429,0.0004774021,0.0002807809,0.00066084805,0.0005017594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986333,0.0002534874,0.0003397368,0.00019825948,0.00019617332,0.00037899482],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225917,0.00018582631,0.0002278199,0.0000700722,0.032319512,0.00025556723,0.00042857614,0.000093073606,0.008522225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061924875,0.00020455619,0.0002644365,0.0009317899,0.00039900574,0.00058290723,0.00016893669,0.0012971255,0.00011666221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027934377,0.00061184284,0.000036229565,0.0000042431902,0.00011023853,0.000023502444,0.0015165748,0.0010495798,0.00004542745,0.98543733,0.008263066,0.002874057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005491666,0.00021739911,0.0004901406,0.0000136696435,0.00009399079,0.00033719878,0.00724852,0.00016035626,0.0001298766,0.021619696,0.9689149,0.00022507369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00373178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016032547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97050136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087565905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026868132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99238414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058610","doi":"10.7202/1098594ar","title":"Making Meaning: Indigenous Legal Education and Student Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Internship; Meaning (existential); Legal education; Practice of law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Action (physics); Legal research; Legal profession; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10166086787338059,"score_gpt":0.4433395643533455,"score_spread":0.3416786964799649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11977083,0.00013591525,0.000030277071,0.021455012,0.00427131,0.00018539364,0.0000058795767,0.00004485234,0.8541005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624056,0.00003817434,0.0003308346,0.0015080553,0.0004874876,0.000017679964,0.0000024777974,0.0000069151697,0.0013678067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988462,0.00030721838,0.00017069829,0.00009432087,0.000423274,0.00015831797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.000058308255,0.00019985059,0.00005809562,0.00014392445,0.00007510775],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995978,0.00005038813,0.000055415392,0.00009611477,0.014913197,0.00036824716,0.0001310533,0.000023062667,0.000923412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009638763,0.000055022094,0.000023365204,0.00028480677,0.000046842186,0.00087800215,0.000040243667,0.0006449761,0.000008715206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009121185,0.0002637717,0.0009326802,0.0000019799766,0.000018460976,0.0000036431607,0.024525242,0.000027692817,0.000032352233,0.9324874,0.0012674101,0.04043022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007687354,0.000032348482,0.0010701275,0.0000034247728,0.000012392035,0.00015608314,0.06250984,0.0000014833303,0.000009166105,0.0017921323,0.9342709,0.000065178436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005857774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010619635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93300354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044563753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030377175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058617","doi":"10.7202/1098591ar","title":"Are Tents a “Home”? Extending Section 8 Privacy Rights for the Precariously Housed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Denial; Political science; Trespass; Sociology","score_opus":0.039203409888685155,"score_gpt":0.29823716596560423,"score_spread":0.2590337560769191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31674576,0.0056909416,0.0019546093,0.059527017,0.057912286,0.0071649062,0.00092434837,0.0014087771,0.54867136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950603,0.00009111761,0.00017765684,0.00054765446,0.0013278071,0.00007971845,0.0000019272777,0.000014513465,0.002699275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984702,0.00025243068,0.00018122866,0.00015429569,0.0005941765,0.0003476907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.00013416848,0.00029152606,0.00011703993,0.000109939305,0.00010115163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010552978,0.000094915325,0.00011814334,0.000007622906,0.040642213,0.00018105516,0.00047107253,0.00007186094,0.0003959578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055620694,0.00006298523,0.00023663993,0.00021554535,0.00013292233,0.00025341377,0.000082071514,0.000533722,0.000003905652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002775612,0.00067733583,0.0010905837,0.000034412813,0.00064753724,0.00008226399,0.07549117,0.0018986379,0.00036879347,0.83196574,0.07839702,0.009068955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045562998,0.000051798113,0.00025909068,0.000010301304,0.000042151718,0.000049974755,0.009066968,0.000029659272,0.00005315662,0.008889056,0.98098165,0.00011056154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009851955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005972468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003891335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015511037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96060675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058618","doi":"10.7202/1098596ar","title":"Volume 67 Index","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Business; Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034308601976959875,"score_gpt":0.19876164890807563,"score_spread":0.16445304693111576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017409155,0.016013995,0.000102149774,0.005005037,0.046424665,0.00011090947,0.004079695,0.000019991465,0.92650265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36359343,0.0009985109,0.00020681562,0.0009627665,0.0005303725,0.000012003358,0.00000661565,0.000031205782,0.6336583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977612,0.000060035163,0.00087880454,0.0004878471,0.00009919546,0.0007129194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873894,0.000033044158,0.00067910925,0.0003022144,0.000045688543,0.0002010171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017288451,0.0002140712,0.00050226884,0.00022910378,0.007800922,0.00023480521,0.0005648506,0.00007805394,0.20027839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003976177,0.00030456006,0.00036207412,0.00025886626,0.00028843505,0.00050482736,0.00062979467,0.00081134215,0.019101264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022815668,0.00018059732,0.0066752643,0.000013408473,0.00024116292,0.00009574236,0.0002803189,0.002860345,1.767442e-7,0.56049764,0.42434826,0.00478428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007612536,0.00011084301,0.0009279921,0.000011384522,0.000020300504,0.00036186626,0.0016846184,0.0024925657,0.0000015963099,0.006725422,0.98654735,0.00035483335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013061685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003206904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56219906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008585585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010564908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058620","doi":"10.7202/1098592ar","title":"La gravité en droit international pénal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015556108719102171,"score_gpt":0.28349082950056625,"score_spread":0.2679347207814641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032978687,0.00027710723,0.000044804623,0.012701902,0.014578538,0.000087099186,0.00036806992,0.000030462566,0.9389333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88960415,0.00010330676,0.0002459611,0.0010125184,0.0029976587,0.000009837656,0.000017891261,0.000023285993,0.10598542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964628,0.00095369795,0.0004279827,0.00023736799,0.001487169,0.00043097418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897176,0.00022199842,0.0002702076,0.000101470665,0.00020233325,0.00023221078],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018105233,0.00016973028,0.00018373162,0.0001142651,0.009306297,0.0002240619,0.000998738,0.00010786669,0.039402187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000298824,0.00018245833,0.00029223188,0.00009813988,0.00046401852,0.0005087167,0.0002386456,0.0013148447,0.00035413803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038800325,0.00023617687,0.00003595542,0.0000032638702,0.00015389665,0.0005118391,0.0013137334,0.00019448568,0.000007316027,0.9905841,0.0024800021,0.0044404403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035432924,0.00007495941,0.00012373562,0.000020100295,0.000027869817,0.0009854713,0.0004329879,0.0000640849,0.000014973026,0.2963205,0.70142025,0.0001607399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032214622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009492835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85662544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001292819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005865053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058623","doi":"10.7202/1098595ar","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05493260154688672,"score_gpt":0.26743574794179537,"score_spread":0.21250314639490864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22300951,0.00032151508,0.000018788356,0.0005664193,0.0018589011,0.00020333081,0.0034433028,0.00026631323,0.7703119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989443,0.0000047644803,0.00017723948,0.00031894038,0.00010131296,0.0000078608045,0.000012492979,0.000081821665,0.00035125864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726516,0.0012006902,0.00027583988,0.00015922144,0.00071913784,0.00037995307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991434,0.000156471,0.00018868152,0.00022839622,0.0001024262,0.00018057939],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034933784,0.00012264222,0.00016960279,0.00009779993,0.0073567447,0.000061058556,0.00044744075,0.000020022528,0.007902534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112917434,0.000113452006,0.00012369976,0.0003535468,0.000048042635,0.00017033254,0.00021050336,0.0006733706,0.0016880339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002979987,0.0032275033,0.10650655,0.00002559545,0.0017056875,0.004534213,0.00074099546,0.015517069,0.012956678,0.48229837,0.33140317,0.038104195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004893489,0.00009802137,0.02397581,0.0000025166087,0.000017673723,0.0016467201,0.00009663405,0.00005534198,0.00056819577,0.00062652637,0.97224766,0.00017556184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014399042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061754994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7759348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036883564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009658639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310830","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1192","title":"télétravail transfrontalier face aux défis de coordination des règles de conflit et des normes minimales d'emploi","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0653927825808888,"score_gpt":0.34275278575370416,"score_spread":0.27736000317281534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709442,0.002950674,0.0013260904,0.020647286,0.000986797,0.00024098443,0.0006437271,0.00014717593,0.10211308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96709996,0.008837996,0.0017795258,0.0011374664,0.0003510494,0.000012680224,0.000015650796,0.000047404148,0.02071824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694395,0.00075062335,0.00045580376,0.0002590752,0.00052311947,0.001067441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862903,0.0002713742,0.00016613676,0.00011990453,0.00032414484,0.00048937876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021054621,0.00026612607,0.00028679872,0.00011352551,0.006712507,0.0003591455,0.00039283367,0.00023034925,0.0010583191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018292388,0.00025396058,0.0002335234,0.0005981511,0.001466489,0.0009795447,0.000045956014,0.00041581492,0.00005644244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027936276,0.00021791039,0.009095479,0.000043678967,0.00020654278,0.00010647535,0.020073138,0.00023715297,0.0012376024,0.91901946,0.0029789752,0.04675564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000608051,0.00017075437,0.10343779,0.00021766766,0.00012827775,0.00007187932,0.012123461,0.00012678112,0.0010812638,0.018777626,0.8629403,0.00031612127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026807252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25517726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90024185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007489715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015770711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310854","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1181","title":"No Country for Old Men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02349347345522424,"score_gpt":0.3100334944892338,"score_spread":0.28654002103400955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037240146,0.00001472034,0.00011480638,0.003042056,0.0010488348,0.00015225791,0.00011426325,0.00011552306,0.9916735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8179828,0.0014596287,0.0015932808,0.0038595975,0.0032416307,0.000032223943,0.00004941898,0.000048213056,0.17173319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992921,0.000049662394,0.00012506213,0.00006754607,0.00024083935,0.00022481597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954295,0.00007182547,0.00005789218,0.000050233873,0.0001617049,0.000115402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007955865,0.000044690543,0.00006705678,0.000029628292,0.0031643626,0.00008841707,0.0001326171,0.000053001328,0.00039429052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012213031,0.000039287672,0.00004902823,0.00018323322,0.00005537076,0.00014165646,0.0000102722715,0.00009627291,0.00019413463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000832459,0.000009227074,0.00006457299,0.0000029389278,0.000010181784,0.0000042926536,0.0006967899,0.000039637638,0.000028096843,0.9595777,0.038656358,0.00090188795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019252383,0.000017624181,0.000058605056,0.000006025344,0.0000053684194,0.0000021494773,0.0011341402,0.0012613328,0.000007804556,0.002331739,0.99492466,0.000058006128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076350366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05203644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95724595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006606968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015859103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310893","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1191","title":"Five Linguistic Methods for Revitalizing Indigenous Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06066495592786393,"score_gpt":0.418206220004975,"score_spread":0.35754126407711107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025315695,0.0026202267,0.0025651716,0.004058707,0.006507747,0.0009945194,0.0001303835,0.0005760665,0.98001564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63990086,0.0103587005,0.275781,0.0067107473,0.018110083,0.00021313957,0.00006822529,0.00021390826,0.04864329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858564,0.00030213656,0.00022730842,0.00014963224,0.0002494874,0.00048579194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998971,0.00036874454,0.00013421744,0.00009266974,0.0002547636,0.00017862607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029096087,0.00009716036,0.0001787865,0.000010419198,0.010557908,0.00014399672,0.00029434307,0.00015123059,0.000089099725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094066776,0.00008201594,0.00023653058,0.00033594624,0.000169112,0.00013089643,0.00003618647,0.00027878198,0.000051825562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012667388,0.000032151398,0.000027340428,0.00003797477,0.00009678693,0.0000350047,0.054613814,0.000033217886,0.0001063185,0.9064227,0.007610985,0.030971052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016873455,0.000033078762,0.000010760496,0.000038408984,0.000032810178,0.000012744198,0.007046552,0.000015503403,0.00011315009,0.0455931,0.9468137,0.00012145537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005635343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022611073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013653208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029446917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404855","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1291","title":"To Whom Are Directors’ Duties Owed? Evidence from Canadian M&A