{"meta":{"query_hash":"30b7eb0a9921","filters":{"venue":"Metaphilosophy"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/30b7eb0a9921","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metaphilosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1493333246","doi":"10.1111/meta.12044","title":"Getting Luck Properly Under Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Attribution; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Analogy; Value (mathematics); Control (management); Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0565495966401459,"score_gpt":0.24089496213491396,"score_spread":0.18434536549476804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493333246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14516912,0.0031199676,0.15414181,0.048599932,0.00067942403,0.000107467895,0.00024928767,0.00036871713,0.6475643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874107,0.00034041255,0.0025276963,0.0011891361,0.00010996908,0.000035769484,0.00002926696,0.00007532986,0.0082817385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936811,0.0032211354,0.00022561343,0.0009043151,0.0011190206,0.00084875163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99168956,0.0029448161,0.0012033983,0.0020774612,0.001391245,0.0006935558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032876,0.00063226465,0.00061094365,0.0014042673,0.0025018728,0.008544052,0.0010632408,0.002574703,0.008446449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017540658,0.00032427014,0.0005882476,0.000847412,0.03156017,0.0095634805,0.004726758,0.0040647835,0.0009871329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024118955,0.000014075976,0.0012439267,0.00003533362,0.000019037532,0.000079591,0.0017966257,0.0014095241,0.00014538519,0.9884294,0.0010814728,0.005721533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116468,0.000019014637,0.00092295976,0.00007280586,0.00001133316,0.000040770927,0.0007001405,0.0015125875,0.00024248677,0.9846831,0.011769067,0.00001670504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036892213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018758712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008544052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054869894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003565244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039811134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498873853","doi":"10.1111/meta.12139","title":"Caricatures, Myths, and White Lies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Analogy; Epistemology; Period (music); Empiricism; White (mutation); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1028423331531241,"score_gpt":0.22018546088229046,"score_spread":0.11734312772916636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498873853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32673138,0.008019447,0.08620397,0.19705516,0.001688806,0.00008497914,0.000057277393,0.00017824507,0.3799807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440646,0.00045483513,0.0019723892,0.0009798357,0.00010725099,0.000020329957,0.0000060553743,0.000020840986,0.002031918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98244125,0.012533802,0.00042775733,0.0012702522,0.0025744461,0.00075256865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974428,0.017192263,0.0028990463,0.002772031,0.001831907,0.0008768136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018950885,0.0005370022,0.0005455316,0.0022917031,0.007520608,0.011225804,0.0016875659,0.0038988632,0.0021791572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025853427,0.0005057626,0.0003936024,0.0013467009,0.121176384,0.013967758,0.007964297,0.009340439,0.00029604742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006699629,0.00001117594,0.00018685244,0.000020398089,0.000004556349,0.000060411487,0.02590769,0.00017830724,0.000054477856,0.9712036,0.0006936054,0.0016721783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008187741,0.000017248327,0.00025239566,0.00015336776,0.000005741171,0.00012878072,0.022686418,0.0007097312,0.00035316602,0.94924647,0.026422875,0.00001573182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016163728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013783014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018950885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029099945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100223005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581973813","doi":"10.1111/meta.12042","title":"In Defense of Anti‐Archimedean Moral Realism: A Response to Recent Critics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Moral realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Moral psychology","score_opus":0.05617317438031854,"score_gpt":0.26283045416981815,"score_spread":0.2066572797894996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581973813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029069614,0.0041633556,0.0020016632,0.9729297,0.0029824385,0.0000056337226,0.000008036626,0.000026054964,0.014976027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53577775,0.007383212,0.0044904137,0.41613558,0.01993981,0.00013519588,0.00003373411,0.0002619484,0.015842456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698592,0.019036803,0.0008490033,0.002859078,0.0063133403,0.0010825701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196477,0.064815745,0.0024355582,0.003554929,0.007951102,0.0015950215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041689537,0.00054258615,0.0011801027,0.0026915823,0.007787836,0.012894774,0.003928212,0.023793776,0.0026972536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078972355,0.00051040435,0.0007966506,0.0018948473,0.04902275,0.014628092,0.0069175926,0.038675163,0.0007740411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003155147,0.000017305934,0.00018524085,0.00007002577,0.00001095192,0.00007036772,0.0038281207,0.00019709836,0.000073229705,0.9270382,0.062642306,0.005835509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038653074,0.000022522585,0.0003414245,0.0004892926,0.00001605494,0.00011727371,0.003631595,0.0014316889,0.00026472445,0.76914835,0.22445641,0.000042029962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037157657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033314798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041689537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008760547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004796705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22047794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1701715910","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01708.x","title":"AN ARCHIMEDEAN POINT FOR PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Skepticism; Philosophy; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.22046507543278415,"score_gpt":0.29212079601589697,"score_spread":0.07165572058311281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1701715910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020363135,0.010097426,0.11260935,0.18361934,0.0033667285,0.00008220544,0.000247687,0.00019586984,0.66941833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499544,0.004396532,0.04230482,0.024217827,0.00353326,0.00046275603,0.0001569334,0.00018085295,0.074792735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969664,0.0016936283,0.00010196882,0.00045108926,0.0006416877,0.00014518588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771285,0.0011045912,0.00016081754,0.00038770077,0.00045937518,0.00017474036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044499952,0.00046603105,0.00039153325,0.0014444834,0.0043077,0.005794915,0.0011478623,0.0031693247,0.005774878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038088884,0.00021763197,0.00051718025,0.00094771205,0.037179094,0.0076575507,0.0034989167,0.006512875,0.0014025545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022969089,0.0000025205447,0.00001371005,0.000008080094,6.2980206e-7,0.0000059131635,0.00036750737,0.000029112356,0.000017885248,0.9981055,0.0008763819,0.0005704608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004888347,0.0000042937736,0.00003276563,0.00003298711,0.0000014032985,0.000019511086,0.00024481083,0.00016169623,0.00005270858,0.96993005,0.029512586,0.0000021994351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001495849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010143236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005794915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052353563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002884062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037985384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910537218","doi":"10.1111/meta.12107","title":"You Make Your Own Luck","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Luck; Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Epistemology; Positive economics; Metaphysics; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08191204937160894,"score_gpt":0.26948065994830483,"score_spread":0.18756861057669588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1910537218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042913314,0.00462272,0.02647395,0.15415427,0.004171531,0.000058532198,0.00015503241,0.0003340418,0.7671165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8210304,0.0021426762,0.0033910424,0.019011104,0.0011115136,0.00006743429,0.00008290131,0.00025462132,0.15290833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943039,0.0030671563,0.0001545873,0.0005410152,0.0013182809,0.0006150421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945661,0.0018171875,0.0006217211,0.000829657,0.0012513107,0.0009140756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00402978,0.0004660155,0.0003686938,0.00063026114,0.003821834,0.0071454505,0.00073797547,0.0023137927,0.01588701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011578132,0.00023282043,0.00037652516,0.00035751163,0.017594323,0.006529353,0.0042204186,0.005226183,0.006246019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042648815,0.000052597297,0.0016822349,0.00011569977,0.00003300545,0.00035501417,0.01547724,0.00032028643,0.0005250731,0.8889812,0.06486145,0.027553549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014737803,0.00008241547,0.0014347102,0.00044595488,0.00002597516,0.000511292,0.00968514,0.0005135262,0.0013449307,0.3193869,0.66649616,0.000058274247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011358929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011955753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022823536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001545877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053147376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975334706","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00205","title":"Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Rest (music); Action (physics); Action theory (sociology); Task (project