{"meta":{"query_hash":"135a5b3a90ed","filters":{"venue":"Metroeconomica"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/135a5b3a90ed","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Metroeconomica"},"results":[{"id":"W1499831120","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-999x.2011.04134.x","title":"MODELING MONETARY MACROECONOMICS: KALECKI RECONSIDERED","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business cycle; Macroeconomics; Investment (military); Monetary economics; General equilibrium theory; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.08239227734719068,"score_gpt":0.218391557506857,"score_spread":0.1359992801596663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499831120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16209897,0.056892443,0.51697284,0.054000165,0.0022880966,0.00008980723,0.0010264679,0.00038551033,0.20624578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411189,0.012708139,0.028327001,0.0006514436,0.000936115,0.00009193037,0.000091137226,0.00008104467,0.01599432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960667,0.00018899461,0.000021557602,0.00007005223,0.00006496231,0.000047818598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923384,0.00043797484,0.000104745755,0.00007498101,0.00006258151,0.0000859396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135131,0.0004921249,0.0009588841,0.00068752415,0.0007751782,0.0035311296,0.0009803833,0.0014181837,0.0033880472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038537413,0.00039918988,0.00067019754,0.0009821234,0.0019555804,0.004274633,0.0019288054,0.0022674806,0.000564724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021842785,0.000025146692,0.0009102536,0.000052318173,0.00003446326,0.00009416984,0.00016190892,0.11399928,0.000262482,0.8756259,0.002037407,0.0067748833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001091686,0.000011761331,0.00032074552,0.000038157043,0.000014204052,0.000036717425,0.00006498536,0.20949402,0.00006250993,0.78140414,0.008524301,0.000017498947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047978917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033775384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047978917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016370136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009883478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011877418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946584430","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-999x.2010.04106.x","title":"HARRODIAN INSTABILITY AND THE ‘NORMAL RATE’ OF CAPACITY UTILIZATION IN KALECKIAN MODELS OF DISTRIBUTION AND GROWTH—A SURVEY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Instability; Position (finance); Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Mechanics; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04818060737127678,"score_gpt":0.22392581919309093,"score_spread":0.17574521182181416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946584430","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1510127,0.09853478,0.4549778,0.039396048,0.00084487913,0.00006944506,0.0003370091,0.00034344126,0.25448388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369779,0.03886772,0.013410296,0.00069164444,0.0008707624,0.000049888862,0.00007152119,0.00007145049,0.008988791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.00041741988,0.000053670967,0.00012426336,0.00022437244,0.00011103683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.001480022,0.00022633701,0.0002388321,0.00022488512,0.00012691876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026470153,0.0004943798,0.0008923103,0.0020762852,0.0010514952,0.0048838784,0.0012022565,0.001842084,0.003007514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005144973,0.00044766412,0.00058577355,0.0033896463,0.0053448705,0.008537087,0.0014694212,0.0027700975,0.00046418695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049328924,0.000007785146,0.00023535389,0.00002988034,0.0000043511786,0.000018805222,0.000093895644,0.0042895866,0.000031400603,0.99101263,0.00069275,0.0035786447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028412671,0.00000756736,0.00015555575,0.000026723821,0.0000032428488,0.000044782842,0.00007515574,0.012734878,0.000066741195,0.97615224,0.010717407,0.0000128585625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043494217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015383938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048838784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004560465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001812312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033088684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039675104","doi":"10.1111/1467-999x.00086","title":"The Production Responses of the Competitive Firm to Three Conventional Distributional Shifts: a Unified Perspective","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Economics; Production (economics); Downside risk; Marginal cost; Rothschild; Marginal utility; Microeconomics; Perspective (graphical); Distribution (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Order (exchange); Stochastic dominance; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.022276341665714114,"score_gpt":0.22743635974863072,"score_spread":0.20516001808291662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039675104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30481037,0.0013081878,0.5740048,0.005049883,0.0001756801,0.00010166829,0.00017300165,0.00014595539,0.114230454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561907,0.00040231948,0.009852623,0.00017645162,0.00008934999,0.00004612459,0.000026406366,0.000017633833,0.0037700175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890184,0.00043431376,0.000050769235,0.00019613691,0.0002533134,0.00016365378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802077,0.000928271,0.0003307593,0.0002840402,0.00026477932,0.00017138143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018208572,0.00060654146,0.00049735425,0.00067942904,0.00045598065,0.0023764784,0.0007963941,0.0014838864,0.004766843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