{"meta":{"query_hash":"be76675be5cd","filters":{"venue":"Melbourne journal of international law"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/be76675be5cd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Melbourne+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W2241917739","doi":"","title":"GMO Trade Wars: The Submissions in the EC-GMO Dispute in the WTO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); International trade; World trade; International trade law; Business; Environmental regulation; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Biology","score_opus":0.017674439060277478,"score_gpt":0.31385613478545776,"score_spread":0.29618169572518027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241917739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028343227,0.02831846,0.020024538,0.36147317,0.01407196,0.00017170617,0.00018443883,0.00010402732,0.5473085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5753307,0.019392276,0.014878849,0.21886133,0.014871014,0.00043507718,0.00034344615,0.00039650095,0.15549088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96385837,0.019055063,0.001735932,0.0027133848,0.0101457555,0.0024914904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591961,0.031144166,0.00224534,0.002371097,0.0035760403,0.0014672044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03442564,0.00066772697,0.00087134074,0.001921098,0.015703915,0.026812095,0.0022133538,0.020333232,0.0060540093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0640403,0.00070127024,0.0011207466,0.004760942,0.024500456,0.023628086,0.00831649,0.02123629,0.001523716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027662994,0.000018147373,0.00020635402,0.00006913161,0.000005430133,0.00057033956,0.0090929875,0.00015377661,0.0001777567,0.9319939,0.04757809,0.010106484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001562019,0.000024595296,0.00058580603,0.00049996783,0.000008645873,0.0004778089,0.008173841,0.00035340618,0.00048326002,0.2790852,0.71024036,0.000051487103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048616417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032462599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03442564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062161824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008630113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18206233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285720775","doi":"","title":"Non-justiciability in Australian Private International Law: A Lack of 'Judicial Restraint'?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Conflict of laws; Judicial review; Prerogative; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Political question; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.04118482205336851,"score_gpt":0.3727313778072658,"score_spread":0.3315465557538973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285720775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34275994,0.0039022814,0.016749717,0.11399482,0.00049341365,0.000075191114,0.000039999064,0.000055070417,0.5219296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973573,0.00080454844,0.0016646674,0.0053636692,0.00015236119,0.00003952237,0.000012471087,0.00001838059,0.018371278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175996,0.0029762017,0.00046815883,0.0008239313,0.0029139004,0.0010577636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733693,0.0066415453,0.0009772257,0.0019043678,0.0023370904,0.0008028235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00904303,0.0001418623,0.0004786863,0.001031825,0.0065498245,0.010517988,0.0017104555,0.0041318857,0.0027114684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027974216,0.00047009185,0.00029610613,0.0013053357,0.023192408,0.0068830177,0.0055185775,0.0073727285,0.00030240547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007038346,0.000019246512,0.0009928073,0.000039818176,0.0000036984961,0.00014439016,0.021576429,0.00010609141,0.00029831185,0.96341956,0.0020484994,0.011344073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035550598,0.000104442086,0.022689648,0.0006702598,0.000043372005,0.0006626924,0.023761056,0.0026445014,0.0013038223,0.66048205,0.28749353,0.00010912106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04481104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06604567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04481104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005735813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01044935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08910042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292255313","doi":"","title":"Gosselin v Quebec (Attorney-General) - Is Starvation Illegal?: The Enforceability of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Charter; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017583904571123715,"score_gpt":0.2988579292090863,"score_spread":0.2812740246379626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292255313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1583815,0.0075742197,0.0019668734,0.3071759,0.0010631573,0.00008500009,0.00054190936,0.00006367676,0.5231478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8642414,0.0016227622,0.0008473354,0.05588645,0.00015446253,0.000042659998,0.00006505568,0.000020550582,0.07711934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981516,0.00022959003,0.000048794507,0.00020076177,0.0005014086,0.0008678216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987753,0.00029277126,0.00009982056,0.000070738985,0.00042979833,0.00033163058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213418,0.00026638975,0.0003149627,0.00046366602,0.013252159,0.0046635726,0.0013710023,0.009909963,0.0037058655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038369992,0.00025717483,0.0004281601,0.00080698624,0.012475799,0.0015243783,0.0017226934,0.0061487975,0.00028842516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060331724,0.000019798572,0.0052666445,0.000038981256,0.000015117709,0.0011471545,0.005803564,0.00034575997,0.0006400548,0.9227468,0.05597489,0.007940786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012462954,0.00009156293,0.043930057,0.0008422047,0.000093940296,0.0010758457,0.01806173,0.0019024364,0.002592159,0.18666147,0.7443945,0.00022959177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041895542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041895542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05533577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3039748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482574598","doi":"","title":"European