{"meta":{"query_hash":"07020f5a5e9d","filters":{"venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion"},"cohort_total":56,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"exported":56,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07020f5a5e9d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Method+%26+Theory+in+the+Study+of+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1774729703","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341354","title":"Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19862573289881266,"score_gpt":0.3682058473765436,"score_spread":0.16958011447773094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774729703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002767369,0.013383035,0.017698603,0.9515686,0.0064909966,0.00009261029,0.00007266916,0.000073263625,0.0078528505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19655974,0.021762416,0.080539316,0.6460133,0.041259,0.0019943034,0.00018146921,0.00034597184,0.011344445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8719925,0.09555342,0.00676373,0.006797602,0.017241526,0.0016513258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7777918,0.16760756,0.0064579593,0.015818134,0.02940307,0.002921496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16806878,0.0014756598,0.0022580018,0.0049232203,0.008241974,0.015343663,0.009769584,0.011965748,0.0038134176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23907802,0.000916711,0.0016826045,0.0038954755,0.0550731,0.021449508,0.010754905,0.03467549,0.001903735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006133631,0.00006704846,0.00037443626,0.00030357525,0.000052105464,0.00009233065,0.008590842,0.00028256088,0.0001606678,0.92768806,0.051917627,0.010409358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009039366,0.00003604617,0.0003601533,0.0012384115,0.000027590313,0.000094681076,0.0053403187,0.0012090837,0.00031933203,0.9062129,0.08502414,0.00004700518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010017731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011304317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16806878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00921758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009164097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8888433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804125812","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341353","title":"Postmetaphysical Thinking and the Philosophy of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Field (mathematics); Philosophy of religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0417814899416762,"score_gpt":0.3042019544072971,"score_spread":0.2624204644656209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804125812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06727418,0.023460008,0.07747545,0.08267392,0.0014034979,0.000070164526,0.00010434553,0.00009644376,0.747442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95879644,0.004082189,0.008377394,0.0029038975,0.00073927455,0.00010578662,0.000041434105,0.000036972433,0.024916627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776006,0.0015627115,0.000064485124,0.00014025587,0.0003563366,0.00011616592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983929,0.0009983013,0.00018814579,0.0001838114,0.00015140505,0.000085456035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035117185,0.00030046108,0.000237221,0.0012648815,0.003037786,0.003981192,0.0007960075,0.0014981398,0.0038349004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028675296,0.00016491755,0.00021189121,0.0010147324,0.036658786,0.0056935903,0.0025290018,0.0040223747,0.0004843742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001642989,0.000002034162,0.000020997273,0.000009039404,4.6351866e-7,0.000005074367,0.0012091649,0.000025012114,0.000018902601,0.9976398,0.0002144172,0.0008534907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057536913,0.000008736037,0.00020114952,0.000041620184,0.0000012308848,0.000035580622,0.0013730773,0.00016988574,0.00008418212,0.9603876,0.037687853,0.000003441763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017818384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020802836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041349614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041349614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026366774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030001462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982776447","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00192","title":"The Female and the Fetish: a Method and Theory Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Fetishism; Object (grammar); Worship; Fantasy; Philosophy; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.03610018840564659,"score_gpt":0.32288250616657205,"score_spread":0.28678231776092544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982776447","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010436015,0.9753737,0.005672592,0.00962263,0.0017358123,0.0006951011,0.00018857326,0.000022272408,0.005645718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102604935,0.9697752,0.008137334,0.0060351645,0.0010929068,0.0025559014,0.00013695231,0.000056729787,0.0019493226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850749,0.010870122,0.0010742027,0.0010085043,0.0015302126,0.00044203215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346507,0.058482237,0.0018076174,0.0012047829,0.0033069202,0.00054764136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03232819,0.0018362182,0.004111021,0.024536174,0.003836015,0.008762961,0.0037516442,0.0045635914,0.010540061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035904706,0.0014971871,0.0024767537,0.020016706,0.010330571,0.010495161,0.0046862173,0.0045816386,0.0031234182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021200444,0.00056567794,0.002525268,0.07837989,0.00032348777,0.0007792826,0.012693859,0.0003721481,0.00031700474,0.21903868,0.04682429,0.63796836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007385411,0.0003862589,0.005854928,0.17412046,0.0007114626,0.0015568015,0.014729453,0.0005311536,0.00036438,0.06662035,0.73488927,0.00016161895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012932088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03232819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012675501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017891653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17096984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993020030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341294","title":"The Identity of NAASR and the Character of the Critical Study of Religion: Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Mythology; Identity (music); Sociology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02478025858134681,"score_gpt":0.30938120303381433,"score_spread":0.28460094445246753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993020030","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011245748,0.32341492,0.025839087,0.30513942,0.03407297,0.00040856382,0.0004428078,0.00014832761,0.2992881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47463045,0.2358339,0.0309127,0.06873989,0.04053101,0.0019093223,0.00045040605,0.00042430594,0.14656802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976169,0.0017404029,0.00007840695,0.00020480603,0.0002623779,0.000097170705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939241,0.00478319,0.00017696791,0.00015571793,0.0006772089,0.0002827513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042226175,0.00055206625,0.00051170425,0.0024148398,0.0035768286,0.0061045852,0.0008629083,0.002549104,0.006095204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006331195,0.00029960406,0.0003074586,0.0018246614,0.012318846,0.0059442464,0.002885815,0.003999752,0.000798545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036271587,0.00004618406,0.00041157752,0.0005402124,0.000006835564,0.00014021153,0.018902844,0.0001821829,0.00031679103,0.8825727,0.065164685,0.031679485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109595385,0.00003349601,0.00087385817,0.0015099023,0.0000043896243,0.00017579031,0.010960396,0.00027535087,0.00013904818,0.21782504,0.76816744,0.000024256298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058174604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005911705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061045852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005853231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032751223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04246837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000848332","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341247","title":"Provocation and Its Responses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Islam; Provocation test; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.06164488228594979,"score_gpt":0.4327181329129964,"score_spread":0.3710732506270466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000848332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12529272,0.0017279538,0.02249132,0.1518116,0.03429534,0.0012790513,0.0005423731,0.0009947894,0.6615649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85979456,0.00040287283,0.0026143892,0.03667758,0.0037387803,0.0011312723,0.00016316403,0.0006051114,0.09487227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529341,0.0362028,0.00085378496,0.0022799713,0.0051078703,0.0026215618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251538,0.053173043,0.0026779233,0.004501277,0.0113157565,0.003178248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021575158,0.0009631136,0.0006130736,0.0021051592,0.011450193,0.008099318,0.002782499,0.0075358846,0.019681988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118006244,0.00039657255,0.0007995242,0.0013387302,0.014950982,0.005491433,0.009715204,0.0118205715,0.0043720338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005073534,0.00028238186,0.0020190056,0.0005076488,0.000026861384,0.001850727,0.34886557,0.00016027348,0.0028074163,0.47978857,0.14036836,0.02281582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006621185,0.00014949573,0.0009968753,0.00033850342,0.000016166354,0.00047257243,0.19744979,0.0004042271,0.0018842852,0.054096784,0.7440681,0.000057008496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001070337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084349426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021575158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005417195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002376971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11410165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008755468","doi":"10.1163/157006809x416805","title":"“On Thursdays We Worship the Banana Plant”: Encountering Lived Hinduism in a Canadian Suburb","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Worship; Sociology; Hinduism; Field (mathematics); Lived experience; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Religious studies; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.047047891893825564,"score_gpt":0.36082779342258675,"score_spread":0.3137799015287612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008755468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839421,0.00053917035,0.00059908646,0.0028497828,0.000071612376,0.000086431864,0.00015185331,0.000023289014,0.011736626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993097,0.0003993057,0.00051023683,0.0006043437,0.000013695452,0.0000291708,0.000058666294,0.000025146563,0.0052623674],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965724,0.0012966805,0.000049706134,0.0003559569,0.0004744872,0.0012507966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647385,0.0011787885,0.0002871732,0.00015018463,0.0007929597,0.0011170256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034637314,0.0009638187,0.0008606821,0.0023958506,0.04642744,0.0062443563,0.0038833902,0.0023978085,0.003951434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005334039,0.00074633013,0.00046401372,0.002969173,0.02750576,0.0023721345,0.006174566,0.004316282,0.00028725775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019759236,0.000011954093,0.0016224374,0.000023903249,0.0000031416557,0.0005751864,0.9942058,0.000019554192,0.00043946467,0.0006604171,0.0007669141,0.0016515121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011973164,0.000010768831,0.0028132354,0.000033154047,0.0000036913934,0.00010157588,0.98866045,0.000032365257,0.00011147175,0.00007791317,0.008139015,0.000015205761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96392995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060690206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060690206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04765465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44034034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012942321","doi":"10.1163/157006811x567733","title":"Sikhism, Traumatic Repetition, and the Question of Aesthetic Sovereignty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sikhism; Argument (complex analysis); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Work (physics); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Religious studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.040404851741266234,"score_gpt":0.2846243276139518,"score_spread":0.24421947587268555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012942321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700204,0.0024530268,0.010223646,0.018623866,0.00032660083,0.000036466467,0.00002670158,0.000048732414,0.2680568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981893,0.00008081986,0.00021700891,0.000103795035,0.000021577596,0.000006106555,0.0000018338663,0.0000046922714,0.0013749226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633163,0.0025795975,0.00010110432,0.00024815355,0.0004292111,0.00031028068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520326,0.002786725,0.00053979683,0.0010235381,0.00022075503,0.00022587631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051823473,0.00020748073,0.0003552806,0.0006742043,0.0054389397,0.004843472,0.0009412146,0.0014336222,0.0032915839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067309546,0.00019645371,0.00020828108,0.00065030064,0.06524851,0.0054606963,0.0072332397,0.0030002468,0.00017810939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003086557,0.000019433579,0.00078234513,0.00004680414,0.000003486313,0.00021486582,0.19184309,0.00007675034,0.00035854493,0.8000617,0.0005682299,0.0059937704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027924136,0.00012268168,0.003753685,0.0003222432,0.000011031457,0.0011758889,0.3045378,0.0006614237,0.0016204944,0.6105345,0.07719402,0.00003832498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001313398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017811846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054389397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024277766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015471786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02740717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018520567","doi":"10.1163/157006807x243601","title":"Science, Scholarship