{"meta":{"query_hash":"746de177d9e3","filters":{"venue":"Metaphysica"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/746de177d9e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metaphysica"},"results":[{"id":"W2317333329","doi":"10.1515/mp-2014-0025","title":"Relations and Order-Sensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Order (exchange); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Computer science; History; Economics","score_opus":0.013023041301096902,"score_gpt":0.2691984249371673,"score_spread":0.2561753836360704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317333329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28546473,0.00002041822,0.011737539,0.0018920297,0.00014144043,0.000045253517,0.0000025129095,0.000043861077,0.7006522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869287,3.8760112e-7,0.00043571074,0.00028364488,0.00009363895,0.000004397832,8.075158e-7,0.0000033970293,0.00048511854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943995,0.00015705971,0.00005278498,0.0001657397,0.0000640821,0.000120355355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994897,0.0002465571,0.00001864454,0.00016985687,0.000016986161,0.000058253732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000255905,0.000049759365,0.000082868326,0.00001709081,0.000087189605,0.000010697406,0.00004172191,0.000024814797,0.000193021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009297434,0.000039927887,0.000024265151,0.00016568367,0.00020964524,0.000047370115,0.000023809842,0.00007258566,0.0005807659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000339091,0.000038461545,0.0001794901,5.1000717e-7,0.000007846857,8.730828e-7,0.00016394327,7.801369e-7,0.0011683516,0.98974806,0.00012727636,0.008561013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015903453,0.00005530124,0.07511217,0.0000023268992,0.000022495198,0.0000041673293,0.000015688422,0.0005730878,0.00034677028,0.91223294,0.011375926,0.000100113066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018848425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002846912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71322817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022927077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024306644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7464764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335101335","doi":"10.1515/mp-2016-0004","title":"Worlds, Triangles and Bolts: Reply to Nulty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Pluralism (philosophy); Possible world; Conflation; Premise; Object (grammar); Philosophy of mind; Skepticism","score_opus":0.023167015158065823,"score_gpt":0.30034604999180375,"score_spread":0.27717903483373796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335101335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40180126,0.00022556889,0.0026822232,0.045758747,0.00067148736,0.00032344105,0.0000475777,0.00015340056,0.54833627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945586,0.0000031667757,0.00029081025,0.0022980066,0.00020748941,0.000026788539,3.1267297e-7,0.0000070397286,0.0026077959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.00008780042,0.000112205176,0.00033370376,0.00011337084,0.00023701813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.00021441451,0.000028848332,0.00034687517,0.000018200777,0.00016363247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002210085,0.0000890823,0.00014982307,0.000040886258,0.000058587862,0.000016395172,0.00017942744,0.000023615392,0.0005089646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011692264,0.0000503016,0.00005287712,0.00023563072,0.0002005449,0.00007341346,0.00005545623,0.00004347269,0.0011485213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006301766,0.00006652288,0.00010164797,0.0000010253179,0.000021059179,0.00000532819,0.00031611643,1.7047691e-8,0.006905874,0.91975963,0.0035365752,0.06922316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007467461,0.00022325717,0.022216614,0.000026121004,0.000028976947,0.0000043902132,0.000046121713,0.0000010791732,0.004975411,0.745573,0.22592962,0.00022868952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001551369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001543155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59275734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000076574515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047660506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523443830","doi":"10.1515/mp-2016-0015","title":"How (Not) To Argue Against Vague Object","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Argument (complex analysis); Object (grammar); Identity (music); Abstraction; Legitimacy; Indeterminate; Law; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02659432679212368,"score_gpt":0.29607645667598026,"score_spread":0.26948212988385656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523443830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46909675,0.000033732245,0.005382782,0.029203778,0.0009662165,0.00026446342,0.0000452132,0.00016124152,0.49484584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302185,0.0000019672445,0.0002027307,0.0020419129,0.00040258185,0.000036044974,7.959985e-7,0.000013160685,0.0042789527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987326,0.00012342753,0.000103415594,0.00042246963,0.0002124929,0.00040557483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989799,0.0002002252,0.000038019592,0.0005381619,0.000032250617,0.00021142827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020801736,0.00013975217,0.00019585624,0.000057081616,0.0000772937,0.00003714985,0.00040952946,0.000049830833,0.00023702037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001187376,0.00008154902,0.00013074846,0.0003328472,0.00019725089,0.00012083409,0.000073651536,0.00007770229,0.0032016975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030561227,0.00008685164,0.000021207625,0.0000012358047,0.000032663524,0.0000120933,0.00030784632,1.9536577e-7,0.10065233,0.84655005,0.0014376751,0.050867278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011517281,0.0005072863,0.030824829,0.0000561977,0.000060396775,0.000005623378,0.00014884185,0.00000465825,0.10724742,0.7161081,0.14314659,0.00073831907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000065811946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022183253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002069728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011357771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561871328","doi":"10.1515/mp-2015-0002","title":"Cognitive