{"meta":{"query_hash":"07020f5a5e9d","filters":{"venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion"},"cohort_total":56,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"exported":56,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07020f5a5e9d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Method+%26+Theory+in+the+Study+of+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1774729703","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341354","title":"Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19862573289881266,"score_gpt":0.3682058473765436,"score_spread":0.16958011447773094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774729703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8488013,0.005979002,0.0018873994,0.0033434953,0.0015654446,0.0021768108,0.000028873523,0.00014406873,0.13607357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960487,0.00030320324,0.0021932283,0.00041568736,0.0006579184,0.000110848705,0.0000064755077,0.000023556086,0.00024041862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935762,0.004179804,0.00088650023,0.00039140662,0.0006678394,0.00029820384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964805,0.0020398211,0.00046595372,0.0007045014,0.00023708584,0.00007211202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009876739,0.00029471546,0.00072038703,0.0003318611,0.00028606612,0.00003236855,0.0006991369,0.000113399125,0.00001998971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993604,0.00018475759,0.00024030702,0.00024516688,0.0004191358,0.000230538,0.00015791316,0.0004217196,0.000013828546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006103916,0.0008507997,0.00016736219,0.00004024541,0.00008377967,0.000012613639,0.10545752,0.00007833677,0.00005403675,0.8896463,0.0013798492,0.0016187876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013712567,0.002436173,0.00010470272,0.00009768059,0.00016355689,0.00001675676,0.024635652,0.000018267663,0.00030525326,0.9581097,0.012512642,0.00022839326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014264444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001413012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14724733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004726766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003989391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7534196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804125812","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341353","title":"Postmetaphysical Thinking and the Philosophy of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0417814899416762,"score_gpt":0.3042019544072971,"score_spread":0.2624204644656209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804125812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875818,0.0064157927,0.0013590863,0.00459652,0.00042236183,0.0013561823,0.000006845507,0.00003345095,0.109991714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843687,0.00020434424,0.00019547372,0.0009137084,0.00015406957,0.000039352606,0.0000010087045,0.000008482711,0.00004668874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745804,0.0015844401,0.00035386704,0.00015455781,0.00033869036,0.00011043031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981671,0.0012419827,0.00019846487,0.00024212107,0.00013261988,0.000017708246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041390467,0.000118742835,0.00032352525,0.00009872233,0.00016882681,0.000046042125,0.0002783122,0.000027684757,0.0000054271436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024896933,0.00005534942,0.000091777685,0.00013267175,0.0004279633,0.00009610442,0.000114769704,0.00017497188,0.0000021034605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006588446,0.0001919509,0.00007609224,0.000012860471,0.000055454486,4.907436e-7,0.19442211,0.000008285581,0.0000074629525,0.80095786,0.0014533129,0.0021552704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015437,0.001006428,0.00017872758,0.000047259062,0.00011656471,0.0000017391794,0.034493018,0.00015250043,0.000044317978,0.9557799,0.0065561095,0.00007975063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014823655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017908205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000909856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059093422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2257084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982776447","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00192","title":"The Female and the Fetish: a Method and Theory Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fetishism; Object (grammar); Worship; Fantasy; Philosophy; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.03610018840564659,"score_gpt":0.32288250616657205,"score_spread":0.28678231776092544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982776447","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17361921,0.55054796,0.0060808356,0.027859071,0.0010850066,0.009284866,0.000017378708,0.00012961646,0.23137607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594356,0.13359514,0.00054225384,0.0038064618,0.0004253281,0.00045402633,0.0000017164476,0.00003612562,0.00170333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888927,0.0095712915,0.0005452136,0.0003443846,0.0003788707,0.0002675821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98895913,0.010001072,0.00027668636,0.0006450089,0.00008521663,0.000032900054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022963062,0.00026085164,0.0005281135,0.000071014656,0.0011445812,0.00014312234,0.0005589969,0.000045650424,0.000033752134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006033254,0.00011092737,0.00013398977,0.00014993476,0.0008134764,0.00009062408,0.00016924128,0.00038153527,0.000004962767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089265214,0.00013632316,0.000096927775,0.00009176628,0.00010797039,0.0000065717863,0.08061145,0.0000015257312,0.0000018861604,0.8449177,0.0011413667,0.07199384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017083886,0.0004975312,0.0002994852,0.00033620055,0.00038241295,0.00006584642,0.029756542,0.00001683142,0.000006567494,0.8680636,0.09869266,0.00017391473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004988291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028122787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009501728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000111219615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8803309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993020030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341294","title":"The Identity of NAASR and the Character of the Critical Study of Religion: Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Mythology; Identity (music); Sociology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02478025858134681,"score_gpt":0.30938120303381433,"score_spread":0.28460094445246753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993020030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98678595,0.0012531385,0.00008401138,0.0029500595,0.00049187883,0.0022137514,0.000004485887,0.000011093625,0.0062056193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986957,0.00063583296,0.000041940657,0.0000843768,0.00018765632,0.00018189754,0.0000013764612,0.00001548783,0.00015578337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923393,0.0056001246,0.0009942263,0.0002281729,0.00066613243,0.00017200426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261254,0.004713417,0.0006412342,0.0015193678,0.0004934705,0.000019970621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008235575,0.00018134103,0.00046006244,0.00010064862,0.000458037,0.000119886856,0.0011494332,0.00004921899,0.000017489043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853196,0.00007806869,0.00013460776,0.00020994015,0.0016177736,0.00033276418,0.00038312052,0.0003547245,0.000002495108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050635607,0.0012189421,0.0010214691,0.00007021395,0.00011942044,1.8380382e-7,0.16290198,0.000008660625,0.00022962235,0.8302505,0.0014425847,0.002230037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021277682,0.0013997499,0.0122018205,0.00010929425,0.00035348217,0.000007472427,0.07013416,0.000068258385,0.0007223907,0.9112603,0.0014551762,0.00016011238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036508422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013601001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09276783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017274651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022282064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5960754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000848332","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341247","title":"Provocation and Its Responses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Islam; Provocation test; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.06164488228594979,"score_gpt":0.4327181329129964,"score_spread":0.3710732506270466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000848332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785459,0.0017983384,0.00013094093,0.0014118656,0.00020499158,0.0005138786,3.782478e-7,0.000012394224,0.017381303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997971,0.0005088326,0.00036805135,0.00013254222,0.00009827991,0.00006864903,1.6488748e-7,0.0000030884298,0.000849411],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956522,0.0038159355,0.00013608886,0.000082675826,0.0001844277,0.0001286562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982064,0.0015481976,0.00007396711,0.00010569104,0.000049460297,0.000016320124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009983688,0.00005011083,0.00009556269,0.00007165157,0.00022658873,0.000011003345,0.0001253237,0.000025737201,0.000008145495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015070436,0.000033813514,0.000014754777,0.00023552896,0.000070893046,0.000097639255,0.000024685349,0.00006378191,0.000004126809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072308096,0.00033171984,0.019337835,0.0000061717587,0.0000115307075,9.2098304e-8,0.6896716,3.1914084e-7,0.00011876926,0.2810721,0.0004702867,0.00890726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043533507,0.00023363312,0.1375409,0.000023884726,0.000052555395,0.0000014591711,0.77694696,0.0000029810585,0.0003861283,0.06870769,0.015547847,0.00012061756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045686777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016253798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21236442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018029652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002340641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34601668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008755468","doi":"10.1163/157006809x416805","title":"“On Thursdays We Worship the Banana Plant”: Encountering Lived Hinduism in a Canadian Suburb","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Worship; Sociology; Hinduism; Field (mathematics); Lived experience; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Religious studies; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.047047891893825564,"score_gpt":0.36082779342258675,"score_spread":0.3137799015287612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008755468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907841,0.001321061,0.00011012533,0.010573699,0.00029524404,0.0009695699,0.000003062162,0.00002139056,0.07886484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719995,0.0014427076,0.00005129513,0.0010807734,0.000092176284,0.000029380508,5.196188e-7,0.0000050593735,0.000098145516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498576,0.0036238243,0.00029052503,0.00024473452,0.00036873276,0.0004864363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977098,0.0018268345,0.00010519594,0.00026457422,0.000027158569,0.00006642187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007335147,0.0001500204,0.00027782161,0.00012858506,0.0007975247,0.000040366125,0.0006910829,0.000099939396,0.000058988735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000580866,0.00007750413,0.00006848394,0.0005254438,0.00027855806,0.000054556338,0.00003412593,0.0003617593,0.0000061215296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027305895,0.0004334147,0.0025812166,0.0000038119135,0.000028465565,0.00007648248,0.42635307,0.00008412412,0.000016472466,0.54585886,0.0014981832,0.022792868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072782545,0.0016319451,0.034020573,0.00015292461,0.000038362872,0.0000022847776,0.438646,0.00005518151,0.000033458506,0.50028706,0.024110256,0.0002941234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.525586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71827805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19269204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017645146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057873574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6133996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012942321","doi":"10.1163/157006811x567733","title":"Sikhism, Traumatic Repetition, and the Question of Aesthetic Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sikhism; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Work (physics); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.040404851741266234,"score_gpt":0.2846243276139518,"score_spread":0.24421947587268555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012942321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966696,0.0012422577,0.00042592688,0.0001569435,0.00015046957,0.0009044047,0.0000056663257,0.00001998384,0.10042471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926704,0.0001167482,0.0002947464,0.00010786748,0.000036718942,0.00006879192,7.668179e-7,0.000008926103,0.000098402495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997567,0.0016116747,0.00038832737,0.00014141436,0.00018214424,0.000109441484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882567,0.000521878,0.0002450992,0.00032292557,0.0000720119,0.000012414421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004171622,0.0001157045,0.0002951242,0.00007077732,0.00017761881,0.000015683327,0.00018712023,0.000023625675,0.00008772126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012170344,0.000058263682,0.00007142763,0.000061290506,0.00048071033,0.00005079738,0.000040163704,0.00010662067,0.0000027652204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029970962,0.00017533837,0.00014911171,0.000019393718,0.000019392832,0.0000010797373,0.37109852,0.0000012412984,5.402261e-7,0.6253578,0.000068210175,0.00280964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014153363,0.0004894855,0.0020131774,0.00006173014,0.00013401227,0.0000063543594,0.36129737,0.0000131920615,0.00001930123,0.6342194,0.0002552208,0.00007540624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014608637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025155026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10259739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005972368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059599233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2375924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018520567","doi":"10.1163/157006807x243601","title":"Science, Scholarship