Transactions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.059363609441009005,"score_gpt":0.2420850855850166,"score_spread":0.18272147614400758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94616306,0.00020756222,0.0009199555,0.022384323,0.004267086,0.00027383585,0.00042940193,0.00030941365,0.02504537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950557,0.00007464101,0.00008074034,0.0019096375,0.0015114892,0.000009732358,0.000008008322,0.000027133185,0.0013229225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882036,0.000010121099,0.00023631114,0.00022525007,0.00028589932,0.00042204672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.000045290595,0.00018615754,0.0002004802,0.00016650389,0.000076445205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023148302,0.00015977642,0.00018682802,0.00020835525,0.0025913517,0.00043362752,0.0002905049,0.00005656334,0.0011062962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007082388,0.00015131658,0.00010157534,0.0007977024,0.00003674045,0.0013743276,0.00002260533,0.0002399513,0.0027925824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000385983,0.00021204412,0.40960217,0.00029725538,0.00043621918,0.0024765935,0.0012339471,0.023828449,0.0017111995,0.018547375,0.46433106,0.07693771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012032371,0.000003897364,0.18146792,0.00027109712,0.000022851342,0.000005249865,0.000089903675,0.000074784635,0.000039492035,0.00042562335,0.81729436,0.00018448815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5305156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94157845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4110629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025190191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404882","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1292","title":"Cooperative Difference in Insolvency Proceedings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Political science; Financial system; Business; Law","score_opus":0.03022051615031474,"score_gpt":0.2287096506447834,"score_spread":0.19848913449446867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7621397,0.000062325205,0.000012209538,0.0014625669,0.00067336106,0.0001544408,0.000007517664,0.00013458497,0.2353533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998166,0.00006162818,0.000024893296,0.0008211314,0.0005479985,0.000010749475,0.000003276035,0.000017370328,0.00034689961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989196,0.0000039792076,0.00029512032,0.00018966966,0.00026315363,0.00032847218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994852,0.000017895158,0.0002254848,0.000065955064,0.00018872552,0.000016758118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003297535,0.0001437354,0.00017284302,0.0001701064,0.0009293834,0.00023265513,0.00025575096,0.00005121685,0.0001158354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009541949,0.000122192,0.0000539217,0.0009791394,0.00004663731,0.0012244381,0.00011726255,0.0003408183,0.00043212235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071560884,0.00013135224,0.039166253,0.00009069549,0.000016556889,0.00029057372,0.00008300397,0.00011295843,0.0010437994,0.9470822,0.004779488,0.007131548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012719022,0.00004038671,0.18915358,0.00039469847,0.000017535456,0.000047233643,0.00036919775,0.0031352201,0.0003562411,0.02923597,0.77546746,0.0005105704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006549392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032134736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91784626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004715578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005310674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7148159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404908","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1307","title":"The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634585772018647,"score_gpt":0.3563337948703247,"score_spread":0.24998793715013823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20614822,0.0010424058,0.00012797887,0.031387433,0.0020788985,0.00038253222,0.00003415509,0.00004480182,0.7587536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998972,0.00065391057,0.000071861294,0.00007932415,0.00013329874,0.0000024293308,6.1641106e-7,0.0000018401832,0.00008469521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880505,0.0002276175,0.00025317934,0.0000707066,0.0004719263,0.00017152973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986803,0.00080740027,0.00018416534,0.000067720684,0.00020506418,0.000055357796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022407353,0.00005299888,0.000111850626,0.000018304583,0.0053009465,0.00007884484,0.00022857779,0.000031191557,0.000037161255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002917254,0.000028966237,0.00006965478,0.00014782845,0.0060867392,0.0002446415,0.00003393389,0.00012332441,0.000008475375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219115,0.0000067414476,0.00017737577,0.000007097185,0.000012267326,0.0000021085473,0.00072126766,0.00002263835,0.000025514972,0.99634206,0.000113058886,0.0024976544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083425996,0.00012416748,0.0023108725,0.00015150056,0.0001502728,0.00007156404,0.01700954,0.00014142493,0.00071203406,0.18916258,0.7891904,0.00014134316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038548263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0205693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001983917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004011883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404962","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1320","title":"Les pratiques de détention de l’Agence des services frontaliers du Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03095077767715222,"score_gpt":0.3081492589224672,"score_spread":0.277198481245315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30751154,0.006079767,0.00030466795,0.07418574,0.0032079981,0.0001979448,0.0001510276,0.00013812695,0.6082232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814194,0.009632897,0.0009930395,0.0008710522,0.0009866104,0.000005024634,0.0000018151526,0.000016638513,0.0060735596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796104,0.0004568691,0.00027231086,0.00015261564,0.00037817174,0.0007789739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918294,0.000112595764,0.00018961549,0.00007135135,0.000101288686,0.00034221215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097246584,0.00015945447,0.00018320825,0.000038066122,0.010874029,0.00009666212,0.0002810522,0.0001211871,0.00030148192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007673807,0.00014478527,0.000100950056,0.0002927746,0.0006862405,0.0003566208,0.00007765907,0.00030179677,0.00003082484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031716892,0.00008149631,0.048293725,0.0003117499,0.0004711613,0.0008961971,0.07109855,0.00033261752,0.000039347924,0.7842639,0.049940187,0.04423935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490304,0.00004549306,0.0383585,0.000228884,0.00008163731,0.0001788742,0.06276423,0.00027549293,0.00008642894,0.013133844,0.8844863,0.00021128728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8345461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012097582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026088237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99041367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404971","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1306","title":"Recoding Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788317923485174,"score_gpt":0.3306276168105635,"score_spread":0.26274443757571175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006527093,0.00012641736,0.0000143182115,0.0018576221,0.0015636144,0.00006358785,0.0000072021753,0.00015421753,0.98968595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656284,0.00022335205,0.00004585587,0.0005667246,0.0013712192,0.0000026147263,6.703355e-7,0.000012097718,0.0012146027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998661,0.00016761861,0.00022584532,0.000116486444,0.00043684745,0.00039219434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994405,0.000080001126,0.00010074751,0.00006463246,0.0001250103,0.00018912641],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017163425,0.00007236385,0.00013693706,0.00004445729,0.008061871,0.00021269744,0.0002235544,0.000076939126,0.00013822701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099932804,0.00006323593,0.00007909761,0.00039897152,0.00014289044,0.00044140103,0.00003370712,0.0002227921,0.0004944121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031068664,0.000008502532,0.00006883437,0.0000064776364,0.000012638895,0.000056370984,0.0007333735,0.000007885838,0.00011914731,0.99021,0.0032927769,0.0054809027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112502225,0.000019151868,0.000099901175,0.000044076463,0.000005712406,0.000009353256,0.0021541747,0.0000044718813,0.000088460816,0.014329902,0.9830363,0.00009598515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03744544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06405716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008775124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002045777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393405017","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i2.1293","title":"La Loi 101 et l’égalité linguistique au sens de la Charte canadienne","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.035056688069745004,"score_gpt":0.2961415734090242,"score_spread":0.2610848853392792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393405017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045730725,0.0012749204,0.0000066727525,0.0080316635,0.0064975964,0.00008795119,0.0009323847,0.00010552454,0.9373326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96795315,0.002063697,0.00006743773,0.0008952076,0.0065367445,0.0000068593176,0.000013211254,0.00006070934,0.022402987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975555,0.0005462033,0.00045005337,0.00024950368,0.00015965434,0.0010390752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982262,0.0007088073,0.00020690552,0.00018810747,0.00032779304,0.00034217266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019386435,0.00030386596,0.00038185445,0.00014211489,0.005669752,0.00032384027,0.00022236041,0.0002488231,0.00044925808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006645277,0.00028433884,0.00018858904,0.000061529376,0.0012390997,0.00006651184,0.00014113086,0.0011279568,0.00021256407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012540255,0.00007331002,0.00047989964,0.00007485295,0.00032077404,0.005333874,0.010563001,0.000028099777,0.000004061673,0.9752716,0.004456201,0.003381822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044562586,0.00011449747,0.0011658918,0.00022733126,0.00015071609,0.0012444161,0.0016910413,0.00009160896,0.000028889142,0.034151446,0.9603742,0.00031436517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08370434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47300565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95591795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032843894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112608715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067209","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1366","title":"réclamations d’actionnaires pour pertes par ricochet en arbitrage investisseur-État sous les traités d’investissement canadiens","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0270083501788192,"score_gpt":0.22940533773529634,"score_spread":0.20239698755647714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64115316,0.021182653,0.00072492607,0.16964708,0.018548213,0.001136486,0.0016205222,0.00080848514,0.14517845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98367834,0.0026844512,0.00037190158,0.0036879093,0.0034925512,0.000033422177,0.000071067145,0.00011568734,0.005864673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968848,0.000087540706,0.0008231031,0.0004835759,0.0006115942,0.0011093552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981801,0.0001647299,0.0006441563,0.00028850758,0.0005281886,0.00019431775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006792067,0.00051010225,0.00047192018,0.00033447822,0.0048604202,0.0007271875,0.0005003329,0.00024723806,0.000987482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075365603,0.00053018075,0.00029557536,0.0009544084,0.00030853934,0.0019353882,0.00016368311,0.00090029696,0.001198269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003687422,0.00025000947,0.0042492957,0.00068115914,0.00026798577,0.0030518188,0.0012831847,0.0011934527,0.0005798614,0.73105764,0.21189463,0.045454055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007471511,0.00004181326,0.08405815,0.00063029904,0.0002377446,0.00034346335,0.0017958989,0.001946302,0.00012941347,0.016799653,0.89262116,0.0006489205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046221845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10295207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.714258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033753854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007848308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067264","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1367","title":"Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025843342562406908,"score_gpt":0.28535590776704206,"score_spread":0.25951256520463517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12551764,0.00033195666,0.0003680635,0.012949028,0.0010160176,0.00031278934,0.000024978759,0.00021103487,0.8592685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963178,0.00039676376,0.0001364966,0.00035830363,0.0006800584,0.000003782901,4.9560606e-7,0.000011594482,0.002094698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988319,0.00024002015,0.00014885589,0.00011519359,0.00032294146,0.00034106954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993175,0.00023437239,0.000092108094,0.00010309992,0.00008066456,0.00017222784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261256,0.00008320746,0.00014114626,0.000044611174,0.009187788,0.00021106227,0.00016097938,0.00005626582,0.0001010924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000470667,0.000043134947,0.000049885002,0.00028856957,0.00587744,0.0002667402,0.000037550864,0.00024049792,0.000032153886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003681598,0.0000065525205,0.00021451764,0.0000021360665,0.000029293144,0.00060740515,0.0074023446,0.00000788781,0.0000014559581,0.9874392,0.0008189598,0.0034334413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017883896,0.00006559645,0.00010199813,0.0000339797,0.000057699694,0.004046503,0.01729913,0.00006644129,0.00002757918,0.020451648,0.9558749,0.00018613513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067979186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064866945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96698755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040265008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016647771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067284","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1365","title":"Modernizing Non-Profit Law in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Profit (economics); Law; Business; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.042705371106519466,"score_gpt":0.30109568127793307,"score_spread":0.2583903101714136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020782,0.000016900196,0.000022989045,0.0072391005,0.0003042489,0.00011091285,0.000027422577,0.000033660523,0.8901666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.000040818923,0.000092553215,0.00046966365,0.0001591984,0.0000066631096,0.0000012396375,0.000007352893,0.00043330502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908274,0.00004215432,0.00016441064,0.000094089766,0.00029748786,0.00031914175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996411,0.000045126137,0.00005111208,0.00007767764,0.00004140194,0.00014357861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042593133,0.000051075876,0.00008125551,0.000023764858,0.0029221282,0.000059653405,0.00022058601,0.000028617862,0.00009114653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015737198,0.00004840845,0.000029804018,0.00026827992,0.00004757206,0.00015728177,0.000041504474,0.00022637805,0.000069171256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014737151,0.000003969785,0.0010472885,0.0000019628915,0.0000043115274,0.000042394495,0.00034731106,0.00071863236,0.00004060062,0.9957331,0.00064805883,0.001410896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013666447,0.0000032264543,0.0016602102,0.000014846279,0.0000025891864,0.0000042503943,0.0017327259,0.0007378726,0.00010209598,0.0052207764,0.99029464,0.00009011711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99004984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004834242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015520852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236269","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1369","title":"Volume 68 