{"meta":{"query_hash":"963bdb34fdc5","filters":{"venue":"Medical Law Review"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/963bdb34fdc5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Medical+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1978135056","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwm021","title":"THE GENDERED POLITICS OF EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IN THE USA AND CANADA: AN AMERICAN OVERLAP AND CANADIAN DISCONNECT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embryonic stem cell; Political science; Law; Politics of the United States; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.09473067631462376,"score_gpt":0.36351599473326435,"score_spread":0.2687853184186406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978135056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042536423,0.052509945,0.0008061489,0.67351747,0.0013109995,0.00004026756,0.00032098484,0.000033303295,0.22892444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7491626,0.042799365,0.0013207409,0.15982361,0.00094609894,0.000056018405,0.00015375817,0.000059420447,0.045678448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.973987,0.003104398,0.00060499494,0.0011359699,0.016083417,0.005084179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96179956,0.014012823,0.0015472906,0.00066965714,0.016531253,0.005439432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011802927,0.00024283267,0.00067793584,0.0038003076,0.029920487,0.013495223,0.0017389462,0.00851567,0.0055129905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024142941,0.00048738348,0.000546359,0.0058331955,0.02104597,0.0032821,0.0050044614,0.008740107,0.00031310378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006168888,0.000028044637,0.00413085,0.0001755187,0.00004481802,0.00054835447,0.012532289,0.00022008049,0.00047855562,0.7827884,0.16644411,0.03254729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056973407,0.00003302595,0.025601631,0.00091770996,0.00013311008,0.00048254288,0.024513828,0.000438207,0.0006480604,0.07226816,0.87469906,0.0002077494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97395545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97007954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10883036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24361031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78962326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046456670","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwr009","title":"REGULATING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS: THE CASE OF DOWN'S SYNDROME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Blastomere; Sex selection; Embryo; Medicine; In vitro fertilisation; Gynecology; Intervention (counseling); Biology; Genetics; Obstetrics; Psychiatry; Embryogenesis","score_opus":0.042291130992885895,"score_gpt":0.30409177294090795,"score_spread":0.26180064194802205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046456670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039489157,0.14125866,0.007031674,0.45279315,0.004422704,0.00012272605,0.00008066122,0.00004934306,0.354752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61470354,0.105483614,0.0045647044,0.23153365,0.0061062314,0.00016417904,0.000063760686,0.00004512475,0.037335288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646276,0.0012538501,0.00013453329,0.0004298616,0.0010363963,0.0006825645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660194,0.0026547587,0.00018009919,0.00011756577,0.0002639766,0.00018165406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005056293,0.00031753362,0.0005241722,0.00084572483,0.00402754,0.00248785,0.0016722915,0.016301766,0.001718536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010058548,0.00037341384,0.00044572353,0.0006563485,0.010430955,0.002310971,0.0023989733,0.008236756,0.00042842628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001531515,0.000028018998,0.0011701765,0.00009231516,0.0000109180455,0.016618576,0.003592965,0.00035726166,0.0004470236,0.91317844,0.0469694,0.017519651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042567135,0.000077624565,0.0030214314,0.0013545915,0.000060730457,0.041024975,0.0034154956,0.0007738579,0.0009991474,0.2817524,0.66741115,0.00006601502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018609684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02218232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018609684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033502677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065082577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037002683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051178177","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwn018","title":"GOING OUT ON A LIMB: PROSTHETICS, NORMALCY AND DISPUTING THE THERAPY/ENHANCEMENT DISTINCTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Psychology; Therapeutic