and the Domestication of Religion: On Dennett's Breaking the Spell","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Scrutiny; Taboo; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","score_opus":0.03740200773963592,"score_gpt":0.3928016362131641,"score_spread":0.3553996284735282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018520567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01873545,0.051367443,0.015647175,0.51393396,0.0088477535,0.0000905926,0.000076286546,0.00007232611,0.3912289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492718,0.029086469,0.010980765,0.09948136,0.0059812274,0.0004422628,0.000049675007,0.00019024516,0.10451616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427515,0.004267265,0.0001479277,0.00026751347,0.0007547587,0.0002873923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98910356,0.009098145,0.00041762597,0.00036548366,0.00068917155,0.00032604337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008336066,0.0004377588,0.00077566406,0.0026713007,0.009360784,0.009715801,0.0011489973,0.0037934987,0.0033667325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008859548,0.00034737063,0.00036461963,0.002299083,0.055537105,0.011629584,0.0058516134,0.007428056,0.00046458555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009313079,0.000012583905,0.00013899834,0.000027101769,0.0000016640332,0.000034337827,0.0036172883,0.000035433502,0.000015560314,0.974515,0.016035086,0.0055576353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016342121,0.00002237626,0.00035571744,0.00038956935,0.0000049505543,0.000074007374,0.005659462,0.00020825019,0.00013387912,0.7261106,0.26700947,0.000015354652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012315011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015684903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012315011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005988039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042232512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04408586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018544991","doi":"10.1163/157006809x460338","title":"The Mennaisian “Catholic Science of Religion”: Epistemology and History in Early Nineteenth-Century French Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Object (grammar); History of science; Dual (grammatical number); Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021179975876251294,"score_gpt":0.27348785278538895,"score_spread":0.25230787690913764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018544991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62121207,0.043730527,0.0032859556,0.03839561,0.00045734475,0.000044690907,0.000115456234,0.000046246245,0.2927121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881009,0.0022026587,0.0002755711,0.00066046335,0.000119966455,0.000008493539,0.000014465866,0.000008069332,0.008609525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979546,0.001622172,0.000024587493,0.000097725046,0.00013052436,0.00017038138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740654,0.0017680891,0.00020518391,0.00006960051,0.0003035998,0.0002469339],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037791939,0.00020657429,0.00025223073,0.0021180443,0.0061577843,0.0044363653,0.0004729392,0.00087328575,0.0037903518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026861746,0.0001348569,0.00011984734,0.0011771629,0.01616432,0.0017170928,0.0015609063,0.0012735637,0.00013990582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051358747,0.000046830773,0.005325094,0.00012844824,0.000012617369,0.00043170006,0.3086311,0.00016036948,0.00032081775,0.6590697,0.0044037313,0.0214181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023627677,0.00011617811,0.026766818,0.0007726218,0.000016127893,0.00045930626,0.1863199,0.0006414413,0.00065399974,0.03950082,0.7446889,0.000040260853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17436515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22246078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99384224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022555683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005262537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023835741","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00246","title":"Categorical Designations and Methodological Reductionism: Gnosticism as Case Study1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Gnosticism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Categorical variable; Embodied cognition; Instrumentalism; Psychologism; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13130112991035503,"score_gpt":0.3633004200684343,"score_spread":0.2319992901580793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023835741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.383445,0.0025360847,0.3398424,0.055712614,0.00072810287,0.0014515864,0.0001656174,0.00021303471,0.21590559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291746,0.00042152006,0.06504768,0.001065547,0.00004572691,0.0008245418,0.00003761034,0.00003688381,0.0033459435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8417464,0.14971232,0.0014382587,0.0013433625,0.004272207,0.0014874185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9356295,0.05331227,0.0021902488,0.0055433833,0.0023046592,0.0010199893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06237062,0.00055340625,0.0007510712,0.0036364791,0.011630785,0.012129096,0.0028332868,0.003969833,0.0019123262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03976031,0.00052737334,0.0007308484,0.0040780413,0.06007251,0.008385836,0.012954603,0.00554848,0.00023180529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002597537,0.00008883453,0.0008677416,0.0000856088,0.000007927171,0.00053790736,0.09777819,0.00030394492,0.00022403395,0.89242816,0.0010949711,0.0065566944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008538112,0.00013677933,0.0011046685,0.000639505,0.000024781728,0.0014305679,0.19420578,0.0059585636,0.0021092962,0.68902314,0.10520637,0.00007516514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003001144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045883046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06237062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010266795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048851413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32985127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024535992","doi":"10.1163/157006811x608359","title":"The Collection and Synthesis of “Tradition” and the Second-Century Invention of Christianity*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Religious studies; Art","score_opus":0.030531999453784167,"score_gpt":0.25716499215813104,"score_spread":0.2266329927043469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024535992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16587326,0.06188694,0.019763567,0.026091404,0.0029961022,0.00008228586,0.00034285578,0.000118780365,0.7228448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966643,0.0074409344,0.0028022134,0.00052478624,0.0006183933,0.000050056024,0.00008124398,0.0000598645,0.021779532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959247,0.0029075814,0.00014622886,0.00028207919,0.0005307167,0.00020864776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243367,0.0049098297,0.0006418944,0.0010901304,0.00071568624,0.00020882333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267716,0.00032567608,0.0004920613,0.0056828265,0.0041110497,0.005859775,0.00068485533,0.00079414895,0.0047713537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071324017,0.0001657923,0.00020954457,0.0052607246,0.018910797,0.0047673993,0.0035143076,0.0021124843,0.00022944021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033027256,0.000010784527,0.000463544,0.00028363237,0.000010811311,0.00009213817,0.08385413,0.00008789404,0.00016790084,0.89235544,0.0034505504,0.019190136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022443011,0.00005592427,0.0034821336,0.0018176623,0.00002583776,0.0003950965,0.056281973,0.0005250444,0.0012352166,0.2789082,0.65721816,0.0000323592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034974609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071192808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068594986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068594986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003943284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049769342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025474434","doi":"10.1163/157006812x635709","title":"Computing Religion: A New Tool in the Multilevel Analysis of Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Empirical research; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Management science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06540313143775371,"score_gpt":0.42942805340696005,"score_spread":0.3640249219692063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025474434","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008546,0.00017252837,0.98684144,0.0012364825,0.000055290246,0.00008654076,0.00051218056,0.00081051385,0.0017389338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13061559,0.0001289241,0.86778396,0.00015521789,0.00006986005,0.00030045758,0.00038984505,0.00018480317,0.0003712168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923259,0.005633828,0.00040251907,0.0005994474,0.000900817,0.0001375093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96782345,0.022738319,0.0019348955,0.005525496,0.0011824761,0.00079532847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072307335,0.00055615965,0.0012220029,0.0043502254,0.0016440864,0.004807238,0.0018857286,0.00091299467,0.009246842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053712495,0.00050733524,0.0018865219,0.006142067,0.0026282181,0.0038340257,0.0058187484,0.0030019805,0.0009855893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013208366,0.00013079145,0.018901866,0.00042443897,0.00035523996,0.0001761736,0.002190214,0.024440074,0.001539777,0.76399136,0.010325303,0.17739277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049998787,0.000066207824,0.0046894727,0.00014751473,0.00007663604,0.00015985093,0.0006786156,0.27197948,0.00092956156,0.6989941,0.02215429,0.000074250296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004609154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005464626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009246842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011481319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002157777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038240194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028934107","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00255","title":"Reflections On Religion, Modernization, and Violence in the Islamic Middle East","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Militant; Islam; Modernization theory; Middle East; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Social science; History; Law","score_opus":0.0587793687950898,"score_gpt":0.36971682889128626,"score_spread":0.3109374600961965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028934107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77267236,0.021280523,0.0006602058,0.055664204,0.00065893395,0.000014658652,0.00002062066,0.000005336265,0.14902322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616027,0.0012826074,0.000044641452,0.00084842014,0.00010577959,0.00000277149,0.0000017993593,0.000001219133,0.001552416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976751,0.0017834564,0.00003881948,0.000045603418,0.00016312549,0.00029384549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998387,0.0010662411,0.00029506726,0.000050328785,0.00008472447,0.00011669808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002471679,0.00023120071,0.00024456464,0.0010364742,0.008470116,0.003936781,0.0005219519,0.001434189,0.0025113714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018564078,0.000148193,0.00015933675,0.0009444589,0.028763998,0.0017607588,0.0045661787,0.0031365005,0.00009802749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053268508,0.00007004671,0.0059128874,0.00011050183,0.00001422818,0.0010089532,0.5131242,0.00018410517,0.00040119913,0.46573064,0.0030438153,0.010346174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026127853,0.00010799229,0.020567205,0.00068177434,0.000016332424,0.0007033385,0.69866854,0.00028437556,0.0006022459,0.081696175,0.19661707,0.000028735214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075582177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013216273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043055117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013865847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031238794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031168812","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549670","title":"Conversion as a Thematic Site: Academic Representations of Ambedkar’s Buddhist Turn","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Trope (literature); Depiction; Sociology; Hinduism; Epistemology; Hermeneutics; Narrative; History of religions; Sociology of religion; Literature; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.0635432758461328,"score_gpt":0.32918716148522187,"score_spread":0.2656438856390891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031168812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.599182,0.001714706,0.011233563,0.011151366,0.00046160346,0.0000857957,0.000108436274,0.00017028974,0.37589234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632794,0.00016970393,0.00043774646,0.00015064846,0.000025055977,0.000012265276,0.000015240149,0.000021725333,0.002839752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483263,0.0038402886,0.00010537509,0.00025651132,0.0005232898,0.0004419026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939078,0.0042854887,0.00047330523,0.00056328677,0.00032750488,0.00044254333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965837,0.00045566197,0.0004122458,0.0029643266,0.011402896,0.014441451,0.0014514482,0.0018993493,0.004184338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074933227,0.0003110224,0.0002817014,0.003271449,0.046064798,0.0063206656,0.008494443,0.0049057966,0.0003032994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656024,0.0000120823715,0.0003585347,0.000035870482,0.0000026403604,0.0003481507,0.7979236,0.00007276756,0.00028539306,0.1976994,0.00064153643,0.0026034485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013084842,0.000025474645,0.001207662,0.00019134102,0.00001253518,0.00055902876,0.86171085,0.00047118688,0.0007335592,0.0351752,0.09987713,0.000023035615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089965435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0105479555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014441451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008656134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030050671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06280488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041746847","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341304","title":"“Pseudo-Speciation