{"meta":{"query_hash":"021687be09d9","filters":{"venue":"Minnesota journal of international law"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/021687be09d9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Minnesota+journal+of+international+law"},"results":[{"id":"W1516339818","doi":"10.24926/19441992.586","title":"Squaring the Circle: Democratizing Judicial Review and the Counter-Constitutional Difficulty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong; Yale University","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Judicial review; Legislation; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Original meaning; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.015825647471893398,"score_gpt":0.29514844867312867,"score_spread":0.27932280120123526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516339818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046265524,0.08677192,0.008352174,0.26571104,0.005801909,0.00078970735,0.000038960323,0.000035955436,0.58623284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876911,0.0055479757,0.00007535844,0.005069101,0.0015110648,0.0000031865145,0.0000012486157,0.0000025949305,0.000098351324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837947,0.000110994464,0.0004948422,0.0000952073,0.00073775195,0.00018174863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825174,0.00067116873,0.00033488957,0.000057674573,0.0006217332,0.00006281603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031270396,0.0000904492,0.00021006326,0.000036656984,0.0015721935,0.00012833173,0.00042285386,0.00003752899,0.0000879437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072024413,0.000051276944,0.0001330324,0.00014323297,0.0046020024,0.00028418633,0.00007821272,0.00024526936,0.000007835034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000548845,0.000022746402,0.0010225041,0.0000054030293,0.00011323398,0.000015087259,0.00067431066,0.0000038498792,0.000018020199,0.9948937,0.0014610538,0.0017151757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001426105,0.000033018616,0.018523367,0.0007379859,0.00029358282,0.00044957857,0.002330729,0.000009895107,0.000026881939,0.058566704,0.9173972,0.00020496419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008835681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002271106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011371168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019400066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166624088","doi":"10.24926/19441992.584","title":"Choice of Jurisdiction in International Trade Disputes: Going Regional or Global","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Respondent; International trade; International trade law; Political science; Free trade agreement; World trade; Business; Free trade; Law; International economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021803322662486774,"score_gpt":0.32974487096462907,"score_spread":0.30794154830214227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166624088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47224742,0.00076877826,0.0104014715,0.1908119,0.015581291,0.0005625661,0.00013904972,0.00010092572,0.3093866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948374,0.00013279368,0.0026771992,0.0005463953,0.0013530434,7.7435277e-7,0.00001125324,0.000012145562,0.0004289994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736077,0.00008975903,0.00094665383,0.00015477193,0.0012212902,0.0002267516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838686,0.00041138247,0.00068660267,0.00008439911,0.000300403,0.00013035495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012562255,0.00012248196,0.00021285775,0.00026119486,0.00010003064,0.00006523268,0.00072893425,0.0001043763,0.0006161325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005840003,0.00011263958,0.00012557406,0.00059909024,0.00029649446,0.0009175043,0.000042437463,0.0002119992,0.000006503261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000399792,0.00044514652,0.09690645,0.000009108317,0.00015495227,0.00010274912,0.0024974297,0.00015326211,0.0006205765,0.89248663,0.0024497337,0.0037741787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016465643,0.00008914737,0.14741305,0.00024489718,0.00002476919,0.00013811314,0.0011744762,0.000102645005,0.0008746775,0.0016356419,0.84646684,0.00018916557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005215175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009039554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89085096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064914336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024256164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6746219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153811296","doi":"10.24926/19441992.594","title":"Sovereignty, Taxation and Social Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Sovereignty; Interdependence; Law and economics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Tax policy; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Political science; Double taxation; Tax