{"meta":{"query_hash":"dab61c7f1408","filters":{"venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dab61c7f1408","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Minnesota+journal+of+law%2C+science+%26+technology"},"results":[{"id":"W1134595154","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3547","title":"Identifiable Neuro Ethics Challenges to the Banking of Neuro Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Confidentiality; Data sharing; Function (biology); Brain function; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Genetic data; Plan (archaeology); Psychology; Knowledge management; Neuroscience; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.1987227544014817,"score_gpt":0.3939480531030056,"score_spread":0.1952252987015239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134595154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018907938,0.004379326,0.076366775,0.7417287,0.0020999187,0.00050034345,0.00034425737,0.00010872343,0.15556397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354342,0.0059731477,0.09770628,0.30640075,0.0057046046,0.0019095988,0.000380215,0.00023409269,0.04625703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8891547,0.07294936,0.0066771004,0.0066280174,0.021760078,0.0028308209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6474336,0.27380684,0.014940186,0.033826027,0.024946624,0.005046734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09094594,0.00042432136,0.00066520507,0.0014752939,0.0065731118,0.017584106,0.0037294764,0.018390883,0.008811284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23610236,0.00078619545,0.00066379,0.002383745,0.025041347,0.015421193,0.009991778,0.015480701,0.0028820976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005921582,0.00007062889,0.0013906745,0.0001251924,0.000019900828,0.00070118124,0.005818818,0.00035983202,0.00034299723,0.91620517,0.04288746,0.032018848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003877323,0.000044930573,0.00069528143,0.0009973394,0.000026800632,0.0019777422,0.0035910024,0.0016684876,0.0008976179,0.76978415,0.22022481,0.000053112486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021789975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020562343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09094594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004443994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020252004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48097384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1137268971","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3473","title":"Incidental Findings in Genetic Research: A Vexing Challenge for Community Consent","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Aboriginal Peoples Health; National Human Genome Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; National Institutes of Health; Vancouver Foundation","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Disease; Informed consent; Population; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Environmental health; Pathology","score_opus":0.6554693380633371,"score_gpt":0.597617285877336,"score_spread":0.05785205218600109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1137268971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044347825,0.006630636,0.07002818,0.8856448,0.0076089376,0.0020259733,0.00022287323,0.0002542519,0.02314959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19239077,0.009685324,0.17021571,0.5863465,0.014157488,0.013474956,0.0005489978,0.00048412115,0.012696125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.54443514,0.3532107,0.032189474,0.018121656,0.044982404,0.0070606302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19032794,0.67030436,0.00996746,0.07585245,0.042815745,0.01073202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.58177507,0.0016364518,0.0049004783,0.0043900684,0.0121663865,0.012642579,0.013464855,0.061780386,0.007657101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65528446,0.003192665,0.0022594829,0.003964934,0.061625607,0.026195,0.021468943,0.063397706,0.004289554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041569522,0.00028977144,0.0032414475,0.001216161,0.00014689691,0.002344917,0.023481496,0.0007518361,0.0010154251,0.6320382,0.20871535,0.12634283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005972791,0.00031023083,0.002035049,0.007572472,0.00011807262,0.003896263,0.0092210295,0.003537761,0.0008353649,0.6653613,0.30613184,0.00038337303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009010162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00883153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00581458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054930214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5157459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13638517","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3617","title":"A Synthetic Theory of Law and Technology","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Technological determinism; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Vision; Law; Technological change; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.01533502580803727,"score_gpt":0.24538025361802474,"score_spread":0.23004522780998746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13638517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026294526,0.0036609967,0.33478427,0.029102216,0.0007192868,0.00020768608,0.0004169138,0.00019498862,0.604619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997981,0.0024212631,0.050932296,0.0025813591,0.00070942444,0.0004034765,0.00033846634,0.000116165764,0.042699467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732566,0.0014475741,0.00009916596,0.00039439814,0.000502407,0.00023076376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942682,0.0039072945,0.00032663657,0.0007958791,0.00043912567,0.0002628328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034833993,0.0005711355,0.00056509336,0.0030865811,0.0021750387,0.009259528,0.0013263627,0.002622098,0.011384377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066375183,0.00034971905,0.0010689212,0.0017528163,0.017470537,0.01032176,0.0028148566,0.0032212024,0.0010803625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018326374,0.0000050288522,0.0000630141,0.0000088582665,0.0000022266504,0.000015704953,0.00016895095,0.0003250124,0.000018814428,0.99791425,0.00039573724,0.0010806104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008099364,0.00001064076,0.0001043595,0.000030246283,0.0000027237418,0.000066319364,0.00023429548,0.0024056411,0.000056313504,0.9757293,0.021347253,0.000004942112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015108903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008265923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011384377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038502903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019555879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038084507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1463745293","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3697","title":"Can