{"meta":{"query_hash":"ebf1c03b0933","filters":{"venue":"Modern Intellectual History"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ebf1c03b0933","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Modern+Intellectual+History"},"results":[{"id":"W1995615166","doi":"10.1017/s1479244304000356","title":"DID THE OLD SOUTH HAVE A MIND OF ITS OWN?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Quarter (Canadian coin); Order (exchange); History; Art history; Intellectual history; Classics; Art; Archaeology; Economic history","score_opus":0.05571873749089862,"score_gpt":0.20602941767177033,"score_spread":0.1503106801808717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995615166","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08094734,0.022833439,0.0023113664,0.44551912,0.004283477,0.00001828476,0.00012622816,0.00007058361,0.4438902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78406066,0.011896796,0.0016144998,0.03658829,0.0019946673,0.00004251353,0.00007479845,0.00012881192,0.16359895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994831,0.00017664793,0.0000107740725,0.00010886596,0.00010832825,0.000112267335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991198,0.0001805084,0.00006508883,0.00014678112,0.00016475604,0.00032319714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012905163,0.0002040776,0.00029513435,0.0005810459,0.006429872,0.006486979,0.00060607254,0.0014498022,0.009081209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002625873,0.00015368017,0.00017788094,0.00083747495,0.019437516,0.009012512,0.0030363945,0.005178155,0.0016637436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029082956,0.000022925735,0.0025392019,0.00007885064,0.0000115546945,0.00019602418,0.04875484,0.000042561074,0.000355537,0.8642213,0.06009861,0.023649441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068676927,0.000014106542,0.0032479318,0.00019908285,0.0000069903144,0.00014559587,0.05256344,0.000056234814,0.00016524407,0.21702807,0.7265525,0.000013939205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009618764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027914757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009618764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003815056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034740318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030379713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035709889","doi":"10.1017/s1479244315000049","title":"<i>FIAT IUSTITIA, PEREAT MUNDUS</i>: IMMANUEL KANT, FRIEDRICH GENTZ, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF PRUDENTIAL ENLIGHTENMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Enlightenment; Politics; Sovereignty; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050030860299324596,"score_gpt":0.2753803333597251,"score_spread":0.2253494730604005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035709889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007738038,0.20544422,0.0018431399,0.54991955,0.014585562,0.000015438845,0.0001255656,0.0001316427,0.22019689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5435638,0.076412424,0.0030002755,0.15318917,0.025969105,0.0001113864,0.00019361917,0.00027657615,0.19728372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986744,0.0005714722,0.000024767718,0.00019160971,0.00030265766,0.00023514044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.00022934977,0.000074369265,0.00003433673,0.00009551535,0.00006965669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013917144,0.00052412826,0.00033707666,0.0010311744,0.0055177296,0.008653102,0.000797104,0.003786204,0.004221393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025510848,0.00023184906,0.0002482857,0.0009712771,0.01064254,0.004347545,0.0021684945,0.005336737,0.0015908214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031811272,0.000018551547,0.00027171103,0.000086804735,0.000006721078,0.00008852119,0.004145858,0.000077370685,0.00011913408,0.64092547,0.33869275,0.015535183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005215751,0.000007638902,0.0006301347,0.0003126213,0.000004192165,0.00012486946,0.0018092054,0.00011693486,0.00018819066,0.10384403,0.89293915,0.000017794653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009655715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011274151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009655715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005366968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030428865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03894025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058374580","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000012","title":"PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Worship; Publicity; Law; Public sphere; Coercion (linguistics); Separation of church and state; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04619380730988953,"score_gpt":0.20448239299888965,"score_spread":0.15828858568900012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058374580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35262987,0.004753715,0.007910443,0.020399285,0.00026088208,0.000025137258,0.00002099974,0.000031142252,0.61396855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935375,0.00017038,0.00024295687,0.00037654812,0.00005598687,0.0000061060828,0.0000023353325,0.0000096923395,0.005598495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985306,0.0009535462,0.000032110398,0.00015720192,0.00010253918,0.00022399992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909616,0.0005176521,0.00010974492,0.00011106461,0.00006876548,0.00009673435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026663,0.00013459932,0.00017020071,0.00053867523,0.005848577,0.008223538,0.00041549577,0.0015821289,0.0018557028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128966,0.00023029189,0.0001610696,0.00044570354,0.038552027,0.004085215,0.002736126,0.0025654593,0.00015607028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014667458,0.000008746387,0.00020742658,0.0000071006243,0.0000015309357,0.000054813543,0.033813655,0.00005154228,0.00008640948,0.963589,0.0003930434,0.0017721388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037742295,0.000052609335,0.0029201235,0.00013317852,0.000013327792,0.00023663198,0.036420528,0.00052368786,0.00091085065,0.80786574,0.15085031,0.00003524591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065677916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009543633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008223538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047678812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015140682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034593523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067174559","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001333","title":"EDMUND BURKE AND THE POLITICS OF CONQUEST","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; CONQUEST; Action (physics); Theme (computing); Context (archaeology); Criticism; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026662491048400013,"score_gpt":0.27435719713146905,"score_spread":0.24769470608306904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067174559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03369448,0.04950115,0.0036249107,0.13745792,0.00063899107,0.000017323116,0.000030408408,0.000027594097,0.77500725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84733045,0.011004307,0.0012067704,0.013442484,0.00030617893,0.00002674091,0.000011833785,0.00003007009,0.12664114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983639,0.0009050303,0.000019551811,0.00015998937,0.0002447353,0.000306807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877137,0.000760516,0.00007805672,0.000060786522,0.0002106286,0.00011859592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014919938,0.00021215888,0.00022566858,0.0008071643,0.01194565,0.0051723905,0.00050534966,0.0033023644,0.0040845475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027369591,0.0001885073,0.00010901993,0.00084147527,0.018083856,0.0033348969,0.0018269644,0.0035071129,0.0004670386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079590145,0.000007348737,0.00017208671,0.000018039838,0.0000017817301,0.000099960125,0.0043958155,0.00011322375,0.000049321963,0.977657,0.012781535,0.004695969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009815906,0.0000111820145,0.0007682568,0.00018626616,0.0000036440458,0.00012445355,0.0059455573,0.00025163818,0.00023841533,0.35844937,0.63399273,0.000018570734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07062207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10766046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07062207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00897314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004459376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14042205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068304162","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001242","title":"IDEAS, INSTITUTIONS, AND <i>WISSENSCHAFT</i>: ACCOUNTING FOR THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; German; Protestantism; Classics; Politics; Charisma; Medieval studies; Natural philosophy; Philology; History; Modern history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy; Religious studies; Theology; Economic history; Political science; Law; Feminism; Epistemology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.17466364101122042,"score_gpt":0.2903916272155749,"score_spread":0.11572798620435445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068304162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034832854,0.11208058,0.042801395,0.29140967,0.0017332758,0.00006867815,0.000300303,0.00031386124,0.51645935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94414526,0.02307475,0.008484403,0.0035445613,0.0011228217,0.00008362891,0.000101164645,0.0001316251,0.019311732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953909,0.0023949565,0.00021186574,0.0004968323,0.0007874455,0.0007181043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342406,0.002809277,0.0009025052,0.0010239118,0.0008928324,0.00094734924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009930158,0.00069394923,0.0004608198,0.0044701835,0.0069597377,0.022512525,0.0015883893,0.0047391322,0.009343978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498116,0.00056322746,0.00047498557,0.008503086,0.03698809,0.031139499,0.0077629643,0.0048727416,0.001243204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002339544,0.000002631961,0.00016334365,0.000008106871,0.0000013836101,0.0000060681764,0.00058828865,0.00012506804,0.000005942193,0.99425715,0.002736792,0.0021028726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043459113,0.0000029091461,0.0005242297,0.000094444906,0.0000048880197,0.000017786604,0.0015160847,0.00032623802,0.00004539782,0.9474858,0.049967106,0.000010802267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018666668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017810019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99304026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017061975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0165925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1237939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092670239","doi":"10.1017/s147924431500013x","title":"BETWEEN ARISTOTLE AND LUCRETIUS: DISCOURSES OF NATURE AND ROUSSEAU’S<i>DISCOURS SUR L’INEGALITE</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epicureanism; Philosophy; Scrutiny; Politics; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Social