reform; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.014107899997962952,"score_gpt":0.22919504368637184,"score_spread":0.2150871436884089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153811296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7916101,0.00016769546,0.00087277015,0.024897305,0.0010196726,0.000090894195,0.0000055879914,0.000026842477,0.18130913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918658,0.000012388125,0.00015753946,0.0058107153,0.0019287474,3.644102e-7,0.000009056445,0.00000489674,0.00021049046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992781,0.0000052307487,0.00029283765,0.000074131625,0.00026999394,0.0000796948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844015,0.000019067484,0.0010730784,0.000032143646,0.0004275176,0.000008061294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022253927,0.00007849056,0.00011663757,0.00012076726,0.00009350262,0.0002341197,0.00014558776,0.000032382137,0.0004263265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073751165,0.00006832534,0.000058793245,0.00007320306,0.000033253007,0.0013531584,0.000020600453,0.000100030324,0.000027615262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080360536,0.00006361276,0.0024477215,0.000005375724,0.000018859031,0.000016813414,0.00003097197,0.00001174786,0.002077877,0.9838467,0.002551572,0.008848392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028997462,0.000064039,0.22161165,0.00009048183,0.000062493324,0.00012873043,0.00016538896,0.0023302166,0.0005998003,0.14248125,0.6292169,0.0003492958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023917548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019192576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84136546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002346524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011197095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46679762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336064461","doi":"10.24926/19441992.600","title":"Teaching the Rule of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Stanford Law School; Georgetown University; York University; George Washington University; Michigan State University; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0201261584110371,"score_gpt":0.30868491608554094,"score_spread":0.28855875767450384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336064461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051007256,0.0007244098,0.00013253634,0.053757228,0.00081368245,0.000040703693,0.000006430519,0.000005410004,0.89351237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642015,0.00008697744,0.00023877749,0.0019574452,0.0008787037,3.573398e-7,4.6270944e-7,0.0000014841547,0.0004156508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896795,0.000067560264,0.00028346683,0.000047038342,0.00053854217,0.00009542666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992052,0.00013571086,0.00023507631,0.000040743307,0.00034827008,0.00003500844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072493876,0.000050378334,0.00011205817,0.000030209107,0.00043409166,0.00003349003,0.00039901485,0.000026120802,0.000093934585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001465282,0.0000327196,0.00011214007,0.000046176374,0.00045795992,0.00024716146,0.000022497696,0.00014947123,0.0000063544494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020362397,0.00005614024,0.00021840668,3.7748808e-7,0.00004336406,0.0000058568726,0.0020623168,0.000010101669,0.00030146868,0.9947267,0.00049486605,0.0020600162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018049742,0.00005637772,0.0019970986,0.000049332673,0.000018433082,0.000020237185,0.0009684615,0.0000031546122,0.00025823107,0.17662363,0.8197711,0.00005340493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034685943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007464733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051633127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006589365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990994843","doi":"10.24926/19441992.565","title":"Canada and International Trade in Culture: Beyond National Interests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.024560931624250174,"score_gpt":0.28844597540535805,"score_spread":0.2638850437811079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990994843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23998518,0.001321283,0.00003202258,0.46081397,0.005123973,0.00021100996,0.00011711693,0.000015542266,0.2923799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98616,0.00031461904,0.000611198,0.0024217905,0.0011997449,0.0000018308929,0.000011273392,0.0000053000526,0.009274242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998427,0.000042984277,0.00045525027,0.000111795656,0.0008078087,0.000155196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933714,0.00007140399,0.00021927948,0.000029453964,0.0002284359,0.00011426493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044051424,0.000096898686,0.00012832716,0.00009490336,0.00009984606,0.00011642823,0.00039063283,0.00006704032,0.0006085891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019912685,0.00008258963,0.00004499964,0.00010514968,0.00011956285,0.0005881919,0.000048339247,0.00023620352,0.0000018298273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011619042,0.00017654701,0.018194247,0.0000035209455,0.00019906189,0.000089649904,0.0051790434,0.00017698422,0.00024959873,0.3490327,0.6050444,0.021538032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047314214,0.000014615884,0.008221148,0.000040422176,0.000003468243,0.00007573826,0.00093255827,0.000040792274,0.0001098264,0.0009026405,0.9890859,0.00009973134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09970542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86456907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7648636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095847587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065526477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9062897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994948234","doi":"10.24926/19441992.684","title":"Mortgage