{"meta":{"query_hash":"ebf1c03b0933","filters":{"venue":"Modern Intellectual History"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ebf1c03b0933","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Modern+Intellectual+History"},"results":[{"id":"W1995615166","doi":"10.1017/s1479244304000356","title":"DID THE OLD SOUTH HAVE A MIND OF ITS OWN?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Quarter (Canadian coin); Order (exchange); History; Art history; Intellectual history; Classics; Art; Archaeology; Economic history","score_opus":0.05571873749089862,"score_gpt":0.20602941767177033,"score_spread":0.1503106801808717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995615166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14350753,0.06193577,0.00034247592,0.00056355755,0.0040099067,0.0005557749,0.00012559166,0.00017337345,0.78878605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90025,0.000078887264,0.000036601923,0.00062108034,0.0014147876,0.000030359479,0.0000072270077,0.000046870176,0.09751417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845034,0.00007772118,0.00042558595,0.00035558204,0.00037236814,0.00031837635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885815,0.00016690927,0.0001970387,0.00049010466,0.00018984328,0.000097923556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018796687,0.00027389204,0.00033368578,0.00038385222,0.0004262913,0.000020635453,0.00047343277,0.00008492635,0.007876138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093495975,0.00021709607,0.0003592163,0.000040235223,0.0011116961,0.00015979639,0.000052442043,0.00032885114,0.00059805746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001036196,0.00017109103,0.0000067515725,0.000032404307,0.00007385315,0.0000020374441,0.8561646,0.00001540746,0.00026561448,0.0056978473,0.13286929,0.004597485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024811868,0.00014590325,0.000005248492,0.000025945325,0.00007069739,0.0000023152334,0.0008321679,0.0007006335,0.00015070368,0.00038775906,0.9971569,0.00027358648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015296618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014681502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006403112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012358454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035709889","doi":"10.1017/s1479244315000049","title":"<i>FIAT IUSTITIA, PEREAT MUNDUS</i>: IMMANUEL KANT, FRIEDRICH GENTZ, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF PRUDENTIAL ENLIGHTENMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Enlightenment; Politics; Sovereignty; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050030860299324596,"score_gpt":0.2753803333597251,"score_spread":0.2253494730604005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035709889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5660774,0.013386604,0.0076662586,0.0007089562,0.0015304165,0.0005317891,0.00004700219,0.000072279705,0.40997925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836097,0.00018928773,0.00015552103,0.00040893897,0.00030659206,0.000015705778,0.000005185071,0.000008903333,0.015300163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824005,0.00035824298,0.0002901533,0.0002454668,0.00057909003,0.00028698824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987182,0.00049914396,0.00011488328,0.0002384008,0.0002215628,0.00020780542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080949714,0.00013680935,0.00025681176,0.000051569055,0.00032920067,0.000019785437,0.00026583025,0.000090322836,0.0004377464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078151596,0.000105235355,0.00010364983,0.000074895324,0.0049609654,0.00010965903,0.00010515103,0.00017982202,0.000031634696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005829077,0.00025493102,0.0008607653,0.000032094882,0.00011718591,0.000010623873,0.4686494,0.00003852919,0.00013774767,0.46443292,0.062045343,0.0028375827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006719136,0.00007661238,0.00006626128,0.00001280124,0.00007415966,0.000008736302,0.0024502478,0.00046427464,0.00006781691,0.0037170467,0.9922125,0.00017767475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015319603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015169887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93016714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086025055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019260813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058374580","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000012","title":"PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Worship; Publicity; Law; Public sphere; Coercion (linguistics); Separation of church and state; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04619380730988953,"score_gpt":0.20448239299888965,"score_spread":0.15828858568900012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058374580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86158127,0.0063582524,0.00034796566,0.003972445,0.0011049245,0.0005011686,0.000012247458,0.00017477875,0.12594697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805606,0.0002072617,0.000035439145,0.0028883987,0.0005149872,0.00006107097,0.00001552843,0.00002548821,0.00819574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873483,0.00007926617,0.00032747615,0.0003161063,0.00020362997,0.00033868852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00021791119,0.0000451533,0.00020179537,0.00008678344,0.00015324568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010064601,0.00019191256,0.00023271168,0.0001584485,0.000109033674,0.00009894591,0.00016787455,0.00008478968,0.0051726406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019467615,0.0001700472,0.00006829544,0.000030362644,0.00034622202,0.00033338004,0.000105958374,0.0002884263,0.00059808843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008688742,0.0006389224,0.00019270227,0.00011593618,0.000043951342,0.000012567145,0.40518922,0.000006746897,0.00045830986,0.2469692,0.33210757,0.014177995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027662396,0.00011603559,0.000071003604,0.000029604269,0.000008293777,0.000005398655,0.00008248398,0.0031128365,0.000035544163,0.09059962,0.90541905,0.00024351872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008774343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022179013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5733115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028723507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040787236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067174559","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001333","title":"EDMUND BURKE AND THE POLITICS OF CONQUEST","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; CONQUEST; Action (physics); Theme (computing); Context (archaeology); Criticism; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026662491048400013,"score_gpt":0.27435719713146905,"score_spread":0.24769470608306904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067174559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10043063,0.007959243,0.016376385,0.0005006736,0.00059218664,0.00015608127,0.00001220257,0.000040965493,0.87393165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725673,0.000113848946,0.00012435761,0.00076007564,0.00021241962,0.0000016224508,0.0000015469328,0.000005191065,0.026213642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920195,0.00010327251,0.00017343416,0.00009287458,0.00021197017,0.00021649864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980497,0.0015728076,0.00005987704,0.000104172446,0.0001196619,0.000093792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006805943,0.00006533608,0.00013180303,0.000045707384,0.0003280802,0.000005339775,0.00013931477,0.00005501484,0.00027750712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007306138,0.000052132185,0.000038139355,0.000044792625,0.007294173,0.000037962378,0.000029127974,0.00011505764,0.000014678549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031214593,0.000013653999,0.00004975999,0.0000038611893,0.000010430578,0.0000011542478,0.055814154,0.0000013718346,0.000019349965,0.9376478,0.0059543187,0.0004529349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016759211,0.000018973204,0.000024168137,0.0000053350336,0.000014653445,0.000002976221,0.00093998754,0.000056671073,0.00002231922,0.0047967904,0.9938834,0.00006717637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008770805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091008603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98792905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031625244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089814526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068304162","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001242","title":"IDEAS, INSTITUTIONS, AND <i>WISSENSCHAFT</i>: ACCOUNTING FOR THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; German; Protestantism; Classics; Politics; Charisma; Medieval studies; Natural philosophy; Philology; History; Modern history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy; Religious studies; Theology; Economic history; Political science; Law; Feminism; Epistemology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.17466364101122042,"score_gpt":0.2903916272155749,"score_spread":0.11572798620435445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068304162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17483617,0.031006513,0.025976235,0.0012412084,0.0045878063,0.0009773101,0.000046672976,0.00028219822,0.7610459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649914,0.00012262729,0.000074006006,0.00033068194,0.000646072,0.000003547979,0.0000026110686,0.000012500771,0.033816576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895877,0.00004270282,0.00013730054,0.0002608431,0.00026612915,0.00033424798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983483,0.0010645856,0.0000402214,0.00020690988,0.00026370215,0.00007631075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013799382,0.000103132996,0.00010757452,0.00029957533,0.00216209,0.000041194526,0.00030994837,0.00003914007,0.00029165196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000311182,0.000086739405,0.00006219477,0.000057013476,0.0024524056,0.00023591887,0.00008078005,0.00028949507,0.000058008794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598557,0.000060181133,0.000010252772,0.000032949632,0.000023552515,0.000007652604,0.353702,0.000007189749,0.00031075536,0.48865718,0.14713643,0.009892012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408868,0.000046493955,0.000015926282,0.000011609588,0.000013700189,0.000003453327,0.0030653593,0.000868226,0.000011221158,0.0034131934,0.9922928,0.000117119605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059995987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003945827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006702936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025773793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092670239","doi":"10.1017/s147924431500013x","title":"BETWEEN