touch; Sociology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Philosophy; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1339127566436069,"score_gpt":0.3519846679299396,"score_spread":0.2180719112863327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051178177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084840365,0.050887458,0.05324195,0.24231859,0.0036435816,0.00006647819,0.000051009352,0.00014529214,0.56480527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457012,0.010074475,0.008225307,0.012273849,0.0011533605,0.00009872458,0.000022633663,0.00010795631,0.022342376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99207824,0.005084846,0.0002729624,0.0006063124,0.0014584293,0.000499173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959959,0.0025569142,0.00041521635,0.00043162145,0.0003112194,0.00028920584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009055183,0.00054548326,0.00037299114,0.0013517303,0.005922333,0.0104278745,0.0013960679,0.0056247525,0.0029908605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010145873,0.0002732359,0.00028411485,0.00074761786,0.09796116,0.008998435,0.007222759,0.005733964,0.0008189322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002006248,0.00002478066,0.00038065904,0.000069767164,0.00000194012,0.00017652482,0.02959238,0.000111406094,0.00023693287,0.9488245,0.0027113138,0.017849704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001490366,0.00006435676,0.0010905064,0.0009019122,0.000008077656,0.0013859251,0.027151825,0.0006123809,0.0007544006,0.7712465,0.1967355,0.000033806104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001981868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019626643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104278745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035979059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035468151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047888935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094515191","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/10.3.295","title":"Reproductive Cloning: Can Cloning Harm the Clone?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cloning (programming); Human cloning; Harm; clone (Java method); Genetics; Biology; Computational biology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gene","score_opus":0.07059149223756356,"score_gpt":0.34814486529231253,"score_spread":0.277553373054749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094515191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012627234,0.15650724,0.017062018,0.49263912,0.003432412,0.00008036825,0.00005089241,0.00008498428,0.31751567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38941896,0.13012105,0.0065625696,0.38180953,0.005367727,0.00026887638,0.00006127763,0.00008822724,0.08630172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028426,0.0045131077,0.0003194293,0.0009954678,0.0031174805,0.00077017123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608947,0.0113892425,0.00080047594,0.0008075354,0.00069589476,0.00021729298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012514307,0.00042167716,0.00077102974,0.00084605644,0.0029346338,0.0058886786,0.0017117929,0.014831092,0.00448214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02538279,0.00031583564,0.0006118862,0.0008944993,0.028313812,0.008280482,0.0028718726,0.006387389,0.001580207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011315188,0.000009968891,0.00034991215,0.00014645421,0.000009171869,0.00038760732,0.002149202,0.00009576421,0.00021104596,0.948382,0.01826291,0.029984621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002644764,0.00013242169,0.00093992654,0.0009780338,0.00004456058,0.0029287115,0.0027399021,0.00025425415,0.0009219946,0.45935583,0.53163654,0.000041409177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035348951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034084872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014831092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002476875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034148004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06618279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330452927","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwu005","title":"Niche Markets and Evidence Assessment in Transition: A Critical Review of Proposed Drug Reforms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Niche; Drug; Business; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Pharmacology; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.12795706977739332,"score_gpt":0.5651604456804467,"score_spread":0.43720337590305336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330452927","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059759685,0.9944389,0.00017893463,0.0044464343,0.0003016829,0.000032665008,0.000011754414,0.0000037818588,0.0005260586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026242966,0.9910829,0.00132153,0.0043618726,0.00032206092,0.000094521354,0.000020862492,0.000004902882,0.00016704827],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98201907,0.009265243,0.0035192764,0.00082482176,0.003895707,0.00047597755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86939293,0.11210568,0.0055388017,0.0015280169,0.010492195,0.0009424002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04610408,0.0009798113,0.0039925682,0.014712251,0.0013317226,0.005262849,0.0035390565,0.006657919,0.00243056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105189264,0.0013268137,0.002946667,0.014508543,0.005022408,0.0077840635,0.0027833115,0.0065862797,0.0006563384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016554199,0.00008360578,0.00050337333,0.16722044,0.001133153,0.0002806294,0.0011843379,0.0008551415,0.00037065768,0.06763356,0.062428497,0.69814104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009343248,0.00011420217,0.0014653798,0.31863576,0.0011907308,0.0004770742,0.00065896387,0.00031138072,0.00023050791,0.026684113,0.6500743,0.000064285916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009057451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020487502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04610408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01384568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029164452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24382466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww005","title":"CONVERTING THE ‘RIGHT TO LIFE’ TO THE ‘RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA’: AN ANALYSIS OF<i>CARTER V CANADA</i>(<i>ATTORNEY GENERAL</i>)<i>,</i>SUPREME COURT OF CANADA: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Majority opinion; Constitutional right; Legislation; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.032031938815030116,"score_gpt":0.30743284443337116,"score_spread":0.275400905618341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344958744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055148073,0.01130244,0.0044463603,0.0412107,0.00033037865,0.00040832435,0.0011492757,0.00003494424,0.8859696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830526,0.010923249,0.0041845543,0.050460815,0.00043142025,0.00035286744,0.0010042139,0.000102364924,0.10201463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901264,0.0011940952,0.00015320712,0.000494972,0.003971182,0.0040601417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981604,0.00063493266,0.00012458989,0.000069387715,0.0007055012,0.00030517788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020827278,0.00058163714,0.00071798975,0.0037974925,0.011408403,0.011659635,0.0037585762,0.006749617,0.00831802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042017633,0.00061958673,0.0016856366,0.004428897,0.021637237,0.0028048535,0.0034633165,0.010048933,0.00059669436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096198555,0.000017100401,0.0006362212,0.000047689387,0.000011173209,0.000330282,0.0027308555,0.00048781472,0.00016367929,0.9793473,0.012142751,0.0040755877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087057466,0.00007498084,0.027035173,0.0010301841,0.00015007476,0.0005910497,0.017431434,0.0024308264,0.0011505276,0.3177489,0.6320316,0.00023806917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0874836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0874836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08271263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63474095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584083607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fww024","title":"Kirsty Horsey (ed.), Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Fertilisation; Embryology; Political science; Legislation; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Reproductive technology; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.035455897368091946,"score_gpt":0.3470727730997107,"score_spread":0.3116168757316187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584083607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017473681,0.9456537,0.0003343778,0.023669375,0.0074538165,0.0000176229,0.000030850733,0.000022843493,0.02264275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040357723,0.924419,0.000783563,0.017439434,0.008697555,0.00008023512,0.00006377446,0.000039750452,0.04444092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758136,0.0007839298,0.0001535237,0.00017558223,0.0011416875,0.00016392086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972474,0.0019505778,0.00021813686,0.00006220696,0.00038925206,0.00013245668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025625096,0.00091850595,0.00078852696,0.0025030298,0.0018163881,0.0045347256,0.0013943772,0.0038240422,0.0071193585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005527073,0.00065871346,0.0005551166,0.0027893465,0.0039943396,0.0048122797,0.001576044,0.005429878,0.0035865153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016213027,0.000018622215,0.00008710707,0.0008773862,0.000006601258,0.000089913556,0.0013434697,0.00015824506,0.00011185515,0.035949472,0.88857067,0.072770596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041006824,0.000010225377,0.0002742929,0.0009917053,0.0000031351258,0.000096323514,0.0002964843,0.000018162922,0.00004120462,0.0047486853,0.99350846,0.000007298735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022513676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03594851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022513676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004810348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007929452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044765294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2651948055","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx021","title":"Civil Registration and Vital Statistics, Emergencies, and International Law: Understanding the Intersection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Reforms","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Geography; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.11707128928784885,"score_gpt":0.3198595996677782,"score_spread":0.20278831037992937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2651948055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016556274,0.26780102,0.045869544,0.28584576,0.0038000634,0.00019737841,0.00035161118,0.000086052816,0.3794923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44671413,0.45387742,0.03201385,0.03422982,0.013111729,0.00063831854,0.00060955447,0.00017871562,0.01862645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98895556,0.0072583286,0.0005108499,0.00064675283,0.0016889949,0.0009394883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646497,0.029938102,0.0016112166,0.0006908861,0.0020350174,0.0010750683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012431645,0.0009455691,0.00094876275,0.009169189,0.0051387697,0.021179482,0.0023666846,0.00787683,0.00522256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022571458,0.0007770438,0.000793703,0.009040133,0.032562267,0.032575164,0.009342147,0.010900635,0.0007605387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002819779,0.000014901658,0.00097636174,0.00014563218,0.0000043757514,0.000104343875,0.004136852,0.00020575596,0.000018164248,0.9759118,0.004577951,0.013900999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036882896,0.000033459964,0.0029832853,0.0035151562,0.0000145574495,0.0003337343,0.021407343,0.0012816782,0.00007368178,0.67095584,0.29935214,0.000045520344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016431892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013825688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021179482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008847088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016056411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06574565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754291607","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwx039","title":"A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Parliament; High