{"meta":{"query_hash":"439a897a2dff","filters":{"venue":"Metaphor and Symbol"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/439a897a2dff","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metaphor+and+Symbol"},"results":[{"id":"W1970405828","doi":"10.1080/10926480701357661","title":"On Acknowledging Thanks for Performing a Favor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Literal (mathematical logic); Psychology; Function (biology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04603929262473463,"score_gpt":0.3021183868059258,"score_spread":0.2560790941811912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970405828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96736467,0.00066729373,0.0021475977,0.0009841237,0.00009760168,0.000034523575,0.00001819971,0.000015401029,0.028670702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379694,0.0008950515,0.0012408908,0.0005152601,0.000062914885,0.000043062373,0.000022384183,0.000013155683,0.003410415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952311,0.0034187844,0.00017555925,0.00020725605,0.0007336424,0.00023354507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745317,0.01810964,0.004637119,0.00090934924,0.0012762346,0.00053592183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006377401,0.0003960627,0.000265936,0.000830648,0.0013633994,0.0022986946,0.00061639707,0.0011731314,0.0030765762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033479024,0.0002261101,0.00022163034,0.00038807813,0.0031578226,0.0033104462,0.0024713837,0.0014209253,0.00045031065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005940695,0.00042194023,0.0549189,0.0017821074,0.0001430284,0.002458846,0.7416036,0.00028599447,0.019314738,0.02533267,0.0034363123,0.14970781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007911571,0.0015298554,0.115460426,0.0015032587,0.00024132254,0.004265981,0.76656,0.0008488035,0.008911866,0.011086607,0.08932849,0.0001842343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005247394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011413178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006377401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053210906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006774647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03372729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981106480","doi":"10.1207/s15327868ms2101_1","title":"On Reversing the Topics and Vehicles of Metaphor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Phrase; Assertion; Reading (process); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Word order; Interpretation (philosophy); Word (group theory); Computer science; Class (philosophy); Contrast (vision); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021052524102400865,"score_gpt":0.28286471311675826,"score_spread":0.2618121890143574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981106480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8118573,0.002789974,0.10018781,0.0052268705,0.00033035956,0.00029467157,0.000120869954,0.00023097679,0.078961186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702804,0.0012949302,0.02332402,0.00056621426,0.00012692512,0.00022189293,0.00017506149,0.0001390191,0.00387155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319977,0.0037762318,0.000241816,0.0010285322,0.0013941,0.00035955376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97321856,0.019838406,0.0023330147,0.0030032478,0.0012148147,0.00039202173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006697288,0.00058326207,0.00055773946,0.0014351883,0.0012959853,0.0036251335,0.0011134465,0.0013039532,0.00445236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029620586,0.00043504857,0.0005341516,0.0007199586,0.008403217,0.013203033,0.0036929988,0.0025041874,0.00077632227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019244992,0.000700385,0.030359888,0.0008115061,0.0000697967,0.0006861725,0.08620951,0.0019894429,0.05983447,0.4153903,0.0026515573,0.3993725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051447353,0.0025148934,0.08736289,0.0010862867,0.00028956306,0.0035293787,0.06192949,0.021994863,0.071588196,0.60013723,0.14865501,0.00039772157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010135836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006697288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012708427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012715916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035419047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001602861","doi":"10.1207/s15327868ms1504_5","title":"\"One's Terms Defy One's Arguments\": The Metaphoric Framing of \"UNIVERSITY AS COMMUNITY\" and \"UNIVERSITY AS BUSINESS\" in the Second Report of the Task Force on Strategic Planning at the University of Manitoba","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Framing (construction); Task force; Sociology; Conceptual blending; Task (project management); Strategic planning; Affect (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Management; Cognition; Philosophy; Economics; Public