{"meta":{"query_hash":"30b7eb0a9921","filters":{"venue":"Metaphilosophy"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/30b7eb0a9921","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metaphilosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0565495966401459,"score_gpt":0.24089496213491396,"score_spread":0.18434536549476804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493333246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1566043,0.0018969255,0.00062324986,0.03608565,0.0030343654,0.0014038814,0.00004444406,0.00049452594,0.7998127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800924,0.000009023654,0.00022789983,0.007429152,0.0023368257,0.00010850523,0.000010442046,0.000044407156,0.009741329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849516,0.00017567557,0.00036237604,0.00033009026,0.0002527032,0.00038396768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988959,0.00015628146,0.00014890327,0.00038243155,0.00030460485,0.00011190183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034846252,0.00024349005,0.00039742107,0.00010534463,0.0004201968,0.0002529515,0.00026133328,0.000092711576,0.001876357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054738117,0.00018400037,0.00022276604,0.000042829306,0.00057077856,0.000444062,0.000036412097,0.0003670008,0.0023932322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007199856,0.000092971575,0.000099669276,0.00004988025,0.00019246449,0.0000031975685,0.005626772,0.00000806035,0.0007733723,0.98909235,0.0026033942,0.0014506396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010203618,0.00020098062,0.0005559422,0.000032104672,0.00019813862,0.000004768659,0.00187625,0.00017840111,0.00023703834,0.78144795,0.21369769,0.0005503748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036851733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074592775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002012239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034166398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498873853","doi":"10.1111/meta.12139","title":"Caricatures, Myths, and White Lies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Analogy; Epistemology; Period (music); Empiricism; White (mutation); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1028423331531241,"score_gpt":0.22018546088229046,"score_spread":0.11734312772916636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498873853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005146823,0.0034957028,0.000020449786,0.009066192,0.001078586,0.0001112409,0.000022509112,0.00012851082,0.98093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990283,0.000015198779,0.00024303954,0.0012499907,0.0012105816,0.000009911414,0.000004641579,0.000011944694,0.006971652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990434,0.000048374797,0.00016132082,0.00026519012,0.0002895354,0.00019219569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993579,0.000030398232,0.00005092513,0.00023178544,0.000102331665,0.00022666207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021857514,0.00014199663,0.0001987286,0.00011089857,0.00028125578,0.00013823881,0.00019599182,0.000039901195,0.00013321404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007030554,0.00010837984,0.000057457426,0.000079427424,0.0004823046,0.00029132975,0.000063935346,0.00015473497,0.00017546596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013624263,0.00004113736,0.000094480994,0.000008440996,0.000016075319,0.0000077269515,0.01929468,0.0000019168438,0.000010262681,0.9573141,0.022534393,0.0006631894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014564344,0.0000882421,0.000040106086,0.000003799209,0.000021545058,0.0000036080344,0.00034574117,0.000017816052,0.000007479314,0.25686052,0.742315,0.00015049918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050561575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034101446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028498882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025127047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4419602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581973813","doi":"10.1111/meta.12042","title":"In Defense of Anti‐Archimedean Moral Realism: A Response to Recent Critics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Moral realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Moral psychology","score_opus":0.05617317438031854,"score_gpt":0.26283045416981815,"score_spread":0.2066572797894996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581973813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78935206,0.00028577782,0.0000043779296,0.049176022,0.00063197466,0.0004887987,0.00008771273,0.000051454397,0.15992184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945268,0.000025934218,0.00040179057,0.0035422794,0.00047435664,0.000047571604,0.000008876057,0.000025902502,0.0009464965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998336,0.00039277805,0.00046466113,0.00028101046,0.00020164561,0.0003238589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.00028680038,0.00008896941,0.00042889515,0.00019287804,0.00013863541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054940925,0.00020601515,0.00042884858,0.00042996608,0.000119881945,0.000039931703,0.00029321277,0.00007219019,0.0033848137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025200666,0.00018184171,0.00012230026,0.00012830742,0.0004288102,0.00024154021,0.00008538015,0.0002135794,0.0005331687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048064327,0.00023483328,0.00021909262,0.000028757133,0.00004487726,0.000025274823,0.012379323,0.000008131855,0.0007855001,0.9810652,0.0044165603,0.00031182123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005365228,0.00041695562,0.0013965608,0.00004267012,0.000036483696,0.000006311608,0.0003655912,0.000009788062,0.00056984567,0.9087791,0.0875706,0.00026957583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042182076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013106568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20517476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018734749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032260396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.22046507543278415,"score_gpt":0.29212079601589697,"score_spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1701715910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028524434,0.00049455464,0.0015627864,0.0036449137,0.0032561002,0.0011084978,0.00029530976,0.00051051594,0.9606029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98611563,0.000013839606,0.004295117,0.0039305803,0.0040597925,0.00014225388,0.000085102474,0.00008355513,0.0012741106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982406,0.00015474233,0.00043026442,0.000505418,0.0002285922,0.00044041773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844015,0.00013018181,0.00018044357,0.00070896413,0.0003334949,0.00020675162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006297746,0.00031877487,0.00046360926,0.00021125743,0.00048670807,0.00007977723,0.00048936973,0.00010427479,0.00076145964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006992978,0.00027534034,0.00038672512,0.000048425092,0.0008230023,0.0004530325,0.000043317417,0.0002837542,0.00021152906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008730489,0.00034518886,0.000049963946,0.00007626078,0.000141699,0.000004991406,0.028680088,3.5018456e-7,0.00013938118,0.96884835,0.0006090324,0.0010173984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000488493,0.0006563792,0.000063207015,0.000016413971,0.00014629557,0.0000029159353,0.0007493586,0.000032580945,0.00090695557,0.91206217,0.084510595,0.00036462743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012050569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001595856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003775353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08191204937160894,"score_gpt":0.26948065994830483,"score_spread":0.18756861057669588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910537218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04371581,0.00067049224,0.0002448597,0.0074391193,0.0035827728,0.00023314556,0.00005010524,0.0002936856,0.94377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641565,0.000028312388,0.00035172046,0.004216056,0.005322359,0.000026575584,0.000035361478,0.000054032458,0.025809098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.00020327826,0.00035555978,0.00038737667,0.00029679827,0.0003737587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881214,0.00013070481,0.00015722077,0.00059959386,0.00017501901,0.0001253083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064286764,0.00026831677,0.00044201475,0.00014169859,0.00041195445,0.00014298699,0.00034196963,0.00011275743,0.0007982275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012121294,0.00022154524,0.00029321635,0.00005551262,0.0005983747,0.00015595577,0.00007224984,0.00037515725,0.0012171913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011464884,0.00008524697,0.0001081379,0.000048148446,0.00009471064,0.000003582335,0.0064841267,0.0000021226683,0.00008061265,0.9875326,0.0020235884,0.0035256657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026467285,0.0000948449,0.00009387049,0.000010627492,0.0000890562,0.000002344943,0.0002918039,0.00003118481,0.00013748153,0.33248362,0.66627395,0.00022650848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105751635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016873474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015155688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975334706","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00205","title":"Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Rest (music); Action (physics); Action theory (sociology); Task (project