{"meta":{"query_hash":"963bdb34fdc5","filters":{"venue":"Medical Law Review"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/963bdb34fdc5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Medical+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1978135056","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwm021","title":"THE GENDERED POLITICS OF EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IN THE USA AND CANADA: AN AMERICAN OVERLAP AND CANADIAN DISCONNECT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embryonic stem cell; Political science; Law; Politics of the United States; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.09473067631462376,"score_gpt":0.36351599473326435,"score_spread":0.2687853184186406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978135056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6008709,0.12932001,0.0000028985708,0.26474646,0.000087860375,0.0008991914,0.000020778534,0.0000041856097,0.004047719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91440475,0.07906358,0.000009126625,0.006331216,0.00006152385,0.000009956498,0.000008425483,0.000006205475,0.00010520149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768937,0.000500815,0.00028279517,0.00016397421,0.0010247142,0.00033833284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984172,0.0005635908,0.00005045715,0.0002781534,0.00007353768,0.00061703933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025366244,0.00007972356,0.00030131848,0.00003033723,0.0002998291,0.0000075738762,0.00015684495,0.00007766917,0.000022977896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012191865,0.00003725022,0.000023726992,0.00026350084,0.0030467813,0.000017268081,0.000034871402,0.00057170715,6.0725057e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003964826,0.0002675859,0.02898955,0.010509191,0.00009636957,0.0011715599,0.001791552,1.4231675e-7,0.000037136735,0.64530295,0.01349485,0.29829946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006733745,0.00042742502,0.12632197,0.0027494095,0.000064299544,0.00045922384,0.00084416446,0.00023315997,0.000012771766,0.0006613286,0.86740094,0.0001519219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96123326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010670795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030330059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046456670","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwr009","title":"REGULATING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS: THE CASE OF DOWN'S SYNDROME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Blastomere; Sex selection; Embryo; Medicine; In vitro fertilisation; Gynecology; Intervention (counseling); Biology; Genetics; Obstetrics; Psychiatry; Embryogenesis","score_opus":0.042291130992885895,"score_gpt":0.30409177294090795,"score_spread":0.26180064194802205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046456670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.526199,0.4236243,0.001121259,0.006287929,0.00041449326,0.0028826322,0.00005052828,0.00021120781,0.039208658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97887254,0.01675673,0.001391782,0.002797991,0.00004992002,0.000092681374,0.00001404556,0.0000103964885,0.000013941999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988823,0.00011992686,0.00040590885,0.00014013854,0.0003012353,0.00015050574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.00042513828,0.000119821765,0.00031225968,0.00005210582,0.00019764167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005480175,0.000094259005,0.00033231176,0.000012222723,0.000055608616,0.0000028195495,0.00011516271,0.000069684975,0.0007085588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018300798,0.000052712185,0.00008792682,0.00012834584,0.00016620355,0.00002681793,0.00005470417,0.00017152607,0.00003766517],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007131181,0.00063483074,0.02028983,0.023207756,0.00029415847,0.039369952,0.00044331473,9.056133e-7,0.00000969362,0.061300542,0.008973837,0.84540385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005037172,0.003485738,0.19901322,0.24448317,0.0070970077,0.4427724,0.00014750699,0.00092932105,0.002957779,0.005246146,0.08766161,0.0011689622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010172868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056608696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009647122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046838533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77582216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051178177","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwn018","title":"GOING OUT ON A LIMB: PROSTHETICS, NORMALCY AND DISPUTING THE THERAPY/ENHANCEMENT DISTINCTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Psychology; Therapeutic