administration; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.020270783314826173,"score_gpt":0.19360687231394946,"score_spread":0.17333608899912328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001602861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2743067,0.02096627,0.046575837,0.37235513,0.0037583297,0.00007202997,0.000097107346,0.00018868202,0.28167987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778943,0.0020548487,0.004859292,0.007480847,0.00016553733,0.00004767953,0.000020840054,0.000082007435,0.007394641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913061,0.0072430247,0.000069691894,0.00019287084,0.00065642316,0.000531846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718803,0.0015603938,0.0002473601,0.00019741495,0.00041409497,0.00039268515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057768957,0.0007231151,0.00055393134,0.002051202,0.016595248,0.009791543,0.0015301039,0.0044461205,0.002078359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070235124,0.00040201188,0.0005487158,0.0032431076,0.055490106,0.014354541,0.0065322616,0.007437325,0.00047134486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037669124,0.000020321357,0.0004722028,0.000052452946,0.000005135041,0.0006231298,0.25448582,0.00007181176,0.00031382721,0.7252279,0.013530829,0.0051589166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005289037,0.000042652493,0.001157756,0.000424795,0.000022205531,0.0012715437,0.49026477,0.0009275722,0.0006399415,0.21156791,0.29356995,0.000058006113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04005021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050873224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128940875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010399718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0935536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018979779","doi":"10.1207/s15327868ms1703_1","title":"Metaphoric Interpretations of Comparison-Based Combinations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Expectancy theory; Noun; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Transitive relation; Meaning (existential); Perception; Categorization; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0362713479323739,"score_gpt":0.3061862288424094,"score_spread":0.2699148809100355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018979779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91733575,0.00043699614,0.041923456,0.00055613165,0.00007692379,0.000054403954,0.00004749154,0.00016967747,0.03939918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958834,0.00003717644,0.0036917804,0.000031796513,0.0000092908485,0.000010274513,0.000018922196,0.000021275768,0.00029609285],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727494,0.001601166,0.00008957664,0.00022131373,0.00072384544,0.00008917051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913551,0.0057538627,0.001077249,0.0008274388,0.00071294146,0.00027336396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023509145,0.0004939766,0.00028860866,0.0006584401,0.0005126697,0.0022908289,0.00046900287,0.00096222956,0.0031338034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013041827,0.0002704691,0.0003535901,0.00034913194,0.002244753,0.0032574772,0.0015082842,0.0013922349,0.00021312232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002498395,0.0004744739,0.014886167,0.0014194661,0.0002193074,0.0033925814,0.14118019,0.0029188565,0.4148611,0.32685107,0.002545976,0.08875239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297534,0.0036514478,0.096415274,0.0006821217,0.00051344594,0.013440715,0.0681897,0.067821234,0.09213657,0.59078205,0.06534594,0.00039177234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108395485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010281907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031338034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039302182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021238394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012432933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040558989","doi":"10.1080/10926480903310286","title":"<i>“That Was Smooth, Mom”:</i> Children's Production of Verbal and Gestural Irony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Sydney","keywords":"Irony; Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Linguistics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013836201676670821,"score_gpt":0.2572284266501002,"score_spread":0.24339222497342938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040558989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958733,0.000098521836,0.0005674227,0.00016795882,0.000008561183,0.000011308847,0.00016568635,0.000028028182,0.0030793082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784696,0.00007384929,0.001091347,0.000045642726,0.0000038718917,0.000021820795,0.00016679597,0.0000107555825,0.0007389872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976116,0.000083730956,0.000021138101,0.000035229445,0.0000491067,0.000049737137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986998,0.0005069934,0.00049330347,0.00008831801,0.00013508512,0.00007636278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007006951,0.00018352401,0.000104935694,0.00060298224,0.00047476127,0.00047270907,0.00017907287,0.00034571945,0.0022758998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034846563,0.00011869377,0.00012557198,0.0003265279,0.0008435104,0.00063956744,0.0005428391,0.0004366916,0.00020828149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056961295,0.00009014627,0.54120874,0.00042963543,0.000050919483,0.0053411024,0.3256994,0.00030845433,0.05360693,0.003563702,0.0073220497,0.061809354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010509602,0.0001510056,0.8835373,0.00014177279,0.000039461123,0.007548841,0.08521534,0.00061478815,0.008736518,0.0007333199,0.013231614,0.00003948499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007816066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016689382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007816066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004355226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029602484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015541136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041673271","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2001.9678895","title":"Moment-By-Moment Reading of Proverbs in Literal and Nonliteral Contexts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Literal (mathematical logic); Context (archaeology); Ambiguity; Sentence; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Literal and figurative language; Statement (logic); Psychology; Trope (literature); Resolution (logic); Computer science; History; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01180774544606914,"score_gpt":0.2820890615839732,"score_spread":0.270281316137904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041673271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98158586,0.00081722206,0.003524695,0.00011870325,0.00002986672,0.000024239756,0.00006898248,0.000080031525,0.013750575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522215,0.000340256,0.002424249,0.000058582456,0.000017863675,0.000016283408,0.00009372849,0.000073407,0.0017533547],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993297,0.00033174249,0.000038121598,0.00009876794,0.00015421986,0.00004746536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861022,0.010579083,0.0016298585,0.00080789946,0.0006093593,0.00027157753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010493291,0.00028992412,0.00050131476,0.0006951394,0.0002944741,0.0017469333,0.00039712052,0.0005886281,0.007963833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015790163,0.00028023822,0.00017663023,0.0004039992,0.0006939026,0.002632704,0.0006553605,0.0007032081,0.00088260043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038724418,0.0010229665,0.06129255,0.0018229878,0.00017555486,0.004152832,0.15789752,0.00055896613,0.47990698,0.016901916,0.002046772,0.2703485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022474866,0.005174674,0.6934413,0.00082854263,0.00017898099,0.00598156,0.07369791,0.0039924863,0.15198648,0.021859204,0.04238177,0.00025244962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003484195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080918934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007963833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029743536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017144154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026641667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118903334","doi":"10.1080/10926480903028094","title":"A Naturalistic Exploration of Forms and Functions of Analogizing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Categorization; Computer science; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Metaphor; Similarity (geometry); Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03716046029632899,"score_gpt":0.30254034957442677,"score_spread":0.2653798892780978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118903334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05971529,0.031526882,0.38655683,0.031627856,0.0004083129,0.00013633417,0.00015114524,0.0002630431,0.48961425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9120021,0.00717173,0.07315283,0.0012328217,0.0004181919,0.00020982756,0.000082851715,0.000089868845,0.005639704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971764,0.0017641295,0.00009763618,0.00036424265,0.00049066724,0.000106937114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953831,0.0031199153,0.00023477196,0.0008466303,0.00029159998,0.00012396167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003477178,0.00054536475,0.00049622584,0.00395779,0.0023595798,0.006174745,0.0021392156,0.0021965925,0.003571383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006189161,0.0004956099,0.0005778802,0.0023843981,0.03628512,0.016094219,0.0038245926,0.0035231756,0.00033545564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033632875,0.000003128722,0.0000430942,0.00001901114,0.0000010473962,0.0000130373755,0.00069419795,0.00013420543,0.00005002772,0.9962077,0.00014408004,0.002687067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003225128,0.00000686114,0.00008916867,0.000032991687,0.0000016794892,0.00010652367,0.00037653826,0.00084811286,0.00010209647,0.9859331,0.012495578,0.0000041738244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008132128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006625992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006174745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026649337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014135824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019335568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159216608","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2011.583197","title":"Context and Intonation in the Perception of Sarcasm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Tone (literature); Perception; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Intonation (linguistics); Statement (logic); Sentence; Context effect; Social psychology; Audiology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Irony; Medicine; Word (group theory); Neuroscience; History","score_opus":0.04139863845823647,"score_gpt":0.29084637172290967,"score_spread":0.2494477332646732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159216608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968892,0.00014832652,0.0007422723,0.000032322325,0.000018255081,0.000013540858,0.000013121435,0.000011271475,0.002131666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901414,0.00008667705,0.0005622718,0.000031134183,0.000012690116,0.000014852585,0.000016706377,0.000010262058,0.000251205],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902177,0.00058131065,0.000041279887,0.00010991963,0.0001831516,0.00006249726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960763,0.0024668926,0.0008220207,0.000104790044,0.00031381103,0.00021611381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008951089,0.00046483474,0.0002511686,0.00032453611,0.00033098506,0.0010147194,0.00018080988,0.0005049105,0.0020097473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009669331,0.0003084798,0.00016506402,0.00011446634,0.00064705993,0.00074636855,0.0008052062,0.00047306766,0.00020197916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062210704,0.00020245666,0.07490815,0.0011219969,0.0001748079,0.0013306936,0.09705018,0.00044939277,0.7675264,0.0015509491,0.00040291203,0.04906098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024902454,0.0039633596,0.90889007,0.00032196374,0.00022448886,0.0020355836,0.051270127,0.0025352114,0.024005247,0.0022037844,0.004127579,0.00017350363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002377885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003331358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020097473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012857864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001180416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067232847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273721664","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2016.1116908","title":"Aptness