management); Philosophy; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.11238933394246156,"score_gpt":0.2935694555709934,"score_spread":0.18118012162853184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975334706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74622345,0.0000632095,0.000043994605,0.007961604,0.0012064005,0.0002814756,0.00004152485,0.0001609524,0.24401739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672216,0.00013155505,0.000079905614,0.0010855149,0.00054778595,0.000016156526,0.000002469244,0.000023578752,0.001390877],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.00011979849,0.00029840038,0.00045648,0.00042429683,0.0002398227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990777,0.00013094988,0.00015728117,0.0005042609,0.000035497058,0.00009436068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011598911,0.00019213464,0.00024542824,0.0002119244,0.00012908157,0.000020072348,0.000313034,0.00007019721,0.00025905488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002636735,0.000116058276,0.00017164894,0.0005617655,0.00017696641,0.00019005808,0.000036431386,0.0001757417,0.00025403078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003029977,0.00061785366,0.0006694298,0.00006865573,0.000017378725,0.00011699984,0.00012455731,0.00003492878,0.8452848,0.1468233,0.00040896356,0.0055301255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064038805,0.00039979414,0.0019047938,0.000064031236,0.0000338446,0.000020194799,0.000012713682,0.00006798808,0.63923025,0.3081799,0.049125377,0.00032074912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016819658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046200216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020417765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013953233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4732719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981549461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00357.x","title":"THEORIZING INTERNATIONAL FAIRNESS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Mainstream; Spell; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01784467246631162,"score_gpt":0.32070350654483387,"score_spread":0.30285883407852227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981549461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08351613,0.00020253641,0.00048238487,0.04032175,0.0008998459,0.00010085643,0.0000093986355,0.00013652377,0.8743306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528533,0.00008266292,0.00091694144,0.0011543025,0.0014712965,0.000004090154,0.000006864557,0.000005778357,0.001072744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.000075484946,0.000114955285,0.00014114463,0.0003438149,0.00018795549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996682,0.00003518261,0.000039082734,0.00011085902,0.000070684284,0.00007599214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040940117,0.00006751972,0.000087002605,0.0000640836,0.00023643531,0.00008036441,0.00034411674,0.00005754872,0.00033503867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100348,0.0000661481,0.0000812162,0.00016237429,0.00012523675,0.0003106165,0.000041570118,0.00009116316,0.00034125496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004036194,0.0000358821,0.0005817508,8.3135245e-7,0.000019058518,0.0000020235948,0.0029381074,0.000021837355,0.000023522358,0.9881779,0.00053572445,0.00765934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012800837,0.0000062893105,0.00024328532,0.0000039999577,0.000010547138,6.171329e-7,0.0008069842,0.00024883254,0.00001706295,0.19373392,0.80469096,0.00010951018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019599618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061500346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070905255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031274754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4386256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006596923","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00333.x","title":"Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Metaphor; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021938531361714236,"score_gpt":0.2814271955218167,"score_spread":0.25948866416010247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006596923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636843,0.027944848,0.00054218335,0.015844366,0.0015473604,0.0010248974,0.00008318001,0.00016036365,0.2891685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535924,0.000091892885,0.00053803425,0.0032378796,0.00041284325,0.00008560739,0.000016983195,0.000026983744,0.00023053022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803466,0.0004241147,0.0004519353,0.00046306103,0.00033614354,0.00029008609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869287,0.00025406713,0.00022767365,0.0005906071,0.00013790901,0.00009687287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007943596,0.00027215463,0.0005918346,0.0001722716,0.0001403022,0.000023336956,0.00034295395,0.000344036,0.0003624089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018738146,0.00015613192,0.00034327316,0.0004181341,0.00090977305,0.00008981292,0.00008448345,0.00059252616,0.000119419965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048319984,0.00019832514,0.0001863696,0.000028433924,0.0004000251,0.000049047547,0.0014372703,0.0000017846971,0.00023821613,0.9953913,0.00007364229,0.0015123775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048112525,0.00020908163,0.0036305285,0.00002397835,0.00042297074,0.0001243118,0.00041052824,0.0000015428819,0.0012374419,0.9875352,0.0013547089,0.00023846964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008887329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047168855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33167496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015101364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001721892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06855442791955355,"score_gpt":0.35978905727043126,"score_spread":0.29123462935087774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011119464,0.000210617,0.00019011297,0.20247969,0.0002506314,0.00014840499,0.0000070550736,0.00013260804,0.7854614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831813,0.000014709722,0.00032362985,0.014846952,0.001484954,0.0000036153663,0.0000011898321,0.0000039891156,0.00013965734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983768,0.00032224832,0.0001824372,0.00018884588,0.0004972615,0.0004324053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991957,0.0002525298,0.00005199764,0.0002459193,0.00007610788,0.00017772208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095549354,0.00011108041,0.00013929937,0.000020530533,0.0010556695,0.0000875286,0.00046035374,0.00012127034,0.000084307445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010482427,0.0000775063,0.00013196794,0.0004921981,0.00047943636,0.00017831205,0.000029992078,0.00027454874,0.00019539273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037062346,0.000030068008,0.00030510002,0.0000012148895,0.000009998311,0.0000029230885,0.0008888621,0.0000032081978,0.000006104257,0.99586016,0.00024283984,0.002645789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780312,0.000029696934,0.0027660977,0.000006281855,0.00001957763,8.6700317e-7,0.0001622116,0.000010988251,0.000020140085,0.9629923,0.03381477,0.00009902821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022074065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003322073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000860384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81194633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023683608","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00515.x","title":"PHILOSOPHY, MYTH, AND THE “SIGNIFICANCE” OF SPECULATIVE THOUGHT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Parallels; Mythology; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Relation (database); Similarity (geometry); Metaphysics; Western philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01700582519115804,"score_gpt":0.21556813050029308,"score_spread":0.19856230530913505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023683608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58705604,0.011806623,0.0019928233,0.0045516114,0.00089746725,0.0011514261,0.00009238215,0.00006914368,0.3923825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836427,0.00006116445,0.0006212847,0.00036597395,0.00041788482,0.0000012332118,0.000010279683,0.0000033134702,0.00015457474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879676,0.0001358044,0.00034890647,0.00021340647,0.0003005493,0.00020457723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.00031355326,0.00017765834,0.00022918028,0.00005673499,0.00007482288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012807314,0.00013127513,0.00027790252,0.00008405311,0.00013658011,0.000016910411,0.00015451164,0.000051794086,0.00015893398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004165054,0.00007711903,0.0001010245,0.00030182046,0.00046642625,0.00012654334,0.000011450241,0.00012376459,0.00004931994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011388233,0.000056348086,0.23075774,0.00017176804,0.00031533,0.00003075648,0.0017743976,0.00030618353,0.0002739888,0.73097783,0.00046790735,0.03372895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015588187,0.00015748914,0.5770077,0.000043966276,0.00008173314,0.000029374825,0.0002507915,0.0010123416,0.0004083465,0.4128284,0.006366026,0.00025501885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008223493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031993794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41130826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020866562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016200886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044010586","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00508.x","title":"THE COMMUNITY VIEW REVISITED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Ottawa; City University of New York","keywords":"Epistemology; Key (lock); Content (measure theory); Reflexive pronoun; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0687676447740696,"score_gpt":0.2672389219329435,"score_spread":0.19847127715887392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044010586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018700376,0.0019456479,0.00007372194,0.009793056,0.00033521114,0.000356725,0.0000356186,0.00019013725,0.9685695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945838,0.000055329856,0.00007453512,0.001817377,0.0013874414,0.000023240436,0.000020135407,0.000019913088,0.0020182363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989593,0.00014345521,0.00033124894,0.00012701564,0.00018476494,0.00025422417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985565,0.00042846758,0.000107660715,0.00070371554,0.00012125273,0.00008238833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012363815,0.00014588307,0.00016269526,0.000060763534,0.0027221772,0.0001964303,0.00046349657,0.00003226308,0.0002628773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048576087,0.000094143346,0.00014072991,0.00011667282,0.00050181005,0.0001301767,0.00006990164,0.00038166944,0.0006195628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106688785,0.00005867849,0.000008897173,0.00001130427,0.0000408003,0.0000013296172,0.0026143468,8.833202e-8,0.00004707098,0.9886908,0.0022448164,0.006271192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084287996,0.0000285552,0.00012768066,0.000009708018,0.000026859023,0.0000017812043,0.0003789935,0.0000013454392,0.00011176727,0.3231553,0.6759773,0.00009640004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044611774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014602518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015460839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008865854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060937840","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00159","title":"Bernard