Court; Politics","score_opus":0.09521898072499438,"score_gpt":0.454386274419599,"score_spread":0.35916729369460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754291607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025685756,0.01683956,0.054476272,0.14901312,0.001501591,0.00016934545,0.00012543767,0.000039591465,0.75214934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93583745,0.0059187193,0.010922912,0.018380778,0.0028907703,0.00023760227,0.00006132813,0.00008435401,0.025666218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235554,0.010106937,0.00040229675,0.0015697132,0.0032849647,0.0022805957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759127,0.007993095,0.0008652202,0.0013775574,0.0014269247,0.0007460144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01743602,0.0009181665,0.0010393145,0.0033432054,0.009800252,0.015077358,0.0051651504,0.015498424,0.008625519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018673403,0.00064331916,0.0013681777,0.00178346,0.083049655,0.021507083,0.011061019,0.018422946,0.0009110538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017365218,0.0000043823675,0.0000553656,0.000007436069,0.0000019783079,0.0000627618,0.0009850779,0.00012059594,0.000008818735,0.9978563,0.00036258556,0.00053284096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007776717,0.0000090183885,0.00014088835,0.00007640064,0.00000518257,0.00008993855,0.0012852246,0.00049581204,0.00002753181,0.9847335,0.013119358,0.000009344538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02775211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023257816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02775211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014959644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01413716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095125761","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa031","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds), <i>Informed Consent and Health: A Global Analysis</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Informed consent; Doctrine; Position (finance); English law; Liability; Test (biology); Subject (documents); Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Business; Library science","score_opus":0.11678855080852936,"score_gpt":0.3914428599898981,"score_spread":0.27465430918136874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095125761","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014173119,0.7351517,0.00059339055,0.24590798,0.010559287,0.000017196371,0.00004726485,0.000031794276,0.007549719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035012667,0.8745738,0.0008223212,0.096970566,0.015501391,0.00004881328,0.000077420365,0.000040682076,0.00846373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292326,0.0027340117,0.00051067886,0.0006546087,0.0027592604,0.0004183084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847852,0.01211873,0.0008140197,0.00027193534,0.0010768112,0.00093326846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00856865,0.0014036275,0.0010596178,0.0030383735,0.0029369534,0.007945801,0.002543648,0.01139468,0.0072329314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018546361,0.0010339735,0.00085625343,0.003696476,0.01010667,0.010727317,0.0032902153,0.015830021,0.0033967092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036300393,0.000017543363,0.00022661818,0.0005257669,0.00001735274,0.00013824346,0.0014000944,0.00007992331,0.00004599192,0.03685619,0.9012953,0.059360735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021341451,0.000023727145,0.0008893591,0.0032781314,0.000019241415,0.00054701266,0.0011782728,0.000117037845,0.00008883786,0.03575552,0.958048,0.000033520748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02614919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04049911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02614919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006264364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010704821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051993966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192873402","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaa042","title":"Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Bioethics; Autonomy; Law; Reproductive rights; Normative; Position (finance); Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Business; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.07434284508748323,"score_gpt":0.35018914763106673,"score_spread":0.2758463025435835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192873402","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014712939,0.03096061,0.009755572,0.8378921,0.0012363245,0.00004976836,0.000045076602,0.000033279204,0.105314374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59113014,0.020938138,0.007571008,0.36023661,0.0033287283,0.00020789092,0.000047558417,0.000112154936,0.016427737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9573002,0.024359338,0.0018547632,0.0033840206,0.00963946,0.0034622836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8989066,0.0858739,0.0038877113,0.0037199503,0.005766409,0.001845507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052256417,0.0003211486,0.00091966195,0.0012152855,0.0067034913,0.011765961,0.0029945737,0.02828237,0.0027653964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07436717,0.00053660723,0.00086864905,0.00090757734,0.050944235,0.017454067,0.007588125,0.025098706,0.000868544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011654396,0.0000079898455,0.0002668238,0.00005684833,0.0000038099774,0.00016647228,0.0029950084,0.000069514266,0.00012600188,0.98054975,0.0079549635,0.0077912644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040920586,0.00004246356,0.0006335357,0.0014623323,0.000022990296,0.00079280866,0.0032587715,0.00042686285,0.0009539438,0.76923347,0.22309102,0.0000407703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009411416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008902935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052256417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069410047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014292523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27636164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297489070","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac036","title":"The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Best interests; Eugenics; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Compromise; Human rights; Convention; Sociology","score_opus":0.026144583086995854,"score_gpt":0.3358336273762773,"score_spread":0.30968904428928146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297489070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028045295,0.060967803,0.008745052,0.56453156,0.0013158016,0.00008394681,0.000117172036,0.000029295607,0.33616418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8387031,0.03944166,0.00478293,0.08397759,0.0017877865,0.00023793033,0.000082166094,0.000023478739,0.030963384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820386,0.011048508,0.0010242179,0.00074229384,0.0035470165,0.0015993679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858614,0.010516029,0.0012985202,0.0005031477,0.001077805,0.00074307824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017929941,0.00043286392,0.0006357866,0.0014963982,0.0045089363,0.008239285,0.0014554067,0.01257896,0.003182379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024417643,0.00036207866,0.0004801949,0.001576438,0.027793016,0.006673137,0.0053675305,0.008461663,0.00041405947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039544902,0.000006449734,0.00024886415,0.000041771145,0.0000022508123,0.00011136518,0.0015897918,0.00009079883,0.000028070874,0.9883928,0.004451686,0.0050322115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026268253,0.000056530676,0.0022474302,0.002033409,0.000021019134,0.00061488483,0.0068820566,0.0005973669,0.00028628812,0.69623715,0.29093695,0.00006064249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023403984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031642303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023403984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076216934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017039806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09482372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394793383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae008","title":"Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds.), <i>Privacy and Medical Confidentiality in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Health care; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.052962301225896374,"score_gpt":0.3886952447145482,"score_spread":0.3357329434886518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394793383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005223799,0.92597556,0.00059661095,0.04932981,0.0034207597,0.000012566779,0.000052353746,0.000016335118,0.020073574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057858024,0.9755283,0.0007030021,0.0055664866,0.0025026458,0.000023961145,0.00007280479,0.000028927947,0.009788075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997241,0.001085667,0.00015222328,0.0002544286,0.0010151301,0.00025157473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948367,0.0038486472,0.00032615574,0.00007509219,0.00048382446,0.00042962245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032374507,0.0010886561,0.0007733992,0.0026760509,0.0027804875,0.008586813,0.0016667332,0.004460155,0.011590848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00480839,0.00079653447,0.00065145816,0.006361424,0.0047489326,0.011904187,0.0029596623,0.0052442146,0.0044774124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007196963,0.00007260579,0.0009762815,0.0031205947,0.000039727216,0.00033356424,0.015308684,0.00031493406,0.0001983001,0.087390386,0.7298778,0.16229512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009756043,0.00001999324,0.0020725306,0.0041762185,0.000021467931,0.00041935657,0.009250779,0.00013652859,0.000113621034,0.016930455,0.9668245,0.000024864223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018016707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029738836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018016707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005397574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009980205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039162338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394868993","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae012","title":"‘My