{"meta":{"query_hash":"57eb07349826","filters":{"venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/57eb07349826","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Michigan+Journal+of+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1536169057","doi":"","title":"Towards a Right to Privacy in Transnational Intelligence Networks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Information privacy; Terrorism; Privacy law; Political science; Convention; Government (linguistics); Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Privacy policy; Autonomy; Internet privacy; Law; Human rights; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.026716084003662117,"score_gpt":0.3312473456313223,"score_spread":0.3045312616276602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536169057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041566238,0.0049249637,0.18799481,0.22818013,0.0006338193,0.00013729793,0.00008742074,0.00012744364,0.53634787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030374,0.003456002,0.038187545,0.024592591,0.00057962263,0.00024686474,0.00006949693,0.00006592782,0.029764583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758528,0.011749172,0.0009385515,0.0027768994,0.0062952144,0.00238736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984672,0.0072858394,0.0013768297,0.0038160325,0.0019265034,0.0009228702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020077746,0.00038482147,0.0006104122,0.0011598378,0.010653184,0.016276842,0.0019324467,0.011326514,0.0030326105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023147363,0.0006416579,0.000851411,0.0015023213,0.040854823,0.026773531,0.012909257,0.015071043,0.00084713177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002828983,0.000003148239,0.00009215459,0.0000069393136,0.0000014467274,0.000040727587,0.0020960928,0.00011746902,0.000051771596,0.99496365,0.0007286337,0.00189512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007799262,0.000010020603,0.00015794545,0.00012285469,0.0000048509874,0.00018175371,0.002116628,0.0006616845,0.00022142378,0.9269052,0.06959455,0.000015197342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007626943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047502713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020077746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044151978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008785821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106182575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591530496","doi":"","title":"AN UNRECOGNIZED STATE IN FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON TAIWAN","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International court; China; Political science; Law; International law; Tribunal; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Political status of Taiwan; Mainland China; Public international law","score_opus":0.007216451443868574,"score_gpt":0.2581049576718722,"score_spread":0.2508885062280036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591530496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8313144,0.0015096393,0.00043300877,0.009102814,0.00008167845,0.000049487928,0.000033239263,0.000011734555,0.15746394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934174,0.0003085113,0.000064683954,0.0013058764,0.000032085685,0.000018315275,0.000011182884,0.0000036670042,0.0048382473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647754,0.0007181215,0.0001486525,0.00040606674,0.0005448534,0.0017048207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974389,0.001125764,0.0003929327,0.0002225715,0.00043523058,0.0003845166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003448815,0.0002070878,0.00044381735,0.0016164546,0.010788205,0.010495746,0.0013057796,0.0057772435,0.0039238594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055079367,0.00027749946,0.00061689515,0.0020418474,0.010969076,0.0029357949,0.005095185,0.0062572616,0.00012079238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056049714,0.00005728043,0.019412875,0.000063311454,0.000044953922,0.012424789,0.055173583,0.00050607417,0.0008865914,0.9011616,0.0032782305,0.006934672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039349208,0.0005244998,0.11305034,0.0020647794,0.0010045796,0.0074576545,0.30982414,0.008999365,0.008753659,0.18456663,0.3626605,0.000700285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15810964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19696952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15810964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015367766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012491405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31437868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169522399","doi":"","title":"Prescriptive Treaties in Global Warming: Applying the Factors Leading to the Montreal Protocol","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Developing country; Global warming; Negotiation; International community; Globe; Kyoto Protocol; Political science; International trade; Order (exchange); Business; Development economics; Economic growth; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Climate change; Geography; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.012814485233310732,"score_gpt":0.26676364857813467,"score_spread":0.2539491633448239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W169522399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011419559,0.0067578848,0.030793373,0.20482065,0.001273654,0.00022041498,0.00020502013,0.00010736555,0.7444021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6802235,0.0068822135,0.01662759,0.1368124,0.0021962477,0.000834097,0.00018890877,0.00021181226,0.15602319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982383,0.0081409905,0.00046168186,0.0009434248,0.006345699,0.0017251923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98760635,0.00804651,0.000714451,0.00088369986,0.0022545117,0.0004944611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018154947,0.0006755029,0.00040784772,0.0013756983,0.009776478,0.008884434,0.0028726906,0.011023386,0.0061354367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042951964,0.00055110885,0.000771816,0.0019287559,0.021510463,0.007395082,0.004693774,0.014407956,0.00071128056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021620674,0.0000024744813,0.00004403504,0.000007431906,0.0000010132595,0.0000107752085,0.0002579941,0.00018648252,0.000028525157,0.9934635,0.0048755114,0.0011201208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042889442,0.000026712258,0.001013942,0.00033422405,0.000018009172,0.00003889462,0.00080583873,0.0017923707,0.0004694807,0.72013557,0.27526197,0.000060138584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24105068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29161614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24105068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023155106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03469974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4792952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834698328","doi":"","title":"Identity, Effectiveness