contract; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Poetry; Rhetoric; Skepticism; Literature; Law; Theology; Art; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037596281142673826,"score_gpt":0.2795588436107352,"score_spread":0.24196256246806136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092670239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16478334,0.06065773,0.006909085,0.14958662,0.0013646116,0.000022828983,0.00005519556,0.00006449938,0.6165561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785281,0.002225982,0.0008056435,0.0039019058,0.00041270192,0.00003071121,0.000010410232,0.0000418598,0.0140426215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904441,0.00751552,0.000101604855,0.0006110558,0.0008280525,0.0004996328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944126,0.0045207613,0.0003526322,0.00027367775,0.00026866706,0.00017169128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006307765,0.0005664693,0.0005768022,0.002525231,0.016197126,0.011776743,0.0012684176,0.005490759,0.002009359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008472327,0.00028325155,0.0002617088,0.002252247,0.07248814,0.008773807,0.004368695,0.004598336,0.0003110141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020131793,0.000007166487,0.000092426075,0.000021977059,0.0000018414947,0.000070304864,0.131456,0.00003060363,0.00004022687,0.86314,0.002742217,0.0023771946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032966134,0.00003247046,0.0010364079,0.0005267339,0.000008738472,0.00017975784,0.09933167,0.0002323583,0.00030681744,0.46007812,0.43820292,0.000031072064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015653007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015726928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016197126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015475441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039673997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11228269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114327004","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000882","title":"J.S. MILL'S<i>PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY</i>IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA: PUBLICATION AND RECEPTION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Capitalism; Intelligentsia; Politics; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09021412911111881,"score_gpt":0.29799083716751884,"score_spread":0.20777670805640003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114327004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076933384,0.10463929,0.014286075,0.18742879,0.02122557,0.000046778005,0.00012898639,0.00014745675,0.5951637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495964,0.040141787,0.0026789624,0.0075384853,0.011401689,0.000050105387,0.00004190576,0.0001878677,0.08836282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979532,0.0010752771,0.00010226354,0.0001699169,0.0005301661,0.00016912924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949574,0.0035286814,0.0004869775,0.00025140666,0.0005557221,0.00021984488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032992517,0.00029991727,0.0004239668,0.0014985615,0.003179425,0.010803207,0.00043785397,0.0017647033,0.0013707515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008793918,0.00031328594,0.00022550426,0.0017060864,0.00945463,0.0039365645,0.0019221945,0.0033023956,0.0005886638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040888273,0.000018812292,0.0008080938,0.000108491055,0.000012133742,0.0001673507,0.020328432,0.00031866532,0.0002423977,0.89352185,0.05706183,0.027371049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009432375,0.00002908162,0.001970635,0.0003966309,0.000011674607,0.00021369,0.003804769,0.00044612825,0.0007297246,0.15424022,0.8381129,0.000035117188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00187842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018873573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010803207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027146575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019696355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115528173","doi":"10.1017/s1479244312000066","title":"WILLIAM MANNING AND THE POLITICAL THEORY OF THE DEPENDENT CLASSES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Virtue; Political philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.037515984924730496,"score_gpt":0.27127339467262135,"score_spread":0.23375740974789086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115528173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603713,0.022496834,0.0071097743,0.12554851,0.001225659,0.00003353913,0.00007914359,0.000025781863,0.82744354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7691789,0.018257815,0.0031713713,0.018528907,0.003417989,0.00015229377,0.000060996303,0.000063624226,0.18716806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863225,0.000710094,0.000029214907,0.00016520495,0.00029202443,0.0001712114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986771,0.000887224,0.000114163144,0.00008635496,0.00011286421,0.0001222669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014923938,0.0004045943,0.00024390049,0.0015131918,0.00790037,0.0038885747,0.0006818567,0.0023288038,0.005141435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026955775,0.00027052223,0.0002281503,0.0013573089,0.019493,0.00540808,0.0021869077,0.0055061085,0.0006664755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019969166,0.0000040220125,0.000039000777,0.000004136528,4.8679146e-7,0.000009661768,0.00041194682,0.000041558458,0.000010280486,0.9932546,0.0051157526,0.0011065428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007500381,0.000005976928,0.0002513037,0.000055244956,0.00000192765,0.000025301912,0.00055131223,0.00018207425,0.00006274682,0.7841582,0.21469104,0.0000073842675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012037691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015915725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012037691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006280354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025310933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045567334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121424802","doi":"10.1017/s147924430999028x","title":"CAMUS AND THE THEATRE OF TERROR: ARTAUDIAN DRAMATURGY AND SETTLER SOCIETY IN THE WORKS OF ALBERT CAMUS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"North African History and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Dramaturgy; Cruelty; Politics; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Literature; History; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010105305189934891,"score_gpt":0.17098858298618844,"score_spread":0.16088327779625355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121424802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20718572,0.047098164,0.0016309976,0.043571435,0.001479025,0.000034023302,0.000036450743,0.00005724562,0.69890696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522248,0.0056144996,0.0004930905,0.0019496547,0.00056173245,0.000019063116,0.000007922732,0.000032287047,0.039096866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988796,0.0007198419,0.000013513259,0.00006123452,0.0001565939,0.00016926267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943155,0.00033894263,0.00007875337,0.000041802985,0.000053924632,0.000054902684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011279769,0.00047446744,0.00022364143,0.0009755511,0.012195063,0.004823178,0.0004523648,0.0013993751,0.0032132156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019396924,0.0001308006,0.0001165689,0.0011176703,0.018036814,0.0019874158,0.002625728,0.0019761822,0.00030495474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009919157,0.000021431357,0.0010395074,0.00013403327,0.0000064448527,0.0007377889,0.2899356,0.0002668907,0.00047102696,0.65150774,0.03140138,0.024379006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073323567,0.00002290777,0.0022608805,0.00022803093,0.000004523891,0.00055801583,0.062766045,0.00014901446,0.00038956452,0.0151722925,0.91842383,0.00001764465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015519777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02817486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015519777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063921534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014299987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046378493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127884440","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000419","title":"FEARFUL SYMMETRY: THE UNHISTORICAL SELF OF WHITENESS STUDIES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Colonialism; Race (biology); History; Work (physics); Economic history; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.045867757666480206,"score_gpt":0.29303078146396694,"score_spread":0.24716302379748673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127884440","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17752755,0.034499455,0.006686499,0.42422163,0.011267187,0.00004563707,0.00010220615,0.00007157719,0.3455783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272221,0.0063122623,0.0008972988,0.041850798,0.004441669,0.00006964162,0.000029024966,0.000097345655,0.019079871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930784,0.004745722,0.00011155708,0.000625007,0.00095210806,0.00048712097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901753,0.0064075147,0.0006202876,0.0007545355,0.000897421,0.0011449163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012811789,0.00049232383,0.00048240993,0.0023455748,0.015336352,0.008432436,0.0012134267,0.0017796966,0.004250222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764863,0.0002487665,0.00020221117,0.0016168355,0.064997345,0.013455186,0.0056388276,0.008113896,0.00035216892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021425327,0.000048177393,0.0011693387,0.00004404131,0.0000060961693,0.00016617673,0.15857278,0.000024753235,0.00009828552,0.79722524,0.029938862,0.012684813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023928007,0.00004327182,0.0024153597,0.00038471693,0.000010092554,0.0003319359,0.18322383,0.0001922298,0.00024170672,0.4566373,0.35646105,0.000034591547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008378135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00793736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015336352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038365873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037138613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06775606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141904500","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002157","title":"POLITICAL ECONOMY, THE STATE, AND REVOLUTION IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Patriotism; State (computer science); Virtue; Economic history; Economy; Political economy; Order (exchange); Political science; History; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.022220350433676823,"score_gpt":0.20170757661756156,"score_spread":0.17948722618388474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141904500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37077817,0.048077863,0.0008000202,0.054228816,0.00041547112,0.000014510787,0.0000863059,0.000054091535,0.52554476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667498,0.0053571216,0.00015378174,0.0015261099,0.00032095742,0.000010462684,0.000025778576,0.000013640175,0.025842339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897814,0.00050068647,0.00001787615,0.00005712103,0.00012398665,0.00032226372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994474,0.0002578514,0.00011677903,0.000023538629,0.000088475885,0.00006588038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011085216,0.00020901997,0.00017398388,0.0018145795,0.005968408,0.006853978,0.00028969065,0.0012098311,0.002728075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018317107,0.00011495244,0.0002208768,0.0015057556,0.009323384,0.0020515977,0.0013566279,0.0014192875,0.00017337494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000293066,0.000020892137,0.0022007483,0.00003356137,0.000011091054,0.00025552133,0.047446646,0.0002884296,0.00006916437,0.9311649,0.008000444,0.010479306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004371744,0.00006629431,0.026983181,0.00038913274,0.000023959134,0.00032110573,0.034024604,0.0004772708,0.00024159266,0.13100164,0.8063823,0.00004521539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09707902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11552314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09707902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01585954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033619024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19302797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688833","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000638","title":"PROVINCIALIZING