Advocacy is Not About Me, My Advocacy is About Canadians’: A Qualitative Study of how Caregivers and Patients Influence Regulation of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Legislation; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.04416365183645548,"score_gpt":0.43295342211107807,"score_spread":0.3887897702746226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394868993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559872,0.0027671335,0.001347084,0.021701558,0.00022677933,0.000282056,0.00018989929,0.000027048403,0.017471092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908603,0.0011098903,0.00048589797,0.0059057917,0.0000276549,0.00009461498,0.00004759573,0.000029715591,0.0032126247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813027,0.0112997545,0.00040205053,0.0010763936,0.0023670353,0.0035521293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715073,0.015742958,0.0019384872,0.00052772445,0.004833405,0.0054500974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147955315,0.00065463764,0.0011096933,0.0019571213,0.03968687,0.0073006344,0.0035537637,0.0032975478,0.004859709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032627746,0.0008538146,0.00043195792,0.0026073174,0.028274637,0.004963121,0.0069595366,0.008710635,0.00038183155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010333794,0.000021824422,0.0015630777,0.000054338263,0.0000029521188,0.00028790152,0.9935134,0.000014184922,0.0000979148,0.0012777759,0.00148584,0.0016704921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002630098,0.000009695251,0.0009183053,0.00011455059,0.0000028736777,0.00007176792,0.9897857,0.000032261396,0.000039991748,0.00015879692,0.0088498,0.000013684195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82687086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9189982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17312914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06781224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10062697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49201453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400723744","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae026","title":"Towards a rights-based approach for disabled women’s access to abortion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Abortion; Reproductive rights; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05934614302924285,"score_gpt":0.437815176485652,"score_spread":0.37846903345640914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400723744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057873833,0.08321929,0.012491143,0.7219406,0.002340889,0.00012880932,0.0000520269,0.000031523243,0.17400831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6122304,0.10935385,0.023097383,0.19992502,0.007806439,0.0005951137,0.00012263122,0.00006898685,0.046800125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97499204,0.016675636,0.00094950007,0.00096551405,0.00465624,0.0017611495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97648436,0.01739074,0.001269555,0.0009699885,0.002706508,0.0011788598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039749335,0.0003087917,0.0006974274,0.0046878434,0.0040076924,0.008045999,0.0022206698,0.009418567,0.0046197264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029441504,0.00036992045,0.00079834944,0.0012007591,0.030084282,0.0077634957,0.010477181,0.011175475,0.0005935195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057680063,0.00002583592,0.00021985572,0.00029626975,0.0000074263467,0.00008149493,0.0037167429,0.00015437334,0.000113767084,0.96791124,0.008840996,0.018626276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032896438,0.00007346929,0.0015405847,0.0032193675,0.000026922622,0.00028430522,0.005087135,0.0002542001,0.00027888495,0.37084442,0.61831963,0.000038212904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018423965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032494288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039749335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009788104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03500794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21021712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403462383","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae036","title":"Lawrence O. Gostin and Benjamin Mason Meier (eds), <i>Global Health Law &amp; Policy: Ensuring Justice for a Healthier World</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.048066051105037484,"score_gpt":0.4371796674806875,"score_spread":0.38911361637565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403462383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013113373,0.827294,0.00047636722,0.14513001,0.0092682075,0.000012527022,0.00006774673,0.000038724666,0.017581351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023079875,0.9469019,0.0006486456,0.016583513,0.008098573,0.000029204131,0.00008161744,0.000034591576,0.025313932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972983,0.0008188649,0.00014256673,0.00024206823,0.0013303676,0.0001678511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948102,0.0030052725,0.00038232008,0.00010106514,0.0012233845,0.00047764997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045533055,0.0010941343,0.0009654289,0.0035073196,0.0024283633,0.0072668837,0.0013939178,0.0055043567,0.012265469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007005013,0.000837532,0.00061844167,0.0036478043,0.0030044785,0.007347962,0.0020702237,0.005854904,0.008565555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008575087,0.000012669242,0.00011502746,0.0004440948,0.000007946876,0.000020936033,0.0001760349,0.00008465269,0.000029075201,0.011051739,0.92951715,0.058531962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065695767,0.0000067609835,0.00059659895,0.0012915513,0.000013514018,0.00008381229,0.00038858844,0.0000760317,0.000048224225,0.008222085,0.9892517,0.000014637536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044762287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10407564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044762287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052153314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010902739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0890035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592773","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf006","title":"A