management); Philosophy; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.11238933394246156,"score_gpt":0.2935694555709934,"score_spread":0.18118012162853184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975334706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068591232,0.013507001,0.04753543,0.8488248,0.009123027,0.000028727512,0.00009756969,0.0002448683,0.07377951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.637187,0.018268256,0.034433573,0.25325894,0.018130546,0.00030750566,0.00015696854,0.0006975903,0.03755961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917129,0.0036016344,0.00038757126,0.0014265343,0.0023428919,0.00052848365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849117,0.008960698,0.0007773949,0.0023368478,0.0018325781,0.0011808849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014660424,0.0008396019,0.0017803828,0.0016620648,0.005796901,0.0077756783,0.0033504602,0.009361677,0.0076427124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02292677,0.0006202056,0.0011102896,0.0013218286,0.070376724,0.030709252,0.0072286977,0.01697357,0.0038919563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018728331,0.000013411087,0.00015320741,0.00007203465,0.000013465194,0.000041754316,0.0017350471,0.00009990325,0.00004686763,0.9756864,0.01527569,0.006843625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001064135,0.0000111398895,0.000119206416,0.00008696635,0.000003128632,0.00006239983,0.0009662812,0.0002151102,0.00003112854,0.9642691,0.03421429,0.0000105299705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030972194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026378853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014660424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004340665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038633104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07753265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981549461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00357.x","title":"THEORIZING INTERNATIONAL FAIRNESS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Mainstream; Spell; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01784467246631162,"score_gpt":0.32070350654483387,"score_spread":0.30285883407852227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981549461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034666196,0.0031035799,0.1614889,0.039378557,0.0005799064,0.00009586183,0.00008497984,0.00010321979,0.76049876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96861523,0.0011418659,0.013260027,0.0025867978,0.00041625084,0.00020628364,0.000074378346,0.000067962756,0.0136312535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.004109105,0.0002750758,0.0009626408,0.0015958284,0.00066458964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373144,0.0034742863,0.00047337177,0.0010192775,0.000990348,0.0003112893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012633398,0.00048363785,0.0004739081,0.002724857,0.0040835044,0.006309331,0.001627955,0.0037936175,0.0076938556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013375345,0.00022996715,0.0007029344,0.0020963927,0.028149486,0.008177987,0.0064171967,0.004063926,0.0006592014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010982874,0.000003002489,0.00007818214,0.0000073204324,0.0000016537243,0.0000074391946,0.0005507998,0.00024268683,0.000010058532,0.9978655,0.00031110027,0.00092111423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003898359,0.0000028641127,0.00007071189,0.00004433777,0.000003337491,0.000013826539,0.00037057482,0.0005359867,0.000041522027,0.9900575,0.00885354,0.0000019175343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00240043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013201827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012633398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055298205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040325527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066812575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006596923","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00333.x","title":"Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Metaphor; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021938531361714236,"score_gpt":0.2814271955218167,"score_spread":0.25948866416010247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006596923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13263199,0.048777808,0.23837522,0.09697938,0.002093568,0.00009836945,0.00017872266,0.00026713003,0.48059782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795058,0.002874273,0.0137575995,0.0013157378,0.00031413545,0.00006976751,0.000030841562,0.00003610885,0.0020957256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211895,0.006035902,0.0002189699,0.00034593954,0.0010451282,0.00023512144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913749,0.006322401,0.0005948668,0.0007485677,0.000661023,0.00029819726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068827476,0.00037462614,0.00047933785,0.0033929278,0.00301332,0.007133073,0.0009378801,0.002217609,0.0034947877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115192365,0.00029702787,0.0004340767,0.0029145884,0.046260867,0.013182367,0.0042624986,0.0039111883,0.0003443842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004018771,0.000004120399,0.00008376968,0.000027387126,0.0000026823839,0.000022593098,0.0023290927,0.00006554548,0.00004630434,0.99536395,0.00035808788,0.0016924791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000738653,0.0000057439793,0.00013940642,0.00005894795,0.00000196699,0.00009565742,0.0017212599,0.0003892903,0.00004070053,0.9854299,0.0121059865,0.0000038419207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006947175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049051736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007133073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031766605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016963797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03639984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06855442791955355,"score_gpt":0.35978905727043126,"score_spread":0.29123462935087774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10255862,0.00093031925,0.019436603,0.04413419,0.00040495038,0.00006858943,0.00002983897,0.000056077344,0.8323808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977013,0.0003715032,0.0031810934,0.0045248596,0.00008867664,0.0000749071,0.00001562073,0.00003527495,0.014695164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964025,0.0025031439,0.00005855525,0.00032321017,0.00025471408,0.00045787366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978173,0.00081014953,0.00021622848,0.00029059147,0.00031694508,0.00054878264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067092855,0.0004015264,0.00023348912,0.0007311336,0.0049564117,0.005273246,0.0005102273,0.0034063468,0.0069802264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040468243,0.00020027508,0.00033213658,0.00038559406,0.019419724,0.0047846814,0.009902415,0.0039033678,0.0008628368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009016659,0.000015125211,0.00049076445,0.000020629986,0.0000031576162,0.00009765304,0.0043686684,0.00015762213,0.00016072774,0.98972696,0.002283524,0.0026660804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027168498,0.00006347398,0.001410325,0.00022214744,0.000011736825,0.00024020277,0.016402112,0.00076585665,0.0006485091,0.7484458,0.23174681,0.000015934247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005440698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013540933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069802264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024859917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021999173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035482526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023683608","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00515.x","title":"PHILOSOPHY, MYTH, AND THE “SIGNIFICANCE” OF SPECULATIVE THOUGHT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Parallels; Mythology; Philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Relation (database); Similarity (geometry); Metaphysics; Western philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01700582519115804,"score_gpt":0.21556813050029308,"score_spread":0.19856230530913505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023683608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21246459,0.02553689,0.14041546,0.18881342,0.0017381259,0.00011172945,0.00010478998,0.00018108614,0.43063393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888005,0.0017419939,0.0043637427,0.001222667,0.00029585705,0.000035874426,0.000016169253,0.00002893578,0.0034941614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498135,0.0038751499,0.00010178909,0.00028935465,0.00051849073,0.00023399066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908111,0.00682027,0.0006595872,0.00074082124,0.00069027615,0.00027795506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008128795,0.0003482415,0.00034526506,0.0017033719,0.0037332026,0.008384782,0.00080962555,0.0019185279,0.002362833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009150083,0.00025113745,0.00035745982,0.0013508031,0.060167853,0.0066478574,0.003798019,0.0042283055,0.00024319482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075637613,0.0000043297514,0.00018695038,0.000031324347,0.000003062679,0.00002427667,0.004768642,0.00013866909,0.00008626796,0.99262017,0.0005764024,0.0015522466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102413505,0.000014398212,0.00038841675,0.00011916251,0.0000055158866,0.00007408078,0.0036747847,0.00088175817,0.00024139724,0.9680154,0.02656756,0.0000072564453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011178188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007958376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008384782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004485075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036537468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04298967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044010586","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00508.x","title":"THE COMMUNITY VIEW REVISITED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Ottawa; City University of New York","keywords":"Epistemology; Key (lock); Content (measure theory); Reflexive pronoun; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0687676447740696,"score_gpt":0.2672389219329435,"score_spread":0.19847127715887392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044010586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027021598,0.0067467173,0.0102274325,0.23665692,0.0013105597,0.000038430855,0.00013653134,0.000091656424,0.71777016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93624955,0.0026800293,0.0013800372,0.019791279,0.0021389686,0.00007951348,0.00008734664,0.0001355222,0.037457746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366176,0.002849387,0.000090869435,0.0009860261,0.0014463738,0.00096561253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144214,0.0038556731,0.00054369064,0.00072979764,0.0015847601,0.0018438743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006025309,0.00047545714,0.0006560748,0.0043701245,0.014081921,0.013769459,0.0028076516,0.01043974,0.021546092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012061401,0.00027280097,0.00062957645,0.003460645,0.035105236,0.019185422,0.008793361,0.008448291,0.0017810651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042905717,0.0000045234433,0.00006913579,0.000013927102,0.0000018381556,0.000035942165,0.0016819171,0.000050950413,0.000012173934,0.9903908,0.0061120503,0.0016226317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763009,0.0000076277884,0.00020011202,0.00014192583,0.0000074030327,0.00012293427,0.0041832505,0.00055042846,0.00005218009,0.86000746,0.13468882,0.000010355397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020235093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015393342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021546092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011163779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065065287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080999315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060937840","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00159","title":"Bernard