{"meta":{"query_hash":"021687be09d9","filters":{"venue":"Minnesota journal of international law"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/021687be09d9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Minnesota+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W1516339818","doi":"10.24926/19441992.586","title":"Squaring the Circle: Democratizing Judicial Review and the Counter-Constitutional Difficulty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong; Yale University","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Judicial review; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Original meaning; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.015825647471893398,"score_gpt":0.29514844867312867,"score_spread":0.27932280120123526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516339818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04069951,0.019924242,0.04058168,0.69078034,0.003013772,0.00018456693,0.000060864942,0.0004129038,0.20434211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260905,0.005699091,0.015622067,0.11726808,0.008370649,0.00034613264,0.000045155764,0.0003058437,0.026252616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9208002,0.042443104,0.0028548583,0.010786969,0.01799699,0.0051178276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8236521,0.13471684,0.010991949,0.013716233,0.012414069,0.0045088693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054275006,0.0005006796,0.0010656066,0.003778844,0.010782044,0.021317434,0.0024945198,0.014468589,0.0057955766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13820715,0.00087311224,0.00076016766,0.0027367782,0.026213588,0.017158631,0.007440544,0.018210743,0.0017962628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004516505,0.00004557679,0.0010270571,0.00012855862,0.000039109313,0.0002020373,0.0033958966,0.00089814916,0.0005748014,0.92079085,0.034608677,0.038244084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786311,0.00007019292,0.0015813783,0.00032425628,0.000039263665,0.0002966592,0.0013465709,0.0029396066,0.001160811,0.76673776,0.22522745,0.00010814166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007019117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009624139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054275006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013479711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01635416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28703707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166624088","doi":"10.24926/19441992.584","title":"Choice of Jurisdiction in International Trade Disputes: Going Regional or Global","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Respondent; International trade; International trade law; Political science; Free trade agreement; World trade; Business; Free trade; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021803322662486774,"score_gpt":0.32974487096462907,"score_spread":0.30794154830214227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166624088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49530697,0.0055914754,0.021745132,0.008558046,0.0001472833,0.0001467704,0.000077629134,0.000020327312,0.46840647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995738,0.0005259562,0.0010541251,0.0006216836,0.00004038055,0.000037991686,0.000012693635,0.000009386614,0.0019599248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823247,0.011078392,0.00051665853,0.0012085915,0.002189078,0.0026825503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98729557,0.009226746,0.0014157555,0.0005328386,0.0010878977,0.0004412444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015407862,0.00028359363,0.00072625943,0.002701478,0.008241919,0.013316173,0.0014090744,0.004625354,0.003942968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022369556,0.00039751726,0.0008715982,0.0035932267,0.017761864,0.009262599,0.0059564193,0.0042841258,0.00034531543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004538593,0.000028036655,0.0048187315,0.000048475533,0.000021740592,0.0006078524,0.018783167,0.00070697715,0.000617395,0.96739256,0.00076887425,0.0061609363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012354244,0.00023087152,0.02852494,0.0012920612,0.00027431213,0.0019226195,0.18289189,0.0053682155,0.0027126335,0.67661995,0.09987978,0.00015925692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077374745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015650112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015407862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054834126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029596118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08148551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153811296","doi":"10.24926/19441992.594","title":"Sovereignty, Taxation and Social Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Sovereignty; Interdependence; Law and economics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Tax policy; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Political science; Double taxation; Tax reform; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.014107899997962952,"score_gpt":0.22919504368637184,"score_spread":0.2150871436884089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153811296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08163576,0.011131,0.031980723,0.050571043,0.0003778338,0.00006196054,0.00009221298,0.000036878977,0.82411253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97232056,0.0035650218,0.0031011323,0.0021271927,0.00022137117,0.00007361274,0.000052777094,0.000014859542,0.018523496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656856,0.0019288376,0.00017136004,0.0003429764,0.00062498596,0.00036328452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970933,0.0015784642,0.0004323726,0.00031876808,0.00032907352,0.00024784496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004528836,0.00025571662,0.00039475266,0.0010272298,0.004666644,0.0066280207,0.0006355997,0.003035293,0.0040820637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057669193,0.00020343666,0.0003258096,0.0014467252,0.025647337,0.005991991,0.004150497,0.0031896073,0.0003629115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010732008,0.0000021930805,0.00007832029,0.0000032976714,6.4519196e-7,0.000009055154,0.0002545319,0.00010066177,0.0000068099503,0.99846727,0.00030238833,0.0007736846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004262547,0.000004077849,0.00019627574,0.000039090362,0.0000016683365,0.000029045694,0.00034145883,0.00034345762,0.000023660847,0.98012793,0.018885724,0.000003212247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055806874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066280207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004984634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050900076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03616619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336064461","doi":"10.24926/19441992.600","title":"Teaching