and the Domestication of Religion: On Dennett's Breaking the Spell","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Scrutiny; Taboo; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","score_opus":0.03740200773963592,"score_gpt":0.3928016362131641,"score_spread":0.3553996284735282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018520567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94775826,0.0005391404,0.00073059817,0.005209174,0.00026912848,0.001115583,0.0000010078494,0.000020000898,0.044357084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569196,0.0026678208,0.00044700873,0.00076081004,0.00008660452,0.000025461439,2.9429273e-7,0.000007654187,0.0003123646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933316,0.004777945,0.00043745906,0.0002704334,0.0009342956,0.00024827605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300253,0.005843119,0.00033433796,0.0005701777,0.00020992836,0.000039895353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020167653,0.00012815371,0.00024782817,0.00018119653,0.0013538849,0.00007985356,0.0009583364,0.00006898417,0.0000069441185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025645008,0.0000635924,0.00011979584,0.00154577,0.002512367,0.00019203493,0.00008541221,0.0004319746,0.000010203612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029851354,0.00029009915,0.0019772453,0.0000054178363,0.00002779409,0.000002259022,0.20311122,0.00010451802,0.00023943823,0.7911435,0.0009596574,0.0018403626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040464965,0.0011938195,0.03748619,0.0002409959,0.00027905044,0.000094725045,0.2554569,0.00026194655,0.001153021,0.6804905,0.018880088,0.0004162959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003134807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002745408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110653006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006158344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014337219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018544991","doi":"10.1163/157006809x460338","title":"The Mennaisian “Catholic Science of Religion”: Epistemology and History in Early Nineteenth-Century French Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Object (grammar); History of science; Dual (grammatical number); Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021179975876251294,"score_gpt":0.27348785278538895,"score_spread":0.25230787690913764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018544991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987648,0.007805416,0.000008136687,0.0016943574,0.00020597386,0.00061345525,0.0000010476776,0.000011090596,0.0020125401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755895,0.0017285711,0.000043417393,0.00011808176,0.000054979802,0.000042409276,3.3737783e-7,0.00000568001,0.0004476012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666303,0.0016509941,0.0006120172,0.0003402315,0.00045115038,0.00028256778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845445,0.00069532683,0.0002807669,0.00039626416,0.00013922059,0.000033992947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005128422,0.00018286327,0.00048655368,0.00019390008,0.0011213422,0.00003584392,0.0005976901,0.000036797104,0.0000067415085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022092655,0.00009553408,0.00009552981,0.00029170446,0.0008505493,0.00009930841,0.000106656145,0.00025932715,0.0000013844904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010290826,0.0010522371,0.0029154655,0.00000974772,0.000050027782,0.000009582048,0.89256203,0.000007227215,0.0000704023,0.09695305,0.000841591,0.0054257023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004460974,0.013394222,0.14958693,0.00012352286,0.0008630881,0.000008766754,0.52890337,0.000056609922,0.000021564836,0.20755123,0.0940871,0.0009426249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058706705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041819274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021727657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023835741","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00246","title":"Categorical Designations and Methodological Reductionism: Gnosticism as Case Study1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Gnosticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Categorical variable; Embodied cognition; Instrumentalism; Psychologism; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13130112991035503,"score_gpt":0.3633004200684343,"score_spread":0.2319992901580793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023835741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90208817,0.0050071673,0.01657231,0.00466906,0.00097051554,0.0021065834,0.000008777654,0.00014143669,0.068435974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628806,0.0009532172,0.0012430793,0.00031042157,0.00040789254,0.00017093941,0.0000014562244,0.000015946729,0.0006089634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943498,0.004157673,0.0005234197,0.0003790874,0.00033983286,0.00025020126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940133,0.0053340443,0.00015142356,0.00030423544,0.00013559754,0.00006141489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00440621,0.00022825447,0.00048918533,0.00016655122,0.000977754,0.00006635899,0.00024165657,0.00008030511,0.00008422675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012493468,0.00014131705,0.00009470215,0.000209001,0.00044446025,0.00007257855,0.00009392774,0.00038153163,0.000014540143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029522693,0.0013317696,0.0001422908,0.000012586706,0.00011085831,0.0007557857,0.15631829,0.00004278747,0.000022235805,0.8330735,0.0022678599,0.005626801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076683296,0.0019706523,0.00013609848,0.000010887257,0.00026835728,0.0011366658,0.050544724,0.000025903735,0.000012804657,0.9159954,0.028897231,0.0002344292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002913483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005323717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105773576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050364364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014223702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75201917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024535992","doi":"10.1163/157006811x608359","title":"The Collection and Synthesis of “Tradition” and the Second-Century Invention of Christianity*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Religious studies; Art","score_opus":0.030531999453784167,"score_gpt":0.25716499215813104,"score_spread":0.2266329927043469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024535992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94769275,0.0050447863,0.00036980602,0.00029982638,0.00023882855,0.0009330406,0.000014642906,0.000008951107,0.04539735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982248,0.0014617488,0.00005810429,0.000074216296,0.000027230462,0.00007540207,4.1621055e-7,0.0000046567557,0.000073453484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980063,0.0013660644,0.00033043753,0.00009749278,0.0001316849,0.00006803015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977648,0.0017432362,0.00025587177,0.00014336666,0.00008451034,0.000008177183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003067444,0.00007755045,0.00020031782,0.00007582496,0.00033080802,0.00002192975,0.00012406404,0.000023214174,0.00004315388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021553058,0.000035524572,0.000054989276,0.00009860087,0.00057453354,0.000060368304,0.000038972565,0.00009556608,2.5583435e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001064481,0.00033788005,0.00022313878,0.00007322283,0.00014530665,1.6782953e-7,0.181466,3.248011e-7,0.00004329925,0.803876,0.0012211867,0.011549009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002202791,0.0016981378,0.015138924,0.0001535439,0.00039942045,0.000005594656,0.24636944,0.00020925196,0.001396386,0.7201822,0.012090385,0.00015394228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013335262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012639847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08369379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062866134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004379532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25443414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025474434","doi":"10.1163/157006812x635709","title":"Computing Religion: A New Tool in the Multilevel Analysis of Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Empirical research; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Management science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06540313143775371,"score_gpt":0.42942805340696005,"score_spread":0.3640249219692063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025474434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97661847,0.0023424658,0.009432699,0.0016073573,0.00047689688,0.0012330926,0.0000035303237,0.000031538133,0.008253978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530023,0.00086926925,0.002242458,0.0011354527,0.00030675263,0.00003479669,0.0000047830513,0.000015782094,0.00009049058],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983351,0.013431639,0.0011915629,0.00044069273,0.00096729136,0.0006178354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928504,0.0053947726,0.0006194635,0.0009500674,0.0001234294,0.00006187174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031477064,0.00026041042,0.00078968785,0.00065837655,0.0003238373,0.000043414744,0.0012834796,0.00023096356,0.00001346244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012743544,0.0001702796,0.00035196418,0.0030949372,0.0002962777,0.00016587932,0.000103334874,0.0004586818,0.0000076021647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042194952,0.0017048374,0.12338546,0.000024756047,0.0003245248,0.0000072375406,0.69223744,0.000577782,0.00009155853,0.15904701,0.009440246,0.012737207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004209771,0.0011897411,0.43867236,0.0002165901,0.002273944,0.000017859158,0.25499275,0.00044769814,0.00012886798,0.28272483,0.014204533,0.0009210579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07116728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009318552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43724468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006892675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007916259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028934107","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00255","title":"Reflections On Religion, Modernization, and Violence in the Islamic Middle East","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Militant; Islam; Modernization theory; Middle East; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Social science; History; Law","score_opus":0.0587793687950898,"score_gpt":0.36971682889128626,"score_spread":0.3109374600961965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028934107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8901578,0.0012859807,0.0028687397,0.0025013401,0.00027782287,0.0010687438,0.0000016541383,0.000030104298,0.10180778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942913,0.004430494,0.00022788862,0.00061542535,0.0000876979,0.000087669214,6.0018914e-7,0.000008365895,0.0002505361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546987,0.0034062944,0.00028466078,0.00024815032,0.00037602402,0.00021501766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998526,0.0009610672,0.00012275028,0.0003108207,0.000069164504,0.000010205584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006121411,0.000115105046,0.00018684177,0.00016346527,0.0007354334,0.000025119512,0.0004056555,0.00006017723,0.000004488898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004275813,0.00007440377,0.000039217553,0.0007604211,0.00024059985,0.000059952654,0.000039604773,0.00023198963,0.000004137751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013323456,0.0004377056,0.0020812196,0.0000058392684,0.000012526081,0.0000065303634,0.52347666,0.0002866053,0.00002301207,0.4674303,0.00085085694,0.00525553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007836461,0.000535375,0.009473741,0.00014207947,0.00005215298,0.00000827572,0.34349686,0.00008569981,0.000004425368,0.63352555,0.011700867,0.00019130958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009179136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02003626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1799798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000820099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003207632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031168812","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549670","title":"Conversion as a Thematic Site: Academic Representations of Ambedkar’s Buddhist Turn","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Trope (literature); Depiction; Sociology; Hinduism; Epistemology; Hermeneutics; Narrative; History of religions; Sociology of religion; Literature; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.0635432758461328,"score_gpt":0.32918716148522187,"score_spread":0.2656438856390891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031168812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760678,0.00039335524,0.000121854355,0.00007826668,0.00023544356,0.0006398145,0.00001063754,0.000022144963,0.12243069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974581,0.00011622756,0.0002995379,0.00014933432,0.00006975902,0.000055666238,0.0000027512463,0.000013165922,0.0018354603],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772793,0.0011077109,0.00051092886,0.00019751117,0.000291214,0.00016468226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830896,0.0008252938,0.00034645858,0.00038552194,0.000114986455,0.000018754201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023873674,0.00014987114,0.00033601176,0.00019184637,0.0002412317,0.00001280556,0.0003611471,0.000048541013,0.0003676012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023936301,0.000095087606,0.000111054185,0.0001119482,0.00035971453,0.000109041895,0.000093062714,0.00024394096,0.000041071118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026431325,0.00043323086,0.0018311285,0.00007741219,0.000074852585,0.000006559826,0.69162047,0.000002576117,0.00012706316,0.3040077,0.0010901105,0.0004645727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020213702,0.0016878713,0.004628904,0.00022875574,0.00041724485,0.000017349686,0.6413971,0.000030178095,0.0030767412,0.3428462,0.0033003958,0.00034784278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023283996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026346426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121390305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018263752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001423021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40249753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041746847","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341304","title":"“Pseudo-Speciation