Index","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.04876373161328179,"score_gpt":0.21814754224226915,"score_spread":0.16938381062898736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024683978,0.0070320414,0.000082135564,0.0058003846,0.041390993,0.00009983696,0.0019699647,0.00006269861,0.94109356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18735635,0.005099085,0.00015026226,0.00043548053,0.0008530176,0.000004671138,0.000008289135,0.000036404625,0.80605644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976627,0.000027514267,0.0008809711,0.00048309122,0.00007241762,0.00087326043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988354,0.000048878865,0.0005029107,0.0003016179,0.00006717913,0.00024402003],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015952333,0.00023079434,0.0005451142,0.00033879804,0.0029926605,0.00032908234,0.00042456164,0.00017872501,0.0594935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009154755,0.00029825908,0.00035212515,0.00050792424,0.00036526998,0.0006574233,0.00027490786,0.00046400676,0.31312484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001025344,0.00005853992,0.0066812746,0.000025994497,0.0002337496,0.00011380863,0.00020682279,0.0007521437,2.5801273e-7,0.33962896,0.6455634,0.006724778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062433176,0.000047096084,0.0038246287,0.000050132177,0.000017580838,0.00009870969,0.0007611504,0.0044290423,0.000003785997,0.006454308,0.9833468,0.0003424426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097085664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003308327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33778337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031986093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072400144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236305","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1368","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09180876579044982,"score_gpt":0.3043602332821735,"score_spread":0.21255146749172366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34714988,0.00008600127,0.000013651838,0.0006578317,0.0015401883,0.00016483932,0.0013430913,0.0009919737,0.6480526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988393,0.000028850669,0.00011560281,0.00011584878,0.00017652547,0.0000023539274,0.000015118631,0.0000960846,0.00061031355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981334,0.000456172,0.00027730773,0.00015762734,0.00048686855,0.0004885753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989918,0.0002556484,0.00013031694,0.00022723648,0.0001656412,0.00022939584],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315557,0.00013454533,0.00018075538,0.00015574004,0.0022763384,0.00009249113,0.00031508118,0.000056453413,0.00080307585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031413577,0.00011062102,0.00011934476,0.00074942777,0.000063818916,0.00023224432,0.00007601251,0.0003384049,0.038630363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090783346,0.00065597123,0.114080794,0.00004756177,0.0013593856,0.004483006,0.00041657547,0.0024436114,0.016519412,0.24239385,0.5695011,0.047190905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049056805,0.000043361037,0.19248623,0.000020834505,0.000019129737,0.0004179193,0.000046680023,0.0001394546,0.0021239119,0.0012191955,0.80277514,0.00021757036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089037605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6516894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006068726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398236501","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1363","title":"“Must the Police Refuse to Look?”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10311175227853549,"score_gpt":0.4080619500246245,"score_spread":0.304950197746089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398236501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10955968,0.000004732377,0.000008979916,0.05036718,0.0008930658,0.00010510133,0.000025797724,0.000110357454,0.8389251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870814,0.00022671142,0.00008458654,0.0041208547,0.0012996568,0.000004117497,5.8302425e-7,0.000010025744,0.005545352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989027,0.00021573264,0.00013036418,0.00008204112,0.0003138446,0.00035532052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992954,0.00020377684,0.000061587976,0.00013728975,0.00006710493,0.00023484591],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012550158,0.0000564958,0.00006597638,0.000055960427,0.008644031,0.0001794737,0.00032490728,0.00004327995,0.0006020018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098438235,0.00003869841,0.00006490456,0.00048004717,0.00010788519,0.00024320587,0.00005321884,0.00026236003,0.002019581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027423897,0.00007535363,0.00061590294,0.000004693055,0.00006731022,0.000020772155,0.14010279,0.00059275184,0.0004053848,0.65709245,0.17304727,0.027947914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006058138,0.000018712897,0.0027725806,0.000008897931,0.000010601851,0.000019494353,0.009816415,0.000006752956,0.000009055864,0.00037762275,0.9868385,0.000060793405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29107618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5685344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007161742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001714083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272772","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1370","title":"Mathur v. Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027966647036996067,"score_gpt":0.3052310094489832,"score_spread":0.2772643624119871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014734265,0.00024592897,0.000034589753,0.0028553822,0.0021054402,0.00003879221,0.0000034266384,0.00008774566,0.9798944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877501,0.000110687986,0.0001221711,0.00017454465,0.00081063027,0.0000011587223,4.5201492e-7,0.000007512599,0.0110227065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.000045626897,0.00012821807,0.00008743766,0.00028482417,0.00019917192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972135,0.000028123195,0.000023091676,0.00004961365,0.00004436969,0.00013344134],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055615517,0.00005221137,0.000064269836,0.000037442984,0.0029480443,0.00029332718,0.000102653474,0.00005265181,0.0029444438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008767926,0.00004485739,0.00008827924,0.00008911453,0.00006839114,0.00029722304,0.000014269444,0.0002772307,0.00023278141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003381852,0.0000115185085,0.000100756035,0.000002274213,0.00001802339,0.00008689406,0.0030881802,8.589959e-7,0.0000194553,0.9709866,0.0016501052,0.02403193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053452182,0.00002159672,0.00028563754,0.000032011783,0.000012112056,0.000059636834,0.00024902355,0.000005611252,0.000025930309,0.0051493854,0.9940441,0.000061453335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11713566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81036294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99239403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051123367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272975","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1439","title":"droits et la justice au guichet","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.13111102307223022,"score_gpt":0.43760386653234945,"score_spread":0.30649284346011924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018191077,0.0046009235,0.00015471093,0.06648167,0.015398538,0.00017811939,0.00025218504,0.00013235112,0.8946104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88192505,0.0014989395,0.0009137358,0.008148341,0.0049289307,0.000004024365,0.000010867562,0.00005326773,0.10251683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656457,0.0010518896,0.0005281159,0.00031395123,0.0007394544,0.00080204685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983763,0.00045436807,0.00014202607,0.00016612289,0.00032512558,0.0005360199],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020400067,0.00026306458,0.00023991478,0.000071553884,0.0034225232,0.0007209473,0.000357546,0.0003055598,0.0013918959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030183655,0.00023449035,0.00025420595,0.0002683414,0.00095849624,0.0010423313,0.000070974056,0.0009055463,0.0009993232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035955939,0.00006233913,0.0000590883,0.00010874038,0.000113134665,0.00021303742,0.016585505,0.0001272473,0.00003204254,0.9576898,0.021819964,0.0031854927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020692869,0.00003572627,0.0005742567,0.00028307515,0.00034200973,0.0006139619,0.0071781185,0.00051482936,0.00009971352,0.0028332043,0.98701316,0.000305007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015386652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057439547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020026588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038759757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402273831","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1438","title":"Transgender Erasure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Erasure; Transgender; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.061052604928635006,"score_gpt":0.38472717382733546,"score_spread":0.32367456889870044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402273831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076139546,0.0046358784,0.00014675809,0.00632936,0.007189429,0.00007752419,0.000065897904,0.00012417062,0.97381705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794589,0.0003810091,0.00007858859,0.0012789256,0.0022843122,0.0000047973276,0.000002452168,0.0000412993,0.016469687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987383,0.00014278821,0.00028901803,0.00019240151,0.00021409547,0.00042343623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945587,0.000049553775,0.000034773184,0.00017494256,0.00004647544,0.00023840567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004058429,0.00012754886,0.00014304947,0.00011036536,0.0012182858,0.00012490722,0.0001805205,0.00013743012,0.006561303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059008007,0.0001062696,0.00017109454,0.00015397706,0.000054663633,0.00016654065,0.000010138212,0.0007003863,0.0027706178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034474386,0.000099795965,0.00079015864,0.00025237462,0.00021618554,0.00081682706,0.0006510014,0.000004016648,0.000052467407,0.84692854,0.11895774,0.031196399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032142212,0.0000721776,0.0033896118,0.000017932349,0.00006593551,0.001944491,0.00005054705,0.000005429926,0.000010226409,0.0063194227,0.98767155,0.00013126268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020873232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027429222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070570226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017209848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402274817","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1440","title":"Jacques-Yvan Morin, GOQ, L D’H (1931-2023)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morin; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05073938416259463,"score_gpt":0.2901225430192741,"score_spread":0.23938315885667946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402274817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004619141,0.18620199,0.000040564606,0.013536999,0.026261602,0.00011710202,0.00012665277,0.00011746516,0.7731357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73357373,0.04104592,0.00048456003,0.0011296923,0.014982752,0.000011945203,0.000004414776,0.00007644542,0.20869052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683535,0.00041054955,0.00053655775,0.0003741323,0.0008597502,0.0009836679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987973,0.00022152641,0.00012536184,0.0001488264,0.00020031251,0.0005067036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198321,0.00032479758,0.00042575528,0.00008491901,0.00812302,0.0005966987,0.00043909205,0.00029674816,0.005025894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114537725,0.00030435034,0.0005043736,0.0007519514,0.0012677839,0.00074614905,0.00012902134,0.0010821561,0.0021583603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004635054,0.00006516009,0.000021913309,0.000047623627,0.00021610483,0.00051265676,0.0028108477,0.000009403123,0.0000048157735,0.8127018,0.11860652,0.0649985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017171615,0.0001246405,0.000080661106,0.00039982196,0.00013578271,0.000096069685,0.0018604812,0.00007855688,0.000022709644,0.0382927,0.95838463,0.00035221202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031339094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075202756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012727665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061848485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190084","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1525","title":"Enjeux et défis de la profession notariale au regard de l'instrumentation des directives médicales anticipées :","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06061619030765158,"score_gpt":0.4463631183410778,"score_spread":0.3857469280334262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81315666,0.011000115,0.0030400855,0.06273265,0.00873539,0.00074797083,0.00016118157,0.00021571704,0.1002102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96341044,0.015000883,0.010421258,0.0050854897,0.002949477,0.00003790865,0.000013742532,0.000085134845,0.0029956943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857697,0.011081881,0.0009416682,0.0003667533,0.0005256793,0.001314321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942482,0.0041836062,0.00026896503,0.00020549622,0.00023081472,0.0008629027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01246354,0.00031730885,0.00048476856,0.00012418049,0.006511712,0.00012311102,0.00021342124,0.0012723493,0.0008884485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019524555,0.0002629913,0.00026232938,0.00033859367,0.00078904175,0.00069448963,0.00010852435,0.005589257,0.00013515452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029596867,0.0007779681,0.038049217,0.008111036,0.0005160576,0.0007731781,0.25831488,0.000048506718,0.0015530314,0.38941786,0.03174913,0.27039316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014790785,0.00040374746,0.0518927,0.015080351,0.00031153802,0.0006406808,0.039404746,0.00066114153,0.00058104855,0.023347491,0.8658428,0.00035466577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011874417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010738761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8340937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027647936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022434632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190491","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1518","title":"Front Matter - v. 69, no 2","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.034505521292223666,"score_gpt":0.2178121629543866,"score_spread":0.18330664166216293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010581314,0.009793503,0.000020818674,0.00031914,0.06047723,0.00010336158,0.005710074,0.000017396771,0.9235479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011635984,0.0021420482,0.00019947534,0.0009092982,0.0019774653,0.000012095076,0.000047604,0.00007496575,0.9934735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976195,0.000013626754,0.0010282861,0.00070320454,0.00006125356,0.0005741013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987731,0.000023876617,0.00057865906,0.00037659652,0.00006168424,0.00018606038],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061188446,0.0003813519,0.00089526136,0.00030427647,0.0013073473,0.0005487094,0.0005232401,0.00027545795,0.6541952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014873283,0.00038303892,0.00051326223,0.00007522814,0.00014851619,0.000272723,0.0002802738,0.00083833263,0.98288345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007272977,0.000025106052,0.00001351928,0.00006798756,0.00035336876,0.000027217315,0.000049730283,0.000022758046,1.5325685e-7,0.03508369,0.9642717,0.00007749699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023053196,0.000026644255,0.000009251865,0.000106377396,0.000027491851,0.000055514258,0.00004911077,0.000032304633,0.0000035300511,0.0021767966,0.9968238,0.00045868376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004969693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083709005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32868832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003755693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008342244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190545","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1519","title":"Armand LC de Mestral, CM (1941-2023)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Medicine and Dermatology Studies