Phenomenology and Indirect Sense","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Referent; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sentence; Psychology; Cognition; Metaphysics; Perception; Cognitive science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0819431330076603,"score_gpt":0.3350741707342995,"score_spread":0.2531310377266392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561871328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51720726,0.00019322388,0.00014837061,0.0004110247,0.00017726039,0.00006225515,0.0000072741664,0.000035402532,0.48175794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998947,0.0000017497935,0.000072015915,0.00048800683,0.00012117677,0.000014572276,0.0000018834568,0.0000057268985,0.00034782605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999223,0.00016018278,0.00007391134,0.00024226129,0.000090674155,0.0002099921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.00015949669,0.000030295761,0.00012513554,0.00003391703,0.0001503225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021388006,0.00008101708,0.0001526354,0.00003757905,0.000041707975,0.00001114207,0.00006436466,0.000040346145,0.00014619839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007953415,0.00006444875,0.000026730497,0.00018035561,0.00045388847,0.00005051865,0.000050250263,0.00009921499,0.0007025815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008533443,0.0001263292,0.0001622494,0.000001177128,0.00006811151,0.000037447295,0.0036571978,8.723423e-8,0.00032603624,0.9817353,0.00021556357,0.01358519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092829886,0.00038905966,0.008291922,0.000005295043,0.000070147275,0.000035809382,0.0009124041,0.000019302615,0.0010837218,0.9838247,0.0042388267,0.00020055371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014079209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.581551e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4817398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006420989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010163527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90304977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784922597","doi":"10.1515/mp-2016-0007","title":"Mary Shepherd on Causal Necessity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Causation; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Causality (physics); Ontology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0254190516765797,"score_gpt":0.3021737170414233,"score_spread":0.2767546653648436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784922597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25360927,0.000020790174,0.0007840716,0.0049456796,0.0005223513,0.000064999454,0.000013551178,0.00007617193,0.7399631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963736,0.0000018041161,0.00005420062,0.00086330756,0.00028690882,0.000013632678,5.4363954e-7,0.000007491172,0.0023985344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990454,0.00012801877,0.00009108764,0.00030188664,0.0001684872,0.00026516363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992434,0.0002193343,0.00003311184,0.00038421445,0.000013628098,0.00010631829],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016633843,0.000099341676,0.00013297671,0.000024179833,0.00007065495,0.000009909222,0.0002669693,0.000043302378,0.0026317732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003194188,0.000054478733,0.00008268041,0.00015923221,0.000261945,0.00007706749,0.000044196462,0.00007901449,0.005297108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005845588,0.00016754132,0.00013481818,8.624445e-7,0.000022322767,0.000013628877,0.00007573914,6.689917e-8,0.005928573,0.9492202,0.0017984782,0.042579327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004264294,0.000234345,0.048517853,0.000016017455,0.000020891592,0.0000020456055,0.000009362004,0.0000026136736,0.005540697,0.92815244,0.01688663,0.00019067101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012307059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.0862227e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013878558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006829513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915005471","doi":"10.1515/mp-2019-2003","title":"Powerful Qualities or Pure Powers?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Algorithm; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.026406349732845023,"score_gpt":0.3214837879990691,"score_spread":0.2950774382662241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915005471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31976026,0.000060007762,0.00010863208,0.0011185245,0.00079749833,0.00011926245,0.00001184736,0.00006492098,0.677959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976065,6.911269e-7,0.00005932186,0.00089534256,0.0001537094,0.000008020552,0.0000025476586,0.0000109827015,0.022804406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988625,0.0001338365,0.00013743757,0.00032154116,0.000215763,0.00032893242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991418,0.00019983458,0.000048533606,0.000490197,0.000025491872,0.00009413136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022793504,0.00012452711,0.00021193926,0.00003993576,0.000042939482,0.000028595918,0.00035264625,0.000058341808,0.016236862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034695484,0.00008281908,0.00011852533,0.00028597345,0.00020233062,0.00011521057,0.000053340496,0.0001417876,0.01473884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092138034,0.000110070316,0.000064087064,0.0000050183185,0.00004056152,0.000008336172,0.001280589,3.8326374e-7,0.0006592439,0.99522,0.0014210116,0.0010985518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067063223,0.00053287746,0.0032356372,0.000017601606,0.000040595387,0.000010854579,0.0017518009,0.000016798811,0.0031820156,0.90264964,0.087482356,0.00040919287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019435649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012601466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6563047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001014076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015586505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938482798","doi":"10.1515/mp-2019-2006","title":"Why We Shouldn’t Pity Schrödinger’s Kitty: Revisiting David Lewis’ Worry About Quantum Immortality in a Branching