Predicts Metaphor Preference in the Lab and on the Internet","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Simile; Metaphor; Preference; Psychology; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Social psychology; Dominance (genetics); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04598963472906858,"score_gpt":0.27811812104847833,"score_spread":0.23212848631940974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273721664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99876815,0.00006885589,0.00020411272,0.000026840848,0.0000029985179,0.000009457645,0.000020228561,0.0000066370403,0.0008926882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986039,0.00010568401,0.00063495454,0.00003556077,0.000006684335,0.000015743259,0.00007145824,0.0000071326463,0.0005189378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936324,0.0002887633,0.000061028342,0.00007500568,0.0001632683,0.000048806705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044245,0.0047386307,0.0027884562,0.0005129323,0.00045432258,0.0010631729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015072569,0.00030908387,0.000221846,0.00066237035,0.00026848336,0.001583728,0.0001864891,0.0007485386,0.005330549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013098563,0.00023388481,0.00034569588,0.00029785594,0.00038581065,0.0010008371,0.00056156574,0.00075706886,0.0006614726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018123526,0.0025358233,0.86569196,0.00040403585,0.00029578505,0.00078835816,0.019337658,0.00080532866,0.07279435,0.000879782,0.0007418285,0.03391276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005763401,0.0011610197,0.98304105,0.000040659754,0.00006826009,0.0007682329,0.006291846,0.0024477022,0.0036930398,0.0010056378,0.0013700627,0.0000549152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044513098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008917145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005330549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015966251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088647146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017832518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781543551","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2018.1407995","title":"A future-minded lark in the morning: The influence of time-of-day and chronotype on metaphorical associations between space and time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chronotype; Morning; Psychology; Focus (optics); Space (punctuation); Time of day; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.013417081960006579,"score_gpt":0.28771079806389654,"score_spread":0.27429371610389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781543551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996947,0.000072841,0.0003926215,0.000056251913,0.000010159832,0.000003441896,0.000009328415,0.0000033489991,0.0025051148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939764,0.000042201642,0.00030446477,0.00002036498,0.0000022950007,0.0000030662159,0.000011026631,0.0000044554035,0.00021456284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994147,0.0003265847,0.00002036418,0.00007486439,0.00010385687,0.000059679584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629176,0.0021276842,0.0007908755,0.00027403783,0.00022117316,0.00029458987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012566593,0.0001799506,0.00016350758,0.00036414023,0.0005722152,0.0014311629,0.00021291028,0.00032111586,0.0020628525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062229168,0.00015391261,0.00021842649,0.00023140118,0.0011580389,0.0009299944,0.0010620964,0.00050575973,0.00009874162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041324883,0.00073467544,0.5066673,0.00042941337,0.0003396259,0.002415152,0.29685098,0.0007375477,0.10734107,0.022125103,0.001447193,0.056779414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060483602,0.0005202819,0.9162965,0.00007133986,0.00013476277,0.0009544503,0.06637461,0.0014266883,0.0035596937,0.005434212,0.0050710905,0.00009604296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017755681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002835485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020628525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029883953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031531934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006900966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782154253","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2018.1407993","title":"Metaphorical and literal profiling in the study of emotions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anger; Metaphor; Conceptualization; Psychology; Linguistics; Conceptual metaphor; Literal and figurative language; Cognitive psychology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Social