History","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02831791314258961,"score_gpt":0.3053116320846598,"score_spread":0.27699371894207014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013735574,0.3175172,0.00015752407,0.027851637,0.018729154,0.00012665505,0.000052403633,0.000076072036,0.6341158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62488586,0.09702248,0.0025197037,0.07141059,0.028264645,0.0000334236,0.000036688558,0.00028831657,0.17553829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973834,0.00020893016,0.0006694214,0.00032513903,0.0004387712,0.0009743145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849045,0.0002482921,0.00010928788,0.00026319348,0.000121069934,0.00076770195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008978562,0.00033411192,0.000629898,0.00019506298,0.0017777871,0.000046346053,0.00017735691,0.00030179933,0.0018796163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113442904,0.00028140238,0.00030823986,0.00023937818,0.0007742827,0.00021607612,0.00006782319,0.0018506192,0.0021502967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007271737,0.00014366236,0.00017626637,0.00083497004,0.00085199013,0.03225104,0.00036145392,0.0000080451455,0.00015647143,0.05486095,0.89649415,0.013788283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011773208,0.00039817745,0.00013641486,0.00213714,0.0010491259,0.0341766,0.00065833156,0.0003088173,0.00022166055,0.0007781393,0.95871794,0.00024035962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026488316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033312105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6235123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065437617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015073614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190781","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1526","title":"Tort of Malicious Prosecution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Tort; Computer security; Political science; Law; Criminology; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01997209891688215,"score_gpt":0.32142806533975266,"score_spread":0.3014559664228705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07292725,0.00013399014,0.0000617702,0.000639264,0.0014137975,0.000061871986,0.000016942342,0.00003986377,0.92470527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387467,0.000019753106,0.00009405697,0.000054394997,0.00061006786,0.0000011410299,0.0000010280937,0.000004812293,0.005340068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929416,0.000045970704,0.00014886657,0.00006303875,0.00032996145,0.00011799714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.000024428418,0.000039202576,0.000033622207,0.00011692418,0.000054081964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039627717,0.000039059898,0.000059019094,0.000040632924,0.0013115809,0.00007354378,0.00011361128,0.000037633097,0.00072387286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010046547,0.000030254267,0.000071351045,0.00003320025,0.00011262683,0.00020239018,0.000008691592,0.000116316725,0.00006125649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004194915,0.000013678654,0.0000067531278,0.000005433388,0.000016787068,0.000030109986,0.00038931705,0.0000021535684,0.000073018964,0.99861073,0.00029274533,0.00055506884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044679124,0.00002760325,0.000066927525,0.00004769573,0.000008271458,0.000030689447,0.00003867916,0.00001195683,0.0006930974,0.14386071,0.8551283,0.000041367006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014147545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076247016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92094743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009977955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021086988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190849","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i2.1523","title":"Genderfucking as a Critical Legal Methodology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1876565163983834,"score_gpt":0.4665047721174801,"score_spread":0.27884825571909666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023513266,0.0006135846,0.0042699277,0.013694775,0.0035710018,0.000051227893,0.000005654344,0.00007534284,0.9753671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420685,0.00007719013,0.003080853,0.00045881042,0.0011643599,0.00000173063,5.047304e-7,0.000010613295,0.000999091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984477,0.0005423694,0.00017692076,0.00014234059,0.0003290706,0.00036155945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918264,0.00043938024,0.000020123498,0.000059143185,0.00009108798,0.00020763197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014289479,0.00006355126,0.00009532825,0.00006690688,0.0027922662,0.00033002184,0.00012777348,0.00008553986,0.0006608265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042004418,0.00005427445,0.00010442007,0.00010877689,0.00022872888,0.00026797713,0.000028560831,0.00033148067,0.00013895932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022727986,0.000010080376,0.000010329177,0.000007069492,0.00002211658,0.00024775215,0.001509884,0.0000072002117,0.00012112957,0.99319065,0.00037538432,0.004496151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052357413,0.000024706875,0.000028964698,0.00001554928,0.000024175271,0.00048708948,0.004110432,0.0000708151,0.00039264484,0.18764874,0.8070709,0.00007362271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005658638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029858323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009531227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055654356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967390","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1577","title":"Front Matter - v. 69, no 3","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03518274874064444,"score_gpt":0.21799326378196876,"score_spread":0.1828105150413243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010745269,0.00968338,0.000021446911,0.00031930904,0.060712732,0.000103566446,0.005751508,0.000017378354,0.92337996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011978409,0.0021138773,0.00020158579,0.0009079142,0.001969545,0.000012092481,0.000046475634,0.000075027216,0.9934756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976191,0.000013617426,0.0010282868,0.0007034399,0.00006128373,0.00057428173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877286,0.000024012934,0.00057788397,0.00037676218,0.00006242827,0.00018607243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006152117,0.00038142447,0.0008951243,0.00030438113,0.0013071214,0.0005486516,0.0005231959,0.00027543068,0.65269685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015065496,0.00038306782,0.0005133338,0.000075260956,0.00014852994,0.00027274986,0.0002800954,0.00083835446,0.98327386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007369858,0.00002512178,0.000014030659,0.00006863642,0.00035332597,0.00002680339,0.000049727212,0.000022666185,1.597724e-7,0.03425199,0.9651037,0.000076490636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023182026,0.000026544092,0.00000933453,0.000107344706,0.000027273134,0.000054704844,0.00004930015,0.00003252947,0.0000036307417,0.002160679,0.996838,0.00045883752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049770105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083793406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.330577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037707822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008387642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967463","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1575","title":"What's the Problem with Substantive Review?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.033778265212269634,"score_gpt":0.25234841417542064,"score_spread":0.21857014896315102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012076192,0.3222812,0.0011371269,0.09508329,0.005042981,0.00090677553,0.00026730075,0.00014308383,0.5630621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880278,0.0077919974,0.0007957455,0.0016802786,0.0003039921,0.000007640923,0.000012301688,0.000019457135,0.0013607704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993391,0.000022048773,0.00030472787,0.00014222224,0.00006570234,0.00012618206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959946,0.00006993561,0.00014032706,0.00008813797,0.000062135696,0.000040030623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006603471,0.000080375685,0.00013516434,0.000042089618,0.0008748661,0.00021633403,0.0000966388,0.000029024073,0.00032843032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007880599,0.00004711896,0.00006871574,0.00019079723,0.0000467598,0.0007433308,0.000014885048,0.00023705579,0.00033087804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012341054,0.000010019592,0.00020807283,0.00007754327,0.00004011071,0.000010490027,0.000046547815,0.000024064164,0.0000011798882,0.9930843,0.0018086586,0.00467667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508638,0.000036532238,0.0021403711,0.0016200573,0.00001037652,0.00016420662,0.000032288182,0.00018066466,0.00001678784,0.060506564,0.93511283,0.00009424199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027279471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098712386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052376166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063921734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67288506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967499","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1576","title":"Difficult Road to Justice:","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03545290557287269,"score_gpt":0.2487168181805813,"score_spread":0.2132639126077086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015012965,0.00033649648,0.00010259971,0.003064164,0.0036069234,0.000049986495,0.000110648514,0.00011802305,0.99110985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634966,0.000009613311,0.00005350439,0.0014664266,0.0022038452,0.0000036629333,0.0000033541241,0.000018346802,0.032744624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916464,0.000025031442,0.00022171732,0.00013200539,0.00019671328,0.00025989625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994857,0.000036615267,0.000016029904,0.00007932215,0.00008754363,0.00029481598],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092846116,0.00010810153,0.00012220658,0.00005006553,0.0017740418,0.00032997158,0.00013516074,0.000028981509,0.0019216837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022423566,0.000074868396,0.0000998137,0.000041996223,0.00007512535,0.00020578991,0.000029529225,0.00028638038,0.0014301513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059921854,0.000029143765,2.541713e-7,0.000025380225,0.000020352529,0.0001440078,0.00077124516,0.0000051994193,0.000007739037,0.97788215,0.011937708,0.009170802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005929305,0.00008988558,0.000004757737,0.00004960173,0.00004248775,0.000053363983,0.0003077625,0.0003425588,0.000004491317,0.004814791,0.9941029,0.0001281014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004191466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020544808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010295278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059379527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967537","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1574","title":"autorité internationale des fonds marins :","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04425639751111356,"score_gpt":0.2579566329581496,"score_spread":0.21370023544703604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011440485,0.015527908,0.0025965665,0.01410713,0.026106248,0.000100008256,0.000121662655,0.00015942848,0.940137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928426,0.0015585661,0.0012060646,0.0021111823,0.014884888,0.0000062086906,0.00003968548,0.000079118574,0.08727171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980691,0.000023584262,0.00055392797,0.0003078333,0.0005743855,0.00047114506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990367,0.00010971355,0.00016315936,0.00013232465,0.000496182,0.0000618771],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055346766,0.00026885103,0.00021837902,0.00025080185,0.0016018881,0.0019988352,0.00047983366,0.00019341962,0.006395329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001890397,0.00026064183,0.00029863304,0.0002561361,0.00045841507,0.0029349527,0.00021907472,0.00085762376,0.0019623088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001481459,0.00013621143,0.0010064344,0.00040916674,0.00027494403,0.00053162,0.00002712662,0.00010831716,0.000016210759,0.9370495,0.02158878,0.038836874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029826802,0.000026638798,0.0011054917,0.0008127947,0.00013871022,0.0003972827,0.000052044157,0.008009031,0.00003389466,0.120591216,0.8682623,0.00027236535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001827327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002083994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89169854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003949053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019559908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967564","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1572","title":"Overbreadth Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03170321817163785,"score_gpt":0.3405854726422747,"score_spread":0.30888225447063683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000609838,0.0004925895,0.00025280894,0.0062494585,0.00030110855,0.00005873965,0.000025497626,0.00009797853,0.991912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579364,0.00029674335,0.00042410698,0.00033716572,0.00075204927,0.000002516748,0.0000011560826,0.000007821372,0.0023847758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993405,0.00005048131,0.00012267761,0.00009168981,0.00021893249,0.00017572701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968076,0.000045139037,0.000024055307,0.00007220745,0.000045165114,0.0001326993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046626586,0.00004523207,0.00005778518,0.000024952698,0.003040565,0.00027598298,0.00014871416,0.00003715357,0.0007546305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023995286,0.000036706726,0.000073623276,0.00019636027,0.00007303228,0.00023364546,0.000021055575,0.00021333851,0.00036730288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.590523e-7,0.0000073991528,0.000009180415,0.0000032506632,0.000008880586,0.000016977332,0.00018236609,0.000001947933,0.000030982083,0.9886608,0.0030138013,0.008063665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033475928,0.0000063188318,0.000050566887,0.000033031192,0.000009512682,0.000023891125,0.00014250941,0.000033421216,0.000036639984,0.011809988,0.98776716,0.000053494565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013263588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025848697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092609196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001666447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410088868","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1627","title":"Responsible AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0526171416579714,"score_gpt":0.4110048174458746,"score_spread":0.3583876757879032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410088868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013771172,0.00051641633,0.00003256947,0.08417643,0.0016924129,0.000041866624,0.000009574161,0.00009576617,0.9120579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911515,0.00052050996,0.0002460122,0.0026874265,0.0011178633,7.559426e-7,3.1036652e-7,0.000012885137,0.00426275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876744,0.00022755143,0.00014544102,0.000096691976,0.00044967353,0.00031323225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992574,0.00021313543,0.000025915344,0.000064163556,0.00019510915,0.00024431],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002438824,0.00006185754,0.00008734982,0.000059191523,0.006011484,0.00081938464,0.00018436882,0.00012650446,0.00066462695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040867837,0.00005333174,0.00010691772,0.0002159938,0.00023328197,0.00072532735,0.000023189632,0.000686621,0.00021138423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005367584,0.000008949706,0.0000066280395,0.0000032688833,0.000017168682,0.00010422877,0.0018607597,0.0000018496314,0.000047120448,0.98615354,0.0070976233,0.0046935077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042501342,0.000025909105,0.000017566723,0.000041755513,0.000007987668,0.000015671465,0.0007549522,0.000006917428,0.00008834306,0.1699654,0.8289675,0.00006545704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032017864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026739752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98977435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013707923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013498664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99528253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089313","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1645","title":"Reasonable Apprehension of AI