of the Human Race:Religions as Hazard-Precaution Systems”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Natural (archaeology); Hazard; Welfare; Sociology; Human welfare; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology; Gender studies; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06522725682895067,"score_gpt":0.3395080979498099,"score_spread":0.27428084112085926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041746847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.797101,0.0006429595,0.03896778,0.009515711,0.0002195242,0.00008045916,0.000035349552,0.000040844694,0.15339641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706835,0.00004354161,0.0019840908,0.00019759995,0.00001051672,0.000010029222,0.0000057711954,0.0000026187677,0.00067762105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914634,0.0005620307,0.000018858238,0.00011308482,0.00008185781,0.0000778911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832565,0.00050054543,0.00035906537,0.000334906,0.00023004213,0.000249776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017343417,0.00008571369,0.00013606033,0.00042625153,0.0014742048,0.0015421624,0.00053302484,0.0007646548,0.003213237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044500143,0.00009982517,0.00015553947,0.00026745605,0.01331623,0.002346049,0.0020675755,0.0008858344,0.0001831747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008147532,0.00005076321,0.0133156935,0.00009726604,0.000016558573,0.0003787793,0.050402373,0.00051835185,0.004033406,0.9001579,0.0012632456,0.029684018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034274708,0.00015124757,0.050988737,0.000111429414,0.000021150901,0.0012788184,0.034143582,0.0039601554,0.001907784,0.87533396,0.032018907,0.000050038998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008890333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012244275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003213237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082973466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059248885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01074934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042926210","doi":"10.1163/157006808x317491","title":"Redescribing Christian Origins","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.059331233635025626,"score_gpt":0.3060095329793916,"score_spread":0.24667829934436597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042926210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11522958,0.0048241927,0.15572366,0.016170984,0.0040215603,0.00051618903,0.0007466719,0.00047945813,0.7022876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7845665,0.0021706165,0.090448186,0.002391418,0.00047471677,0.0004695006,0.00053065666,0.00048696858,0.11846139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971328,0.0017268443,0.00013220699,0.00044504818,0.0003304546,0.00023271081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947842,0.002182287,0.00030838154,0.0018737743,0.0006438831,0.00020755037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00477146,0.00043699727,0.00037193747,0.0034859048,0.0052587567,0.0056681396,0.0012566659,0.0014070302,0.018448083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008502881,0.00031230334,0.00031114873,0.002601966,0.014654074,0.0063193534,0.004697826,0.0029075672,0.0018147781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024675848,0.000023998515,0.0008382355,0.000106110936,0.000004113489,0.00005007247,0.023524506,0.00008227119,0.00033347396,0.9356395,0.0032464326,0.036126636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026993283,0.000031323507,0.0028074891,0.00042837334,0.000024838082,0.00021577322,0.021257633,0.00076889043,0.00198956,0.4584941,0.513918,0.000037180067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033696636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008109594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018448083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034087056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004623065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061715007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049023236","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557298","title":"Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Possession (linguistics); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0309604814388721,"score_gpt":0.4156748958633761,"score_spread":0.384714414424504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049023236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127157,0.0011667303,0.004737868,0.001957106,0.000028111243,0.000041295756,0.000020577141,0.000010513302,0.07932223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991436,0.0001372239,0.00020625207,0.000029246683,0.0000022637064,0.0000044262215,0.0000033291185,0.0000010262052,0.00047256568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976574,0.0015483762,0.00008003567,0.0001335377,0.00040645548,0.00017412614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946418,0.0029741856,0.0012487068,0.00032022534,0.00041519137,0.00039989498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003852656,0.00021523776,0.00029393332,0.0012408597,0.0022883094,0.0026973588,0.00035364233,0.0005080909,0.0029930936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007828034,0.00018524624,0.00020800921,0.00074630027,0.0108349435,0.0015467065,0.002618173,0.000869596,0.00010359054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937274,0.00023815845,0.091214426,0.00028855595,0.000057758647,0.00042880114,0.37737367,0.0006327019,0.002803189,0.48352408,0.00090290763,0.04246632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052148258,0.00030342827,0.23194815,0.0008176286,0.00007326041,0.0010389179,0.48289463,0.0047401837,0.0011672237,0.19811542,0.07874725,0.000101757025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009543003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009961307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022303688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089901884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020375013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054595673","doi":"10.1163/157006807x244934","title":"Time, Habit, and Agency in English Puritanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Habituation; Protestant work ethic; Sociology; Social psychology; Protestantism; Modernity; Epistemology; Late modernity; Leverage (statistics); Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02034825410239564,"score_gpt":0.27737133042674145,"score_spread":0.2570230763243458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054595673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743486,0.0009799642,0.0016289989,0.0017280042,0.000029550105,0.000019302039,0.00002196501,0.000008610075,0.12123491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894947,0.000057284797,0.000071541355,0.000025596584,0.0000049188343,0.000003084322,0.0000017511618,0.0000011376297,0.00088538136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911994,0.00057064154,0.000038701543,0.00006661967,0.00009873412,0.00010532036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800104,0.0010931019,0.00040749277,0.000152321,0.00018001554,0.0001660451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012501719,0.00008134763,0.00016011744,0.00059497246,0.0015455208,0.00273306,0.00029193005,0.00027388326,0.002164905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022393665,0.00007971474,0.000102943566,0.000669198,0.009522967,0.0018703395,0.0018923006,0.000532481,0.00006511641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010147933,0.00012369476,0.038541336,0.000121357145,0.000013741072,0.000570504,0.33599463,0.00021500842,0.0006889081,0.6012751,0.0007690952,0.021585152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004513386,0.00020584982,0.14464296,0.0003584934,0.000038328613,0.00090519525,0.47035033,0.0017113115,0.0013985726,0.23962186,0.14063856,0.00008334021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005522423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005088407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019075351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067130214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013840258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060422088","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341310","title":"The Scientific Study of Religion: Two Case Studies, One Response","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08038610696636907,"score_gpt":0.35167384639048777,"score_spread":0.2712877394241187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060422088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4104547,0.015258829,0.018609237,0.4690008,0.027349997,0.00715506,0.0007048684,0.00011964182,0.051346943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765798,0.01091821,0.014792639,0.14112277,0.005819287,0.007850491,0.00027700246,0.000107009895,0.04253283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95195603,0.036031477,0.0034128241,0.0015184759,0.005576447,0.0015048031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8587178,0.11080763,0.0091413325,0.0039463146,0.013445671,0.0039412864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04253769,0.0008029176,0.00092267455,0.0033493934,0.00852583,0.0049107736,0.003004383,0.017947987,0.005783031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15988432,0.00086370454,0.0014114152,0.0036747938,0.0067809117,0.0052711857,0.0084064165,0.009200091,0.0007001017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001077047,0.0020537293,0.013795078,0.008890478,0.00017912168,0.0450501,0.6811687,0.00058883335,0.0059218663,0.0652508,0.121618226,0.05440604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042864957,0.0009401604,0.008602097,0.004014091,0.000116037925,0.013364573,0.5119475,0.0006052392,0.0027642592,0.010478293,0.44650936,0.00022982576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019239199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035619861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04253769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007860718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005582802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22496349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078445284","doi":"10.1163/157006811x549715","title":"Does “Q” Have Any Representative Potential?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Q Methodology Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; State (computer science); Reflection (computer programming); Work (physics); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Physics; Geometry","score_opus":0.21055538005038363,"score_gpt":0.48588304929995996,"score_spread":0.2753276692495763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078445284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37879676,0.0015869227,0.12467529,0.07665358,0.0005782516,0.00021133074,0.00019147045,0.00011936777,0.417187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448687,0.00014518198,0.0023266776,0.00085225474,0.00009079445,0.000028159444,0.000026182784,0.000015372,0.0020283763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023694,0.0060330764,0.00034473249,0.0011764799,0.0015480088,0.0006608271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95123786,0.034871582,0.0037557345,0.004424573,0.0038485907,0.0018617539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013078137,0.00022647259,0.0006929751,0.0011342603,0.0041829012,0.0060790004,0.0013637325,0.0029197216,0.012368421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059186168,0.0002931402,0.00042245898,0.0013892455,0.021999324,0.012366888,0.0026771226,0.0022253108,0.00091365515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113185706,0.00003309497,0.0023154803,0.000088957895,0.000018855813,0.0002581834,0.004187684,0.00042389543,0.00025910465,0.9747045,0.0022609914,0.015336146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002882752,0.000043173088,0.0011345489,0.00010907475,0.000013936385,0.00015014765,0.00690808,0.0015602281,0.0004331155,0.9670652,0.022535915,0.000017853044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016230814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013492196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013078137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001934563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026024277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069164634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083901661","doi":"10.1163/094330509x12568874557252","title":"You Show Your Smith and I’ll Show Mine: Selection, Exegesis, and the Politics of Citation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Constructive; Citation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Exegesis; Poetics; Object (grammar); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0222123477526411,"score_gpt":0.3484354068318179,"score_spread":0.3262230590791768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083901661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16729923,0.02431148,0.083167106,0.22437291,0.006801619,0.00015852229,0.00048333473,0.00038149403,0.4930243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95275134,0.0057686158,0.008821017,0.004434932,0.0018807745,0.00017416014,0.000108643966,0.0003230062,0.025737576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96836656,0.023258172,0.0010989665,0.0016439128,0.0049836845,0.00064871396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87624866,0.104098104,0.0043008863,0.007597299,0.0068753394,0.0008796906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029209167,0.00023150888,0.00073887734,0.006523735,0.008275021,0.016290905,0.0012984847,0.0020979722,0.0052269245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10145244,0.0003547602,0.00027406533,0.010337114,0.030908914,0.015605498,0.005482807,0.0026934145,0.0007332521],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003099594,0.000009017204,0.0012231744,0.00010242929,0.000010593336,0.00007253841,0.028582036,0.000063697094,0.00016988012,0.9298267,0.015684038,0.024225015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023852746,0.00003209606,0.0022846623,0.00082381954,0.000027679409,0.00022945229,0.028319102,0.0005582619,0.0015941727,0.6116935,0.3543685,0.000044808898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00199926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023175604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99172497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038513553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028634353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15447468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085013143","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341299","title":"Change