Regulation be as Innovative as Science and Technology? The FDA's Regulation of Combination Products","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"","keywords":"Food and drug administration; Regulatory science; Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; Business; Product (mathematics); Regulatory affairs; Risk analysis (engineering); Gene technology; Medicine; Biotechnology; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.015416698918184108,"score_gpt":0.2982455711496779,"score_spread":0.28282887223149383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1463745293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031314956,0.027098188,0.0057520913,0.8483778,0.00428379,0.000027194454,0.000049089092,0.00005728805,0.11122304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2630303,0.023185747,0.0052257734,0.6722995,0.013820168,0.00024903478,0.000069760354,0.00009633706,0.022023441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726079,0.009626384,0.0012262085,0.0027039757,0.01197691,0.0018586671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734291,0.018336523,0.0019576675,0.0020300124,0.0032874946,0.0009592777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028705906,0.000504259,0.0011332792,0.0013479475,0.0047118305,0.014204827,0.002253696,0.028504735,0.006906928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06278813,0.0004957639,0.0011999884,0.0013653805,0.029655222,0.020283908,0.0047065136,0.015419947,0.0015805147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026965428,0.000035560537,0.0004567603,0.00005700785,0.0000121170615,0.00008860058,0.00049353053,0.0001559157,0.0001667887,0.9351986,0.043673575,0.019634534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055267945,0.000057351368,0.0006542593,0.00083018665,0.00002766972,0.00030171406,0.0005999794,0.00049392466,0.00025784536,0.6011938,0.39548188,0.00004622472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078012957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063226367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006033588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009690499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15181315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496624269","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3649","title":"Frontiers of Medical Technology: Reflections on the Intersection of Innovation and the Health Care System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Politics; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Health care; Media studies; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.024314354189117714,"score_gpt":0.34869226024367045,"score_spread":0.32437790605455274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496624269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003769819,0.03774633,0.001759767,0.8644008,0.00229367,0.000012835345,0.000010120406,0.000012368365,0.08999429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6749982,0.038397215,0.0023865318,0.23139958,0.014103955,0.00015928618,0.000017642516,0.00005975842,0.03847781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98210055,0.012946841,0.00026732893,0.0006613325,0.002362514,0.0016614946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97357565,0.024138188,0.00058317755,0.0002971641,0.00056119676,0.0008447079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015983777,0.0005220143,0.00057388074,0.0021872448,0.011199386,0.017533543,0.002075825,0.015025379,0.0043891366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01702751,0.00047752375,0.000803208,0.0015249425,0.080057226,0.01555919,0.009859469,0.013952903,0.00041410312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007417542,0.000013670194,0.0000887356,0.000045165732,0.0000018889593,0.00010850558,0.013737205,0.00008317198,0.000044025655,0.96513045,0.01771223,0.0030275017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020107434,0.000026874868,0.0004242747,0.0005512622,0.0000057666202,0.00018845419,0.019640608,0.00026642022,0.00020805954,0.45772737,0.5209224,0.000018327471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011248368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01109972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021531545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144726625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.156223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501196208","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3498","title":"You Are Too Soft!: What Can Corporate Social Responsibility Do For Climate Change?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Summit; Climate change; Greenhouse gas; Presidential system; Political science; Parliament; China; Montreal Protocol; Earth Summit; International community; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Political economy of climate change; Global warming; Political economy; Economy; International trade; Sustainable development; Business; Politics; Economics; Law; Geography; Ozone layer; Meteorology","score_opus":0.23240535895471812,"score_gpt":0.2944822126321513,"score_spread":0.06207685367743318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501196208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007793266,0.024753315,0.0024193635,0.90281993,0.0015915257,0.000018025321,0.00008426344,0.0000242803,0.060496066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85419333,0.041301664,0.0014057896,0.090132944,0.005501992,0.00013293797,0.000094777526,0.00006055634,0.0071760775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903874,0.00603838,0.00014904495,0.00056478503,0.001433564,0.0014268657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97980005,0.011711615,0.0020017321,0.00067076075,0.002841361,0.0029745747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013266607,0.00071227597,0.00068776467,0.0017536484,0.0068291766,0.01228424,0.0016557297,0.010572145,0.0080614155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03484631,0.00023523247,0.0006547428,0.0019161544,0.02035607,0.022500394,0.0048351036,0.009450465,0.0012538532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007978149,0.00012706888,0.0024504606,0.00038220975,0.000045934084,0.000109545654,0.003688169,0.0008656082,0.000068419664,0.8405369,0.09032999,0.06131592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017350256,0.000029600711,0.0022400469,0.0009729308,0.000014549645,0.000040049534,0.004309892,0.0006334563,0.00008430536,0.8925448,0.099077314,0.000035795558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009368782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009003429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013266607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007957935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009523834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07016134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521262703","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3584","title":"Building