{"meta":{"query_hash":"a963ae477b56","filters":{"venue":"Michigan Law Review"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a963ae477b56","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Michigan+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2100716734","doi":"10.36644/mlr.113.1.political","title":"The Political Safeguards of Horizontal Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.014700598184814246,"score_gpt":0.3167697665434402,"score_spread":0.30206916835862596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100716734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0523033,0.007110647,0.11211969,0.14554091,0.0013631119,0.00007975365,0.00022170319,0.00024228626,0.6810187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695514,0.0017313394,0.005455773,0.010330026,0.00075138814,0.0000932933,0.000055277927,0.00007888524,0.011952675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911272,0.0029372105,0.00030383404,0.0018383397,0.0021319806,0.0016614273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352235,0.0030315109,0.00092668866,0.0015146767,0.000712128,0.00029271224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091746105,0.0004293748,0.000522745,0.001241866,0.0063301576,0.0075499634,0.0010109122,0.004662708,0.007388732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012132593,0.00045067392,0.0011511418,0.00091878383,0.026282819,0.00820294,0.005337929,0.010006634,0.001183976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028137981,0.000002485234,0.0000701074,0.000006642172,0.0000031145046,0.000007503583,0.00018635266,0.0001286181,0.000030528012,0.99777955,0.00057985994,0.0012023655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011677266,0.000007031431,0.00020081417,0.00005680452,0.000008020655,0.000014278783,0.00015362416,0.00031804564,0.00018407722,0.9757547,0.023284636,0.0000062907197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007952231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005774686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091746105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076803244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006772262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05572492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528934385","doi":"10.36644/mlr.115.6.thick","title":"Thick Law, Thin Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Sovereign state; Public international law; Global justice; Law and economics; Principle of legality; International legal system; Distributive justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05120235571599132,"score_gpt":0.3768750812207748,"score_spread":0.3256727255047835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528934385","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019297181,0.91860145,0.00053242524,0.060803015,0.008429696,0.000007173527,0.000049552553,0.000011684742,0.011371969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0123063065,0.910386,0.000669231,0.04543582,0.018950043,0.000034050117,0.00015535946,0.000047994006,0.01201526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641466,0.0013693417,0.00022630702,0.00037458827,0.0014131058,0.00020192919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99084985,0.004592237,0.00069936534,0.00030111402,0.0031540713,0.00040329277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040661483,0.00066696195,0.00085473486,0.004687519,0.001488529,0.0042732814,0.00094769755,0.0027694192,0.0065021073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018847639,0.00044614926,0.0005387813,0.00387193,0.0046538357,0.0064160447,0.0020382088,0.006042932,0.0024662367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020629464,0.000020201574,0.00021251387,0.0014342498,0.00004188647,0.00004326986,0.00020174342,0.00016768799,0.00012248372,0.073253274,0.8177061,0.10677595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006488003,0.000017753873,0.00069927744,0.0029068117,0.000022627612,0.00008084208,0.0001969506,0.000057591278,0.000061516905,0.028492091,0.9674444,0.0000136437675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008641024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016373716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008641024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032246262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006736782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023396432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574147565","doi":"","title":"Judging Magic: Can You See the Sleight of Hand?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Law; Legislature; White (mutation); Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Aesthetics; Art; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02038836810664711,"score_gpt":0.30473595973647216,"score_spread":0.28434759162982504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574147565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006120976,0.023702092,0.0012447957,0.7572586,0.009786699,0.000027533637,0.00006113622,0.00016535439,0.20163284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3294175,0.030718533,0.0029650892,0.34861678,0.010441915,0.000099703015,0.00017806263,0.0003570543,0.27720538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806887,0.0008918139,0.000057424015,0.00019926328,0.00046132976,0.00032135873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948736,0.002008208,0.00026817352,0.00021419005,0.0011846055,0.0014513342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002359103,0.00052813423,0.00046642663,0.0011118656,0.010247262,0.0122029865,0.0011216342,0.0052315984,0.024073927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154249715,0.0003363416,0.00