048541594,0.0003325244,0.0005761074,0.00036713132,0.0027640946,0.002471225,0.0018722962,0.001440368,0.00039380847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100721925,0.000044438373,0.0009655847,0.000087445325,0.000019622592,0.00039057876,0.00044999947,0.047088806,0.011205984,0.9188925,0.0007825108,0.019971794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024466714,0.00012546318,0.0022479193,0.000029172275,0.000017858285,0.00026180112,0.00046033564,0.0827186,0.003912224,0.9048781,0.005271813,0.000052320393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040221636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017249638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004766843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012258313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005330617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015946686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140849362","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-999x.2006.00238.x","title":"A POST‐KEYNESIAN AMENDMENT TO THE NEW CONSENSUS ON MONETARY POLICY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monetary policy; New Keynesian economics; Inflation (cosmology); Keynesian economics; Interest rate; Fiscal policy; Nominal interest rate; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Doctrine; Inflation targeting; Real interest rate; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014973410941206149,"score_gpt":0.22125294523460282,"score_spread":0.20627953429339665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140849362","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105612636,0.001882704,0.4514026,0.04594716,0.007932378,0.00014205764,0.0007656017,0.00034161532,0.38597316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463875,0.0006590358,0.028254846,0.0026256768,0.0012487221,0.0001373303,0.00012810067,0.0000806809,0.020478081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681795,0.0011490653,0.000232424,0.0006937956,0.00077198166,0.00033465898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953283,0.001322873,0.0004844007,0.0014628291,0.0011793297,0.00022225056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049247695,0.000414311,0.0007642359,0.0006985425,0.0015965778,0.0035932492,0.0010917479,0.002531269,0.008616476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012140923,0.00030760258,0.0010342116,0.000793579,0.005954362,0.0038807476,0.0026394401,0.004989785,0.001801508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015136881,0.00000396401,0.000030305811,0.0000078633575,0.00000343029,0.000018758054,0.00004507941,0.0010666212,0.00012747536,0.99592566,0.0010472895,0.0017084983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019630905,0.000011022731,0.00005039747,0.000010215926,0.000003482639,0.000018581188,0.000019689893,0.0027173785,0.00016282951,0.9882321,0.0087471455,0.000007563756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012623589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070560933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008616476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024570194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001754334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028824985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147203282","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-999x.2009.04082.x","title":"A STUDY OF THE DIVERSIFICATION OF CHINA'S FOREIGN RESERVES WITHIN A THREE‐COUNTRY STOCK‐FLOW CONSISTENT MODEL","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Economics; China; Portfolio; Imperfect; Stock (firearms); Foreign-exchange reserves; Exchange rate; Monetary economics; Financial economics; International economics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.048013025931919064,"score_gpt":0.23698541974883466,"score_spread":0.1889723938169156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147203282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96194947,0.000278046,0.026034754,0.0010416196,0.00003586187,0.000040297753,0.00033876117,0.00007251022,0.010208641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964774,0.00013669547,0.0015238696,0.0000473363,0.0000085942465,0.000027543269,0.00008799149,0.000011344536,0.0016792638],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999828,0.0000891342,0.0000061178625,0.0000244347,0.000013704298,0.00003866225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989826,0.00051546254,0.00018047089,0.000054362856,0.00010695197,0.00016020794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009593954,0.00046529112,0.0008615888,0.0005807597,0.00068872684,0.0015684882,0.0012928267,0.0013262591,0.003434771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002214542,0.0003735559,0.0010450244,0.0006046506,0.00093981903,0.00106467,0.0008308356,0.0011001964,0.00012591647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004158575,0.00003397692,0.0019447459,0.000010741104,0.00003435099,0.00014427425,0.00003512407,0.9802024,0.00022807081,0.016548827,0.00022363265,0.00055237557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029761371,0.000022950326,0.0004907209,0.000004451938,0.000014231915,0.000008126674,0.0000216732,0.9962431,0.000050968534,0.0029745142,0.00013326932,0.000006270035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050978377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013282204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050978377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016486872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018383275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10136324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157076856","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-999x.2005.00214.x","title":"THE DEMAND FOR A RISKY ASSET: SIGNING, JOINTLY AND SEPARATELY, THE EFFECTS OF THREE DISTRIBUTIONAL SHIFTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Downside risk; Economics; Econometrics; Comparative statics; Property (philosophy); Asset (computer security); Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0151083219407891,"score_gpt":0.2198841529450949,"score_spread":0.2047758310043058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157076856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97576267,0.000051751333,0.018565198,0.00035876496,0.0000047221856,0.0000066302377,0.000051758736,0.000010785817,0.0051876702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980457,0.000022927325,0.0012829758,0.000017506032,0.0000034061466,0.0000034530149,0.00001372151,0.0000014892305,0.00060883426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997522,0.00009273322,0.000013692052,0.000059173384,0.000038240276,0.000043852397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839526,0.00082699285,0.0003418768,0.00016488969,0.00010651502,0.00016448135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080114405,0.0001632664,0.00026838636,0.00012965036,0.00017099535,0.00077057176,0.00033516093,0.0007930211,0.0024192226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034752735,0.0002129706,0.00022266059,0.00013940551,0.00077336945,0.0010130806,0.00074482744,0.00066261407,0.00018670742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019110666,0.0005023223,0.18558176,0.00027825154,0.0003258819,0.00270618,0.0020613603,0.2176491,0.13415332,0.37707624,0.0009964067,0.076758094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119370095,0.0010592891,0.16184413,0.000048875478,0.00020413124,0.0019536894,0.0014021689,0.46513703,0.023408074,0.34126642,0.0034108676,0.00014592902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008287715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007484765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024192226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041633513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023854809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008093119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179085457","doi":"10.1111/meca.12109","title":"Convergence Towards the Normal Rate of Capacity Utilization in Neo‐<scp>K</scp>aleckian Models: The Role of Non‐Capacity Creating Autonomous Expenditures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Safeguarding; Convergence (economics); Growth model; Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Capacity utilization; Instability; Simple (philosophy); Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Physics; Mechanics","score_opus":0.08371822106320857,"score_gpt":0.2457288252780822,"score_spread":0.16201060421487362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179085457","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39082575,0.0012932835,0.4735429,0.0070363004,0.00016414476,0.00007898445,0.00041540054,0.00031063173,0.12633261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773383,0.0005930731,0.008779454,0.00014306548,0.000047596917,0.00005458596,0.000057204663,0.00006214626,0.012924607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995018,0.00018438131,0.000017117796,0.000086610846,0.00007988893,0.00013021372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829465,0.0007190048,0.0003784409,0.00016628223,0.00021299506,0.00022864288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015402472,0.0005946134,0.0007350491,0.0009085365,0.0007533632,0.0034256345,0.0012673965,0.0011449624,0.005288413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054764743,0.00036543148,0.0010873791,0.00077322795,0.0026250328,0.0034325845,0.0019357438,0.0019174607,0.00055904285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002162134,0.000015965916,0.00041434224,0.00002302673,0.000009743894,0.00006431437,0.0001103439,0.060491793,0.00022972148,0.936082,0.0009784467,0.0015586939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015901176,0.000014010915,0.00032611183,0.00002245961,0.000008065789,0.00005528608,0.00010159962,0.31988543,0.00015477074,0.67734706,0.002051898,0.000017372995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006320663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026342748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006320663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00287945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012602012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020892024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519889302","doi":"10.1111/meca.12152","title":"Prototypes, Reality and the Growth Rate of Autonomous Consumption Expenditures: A Rejoinder","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Growth model; Econometrics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032744463576151316,"score_gpt":0.24096262015498762,"score_spread":0.2082181565788363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519889302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20606136,0.010341769,0.12477619,0.55094993,0.002088548,0.000051350937,0.0008362258,0.00032814697,0.1045665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98103434,0.0015372402,0.00775713,0.0044872565,0.0011583116,0.000040263556,0.000059876835,0.00005995134,0.0038655943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721587,0.00143365,0.0001509142,0.00064448634,0.0004400828,0.000115041395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769157,0.016046379,0.0018418282,0.0027578461,0.001818597,0.00061972026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065768207,0.0003515936,0.0009749101,0.0012789255,0.0012221484,0.007141291,0.0019082705,0.004952096,0.005452721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031028526,0.0004697145,0.0005797189,0.0011607142,0.0126009155,0.010627569,0.005214105,0.0049768356,0.0006824697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024668221,0.00000773682,0.00058268796,0.000029052242,0.000010145564,0.00003205007,0.00050344644,0.0009375975,0.000036346697,0.9898685,0.0043370817,0.0036305229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007727093,0.000006542956,0.00052908104,0.000026077423,0.000004728516,0.000030779534,0.00030513207,0.0028091085,0.000049292288,0.9888483,0.007368032,0.000015158578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034532005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018071213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007141291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022340987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009849379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034781992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520626712","doi":"10.1111/meca.12148","title":"Linear