Gert's Moral System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Bond; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.03516350569316903,"score_gpt":0.1982966613331263,"score_spread":0.16313315563995726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060937840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010709335,0.014708741,0.015860055,0.09228523,0.0023710588,0.000027528173,0.000093303424,0.00008777551,0.8638569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8115295,0.003894366,0.0056277313,0.012951765,0.0023717969,0.00008578057,0.000053635184,0.00013121442,0.16335416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985177,0.00089154515,0.00003258051,0.00019323143,0.00020598412,0.00015894404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930644,0.0003588349,0.000045997313,0.000120143624,0.000098676384,0.000069959024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019230308,0.00050004,0.00047387532,0.0010421105,0.0036021327,0.00392062,0.00085335626,0.004581128,0.007195927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035205467,0.00024225938,0.00035466213,0.00073644187,0.015411717,0.0045344695,0.0021312241,0.004782786,0.001208545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017184517,0.00000139986,0.000008527816,0.00000315337,7.144142e-7,0.0000051044244,0.0001582238,0.000035811667,0.0000065456034,0.996207,0.0030420746,0.0005296095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006082959,0.0000023565137,0.000033102406,0.000012114506,0.0000010813236,0.000017035123,0.00009224008,0.00010183071,0.000024406389,0.9603608,0.039345562,0.0000032579114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038039393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029986124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007195927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034151266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012456586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024778545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072471026","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x","title":"HOW WE HAVE BEEN LEARNING TO TALK ABOUT AUTISM: A ROLE FOR STORIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Autism; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Autism spectrum disorder","score_opus":0.04628814462062808,"score_gpt":0.30847880142563117,"score_spread":0.2621906568050031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072471026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.349674,0.01746586,0.025565159,0.1290604,0.0023666047,0.00016658157,0.00027205344,0.00057439716,0.4748549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676563,0.0022827156,0.003708119,0.002821801,0.00022704499,0.00009941932,0.000058628706,0.00011960004,0.0139171155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98531586,0.012146452,0.00023968976,0.00059976184,0.0010219183,0.00067630014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699295,0.022510793,0.0023671554,0.0012127234,0.0014460915,0.0025337255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010313448,0.0009464826,0.0005092412,0.0022644924,0.011162989,0.012518255,0.0021164466,0.004132094,0.0073414044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027451094,0.00053954445,0.0004717222,0.0008513571,0.03807299,0.022179367,0.0106036095,0.0069533796,0.0011291831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003714381,0.000040505915,0.001004072,0.00014219843,0.000013115452,0.0013711876,0.88483196,0.000056400007,0.00048741788,0.09658758,0.0064740553,0.008954348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021525218,0.000084384745,0.0013917616,0.00062281755,0.00003255609,0.004921077,0.69974905,0.00029932056,0.0009204673,0.048023034,0.24388334,0.00005063005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017029413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022589497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012518255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031404183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018030427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054543376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100281699","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00442.x","title":"ACKNOWLEDGING AND RECTIFYING THE GENOCIDE OF AMERICAN INDIANS: “WHY IS IT THAT THEY CARRY THEIR LIVES ON THEIR FINGERNAILS?”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Demise; Redress; Phenomenon; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06288955979326025,"score_gpt":0.22798529177469493,"score_spread":0.16509573198143468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100281699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5580249,0.003523391,0.0035024125,0.15212615,0.0015132152,0.000036931197,0.00002371526,0.000059977152,0.28118926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909931,0.00046211827,0.00026495822,0.003920098,0.00015782272,0.0000074960353,0.000004374321,0.000009669288,0.004180369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795926,0.0010299146,0.000036145164,0.00014685691,0.00019534916,0.0006325234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.000500222,0.00031975005,0.00015676579,0.00027945774,0.00026587228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043626595,0.00028596117,0.00023907426,0.0006752177,0.019751377,0.008300669,0.0010446601,0.0032515794,0.0018297806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043932814,0.00020082486,0.00018716657,0.00061962457,0.048035145,0.004056083,0.005060968,0.007667543,0.00024309722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002252348,0.000037626323,0.002482737,0.000037521935,0.000008207484,0.0004905332,0.6127448,0.00009339054,0.0005828818,0.36804223,0.007318422,0.008139168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007198348,0.00003065117,0.00410839,0.00013627518,0.0000187918,0.000429313,0.76952326,0.00025418287,0.0007322579,0.043204878,0.1815145,0.000040294428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0324125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05143048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0324125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004162404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059447875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0644477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105991975","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01636.x","title":"Mental Causation: The Mind‐Body Problem. By Anthony Dardis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Citation; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.035612631576947065,"score_gpt":0.2596950115166866,"score_spread":0.22408237993973956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105991975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012838194,0.3701626,0.003120397,0.5824707,0.0152548235,0.000014437563,0.00007186985,0.000035356334,0.027586006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19466884,0.45346847,0.0076343226,0.18135524,0.07792796,0.00025941845,0.00018585668,0.00020939359,0.08429052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988996,0.0005850667,0.00004848111,0.00017794405,0.0002336754,0.000055320987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942714,0.005017941,0.00015869585,0.00010586808,0.00026436133,0.00018183311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026860493,0.0011561876,0.001264808,0.0018342641,0.0029568188,0.0045718867,0.0012488426,0.0051854043,0.0041124616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00844736,0.0008409815,0.000554189,0.0019189306,0.013583211,0.009598172,0.0032702163,0.013529972,0.00133904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004480343,0.000023707713,0.00021306584,0.000335772,0.000028875202,0.0001813838,0.0024258797,0.00040719725,0.00009421086,0.55109483,0.41654137,0.028608924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002274934,0.00001274534,0.00039555266,0.0006859376,0.000011837406,0.00033186562,0.0011395578,0.0005997327,0.00008058361,0.58932406,0.40737182,0.000023595505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042434884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037687833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051854043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002111564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001900069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015320599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115065741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01624.x","title":"RIGHT ACT, VIRTUOUS MOTIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Action (physics); Relation (database); Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05604761966791063,"score_gpt":0.4515562491710352,"score_spread":0.3955086295031246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115065741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10425963,0.010766959,0.04362533,0.07716341,0.0011443216,0.000076101605,0.000092165974,0.000069156165,0.76280296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97892797,0.0012419929,0.0038008606,0.0029899478,0.00026555712,0.00006393454,0.000024494348,0.000015009308,0.012670212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515164,0.0029912055,0.00019674911,0.00049410557,0.00085556565,0.00031081273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366707,0.003619359,0.00085292174,0.00041681476,0.0007541932,0.0006896698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035559612,0.00023559047,0.00027512378,0.0012049002,0.0021559934,0.0030437012,0.00045526275,0.0023277304,0.0068567838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007061117,0.00012364522,0.00018575048,0.0005440263,0.018682051,0.004456204,0.00296439,0.0028519526,0.00070211885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019681289,0.00003187808,0.00079757586,0.000058059806,0.0000031130821,0.00006643417,0.0026097207,0.000078387355,0.000090925365,0.988246,0.0026831084,0.005314967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031944706,0.000051963147,0.0028776417,0.00022801184,0.000007686949,0.00063845643,0.0046726735,0.0007357841,0.00021495853,0.9199642,0.07056282,0.000013820512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006825094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063773955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068567838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016669957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016566144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022938192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130217881","doi":"10.1111/meta.12089","title":"Whole