Borrowing: A Comparative Analysis of National Regulatory Approaches to Loans and Lenders in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Mortgage insurance; Mortgage underwriting; Shared appreciation mortgage; Economics; Financial system; Finance; Insurance policy; Casualty insurance","score_opus":0.05629502921329254,"score_gpt":0.2288886820819786,"score_spread":0.17259365286868605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994948234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180156,0.00023206531,0.00021143456,0.0018585289,0.00017190912,0.000051623618,0.0001226728,8.9419893e-7,0.005549332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889326,0.00007330087,0.00036736828,0.0005255018,0.000036881138,0.000002177117,0.000015477446,0.000004312709,0.000081746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909,0.000020573307,0.00056458724,0.00011962064,0.00011490394,0.00009031306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991694,0.0001645795,0.00042850323,0.00006900656,0.00011864956,0.000049862803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006104823,0.000082328224,0.0003534648,0.0005189936,0.00003977679,0.000031658554,0.00017079871,0.000028172453,0.00003584573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028905579,0.00006937108,0.000060579336,0.0003415512,0.00015432222,0.00015801142,0.00003165722,0.00017340785,3.5553992e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012283267,0.000042885917,0.09444187,0.0000057148895,0.00058235927,0.0000067059373,0.0041582105,0.006159499,0.000041021296,0.8941072,0.00028936373,0.000042304753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038141406,0.00007171153,0.7898461,0.000053765067,0.00011110087,0.0000668706,0.002220983,0.09416464,0.0003253724,0.011706464,0.097220846,0.00039796063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23229256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5992041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88240075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010134281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000876989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137592572","doi":"10.24926/19441992.598","title":"International Bribery: The Moral Imperialism Critiques","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Enforcement; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Scholarship; Business; Political science; Convention; International law; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Terrorism; Economics","score_opus":0.027965460359406294,"score_gpt":0.31191816989308324,"score_spread":0.28395270953367696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137592572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056696516,0.00206989,0.00022735668,0.47271407,0.03771375,0.00010720169,0.000047608348,0.000014485862,0.43040913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93317574,0.005310124,0.0013335141,0.010494667,0.008062131,0.0000023018113,0.000012922225,0.000012809175,0.041595798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978422,0.00016738547,0.0008643237,0.0001700522,0.00067801937,0.00027802453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982632,0.00013995034,0.0005745576,0.00011845907,0.000744741,0.00015911361],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013785416,0.00017639363,0.0002441204,0.000117434065,0.00026211358,0.00042727968,0.0011582292,0.000120535005,0.008142492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018609641,0.00014572834,0.00029443545,0.000119104654,0.00041852772,0.0011310377,0.00007462381,0.00032823443,0.0001814136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009514463,0.00018737803,0.0003882636,0.0000018789527,0.00017857607,0.0000595955,0.0041505336,0.00003773273,0.0001680689,0.88020325,0.028224276,0.0863053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050804886,0.00008031411,0.0034563842,0.00010471858,0.000027484326,0.00030019926,0.0011423413,0.00011761828,0.0001008767,0.011235725,0.98276603,0.00016023399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041177706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026162167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006199217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023341634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200829091","doi":"10.24926/19441992.362","title":"U.S.