Gert's Moral System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Bond; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.03516350569316903,"score_gpt":0.1982966613331263,"score_spread":0.16313315563995726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060937840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053303733,0.0010604053,0.0000015638611,0.0045862617,0.0009107425,0.00015032716,0.000052009327,0.0003361056,0.93959886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688122,0.000026827176,0.00009336053,0.0010356796,0.003219489,0.000024643226,0.00001798034,0.000029667219,0.02674012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988235,0.00010716528,0.00028317282,0.00029736565,0.00019349609,0.00029526357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993533,0.000049506445,0.00006262553,0.00038085924,0.000050421797,0.00010330311],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018191391,0.0002281771,0.00033081832,0.00010015256,0.00045063294,0.00008738796,0.00030943684,0.000080692196,0.028762924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000462189,0.00018978551,0.00022762228,0.000043264798,0.00040269844,0.00024653377,0.000022852018,0.00020700856,0.00819372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006641035,0.00005746201,0.00004735918,0.00003057065,0.000103514234,0.000033136403,0.0019008362,0.0000030888516,0.000003904132,0.9880778,0.004530173,0.0051456997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044248236,0.00012994757,0.000063626576,0.00003328589,0.00010999678,0.000026338434,0.00010403975,0.00005954274,0.00004059429,0.23671581,0.76194835,0.0003259951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000078597564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016225584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020099562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000118557045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072471026","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x","title":"HOW WE HAVE BEEN LEARNING TO TALK ABOUT AUTISM: A ROLE FOR STORIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Autism; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Autism spectrum disorder","score_opus":0.04628814462062808,"score_gpt":0.30847880142563117,"score_spread":0.2621906568050031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072471026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16655256,0.0026600184,0.010806962,0.78247535,0.00063596206,0.004010707,0.00013598292,0.0010233648,0.031699102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908247,0.00006334118,0.0012478111,0.0012425949,0.00022882746,0.00015259744,0.000004810309,0.000052731844,0.0061826087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972938,0.00018119234,0.00022624666,0.00081239047,0.0006871487,0.00079926004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989044,0.00022665676,0.00009966808,0.00047725526,0.000022430777,0.00026958002],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028264953,0.00029155283,0.0003833515,0.00037460792,0.00053268246,0.00035797036,0.00066404894,0.00010251306,0.000049907336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090520846,0.00028057772,0.00020025006,0.0006375883,0.000115324096,0.00040848774,0.00014617681,0.0004225266,0.00011553493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027269937,0.0002912605,0.00013848777,0.0000486296,0.000031026342,0.00006853556,0.0046603824,0.00029189058,0.20350714,0.7585312,0.0008725676,0.031286143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007829363,0.0012671605,0.0010727745,0.000029143617,0.000030734325,0.000017459872,0.00018184734,0.0013182611,0.11454422,0.60781807,0.2724119,0.00052545534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025731712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016119826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077399876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051662624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100281699","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00442.x","title":"ACKNOWLEDGING AND RECTIFYING THE GENOCIDE OF AMERICAN INDIANS: “WHY IS IT THAT THEY CARRY THEIR LIVES ON THEIR FINGERNAILS?”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Demise; Redress; Phenomenon; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06288955979326025,"score_gpt":0.22798529177469493,"score_spread":0.16509573198143468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100281699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47207978,0.0029671455,0.000050351868,0.0055007916,0.0004811832,0.00028951795,0.00019833048,0.000086924825,0.51834595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949417,0.000104129664,0.00003875604,0.002562745,0.0006473643,0.000018604273,0.00000688251,0.000029740373,0.0016500779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988687,0.00013019373,0.00028203364,0.00027822508,0.00016425586,0.00027659987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990444,0.00032993202,0.00017445658,0.00031916858,0.00006468019,0.00006733405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016757063,0.0002496963,0.00037229594,0.00011565854,0.00041712465,0.000084658044,0.00026747497,0.000034291646,0.00017145973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023252598,0.00014228809,0.00019859642,0.00006860364,0.0006879777,0.00014252216,0.00006516364,0.00023902624,0.00002580238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007648504,0.00020730653,0.0012706624,0.00008559013,0.00029452096,0.000012941547,0.1534889,0.000003567161,0.00016544279,0.82204884,0.0035762854,0.018769464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032053274,0.00048730255,0.0017310971,0.00014665889,0.00012436415,0.000006055667,0.017348634,0.00013735708,0.0006766622,0.48141137,0.49699724,0.000612712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003244006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014518311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032229957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018313402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.035612631576947065,"score_gpt":0.2596950115166866,"score_spread":0.22408237993973956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105991975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620361,0.0014102699,0.000064886626,0.052676927,0.0076398677,0.0010742432,0.00061813,0.00018024456,0.7742993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860576,0.00003656136,0.0002302861,0.0017231202,0.0026898386,0.000061351784,0.0001274437,0.000035255576,0.009038578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.00013761922,0.00031907466,0.00032274256,0.00033205614,0.0002849296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998994,0.00013430622,0.00015829652,0.0005015165,0.00012942782,0.00008248844],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006001584,0.00023153255,0.00027595676,0.000059316353,0.00081634714,0.00018922462,0.00035795284,0.000103829836,0.0015060249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035330886,0.00015362405,0.00020165117,0.000055286335,0.0011431137,0.00024613316,0.000069754766,0.0006120664,0.0003717797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001649804,0.00019317049,0.00017949895,0.000029218154,0.0002202842,0.0000037530383,0.024079993,3.0180934e-7,0.009249816,0.91824,0.046140276,0.0016472092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026358227,0.00007184895,0.00006675027,0.0000073782244,0.00011579019,0.0000061595097,0.0007711876,0.0000123145155,0.0020290553,0.11383385,0.8825939,0.00022816792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014835509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004522151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8364536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000121312505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040282608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115065741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01624.x","title":"RIGHT ACT, VIRTUOUS MOTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Action (physics); Relation (database); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05604761966791063,"score_gpt":0.4515562491710352,"score_spread":0.3955086295031246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115065741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08757506,0.00008661094,0.00042257758,0.041160718,0.0071033873,0.0006494594,0.000021115702,0.00030737728,0.8626737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505105,0.00002655189,0.004201029,0.014373749,0.0026808386,0.00009537451,0.000008918078,0.00005058653,0.0035119238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589115,0.0019515845,0.0005255018,0.0004168479,0.000671454,0.00054347643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913428,0.0069733798,0.00029194675,0.0008237548,0.00021992234,0.0003482006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048440685,0.0002094205,0.00034039235,0.00014252197,0.0014714435,0.000012248256,0.0005195535,0.0006466708,0.0069957348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013456395,0.00016463861,0.00011574874,0.0003242554,0.00041380362,0.00029165988,0.00021817704,0.011937534,0.00849026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007071008,0.00020662059,0.005517404,0.00009473486,0.00012304951,0.00007487209,0.0018405413,3.1882547e-7,0.004507769,0.9746465,0.011057052,0.0018603976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005934209,0.000056831268,0.0044535995,0.000034172805,0.00008076143,0.0000050278527,0.00020180241,0.00003069035,0.00036795082,0.65960306,0.33435753,0.00021512299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008179818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012060332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88747597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004244135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023738312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130217881","doi":"10.1111/meta.12089","title":"Whole Lives and Good Deaths","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Currency; Value of life; Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026636423351834793,"score_gpt":0.21858024475261345,"score_spread":0.19194382140077865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130217881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38681486,0.00034115644,0.000018070636,0.0017477783,0.00036474076,0.00009864751,0.000019730502,0.0000604837,0.61053455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231887,0.000015710702,0.0000525071,0.0005171697,0.00070884696,0.000007291441,0.0000043037853,0.000011514152,0.0063637765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994328,0.000056745754,0.000117071846,0.00016191638,0.0001040276,0.00012741878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996751,0.000040334824,0.00003778928,0.00013679164,0.00004782418,0.000062167615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015962422,0.00010030202,0.0001479699,0.00006393148,0.00026826878,0.00016815896,0.00007800827,0.000017813205,0.0005430642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025085643,0.00008117429,0.00005087475,0.000019972858,0.0001733644,0.00014345354,0.000042112893,0.000072070434,0.00024424147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028739378,0.000039045433,0.0005723037,0.000013893083,0.000033739285,0.0000013667129,0.0020141827,2.3482852e-7,0.00027204913,0.99436885,0.00082544377,0.0018560423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019591275,0.0001056173,0.0019068094,0.000008000132,0.00003313911,0.0000010931174,0.00012430243,0.00007002075,0.00016076266,0.26726037,0.7299934,0.00014055565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055926477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039790268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.729168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004594094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047924195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59461725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135858668","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01716.x","title":"Minimally Creative Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Novelty; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Creativity technique; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1323051549234892,"score_gpt":0.350952909384375,"score_spread":0.2186477544608858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135858668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2709378,0.00009915201,0.0000907856,0.00056468806,0.0010615741,0.000116797906,0.000008288074,0.000079665646,0.72704124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794276,0.000005992594,0.0014395528,0.0013023968,0.0001802306,0.00005403598,0.0000020690497,0.000015010136,0.017573116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.00014116774,0.00016116252,0.0003417745,0.00014050622,0.00021199578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992921,0.00006925613,0.0000767403,0.0004135679,0.000046371682,0.00010196558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017571574,0.00012556062,0.00015012876,0.00013344985,0.00009311759,0.00001441163,0.0002684995,0.000050634317,0.00875986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000724205,0.00010961417,0.00008596661,0.00036579603,0.0002111122,0.00010920179,0.000033508637,0.00011679279,0.0020731315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022526641,0.0022058191,0.01669967,0.00000826283,0.000117711126,0.00007526022,0.031772505,1.1558277e-7,0.005570435,0.9191543,0.015954742,0.008215956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012036533,0.0009555732,0.70509154,0.000017902501,0.00015942936,0.00009507641,0.0030431517,0.000007516456,0.02623363,0.08097011,0.18136902,0.0008533842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054817185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003151206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011254778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021073725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17678346117820307,"score_gpt":0.28260890735972716,"score_spread":0.10582544618152409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200912703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040366217,0.0041439137,0.00004940147,0.024352489,0.0033125426,0.0002631333,0.000022995066,0.000189085,0.9273002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785012,0.000025180943,0.00017536277,0.0057022953,0.0045487396,0.000026589783,0.000011633936,0.000033479504,0.010975546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876076,0.00019921707,0.00025761375,0.00022173396,0.0002986313,0.0002620178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.00017197388,0.00012523727,0.00043772956,0.00023589101,0.00010105919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097058853,0.00017068554,0.00024696827,0.00006175344,0.00040751527,0.00014656773,0.0003433641,0.000058262733,0.00015801052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016890671,0.00010735906,0.00016950592,0.000049356742,0.0006705085,0.00019862769,0.00007890746,0.00034850347,0.00058895536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008480894,0.000043702945,0.00005673327,0.000013705411,0.00007954686,0.0000049753194,0.026813354,0.000004603247,0.000023459175,0.95997614,0.011217045,0.0017582445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018802432,0.000048469876,0.000023295826,0.0000069502685,0.00006380441,0.0000027538683,0.0022601064,0.000034370496,0.000056445802,0.33809334,0.65909046,0.00013195093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011435305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015817923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93813497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001819635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005267234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7570026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240850837","doi":"10.1111/meta.12153","title":"Self‐Images and “Perspicuous Representations”: Reflection, Philosophy, and the Glass Mirror","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphor; Ambiguity; Philosophy; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06760753610240872,"score_gpt":0.26888256502401725,"score_spread":0.20127502892160853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240850837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02266426,0.0072471634,0.000013174048,0.03209879,0.0015553717,0.00057966344,0.000039108083,0.0002954895,0.935507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932155,0.00020346048,0.0005774535,0.0016449357,0.0013300925,0.000073913645,0.000006676631,0.000027551625,0.0029204441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835676,0.0002077658,0.00031000996,0.0004707275,0.00040494546,0.00024979332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885756,0.00013158534,0.00013733735,0.00041548442,0.00025052117,0.0002075147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006931861,0.00024111188,0.00033147464,0.00023052211,0.0010031854,0.00032342933,0.00025147485,0.000044155633,0.00006363402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120472614,0.0001635785,0.00009998267,0.00013201394,0.0022273525,0.0005758731,0.000109725566,0.0002141877,0.0000832621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098347744,0.00007082467,0.000094356314,0.000030091409,0.000077254605,0.0000074547875,0.030144878,5.522292e-7,0.000021092677,0.965441,0.0037926955,0.00022146516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018602205,0.00013386988,0.0001340818,0.00001193243,0.00015997888,0.00003658705,0.0018654177,0.000091343485,0.00002608649,0.61691123,0.37848288,0.00028633125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004420803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017812334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048890462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005760611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8206773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23389744417782146,"score_gpt":0.24805714729496037,"score_spread":0.014159703117138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322233634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02391746,0.0004815066,0.000085560016,0.0009825871,0.00237708,0.00015017853,0.000034862933,0.00017225745,0.9717985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938787,0.000021143627,0.00039267863,0.0011830514,0.0010757832,0.000019310099,0.00001441444,0.000031303,0.0078744525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998942,0.00008269009,0.00025099033,0.00026497885,0.00019646912,0.0002628828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00004885044,0.00009839963,0.00038247945,0.00012494334,0.00009403802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029231622,0.0001816561,0.00027262417,0.000094432056,0.00026733143,0.00004815535,0.00024523458,0.0000596349,0.0019809424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035055775,0.00014754407,0.00020916743,0.000039853247,0.00068697217,0.00019151393,0.000043211687,0.00023228202,0.00066275697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017454006,0.00009702185,0.00010950632,0.000024444285,0.00008870683,0.000012864857,0.030113276,7.427776e-8,0.000037524955,0.9677528,0.0013832389,0.00036309942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019309775,0.00010523451,0.000117754396,0.000008914662,0.00009897778,0.0000019923298,0.0014851051,0.0000036715096,0.00041048683,0.60370636,0.39363956,0.00022880353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019803923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001620581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96547043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013072421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021130398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549944756","doi":"10.1111/meta.12165","title":"Overcoming Instructor‐Originated Math Anxiety in Philosophy Students: A Consideration of Proven Techniques for Students Taking Formal Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Education, Achievement, and Giftedness","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Mathematics education; Apprehension; Mathematical