{"meta":{"query_hash":"7fefbfe607e5","filters":{"venue":"Metacognition and Learning"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7fefbfe607e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metacognition+and+Learning"},"results":[{"id":"W1965723601","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9132-0","title":"Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Metacognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Exploratory research; Perception; Sample (material); Qualitative research; Computer science; Sociology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.26721480546491155,"score_gpt":0.41775455877081275,"score_spread":0.1505397533059012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965723601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98196155,0.00013505536,0.015323231,0.0000881003,0.000013593967,0.00030609174,0.0005945557,0.00006021197,0.0015174977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778932,0.00008843319,0.020533806,0.00003922291,0.0000053568247,0.00056272757,0.00063989474,0.00001179991,0.00022551538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130464,0.0041496083,0.0009966623,0.0010002119,0.0023674248,0.00018137424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91383153,0.056496844,0.01114164,0.0051716436,0.012294078,0.0010641739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009244675,0.0003347627,0.0004298595,0.0026140807,0.0005645082,0.0020169464,0.0004424679,0.00053479325,0.0005705584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05135153,0.00023945616,0.00044578596,0.0024132174,0.0005063579,0.0017901117,0.0021941066,0.0008658313,0.00014526046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011277306,0.001562272,0.74011093,0.0012836237,0.0008300773,0.0002478887,0.054241344,0.003666362,0.01929885,0.0021248579,0.0009597097,0.17454639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016309842,0.0026264952,0.87565804,0.0008270989,0.00088523363,0.0003984473,0.041105244,0.018133376,0.044612877,0.0047857836,0.010425077,0.00037920653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014707429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00380324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009244675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073646393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013689486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048891127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967281592","doi":"10.1007/s11409-010-9066-0","title":"Consistent results with the consistency hypothesis? The effects of epistemic beliefs on metacognitive processing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Recall; Metaphor; Empirical research; Protocol analysis; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05999279552421096,"score_gpt":0.2769992554757469,"score_spread":0.21700645995153592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967281592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91364753,0.00355708,0.023252288,0.013244468,0.0012035103,0.00053677603,0.0026395456,0.00047056132,0.041448236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905151,0.00030073366,0.0034961037,0.0017750998,0.00044779238,0.00025026387,0.0012692442,0.00035788116,0.0015878753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807342,0.00694895,0.0018607185,0.006297506,0.0032949154,0.0008637203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6341498,0.27058756,0.027987536,0.050732795,0.013208341,0.0033340561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033497173,0.0014706923,0.0015614101,0.00195911,0.001246204,0.00685123,0.0046503004,0.004968983,0.031126238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2582968,0.0018254771,0.0028006088,0.001946519,0.0045575975,0.012374398,0.0056209136,0.005327622,0.0031849984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05143654,0.008732445,0.52280074,0.0051538968,0.017598234,0.0036177684,0.017732155,0.0075704763,0.09094995,0.100420274,0.014360391,0.15962711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066423044,0.0021664586,0.78314686,0.00047592458,0.0048196763,0.0013400898,0.0033657933,0.008255413,0.017597187,0.16383491,0.007920231,0.00043513064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016068454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009944007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033497173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015252532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1771521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971056750","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9077-5","title":"Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Metacognition; Psychology; Lead (geology); Neuroscience; Biology","score_opus":0.06111102779936895,"score_gpt":0.4043286265249417,"score_spread":0.3432175987255728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971056750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97682196,0.00076160213,0.009618693,0.001996876,0.000065371154,0.000026025029,0.000014057804,0.000037983118,0.010657427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749714,0.00013115164,0.0019541678,0.000088154644,0.000017268294,0.000022312379,0.000007012671,0.000008230323,0.00027458376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950257,0.0029784893,0.00017903373,0.0005986157,0.0007534263,0.0004647024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97470075,0.016050199,0.0037357481,0.0028952113,0.00097064924,0.0016474478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004191829,0.00026349543,0.00035652428,0.0006426151,0.00082820817,0.0042351694,0.00082497526,0.0019291983,0.0021760375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029297927,0.0002953297,0.00047623322,0.0004048495,0.0021958745,0.0026581364,0.0032784035,0.0012997196,0.00024679882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030881823,0.0038165012,0.21874475,0.0011717579,0.00087763835,0.0013211764,0.08457619,0.004778803,0.054740466,0.05943574,0.0027328122,0.56471604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010587896,0.0040414724,0.57767975,0.0013033921,0.0012921944,0.002663249,0.04155832,0.031084038,0.05054695,0.2675411,0.02086879,0.00036193922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066212803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005766725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042351694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072274235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014695149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022168756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985231015","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z","title":"Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Australian Research Council; Johnson and Johnson","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognition; Collaborative learning; Coding (social sciences); Empirical research; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Self-regulated