-Canadian Grain Disputes","year":2000,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.013026885023747626,"score_gpt":0.26358370655932206,"score_spread":0.25055682153557446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200829091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019626364,0.008426058,0.000012696527,0.041367084,0.009189601,0.000106317784,0.0001929393,0.000012525143,0.9210664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8745508,0.017353952,0.0004591691,0.0044719987,0.008007251,0.0000018750129,0.000026109401,0.000039455426,0.095089346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996898,0.00024352934,0.000934605,0.00023430883,0.0012393633,0.00045016824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770576,0.00019830835,0.00043482636,0.00014186789,0.0010320097,0.00048722973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010756223,0.00025368985,0.00035056553,0.0002565706,0.0005153291,0.00034980185,0.0013678661,0.00011272294,0.019684406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025800255,0.00022948248,0.00040474048,0.00022611742,0.000533387,0.0008240562,0.000049456958,0.0004075523,0.0025359055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174058,0.0001990355,0.0017789599,0.0000072565304,0.0009566659,0.00037749318,0.0028399567,0.000042247735,0.00003078144,0.8914131,0.089737535,0.012499576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004839507,0.00014118785,0.001578257,0.00020493903,0.00007630242,0.000048504506,0.0003971111,0.000046183366,0.00003741407,0.003308862,0.99344623,0.00023105527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027395658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05841403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062863517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040934462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202365443","doi":"10.24926/19441992.541","title":"Water Wars: Canada's Upstream Battle to Ban Bulk Water Export","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Upstream (networking); Environmental science; International trade; Business; Engineering; History; Ancient history; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.005293642308678378,"score_gpt":0.18727682107046362,"score_spread":0.18198317876178524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202365443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382121,0.000032989738,0.00016415777,0.010404784,0.001129144,0.00005678038,0.000010015203,0.0000054868797,0.04998452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982039,0.000032188793,0.00040538362,0.00263285,0.000282581,0.0000031916645,0.000013983445,0.000016822954,0.014574005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843234,0.00002174324,0.0003644701,0.00017549716,0.0007390552,0.0002669222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995194,0.000020809373,0.00009107754,0.00012508953,0.000021556989,0.00022207896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014953378,0.0001466689,0.00016147549,0.00004318949,0.00009247737,0.000011803749,0.0003896523,0.00003288007,0.013424153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006790725,0.00008605585,0.00009542308,0.000036559497,0.00035419746,0.00023206518,0.0001773498,0.00012910612,0.0006128986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013009983,0.0018743018,0.1380839,0.000014536614,0.0006395582,0.0069648693,0.0066537485,0.025149357,0.29432118,0.001639728,0.5067402,0.016617566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225896,0.00009778279,0.0052743205,0.000013015657,0.000009813355,0.0008531359,0.00017094029,0.00001596842,0.018944,0.00006650762,0.9741749,0.00015371677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0319751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02484406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46743467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007710261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019532123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202923523","doi":"10.24926/19441992.473","title":"Made in the USA Foundation v. United States: NAFTA, the Treaty Clause, and Constitutional Obsolescene","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Commerce Clause; Law; Foundation (evidence); Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.02039607614347775,"score_gpt":0.2995039491316351,"score_spread":0.2791078729881573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202923523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866773,0.00011774633,0.00055302493,0.034627747,0.0006165325,0.00017807739,0.000032368895,0.000006638135,0.07719057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357694,0.0007822003,0.00012320121,0.0025769742,0.00058137934,0.0000048992993,0.000054013475,0.0000038117341,0.0022966051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834025,0.0002622158,0.00039960796,0.00009822144,0.00075707596,0.00014263591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888384,0.00040841248,0.00020789445,0.00006799752,0.0003898104,0.000042060514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012038903,0.00009082905,0.000097745404,0.00011529223,0.0003818822,0.0002228896,0.00045112913,0.0000547381,0.0011871536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001239574,0.00005593841,0.000064083855,0.00020467261,0.0011172004,0.00056202145,0.000013716127,0.00022297181,0.000035938057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007896682,0.00008527106,0.007905861,0.0000013045044,0.00003405665,0.000015962187,0.002094886,0.00039281414,0.00003158106,0.9867524,0.00066829025,0.0019385964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007486175,0.00005376758,0.035096586,0.00007022724,0.000020857637,0.00012870364,0.0011862144,0.0004576004,0.00004394771,0.015639378,0.94645053,0.00010358673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022735894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005069402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016341062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012228027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203241988","doi":"10.24926/19441992.553","title":"Food