psychology","score_opus":0.03486200886211673,"score_gpt":0.32692696179085556,"score_spread":0.29206495292873885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782154253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41606238,0.0832568,0.3563453,0.009996901,0.0013923462,0.000278373,0.00023660618,0.00017695299,0.13225435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92856985,0.008452414,0.05961493,0.00068041,0.00031516483,0.00035155084,0.00006193612,0.00004946792,0.0019042905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961195,0.0032260881,0.00011479179,0.00017924489,0.00026872967,0.00009165039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945716,0.004310889,0.00043145844,0.0003945887,0.0001272081,0.00016422578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041772863,0.00043937797,0.0005873221,0.0031403527,0.0010886302,0.0034902557,0.0006213173,0.0010771048,0.0019383241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008313632,0.00023031955,0.00037754668,0.002490033,0.0102755,0.004869487,0.0025775956,0.0015596146,0.00022371524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012391942,0.000083531784,0.006836698,0.0009808638,0.000038037982,0.0005308282,0.0581351,0.0010702914,0.008295588,0.8492123,0.001303906,0.07338888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054750133,0.00038314486,0.02534691,0.00089185766,0.00005210059,0.0037483263,0.06702732,0.005866711,0.0031988749,0.8118298,0.08144325,0.00015693395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046455036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048005694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041772863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006821202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007940374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022091866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003888718","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2020.1712786","title":"“… If We Look Slightly Askance, We See it All”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03507637731900148,"score_gpt":0.2928458381481143,"score_spread":0.25776946082911284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003888718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075160025,0.029127166,0.0029384834,0.624326,0.31240278,0.000024400084,0.00014662238,0.00031906928,0.029963909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023915526,0.03722644,0.0046386733,0.52633286,0.20845266,0.00010975922,0.00030254034,0.0009105023,0.19811115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959857,0.0017724307,0.00023854019,0.00045849424,0.0012630911,0.0002818149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98880976,0.002977309,0.0009666738,0.0005212708,0.005409396,0.0013155623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004113227,0.0011678621,0.0009648541,0.001162957,0.0028411786,0.008597634,0.0014426819,0.0035635638,0.035485286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029269485,0.00036183698,0.00073768833,0.0009749012,0.005137939,0.009065723,0.0021196099,0.014973789,0.026087968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030644293,0.0000069674156,0.00016732613,0.00015280893,0.000009976955,0.00006539338,0.00051570876,0.000013300786,0.00019510351,0.006292207,0.97840184,0.0141486265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042158545,0.000013467301,0.00026134335,0.00022235581,0.000007336115,0.00038713342,0.0010913927,0.00003829251,0.0001364166,0.0030684136,0.9947537,0.000015866406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025391574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005628824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035485286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017393088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002222304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11871016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120872044","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2020.1843970","title":"Factors that Influence the Processing of Noun-Noun Metaphors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Literal and figurative language; Noun phrase; Proper noun; Head (geology); Nominalization; Psychology; Literal (mathematical logic); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Communication; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.037089511433981544,"score_gpt":0.3004676975241972,"score_spread":0.2633781860902157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120872044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99048156,0.00028633425,0.0029290863,0.000112193,0.00004812484,0.00011779814,0.00016105919,0.000045178458,0.0058185677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936,0.00019372853,0.0043369094,0.00009956087,0.000022445667,0.0001422148,0.00021591192,0.00013704291,0.0012521415],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900156,0.00021696276,0.00007713951,0.000326976,0.00022484735,0.00015256008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993083,0.004550126,0.0011408647,0.000329555,0.00054632477,0.00035010878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010453161,0.00056362216,0.0004773019,0.00032061877,0.00042740995,0.002473803,0.00032478772,0.00077961525,0.0058875233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016540645,0.00046366794,0.00031681333,0.00035209605,0.0007674134,0.0022765908,0.00076344074,0.0009471456,0.0006327496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003519451,0.00038402577,0.03478397,0.0009259771,0.000089748595,0.000856948,0.008957989,0.00057972694,0.9272524,0.002862321,0.0007028363,0.019084496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035185556,0.0021063855,0.86333436,0.00017372501,0.00027262027,0.0015886106,0.00670802,0.0066696825,0.0972181,0.014572865,0.0067883315,0.00021534451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001611797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014184208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058875233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042050183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043320077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019695759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175047571","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2021.1907185","title":"The