learning; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.11002184756408996,"score_gpt":0.37433525060992884,"score_spread":0.2643134030458389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985231015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99846965,0.00010791788,0.00051571423,0.000053472053,0.0000061322235,0.000012246348,0.0000133570165,0.000005255654,0.0008161777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941075,0.000039871884,0.00029226797,0.000014718002,0.0000041889816,0.000020830885,0.000022748407,0.000005745416,0.00018895594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978787,0.0006307123,0.00015654684,0.00043878233,0.0006223503,0.0002729155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806682,0.012105148,0.0032438831,0.002169811,0.0007012326,0.0011118652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002369892,0.00024960967,0.0005223413,0.0006782567,0.0003919577,0.0026480793,0.0010353826,0.0010722032,0.001876799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02382429,0.00029816845,0.00039240878,0.0005216171,0.0011665841,0.0016059651,0.0018827326,0.0013279053,0.00026135324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003339365,0.006575452,0.7788297,0.00048837595,0.001040171,0.00039387358,0.04210895,0.0013285464,0.05378245,0.0046703625,0.00044532662,0.106997356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007403301,0.000458587,0.989391,0.00004020263,0.00013890062,0.00013706941,0.0023052332,0.0012912018,0.0027589095,0.0028984735,0.000484987,0.000021451222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082206714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074790715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026480793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042535286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012533367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005462082","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9041-9","title":"Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Empirical research; Psychology; Session (web analytics); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Mathematics education; Protocol analysis; Cognitive psychology; Empirical evidence; Rationality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07536978327440856,"score_gpt":0.33126251270688517,"score_spread":0.2558927294324766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005462082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8599593,0.0010365143,0.07893563,0.0070288302,0.00013697034,0.00024654873,0.0006994096,0.00013485608,0.05182189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994559,0.0001337812,0.0042635994,0.00017428237,0.0000838296,0.00008967138,0.00024241772,0.000032734635,0.00042065606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890338,0.0043678097,0.0010309535,0.0025683849,0.0023429298,0.00065604865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5803246,0.31291628,0.0347929,0.054013945,0.01371792,0.0042344164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017899254,0.0005994978,0.0013686637,0.0028468093,0.0012434841,0.0065544522,0.003060337,0.003255442,0.012327476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20667948,0.00095143134,0.0011792823,0.0030019046,0.006165248,0.0142234955,0.007084672,0.0035621028,0.0009263244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009529954,0.002562406,0.3975403,0.0013001328,0.0018904504,0.0007726307,0.01368046,0.005302845,0.004868559,0.43195003,0.002303722,0.12829852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011779564,0.0005541828,0.15303132,0.00025690987,0.0006085568,0.0012055902,0.0032692845,0.011863878,0.0025512062,0.82278436,0.0025735348,0.00012323097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011563606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042797622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017899254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085600745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018111219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094661474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023360218","doi":"10.1007/s11409-009-9039-3","title":"Metacognitive learning: the effect of item-specific experience and age on metamemory calibration and planning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metamemory; Metacognition; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.04773316465582826,"score_gpt":0.37361312484722553,"score_spread":0.32587996019139726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023360218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774075,0.00015816287,0.0011936296,0.00001790311,0.000010029221,0.000011162697,0.00005795427,0.000023459183,0.0007870694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983169,0.00005197348,0.0008177223,0.000014246125,0.000005659707,0.000019805475,0.00008025204,0.000029794835,0.00066365855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.0003633041,0.00008903379,0.00030153085,0.00019066034,0.000071674105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9296682,0.055397183,0.0057298956,0.0061470107,0.0014606558,0.0015970451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031725003,0.00038615766,0.0004304416,0.0005344371,0.00016078465,0.0012021237,0.00069518475,0.00056143274,0.003659864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037044175,0.00036106596,0.00031641035,0.00043787088,0.00041548247,0.0017676431,0.0011502337,0.0007993463,0.0004027299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029233642,0.0035379692,0.65967494,0.0003963681,0.0008520856,0.0005726161,0.004931265,0.006515903,0.085939415,0.0015144793,0.00088199903,0.20594926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020264123,0.004015734,0.9526198,0.00005904123,0.0003979429,0.00069033797,0.000506974,0.008643293,0.02943468,0.0023539513,0.0009883195,0.00008732921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052186183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005239864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003659864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001958326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003312518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016777992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041990263","doi":"10.1007/s11409-013-9104-9","title":"A domain-specific account of self-regulated learning: the cognitive and metacognitive activities involved in learning through historical inquiry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Comprehension; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Empirical research; Discipline; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.06518183871485757,"score_gpt":0.33545002387563344,"score_spread":0.2702681851607759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041990263","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07665045,0.0027947717,0.6811446,0.007745617,0.00015923179,0.00013833243,0.00023775593,0.00044516317,0.23068403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422603,0.0011114726,0.0480519,0.0005284943,0.000090627764,0.00015044758,0.00011609643,0.00004611396,0.0076444363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999443,0.00022853115,0.00003072158,0.00012527527,0.00011223692,0.000060270173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857056,0.00080690166,0.00011643648,0.00030198938,0.0001196511,0.000084523825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00104246,0.00038334588,0.00025665408,0.00092792674,0.0006348163,0.0029627488,0.0012216682,0.0013316841,0.0024460123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025360978,0.00022410462,0.0005752029,0.00085632654,0.004569852,0.005031414,0.0012269234,0.0019271409,0.00028478634],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010272233,0.000024300756,0.00047992615,0.000060374245,0.000011821466,0.000060779512,0.0014984569,0.0022357563,0.0006197113,0.98485225,0.00033095723,0.00981539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010229953,0.000026137053,0.0015027293,0.000054212163,0.000018924853,0.0001688753,0.00043097566,0.013294078,0.0010299996,0.9733088,0.010143086,0.000012032398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097017334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009836302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029627488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080645934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010205678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008182764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063772878","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9074-8","title":"Statistical estimates of