the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Stanford Law School; Georgetown University; York University; George Washington University; Michigan State University; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0201261584110371,"score_gpt":0.30868491608554094,"score_spread":0.28855875767450384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336064461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009547793,0.027398586,0.017513543,0.4303634,0.0089372555,0.00004360566,0.000110751214,0.00016795416,0.50591713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5661201,0.036415968,0.018913746,0.10203038,0.009974917,0.00014285996,0.00019154734,0.00040547748,0.26580504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996232,0.0014836544,0.000113267444,0.00063198584,0.0010955463,0.0004435107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409264,0.0033235396,0.00033446413,0.00045231375,0.00075259205,0.001044466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975872,0.0004249077,0.00041571012,0.0008106708,0.0073520914,0.007616264,0.000992571,0.0035457502,0.01538601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015065763,0.00029256643,0.00034727278,0.0005363679,0.02127102,0.007782672,0.0027879595,0.01441655,0.0052356096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010898847,0.000096160395,0.000695913,0.000082683844,0.0000044497583,0.00009754428,0.006300369,0.00037560274,0.00018459193,0.71969056,0.20733394,0.06512733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007898097,0.000023460412,0.0004884285,0.00034968238,0.0000023355615,0.00009905558,0.0025269066,0.0003841562,0.00018753865,0.38162744,0.6142917,0.000011386999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009660727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016107831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01538601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072814566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009457761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052830875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990994843","doi":"10.24926/19441992.565","title":"Canada and International Trade in Culture: Beyond National Interests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.024560931624250174,"score_gpt":0.28844597540535805,"score_spread":0.2638850437811079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990994843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048492525,0.012976073,0.0005656336,0.08252792,0.0004029795,0.000014875495,0.00017055367,0.000027763957,0.8548217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300406,0.011911393,0.00043221726,0.0105850175,0.0002024228,0.000019149978,0.000092381015,0.000051396742,0.04666544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.00047894398,0.00004539305,0.00017049455,0.0009773965,0.0012909708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687433,0.0004420416,0.00022069001,0.00011181818,0.00089855166,0.0014525875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013416576,0.0002957518,0.00037359382,0.0021507447,0.015893588,0.01808629,0.00076030433,0.0020614248,0.014742197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034380662,0.00013834414,0.00022203602,0.005673705,0.02301416,0.004854989,0.005676706,0.0035706498,0.00050816184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022067316,0.000019694466,0.0068749264,0.0000600902,0.000015452275,0.0001652817,0.018854354,0.00018173741,0.000082762504,0.90937513,0.032803968,0.03154452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017452849,0.00002655859,0.025254652,0.0010401797,0.000039500053,0.00022217583,0.089354284,0.00042138595,0.00018014117,0.17926362,0.70411706,0.000062909545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058431923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057722196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08543407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41880578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994948234","doi":"10.24926/19441992.684","title":"Mortgage Borrowing: A Comparative Analysis of National Regulatory Approaches to Loans and Lenders in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Mortgage insurance; Mortgage underwriting; Shared appreciation mortgage; Economics; Financial system; Finance; Insurance policy; Casualty insurance","score_opus":0.05629502921329254,"score_gpt":0.2288886820819786,"score_spread":0.17259365286868605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994948234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687827,0.0017091502,0.00020636694,0.0029808518,0.000014009229,0.000044854463,0.0010298626,0.000015679989,0.025216687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943605,0.0010300054,0.00008650694,0.0002676855,0.000007555606,0.000015209824,0.00053839415,0.000008572996,0.0036855724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973174,0.00029603578,0.000073913645,0.00014886321,0.0007855156,0.0013782404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125904,0.0016561799,0.001261502,0.00017098774,0.0038274685,0.0018247776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018495199,0.00017094791,0.00064514147,0.0033537564,0.005132796,0.0045418176,0.0017389827,0.0008928193,0.0038883605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008760397,0.00028887542,0.0005584086,0.0072267368,0.0031700311,0.001138904,0.0018621294,0.0015667104,0.00014384833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004889473,0.00029130673,0.8522647,0.000113927315,0.00019268804,0.00048108725,0.020076482,0.003725028,0.00055288663,0.07654515,0.014487253,0.030780567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025134512,0.000032187192,0.95522636,0.000103721155,0.000094773925,0.00005921842,0.028136436,0.0014029867,0.000271626,0.0011278213,0.013487341,0.00003236338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063190214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063190214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078388944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45847923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137592572","doi":"10.24926/19441992.598","title":"International