Fight: An Appraisal of the Fruit and Vegetable Dispute Resolution Corporation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021481693054897544,"score_gpt":0.21119659199756274,"score_spread":0.1897148989426652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203241988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99527496,0.00032979285,0.000013271431,0.0018159696,0.00054330006,0.00006383529,0.000029445362,0.0000047695357,0.0019246273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988652,0.00007335069,0.00024395846,0.00013819433,0.0003263991,0.0000015088577,0.000017038848,6.882277e-7,0.00033364733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.00005035932,0.00032592673,0.000097919954,0.00036089675,0.00009400523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922603,0.00006951832,0.00037050716,0.000031141884,0.0002477617,0.000055011405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016611554,0.000084929736,0.00011842098,0.0000108962795,0.0001090368,0.000050692805,0.0002813434,0.000053604865,0.00016695276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045332195,0.000025923599,0.00006671291,0.00011278977,0.000052266583,0.00042377686,0.00005460901,0.00010086651,0.0000030299889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035063335,0.0011659705,0.19472648,0.000030470495,0.00040012377,0.000021711712,0.0012972389,0.00026645383,0.07455644,0.6804867,0.020352181,0.026345646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048784685,0.00080412265,0.81438965,0.00010930475,0.000032129577,0.00024832127,0.00014186544,0.0006592634,0.007823479,0.0075904145,0.16751595,0.00019764331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037410537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043579654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67289627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025843692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003864394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18280156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204195310","doi":"10.24926/19441992.533","title":"Slicing the Rent-Seeking Onion: Why Differential Rent-Seeking Explains the Competitive Disadvantage of United States Sports Franchises in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Rent-seeking; Differential (mechanical device); Advertising; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.010537371110391281,"score_gpt":0.20123047054374743,"score_spread":0.19069309943335616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204195310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892966,0.0006323653,0.0004393248,0.002644996,0.00085707795,0.000070861,0.00012519413,0.000001948603,0.005931593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969403,0.0017029309,0.000022941773,0.0008189578,0.00024234236,0.0000018139735,0.000039614413,0.000013267645,0.00021781256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.000019545956,0.0010250853,0.00014095263,0.00021128927,0.00018980348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987066,0.0001316292,0.0008314829,0.00016229009,0.00011527418,0.000052761745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004184724,0.00013840987,0.00031926826,0.00018146537,0.00013118681,0.00006496068,0.0004670743,0.000027915588,0.0020595526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003322586,0.00009646506,0.000118583404,0.00020735843,0.00009039504,0.00023932956,0.000040008363,0.00027818716,0.0000024294761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002496733,0.00020397334,0.72979474,0.000029950832,0.00032206616,0.00011458325,0.0031812603,0.031625405,0.000060863866,0.2315375,0.0012970989,0.0015828947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001876907,0.000119774326,0.2829434,0.0007776582,0.000043722004,0.00014333331,0.003712087,0.1138786,0.0002376938,0.00341283,0.5923647,0.00048925675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17526855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18842375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022413905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007468015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206057171","doi":"10.24926/19441992.544","title":"Looking to the North While Playing Doctor: Solving the H-1B Visa Problem by Following Canada's Lead","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); History; Medicine; Geology","score_opus":0.010781017278165777,"score_gpt":0.2592165192503363,"score_spread":0.2484355019721705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206057171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8619379,0.00046452993,0.0020104968,0.07128841,0.002413442,0.00022998419,0.000033329034,0.00001542359,0.061606493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911212,0.00011074976,0.00028624103,0.0036124873,0.0007099015,0.000004009157,0.0000058167134,0.000009999693,0.004139642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817073,0.000116976466,0.00039402113,0.00010739993,0.0009710384,0.00023985063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989627,0.00023693046,0.00026418912,0.000098635675,0.00033517092,0.00010235074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008957798,0.000100983845,0.000120298566,0.000045157725,0.0008455758,0.00029506287,0.00081329956,0.000033105018,0.0001838557