touch; Sociology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Philosophy; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1339127566436069,"score_gpt":0.3519846679299396,"score_spread":0.2180719112863327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051178177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31368542,0.061234597,0.015768796,0.45585576,0.0073728496,0.013179025,0.00006066221,0.0012911599,0.13155176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7979709,0.09366021,0.000065885484,0.106826894,0.00030665842,0.00020020078,0.0000070020783,0.000031584586,0.0009306853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969521,0.00034066592,0.00061447057,0.0005039241,0.001215296,0.0003735513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983983,0.00071250665,0.0002181693,0.00043001337,0.000054989345,0.0001860172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011024779,0.0002108309,0.00029354767,0.00002958243,0.0008166296,0.000035925936,0.00038354803,0.00007306791,0.0005619057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003646933,0.00012612861,0.000075154334,0.00030960023,0.0014310927,0.000088704415,0.00016704612,0.0006848489,0.00024231775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093146875,0.0016824392,0.0002773144,0.0027718365,0.000039442064,0.00026768967,0.0009571389,4.1309883e-7,0.019604351,0.5807474,0.013629417,0.37992936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004860446,0.00043409216,0.00017736637,0.0029943758,0.000020072117,0.000100960795,0.0000036111903,0.00015315684,0.015836226,0.0008364486,0.97869897,0.00025868314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007585919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000095510195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96506953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040119092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006810846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6280937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094515191","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/10.3.295","title":"Reproductive Cloning: Can Cloning Harm the Clone?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cloning (programming); Human cloning; Harm; clone (Java method); Genetics; Biology; Computational biology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gene","score_opus":0.07059149223756356,"score_gpt":0.34814486529231253,"score_spread":0.277553373054749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094515191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004780816,0.4646938,0.000025211782,0.48227772,0.0004892596,0.0015394383,0.0000029406258,0.0003942141,0.04579658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54036635,0.36570045,0.0009779272,0.086884275,0.00211496,0.00046419844,0.000023276441,0.00007068202,0.003397847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714637,0.00017631888,0.00059126946,0.00071696984,0.0008588295,0.000510258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977558,0.00017127441,0.00016788495,0.0013995245,0.00016853983,0.0003369493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019119108,0.00022177241,0.0006986028,0.00003425072,0.00027726262,0.0000125734,0.00033700257,0.00015764526,0.001631754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008954608,0.000121565114,0.00017137619,0.000509623,0.0007398489,0.000049919938,0.0001384393,0.0010611822,0.000282145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004754404,0.00052742555,0.0021290933,0.009089069,0.00021827813,0.00067605276,0.0004162533,1.5804292e-7,0.000088574976,0.2340524,0.24575107,0.5070041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033755603,0.00019608789,0.00051305647,0.004219293,0.00014377649,0.00069314137,0.00002961204,0.000014529343,0.0004491208,0.00065785705,0.9926056,0.00014032965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021782384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016315364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008437538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010248008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330452927","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwu005","title":"Niche Markets and Evidence Assessment in Transition: A Critical Review of Proposed Drug Reforms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Niche; Drug; Business; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.12795706977739332,"score_gpt":0.5651604456804467,"score_spread":0.43720337590305336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330452927","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.1981088e-7,0.9552953,0.000019173613,0.028280199,0.0005812976,0.0082385065,0.000040366966,0.00006044553,0.0074845916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000004181566,0.96341926,0.00052489544,0.034151837,0.0002999968,0.0013361343,0.00009132004,0.00006528456,0.00010710458],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97953,0.01088095,0.0055633243,0.00095584046,0.0020872545,0.0009826701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98924166,0.0068755783,0.0011753591,0.0011909865,0.00049832516,0.0010180998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022973748,0.0007117443,0.007948654,0.0000944062,0.00021742785,0.0000065896265,0.0008350557,0.0008563837,0.0034803152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012742865,0.00043986546,0.00060975907,0.0007830366,0.0005665188,0.00016022236,0.00033800994,0.0037314727,0.00033838933],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031070267,0.000051290423,0.0000015109556,0.7265638,0.000015305552,0.000045597728,0.000018122759,1.2800529e-10,1.5052384e-9,0.010267656,0.018555487,0.2444781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010869605,0.00004506745,0.0000043877876,0.49917927,0.0005046614,0.000035242334,0.0000035503394,6.6724743e-7,3.484638e-9,0.0000778146,0.49985585,0.00018477209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031230334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030511004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48130038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006490773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040159365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