learners’ judgments about knowledge in calibration of achievement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Measure (data warehouse); Psychology; Statistic; Correctness; Metacognition; Mathematics education; Sample (material); Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognition; Data mining","score_opus":0.10194530623517949,"score_gpt":0.38494302389290286,"score_spread":0.28299771765772336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063772878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87835395,0.00022969359,0.1162915,0.000126568,0.000042070307,0.000092462,0.00037497288,0.00033741203,0.004151361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98903275,0.00004285054,0.010038476,0.000030716914,0.000011141077,0.00007039371,0.0002674963,0.00003586482,0.0004703777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245197,0.0045301914,0.0004890925,0.0011175612,0.0012272857,0.00018385469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63885367,0.32198328,0.010926531,0.01852928,0.008636133,0.0010710744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019393709,0.0005246296,0.0004049051,0.0017228009,0.00036084297,0.0014750109,0.00075307966,0.00095406926,0.0025333792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20445764,0.00037658852,0.00087890035,0.0011114178,0.0011775224,0.0019430101,0.0014384236,0.0012858871,0.00053813535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064224605,0.001119003,0.50315523,0.0005286956,0.001926356,0.00024285591,0.0050362605,0.080385946,0.028134024,0.03003417,0.002629245,0.34038574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019076923,0.0017016167,0.7022455,0.000097373064,0.00042175566,0.00063622557,0.0014288438,0.20453778,0.039296426,0.046816964,0.0024101466,0.00021662594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011619034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009952855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019393709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052762096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005493755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10256499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076994293","doi":"10.1007/s11409-011-9070-z","title":"Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Metacognition; Context (archaeology); Reliability (semiconductor); Concurrent validity; Construct validity; Measure (data warehouse); Comprehension; Inference; Construct (python library); Reading (process); Vocabulary development; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Computer science; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Teaching method; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.1421308067241243,"score_gpt":0.2906518890518613,"score_spread":0.148521082327737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076994293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98393744,0.00018145627,0.009912818,0.000030832933,0.00001534422,0.00065749104,0.00046139967,0.00011505421,0.004688152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93903595,0.00036273297,0.054540813,0.000071240225,0.000012147629,0.002554199,0.00087310997,0.000053838063,0.0024960164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959578,0.0012620023,0.00067696825,0.000633659,0.001192952,0.00027654122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714712,0.019099731,0.0044910084,0.0019381803,0.0020357014,0.00096414547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032683809,0.0014410451,0.00088605814,0.002379049,0.00051091687,0.0018500746,0.00096465787,0.0014159629,0.0037722816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02410843,0.00070912443,0.0010825327,0.0016112092,0.00042929745,0.0023027807,0.0019141573,0.0012565467,0.0011430407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016120153,0.0036365143,0.73192835,0.0008138107,0.0006859518,0.00054725836,0.00919353,0.0027202577,0.040712904,0.0014531753,0.0007850066,0.20591128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023366613,0.003478255,0.9464857,0.0002464652,0.00034629751,0.0011072772,0.0040965416,0.007699262,0.029695237,0.0024354027,0.004011519,0.00016444652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011777843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037003465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037722816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046429754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000659007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017285049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114184575","doi":"10.1007/s11409-007-9016-7","title":"Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":274,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Metacognition; Self-regulated learning; Construct (python library); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Psychology; Adaptation (eye); Exploratory research; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition","score_opus":0.28989743008966173,"score_gpt":0.4333952759236632,"score_spread":0.1434978458340015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114184575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6685334,0.00036817277,0.31890586,0.00056757027,0.000073561314,0.00017838148,0.0015131454,0.0016424851,0.008217433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96365565,0.00014277644,0.033778653,0.000033464137,0.000011663195,0.0000575985,0.0005675664,0.00014071954,0.0016118712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.00034413626,0.000076813325,0.00017954396,0.00042688582,0.000063756685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421498,0.04280766,0.0034413564,0.007184722,0.0038408027,0.00057561893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002984358,0.00025064062,0.000243659,0.0021829938,0.0004020998,0.0016424756,0.0008716244,0.0006604298,0.0040161978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053239726,0.00015739228,0.00021864299,0.0023893395,0.0006373076,0.0038347873,0.0010525449,0.0012295798,0.00042342918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019616352,0.0012559877,0.21501048,0.0013472069,0.00038666432,0.0012164826,0.011122851,0.028714517,0.07531513,0.1026586,0.0025740245,0.55843645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091338334,0.001409227,0.15218368,0.00055825064,0.00027289195,0.0021876914,0.007999142,0.4404917,0.11132096,0.2560896,0.02720555,0.00018994552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019821771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040161978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049989537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074078195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015783012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149497228","doi":"10.1007/s11409-014-9123-1","title":"Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self- and socially-regulated learning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute of Education Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Self-regulated