020840106,0.0006781307,0.014782094,0.0140970815,0.0030307008,0.009746238,0.006804821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033475633,0.000024860283,0.0009080236,0.00008267295,0.000004326996,0.00021771432,0.014864509,0.000017281842,0.0000967442,0.058015775,0.8684262,0.057308294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021269936,0.000031651,0.0012564136,0.00047862725,0.000006389847,0.0003615077,0.057195995,0.00009094099,0.00015731591,0.044872653,0.8954894,0.000037673162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019541802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041900758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024073927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033713179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031275516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08053529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795811883","doi":"10.2307/3595344","title":"Meaning's Edge, Love's Priority","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Jungian Analytical Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03370166338552145,"score_gpt":0.3557783986952186,"score_spread":0.32207673530969716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795811883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070680953,0.031746518,0.0022565452,0.18184148,0.0035678728,0.000018115152,0.000040408326,0.000028132881,0.7734328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6907909,0.016743397,0.00083425496,0.095158175,0.0036256758,0.00007628963,0.000034929537,0.000087378365,0.19264899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969463,0.0015443985,0.000049136284,0.00025348092,0.000617811,0.0005890096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.0008688078,0.00012955905,0.0001756599,0.00042959073,0.00047859177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028883654,0.0002902566,0.00036688586,0.0006862577,0.008971093,0.0073441262,0.0006017898,0.0029413595,0.0073592775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051367567,0.00022931727,0.00028119638,0.00063512893,0.022475202,0.011209223,0.0038050797,0.008679086,0.0011892137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008937932,0.000006257363,0.00015681288,0.000038753322,0.0000030310011,0.00009727916,0.011026779,0.000011702161,0.00003659181,0.90824234,0.071219034,0.009152565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006902688,0.000013683208,0.00043521635,0.00018292083,0.000005001657,0.00024339126,0.011326397,0.00001839906,0.000054006458,0.14395387,0.8437522,0.00000803823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008231444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014434951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008971093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048398715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003980636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035115838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121221306","doi":"10.36644/mlr.118.2.new","title":"The New Housing Segregation: The Jim Crow Effects of Crime-Free Housing Ordinances","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"White (mutation); Inequality; Race (biology); Political science; Fair Housing Act; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Civil rights; Gender studies","score_opus":0.016885640758601023,"score_gpt":0.28799142892976226,"score_spread":0.27110578817116127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121221306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46121296,0.010780515,0.0018014205,0.17499217,0.0028341513,0.000049698083,0.00013659163,0.00008032112,0.34811208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630201,0.0033258346,0.0004071988,0.016375257,0.0008923912,0.00001469791,0.00002810942,0.000036234298,0.015900183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976949,0.0010869467,0.000030043086,0.0002292317,0.0004991024,0.00045978592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975314,0.00079169805,0.0003254689,0.00028215887,0.00042042954,0.00064873556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020273158,0.00027782161,0.00039774622,0.00089822215,0.007515203,0.006003789,0.00090315635,0.0017504026,0.008910087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00643281,0.00021930276,0.00044937414,0.00064045034,0.009409829,0.002776417,0.003901468,0.0032866518,0.00057562144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004976931,0.0011095173,0.04447859,0.00021406483,0.00015454099,0.0020052039,0.0431223,0.00097295275,0.0015403593,0.5259553,0.18153872,0.19841078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029235194,0.00048421262,0.1577332,0.00061358546,0.00018940766,0.0007093165,0.06935017,0.0016381374,0.0014769551,0.14212856,0.62525886,0.00012516647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05517303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10864503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05517303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043215067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019559471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10970378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121892939","doi":"10.36644/mlr.114.7.constitutional","title":"Constitutional Avoidance as Interpretation and as