and Newness in Transjudicialism’s Coming of Age","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Legalization; International law; Scholarship; Hegemony; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010478595950130563,"score_gpt":0.25083683143790536,"score_spread":0.2403582354877748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834698328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18509804,0.0056524538,0.06307106,0.06704398,0.0010451786,0.0000814571,0.000023238532,0.000117767086,0.67786676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881356,0.0004521764,0.0028281733,0.001132285,0.00028995782,0.000037716654,0.000008796553,0.000057504883,0.007057789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.966852,0.020855878,0.001096047,0.0037480425,0.0052228854,0.002225086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621998,0.021079667,0.0026044995,0.008050796,0.0038857998,0.0021795034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05366493,0.0003743687,0.0006517075,0.0036202387,0.015132511,0.02313224,0.0022322638,0.005168077,0.00440697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043108203,0.00048914814,0.00054848316,0.001927263,0.1095158,0.035540324,0.014171161,0.009974045,0.000565085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060465645,0.00000976209,0.00028882455,0.000010326774,0.0000016118937,0.000030015352,0.017958188,0.000039451235,0.000047556692,0.9768421,0.0002696095,0.0044964585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020184376,0.00004155396,0.0009696131,0.00013520535,0.000009753297,0.00023636747,0.02902135,0.0006446561,0.00049137085,0.8843155,0.0840879,0.000026575673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002719826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019328577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05366493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071816402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046305554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28381073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196715695","doi":"","title":"The Political Economy of Rule of Law Reform in Developing Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Rule of law; Politics; Law reform; Developing country; Economics; Political science; Law; Political economy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.012654124288102198,"score_gpt":0.2946481880887157,"score_spread":0.2819940638006135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196715695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43702874,0.005769886,0.0069886507,0.03762298,0.00014239032,0.00017144148,0.000114399,0.000030209574,0.5121313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995059,0.0010903566,0.0003184528,0.0007712915,0.000038374055,0.00002914115,0.000012412054,0.000006244518,0.002674775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910217,0.0045039062,0.00026828333,0.0006592227,0.000787807,0.00275919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883427,0.0068895877,0.002567491,0.0004889924,0.00081065105,0.0009006211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007890712,0.00016955571,0.0004738306,0.002004407,0.009683011,0.013533085,0.0007634749,0.0026247208,0.005191981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01678183,0.0003274179,0.00031651327,0.0033638156,0.019661965,0.004277106,0.0050302343,0.0047592046,0.0002882201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003228061,0.00004307915,0.007573688,0.00006962186,0.000012025444,0.0006360723,0.011490414,0.0009812879,0.00013870344,0.96700424,0.0014995582,0.0105190165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002079623,0.00024792342,0.0788043,0.0010910088,0.00007316954,0.0009027588,0.08367369,0.0036125197,0.0013266272,0.50762594,0.32231465,0.0001194088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020955713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016416185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020955713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011135184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008988923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256829957","doi":"","title":"The Shifting Border of Immigration Regulation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interdiction; Immigration; Witness; Border Security; Political science; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Phenomenon; Immigration law; Political economy; Border crossing; Control (management); Immigration policy; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Geography; Business; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.007791230788416217,"score_gpt":0.31499243666394355,"score_spread":0.30720120587552735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256829957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093339875,0.0063193673,0.028180799,0.13160494,0.002283632,0.00006345831,0.000096575684,0.00012908498,0.7379823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938771,0.0017095603,0.0044031963,0.03352965,0.0008224296,0.00012911807,0.0000516308,0.000071888186,0.020511594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987069,0.0042521413,0.00043361957,0.0030068175,0.0034265677,0.0018118246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964625,0.0012674071,0.00036565535,0.0006398751,0.00080163236,0.00046297684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006543985,0.0002856813,0.0005078548,0.0012270159,0.0075831385,0.010376879,0.0014