ARISTOTLE AND LUCRETIUS: DISCOURSES OF NATURE AND ROUSSEAU’S<i>DISCOURS SUR L’INEGALITE</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epicureanism; Philosophy; Scrutiny; Politics; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Social contract; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Poetry; Rhetoric; Skepticism; Literature; Law; Theology; Art; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037596281142673826,"score_gpt":0.2795588436107352,"score_spread":0.24196256246806136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092670239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84192985,0.099976525,0.00060857047,0.0023412684,0.00083394116,0.00022620322,0.000052997326,0.000103560466,0.053927083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816279,0.0004459467,0.00011557931,0.00014224355,0.00026664438,0.0000067808096,0.000006361791,0.000016276854,0.017372278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986386,0.00015924161,0.00023443227,0.000301215,0.00040217763,0.00026437576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989087,0.0004470793,0.000087953806,0.00014453333,0.0001500752,0.00026167187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038312897,0.00016298407,0.00034595397,0.00009977371,0.0002318088,0.000014738407,0.00017045646,0.00017960124,0.00006545008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009508379,0.00014339855,0.00005449434,0.00011815144,0.0012256474,0.00022998945,0.00009649,0.00031041444,0.0000055151927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080894904,0.0000880107,0.005727905,0.00004576876,0.00006103866,0.000006545738,0.8488292,0.0000017613269,0.00005930652,0.003705825,0.13305005,0.0083436705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019933295,0.000116876785,0.000310235,0.00002858361,0.000037164096,0.0000012568247,0.002191715,0.000045339642,0.000017025057,0.0032020912,0.9936619,0.00018848368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021014283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005250322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86061186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042511927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025515948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114327004","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000882","title":"J.S. MILL'S<i>PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY</i>IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA: PUBLICATION AND RECEPTION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Capitalism; Intelligentsia; Politics; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09021412911111881,"score_gpt":0.29799083716751884,"score_spread":0.20777670805640003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114327004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5444236,0.0006618446,0.001198121,0.0013744804,0.00033931254,0.0001528384,0.000005116015,0.00004744824,0.45179725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736184,0.000028323831,0.0001132919,0.00046639174,0.00015733363,0.000013410431,0.0000033702447,0.0000069990497,0.0018490581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.00026672127,0.0002723111,0.00019683264,0.00014284937,0.0003184031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910605,0.00031724942,0.00005286404,0.00012821582,0.00012516142,0.00027044548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009031077,0.00008073964,0.00015737342,0.00012051875,0.00006261872,0.0000139581,0.00015402581,0.00012528448,0.0003124676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030378816,0.00008529478,0.000033692668,0.00007540868,0.0006844828,0.00030201033,0.000043555046,0.00012478775,0.000046734636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008319331,0.000054923443,0.0001509276,0.000008406169,0.0000037692903,4.6637106e-7,0.06648193,0.0000023811174,0.00026691705,0.92948127,0.0014982739,0.0019675384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034306463,0.00010674049,0.0002131157,0.000018960152,0.000007043257,0.000002057426,0.000753453,0.0012658339,0.00046514903,0.16397776,0.8326737,0.00017311648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001560909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027537535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83117545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016389261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004621697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42857346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115528173","doi":"10.1017/s1479244312000066","title":"WILLIAM MANNING AND THE POLITICAL THEORY OF THE DEPENDENT CLASSES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Virtue; Political philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.037515984924730496,"score_gpt":0.27127339467262135,"score_spread":0.23375740974789086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115528173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1456844,0.012382452,0.010979783,0.0018468067,0.0013999733,0.0002556825,0.000010001727,0.00004290281,0.827398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98776585,0.00004518279,0.000039979048,0.0014578493,0.00024978828,0.000006695536,2.846506e-7,0.000005702024,0.010428698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987086,0.00047913915,0.00013362251,0.00008183797,0.0002736347,0.00032313052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786013,0.001793802,0.000052365693,0.00013758811,0.000051284303,0.00010480972],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062222837,0.000071873365,0.000115493654,0.000022097325,0.0003863399,0.0000064793053,0.00021290852,0.000051524185,0.0002815242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011864044,0.000042449523,0.00006997743,0.00004125328,0.00619822,0.00007289429,0.00007593879,0.00016053372,0.000011820552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026999174,0.00001848785,0.00063396187,0.0000033001556,0.0000132936575,1.1510171e-7,0.045380414,0.0000017181177,0.000012465476,0.95164543,0.0018280034,0.00043580588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014444724,0.000010303939,0.00029045198,0.000012666909,0.00004083324,0.000005688093,0.0034785669,0.000033929682,0.000055604538,0.019332323,0.976507,0.00008817985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008222686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001140306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034878915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000621629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99650633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121424802","doi":"10.1017/s147924430999028x","title":"CAMUS AND THE THEATRE OF TERROR: ARTAUDIAN DRAMATURGY AND SETTLER SOCIETY IN THE WORKS OF ALBERT CAMUS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"North African History and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Dramaturgy; Cruelty; Politics; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Literature; History; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010105305189934891,"score_gpt":0.17098858298618844,"score_spread":0.16088327779625355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121424802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978961,0.016735625,0.00002458176,0.00074248447,0.0008573694,0.00036039765,0.000026366271,0.000019911802,0.08333713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940185,0.00006801603,0.000018886187,0.00066538533,0.00014863459,0.000017721173,0.000005292417,0.000014181023,0.005043374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916327,0.000109028304,0.0002457525,0.00018053156,0.00014342702,0.0001579766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901885,0.00051899935,0.00010451944,0.00028093814,0.000042008734,0.000034693927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031934006,0.0001527027,0.000254838,0.00006211123,0.00017006644,0.000025192958,0.00019770996,0.00009806901,0.0007148853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004816103,0.0000872658,0.000111173926,0.000024997891,0.0022368159,0.000096393305,0.000037171412,0.00058967184,0.0000020586547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001793602,0.000047887534,0.000056876674,0.000043591273,0.000028590908,0.0000014365687,0.95670396,0.0000017157063,0.00013132047,0.008621139,0.030754786,0.0034293248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005145404,0.000065487155,0.00008258227,0.00003958031,0.00003411494,0.000011006837,0.0067215334,0.00044713967,0.000011551971,0.0010068553,0.9909367,0.00012890484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006343556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009530907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039605013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005935106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82416415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127884440","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000419","title":"FEARFUL SYMMETRY: THE UNHISTORICAL SELF OF WHITENESS STUDIES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Colonialism; Race (biology); History; Work (physics); Economic history; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.045867757666480206,"score_gpt":0.29303078146396694,"score_spread":0.24716302379748673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127884440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31718588,0.107967086,0.024778465,0.0033645094,0.012791907,0.0010684321,0.000011397837,0.0010597312,0.5317726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97128993,0.0011132897,0.00040386358,0.0007397865,0.0005714009,0.00002637674,0.0000010669045,0.00003218827,0.02582208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976219,0.00066760386,0.00032453533,0.00034752412,0.00065115496,0.00038727338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746627,0.0014953421,0.00020578277,0.00040526091,0.00030231063,0.0001250379],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013118327,0.00019075768,0.0004231844,0.00008998762,0.00079883845,0.000009087125,0.000590212,0.00012829146,0.00024783664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019753764,0.0001526488,0.00023822112,0.00032033894,0.0027634632,0.00009874397,0.000075120115,0.0002999788,0.00008873726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022421229,0.000103590726,0.00009281954,0.000026714679,0.00008142518,6.461812e-7,0.6966914,0.000012002564,0.00011535243,0.0028239205,0.2918536,0.008176117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012223053,0.000096465235,0.000033813332,0.000015268315,0.00004964935,7.629856e-7,0.010063956,0.0004364548,0.000022656854,0.0007196441,0.9882435,0.0001955932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009215124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029897926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6963899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030572843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004495367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141904500","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002157","title":"POLITICAL