.032031938815030116,"score_gpt":0.30743284443337116,"score_spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11445723,0.027914101,0.00017371301,0.84109133,0.00080119784,0.0030066154,0.00044718737,0.00005044748,0.01205817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89317125,0.0019210622,0.00010062044,0.103331394,0.0004116253,0.00011419172,0.000008570855,0.000018042703,0.0009232663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957586,0.0006673761,0.0007322491,0.00040565268,0.001820319,0.0006157863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974954,0.00055179314,0.00023792958,0.00044924513,0.0004259727,0.0008396466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019751105,0.00023896479,0.001007884,0.000023345894,0.0007439785,0.000028322558,0.00084672624,0.000066279696,0.00045359175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020100411,0.00010313818,0.00013356442,0.0012330479,0.00038225984,0.00009765155,0.00019524054,0.00013690011,0.0000050162234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046949637,0.00017090367,0.008558331,0.0008623968,0.0030102993,0.000052118736,0.008915166,0.000035926234,0.0017049655,0.048681915,0.8894896,0.038471427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011044833,0.000029941175,0.007941698,0.0009345162,0.000647101,4.559216e-7,0.0003754098,0.000017289927,0.00031476727,0.000007891962,0.9894126,0.00020784736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040277783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014123394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5722156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584083607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww024","title":"Kirsty Horsey (ed.), Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Fertilisation; Embryology; Political science; Legislation; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Reproductive technology; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.035455897368091946,"score_gpt":0.3470727730997107,"score_spread":0.3116168757316187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584083607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27051893,0.29373682,0.00042356062,0.42311117,0.0001687844,0.0018837393,0.0000028777995,0.000193747,0.009960369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496457,0.048036434,0.00008761896,0.0019181307,0.00018320284,0.000026925625,0.000004392788,0.0000062700733,0.00009132837],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889034,0.00013320612,0.00039054742,0.00019441775,0.00026387552,0.00012758625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917805,0.00015868261,0.00014674813,0.0003502208,0.00008902388,0.00007728078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014418728,0.00007064581,0.00033746377,0.000017796789,0.00007653326,0.000001514795,0.00006952726,0.000090189205,0.0002957748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036683516,0.000030260628,0.00004155713,0.00009114491,0.00044121477,0.000035542085,0.000045601617,0.00012313627,0.000010663868],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018037725,0.000017246333,0.0033660498,0.0047791903,0.000015515265,0.0000030600843,0.000014369363,1.7351995e-9,0.0027626434,0.22086641,0.0012754217,0.76688206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013827143,0.00052708044,0.21349889,0.03881696,0.000299689,0.0002765361,0.000023687739,0.000011480715,0.0039562727,0.013187762,0.7278194,0.00019953646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026322376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037528248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018785615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038425118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43916243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651948055","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx021","title":"Civil Registration and Vital Statistics, Emergencies, and International Law: Understanding the Intersection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Reforms","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Geography; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.11707128928784885,"score_gpt":0.3198595996677782,"score_spread":0.20278831037992937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651948055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00498232,0.2106624,0.13821533,0.12858118,0.009964608,0.0015923774,0.000502318,0.00007274985,0.5054267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95798814,0.039775357,0.000060839917,0.0014244656,0.00019541473,0.000011019591,0.000014900574,0.0000061644823,0.0005237038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992541,0.000017058434,0.0003975855,0.00016418203,0.00006618251,0.00010088368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.000017709732,0.0002625464,0.00017895288,0.000017210023,0.000092828624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011987975,0.00006533497,0.00019586057,0.000009777314,0.0003793905,0.00009985836,0.00013642845,0.00005724766,0.00024369879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003584502,0.000042503176,0.000025528063,0.000014942327,0.00024306339,0.00015619617,0.00005984354,0.0001295676,0.00001825965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.027293e-7,0.000004860018,0.00080391625,0.00038695888,0.0000142570825,0.0000020726895,0.000049922885,9.288827e-9,1.4062272e-7,0.9886206,0.0009835436,0.009132858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002858329,0.00006453073,0.0052737715,0.0017514894,0.000007211906,0.00007040989,0.000099130615,0.00053110917,4.6031644e-7,0.16657682,0.8251687,0.00017052684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004322435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063482756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007451038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015370792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6534257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754291607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx039","title":"A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Parliament; High