Bribery: The Moral Imperialism Critiques","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Enforcement; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Scholarship; Business; Political science; Convention; International law; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Terrorism; Economics","score_opus":0.027965460359406294,"score_gpt":0.31191816989308324,"score_spread":0.28395270953367696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137592572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007273607,0.011861965,0.0055671493,0.22215489,0.0015291859,0.00002051536,0.000040922958,0.000040336065,0.7515115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8293254,0.011188772,0.0037518723,0.056554694,0.008545643,0.00016106677,0.0000729477,0.00041901955,0.08998061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918852,0.0041384827,0.00022104535,0.000950256,0.0017745738,0.0010304805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892368,0.007153016,0.000711567,0.0010785925,0.0012361065,0.0005840176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008342936,0.0007767854,0.00086340506,0.0024748917,0.012794699,0.012196448,0.0025923895,0.010648988,0.010223596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013331996,0.00042217874,0.0010924329,0.0018968506,0.08096637,0.01545803,0.007960259,0.01863107,0.001675577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019817128,0.000004958529,0.000035168297,0.000013395756,0.0000013307724,0.000025361447,0.0027204375,0.000035543308,0.0000074147274,0.98993623,0.0062082014,0.0010099389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014614454,0.0000064482942,0.00016296287,0.0001827585,0.0000048227375,0.00008831422,0.0037455377,0.0002367248,0.00007797873,0.7846363,0.21083215,0.000011297213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007834378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006776542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012794699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119779315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00454873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086906314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200829091","doi":"10.24926/19441992.362","title":"U.S.-Canadian Grain Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.013026885023747626,"score_gpt":0.26358370655932206,"score_spread":0.25055682153557446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200829091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0164277,0.0026770423,0.00065345335,0.017695833,0.00061543233,0.00014829615,0.0014489107,0.000055760494,0.9602776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41921777,0.004506294,0.0023883693,0.02809798,0.00021300685,0.00019967108,0.0014262039,0.00008423953,0.5438665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929635,0.00040522852,0.00019681065,0.0006362451,0.003176057,0.0026222072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972186,0.0005035436,0.00008590299,0.0001478653,0.0017225484,0.00032151147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198481,0.00062590063,0.0005593962,0.002650922,0.03480918,0.010067731,0.0025945012,0.007967492,0.025505923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008409441,0.00041703222,0.0008347891,0.0048904917,0.004098372,0.002057302,0.0038970823,0.0043681203,0.0018094642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055909823,0.00003394529,0.0020694372,0.00007905571,0.000018008634,0.0007219685,0.00623443,0.00037673954,0.00032253267,0.7065725,0.26580542,0.017710056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028876388,0.0000106043535,0.0036213268,0.0001433163,0.00003140145,0.00020725194,0.0043695145,0.0005032142,0.00046755886,0.015594641,0.97496223,0.000060117698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99194664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0946465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0946465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1021634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68671167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202365443","doi":"10.24926/19441992.541","title":"Water Wars: Canada's Upstream Battle to Ban Bulk Water Export","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Upstream (networking); Environmental science; International trade; Business; Engineering; History; Ancient history; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.005293642308678378,"score_gpt":0.18727682107046362,"score_spread":0.18198317876178524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202365443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024052719,0.0054531684,0.0025675362,0.48341346,0.0049359496,0.00021224859,0.0011269617,0.0003696804,0.4778683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15518183,0.004220827,0.0024642488,0.32961726,0.0005633369,0.00012041987,0.00054183434,0.0002380501,0.5070522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929611,0.0003142113,0.000096516436,0.0005232549,0.0033817273,0.0027232426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936417,0.0007877758,0.000102077625,0.00023673539,0.003050067,0.0021815598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028907696,0.00080503616,0.0004489864,0.0012963655,0.031139702,0.011200479,0.0027229,0.014436442,0.021381091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008646491,0.0007912499,0.0006620182,0.0019523258,0.0072888676,0.0035506072,0.0033117756,0.012235378,0.0016741435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005327543,0.00007273892,0.0032259487,0.0000829117,0.000025600375,0.00046934988,0.0016021729,0.00048618915,0.0008357764,0.17110299,0.7886526,0.033390462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052241365,0.000024062043,0.0048360704,0.00011507748,0.000024738974,0.00006166806,0.0025262071,0.00043072214,0.00066936295,0.007716666,0.9834843,0.000058872032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08253345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08253345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29313576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59882486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202923523","doi":"10.24926/19441992.473","title":"Made