Bias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Apprehension; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.051438074584039026,"score_gpt":0.2931065987156708,"score_spread":0.24166852413163176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089313","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019508943,0.0044470127,0.59364647,0.011430105,0.0071270415,0.00038097485,0.000021319123,0.00077369506,0.36266446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881861,0.00007382648,0.01092567,0.00032582643,0.00013532347,0.000002112028,3.997789e-7,0.000014110682,0.00033663836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998516,0.00009314977,0.0003882422,0.00025650306,0.000418987,0.00032708715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990688,0.00014302653,0.00008041074,0.00035189363,0.00021229434,0.00014359699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007373932,0.00012116915,0.00016812661,0.0001350537,0.0007363509,0.00028342055,0.0006701264,0.00006282945,0.00010178944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006451377,0.000099259756,0.00013297104,0.0005185873,0.00006705508,0.0011514181,0.00018758356,0.0004001925,0.0002642945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046608175,0.000035731715,0.00001542784,0.00002733389,0.000018898909,0.000226302,0.00012947258,0.00045620982,0.0021125237,0.9612573,0.0015587419,0.034157425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058950896,0.00015342348,0.000020699357,0.0002399962,0.0000107627575,0.0007824221,0.000080822814,0.048715632,0.13463931,0.06962141,0.745498,0.00017856325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000297109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018831676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96867716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006914408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028187294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56634897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089364","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1683","title":"Abortion in the Age of AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03578763188535195,"score_gpt":0.34869899902118706,"score_spread":0.3129113671358351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6928744,0.006466003,0.00020594086,0.073348105,0.0010613016,0.00047434543,0.00001143013,0.00014427457,0.22541425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988865,0.00021996917,0.0001601344,0.00057678093,0.00011356465,0.0000029497687,0.0000010315794,0.000004251682,0.000034782704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948144,0.00002624287,0.00017511811,0.000073656716,0.00014132986,0.00010224016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977577,0.000024655743,0.000023534292,0.00012068609,0.00003745812,0.000017914092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047862198,0.00003789065,0.0000925093,0.00007620293,0.00013165642,0.000009371814,0.00005278611,0.000036659516,0.000022729033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008637471,0.000020230047,0.000039536124,0.0001781401,0.000057652676,0.00005663886,0.000007860401,0.00045996232,0.000008285152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013950752,0.00018731633,0.0069080046,0.00042576913,0.000050841893,0.002299386,0.00032011187,0.000007929635,0.00505181,0.88088584,0.002915192,0.100808315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028983568,0.00030118192,0.032541394,0.0002500731,0.000023121034,0.0016664012,0.00023698591,0.000016794971,0.0059570293,0.014417761,0.9442617,0.00003766416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008372426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013014907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031019474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102446575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19983329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089437","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1706","title":"Directors’ Duties and the Collective Governance of Algorithmic Management Systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Public administration; Accounting; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.007591168040252254,"score_gpt":0.21402590809311056,"score_spread":0.2064347400528583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013527183,0.090542145,0.3893618,0.022107938,0.0054569724,0.0024590597,0.00014440398,0.000988374,0.47541213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664885,0.0007500279,0.0022613143,0.000028993232,0.000029141462,0.000029804496,6.5951205e-8,0.0000037524414,0.00024805556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.00005470856,0.00017101094,0.00014259032,0.00014915409,0.00011084059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956256,0.000091906426,0.00007393572,0.00020305198,0.000044849327,0.000023688006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045314725,0.00006761051,0.00012212376,0.00003618863,0.00077477715,0.00010600222,0.00040247574,0.00003649183,0.0000028139552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048221073,0.000042041393,0.00004127742,0.00027518193,0.00020873101,0.00010182633,0.00016182574,0.00019510316,0.0000026864388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029519333,0.000009634284,0.000003269601,0.000021127486,0.00006027263,0.000012967063,0.00012927433,0.000011607405,0.0000032036426,0.9856038,0.00024112345,0.013900746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010392976,0.00008746595,0.0005598752,0.0002648618,0.000059371592,0.0011690626,0.00028791235,0.12962471,0.0010626089,0.17324726,0.6923699,0.00022771933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012096784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047295543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98312163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055588604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005520243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59590375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410089674","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1646","title":"Algorithmic Price Personalization and the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03136850153275612,"score_gpt":0.2382527671274877,"score_spread":0.20688426559473158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410089674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01411056,0.0179822,0.040949196,0.0074098874,0.0015299019,0.0002244781,0.00021449022,0.000054803866,0.91752446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979271,0.0012350782,0.00020964265,0.00022780774,0.00009075776,0.000002611488,0.000005461259,0.000008587788,0.0002929116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993543,0.000029692637,0.00035219788,0.0001243932,0.000050023467,0.00008941563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996586,0.000038748636,0.00014310052,0.00007594706,0.000046164692,0.00003745341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006096001,0.00006469644,0.00018081827,0.000101513564,0.0004893292,0.000102453334,0.00008023514,0.00003076023,0.00046783255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019416824,0.00005059046,0.00011194298,0.00018112382,0.00009061408,0.0002118973,0.000014162145,0.00011327767,0.000040832416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004417682,0.000013578744,0.00006822026,0.000030937164,0.00006229593,0.0000022592506,0.00018262588,0.000022893622,0.00001464714,0.9988923,0.00007261003,0.0006332341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013407663,0.00006443968,0.0018251722,0.00014402567,0.00012038848,0.00022394714,0.00046161158,0.07687602,0.0005323849,0.1640579,0.7540583,0.00029502876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023127132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013468711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98381656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026292928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019854301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5122438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090255","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1708","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.12418554398247822,"score_gpt":0.3967832414877197,"score_spread":0.2725976975052415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068623666,0.00044910054,0.00044751485,0.0024194745,0.003247785,0.00008012877,0.000031983996,0.0001655765,0.98629606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997432,0.0001887248,0.00018494889,0.00020586011,0.0007107789,0.0000016504356,6.559192e-7,0.000014796231,0.0012605675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984379,0.00044468962,0.00022486741,0.0001385592,0.00042208005,0.0003319223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990649,0.000500528,0.000035640973,0.00009361217,0.00012773165,0.00017755928],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029265292,0.00007666021,0.00009840577,0.000049641567,0.004081404,0.0003868011,0.00030148416,0.00007810291,0.0024111297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003592288,0.000063942265,0.00009930496,0.00029415698,0.00033670382,0.00040137296,0.000026213971,0.00029665497,0.0011152868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057097322,0.00001553919,0.00023647028,0.0000023405285,0.000020414203,0.000075002004,0.0010712314,0.000013854982,0.000021088339,0.9553966,0.0021774487,0.04096431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009038281,0.00001575105,0.00015406185,0.000029717843,0.0000079340325,0.000017915781,0.00072078075,0.000044459255,0.00059079955,0.0153197795,0.98299533,0.000094402865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018340537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17828017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99056965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014619026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030309713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090280","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1712","title":"Volume 69 Index","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Index (typography); Political science; Computer science; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.016417245645898686,"score_gpt":0.23911616869422578,"score_spread":0.22269892304832709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016414473,0.019964421,0.0013708664,0.03752381,0.0164269,0.00008915159,0.000031325577,0.00017145785,0.92425793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89181817,0.00089704926,0.000078299134,0.0022586524,0.007152167,0.000005000472,0.000010167961,0.00006364689,0.09771686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833566,0.000026170103,0.00041825205,0.0002603225,0.0004043115,0.0005552891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937797,0.00002560715,0.0001281713,0.00016240767,0.00022978164,0.00007604459],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004414479,0.00023695166,0.00020402946,0.0002539215,0.002734896,0.0022686322,0.00024517492,0.00017000425,0.017644653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036972146,0.00023014267,0.00032721474,0.00060401513,0.000147669,0.0030129133,0.00013492732,0.0008454013,0.013768725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007968016,0.00010271961,0.00021442065,0.00025366526,0.00013497943,0.00032090454,0.000005069505,0.00011712166,0.000007520496,0.76490504,0.16467392,0.069256656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025343354,0.000012192308,0.0005597275,0.0005646634,0.00018214986,0.00038839155,0.00012963681,0.020344697,0.000002988986,0.0037685195,0.9735222,0.00027143952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012451939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019297906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000212694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017746199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090284","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1626","title":"Legal Definitions of Intimate Images in the Age of Sexual Deepfakes and Generative AI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Transformation in Law","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04972453206467995,"score_gpt":0.2506951116949812,"score_spread":0.20097057963030127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11638352,0.0019584876,0.004764957,0.0021155542,0.00034421292,0.00014151393,0.0015900594,0.000014464654,0.8726872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887437,0.00019559191,0.0007149603,0.00015373193,0.000023168623,0.0000035864796,0.0000071720633,0.000006656189,0.000020746918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993533,0.000015831549,0.00042219184,0.000080241,0.00003538689,0.000093058574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974453,0.00006118157,0.00008849157,0.00006482656,0.000023142285,0.000017819852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003989068,0.00006116683,0.00015512005,0.00012457314,0.00014737045,0.00013246363,0.00009214142,0.000026862224,0.000045531317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018662227,0.000050165818,0.000037991435,0.0001198444,0.00013168655,0.00069165503,0.000012587051,0.00015633792,0.000012803312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032652458,0.000026043948,0.00017532105,0.000046714547,0.000020455287,0.000013084237,0.00028374832,0.00009724133,0.00005809894,0.99870515,0.000114665905,0.00045622222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095498783,0.00042684405,0.0052,0.00018626808,0.000031949286,0.0005588733,0.00096546655,0.0015582722,0.004642818,0.5877611,0.39735958,0.00035383334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008603115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002099897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016681692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029165133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20457026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090285","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1644","title":"New Jim Crow","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0600957320603762,"score_gpt":0.3759033197245683,"score_spread":0.3158075876641921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003844638,0.024118379,0.00016366017,0.21171556,0.01533937,0.000059699054,0.000035217763,0.00006324064,0.7481204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80205303,0.012714702,0.0020323396,0.0043036537,0.014736176,7.694721e-7,0.0000012729785,0.00006257398,0.16409549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765486,0.00031700713,0.00035015837,0.00021319033,0.00075245585,0.00071232405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983761,0.00028726313,0.00008893107,0.00011084631,0.00023811907,0.00089876505],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019254694,0.00018567606,0.00022713178,0.000057348632,0.006408347,0.0016038043,0.0003747941,0.0004119072,0.0059987577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023801315,0.00017650175,0.00034013577,0.00043983513,0.00058044767,0.001534737,0.0000589636,0.0016573963,0.0013191905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003364276,0.00002217508,0.000005714417,0.000024379633,0.000085192885,0.00029238992,0.0038035254,0.0000053005124,0.000011319458,0.8262926,0.05805092,0.111403145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010408607,0.00007977716,0.000022687796,0.00030401154,0.000064390624,0.000098259974,0.0011135038,0.000024486806,0.00003360099,0.215836,0.7821435,0.00017573139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03283013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04191978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8016686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000384198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000263203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090288","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1625","title":"AI’s Democratic Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05650542861783929,"score_gpt":0.3881377428373882,"score_spread":0.3316323142195489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005357559,0.0011092817,0.000043657295,0.11994466,0.0016037693,0.000055603603,0.000006172403,0.00009196674,0.87660915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99294066,0.0014929891,0.00011973881,0.0024216273,0.0013308685,0.0000013832419,3.6870705e-7,0.0000147145865,0.0016776458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987288,0.00017517262,0.00017265645,0.00011038446,0.00046736252,0.00034558726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929404,0.00015515377,0.00003353644,0.000067795554,0.00017045204,0.00027903126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015714761,0.00007831193,0.000110611596,0.00004540965,0.005681416,0.000591707,0.00020813492,0.00014139754,0.00045649832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020778767,0.000066841945,0.00011954906,0.00014214734,0.00022991952,0.00069349405,0.000023117927,0.0007363345,0.00016693032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014664435,0.000017742557,0.0000032196358,0.000008477309,0.000026480777,0.00009477633,0.0031370264,0.0000013351646,0.0000069662065,0.9834157,0.004261059,0.009025704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004612635,0.000034159522,0.000008496657,0.00005374052,0.000012510336,0.00001209395,0.00094109535,0.000017990797,0.000012079099,0.25362048,0.7451644,0.00007684627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018249246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02804372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014523884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069079426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99561304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410090337","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1667","title":"Déléguer