{"meta":{"query_hash":"6723dd4eab72","filters":{"venue":"Medical Law International"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6723dd4eab72","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Medical+Law+International"},"results":[{"id":"W2006965763","doi":"10.1177/096853320901000201","title":"Broad Consent in Biobanking: Reflections on Seemingly Insurmountable Dilemmas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Informed consent; Political science; Relation (database); Law; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.4644562372863117,"score_gpt":0.6035350497465634,"score_spread":0.13907881246025167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006965763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026967798,0.014747577,0.011142458,0.95623064,0.002711999,0.000047527592,0.000009930785,0.000022100003,0.012390963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41245344,0.03244047,0.02834916,0.5008495,0.012531838,0.0007736757,0.000033828263,0.0002699316,0.012298182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81996495,0.14899825,0.004692913,0.0049064304,0.016386261,0.0050511267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67038596,0.31198326,0.0035733646,0.004586762,0.006964202,0.0025064372],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21694776,0.0013399962,0.002263143,0.002952098,0.015796743,0.026830534,0.006275122,0.05185881,0.0029765037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20077172,0.0010887593,0.0020716123,0.0031688784,0.18797998,0.044758357,0.019611431,0.06593494,0.0008486899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018692543,0.000015704545,0.000045313605,0.00015332436,0.0000064007972,0.00029767555,0.025240522,0.0002646041,0.000093320115,0.9547532,0.011848758,0.007262429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025317984,0.000023228125,0.00006122644,0.00087176904,0.0000058051264,0.00030339495,0.016039312,0.00028053802,0.00015826985,0.8944321,0.08775744,0.000041521747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004692527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004095998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014909479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018596213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043279463","doi":"10.1177/096853320100500201","title":"Xenotransplantation: Consent, Public Health and Charter Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Informed consent; Biobank; Law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Health law; Political science; Public health; Bioethics; Autonomy; Transplantation; Medicine; Health care; Health policy; International health; Alternative medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.06618677151574064,"score_gpt":0.3732393636724216,"score_spread":0.30705259215668096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043279463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071900957,0.01605511,0.0038788307,0.9210084,0.001905877,0.00008182918,0.0001247853,0.00004694674,0.049708083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39063057,0.028833112,0.0077337166,0.53831285,0.0043485295,0.00019205511,0.00020958621,0.00010451978,0.029635072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94351435,0.022083664,0.002424925,0.0030089188,0.019635689,0.00933242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170718,0.06441524,0.0029027297,0.0022040973,0.010861365,0.0025447202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06354269,0.0005919475,0.0009698786,0.0030364143,0.0146083515,0.015131446,0.005472891,0.025757432,0.0034731703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10480049,0.0005306038,0.0012916673,0.005091017,0.051387075,0.008906491,0.004473728,0.01825019,0.00043997858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010334476,0.000011391909,0.00033445042,0.000113373775,0.000004924586,0.0003160018,0.007486199,0.00021700017,0.000062059575,0.9342093,0.046461508,0.0107735805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045826775,0.000032202723,0.0030034538,0.0019076536,0.000039499457,0.0007964229,0.019234808,0.0011048857,0.0004752335,0.4201715,0.5530286,0.0001599231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72268504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66635007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72268504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065529875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16187923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55789626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076134841","doi":"10.1177/096853320400600205","title":"Wrongful Life: The Problem of Causation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Action (physics); Abortion; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02445500327807351,"score_gpt":0.36060774605452967,"score_spread":0.3361527427764561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076134841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028101848,0.0439145,0.10101086,0.58490807,0.006180028,0.00015746495,0.00008825893,0.0000765264,0.23556247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672974,0.029169055,0.012809745,0.069510564,0.0062063034,0.0002067377,0.000041821648,0.000071385824,0.014686963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981631,0.011232579,0.00079192256,0.0014640274,0.0032394438,0.0016410495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621828,0.032385606,0.0022754348,0.0012698655,0.0012534749,0.0006328785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016532643,0.0006811156,0.0012239418,0.0026905036,0.007424928,0.006413841,0.0024598564,0.014249888,0.0041695056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044953648,0.00057350675,0.000811485,0.001643102,0.05410364,0.013521314,0.007785313,0.013672016,0.0004183803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002837873,0.000004619802,0.00048021993,0.000024643983,0.000005655163,0.0004799326,0.0008631186,0.00008659276,0.000011414748,0.9936587,0.0013050481,0.0030772125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058805394,0.00001491003,0.00030167913,0.0002032613,0.000010270416,0.0012303473,0.0016490321,0.00026428432,0.00005112618,0.9710127,0.025240611,0.000015876214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085845115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063065994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016532643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054729898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005573042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08743405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102243693","doi":"10.1177/096853320800900302","title":"From Human Embryos to Interspecies Creations: Ethical and Legal