Lives and Good Deaths","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Currency; Value of life; Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026636423351834793,"score_gpt":0.21858024475261345,"score_spread":0.19194382140077865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130217881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06882091,0.007637697,0.00818063,0.072124526,0.0017160402,0.000053872478,0.00016563693,0.00011204797,0.8411887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94101745,0.001585225,0.0009985263,0.0036643844,0.00025323575,0.000028787452,0.000053685188,0.000051159586,0.052347567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631774,0.0024484203,0.0000610611,0.00027558577,0.00037648712,0.00052073033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967878,0.0012515109,0.0003273007,0.00045105725,0.00037552632,0.0008068842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035684672,0.0003103607,0.0004422315,0.0010090749,0.007161076,0.0072178952,0.00071612763,0.0018477495,0.017366363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062725414,0.00018185696,0.00030621127,0.00050360936,0.030634413,0.0073164627,0.007852816,0.0037606554,0.0012993903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023573311,0.000015514994,0.0003511097,0.00004426745,0.0000068112013,0.00013414852,0.03366106,0.00009483597,0.00004149102,0.9463099,0.011172917,0.0081442995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015280648,0.000041120737,0.0008946097,0.00034252694,0.000012613432,0.00042707147,0.07129061,0.00013224166,0.00027132418,0.49772337,0.42882606,0.000023197043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016149022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028937429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017366363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020956157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05809623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135858668","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01716.x","title":"Minimally Creative Thought","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Novelty; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Creativity technique; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1323051549234892,"score_gpt":0.350952909384375,"score_spread":0.2186477544608858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135858668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10276695,0.00380922,0.15937491,0.014176764,0.00085837994,0.000103727034,0.00013191192,0.00029208223,0.718486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705804,0.0004103149,0.01653484,0.0005797631,0.0002886329,0.000063361615,0.000048221827,0.000037904505,0.011456588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717027,0.0013475514,0.00012243618,0.0004176654,0.00073570723,0.00020644866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966216,0.0016716081,0.0003585051,0.0005701828,0.00048451923,0.00029349935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025384135,0.00030145497,0.00035864086,0.0012683814,0.0017205653,0.004307722,0.00076261687,0.0009935432,0.004752578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005866303,0.00015214426,0.0006602552,0.00057600834,0.019917676,0.004335234,0.0025090384,0.0023471608,0.00058803154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064095166,0.0000029460432,0.000056063236,0.000016368038,0.0000019131185,0.000018180908,0.00063614425,0.00008962699,0.00012204299,0.99674267,0.00038645248,0.001921255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006797736,0.000007652498,0.00008457569,0.000018349809,0.000002328913,0.00005697904,0.00020705845,0.00047055862,0.00011058777,0.99018294,0.008848591,0.0000035562452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044722485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035088035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004752578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021666144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010385979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015898943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200912703","doi":"10.1111/meta.12160","title":"Getting off the Wheel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Attribution; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17678346117820307,"score_gpt":0.28260890735972716,"score_spread":0.10582544618152409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200912703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00919766,0.013833365,0.05894206,0.70668083,0.0060166838,0.000039710438,0.00014008446,0.00034223284,0.20480745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900761,0.013945888,0.029773092,0.07349889,0.007080673,0.0002650827,0.00017480722,0.00083567353,0.08434991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877908,0.0074407,0.0002802582,0.0010053216,0.0028084093,0.00067448633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981045,0.011694081,0.0005529585,0.0027020113,0.0028989522,0.0011069585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017900236,0.00063899107,0.0009780476,0.0035465218,0.0066663953,0.013083154,0.0017442453,0.0063757086,0.011784005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029828662,0.00055326225,0.0006934217,0.0016145018,0.049757283,0.031256087,0.008387601,0.016673442,0.0031276883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076263295,0.000008487696,0.00005700019,0.000027325135,0.0000037096409,0.00001743706,0.0013191986,0.000119067525,0.00002692881,0.9798957,0.014099224,0.004418286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041911653,0.000004574605,0.0000479674,0.00012121,0.000002663541,0.000023169478,0.0010614935,0.0003079815,0.00008116202,0.9353112,0.063027024,0.000007312666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054763444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017900236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008022427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070375227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09466666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240850837","doi":"10.1111/meta.12153","title":"Self‐Images and “Perspicuous Representations”: Reflection, Philosophy, and the Glass Mirror","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphor; Ambiguity; Philosophy; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06760753610240872,"score_gpt":0.26888256502401725,"score_spread":0.20127502892160853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240850837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46038613,0.007636502,0.046135668,0.042782146,0.0005538129,0.000044281565,0.00004021303,0.00018603433,0.4422352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503857,0.00043094324,0.0008754267,0.00026467204,0.00002995784,0.000006973545,0.0000032332166,0.000016389326,0.0033338387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736804,0.0019078653,0.000046957928,0.00017123666,0.00030374358,0.00020208943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831057,0.00092544814,0.00022762721,0.00028069102,0.00012649973,0.00012908677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036765048,0.00028318836,0.00023523807,0.0010051602,0.0034604575,0.0072408724,0.0007291141,0.0022038303,0.0025178492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428844,0.00022794481,0.00024539008,0.0007106693,0.047574233,0.008066157,0.0059356256,0.0026891923,0.00020783355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187961,0.000014743101,0.00030244575,0.000024904348,0.000004230173,0.00014667504,0.11112738,0.0001186941,0.00031425236,0.88056296,0.0009940348,0.006371003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029681281,0.000086954235,0.0018207522,0.00025260096,0.000014893717,0.000657922,0.15403205,0.001383278,0.001424027,0.7394322,0.10082729,0.000038428716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001807179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012411718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072408724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026659337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001394166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019443452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322233634","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x","title":"Distant Peers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.23389744417782146,"score_gpt":0.24805714729496037,"score_spread":0.014159703117138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322233634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04844198,0.002589282,0.062031906,0.055123236,0.0011640176,0.0001465906,0.00012055384,0.00022143219,0.83016104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387935,0.00088551285,0.0054500294,0.0051282435,0.00050042005,0.0000643416,0.000058772668,0.000094296294,0.049024824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99060094,0.004826348,0.00026117725,0.0017303979,0.0019083817,0.0006726513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898608,0.0038118951,0.0011100136,0.0015112361,0.0019549932,0.0017510327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046106246,0.00050634966,0.00052320235,0.0012945246,0.0052149133,0.0075205932,0.0016813779,0.004197625,0.036180254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018613541,0.00027088486,0.0003659769,0.00072819786,0.0147015955,0.010649857,0.007703563,0.003911196,0.003990555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028522212,0.000023326575,0.0005560326,0.000060233135,0.000015061774,0.00031782087,0.0049598105,0.00031328044,0.00033575235,0.9760558,0.006558126,0.010776276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026586114,0.00003983109,0.00055255584,0.00014486948,0.00001782667,0.00036794605,0.0073743453,0.001148576,0.00044537187,0.8533675,0.13648531,0.000029177645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016889964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011743758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036180254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030632422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015306212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12103504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549944756","doi":"10.1111/meta.12165","title":"Overcoming Instructor‐Originated Math Anxiety in Philosophy Students: A Consideration of Proven Techniques for Students Taking Formal Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Education, Achievement, and Giftedness","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Mathematics education; Apprehension; Mathematical