common law power to dissect: a medico-legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal College of Surgeons of England; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Law; Common law; Legal history; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); English law; Medical law; Scots law; Sociology; Political science; Sources of law","score_opus":0.015364951499460497,"score_gpt":0.33626761970771357,"score_spread":0.3209026682082531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592773","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088650305,0.4770082,0.0023094218,0.34842452,0.0034451592,0.000031215095,0.000031769014,0.00001595452,0.15986873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48382738,0.29353884,0.0020586206,0.17557728,0.011543058,0.00010851795,0.000058325768,0.00006116652,0.03322675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923821,0.0044723973,0.00038433913,0.0007399473,0.0015333702,0.00048770107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833692,0.013529181,0.0007795632,0.00037072567,0.001357123,0.0005942159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011156764,0.00026442762,0.0005338317,0.0039749215,0.0054048183,0.008281873,0.0013468028,0.009047018,0.0024303673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014707524,0.00053645734,0.00031503508,0.003066666,0.044906504,0.010447206,0.0034253579,0.01033927,0.0005294492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010763077,0.00002655709,0.0002499534,0.000161696,0.0000047903777,0.00025928378,0.0077333217,0.000049535323,0.000094869436,0.94549805,0.01897595,0.026935268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025665398,0.00006897707,0.0013954609,0.0015583192,0.000010078724,0.0005647573,0.0041781105,0.000101337035,0.00017572989,0.20072865,0.79116106,0.000031796924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010711494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013507258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011811378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011811378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009816438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08569795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409601977","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf016","title":"Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust UKSC 1: no quarter for deserving claimants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02758016300208845,"score_gpt":0.39764782377031355,"score_spread":0.3700676607682251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409601977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010870808,0.010613989,0.00065019494,0.6045369,0.015843049,0.00019735417,0.00061754993,0.00025114554,0.35641903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05785915,0.0042823222,0.000777322,0.5016211,0.006431225,0.00021618765,0.0002506778,0.00025971554,0.42830223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872449,0.0018956689,0.0011025592,0.0015624965,0.0045545283,0.0036398561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97881556,0.010196844,0.0012561893,0.001357551,0.00504981,0.0033239503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006800426,0.00058209803,0.0010551523,0.0012665663,0.008734094,0.011641368,0.0027070055,0.057926863,0.057006314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047396347,0.0013391139,0.0012234319,0.00089931226,0.0041380473,0.004601218,0.0039109,0.024227284,0.015672496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006469258,0.000026436966,0.0010630745,0.00020064187,0.00003279758,0.0021570406,0.00096219545,0.00003731326,0.00043752344,0.058235124,0.92416245,0.012620681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052787113,0.000028777555,0.0020455502,0.00092058536,0.000042343614,0.0010444735,0.0008747963,0.0000766154,0.0003049883,0.0075078793,0.98704857,0.000052726384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051592167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14235948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057926863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006766027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026205553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19070512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412802334","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf021","title":"Support for decision-making guidance in England: a pragmatic