anxiety; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05383977275878466,"score_gpt":0.3971402323379571,"score_spread":0.34330045957917243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549944756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991412,0.00013309845,0.0018827198,0.0008937762,0.00075567386,0.001802541,0.00007468403,0.0001086629,0.0029368466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958281,0.000034769226,0.0025822562,0.0004114727,0.0003320595,0.0006166392,0.000032834178,0.00004211329,0.00011978627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976412,0.00018972688,0.0007783604,0.00051682786,0.0004549923,0.00041886372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984222,0.00017342111,0.00062951515,0.0004729222,0.00023279709,0.000069141264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009849045,0.00029158406,0.00047409243,0.00044804031,0.0001232014,0.000057348487,0.00052239426,0.00018891627,0.00010767919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014249938,0.00022369184,0.00014684653,0.00034609568,0.00013852958,0.0006356377,0.00011284307,0.00014195697,0.0000110752535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026698553,0.001229529,0.70075417,0.00013063365,0.00024934995,0.000003259625,0.0024417744,2.8065375e-7,0.0064136568,0.28373,0.00007801065,0.004702325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00992757,0.0013391279,0.45988587,0.0007001634,0.00026242813,0.000015489299,0.000975635,0.000010055026,0.017310245,0.50513566,0.0034115955,0.0010262071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084423315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033946326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24086833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013653777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053538148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552006455","doi":"10.1111/meta.12202","title":"Intentionality and Content in McDowell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Presupposition; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Relation (database); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14013019703397261,"score_gpt":0.22627664790842872,"score_spread":0.0861464508744561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552006455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5266769,0.00051349925,0.000054091903,0.052590184,0.00030447665,0.00037552018,0.00014404528,0.000097560485,0.41924372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948382,0.000020709276,0.000050395185,0.00070979464,0.00035909383,0.00004872697,0.0000036489998,0.000009187146,0.003960275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993077,0.00003541088,0.0002137196,0.00021429201,0.00009922016,0.0001296386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996009,0.00006561418,0.000048586327,0.00017449043,0.000054967193,0.000055441775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013869275,0.000101658254,0.00014156564,0.000089128145,0.00009787543,0.00004007151,0.00009168081,0.000024201465,0.00080821395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020500314,0.000064341075,0.000058128953,0.000030306977,0.00032376847,0.00014542018,0.000038118207,0.000054069555,0.00023208503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111309155,0.00006308131,0.00063722447,0.000006770581,0.000015827922,0.0000019163797,0.000588072,2.3880325e-8,0.0004917891,0.995476,0.0003241034,0.00238408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066178694,0.00004358325,0.0051699476,0.000042918582,0.00001716574,0.000002764599,0.00016883938,0.0000019536924,0.0002554067,0.7676521,0.22580838,0.00017512843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053037766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011264855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46816128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014783821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062970453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88493764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578690651","doi":"10.1111/meta.12201","title":"The <i>Salto Vitale</i> Method in Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Certainty; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.04318139815212278,"score_gpt":0.38138922684333804,"score_spread":0.33820782869121524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578690651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006017677,0.0008563489,0.00057000254,0.044130802,0.0019065128,0.00035470733,0.000017220931,0.00007794568,0.94606876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953858,0.00003127138,0.0008791967,0.0020755723,0.00080702873,0.00012585569,0.0000018568469,0.0000314564,0.00066191057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719876,0.0004473544,0.0004614444,0.00071382587,0.00044148648,0.0007371491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964509,0.00063009956,0.00027348354,0.002342418,0.000078168334,0.0002249263],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021827393,0.0002960691,0.00037597498,0.00011361104,0.0014107672,0.00028293036,0.0024236485,0.00016444972,0.00027792776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006121226,0.0001965615,0.00023941816,0.0002782861,0.0012805265,0.0003362998,0.0003666876,0.0005205305,0.0011860086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108625856,0.00013504627,0.0006901532,0.0000043639366,0.00004431281,0.00007447532,0.00021060098,0.0000012669561,0.00017782232,0.9874186,0.00022606878,0.010908664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064925797,0.00009374732,0.0103764655,0.00001701623,0.000023271838,0.000019937963,0.000027188153,0.000037456353,0.00026628812,0.9697709,0.018455168,0.00026328655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010319256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027236563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035700286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023656936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","score_opus":0.14925560794152187,"score_gpt":0.28480463656376265,"score_spread":0.13554902862224077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782079141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036472682,0.0016227687,0.00020565777,0.119570374,0.004813969,0.0010430535,0.00011351013,0.0004349206,0.83572304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596997,0.000016907667,0.00029697196,0.021559618,0.015154495,0.00007483106,0.00001701189,0.00006527419,0.0031151974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974272,0.0004244589,0.00050906424,0.00052271626,0.000563232,0.0005532895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970984,0.00087037496,0.00030163128,0.0010702992,0.00054647285,0.00011286027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011283688,0.00042856595,0.00044012602,0.00009942348,0.0022627995,0.0003356044,0.0010514102,0.00013818558,0.00062625285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036332512,0.00021728213,0.00035253062,0.00022075055,0.0032318255,0.00023298641,0.00021290683,0.00086422125,0.0006422616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026800884,0.00011841133,0.00017949425,0.00003954045,0.00028665763,0.000007103968,0.026814973,0.000004239334,0.00023291327,0.96489495,0.0063322573,0.0010626802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023815731,0.00025690458,0.00016169177,0.00003122103,0.00020098133,0.000009867735,0.00089719275,0.00010704298,0.00018094869,0.5999063,0.3977195,0.0002901595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066245135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015450556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029275396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006673741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06180871193112166,"score_gpt":0.24956945785407172,"score_spread":0.18776074592295006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787680258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4652099,0.0013586713,0.00019995373,0.018779537,0.004358395,0.0004087854,0.00044497725,0.00010471165,0.50913507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922975,0.00001620678,0.000038817678,0.0005873974,0.00044551466,0.000011134247,0.0000040935297,0.000012429693,0.006586913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988386,0.00016785203,0.0003044174,0.00020348624,0.0003183342,0.00016729953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881935,0.00019122366,0.00019408006,0.00053766783,0.00020619875,0.000051460032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045905128,0.00013411872,0.00039080548,0.00017742917,0.00013194891,0.000020988484,0.00029279143,0.0000471932,0.00059495005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009804833,0.00006272643,0.0005012295,0.0001742921,0.00069752353,0.0000966529,0.000065491826,0.00009278284,0.000050302373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010559468,0.000074261974,0.0006944182,0.000011131586,0.0015107495,6.061033e-7,0.004608815,0.0000039199485,0.00018437633,0.991267,0.00080712343,0.00082700024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005668673,0.00009853695,0.0021631587,0.000029518194,0.0041118893,4.32947e-7,0.0005986264,0.000019924983,0.0019458528,0.62385565,0.36632454,0.00028498823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046271354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011510048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022988472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003211669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6514286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792728632","doi":"10.1111/meta.12203","title":"The Challenges of Extreme Moral Stress: Claudia Card's Contributions to the Formation of Nonideal Ethical Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical theory; Ethical theories; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethical issues; Normative ethics; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.14880393995529806,"score_gpt":0.448384150467472,"score_spread":0.29958021051217393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792728632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008573903,0.0039558467,0.008854617,0.92261153,0.0014618956,0.0015918456,0.00072563003,0.000055930883,0.052168775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951076,0.0011456788,0.00022707258,0.0026182316,0.0005915937,0.00017027403,0.000004279566,0.000017706257,0.00011759721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896673,0.007983458,0.0008821693,0.00020725431,0.00085106544,0.00040874333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964161,0.033363294,0.00054842065,0.00080253946,0.0009829936,0.00014176435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016157992,0.00014668789,0.00034816266,0.000072344956,0.0011065259,0.0000052063333,0.0006212233,0.0005110728,0.00010937205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032526836,0.000063555,0.0001472661,0.00021517294,0.000735887,0.00012097811,0.00026132568,0.0027183117,0.00015212473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001728656,0.000040714414,0.00013592659,0.00009669282,0.00007487092,7.220889e-7,0.0027902,0.000001699644,0.00048309317,0.99073225,0.0017854169,0.0036855214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006888402,0.00014455816,0.0022749472,0.00041919298,0.00013854935,0.0000011853932,0.0031204466,0.00001771417,0.0007186834,0.95842946,0.033937745,0.00010866353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050055405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033106687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98653364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008955974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002708111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911258360","doi":"10.1111/meta.12344","title":"Well‐Being