Uncertainties Surrounding the Creation of Cytoplasmic Hybrids for Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10306610234764504,"score_gpt":0.43523910669399163,"score_spread":0.33217300434634656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102243693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07551178,0.055544466,0.042137075,0.48811394,0.0020246145,0.00015030148,0.000094594914,0.00009624249,0.33632696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85464597,0.025106361,0.016397482,0.0789475,0.00074892293,0.00015245433,0.000047532285,0.000061410945,0.02389242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774753,0.009578548,0.0006386564,0.0014312164,0.00950865,0.001367682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464009,0.044944346,0.0016673817,0.0020063284,0.0037447084,0.0012363897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03561835,0.00026550633,0.0004333643,0.0008645464,0.010104309,0.010391098,0.001962985,0.0075486773,0.0019828188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033924486,0.00036333004,0.00040481536,0.000886744,0.05692239,0.0041862736,0.0074690273,0.009547181,0.00026998477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002122114,0.0000062073054,0.00048990635,0.00006519395,0.00000398247,0.00030554057,0.009665108,0.00012501114,0.00042092154,0.96723014,0.003689495,0.017977232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000377386,0.000074155,0.0018848537,0.001378381,0.000050566137,0.0015708627,0.02996114,0.00044332902,0.003693276,0.51445985,0.44635543,0.00009042811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12437964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27791342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12437964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015851311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043060336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24731135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103684541","doi":"10.1177/0968533213479792","title":"Cell therapy research and innovation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Political science; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Public relations; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1532734447725162,"score_gpt":0.45552262503722485,"score_spread":0.30224918026470865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103684541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054812436,0.20245841,0.026534429,0.2927855,0.005761736,0.00014733481,0.0001019712,0.00009461414,0.4666348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33875796,0.29467067,0.03681372,0.12453277,0.010036463,0.00053120404,0.00019438894,0.00009714175,0.19436562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896449,0.0032929773,0.0003368921,0.00089270587,0.005151159,0.00068134564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924764,0.0044187987,0.00059020286,0.00089562975,0.0010393347,0.00057953346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009793235,0.00033840162,0.0006606917,0.0015645005,0.0031529793,0.009977459,0.0010812753,0.0064183334,0.0075668925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009590184,0.00022222135,0.00060768373,0.0015136539,0.019955004,0.0045975326,0.0048611183,0.003946005,0.0014749132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067043966,0.000011678232,0.00015112733,0.00012932958,0.000004608611,0.00008662315,0.0009588597,0.00012666576,0.00025405313,0.9512632,0.012941274,0.034065757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059277377,0.00003580397,0.00019287672,0.00044653003,0.00000659775,0.00034090882,0.0009316805,0.00012437033,0.00051544275,0.252315,0.74507266,0.000012102321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055367844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070403423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008191857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011215069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05943632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111768102","doi":"10.1177/0968533215571956","title":"A comparative analysis of the requirements for the use of data in biobanks based in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Biobank; European union; Data Protection Act 1998; Data access; Key (lock); Data science; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Database; International trade; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.6322368162565764,"score_gpt":0.574493065418311,"score_spread":0.05774375083826533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111768102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967419,0.012479983,0.010715637,0.025876086,0.0002559308,0.0007241976,0.00189695,0.000079711324,0.051229548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877709,0.0026360769,0.0045111272,0.002541784,0.00005398618,0.00043733543,0.0009863521,0.000050480325,0.0010119557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7227493,0.14460692,0.05517085,0.008803523,0.055790707,0.012878684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4690467,0.38341713,0.07027039,0.018681346,0.047259886,0.011324493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20518011,0.00025838232,0.001010055,0.0063606435,0.003915519,0.012390948,0.0029952158,0.00261016,0.0031575717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38698626,0.0007885134,0.001139267,0.008805326,0.0069980146,0.007668922,0.008343622,0.0021608695,0.00042050486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018746766,0.00024766306,0.45202145,0.0042628907,0.0005269809,0.0053463066,0.1313053,0.0027558864,0.0043106973,0.25844753,0.012226435,0.1266741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014334994,0.00030142913,0.82655185,0.004985855,0.00022393625,0.0034987153,0.08126186,0.0013400932,0.00219673,0.011809838,0.06747094,0.00021538224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029588545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03150651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013918194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019838663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98015445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130656404","doi":"10.1177/096853320600700307","title":"Priority-Setting and Public Law: Potential Realised or Unfulfilled?