l’autorité au système ? L’extériorisation de la fonction judiciaire et le dé-agencement des juges","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03235038342470889,"score_gpt":0.326134854124114,"score_spread":0.29378447069940516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410090337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018978355,0.01170181,0.0010932583,0.04634482,0.0096400045,0.00023766689,0.000059262133,0.00017683809,0.91176796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787636,0.002071904,0.00028581457,0.00046254005,0.005632792,0.000011261001,0.0000035132596,0.000035202047,0.0036206048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967898,0.001190632,0.00043048584,0.00027805613,0.0006853921,0.00062562287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999057,0.00022490957,0.00014958519,0.000083127175,0.00015747071,0.00032791743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030037337,0.00022789113,0.0002491511,0.00008316113,0.006914338,0.0006004027,0.00022307015,0.0003405171,0.00026626795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096297386,0.00022176349,0.00028987825,0.0004726567,0.0009289903,0.0013531251,0.00005469128,0.0007939813,0.00019875442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012118702,0.00013725673,0.00011594846,0.00009730544,0.00012336002,0.00014491972,0.012022021,0.000112670445,0.00012600217,0.94483405,0.0009142354,0.04136009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021513538,0.000107569205,0.00081114436,0.0004357547,0.000113430906,0.00009408425,0.0025775798,0.00014177909,0.000105042265,0.3406851,0.654495,0.00021834514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037216023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012408508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00260195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004364672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157873","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1719","title":"Risks, Benefits, Opportunities, and Electronic Formalities in the Law of Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07881980587268692,"score_gpt":0.3379319718446832,"score_spread":0.25911216597199627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05360711,0.0014894584,0.000016058599,0.0119487075,0.00006142936,0.00015158844,0.00004627032,0.000009935933,0.93266946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995887,0.0029398995,0.000031847932,0.00079222483,0.00004459325,0.00000686086,0.0000010774819,0.0000023305076,0.00029419878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992682,0.00010604047,0.0001897398,0.00005610251,0.0001613182,0.00021861664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996556,0.00010531427,0.000073223826,0.000080058846,0.0000493375,0.00003643187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095256674,0.000048137925,0.00008754413,0.000028832865,0.0019771596,0.000065962304,0.00021471392,0.000037089398,0.000028820443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001572915,0.000034521505,0.000034202592,0.00011469532,0.00023902518,0.0002016495,0.00003048834,0.0001972719,6.2016073e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029690739,0.000017721739,0.00013573923,0.000003994639,0.000007289023,7.404667e-7,0.0007552009,0.000007659602,0.0000016721897,0.9953035,0.00008279857,0.0036807056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013351742,0.000017214787,0.0006405299,0.00002440416,0.0000103472685,0.0000056133244,0.007918875,0.0000057646453,0.000045138524,0.037393905,0.953765,0.000039737257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019598687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13149424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053532684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004469242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157910","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1716","title":"Entre affirmations française et britannique de souveraineté, le titre ancestral autochtone en jeu","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Cultural Identity and Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02153919192672603,"score_gpt":0.2630787357891686,"score_spread":0.24153954386244259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019078825,0.008601237,0.00022752496,0.05146206,0.002514407,0.00024968182,0.00078846974,0.00010420964,0.9169736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83027005,0.0014021539,0.0004955765,0.0016459457,0.0010418494,0.000009261787,0.000026713926,0.00002169071,0.16508673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984342,0.0002472779,0.0004586906,0.0001842288,0.00019945441,0.00047619082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992438,0.00008910901,0.00014642718,0.0001446233,0.00019887357,0.00017714663],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038843456,0.00023294946,0.00028255332,0.000086493776,0.005521223,0.0009118644,0.00026870854,0.00017266956,0.0055733705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003927342,0.00023375948,0.0002856692,0.000064428634,0.00034247528,0.0011818546,0.000076220014,0.0008687985,0.00017903172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017448474,0.00023916809,0.00002439535,0.00012908042,0.0001467208,0.00013948005,0.010209162,0.00023420635,0.0001268873,0.9389458,0.048720732,0.0010669616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006818778,0.00005681181,0.00038828247,0.0005751482,0.00011361033,0.00021942638,0.0049873698,0.00019677129,0.00018814961,0.013328936,0.9790144,0.00024924107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029018728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25474262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019636119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009547183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99577343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158578","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1718","title":"Words that Wound and Laws that Silence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Political science; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0486106615398621,"score_gpt":0.32876601826763774,"score_spread":0.28015535672777564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0132054305,0.0024256909,0.0000744589,0.007463694,0.0012499045,0.00008034561,0.0000059510407,0.000033005945,0.97546154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991427,0.0011090882,0.00017187899,0.0009910581,0.00010478928,0.0000035266742,2.007894e-7,0.0000034877114,0.0061889584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904823,0.00017959841,0.00012221359,0.00015255295,0.0002021554,0.000295237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951583,0.00019149805,0.00007097851,0.000086714834,0.000044664575,0.00009031806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078911043,0.00009182089,0.00015993908,0.000040586183,0.0074336138,0.0000936547,0.00019037764,0.00010070509,0.00010476076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006886642,0.00007802523,0.000051961426,0.00011300026,0.0006859763,0.00017820162,0.00007937537,0.0002658922,0.000012397872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031163592,0.00003561784,0.03397615,0.000017946728,0.000106172294,0.00006828658,0.005770943,9.083695e-7,0.0000050679114,0.94455266,0.003679545,0.01175553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002447341,0.000024816609,0.009430997,0.00005322703,0.000028756931,0.00003803141,0.018176472,0.0000010673737,0.000115984825,0.026722914,0.94504863,0.00011437557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008171761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016098272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055439206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019443176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158590","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1717","title":"Judicial Review of Rulemaking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030213038833962876,"score_gpt":0.344318470434393,"score_spread":0.31410543160043014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018411344,0.02027591,0.000053959022,0.005472845,0.0006322694,0.000064100735,0.0000059833387,0.000011544299,0.97329926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771756,0.019357612,0.000118769116,0.0029496837,0.00029485184,0.000002086604,2.6953302e-7,0.0000016002933,0.000099510355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999175,0.00009193204,0.00024155548,0.000060725026,0.00028233405,0.00014845161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953943,0.000059253525,0.00010733752,0.00003866811,0.00021562378,0.000039681454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071490614,0.000047168473,0.00016817001,0.000030098363,0.004752678,0.00001502424,0.00013969374,0.000027827102,0.0001768905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026182638,0.000040010353,0.00009900523,0.00022376359,0.00048536822,0.00008144332,0.00003739067,0.000116941526,0.000008746787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034175173,0.000014672473,0.0001622652,0.000053358395,0.000028330147,0.0000044299745,0.00004659568,3.3186177e-7,0.0000040381124,0.9901858,0.0013799662,0.008116774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073463954,0.0000077088725,0.00029579096,0.0027331836,0.00003376176,0.0000030669275,0.0001825987,1.2533346e-7,0.000029414174,0.055169847,0.9414298,0.00004126455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066683465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012081476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007332355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411733541","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i4.1694","title":"DAO","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.043452150111251,"score_gpt":0.3348709416515023,"score_spread":0.2914187915402513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411733541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015809897,0.04433356,0.00007351048,0.078346394,0.02393535,0.000059448797,0.000045806304,0.000056474368,0.85156846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88945466,0.00660151,0.00030105433,0.0008325911,0.005804765,0.0000018042008,3.1309793e-7,0.000018423138,0.096984886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997936,0.00019045694,0.0002638521,0.0002314103,0.0007578473,0.0006204085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.00012421531,0.000091285256,0.00008133951,0.00007358517,0.0003529923],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012105881,0.00013268208,0.00015575782,0.00002365818,0.0052402928,0.00056855264,0.00039941526,0.0001540435,0.0035595796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000577781,0.00011699194,0.00023438616,0.00068777584,0.0008566011,0.0009950446,0.000045623416,0.0005474754,0.001074798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014862791,0.000020914846,0.000030007908,0.000012097099,0.000023309367,0.00019390653,0.0013829503,0.000009331665,0.0000041557064,0.8506423,0.029149884,0.11852966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006158208,0.000048965594,0.00012801179,0.00021838138,0.00003130896,0.00011429463,0.0016483126,0.0001288359,0.00001806503,0.035028435,0.9624123,0.00016152566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03551165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0918589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003848468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077277036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223206","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1883","title":"The Republic of Dissent","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Scrutiny; The Republic; Harm; Academic freedom; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.020378398649814024,"score_gpt":0.325977240519526,"score_spread":0.305598841869712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020541933,0.00041251455,0.00003543017,0.015986074,0.0011318682,0.00003766224,0.0000043748623,0.000009855004,0.980328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917206,0.00050391885,0.00004949235,0.00033034448,0.00028600506,7.4883627e-7,1.17425024e-7,0.0000020946513,0.007106665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992376,0.00012451794,0.00018958944,0.00004136881,0.0002055508,0.00020135762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994395,0.00022269551,0.000084995816,0.00008118666,0.00010208918,0.000069537564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009757733,0.00003409238,0.000063917956,0.000019292349,0.00394911,0.000037208993,0.00028747765,0.000054157976,0.000058061054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030222544,0.000021579446,0.00005891635,0.00012485964,0.00045176424,0.00007321472,0.000028525343,0.0002139627,0.000004063625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025296404,0.000006463478,0.00022890602,0.0000013736056,0.000011600084,8.965252e-7,0.00018151107,0.0000010031013,0.0000042286774,0.9862907,0.007950525,0.005320272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006504708,0.000006244834,0.00023028786,0.000015116766,0.0000075579105,0.0000030283525,0.0013424617,0.000002981863,0.00013037135,0.04545676,0.9527172,0.000022984612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016323616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004971892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005435612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032357424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223219","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1880","title":"The Administrative Law of Section 33 of the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Legislation; Context (archaeology); Administrative law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.03244499481277436,"score_gpt":0.2638348400428245,"score_spread":0.23138984523005013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075046625,0.000036019723,0.00018635236,0.0037736995,0.0024585053,0.00009097294,0.000016023516,0.000008911692,0.98592484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977326,0.000012431432,0.00001606932,0.0009940813,0.00058402965,0.0000016661907,9.547882e-7,0.0000041248545,0.0006540643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937695,0.000015009074,0.0002639927,0.00006152962,0.00018972592,0.000092807146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932176,0.000059684655,0.00027239876,0.00010053255,0.00024126784,0.0000043292794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025444644,0.00006173709,0.00008850879,0.0000250806,0.0010046628,0.0000764939,0.0002482394,0.000028989056,0.00005902955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000617392,0.000033684406,0.00009980419,0.00009759618,0.00026415425,0.00024198272,0.00005369063,0.00014472715,0.000004252845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002536445,0.000032611926,0.00044281283,0.000019642019,0.0000488582,6.9006575e-7,0.000007727027,0.000014870549,0.00016271736,0.99753904,0.0013481101,0.00035755182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003017971,0.000015458829,0.0045175706,0.000086373235,0.000043862332,0.0000063061534,0.00017151926,0.00021135435,0.0029398904,0.04568161,0.94597167,0.000052574385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038378948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002377378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99022794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001918238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056466038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223230","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1877","title":"The Discriminatory Use of the “KGB Procedure” by Police Against Women in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Witness; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Criminal justice; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.018862102587175435,"score_gpt":0.2550471595667021,"score_spread":0.23618505697952666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77711844,0.000359482,6.476753e-7,0.0067114225,0.00088557997,0.00018894173,0.00003869953,0.0000068252566,0.21468994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996945,0.00019661691,0.0000016048194,0.0013185091,0.0000411938,0.0000064710057,1.8189981e-7,0.00000417214,0.0014862489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864256,0.0002522852,0.00022329601,0.00008863866,0.0003777679,0.00041546542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942917,0.00013430402,0.00011185729,0.00013559498,0.00008113297,0.00010793588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061894994,0.00007411293,0.000107839485,0.000020102043,0.0028960982,0.000071413546,0.0004947248,0.000038259066,0.000013879943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001328931,0.000044374585,0.000047735703,0.00023244621,0.00019665823,0.00011556905,0.0000617356,0.00028000903,4.8545616e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000971225,0.0002834478,0.084044054,0.00009299854,0.00022621073,0.000019726585,0.08829274,0.00010624305,0.0004274088,0.75037205,0.04837812,0.027659895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014641337,0.000005372487,0.009936615,0.000029499039,0.000005835863,0.0000012678294,0.037238937,0.00000581537,0.00016307304,0.0009900626,0.95141435,0.000062779116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9477686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90303624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080816704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068939204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223234","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1874","title":"Contributions