Intellectual Property Management Capacity in Public Research Institutions in Vietnam: Current Needs and Future Directions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Minnesota","keywords":"Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Public administration; State (computer science); Political science; Normative; Investment (military); Public policy; Economic growth; Capacity building; Public relations; Business; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.23331946884852034,"score_gpt":0.3256289065274671,"score_spread":0.09230943767894678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521262703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16774243,0.075077064,0.0068649063,0.48718518,0.0007854098,0.0005416847,0.0006509748,0.00032261308,0.2608297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92804736,0.03375693,0.0074877082,0.009901601,0.0005709782,0.00025811928,0.00047630823,0.000033671222,0.019467346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969855,0.001206568,0.00008111789,0.00022529805,0.00032644902,0.0011749536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96962637,0.010446214,0.0026495066,0.0012104242,0.0047900653,0.0112774195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337438,0.00027055782,0.00035509467,0.0017487246,0.003123987,0.009274368,0.002806685,0.0026700294,0.021747833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011552072,0.00025099335,0.00029422017,0.0025441914,0.007150632,0.011261076,0.0042340592,0.0017678484,0.0011086568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001660388,0.0011271822,0.033436075,0.002647887,0.00003329652,0.00079146307,0.012024638,0.0018337092,0.00057973055,0.38619664,0.052473873,0.50868946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016799166,0.00040023794,0.04270607,0.0071156267,0.000039835926,0.00045849316,0.08028851,0.005435911,0.0010173756,0.14538845,0.7168889,0.000092611415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05107949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04291462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05107949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012316189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05566632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10156435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802083710","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3741","title":"To Use or Not to Use: Reforming Patent Infringement, the Public Use Bar, and the Experimental Use Doctrine as Applied to Clinical Testing of Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Invention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Patent infringement; Doctrine; Patent law; Medical device; Bar (unit); Business; Law and economics; Engineering; Law; Economics; Political science; Intellectual property; Biomedical engineering","score_opus":0.27340159009258685,"score_gpt":0.42486286621856606,"score_spread":0.1514612761259792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802083710","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02335054,0.013576721,0.031975105,0.6395528,0.0017946064,0.00010297948,0.00004747506,0.00010451085,0.2894953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.720779,0.008635256,0.015906096,0.16709565,0.0025793246,0.00021132063,0.000028545564,0.00009404459,0.08467079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959446,0.0054284744,0.00039792282,0.0010048489,0.002631364,0.0009428952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730661,0.023194516,0.0008682359,0.0007505697,0.0015037867,0.00061677623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013945701,0.00041400088,0.0006860364,0.00092593743,0.0049493597,0.010539087,0.001989274,0.020041713,0.002595438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027095925,0.0005784552,0.0005054477,0.0007165771,0.02849956,0.011307105,0.002848334,0.013230071,0.00041926306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022931761,0.000023387953,0.00019319476,0.00001959414,0.0000044429817,0.000072797724,0.0012868001,0.00021265232,0.00017498575,0.97859037,0.011558024,0.007840907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010041313,0.000109248846,0.0009050745,0.0003189848,0.000053645264,0.00015378828,0.0016371076,0.0019710646,0.0016696601,0.8409074,0.15210807,0.00006543436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013782196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023368742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020041713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063447626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010830809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07375276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980235613","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3822","title":"When Cute Becomes Criminal: Emoji, Threats and Online Grooming","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emoji; Exploit; Internet privacy; Vicarious liability; Psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Social psychology; Computer security; Political science; Social media; Tort; Computer science; Liability; Law","score_opus":0.015761889329670892,"score_gpt":0.263393754690004,"score_spread":0.24763186536033308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980235613","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29639608,0.56613165,0.0057941605,0.020899298,0.0018250506,0.00018186818,0.00045000832,0.000068315334,0.10825351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6275441,0.3549134,0.0030334413,0.0077479957,0.0006232138,0.0001043101,0.0003018405,0.00003414293,0.0056974255],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968593,0.0016751128,0.0003750729,0.00021186186,0.00071062054,0.00016798006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108535,0.0066005653,0.001466923,0.00016891435,0.00054334314,0.00013490628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002804088,0.00034808303,0.00057228113,0.0040651537,0.0013399165,0.0044961553,0.00050050905,0.0016036188,0.0018743317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013843936,0.00024497468,0.0004722871,0.0027698933,0.0041683475,0.0046800296,0.0017622873,0.0014712645,0.0003616949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019360498,0.000096101256,0.03362555,0.017606111,0.00034467736,0.0065418445,0.04972182,0.00024850413,0.0028438678,0.07066688,0.017976373,0.8001348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002037563,0.00029847375,0.15983294,0.05456702,0.0008448421,0.024649072,0.13369057,0.0003976704,0.0046662753,0.026819436,0.5940388,0.00017456537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022989202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077376463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044961553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009823982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014316256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014829576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121702970","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3494","title":"Structure-Function