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018523575,0.000063001906,0.0001068974,0.00023587847,0.0000578538,0.0003279581,0.00005090956,0.00024498592,0.0000067742803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016654418,0.0002791563,0.16624312,0.000011571375,0.0008457429,0.00029262927,0.075848415,0.010026362,0.0019744362,0.35915667,0.3686266,0.01652877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017850706,0.000016618464,0.0009973102,0.000056495443,0.0000162745,0.000022630464,0.0028385823,0.00075531495,0.000018162023,0.000082547864,0.9949212,0.00009633407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11711488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95685977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036317436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037171502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8887643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155161874","doi":"10.24926/19441992.558","title":"The Canadian Middle Road: Balancing Efficiency and Sovereignty in the Age of Multijurisdictional Merger Review","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Merger control; Competition (biology); Competition law","score_opus":0.018009477252855063,"score_gpt":0.27124642843409674,"score_spread":0.2532369511812417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155161874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09933985,0.2263726,0.000045072742,0.17768098,0.0068916134,0.001174143,0.00084772916,0.0000041571184,0.48764384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650876,0.027297078,0.000038206374,0.0060112323,0.00035384233,0.0000037194745,0.0000018869675,0.000008155144,0.001198268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996804,0.0005290207,0.0009808309,0.00016355653,0.001119353,0.00040324323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978011,0.00059146376,0.00080048374,0.00016266071,0.00043905366,0.00020524043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004174353,0.00016738166,0.00030548417,0.00012229178,0.0007455102,0.00015877654,0.00084253313,0.0000974551,0.00046192456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014852191,0.00011083757,0.00020758863,0.00041986787,0.0007777982,0.00033175942,0.000022651404,0.0004544284,0.000004879797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002185077,0.00007515867,0.0014534113,0.00005465652,0.00008521615,0.000098800534,0.0040216967,0.00005964057,0.00002051227,0.9829471,0.010255389,0.00090654934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043327807,0.000056494766,0.012741499,0.0012849696,0.000044002245,0.00018318262,0.00072843005,0.000082783976,0.000018346875,0.0031903884,0.98109514,0.00014147542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38765517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86814034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048929325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014593741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6164225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W784505344","doi":"10.24926/19441992.741","title":"Representing Chinese Real Estate Investors in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of international law","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Business; Investment (military); Politics; Property law; Institutional investor; Face (sociological concept); Chinese market; Finance; Law and economics; Property rights; Economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01744740310416218,"score_gpt":0.23826878287202727,"score_spread":0.2208213797678651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W784505344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88171536,0.00006303504,0.0006863073,0.0026727056,0.00068707677,0.000051170773,0.000012837793,0.0000037571415,0.114107735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965249,0.001574291,0.00032440273,0.0009959949,0.00032327475,0.000003081212,0.000017882216,0.000009688495,0.00022653778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988694,0.000036344954,0.00072342803,0.00012253107,0.000101454,0.00014684028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999019,0.00011813613,0.00059266324,0.00014545265,0.00009758213,0.000027147456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016049984,0.00009264802,0.0002035582,0.0003412837,0.000059194754,0.00008874049,0.0004993583,0.00003135461,0.00004468443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025389035,0.00007162435,0.00009703638,0.00028011316,0.0000543137,0.00032081793,0.000046244393,0.00018810485,0.000038558697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004072304,0.0000943305,0.2710887,0.000007635178,0.000039936658,0.000032982312,0.0018489823,0.0021951993,0.0000060753446,0.7223882,0.0009819174,0.0012753509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008459388,0.00009205257,0.2564067,0.000037566417,0.000004312726,0.000029145931,0.00031391304,0.0067343945,0.000012487453,0.06993758,0.6654276,0.00015827663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022271324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003578013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6644457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005715558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005851695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33667728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}