civilistes à l’interprétation des lois constitutionnelles canadiennes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Code (set theory); Relevance (law); Civil code","score_opus":0.01602313191760216,"score_gpt":0.29804034634127163,"score_spread":0.28201721442366945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009206583,0.0011262494,0.0018745107,0.005557565,0.0010593872,0.00011077863,0.00010014115,0.000052132822,0.9809126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835205,0.0004488422,0.00012463114,0.0004646706,0.00019528148,0.000008150652,0.0000030035287,0.0000019243514,0.00040146665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907726,0.00010237107,0.00022149918,0.00011139048,0.00018382381,0.00030364314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902534,0.00016530471,0.00007015192,0.000047529895,0.0005299744,0.00016168543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043510812,0.00008504784,0.00013392526,0.00007434147,0.016230237,0.0000944343,0.00014503837,0.000055778266,0.00016394258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009128579,0.000076669865,0.00008998308,0.00026835423,0.0018568035,0.00025555785,0.000031068048,0.00014292839,0.000026097721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009095529,0.000027056976,0.0010787142,0.0000022470679,0.000057911373,0.000010135748,0.00053890835,0.0000250703,0.000017302154,0.9948736,0.0009380401,0.0024219276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022535745,0.000013156964,0.0009419749,0.00010934717,0.000041854215,0.000015323636,0.0059735975,0.00000554856,0.0001122147,0.2045906,0.7878769,0.0000941043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121126264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76235425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98914546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067850255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018389583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223254","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1871","title":"Reflections on Equity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Charter; Equity (law); Racism; Harassment; Ambivalence; Normative","score_opus":0.23436625003309317,"score_gpt":0.5488728815015316,"score_spread":0.3145066314684384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048740607,0.000019714034,0.0000070623537,0.14565006,0.0033919315,0.000054607473,0.0000012779401,0.000017240676,0.8503707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962037,0.000034250173,0.00027063963,0.0074744774,0.00035748156,0.000010549683,0.000001246234,0.0000028317222,0.029811477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992425,0.00018348875,0.00017803315,0.00008028325,0.00017191863,0.0001437906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994914,0.000116924864,0.000076616736,0.000079128746,0.00017932373,0.0000565953],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007314422,0.000042791227,0.00005195021,0.00017899876,0.0031466922,0.00017291846,0.0001267974,0.000056999434,0.0017893075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026009732,0.000042233132,0.000027005131,0.0008071585,0.000056989193,0.0004938708,0.000014136275,0.0005555341,0.00007590889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006040034,0.0001856613,0.00008684064,0.0000012272263,0.00000426625,3.8400097e-7,0.00033359206,0.000006228844,0.000014595116,0.98076737,0.008758116,0.009835693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082708626,0.000009606801,0.0026623863,0.000026359303,0.0000045403585,0.0000013772119,0.0011391053,3.1309304e-7,0.000025304158,0.045973115,0.9500343,0.000040861098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007676606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043691117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96154964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050610525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004096522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223277","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1886","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 2","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03001437855804403,"score_gpt":0.2164328161907774,"score_spread":0.18641843763273336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000054010816,0.004095256,0.00005951649,0.00030512369,0.04175628,0.00012075583,0.005887538,0.000011380877,0.94775873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005141728,0.0021198292,0.00025541885,0.0014681837,0.0009964921,0.000011829654,0.000054375334,0.00003451638,0.99454516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768335,0.000017977658,0.0010545275,0.0006328794,0.00005294793,0.00055832206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850124,0.000035489993,0.0007949543,0.00042625287,0.00008958665,0.00015249221],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005698921,0.00036037373,0.0009795693,0.00031926966,0.0018166464,0.00032537236,0.00061563717,0.00028488232,0.6135262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002748866,0.00038328167,0.00045611203,0.0000790493,0.0001405246,0.00025726683,0.0002794067,0.0006687798,0.9163427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011102322,0.000035675035,0.000043648633,0.00004884999,0.00030235585,0.000008998408,0.0000256116,0.000032301527,8.638199e-8,0.026997583,0.97238886,0.00010493379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039469756,0.000020200621,0.000024312905,0.00009424199,0.000020589074,0.000018865954,0.00004016843,0.000021744685,0.00000439605,0.00089969154,0.9980522,0.0004089391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063146965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008008032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30281645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036556838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012166548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124422838","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2209","title":"Constitutional Labour Rights in the Gig Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Collective bargaining; Charter; Gig economy; Section (typography); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.017406432847769205,"score_gpt":0.26686586436557835,"score_spread":0.24945943151780914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124422838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029730606,0.00010638933,0.00012011323,0.0053785304,0.00047625357,0.00007038728,0.000016511707,0.000020908994,0.9908379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989279,0.000022681144,0.00003545133,0.0005158607,0.0002904382,0.0000041348635,0.0000020163632,0.0000010607407,0.0002004688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941045,0.00007525498,0.00017393735,0.00006435499,0.000111623296,0.00016440547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997732,0.00009411308,0.000022057211,0.00003492154,0.000024163108,0.000051544244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008534041,0.000048683458,0.00005590147,0.00003227963,0.002012639,0.00047959515,0.0001587086,0.000038685404,0.00041553268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000717963,0.000032993623,0.00005712634,0.00012707913,0.00032882244,0.0012703212,0.0000040391583,0.00020851167,0.00022429784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001995917,0.000012608336,0.00002382982,0.0000029347175,0.0000070671977,0.000026760126,0.0006016258,0.000024169882,6.443596e-8,0.9935205,0.00028336397,0.0054950737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007271341,0.000007078651,0.000045319204,0.000026232012,0.0000026028279,0.000047333706,0.00037705508,0.0000130652015,0.0000047246363,0.1380051,0.86135423,0.00004458164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065739785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016587751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092690185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003076098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124425451","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2233","title":"Bending the Rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Anthropocentrism; Rule of law; Supreme court; Indigenous; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Common law","score_opus":0.0267978589757836,"score_gpt":0.32182136860832095,"score_spread":0.2950235096325373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124425451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059589758,0.00055979454,0.000010765073,0.0071972874,0.0008629353,0.000037819005,0.0000146751445,0.0000366908,0.98532104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951995,0.00033401922,0.00007269762,0.00054668257,0.0011333148,0.0000013129251,4.7494194e-7,0.000007980108,0.0027039987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999281,0.00010413942,0.00009421752,0.00006573468,0.00023780936,0.00021710728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997375,0.000084420884,0.000020310572,0.00005691523,0.000004557376,0.00009631019],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060532,0.000048805592,0.000044735934,0.00001625231,0.0052335574,0.00021312758,0.0001844673,0.000034050117,0.0011522803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013653257,0.000030381258,0.000074757314,0.00006604297,0.00019477087,0.00019734522,0.000026517137,0.00024399755,0.0005382113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.206657e-7,0.000004370061,0.000029919293,0.0000014538738,0.000010332803,0.000023063967,0.00062871963,0.0000024734127,0.000020381061,0.9879931,0.0011350062,0.010150462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026338632,0.000008495453,0.00011774762,0.000020201607,0.000009054666,0.000042754444,0.00044277505,0.000005213671,0.000059608174,0.011666713,0.987555,0.00004608694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019230536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050894436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110530826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006607476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124427986","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2239","title":"Corporations in the Crosshairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; The Internet; Legislation","score_opus":0.02884166200132041,"score_gpt":0.237129053474099,"score_spread":0.20828739147277858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124427986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049076945,0.00053064484,0.00015336774,0.010854666,0.0018133409,0.00016938307,0.000013243775,0.000103512,0.9372849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956864,0.000018985815,0.000022835273,0.002754514,0.0012713678,0.000005399913,0.0000046554205,0.000012000649,0.00022384978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993032,0.0000083478135,0.00019520424,0.0001052776,0.00021979498,0.00016815093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997275,0.000027209831,0.000085101754,0.00010437994,0.00004961881,0.000006174524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046300283,0.00008381007,0.000074462645,0.000072921415,0.0010231715,0.001002156,0.00021381381,0.000028401251,0.00031244624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016770011,0.000053231244,0.000069044065,0.00045179483,0.000045153363,0.0012885451,0.00003580499,0.00028811046,0.0004942317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054312445,0.000023323699,0.0005085771,0.000019068053,0.0000066607313,0.00029118673,0.00002140636,0.0000738327,0.000026771037,0.98314315,0.012164409,0.0037161969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223231,0.0000042086167,0.0019729969,0.000056562905,0.00001316155,0.00007820798,0.00013674273,0.00078329066,0.000006423249,0.023819039,0.9729261,0.000080951715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087149226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01277196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96076167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027507622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056503554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96638125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124434997","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2236","title":"Competing Constitutional Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Democracy; Limiting; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.03810785600891519,"score_gpt":0.3240699980064703,"score_spread":0.2859621419975551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124434997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051864884,0.0011475306,0.00007080405,0.0054444824,0.0022561615,0.000084521176,0.000020427897,0.00015127538,0.9856383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738836,0.00008051335,0.00071904575,0.00012861515,0.0011395428,0.0000023258633,0.0000010762786,0.0000034806355,0.0005370208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988097,0.00013454202,0.00018567304,0.00012434575,0.00045229634,0.00029341792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994736,0.00017880293,0.000040604154,0.000033538032,0.00012593072,0.00014754155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060748734,0.00008661688,0.00011318742,0.00002296299,0.012429282,0.00026974984,0.00014514115,0.00005660212,0.0008153673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008353255,0.00006048456,0.00011168616,0.00012657812,0.0011128836,0.00034844255,0.000035376688,0.00032792622,0.00030410275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017861745,0.000009519362,0.00005332507,0.000004276409,0.000045065903,0.0000817653,0.0015876929,0.000010714904,0.000019253714,0.9961569,0.0010566877,0.00097304245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516075,0.000008191848,0.00007466192,0.00007781326,0.000015742136,0.000055139964,0.0015276714,0.000021688093,0.000043407646,0.0056526707,0.9923365,0.000101361984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036825167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011688203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99220186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003035837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019530828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124448299","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2203","title":"Vers la reconnaissance d’une compétence autochtone en matière de justice pénale adolescente","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychodrama and Leishmaniasis Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Harm; Mandate; Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Juvenile delinquency; Criminal law","score_opus":0.038554576599683914,"score_gpt":0.3252695876632608,"score_spread":0.2867150110635769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124448299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019478678,0.02448019,0.00046762225,0.038222577,0.01057273,0.0001680636,0.00009396568,0.00013588618,0.9239111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496908,0.01325772,0.0017560662,0.0010876497,0.003646976,0.000008844092,0.0000013702958,0.00004786555,0.030502668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967519,0.0009152226,0.0004940806,0.00038446166,0.00056925206,0.0008850664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985229,0.00062634755,0.0001554544,0.00017441672,0.00014784702,0.0003730807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018397649,0.00030044687,0.00037356841,0.00007693493,0.004875117,0.00044079873,0.0005426457,0.00024031989,0.0010431154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015492142,0.0002959729,0.00027615958,0.00063744455,0.0011071598,0.0007123661,0.000080810445,0.001313901,0.000769469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058271962,0.00022460024,0.00015350527,0.0005485878,0.0003516292,0.0011404376,0.01951503,0.00008379073,0.00012098939,0.84311086,0.06479556,0.069896735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033744492,0.00008027494,0.0012027362,0.00248322,0.00026810225,0.00076092297,0.008027013,0.00042179966,0.00004022233,0.0045912024,0.9814506,0.00033641973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046085357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00922463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007091744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007558935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124464459","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i3.2200","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 