Embodiment of Power as Forward/Backward Movement in Chinese and English Speakers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Categorization; Conceptual metaphor; Psychology; Metaphor; Embodied cognition; Schema (genetic algorithms); Cognitive psychology; Movement (music); Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0072357348082713125,"score_gpt":0.27031224351007077,"score_spread":0.26307650870179944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175047571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977489,0.000041484564,0.00039644825,0.000023657894,0.0000037688733,0.000008126114,0.0000069013727,0.000002737057,0.0017679668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989291,0.00004432369,0.000620779,0.000018465784,0.0000025274114,0.0000077471,0.000011849407,0.0000048596994,0.00036038755],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993242,0.00019753358,0.000049382827,0.00011865828,0.0002167753,0.00009339078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977405,0.001217637,0.00048795517,0.00014166771,0.00024783652,0.00016429464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017312065,0.0004442986,0.0002713618,0.0006071699,0.0004252126,0.0014269175,0.00023470218,0.00038209843,0.0021171768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005567015,0.00028923614,0.00025212302,0.00025874347,0.0015965641,0.0014060603,0.0010598742,0.0005970146,0.00014019695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019482875,0.00038047647,0.15874104,0.00052732014,0.00013929328,0.0022397947,0.2989079,0.0005357893,0.48506594,0.011942959,0.00037101962,0.039200176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022557791,0.0013412721,0.8136504,0.000109642206,0.00030018695,0.0035905722,0.1059877,0.005798538,0.055823244,0.006100579,0.0067266203,0.00034579163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00421552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035435387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00421552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033115043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044654304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009155571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327544910","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2023.2172821","title":"On Poetry and the Science(s) of Meaning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Literature; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024001017869564743,"score_gpt":0.2996631956265722,"score_spread":0.2756621777570074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327544910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010988955,0.15202585,0.008806482,0.13106704,0.013050614,0.000028252669,0.00011569593,0.00008199284,0.6838351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64462113,0.16100383,0.005625912,0.031062875,0.032752827,0.00016790887,0.00020737479,0.00022744996,0.12433078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982206,0.0010506737,0.000054781438,0.00016150619,0.0003754961,0.00013693263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609643,0.0028300877,0.0001908055,0.0003010599,0.00040680976,0.00017480666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002200062,0.00058761326,0.0005601149,0.0022593613,0.0055101705,0.009497858,0.00066867174,0.0022470676,0.008951701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060236272,0.00023642802,0.00028852033,0.0028963017,0.035532564,0.015099295,0.0037925723,0.004771956,0.0019613386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012780559,0.000007857078,0.00011001199,0.000072411975,0.0000035047797,0.000074937496,0.0064865495,0.0000525644,0.00006952298,0.9468202,0.03230656,0.013983102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051887064,0.00001921198,0.00040395395,0.00030413456,0.0000035588855,0.00015305803,0.00480872,0.00008355959,0.000075751734,0.6724803,0.3216512,0.000011329049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024092395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033339588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009497858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022215862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020133953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029946387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327545073","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2021.2011285","title":"Cognitive Factors Related to Metaphor Goodness in Poetic and Non-literary Metaphor","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Poetry; Space (punctuation); Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.026117536368433197,"score_gpt":0.3155693955414691,"score_spread":0.28945185917303595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327545073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967049,0.000085444924,0.00074840663,0.00003942733,0.0000046141818,0.000013570749,0.000008598504,0.0000051831657,0.00238982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993705,0.000023510975,0.0004899835,0.000007804789,0.0000031872764,0.0000052309697,0.000013823801,0.000002855705,0.00008301751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765503,0.0010174918,0.00016792973,0.00017730554,0.00084355654,0.00013869387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97343767,0.016779648,0.0054528657,0.0012997176,0.0016259599,0.001404159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033996352,0.00042551852,0.00036983617,0.002112813,0.0006566688,0.0021661918,0.00032348986,0.0006826083,0.0019463855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03425539,0.0002584301,0.000411339,0.0008992544,0.003956204,0.0018352686,0.0014765419,0.0010970378,0.00011288486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015864274,0.0012123294,0.81024826,0.0008087207,0.00047651818,0.0012903924,0.088095404,0.002569025,0.025711617,0.017549695,0.0005016995,0.049949918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051164556,0.00050062407,0.9500273,0.000052631003,0.00006981977,0.0013180634,0.028695615,0.0026920051,0.0016150067,0.013505576,0.0013662274,0.00010589093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067162816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010700404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033996352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053348864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033804952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017979205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387165568","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2023.2225561","title":"Early