ECONOMY, THE STATE, AND REVOLUTION IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Patriotism; State (computer science); Virtue; Economic history; Economy; Political economy; Order (exchange); Political science; History; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.022220350433676823,"score_gpt":0.20170757661756156,"score_spread":0.17948722618388474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141904500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087454036,0.028053097,0.00060568546,0.0011137294,0.0004187482,0.00019521899,0.0000129295095,0.00008223111,0.88206434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652535,0.00010655058,0.0000140085,0.003878239,0.00023232056,0.000006073826,0.000003966117,0.000016239848,0.030489143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987813,0.00013541867,0.00030561804,0.00028845982,0.00009574016,0.0003934577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993153,0.00021922225,0.000045221586,0.00024940952,0.000054620545,0.000116179195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017419386,0.00016327602,0.000202956,0.0001613621,0.00018764709,0.000028160533,0.00018162775,0.00003474417,0.0016958953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010809346,0.00013156934,0.00007969443,0.000027262853,0.00083922804,0.00017406099,0.000030910538,0.0003047631,0.00029090716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004089008,0.00012329145,0.00001698574,0.000015481612,0.000016771126,0.000011889955,0.083648816,0.0000061272726,0.000020818568,0.86761594,0.04637718,0.0021057946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014259144,0.000088640016,0.00010557176,0.000017129447,0.000018376903,0.0000035970174,0.00017171576,0.0026384895,0.000005441745,0.027795242,0.9688418,0.00017140889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013804826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016967305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076461147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054483677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688833","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000638","title":"PROVINCIALIZING AMERICA: NEW AND NOT SO NEW INTELLECTUAL HISTORIES OF WEIMAR GERMANY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"European history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Flourishing; German; Intellectual history; Politics; History; Field (mathematics); Classics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Art history; Economic history; Law","score_opus":0.04324982954483539,"score_gpt":0.2566012595655633,"score_spread":0.2133514300207279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2769686,0.026521912,0.15223475,0.0020520696,0.007932812,0.0010096845,0.000022517419,0.0009337818,0.53232384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78664154,0.00050355215,0.0019503477,0.0020049731,0.0016762263,0.0000051585102,0.000005516548,0.00008756504,0.20712513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977489,0.000427586,0.00045583377,0.00042905158,0.00045142253,0.00048716957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977034,0.0011777497,0.00021279947,0.00033447228,0.00012366322,0.00044796785],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048452496,0.00025894583,0.00042798385,0.00022946768,0.0005069166,0.000029377205,0.00042280296,0.00014886078,0.0012783799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003980701,0.000292308,0.00012778923,0.00015071899,0.0018356104,0.0002125957,0.00011811343,0.00035557733,0.00014209094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011267795,0.000033794913,0.000021391426,0.000035873672,0.000021890044,0.000001922402,0.6809412,0.0000070284414,0.0010168502,0.012624125,0.27094588,0.034237325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002133317,0.00020427478,0.000013003724,0.000025082243,0.000041807627,0.0000027731435,0.00059935276,0.0003421473,0.00021950618,0.00077032595,0.9972484,0.00031999333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005508822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012028363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001457631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019608305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148706345","doi":"10.1017/s1479244304000113","title":"AN OPEN ELITE: THE PECULIARITIES OF CONNOISSEURSHIP IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; The arts; Aesthetics; Art; Taste; Visual arts; History; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0648806956658354,"score_gpt":0.2428221224471325,"score_spread":0.1779414267812971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148706345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.771307,0.011670405,0.00060646964,0.00039073243,0.0009658444,0.000474054,0.000023835551,0.000091158916,0.21447052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986438,0.00007329756,0.00002847228,0.0003162199,0.00026735963,0.000049465325,0.000007106714,0.000024195779,0.012795915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883515,0.000089942565,0.00033064836,0.00026839087,0.00022417949,0.00025166982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993011,0.00012707437,0.00007690062,0.0002926684,0.00014411642,0.000058137826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021796698,0.00019331025,0.00031516,0.000086631466,0.0003238677,0.0000611847,0.00064271427,0.000056156812,0.00074403756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010771112,0.00013453428,0.00007005316,0.000038039372,0.0007671876,0.00029448743,0.00010528385,0.00027518312,0.000057148347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337749,0.00020421842,0.000032989512,0.00001885197,0.00002531132,0.0000048885954,0.9456433,0.00005918224,0.00025027152,0.04793354,0.0037892004,0.0019044577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006543814,0.00037078938,0.000098645236,0.000050730152,0.00002108439,0.0000019485674,0.0037804006,0.00018195486,0.00006336649,0.024404658,0.97011715,0.0002549188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029244586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01790659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043407382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010354208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149836432","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002121","title":"QUENTIN SKINNER'S HOBBES AND THE NEO-REPUBLICAN PROJECT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Subject (documents); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Intellectual history; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.051794588518913096,"score_gpt":0.22594214427978898,"score_spread":0.17414755576087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149836432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1213903,0.022138655,0.00062185223,0.025221296,0.0023694455,0.0010633344,0.000055184722,0.0005532205,0.8265867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576369,0.00014937676,0.00002293311,0.0067333826,0.0011028727,0.000025765032,0.0000110070705,0.000019870198,0.034297917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986221,0.00016750209,0.00029606407,0.00031379223,0.00024115064,0.00035936688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990808,0.0004102238,0.00005810861,0.0002685523,0.000078771474,0.00010358422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023774942,0.00021645555,0.0002736771,0.000104910665,0.0003204591,0.00009584011,0.00025532374,0.00005976516,0.003486147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028879647,0.000135474,0.00015455183,0.000034086348,0.0012988785,0.00013446965,0.000057692858,0.0003284235,0.000066385684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023646606,0.00014211894,0.0000014453373,0.000012008708,0.000035898887,0.0000038378053,0.11459469,5.09658e-7,0.00001598327,0.7901866,0.08665148,0.008118989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005228937,0.00013418798,0.000008471901,0.000016339958,0.000030186215,0.000008780796,0.00017082259,0.00072289695,0.000018205958,0.08689544,0.91128516,0.000186628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026696335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011360554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83624655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006446533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726786","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000250","title":"SCALES OF TIME AND THE ANTICIPATION OF THE FUTURE: GIBBON, SMITH, PLAYFAIR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); History; Adam smith; Scale (ratio); Temporality; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography; Economics; Cartography; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.01740300606396554,"score_gpt":0.1726137909636489,"score_spread":0.15521078489968337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153726786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8869546,0.048643664,0.012792028,0.0011297889,0.0014774684,0.00031398103,0.000036903646,0.000025566713,0.048626017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963981,0.00048369213,0.0000367087,0.0001399487,0.0001168263,0.0000073096326,6.7617464e-7,0.000010448473,0.0028062775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925125,0.000044467906,0.00041126914,0.00015801289,0.00003112087,0.00010387287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991681,0.00029727994,0.0002928818,0.00019072574,0.000029503777,0.000021528293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042598465,0.000087163615,0.00037350817,0.000046926547,0.00012554858,0.0000029360015,0.00018103108,0.00006751258,0.00014127608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035186703,0.00006336785,0.00012125238,0.000054539745,0.0007189311,0.000038140468,0.000064782915,0.00009820888,0.000047636822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005787132,0.00033221272,0.010138512,0.00023511058,0.00045814473,2.1790102e-7,0.37673956,0.0007339751,0.00015001245,0.45078054,0.13190368,0.027949322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010553895,0.000095763324,0.006228616,0.00001910264,0.000026711516,8.9651553e-7,0.000128286,0.039179794,0.000059525617,0.03193177,0.92103106,0.00024311396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029068673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082380066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78912735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022603614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000182279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26489314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159723608","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309990321","title":"AGAINST