Multiverse","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Immortality; Philosophy; Nothing; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Theology","score_opus":0.019338288876073355,"score_gpt":0.2770159681132778,"score_spread":0.2576776792372044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938482798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808153,0.00017607523,0.0150567675,0.0011313341,0.0002117791,0.0006139912,0.00007570779,0.000074117255,0.0018449372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984813,0.000013315467,0.0006407078,0.00019957965,0.00037097945,0.00008927332,0.000052977455,0.0000426305,0.00010924187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797237,0.00012732664,0.000451435,0.0006634974,0.00027712976,0.0005082179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873,0.000118856566,0.0002644558,0.0007054417,0.00006452027,0.000116711744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045031187,0.0003145364,0.00054230186,0.000112317895,0.00019351387,0.000118366006,0.00035878396,0.000056711076,0.00037428952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010501537,0.00031221553,0.00032045736,0.0005238536,0.00003949474,0.00038134478,0.00015789492,0.00049853575,0.0002908276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030276786,0.00060204807,0.029033594,0.00011116129,0.00019713235,0.0000032100172,0.001429969,0.00014682327,0.052195128,0.8942776,0.0006063924,0.02136667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065457528,0.00024097548,0.111439764,0.0019379208,0.0006169818,0.0000025721633,0.007524624,0.1905709,0.025116077,0.48762026,0.16398662,0.004397529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011441229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001650568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40665734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000487489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052919695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005997682","doi":"10.1515/mp-2019-0021","title":"Two Sides of the Same Coin? Neutral Monism as an Attempt to Reconcile Subjectivity and Objectivity in Personal Identity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Personal identity; Monism; Metaphysics; Identity (music); Self; Philosophy; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.038693564010444784,"score_gpt":0.32591988029211544,"score_spread":0.28722631628167067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005997682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818164,0.000026707583,0.00005501933,0.0030249385,0.00014274962,0.00021432567,0.000026889871,0.000019995783,0.0146729555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867594,7.3384444e-7,0.000046291698,0.0011230939,0.0001081495,0.000016441603,4.4691083e-7,0.0000071807362,0.000021729837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985405,0.00045825366,0.00014497018,0.00042742144,0.00019056283,0.00023824164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931765,0.00018306996,0.000061384984,0.00024376642,0.000026249141,0.0001678662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004129473,0.00012125915,0.0002653451,0.0000277353,0.000088042376,0.000027048882,0.00029788332,0.00003989816,0.00009576539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014104352,0.00009141233,0.00009882249,0.0005149394,0.00037476275,0.00029318986,0.00013314441,0.00023057795,0.00004540614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032116997,0.0006384056,0.040054694,0.000020869767,0.000059106922,0.000014981139,0.020350127,0.000015290207,0.06716151,0.8674138,0.00003560496,0.0039144317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045553813,0.00036840257,0.66278356,0.0000104658075,0.000026452473,0.00000472808,0.0004976422,0.00017877879,0.017188963,0.31828412,0.00003330947,0.00016800388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017818452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068628625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6227289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019317036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029548348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37276864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31970582","doi":"10.1515/mp-2020-0005","title":"On the Nature of Persons; Persons as Constituted Events","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Seneca Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Consciousness; Event (particle physics); Constitution; Epistemology; Identity (music); Virtue; Personal identity; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Self; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020122182150336718,"score_gpt":0.3054769245285997,"score_spread":0.28535474237826297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31970582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41832337,0.00016118865,0.0000382396,0.00570684,0.00039887786,0.00007933084,0.00003645081,0.00001778682,0.57523793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686223,0.0000013131296,0.000037897706,0.0016619886,0.000067387955,0.000011801942,0.000003295106,0.0000050784006,0.0013490028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904954,0.00021236272,0.000089063935,0.00024440163,0.00022215511,0.00018249986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999036,0.00040834976,0.000047310914,0.0004102102,0.000040878753,0.000057249086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015813559,0.00009259444,0.00015141239,0.000021359981,0.00011007718,0.000007961534,0.00026646728,0.00007733382,0.0022864603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021647663,0.000057449724,0.00015985857,0.0003840328,0.0003943479,0.000029940315,0.00004032231,0.00032884057,0.00046293385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025453583,0.00021840274,0.00002106334,0.0000020210207,0.000082742525,0.000018451834,0.00066044286,6.5357955e-7,0.003665696,0.99353695,0.0014858427,0.0002822771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004297113,0.00015616367,0.003370076,0.00003938958,0.000103290695,0.000020341191,0.0010278492,0.000023582194,0.023370117,0.9611259,0.010139854,0.00019371274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010707317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.647191e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57853884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074963014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003825063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221068655","doi":"10.1515/mp-2021-0018","title":"The