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pfizer UK","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimation; Function (biology); Work (physics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.14129032647888934,"score_gpt":0.39525033801245374,"score_spread":0.2539600115335644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130656404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00817252,0.008848276,0.039012328,0.86426276,0.0020374628,0.0000729767,0.000055254706,0.00007754539,0.07746085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358882,0.0057156943,0.019710287,0.12305534,0.0063446388,0.00026891855,0.000049442897,0.000107722495,0.008859797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93121356,0.04008389,0.0026776853,0.005215739,0.013798728,0.007010563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86298406,0.10487978,0.006678577,0.008356944,0.011578349,0.005522254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10195338,0.0007089258,0.0015841599,0.0026509028,0.008251271,0.026253473,0.005131927,0.022822035,0.0054631103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14801948,0.00086911686,0.0013022989,0.0026181804,0.076631136,0.03115078,0.011961797,0.03069622,0.0006434221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006576045,0.0000117388645,0.00012133952,0.000028137118,0.0000063699295,0.000023672801,0.000725165,0.00017230866,0.000022215265,0.9912026,0.0033035341,0.004376377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037086887,0.000020121606,0.0001508981,0.0001919489,0.000010428623,0.00003480145,0.0007533387,0.00047054692,0.000069426,0.9732964,0.0249397,0.000025251944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021004302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017184092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10195338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021483678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03503738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53918743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237612033","doi":"10.1177/0968533215626773","title":"Informed consent in international normative texts and biobanking policies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Informed consent; Dignity; Autonomy; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Normative; Harmonization; Political science; Medicine; Public relations; Alternative medicine; Law; Bioinformatics; Biology; Pathology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4353636573947244,"score_gpt":0.5928000669080952,"score_spread":0.1574364095133708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237612033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014825703,0.0137606505,0.22266924,0.24194807,0.0048562973,0.00152438,0.00062254426,0.00038694855,0.49940622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6013486,0.013912746,0.21606132,0.11028004,0.004625263,0.007236864,0.0013769448,0.00053388294,0.04462428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.72787094,0.20505436,0.024793612,0.012574831,0.023343235,0.0063629765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72713196,0.22041087,0.009369131,0.025518326,0.014772559,0.002797106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20939282,0.0011397629,0.0013982574,0.0036034882,0.008014821,0.018528884,0.003702937,0.0197194,0.0056488523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22042818,0.0013701231,0.0013023745,0.004699086,0.056754675,0.019986609,0.009872362,0.018316373,0.002245063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008980467,0.000008633459,0.00008700388,0.00005431966,0.0000034175882,0.000064526685,0.0042372677,0.00010947223,0.00005794713,0.98723155,0.003970846,0.00416618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027260112,0.00003470598,0.00031252307,0.00122419,0.000017718306,0.0003346555,0.0030862074,0.000528747,0.00043219962,0.84351194,0.15042266,0.0000673449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003638843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027350932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007862935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022589939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97495943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314938669","doi":"10.1177/096853321001000301","title":"The Evaluation of Capacity to Make Admission Decisions: Is it a Fair Process for Idividuals with Communication Barriers?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Process (computing); Work (physics); Business; Order (exchange); Public relations; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.1775988477396283,"score_gpt":0.5320736687641112,"score_spread":0.3544748210244829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314938669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2940861,0.0039541717,0.033134397,0.47977555,0.0016107414,0.0015143019,0.00013094502,0.00027042118,0.18552342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703801,0.00087502267,0.010833912,0.011236376,0.00015801915,0.00039052122,0.00002668919,0.000036327667,0.00606303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8357133,0.12653825,0.0072050714,0.0024378367,0.021255624,0.006849901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77437234,0.14793998,0.019706806,0.01311525,0.029462386,0.015403151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15426874,0.00045554055,0.000562479,0.002029649,0.009725058,0.013027435,0.0031077035,0.0049816337,0.0032761514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3341897,0.00045109083,0.0005266397,0.0010999475,0.036397662,0.009517324,0.008320608,0.007447647,0.00086060417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024644207,0.00054150523,0.054715376,0.00044897795,0.000060903472,0.0013050069,0.3100329,0.0007156087,0.0011992125,0.2597051,0.04876947,0.3222595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015154695,0.00076269114,0.06695652,0.0036276008,0.000058284335,0.001956872,0.39249334,0.0044350596,0.0057774154,0.2804442,0.2425824,0.0007540687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05629638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06781825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15426874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022488425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079272404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81586087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318733168","doi":"10.1177/096853320600700304","title":"Stem Cell Patents and Social Controversy: A Speculative View from Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Commercialization; Embryonic stem cell; Stem