anxiety; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.05383977275878466,"score_gpt":0.3971402323379571,"score_spread":0.34330045957917243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549944756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96109873,0.0013057042,0.017704064,0.0075763986,0.00009956058,0.00021188345,0.00000895134,0.0001719203,0.011822824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790933,0.0010183856,0.017515203,0.00038966158,0.00003804622,0.000115151895,0.000009455191,0.000024353061,0.0017964127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972343,0.0015367505,0.000085167245,0.00010661044,0.00078441825,0.000252844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906907,0.0065142876,0.0006807761,0.00036912563,0.0006073362,0.001137826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053777914,0.0003177374,0.00038348237,0.0009700846,0.0016235111,0.0026713018,0.0014550477,0.00079752714,0.0025830702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0173047,0.00018205267,0.00045949072,0.00038746634,0.0020140938,0.0018178298,0.002036898,0.0018900486,0.00021957034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048416288,0.012165321,0.035888925,0.0010511244,0.000066329594,0.0014339734,0.06849386,0.0011531941,0.008121886,0.022749176,0.003922453,0.8444698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020412328,0.03657581,0.22766566,0.0034641207,0.0010303315,0.009476234,0.3753187,0.038779356,0.03317919,0.09410468,0.1778408,0.00052380824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079776434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033609888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053777914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010487854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038271334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028440773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552006455","doi":"10.1111/meta.12202","title":"Intentionality and Content in McDowell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Presupposition; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Relation (database); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.14013019703397261,"score_gpt":0.22627664790842872,"score_spread":0.0861464508744561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552006455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11218708,0.0044372794,0.08383494,0.025961641,0.00038615466,0.00011858128,0.00014545144,0.00017962191,0.77274925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782462,0.0004370585,0.0083397105,0.00094978797,0.000108776694,0.000060657898,0.000031863357,0.00004443942,0.011781346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972235,0.0012339944,0.00015324866,0.00052216044,0.0005892779,0.00027783195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649906,0.0019300244,0.00029314408,0.00040494723,0.00061672746,0.00025599397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032193505,0.00037200007,0.0003667166,0.002867464,0.0045297625,0.007342048,0.0011218122,0.0020654455,0.0046735327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066928193,0.00032653945,0.00037807072,0.0017643556,0.03536729,0.009171962,0.005708313,0.0023301644,0.00033589455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026087669,0.0000018356017,0.00004751357,0.0000070232118,7.723599e-7,0.000015798416,0.0015337971,0.000026911068,0.00003693563,0.99736303,0.00020483379,0.0007589863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006554888,0.0000051912807,0.00011463747,0.000035632755,0.0000046020677,0.00003894367,0.0012112703,0.0002643673,0.00021134118,0.976097,0.022004219,0.0000061502883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008194554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055122273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008105365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029966417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058808804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578690651","doi":"10.1111/meta.12201","title":"The <i>Salto Vitale</i> Method in Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Philosophy; Epistemology; Certainty; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.04318139815212278,"score_gpt":0.38138922684333804,"score_spread":0.33820782869121524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578690651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006632475,0.03110031,0.38737562,0.18513711,0.0109672025,0.00021496433,0.00052951975,0.0008134602,0.3772295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55154854,0.016562786,0.2715451,0.032132965,0.013049357,0.00117487,0.0003801574,0.0015785635,0.11202762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955237,0.0030991882,0.0001613215,0.00043230827,0.0006764732,0.00010712183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342453,0.0045297365,0.00019561732,0.0010270554,0.00063234987,0.00019065064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006896944,0.0004974455,0.00065165287,0.0023159855,0.0022076827,0.0043572774,0.0012700926,0.0018465678,0.009251328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102404505,0.00044376575,0.0011060607,0.0011595726,0.01937112,0.0061945133,0.0035931093,0.0054402296,0.0027260222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011705185,0.000007875356,0.000105021856,0.00006791989,0.000010433239,0.00001935174,0.00028308755,0.00014775412,0.00013062941,0.9715336,0.01769055,0.009992045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017250662,0.000011494948,0.00014114138,0.00017859187,0.0000063871234,0.000051593877,0.00006420227,0.0006854593,0.00023772575,0.8750099,0.12358117,0.000015073297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024366875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022786637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009251328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037036971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036474943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782079141","doi":"10.1111/meta.12279","title":"Show Me the Argument: Empirically Testing the Armchair Philosophy Picture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inductive reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Point (geometry); Mathematics","score_opus":0.14925560794152187,"score_gpt":0.28480463656376265,"score_spread":0.13554902862224077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782079141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647338,0.0009110334,0.0051703663,0.0035498252,0.000118868134,0.0002542314,0.0002880415,0.000033461027,0.024940426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956618,0.00023378052,0.0022975435,0.0004373368,0.000062738,0.00025137,0.00021494253,0.000020836831,0.00081953395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96010286,0.026537223,0.0023921968,0.0034007835,0.0064183804,0.0011484686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45714247,0.44919556,0.04052276,0.017578669,0.03225377,0.0033067963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041634645,0.00038642867,0.00092558196,0.0053913523,0.0023286752,0.0061400356,0.0021430904,0.003628804,0.009148989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28565553,0.0004634004,0.00046307716,0.007354977,0.006145037,0.014409039,0.004950029,0.0046913847,0.001916002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063913907,0.0069176843,0.4299551,0.003038997,0.001179842,0.0024215619,0.19222191,0.0042891437,0.007466117,0.21078762,0.0101437755,0.12518685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011958454,0.007800373,0.41113764,0.003011019,0.0017602383,0.0014703968,0.24188219,0.026465282,0.012117591,0.18892674,0.103854746,0.0003780242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010802555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087038695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041634645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017085497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001497925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22018772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787680258","doi":"10.1111/meta.12194","title":"Truth Analysis of the Gettier Argument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scrutiny; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Analytic philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06180871193112166,"score_gpt":0.24956945785407172,"score_spread":0.18776074592295006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787680258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06918578,0.0031140037,0.34110746,0.049040418,0.0018405961,0.00015850754,0.00027243147,0.00046028022,0.5348205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957053,0.0004347484,0.02574314,0.0036935892,0.0005825069,0.000093863295,0.00008800688,0.00013403356,0.012176977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858655,0.0068718507,0.00058539433,0.0018667205,0.003927819,0.0008828037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97164065,0.020179864,0.0011333869,0.0029844083,0.003522319,0.0005393803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012641465,0.0006462307,0.0008961086,0.0049092243,0.004081575,0.006003724,0.001965692,0.00561439,0.017231226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03804509,0.000556992,0.002013033,0.002468159,0.021416396,0.012776979,0.007919391,0.0056101163,0.0010870192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008018831,0.0000039904626,0.00005018021,0.000016202917,0.0000066368475,0.00003560876,0.00032837645,0.00013178654,0.00004743424,0.9976483,0.0006412392,0.0010822151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068737872,0.000005769599,0.0000604298,0.00002715205,0.000008844882,0.00003476966,0.00015847314,0.00144731,0.00023447181,0.99332494,0.004685183,0.000005690608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011212282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008259353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017231226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042539244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001253246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06685525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792728632","doi":"10.1111/meta.12203","title":"The Challenges of Extreme Moral Stress: Claudia Card's Contributions to the Formation of Nonideal Ethical Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical theory; Ethical theories; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethical issues; Normative