learning; Metacognition; Self-control; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.02568017868819967,"score_gpt":0.33563696073452903,"score_spread":0.30995678204632937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149497228","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20454103,0.0034998672,0.72193205,0.011694177,0.0010608883,0.00045841653,0.00050394476,0.00093097315,0.05537859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647533,0.0009728752,0.1280949,0.00041887534,0.00045872614,0.0008176375,0.00014754849,0.00018999702,0.0041461173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160403,0.0031507874,0.0011297645,0.0012425684,0.0025433803,0.0003295834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8241456,0.13698241,0.008257536,0.022200305,0.0069097476,0.0015044101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021619467,0.0003907167,0.0009527281,0.0021963145,0.0017033735,0.0060273143,0.0035217348,0.0019649325,0.0065645603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118104644,0.00071154255,0.0008849693,0.0024182515,0.008124655,0.013265759,0.0025794634,0.0025001573,0.0006502663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000543794,0.00029355063,0.026417818,0.0011002498,0.00014300186,0.00041126506,0.006584102,0.007864818,0.0072653894,0.7298614,0.0020642427,0.21745038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009830856,0.00044071279,0.055154435,0.00048756736,0.00015578078,0.00284062,0.0067030014,0.05609604,0.012602015,0.8432067,0.022059808,0.0001550554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021632563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003005567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021619467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018406643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034783385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11433607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956977098","doi":"10.1007/s11409-019-09198-4","title":"Does domain matter? Monitoring accuracy across domains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Task (project management); Calibration; Psychology; Generality; Resolution (logic); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Artificial intelligence; Metacognition; Domain knowledge; Computer science; Machine learning; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0662592283616116,"score_gpt":0.39904623244513565,"score_spread":0.332787004083524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956977098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946964,0.000390697,0.0020161925,0.0002903907,0.000022435725,0.000008620902,0.00022303106,0.000026685115,0.002325539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906427,0.00007497216,0.0004043498,0.000053238866,0.000015783311,0.0000046043233,0.00015111982,0.000014500871,0.00021715087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981002,0.0006405751,0.00018258834,0.00057018636,0.00029008594,0.00021627473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226865,0.05017784,0.013802749,0.009194714,0.0024978071,0.0016404086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004998206,0.0004520887,0.00079594564,0.0010154031,0.00028781345,0.0026789655,0.0007215232,0.0015052281,0.0029809363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06481548,0.0003558273,0.00051462493,0.0010371607,0.000880775,0.004166236,0.0012255318,0.0012808728,0.00057286344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029057155,0.000419879,0.92796254,0.00016167984,0.00066172256,0.00010475095,0.00081592967,0.005085874,0.005582414,0.0019075532,0.00060295826,0.05378892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005983751,0.00029111528,0.9748744,0.000057194036,0.00023007316,0.00020380203,0.0003857854,0.0097435005,0.0025173526,0.010875841,0.0007213464,0.00003966713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019670732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016282364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004998206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003513384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030360432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026433349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991370972","doi":"10.1007/s11409-019-09213-8","title":"Recognizing early childhood as a critical time for developing and supporting self-regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Early childhood; Context (archaeology); Child development; Self-control; Self-regulated learning; Cognition","score_opus":0.014573479624900772,"score_gpt":0.30878961218380696,"score_spread":0.29421613255890616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991370972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89245933,0.011952883,0.010203825,0.005601969,0.00042425274,0.000059077232,0.00031693486,0.00018196307,0.07879976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854278,0.0032401092,0.0061236154,0.00022678034,0.000022697777,0.000036075035,0.00008435668,0.000023933058,0.004814684],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944717,0.00012791951,0.000023452914,0.00007582688,0.00012487013,0.00020073174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782026,0.00065183797,0.0004658418,0.00015583061,0.00042819165,0.00047811345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021166,0.00026635773,0.00027804368,0.0005637815,0.0011081109,0.0029652147,0.00041551,0.0007410252,0.0021364233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028364058,0.00020947304,0.00017158514,0.00036145133,0.0014773287,0.0013641281,0.0018040746,0.0015810634,0.00028790892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050552195,0.0006908341,0.2295706,0.0019394546,0.00011344414,0.006504509,0.06667816,0.0011180466,0.07230727,0.27182424,0.009001113,0.33974683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025272639,0.00034164693,0.6766194,0.003771206,0.00014169225,0.0034003581,0.0461787,0.00064682006,0.05845644,0.0488634,0.16142415,0.00013096746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008482885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024849838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008482885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014481974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004571926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016866982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143973764","doi":"10.1007/s11409-021-09263-x","title":"Are children’s judgments of another’s accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Task (project management); Theory of mind; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Self-confidence; Correlation; Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07080742795055357,"score_gpt":0.30478878788911956,"score_spread":0.233981359938566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143973764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987243,0.000094387826,0.0002095554,0.000042811982,0.0000034103482,0.0000024563863,0.00008198898,0.000009292912,0.0008317655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992667,0.00008946678,0.00029435748,0.000018549345,0.0000026787163,0.0000065342124,0.000106356245,0.000007060655,0.00020839238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998862,0.00022710988,0.00013012068,0.00025921303,0.00037249905,0.00014908583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96847993,0.013925197,0.012046743,0.0023539648,0.0024189262,0.000775211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024644134,0.00027269227,0.00037859587,0.0010894664,0.00017507304,0.0021938225,0.00042246477,0.0006315037,0.0022050627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035034187,0.00037581602,0.00026736475,0.0006680205,0.0011364039,0.0012274799,0.0006910392,0.0009385948,0.0004943756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021889032,0.00013225466,0.9661428,0.00007876151,0.00010629474,0.0002793286,0.0063761584,0.0004809366,0.0072253128,0.000601296,0.00035541365,0.018002568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006935003,0.0000875772,0.9944396,0.0000301494,0.000032924683,0.00021805211,0.0011995081,0.00046241077,0.0024583382,0.0007052159,0.0003313739,0.000027955288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005282712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005129702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005282712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004277872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002924521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013033211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200522671","doi":"10.1007/s11409-021-09273-9","title":"Constraints