903886,0.0069619557,0.0041210786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011473052,0.00030712347,0.0005958646,0.001110203,0.030425623,0.007103736,0.008871892,0.013055061,0.0008775335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007067831,0.000007785426,0.00039702223,0.0000071075424,0.000001922901,0.00005447409,0.0026416818,0.00012161371,0.00017226042,0.98883516,0.0030091025,0.00474484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003361351,0.00006526778,0.002272429,0.0003756985,0.000019715488,0.00024706614,0.008689218,0.0009914101,0.0005570123,0.7165941,0.27010086,0.00005358418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011292876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057776244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011292876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085063465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008630014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061718106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583756301","doi":"","title":"Staying Within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Law and economics; Eminent domain; Arbitration clause; Business; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Arbitration","score_opus":0.017019706147318396,"score_gpt":0.3042780462121921,"score_spread":0.2872583400648737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583756301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039364718,0.00063966785,0.03306028,0.048018888,0.00083229865,0.0005590054,0.00021642151,0.00014613733,0.8771625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7958897,0.0006590719,0.023974469,0.060538687,0.0006647424,0.001533772,0.00021854417,0.00024012453,0.11628095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9475461,0.014178066,0.003348012,0.005868048,0.017586753,0.011472953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770245,0.012932642,0.0014805685,0.0029868886,0.0044852616,0.0010901932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034264475,0.0005925275,0.0010000342,0.0012412604,0.011502065,0.015696067,0.0063637546,0.0218393,0.0070118024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046144173,0.0011080534,0.0021954745,0.0011997776,0.025301665,0.00753714,0.0118881175,0.018684665,0.0018959136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017107386,0.000019628984,0.00022236731,0.000027499567,0.000009387242,0.0003892641,0.0041974126,0.00050224306,0.00028599976,0.9851141,0.0068792077,0.0023357642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010831457,0.00013146247,0.0018942091,0.0007679054,0.00007225076,0.0005866979,0.013008724,0.0031048039,0.0024034546,0.5670753,0.41053703,0.00030982654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0906025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0851048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0906025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013269778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04229277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18121004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269577822","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Cooperative Approaches to Shared Marine Fishery Resources: Territorial Subversion?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; Fishery; Business; International trade; Marine conservation; Political science; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.03584772589844807,"score_gpt":0.2667784440373416,"score_spread":0.23093071813889351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269577822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118098326,0.006404019,0.005892756,0.077854574,0.000467821,0.00009742515,0.00017791841,0.00007144158,0.7909357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94636565,0.0030198775,0.00211694,0.009407231,0.00005314586,0.00009635668,0.00008785498,0.000022617707,0.03883035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948843,0.0007103952,0.000118489785,0.00045190167,0.0016348542,0.0022000175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701226,0.0006331758,0.0001958163,0.00016067275,0.0012076043,0.0007905159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029210227,0.00034743722,0.00035355586,0.0015578045,0.017694596,0.0076570874,0.0017855138,0.0030984683,0.0061597284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058187097,0.00026502175,0.00043075762,0.003993839,0.011587522,0.0037455966,0.007066843,0.0034052671,0.00029169972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009607301,0.000013192677,0.0030988979,0.000032841945,0.000016324313,0.00021775613,0.010883286,0.0003201916,0.00014123575,0.95589614,0.013611706,0.015758866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047755842,0.000059158785,0.030462006,0.0005831795,0.00013657137,0.00057788845,0.08639842,0.002404547,0.0005857765,0.11430409,0.764317,0.00012357083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96463513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07158822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07158822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118698135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916496558","doi":"10.36642/mjil.40.2.intellectual","title":"Intellectual Property: A Beacon for Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investor-state dispute settlement; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Treaty; Intellectual property; Multinational corporation; Bilateral investment treaty; Business; International trade; State (computer science); Foreign direct investment; Investment (military); Law and economics; Law; International investment; Economics; Political science; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.014596359493809738,"score_gpt":0.2244045300531852,"score_spread":0.20980817055937545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916496558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007478667,0.020498652,0.09760679,0.5063834,0.005596535,0.00014395503,0.000065154425,0.0002950325,0.36193177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771656,0.0117066465,0.044879608,0.09108275,0.014183421,0.000672914,0.00010446052,0.00037656157,0.05982806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780186,0.011612379,0.0009703439,0.0028865456,0.0041125915,0.0023995503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96206176,0.026476238,0.0015491522,0.0050735148,0.0034546666,0.0013845478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05330466,0.0007822832,0.0013698648,0.0036028496,0.013931401,0.022219636,0.0052433587,0.023753759,0.0071108704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051714804,0.0006839255,0.0018341482,0.0022207936,0.08821508,0.037924025,0.01052202,0.031390376,0.0014385415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017071579,0.000004828935,0.0000125661145,0.0000071348245,6.5687317e-7,0.000010088081,0.00038414376,0.00006289598,0.000010204008,0.9964379,0.001525994,0.0015418765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021323724,0.000020532245,0.00004546246,0.00017845964,0.000003940315,0.00003675723,0.0006333871,0.0005574251,0.0000821163,0.9144004,0.08399968,0.000020454792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011252945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009138915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05330466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017994795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022308744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28190535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121382706","doi":"","title":"After Atrocity: Optimizing UN Action Toward Accountability for Human Rights Abuses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Human rights; Sri lanka; Action (physics); Political science; Value (mathematics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.05494072931758388,"score_gpt":0.3626560072754666,"score_spread":0.3077152779578827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121382706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03210974,0.0054356307,0.06838443,0.5330553,0.00433458,0.0007370185,0.0001288981,0.0010733864,0.35474107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82518524,0.0030805802,0.031064978,0.08841208,0.0015976704,0.0006422189,0.00013545938,0.0005982291,0.04928363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9418109,0.032412637,0.0016226138,0.0034147766,0.008717223,0.0120219225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91224784,0.041092504,0.0072815325,0.0054851496,0.014081582,0.019811349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062606506,0.0009949384,0.0007528379,0.0024694873,0.011512961,0.02255437,0.0031382665,0.011468926,0.017979912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13231058,0.0005100588,0.00072980963,0.0017784433,0.0122972755,0.027110513,0.02323165,0.014936207,0.0026493175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010416578,0.00033122732,0.00734421,0.00031320204,0.000050848423,0.00075477164,0.01728786,0.0037946997,0.00091843033,0.63772815,0.16545151,0.16592096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052769763,0.00020054287,0.004946937,0.0018194165,0.000057379068,0.00025433776,0.028489262,0.006242619,0.0016455379,0.48045594,0.47569922,0.00013603733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014363252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015368062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062606506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012819579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04270011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3310988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122509199","doi":"10.36642/mjil.40.2.higher","title":"A Higher Authority: Canada’s Cannabis Legalization in the Context of International Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Legalization; Convention; Human rights; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; International law; International human rights law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.011919209379159783,"score_gpt":0.282058050475039,"score_spread":0.2701388410958792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122509199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042685144,0.026081461,0.0026167224,0.14409298,0.0012903218,0.0001415081,0.00048021285,0.00005400143,0.7825576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782953,0.018937837,0.0032459814,0.052412976,0.0006301279,0.00010881862,0.0002082088,0.00005374699,0.14144933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942508,0.0005506586,0.000113486785,0.00049650314,0.0028280474,0.0017603792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967057,0.0013455538,0.00016860817,0.0001559732,0.001140184,0.00048405532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033574686,0.00034774042,0.00043044816,0.002336735,0.01700054,0.013002792,0.0017095014,0.0054235347,0.006840703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052853934,0.00031582627,0.00053322327,0.0033624459,0.021207111,0.0033052375,0.0029160772,0.0066902013,0.00025428366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010443386,0.00001056787,0.0006380074,0.000050201306,0.000004624234,0.00020453038,0.004386056,0.00013262026,0.00023472546,0.9734527,0.014373482,0.0065019433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029111277,0.000039564424,0.0077196485,0.000562033,0.000049428134,0.00021524995,0.0090236,0.00048272658,0.00103608,0.09093786,0.8897991,0.00010563802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98969215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11551878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11551878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20776705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83815134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129217932","doi":"10.36642/mjil.42.1.differentiating","title":"Differentiating the Corporation: Accountability and International Humanitarian Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporation; Political science; International humanitarian law; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; International