Court; Politics","score_opus":0.09521898072499438,"score_gpt":0.454386274419599,"score_spread":0.35916729369460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754291607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06764734,0.2014152,0.00021528974,0.19925366,0.0018108153,0.0075730905,0.0000745762,0.00031991018,0.52169013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370664,0.0038109366,0.0002741058,0.00072100596,0.0004071585,0.00012451444,0.0000025521144,0.000007794826,0.0009453103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804175,0.00017190448,0.00036919993,0.00026230272,0.0008274754,0.00032737246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.00024159989,0.0004285093,0.00026979475,0.00043405558,0.00017265222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018652186,0.00012889632,0.000542945,0.0000070500973,0.0034347342,0.00007916339,0.00076753146,0.00010808709,0.00040453434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043714377,0.00008412662,0.00020830813,0.00006874046,0.0015289694,0.0002493717,0.00013752891,0.00016366648,0.00002652063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028347345,0.000060945662,0.00049212336,0.00078184693,0.000060699043,0.000005670783,0.0013210095,1.172024e-8,0.000015301624,0.9907,0.0037700755,0.0027894692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045155876,0.00004872586,0.014975407,0.008081366,0.00019613277,0.000001040186,0.00034294842,0.0000045530664,0.000045682587,0.008397455,0.96716726,0.0002878713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046322316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046292137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98230255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014050235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064005864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095125761","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa031","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds), <i>Informed Consent and Health: A Global Analysis</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Informed consent; Doctrine; Position (finance); English law; Liability; Test (biology); Subject (documents); Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Business; Library science","score_opus":0.11678855080852936,"score_gpt":0.3914428599898981,"score_spread":0.27465430918136874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095125761","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005027674,0.67790073,0.00045844048,0.28862643,0.000114178314,0.0014514233,0.000084767,0.00012594005,0.026210377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10037814,0.42906913,0.00080517016,0.46932444,0.00016494963,0.000024088884,0.00014028887,0.000012726758,0.00008107784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791354,0.00014912877,0.0006177871,0.00033210468,0.0006810167,0.0003064274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978804,0.0002388648,0.00014510956,0.00023824368,0.000047241712,0.0014501683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678075,0.00019578895,0.0010492546,0.000015375377,0.00009639186,0.000017909377,0.000118862125,0.000117849624,0.0003687779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014479663,0.00014537016,0.000165524,0.00060608785,0.0002757507,0.00007236649,0.00015634579,0.0002960389,0.000038252827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039766118,0.0008361539,0.07617408,0.096580885,0.00349673,0.00079755177,0.0009491183,2.035914e-7,0.0000082375245,0.081328474,0.31668773,0.42274317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013427254,0.00041531166,0.007355824,0.0047922116,0.0012954979,0.00012324408,0.000011089252,0.00008322386,0.0000023786545,0.00014709968,0.98426634,0.00016504519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020623501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032299937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66757864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047513156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000809262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5928023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192873402","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa042","title":"Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Bioethics; Autonomy; Law; Reproductive rights; Normative; Position (finance); Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Business; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.07434284508748323,"score_gpt":0.35018914763106673,"score_spread":0.2758463025435835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192873402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4795023,0.14967705,0.0013557682,0.3650091,0.00029510283,0.001962257,0.000013987961,0.00030350973,0.0018809492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147575,0.01458518,0.0004537734,0.069705375,0.0003372057,0.00011286583,0.000025099147,0.00001309931,0.000009904658],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981131,0.00008509132,0.0006383835,0.0003322304,0.00063136645,0.00019984192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901736,0.00004437788,0.00014278769,0.0003232971,0.00016628139,0.00030589054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045174814,0.00013196706,0.00058575254,0.000032764765,0.000042438543,0.0000037035738,0.00009803771,0.00014643748,0.0017014375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014006215,0.00009057247,0.00013289704,0.0003589662,0.00021657711,0.000053343694,0.0000327508,0.00020215605,0.0001041295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020824699,0.001470982,0.0053099203,0.10905575,0.00035795823,0.00054680574,0.0018993356,2.349689e-7,0.0039634984,0.09747633,0.11759024,0.6602465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005963379,0.00081216474,0.0022913343,0.008024569,0.0005603765,0.00005771146,0.00006231848,0.000046739297,0.03780764,0.0030051183,0.9465048,0.00023093811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002897406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029662093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8289145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003545075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012090657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297489070","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac036","title":"The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Best interests; Eugenics; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Compromise; Human rights; Convention; Sociology","score_opus":0.026144583086995854,"score_gpt":0.3358336273762773,"score_spread":0.30968904428928146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297489070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09618332,0.14874618,0.000063867694,0.5582724,0.0012907161,0.0033928636,0.000116661184,0.00018225025,0.19175172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97983164,0.017227566,0.000014012681,0.0020105564,0.00017971946,0.0001557912,0.000017663502,0.0000036248716,0.00055943796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869007,0.00037316786,0.00016650293,0.00014729101,0.00049132225,0.00013162373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993614,0.00024129667,0.000047536323,0.00018695337,0.000019435363,0.00014341148],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013432737,0.000049320013,0.000107377346,0.0000020791842,0.0018034999,0.000032659165,0.0003101641,0.00002179289,0.001544059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016622974,0.000031339758,0.000042677682,0.000105045714,0.0007636312,0.00006662548,0.00020729862,0.00018679157,0.000019203882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030473454,0.00005645813,0.0005633191,0.00013100174,0.00000702395,0.0000020057714,0.000989089,4.45404e-8,2.1497428e-7,0.91641426,0.0072855316,0.07454803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004061779,0.000013218543,0.0002939853,0.000099554345,0.000016076281,0.0000014167454,0.00033061497,0.000006395142,1.7664334e-7,0.0022028324,0.99695283,0.000042254218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013841585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029044367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98966736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010616515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072458664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394793383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae008","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds.), <i>Privacy and Medical Confidentiality in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Health care; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.052962301225896374,"score_gpt":0.3886952447145482,"score_spread":0.3357329434886518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394793383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04017222,0.8552656,0.00041046168,0.09522879,0.00031260928,0.0012674318,0.00004242306,0.00012796908,0.007172503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7211033,0.24113967,0.00014449819,0.03713863,0.00015398163,0.00004984041,0.00010944923,0.000013764954,0.00014684138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960396,0.0006540807,0.0009081017,0.00059335993,0.0014364354,0.00036837222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976874,0.0007031194,0.00008364403,0.00037629463,0.00007037917,0.0010791434],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028435802,0.00026087608,0.0014419054,0.00012534093,0.00008011168,0.00004688085,0.00020518425,0.00029580604,0.00093474274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011617233,0.00019499476,0.00019972707,0.001039395,0.0005665025,0.0001490264,0.00024704973,0.0010650281,0.0000435875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048436658,0.0018649104,0.04920736,0.10380533,0.0045388723,0.0064060334,0.0041108453,1.656826e-7,0.000043859414,0.45327595,0.058170572,0.31809175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001329696,0.00023822302,0.008252985,0.019664833,0.0015126803,0.0003221596,0.000018362072,0.00076886796,0.000015754613,0.0017707846,0.9658105,0.00029515228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015957837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011219308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061172315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052092376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394868993","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae012","title":"‘My