on the use of the memorizing effort heuristic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Memorization; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Heuristic; Metamemory; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Experimental psychology; Context effect; Social psychology; Metacognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.07855467245522964,"score_gpt":0.24723172791174244,"score_spread":0.1686770554565128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200522671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56377053,0.0014335484,0.21387601,0.0035706447,0.00010054138,0.00021657228,0.00059344684,0.0003967606,0.21604195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880806,0.00009863913,0.010194353,0.00007892252,0.000018668812,0.000046367535,0.00008199306,0.0000846799,0.0013157794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947615,0.0028381047,0.00042448431,0.0004397982,0.00084485475,0.00069129776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79584956,0.18448946,0.004456297,0.009703927,0.0037034128,0.0017972608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008538577,0.0005316913,0.00078546867,0.0016220879,0.0005443012,0.004413569,0.001664497,0.0016862891,0.009215145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094246365,0.0005233218,0.00050868327,0.001347148,0.0015220772,0.0044744634,0.0016596667,0.0027249386,0.00058159453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001841117,0.0006390714,0.017852355,0.00046501172,0.0003173785,0.0008104535,0.001067963,0.08098572,0.007404963,0.75590193,0.0035359056,0.12917812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035476856,0.0002747422,0.021547046,0.00029181325,0.00016373316,0.00070697995,0.00073960214,0.21798323,0.011194707,0.7404291,0.0062006037,0.00011352513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001629028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002160632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009215145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010757159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012474112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045156837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283827058","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09313-y","title":"How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"Flinders University; Australian Government","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Duration (music); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15767976839915737,"score_gpt":0.41044014986003546,"score_spread":0.2527603814608781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283827058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938174,0.000028395187,0.0048381602,0.000069179754,0.000010977974,0.00009477953,0.00006956155,0.00004556953,0.0010259845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895488,0.000037667032,0.009190711,0.00006571322,0.000013182145,0.00025303446,0.000116456074,0.000028366945,0.00074603636],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979583,0.00077621394,0.00016845402,0.0005093886,0.0004753497,0.00011218985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819857,0.010177434,0.004814463,0.0015507616,0.0006325855,0.00083897164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029388836,0.0006976913,0.0005842861,0.0005225602,0.00029286896,0.0012957786,0.0007094942,0.0010573725,0.002953934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022931747,0.00056130294,0.0003276296,0.00029720747,0.00053297554,0.0017247102,0.0011177314,0.0014299415,0.00027053666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011762996,0.008682403,0.07964671,0.0006769947,0.000263811,0.00030974258,0.005831725,0.008363911,0.7920304,0.0046212245,0.0011374603,0.08667262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015230506,0.01960995,0.65164685,0.00023008884,0.00028247052,0.0006210225,0.0018021762,0.16339509,0.12197631,0.03434955,0.0041239387,0.00043958036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056042866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008285879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002953934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034242676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046598885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015542448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303411337","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09325-8","title":"An examination of the effect of feedback on meta-ignorance of mental illness public stigma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Ignorance; Psychology; Mental illness; Clinical psychology; Social stigma; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Mental health; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.03979937512764321,"score_gpt":0.3217396022727637,"score_spread":0.2819402271451205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303411337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756021,0.0047600353,0.009955577,0.0020896879,0.00064089685,0.00072484853,0.0012369626,0.0007112159,0.004278746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933797,0.00035690147,0.004334561,0.00026542594,0.000086297754,0.00032173438,0.00021437464,0.00012690925,0.00091397663],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93306005,0.050008144,0.0053715887,0.00631125,0.004338759,0.0009102399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09287836,0.8802702,0.012208869,0.010403594,0.003169471,0.0010695531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09507096,0.0015909009,0.0033378366,0.0013942702,0.0012213337,0.0030018748,0.0016500446,0.0023823234,0.009898751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55187845,0.0010478765,0.006094624,0.0015025303,0.0026566288,0.005800538,0.0028417367,0.0054925997,0.00050284097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.3970072,0.0059323995,0.16753237,0.015635215,0.10196689,0.00048409577,0.013897243,0.008970428,0.011937816,0.0019227106,0.0035847388,0.27112895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021723745,0.073590875,0.6770503,0.0034507024,0.1345587,0.0009898396,0.0030267981,0.03970832,0.022787325,0.013345444,0.0089352345,0.0008327394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033922666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034566317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09507096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016049907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017804345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50278926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313433994","doi":"10.1007/s11409-022-09330-x","title":"Temporal change of emotions: Identifying academic emotion trajectories and profiles in problem-solving","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Boredom; Curiosity; Self-regulated learning; Developmental psychology; Metacognition; Transition (genetics); Dynamics (music); Latent growth modeling; Academic