the Name! On the Importance of Reclaiming NAASR’s Original Objectives for the Twenty-First Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.05563113604833764,"score_gpt":0.3729482716472992,"score_spread":0.3173171355989616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085013143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042595342,0.006139942,0.00091092667,0.9002751,0.086775646,0.000009592497,0.000035331337,0.00004151995,0.0053859917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029874818,0.007825905,0.0039053098,0.85405564,0.0625419,0.0001139956,0.000058130263,0.00038989724,0.041234337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98078614,0.010675551,0.0012586763,0.0014758254,0.004955496,0.0008484082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432665,0.034279976,0.0024514499,0.0027761883,0.014663042,0.00256273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022438684,0.0010177438,0.0013002068,0.0012381197,0.007992591,0.010781139,0.002822096,0.013636874,0.0076844147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079341084,0.00036449014,0.0009617474,0.0011033928,0.019095873,0.011468651,0.0066149696,0.034352355,0.006050171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058872694,0.000030953604,0.00015904756,0.00014774335,0.000016357264,0.00011389785,0.0044488106,0.00007042754,0.00022520008,0.09760041,0.8834537,0.013674483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010303881,0.000017288023,0.00031368414,0.0003586494,0.0000066295747,0.00011107072,0.0029870742,0.00010746582,0.0001956164,0.027841914,0.9679949,0.000055434743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068091955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008281031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022438684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005139911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059511033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118668556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130425445","doi":"10.1163/157006810x531067","title":"Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03389762695376131,"score_gpt":0.3239184910439424,"score_spread":0.2900208640901811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130425445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07717939,0.0037812153,0.20967107,0.17880152,0.0020516843,0.00043915812,0.0004569251,0.00036283192,0.52725625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96719867,0.0012180755,0.0217459,0.0038339614,0.00094129174,0.00043455107,0.0001685568,0.00009546639,0.004363486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98609376,0.008939591,0.00056954526,0.0009435623,0.0027941968,0.0006593176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96506983,0.023993189,0.0020958679,0.0038043521,0.0032536534,0.0017829825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023059614,0.00087775296,0.0012065426,0.004300719,0.0048170644,0.009886929,0.002677077,0.0037838612,0.009800183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030497279,0.00079975283,0.0013145788,0.0028110943,0.05598233,0.018605608,0.008563066,0.009991435,0.00074490835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015011676,0.000014182047,0.00015853805,0.000023563272,0.000006106578,0.00002346353,0.00046455621,0.00021922214,0.000024591025,0.9969811,0.0005232733,0.0015465159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011285008,0.000004033448,0.000081329665,0.000021448743,0.000003636911,0.000009668969,0.0003385638,0.0006829186,0.000037993887,0.9973182,0.0014868869,0.0000041416083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019203146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023059614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007323309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045388737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121952415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131662226","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341259","title":"Authenticity, Sincerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Theme (computing); Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; China; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01079358009765086,"score_gpt":0.31735770463313323,"score_spread":0.3065641245354824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131662226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719787,0.0006240999,0.00074528373,0.0015085564,0.000017935268,0.000008893135,0.000011345945,0.0000022027739,0.025102884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.00007840643,0.000059098038,0.000021001975,0.000003549377,0.0000013849835,0.0000016696405,4.075449e-7,0.00033401366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991449,0.00045647367,0.00003883243,0.00008139304,0.00014910757,0.00012928451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872774,0.0005770531,0.0003199093,0.00007375907,0.00013658695,0.00016500785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014682296,0.000117902775,0.00020314148,0.001098007,0.0018444284,0.0022028363,0.0003351018,0.0003051676,0.0015571624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016465959,0.00011060886,0.000095901196,0.0013218102,0.009031816,0.0017054684,0.0016586904,0.00048217547,0.000028779674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015569695,0.00008875271,0.11637747,0.00039182208,0.000060077607,0.0018250959,0.29278964,0.0007781812,0.0041101137,0.53027314,0.0010639783,0.052086018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049069895,0.00021295687,0.46998695,0.00045483126,0.00010882802,0.0006737919,0.23086567,0.005416309,0.0022297555,0.24962358,0.040291753,0.00008654692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012913141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018651212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012913141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029943162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023746497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025675952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408854945","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341376","title":"“It Was Like That When I Came In”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Encyclopedia; Epistemology; Sociology; Identification (biology); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041982504740394506,"score_gpt":0.38736605805555874,"score_spread":0.34538355331516424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408854945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728019,0.009750099,0.019119829,0.33652475,0.0279443,0.0004276025,0.00082705484,0.0008955397,0.5372307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.368522,0.004288117,0.014666091,0.19423924,0.0022221785,0.00044086753,0.00046569423,0.0007359031,0.41441995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614245,0.0021086873,0.00009128257,0.00046224208,0.00076204626,0.00043331026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997031,0.0005043896,0.00029220645,0.0002949024,0.00099696,0.00088044524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031663657,0.00066225923,0.00048066408,0.0007301592,0.00846837,0.004456382,0.0007858,0.0019830228,0.02526192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011733962,0.00035423232,0.0005297877,0.0006322396,0.007867638,0.0053477637,0.0031076458,0.009919142,0.015351547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238652,0.00012100003,0.00612259,0.00025568114,0.000057576424,0.0011528669,0.11157395,0.00007267528,0.0013067075,0.08355134,0.7404603,0.055201486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001478726,0.000072006515,0.0022465105,0.00027372758,0.000019012658,0.0014028659,0.060820725,0.00008840775,0.00045655886,0.011486315,0.92305624,0.00006289055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073673874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014627108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02526192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022006962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002026654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08450949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580720787","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341385","title":"Buttering Bread on Both Sides","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06801696171307173,"score_gpt":0.3360379743221424,"score_spread":0.26802101260907063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580720787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009943653,0.005299629,0.0016987924,0.860575,0.0649358,0.000014701568,0.0001357423,0.00017435924,0.06617162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026055833,0.003998904,0.0017728022,0.6127679,0.02209545,0.00003784662,0.00013810329,0.000774443,0.33235884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571395,0.0012833831,0.00015673517,0.00091167586,0.00138034,0.0005540256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114484,0.0024068893,0.00044285596,0.0010016318,0.0036175768,0.0013861863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003765562,0.0007875931,0.0009893238,0.00087436143,0.0070350547,0.012018873,0.0017226681,0.008084425,0.09253931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022656731,0.00042422535,0.000773766,0.00089597324,0.008594943,0.018988276,0.007833047,0.02089249,0.036734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038420098,0.000009375117,0.00015147378,0.000043833086,0.000009907973,0.00008012064,0.0014639238,0.00002718247,0.00015741306,0.058471702,0.9291669,0.010379756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004937569,0.0000067430024,0.0001186524,0.000099299694,0.0000031636926,0.00005468235,0.0027142835,0.00003679629,0.0000876794,0.00962605,0.9872344,0.000013282806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011662406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023485651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09253931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022433365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028145006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30957484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275336053","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341346","title":"Theory, Method, and Madness in Religious Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Legitimacy; Sociology; Function (biology); Aura; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08167268275727134,"score_gpt":0.4626269002765907,"score_spread":0.38095421751931935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275336053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052303363,0.10767929,0.23268929,0.3736044,0.0071687377,0.00076438236,0.00012520616,0.00022348338,0.22544181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832783,0.024513321,0.108021535,0.022293737,0.003222216,0.0019363529,0.00006598934,0.00020893315,0.0069549102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87807375,0.11104631,0.0025475584,0.00235703,0.0048661544,0.0011092271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80094844,0.18018603,0.006139699,0.006413125,0.0034853544,0.0028273673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11228592,0.00090884167,0.0013873462,0.008698366,0.010517196,0.016839333,0.0029843068,0.004567009,0.0029265746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08135874,0.00075063825,0.000769477,0.0069277943,0.11341431,0.017783938,0.010941863,0.009407615,0.00039363524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120859895,0.000026713782,0.0011959444,0.00026351833,0.0000123539,0.000052643336,0.028321503,0.00013099483,0.000049959344,0.9592722,0.0014181164,0.009243895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030076422,0.00004943833,0.0007719445,0.0010252359,0.000009315829,0.00014306617,0.011334001,0.0004969094,0.0001365131,0.93147516,0.05449591,0.000032575652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005981787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060923076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11228592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102730375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012995789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5938318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766177670","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341427","title":"Truth-Conditions and Religious Language: Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Semantics (computer science); Grammar; Epistemology; Philosophy; Alethiology; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Logical truth; Truth value; Truth condition; Pragmatic theory of truth; Sociology; Coherence theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.025755963335930655,"score_gpt":0.32343835654619496,"score_spread":0.2976823932102643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766177670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007735706,0.26880646,0.06544604,0.075657606,0.015129183,0.00014883274,0.0013823285,0.00031397355,0.56537974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53036463,0.16654478,0.03654382,0.036262613,0.06633904,0.00072678376,0.0023343586,0.000714093,0.16016996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.00028237212,0.00003700424,0.00014834512,0.00012817768,0.00005291945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788576,0.0014827988,0.000080063306,0.00009320256,0.00036240646,0.0000957454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012280074,0.00068475516,0.00056489167,0.0022049388,0.0014888848,0.003745321,0.0009253443,0.0021828879,0.019490426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032222683,0.00044370865,0.00069230644,0.0017579652,0.006029114,0.0062046107,0.0021328016,0.0035882213,0.0023163985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011851219,0.000021035265,0.000106159154,0.00015574042,0.000006082267,0.000059626836,0.0006668871,0.0003398068,0.00017774515,0.9538453,0.033546,0.011063842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114270515,0.000017019016,0.00043490413,0.00035919098,0.000006081097,0.00010001935,0.00032208403,0.0005104605,0.00010049273,0.71237403,0.2857453,0.000019031913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038418865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026302713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019490426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037459119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001002564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06520194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769181511","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341426","title":"Why