Advocacy is Not About Me, My Advocacy is About Canadians’: A Qualitative Study of how Caregivers and Patients Influence Regulation of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Legislation; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.04416365183645548,"score_gpt":0.43295342211107807,"score_spread":0.3887897702746226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394868993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91546434,0.02288847,0.0000064572614,0.05885193,0.00031340038,0.0017743189,0.000059661663,0.000013313198,0.0006281065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97975844,0.010981453,0.000026478123,0.008888667,0.000045836296,0.00017698365,0.000021657328,0.00001832055,0.000082167324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921902,0.0026045823,0.0017256474,0.0005669669,0.0023927963,0.0005197986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941287,0.0039626705,0.00045047502,0.00043363075,0.00030465293,0.00071987207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005121103,0.00024643773,0.0011395104,0.00011353443,0.00010971371,0.000010266679,0.0004139919,0.00027194386,0.0021469286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01165967,0.00019738624,0.00005666824,0.00080703583,0.0003385499,0.0002639133,0.00014649202,0.0013267716,0.0000075346948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018120125,0.0008433843,0.20161228,0.09726898,0.0002135882,0.00025606915,0.5971279,0.000001303934,0.0000036998658,0.008319204,0.031654153,0.0625182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041464143,0.0003994469,0.17155644,0.17428505,0.0002584874,0.000002445916,0.16624714,0.00057314755,0.000005439178,0.00026054037,0.48166874,0.0005966963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95984447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4500146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006832311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008678238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400723744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae026","title":"Towards a rights-based approach for disabled women’s access to abortion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive rights; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05934614302924285,"score_gpt":0.437815176485652,"score_spread":0.37846903345640914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400723744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000922277,0.021217072,0.17378618,0.357685,0.0021215882,0.008736651,0.000063826184,0.0007388105,0.4347286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87268376,0.012844163,0.007956618,0.07896522,0.0043868884,0.014284378,0.0004977531,0.00009815667,0.008283031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980226,0.00020530637,0.0003066802,0.00033168463,0.00083291734,0.0003008109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999164,0.0001590385,0.000027865868,0.00017081854,0.000075446296,0.00040285816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023810032,0.00009540433,0.00026780664,0.00002247327,0.0002761542,0.00021526452,0.0003667583,0.00009106266,0.0025525035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054094056,0.000055617085,0.00013386969,0.00042838682,0.00034647115,0.00022705595,0.000031450414,0.000094318144,0.00005787158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007840257,0.00012514931,0.00000649365,0.0034232822,0.000015170509,0.0000020851746,0.0005354074,0.0000023231582,4.3953452e-7,0.90543574,0.0190439,0.071402155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091969836,0.000028542641,0.000010110544,0.0011736788,0.000032089323,2.5632892e-7,0.0000230515,0.00051097013,0.000006045986,0.027955499,0.9700712,0.00009659777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016351882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010602211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019645382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035194366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403462383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae036","title":"Lawrence O. Gostin and Benjamin Mason Meier (eds), <i>Global Health Law &amp; Policy: Ensuring Justice for a Healthier World</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.048066051105037484,"score_gpt":0.4371796674806875,"score_spread":0.38911361637565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403462383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000082524144,0.42028627,0.0003725845,0.48229644,0.0010960153,0.0012996077,0.00020585029,0.00021017705,0.09415052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034268346,0.5415201,0.0026965071,0.4158896,0.0035560725,0.00024029144,0.0001538264,0.00004020365,0.0016350342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955669,0.0009024524,0.0007286796,0.00056826946,0.0010989079,0.0011347678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968864,0.00085938827,0.00012159136,0.00025358857,0.00009772289,0.0017813569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008463722,0.00022879132,0.0006633788,0.00003765973,0.0010255435,0.0001917716,0.00040340648,0.00019702793,0.0005509168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002355122,0.00019566083,0.00013435843,0.0011368454,0.0007113755,0.00023890546,0.00011765817,0.00048809295,0.00009771567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035798098,0.000030628544,0.000009098466,0.007911074,0.000009587587,0.0000062826784,0.00044461485,3.8952507e-8,2.575672e-8,0.80221474,0.065696776,0.123673566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014747778,0.00005275011,0.000021395566,0.007484616,0.000045766727,0.000016517986,0.000026422,0.000018252276,8.004789e-8,0.011985661,0.98002833,0.00017275421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22341517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91433156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048698403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033582987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92157423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592773","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf006","title":"A