cell; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Biology; Economics; Economy; Genetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010189332266112586,"score_gpt":0.24220460593473658,"score_spread":0.232015273668624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318733168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029643329,0.012814718,0.0005644106,0.7683495,0.00046714276,0.00002692688,0.00022314941,0.000018275012,0.18789251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7687885,0.015526847,0.0007982749,0.17806953,0.0008297295,0.000042146417,0.00010628865,0.000038184808,0.035800558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274147,0.0008127511,0.0001212302,0.0005794061,0.0028213558,0.0029239026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960376,0.004099785,0.0006118202,0.00018690489,0.0037350117,0.0017626422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047144764,0.00037634824,0.000733776,0.0024346577,0.029832477,0.015083271,0.0024613289,0.014440535,0.009644978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010770342,0.0003646255,0.00088491954,0.0031716651,0.029314414,0.0070748837,0.0043324335,0.011149422,0.00047395212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026032743,0.000015000588,0.0009998007,0.00007424063,0.00001238874,0.00028055845,0.0050101797,0.00016940644,0.0001414641,0.9493676,0.03750412,0.006399134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018775673,0.000043241373,0.009064313,0.0010214774,0.00011168461,0.000357729,0.03175785,0.0012763743,0.00051000545,0.37004215,0.58541304,0.00021447953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97283036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13197081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17201763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9575197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321553108","doi":"10.1177/0968533212458431","title":"Open science and community norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; European Commission; Wellcome Trust; Genome Canada","keywords":"Novelty; Data sharing; Open data; Open science; Big data; Data retention; Best practice; Public relations; Data science; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.1429039671374403,"score_gpt":0.43990939799756207,"score_spread":0.29700543086012177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321553108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05586568,0.0030370413,0.17528181,0.20448434,0.0015111384,0.00054897374,0.000285152,0.00036689595,0.558619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89000595,0.0013058567,0.039423954,0.034043517,0.002164985,0.0012634626,0.0002029721,0.0002120324,0.031377207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83945,0.08845915,0.010161107,0.018994251,0.035644736,0.007290701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65669864,0.2269303,0.023466669,0.051547945,0.028877396,0.012479101],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14194286,0.0004624153,0.0010018502,0.003037841,0.012446266,0.019040387,0.0037162001,0.012229531,0.0077300174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18935828,0.00082083035,0.0009767718,0.0032280611,0.05846866,0.023435034,0.017843198,0.0107262945,0.0012724469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000841067,0.000012082466,0.0003712367,0.000019974741,0.0000051731117,0.00002947726,0.0024535775,0.0001139503,0.00005782893,0.9913072,0.001799793,0.0038213406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041551422,0.00003915964,0.0005419643,0.00018688399,0.000010488867,0.000071145354,0.0016691836,0.0005986773,0.00025754768,0.9117725,0.0847683,0.000042593492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057969093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043593347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007960202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020088855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75067455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325693315","doi":"10.1177/096853320800900103","title":"Constructing ‘Health’, Defining ‘Choice’: Legal and Policy Perspectives on the Post-PGD Embryo in Four Jurisdictions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Embryo; Savior sibling; Outcome (game theory); Embryo transfer; Political science; Gynecology; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Economics","score_opus":0.027432170543956885,"score_gpt":0.3400954962596099,"score_spread":0.31266332571565303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325693315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33075535,0.0082397275,0.040586572,0.2449855,0.0004004102,0.0002441977,0.000149766,0.000037775233,0.3746008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843918,0.00082526193,0.0049123378,0.0061640325,0.00008633063,0.00008596988,0.000019641435,0.0000143992,0.0035003312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9482315,0.038257502,0.0016417088,0.0023767843,0.004397878,0.0050945655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366191,0.0531332,0.003512045,0.0016731556,0.0034697629,0.0015926843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04566393,0.0003482389,0.0006463594,0.002580212,0.015725303,0.018257294,0.0030547988,0.012966266,0.0024132035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033428077,0.0008555325,0.00097609323,0.002427958,0.12288359,0.00951004,0.010294333,0.010265956,0.0002035923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010488254,0.0000075083735,0.00067559734,0.00001909229,0.0000027139843,0.0001916739,0.0344252,0.0001885864,0.0001020523,0.96294814,0.00035176612,0.0010771523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004722573,0.00007002812,0.004897445,0.0005910864,0.000046614725,0.00049274863,0.10628365,0.001609586,0.0012980923,0.7944913,0.0900311,0.00014118254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106548674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075068235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106548674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031171078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025873026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24149686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334331993","doi":"10.1177/0968533212441887","title":"Commercialization versus open science: Making sense of the message(s) in the bottle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Dissemination; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Open science; Political