AMERICA: NEW AND NOT SO NEW INTELLECTUAL HISTORIES OF WEIMAR GERMANY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"European history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Flourishing; German; Intellectual history; Politics; History; Field (mathematics); Classics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Art history; Economic history; Law","score_opus":0.04324982954483539,"score_gpt":0.2566012595655633,"score_spread":0.2133514300207279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2978151,0.27510414,0.00067241624,0.04212212,0.0018693956,0.000047985195,0.0004911486,0.000106311774,0.3817714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89641225,0.07689659,0.0002944502,0.002481174,0.0004974141,0.000027238646,0.00025079888,0.000036955422,0.023103137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923944,0.00024272356,0.000042597505,0.00005808313,0.00019310812,0.0002240775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991605,0.00039153063,0.00014823834,0.000069954476,0.00015065448,0.000079041594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010730503,0.00016788935,0.00024587766,0.0031807823,0.0039233826,0.0042652967,0.0004551239,0.0007035107,0.0032892271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021443388,0.00013565045,0.00012308315,0.0066822493,0.003346598,0.0028716363,0.0018645754,0.001137837,0.00033398488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010965242,0.000047216316,0.0093589295,0.0021864555,0.00007239079,0.0016766799,0.27791882,0.00052794634,0.0015867183,0.33184102,0.08643316,0.2882409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024235553,0.000012455844,0.015369414,0.0009449079,0.00002713077,0.00040434932,0.03793218,0.0000832797,0.0003414298,0.0057422733,0.9391194,0.000020696592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06784525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14176098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06784525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008395151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070165154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13490069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148706345","doi":"10.1017/s1479244304000113","title":"AN OPEN ELITE: THE PECULIARITIES OF CONNOISSEURSHIP IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; The arts; Aesthetics; Art; Taste; Visual arts; History; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0648806956658354,"score_gpt":0.2428221224471325,"score_spread":0.1779414267812971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148706345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86484694,0.0027601386,0.00064810086,0.0055772024,0.00012217923,0.000021382097,0.0000215775,0.000009630638,0.12599283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893147,0.00038246886,0.0000477404,0.00014987362,0.000029487079,0.0000050139147,0.0000035761584,0.0000070480382,0.010060159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969426,0.0011011845,0.00011888676,0.0003230235,0.00046545602,0.0010488384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680823,0.0016236173,0.00040663424,0.00017045432,0.00029848068,0.0006925917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035920541,0.00016518951,0.00038292055,0.0024853651,0.014925212,0.0098109795,0.00069379783,0.0011503191,0.0062009394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058512646,0.00031678344,0.00012709477,0.0023824072,0.027612617,0.005908892,0.007441608,0.0023373943,0.00029339662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002093715,0.000015133597,0.0028394824,0.000026860766,0.0000020328457,0.00048002208,0.8681024,0.00001563916,0.00014053582,0.12183834,0.00061128614,0.0059073498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018883571,0.00006481619,0.03126939,0.00020055665,0.0000095182395,0.0005415794,0.7492384,0.00011975317,0.00016253472,0.026638487,0.1916939,0.00004215635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11497988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17726846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11497988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010998545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037694154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22862118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149836432","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002121","title":"QUENTIN SKINNER'S HOBBES AND THE NEO-REPUBLICAN PROJECT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Subject (documents); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Intellectual history; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.051794588518913096,"score_gpt":0.22594214427978898,"score_spread":0.17414755576087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149836432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011440582,0.067284554,0.0038305458,0.14386737,0.004486411,0.000019110335,0.0000623598,0.000038093833,0.76897097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5508839,0.037530143,0.0027299272,0.027865041,0.0031927163,0.000104410545,0.00004913095,0.0001600674,0.37748465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873585,0.00079041347,0.000018531007,0.00013683905,0.00018260899,0.00013566893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989687,0.0006677569,0.000055332304,0.00007577172,0.00009402662,0.00013833454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624622,0.00035925306,0.00026712145,0.0007832302,0.0071319966,0.0047994377,0.00048070258,0.0018183049,0.0053425487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002416644,0.00015740984,0.00012130372,0.0010629923,0.015293704,0.004843513,0.0020885952,0.0033011073,0.0009569452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009811567,0.00000928125,0.00006781671,0.000014707403,0.0000011900738,0.00004841745,0.0043519624,0.000036767375,0.000032602555,0.938086,0.05035089,0.0069905524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004240884,0.000004115917,0.00015935411,0.000110779256,9.012922e-7,0.000047430403,0.0022450981,0.000048702565,0.00008250406,0.18216349,0.8151271,0.000006274647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009280517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019876463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009280517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036329045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020990288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026358664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726786","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000250","title":"SCALES OF TIME AND THE ANTICIPATION OF THE FUTURE: GIBBON, SMITH, PLAYFAIR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); History; Adam smith; Scale (ratio); Temporality; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography; Economics; Cartography; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.01740300606396554,"score_gpt":0.1726137909636489,"score_spread":0.15521078489968337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153726786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022087222,0.15515882,0.00753973,0.3694338,0.002857811,0.000024077839,0.00012649596,0.000101898775,0.4426702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8317047,0.0779545,0.0044188728,0.030391343,0.002449506,0.00008602196,0.00007056189,0.00019139888,0.0527331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892896,0.00066474057,0.000021324355,0.00014076049,0.0001504968,0.00009366042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973628,0.0018649888,0.00023190878,0.000098987286,0.0002472025,0.0001940596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020745066,0.0006044665,0.00036155473,0.002528736,0.0050313515,0.009057074,0.00069372344,0.0032288178,0.0043793665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077487403,0.0002871852,0.00021640887,0.004500283,0.026667845,0.0116149755,0.0022086506,0.0038050236,0.00053405593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018720011,0.000004078963,0.00020629705,0.00003135347,0.0000021266358,0.0000668005,0.012224013,0.0001758714,0.0000280151,0.9537666,0.02724757,0.006228577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007793827,0.000010202944,0.0006427299,0.00038318595,0.000004899541,0.00012279965,0.012708365,0.00023064847,0.000069204565,0.612734,0.373067,0.000019183668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03619764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03144342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03619764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009669175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026915951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07197386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159723608","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309990321","title":"AGAINST WHITENESS: RACE AND PSYCHOLOGY IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Cultural History and Identity Formation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Water Network","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Allusion; Identity (music); Ethnic group; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Sociology; Anthropology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.040007883658463264,"score_gpt":0.2379323456689795,"score_spread":0.19792446201051622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159723608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62511843,0.011747732,0.000593919,0.138591,0.00085487234,0.000014143911,0.000019922254,0.000020615355,0.22303939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98082775,0.0021191079,0.00012200277,0.009469291,0.00020759407,0.000008668217,0.000004750493,0.000010213062,0.0072307345],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990308,0.0005898192,0.000012536921,0.0000979333,0.00011520187,0.00015374502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916565,0.00031329526,0.000119418626,0.000032718865,0.00010644077,0.0002624016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021553882,0.00020925087,0.00020332032,0.0010739742,0.0109710265,0.003676809,0.0003607434,0.001198855,0.004626432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020342798,0.0001297967,0.00016655221,0.0009101116,0.021372277,0.0031179755,0.0030157291,0.003157881,0.00027142078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094201074,0.00016017359,0.022567222,0.00011443085,0.00003578615,0.00038497263,0.6091937,0.00008251873,0.0015948861,0.30749893,0.018079506,0.040193602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003303193,0.000105177074,0.07309522,0.0005506858,0.00004863939,0.00033887962,0.5701412,0.000204521,0.0007718376,0.19320098,0.16146432,0.000045557506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03369921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05375848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03369921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026951265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002869967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06700611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165326660","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001552","title":"THE PREDICAMENT OF