common law power to dissect: a medico-legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal College of Surgeons of England; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Law; Common law; Legal history; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); English law; Medical law; Scots law; Sociology; Political science; Sources of law","score_opus":0.015364951499460497,"score_gpt":0.33626761970771357,"score_spread":0.3209026682082531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060147693,0.1613004,0.000015435278,0.09731127,0.001065424,0.00037767662,0.0000026885486,0.00009717453,0.73976976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088631846,0.08954831,0.00021502774,0.77199364,0.00072514237,0.0002695799,0.000021040703,0.000023026721,0.048572414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976169,0.00037226468,0.00033678813,0.00026374153,0.0010566917,0.0003536332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893206,0.00017040923,0.00004890047,0.00027711407,0.00007345072,0.00049806526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018874118,0.00013099061,0.00043261208,0.0000029418443,0.00040104333,0.000023691475,0.0006367409,0.00023439704,0.010213935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006546853,0.0000968488,0.00021587044,0.0003230878,0.0009297533,0.00009492107,0.000110689405,0.00040717362,0.0002730032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012857593,0.000037005033,0.0000051605775,0.00024578642,0.000011789859,0.000013741745,0.000824094,3.28376e-9,6.6399724e-7,0.6283437,0.36789528,0.002621472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009994016,0.000017027318,0.000008826664,0.0037471664,0.000046807505,0.000001651403,0.00014678061,2.1513105e-7,0.0000013479785,0.00265904,0.993156,0.00011518159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030737699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011645288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032322854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044785134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409601977","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf016","title":"Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust UKSC 1: no quarter for deserving claimants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02758016300208845,"score_gpt":0.39764782377031355,"score_spread":0.3700676607682251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409601977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001412753,0.5068932,0.001727998,0.17440768,0.0029008857,0.0035536734,0.0000455718,0.000246386,0.30881184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26701045,0.2638845,0.005434097,0.40098962,0.005927293,0.0011553682,0.00054470013,0.00014039797,0.05491357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974963,0.000094213305,0.00077742705,0.00041718787,0.00073607103,0.00047876567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790716,0.00059623603,0.0000953055,0.0005356244,0.00035717638,0.0005085206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022880917,0.00021753646,0.0008395553,0.000041415606,0.00016160587,0.000019634414,0.00028721197,0.00040376137,0.00654118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032922023,0.0001590977,0.00026643358,0.0002478261,0.00013940164,0.000040836832,0.000097454526,0.0009352365,0.00012862704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007171804,0.00020093405,0.0014570968,0.046145916,0.000095400406,0.00007697329,0.000060070168,4.5682484e-8,0.000002435021,0.042789854,0.85842013,0.0506794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080327335,0.00019346156,0.00010942351,0.017054204,0.00023605667,0.000011699009,0.000008923918,0.0002856552,0.000008214783,0.0009451474,0.9802047,0.00013924036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026990127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083512554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009255111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053127774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412802334","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf021","title":"Support for decision-making guidance in England: a pragmatic