Birds Can Fly: Awakening the Literal Meaning of Conventional Metaphors Further Downstream","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Meaning (existential); Sentence; Literal (mathematical logic); Comprehension; Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Psychology; Word (group theory); Reading (process); Task (project management); Interpretation (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023076479596812333,"score_gpt":0.28190526441462366,"score_spread":0.25882878481781135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387165568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939779,0.00018486597,0.0028185484,0.00009294351,0.000020889202,0.0000135087585,0.000024821256,0.00005482465,0.002811775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967525,0.00009079965,0.002480365,0.0000948984,0.00000794179,0.000012077041,0.00004917928,0.000040763207,0.000471428],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972016,0.00010740783,0.000015974558,0.00005701134,0.000067895846,0.000031559845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968832,0.002313352,0.00034266125,0.00017617298,0.0001436662,0.00014089563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048552017,0.00028027885,0.00025444033,0.00017928539,0.00019996655,0.00074430445,0.00019294642,0.00054894417,0.0029694117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00671952,0.00020678357,0.00021533691,0.00011088173,0.00076962,0.0016121109,0.0007119244,0.0010202782,0.00026346053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015956187,0.00015552893,0.008218971,0.0005333451,0.000057086774,0.0010516364,0.026692344,0.00029842378,0.9298774,0.002999191,0.0004559685,0.02806456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033846596,0.0070488267,0.64442873,0.00031342747,0.0003783279,0.006048229,0.0426012,0.010690653,0.2468064,0.023294676,0.017761016,0.0002900334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004130258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059542013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029694117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014218719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014951528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0099336505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390950483","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2024.2295636","title":"Super Figures: Poetry, Picture Poetry, and Art in the Service of Human Connection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Connection (principal bundle); Literature; Art; Psychology; Aesthetics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02294624176027134,"score_gpt":0.30466076061391617,"score_spread":0.28171451885364485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390950483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043147814,0.028739152,0.019059671,0.05602213,0.0033460169,0.000028569631,0.000115217445,0.00023302168,0.8493084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9225285,0.009316606,0.0071351095,0.004387529,0.0021033774,0.000047181627,0.00007561175,0.00019041687,0.05421566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.0006415686,0.000026001411,0.000103793114,0.00016087801,0.000059038608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985733,0.0007967467,0.0001229548,0.00021842086,0.000104069724,0.00018451014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013712223,0.00041077202,0.0002588545,0.0019274859,0.003780629,0.008577205,0.00052096177,0.002196862,0.016386515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004253989,0.00020243264,0.00017037836,0.0027450037,0.027442051,0.016112812,0.0027675394,0.0030750658,0.001969594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019168545,0.000007045866,0.00023048511,0.000042408854,0.0000021348144,0.00005366393,0.014291329,0.000041400584,0.00009614034,0.9622209,0.011585818,0.011409547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014585411,0.000032430573,0.0009427018,0.00015231952,0.00000447917,0.0006065064,0.020545917,0.00030452592,0.00017050195,0.65005976,0.3271522,0.00001408902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012419145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021131951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016386515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009034115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054818332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397044503","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2024.2314595","title":"Is That a Genuine Smile? Emoji-Based Sarcasm Interpretation Across the Lifespan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Emoji; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Social psychology; Linguistics; Social media; Computer