achievement; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1228705469515492,"score_gpt":0.3879908070769282,"score_spread":0.265120260125379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313433994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971328,0.00014324351,0.0010523045,0.000051867144,0.000006714146,0.000021942273,0.00015884034,0.000012262688,0.001420061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998468,0.00013148527,0.00065470877,0.000015380316,0.0000060154985,0.00003603507,0.00021655713,0.000007857235,0.00046389268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998135,0.00004956189,0.000012929004,0.000041714367,0.00004756798,0.000034858647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987888,0.00041901515,0.0003912758,0.00007186989,0.00016665657,0.00016240799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004600311,0.00015348013,0.00018153334,0.00063116045,0.00020241951,0.0009808004,0.00018059139,0.0003630302,0.0020148389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047362815,0.00010201579,0.00016204781,0.0006245771,0.0001935554,0.00044712974,0.00054581714,0.00053387193,0.0003738915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028452305,0.0007673716,0.84930754,0.00020691054,0.00016205799,0.00020883368,0.007761092,0.0011672544,0.027818706,0.0011100834,0.0014283807,0.10721656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009570456,0.00021857065,0.9937623,0.000023535944,0.000023401477,0.00014402205,0.0015856045,0.0015867156,0.0012838132,0.000594805,0.0007558756,0.0000116771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011899729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017538973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020148389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022848118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017572261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067403316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376874759","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09342-1","title":"Exploring the effects of a musical play intervention on young children’s self-regulation and metacognition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Society for Education, Music and Psychology Research","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Curriculum; Task (project management); Clinical psychology; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.061063791564028136,"score_gpt":0.3393742978142715,"score_spread":0.27831050625024334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376874759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999263,0.0000943542,0.00015741582,0.00002167404,0.000009146201,0.00013164582,0.000024483481,0.000012570858,0.00028566807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485636,0.00028448674,0.0034124656,0.000027737246,0.000017736707,0.00080122036,0.00007654687,0.00000516047,0.0005182138],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993777,0.00017466742,0.00005838152,0.00010606307,0.000096134034,0.00018696167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911875,0.0003776916,0.00014388487,0.000054802444,0.000054307664,0.00025059696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008105908,0.00060991355,0.00075183815,0.000599603,0.00041852312,0.00035075212,0.00051340665,0.0004301477,0.0019335487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014983867,0.00024094018,0.0005988979,0.00022313111,0.00039314904,0.00023275227,0.0006691687,0.00072448567,0.00013139438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045469,0.23484963,0.08255292,0.004014346,0.0006767316,0.0015612852,0.0124683315,0.001366591,0.1374889,0.0008540986,0.0013510251,0.4773471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008784706,0.17555657,0.7683829,0.00040560862,0.00071756414,0.00041512123,0.003279412,0.0014771667,0.036440037,0.0003438651,0.004134581,0.00006253345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022258149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030396306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022258149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040409339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008030797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0064683557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381053771","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09348-9","title":"Covert retrieval yields a forward testing effect across levels of successive list similarity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Facilitation; Psychology; Cued recall; Metamemory; Recall; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Interference theory; Similarity (geometry); Information retrieval; Computer science; Free recall; Artificial intelligence; Working memory; Cognition","score_opus":0.09367351108515826,"score_gpt":0.3508752699037557,"score_spread":0.25720175881859747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381053771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98589295,0.00026487425,0.006118898,0.00018014446,0.00012236925,0.0000625688,0.00030390755,0.0004597575,0.006594591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98020315,0.00032972053,0.008350167,0.00025550023,0.00011813225,0.00008199436,0.0009241523,0.0008650059,0.008872189],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979121,0.00019376472,0.00015445294,0.0005389891,0.0010245315,0.0001762077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977018,0.013563812,0.0021034516,0.0050833984,0.0011108126,0.0011206571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020347522,0.0011209361,0.0019682017,0.0010191605,0.00036822876,0.0017583442,0.0017549159,0.0012235647,0.012647431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01947052,0.00092622597,0.00081906485,0.00079862523,0.0015977997,0.0034660362,0.0020963347,0.0027538117,0.0023784211],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006475381,0.0011543451,0.0052416236,0.00043554013,0.00018393504,0.00021046307,0.00033101978,0.00075152965,0.92559314,0.001089698,0.00056526135,0.057967998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007564909,0.007934519,0.24595599,0.000107241576,0.0004501017,0.0019987137,0.0002903032,0.0171628,0.7115348,0.011446986,0.0022131226,0.00014894585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017199797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020304874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012647431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075602497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010826415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241929","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09352-z","title":"Supporting self-regulated learning in clinical problem-solving with a computer-based learning environment: the effectiveness of scaffolds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metacognition; Scaffold; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Self-regulated learning; Mathematics education; Cognition; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0201107742434052,"score_gpt":0.31308459706619435,"score_spread":0.29297382282278916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385241929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879149,0.00016621253,0.00715349,0.00018599731,0.000034905723,0.00014949552,0.000023249719,0.0001451112,0.004226764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822572,0.00027285048,0.015623676,0.00004582921,0.000023341243,0.0003164529,0.000051288553,0.00002682986,0.0013825931],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987129,0.0007095688,0.000060815895,0.00015074734,0.0002677135,0.00009825298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98509896,0.01217795,0.00077586726,0.00068649586,0.00032115082,0.00093959976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019430122,0.00038413497,0.00040015785,0.0005454248,0.000288324,0.0012106397,0.0008016095,0.00053602445,0.0023709147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015229658,0.00015300757,0.00023000441,0.00026896372,0.0004584066,0.0010414023,0.0012330308,0.0007947963,0.00032779266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008106343,0.043800104,0.02332705,0.001174227,0.00023789461,0.00029172038,0.0059470106,0.009478948,0.031721752,0.0054458487,0.0018989325,0.86857027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018898472,0.12899451,0.32344958,0.0029604433,0.0017818105,0.002229483,0.010695529,0.23473772,0.17594613,0.05753601,0.04225109,0.0005191225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042731827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046425793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023709147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025079792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010607925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010275722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387127679","doi":"10.1007/s11409-023-09359-6","title":"Towards