law; Compromise; Business; Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.025909459691122957,"score_gpt":0.23477552784159786,"score_spread":0.2088660681504749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129217932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036561836,0.015644753,0.02635728,0.2047604,0.0014203072,0.00009735267,0.000032877324,0.000102344566,0.7150229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402647,0.005237884,0.0037606615,0.026692472,0.0013635257,0.00014385257,0.000023684042,0.000058808437,0.022454424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753548,0.014793506,0.0010756071,0.0019414676,0.0039108116,0.0029238462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765604,0.015756533,0.0031955214,0.0014076133,0.0019387603,0.0011411381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019317443,0.0004800187,0.00042904177,0.0020438945,0.009533709,0.019545598,0.0015450565,0.007985105,0.002383204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025206009,0.00031980244,0.00043316858,0.002159962,0.06345202,0.013764053,0.009497558,0.010854248,0.00037082733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021183128,0.00000596262,0.00029738917,0.000011246953,0.0000011017837,0.000033437973,0.0027232768,0.00009936848,0.0000224773,0.9920176,0.0015406477,0.0032453937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013604658,0.000047800426,0.0018942894,0.00065080624,0.000015725534,0.00017818049,0.009891943,0.00090571353,0.00042413763,0.80368114,0.18224628,0.000050389473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009900512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00920139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019545598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00949806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010975265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102161646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129763006","doi":"10.36642/mjil.42.1.can","title":"Can the Liberal Order be Sustained? Nations, Network Effects, and the Erosion of Global Institutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Treaty; Order (exchange); Corporate governance; Internet governance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.008640488820742566,"score_gpt":0.2783133559400403,"score_spread":0.2696728671192977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129763006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051217202,0.0075785327,0.012781739,0.39360398,0.0014079786,0.000044333552,0.000086525666,0.0001347037,0.533145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497266,0.004211039,0.0024311452,0.021219524,0.00061862083,0.00006854603,0.000040879175,0.000094909985,0.021588793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962752,0.0016236057,0.000077661636,0.0004833092,0.0006865642,0.00085362204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352056,0.003414546,0.00070158916,0.0010186482,0.00038975244,0.0009548798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075043314,0.0003365297,0.0003923579,0.0011128533,0.00805064,0.020540122,0.0012170416,0.007947564,0.010075966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01318931,0.00026990083,0.00047832783,0.0012368825,0.050090205,0.024762984,0.009420484,0.008954578,0.0009025748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042519173,0.0000054147845,0.00022895915,0.000011831805,0.0000018778121,0.000036301924,0.0016583224,0.00023000372,0.00002612075,0.9919802,0.0022670599,0.003549635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008042778,0.000007877805,0.00045740485,0.00012939476,0.0000028949225,0.000032543136,0.0033254437,0.00032183528,0.000093824354,0.90953654,0.08607094,0.000013303416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008953368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009630127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020540122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007942182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068223006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057624876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225504452","doi":"10.36642/mjil.43.2.criminal","title":"Criminal Law in A World of States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Criminal law; Political science; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Municipal law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029243267011669325,"score_gpt":0.3300993353739787,"score_spread":0.3008560683623093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225504452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040320557,0.011897293,0.023809908,0.07920251,0.0008607191,0.000028604549,0.00010717202,0.00009893886,0.8436743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943144,0.006772162,0.005137486,0.012407423,0.0011040568,0.00010422977,0.000107102685,0.000066865454,0.031156544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722064,0.0013189052,0.00008752046,0.0004915689,0.00056664797,0.00031469722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817073,0.00092188374,0.00020443214,0.00028310384,0.00022584053,0.00019403464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020137106,0.00034302796,0.00041913657,0.0015866947,0.008305058,0.0135264145,0.000714889,0.0036764876,0.008097586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004013452,0.0002856865,0.00040917977,0.0023559425,0.027263869,0.013048144,0.0060125743,0.005942663,0.00080913695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2788125e-7,0.0000015358207,0.000066597415,0.0000034024768,7.8223536e-7,0.000011161826,0.00069938914,0.00006379502,0.0000070457404,0.9973984,0.00082269736,0.00092443987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003830785,0.000007190329,0.00023549992,0.000076049124,0.000003986844,0.00004352133,0.002294136,0.00038416233,0.000035390894,0.88441443,0.11249269,0.000009115731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00661576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007567713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135264145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005110295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035785967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037077963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366320848","doi":"10.36642/mjil.44.2.relentless","title":"Relentless Atrocities: the Persecution of Hazaras","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Genocide; Crimes against humanity; Law; Element (criminal law); Statute; Deportation; Ethnic Cleansing; Political science; Criminology; International law; Ethnic group; International community; Refugee; The Holocaust; War