EXPERIENCE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subject (documents); Term (time); Natural (archaeology); Wish; Politics; Formative assessment; Criticism; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11521239267518703,"score_gpt":0.20867088684953067,"score_spread":0.09345849417434364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165326660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028099027,0.007461407,0.0141907595,0.06373852,0.001320974,0.000043120057,0.000118455435,0.00010785449,0.8849199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378986,0.0029523545,0.0025458485,0.007879725,0.00082755316,0.00009700128,0.00009433705,0.00014382732,0.04756074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884293,0.0067521143,0.00026186882,0.0014219391,0.001919671,0.001215067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217576,0.00315349,0.00045118268,0.0017082978,0.0011133495,0.0013979134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061684097,0.0004099016,0.0005379151,0.0010394477,0.008988236,0.0154635385,0.0015035212,0.0028453034,0.0104860235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012164072,0.00027696713,0.00037980685,0.0012194082,0.071605876,0.018566163,0.010334837,0.0054780925,0.0018427549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018359406,0.00001121077,0.00038106294,0.00004050806,0.000004860751,0.00007397782,0.028159622,0.000062025545,0.000065994696,0.95657957,0.007617481,0.0069852713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001749088,0.000035466033,0.0005808251,0.00028681595,0.000006701305,0.00030743316,0.03593086,0.0001641106,0.00011458428,0.5511948,0.41133735,0.0000235379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005502047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003811319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154635385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005901108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004512737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042815745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172085669","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000085","title":"THE INDIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, THE BIRTH OF THE MODERN DISCIPLINE AND “THE DESTINY OF ONE NATION”, 1905–1947","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Destiny (ISS module); Context (archaeology); Appropriation; Doctrine; Social science; Politics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; History; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250022323582497,"score_gpt":0.2763862648344578,"score_spread":0.2438860415986328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172085669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053233165,0.09135686,0.0014190889,0.09450483,0.007188484,0.00004422306,0.00011428704,0.00009444309,0.7520446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257262,0.05637764,0.0009271779,0.009702098,0.0037159196,0.00008163419,0.00008362478,0.00009209347,0.10329367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850416,0.00051023625,0.000047094836,0.00015058983,0.00042326926,0.00036457914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984175,0.00057904323,0.00019206492,0.00012671457,0.00034655273,0.000338058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013423663,0.00032621957,0.0002456471,0.0016445481,0.017424352,0.007886397,0.0007077951,0.001612754,0.00335804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038225006,0.00029795305,0.00018256425,0.004003005,0.020615293,0.0047084196,0.0035359752,0.0068571405,0.00067716907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028681083,0.000036838337,0.0015650159,0.00008519834,0.000008240049,0.00029837366,0.05852903,0.000063235886,0.00012095749,0.8203509,0.07340376,0.04550973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003988172,0.000014012416,0.0062197666,0.00019545128,0.000009299131,0.0002864762,0.013294965,0.00004126467,0.00007573964,0.030577632,0.9492609,0.000020492233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06366843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088564396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98257565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124046225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017408457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12659568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316755484","doi":"10.1017/s1479244311000552","title":"WHAT IS OUR “CANON”? HOW AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORIANS DEBATE THE CORE OF THEIR FIELD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); Canon; History; Conversation; Intellectual history; Window (computing); Core (optical fiber); Center (category theory); Scholarship; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Classics; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology; Telecommunications; Economic history","score_opus":0.06689479025574607,"score_gpt":0.29337077053478405,"score_spread":0.22647598027903798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316755484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095237724,0.016449098,0.005543555,0.27453262,0.0056263227,0.000040124585,0.00008862851,0.00013581845,0.6023461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089303,0.006528585,0.0020199902,0.022108674,0.0022676666,0.00005928227,0.000050817278,0.00016652257,0.057868034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972759,0.0018454116,0.000035844037,0.00018449425,0.00036508028,0.00029324676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571687,0.0030622857,0.00023727755,0.00020560193,0.00039311938,0.0003848652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004894713,0.0002387071,0.0002858554,0.0024193907,0.011538479,0.013297698,0.000982901,0.0026489834,0.0049050353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010793992,0.00020796814,0.00020611784,0.0029285983,0.027153512,0.010869052,0.001956529,0.004961327,0.0006915798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585149,0.000023221728,0.0011050474,0.00007341033,0.000007709153,0.0001581442,0.24671525,0.00007961247,0.00020182287,0.6250859,0.091714144,0.034809824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007781995,0.000009084773,0.0021717234,0.00046050767,0.000008144051,0.000106219726,0.18559179,0.00024793416,0.0002582798,0.16065732,0.6504536,0.00002754619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010175529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024424067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005941097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037701228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04310584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328483916","doi":"10.1017/s147924431400064x","title":"MALCOLM’S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>: HOBBES’S “THING”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Natural law; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Politics; Subject matter; Intellectual history; Law; Epistemology; Classics; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058571422995557586,"score_gpt":0.20154155256975728,"score_spread":0.1429701295741997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328483916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082327165,0.23150346,0.007039808,0.20693801,0.018325314,0.00002226286,0.00015294513,0.00014833694,0.5276371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48178875,0.08583572,0.0063185296,0.053929105,0.021093711,0.0001272021,0.00019668021,0.00057565165,0.35013458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902785,0.0004937885,0.000026712161,0.000109238,0.00026821427,0.00007420065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.00044700806,0.000073788025,0.00007333232,0.0001207847,0.00007855376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317722,0.00049953314,0.00029790506,0.0012730508,0.0031506305,0.004777539,0.0004990049,0.0014083486,0.0037414995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031980765,0.00022557242,0.00019670729,0.00097351545,0.009817495,0.0040307622,0.0015503169,0.0037272875,0.0014190739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025648154,0.000008827566,0.0002219814,0.00010671689,0.0000055140545,0.000089056855,0.007406027,0.000053388296,0.00025724937,0.6853671,0.28246287,0.023995718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002717981,0.000006500528,0.0004449273,0.00023956885,0.00000262831,0.000081680155,0.0012604638,0.00006281555,0.00017553192,0.08478153,0.9129339,0.0000077504765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006139707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011506988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006139707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003032126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016518374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329653820","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000213","title":"HISTORY PAINTING REDISTANCED: FROM BENJAMIN WEST TO DAVID WILKIE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Painting; Representation (politics); Ideology; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Art history; History; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.045379367424179196,"score_gpt":0.21179164430242614,"score_spread":0.16641227687824695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329653820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112433955,0.0496931,0.0036589974,0.19077261,0.003558045,0.00002699764,0.000076466,0.000093377945,0.6396864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7293655,0.02071561,0.0011917662,0.012919228,0.0007811814,0.00003863275,0.000035815727,0.00018308933,0.23476912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992337,0.00037119904,0.000013591161,0.0000860989,0.00017118012,0.00012417718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993255,0.00042615703,0.000053434862,0.000036623496,0.000075300064,0.00008300135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014096837,0.00034546113,0.00030663895,0.001108708,0.009207377,0.006193803,0.00067021314,0.0017474656,0.0075835334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027950346,0.00030050575,0.00010502379,0.0011072593,0.011093524,0.00728914,0.0028349457,0.0040917094,0.0010313748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045410892,0.00003997142,0.0004631067,0.00009736236,0.0000049039973,0.00042001597,0.19244254,0.0000719944,0.0003920464,0.65244436,0.10531665,0.048261683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064250376,0.000009846854,0.0004638036,0.00021465468,0.0000038652106,0.00027740657,0.053669076,0.000089731,0.00035109976,0.040775463,0.9041228,0.000015843312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022983415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039369583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022983415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005546576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014476859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04569924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338411970","doi":"10.1017/s1479244316000111","title":"GEORGE CATLIN, THE SCIENCE OF POLITICS, AND ANGLO-AMERICAN UNION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; George (robot); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Field (mathematics); Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Geography; Art