a new theory of student self-assessment: Tracing learners’ cognitive and affective processes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Metacognition; Session (web analytics); Self-assessment; Qualitative property; Learning analytics; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03971913758098297,"score_gpt":0.3714180673073345,"score_spread":0.3316989297263515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387127679","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03362753,0.00067406724,0.94797146,0.002257541,0.00008322194,0.00008574831,0.000046065714,0.00022726036,0.015027032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73837817,0.0006897264,0.25744697,0.00025890095,0.000062452105,0.00024779182,0.00005318388,0.00009202768,0.0027707047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975279,0.0012066979,0.00012291512,0.00048369172,0.00052854983,0.00013024811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872634,0.008432773,0.0008273532,0.0014710592,0.0015684558,0.00043700295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040627704,0.0007089116,0.0006354734,0.0023109117,0.00075909024,0.0079915505,0.0020688903,0.001632078,0.0026790407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017470807,0.00058994966,0.000790876,0.0010810781,0.0067608887,0.011879063,0.0025233738,0.0028540334,0.00056432124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054297616,0.00019175053,0.016783996,0.00042923362,0.000118620075,0.00014845762,0.021174159,0.0140044745,0.0054419935,0.79839975,0.0010477154,0.14220554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016431926,0.00010684981,0.00852443,0.00023521548,0.0000534067,0.00022573344,0.004231963,0.10646151,0.0025989304,0.8686913,0.008794564,0.000059615628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025003857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017281059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079915505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001823893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002459454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021486223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445032","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09373-2","title":"Examining adaptations in study time allocation and restudy selection as a function of expected test format","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Function (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","score_opus":0.031009085704044898,"score_gpt":0.2618780166180574,"score_spread":0.23086893091401248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391445032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988091,0.000042077474,0.0005364792,0.000020329708,0.000007445782,0.000029292345,0.00005668935,0.000018230403,0.00048026754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978478,0.000023279941,0.00062137266,0.00003414722,0.0000074475315,0.000087757595,0.00011318724,0.000025904457,0.001239117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982436,0.00066608633,0.00013585822,0.0004490474,0.00034579943,0.00015956418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542068,0.034416925,0.0055505354,0.0028355338,0.0013622111,0.0016279172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003507116,0.0003583919,0.00044685067,0.00055516395,0.00019862026,0.0010287801,0.0007561924,0.0005426927,0.0033698347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036568593,0.00030221496,0.00032649023,0.0005447343,0.0004074898,0.00077615166,0.0007224752,0.0010391764,0.00044054346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05037675,0.011553987,0.65351707,0.0003055218,0.00060236733,0.00035933458,0.004252147,0.0049520973,0.16229038,0.0004687662,0.00082883035,0.11049275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013780355,0.004192635,0.9877687,0.000007684518,0.00006730467,0.0000659406,0.00023191066,0.002089051,0.004998588,0.00013771698,0.0002855481,0.000017246557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014918171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016189504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003507116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030380875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042753667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018547654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401010658","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09399-6","title":"On the confidence-accuracy relationship in memory: inferential, direct access, or indirect access?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Metacognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.18061953074401849,"score_gpt":0.38001452586178625,"score_spread":0.19939499511776776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401010658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93407226,0.004915131,0.029715616,0.0060181227,0.00020803371,0.000062942265,0.00033471547,0.0001150844,0.024557991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949904,0.0010247059,0.0024806908,0.00028428447,0.00017518834,0.000028316897,0.00009906367,0.000066822075,0.0008504538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958697,0.0011880996,0.00031786144,0.0010661926,0.0012637308,0.00029447098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8087981,0.15300694,0.015525159,0.0130860945,0.0066015758,0.002982073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010057489,0.0006645122,0.001488313,0.0021146093,0.00054771703,0.0059515685,0.0021657138,0.0026440197,0.010286888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10983977,0.0011054698,0.00087572046,0.0021201002,0.005253581,0.014661409,0.0030762486,0.004013639,0.00093633943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069170278,0.002107717,0.32845834,0.0014242139,0.0021798878,0.0009838811,0.0105503285,0.010218522,0.016845142,0.22220771,0.002931124,0.3951761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047603375,0.0012957955,0.5010503,0.00055348105,0.0010331387,0.0011371318,0.002591333,0.028325157,0.008930793,0.45134827,0.0027775622,0.0004810575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033555194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022219284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010286888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092276424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000992207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053189754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402710578","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09403-z","title":"Analyzing multimodal data to understand medical trainees' regulation strategies and physiological responses in high- fidelity medical simulation scenarios","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Psychology; Medical simulation; High