ethics; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.14880393995529806,"score_gpt":0.448384150467472,"score_spread":0.29958021051217393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792728632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06036227,0.009737566,0.055592302,0.46889508,0.0035878061,0.00017697396,0.000035728404,0.00007552033,0.40153667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96338475,0.002077725,0.008172412,0.013940675,0.00072287954,0.0001783872,0.000010783897,0.00003074684,0.011481638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97376573,0.019245792,0.0005925414,0.0012810659,0.0036970053,0.00141787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664945,0.023935271,0.001653812,0.0017333099,0.003800704,0.0023824172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020949418,0.00057377986,0.0006569257,0.0027902022,0.011379901,0.015549718,0.0024588117,0.005893144,0.0024959322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033853065,0.0005069881,0.0004254212,0.0014024269,0.09630467,0.012188677,0.011157006,0.011648031,0.00034670532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006549224,0.000011757649,0.00014857386,0.000019617575,0.0000012810017,0.000055181114,0.0067491275,0.000117669995,0.0000123047885,0.9875008,0.0031808051,0.0021962032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016587257,0.000015385333,0.000233295,0.00015092106,0.0000031087568,0.00015524222,0.008768,0.000870148,0.00007419005,0.90271866,0.08696656,0.000027786691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005254882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039832005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020949418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012672112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00979502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11079246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911258360","doi":"10.1111/meta.12344","title":"Well‐Being Blindness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Blindness; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08544926162774868,"score_gpt":0.27387758750612506,"score_spread":0.18842832587837638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911258360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58672416,0.028201336,0.03547603,0.1990921,0.0022660333,0.00009662583,0.00035667376,0.00013764518,0.14764947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893884,0.0017573086,0.0010913776,0.0055768355,0.00019490525,0.000028966459,0.00002682636,0.000015825877,0.0019194238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350536,0.0035218433,0.00017716837,0.0010385267,0.001229247,0.0005278054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98512024,0.007362348,0.0021540704,0.001433711,0.0021669006,0.0017626726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008916308,0.00026919256,0.00077889906,0.00092598243,0.0015202948,0.0037809198,0.00060977845,0.001304593,0.004979557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177742,0.00016364623,0.00031328117,0.0005480408,0.01749628,0.004565726,0.0028542874,0.0043756966,0.00049823686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034304065,0.00029963514,0.037373383,0.000704501,0.00018698367,0.0005187259,0.06712411,0.00046937584,0.0058795125,0.7310421,0.017540064,0.13851857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002252833,0.00021254478,0.034541514,0.00054856855,0.000062830266,0.0007574185,0.02181534,0.0007851998,0.0023797746,0.86685365,0.07193405,0.00008651588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001876558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000901735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008916308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013774649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018519494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047154486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.055561751455892434,"score_gpt":0.34004811320522343,"score_spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955282148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013734103,0.045754615,0.0073646186,0.8236888,0.0021742354,0.000016514372,0.00006768968,0.00002816099,0.10717129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87384474,0.028008578,0.0030987205,0.073042676,0.0071006385,0.00009645477,0.00006838885,0.0000747739,0.01466502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975418,0.001686793,0.00004545968,0.00026861235,0.00030492473,0.00015252484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635774,0.0024835183,0.00021952177,0.00017730243,0.00046134373,0.00030061664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050247605,0.00045659937,0.0006422116,0.0018831069,0.0044535603,0.0055754427,0.00086071325,0.0045970087,0.005668787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004307933,0.00018200146,0.00032531642,0.0015488857,0.03500536,0.009937808,0.003907033,0.006502849,0.0005867833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006248177,0.00001327478,0.00012394166,0.000057946978,0.0000048085817,0.00005291905,0.0024208329,0.00013816725,0.00004739925,0.98269856,0.011750317,0.0026855734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004425705,0.0000054669863,0.00009899949,0.00014202055,0.0000024134304,0.000041798103,0.0031493178,0.0002087071,0.00003126097,0.9495536,0.04675714,0.0000048814272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020126768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010497441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005668787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004412867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019904901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032017767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022064695","doi":"10.1111/meta.12408","title":"CARTESIAN PHILOSOPHY AS SPIRITUAL PRACTICE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Epistemology; Cartesianism; Philosophy; Analogy; Cartesian coordinate system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07732346710249455,"score_gpt":0.24990786832565892,"score_spread":0.17258440122316437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022064695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048025824,0.018156834,0.052747756,0.07903131,0.001328656,0.000055457633,0.000039239,0.00011262964,0.8005024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96651334,0.0035765101,0.008411791,0.0025895804,0.00054956647,0.00008372822,0.000017845003,0.000043946347,0.018213674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480456,0.004129347,0.0001264029,0.00031331205,0.00045198805,0.00017441985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664474,0.0018451656,0.00031971224,0.0004481807,0.0004951587,0.0002470052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049652387,0.00036120316,0.00039543587,0.0010540938,0.0038050092,0.0055688657,0.0005754738,0.0020884483,0.0028846571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044793193,0.00018797281,0.00029317962,0.0007744336,0.06861187,0.0050502974,0.004564757,0.0038852573,0.0005047156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014038825,0.0000015153786,0.00002464249,0.000009900809,4.8812325e-7,0.000011151735,0.0022514837,0.000030209201,0.000024249457,0.99670756,0.00033759006,0.00059969554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072610187,0.000014909476,0.0001237574,0.00008530758,0.0000024009148,0.000061989005,0.0025923515,0.00023299266,0.00008896875,0.9335066,0.06327968,0.0000037882585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023903376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013983859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055688657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040301327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031813704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029240847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091068716","doi":"10.1111/meta.12458","title":"Argumentation, Adversariality, and Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Politeness; Adversary; Sociology; Faith; Argumentative; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10479018412141097,"score_gpt":0.3270651986978478,"score_spread":0.2222750145764368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091068716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26906627,0.004309216,0.123392604,0.084627315,0.0005171501,0.00012476386,0.000083235966,0.00017288409,0.5177065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948767,0.0002430149,0.0028180438,0.000499646,0.00007792813,0.000040399827,0.000007791241,0.000013528725,0.001422886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574667,0.034959603,0.00093854766,0.002349837,0.0034515834,0.00083374244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299933,0.05528339,0.006084572,0.0031165471,0.0037245888,0.001797658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029455643,0.0005141167,0.00056527165,0.002911104,0.005400969,0.008873657,0.0018088571,0.003977792,0.0030488668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034872413,0.00031512944,0.00040753136,0.0013076693,0.07018663,0.007620561,0.007126059,0.0027467376,0.00023874125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063110942,0.00001132664,0.00029976285,0.000015231488,0.0000045932843,0.000032721004,0.0060124625,0.00020115971,0.00006355085,0.9913557,0.0003035979,0.001693661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012496378,0.000011015433,0.00023732794,0.0000644464,0.000003863721,0.00004606761,0.0034109547,0.00076360203,0.0001409564,0.98198515,0.013313894,0.000010254654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011976572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007596275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029455643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002462186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15577823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145446726","doi":"10.1111/meta.12589","title":"The old fisherman's mistake","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Confusion; Foundation (evidence); Naturalism; Consciousness; Epistemology; Fallacy; Morality; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.036031658046959736,"score_gpt":0.20161586937269918,"score_spread":0.16558421132573944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145446726","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010525539,0.0075666704,0.009717646,0.90803176,0.022029242,0.000026412778,0.000104651124,0.00016644619,0.041831594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6262071,0.006330933,0.010388958,0.29281253,0.017717684,0.000091879214,0.000057302874,0.00023818681,0.046155497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939202,0.002059351,0.00041752277,0.0009649655,0.0022823878,0.0003555792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873986,0.0069596,0.000649242,0.0011009286,0.0031310332,0.0007605762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010721681,0.0005146943,0.00076858146,0.001932042,0.005248873,0.003016056,0.0016214048,0.006890124,0.004134475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03726469,0.00035152104,0.0003047045,0.00090024294,0.031181145,0.011870015,0.0033057483,0.013144076,0.0016519318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106603504,0.000029139472,0.00081065187,0.000109377026,0.000022743567,0.0006715494,0.004618647,0.00015684219,0.00017855196,0.6600505,0.3096794,0.023566145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003629946,0.00002700373,0.00064404093,0.0005172325,0.000020659745,0.00077912165,0.00203471,0.0009649721,0.00040559852,0.7660057,0.22851682,0.000047873356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008682583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046601566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039377203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056702375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189039354","doi":"10.1111/meta.12508","title":"Two dogmas of aesthetic