3","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03160965413123776,"score_gpt":0.2099555058256226,"score_spread":0.17834585169438485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124464459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039811624,0.017101174,0.00010924165,0.0011828212,0.05413236,0.00013205521,0.0024382991,0.000036123278,0.9244698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26128137,0.0048171305,0.00041755612,0.0011833926,0.0021252553,0.000008450176,0.000006736129,0.00008324671,0.73007685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996664,0.000027466564,0.0014334763,0.00089082035,0.00008907797,0.00089515286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870986,0.00006801084,0.00037776926,0.00041184615,0.00008305191,0.0003494364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014217817,0.0004021194,0.00077401503,0.0003600766,0.0030297274,0.0015358778,0.0005325326,0.00019406562,0.4162943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034514902,0.0004346705,0.00065841636,0.00016525658,0.00031635966,0.0010866723,0.00029797494,0.0007527294,0.7529617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002224134,0.0000809272,0.0005248581,0.00010787527,0.0006844519,0.00015501841,0.00030621522,0.000052151878,0.0000011246826,0.25209257,0.74457633,0.0013961934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003971969,0.0000693512,0.00019476544,0.00017428078,0.00005481096,0.00017916624,0.00025079376,0.0017372405,0.000012881382,0.0045188554,0.99187815,0.00053251476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038630853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011658678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3366674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005330512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013170551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127895132","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2636","title":"Thesis Survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Survey data collection; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.035446457258888994,"score_gpt":0.29519129439691977,"score_spread":0.25974483713803076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127895132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030723598,0.00020985668,0.00008479589,0.00040478254,0.00078086526,0.000082762344,0.00028362864,0.00011789928,0.9673118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803495,0.000017019654,0.00035819577,0.00040888408,0.00006814363,0.0000018885363,0.0000037602092,0.000037319824,0.0010698496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984538,0.0004704355,0.00029852721,0.00015151767,0.00028424434,0.0003415067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907106,0.00022484557,0.0001148648,0.00024024233,0.00022094916,0.00012803616],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020062993,0.0001329301,0.00019496346,0.00013708687,0.002167354,0.00009953362,0.00033423165,0.00006133588,0.0005892633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029843507,0.00010955126,0.00011529892,0.00041834824,0.00007278124,0.00019197712,0.00006823112,0.00037220842,0.0023697189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006500174,0.00060034764,0.068249114,0.000030413497,0.00094901095,0.00035668915,0.00005592521,0.00028450362,0.004208652,0.767435,0.124834836,0.032345448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005810835,0.000023984383,0.098978944,0.000048553185,0.000036100893,0.00013435431,0.000021236581,0.000036958176,0.0042350227,0.0023919002,0.893362,0.0001498586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011863215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017915603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018062012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013003538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127917038","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2609","title":"Front Matter - v. 70, no 4","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02449971408508544,"score_gpt":0.20899364216719815,"score_spread":0.1844939280821127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127917038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005026044,0.0045450944,0.00016696275,0.0014698228,0.034142278,0.00016342927,0.0012221308,0.000015475265,0.9577722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17480007,0.002337346,0.0004800894,0.003273987,0.0005630364,0.000008427765,0.0000042369225,0.00003245542,0.81850034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670947,0.00003351429,0.0015692664,0.000761998,0.00006559623,0.0008601734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830014,0.000061561106,0.0007339246,0.00052318786,0.0001417,0.0002395125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012599968,0.00037813652,0.00092074776,0.0004014323,0.0045161215,0.0006198456,0.0006834816,0.00020676876,0.2340916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006795489,0.00043599843,0.0005434541,0.00018809394,0.00035547934,0.00064420264,0.00042196186,0.0006033861,0.38974833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048042548,0.0001504229,0.0045136358,0.0000509209,0.0006155117,0.000022126236,0.00010636837,0.000058653663,7.9176493e-7,0.3035407,0.6900709,0.0008219073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001083415,0.000044886863,0.0013647184,0.00011223719,0.00005359699,0.000024846448,0.0003121614,0.0003714756,0.000021845439,0.006445828,0.9897353,0.00042968226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005219442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020836659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2996644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053275947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015136913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127921007","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2624","title":"Best Interests or Autonomy?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Family law; Autonomy; Best interests; Health law; Welfare; Common law","score_opus":0.05996678990084643,"score_gpt":0.4103966385545401,"score_spread":0.3504298486536937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127921007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012723605,0.0016814062,0.00016883996,0.02710916,0.0022179591,0.00022059512,0.000017459259,0.00006385456,0.95579714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815128,0.00037606357,0.0018545118,0.004903924,0.0006445803,0.0000036394656,0.000002470187,0.000013611983,0.010688409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894536,0.000058477803,0.0003770672,0.0001479472,0.00020390376,0.0002672357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.00012515312,0.00007407237,0.00020214349,0.00024991692,0.00024948857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046341182,0.00011108583,0.00024389027,0.000108138,0.0009334709,0.000039415612,0.00012734355,0.00015947271,0.0005330667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025272998,0.00007679651,0.00009669704,0.00019112768,0.00006969438,0.0000796404,0.000059037284,0.0011777075,0.00008446583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074717717,0.00056794105,0.0076697706,0.0008552281,0.00031723434,0.0030674448,0.0005798353,0.000008062679,0.00005817643,0.78825593,0.009917101,0.18795611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007535026,0.00031133313,0.0004754062,0.00040450593,0.000070754744,0.0005926369,0.00016201717,0.000033974808,0.00019675551,0.0011569031,0.9957655,0.0000767278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055434724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001986211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98584837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023836172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018083617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7179598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127943489","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2630","title":"Comparer sans harmoniser","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04964689509831655,"score_gpt":0.3971692641415429,"score_spread":0.34752236904322636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127943489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002442345,0.023214892,0.00076129136,0.05302957,0.014395387,0.0002043313,0.00018436789,0.0000375494,0.90573025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78068703,0.002429238,0.00061099755,0.0077995863,0.0012221035,0.000024720992,0.000013145486,0.000059092676,0.20715411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946286,0.001820508,0.0010355524,0.0006801958,0.00047103973,0.001364077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976205,0.00030853876,0.0002796463,0.0008858634,0.00039522123,0.0005102179],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023554459,0.0004348454,0.00077943085,0.0004795933,0.003941385,0.00023875076,0.00097102096,0.00057313143,0.025084862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030449695,0.00041560014,0.0006885276,0.0009556229,0.00079157896,0.00021599192,0.00012583149,0.002549861,0.0036756243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004378326,0.0013221295,0.0055167465,0.00005610552,0.0017651614,0.0010645629,0.00022685844,0.00002923132,0.00013803376,0.45918223,0.42935458,0.10090653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028055639,0.00017441645,0.0065219235,0.00026736842,0.00037812238,0.0013346457,0.00046456346,0.00006208407,0.00008473684,0.007908649,0.97965515,0.0003428041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060144655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017566234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7782447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021639986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003520512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127953218","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2615","title":"Do Pre-1970 Precedents Still Matter?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Assertion; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.023953914497859267,"score_gpt":0.31364878628662035,"score_spread":0.2896948717887611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127953218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01066484,0.0038385817,0.00010849005,0.007221799,0.006897159,0.0002990404,0.0000981147,0.000033039094,0.97083896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116576,0.0024921182,0.00007166663,0.0016648738,0.00095061335,0.000011615535,9.755645e-7,0.000010635223,0.0036317585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966583,0.00036687905,0.0007581969,0.00041922447,0.0009683504,0.00082902226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985618,0.00016431979,0.00032760703,0.00018320938,0.00044735565,0.00031571637],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094711874,0.0003217534,0.0004677874,0.00012180478,0.015891217,0.00046956554,0.000737544,0.00021779914,0.003232404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014475464,0.0002912927,0.00034555205,0.00062021945,0.0014104481,0.00053000246,0.0003512291,0.00069637166,0.000727501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011400808,0.0002664964,0.009287937,0.000024824958,0.00049654295,0.000043639662,0.0012022929,0.000043834832,0.000012663277,0.96643215,0.0065167095,0.015558875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005780768,0.00006530315,0.013052099,0.000527481,0.00019721377,0.000030939624,0.0016966442,0.000004870024,0.000062691324,0.07889544,0.9045792,0.00030999794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010942665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020532003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048234462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012520576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128013358","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2612","title":"compétence autochtone en matière de justice pénale adolescente :","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Human rights; Citizenship","score_opus":0.021664595628800895,"score_gpt":0.31217743937395115,"score_spread":0.29051284374515024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128013358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022136867,0.009730553,0.0011697753,0.03071554,0.006834175,0.00034235138,0.00009756765,0.00008710872,0.94880927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8144786,0.007632254,0.0073817084,0.0046060863,0.0033437859,0.000017438528,0.0000017039043,0.00004947209,0.16248897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963736,0.0008376255,0.0005952495,0.0003134575,0.00062952243,0.001250552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841005,0.00040173024,0.00026068708,0.00022594734,0.00037482328,0.0003267731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001702594,0.00029953066,0.00045372455,0.000104765386,0.013503979,0.0001890091,0.0007636994,0.00024543225,0.0007716275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024761754,0.00030958795,0.00024481327,0.0006443113,0.0010403874,0.0003738292,0.00022374863,0.0011453454,0.00044799133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046757068,0.00043276887,0.00076650345,0.00038246866,0.00032179148,0.00032285534,0.011152514,0.00016110088,0.00012417564,0.946055,0.015266846,0.02496721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005501327,0.000082061255,0.0019372366,0.0011096323,0.0005132709,0.00019697956,0.007333483,0.00013562023,0.00018294972,0.007801425,0.979861,0.000296162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013121924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069545746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017575512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019808086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128018999","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2618","title":"Newcomers to Canada:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Crimes against humanity; Reputation; Subject (documents); Human rights; Impunity; Humanity","score_opus":0.013527246190820033,"score_gpt":0.299786377440348,"score_spread":0.28625913124952795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128018999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014689389,0.0000095992655,0.000033983524,0.009776463,0.001509375,0.000046502326,0.000008081227,0.000010841355,0.97391576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96552193,0.0000030203596,0.00012556325,0.004041238,0.0002531248,0.0000012106699,4.0017247e-7,0.000002556427,0.030050926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926394,0.00004688816,0.000119689794,0.00006788238,0.00031172123,0.00018986025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996118,0.000037157817,0.000028544486,0.000044955228,0.00013891209,0.00013860984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022621619,0.000044068547,0.00006446178,0.000041931908,0.004198299,0.00006362579,0.0002308807,0.00002325273,0.0005186945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028908233,0.000037681388,0.000034344666,0.00005608234,0.000043647535,0.00006120465,0.000018170109,0.00011627369,0.000024527497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044001677,0.000005569928,0.000027280956,5.499383e-7,0.0000139091735,0.000017024076,0.0000855643,0.000012144437,0.0000021361236,0.99277544,0.0063494337,0.00070653256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007667918,0.000005883696,0.0003765713,0.000014252476,0.0000039924935,0.0000022882837,0.00010274951,9.679591e-7,0.0000647396,0.038056172,0.96124876,0.000046932284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90434736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004768962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016771363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128070020","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i4.2639","title":"Volume 70 Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.027644247522276722,"score_gpt":0.2094466425353837,"score_spread":0.18180239501310697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128070020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012676483,0.00065217813,0.00045291532,0.00070837396,0.004391151,0.000044478184,0.00015302496,0.000020471172,0.99230975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7949309,0.00014390866,0.00015800605,0.00067761,0.00009878046,0.000002978289,0.0000010612408,0.000007278435,0.20397952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990361,0.000006398644,0.00043749783,0.000233567,0.000022460752,0.00026397756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995315,0.00001444248,0.00018102909,0.00017179833,0.0000314045,0.00006981173],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000525899,0.00009649722,0.0002608082,0.00016863819,0.0013956913,0.00012624802,0.00024123803,0.000052780608,0.0075360574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004009848,0.000105063526,0.00013177082,0.00014581945,0.00009544746,0.00023777591,0.00010235743,0.0001728817,0.009788901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069621697,0.000028460274,0.00847717,0.0000046568684,0.00008842254,0.0000058212518,0.00002937386,0.000059118844,4.0846626e-7,0.85955054,0.13083254,0.0009165346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039272266,0.000010156926,0.002378994,0.000010023057,0.000004353695,0.000009365559,0.00013497793,0.00037180554,0.000010380571,0.023323879,0.97324246,0.00011090405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026532155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001439089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012598891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034834131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}