Truth Matters for the Study of Religion: A Defense of a Truth-Conditional Semantics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Falsity; Epistemology; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Truth value; Logical truth; Truth condition; Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Philosophy; Function (biology); Linguistics; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.05805603771629132,"score_gpt":0.32744133583495993,"score_spread":0.2693852981186686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769181511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06875778,0.0044780555,0.5889298,0.14369817,0.0014908514,0.00018335755,0.00046652887,0.0003198941,0.1916756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619609,0.0008679786,0.028769748,0.0036405534,0.00095118344,0.00017324857,0.00010239326,0.000115210154,0.0034188144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992415,0.004638641,0.00042184006,0.0009668542,0.0012233009,0.00033431806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97487926,0.018028634,0.0014840732,0.0027320008,0.0020858934,0.00079011795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016439985,0.0005298089,0.0011333022,0.003409409,0.0043008905,0.0074558496,0.0026427712,0.0044369507,0.0049929423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022282483,0.0006043458,0.0016602721,0.002362717,0.056272686,0.021595255,0.0062796604,0.0078000273,0.0006047134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048633683,0.0000033664057,0.000044885495,0.000013548903,0.000002719727,0.0000125048045,0.00048472546,0.00008376779,0.000026944232,0.9986588,0.00017296428,0.0004909469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049916252,0.0000027390352,0.000029912102,0.000013400132,0.0000024520073,0.000012164269,0.00011808992,0.00043389795,0.000033205335,0.9982158,0.0011304498,0.0000029352534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002034939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012382146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016439985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030423112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086943984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800458785","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341441","title":"Liberal Hermeneutics of the Spectacular in the Study of the New Testament and the Roman Empire","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Depiction; Ideology; Scholarship; Empire; New Testament; Sociology; Capitalism; Politics; State (computer science); Status quo; Literature; Philosophy; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Classics; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023718377307643118,"score_gpt":0.37264469525276495,"score_spread":0.34892631794512186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800458785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3076618,0.010814962,0.025412427,0.0667873,0.0009899852,0.00007701767,0.00008095959,0.00003902373,0.58813655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931779,0.0005462863,0.0011275158,0.00047809753,0.00010250153,0.00003045624,0.0000055493297,0.000007891988,0.0045237876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861287,0.0124349315,0.00016252494,0.00027733465,0.0007389288,0.00025748814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926388,0.0052401777,0.00072384893,0.0008016443,0.0003196457,0.00027594864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065564895,0.00019015514,0.00028750682,0.0011160951,0.0041582496,0.00641313,0.00063871,0.0009208952,0.0023549618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907513,0.00015863546,0.00014226504,0.0010145835,0.069455355,0.0030521818,0.0036555962,0.0031985631,0.00016530848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008592608,0.000013756191,0.0010783555,0.000020670941,0.0000019189072,0.000025371895,0.022506043,0.000091553484,0.000045602123,0.97222507,0.0007544496,0.003228508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021141313,0.000044169352,0.0042022876,0.0006086689,0.000007044924,0.0001691961,0.0646853,0.0014803999,0.0006230235,0.76361424,0.16451801,0.000026430827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024730172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042776177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065564895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035763648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002728629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034674466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810041381","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341447","title":"Christianity: “A Manner of Dividing the Sensible”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Abstraction; Reading (process); Hegemony; Politics; Sociology; Nothing; sort; Judaism; Epistemology; Wish; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Linguistics; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03686341055759426,"score_gpt":0.4051518542654317,"score_spread":0.3682884437078374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810041381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0772878,0.007367344,0.041331448,0.10159577,0.003494274,0.00021004668,0.00014631465,0.00017808894,0.7683889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541289,0.0008960727,0.011171977,0.007481002,0.0003781535,0.0001379198,0.000041171566,0.000087518034,0.025677243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355304,0.00508156,0.000120990975,0.0003262177,0.0005841155,0.00033397603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963852,0.0018269734,0.00026985444,0.00071436085,0.0004540611,0.00034948695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060964874,0.00035351323,0.00038215655,0.0012948748,0.007354792,0.007284148,0.0010446197,0.0017922744,0.007178615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008972733,0.00024168426,0.00024511508,0.0010116878,0.037255332,0.0056552435,0.0052069617,0.004584262,0.0006586306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016767994,0.00001315441,0.00016779087,0.00003336352,0.0000018652973,0.0000231692,0.041599955,0.000031120653,0.00012981836,0.9483741,0.0044682324,0.005140702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028268856,0.00005443781,0.00087757607,0.00043340249,0.000009397917,0.0001687675,0.07289248,0.00034141395,0.00055888307,0.46535525,0.45924512,0.000035081455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029177386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007354792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028152165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028858013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032241642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810136477","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341450","title":"Food for Thought: The Question of the Animal in Gil Anidjar’s Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Hebrew Bible; Section (typography); Christianity; Hebrew; New Testament; Philosophy; Eucharist; Literature; Old Testament; Early Christianity; Monotheism; Biblical studies; Theology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03186318786241514,"score_gpt":0.3376959774180198,"score_spread":0.30583278955560467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810136477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16320276,0.019804537,0.0066222176,0.11401815,0.0014285635,0.000030571115,0.000068551686,0.00006716157,0.6947575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728309,0.0016714017,0.0010329073,0.0033666831,0.00029735675,0.000015369857,0.000010975776,0.000025670926,0.020748695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982493,0.0012701193,0.000025361973,0.000108005035,0.00021846662,0.00012873058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980263,0.0014465146,0.00014794077,0.00012286987,0.00015184621,0.00010455852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028617503,0.00023334978,0.0002666357,0.0012063674,0.005090546,0.0042125243,0.0006770329,0.0020282867,0.0035214836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030438863,0.00015731232,0.00015344676,0.00096576236,0.044128392,0.0024953661,0.0023963924,0.002624355,0.00024858536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021029191,0.000011698515,0.00017699871,0.000060197406,0.0000024002982,0.00012435044,0.062166717,0.00005608025,0.00017688295,0.9302838,0.0040496155,0.0028703436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029906618,0.000046855064,0.0016949256,0.0005495999,0.000013769282,0.00029930854,0.08815497,0.00031522592,0.0006645373,0.4703532,0.4378495,0.000028131904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006466332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01019757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006466332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045599756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019214628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033085108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810236558","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341449","title":"Introduction: Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.022571977230417477,"score_gpt":0.31073743362866857,"score_spread":0.2881654563982511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810236558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027373985,0.13910913,0.0017973387,0.6288463,0.047818966,0.000033337845,0.00044985733,0.00013007497,0.17907758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1887265,0.080134645,0.0037654792,0.29540312,0.090264454,0.00022653695,0.0005060756,0.00071093015,0.34026238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987225,0.000685408,0.000031149713,0.00013627592,0.00034971745,0.00007498583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713755,0.0021541924,0.00010929865,0.00006777834,0.00037972536,0.00015147561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051043,0.00052248576,0.0005286139,0.0017704876,0.0037320997,0.0047306316,0.000758665,0.0033321069,0.016243152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005177232,0.00028252817,0.00030402723,0.0020559898,0.007107565,0.0039479095,0.0020991326,0.0075581674,0.0023006608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025554316,0.000011858681,0.00012723947,0.00017875322,0.0000044860617,0.00004677522,0.004040391,0.000045828143,0.00008387717,0.2401506,0.7470015,0.008283185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070781275,0.000008732823,0.0005798753,0.0006252064,0.0000046645105,0.000061366634,0.002130428,0.0000637252,0.000069857946,0.04174279,0.95469487,0.000011438361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009326119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012469778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016243152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044448883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018126166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054338753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865263030","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341451","title":"Why I am Such a Good Christian: Comments on Gil Anidjar, Blood: A Critique of Christianity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Monotheism; Judaism; Protestantism; Philosophy; Ambivalence; Confession (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Kinship; Theology; Religious studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Islam; Anthropology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029816910741182544,"score_gpt":0.3234905639794878,"score_spread":0.29367365323830524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2865263030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012945371,0.008030501,0.00045628846,0.95162797,0.0070011653,0.000017941758,0.00003010206,0.000024953104,0.01986576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4760354,0.0070570474,0.0008534338,0.47181928,0.0140765635,0.00009747752,0.000026779515,0.000188581,0.029845534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355924,0.00424338,0.00016201203,0.0005616742,0.00086228724,0.00061136985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787259,0.017233435,0.00083164236,0.0003714831,0.0017849946,0.0010525876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011511952,0.000616729,0.0008040411,0.0012476993,0.018369203,0.007560847,0.0025093332,0.0127644865,0.003583461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022502346,0.0004196873,0.00046086963,0.0014405731,0.037889794,0.005374319,0.0049101794,0.022165494,0.00056710024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007969638,0.000032165382,0.0007159095,0.00023230548,0.000015279875,0.0017102127,0.31195453,0.00013833112,0.00041087499,0.29679248,0.38217315,0.0057451185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020911111,0.000034667788,0.0012423138,0.0008036712,0.000016194199,0.00055750203,0.1970911,0.00017868806,0.00040124526,0.03471613,0.7648684,0.000069141475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026375849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035578292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026375849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010808222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004790843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07841945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988930514","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341470","title":"A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religions or Setting the Parameters for a Scientific Study of Religions In the Modern