in the USA Foundation v. United States: NAFTA, the Treaty Clause, and Constitutional Obsolescene","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Commerce Clause; Law; Foundation (evidence); Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.02039607614347775,"score_gpt":0.2995039491316351,"score_spread":0.2791078729881573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202923523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040495604,0.014128947,0.0037276067,0.26772377,0.006066609,0.000114470575,0.00041696543,0.00009281981,0.6672332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67244315,0.0061072037,0.0029099172,0.18037522,0.0032281838,0.00039975872,0.0003040476,0.00008370787,0.1341488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943403,0.0017383351,0.00024508478,0.00085015746,0.0016066396,0.0012193819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647504,0.0023500754,0.00022263183,0.00020800628,0.000560318,0.00018398359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008754922,0.000503714,0.0004702606,0.0013160451,0.0126259485,0.009563405,0.001900674,0.019666268,0.0049298783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013493858,0.00068709115,0.0005600116,0.0013833268,0.01106596,0.0068520634,0.002843426,0.014273908,0.0005875292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015866675,0.00001542572,0.00033170555,0.000017224822,0.000005294814,0.00017185548,0.0012705919,0.00008585251,0.00010220383,0.9350041,0.058721885,0.0042581074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006866526,0.000055745295,0.0022780492,0.00055416237,0.00005763344,0.0001592944,0.0019939353,0.0004096717,0.0005894194,0.2707089,0.7230219,0.000102656326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15572023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24589819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15572023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00974881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015299235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3096277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203241988","doi":"10.24926/19441992.553","title":"Food Fight: An Appraisal of the Fruit and Vegetable Dispute Resolution Corporation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021481693054897544,"score_gpt":0.21119659199756274,"score_spread":0.1897148989426652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203241988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009107348,0.03773031,0.00064187305,0.69917995,0.009280436,0.00028162118,0.0003858891,0.000093573,0.2432989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12148674,0.043857038,0.0017035647,0.5983313,0.010913784,0.0006998086,0.00060462044,0.00019883334,0.22220439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802639,0.0030385724,0.0009942199,0.0011195518,0.009873097,0.0047107236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785084,0.009336457,0.0014439137,0.0004976258,0.0071997256,0.0030138637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020805743,0.0012171709,0.0010120696,0.0046828934,0.02166426,0.031754497,0.0050323564,0.056659564,0.009706683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042540163,0.0010066346,0.0017508,0.0049759364,0.007383942,0.011491308,0.005232603,0.024816824,0.0018549573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006161333,0.0001285301,0.0016279282,0.00020654431,0.000027240729,0.0006322651,0.0015617314,0.00035410537,0.00013261058,0.17426488,0.80150765,0.019494854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004476035,0.00007195142,0.0049243504,0.0008908716,0.000040057275,0.0001506428,0.0056794174,0.00037759726,0.00013570108,0.010973663,0.97661805,0.00009302091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19399981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33359802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19399981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022373026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06612441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38574123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204195310","doi":"10.24926/19441992.533","title":"Slicing the Rent-Seeking Onion: Why Differential Rent-Seeking Explains the Competitive Disadvantage of United States Sports Franchises in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Rent-seeking; Differential (mechanical device); Advertising; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010537371110391281,"score_gpt":0.20123047054374743,"score_spread":0.19069309943335616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204195310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826878,0.0004027653,0.00021875167,0.0031090614,0.000020781297,0.000014136774,0.0005381611,0.00000786983,0.013000797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789494,0.00008637756,0.000038835442,0.0001671027,0.00000789169,0.0000015690571,0.00010211004,0.000004918677,0.001696396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991115,0.000062531966,0.000018298984,0.000101703656,0.00014021338,0.0005657539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707603,0.0004109192,0.0003687867,0.00015468277,0.00078370905,0.0012057597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072446704,0.00017020186,0.00050921354,0.0011487943,0.0048577194,0.0029835608,0.0012610651,0.0010811703,0.010747384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036584295,0.00018947372,0.00049727934,0.0018835596,0.0025810306,0.0010493826,0.0013461809,0.0014692834,0.00046161198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023918514,0.00013224638,0.93883586,0.00003446617,0.00012266956,0.00043943527,0.0067071696,0.0013290048,0.0005823043,0.022756608,0.010011393,0.01880971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024223667,0.000026579308,0.9606558,0.000071811446,0.0000910934,0.00010746086,0.02315623,0.0024403206,0.00022285506,0.0049855816,0.008180948,0.000037096597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98775357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025762022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011008498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014517483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206057171","doi":"10.24926/19441992.544","title":"Looking