history","score_opus":0.03824598057608306,"score_gpt":0.27458209902271835,"score_spread":0.2363361184466353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338411970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03209989,0.28550568,0.0005253505,0.50835687,0.0027638378,0.000016748054,0.000038302253,0.00001731881,0.17067602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58671933,0.19955233,0.0017030659,0.10453435,0.0036649222,0.00009604458,0.00007377976,0.00005489386,0.103601344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998889,0.00065316254,0.00002179768,0.0001185711,0.00019872004,0.000118741744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786586,0.0015276746,0.00014124354,0.00003925904,0.00021623074,0.0002097554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018436366,0.00024715203,0.0003073291,0.0023935316,0.010523991,0.0051793125,0.00047486267,0.0023250876,0.0028018143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027500638,0.0003018763,0.000095899915,0.002695961,0.011996359,0.004956424,0.0018875261,0.0036375988,0.00037942527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031520052,0.000038121012,0.0025246022,0.00017191198,0.000010395994,0.00016100534,0.03734971,0.00012967232,0.00009472682,0.78827924,0.15101244,0.020196714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008953368,0.000017900325,0.0036021308,0.0005148364,0.0000058571813,0.00014016875,0.016281461,0.000118274045,0.00008811664,0.10781572,0.8713867,0.000019860467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05498961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102377385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05498961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077492273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052408897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10933906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610402466","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000105","title":"SIGMUND FREUD, SUBLIMATION, AND THE RUSSIAN SILVER AGE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sublimation (psychology); Genius; Literature; Freudian slip; Psychoanalysis; Human sexuality; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05493202414464346,"score_gpt":0.3152505357056627,"score_spread":0.26031851156101926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610402466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06994788,0.45424855,0.0037021295,0.14014313,0.004716327,0.000021919062,0.000042989705,0.000079799,0.32709724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86793846,0.07636048,0.0013890164,0.007465397,0.0021411935,0.000038520186,0.000022919385,0.00007982839,0.044564232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904317,0.00061249716,0.000028223785,0.00009870122,0.0001274541,0.000089990426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995703,0.00027033215,0.000054583157,0.00003160471,0.000044043984,0.000029056597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016281713,0.0005278916,0.00035763148,0.0012001467,0.0032619794,0.0041248715,0.00034089928,0.0017971239,0.0017413102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020002848,0.00016757697,0.00015887266,0.00070735003,0.015300951,0.0036388952,0.0021262204,0.002380522,0.00049699267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054826083,0.000026718466,0.0007089277,0.00012463391,0.000008074263,0.00023451509,0.04006656,0.000095120515,0.0001957116,0.8917861,0.027984718,0.03871416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001858594,0.000046413366,0.0017414595,0.0006283139,0.000010893846,0.0005337952,0.017239207,0.00014927224,0.00042230543,0.37336844,0.60581005,0.000031181567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034806214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003057462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041248715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002600698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011809313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01886946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611659558","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000038","title":"FROM SEXUALITY TO GOVERNMENTALITY: THE OEDIPUS COMPLEX OF MICHEL FOUCAULT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Electronic Arts (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Michel foucault; Governmentality; Human sexuality; Oedipus complex; Unconscious mind; Power (physics); Psychoanalysis; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Philosophy; Free association (psychology); Epistemology; Gender studies; Psychoanalytic theory; Law; Politics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1555516778155222,"score_gpt":0.37397607888347706,"score_spread":0.21842440106795485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611659558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09856062,0.10630561,0.007357233,0.2880317,0.003364767,0.000040504165,0.000054889948,0.00008774083,0.496197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550286,0.009123512,0.001073453,0.011700964,0.0011683273,0.000042180665,0.000011223076,0.0000491471,0.021802781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.002009029,0.000030107423,0.000119992226,0.0003435254,0.00025133262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989588,0.0006866426,0.0000704099,0.000059255697,0.00010880305,0.00011601967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329742,0.00030615405,0.00030270085,0.0010068115,0.005656303,0.0046266075,0.00035583138,0.0018999568,0.00088560063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039659734,0.00014750728,0.00014265381,0.0008235784,0.037439846,0.0037698613,0.0026516505,0.0038002697,0.00021007769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096357635,0.0000071097247,0.0000777467,0.000014401484,0.0000010685401,0.000071261966,0.018247666,0.00004319339,0.000053243824,0.96878123,0.007203374,0.00548994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001142997,0.000025242462,0.0005149403,0.00018336107,0.0000026337384,0.00026375064,0.011292924,0.00021285364,0.00017229984,0.5350725,0.45222566,0.000022324928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008803321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008803321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00656942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002813121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047664642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751843608","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000361","title":"INSOMNIA AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL PATHOLOGIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; State (computer science); History of political thought; Value (mathematics); Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Law; History; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08174841872071062,"score_gpt":0.31330479078478873,"score_spread":0.23155637206407811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751843608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11217151,0.014831696,0.0064070835,0.08112839,0.0015106145,0.00012821995,0.0004222119,0.00013249388,0.78326774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92686474,0.005683712,0.0013918033,0.010352216,0.0015286509,0.00013644298,0.00017340534,0.000061844905,0.053807203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986274,0.00030858666,0.000078690086,0.0002002741,0.00034183238,0.00044331758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984151,0.0005876613,0.00028577188,0.00021520666,0.00023563603,0.00026060353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022764585,0.00022609718,0.00046878564,0.0022480697,0.006559621,0.003319819,0.0007365447,0.0023309772,0.010495973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005313677,0.00016801008,0.0006366598,0.0016198463,0.026822027,0.0037644089,0.0057336707,0.00384283,0.0008147668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111539375,0.000009542361,0.0005805032,0.000024503015,0.0000035058215,0.00027727912,0.002419596,0.00003598925,0.000050136296,0.9880058,0.004075508,0.0045065284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000522654,0.000018757193,0.0020284469,0.000112334055,0.000018306055,0.0012349326,0.0043236157,0.00015859117,0.0001470238,0.84957886,0.14230768,0.000019106234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010583992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008961533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010583992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055149407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005009771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04001385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752277470","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000373","title":"FROM MYSHKIN TO MARXISM: THE ROLE OF DOSTOEVSKY RECEPTION IN LUKÁCS'S REVOLUTIONARY ETHICS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; HERO; Politics; Duty; Dilemma; Sociology; Fyodor; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09425376190013937,"score_gpt":0.34263197305757664,"score_spread":0.24837821115743727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752277470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24340172,0.019454444,0.010829341,0.07701561,0.00094456214,0.000037442653,0.000053059997,0.00010347115,0.64816034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893355,0.00088273565,0.00036667864,0.0009779234,0.00009890975,0.000012790983,0.000005527702,0.000025201463,0.008294665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806565,0.0013043907,0.00003122422,0.00017272675,0.00016173048,0.00026441374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900514,0.00067663036,0.00010137523,0.00006876538,0.00007046718,0.00007768492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002413394,0.00034812783,0.00026611457,0.00080468075,0.007567276,0.0067952303,0.00069057895,0.002105057,0.0012848086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002875879,0.00020584346,0.00019664111,0.00057657075,0.04084658,0.004936694,0.0034079591,0.0038192153,0.0002224713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017173144,0.0000060361526,0.00011316304,0.00001181071,0.0000015351502,0.0000586847,0.019505022,0.000085984706,0.000059004182,0.97657096,0.0016503476,0.0019202533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025835796,0.00002801621,0.0007080689,0.00015027757,0.000008767247,0.00015760478,0.022611937,0.000513775,0.0006082894,0.80079746,0.17436653,0.000023461676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053013214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050597466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008317776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008317776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028808743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775828104","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000579","title":"TRANSLATED LIBERTIES: KARSANDAS MULJI'S<i>TRAVELS IN ENGLAND</i>AND THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE VICTORIAN SELF","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Amateur; Contextualization; Subject (documents); Ethnography; State (computer science); Sociology; History; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03164306132028175,"score_gpt":0.2100503639196284,"score_spread":0.17840730259934665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775828104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9128697,0.011902521,0.00050885143,0.010170552,0.00022546103,0.000029541889,0.00013248091,0.00002642699,0.06413441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860241,0.002336277,0.00018407898,0.0005594915,0.000039184903,0.000010820388,0.00002374555,0.00002146128,0.010800974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906474,0.0005689614,0.00003165453,0.00007055207,0.00007930416,0.0001847644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989543,0.0005610332,0.0001915682,0.00005823209,0.00007934502,0.00015547361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097136234,0.00023828051,0.00026188276,0.0011319828,0.010745214,0.005054506,0.0006353502,0.00089296314,0.0038219683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019042986,0.00028150942,0.00009744704,0.001725883,0.012342208,0.0030358804,0.003397626,0.0021552397,0.00022135582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008440759,0.00000455238,0.00072904903,0.0000561476,0.0000014481326,0.00045110984,0.98528695,0.0000111721465,0.00017131818,0.009741669,0.0009615833,0.002576536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019333845,0.000018472752,0.007604889,0.000185194,0.0000052459995,0.0005984119,0.8547649,0.000021892338,0.00021805878,0.0013148721,0.1352516,0.0000146483135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071948394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22224453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071948394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008640697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029940242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14305925},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2819365728","doi":"10.1017/s1479244318000203","title":"FORUM: LAW, EMPIRE, AND GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: AN INTRODUCTION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Scholarship; Intellectual history; Subtitle; World history; Legal history; Empire; Intervention (counseling); Law; International law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05097456034415468,"score_gpt":0.224313979885698,"score_spread":0.17333941954154333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2819365728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010911023,0.23759352,0.015972644,0.32051888,0.06821325,0.00028936143,0.0015036503,0.0003119703,0.3446857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2614962,0.22215754,0.013387228,0.06802854,0.13416538,0.0013872467,0.002002376,0.0008312763,0.29654422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991423,0.00043005365,0.000031552463,0.00007370711,0.00014630855,0.00017607714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781716,0.0015048946,0.00008100103,0.000093766714,0.00017808344,0.00032505798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024276923,0.0009638237,0.0007434478,0.005658183,0.0045092315,0.009501348,0.0012826486,0.008297105,0.03881201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037117184,0.0003118594,0.00064708706,0.006453405,0.0062862397,0.013660447,0.00589754,0.0042893197,0.004221292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004878059,0.0001431293,0.0007200773,0.00045994282,0.0000062264153,0.00035554508,0.008641056,0.00049248,0.00033430642,0.68598604,0.25965515,0.043157242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012570426,0.0000349422,0.00063656457,0.00094075635,0.0000032997457,0.00018574636,0.004903863,0.00020469214,0.000047412614,0.100321695,0.89269084,0.00001751567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027737722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038030827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03881201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035005151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002963963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12983912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2867487351","doi":"10.1017/s1479244318000239","title":"LEGAL FLOWS: CONTRIBUTIONS OF EXILED LAWYERS TO THE CONCEPT OF “CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY” DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Crimes against humanity; Commission; Normative; War crime; Law; Political science; International humanitarian law; Sociology; Human rights; International law","score_opus":0.026600202495352585,"score_gpt":0.2183115346972781,"score_spread":0.19171133220192552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2867487351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4592793,0.029385202,0.008915948,0.09615372,0.0016375597,0.00012319937,0.000059630675,0.00004650078,0.40439886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823989,0.004234971,0.00048932823,0.0019979714,0.00059439265,0.000034855555,0.000012418878,0.000022879705,0.010214405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250484,0.005037906,0.00020415819,0.00053611427,0.0007940071,0.00092293374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97931117,0.017484425,0.0013922625,0.00049324933,0.00073356344,0.00058529136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013077202,0.0003818927,0.00035950416,0.0050349,0.015312176,0.014668624,0.0015572136,0.0052560335,0.0033764134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021756137,0.00047020544,0.00019177239,0.0032526723,0.055765964,0.017240677,0.009733866,0.008490946,0.00017249523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019254616,0.000030638897,0.00078130077,0.000060618,0.0000023371133,0.00034555787,0.31052923,0.00008428603,0.00006509976,0.6743944,0.0018699653,0.011817312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032074968,0.00008020864,0.0055168644,0.0010990141,0.000015722979,0.0008432889,0.3827072,0.00077758124,0.0007751753,0.2545391,0.35354763,0.00006621894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009162654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011370529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015312176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013582336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065612523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09854722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927177721","doi":"10.1017/s1479244319000076","title":"SCOTTISH MEDICAL ETHNOGRAPHY: COLONIAL TRAVEL, STADIAL THEORY AND THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RACE,<i>c.</i>1770–1805","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Linnéuniversitetet; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Civilization; Colonialism; Enlightenment; Humanity; Race (biology); Ethnography; History; Anthropology; Scottish Enlightenment; Ethnology; Classics; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02057558581827212,"score_gpt":0.21660490723303175,"score_spread":0.19602932141475962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927177721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570418,0.005110483,0.0002670366,0.005548245,0.00009129821,0.000025596755,0.0001552644,0.000009342081,0.0317509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958275,0.0013682189,0.00010298819,0.0005708723,0.00005998993,0.000009846493,0.000030984713,0.0000032153332,0.0020263898],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822265,0.0010765104,0.00007190927,0.00009286133,0.00021310283,0.00032301873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959209,0.0024620364,0.0006748303,0.00016572874,0.00035062307,0.00042586753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034706213,0.00021426396,0.00022201444,0.0034847786,0.0065741264,0.002707251,0.00044396016,0.0004947541,0.0038122241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048984094,0.00016277598,0.0001171651,0.00323487,0.010680463,0.0012357591,0.0028738382,0.00080432807,0.0001860098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022535827,0.000011205646,0.010861223,0.0000872692,0.0000062555087,0.00068855233,0.9635018,0.000023525492,0.00034052902,0.007277041,0.0031940981,0.013986022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006634492,0.00006598604,0.07851368,0.0004092252,0.000016214046,0.00071314693,0.81163925,0.00006756271,0.00032723907,0.0015264631,0.106690496,0.000024146257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1832125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34619945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99342585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054062232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3642922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115094147","doi":"10.1017/s1479244320000554","title":"On the Decolonial Beginnings of Edward Said","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Orientalism; Empire; Decolonization; Universalization; History; Sociology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literature; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Ancient history; Political science; Art; Law; Archaeology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06304337678817255,"score_gpt":0.20002965175559773,"score_spread":0.13698627496742516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115094147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10763722,0.034418795,0.0028628758,0.09736205,0.002904297,0.000029968218,0.00007115766,0.0000663113,0.7546473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988731,0.0058580767,0.00050828984,0.008968689,0.0006735635,0.00003189668,0.000021360938,0.000090247784,0.08497475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.00059656997,0.000031816715,0.00012908943,0.00018227057,0.00022152024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987299,0.00078490685,0.00008778308,0.000088219655,0.00020387204,0.00010539386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013205021,0.00035172937,0.00027649038,0.00094371726,0.00892024,0.0059424243,0.00046877228,0.0015120382,0.0023422295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031303016,0.00020172415,0.00014998521,0.00065392215,0.027218586,0.0046823113,0.0036512685,0.004572358,0.00067921245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059352937,0.000012578139,0.00049673574,0.0000983419,0.0000039858073,0.00036672852,0.17433657,0.00007613498,0.00020939228,0.77944654,0.034680773,0.010212935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086367845,0.000017194687,0.00039012887,0.0003187329,0.0000047390577,0.00029669958,0.06248113,0.00006507669,0.00046388153,0.045787532,0.8901499,0.000016252532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012100141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018994214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012100141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061329193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025165812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04449761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202257852","doi":"10.1017/s1479244321000536","title":"Hannah Arendt Encounters Friedrich von Gentz: On Revolution, Preservation, and European Unity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Biography; Philosophy; Politics; Conviction; French revolution; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Conservatism; History; Literature; Art history; Law; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06948861233258574,"score_gpt":0.2789033295100351,"score_spread":0.20941471717744936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202257852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24632938,0.043466877,0.0044269864,0.20210281,0.0015165949,0.000028168257,0.000048117625,0.000058179314,0.50202286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97589797,0.0031202887,0.00038021055,0.0049607535,0.0001572725,0.000012799014,0.000008635118,0.000015253574,0.015446912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982993,0.0010252981,0.000021329699,0.00012052585,0.0002843228,0.00024925428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944884,0.00038955873,0.00004791841,0.00003218293,0.00004416885,0.000037296762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016788018,0.00020191041,0.00020350728,0.000685074,0.0058498858,0.0033422096,0.000512785,0.0026871096,0.0014473915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027259456,0.00011797656,0.00014148472,0.0007774301,0.020046191,0.0033711581,0.002720922,0.0026879509,0.00016299031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016378564,0.0000128135525,0.0002577699,0.000018835204,0.0000042278148,0.0001651637,0.06884745,0.000117157695,0.00012835805,0.911054,0.012535931,0.0068419483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146506045,0.000026568769,0.0017492289,0.0002479074,0.000008528573,0.0004361213,0.04317319,0.00042776242,0.00074877124,0.32930607,0.6238297,0.000031533265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012215771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0157762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012215771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050743236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018331175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036816955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204583279","doi":"10.1017/s1479244321000408","title":"Empire