Communities-measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products: The World Trade Organization on Trial for Its Handling of Occupational Health and Safety Issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asbestos; Competence (human resources); Project commissioning; World trade; Occupational safety and health; Business; Publishing; Public health; Environmental health; Public relations; International trade; Political science; Law; Management; Medicine; Economics; Nursing","score_opus":0.07582298400388328,"score_gpt":0.34143627011629485,"score_spread":0.2656132861124116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482574598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12220929,0.020563189,0.010241807,0.19463775,0.0039028288,0.0005165016,0.00037839529,0.00015440956,0.6473958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67397434,0.0032114119,0.004836693,0.21178772,0.0009353137,0.000332918,0.00015658149,0.00012304331,0.10464206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689677,0.008154783,0.0016178485,0.0030494495,0.0124627855,0.005747456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98482263,0.007798444,0.0011488564,0.0010927893,0.0037345723,0.0014026606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026772967,0.00087770954,0.0009788768,0.002000148,0.016301613,0.01990692,0.003804861,0.06345304,0.0034432528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03872241,0.0007718653,0.0016589653,0.0023089412,0.011392348,0.006548497,0.0065624244,0.014825379,0.00074105663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016475069,0.00031471238,0.0046623857,0.00014636511,0.00008247489,0.0017169232,0.0032946886,0.000909154,0.0016128187,0.8983699,0.07067129,0.01805449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039098147,0.00037575336,0.010184121,0.0011991333,0.00028902863,0.001268525,0.006261648,0.002758926,0.006852012,0.11421818,0.85581213,0.00038965387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22730598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27852327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22730598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010590606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030781537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4519658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956078949","doi":"","title":"Diversity in the Investor-State Arbitration: Intersectionality Must Be a Part of the Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Intersectionality; Diversity (politics); Conversation; Sociology; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.03817542786015609,"score_gpt":0.24669636052280242,"score_spread":0.20852093266264632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956078949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21046692,0.015315877,0.030624967,0.411264,0.0019495181,0.00007594254,0.00004842316,0.00005734336,0.33019704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857248,0.0013521553,0.0012823793,0.0069350027,0.00059324014,0.00004834832,0.000010008843,0.000026033653,0.0040280297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9520463,0.037659388,0.0011231108,0.0019159066,0.004183013,0.003072381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739717,0.022561926,0.0008909271,0.0007444067,0.0008168094,0.0010142485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033860385,0.00053679495,0.0014362596,0.0024424966,0.026208129,0.026632871,0.0022359693,0.009309415,0.0038090495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025849313,0.00061697746,0.0008160407,0.003139972,0.07038754,0.035220645,0.022466663,0.015084115,0.00030893774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015786078,0.000010844533,0.0004402976,0.00004682375,0.00000769948,0.0001929899,0.2236774,0.00011397324,0.00012067812,0.76821905,0.0015983542,0.005556215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016544118,0.000047884412,0.0010896754,0.00075660244,0.000018134895,0.00042017997,0.30972415,0.0005551324,0.0002978494,0.4566942,0.23032686,0.00005282468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041612717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032140359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033860385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01044377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069504497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17907298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982233201","doi":"","title":"Substance and Procedure in Private International Law by Richard Garnett","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Conflict of laws; Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.010014374189077474,"score_gpt":0.2740219235597967,"score_spread":0.26400754937071924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982233201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006632348,0.061911702,0.0029112687,0.6689297,0.010275253,0.00003190924,0.00003693352,0.000027474789,0.2492434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2894707,0.042368207,0.0029860542,0.18602641,0.012879957,0.00015710763,0.000039642477,0.00019316997,0.46587878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961767,0.0020192594,0.00014045888,0.0004292107,0.00083632226,0.00039798944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229616,0.0060524154,0.00026151843,0.00025215067,0.0006303481,0.00050733675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385278,0.00047179416,0.000774016,0.0013374463,0.008410662,0.008416729,0.0014342115,0.011836478,0.004809148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013872126,0.00072557665,0.0004541384,0.0013985543,0.018972302,0.012319612,0.003500768,0.01839273,0.0009898782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015982972,0.000029539924,0.00013906664,0.000033663535,0.0000054110114,0.00007376939,0.004734574,0.00024394109,0.000037834638,0.8250231,0.16189401,0.007769108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015495929,0.000015541691,0.00052052335,0.00039174207,0.000010718189,0.00008761896,0.004947521,0.00037149218,0.00007956917,0.3723481,0.6211729,0.000038782022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04356239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07195003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04356239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005253282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057457555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08661765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}