crime; Sociology; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.02276222398557129,"score_gpt":0.3152119908428549,"score_spread":0.29244976685728363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366320848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7775359,0.0027922874,0.00077410607,0.021024812,0.00037036114,0.000029021767,0.000022586746,0.000013276238,0.19743763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903424,0.0007992278,0.00008788902,0.0022110404,0.0000776415,0.0000065745376,0.000006023235,0.000004535637,0.0064647715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979686,0.000885913,0.000056662775,0.00015208438,0.0001925143,0.0007442455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880123,0.00041086992,0.0003456865,0.00013285436,0.000119811215,0.00018963098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018079489,0.0002787125,0.0002506564,0.0005905278,0.021028433,0.0044154176,0.00080968725,0.0026077763,0.0023723182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003120222,0.0002412503,0.0001570072,0.00050735986,0.0234625,0.003372813,0.006563808,0.0051340796,0.00040448824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054472926,0.00009310518,0.012046662,0.00006288053,0.000019140425,0.0067628063,0.56242096,0.000104763465,0.0013462682,0.38841385,0.0098749455,0.018800125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001552122,0.00014770683,0.02436167,0.00040848242,0.000031622727,0.0051451456,0.7125723,0.0003130764,0.0013722063,0.034422997,0.22114886,0.000060423557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016533224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029256133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021028433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002816561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028019715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03287399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381747867","doi":"10.36642/mjil.44.3.rebraiding","title":"ReBraiding Frayed Sweetgrass for Niijaansinaanik: Understanding Canadian Indigenous Child Welfare Issues as International Atrocity Crimes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Genocide; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; International law; Colonialism; Law; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04685141468412077,"score_gpt":0.3336396824800749,"score_spread":0.2867882677959541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381747867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46634716,0.013135547,0.0036382796,0.1258604,0.00066310173,0.00016390748,0.0003386468,0.000060061506,0.38979286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573023,0.0075199367,0.0019229137,0.0059087,0.0000604014,0.000040643798,0.00007183392,0.00004307383,0.027130408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785525,0.00040616054,0.000037263297,0.00018534799,0.00051928416,0.0009967266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841964,0.0003671758,0.00014642975,0.000054458174,0.0005842938,0.00042810373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020968744,0.0005920657,0.00035757042,0.0020962828,0.044200625,0.012259843,0.0026702199,0.0026522104,0.0041845683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002775324,0.00034729548,0.0004097567,0.0022856754,0.02795304,0.003892537,0.006004105,0.0048511703,0.00021281814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015148127,0.000024953446,0.008254354,0.00012165219,0.000009490337,0.0010766445,0.7818779,0.00030254133,0.00036196058,0.1787447,0.012848212,0.0163625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026875468,0.000008906942,0.008759613,0.0003025981,0.000026085678,0.00026401764,0.8221084,0.00026011313,0.00019511528,0.007002002,0.16102438,0.0000461259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99524176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1253016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17602463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W848242454","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and the New Reality of Climate Change: Adaptation's Limitations in Achieving Climate Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Human rights; Adaptation (eye); Climate justice; Environmental resource management; Climate change adaptation; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental justice; Economic Justice; Environmental planning; Law and economics; Natural resource economics; Sociology; Geography; Law; Economics; Ecology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05798860384433503,"score_gpt":0.33129640674284383,"score_spread":0.2733078028985088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W848242454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016995454,0.009651137,0.008831273,0.649429,0.0012327821,0.00004371684,0.000045938676,0.00004199106,0.31372872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8661812,0.005170438,0.0035395636,0.106403284,0.0020432663,0.00022213391,0.000031838954,0.00006685589,0.016341405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830403,0.008777209,0.0004785354,0.0017814355,0.0031593116,0.0027632862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837157,0.011894937,0.00065829704,0.0011573334,0.0011925957,0.001381098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028876895,0.0005378336,0.0009185326,0.0011267231,0.01597047,0.017995587,0.0031637077,0.014105555,0.0045042816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01915105,0.0004276404,0.0008158646,0.0012509283,0.098195724,0.02005604,0.014256688,0.024273837,0.00047388414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042679308,0.000006717126,0.00011525584,0.000011946921,0.0000023647992,0.00004050165,0.0027660795,0.000080689766,0.000030996587,0.9911742,0.0028166492,0.0029503144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019811247,0.000022718841,0.00070022984,0.00031292796,0.000010770715,0.00012442328,0.0077108266,0.00041223122,0.00016887856,0.8636076,0.12686484,0.000044748835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06265831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060455095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06265831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01032595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018640703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15271747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}