of the Human Race:Religions as Hazard-Precaution Systems”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Natural (archaeology); Hazard; Welfare; Sociology; Human welfare; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology; Gender studies; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06522725682895067,"score_gpt":0.3395080979498099,"score_spread":0.27428084112085926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041746847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98915744,0.000092240036,0.0006117913,0.0015493331,0.00057990936,0.0015223962,0.0000040242467,0.000023745648,0.0064591086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863845,0.000069194226,0.0001371428,0.00040617268,0.00006406365,0.00018108025,0.000001089492,0.000010801197,0.00049203384],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401355,0.004332782,0.00054846396,0.0003348991,0.00056759495,0.000202713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791616,0.00094118115,0.00042006615,0.0006164325,0.00007940545,0.0000267262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029014351,0.00015837571,0.00027604654,0.00013760147,0.0002763106,0.00002517417,0.00075169257,0.0000836548,0.000029162984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047113196,0.00009045204,0.000120664205,0.00045596392,0.00017212558,0.00011971311,0.000119854885,0.00026126832,0.00005213627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027974174,0.0036274048,0.006665463,0.00007838659,0.00006438563,0.0000065016025,0.018987969,0.0029587746,0.4877114,0.46224126,0.01397874,0.0033999744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003212715,0.0021528013,0.20593043,0.00033558396,0.00018354152,0.000112776324,0.012306889,0.00058741774,0.08020176,0.6931185,0.0013873696,0.00047017392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077888963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023713104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40750962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045245666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001552288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36885273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042926210","doi":"10.1163/157006808x317491","title":"Redescribing Christian Origins","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.059331233635025626,"score_gpt":0.3060095329793916,"score_spread":0.24667829934436597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042926210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91029406,0.0010837612,0.0022376396,0.00042424144,0.0003897802,0.0005310322,0.000004646524,0.000040796418,0.08499406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984799,0.00016927166,0.00028464405,0.0005534281,0.00016619056,0.0000464468,0.0000013668539,0.00000909815,0.00028962345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848723,0.00070437836,0.00029001408,0.00016015004,0.00021202143,0.00014621315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991548,0.00044670945,0.00010242473,0.00021618084,0.0000649461,0.000014904636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014161257,0.00010712088,0.00020613735,0.00012369902,0.0003773269,0.000028602255,0.00023518396,0.000022534752,0.00011166025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011237148,0.00006446473,0.000069626505,0.00012984766,0.00014916908,0.00008203638,0.000044012442,0.0001574973,0.000012758479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016076086,0.0004676249,0.0004999433,0.000012064889,0.000051008836,0.000009495725,0.43607432,0.000015724161,0.000038475675,0.54466385,0.011700518,0.0063062455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018553524,0.0030296452,0.0039003838,0.00012170417,0.00014336595,0.000024313267,0.3166699,0.00028595165,0.0002700392,0.122018136,0.5512394,0.00044181547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036353876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007582694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53953886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063191505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5495643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049023236","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557298","title":"Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Possession (linguistics); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0309604814388721,"score_gpt":0.4156748958633761,"score_spread":0.384714414424504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049023236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716926,0.0013287844,0.0014471095,0.0028031257,0.0001027172,0.00074574375,8.086803e-7,0.00002019443,0.021858914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.0010217691,0.000921788,0.0007694125,0.00006519966,0.000019015588,2.313337e-7,0.0000039148454,0.0001247873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943686,0.0044781393,0.0002993112,0.0002768582,0.00030835907,0.00026871098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983804,0.0012723423,0.00007695318,0.00018633032,0.00003524376,0.00004872773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489151,0.00012611138,0.00029806318,0.00009728515,0.00047471342,0.000028548766,0.00035399589,0.000078629506,0.000054744338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008240793,0.00007499815,0.00004438548,0.00047983148,0.00029586145,0.000088078945,0.000084354586,0.00018156381,0.0000043244695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047148578,0.0011806387,0.010188399,0.000006250921,0.000013457519,0.000023343284,0.2047074,0.000013322599,0.0001630774,0.6326984,0.0004840078,0.1500502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006302868,0.0019829303,0.24214245,0.00007214055,0.0000214687,0.0000011818964,0.15433381,0.0000017633479,0.000053759337,0.59653133,0.004043503,0.00018537346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026109838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026230633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23195405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014830492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39470437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054595673","doi":"10.1163/157006807x244934","title":"Time, Habit, and Agency in English Puritanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Habituation; Protestant work ethic; Sociology; Social psychology; Protestantism; Modernity; Epistemology; Late modernity; Leverage (statistics); Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02034825410239564,"score_gpt":0.27737133042674145,"score_spread":0.2570230763243458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054595673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093748,0.00022233906,0.0006965521,0.000043082026,0.00014004376,0.0003838278,0.0000026256996,0.000023436123,0.0891133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875283,0.000047510148,0.00030749393,0.00012372865,0.00009955591,0.000012437492,0.0000016574444,0.000007864164,0.0006469431],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848276,0.0006894165,0.0003574487,0.00013090551,0.00018392997,0.00015552624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.0004528118,0.000096542186,0.00019624046,0.000053780896,0.000020425405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059339534,0.00010153099,0.00018369521,0.00016294456,0.000118575255,0.000045020446,0.0001729901,0.00003457963,0.0000896707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015129575,0.00006632531,0.000032048596,0.000067377274,0.000103995095,0.0001449083,0.00003806738,0.00018511742,0.000010541887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015387949,0.000433591,0.00056741084,0.000023906176,0.000013831556,0.000011205184,0.8558977,0.000011069429,0.000043357188,0.12522376,0.0005042648,0.01711598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039474773,0.0016364871,0.04051802,0.00013476827,0.00008293851,0.000013061323,0.32595584,0.0004691939,0.00033868384,0.5709788,0.055334944,0.000589806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080488983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015697017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5299419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016257882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060854136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27046674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060422088","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341310","title":"The Scientific Study of Religion: Two Case Studies, One Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08038610696636907,"score_gpt":0.35167384639048777,"score_spread":0.2712877394241187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060422088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98751265,0.003819403,0.000021025506,0.0007799232,0.0010098892,0.003503006,0.0000073076712,0.00004527767,0.003301492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976239,0.00026173267,0.00012390928,0.00012351274,0.00025490127,0.0005143331,0.0000013412994,0.000031699314,0.0010646284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880309,0.008807149,0.00116986,0.0005981259,0.00096763385,0.00042629818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98966664,0.0075707408,0.0006017279,0.001489109,0.0006181074,0.000053677824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01729309,0.00036694304,0.0007086377,0.0003688561,0.00194999,0.00026044532,0.0009668952,0.000053478176,0.00003299018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008725927,0.00020768381,0.00018182541,0.00046293,0.0009223542,0.00021468692,0.00029423286,0.0004442525,0.000034967394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004010617,0.006242904,0.0004850096,0.00006746129,0.0007197587,0.00021565772,0.7831685,0.00007980141,0.00022259174,0.1857484,0.010840571,0.008198731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044986415,0.0086382935,0.00049181073,0.00014915319,0.00051490724,0.00012715418,0.59161484,0.00003164226,0.00021426006,0.38264814,0.010635296,0.00043582535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057067424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040605855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19689976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051279003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040475414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078445284","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549715","title":"Does “Q” Have Any Representative Potential?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Q Methodology Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Work (physics); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Geometry","score_opus":0.21055538005038363,"score_gpt":0.48588304929995996,"score_spread":0.2753276692495763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078445284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63301647,0.00009305273,0.3440993,0.0006184637,0.00041117708,0.0013588783,0.000007682659,0.000033620687,0.02036136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138705,0.000021948888,0.084670044,0.000177135,0.000047806658,0.0002360441,6.1540237e-7,0.00001210999,0.000963782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741162,0.02282433,0.0010648192,0.00078444934,0.0009221047,0.0002880736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837695,0.013519344,0.0005667746,0.0018355836,0.00026554937,0.00004324715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046470564,0.00016893726,0.00045077156,0.0003908755,0.00019226786,0.000032659187,0.0019104567,0.000096309785,0.00015550121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070990617,0.00007741302,0.00014224311,0.000924626,0.00031251975,0.00015175657,0.0002843715,0.00031494387,0.00006305108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021948882,0.003756943,0.09025979,0.000010940898,0.00026404645,0.000102851554,0.5760717,0.00033652282,0.005817997,0.23819125,0.00660144,0.07639168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041721552,0.00026135411,0.06442343,0.0000054142674,0.000055008764,0.00001226308,0.08682026,0.000041937878,0.0044682547,0.843166,0.00023333047,0.00009555688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062519737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020268852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60497475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016089733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021783748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083901661","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557252","title":"You Show Your Smith and I’ll Show Mine: Selection, Exegesis, and the Politics of Citation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Constructive; Citation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Exegesis; Poetics; Object (grammar); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0222123477526411,"score_gpt":0.3484354068318179,"score_spread":0.3262230590791768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083901661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98945147,0.00091177045,0.0038696723,0.0018287331,0.000029817584,0.00039953008,0.000004279119,0.000008925673,0.003495814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707246,0.00074179337,0.0018138159,0.00012409667,0.00005670996,0.000007882513,0.0000011865271,0.0000035572216,0.00017851181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958655,0.0032860446,0.00025364093,0.0001586357,0.0002936655,0.00014250327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817723,0.0014015476,0.00016846531,0.00016618242,0.00006270194,0.000023865958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699067,0.000082441955,0.00022850871,0.00011736556,0.00034976203,0.000044448705,0.00022121529,0.000029731898,0.0000024972153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000647053,0.00004775053,0.00004380344,0.00040994617,0.00024274652,0.000095052055,0.000031595755,0.00010365155,1.2893102e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026324927,0.00047377354,0.025184475,0.000027634926,0.00011391416,0.0000013011434,0.34862232,0.00008530534,0.00063775433,0.5467147,0.00063389086,0.077241674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017660351,0.0006189188,0.090440996,0.00007677831,0.0004558845,0.0000044477965,0.26348186,0.00056019035,0.00031198192,0.6407208,0.0013611057,0.00020103567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001867801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006258712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09400607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010641098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022489516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30149403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085013143","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341299","title":"Change