Blindness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Blindness; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08544926162774868,"score_gpt":0.27387758750612506,"score_spread":0.18842832587837638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911258360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7119333,0.000019445222,0.000018336243,0.004980079,0.0010699232,0.00011721793,0.0000017862299,0.000064415384,0.2817955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98928535,0.000010366557,0.00013097518,0.0069543817,0.00018480927,0.000007215984,0.0000017669445,0.000011646861,0.0034135028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989439,0.0000670811,0.00014195548,0.00037979157,0.00025519694,0.00021207384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00006675286,0.000045617046,0.00026292374,0.000013408958,0.00006940336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012425242,0.000113084294,0.00014594677,0.00009990111,0.00007666587,0.00002030427,0.00026815772,0.00005000811,0.0010821802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030596042,0.00009391849,0.00009206669,0.00021162888,0.00006669263,0.00013902916,0.0000594902,0.00013783421,0.010931568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013697601,0.00060603215,0.005736291,0.000042803964,0.000027823779,0.00007826717,0.00020788563,0.00013023811,0.4142154,0.57339513,0.0027028997,0.0027202982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017840511,0.00037051126,0.0100632915,0.000040352756,0.0000320678,0.00008868342,0.000020487112,0.00040316093,0.2304606,0.6243251,0.13180864,0.00060303404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020956188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.3418924e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.278382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011915508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071206678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.055561751455892434,"score_gpt":0.34004811320522343,"score_spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955282148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014864729,0.00022384909,0.00002634531,0.20069797,0.00060850795,0.00046189668,0.000080443286,0.00022823576,0.782808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682731,0.00004464569,0.0005996446,0.028427625,0.0014870282,0.000020173671,0.000007869492,0.000022105209,0.0011177767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966524,0.00036302998,0.0003868,0.0006055561,0.0011395946,0.0008526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984279,0.00019933816,0.00009914994,0.0005471206,0.00018274438,0.0005436984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009302121,0.0002754848,0.00042619093,0.00008020144,0.00045603322,0.00011899593,0.0006748852,0.00043274678,0.0018903539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024108766,0.00025261124,0.0003618094,0.0007512154,0.0006039081,0.000441601,0.00014440659,0.00052618014,0.0048428145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202745,0.00012835907,0.00325643,0.000030184683,0.00006068225,0.000008350149,0.0007887933,9.985575e-7,0.000027190741,0.9937088,0.0017218983,0.00023629925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003683758,0.000080672384,0.00074878155,0.00002203612,0.000041837546,0.0000024234034,0.00006021789,0.0000106942825,0.000024081042,0.8634724,0.13487397,0.00029452296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053891476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034772434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021489711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028861355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022064695","doi":"10.1111/meta.12408","title":"CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHY AS SPIRITUAL PRACTICE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Epistemology; Cartesianism; Philosophy; Analogy; Cartesian coordinate system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07732346710249455,"score_gpt":0.24990786832565892,"score_spread":0.17258440122316437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022064695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010812872,0.00060620456,0.000056438177,0.16055983,0.00081192073,0.0002270655,0.00003193226,0.00028882755,0.8363365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94775707,0.000013728182,0.00041807996,0.044539485,0.006346444,0.000022182467,0.000011009267,0.000038207552,0.00085381366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976532,0.00015248422,0.00043156501,0.0006412915,0.0007149748,0.00040652585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985154,0.00018103007,0.00017005355,0.00038474982,0.00023227902,0.0005164893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025148786,0.0003185313,0.00039844643,0.000115074115,0.00067583256,0.00022377032,0.0006183949,0.00007367147,0.0024127585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006769021,0.00028027396,0.0002626374,0.00026028437,0.0006213673,0.0010890845,0.00010334664,0.00041983204,0.006000191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007142551,0.00012274287,0.000004295449,0.000023541144,0.000047850965,0.00007464036,0.016616058,0.0000047318777,0.00010372474,0.97513366,0.007238715,0.0005586115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027976697,0.00044575613,0.0000022248412,0.000008000464,0.00007328415,0.000009005327,0.00040572305,0.00004616818,0.00006582645,0.21003261,0.78830206,0.00032954777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087189335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065005347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046413443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006630888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091068716","doi":"10.1111/meta.12458","title":"Argumentation, Adversariality, and Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Adversary; Sociology; Faith; Argumentative; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10479018412141097,"score_gpt":0.3270651986978478,"score_spread":0.2222750145764368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091068716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08993746,0.00079529156,0.0002703899,0.51939684,0.00076091546,0.00038373237,0.000025885814,0.00021100407,0.3882185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938433,0.000030788695,0.00018137552,0.004987791,0.0007137437,0.000007340538,0.000004083061,0.0000042137244,0.00022736518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.00014576566,0.000117813026,0.00017839318,0.00016553687,0.00014322785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976563,0.000049621536,0.000047368587,0.000038180195,0.000035022833,0.00006416661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025714465,0.00007033088,0.0001482404,0.000019022884,0.0008198445,0.000028721839,0.000096588636,0.000061225335,0.0000813685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077905665,0.000066894136,0.00004653385,0.00013541641,0.00042318838,0.00009849822,0.00005412077,0.00007320245,0.000063068066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048447942,0.000033039032,0.014798664,0.00003569651,0.00016832107,0.000009273608,0.1815491,3.1748132e-7,0.00005866158,0.79427624,0.007206184,0.0018160273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014255795,0.00018059512,0.036019634,0.0000042806123,0.00023354948,0.0000014960644,0.032818984,0.0000100516645,0.00018762481,0.36172196,0.56684655,0.0005496851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008951612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006592953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011675803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028405491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63056636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145446726","doi":"10.1111/meta.12589","title":"The old fisherman's mistake","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Confusion; Foundation (evidence); Naturalism; Consciousness; Epistemology; Fallacy; Morality; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.036031658046959736,"score_gpt":0.20161586937269918,"score_spread":0.16558421132573944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145446726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009628957,0.0009760868,0.0000018206016,0.043822955,0.0023340879,0.00022903288,0.00012844476,0.00016935241,0.94270927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95200014,0.000009148799,0.000008121107,0.003526675,0.0021662032,0.00012665443,0.000022622493,0.000027766533,0.04211267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870664,0.00014566736,0.0002348546,0.00023713862,0.00040752252,0.0002681951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919236,0.00018634475,0.00008573791,0.0004254631,0.0000402005,0.00006987398],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030034356,0.00015401935,0.00016189246,0.000052378353,0.0030485496,0.00020329597,0.0004863356,0.000015397496,0.002962513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025235146,0.00010535518,0.00022040085,0.00008422654,0.00034668957,0.000109607536,0.00019079422,0.00036848284,0.00021909962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032658183,0.00007751759,0.0000058149844,0.000004202081,0.000056351517,0.000013936518,0.0015362093,0.0000055654878,0.00001106417,0.97149193,0.0252654,0.001499324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012672343,0.000052851046,0.000011172345,8.121282e-7,0.000020956279,0.000002263154,0.00022129464,0.000020143894,0.000009328885,0.39169282,0.6077447,0.00009697642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003314843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052422947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037950686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014831093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189039354","doi":"10.1111/meta.12508","title":"Two dogmas of aesthetic