WHITENESS: RACE AND PSYCHOLOGY IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Cultural History and Identity Formation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Water Network","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Allusion; Identity (music); Ethnic group; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Sociology; Anthropology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.040007883658463264,"score_gpt":0.2379323456689795,"score_spread":0.19792446201051622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159723608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655996,0.0005087918,0.00008630259,0.00028034273,0.00087391044,0.00009070371,0.0000035969215,0.000036578243,0.032520182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904236,0.000052736716,0.0000148673735,0.002643714,0.000205122,0.000015957388,0.000009017531,0.00000889382,0.0066260733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937737,0.00006230102,0.00016074076,0.0001571029,0.00010414494,0.0001383628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996176,0.00006474931,0.000079958314,0.0001703462,0.000040487266,0.000026871441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018012406,0.000102379774,0.00013442192,0.00012186632,0.00021062377,0.000036661906,0.00017129834,0.000029486893,0.0006854206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079584606,0.000074912205,0.000042530686,0.000028593582,0.000815338,0.00022014622,0.0000201559,0.00034453088,0.00015905414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047297177,0.000045021196,0.000047443376,0.000008427683,0.0000052682253,0.0000022731297,0.92475677,0.0000013016083,0.001042189,0.0022142467,0.061889917,0.009939852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012526411,0.000057811776,0.00042536814,0.0000037176776,0.000006070662,0.000006457143,0.0029243953,0.00035550568,0.000004907915,0.00041229586,0.9955597,0.00011850078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018552564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006834357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078533805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020120999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75048745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165326660","doi":"10.1017/s1479244307001552","title":"THE PREDICAMENT OF EXPERIENCE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subject (documents); Term (time); Natural (archaeology); Wish; Politics; Formative assessment; Criticism; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11521239267518703,"score_gpt":0.20867088684953067,"score_spread":0.09345849417434364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165326660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504614,0.013368961,0.00068154134,0.00053650606,0.0029004684,0.00017586208,0.0000070856245,0.00011087877,0.43175727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635713,0.00015787911,0.000018338535,0.00018276206,0.00016265763,0.000018300754,4.7951073e-7,0.00000688029,0.0358814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999184,0.000034011995,0.0001744113,0.00015729434,0.0002912512,0.0001589938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993731,0.00020183381,0.00007295839,0.00022613921,0.00007498357,0.000051011157],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012387679,0.00008564959,0.000103760896,0.0000515707,0.00094002124,0.00000655488,0.0003764976,0.000019073423,0.0015408824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012934007,0.00006159735,0.00006893604,0.000015672633,0.003960066,0.00012443904,0.000040968123,0.00012952846,0.00009545921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003501002,0.0000505472,0.0000034562304,0.0000045923703,0.0000063915295,0.0000025398206,0.8807456,0.0000042121897,0.0004559265,0.017159643,0.099865444,0.0016666723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056519864,0.00011187482,0.000008018899,0.0000073399506,0.0000027490382,0.0000052304354,0.0007936329,0.00043286398,0.00019135278,0.0012237142,0.99708587,0.00008084494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000573377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000590841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89722043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002283834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010970336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172085669","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000085","title":"THE INDIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, THE BIRTH OF THE MODERN DISCIPLINE AND “THE DESTINY OF ONE NATION”, 1905–1947","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Destiny (ISS module); Context (archaeology); Appropriation; Doctrine; Social science; Politics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; History; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03250022323582497,"score_gpt":0.2763862648344578,"score_spread":0.2438860415986328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172085669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75684285,0.03386221,0.019591102,0.026434047,0.006947061,0.0024056393,0.000039818136,0.00012847467,0.15374878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957111,0.00024202072,0.000060258477,0.0010567184,0.00022664634,0.0001555444,0.0000014243363,0.000027639297,0.04111873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724406,0.0008640185,0.00065899454,0.0004188627,0.00044665788,0.0003673927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444413,0.0038258915,0.0006019956,0.0007900381,0.0002724924,0.00006547424],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011510884,0.00021539249,0.00036014323,0.00007976326,0.0005416147,0.000011247066,0.0010941324,0.0003517058,0.0014207135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021330568,0.00009976646,0.00019051626,0.00024170229,0.00335165,0.000056965397,0.00020301012,0.0010814612,0.000093766976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008251509,0.0006324034,0.0032543514,0.000017976685,0.00047718492,8.0075887e-7,0.45106244,0.000040071114,0.00050866255,0.046598196,0.4716505,0.02493224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005798569,0.0008105953,0.093161464,0.000070504575,0.00034120816,0.00009610209,0.0062462133,0.0050772587,0.0000523122,0.5024323,0.38505027,0.000863181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044538965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010528836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45583412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006973663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058172824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316755484","doi":"10.1017/s1479244311000552","title":"WHAT IS OUR “CANON”? HOW AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORIANS DEBATE THE CORE OF THEIR FIELD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); Canon; History; Conversation; Intellectual history; Window (computing); Core (optical fiber); Center (category theory); Scholarship; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Classics; Law; Literature; Political science; Art; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology; Telecommunications; Economic history","score_opus":0.06689479025574607,"score_gpt":0.29337077053478405,"score_spread":0.22647598027903798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316755484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5906206,0.14959982,0.03280244,0.04321442,0.052368954,0.001732405,0.00008569651,0.00066330266,0.12891237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94413626,0.0030129105,0.000063394036,0.0039482582,0.0017760284,0.000019984558,0.0000029081739,0.000037194317,0.04700303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978478,0.0003074571,0.00030514444,0.00026118875,0.00050205534,0.00077636866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692637,0.0019812793,0.00022890144,0.00043326814,0.0001650709,0.00026514172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007315175,0.00025540343,0.00037023684,0.00013538398,0.00039810993,0.000029457153,0.00082906726,0.00023702634,0.0008954923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017274679,0.00019741262,0.00022385285,0.00023584267,0.001303685,0.0004255175,0.00011114304,0.000624404,0.00010782012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003347694,0.000037830137,0.000092749615,0.0000069880293,0.00003105843,3.8833232e-7,0.5340038,9.372307e-7,0.000125297,0.0010261037,0.4445128,0.020128578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008833631,0.00013050757,0.000006359981,0.000027293074,0.000036773024,0.0000040687296,0.03252041,0.00028671807,0.0007036093,0.0006780995,0.965275,0.00024286211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030158453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009696589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52076215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001336638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005410985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328483916","doi":"10.1017/s147924431400064x","title":"MALCOLM’S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>: HOBBES’S “THING”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Natural law; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Politics; Subject matter; Intellectual