science; Business; Marketing; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.15148663900210155,"score_gpt":0.4616206284386014,"score_spread":0.31013398943649984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334331993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004685347,0.0065886187,0.01187174,0.9436223,0.0032721239,0.00003197008,0.000027283382,0.00006201807,0.029838573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6328442,0.013045255,0.020750435,0.30339295,0.015157231,0.00037157157,0.000060231057,0.0005717583,0.013806455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9254267,0.042630747,0.0034029933,0.00504865,0.020621512,0.0028694584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7224748,0.23050612,0.011835975,0.013651696,0.016219474,0.005311929],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.110768765,0.0011128035,0.0016879708,0.004381812,0.0137723535,0.0570182,0.004504063,0.03357673,0.005739317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19723237,0.0011396507,0.0009668257,0.004829089,0.13632928,0.10713822,0.019882225,0.035653047,0.0011924948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050761548,0.000017832766,0.00028955474,0.0001637194,0.000018152517,0.00010608946,0.021293093,0.00011403696,0.00021095028,0.95004267,0.016950049,0.010743126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034805256,0.000031039563,0.0002026481,0.00065180217,0.000021714764,0.00009766618,0.01694571,0.00049237336,0.00021131092,0.8494244,0.13182679,0.00005959525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006010101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003930177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01148055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014120463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5858082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465346565","doi":"10.1177/0968533216659105","title":"The patient’s voice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Public relations; Scholarship; Food and drug administration; Political science; Public administration; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Social science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.126819669844956,"score_gpt":0.43890813885153074,"score_spread":0.3120884690065747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465346565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046601277,0.005045364,0.0042863963,0.6977313,0.0054296805,0.00006308161,0.00006055603,0.00014148925,0.24064085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79132736,0.002852784,0.000990602,0.15797529,0.0024838576,0.000079685706,0.00004256767,0.00009140873,0.0441565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98026043,0.013382664,0.00040844295,0.00095381256,0.0027756775,0.0022189796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850344,0.0073774285,0.001022807,0.0007860282,0.0014848162,0.0042945165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008657857,0.0005166986,0.00055100565,0.0006259388,0.009822785,0.009450608,0.0012529298,0.011033892,0.018159553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03444606,0.0002850814,0.0006055289,0.00037010512,0.011748591,0.008345473,0.009981572,0.015982555,0.003362775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012570262,0.00025476955,0.0068948693,0.00029546372,0.00006380419,0.010040271,0.24088225,0.00030925643,0.0024877302,0.2827507,0.34095758,0.11493772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003154268,0.00015138625,0.0010358976,0.00066336786,0.000020958081,0.010737064,0.15986007,0.000297845,0.0006100319,0.047598723,0.77893543,0.000057703885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009776214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008774478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018159553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026977395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005637852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06074971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766146767","doi":"10.1177/0968533217736561","title":"The challenge of human challenge research models: A Canadian perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Research ethics; Fiduciary; Vulnerability (computing); Perspective (graphical); Informed consent; Political science; Public relations; Common Rule; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Duty; Computer security","score_opus":0.18698427260088288,"score_gpt":0.4812024807304544,"score_spread":0.29421820812957156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766146767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002570939,0.034077715,0.011916756,0.8606802,0.002989932,0.00070035784,0.000275814,0.00006877715,0.08671945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27475628,0.06784512,0.06720967,0.5415721,0.0039580674,0.0030121326,0.0003605104,0.00026361647,0.04102257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.852719,0.08816085,0.0048399093,0.009231677,0.03580507,0.009243386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7190187,0.18250227,0.008048949,0.014591385,0.05701455,0.01882414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23629381,0.0015144409,0.0024757595,0.00554209,0.02530904,0.028663276,0.01154098,0.020392062,0.008579785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1711629,0.0014587333,0.0020009694,0.0052349665,0.080799684,0.014773069,0.01665494,0.02330877,0.0010247407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007311539,0.000058908357,0.0012736759,0.00075949245,0.000058461585,0.00036700777,0.0106096,0.00049486104,0.00017845655,0.9236283,0.045063738,0.01743446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018228842,0.00019344766,0.0027254047,0.0058917827,0.00020577034,0.00052165205,0.015148399,0.00121882,0.00032526063,0.40963587,0.563731,0.00022034341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8755091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8956247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84617907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15382092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4266646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793848320","doi":"10.1177/0968533218762239","title":"Communication of genetic information in the palliative care context: Ethical and legal issues","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Bioethics; Palliative care; Context (archaeology); Normative; Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03558206590580865,"score_gpt":0.36738938559220685,"score_spread":0.3318073196863982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793848320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034732044,0.0068935314,0.010540422,0.88954926,0.0008213512,0.000072574774,0.000026525882,0.00003626599,0.057327993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8765257,0.0059095044,0.010233568,0.10054846,0.001029924,0.00014812592,0.000023979928,0.00003568218,0.0055449363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554997,0.03616972,0.0012903266,0.000925265,0.0037903732,0.0023246412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92444354,0.059697244,0.0040919813,0.0022222637,0.004979793,0.004565111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03884841,0.00034079415,0.00053443556,0.001165903,0.014543477,0.012153928,0.002105073,0.013348955,0.0025396722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060968846,0.0003761015,0.00043297705,0.0011093002,0.048129752,0.009328494,0.0077953893,0.0101142675,0.0004192946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023728051,0.00006613415,0.0032431085,0.00020965819,0.000015442949,0.004843896,0.28910518,0.00031783833,0.00058498676,0.6375576,0.021052036,0.04298038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003352024,0.00008821457,0.003693248,0.0028273899,0.00002645728,0.009140284,0.39591536,0.0007850446,0.0008258491,0.34198293,0.24455294,0.00012875565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028511783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036274232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03884841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011286158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030327251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2054525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969268239","doi":"10.1177/0968533219866235","title":"Assisted