and Arab Indology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Philology; Palestine; Arabic; Ancient history; Orientalism; Empire; History; Mandatory Palestine; Relation (database); Classics; Politics; Mandate; Political science; Law; Feminism; Philosophy; Archaeology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07088080784816259,"score_gpt":0.20838065340351428,"score_spread":0.1374998455553517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204583279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049728755,0.021177225,0.0007056471,0.0058104987,0.00029413283,0.000009972671,0.00003243749,0.000018675255,0.9222226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468209,0.0087539,0.0004088257,0.0009067198,0.00024908723,0.000019799596,0.000026313055,0.000025134997,0.042789258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993923,0.00038145174,0.00001647814,0.00005122106,0.00005257614,0.00010608363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963033,0.00018053812,0.00004369977,0.00004513414,0.000044602486,0.00005573115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007211899,0.00028645617,0.00020693011,0.001058075,0.0049805115,0.004779593,0.00031142443,0.00050206383,0.005815544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008399472,0.00010894614,0.00008429277,0.0011989647,0.016310157,0.0022026394,0.002286504,0.0017954968,0.0006480483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022704366,0.000019799965,0.0012558918,0.00009506304,0.0000051362563,0.00033045406,0.038519092,0.00010334714,0.00011473212,0.9390851,0.0050534713,0.015395163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151418335,0.000038508417,0.005312768,0.000615165,0.00000785097,0.0005748261,0.046333633,0.00019984429,0.0001897793,0.1556382,0.79105985,0.000014506717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056202468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011298771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005815544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004107619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015716635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029803038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241072380","doi":"10.1017/s147924431600038x","title":"THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION OF THE BRITISH NEW LEFT: “CULTURE” AND THE “MANAGERIAL SOCIETY,”<i>C.</i>1956–1962","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Criticism; Capitalism; Relation (database); Politics; Sociology; Period (music); Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02938728073333364,"score_gpt":0.25062352884469474,"score_spread":0.2212362481113611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241072380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12938645,0.089482486,0.0022568079,0.28770554,0.0033179128,0.000018865703,0.000050973656,0.00003472354,0.4877463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96391976,0.007046724,0.0002899492,0.006979495,0.0007254412,0.000011456422,0.000011647659,0.000022536273,0.02099299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818194,0.0010886674,0.000030303061,0.00011562271,0.00033925867,0.00024422954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855334,0.0008340659,0.00015428505,0.00007269785,0.0002020953,0.00018347103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001531501,0.00025702186,0.00019467833,0.0015240888,0.008781719,0.0070583755,0.0006218274,0.0017787954,0.0022428914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030108069,0.0001708296,0.000104583065,0.0016957226,0.04339192,0.0030232365,0.0017546937,0.0031934998,0.00022109847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038353086,0.000012524023,0.0013488962,0.00008085905,0.000005313935,0.00022123763,0.13182274,0.00013167558,0.000365071,0.8009298,0.045693614,0.019349935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009910982,0.00002704577,0.010315811,0.0004683039,0.0000047059675,0.00021175017,0.08945564,0.00029968232,0.00029144768,0.13463576,0.76424795,0.00003206305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19290598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3085865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19290598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018756345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055524046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38356626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391841070","doi":"10.1017/s1479244323000252","title":"Rawson Rawson and Early Victorian Poverty Knowledge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; History; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03595040340974927,"score_gpt":0.29207550683337846,"score_spread":0.2561251034236292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391841070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06465937,0.10966824,0.0034017896,0.24934071,0.0013984196,0.000034424993,0.00028456768,0.00004732358,0.57116526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8223026,0.035256736,0.0020672623,0.016368985,0.00080368744,0.000051376137,0.00012960304,0.000119515425,0.122900195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644935,0.0013053279,0.00015843235,0.00039125682,0.0011178246,0.000577863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934223,0.003975508,0.00041823954,0.00041255087,0.0013914733,0.00037991328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048870402,0.0002146058,0.00042350468,0.0030860077,0.008896601,0.0059013236,0.0007612148,0.0016450213,0.0034820605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011068454,0.00039151756,0.00017319401,0.0036566434,0.023606794,0.0065430515,0.004766673,0.0033864342,0.0004258253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013296868,0.000011421728,0.0007310523,0.00009131081,0.000005537955,0.00015889556,0.040001083,0.0001579814,0.00007405259,0.8908272,0.03717391,0.030754196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021591088,0.0000067435585,0.0016205553,0.00035365627,0.0000026429823,0.00011270187,0.010337274,0.0001468668,0.00009782281,0.18556075,0.8017319,0.000026891297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24413249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39529145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24413249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028442355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017559905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48542297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393195835","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000027","title":"The Intellectual History of Milton Friedman's Criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Criticism; Social criticism; Positive economics; History; Sociology; Literature; Social science; Economics; Political science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.07766171978699428,"score_gpt":0.2566026518162692,"score_spread":0.1789409320292749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393195835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060654324,0.06363735,0.008073036,0.37494525,0.0050288793,0.000027397935,0.00007797,0.000103532424,0.48745227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386247,0.01056279,0.0013649835,0.017532066,0.0030242517,0.00003658144,0.000018929795,0.000063819185,0.028771888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944253,0.003143979,0.00010346501,0.00042525903,0.0014742146,0.0004277312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928195,0.005699284,0.0004067373,0.0002426651,0.0006425979,0.00018917584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046699652,0.00040162652,0.00031987258,0.0032145493,0.007618347,0.0063997996,0.0007731723,0.0042780605,0.0017243335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008184034,0.00022919706,0.0002340742,0.0022400154,0.03635666,0.0045962716,0.0020927426,0.0053932243,0.00024001388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018062663,0.000011378601,0.0002939734,0.000034615066,0.0000057488232,0.00013277058,0.014063474,0.00020356942,0.00006577938,0.95152205,0.022024969,0.0116236145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124259595,0.000019759455,0.00073561235,0.00042392692,0.000005890131,0.00016790986,0.0051658466,0.00038969726,0.00035436786,0.4145929,0.5780993,0.000032454165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01311163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010607703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014359648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014359648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005180679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10418701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992669","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000258","title":"Affirmative Orientalism: August Bebel, Islam, and World History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Orientalism; Islam; Religious studies; History; Ancient history; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05030052073997824,"score_gpt":0.27020253073209866,"score_spread":0.21990200999212042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16412851,0.13563688,0.00081735005,0.19126044,0.0031956371,0.000015469059,0.000033786015,0.000037755744,0.5048743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96247184,0.013912623,0.00024654059,0.005196002,0.0008308035,0.000009315113,0.000007687406,0.000016818114,0.017308323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992067,0.00052310183,0.000011511917,0.000048571463,0.00008811359,0.000121891535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940467,0.00033927502,0.00008579312,0.000032435764,0.000050964132,0.00008688145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016307809,0.00031491555,0.00018691242,0.00082840625,0.005951614,0.006004583,0.00042005957,0.0012128922,0.0014592897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015592002,0.00012750785,0.000080885446,0.0009439492,0.019078098,0.003852431,0.0020821195,0.001995776,0.00021762784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004225498,0.00004352322,0.0012585728,0.00007301444,0.0000068645713,0.00032744964,0.13137911,0.00007117412,0.00013441044,0.82993525,0.022943616,0.013784667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018302604,0.00003060585,0.0030095023,0.00042184102,0.0000115380035,0.0002553441,0.098432705,0.00009101119,0.00024861353,0.24724944,0.6502132,0.000017970266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076455954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015867505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076455954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004388989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016032731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031844497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992872","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000234","title":"Hans Morgenthau, Peaceful Change, and the Origins of American Realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"German Social Sciences