history; Law; Epistemology; Classics; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058571422995557586,"score_gpt":0.20154155256975728,"score_spread":0.1429701295741997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328483916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042449404,0.0035060376,0.006930047,0.0016530366,0.0052063935,0.0002789376,0.00003266643,0.0005451112,0.93939835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254891,0.000041811265,0.00007079442,0.006022266,0.0026257583,0.000028221064,0.000020377685,0.000055333785,0.0656463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818283,0.00015437769,0.00036811866,0.0004235335,0.0003515818,0.000519574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871373,0.00047674347,0.0000696852,0.00038286077,0.00010499549,0.00025196694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023103111,0.00028991318,0.00033250303,0.00013036719,0.00027409158,0.000055012653,0.0003646833,0.00010514249,0.021047339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003915038,0.00025472237,0.00024172361,0.000026698735,0.000603439,0.00016546965,0.00010188845,0.00041370257,0.003046705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009791486,0.00029430387,0.0000056298472,0.00006304115,0.000054147564,0.000006366434,0.108941056,0.0000056406775,0.00012087868,0.70812994,0.17263986,0.009641204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023700287,0.00018306969,0.0000035458013,0.0000311091,0.000029826055,0.00000508327,0.000045724555,0.0020084393,0.00008054455,0.06380528,0.93324023,0.00033015123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010038491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056484987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031884725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047006233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329653820","doi":"10.1017/s1479244314000213","title":"HISTORY PAINTING REDISTANCED: FROM BENJAMIN WEST TO DAVID WILKIE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Painting; Representation (politics); Ideology; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Art history; History; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.045379367424179196,"score_gpt":0.21179164430242614,"score_spread":0.16641227687824695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329653820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21491373,0.008868186,0.02192907,0.00045509002,0.008712254,0.00044799095,0.00006121636,0.0008660936,0.7437464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605107,0.000011468557,0.00019524264,0.0044830833,0.0024423453,0.000037444257,0.000057648504,0.000077154546,0.13218491],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809015,0.00016807683,0.0004058347,0.00057208416,0.0003191363,0.00044471526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986501,0.0004148421,0.00011577432,0.00047135339,0.00013344655,0.00021452297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036423173,0.00033437356,0.00037460512,0.00016724187,0.00031609877,0.000043862463,0.00041925986,0.00009821919,0.022493372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049502176,0.00031859925,0.00016807986,0.000023371025,0.00043619087,0.0002247445,0.00011211167,0.00035536804,0.0023866314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084366715,0.000081154336,0.000003713139,0.000016684304,0.000029655557,0.0000038942153,0.48746866,0.000010107538,0.0021149865,0.024109904,0.47597644,0.010100452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000202992,0.00020279242,0.000007717156,0.000072432085,0.000032276013,0.0000010125029,0.0011328241,0.0010338918,0.00014340637,0.0033822411,0.9933319,0.000456487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044032186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017419384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.645597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014644589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009175946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338411970","doi":"10.1017/s1479244316000111","title":"GEORGE CATLIN, THE SCIENCE OF POLITICS, AND ANGLO-AMERICAN UNION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; George (robot); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Field (mathematics); Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Geography; Art history","score_opus":0.03824598057608306,"score_gpt":0.27458209902271835,"score_spread":0.2363361184466353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338411970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804329,0.0006593616,0.0021419728,0.0012319925,0.0005686636,0.00013999945,0.00000840436,0.00005896723,0.0147577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729878,0.00019501874,0.00007111492,0.00015586255,0.00008517592,0.0000037022955,2.1937122e-7,0.000008012108,0.026493106],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874336,0.00019346735,0.00015484278,0.00022479768,0.00036298294,0.0003205792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989968,0.0003977768,0.00009988169,0.00022134304,0.00014926349,0.00013492038],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010414668,0.00008631927,0.00013238924,0.00006867858,0.0006596849,0.000007893052,0.00036218535,0.00004852116,0.00029723794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008912028,0.000056863835,0.00005470964,0.00018701289,0.011781069,0.00015640038,0.00005767451,0.000100904304,0.00002162046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017866027,0.0000671577,0.0010073755,0.0000112612615,0.00001674421,0.0000014182347,0.8680697,0.0000016925884,0.0087285815,0.048901737,0.0578575,0.015318979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114669616,0.000087511646,0.00083264185,0.000020170584,0.000014205082,0.0000014333133,0.0039279214,0.000033504777,0.00073073653,0.0014179006,0.992653,0.00016631135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045969198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032528504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012739177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067570625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610402466","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000105","title":"SIGMUND FREUD, SUBLIMATION, AND THE RUSSIAN SILVER AGE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sublimation (psychology); Genius; Literature; Freudian slip; Psychoanalysis; Human sexuality; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05493202414464346,"score_gpt":0.3152505357056627,"score_spread":0.26031851156101926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610402466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10109383,0.009544992,0.10648185,0.0060871234,0.001225459,0.00095341384,0.000016193717,0.00035887415,0.7742383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529819,0.00021810562,0.00038605466,0.001166776,0.00012877352,0.00023100375,0.0000049249275,0.000031336058,0.04485116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915797,0.000072866016,0.00018555053,0.0002914953,0.00010213032,0.0001900071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849415,0.00019794519,0.00013376192,0.0010982482,0.000019647186,0.000056236844],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026214204,0.00013582954,0.00016167253,0.00006384917,0.0005389112,0.000060287635,0.00052278175,0.00010657784,0.0032015163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005869815,0.00010083955,0.000074206844,0.000023697898,0.0009340832,0.00008398872,0.000049456507,0.00021920644,0.00020849491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000453359,0.00018823706,0.00012945781,0.000009667268,0.00012040703,0.000007778372,0.16409108,8.210688e-7,0.0008612194,0.25928864,0.5365864,0.03826294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079220877,0.00003556372,0.0015740969,0.000007522742,0.000016594642,0.000011548274,0.000038576596,0.00061505655,0.000036222194,0.032452915,0.96426845,0.00015124492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004481852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001092618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85188806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011432641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022145541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611659558","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000038","title":"FROM SEXUALITY TO GOVERNMENTALITY: THE OEDIPUS COMPLEX OF MICHEL FOUCAULT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Electronic Arts (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Michel foucault; Governmentality; Human sexuality; Oedipus complex; Unconscious mind; Power (physics); Psychoanalysis; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Philosophy; Free association (psychology); Epistemology; Gender studies; Psychoanalytic theory; Law; Politics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1555516778155222,"score_gpt":0.37397607888347706,"score_spread":0.21842440106795485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611659558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72676474,0.0016846291,0.0054976805,0.01788912,0.005423588,0.0006554771,0.00022823768,0.00013899487,0.24171753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767693,0.00006201552,0.00023875934,0.002183085,0.00054638396,0.000013788827,0.000007668314,0.000019609512,0.020159332],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782056,0.00031950153,0.0003092183,0.0003492507,0.00085481495,0.00034665165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769574,0.0008527957,0.00022925058,0.0009023176,0.0001449134,0.00017498368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010038855,0.00016309215,0.00027151944,0.00003071807,0.0011894172,0.00005980819,0.0012895112,0.00017550103,0.0017429319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00317823,0.00014050977,0.0001266204,0.000039653,0.0018665858,0.00015471652,0.00026377567,0.00033298615,0.0002374361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009602775,0.000114678944,0.00025854737,0.00000929128,0.000048209597,0.0000023077869,0.6837611,0.0000050861217,0.002417394,0.0011970408,0.3070767,0.005013591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016630223,0.000051621257,0.0009989502,0.000019434261,0.000026311563,3.7860823e-7,0.0073578674,0.00033558736,0.0002897365,0.0044605806,0.9860954,0.00019778419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06442712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021381164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67901874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012225105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003750258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751843608","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000361","title":"INSOMNIA AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL PATHOLOGIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; State (computer science); History of political thought; Value (mathematics); Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Law; History; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08174841872071062,"score_gpt":0.31330479078478873,"score_spread":0.23155637206407811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751843608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09143433,0.0020702588,0.0051301597,0.0004732374,0.00070162513,0.00008364956,0.000026674217,0.00008209343,0.89999795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113775,0.000109900146,0.0003566197,0.00091379887,0.00020712707,0.0000067334117,9.792199e-7,0.0000042059683,0.017262876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993166,0.000061065446,0.00009423772,0.00016052589,0.00017145537,0.00019616136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993764,0.00022444689,0.0000668128,0.00018097006,0.00005834182,0.00009303464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018416689,0.000079135396,0.00010417406,0.0000374334,0.0013136006,0.0000410912,0.0002313604,0.00007269062,0.0008492733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013921715,0.000079383426,0.00003482335,0.000009747802,0.013765753,0.00013256713,0.00006563389,0.00010964057,0.00007279818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009887229,0.000020146512,0.0013313788,0.0000024345045,0.00001026453,0.000008478792,0.01580145,0.0000016882481,0.00007224137,0.97148395,0.009835135,0.0014229603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008633944,0.00001696382,0.00018906388,0.000007638914,0.00001002582,0.0000074606282,0.00013523153,0.0000234188,0.000009885498,0.0029840812,0.99642104,0.00010887466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017190195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000348873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98658586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023323072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012956875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752277470","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000373","title":"FROM MYSHKIN TO MARXISM: THE ROLE OF DOSTOEVSKY RECEPTION IN LUKÁCS'S REVOLUTIONARY ETHICS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; HERO; Politics; Duty; Dilemma; Sociology; Fyodor; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09425376190013937,"score_gpt":0.34263197305757664,"score_spread":0.24837821115743727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752277470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508964,0.008926741,0.0032994263,0.012762951,0.0022066496,0.0007738608,0.000029357629,0.00018398117,0.120920606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437135,0.00039940546,0.0003712324,0.000708222,0.00038792356,0.000041747982,0.0000044781045,0.000023298273,0.0036923427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972911,0.0011505247,0.0003314201,0.0003703956,0.0005101295,0.00034646995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963915,0.0024768692,0.00021416544,0.0006583563,0.00014890805,0.000110214605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002515465,0.00015379624,0.00026974588,0.00009716718,0.00083720445,0.000017128903,0.0011527251,0.00047114436,0.001708938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010894951,0.00013212235,0.00012566328,0.00008651047,0.0017997198,0.00017750141,0.0002549602,0.0009066692,0.0003441361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032477154,0.00013941471,0.000901842,0.0000069944763,0.000025087204,0.0000034458121,0.91457444,0.00009372922,0.0046891025,0.018898614,0.041725766,0.018616766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017203386,0.00007698921,0.0026860014,0.000056770838,0.000011871991,3.2721778e-7,0.008652385,0.0004785438,0.00015625192,0.14778943,0.83969015,0.0002292698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016629606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045959293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90592206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016308858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004344566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775828104","doi":"10.1017/s1479244317000579","title":"TRANSLATED LIBERTIES: KARSANDAS MULJI'S<i>TRAVELS IN ENGLAND</i>AND THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE VICTORIAN SELF","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Amateur; Contextualization; Subject (documents); Ethnography; State (computer science); Sociology; History; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03164306132028175,"score_gpt":0.2100503639196284,"score_spread":0.17840730259934665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775828104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868389,0.003204952,0.00003735318,0.0007588957,0.0024448496,0.0002576264,0.00001838416,0.000030842475,0.0064082136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946379,0.000084868414,0.0000051789452,0.000278492,0.0003669009,0.000016660042,0.0000014843573,0.000023402581,0.0045850887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889505,0.00021675609,0.00031044884,0.00021501044,0.00014739881,0.00021535397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988248,0.00033405624,0.00021674052,0.00052757416,0.000059905382,0.000036944286],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030570824,0.00017993788,0.0003089359,0.00008871734,0.0010515493,0.000032322136,0.00054127537,0.00010257753,0.0015166171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015510143,0.00011129037,0.00013015857,0.000013580673,0.0037472046,0.00012681336,0.00005615834,0.0003698641,0.000019445848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032324504,0.00005613903,0.000026815609,0.000032642994,0.000042358955,0.00000275565,0.996383,0.0000029159091,0.000053852655,0.0024467877,0.000105974636,0.0005234726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013891917,0.000071898474,0.000061773615,0.000036293764,0.000035457277,0.000004475405,0.00001084617,0.00039639414,0.00009235635,0.005427974,0.99232876,0.000144549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009689901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045699854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001684132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013097224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939615},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2819365728","doi":"10.1017/s1479244318000203","title":"FORUM: LAW, EMPIRE, AND GLOBAL INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: AN INTRODUCTION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Scholarship; Intellectual history; Subtitle; World history; Legal history; Empire; Intervention (counseling); Law; International law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05097456034415468,"score_gpt":0.224313979885698,"score_spread":0.17333941954154333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2819365728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24465005,0.012804995,0.013313028,0.002785012,0.017801542,0.00062832923,0.000118903474,0.0012372086,0.7066609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322267,0.000032167627,0.00010411242,0.0034570775,0.0040006903,0.00002451124,0.000050921237,0.000053899417,0.06004992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978673,0.00013548152,0.0004264518,0.0007186396,0.00030825016,0.00054389256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870414,0.000147945,0.00008519511,0.00045029304,0.00026171727,0.00035071874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015960241,0.00036128008,0.00037607393,0.00012352163,0.00044436287,0.000052235286,0.0003130085,0.00015045193,0.011489321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029098112,0.00034957964,0.00011913424,0.000040521514,0.0029957194,0.0005375437,0.000117729556,0.00031487393,0.00060132315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002109303,0.00017148773,0.0000060915518,0.00001816808,0.000033803917,0.0000044893027,0.13811578,5.168253e-7,0.00004381571,0.38637742,0.46763715,0.007380363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023736642,0.0010264618,0.0000026188188,0.000008413915,0.000036511774,0.00001902326,0.0004887053,0.007567322,0.000009535397,0.009311294,0.98085743,0.0004353149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016902202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005143007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68757665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036001683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021397744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2867487351","doi":"10.1017/s1479244318000239","title":"LEGAL FLOWS: CONTRIBUTIONS OF EXILED LAWYERS TO THE CONCEPT OF “CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY” DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Crimes against humanity; Commission; Normative; War crime; Law; Political science; International humanitarian law; Sociology; Human rights; International law","score_opus":0.026600202495352585,"score_gpt":0.2183115346972781,"score_spread":0.19171133220192552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2867487351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54948664,0.0032537223,0.0012972112,0.00059997715,0.0020583174,0.00054796296,0.0005166502,0.00010284824,0.44213668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596525,0.0000035534915,0.000008316938,0.00081574114,0.0005466709,0.000023519842,0.0000088071865,0.000018917777,0.13892195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986619,0.00012570247,0.0004570009,0.00021338223,0.00024148735,0.00030054108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986803,0.00038919479,0.00011126983,0.00038484842,0.00033770985,0.00009669732],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015830783,0.00018077235,0.00030437004,0.000115783194,0.000563552,0.000016114274,0.00045846959,0.000042414915,0.0058535812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019684128,0.00011568473,0.00018524106,0.00006149292,0.0016860012,0.00011129169,0.000102578386,0.00026426045,0.00012978267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022055348,0.0002002499,0.0000028768977,0.000052951007,0.00014821965,0.0000030590218,0.4752791,0.000038451308,0.002402645,0.34940323,0.17162691,0.00062174216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020590475,0.0001740395,0.000007888361,0.000028656441,0.000025849266,7.9107787e-7,0.0009736361,0.0014400835,0.0014994174,0.0006382582,0.99485135,0.00015410472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067705114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00952741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8232245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047767215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013489756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927177721","doi":"10.1017/s1479244319000076","title":"SCOTTISH MEDICAL ETHNOGRAPHY: COLONIAL TRAVEL, STADIAL THEORY AND THE NATURAL HISTORY OF RACE,<i>c.