dying for prison populations: Lessons from and for abroad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Prison; Assisted suicide; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0763144201726877,"score_gpt":0.43720152247582306,"score_spread":0.36088710230313537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969268239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025519457,0.18186161,0.0011067123,0.66104394,0.0044051185,0.000111210014,0.00033669552,0.00007681952,0.12553842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48650554,0.35618943,0.0056543685,0.110364236,0.0021236648,0.00018409968,0.00043038264,0.0001698453,0.038378425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951196,0.002086718,0.00018511416,0.00018115257,0.0006427716,0.0017848588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891727,0.0028484256,0.00029940385,0.00037947687,0.004025598,0.0032744182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075789625,0.00052256166,0.00063081435,0.002268726,0.014119633,0.010517979,0.002782134,0.0040466688,0.0074797277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012868696,0.00022470714,0.00078546087,0.0031411245,0.01194354,0.007712678,0.0058672098,0.007764649,0.000765475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018534315,0.00025454117,0.008678748,0.002995652,0.000050496572,0.0025065725,0.12248533,0.0005484212,0.0003028714,0.2795056,0.2756191,0.30686727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024308569,0.00013497466,0.012331338,0.009690656,0.000057991896,0.0010346769,0.34890658,0.00017996441,0.0003466778,0.028500555,0.5986793,0.00011294195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7897175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9376948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059435084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13866934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43123376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087806461","doi":"10.1177/0968533220958185","title":"Informed consent to clinical research in India: A private law remedy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Informed consent; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.27708543399854135,"score_gpt":0.5242431369642295,"score_spread":0.24715770296568818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087806461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031839,0.011967517,0.029069798,0.5168068,0.0043928926,0.00027558985,0.00017046093,0.00026049136,0.40521756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66822517,0.005748132,0.011852476,0.2650595,0.0032322253,0.0004776976,0.000120533354,0.000093060786,0.0451912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706179,0.010878855,0.0018819819,0.0033319977,0.009724453,0.0035648288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948002,0.03721378,0.003333428,0.0067535304,0.0030212589,0.0016760393],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026342854,0.00047829637,0.0007584832,0.0019044118,0.009508877,0.013231404,0.0026753626,0.020368664,0.004951022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04825548,0.00089038245,0.0013316764,0.0022657714,0.037677627,0.0074246856,0.014606175,0.025465397,0.0010279738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017821027,0.000018267561,0.00043765095,0.000060624403,0.000010329621,0.00047802235,0.00252407,0.00011841608,0.00018894182,0.98164314,0.00690224,0.0076005314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010543247,0.00012644297,0.0025881138,0.0012946562,0.000098568584,0.002436031,0.003086866,0.0010585012,0.0010196029,0.71454126,0.2735153,0.00012927345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01081678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012964545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97963136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008199969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02248447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13931596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108769460","doi":"10.1177/0968533220963157","title":"The legal and policy considerations of transplanting pediatric thymus regulatory T cells as an immunotherapy in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program","keywords":"Statute; Transplantation; Donation; Legislation; Intervention (counseling); Medicine; Law; Political science; Surgery","score_opus":0.012810090755044145,"score_gpt":0.2940830669656625,"score_spread":0.28127297621061836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108769460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03770397,0.012806756,0.0030415957,0.7646357,0.0035574152,0.00031775734,0.00089766533,0.00014217032,0.17689699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4256323,0.022196101,0.009973337,0.44773734,0.0021327182,0.0002822022,0.00070745405,0.00012666866,0.09121189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479074,0.002091727,0.00071941124,0.001153261,0.006838677,0.0044062384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693749,0.010564584,0.0016018376,0.00080961507,0.009424848,0.008224129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012084556,0.00034719834,0.0006389146,0.0012336099,0.015083717,0.012750955,0.0037659109,0.011877585,0.0068635927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023846049,0.00068521505,0.0009228688,0.0019421007,0.008247311,0.002854154,0.003550228,0.009979461,0.00053244573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002332764,0.00015750955,0.013093123,0.0004948175,0.000082646104,0.0032843202,0.005497878,0.0024559994,0.0027110248,0.6144035,0.28728524,0.070300564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021913945,0.00025515878,0.019402618,0.0016417076,0.00019024209,0.0013682274,0.0063106623,0.0039680516,0.0021697371,0.03975399,0.924445,0.0002755538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98844784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108456634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108456634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43078208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125052827","doi":"10.1177/096853320500700202","title":"Harmonizing