review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05413149822967526,"score_gpt":0.49378053914640657,"score_spread":0.4396490409167313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412802334","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008958035,0.99758923,0.00010250339,0.0013460107,0.00013589859,0.00007452823,0.00003239936,0.000003267037,0.000626496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027014122,0.99536395,0.0005253146,0.0010456557,0.000076370045,0.00014013125,0.000040696756,0.000002385111,0.0001040286],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896082,0.005711981,0.0022614556,0.00035107275,0.00185674,0.0002105074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549569,0.036844347,0.0029180415,0.0005574712,0.0042189728,0.0005041462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015002474,0.000712093,0.00302974,0.006638264,0.00072210724,0.0030448285,0.0017363324,0.0026076112,0.004078574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055194944,0.00076290325,0.0016174281,0.006856387,0.0012719319,0.003168859,0.0017287263,0.0023891383,0.0005915823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013890736,0.00005991311,0.00023400302,0.43621716,0.00065123977,0.00014256375,0.000574742,0.00021268144,0.00017286856,0.008305041,0.022429278,0.5308616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010662457,0.00013207828,0.0013705621,0.64803016,0.0013475749,0.00033632328,0.0004339639,0.00009325805,0.00009477526,0.0026084115,0.34541506,0.000031180298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00916805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031482678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015002474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067046536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019522227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07934159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290541","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf040","title":"<i>The Welfare of Future Children: Reproductive Ethics and Disability Screening</i> , Rebecca Bennett.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Eugenics; Reproductive technology; Reproductive rights; Reproductive justice","score_opus":0.018610468435411687,"score_gpt":0.3678214657605746,"score_spread":0.3492109973251629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002974449,0.16127954,0.00016142182,0.78493947,0.0143792825,0.00004796801,0.00013001135,0.00002686956,0.03873797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077116257,0.064752676,0.00036169967,0.8467271,0.0066912277,0.00015198454,0.000093162525,0.000044063556,0.07346644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419504,0.0019728031,0.0002944604,0.00046948646,0.0022750045,0.0007931589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940749,0.0035894767,0.0002788845,0.00014679329,0.0013563782,0.00055366143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068454538,0.0011227883,0.0008049138,0.0014097147,0.008642674,0.005218474,0.003387962,0.02254265,0.008065275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015644208,0.00084490323,0.0006177559,0.0019066327,0.008171759,0.004455341,0.0031374267,0.018334676,0.0024162359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048521592,0.0000053541385,0.0000733863,0.00007282819,0.0000024952396,0.00005246718,0.00029618313,0.000013556872,0.000028630517,0.01399492,0.9792259,0.006229515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013243553,0.000007325764,0.0012936274,0.0011379428,0.0000100348325,0.00015395359,0.0010419306,0.00003017312,0.00008171611,0.005747671,0.99045837,0.000024042669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40405333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6469678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40405333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010638599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037851933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80340296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417088249","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf043","title":"Prescribing wearable tech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Ian Potter Foundation; David and Elaine Potter Foundation","keywords":"Wearable computer; Wearable technology; Smartwatch; Context (archaeology); Health care; Information privacy; Exploratory research; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.03596724973880766,"score_gpt":0.3525416875785548,"score_spread":0.31657443783974715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417088249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023830563,0.014880685,0.0056397603,0.08417801,0.0065859817,0.00024970557,0.00078563875,0.00027756378,0.88501954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09414337,0.033874188,0.00737783,0.22148918,0.0056895763,0.0007881364,0.0013023873,0.00036451832,0.63497066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888337,0.0036987292,0.001312954,0.0012883514,0.003964001,0.0009021748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872457,0.0059233233,0.00090041285,0.002577197,0.002580537,0.000772806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005187289,0.00049230084,0.0005901789,0.0010899917,0.0026593907,0.0046406253,0.0013949502,0.011076255,0.1060585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030747805,0.000678699,0.00089167035,0.0012108986,0.0040567974,0.0042511136,0.0043778345,0.00809136,0.05714799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054469507,0.000058117337,0.0010991276,0.000794595,0.000018758352,0.0007616724,0.0017143562,0.00010101433,0.00096019305,0.38542354,0.47208178,0.13693231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001237043,0.000019145853,0.00040675976,0.000477433,0.000005403231,0.00041292718,0.0002408507,0.000023489309,0.00022115007,0.009294297,0.9888776,0.000008484876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035908665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004830843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1060585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001949869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007242837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35480106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}