the Name! On the Importance of Reclaiming NAASR’s Original Objectives for the Twenty-First Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.05563113604833764,"score_gpt":0.3729482716472992,"score_spread":0.3173171355989616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085013143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234491,0.0020206745,0.003141442,0.040890347,0.0010520547,0.011306666,0.0000071667064,0.00004660421,0.018085973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934684,0.003156767,0.00035925393,0.0011148314,0.00020218492,0.0013399804,5.4569523e-7,0.000011700921,0.00034635013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567693,0.0030235269,0.0003114496,0.00022111146,0.0005116173,0.0002553567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471104,0.004315898,0.00031083528,0.0005473264,0.00009539146,0.000019519472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012014714,0.00013694668,0.00019450518,0.00006067508,0.0011285244,0.00005644547,0.0009685673,0.00004449423,0.00010541676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051840604,0.000055228193,0.00013142133,0.00035720336,0.0003482983,0.000103257866,0.00008693715,0.00021109814,0.000009776143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021181081,0.0004477018,0.0026520847,0.000020438163,0.00009741906,4.944587e-7,0.46128842,0.00005587271,0.000026755479,0.4801514,0.005681949,0.049365636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057695963,0.00058565976,0.020186199,0.000071884366,0.00012631138,5.658199e-7,0.6768109,0.00011986197,0.00005399054,0.10955902,0.19175394,0.00015466216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004767905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027725194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37059242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059823247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020629544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86798114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130425445","doi":"10.1163/157006810x531067","title":"Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03389762695376131,"score_gpt":0.3239184910439424,"score_spread":0.2900208640901811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130425445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689571,0.00050114794,0.0022864488,0.0009967933,0.00056863285,0.001945514,0.00007555261,0.000033009484,0.024635779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979858,0.00015359317,0.001147466,0.000107617176,0.00023843381,0.00018799695,0.000009014631,0.000022635306,0.00014749083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979293,0.00063007657,0.00070618046,0.00026584792,0.00027161016,0.00019702851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960983,0.0023380269,0.0005161159,0.0007259144,0.00029745084,0.000024231675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003510276,0.00020335421,0.0005076771,0.0002505723,0.0002434865,0.000023774079,0.0006089355,0.00008235289,0.00001819013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000345537,0.00013538764,0.00021518226,0.00015585366,0.0004189341,0.00009749341,0.00006876303,0.00025074964,0.00000191306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037257167,0.0006913608,0.00064955076,0.00009013957,0.0000749034,3.196546e-7,0.0811107,0.000009582148,0.0019261525,0.911507,0.0007934222,0.0027742693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009787745,0.0011808121,0.0016450953,0.00006219491,0.0002147575,0.000004065942,0.009552237,0.000010591548,0.0025575291,0.97928506,0.0043553226,0.00015354103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011488097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069720764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07155847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065354557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023737151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5520948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131662226","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341259","title":"Authenticity, Sincerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Theme (computing); Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; China; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01079358009765086,"score_gpt":0.31735770463313323,"score_spread":0.3065641245354824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131662226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98939395,0.001615403,0.000042307154,0.004919569,0.00007127626,0.0011392955,0.0000027388453,0.0000070417204,0.0028084388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991318,0.0005026437,0.000083448984,0.00015404285,0.00005091927,0.000050617156,6.534761e-7,0.0000050418653,0.000020818452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506086,0.00411063,0.0002660177,0.00020108098,0.00025266223,0.00010874163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976008,0.001873895,0.00017942637,0.00028232037,0.000041083942,0.000022505472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00843138,0.00010905286,0.000241127,0.00007101278,0.0003756848,0.000035470304,0.0002941399,0.000101583784,0.0000030221456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051441113,0.000054289034,0.000032597196,0.0003069161,0.0007925881,0.00011068298,0.00010892919,0.0003667882,3.9318545e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055355893,0.00023062323,0.013417374,0.00003072297,0.00001970715,0.0000013662201,0.35963085,0.000004137253,0.00025187986,0.6199845,0.00007981566,0.005795429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078095106,0.00012754367,0.15161224,0.000025781157,0.00003983724,0.0000071121135,0.008117675,0.000044336433,0.000020552485,0.8388739,0.00028284057,0.00006718874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013003688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35151318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021110669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018061577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408854945","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341376","title":"“It Was Like That When I Came In”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Encyclopedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Identification (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041982504740394506,"score_gpt":0.38736605805555874,"score_spread":0.34538355331516424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408854945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.852178,0.00038085371,0.005489639,0.027492445,0.0010490628,0.0015020904,0.0000045718725,0.000073479736,0.111829855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940343,0.0011898017,0.0006314287,0.0013163206,0.00007450553,0.00008954421,3.1579341e-7,0.000010156845,0.0026536244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426156,0.004422796,0.00032124724,0.00023736432,0.0004813163,0.00027574025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965427,0.0028396675,0.00014696966,0.00037070867,0.00005809573,0.00004184137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076320902,0.0001187774,0.00024261959,0.00012779346,0.00022952171,0.000034366036,0.00057282386,0.00010220241,0.00010735916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056855235,0.0000679558,0.00012853112,0.0003396641,0.00018501075,0.00016368963,0.00005712506,0.00020950909,0.00004098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018852581,0.0008559715,0.015848625,0.0000073291944,0.00005473385,0.000013265142,0.84042376,0.0000117897025,0.00038849338,0.09176925,0.032402884,0.01803535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016519265,0.00039274272,0.0051565845,0.00016799656,0.00005001745,0.000004120179,0.47198066,0.000006637852,0.00025932371,0.34346166,0.1765954,0.0002728969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057585426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3684431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011481693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005180141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580720787","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341385","title":"Buttering Bread on Both Sides","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06801696171307173,"score_gpt":0.3360379743221424,"score_spread":0.26802101260907063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580720787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81616414,0.00039244138,0.00013975083,0.0018388872,0.00066631753,0.00070956803,0.000007732822,0.000041656396,0.18003953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827254,0.0001722727,0.00014540284,0.0003640803,0.0004596301,0.00006102033,8.6494595e-7,0.000018409102,0.0005058009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980359,0.00085450854,0.00031107248,0.00027102852,0.0003236527,0.0002038567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978689,0.00086965447,0.00028936722,0.00090997276,0.00003908886,0.000023021816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002590716,0.00020036323,0.0003175474,0.00012863241,0.0009542192,0.00018684137,0.00082301727,0.000040393355,0.000042286083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016167527,0.00012774418,0.000113021015,0.000024984374,0.00021133758,0.00013149495,0.000112115325,0.00024404914,0.000027393546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005806007,0.0007965691,0.0008225893,0.000038280392,0.000083920204,0.000025671063,0.17296965,0.000030678602,0.0000749313,0.795683,0.0013919675,0.027502099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017614624,0.0026692085,0.004441665,0.0002966613,0.00012508436,0.000008800587,0.03219071,0.000023935165,0.00048602367,0.92465997,0.03297699,0.00035950085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016528097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043085736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1821084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001466142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006790091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7339179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275336053","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341346","title":"Theory, Method, and Madness in Religious Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Legitimacy; Sociology; Function (biology); Aura; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08167268275727134,"score_gpt":0.4626269002765907,"score_spread":0.38095421751931935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275336053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92955333,0.00881894,0.019804534,0.004944622,0.001132766,0.0022100643,0.0000037704472,0.000099539306,0.033432435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887414,0.004170526,0.0055388357,0.00068735937,0.000095612246,0.00017621939,6.785075e-7,0.000017222854,0.00057214143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840657,0.014155384,0.0005321499,0.00035159118,0.00057183934,0.00032332202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935944,0.0055399225,0.000207615,0.00038385883,0.00019540326,0.00007881364],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030453702,0.00018486992,0.00047570997,0.00021438747,0.00026626315,0.00005353433,0.00048211022,0.000121776684,0.0000042738716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032259433,0.00012988926,0.00009768754,0.00080925773,0.00033292375,0.00014886152,0.0001206396,0.0003845774,0.0000070323013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027136307,0.00040662682,0.0030367984,0.000013075956,0.000077887285,0.000016125265,0.71528965,0.00014789833,0.00002214926,0.26881996,0.0040377825,0.007860676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071485166,0.00021141225,0.00041307294,0.00003817568,0.000042727173,0.0000057366346,0.4832482,0.000019066036,0.000022505188,0.5098406,0.005335175,0.00010847826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005890748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024292504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24102065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013486129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008288345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766177670","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341427","title":"Truth-Conditions and Religious Language: Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Grammar; Epistemology; Philosophy; Alethiology; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Logical truth; Truth value; Truth condition; Pragmatic theory of truth; Sociology; Coherence theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.025755963335930655,"score_gpt":0.32343835654619496,"score_spread":0.2976823932102643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766177670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660162,0.0010294571,0.00008692019,0.002380243,0.0008797383,0.00065050006,0.000012717188,0.000039883053,0.028904386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979258,0.00028318554,0.00014594551,0.00012112676,0.0011248012,0.00007742423,0.000005280928,0.000014624649,0.00030177544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823594,0.0007746546,0.00029984003,0.00029263325,0.00023184337,0.00016508494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.00058023876,0.00027343744,0.0007720435,0.00006233617,0.000025132236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022218388,0.00016734599,0.00027492412,0.00014791387,0.00096891215,0.00017247756,0.00043677996,0.00004437998,0.0000392817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003597124,0.00011512816,0.000071086855,0.00003569685,0.000331021,0.00018143615,0.000087803935,0.00023613354,0.000011144954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002652805,0.00046909292,0.00052891934,0.000030507646,0.00007501461,0.000015114089,0.2511898,0.00000889427,0.00009901944,0.733342,0.005391985,0.008584391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001995369,0.0013919713,0.005260208,0.00005931408,0.0002490527,0.00003591907,0.09024425,0.000021635664,0.00026584291,0.8818049,0.018353492,0.00031803543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014845183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040961357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16094556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011972263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007289892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769181511","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341426","title":"Why