empiricism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Pleasure; Appeal; Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Philosophy; Empiricism; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.06425636355701177,"score_gpt":0.3179274221905319,"score_spread":0.25367105863352013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189039354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08676882,0.0031819937,0.076519944,0.13814282,0.0012243409,0.00007767151,0.000109052635,0.0001992751,0.6937761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98812187,0.00035059862,0.0042082025,0.0021632533,0.00040873824,0.00006712998,0.000024707353,0.00005646386,0.004599101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050516,0.005009473,0.0002874936,0.0014724929,0.0021345068,0.00059085345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858015,0.007920653,0.00086236175,0.0029549613,0.0017308977,0.0007296072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013038807,0.0003860535,0.00075270195,0.0029238183,0.0029967285,0.008457267,0.0015389082,0.0040164287,0.0072239866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02096817,0.00044754962,0.00047032983,0.0007700367,0.06502583,0.009372628,0.006343131,0.007386585,0.00070726214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012198323,0.000008715953,0.00015200174,0.000011913874,0.0000041570206,0.000024673176,0.0006686763,0.00009131188,0.000046440222,0.9966248,0.0006646204,0.0016904908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397956,0.0000039590823,0.00014126899,0.000015290829,0.0000013332074,0.000024640252,0.00025962116,0.00044386796,0.000052209398,0.99583036,0.0032146557,0.0000033579342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009173537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000757717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013038807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047126804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016370144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06895661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212931209","doi":"10.1111/meta.12542","title":"Grounding interventionism: Conceptual and epistemological challenges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); Epistemology; Causation; Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Ground; Political science; Law; International relations; Politics","score_opus":0.20608622477043415,"score_gpt":0.275872038539246,"score_spread":0.06978581376881188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212931209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025504379,0.024633681,0.47412917,0.39253128,0.0013825117,0.00013639982,0.00019153378,0.00027205658,0.081218965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86840445,0.0085722655,0.1045892,0.011317566,0.0025004726,0.0006991156,0.00013621157,0.00021761257,0.003563141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525157,0.032012742,0.0017261108,0.0053574503,0.0067318976,0.0016561381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597179,0.11753549,0.0050911293,0.010411573,0.005355022,0.0018888653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065718725,0.0013836273,0.0034295989,0.0056367186,0.0072305934,0.015711118,0.008424441,0.011909044,0.006206187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06051659,0.0013943452,0.0021818494,0.0040807263,0.12482132,0.040662847,0.014667051,0.020852074,0.00074234157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032913854,0.000007152338,0.000031749132,0.000030674008,0.0000035215432,0.0000071546438,0.0004762329,0.00020157672,0.000006828194,0.99728847,0.00019727073,0.0017461888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005226243,0.0000023699365,0.000013238578,0.00003246994,0.000001226539,0.0000050911844,0.00029250325,0.00034248483,0.000014829444,0.9976146,0.0016724376,0.0000035010492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030799226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021105532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065718725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010805775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009782421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34755802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225410264","doi":"10.1111/meta.12565","title":"Chains of being: Infinite regress, circularity, and metaphysical explanationRoss P.CameronOxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 252.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Citation; Theology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05912471100144995,"score_gpt":0.2731131220891251,"score_spread":0.21398841108767513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225410264","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007638836,0.6088699,0.029806826,0.12488323,0.002305717,0.000034529003,0.00026778164,0.00016263973,0.22603051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5779326,0.27076283,0.020493649,0.008050376,0.0039242967,0.0002393705,0.0004152127,0.00032467511,0.11785704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985563,0.0007898419,0.0000776612,0.0001796068,0.00028485255,0.000111768044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713445,0.0019670115,0.00022874378,0.0003260345,0.0002270637,0.00011678701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002793674,0.00090904866,0.0010035593,0.0018250801,0.0023152737,0.0055507673,0.0010900503,0.003161777,0.010678428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005932571,0.00079136074,0.0005961813,0.0020367748,0.027460348,0.014030528,0.0028910886,0.0038473085,0.0015691485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019005494,0.000007176885,0.00010022353,0.000109465596,0.000009110321,0.00005674236,0.0022608545,0.00041162324,0.000073123425,0.9485845,0.02799102,0.02037711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004304481,0.0000033341753,0.00020235838,0.00018941695,0.0000030081515,0.000060093305,0.0007139766,0.00023593294,0.000048501028,0.9230716,0.075459704,0.000007764591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00962689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010678428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004737967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028156824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03572297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239735155","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00285","title":"Constitutive Luck","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05346291251323264,"score_gpt":0.254783815402392,"score_spread":0.20132090288915933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239735155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038288645,0.002901379,0.07516438,0.017487053,0.000575558,0.000078718935,0.00015549663,0.00022012413,0.8651285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660224,0.000748302,0.004863458,0.002747296,0.00023438246,0.000090719965,0.0000892927,0.00008751787,0.025116736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613935,0.0012928506,0.000197825,0.00081833574,0.0010606288,0.00049094943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713385,0.0007258938,0.0005091416,0.00083234574,0.0005153247,0.00028346537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033943953,0.00045137797,0.00047089037,0.0010502492,0.0028882544,0.005927775,0.0009717442,0.0024765227,0.007388096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586033,0.00030615347,0.0004897656,0.0008647058,0.029766161,0.008163044,0.0048038815,0.0036472825,0.0014388751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055593714,0.0000056638596,0.00022948797,0.000032041287,0.000004249327,0.000041705192,0.0020450111,0.00006568209,0.00018471628,0.99288225,0.0014858247,0.0030177985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075692506,0.00002312269,0.0007865734,0.000116816846,0.000013515841,0.00042803687,0.0012996204,0.00036718496,0.0008758507,0.91568273,0.080376245,0.000022707265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012415041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010335747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007388096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035837183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002387199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026001811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245195506","doi":"10.1111/1467-9973.00287","title":"Oracularity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Falsifiability; Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Credibility; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.1064484508213111,"score_gpt":0.2662004836574623,"score_spread":0.1597520328361512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245195506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805413,0.003577011,0.04444365,0.11628034,0.0034863574,0.0000808962,0.00016251636,0.00034403105,0.7635711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637429,0.00072593987,0.0033061511,0.009875824,0.0007581642,0.000060789796,0.00006919846,0.00011872452,0.021342382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864657,0.0055086897,0.0005985787,0.0019649789,0.002435174,0.00084601325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773393,0.008783307,0.003186152,0.0030167853,0.0068911323,0.0007833935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013427679,0.0004623946,0.0004724235,0.0011022971,0.0065118326,0.008110745,0.0015851664,0.0037963705,0.011401499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147745,0.0002530864,0.0003706183,0.0014129773,0.029284824,0.009511751,0.005696873,0.0062947082,0.00185867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018134408,0.0000075128664,0.0003089237,0.00006457755,0.000006464345,0.00005674041,0.0108882915,0.000044524128,0.00016359505,0.9774039,0.005963785,0.005073621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019038107,0.000056076944,0.0013844186,0.0006733011,0.000052708863,0.000299886,0.020965712,0.001055765,0.0012432456,0.5787359,0.3954657,0.00004817714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050634877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004156986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013427679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034068336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004750177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250979798","doi":"10.1111/meta.12371","title":"Inarticulate Forgiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Forgiveness; Action (physics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.012574507874099573,"score_gpt":0.2804197412857387,"score_spread":0.2678452334116391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250979798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2309119,0.00353411,0.035779316,0.019467399,0.00066748273,0.000085645646,0.000045399473,0.00015541958,0.7093534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848135,0.0003740624,0.0011988286,0.00090512226,0.00006283791,0.000020778658,0.000010495242,0.00001772771,0.012596717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607027,0.002371501,0.00014052198,0.00033415912,0.000719451,0.0003641017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957644,0.0015075714,0.0008151117,0.0011397994,0.0005114614,0.0002616248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033282738,0.0004252943,0.00026532516,0.00064512796,0.0020957522,0.0034805832,0.00087418774,0.0020273996,0.0042585237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008969969,0.00017538582,0.00033144228,0.00019801439,0.017889485,0.0038517793,0.004886122,0.0030422227,0.000601162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004092481,0.0000512814,0.0017487248,0.000103571416,0.000015545813,0.00050940615,0.028420253,0.00015165961,0.0012851633,0.9494692,0.002243361,0.015960846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030299721,0.00017962961,0.0065764245,0.00052484404,0.000040454357,0.0023298012,0.03434696,0.0011821503,0.003999087,0.8081022,0.14264394,0.000044178934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049112417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005499699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042585237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017505918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009340949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017601848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322504453","doi":"10.1111/meta.12615","title":"On the inseparability of reasoning and virtue: Madame de Maintenon's Maison royale de <scp>Saint‐Louis</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Mores; Virtue; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Art history; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02574200678598042,"score_gpt":0.27224983111843676,"score_spread":0.24650782433245633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322504453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35128003,0.012077046,0.0017130772,0.12601462,0.0007305825,0.000043446566,0.00009039701,0.00007781896,0.5079729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881509,0.00082880765,0.0003867296,0.0020756435,0.00010295224,0.00000901556,0.000010127992,0.0000437107,0.1083922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982887,0.0010087632,0.000020931131,0.00020043463,0.00021985701,0.00026139562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982241,0.001071698,0.00013868618,0.000072815266,0.00021605994,0.0002767299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025192413,0.00025626237,0.0002844458,0.00050952256,0.012371963,0.0039740815,0.0005832835,0.0015527885,0.0081190085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002091753,0.00028298647,0.00014953752,0.00031695713,0.012333817,0.0015051385,0.0026263588,0.004181291,0.0005781799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010405942,0.00007444256,0.003038604,0.000077986275,0.000013880387,0.0016745427,0.24437313,0.00034283297,0.0010981882,0.667145,0.054246552,0.027810765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013596829,0.00005389464,0.0078133475,0.00013750095,0.0000059905433,0.0004817923,0.03062254,0.00034393911,0.0008749979,0.022429936,0.9371879,0.00003453526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17011262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42135617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17011262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012665634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042994674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33824492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07777898570228699,"score_gpt":0.36757554331156006,"score_spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14474477,0.004249289,0.039463814,0.28217053,0.0010724522,0.000067164205,0.00010582054,0.00006510933,0.5280611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990404,0.00036208297,0.0012616153,0.005079066,0.0005152434,0.000054534612,0.000013085423,0.000021044383,0.0022892563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662547,0.02425302,0.0007139069,0.0021660172,0.004394257,0.0022181165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938814,0.049116895,0.00390875,0.002377413,0.004034566,0.001748379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028316468,0.00052051677,0.0011335933,0.003989386,0.010165185,0.013232233,0.0025070915,0.01133707,0.0059199156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049036,0.00042070993,0.00079695013,0.0022635239,0.066908896,0.012490105,0.009536938,0.009319126,0.00040882573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567458,0.000010254745,0.00011045243,0.000009399619,0.0000039871984,0.000026105869,0.0010339922,0.00009182827,0.000026979804,0.99785763,0.00036288818,0.00045795957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013038467,0.0000061814017,0.00017502166,0.00004441341,0.0000047075973,0.000013537937,0.0010376823,0.00040990714,0.000067850364,0.99489164,0.0033277974,0.0000082549695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034881085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00243053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028316468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008159691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032909145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391816761","doi":"10.1111/meta.12667","title":"Academic hoaxes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Dimension (graph theory); sort; Work (physics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04639697067024791,"score_gpt":0.39220870454276374,"score_spread":0.34581173387251585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391816761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30613762,0.008229755,0.024469525,0.05551859,0.001960389,0.00019576016,0.00037669437,0.0017275132,0.60138416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403388,0.0015660238,0.0029192446,0.0027178207,0.0004249907,0.000089231515,0.00015960468,0.0002902591,0.051494107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846618,0.00825397,0.00072333164,0.001268614,0.003525101,0.0015672017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247878,0.025715116,0.012115112,0.014234409,0.012602908,0.0105447],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072551,0.0006130642,0.0005995878,0.0025380685,0.0070159836,0.009184668,0.0016955691,0.0025522353,0.026275666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052244324,0.00040186202,0.0004026612,0.0026787731,0.010395616,0.015645728,0.01108325,0.0038884971,0.005909598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055743987,0.00029810434,0.023017414,0.00096756587,0.00008011205,0.0012950865,0.09336775,0.0005596318,0.0027213688,0.4796734,0.09403066,0.30343148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036720667,0.00017849053,0.018346127,0.001048772,0.000035945268,0.0012824298,0.080998704,0.0006512831,0.0025023345,0.15034601,0.74444693,0.00012623976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011544499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013527116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033220996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020173783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08790088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400588946","doi":"10.1111/meta.12699","title":"Aristotle's tyche (τύχη) and contemporary debates about luck","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Existentialism; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05645477353636011,"score_gpt":0.2458058950611083,"score_spread":0.1893511215247482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400588946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08519873,0.032217957,0.02381948,0.10904199,0.0013202665,0.000024653606,0.00011482549,0.00008572437,0.74817646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97987044,0.003219375,0.0012863507,0.003038542,0.0004121713,0.000019252899,0.000018953777,0.00002679828,0.012108007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.000913561,0.000040019542,0.00017738482,0.0003405927,0.00015316573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984145,0.0010698931,0.00010910755,0.000121622186,0.00020208956,0.00008276357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027917856,0.00033824003,0.0004324243,0.001661442,0.004367372,0.005334682,0.00055655127,0.0030416574,0.0027628962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00317758,0.00020133081,0.00023741198,0.0013519543,0.039838664,0.0053698244,0.0019934212,0.00409557,0.0004182212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006110077,0.0000021499359,0.000025526238,0.0000092897735,8.4933583e-7,0.000017766784,0.0021126375,0.000079103185,0.00001895121,0.99602556,0.0007719329,0.00093006337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056375425,0.000006289157,0.00017800527,0.00007947393,0.000001642046,0.000023565062,0.00155221,0.0001851859,0.00005101274,0.95966333,0.03824582,0.000007825281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056455988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053526103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007215022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007215022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05234891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400609253","doi":"10.1111/meta.12695","title":"Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Epistemology; Philosophical theory; Indigenous; Section (typography); Philosophical analysis; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010038422624911204,"score_gpt":0.21107098327860707,"score_spread":0.20103256065369587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400609253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09847541,0.027545476,0.03755474,0.14047843,0.0073197545,0.00016500008,0.0002378926,0.00026991413,0.68795335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582858,0.0058509707,0.006840954,0.0030564556,0.0017164641,0.00011108126,0.00006005944,0.00014962278,0.023928491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960394,0.0024791616,0.0001603371,0.0002619113,0.0008217505,0.00023750724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853321,0.009599999,0.0011270882,0.0011822934,0.0022046973,0.00055382913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008351422,0.00037672764,0.00050199206,0.0028761649,0.0061801076,0.009853261,0.0011603897,0.0016911839,0.0046590576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016852591,0.00020440495,0.00021890605,0.0028793486,0.02154752,0.006992307,0.004276718,0.003618361,0.00045767613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019033992,0.000016274846,0.0004886842,0.00019886626,0.000006771864,0.00035258624,0.09050782,0.00010289434,0.0001968638,0.8876937,0.0068738665,0.013542624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021795717,0.00003676658,0.0015592526,0.0017111596,0.000020652406,0.00045649117,0.08729574,0.0005473588,0.00097211165,0.36665976,0.54066736,0.00005151305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030623188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039822585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009853261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004713875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00613852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04416704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}