and Non‐Linear Granger Causality Between Short‐Term and Long‐Term Interest Rates: A Rolling Window Strategy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Granger causality; Causality (physics); Term (time); Econometrics; Economics; Linear model; Government bond; Interest rate; Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.12692100108191381,"score_gpt":0.2861073335694073,"score_spread":0.1591863324874935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520626712","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32705164,0.0009139437,0.66737354,0.00022067674,0.00006895017,0.00021632799,0.0002697182,0.00057611376,0.0033091458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87805027,0.00036274898,0.11875192,0.00004291629,0.000049581875,0.00016562683,0.00040730697,0.00008374873,0.0020858443],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838686,0.0008531721,0.00011882214,0.00029387203,0.00021659717,0.00013071022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982567,0.008096761,0.00066552835,0.0005649139,0.00062494224,0.00022225709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051083514,0.0007552807,0.00091599114,0.0025492203,0.0005759394,0.0014982212,0.000933011,0.0005543705,0.004936036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01578339,0.00037548746,0.0010486086,0.0020217868,0.0004468019,0.0013464233,0.000875034,0.0007807673,0.00067069015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025318265,0.0008597634,0.070351385,0.00035838035,0.0013939429,0.001551028,0.00085178344,0.144179,0.021559546,0.052876785,0.0022713898,0.7012152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014951802,0.00063203106,0.050845023,0.00006451428,0.00056444603,0.00038634328,0.00026031706,0.9006964,0.010493075,0.033414897,0.0023745194,0.00011900353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020940625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017423192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051083514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025259244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077951833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027015865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765913747","doi":"10.1111/meca.12192","title":"Trend and business cycles with <i>external markets</i>: Non‐capacity generating semi‐autonomous expenditures and effective demand","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Effective demand; Investment (military); Macro; Distribution (mathematics); Macro level; Endogenous growth theory; Income distribution; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Market economy; Human capital","score_opus":0.013593294724682705,"score_gpt":0.21806482926203644,"score_spread":0.20447153453735373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765913747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95758224,0.0008957645,0.013197215,0.0028529372,0.000036098587,0.000014946939,0.0004883824,0.000049229337,0.024883108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977793,0.0002613866,0.0003642914,0.000031532712,0.000030870044,0.0000045102947,0.000088851935,0.000007764012,0.0014313627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991715,0.000021206683,0.0000066510024,0.000021433856,0.000016819826,0.000016683762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.00044317672,0.000494154,0.0000851038,0.00014820682,0.00010874577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040334134,0.00011092658,0.00019561294,0.00064928195,0.00017320855,0.0014829413,0.00020203483,0.00033105508,0.0044868253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025506916,0.00008646122,0.00020200247,0.0010638117,0.00075516483,0.0011228914,0.00043198158,0.00048953923,0.00022441852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016395455,0.000095528114,0.20012787,0.00012249382,0.00007294308,0.00065160607,0.0007334946,0.029685697,0.0024500985,0.7133442,0.0062625483,0.046289504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020852818,0.000088712804,0.26361012,0.00008939451,0.000051377658,0.0005742294,0.0011473531,0.14157432,0.0011290045,0.56882805,0.022845853,0.000040773673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002016715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014068546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044868253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056416314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021496006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01500994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794364033","doi":"10.1111/meca.12204","title":"Testing a Goodwin model with general capital accumulation rate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for New Economic Thinking","keywords":"Economics; Capital (architecture); Econometrics; Constant (computer programming); Wage; Simplicity; General equilibrium theory; Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Labour economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0746179200522449,"score_gpt":0.2626253842517669,"score_spread":0.18800746419952202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794364033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255041,0.000264795,0.06515097,0.0014182753,0.00007509698,0.00012364831,0.00074836705,0.00019965049,0.0065150848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916189,0.000068191046,0.0065440475,0.00008247719,0.000023774415,0.000049381957,0.00026983512,0.00002994733,0.0013134703],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945633,0.003091243,0.00029529512,0.0012097957,0.00032924965,0.0005111364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96278155,0.028439904,0.003302354,0.0032551577,0.0015670181,0.0006540607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010592559,0.00088030763,0.0021117558,0.0012892018,0.00065642066,0.003896908,0.0031060912,0.0025384703,0.0063284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04049636,0.0007540506,0.002319515,0.0015009629,0.0019021807,0.0032708007,0.001962739,0.0016923872,0.0004877267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012502953,0.0003570948,0.042942658,0.00027570673,0.0008895157,0.0009904143,0.0006722477,0.79392076,0.002363973,0.13545722,0.0026925425,0.018187579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033544065,0.0003303564,0.011704637,0.000029784578,0.00021690647,0.00011958225,0.00031002442,0.91212296,0.0010817186,0.07231376,0.0013462714,0.00008851581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030006839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011055418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030006839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024795544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014488348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05966431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993451959","doi":"10.1111/meca.12279","title":"Aid