Ontological Distinction between Persons and Their Bodies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Seneca Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Epistemology; Dualism; Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Ontology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.035561207209380885,"score_gpt":0.285999124466312,"score_spread":0.2504379172569311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221068655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6739668,0.000575329,0.0004828746,0.008484833,0.00042627045,0.00014818764,0.000068988964,0.000076369884,0.31577036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999124,0.0000014626531,0.000009759272,0.000121104225,0.00013023384,0.000060818646,0.0000023294253,0.0000031355485,0.0005471777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920624,0.00025655175,0.00007019547,0.00018985735,0.00009715673,0.00017997524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992806,0.0004689162,0.000030572304,0.00016916818,0.000005952844,0.000044797944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030195338,0.00006837091,0.00010191709,0.000010859519,0.00094305264,0.00002226675,0.00019435748,0.000014201492,0.00023221923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002744423,0.000036223424,0.000058865397,0.00009499946,0.000456789,0.00002485532,0.00013193762,0.00017901995,0.000025416246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024954325,0.000048732712,0.0008915488,5.1375855e-7,0.00003998665,0.000001584235,0.0016219716,2.9611647e-7,0.00013238701,0.97316223,0.0004788885,0.0235969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015443929,0.00027351058,0.11554361,6.9831077e-7,0.00003233539,0.0000072378266,0.0021619238,0.00003628472,0.00007242898,0.77904826,0.10254764,0.00012164499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019370045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024358005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3251572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010191761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033810823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285393545","doi":"10.1515/mp-2021-0041","title":"Metaphysical Compatibilism and the Ontology of Trans-World Personhood: A Neo-Lewisian Argument for the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge (Determinism) and Metaphysical Free Will","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Foreknowledge; Compatibilism; Metaphysics; Determinism; Philosophy; Incompatibilism; Epistemology; Free will; Philosophy of mind; Personhood; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.02981770255263117,"score_gpt":0.23725089945891878,"score_spread":0.20743319690628761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285393545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96940935,0.0045756805,0.00046459015,0.015063856,0.00059634604,0.0023849395,0.0012155073,0.000049560156,0.0062401644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986723,0.000013164833,0.00018356639,0.00028362428,0.00026899838,0.0002836962,0.00001864542,0.00002172816,0.00025429914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977976,0.00066586316,0.0005343225,0.00042347476,0.0002854068,0.00029333073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960553,0.0027063105,0.0003338727,0.0007266421,0.000114154675,0.00006373303],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087567186,0.00029932408,0.001113997,0.00009029285,0.00085999403,0.000028604867,0.0006149662,0.000029477083,0.000245369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058682264,0.00017202248,0.00056731264,0.000106946805,0.0039098,0.00013815066,0.00028303312,0.00034875088,5.907592e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082541,0.0005680327,0.00012196766,0.00012100559,0.00093293074,5.764417e-7,0.043208838,0.00001248231,0.00022806085,0.95000595,0.00044875348,0.0035259738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008172985,0.0019116186,0.0070137596,0.000028862172,0.0032790217,0.0000068653912,0.006952035,0.006968469,0.0010849232,0.9159333,0.048112843,0.0005352957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028585063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012293536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047664087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012195924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031254585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296836308","doi":"10.1515/mp-2022-0017","title":"A “Nouvelle Métaphysique Thomiste” or Simply Neo-Cayetanism?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphysica","topic":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thomism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Humanities","score_opus":0.04698835794811715,"score_gpt":0.2343107482267333,"score_spread":0.18732239027861616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296836308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11339735,0.00026123278,0.00009047771,0.0037330368,0.0021350612,0.0005595242,0.00022091277,0.00033606368,0.8792663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660432,0.000010957035,0.00006350206,0.0028480948,0.0013039643,0.00018242472,0.000036224345,0.00003865744,0.029473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844074,0.00027958318,0.00025501376,0.0003533158,0.00031302625,0.00035831708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991296,0.00017976371,0.00012633261,0.00041938486,0.000053775766,0.000091151145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022489016,0.00022346585,0.00038203676,0.00009249518,0.0010302033,0.00006264145,0.00041198987,0.000023514536,0.022491883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023636741,0.00017371132,0.000255359,0.000105638144,0.00027765526,0.00013744376,0.0002413173,0.00033859385,0.0003128576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019476678,0.0002848418,0.000002461655,0.000022336373,0.00014804564,0.000040054067,0.014466953,0.000025636127,0.0005247439,0.9709154,0.011865041,0.0015097172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046238594,0.00044955363,0.000014030504,0.0000034272562,0.00008346441,0.000009106041,0.0043831607,0.00014061753,0.00036931213,0.14964163,0.8441633,0.00028000597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016350253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001258751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033413347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073388655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}