</i>1770–1805","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Linnéuniversitetet; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Civilization; Colonialism; Enlightenment; Humanity; Race (biology); Ethnography; History; Anthropology; Scottish Enlightenment; Ethnology; Classics; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02057558581827212,"score_gpt":0.21660490723303175,"score_spread":0.19602932141475962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927177721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77747124,0.09181492,0.0002891696,0.00030533207,0.016363375,0.0007384611,0.000038817314,0.00012945474,0.11284925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89276063,0.0002515206,0.000013419368,0.0012395575,0.0005231805,0.000025843614,0.00001583199,0.000033861153,0.10513615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739283,0.00060268055,0.00049223384,0.00039441057,0.0008315025,0.0002863514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971161,0.0019999496,0.00021709572,0.000312748,0.00023233212,0.000121795834],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017476651,0.00025167383,0.00049340475,0.00030492913,0.00021265275,0.00002303222,0.00048374967,0.00015712352,0.02121004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088462164,0.00020478271,0.00026654813,0.000042526837,0.00439337,0.0002957728,0.00010606721,0.0006941607,0.00015262993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029901417,0.00016618484,0.000046334302,0.00009306544,0.00019301314,0.000009727297,0.4397731,0.0000026649795,0.00023327881,0.26080927,0.29280406,0.002879144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019783736,0.00015254755,0.0001106985,0.000055075172,0.00008145088,0.000014954321,0.0004687184,0.0010269807,0.000024371297,0.0054551945,0.990332,0.00029962233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009486992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030489145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69752795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009149875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007603189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115094147","doi":"10.1017/s1479244320000554","title":"On the Decolonial Beginnings of Edward Said","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Orientalism; Empire; Decolonization; Universalization; History; Sociology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literature; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Ancient history; Political science; Art; Law; Archaeology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06304337678817255,"score_gpt":0.20002965175559773,"score_spread":0.13698627496742516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115094147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78301466,0.0032074975,0.000066476096,0.009550625,0.0010788082,0.00026176564,0.000041762793,0.00013403734,0.20264438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97546035,0.000017167462,0.0000071802924,0.0068006157,0.00040016585,0.000016543014,0.0000037743725,0.000012401544,0.017281827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928576,0.000042937,0.00018334834,0.00016788683,0.00016514338,0.00015491956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.00030319934,0.00006728519,0.000099285055,0.00007454527,0.000046125264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005013779,0.00013606493,0.00018796595,0.000024743389,0.00022836908,0.000015137662,0.00021666496,0.000026843683,0.0061130547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024983534,0.00008281807,0.00011564015,0.000019795787,0.0005239804,0.000073384166,0.00006188058,0.00017082345,0.0003298282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017060134,0.0000304207,0.0000029393666,0.000013199522,0.000040713247,0.000002012226,0.6091952,0.0000043785535,0.00020649644,0.043672107,0.3455614,0.0011005716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010054103,0.00045251433,0.000009142637,0.000015240037,0.000015398706,5.056812e-7,0.00044315247,0.0003582368,0.00017413734,0.0013972244,0.9969207,0.00011322461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006748155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008725397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6513593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097665456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000364506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202257852","doi":"10.1017/s1479244321000536","title":"Hannah Arendt Encounters Friedrich von Gentz: On Revolution, Preservation, and European Unity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Biography; Philosophy; Politics; Conviction; French revolution; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Conservatism; History; Literature; Art history; Law; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06948861233258574,"score_gpt":0.2789033295100351,"score_spread":0.20941471717744936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202257852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22718105,0.0051056375,0.015693175,0.007546463,0.0020712628,0.0003883642,0.00004784632,0.00045110835,0.7415151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768456,0.00020519177,0.00013873796,0.0023970106,0.00054424355,0.000011979629,0.000031111525,0.000038740556,0.019787384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971462,0.0009679213,0.0003176569,0.00051721436,0.00057131646,0.00047970106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982839,0.00046567645,0.000077984514,0.00039150965,0.00042885417,0.00035207893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062613114,0.00020191004,0.00020742921,0.00015749538,0.00059518433,0.00004893088,0.000313966,0.00011125914,0.0012388739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045432076,0.00023007243,0.00008620257,0.00024703346,0.0007085712,0.0003118817,0.00013542661,0.0003605524,0.000396122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016670919,0.0005468283,0.00040547154,0.00008750521,0.000111297006,0.00009574555,0.40829775,0.00014908757,0.001248533,0.088098854,0.49428752,0.006504687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019833326,0.000115405775,0.00041422262,0.000050893013,0.00002395678,0.0000027672568,0.000519677,0.0005209785,0.00016435319,0.027319651,0.97036517,0.00030458273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007382849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074820337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74966455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014577692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004984757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204583279","doi":"10.1017/s1479244321000408","title":"Empire and Arab Indology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Philology; Palestine; Arabic; Ancient history; Orientalism; Empire; History; Mandatory Palestine; Relation (database); Classics; Politics; Mandate; Political science; Law; Feminism; Philosophy; Archaeology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07088080784816259,"score_gpt":0.20838065340351428,"score_spread":0.1374998455553517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204583279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5602138,0.021841314,0.00022717318,0.0003949167,0.0031295158,0.00009058424,0.000020639598,0.00013618809,0.41394585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200156,0.000058962964,0.000033708802,0.0026411298,0.0006663173,0.000010289621,0.00001695174,0.000024245437,0.07653285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00008420761,0.00016016014,0.00026945557,0.00009367699,0.0001855314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999459,0.00015040148,0.00003773032,0.00019159984,0.00009045584,0.00007078379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000069431444,0.00013624056,0.00018220692,0.00009978387,0.0002764907,0.000019245836,0.000087757784,0.000071986375,0.01495069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008601799,0.00014406517,0.00006508584,0.000014157342,0.0005481684,0.000097782955,0.000044307235,0.00023203058,0.000420353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045862733,0.000059811056,0.000009164161,0.000031749016,0.000030633568,0.00006263114,0.88210106,0.0000013088917,0.00020136006,0.03135195,0.08243128,0.0036732077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015153426,0.00006764772,0.000004879668,0.000010524076,0.0000145731365,0.00003703152,0.00018186714,0.00009526443,0.00008291333,0.007121985,0.9920531,0.00017867667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037133694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003766529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90962183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024185529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014859793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98594975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241072380","doi":"10.1017/s147924431600038x","title":"THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION OF THE BRITISH NEW LEFT: “CULTURE” AND THE “MANAGERIAL SOCIETY,”<i>C.