to agriculture, trade and structural change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Landlocked country; Openness to experience; Agriculture; Economics; Industrialisation; Developing country; Panel data; International economics; Structural adjustment; International trade; Economic growth; Econometrics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.01927909672784575,"score_gpt":0.26875517681919414,"score_spread":0.2494760800913484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993451959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492815,0.0035445204,0.0011609273,0.0036161365,0.000056855853,0.00001767931,0.00039966064,0.000038886672,0.041883808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979031,0.0007416637,0.0000582342,0.000066854154,0.00003431587,0.0000015328612,0.000039337785,0.000001853634,0.001153172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962854,0.00014228302,0.000014147112,0.000037174344,0.000060605027,0.000117161435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932239,0.0036228527,0.0021014025,0.00020822407,0.00034564824,0.0004979796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006968961,0.00013433583,0.0001920465,0.0010277095,0.0003162695,0.0013665681,0.00015854336,0.00038600323,0.009715466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046997303,0.000049512368,0.00020743068,0.0015967024,0.0013737732,0.0005457872,0.000673982,0.0005796543,0.00035492494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005209675,0.0006355968,0.68171716,0.00043542412,0.0003745466,0.0008741328,0.000945556,0.07987024,0.0020484373,0.14167163,0.0061413744,0.08476498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008429207,0.0004748423,0.84894645,0.00020552585,0.00019439135,0.00054494233,0.0022086378,0.018454537,0.0013807607,0.08924227,0.03823608,0.000027323016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003410125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004300934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009715466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008318056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000615142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03250146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210487126","doi":"10.1111/meca.12381","title":"Reclamation of a resource extraction site: A differential game approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Università di Pisa","keywords":"Land reclamation; Lease; Order (exchange); Differential (mechanical device); Business; Homogeneous; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.06517088826453174,"score_gpt":0.23992555927173012,"score_spread":0.17475467100719838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210487126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31119534,0.0010849901,0.6457741,0.0032630155,0.00018692523,0.0003766524,0.00085683964,0.00011517623,0.03714699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969162,0.0004521018,0.017557649,0.00015444153,0.00004817326,0.00020420566,0.00013513463,0.00002942061,0.012256934],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984036,0.0007768262,0.000053407566,0.0002503727,0.00013500103,0.00038076704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436754,0.0041010613,0.0006179095,0.00012317172,0.00023361987,0.00055660005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022652748,0.001564741,0.0022869261,0.0011445949,0.0008635572,0.0021840741,0.003145477,0.0033648484,0.00704294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006102771,0.0009892776,0.001469347,0.000875713,0.002481442,0.002752653,0.0021690982,0.0023898478,0.0003818772],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001968659,0.00014436655,0.0010852509,0.00013984815,0.00009781968,0.0006527587,0.00012786119,0.91539824,0.0014942095,0.076820895,0.00089660735,0.0029453316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007111705,0.00009414222,0.0003598147,0.000018827779,0.000034015895,0.000073574745,0.00010445986,0.9721172,0.00027369906,0.02601032,0.00081670354,0.000026128018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012886133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068454216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012886133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037456925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015852577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027177036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220680316","doi":"10.1111/meca.12384","title":"The Canadian–US dollar exchange rate over the four decades of the post‐Bretton Woods float: An econometric study allowing for structural breaks","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Float (project management); Economics; Exchange rate; Liberian dollar; Context (archaeology); Us dollar; Econometric model; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; International