and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07253433264576914,"score_gpt":0.29752290173847384,"score_spread":0.2249885690927047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051461723,0.0901756,0.0062543526,0.23668751,0.0018098735,0.00002887933,0.00005692964,0.000048164657,0.613477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94179696,0.017381947,0.0019988422,0.013190133,0.0013209734,0.000048575617,0.00001967822,0.000043236774,0.024199659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884546,0.0007622083,0.0000171512,0.0001092691,0.00015094172,0.00011495147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889874,0.0007911526,0.00007813289,0.00006781871,0.00008656758,0.0000776177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014701099,0.00028344337,0.00024276348,0.001203153,0.005677567,0.00385098,0.0003894169,0.0022767978,0.0019816556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024940476,0.00019242353,0.00016586046,0.0010390616,0.019600784,0.0038876424,0.0022372822,0.0038921784,0.0002860236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005463484,0.0000057467987,0.00010603747,0.000008835424,0.000001429418,0.00002830411,0.0026880454,0.0000865716,0.00003094929,0.9892023,0.0052308436,0.0026053756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009348152,0.000007844998,0.0003918045,0.000083334504,0.0000028051652,0.000042423173,0.0014937109,0.0001748187,0.000092054746,0.8111836,0.18650913,0.000009113071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008670992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091408705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008670992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047621327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023210205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0345518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403040527","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000246","title":"The Intersection of Ableism, Domestic Colonialism and Statistics in Britain from Bentham to Galton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia; Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Galton's problem; Intersection (aeronautics); Colonialism; Ableism; Statistics; Genealogy; Geography; Sociology; Mathematics; History; Gender studies; Cartography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027654936908098702,"score_gpt":0.22419057768787434,"score_spread":0.19653564077977564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403040527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11496833,0.2971686,0.0045552375,0.3216444,0.00442952,0.000023274863,0.0005418873,0.00016715891,0.2565016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8429176,0.059937395,0.0017451228,0.0241312,0.0026407738,0.000027313456,0.00015870601,0.00017382686,0.06826797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708146,0.001583951,0.00015268274,0.00027776085,0.00058447337,0.00031968887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886495,0.008437182,0.00044784285,0.00043185678,0.0012368698,0.00079667434],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024213009,0.00024126476,0.00032203805,0.0029240488,0.0028729953,0.0074196304,0.00055051665,0.0013638643,0.0041434686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008690688,0.00035321037,0.00011966268,0.0048669903,0.017168555,0.0029600426,0.0030221445,0.0024828447,0.00039164096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008265234,0.00003451194,0.0040712887,0.00031275745,0.000023969598,0.0005880645,0.027273936,0.00065334677,0.00026118933,0.80443585,0.07234045,0.08992208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086198115,0.000023940087,0.014676653,0.00039098677,0.00000679917,0.0001245254,0.0052294102,0.00029947623,0.00014791112,0.09894606,0.8800918,0.00005385051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.155528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19147673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013757304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004368216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30924547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406848780","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000222","title":"Planetary Politics and the Climates of History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Astrobiology; History; Geography; Geology; Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.02233258876253971,"score_gpt":0.17417989663297612,"score_spread":0.1518473078704364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406848780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025315216,0.031922843,0.0021156296,0.032059252,0.00071381434,0.000015253393,0.00009527174,0.000043793974,0.9077189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96758425,0.006529029,0.00033172307,0.001681903,0.00053787,0.000022434902,0.000028049004,0.00003707507,0.023247711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985372,0.0008383231,0.000024053292,0.0001537045,0.00015512586,0.00029162233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888104,0.00051868375,0.00013790077,0.00016044363,0.000095092975,0.00020684446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014353174,0.00026395256,0.0002511789,0.0013280875,0.008044956,0.008755803,0.0005261036,0.0013558653,0.010649999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027465092,0.00021100233,0.00018067441,0.0020544562,0.030643065,0.0067442227,0.0049322317,0.0020612443,0.0006434136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056028225,0.0000034938937,0.00032888018,0.000018106153,0.0000023070465,0.000030018093,0.0037651036,0.00013255444,0.000024492158,0.9899603,0.002333418,0.0033956938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073173496,0.000009658036,0.0015312035,0.00012357086,0.0000035485364,0.000055493732,0.008465219,0.000113891925,0.00007245075,0.6388363,0.35077137,0.000009887654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006367111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094886925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010649999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060865413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030735882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04416114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290450","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100085","title":"Du Bois’s Eugenic Democracy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Eugenics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03652093191379489,"score_gpt":0.24025928157408943,"score_spread":0.20373834966029453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015461477,0.014964055,0.020657383,0.33799723,0.004903765,0.000046972636,0.00011528877,0.00010354386,0.60575026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7432827,0.0066495193,0.01102097,0.08615326,0.002676856,0.00020161514,0.000050006485,0.00014483841,0.14982024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703014,0.00127845,0.00006427819,0.0006827695,0.00058032555,0.0003639108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982272,0.00096917525,0.000110524845,0.00021747709,0.00029239577,0.0001832361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004209899,0.0003970967,0.00042903848,0.0009325306,0.005156775,0.004337834,0.00052335026,0.0039222813,0.00350358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008523102,0.0002252202,0.00035162058,0.0004951035,0.016894903,0.0039731963,0.0031984504,0.008202363,0.0008084102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006387506,0.000003545526,0.00007656588,0.0000051483594,0.0000015432018,0.000016460663,0.00046821125,0.00006169902,0.000033989963,0.987899,0.008175622,0.0032518099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012724258,0.000012512206,0.00017731873,0.000051778035,0.0000032093453,0.00005435671,0.00019077625,0.0002452388,0.0001931011,0.7450594,0.25398913,0.000010434278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011199576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010738798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011199576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004723457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038924501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03427124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414765408","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100188","title":"British Legal Opinion about Immigration and Sovereignty, 1833–1906","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Immigration; Skepticism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Colonialism; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.02144342996793228,"score_gpt":0.20601194669386258,"score_spread":0.1845685167259303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414765408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1278005,0.09005896,0.0006760178,0.24362278,0.006093021,0.000057886286,0.00068871625,0.000041100167,0.53096104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6176784,0.023541665,0.00058362744,0.09124776,0.002521613,0.00007294984,0.00025520293,0.00006385168,0.26403487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680483,0.0006063257,0.00020565491,0.00044487766,0.0009842698,0.0009539906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978593,0.0011346117,0.00016202846,0.000078042656,0.0004886783,0.00027736105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028914378,0.00021781091,0.00038622614,0.0014258174,0.0135850245,0.005744067,0.00077308173,0.008832168,0.0066042375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007407697,0.0005267903,0.00029808716,0.0022776772,0.009659267,0.002949898,0.0020148158,0.0102567505,0.0008980857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001440145,0.000046141697,0.0025040102,0.00023672325,0.000026380409,0.0019677598,0.06262177,0.00022154099,0.0008682097,0.6756317,0.2213511,0.034380645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148934005,0.000015820247,0.006362477,0.00022279963,0.000009101947,0.00015517342,0.0029051155,0.000046936915,0.00011793741,0.0075259167,0.98259544,0.000028203984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5657669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70678145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5657669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03088841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013256474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8735808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416607970","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100279","title":"Civil Society Divided against Itself: The Fight for Shorter Hours in Antebellum America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; York University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Power (physics); Civil society; Articulation (sociology); Spanish Civil War; Wage; Suffrage","score_opus":0.016804873347200735,"score_gpt":0.20544481811791696,"score_spread":0.18863994477071622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416607970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.632473,0.008344571,0.00038799047,0.18766004,0.0014541565,0.000037710102,0.000055907858,0.000021508955,0.16956514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624452,0.0019552829,0.00007021388,0.014277495,0.0005348383,0.000041538864,0.000020765005,0.000031033916,0.020623552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974842,0.0006454164,0.000019390423,0.00012935919,0.00012588172,0.0015957195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846315,0.00028389198,0.00017020716,0.000047571422,0.0001047047,0.0009304511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018212472,0.0002932031,0.00035017123,0.0007502382,0.033448964,0.008445635,0.0011356646,0.002937748,0.007972465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002113317,0.00027471673,0.00018958504,0.0009111358,0.017558852,0.004887567,0.007528937,0.009267121,0.00045678767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013976949,0.00021553501,0.008184782,0.000100369536,0.000016398602,0.0009896128,0.49602452,0.00014366445,0.00059530395,0.41931763,0.048525214,0.02574719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005566769,0.0001113417,0.034064736,0.0003579024,0.00001533853,0.0001520162,0.42499977,0.00010248244,0.00032342342,0.03573613,0.5040331,0.000048106816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07834123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17892712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07834123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013785793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009218094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15577048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}