to the North While Playing Doctor: Solving the H-1B Visa Problem by Following Canada's Lead","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); History; Medicine; Geology","score_opus":0.010781017278165777,"score_gpt":0.2592165192503363,"score_spread":0.2484355019721705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206057171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30879992,0.0013159787,0.005737197,0.20688184,0.001351428,0.00012936212,0.00048012822,0.00020096143,0.47510317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907301,0.0007664287,0.0037512952,0.011723336,0.00009561799,0.000041573174,0.00014620379,0.00013358757,0.092612036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976928,0.00041742582,0.000020697062,0.00016970337,0.00028496687,0.0014143775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950654,0.0007758427,0.00021716736,0.00017344451,0.0009717666,0.0027964052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022808143,0.00039110388,0.00048335904,0.0007019268,0.036729157,0.008119569,0.0019864456,0.005224374,0.024613064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007896175,0.00035793896,0.0004160084,0.0016096069,0.005456045,0.002741475,0.002847118,0.005312364,0.0024943051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036945235,0.00054164336,0.053049225,0.00012235228,0.00006723028,0.0015144403,0.043296564,0.0049252207,0.0006534233,0.1922469,0.5367269,0.1664866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014918623,0.00015564586,0.03082968,0.0005759642,0.00011277202,0.00051506807,0.36770362,0.012093094,0.0010077906,0.08192439,0.5047476,0.00018525933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9690215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99026126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036729157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028574618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08278465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20732433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155161874","doi":"10.24926/19441992.558","title":"The Canadian Middle Road: Balancing Efficiency and Sovereignty in the Age of Multijurisdictional Merger Review","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Merger control; Competition (biology); Competition law","score_opus":0.018009477252855063,"score_gpt":0.27124642843409674,"score_spread":0.2532369511812417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155161874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025090342,0.19519277,0.002195835,0.5298794,0.0057541723,0.00011643795,0.00058714184,0.00009314903,0.24109074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71636844,0.11010374,0.0033839669,0.09470631,0.004680481,0.00016195345,0.00049717515,0.00012366488,0.06997428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98309153,0.0032274236,0.00049588305,0.0009138342,0.008793213,0.003478221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361553,0.01434623,0.0016176814,0.0012170697,0.042217016,0.004446588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020038866,0.00044445173,0.00082081585,0.007909985,0.015574133,0.017469924,0.0030549474,0.0076174783,0.0060804556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057680767,0.00043228458,0.00044099998,0.008766914,0.009360248,0.0072704037,0.0025140988,0.0050641,0.0005338755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065974265,0.000021607251,0.0025501847,0.00037084892,0.000051651263,0.00022181272,0.0026571369,0.0006251544,0.00017035939,0.48471978,0.44058037,0.067965135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026576536,0.000021110847,0.009124488,0.0011890786,0.00007937224,0.00007463917,0.005665969,0.0005970077,0.0002549984,0.056818496,0.92603207,0.000116082214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9326909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96631706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082367405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24996743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5976201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W784505344","doi":"10.24926/19441992.741","title":"Representing Chinese Real Estate Investors in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Business; Investment (military); Politics; Property law; Institutional investor; Face (sociological concept); Chinese market; Finance; Law and economics; Property rights; Economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01744740310416218,"score_gpt":0.23826878287202727,"score_spread":0.2208213797678651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W784505344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424099,0.0004893376,0.00020626996,0.007937139,0.00008533031,0.00006137368,0.00012254775,0.000014646418,0.04867336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783426,0.0008171298,0.00020434246,0.0020630232,0.000034504632,0.000034609002,0.00007816318,0.000002714499,0.018422902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994456,0.00016977063,0.000015153715,0.000043070635,0.00011968003,0.00020663162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992804,0.00009746965,0.00008510012,0.000039691797,0.00019476435,0.0003025873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001403467,0.00019295083,0.0001099448,0.000507055,0.0031176363,0.001706551,0.0003386267,0.0005305697,0.0055478066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001348786,0.000085135485,0.000074942356,0.00089483045,0.001015598,0.00084742036,0.0012090927,0.0005880231,0.00043007082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030634727,0.000515769,0.40478918,0.00012468964,0.00003646618,0.0018450171,0.16032718,0.0011848911,0.0043774988,0.048005167,0.13458279,0.24390505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005926705,0.00039602187,0.37867776,0.0002543686,0.00008809635,0.0006139316,0.2777355,0.0059587006,0.003962888,0.0059204116,0.32622448,0.00010864212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11361736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21664451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11361736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037980047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053747804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2259121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}