Analysis of Global Pharmaceutical Linkage Regulations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Linkage (software); Tying; Business; Intellectual property; Generic drug; Public economics; Function (biology); International trade; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Drug; Political science; Medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.06382007411605199,"score_gpt":0.3134450849888588,"score_spread":0.2496250108728068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121702970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41222417,0.002797645,0.34463578,0.0078788875,0.00018958186,0.0003782965,0.0013059347,0.00078332063,0.22980638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620198,0.0010282903,0.009210312,0.0004466766,0.0001543224,0.00018962349,0.00034015797,0.000099825695,0.026510974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.00073377456,0.000043649754,0.00029220124,0.00041490185,0.00049958617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936638,0.0035790794,0.0011890596,0.00054436934,0.00074493006,0.0002787293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045132404,0.00077035883,0.001570203,0.0023678648,0.0012337533,0.0031539642,0.0013504584,0.002954742,0.015265657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01423154,0.0006051291,0.0022427624,0.0019000482,0.0026747063,0.0030178835,0.0021859547,0.0027882645,0.00088239997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043082706,0.00009391704,0.002083131,0.00006216098,0.00007646441,0.00017065089,0.00014058339,0.13223596,0.00038225792,0.85073054,0.004039909,0.009941408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001062956,0.00015342094,0.006371402,0.00008106403,0.00011655722,0.0000946266,0.00022158143,0.3275311,0.00038444428,0.65165865,0.013221488,0.00005941323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012134577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00578883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015265657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042263507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025125938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051068664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123964665","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3835","title":"Renewable Energy and Trade: Meeting the Paris Agreement’s Goals Through a Two-Step Jurisprudential Advance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"TRIUMF","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Agreement; Energy (signal processing); Economics; International economics; International trade; Engineering; Philosophy; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Linguistics; Statistics","score_opus":0.011758268567920343,"score_gpt":0.2518512070243082,"score_spread":0.24009293845638785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123964665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018994715,0.0037283294,0.016874885,0.25071013,0.0031267153,0.00018323437,0.00008872854,0.00018560569,0.7061076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6034431,0.0023958765,0.024188772,0.10625564,0.0022566938,0.00057592546,0.00007972409,0.00019868158,0.2606056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796207,0.0046888776,0.00039742503,0.0009865811,0.0038896375,0.0020755546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950369,0.002987685,0.000256608,0.00055644935,0.00066745427,0.0004949609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012160687,0.0010673297,0.0005575853,0.0015944366,0.009573962,0.017870234,0.0028284516,0.029275045,0.007623666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015807511,0.0006561843,0.0011290578,0.0009703859,0.015261865,0.010512968,0.010775247,0.015291084,0.0018634656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011695162,0.000021194295,0.00005640752,0.000014044637,0.000003850907,0.00011966792,0.0007446894,0.00035602355,0.0000682753,0.9845147,0.010775394,0.003313963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008920783,0.000076158976,0.0007151244,0.00024641625,0.000014731842,0.00020456813,0.0027459401,0.0015629082,0.0012662624,0.5675969,0.42538154,0.00010032079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018530553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031937283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029275045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013674961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0267045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09921926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153679474","doi":"10.24926/15529541.3837","title":"Antitrust Policy Toward Patent Licensing: Why Negotiation Matters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law, science & technology","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Law and economics; Patent law; Business; International trade; Industrial organization; Intellectual property; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1043616754068066,"score_gpt":0.25124666626024206,"score_spread":0.14688499085343545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153679474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054919817,0.010201159,0.050675888,0.5155807,0.0013932624,0.0001252711,0.00007708431,0.0002067051,0.36682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93933594,0.0024909012,0.0033308333,0.044171844,0.001196762,0.000101523605,0.000018726183,0.00008225946,0.0092711495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683967,0.011793813,0.0010762219,0.0044250106,0.010295019,0.0040132166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91862774,0.06002471,0.0059497217,0.00505423,0.008133608,0.002210092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041445296,0.0005593699,0.0010551,0.0021529591,0.0093412595,0.021405837,0.0030422297,0.021043971,0.011598237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09477266,0.00070078654,0.0011250923,0.002132359,0.037995093,0.026607975,0.0066009094,0.019560037,0.0020236224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011796298,0.000014379737,0.00028057973,0.000031605192,0.0000067665806,0.00008343432,0.00055739045,0.00040314396,0.0001259804,0.989342,0.0042324807,0.004910431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034646146,0.00001572156,0.00029607542,0.00015283214,0.000011035926,0.00008637388,0.000589939,0.0012759635,0.00032334885,0.96826386,0.028927326,0.000022909906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007879413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033878877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041445296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014303042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013519184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2191863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}