review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05413149822967526,"score_gpt":0.49378053914640657,"score_spread":0.4396490409167313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412802334","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8727558e-8,0.97407037,0.0008797069,0.0016676494,0.0023238966,0.007972407,0.0001821725,0.000094554205,0.0128092505],"genre_scores_gemma":[3.8372843e-7,0.9703122,0.0014458919,0.022301378,0.00041952898,0.0044528474,0.00020827386,0.00009660818,0.0007628856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98845506,0.0025579734,0.0050708205,0.0014457154,0.001370503,0.0010999191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767453,0.019317757,0.0011841677,0.0019996117,0.00021255686,0.00054061296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01381342,0.00089349004,0.0076468387,0.00026666347,0.0001336685,0.00003035875,0.0018480952,0.0011653176,0.008448782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042555213,0.0005971786,0.00163701,0.0012457728,0.00016952546,0.00004923022,0.0002663309,0.0017436052,0.0012083685],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025068143,0.00007308432,8.416075e-8,0.41004318,0.000051966144,0.0009119293,0.000009396539,2.4760582e-9,5.4927684e-11,0.0031204117,0.020891042,0.5648964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015391951,0.00004300764,2.889307e-7,0.49340165,0.00047628692,0.0006411319,5.912556e-7,3.8360758e-7,1.4382551e-10,0.00048731608,0.5045357,0.00025979168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041362408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014446749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5646366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024884025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023491376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290541","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf040","title":"<i>The Welfare of Future Children: Reproductive Ethics and Disability Screening</i> , Rebecca Bennett.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Eugenics; Reproductive technology; Reproductive rights; Reproductive justice","score_opus":0.018610468435411687,"score_gpt":0.3678214657605746,"score_spread":0.3492109973251629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002658786,0.08620576,0.000045401863,0.8850445,0.0004363663,0.0009354663,0.000008856225,0.00003654061,0.024628315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6895236,0.29636198,0.0003289421,0.010630483,0.0015379103,0.00008750027,0.00003981963,0.000014303428,0.001475452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719834,0.0012123218,0.0003758819,0.0003320658,0.0007114351,0.00016996104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985519,0.0006695928,0.000098781085,0.00041944775,0.00014323265,0.00011704646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065093865,0.00008340795,0.00026840487,0.0000044983967,0.0011460775,0.000028783388,0.00029564157,0.00016431622,0.00018907066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005102427,0.00004499588,0.000095534284,0.0002949896,0.00461709,0.00008112243,0.00009383037,0.0005006738,0.000001453704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005840544,0.00005308041,0.0028478429,0.000561485,0.000021383155,2.4401183e-7,0.0004931458,4.0040394e-8,1.0428197e-7,0.8705572,0.0023890908,0.12307053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008875968,0.000013154042,0.008782485,0.000990788,0.000055485667,7.306581e-7,0.0005264741,8.945954e-7,0.0000033819688,0.010306758,0.9791707,0.00006043236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004441976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007675147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97678155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023439976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012344401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417088249","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf043","title":"Prescribing wearable tech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Ian Potter Foundation; David and Elaine Potter Foundation","keywords":"Wearable computer; Wearable technology; Smartwatch; Context (archaeology); Health care; Information privacy; Exploratory research; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.03596724973880766,"score_gpt":0.3525416875785548,"score_spread":0.31657443783974715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417088249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000068323294,0.30465496,0.0025681127,0.08508141,0.00086975447,0.000873573,0.000003926775,0.00023593176,0.605644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106322825,0.82799184,0.0009875916,0.056466933,0.0008482618,0.00030757027,0.000022657527,0.000018114013,0.00703422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854964,0.0002951426,0.00021356199,0.00018243078,0.0005315243,0.00022767563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994012,0.00009564509,0.000035217698,0.00028072164,0.000043995256,0.00014322106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025446916,0.000062990475,0.00019485486,0.000018268536,0.00042953572,0.00003937764,0.00055289787,0.00010893859,0.0017116307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050938344,0.000052229316,0.000059062237,0.00037087774,0.00023585731,0.00015295461,0.00020796794,0.00023871117,0.0001886893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016533229,0.000046716807,0.000048152488,0.0012840034,0.0000095554105,0.0000058981677,0.000077496654,6.932281e-9,0.000004381239,0.7619078,0.07587068,0.16074362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006587707,0.000005901885,0.000010379243,0.0048406315,0.000019610188,6.7246935e-7,0.000016224109,0.0000054368575,0.000024143794,0.014336564,0.9806202,0.000054374017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004982132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018147985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005260051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025927517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}