empiricism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Pleasure; Appeal; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Philosophy; Empiricism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.06425636355701177,"score_gpt":0.3179274221905319,"score_spread":0.25367105863352013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189039354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084632,0.00022262364,0.0005675941,0.0059435815,0.00015113872,0.00006345802,0.0000111362815,0.00007309371,0.08450419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553704,0.000068232606,0.00061125145,0.002530827,0.000041181567,0.000004677239,0.0000025129639,0.000013754356,0.0011905386],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871415,0.00018397183,0.00026416942,0.0003386848,0.00033602217,0.00016302764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.000018955494,0.00009310513,0.00043858468,0.00006339777,0.00008077103],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011623605,0.00011837868,0.00025987488,0.000122902,0.00007454488,0.000019766228,0.00019377025,0.000034571385,0.0010397387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011130045,0.0001033636,0.00025274596,0.0007252235,0.00015913384,0.00007133737,0.000064184045,0.00010232907,0.00037334915],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015189366,0.00046360784,0.0005968995,0.000017989973,0.000008127313,0.00019192325,0.0005424695,0.00011327459,0.8730234,0.108543515,0.000350885,0.016132748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020340756,0.00017552776,0.00133765,0.000051224597,0.00030857997,0.0005678107,0.0002465685,0.0014082836,0.74849945,0.19338429,0.05123482,0.000751716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000060457182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019410359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124523915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010186066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035919275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","score_opus":0.20608622477043415,"score_gpt":0.275872038539246,"score_spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212931209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42092338,0.06954128,0.00014590855,0.03352545,0.010179469,0.0008711408,0.00022323,0.0005912677,0.46399885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945813,0.00020861678,0.00009054464,0.00091380574,0.001062706,0.00009039606,0.000031312706,0.000022236565,0.0029990857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834144,0.00048319134,0.0003059856,0.00036644973,0.00025782618,0.00024508304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.00019789471,0.00014135294,0.0002196297,0.000056798024,0.000074400086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008040908,0.00017970032,0.00034724275,0.00011146331,0.001064703,0.00008358639,0.00021680801,0.000046484944,0.0015556769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045459343,0.00016409936,0.00019467389,0.000034459677,0.0011586325,0.00014745592,0.00027023986,0.00046152578,0.000059801776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017559798,0.000111708796,0.00005335815,0.00004323974,0.00010886925,0.000020930165,0.01938992,9.553281e-7,0.00001389984,0.9782928,0.00033777457,0.0016089714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014286,0.00049430033,0.00015288439,0.000010165915,0.00009319445,0.000024484612,0.015460935,0.0000125325705,0.000010454387,0.46953914,0.5135581,0.0002424169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035163557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033465283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57365793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000341317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013977349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225410264","doi":"10.1111/meta.12565","title":"Chains of being: Infinite regress, circularity, and metaphysical explanationRoss P.CameronOxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 252.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Citation; Theology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05912471100144995,"score_gpt":0.2731131220891251,"score_spread":0.21398841108767513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225410264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350393,0.0008207896,0.0048705335,0.018104874,0.0016766094,0.0019090011,0.0016161312,0.00047860167,0.035484202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676883,0.0004345525,0.0003454204,0.0014011313,0.000106175146,0.000030271409,0.00004857602,0.00003135975,0.0008336863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969359,0.000502464,0.00045267068,0.00073757523,0.0010179225,0.00035346154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.00041616312,0.00039229356,0.00059050013,0.00011353301,0.00013925694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048749108,0.0002494279,0.00040798704,0.00031774427,0.0007416115,0.000044153734,0.0007031343,0.00007447991,0.00017103016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004773258,0.00027969788,0.00017502537,0.0013354308,0.00095995027,0.00038060185,0.0009389021,0.00077698496,0.0000028243876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006341228,0.00041782425,0.00026742977,0.000072066854,0.000087179564,0.00006156366,0.0004824307,0.000044719687,0.073516496,0.92301947,0.0011566704,0.0008107168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030429629,0.0008401844,0.0017678468,0.000041090425,0.0003902688,0.00004594805,0.00038658804,0.0021700556,0.10435778,0.2075153,0.6783359,0.001106054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003149508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002739248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71550417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000745542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007539882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239735155","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00285","title":"Constitutive Luck","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05346291251323264,"score_gpt":0.254783815402392,"score_spread":0.20132090288915933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239735155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06177095,0.00022032672,0.0003134176,0.00062909385,0.0007574892,0.0001586391,0.000013791867,0.00011735375,0.93601894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666786,0.000021780224,0.00034989187,0.0017521819,0.00007376066,0.000011427909,4.3216943e-7,0.000009156085,0.0011135308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990561,0.000119974604,0.00013125538,0.0003038114,0.00018188033,0.0002069683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995398,0.00008093004,0.000039765855,0.0002412455,0.000016497374,0.00008178857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009456863,0.00011585472,0.00013080149,0.00006961582,0.00014008672,0.000023424715,0.0001615016,0.000034899454,0.0004783977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055578514,0.00009375401,0.00008349706,0.00031744974,0.0002255533,0.000137209,0.000020945496,0.00010705677,0.0011954514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032436274,0.0000550125,0.00015280115,0.0000035767032,0.0000035372836,0.000046722074,0.000042548963,0.00000441131,0.06867645,0.93022734,0.00046123294,0.00032313197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033698799,0.00005153654,0.0001192904,0.000006137785,0.000016299899,0.000046744863,0.000008833845,0.000014822526,0.5056376,0.3196656,0.17387637,0.00021977551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024286749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.6659954e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010293825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027120328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.1064484508213111,"score_gpt":0.2662004836574623,"score_spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245195506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028420238,0.0010074276,0.00014030111,0.001610292,0.0019304052,0.000164797,0.00002162395,0.0001516029,0.96655333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833495,0.000019893316,0.0005434292,0.0020756433,0.0008053699,0.000017068003,0.00001125035,0.000027529262,0.008164854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885154,0.00021222839,0.00022799695,0.00025798558,0.00020009284,0.0002501707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992384,0.000084745814,0.0000819614,0.00036942,0.0001420108,0.00008350869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050855457,0.00017115643,0.00027849758,0.00008317665,0.00034016112,0.000089328096,0.0001576536,0.00007326704,0.0013637345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013168583,0.0001456709,0.00020605608,0.000051156705,0.00047027867,0.00017882112,0.000020048466,0.00028529813,0.0006865758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032971914,0.00008591795,0.000113971335,0.000021947886,0.000069091264,0.0000075976627,0.003273959,6.896117e-7,0.000044696106,0.9950002,0.0011965149,0.00018213631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014204072,0.000031459316,0.000022592503,0.0000035662463,0.00004868108,0.0000024620163,0.00022986147,0.0000018077188,0.00031738373,0.44062456,0.5584425,0.00013312719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004969515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008559052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95991474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013311102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250979798","doi":"10.1111/meta.12371","title":"Inarticulate Forgiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Forgiveness; Action (physics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.012574507874099573,"score_gpt":0.2804197412857387,"score_spread":0.2678452334116391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250979798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123882,0.00048608967,0.000030434949,0.0003884389,0.0022310917,0.0002597321,0.000005586946,0.00010969136,0.084100716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919034,0.0000049273353,0.000065715685,0.00019012604,0.00009624983,0.000039409846,0.00001054281,0.000033995257,0.007655629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889857,0.000070012204,0.0002177986,0.00034130883,0.000161994,0.00031033222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992809,0.000025685922,0.00005604938,0.0005122356,0.000041290587,0.00008383452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015182936,0.00016402134,0.00024971832,0.0001375882,0.00005876387,0.00001829956,0.00019948979,0.00016524956,0.007119952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032580133,0.00013077613,0.00017214604,0.00029578127,0.000054265995,0.00009195007,0.000048839658,0.00019515415,0.009084506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049187936,0.0013962594,0.16699024,0.00008514167,0.0010135127,0.00046171152,0.0031990577,0.00051449775,0.0160425,0.78981686,0.0013899895,0.01859838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011082113,0.0019410966,0.53175646,0.00020135396,0.0010472442,0.0003497665,0.0012994696,0.00034345768,0.009020705,0.108057074,0.3319678,0.0029334598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005309337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.729299e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017982913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009963339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99378765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322504453","doi":"10.1111/meta.12615","title":"On