University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06861194764720867,"score_gpt":0.36642343820784623,"score_spread":0.29781149056063755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988930514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039426208,0.009618871,0.08198171,0.45150223,0.010297678,0.00033209028,0.0006501773,0.00025403465,0.40593702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307938,0.0018443104,0.018516855,0.01330728,0.0022152397,0.00034275994,0.0001069275,0.00011158642,0.032761265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850914,0.011433248,0.000634339,0.0007309435,0.001587422,0.0005226207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783361,0.013152344,0.0014953758,0.0035394107,0.002110388,0.0013663393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03450931,0.00027082674,0.00049981417,0.0010500007,0.0056747734,0.0077147475,0.000855844,0.0038873763,0.0046657426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022589896,0.00019433374,0.00031385754,0.0011527967,0.042218328,0.009542628,0.0037363237,0.006688123,0.0006162863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005004009,0.000005303711,0.000049700342,0.000012970354,6.146985e-7,0.0000058628125,0.0014982935,0.00002128549,0.000061873434,0.9952749,0.0021798038,0.00088443304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026949483,0.00003657486,0.00039697983,0.00019462768,0.000005801992,0.000046221463,0.0032255973,0.00034362604,0.00039077006,0.82403874,0.17126991,0.000024263893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028279123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029107926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009781036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18250489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024221467","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341477","title":"A Report on the Special Executive Committee Meeting of the International Association for the History of Religions in Delphi","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Delphi method; Politics; Executive committee; Executive director; Delphi; Sociology; History of religions; International relations; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Management; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06862229842747186,"score_gpt":0.29696873027631543,"score_spread":0.22834643184884357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024221467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08334913,0.0056342687,0.09513174,0.49499226,0.08534922,0.058748797,0.011880997,0.0011846453,0.16372906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31665817,0.008031726,0.110941395,0.08063299,0.02299771,0.106890514,0.010313171,0.0018113726,0.34172294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94049186,0.03772382,0.0032698456,0.0018981709,0.01162702,0.004989215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8581336,0.05075894,0.003451426,0.0051920074,0.071645826,0.010818225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.111101925,0.0010132428,0.0007808927,0.0029883517,0.006201862,0.0052131526,0.0020831907,0.0043816147,0.049806003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13533966,0.0011873551,0.0008846059,0.0020149318,0.0018150778,0.0031983184,0.006400788,0.0077247736,0.010009822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024536092,0.00024737118,0.002372204,0.00066137867,0.000023094597,0.00030707783,0.009644589,0.00061140663,0.0030529778,0.012048954,0.86814433,0.102641195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007530236,0.00028623492,0.009978678,0.0016289131,0.000017742357,0.000115650466,0.022672284,0.0019218371,0.0016386667,0.0052219722,0.956317,0.00012578942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008084524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006583385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111101925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060281116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022188796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5875702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045319486","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341503","title":"A Response to My Critics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.06257077170416289,"score_gpt":0.41328399272007965,"score_spread":0.35071322101591673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045319486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000067631816,0.00056431006,0.00010962809,0.9501195,0.048314136,0.000011190119,0.000030460165,0.00005051843,0.00073265657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012587139,0.00035606482,0.00023804409,0.97153485,0.022212759,0.00006381732,0.000019883133,0.00008827105,0.00422762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96015626,0.013781569,0.00335423,0.0046162033,0.015629428,0.0024622623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7997967,0.09295263,0.007207525,0.009946247,0.074410625,0.015686236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037287652,0.0020578993,0.0024691785,0.0030508458,0.009505761,0.01767762,0.008818842,0.065094344,0.016361034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22521389,0.0013234667,0.0032675858,0.0030986094,0.012705099,0.011268369,0.008316856,0.123984,0.018298488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113102515,0.000009928165,0.00006227185,0.00004249241,0.0000068247446,0.000055807144,0.00021171472,0.000015599724,0.00004373111,0.0012794939,0.9967514,0.0015093689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032794174,0.00003064608,0.00044541268,0.0006848154,0.000024527526,0.0002159319,0.0017525007,0.00018176752,0.00019018125,0.003620556,0.9927457,0.0000752346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006258685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058443476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065094344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009694536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011167553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19719833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135979915","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341513","title":"Religious Studies and the Spiritual Turn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Emic and etic; Sociology; Scholarship; Sociology of religion; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037756511258788546,"score_gpt":0.4166253721737679,"score_spread":0.37886886091497934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135979915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44768703,0.054489568,0.0060127527,0.17183448,0.0014242129,0.00004033071,0.00004335685,0.000020143414,0.31844816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909696,0.003606571,0.00041598524,0.0031192722,0.00025478698,0.000008254263,0.000008016421,0.0000047399612,0.0016127923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930935,0.005927433,0.000099643075,0.00014780968,0.0004913194,0.00024033787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981414,0.014239961,0.0016364121,0.0005965795,0.0008990102,0.0012140573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00659628,0.00015308755,0.00022255063,0.0019976366,0.003754256,0.0035287063,0.0005036809,0.0009922099,0.003547557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009506641,0.00009580258,0.00017481833,0.001122792,0.021213911,0.003697045,0.005435992,0.0021839172,0.00014413666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030591746,0.00006701232,0.009962997,0.00022574404,0.000014457259,0.00020197582,0.11230483,0.00013141563,0.0002500995,0.83439887,0.0053478014,0.037064165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028225431,0.000117409305,0.022458363,0.0022738508,0.000017401244,0.00044312552,0.23741834,0.0005189642,0.0003687397,0.43907943,0.29724377,0.000032434677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015381355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030020087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00659628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021488327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014285689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03488487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211766733","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341528","title":"“So Many Mothers, So Little Love”: Discourse of Motherly Love and Parental Governance in 2019 Hong Kong Protests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Nationalism; Politics; Wife; Sociology; Gender studies; China; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.017269312014942615,"score_gpt":0.36395923399615776,"score_spread":0.3466899219812151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211766733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574892,0.0011422975,0.0003657542,0.01060192,0.00019825259,0.000021305766,0.000020602163,0.000009873192,0.030150734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958547,0.00030176947,0.00004926181,0.00047628122,0.000020048466,0.000008721677,0.0000053558183,0.0000037206314,0.0032801158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997689,0.0016024092,0.000059493643,0.000121304074,0.00013593448,0.00039182595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.0017205707,0.0004030375,0.00014711368,0.0002813183,0.0005029103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299445,0.0004947051,0.00032782456,0.00072135206,0.012869162,0.005764,0.00063609483,0.0012884389,0.0022234693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003336636,0.00035119997,0.00018052493,0.00067674037,0.016531674,0.0026226232,0.0035731904,0.0026198481,0.00015514264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019494677,0.000017473383,0.004066486,0.000027590817,0.0000047039603,0.0005784505,0.980206,0.00003620486,0.00017902216,0.011396891,0.0015773553,0.001890329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037769667,0.000020910345,0.0048867916,0.00010274908,0.0000059848844,0.00010155657,0.9606349,0.00009632712,0.0002483434,0.00058745977,0.03329867,0.000012511981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092956476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12012904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092956476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013645676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006073885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18483084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205290179","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03401-02000","title":"Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.023920624358781846,"score_gpt":0.35227683801875115,"score_spread":0.3283562136599693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205290179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031758015,0.0003799435,0.00049772573,0.002459307,0.0010629516,0.00004262886,0.0011972915,0.00031719488,0.99372536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016056234,0.0003455431,0.00041629546,0.00081127475,0.00026788068,0.000027159816,0.0004691977,0.00021197433,0.995845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936503,0.00009715967,0.00003224905,0.00020694586,0.00019995694,0.00009873753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981273,0.0007457423,0.0001031122,0.00019221871,0.0004033977,0.00042819456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051706,0.0015457269,0.0009626294,0.0018466638,0.002526352,0.00852481,0.0011977969,0.0064114346,0.9447961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034912042,0.0006189269,0.00058304035,0.0015336068,0.002119854,0.005062654,0.002405219,0.0025093427,0.8829036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058667036,0.00008785465,0.0004988993,0.00034928406,0.000009869906,0.00013609997,0.00021405223,0.00008771718,0.0005813955,0.050700746,0.77295667,0.17431879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015577842,0.000016134318,0.00046831818,0.00021679577,0.000002889327,0.00009436845,0.00015991282,0.00007523156,0.00011353974,0.00369702,0.99513406,0.000006048258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046065366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071297577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055203915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016745651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019619658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210377738","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10074","title":"‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Ideology; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Theology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03815193887266696,"score_gpt":0.40221838824082795,"score_spread":0.364066449368161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210377738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010440227,0.03463723,0.0006982882,0.9232437,0.0045343204,0.000014184266,0.00006278489,0.000014323625,0.026354995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5210955,0.055133197,0.0022285348,0.37334582,0.029762246,0.000131399,0.000110200126,0.00008293153,0.018110165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963432,0.002388454,0.00018589584,0.00023634941,0.00055471313,0.00029141983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355246,0.012800517,0.0005076435,0.00045476915,0.0018887111,0.0007958045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070194826,0.00021791852,0.0004908913,0.0016087581,0.003843088,0.0069446834,0.0018502031,0.0066450867,0.005257345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015449025,0.00015361042,0.0002957887,0.0016800498,0.018524002,0.006511592,0.003839661,0.00865606,0.000714207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059685917,0.000059489463,0.0018423995,0.00056166085,0.000009336616,0.0008640429,0.03272921,0.00006964826,0.00029763798,0.7804069,0.11164466,0.071455255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021217555,0.00008064792,0.006073331,0.0031717771,0.000011626904,0.0018454854,0.04955642,0.00032392595,0.00032292874,0.2413653,0.69716346,0.00006395164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068962905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007980275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070194826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025162965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025683395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037122965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230029655","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341334","title":"Liminal Contradictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Liminality; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Point (geometry); Lineage (genetic); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0951801864645066,"score_gpt":0.3430971898811793,"score_spread":0.24791700341667272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230029655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016074829,0.0030051544,0.026047947,0.03693901,0.0014264487,0.00007688038,0.00017731111,0.00013166368,0.91612065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88154024,0.002555336,0.015331212,0.016691465,0.0009709467,0.00028209604,0.0003012501,0.00027113495,0.08205648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914169,0.0047088815,0.0003391104,0.0013351642,0.0014165929,0.00078339386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926823,0.0032641971,0.00043711058,0.0017192254,0.0015309631,0.0003662314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080968235,0.00060155324,0.00070589146,0.0022623988,0.008421957,0.008448803,0.002190409,0.0034076676,0.020333208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018254282,0.00036291877,0.00071284024,0.0017673429,0.031612854,0.010267104,0.007562686,0.0056005134,0.0038079093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008645543,0.0000049077566,0.00005580686,0.000021083986,0.0000028540712,0.00006317543,0.004291861,0.000024787061,0.000052873667,0.99121326,0.0026188549,0.0016418347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013646393,0.0000072624557,0.00020831688,0.0001516898,0.000009548885,0.00021501197,0.007322457,0.00023219555,0.0003058324,0.7527619,0.23876078,0.000011337506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002329096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002720032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020333208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006015804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025527803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06802136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236653169","doi":"10.1163/157006800x00283","title":"Reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Psychoanalysis; Haven; Sociology; Psychology; Classics; Art history; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.043465186837383284,"score_gpt":0.4369781548626095,"score_spread":0.39351296802522623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236653169","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017775813,0.8599989,0.0006581823,0.010741498,0.03992112,0.00027159217,0.002492624,0.00038311302,0.085355245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017394144,0.8523872,0.0011378771,0.016305981,0.021190654,0.0003354934,0.0038841,0.00021311353,0.102806084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979645,0.0003037627,0.0002929381,0.00027219503,0.0010234452,0.00014317718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945674,0.0012921443,0.00056985905,0.00033380644,0.002815939,0.00042091083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013700423,0.0015651807,0.002072413,0.004943546,0.000613023,0.003772674,0.002742445,0.0022710986,0.19312465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00807693,0.0005526235,0.0011808971,0.004527108,0.00068454514,0.0027284718,0.0015682492,0.0024707254,0.16110092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003948671,0.000024102523,0.00004258012,0.008951397,0.000035756548,0.00011619311,0.000043568594,0.00005530988,0.00022598465,0.0010884549,0.82958436,0.15979266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074711957,0.000009027526,0.00010090445,0.0031316418,0.000018060953,0.00015966599,0.00002193399,0.0000042808974,0.000029914867,0.0003240316,0.9961882,0.000004814391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029867128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043891096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80687535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002044994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050046206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255681613","doi":"10.1163/157006801x00354","title":"Reviews","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.05220494157956687,"score_gpt":0.3919005978075737,"score_spread":0.3396956562280068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255681613","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005078628,0.5350003,0.0032240988,0.025266686,0.039817292,0.00028098893,0.0033027842,0.00088502,0.39171502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004107163,0.36072746,0.0040487,0.016745744,0.013882474,0.00022902472,0.0044577173,0.00047057765,0.5953311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.00019261026,0.000077241304,0.00016204319,0.0005760393,0.000091732174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734807,0.000629098,0.00017232887,0.00035375307,0.0012184555,0.00027838437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012641955,0.0007144286,0.0008690084,0.0034747086,0.00075663865,0.003227544,0.0020681296,0.0019398303,0.28504193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050653857,0.0004344147,0.000637973,0.0029062224,0.0008649749,0.0026690403,0.001376355,0.0019409742,0.21210755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027045047,0.000022670976,0.00008585845,0.0010772252,0.0000121167095,0.000046357596,0.00004968746,0.000033796252,0.00026853385,0.0051320596,0.810778,0.18246652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003167397,0.000004391255,0.000121917736,0.00035321547,0.0000039000356,0.000065193046,0.000017898192,0.000004165836,0.000041637526,0.0005924521,0.9987897,0.0000024344986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037220465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006936457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7149581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015634923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002957609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286213261","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10085","title":"“‘Cause Even Though Perfect It’s Not/ It’s the Best Thing This World’s Got” – or Not?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Literacy; Sociology; Assimilation (phonology); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.07842477565232847,"score_gpt":0.42233203118637486,"score_spread":0.3439072555340464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286213261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005734859,0.0022800427,0.008806597,0.92253774,0.012024198,0.000033092194,0.0001381732,0.0000992468,0.04834618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4022544,0.0032400358,0.0064422106,0.47432584,0.013862267,0.00016791836,0.00027629087,0.00037245473,0.09905865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310815,0.004336073,0.00032134287,0.00072947063,0.0010507557,0.00045418626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848551,0.008780177,0.0010774978,0.0009595206,0.0035946097,0.00073305034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006058245,0.0004932496,0.0006074897,0.00056572683,0.004135221,0.005581693,0.0017032763,0.0076980144,0.015495005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02759846,0.0002265296,0.00047344682,0.00068301265,0.015991159,0.0075804116,0.0030310825,0.012040618,0.0041688685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006827612,0.000029739005,0.001093469,0.00017708413,0.000015503763,0.00028237965,0.015240501,0.00014705662,0.00035832069,0.5174773,0.45264548,0.012464853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793631,0.000040161292,0.0016781153,0.00040067945,0.0000118406515,0.00048519153,0.02507307,0.0005630296,0.0007859533,0.16216525,0.80871904,0.0000628364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059818327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006151703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015495005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033146685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024051527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051835954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313551326","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03501000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03161808959572699,"score_gpt":0.36596954345870397,"score_spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313551326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033366034,0.00038058407,0.0004984929,0.0025900358,0.0010808718,0.000042079453,0.0011457101,0.00031791744,0.9936107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017394084,0.0003421445,0.00041801354,0.0008301756,0.0002849095,0.00002662324,0.00044329962,0.00021328665,0.9957022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.00010112229,0.00003344392,0.00021049018,0.00020109821,0.00010142952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799997,0.0007963626,0.000111324196,0.00020771853,0.00043766102,0.00044686315],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010891733,0.0015500807,0.00095786236,0.0018155419,0.0025457176,0.0086641535,0.0011954005,0.0064997165,0.9436564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036367609,0.0006244408,0.00058910216,0.0015349063,0.0021937473,0.004996364,0.0024086642,0.0025706762,0.8796192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064845226,0.00009380384,0.0005235128,0.00034084052,0.000010516835,0.00014430568,0.00022371186,0.0000921234,0.00058148644,0.052711308,0.7704147,0.17479892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001753913,0.000017004844,0.0005053792,0.0002220238,0.0000032722303,0.0001017827,0.00017450149,0.00008337144,0.0001211207,0.0039613238,0.99478614,0.000006462595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049340436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073927096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056343615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017081382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020412402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08036733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313897458","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10097","title":"Burton Mack’s Challenge to the Study of Religion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Christianity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.0671163401100917,"score_gpt":0.33238995427617224,"score_spread":0.26527361416608053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313897458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031994894,0.04513258,0.005749168,0.7998458,0.004332327,0.00005227213,0.00009987387,0.000042715055,0.1127503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774299,0.014450624,0.0085860705,0.050823126,0.005124401,0.00032129927,0.000041355637,0.000096405405,0.043126784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940824,0.004848091,0.00009087548,0.00035192826,0.00044498255,0.00018171915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861196,0.011637537,0.00048107016,0.00044906442,0.00063228246,0.00068038126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057218503,0.0004051802,0.0005156541,0.0015264468,0.005709856,0.0052523273,0.0012531219,0.0027952099,0.004403555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011895289,0.00032380671,0.00024065642,0.0010932294,0.026139203,0.0057493225,0.0034082117,0.006600863,0.0005166319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036975405,0.00002896827,0.00052929256,0.00025707931,0.000009423717,0.0001861814,0.02819283,0.00012993552,0.00026518857,0.8624551,0.09446879,0.013440206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023837965,0.00003450213,0.0011547786,0.000855485,0.000007728316,0.00023538561,0.02105313,0.0004043646,0.00031668044,0.44430685,0.5315778,0.000029438317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00569911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061365888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057218503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004026241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025200779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030260384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389257859","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10119","title":"Debating Critical Religion: A Response to Timothy Fitzgerald","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Critical thought; Critical theory; Religious studies","score_opus":0.04388446427959898,"score_gpt":0.45123087138312157,"score_spread":0.4073464071035226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389257859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017403359,0.0028552613,0.00027150742,0.9917754,0.004529692,0.000005207027,0.0000064022242,0.0000083878185,0.00037416408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070403377,0.0037257185,0.0012768955,0.9755805,0.009384924,0.00009898403,0.000012916103,0.000098491924,0.0027812459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95969415,0.02600848,0.0017898316,0.0043841917,0.006534609,0.0015887388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7265081,0.23431292,0.004345291,0.0041234894,0.021909034,0.008801161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054944567,0.0018255771,0.002915255,0.0030480393,0.020032,0.014445184,0.0060054855,0.0421679,0.0068970937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15926561,0.0012681035,0.0017586389,0.0029414839,0.039916202,0.029763386,0.010957717,0.078566715,0.0023051316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054389053,0.00005601647,0.000281343,0.00016839505,0.000022575037,0.0002081173,0.011520293,0.00008225686,0.00013087683,0.038266927,0.9397758,0.009433144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091768656,0.000038918446,0.0005342499,0.0014831148,0.000031352505,0.00051519513,0.024806147,0.00045474272,0.00040924715,0.061613087,0.9098291,0.00019309761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020112727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022384929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054944567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014102159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017739048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29057807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389762157","doi":"10.1163/15700682-03601000","title":"Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Philosophy; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03161808959572699,"score_gpt":0.36596954345870397,"score_spread":0.334351453862977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389762157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033366034,0.00038058407,0.0004984929,0.0025900358,0.0010808718,0.000042079453,0.0011457101,0.00031791744,0.9936107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017394084,0.0003421445,0.00041801354,0.0008301756,0.0002849095,0.00002662324,0.00044329962,0.00021328665,0.9957022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.00010112229,0.00003344392,0.00021049018,0.00020109821,0.00010142952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799997,0.0007963626,0.000111324196,0.00020771853,0.00043766102,0.00044686315],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010891733,0.0015500807,0.00095786236,0.0018155419,0.0025457176,0.0086641535,0.0011954005,0.0064997165,0.9436564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036367609,0.0006244408,0.00058910216,0.0015349063,0.0021937473,0.004996364,0.0024086642,0.0025706762,0.8796192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064845226,0.00009380384,0.0005235128,0.00034084052,0.000010516835,0.00014430568,0.00022371186,0.0000921234,0.00058148644,0.052711308,0.7704147,0.17479892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001753913,0.000017004844,0.0005053792,0.0002220238,0.0000032722303,0.0001017827,0.00017450149,0.00008337144,0.0001211207,0.0039613238,0.99478614,0.000006462595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049340436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073927096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056343615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017081382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020412402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08036733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177146","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10128","title":"Critical