the International Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Possibilities, Promises and Potential Pitfalls","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Human cloning; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Stem cell; Law; Sociology; Biology; Social science","score_opus":0.0779074411316029,"score_gpt":0.3378010652065968,"score_spread":0.2598936240749939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125052827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037621517,0.03025392,0.11040973,0.5625224,0.0027745215,0.00027803596,0.0000785331,0.0003044481,0.25575688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.743333,0.017739091,0.08961489,0.12198492,0.002871064,0.0008971223,0.00016492675,0.00020841061,0.023186514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94457954,0.029297043,0.0043595866,0.0047607017,0.012674791,0.004328243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95924336,0.024585288,0.0032983392,0.0060005668,0.005291123,0.0015813105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07946978,0.00060540746,0.0010271271,0.0016166391,0.005729345,0.014386703,0.0030017276,0.01112772,0.0023222289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036758475,0.00049595226,0.001533785,0.0016973619,0.02811872,0.011104222,0.010394007,0.013048167,0.00046866233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013908194,0.00005245745,0.00061860844,0.000109369095,0.000011848133,0.00008692896,0.003973314,0.00083169545,0.00045227038,0.95607287,0.004021373,0.033755388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027103915,0.00014058128,0.002098536,0.0011655927,0.00004577567,0.000283684,0.008084901,0.0011663088,0.001700227,0.770577,0.2146267,0.00008365793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020698307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022094103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07946978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050391154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0169178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42028135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133450859","doi":"10.1177/0968533221993504","title":"After He Jianku: China's biotechnology regulation reforms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Legislature; Political science; Bioethics; Christian ministry; Corporate governance; Public administration; Biotechnology; Sociology; Law; Management; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.007513804159119126,"score_gpt":0.28272975959852475,"score_spread":0.27521595543940564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133450859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061234564,0.019381264,0.0029997355,0.77489996,0.0038583027,0.00011531668,0.00020522218,0.00013940496,0.13716637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50621605,0.01205838,0.0030419528,0.3108915,0.0023824791,0.0002661458,0.00021400145,0.00005587547,0.16487363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413526,0.0012682936,0.00022900295,0.00071254687,0.0021727402,0.0014821973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974655,0.0010135403,0.0002191104,0.0002692042,0.0006378073,0.0003948356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009025664,0.00046995183,0.0003897638,0.0009560324,0.0064175073,0.006538494,0.0008384055,0.008500514,0.0029397684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076772077,0.00034034532,0.0007597411,0.0021032458,0.007400716,0.0036216856,0.0020850205,0.0074970224,0.00045914922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000635431,0.00005256661,0.0028063788,0.00014287424,0.000029418126,0.00034629143,0.00513845,0.0007791156,0.0018811871,0.8653928,0.098191775,0.025175506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009242444,0.00009790225,0.013380918,0.00025303185,0.00004955061,0.00008282622,0.0014313181,0.001552597,0.0026452623,0.10416116,0.8761519,0.00010104661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082530096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06531088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020863809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04455081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1640994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152698653","doi":"10.1177/09685332211002594","title":"National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs): A schema for evaluating and comparing foundation instruments and NITAG operations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Immunization; Political science; Public relations; Legislation; Scholarship; Multidisciplinary approach; Corporate governance; Medicine; Public administration; Business; Law; Immunology; Finance","score_opus":0.050437848266360455,"score_gpt":0.3851135235101081,"score_spread":0.33467567524374764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152698653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030431442,0.006536637,0.4508134,0.052686714,0.0034269816,0.021161018,0.005547871,0.0018630621,0.42753288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21704789,0.003183004,0.7271681,0.007140383,0.00043316235,0.019034445,0.004453193,0.0005530839,0.020986842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7167939,0.18184264,0.036119957,0.011816601,0.045649175,0.00777783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7921535,0.076804295,0.023807265,0.02299097,0.077647805,0.0065962523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19793144,0.001971647,0.0014693093,0.030236285,0.0132264,0.02822447,0.006527263,0.008509737,0.009046248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23328024,0.0014888686,0.0022712597,0.02444701,0.024366204,0.036540505,0.022352953,0.007648613,0.00362953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085535445,0.0001223933,0.0112132905,0.00090200757,0.00006886975,0.00017182769,0.034932293,0.0009590691,0.00048572765,0.7647326,0.04589091,0.14043541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051683757,0.00020838706,0.011694981,0.0037195291,0.0000915461,0.00028554894,0.047394257,0.0019834084,0.0009410395,0.29177085,0.64164335,0.0002153654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034517955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02698321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19793144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029677127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078405984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283775249","doi":"10.1177/09685332221103555","title":"The immunization of children in family break-down: Questionable evidence and conceptual shortcomings in <i>A.P. v L.K.