economics; Finance","score_opus":0.024723598719761958,"score_gpt":0.2357926791383813,"score_spread":0.21106908041861935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220680316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907019,0.00044575304,0.0015072918,0.0008271736,0.000018997089,0.000027097143,0.002079416,0.000029095287,0.004363288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516654,0.0002731051,0.00037551636,0.0000491521,0.000015481079,0.000012731326,0.0018501426,0.000008404066,0.0022488872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954456,0.00009402637,0.000021359769,0.00008609529,0.00008942989,0.00016452627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704677,0.001540948,0.0005387446,0.000101370824,0.0004954421,0.00027670446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023423801,0.00032160545,0.00045482352,0.0016646049,0.0013079565,0.0020578562,0.0010117288,0.0007648213,0.0043742093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066162334,0.00028253035,0.000836946,0.0026306915,0.00087867305,0.0007696926,0.0005626367,0.0018235059,0.00036438732],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005936683,0.00024078733,0.8426918,0.00010557964,0.00038456445,0.0006431015,0.0018679952,0.093568094,0.0007317739,0.027507627,0.006936832,0.02472826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056252982,0.00010334436,0.8146759,0.00006868624,0.00022192563,0.00010757413,0.0038011542,0.171037,0.00043154415,0.0022092543,0.0072034583,0.00008390619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9295269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9096666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070473075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010235043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096549485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14177614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281676673","doi":"10.1111/meca.12399","title":"Information‐theoretic model of induced technical change: Theory and empirics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Frontier; Technical change; Function (biology); Econometrics; Productivity; Stochastic game; Degenerate energy levels; Distribution (mathematics); Growth model; Mathematical economics; Growth theory; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.04904049902844084,"score_gpt":0.2299810395969175,"score_spread":0.18094054056847667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281676673","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14747845,0.0011422071,0.78062767,0.0061293663,0.00011601858,0.00010495148,0.0006260718,0.00020689591,0.06356836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97593576,0.0006625832,0.015055443,0.00020486934,0.00010202923,0.00011354169,0.0001295332,0.000025324405,0.0077708736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981775,0.00089726027,0.00007102845,0.00024623246,0.00038473826,0.00022327247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779905,0.009270339,0.001332948,0.0006895043,0.0006362792,0.0002718939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033133626,0.00056518597,0.001225379,0.0014091241,0.0006457859,0.0028429113,0.0022386005,0.0027259742,0.0060794177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012402524,0.00053183624,0.0010895417,0.0014441608,0.0036809864,0.003974038,0.0015283368,0.002335226,0.00062280276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025837086,0.000036164547,0.00045688928,0.000048375332,0.000028199489,0.000114575465,0.000088544824,0.27475637,0.00026738568,0.7195975,0.0007523361,0.0038276932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021378575,0.000021747319,0.0002578806,0.000015917052,0.0000092513765,0.000051104034,0.000029659761,0.4496146,0.0000959039,0.54904443,0.0008207039,0.000017371178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002791994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012567214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060794177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025731483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010751222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020337641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285044410","doi":"10.1111/meca.12403","title":"Withholding self‐employed and business incomes: An application to Italian firms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metroeconomica","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Withholding tax; Profit (economics); Economics; Payment; Business; Database transaction; Indirect tax; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Public economics; Tax reform; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.02423644867149238,"score_gpt":0.22952333794976768,"score_spread":0.2052868892782753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285044410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84872544,0.001954488,0.04957483,0.0062029115,0.00015916649,0.0006344482,0.00046620765,0.00020642235,0.092076115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933269,0.00037790317,0.0031699028,0.00011735544,0.00007007881,0.000046438774,0.00006454614,0.0000047810086,0.00282206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662066,0.002065726,0.00016504899,0.00022709761,0.000575247,0.00034616463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98791295,0.007686913,0.0021597093,0.0013429663,0.00064943184,0.00024800975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004989984,0.00034836223,0.00044582319,0.0011027666,0.0008595502,0.002121614,0.0011090017,0.0020123255,0.0050226077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148636,0.00015945788,0.00078873517,0.0013858692,0.0018268357,0.0012841516,0.0016879652,0.001398021,0.00033279302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074394484,0.0010312111,0.117283426,0.0005407578,0.00019573391,0.0037573134,0.0026645656,0.086397186,0.0036432066,0.65123767,0.0074840444,0.12502098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058188575,0.00229284,0.15142247,0.0006254867,0.0005084996,0.002667803,0.0029295697,0.53384495,0.0070923995,0.2302629,0.06744734,0.000323866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014282202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066749677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014282202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002661558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001030087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028398156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}