fidelity; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.15934914116802415,"score_gpt":0.43162908036323405,"score_spread":0.2722799391952099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402710578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95284194,0.00010902746,0.04486942,0.0001245906,0.000013906383,0.000090709735,0.00050853833,0.00019286059,0.0012491695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101615,0.00006564092,0.008233396,0.000025404204,0.0000061197857,0.00006290893,0.00035964587,0.00001512606,0.00021564556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996222,0.00015360776,0.000024762918,0.000074876014,0.00007316517,0.000051256007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975829,0.0018100871,0.00020407143,0.00011969679,0.00018257031,0.00010063815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071855995,0.00040246086,0.00022993513,0.0008516922,0.0001576616,0.0007004123,0.00026111462,0.0006259161,0.0016817118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007534262,0.00014182768,0.0003059078,0.00047671192,0.00021722338,0.00052628893,0.0005781427,0.00037596578,0.00025525354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034580666,0.0017018832,0.34788084,0.00083489914,0.00058476103,0.0008432416,0.005629599,0.083802834,0.18197961,0.0018134264,0.001996952,0.36947396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006149005,0.0013458811,0.57430816,0.00016871258,0.00025031716,0.00082484225,0.0027527749,0.38284826,0.032012757,0.0036255352,0.0016737864,0.00012752655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016292809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019962976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016817118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022186081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003788092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0056259036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403336121","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09402-0","title":"Modelling the unique contributions of task understanding to academic challenges and performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.16948994284293128,"score_gpt":0.3965628355978978,"score_spread":0.2270728927549665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403336121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8279057,0.00031497874,0.15553068,0.00059729756,0.00005103536,0.00006688892,0.00017748012,0.00011277665,0.015243168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896353,0.00008441153,0.0073816744,0.0000151523645,0.000008172537,0.000044308035,0.00004590855,0.000021022015,0.0027640022],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994161,0.00027327187,0.000020117921,0.000116390685,0.00007152892,0.000102671336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896409,0.008347698,0.0007904021,0.0004989082,0.00036268024,0.0003594413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015407923,0.00059241767,0.0004115063,0.00055556546,0.0003147382,0.0027659144,0.00097049825,0.0014120599,0.003609837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015821317,0.00039349924,0.00049522525,0.00058515166,0.0008831696,0.0022293897,0.0013218247,0.0013091542,0.0004453328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032097587,0.00035105573,0.016348083,0.0001641094,0.000086953114,0.00013902756,0.001027912,0.8982941,0.0030975274,0.04795974,0.0006776712,0.031532887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000180161,0.00006627422,0.003856592,0.000015498772,0.000020459178,0.000025749887,0.00012363563,0.97039974,0.0004884949,0.024363715,0.0006038374,0.000018095445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00784719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076720687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00784719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087441766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015717325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015603006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411188404","doi":"10.1007/s11409-025-09424-2","title":"Do metamemory judgments impair relational encoding?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamemory; Psychology; Metacognition; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.053965925880990286,"score_gpt":0.30965298004757424,"score_spread":0.25568705416658394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411188404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922523,0.00016064454,0.0034690453,0.0007011063,0.00010611507,0.00002704532,0.0001898235,0.00012304963,0.0029709637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971071,0.00013393506,0.001374846,0.0001416907,0.000014287603,0.000011474829,0.00010603403,0.000057535843,0.0010531864],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.0001245396,0.000114584946,0.00025948754,0.0003889998,0.00013247135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950832,0.00128389,0.0016159464,0.0012828822,0.0002910718,0.000442911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011629111,0.00039470673,0.00054979016,0.0003711331,0.00022821687,0.0012801205,0.00078050466,0.0009819607,0.0047125933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008818158,0.00040890407,0.00019448111,0.00018082194,0.0012035382,0.0021007543,0.0007576055,0.0017268248,0.00061296136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074237897,0.0024952982,0.034909014,0.00051065383,0.0004627782,0.00091761176,0.0013974265,0.0013131972,0.8147967,0.010915543,0.0018932143,0.12296487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006730538,0.002995992,0.24515235,0.00017528812,0.00042203584,0.0025065953,0.0021056,0.010352717,0.67022496,0.059491307,0.005749502,0.00015070727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001970572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018916936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047125933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039748094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078171387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01576513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411565602","doi":"10.1007/s11409-025-09430-4","title":"How do students self-assess? examining the metacognitive processes of student self-assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Self-assessment; Self-concept; Developmental psychology; Self-control; Self-regulated learning; Self evaluation; Academic achievement; Cognition; Social psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.04062015942691434,"score_gpt":0.37832243636529805,"score_spread":0.3377022769383837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411565602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956625,0.0002148259,0.0014770696,0.00015219553,0.000010439572,0.000025580577,0.000021242668,0.000029832432,0.0024062365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813616,0.00014413432,0.0011982127,0.00002700832,0.0000033123758,0.000022251508,0.000021011165,0.0000056764866,0.000442108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954196,0.0022456204,0.00028965413,0.00043455043,0.001419832,0.00019074461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92877054,0.0451152,0.013097593,0.004060885,0.0068943915,0.0020613652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073559973,0.00033959062,0.0004523072,0.0010949653,0.00038490345,0.0040633357,0.0006162631,0.00074887497,0.0007351016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08705341,0.0002920573,0.00034060612,0.00064006436,0.0006059567,0.0023549485,0.0013119553,0.0012015881,0.00033205934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041999717,0.0017569079,0.74072325,0.00018306727,0.00027561586,0.00006530826,0.017212624,0.0014056655,0.0051535,0.001118602,0.0006839918,0.23100148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063358566,0.0015322776,0.95739794,0.00021603168,0.00021294424,0.0002899031,0.010349929,0.011161877,0.011591819,0.0041661593,0.002887188,0.00013059023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015018558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024431974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073559973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005292406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014239745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0389027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}