Truth Matters for the Study of Religion: A Defense of a Truth-Conditional Semantics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Truth value; Logical truth; Truth condition; Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Philosophy; Function (biology); Linguistics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.05805603771629132,"score_gpt":0.32744133583495993,"score_spread":0.2693852981186686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769181511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982816,0.00076318166,0.0023237225,0.0031246839,0.0012212305,0.0041220174,0.00011633399,0.00003037898,0.0054824953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998304,0.0001422232,0.00030279474,0.0005174226,0.0003314948,0.00028911306,0.0000063641505,0.000031568594,0.0000749901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656206,0.0012966603,0.0008682475,0.00037571398,0.0006370184,0.00026029887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200124,0.0053561595,0.001065329,0.0012713053,0.0002757967,0.000030150535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044154893,0.0003072943,0.0006998779,0.00021316306,0.0009797708,0.00009800619,0.0012037696,0.00006889498,0.000024044375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004961537,0.00018359484,0.0003087564,0.00008141044,0.00054284115,0.00014906036,0.00016157136,0.0002582518,0.000002311744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027857795,0.003749146,0.0008839967,0.00018809759,0.0006888654,0.00000940707,0.22333284,0.00017909525,0.00004942195,0.7569945,0.0100019155,0.0011369329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068518976,0.007321991,0.002462278,0.00022952053,0.001279758,0.000013880294,0.12787662,0.00011426554,0.00035880355,0.8438518,0.009236446,0.00040272097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001967119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061149907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095456205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016684846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023353005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75357044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800458785","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341441","title":"Liberal Hermeneutics of the Spectacular in the Study of the New Testament and the Roman Empire","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Depiction; Ideology; Scholarship; Empire; New Testament; Sociology; Capitalism; Politics; State (computer science); Status quo; Literature; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Classics; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023718377307643118,"score_gpt":0.37264469525276495,"score_spread":0.34892631794512186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800458785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97984046,0.00016447589,0.000024787523,0.0068221553,0.00029887471,0.0023409836,0.0000016285896,0.000007617747,0.010499034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835956,0.00023550748,0.00008188481,0.0008068364,0.00010716584,0.000055598535,1.13421635e-7,0.000009468168,0.00034383815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873619,0.010849515,0.0005347899,0.00021595966,0.00081904995,0.00021876516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632144,0.0023145752,0.0003942911,0.0008474589,0.0000986833,0.000023531014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00957438,0.00015692652,0.00032077203,0.000046090754,0.0006748615,0.000053574455,0.0014106963,0.000070438306,0.00001083258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006031129,0.000060254733,0.00019208243,0.00087724143,0.00094256306,0.000060574046,0.00022092708,0.00040854406,9.710265e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016832272,0.0011217619,0.013041479,0.0000062521813,0.00009763183,9.1156653e-7,0.9328085,0.000047723523,0.00010617251,0.049421504,0.0021814625,0.000998279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019601423,0.00074760057,0.052992884,0.0000696555,0.00020169294,0.000003789743,0.8125023,0.00004279895,0.0002038258,0.12860028,0.0025716694,0.00010331107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008625628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01014756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12030616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005109361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009091665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810041381","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341447","title":"Christianity: “A Manner of Dividing the Sensible”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Abstraction; Reading (process); Hegemony; Politics; Sociology; Nothing; sort; Judaism; Epistemology; Wish; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03686341055759426,"score_gpt":0.4051518542654317,"score_spread":0.3682884437078374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810041381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91885066,0.00031390256,0.004529758,0.003284862,0.000703658,0.0008575717,0.0000028593495,0.00003454485,0.071422175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978304,0.00037466144,0.0006105019,0.000472738,0.00020461982,0.000022966362,4.3835198e-7,0.000007839188,0.0004758376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412733,0.0047145663,0.0003330936,0.00016093407,0.00046701025,0.00019708379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705744,0.0021212578,0.00021862272,0.00039811074,0.00017968498,0.000024887588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010160478,0.00009636755,0.00020659265,0.00007445588,0.00065786485,0.00003364971,0.0005423483,0.000066802306,0.000046679277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007490733,0.00005518644,0.00012981289,0.0006181105,0.0004922153,0.0000717138,0.00007008272,0.00023665893,0.000014584954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015223003,0.00062397344,0.002224347,0.000011324303,0.00012458315,0.0000034376174,0.66101587,0.000033508833,0.00072686473,0.29961395,0.029157467,0.006312421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007482534,0.0007898678,0.0046642115,0.00008471539,0.00017874486,0.000006721741,0.66911,0.000104678955,0.0016337665,0.21672158,0.10573345,0.00022398568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074534896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019479122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082892366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032474494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040282903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810136477","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341450","title":"Food for Thought: The Question of the Animal in Gil Anidjar’s Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Hebrew Bible; Section (typography); Christianity; Hebrew; New Testament; Philosophy; Eucharist; Literature; Old Testament; Early Christianity; Monotheism; Biblical studies; Theology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03186318786241514,"score_gpt":0.3376959774180198,"score_spread":0.30583278955560467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810136477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867931,0.0011602341,0.0018874152,0.0009784397,0.0002386868,0.0014497554,0.000036533005,0.000009977568,0.0074458392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989759,0.0000788659,0.0002825397,0.00032629241,0.00016181321,0.00012538952,8.170771e-7,0.000009632291,0.00003877022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973212,0.0017065,0.00047004104,0.00015426232,0.00020971322,0.00013828289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801266,0.0011591207,0.00027238755,0.00030199517,0.00024566706,0.000008166225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004074647,0.000117610056,0.0002698784,0.00008579211,0.00021426393,0.000020643192,0.00040768302,0.0000427382,0.000021612985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005480082,0.00005533884,0.00011671795,0.00019654864,0.0004186324,0.000066178465,0.00008813249,0.0001626517,3.9520827e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008782284,0.0008339239,0.0005593473,0.000081254715,0.00008251011,1.5901121e-7,0.12763166,0.0000037897198,0.0005325463,0.8651845,0.0014256863,0.0027864154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003241231,0.022790765,0.027535714,0.0005909166,0.000548296,0.0000050763747,0.14689814,0.00048471888,0.014185282,0.7553882,0.027973013,0.00035863603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020905735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009066617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10979626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012384139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013143779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50593853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810236558","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341449","title":"Introduction: Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.022571977230417477,"score_gpt":0.31073743362866857,"score_spread":0.2881654563982511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810236558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90330994,0.002093785,0.005606989,0.0028548532,0.0012049709,0.0010553224,0.000019381694,0.00005317172,0.08380157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975691,0.00012960898,0.00046742574,0.00045471473,0.001072686,0.00004300251,0.0000014622834,0.000008772172,0.00025326168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806195,0.0010526596,0.0003746687,0.00018591381,0.00020013624,0.0001246696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888444,0.00039348155,0.00015985881,0.0002833603,0.0002653158,0.000013523054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024151155,0.00010938665,0.00025331933,0.00012350491,0.00020153902,0.000027856657,0.00023692491,0.000031619355,0.00043870858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028759765,0.00006968566,0.0000692977,0.00016433881,0.00034665613,0.000085046195,0.00005930662,0.00014807087,0.000008263638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045236765,0.0013737226,0.00015451039,0.000058729922,0.00014283064,0.0000015794387,0.20086662,0.000001988017,0.00037346454,0.7426219,0.0441324,0.00981989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018768561,0.01043047,0.0023159068,0.00011932271,0.00044378024,0.000013227647,0.13973702,0.000087025124,0.005171066,0.35459298,0.4848372,0.00037514415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018368029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013441824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4407048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008837996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006658405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4803551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865263030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341451","title":"Why I am Such a Good Christian: Comments on Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Monotheism; Judaism; Protestantism; Philosophy; Ambivalence; Confession (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Kinship; Theology; Religious studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Islam; Anthropology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029816910741182544,"score_gpt":0.3234905639794878,"score_spread":0.29367365323830524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2865263030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8931458,0.0014063016,0.0031051638,0.0020259835,0.0006544596,0.0015394889,0.000067759545,0.000057162928,0.09799788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951693,0.00013511196,0.0002449029,0.0040397434,0.00022619609,0.000077041565,0.000003588165,0.000015695667,0.00008843724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971343,0.0015849603,0.00049409794,0.0002488685,0.00033125735,0.0002064794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820805,0.0009020921,0.00024054322,0.00038301543,0.0002392593,0.000027040463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023529339,0.00018813649,0.00039034596,0.00017530839,0.00029469826,0.00004619158,0.00039568037,0.000052149164,0.00021767852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026576716,0.00012267758,0.00010723249,0.00018398513,0.00034702293,0.00007734502,0.00009423463,0.0002338939,0.000009335463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001368131,0.0057009156,0.0006917809,0.00013638067,0.00038020243,0.0000073617425,0.29844815,0.0000028352003,0.00026008792,0.5925144,0.092362724,0.008127029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006602824,0.03725374,0.0063832714,0.0008582147,0.00085665425,0.000011706093,0.19454168,0.00024274888,0.0058621466,0.27527782,0.47118816,0.00092103536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075056567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028337545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37882543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017637405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007836085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988930514","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341470","title":"A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religions or Setting the Parameters for a Scientific Study of Religions In the Modern University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06861194764720867,"score_gpt":0.36642343820784623,"score_spread":0.29781149056063755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988930514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863707,0.00025654348,0.0011928203,0.0007572893,0.0008508328,0.00965778,0.000016236077,0.00001710359,0.0008807008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980448,0.00003315643,0.00052610785,0.00003418868,0.000051040235,0.00029121185,0.0000010263536,0.000013775603,0.001004732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915321,0.0056298207,0.0007305874,0.0006073094,0.0010658657,0.00043434984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781884,0.01970128,0.00055125525,0.0011084469,0.0004193197,0.00003131649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028155887,0.00021419175,0.00052097614,0.00028928634,0.0026174923,0.00008628903,0.0020288539,0.00006397002,0.000002327837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004245176,0.00010073875,0.00019998765,0.002129034,0.0007960989,0.00006464656,0.00023465752,0.00029055597,0.0000012279901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010454942,0.004649814,0.004878312,0.0000433357,0.00017496497,0.0000044357535,0.96739113,0.0011722457,0.0000491682,0.016581248,0.0024880904,0.0015217344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022720008,0.00264335,0.00263313,0.000060507577,0.0004946976,9.817464e-7,0.950387,0.00043223499,0.000007761838,0.035257585,0.0056524356,0.00015830509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010804356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02198291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023910712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011522179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016083248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024221467","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341477","title":"A