Religion Takes a Punch: Notes on a Scholarly Skirmish","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; The Imaginary; Racism; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.048776018876356436,"score_gpt":0.43330164448491615,"score_spread":0.38452562560855974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050661694,0.011937236,0.0011465588,0.94859517,0.014551103,0.000017586042,0.000016442502,0.000025373747,0.018644368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3752694,0.01342022,0.00240163,0.5424161,0.032258783,0.00022662092,0.000031486863,0.0002700085,0.033705734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762264,0.016469216,0.00066050707,0.0014052276,0.003929199,0.0013094184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92969227,0.05951242,0.0014778068,0.002106641,0.005002668,0.0022082017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030805998,0.0006174425,0.00089445966,0.002926345,0.023569524,0.014419059,0.0037971602,0.021248182,0.0040541803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061334703,0.0004248976,0.0008210803,0.0023102148,0.070926525,0.01922295,0.012761644,0.035135444,0.00075884897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033615463,0.00003716013,0.00016380346,0.0001541038,0.000008318126,0.00043206927,0.07299853,0.00006373645,0.00012706709,0.67408293,0.24226286,0.009635842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019033341,0.000021282895,0.00020610244,0.0010871671,0.000007978841,0.00019638243,0.06439493,0.00019433956,0.00033255873,0.16409752,0.76940435,0.000038358674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011063481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012855013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030805998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008958565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16291958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411704941","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10147","title":"What’s Alternative about Alternative Rationality in CAS-E’s Definition of ‘Esotericism’?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0617077405977734,"score_gpt":0.36244989997097793,"score_spread":0.30074215937320453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411704941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0400012,0.0092467265,0.13650648,0.1494507,0.0032229242,0.00016503212,0.0001791043,0.00019374992,0.6610342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95038366,0.0014969308,0.024848802,0.008125344,0.0005939002,0.00030227154,0.00009389565,0.00013319045,0.0140220085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822337,0.0117899,0.00075820996,0.0015713847,0.0026194814,0.0010273472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855934,0.008586099,0.00085347163,0.0019457955,0.0024362407,0.00058503303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013925722,0.0007691317,0.0010874699,0.0035838492,0.0045991456,0.012428395,0.0028184338,0.005230608,0.0051981835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01870128,0.00023913082,0.0009740323,0.0027499867,0.06355862,0.01427231,0.0064249933,0.007872047,0.0007472966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005460165,0.0000031651896,0.000058932907,0.000018694818,0.0000020632394,0.000016578018,0.0029820066,0.00003338361,0.0000169279,0.9952089,0.00065921363,0.0009945816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015491318,0.000011586714,0.00017425722,0.00018805884,0.0000072647485,0.000093222734,0.00861413,0.0005388143,0.00018486484,0.9096761,0.08047484,0.000021370292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003421244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036578316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013925722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043481356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07364708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415406178","doi":"10.1163/15700682-bja10162","title":"Putting the Persian Back in “Magic”: Problems with Ignoring Ancient Ethnographic Discourses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Persian; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Ancient literature","score_opus":0.032462848227863314,"score_gpt":0.2997829247429666,"score_spread":0.26732007651510326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415406178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6172312,0.014226209,0.08587508,0.07893537,0.0026706718,0.001083437,0.0004246776,0.00024989707,0.19930342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98238593,0.0017417414,0.0065256623,0.00558207,0.00035742062,0.000549919,0.000052394003,0.00009740029,0.0027074893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8835731,0.10438548,0.0027332427,0.0031733788,0.004799184,0.0013356137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83750707,0.13869998,0.00577793,0.009339894,0.007667983,0.0010070831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11863369,0.0009415523,0.0009466332,0.009146154,0.014926262,0.012676147,0.0038487967,0.0024024576,0.005464144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14302921,0.0008923231,0.0003137211,0.008736707,0.06053389,0.014731147,0.011546286,0.0031052774,0.0006443218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034785648,0.000012471334,0.0017678579,0.00028579737,0.000013748763,0.0001871945,0.9074108,0.000057666428,0.00017528185,0.07412373,0.0020238739,0.013906758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017937266,0.000016483142,0.0013410872,0.0015358418,0.000018351167,0.00027085896,0.9195454,0.00023260423,0.00048904144,0.029926483,0.046592556,0.000013376772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017269107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027046356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11863369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008304775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005227309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6274024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633722913","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341340","title":"Documenting the Delusion: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delusion; Credibility; Deception; Naturalism; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09274885937243119,"score_gpt":0.36892873747167343,"score_spread":0.27617987809924227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W633722913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95698315,0.002341536,0.0066548735,0.011127856,0.00036320603,0.001305021,0.00026655896,0.000071856215,0.020885872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727395,0.0036904106,0.0070035933,0.003128487,0.00017203856,0.0006046726,0.00010477074,0.00007043668,0.012486118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047744,0.0064244443,0.00038615597,0.0005062746,0.0011474594,0.0010582444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98104787,0.0132839335,0.0017041455,0.0008726509,0.0009187429,0.002172517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008835892,0.0014122629,0.0010420713,0.0031062593,0.020342475,0.0059804805,0.0033781854,0.009788991,0.0040831515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024786666,0.0011675629,0.0010348093,0.002638332,0.009972431,0.0044758823,0.007639697,0.0095045,0.001057761],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028421136,0.0045463634,0.020377187,0.0006348124,0.000051249728,0.270269,0.6429175,0.00048267483,0.0017318415,0.019219013,0.00837725,0.031108776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012299573,0.0010736425,0.007045425,0.0009280181,0.00006148095,0.13954318,0.802579,0.0011703112,0.0018616177,0.005037033,0.04042818,0.00014908623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009170393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024049686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020342475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057126773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035251735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046729267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W764916438","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341332","title":"The Public Nature of Critical Discourses on “Religion”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Religious studies; Sociology; Public discourse; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04413669585574895,"score_gpt":0.4485937896349546,"score_spread":0.4044570937792057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W764916438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029234374,0.5955441,0.0021181772,0.30288738,0.012762192,0.00001488488,0.00006362021,0.000024771738,0.083661355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.342041,0.53031397,0.0014348568,0.056192964,0.04885916,0.00013284787,0.00011522918,0.00015346325,0.02075654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932541,0.004572852,0.00014532638,0.0003868989,0.001320424,0.00032041752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96835804,0.026558518,0.001142354,0.000873789,0.0025612772,0.0005059423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010003747,0.0006006065,0.0007961288,0.0045109936,0.0039721434,0.008694621,0.0013139128,0.0040800674,0.0049800696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023168698,0.0003402071,0.0004962573,0.0042450065,0.02812741,0.014097149,0.002900655,0.006381965,0.0010007899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002837515,0.00002101932,0.00015225925,0.0013320167,0.00003114303,0.00010838382,0.014427638,0.00016878269,0.00019203607,0.7891442,0.14953318,0.044861022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016530692,0.000013940073,0.0007601788,0.0035788936,0.000019876883,0.0001185875,0.007768771,0.0000969166,0.00017730678,0.26310885,0.72431743,0.000022759812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004344275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049493597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010003747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069132145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050400835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0529055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W820096865","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341330","title":"Clarifications: A Rejoinder","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1154943075222061,"score_gpt":0.3383368118532866,"score_spread":0.22284250433108052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W820096865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028484353,0.0045962934,0.0014898843,0.8269661,0.16194545,0.000027173817,0.00004235297,0.000104870895,0.0045429766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01037705,0.002924437,0.0029632736,0.7826301,0.17078364,0.00023631891,0.00005419827,0.00045686922,0.029574128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96048623,0.018728115,0.0027527101,0.0058429106,0.010743038,0.0014469826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8863073,0.07447192,0.0039863326,0.007080436,0.02392556,0.0042284015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622004,0.0024239284,0.0022126534,0.0029406238,0.011872773,0.014703489,0.007850397,0.030008866,0.011819017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1649381,0.0009536544,0.0023341686,0.0022202844,0.020362802,0.020935178,0.012580162,0.058448207,0.007665472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047907935,0.000015562793,0.000089183435,0.00010163809,0.000015816557,0.00015977494,0.002258084,0.000079832054,0.00011960783,0.05194186,0.9384636,0.0067071677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016857806,0.000017593371,0.00016356834,0.00033533713,0.000011904338,0.00017274002,0.002364163,0.00017548671,0.00013568776,0.036871657,0.9596825,0.00005257512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075735743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007969045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03622004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067876237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059956787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19155216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847888219","doi":"10.1163/15700682-12341328","title":"The Future of Religious History in Habermas’s Critical Theory of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Method & Theory in the Study of Religion","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Sociology; Intellectual history; Christianity; Political history; Epistemology; Identity (music); History of religions; Critical theory; Conceptual history; Religious studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04884210258477259,"score_gpt":0.3804293564707374,"score_spread":0.33158725388596477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847888219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100272916,0.039503083,0.089554824,0.27516532,0.0035949918,0.00023990507,0.00015375523,0.00012658215,0.49138868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96833,0.0034213054,0.009512408,0.005652246,0.00090590835,0.00015130875,0.000023128656,0.000029158113,0.011974504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684143,0.0023939607,0.000059894235,0.00023222565,0.00027630155,0.00019615318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973361,0.0018343893,0.00022979944,0.00016262587,0.00021197976,0.00022501798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072095627,0.0004398132,0.00043677926,0.0030449023,0.0046810918,0.005853181,0.0012093374,0.0026252724,0.0024606604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046016546,0.00026978095,0.0004068844,0.001676288,0.051115524,0.012271246,0.0029862428,0.0037367635,0.0002728764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337092,0.0000049575433,0.00005517961,0.0000101994765,7.762309e-7,0.000015260977,0.0025658677,0.0000648018,0.000011801657,0.9956032,0.000618511,0.0010440733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007865421,0.0000055469545,0.00007080472,0.000039417522,0.0000013277721,0.000016709428,0.0012889102,0.00018399357,0.000030661093,0.9792332,0.019116849,0.0000046775926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033028775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034804263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072095627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071351845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035882264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051769614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}