the inseparability of reasoning and virtue: Madame de Maintenon's Maison royale de <scp>Saint‐Louis</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Mores; Virtue; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Art history; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02574200678598042,"score_gpt":0.27224983111843676,"score_spread":0.24650782433245633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322504453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215861,0.000511045,0.000041127907,0.005261689,0.00014775892,0.00018395933,0.000018403562,0.00009904747,0.07215087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585164,0.000077464894,0.00020520209,0.0005853907,0.00018642761,0.000029770255,0.0000018091058,0.000010928393,0.0030513657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983603,0.00050963694,0.00019512167,0.00024995027,0.00032631506,0.00035868588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980627,0.0014446556,0.00008629056,0.00021697594,0.00006127525,0.00012813743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018047646,0.0001279341,0.0002517013,0.00008327863,0.00059573416,0.00003594211,0.0002479127,0.00007975513,0.000024984483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027360537,0.000091018366,0.00011271863,0.000613453,0.0005203908,0.000070023205,0.00009027072,0.00019571107,0.00004209528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015079746,0.00007503816,0.018817728,0.000027784143,0.000065259635,0.0000146716675,0.023132883,0.000014188261,0.00017553233,0.9517787,0.004987169,0.0008959435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022138817,0.00020707297,0.03542012,0.00005948212,0.00006004873,0.0000013904651,0.0029718897,0.0002184443,0.00016402213,0.6090652,0.3514937,0.00011725508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014520109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091442584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3465065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016034853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059825365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45819658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07777898570228699,"score_gpt":0.36757554331156006,"score_spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386618,0.00056061876,0.000018081999,0.006112946,0.0005378599,0.00022167544,0.000011010606,0.00021100604,0.45366505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807143,0.0003097541,0.000079137455,0.00079561624,0.0005401003,0.000011982827,0.000009116571,0.000010172307,0.00017266224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860036,0.00024132009,0.0002249252,0.00021071408,0.00033175104,0.00039095496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.00045451956,0.00005131189,0.00013117392,0.000048563998,0.0001622211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095425494,0.00011001266,0.00021170972,0.00021228044,0.00034453563,0.00005816333,0.00016495878,0.00010510435,0.00000971618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015732188,0.000111156165,0.000042258453,0.000635734,0.00031215328,0.00013743434,0.00008410455,0.0003440563,0.00023585296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136752105,0.000032838085,0.0018964144,0.000091640504,0.000015003638,0.000050489067,0.04678426,0.000016704791,0.000028932445,0.9508183,0.000115773124,0.00013595974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040565914,0.000027826223,0.00847826,0.00012002822,0.000067814035,6.9195875e-7,0.002725643,0.0005763657,0.000045412136,0.9835358,0.0037900736,0.00022642629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013189405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033273338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005822318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043517153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45328167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391816761","doi":"10.1111/meta.12667","title":"Academic hoaxes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Dimension (graph theory); sort; Work (physics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04639697067024791,"score_gpt":0.39220870454276374,"score_spread":0.34581173387251585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391816761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042316847,0.007173625,0.00033595655,0.103756085,0.005530303,0.0002322924,0.0000074892814,0.00058596657,0.8400614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884306,0.00032433923,0.00020508433,0.0006929308,0.0020647254,0.000022837246,0.0000036052168,0.0000075181088,0.008248325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930036,0.000098609475,0.00009956232,0.00013911306,0.00024310825,0.000119218035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997219,0.00006607354,0.000014723111,0.00008588757,0.000049542126,0.00006189243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004540293,0.000049158883,0.000055363067,0.000109790104,0.00020915718,0.000121176345,0.0001344033,0.0000726802,0.0006032534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012309148,0.00004574639,0.00004032758,0.00072559435,0.000103652324,0.00028092653,0.000009549441,0.00013683207,0.0008545473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3778124e-7,0.000007211055,0.000107891596,0.0000051748184,0.000009564826,0.0000010623831,0.006791029,9.31382e-7,0.00011133913,0.9673121,0.016088799,0.0095639415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015509739,0.0000047786584,0.00013767295,0.000009103545,0.000010825947,1.9342443e-7,0.0008357512,0.000017242088,0.0000951572,0.20218985,0.79662925,0.00005468949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057877565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003799578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94611377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004994942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002081002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400588946","doi":"10.1111/meta.12699","title":"Aristotle's tyche (τύχη) and contemporary debates about luck","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Existentialism; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05645477353636011,"score_gpt":0.2458058950611083,"score_spread":0.1893511215247482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400588946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020214023,0.044599235,0.000033940778,0.017876187,0.0021695658,0.00028761983,0.00015072098,0.0005997734,0.91406894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912684,0.00010752161,0.00004482276,0.0012316748,0.0028754573,0.000028566215,0.00003092786,0.000048826914,0.004363783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873304,0.00006389957,0.00031210296,0.0004387153,0.0002198353,0.00023242824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992965,0.00020410468,0.000045130935,0.00026176425,0.000050286973,0.000142222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019368873,0.000267387,0.00033045394,0.00017959255,0.00029963703,0.00049182883,0.00016229259,0.00007826938,0.00064156356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033008706,0.0002017762,0.00019172543,0.000091530805,0.00054764666,0.00039992153,0.00008567854,0.00032268927,0.00059456704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024129984,0.000058994374,0.000028091832,0.00012344649,0.00015531782,0.00007593518,0.0023783254,2.750017e-7,0.00006257789,0.9874649,0.0074328743,0.0021950984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012368913,0.000056379013,0.000033443328,0.00005787878,0.000047850994,0.00000512007,0.00006894437,0.000085265645,0.000058486457,0.48393944,0.5153497,0.00017380016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049120117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025051619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001828838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000340134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8228195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400609253","doi":"10.1111/meta.12695","title":"Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Indigenous; Section (typography); Philosophical analysis; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010038422624911204,"score_gpt":0.21107098327860707,"score_spread":0.20103256065369587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400609253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561839,0.02516134,0.000111696136,0.060140666,0.0011372017,0.0011392236,0.00004217554,0.00040073768,0.5556831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99326324,0.0009568481,0.0003495822,0.003491341,0.00068048126,0.00008822181,0.000013558616,0.000037538164,0.0011192135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777305,0.00013678923,0.00037241052,0.0007010059,0.00056061905,0.00045610644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926805,0.00014026077,0.000070826994,0.0003484797,0.0000038933404,0.00016850657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036000565,0.0003854313,0.00039898665,0.000042201405,0.000750771,0.00015667391,0.00041439524,0.00010553596,0.0013944813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069026,0.00021889979,0.00024491665,0.00041491573,0.0026915725,0.00026371176,0.00066563574,0.00046042047,0.0011307178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075735926,0.0008064016,0.013111202,0.00045418847,0.0017719175,0.00056222884,0.023408888,0.00031983544,0.0067125396,0.7567495,0.014187058,0.1811589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088080374,0.00019077834,0.003067016,0.00004435109,0.00024319222,0.00015211503,0.00016783245,0.0002756351,0.0002452362,0.9229028,0.07125219,0.00057802175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000936469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005407463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63707936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004145101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}