Report on the Special Executive Committee Meeting of the International Association for the History of Religions in Delphi","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Delphi method; Politics; Executive committee; Executive director; Delphi; Sociology; History of religions; International relations; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Management; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06862229842747186,"score_gpt":0.29696873027631543,"score_spread":0.22834643184884357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024221467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6435994,0.001545865,0.0003650246,0.061487842,0.0054257684,0.0059470176,0.0000765856,0.000036401347,0.2815161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972896,0.00011239568,0.00005860384,0.0010379874,0.0008629335,0.000112762325,0.000002691275,0.000013994518,0.0005090193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967127,0.001552791,0.00073735055,0.00022043701,0.00063293026,0.0001437837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132484,0.007067191,0.00097167265,0.0004095261,0.00021483732,0.00001192984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00652763,0.00015634563,0.00032330138,0.000085564694,0.00022076567,0.000017354836,0.0008861241,0.00005380665,0.000019747778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023208295,0.000075289914,0.00024428125,0.0001363728,0.00020991405,0.000046837114,0.000125063,0.0003607686,0.0000010316751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010708219,0.0005400122,0.0023181087,0.000025931276,0.00023353219,0.0000032626422,0.39941943,0.00026953133,0.00009605682,0.51966125,0.07575101,0.000611072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033095863,0.0020459343,0.00526917,0.00043466463,0.0005665286,0.0000071362533,0.18179475,0.0005142672,0.00086448516,0.5315076,0.2733009,0.00038497755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010849893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081498444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3536902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016322167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055452387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30702335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045319486","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341503","title":"A Response to My Critics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06257077170416289,"score_gpt":0.41328399272007965,"score_spread":0.35071322101591673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045319486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94521046,0.000075329575,0.0064561213,0.03350643,0.00011317753,0.00077114603,0.000003448467,0.00003462995,0.013829252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405664,0.000024199146,0.0015036311,0.0041799606,0.00007616418,0.00003230738,1.4579238e-7,0.000008360805,0.00011860324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903373,0.008632236,0.00020271994,0.00019217894,0.00044574513,0.00018978177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619967,0.00339844,0.000059994047,0.00021317293,0.00006486366,0.00006384735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015654104,0.0000798857,0.00017168497,0.00006155335,0.0002817098,0.000040835195,0.0005346552,0.00005316957,0.000014430991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003913889,0.00005917896,0.00004828315,0.00044168287,0.00010844399,0.000048094596,0.00007711809,0.00024029666,0.000014245323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011519647,0.00026409252,0.00011344988,0.0000057897205,0.000012499418,0.00001650231,0.7281954,0.000021514898,0.001741449,0.26431122,0.00084368966,0.0033223843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095886877,0.002401153,0.002042575,0.00004655724,0.000057472345,0.0000013621245,0.3917791,0.000028129185,0.0009507491,0.46908855,0.1323742,0.00027130247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009269077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002739998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33641633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025756104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063833475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5425431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135979915","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341513","title":"Religious Studies and the Spiritual Turn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Emic and etic; Sociology; Scholarship; Sociology of religion; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037756511258788546,"score_gpt":0.4166253721737679,"score_spread":0.37886886091497934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135979915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9324376,0.018935427,0.0008464806,0.024217531,0.00080015074,0.001117521,0.0000021434562,0.000052145948,0.02159103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775997,0.019085133,0.0007055733,0.0016649924,0.00012844203,0.00009417075,4.582447e-7,0.000008409563,0.00071312464],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909661,0.0077625504,0.00036554734,0.00023826044,0.00045666052,0.00021091026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342984,0.0058106603,0.0001549993,0.00036695355,0.00020683964,0.000030727977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009750521,0.00012361485,0.0003381938,0.000049470702,0.00066793733,0.00007314645,0.00034617542,0.00006832297,0.000007124436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025968133,0.00006817962,0.00014457018,0.0005272671,0.0006858182,0.00007449092,0.00011302499,0.00032857672,0.0000055288187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016370344,0.00022117044,0.00054194056,0.000011701626,0.00015618965,0.000017418752,0.7053162,0.000021285594,0.000040131257,0.28108943,0.008746848,0.0036740305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012099564,0.00010335461,0.00031809416,0.000038621263,0.00010194079,0.000013746108,0.6899676,0.0000075843855,0.0000735498,0.28869545,0.019380538,0.00008961345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024143704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020498598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045162126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004090959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006274703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51373017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211766733","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341528","title":"“So Many Mothers, So Little Love”: Discourse of Motherly Love and Parental Governance in 2019 Hong Kong Protests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Nationalism; Politics; Wife; Sociology; Gender studies; China; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.017269312014942615,"score_gpt":0.36395923399615776,"score_spread":0.3466899219812151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211766733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98623854,0.0028781125,0.000072871306,0.0019998814,0.00013462092,0.0008204749,0.000015863365,0.0000070040965,0.007832644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658275,0.001941245,0.00028954836,0.00008296629,0.000108369044,0.000014489487,4.5495477e-7,0.0000119983515,0.00096818164],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657553,0.00222182,0.0003259324,0.00023547557,0.0003846363,0.00025659506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869066,0.0007766827,0.00024407762,0.00021448723,0.000047903377,0.000026213273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032765067,0.00013663612,0.00036055603,0.00004748205,0.00015356558,0.000031600455,0.00026712805,0.0000816501,0.000011681237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048421056,0.000093386094,0.00007533616,0.00043366686,0.0006209355,0.000113373426,0.00009654919,0.00019354715,0.000004165547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018877082,0.0008693101,0.06543186,0.000053081963,0.00008909529,0.000016663327,0.85282433,0.000023136792,0.00032556427,0.06358363,0.00022000626,0.01637452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013084977,0.00034396467,0.16430879,0.00023078143,0.00005774287,0.0000023055438,0.6339554,0.000015475742,0.0006689413,0.19856498,0.00031679557,0.00022631772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012669871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076920674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21886894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052519303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087627704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205290179","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03401-02000","title":"Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.023920624358781846,"score_gpt":0.35227683801875115,"score_spread":0.3283562136599693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205290179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070439555,0.024153663,0.009570534,0.00035965577,0.0053228806,0.006872899,0.0004962687,0.00009879634,0.8826857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14355056,0.0029790523,0.027778404,0.0041239862,0.002806463,0.0044584116,0.0011516792,0.0020895845,0.81106186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686464,0.027001468,0.0013172386,0.0011421063,0.0012422844,0.00065048836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328256,0.00287876,0.0009575141,0.0026025642,0.0002207403,0.000057850768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014825122,0.0007971135,0.0017033976,0.0006567903,0.00014952995,0.000095664676,0.0019098208,0.00045509313,0.009483117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032935067,0.00055044267,0.00043104088,0.0007844342,0.00015660787,0.00008157259,0.00052545895,0.0015728002,0.080557294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007685923,0.0018887974,0.00016501945,0.00018371582,0.0004892125,0.00008052582,0.025598781,0.00044120537,0.0005382689,0.0004393813,0.9680315,0.0013749546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071223103,0.0025870684,0.0024098952,0.0021627494,0.0027011633,0.00022229816,0.07309742,0.000044207773,0.0032673662,0.052924797,0.85047704,0.0029836937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001333742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019398352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117554516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020579531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012418177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210377738","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10074","title":"‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Ideology; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Theology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03815193887266696,"score_gpt":0.40221838824082795,"score_spread":0.364066449368161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210377738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97503793,0.0016204888,0.00033041954,0.0095161535,0.0003522963,0.0012621339,0.000008787747,0.00004316503,0.01182864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952073,0.0006645662,0.0015247571,0.0014699177,0.00007813612,0.0003983863,0.0000032842597,0.000008863575,0.00064476347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913375,0.0073346086,0.0003786742,0.00023460953,0.0005195612,0.00019505764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639416,0.002940186,0.00015769615,0.00035840648,0.000103527345,0.00004599712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009051796,0.000094114985,0.00018343201,0.00022125003,0.0014291647,0.000103425744,0.00032366414,0.000032646632,0.00007643451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012013342,0.000078362624,0.000048261256,0.00058649154,0.00012714835,0.00009594615,0.000103275415,0.00030074673,0.0000036271283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041128056,0.00029162824,0.003737592,0.0000036546376,0.000018540411,0.0000055593114,0.34742603,0.00019238722,0.000040554318,0.6141876,0.03253422,0.0015210987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004107688,0.00019443104,0.0019643977,0.000006212494,0.000027070817,0.0000073773444,0.11866903,0.000022895678,0.000009128182,0.8657057,0.012888521,0.00009443391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025939906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25151813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006254443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014640659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029655","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341334","title":"Liminal Contradictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Liminality; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Point (geometry); Lineage (genetic); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0951801864645066,"score_gpt":0.3430971898811793,"score_spread":0.24791700341667272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230029655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5864732,0.0025403358,0.0010420707,0.00296249,0.0010665907,0.0010558388,0.000008778142,0.00006446938,0.4047862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979804,0.00017880021,0.0002580835,0.00034850635,0.0002744848,0.00007813212,0.0000010532182,0.000010395701,0.00087013806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976903,0.0013453839,0.00032962853,0.0001664039,0.0002955224,0.00017276993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983142,0.0010832028,0.00016100156,0.00028782018,0.00012246995,0.000031332707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054397,0.00012541696,0.00025489228,0.000097181975,0.0002889958,0.000072984105,0.00028959723,0.000024856714,0.000030419707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031604976,0.000075659205,0.00006777826,0.00007729044,0.00015872857,0.00012279507,0.00005148047,0.00020186542,0.000022266195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033161245,0.00077751727,0.0002336205,0.000007870997,0.0000870758,0.000011963063,0.35259953,0.000055611647,0.000005030124,0.6208996,0.021210343,0.0037802022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013924626,0.0024064125,0.00020194058,0.000021217442,0.00018797386,0.000013761526,0.50275135,0.00006238162,0.00001249493,0.20135269,0.29143724,0.00016007383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032309447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002295485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41954693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018938557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001675541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48842436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236653169","doi":"10.1163/157006800x00283","title":"Reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Psychoanalysis; Haven; Sociology; Psychology; Classics; Art history; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.043465186837383284,"score_gpt":0.4369781548626095,"score_spread":0.39351296802522623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236653169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5259141,0.006589418,0.03240352,0.00097115594,0.00018103003,0.004387301,0.0000058057008,0.00012838149,0.4294193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94785047,0.0073740236,0.024069976,0.0037948026,0.00021573939,0.0042892024,0.000004832379,0.00006033646,0.012340602],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967208,0.0024543286,0.0003602329,0.00022380646,0.000101709455,0.00013913793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870676,0.00035358767,0.00010091932,0.0008132,0.0000111440695,0.000014418036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044066906,0.00010506048,0.00022829947,0.00006445205,0.00005542208,0.000006481003,0.00046055214,0.00005086263,0.0012315903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012509371,0.00006618727,0.00007696149,0.000361276,0.000036098816,0.000018372582,0.000007864953,0.00016494958,0.00011627293],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003343102,0.0019852342,0.00037309027,0.000006454177,0.000035709527,0.0000031800753,0.031916585,0.0000033919903,0.00029973336,0.13523155,0.037671674,0.7921391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081462465,0.00070485094,0.0037609146,0.0000306157,0.00003950641,0.000015539237,0.0025467558,0.0000032738712,0.00009001537,0.24832775,0.74352664,0.000139534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024008245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017079037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7919996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074577074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024127353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255681613","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00354","title":"Reviews","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.05220494157956687,"score_gpt":0.3919005978075737,"score_spread":0.3396956562280068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255681613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458098,0.0069240485,0.0070764604,0.00019899732,0.00021067755,0.0033894763,0.000004022495,0.00009885002,0.036287658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883796,0.0020902234,0.0080197835,0.00040162046,0.00011244875,0.0003768588,0.0000027583294,0.000074403855,0.0005422992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828616,0.015158235,0.0007749268,0.00038398002,0.0004885942,0.00033267876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699414,0.0014145419,0.00035524217,0.0011461362,0.000057095647,0.00003285898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029400159,0.00022859596,0.0005637477,0.00024692796,0.000099848745,0.000018467736,0.0008301765,0.000056711735,0.00005795152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011745043,0.00013868586,0.00014618797,0.0012183433,0.00007483702,0.00009198113,0.00010518422,0.00031182234,0.0006398391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006874576,0.014982892,0.042813215,0.00022547977,0.0004097003,0.0003432456,0.23813623,0.0007625972,0.02302639,0.15019585,0.09150972,0.4307201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057483553,0.0032312754,0.016848834,0.00039774156,0.0006136485,0.00023171227,0.03243513,0.0001300953,0.0015669039,0.51263624,0.4252769,0.0008831289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003324633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014280458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42983696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049108115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011633899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286213261","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10085","title":"“‘Cause Even Though Perfect It’s Not/ It’s the Best Thing This World’s Got” – or Not?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Literacy; Sociology; Assimilation (phonology); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.07842477565232847,"score_gpt":0.42233203118637486,"score_spread":0.3439072555340464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286213261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5150048,0.00070308533,0.0020653196,0.22355224,0.0061342265,0.007254781,0.000063877924,0.00033246214,0.24488923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608842,0.0009862129,0.00057219184,0.013629015,0.0002965978,0.0005362967,0.00000264923,0.000032200343,0.023060594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814425,0.015610039,0.00063676503,0.0004446054,0.0013920028,0.00047410294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989792,0.008859251,0.00037669647,0.00079308596,0.00011679459,0.00006217194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021368524,0.00024731015,0.0004055572,0.0001859226,0.003170943,0.00015906013,0.0017055176,0.000081300925,0.0006358023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016296917,0.00014786431,0.00034324586,0.0015314476,0.00027641855,0.00021378807,0.0003599339,0.0011772522,0.00005200986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008403677,0.0009998096,0.00038993786,0.000010847902,0.00018853864,0.000026860198,0.826969,0.0005637707,0.00016072666,0.049468957,0.11670703,0.0036741546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058178324,0.000497228,0.00021749777,0.000038004113,0.00018025529,0.0000136146955,0.6511352,0.00008188701,0.0000981177,0.007402689,0.3395311,0.00022263474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011956147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007251138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44587946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002785358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019093098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313551326","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03501000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03161808959572699,"score_gpt":0.36596954345870397,"score_spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313551326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06888251,0.0064870236,0.0063137705,0.00047681443,0.008747753,0.011160923,0.00089761626,0.00035101705,0.89668256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059471034,0.0015423355,0.00694832,0.0016054229,0.0019356883,0.004475544,0.00057987316,0.0021539803,0.9212878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749006,0.02053651,0.0013697626,0.0011107153,0.0013359141,0.0007464686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992307,0.0041425843,0.000968811,0.0023822163,0.00014307557,0.000056332574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019974308,0.0007972039,0.0015558014,0.0010624963,0.00016155248,0.00007433383,0.0022712385,0.00044940342,0.0037186882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371192,0.00053714216,0.0003860303,0.0010488903,0.00016936664,0.00007735321,0.00053119025,0.0014946711,0.3630757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081328757,0.0008955053,0.000094018935,0.00015000177,0.00036796893,0.00004136687,0.022223275,0.0006057314,0.00018850721,0.00033494114,0.9732972,0.0009882265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008471384,0.00417653,0.005597544,0.0022777393,0.0029097123,0.00010443524,0.06926732,0.00010547568,0.0012202114,0.16675338,0.73541874,0.0036975627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021708712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025942732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35935703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019750991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075781216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313897458","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10097","title":"Burton Mack’s Challenge to the Study of Religion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Christianity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.0671163401100917,"score_gpt":0.33238995427617224,"score_spread":0.26527361416608053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313897458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96909904,0.00065595674,0.00006293459,0.002683924,0.0008307823,0.0033907876,0.000014245965,0.00010375363,0.02315857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974912,0.0005675873,0.000042096766,0.00030611455,0.0004825818,0.00040537163,0.000004756156,0.000040705097,0.0006595865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418515,0.0032031583,0.0008342951,0.00051281793,0.00088080874,0.0003837568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640375,0.0019005582,0.00033999849,0.0011330869,0.00017486855,0.000047734156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071299295,0.00034313547,0.0006119816,0.0004799598,0.0005388621,0.0000655887,0.0011548463,0.00007240868,0.0000327798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023826597,0.00019901774,0.00018983043,0.00059917505,0.00014240148,0.000099073804,0.00028882173,0.00039863476,0.00008757732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011007852,0.002984367,0.00046629691,0.00006823856,0.0002202115,0.000026280057,0.7208305,0.00043214153,0.000044086548,0.25291637,0.012890192,0.0080205435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042247437,0.01620776,0.0032964484,0.00024735957,0.00052012835,0.0000075779944,0.5012174,0.00007879658,0.00019441558,0.40306967,0.07028301,0.00065269164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037509003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026081987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21961308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002861232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017473036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8115708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389257859","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10119","title":"Debating Critical Religion: A Response to Timothy Fitzgerald","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Critical thought; Critical theory; Religious studies","score_opus":0.04388446427959898,"score_gpt":0.45123087138312157,"score_spread":0.4073464071035226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389257859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93693084,0.000100912206,0.0037313113,0.037184678,0.00071136706,0.0012102012,0.0000047546687,0.00022764645,0.019898301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926796,0.00022327964,0.0025785067,0.0025845182,0.00016089395,0.00021314129,0.0000012510075,0.000020107775,0.0015387337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869556,0.009291242,0.0004991774,0.00034380532,0.0007341927,0.0004360507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871842,0.011999145,0.000096667456,0.00045964733,0.00015586383,0.000104460894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018904045,0.00015183551,0.00028756095,0.0002893431,0.00075383624,0.00009085817,0.0006122508,0.00011668392,0.000040829305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009914402,0.00011896817,0.00017606982,0.0020070872,0.0001615882,0.00012096548,0.00010786986,0.00036240328,0.00017931417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015454807,0.00060376665,0.0010827959,0.000017360695,0.000042734526,0.00005633803,0.6931155,0.0004094012,0.0013667799,0.19737247,0.09976384,0.0046235565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012353773,0.0017039703,0.0061410605,0.00022055548,0.000100161014,0.000013153713,0.59848654,0.0002637824,0.00027198833,0.2510132,0.1400345,0.0005157251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036397667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055793347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09462893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008372501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389762157","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03601000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Philosophy; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03161808959572699,"score_gpt":0.36596954345870397,"score_spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389762157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06888251,0.0064870236,0.0063137705,0.00047681443,0.008747753,0.011160923,0.00089761626,0.00035101705,0.89668256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059471034,0.0015423355,0.00694832,0.0016054229,0.0019356883,0.004475544,0.00057987316,0.0021539803,0.9212878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749006,0.02053651,0.0013697626,0.0011107153,0.0013359141,0.0007464686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992307,0.0041425843,0.000968811,0.0023822163,0.00014307557,0.000056332574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019974308,0.0007972039,0.0015558014,0.0010624963,0.00016155248,0.00007433383,0.0022712385,0.00044940342,0.0037186882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371192,0.00053714216,0.0003860303,0.0010488903,0.00016936664,0.00007735321,0.00053119025,0.0014946711,0.3630757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081328757,0.0008955053,0.000094018935,0.00015000177,0.00036796893,0.00004136687,0.022223275,0.0006057314,0.00018850721,0.00033494114,0.9732972,0.0009882265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008471384,0.00417653,0.005597544,0.0022777393,0.0029097123,0.00010443524,0.06926732,0.00010547568,0.0012202114,0.16675338,0.73541874,0.0036975627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021708712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025942732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35935703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019750991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075781216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177146","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10128","title":"Critical