</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Economic Justice; Arbitration; Politics; Nexus (standard); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022347275721694062,"score_gpt":0.33565293256179146,"score_spread":0.3133056568400974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283775249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047085103,0.019660639,0.006888455,0.7523011,0.0011483758,0.00016994789,0.00012370835,0.000046102807,0.17257659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82395154,0.0067546875,0.0042603835,0.15136316,0.0008199114,0.0002115611,0.00004086229,0.00006211372,0.012535741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712464,0.014010242,0.001237856,0.0024410412,0.004366222,0.0066981553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661294,0.027066793,0.0011598688,0.00096356793,0.003176218,0.0015041241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037606936,0.0004554839,0.0010311931,0.0017917064,0.02512416,0.019918598,0.0076694665,0.02706605,0.0025453242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058107004,0.0008563722,0.0010610643,0.0016123826,0.07024381,0.010748961,0.007897366,0.029273452,0.00029762115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023001656,0.000016046755,0.00093487836,0.00010393523,0.000013157369,0.0014553705,0.0485533,0.0001865315,0.00011194968,0.9301443,0.013567984,0.004889491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006795004,0.000066738794,0.0029521373,0.0020562357,0.00010284366,0.0013175567,0.09322225,0.0011987027,0.00073006854,0.61325145,0.28481588,0.00021824327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65329874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63986975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65329874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06108033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062682144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6974861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392236215","doi":"10.1177/09685332241234826","title":"Book review: Medical Doctors in Health Reforms: A Comparative Study of England and Canada Medical Doctors in Health Reforms: A Comparative Study of England and Canada, DenisJean-LouisGermainSabrinaRégisCatherineVeronesiGianluca. (Bristol, Policy Press, 2022), 250 pp. £80, ISBN 978-1-473-5215-0 (hardcover) ISBN 978-1-473-5217-4 (epub) ISBN 978-1-473-5216-7 (ePdf)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.031201603990157038,"score_gpt":0.3906755082898972,"score_spread":0.3594739042997402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392236215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013472009,0.89083165,0.00009241246,0.058101226,0.004376262,0.00013768116,0.0023279055,0.0000217772,0.030639177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0656342,0.8669313,0.00029367983,0.012333891,0.0020170559,0.00017852444,0.0021435888,0.00005129089,0.05041645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977082,0.00043458174,0.00013648944,0.000119623954,0.0012839538,0.0003170661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904294,0.0046770135,0.0006770731,0.000104492916,0.0034394579,0.000672522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017546287,0.00066074525,0.0012192886,0.0052081943,0.003560404,0.0066467966,0.0019599325,0.002167391,0.016924439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010021535,0.0006015237,0.0004011132,0.025464639,0.002078002,0.0031138195,0.0011234409,0.0014406919,0.0019439316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000567257,0.000052706724,0.004016977,0.0049505713,0.000051654857,0.00028334034,0.013708463,0.00017206237,0.00008040557,0.0045937523,0.90374327,0.068290114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030966094,0.000059071957,0.05607625,0.008037979,0.00008100951,0.0004708242,0.039808627,0.00005868167,0.000085581865,0.00062000594,0.89460963,0.000061370316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87923646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96002465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12076354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03687369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061744362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2675386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401518887","doi":"10.1177/09685332241269647","title":"Book review: Leading Works in Health Law and Ethics Leading Works in Health Law and Ethics, FovargueSaraPurshouseCraig (eds) (Abington, Routledge, 2024), 272 pp., £135.00 ISBN 978-0-367-70485-8 (hbk); ISBN 978-0-367-70493-3 (pbk); ISBN 978-1-003-14661-2 (cbk).","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law International","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06475780911108064,"score_gpt":0.43802224661699574,"score_spread":0.3732644375059151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401518887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013908265,0.9240338,0.00033941906,0.01583598,0.016915256,0.000045505585,0.0003444539,0.000094992225,0.0422516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015468547,0.8541017,0.0006701264,0.0068054595,0.009417517,0.00012138026,0.0007566152,0.000106126216,0.12647408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985227,0.00035686634,0.00014045346,0.00011770273,0.00075512804,0.000107184474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939833,0.0031482421,0.00047121308,0.00015699981,0.0017480345,0.0004921594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013566447,0.0016202034,0.0023164416,0.00472289,0.0012786412,0.0058483165,0.0019256619,0.002888316,0.07828252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065007117,0.0007103995,0.00071140146,0.011441577,0.0015161645,0.004453571,0.0016760589,0.003262141,0.054582927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008192535,0.0000100304305,0.000032528547,0.0013360183,0.0000050597127,0.00002622501,0.00007877155,0.000038641167,0.000030280988,0.0012130317,0.9251141,0.072107166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051843076,0.000009546474,0.00023895246,0.0028620216,0.0000058919377,0.00014862756,0.00013002081,0.00001662117,0.00001708393,0.00092344417,0.9956359,0.0000067990504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012982858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036417972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07828252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031593328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}