science; Philosophy; Irony","score_opus":0.027842555179380765,"score_gpt":0.3049435526524234,"score_spread":0.2771009974730426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397044503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99829704,0.00020877869,0.0002516371,0.00009931643,0.000011536843,0.000004764075,0.000047181165,0.000005568068,0.0010741078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992067,0.00016591103,0.0001857019,0.00005056185,0.000007820243,0.0000055995292,0.000053424483,0.000003233976,0.00032091304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999635,0.00013989487,0.000030021005,0.00006729021,0.00007441191,0.000053409218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740976,0.0005445731,0.0012683035,0.0001171726,0.00043490191,0.00022523793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010356624,0.00025303982,0.00019160278,0.00046709462,0.00029045562,0.0007229886,0.0001398518,0.00036874603,0.0010454879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005533525,0.00014583698,0.00019004892,0.00015992353,0.000418224,0.0006159269,0.0006233375,0.00045347246,0.00021118548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054666755,0.0001112899,0.84696966,0.00025859367,0.00017000313,0.0012380424,0.0668991,0.00010274715,0.036952768,0.00034425504,0.000976671,0.04543022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025857387,0.00013722989,0.9839504,0.000042683227,0.000032113836,0.00047606343,0.0133332005,0.00013337219,0.0009875338,0.00014563616,0.0007410629,0.00001811316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081356196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020101853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010454879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017265238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013211918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00547719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411846085","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2025.2521903","title":"Metaphor in the Mirror","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02270966638037991,"score_gpt":0.31744441523266476,"score_spread":0.29473474885228484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411846085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04694569,0.00945048,0.028794775,0.032881405,0.0016083308,0.000023708539,0.000071793096,0.00019017917,0.88003373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94000065,0.0022674287,0.007401568,0.0026179557,0.000313257,0.000027537593,0.000032077085,0.00012012991,0.047219384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999091,0.0005277157,0.000018912668,0.00011640122,0.00016051071,0.00008534494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999438,0.00018773982,0.00004519773,0.00013618745,0.0001180557,0.00007485971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008700888,0.00029287316,0.00027942637,0.00062014,0.0025223203,0.004391948,0.00039298154,0.0014976913,0.009770331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031422817,0.00016773237,0.00031987013,0.00032138446,0.011938504,0.008533366,0.0021861827,0.002108979,0.0015007928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016102273,0.0000065186946,0.000106950225,0.000025603633,0.0000032428634,0.0000813757,0.0039606094,0.000053816737,0.00044492655,0.9846942,0.005526444,0.005080194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019155626,0.000029817505,0.00057994155,0.00013089372,0.000008065269,0.0006804355,0.0064885765,0.0006557537,0.00070132647,0.74959785,0.24108873,0.000019378507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015926401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015661228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009770331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013943911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090435834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03268504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414793608","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2025.2465352","title":"Individual Variation in Metaphor Interpretation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphor and Symbol","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Metaphor; Variation (astronomy); Domain (mathematical analysis); Cultural diversity","score_opus":0.015647766773231323,"score_gpt":0.2994591791608444,"score_spread":0.2838114123876131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414793608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932447,0.00022730042,0.0009802304,0.00009814014,0.000012357162,0.000018652652,0.000019987689,0.000011034007,0.0053875665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896705,0.00007299479,0.00044562182,0.000033197757,0.000002888589,0.0000065390095,0.000022045935,0.000008257037,0.00044142865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946479,0.00273446,0.00018278362,0.0005621062,0.0013920817,0.00048065124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892335,0.0068874536,0.0010609165,0.0009133578,0.001473928,0.00043086504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005036675,0.00030574336,0.0004087201,0.0017313344,0.0018244869,0.002942162,0.00066806,0.0007662888,0.0019324356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020333959,0.00025488317,0.00032669108,0.0010715689,0.003752398,0.0010913912,0.00211505,0.0010738735,0.0001891838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021880156,0.00008735823,0.12129572,0.00019460189,0.00020407818,0.0007872456,0.82224977,0.000319938,0.020605056,0.0042415387,0.00067304,0.029122813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002802506,0.00020062627,0.48198393,0.000121043726,0.00011155378,0.0021719937,0.48729324,0.0012240534,0.0032051383,0.006845503,0.016591454,0.00022351455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013266396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024551442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013266396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011922709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008505053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026636839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}