Religion Takes a Punch: Notes on a Scholarly Skirmish","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; The Imaginary; Racism; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.048776018876356436,"score_gpt":0.43330164448491615,"score_spread":0.38452562560855974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.720351,0.0047695837,0.019686447,0.049490806,0.0040575094,0.0029299348,0.00002139153,0.0006216825,0.19807167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528736,0.000945331,0.0013548215,0.0015200891,0.00028539362,0.00014816801,0.0000016222141,0.000023030636,0.00043416853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267775,0.0051345685,0.00047834462,0.000437534,0.0009087193,0.00036307835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888615,0.0103435805,0.000075923024,0.0004482321,0.00019084393,0.000079940124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009765391,0.00020506395,0.00031153558,0.00024997455,0.000598406,0.0005817601,0.00061394245,0.00018100691,0.000047914684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064844997,0.00014079324,0.00028248932,0.001014201,0.00028373825,0.0004949512,0.0000404252,0.0008466939,0.00009545162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463517,0.0007852098,0.00024890818,0.000029596235,0.000064452055,0.000043967113,0.2024678,0.00003550588,0.00028748883,0.7742789,0.012514013,0.009097831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070696895,0.0016876967,0.0007271244,0.0005989413,0.00023332471,0.000021787439,0.22268896,0.00021698153,0.00045183703,0.6381654,0.13403963,0.000461328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043566576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062622677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2749364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012726616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011263691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77630204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411704941","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10147","title":"What’s Alternative about Alternative Rationality in CAS-E’s Definition of ‘Esotericism’?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0617077405977734,"score_gpt":0.36244989997097793,"score_spread":0.30074215937320453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411704941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092451,0.0021334656,0.0013692089,0.0014087523,0.0012219658,0.0011139145,0.000019041352,0.000013572451,0.08347502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966039,0.002137238,0.00033025024,0.00043399105,0.000089650624,0.0001320974,0.000004612827,0.000007869533,0.00026036592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962827,0.0022709933,0.0006846355,0.00026560342,0.00033007545,0.00016598335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654555,0.0025248392,0.00042494162,0.00028636574,0.00020782664,0.000010483036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003991122,0.00017098157,0.0004267856,0.00026128252,0.0001766749,0.00008940165,0.0003517237,0.0000359778,0.000030794192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037632853,0.000118127406,0.00009182566,0.00017629705,0.00021833231,0.00034427503,0.00010976581,0.00026428158,0.0000029877692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043629485,0.00075711514,0.00054959476,0.00004445837,0.00012446908,0.0000068206596,0.24238946,0.00017421469,0.00002896356,0.7525559,0.00043146216,0.0025012437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011816355,0.0005563399,0.0028550804,0.00023448869,0.00007945403,0.0000011919998,0.18566397,0.00010955286,0.00024173038,0.8065009,0.002447999,0.00012765174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012918573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008921338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08735887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052027368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026168906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415406178","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10162","title":"Putting the Persian Back in “Magic”: Problems with Ignoring Ancient Ethnographic Discourses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Persian; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Ancient literature","score_opus":0.032462848227863314,"score_gpt":0.2997829247429666,"score_spread":0.26732007651510326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415406178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7301655,0.06200985,0.0016182383,0.014019968,0.001925329,0.0072591575,0.000024954583,0.000073399606,0.18290365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994956,0.0028876348,0.00026138953,0.0005694382,0.0002875997,0.00026360623,0.000001467983,0.00003535084,0.00073749974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991607,0.0048291977,0.0012075687,0.00080405094,0.00078688096,0.00076527294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951742,0.0032055092,0.00047904302,0.00089909905,0.00018639631,0.000055745262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008521107,0.0006032639,0.0009942818,0.0005785683,0.001628434,0.00023788125,0.0011718248,0.00013258612,0.000035316767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026530784,0.00031408452,0.000292677,0.0013388954,0.0013502021,0.0001430208,0.00031224787,0.0012729547,0.000009305591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005557103,0.0025459281,0.0062711798,0.00042158688,0.00041677884,0.000028420225,0.5463846,0.0012581679,0.00001796683,0.43350136,0.0010909615,0.0075073466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030547322,0.0034125342,0.0031547893,0.0023180228,0.0008340717,0.00000931273,0.3800129,0.00017195434,0.000018715193,0.554502,0.05184198,0.00066895824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052458043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119258715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26479056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015789256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007547997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633722913","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341340","title":"Documenting the Delusion: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delusion; Credibility; Deception; Naturalism; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09274885937243119,"score_gpt":0.36892873747167343,"score_spread":0.27617987809924227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W633722913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94488245,0.0012045802,0.00010919717,0.00085230655,0.00045531284,0.0015165206,0.0000013911466,0.00003056721,0.05094765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982505,0.00007132146,0.000118292366,0.00035030954,0.00029699405,0.00016548243,3.5649225e-7,0.000016457925,0.0007303076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448276,0.0039531766,0.0005284261,0.000272258,0.0005128214,0.00025054565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968503,0.0020464058,0.00030657757,0.00059026224,0.00017455901,0.000031906548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012631701,0.00020068546,0.00033437548,0.00009252698,0.000941116,0.00020857327,0.0005125455,0.000024979447,0.000029009509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000439286,0.000095907635,0.00008669638,0.00014492932,0.00015763099,0.00016886766,0.00030055287,0.00032015453,0.000015108122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023314053,0.0014892535,0.0008268161,0.000009405042,0.00015986642,0.00058584684,0.94106454,0.000071913026,0.0000015081484,0.043963484,0.0058159586,0.005778279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011755262,0.0018098654,0.00003451912,0.000013428395,0.00021330756,0.00019020202,0.92693084,0.000044466407,0.0000024890035,0.033885513,0.03557033,0.00012950985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021758221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013773862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053368006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002466669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001885202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W764916438","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341332","title":"The Public Nature of Critical Discourses on “Religion”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Religious studies; Sociology; Public discourse; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04413669585574895,"score_gpt":0.4485937896349546,"score_spread":0.4044570937792057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W764916438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146246,0.0038914261,0.0023371577,0.101595536,0.0039160573,0.002120201,0.0000137561065,0.000109558896,0.1713917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976777,0.0007220979,0.0002973363,0.0007257954,0.00014595636,0.00006597938,9.013641e-7,0.000010469465,0.00035375456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99227315,0.0058447593,0.00041562607,0.00021656738,0.00095099554,0.00029888592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917531,0.007149991,0.00017944686,0.00050664996,0.00032441836,0.000086398315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106276,0.00013486107,0.0002527438,0.00009582499,0.0005897692,0.00009119337,0.00085646845,0.00016525014,0.0000070748133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070210616,0.00007432042,0.00017476232,0.00061536755,0.0006764272,0.00013162367,0.0000657062,0.00063041097,0.000010743842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012987363,0.0007712556,0.00041256569,0.0000043611954,0.000031366246,0.0000026710127,0.071343966,0.00001669837,0.000013807485,0.90269834,0.022926627,0.0016484784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005694903,0.00076405366,0.00042506124,0.000044660657,0.000061128216,0.000004184436,0.42973801,0.000022025542,0.00011344495,0.48892272,0.07919467,0.00014053314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012985254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009532108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4137756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071293805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014346755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84053737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W820096865","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341330","title":"Clarifications: A Rejoinder","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1154943075222061,"score_gpt":0.3383368118532866,"score_spread":0.22284250433108052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W820096865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56985813,0.0030333623,0.002440661,0.003238211,0.0011694708,0.0023582368,0.000011744366,0.00012324027,0.41776693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978466,0.000049998278,0.0005819575,0.00044289883,0.00029545603,0.00013575896,0.0000033917645,0.00001402781,0.00062991545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970302,0.0018217615,0.00037721658,0.00022770694,0.000382467,0.00016062525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984702,0.00067529123,0.00016371917,0.0005149894,0.00014088798,0.000034924542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048611714,0.00014858143,0.00024770753,0.00016970356,0.00019742257,0.00005346419,0.00043215236,0.000048096044,0.000032288433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002297527,0.00009576328,0.00007786022,0.00013483361,0.00013818835,0.00010294328,0.000046027682,0.00024913962,0.000039802035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021630018,0.00069779565,0.00027609282,0.000008427827,0.00003846238,0.0000040545146,0.25663182,0.000026654758,0.0000066335115,0.73323005,0.0064103073,0.002453379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011973031,0.0010016945,0.00032574288,0.000028050365,0.00008607543,0.000006469979,0.10371597,0.000021818863,0.000037533766,0.82747257,0.06595051,0.00015628457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009089976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002767858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42798844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021302267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024092133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39051133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847888219","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341328","title":"The Future of Religious History in Habermas’s Critical Theory of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Sociology; Intellectual history; Christianity; Political history; Epistemology; Identity (music); History of religions; Critical theory; Conceptual history; Religious studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04884210258477259,"score_gpt":0.3804293564707374,"score_spread":0.33158725388596477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847888219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7721498,0.057029463,0.0021657378,0.008910533,0.0034096867,0.0029321853,0.000018583361,0.00009021797,0.15329379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729186,0.0014395429,0.00048497765,0.0003094129,0.0002824524,0.000060620823,0.0000010026107,0.000020179521,0.00010993198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793823,0.017866958,0.0009879133,0.00035369865,0.0009786366,0.00043050223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864296,0.012123675,0.000272029,0.00076569227,0.00030681537,0.00010219655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034544595,0.00021917274,0.0005791486,0.00021158934,0.0001878213,0.000015743417,0.001133623,0.00021495609,0.000010979484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050786133,0.00014172262,0.0001958038,0.0006516495,0.0015784384,0.00013575538,0.00013419398,0.0005592171,0.0000041316875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015037962,0.0007139077,0.00039835373,0.00003510296,0.000021505404,0.000012571711,0.101340674,0.000022108337,0.000083228064,0.88890314,0.0019924368,0.004973169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000745824,0.0006763964,0.00012930382,0.0000814407,0.000068105925,0.0000034479888,0.06738841,0.000005539579,0.00015769729,0.8992065,0.031395722,0.00014159524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001293251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005690953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22514208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017791158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017976217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}