Remedy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01983119137489859,"score_gpt":0.316266567124098,"score_spread":0.2964353757491994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121892939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016811695,0.0124592455,0.15161103,0.09219696,0.003930754,0.00017343358,0.000110670546,0.00036839207,0.7223379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86663747,0.004314312,0.029829703,0.029195474,0.004572737,0.00049705006,0.0001180126,0.00039409625,0.06444111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768306,0.009747604,0.0011217839,0.004265121,0.006188988,0.0018460164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990428,0.0048488798,0.0007756332,0.0025128205,0.0010801484,0.0003544787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01435618,0.000969449,0.0013453536,0.0023651302,0.0062651415,0.012472209,0.0038973005,0.011065453,0.0059027644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019703962,0.0005311701,0.0012523606,0.0015357769,0.06954578,0.014891542,0.0093352385,0.016043134,0.00116942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001536316,0.0000020380287,0.0000137461575,0.000008267424,0.0000011890459,0.000013768697,0.0003101559,0.000051754854,0.0000308665,0.99813783,0.00048168376,0.00094702916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011456919,0.000010542748,0.000031272866,0.000054301177,0.0000073446054,0.00003980746,0.00023990768,0.00021928395,0.0001382106,0.95607424,0.043162324,0.00001125058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003089758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024798834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01435618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07592362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205551687","doi":"10.36644/mlr.120.3.esg","title":"Do ESG Funds Deliver on Their Promises?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional investor; Business; Corporate governance; Global assets under management; Shareholder; Asset (computer security); Accounting; Finance; Asset management; Commission","score_opus":0.0318358352476267,"score_gpt":0.2326052312798137,"score_spread":0.200769396032187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205551687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17478359,0.026281279,0.0025146138,0.59772426,0.0024675364,0.000109416775,0.002261391,0.00038230818,0.1934757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87924653,0.014029054,0.0023043638,0.066078484,0.0032286404,0.00012169652,0.0009703145,0.00015345008,0.033867482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286324,0.0016918872,0.00023192972,0.0004087353,0.003275158,0.0015290177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97405994,0.008806453,0.006810196,0.0016846792,0.0054747933,0.0031640166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010229558,0.000360823,0.0004797159,0.0022077395,0.0017486729,0.010293581,0.0011216919,0.005448603,0.013145393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057341404,0.00018489754,0.00041503736,0.0022669446,0.0026416378,0.012485271,0.0019265851,0.0027083599,0.0036855007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035688374,0.00012782187,0.10009578,0.00038313205,0.00008240594,0.000318459,0.0029286423,0.00062250864,0.000610431,0.35761446,0.26218912,0.27467042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007606252,0.00024289128,0.106228985,0.0010250115,0.00010631941,0.00031732031,0.007913955,0.0009991896,0.0017701061,0.060499277,0.8207326,0.00008815727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006270618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006059437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013145393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032052016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006308225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05409974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414324984","doi":"10.36644/mlr.124.1.tort","title":"Tort Law in a World of Scarce Compensatory Resources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Delict; Strict liability; Vicarious liability; Mass tort; Bankruptcy; Plaintiff; Tort reform","score_opus":0.02353660793893506,"score_gpt":0.34467459605543654,"score_spread":0.32113798811650146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414324984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102513246,0.010149986,0.04634462,0.09984144,0.00063674577,0.00005886603,0.00029975112,0.00016592837,0.73998946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592282,0.0026843783,0.004877812,0.0070960275,0.0013719508,0.00008771742,0.00008706759,0.000065217944,0.024501592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970536,0.0011567891,0.000104880055,0.0006545671,0.00073111715,0.00029908025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963439,0.0018946875,0.00046656805,0.00063298614,0.0003908764,0.000270996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042391713,0.00031187665,0.0005654829,0.0017217532,0.006275095,0.0114404075,0.0009920133,0.0050527966,0.006524953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066781836,0.00037093306,0.0004456135,0.001157981,0.02996957,0.017902786,0.004094738,0.0060450374,0.0010322001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032275436,0.0000034377279,0.00007626632,0.000005988664,0.0000017062107,0.00007217245,0.0004160917,0.0002154248,0.000056561676,0.9969797,0.0012351997,0.0009342985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074741906,0.000008079523,0.00029908697,0.00005495684,0.0000029002272,0.00010619467,0.00051107595,0.00063155446,0.00005150811,0.9668251,0.03149133,0.000010732964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023975233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022308114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114404075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041573904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018644086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030164123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}