</i>1956–1962","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Criticism; Capitalism; Relation (database); Politics; Sociology; Period (music); Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02938728073333364,"score_gpt":0.25062352884469474,"score_spread":0.2212362481113611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241072380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25328174,0.032240108,0.0023169,0.041488085,0.008026763,0.0009542533,0.000018364497,0.00012361752,0.66155016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8409125,0.0013400638,0.000025188743,0.00085398136,0.00062262936,0.0000058811443,5.668729e-7,0.000006517358,0.15623266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989979,0.00018716916,0.0001860243,0.00018359054,0.00017957133,0.0002657013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990106,0.0004399789,0.00014504298,0.00027195993,0.00004964073,0.0000827736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079018413,0.00009029888,0.00016674842,0.000004878335,0.0056122765,0.00019424032,0.00076127815,0.0001092497,0.00022324575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012999456,0.000051586198,0.00021980656,0.000010858328,0.007253095,0.00012893307,0.00015159036,0.00023876107,0.000019594274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009930399,0.000032676737,0.00007607346,0.000008120931,0.000054277818,6.392898e-7,0.33328518,0.0000018127204,0.00007398746,0.057795554,0.56415516,0.0444172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003667447,0.000013972772,0.0003483683,0.000008106898,0.000019649002,0.0000025282338,0.000524126,0.00036672302,0.000005869702,0.04735487,0.9509077,0.00008132007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006396739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004467647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58763075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043268577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036753237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391841070","doi":"10.1017/s1479244323000252","title":"Rawson Rawson and Early Victorian Poverty Knowledge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; History; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03595040340974927,"score_gpt":0.29207550683337846,"score_spread":0.2561251034236292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391841070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.560951,0.111154184,0.0025884472,0.00074953696,0.008233558,0.0003049089,0.000006845523,0.0006632311,0.3153483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94430584,0.0012622693,0.000037537793,0.00023066036,0.0008733981,0.000018994499,0.0000026275427,0.000029830364,0.053238824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985352,0.00029271728,0.00019216677,0.00040138152,0.00019291934,0.0003856159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988388,0.00074201793,0.000024926372,0.00015109315,0.00006684438,0.00017632374],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005499708,0.00015966252,0.00022043276,0.00015390602,0.000354776,0.000047290858,0.00020720797,0.00029323777,0.0012565105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004375978,0.00015711795,0.00010339142,0.00012727395,0.0006521505,0.0001773104,0.000057731482,0.00036267616,0.0004464996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024760328,0.000032018957,0.00016987928,0.000030410823,0.0000316399,0.0000115335915,0.854229,3.837519e-7,0.00040810974,0.01396345,0.11848276,0.0126161035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009840371,0.0000806039,0.00010825878,0.00003169837,0.000018424227,0.0000019686365,0.00061028317,0.0005962276,0.000024725588,0.0031870878,0.9950453,0.00019702717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010193852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011416647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87656254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011631257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005128275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393195835","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000027","title":"The Intellectual History of Milton Friedman's Criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Criticism; Social criticism; Positive economics; History; Sociology; Literature; Social science; Economics; Political science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.07766171978699428,"score_gpt":0.2566026518162692,"score_spread":0.1789409320292749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393195835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9438016,0.022053065,0.0042998884,0.0004027557,0.0047701746,0.0005810656,0.000010927295,0.0003783129,0.023702214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815424,0.000068472655,0.00006418119,0.0002741762,0.0006879862,0.00003047044,0.000013466456,0.00009405737,0.020612951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962788,0.00020018405,0.0014653801,0.000716223,0.0008202619,0.000519152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943094,0.003178142,0.00089869276,0.0006511243,0.0009293634,0.00003327677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031541407,0.00038893695,0.00064446166,0.00057056366,0.00026510592,0.000062141844,0.0006120927,0.0002464709,0.0010240766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012298982,0.00034904273,0.00050579314,0.0006108802,0.0019562335,0.0005146712,0.00040998354,0.00065555447,0.000167829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005484191,0.00061940093,0.0003379221,0.0030208176,0.00044591865,0.00014307651,0.1488236,0.000045426543,0.07247918,0.022693021,0.63142794,0.11447949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020362434,0.000067852925,0.00016830718,0.00014225753,0.00013574919,0.000005284949,0.00047639493,0.015007189,0.000726152,0.021877334,0.9607831,0.00040670316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006689055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052397005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3293552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032163223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019350403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992669","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000258","title":"Affirmative Orientalism: August Bebel, Islam, and World History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Orientalism; Islam; Religious studies; History; Ancient history; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05030052073997824,"score_gpt":0.27020253073209866,"score_spread":0.21990200999212042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060190275,0.334274,0.002365552,0.0005960923,0.0071384856,0.00033095526,0.0000146160055,0.0006341779,0.59445584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.716908,0.0008129943,0.00006300513,0.00041543285,0.00041692035,0.00003090576,0.0000040025798,0.00003001858,0.28131875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840826,0.00015763714,0.00022245642,0.00043296715,0.0003716273,0.00040707202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916947,0.00040043885,0.000042136267,0.00015321244,0.0000738094,0.00016090822],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033561783,0.00020828689,0.00024027983,0.00030552555,0.00029548557,0.000037691618,0.00019848511,0.000091079644,0.0014933363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024746696,0.00021202593,0.000095619675,0.000167788,0.0012246639,0.00031909996,0.00011807074,0.00030909048,0.0004926699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014358785,0.00003093525,0.000035605455,0.00004032394,0.000053075735,0.000022442078,0.54619485,4.902066e-7,0.00006692726,0.015437315,0.41010126,0.028002419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093185736,0.000043867512,0.000019162731,0.00007685783,0.000035570338,0.0000036556808,0.0048070643,0.00032881007,0.00001294622,0.0016416052,0.9926857,0.00025157217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013241746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008080192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65671766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003501118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004601912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992872","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000234","title":"Hans Morgenthau, Peaceful Change, and the Origins of American Realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"German Social Sciences and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07253433264576914,"score_gpt":0.29752290173847384,"score_spread":0.2249885690927047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5902422,0.111579165,0.004273755,0.010759321,0.008111345,0.0011861256,0.00004129297,0.0005276739,0.2732791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98487556,0.002620112,0.000048620434,0.00036492466,0.00049880147,0.000035088968,0.0000013706706,0.000014074235,0.011541434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986336,0.00022658205,0.00017934672,0.0002608401,0.00042509387,0.00027449644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999204,0.00040344056,0.00006854771,0.00015084645,0.00006178651,0.00011141299],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008301405,0.0001082753,0.00021474632,0.00011662166,0.0004062266,0.00002856024,0.0003005214,0.000054974164,0.0005409496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019130847,0.00008226534,0.000115338116,0.0002798112,0.0051279874,0.00014079515,0.000053474552,0.0001825824,0.00004456702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024635652,0.000014911121,0.000016864606,0.000014477104,0.000016450944,0.000003050954,0.8745779,7.495835e-7,0.000058056645,0.06647664,0.031499896,0.027296398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081282196,0.000034675213,0.00006916872,0.000017386203,0.00002439919,9.522611e-7,0.0040645935,0.0010050376,0.000004168092,0.0013739704,0.9932158,0.0001085665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057345074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01419193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012476747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038804172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403040527","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000246","title":"The Intersection of Ableism, Domestic Colonialism and Statistics in Britain from Bentham to Galton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia; Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Galton's problem; Intersection (aeronautics); Colonialism; Ableism; Statistics; Genealogy; Geography; Sociology; Mathematics; History; Gender studies; Cartography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027654936908098702,"score_gpt":0.22419057768787434,"score_spread":0.19653564077977564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403040527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72601396,0.08440595,0.17312549,0.0005526934,0.0043128156,0.0003530185,0.00034678093,0.00005901948,0.010830266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550873,0.0007198672,0.00032824336,0.00010423524,0.00007991271,0.000027365173,0.000004812423,0.000018224027,0.0032085823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907506,0.00002000118,0.00044064107,0.0002730879,0.000027287393,0.00016391264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.00065572566,0.00006661421,0.00010651859,0.00001715978,0.00005062763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027280787,0.00010030373,0.00028120086,0.000119139215,0.000092067385,0.00002170426,0.00010460833,0.00006662344,0.00017801647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047194798,0.000105544896,0.00004360331,0.00009055671,0.00016397749,0.000051569546,0.000056111636,0.0001573374,0.00013441672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024396685,0.00014290755,0.0010926137,0.00012856239,0.00023837526,0.000024658912,0.46511215,0.0004992324,0.000081362145,0.28619415,0.18457761,0.061664402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000144761,0.000120243625,0.00091974204,0.000034548695,0.0000072011967,8.9619624e-7,0.0002108883,0.034936514,0.0000037065709,0.07269448,0.89075977,0.00016725805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023844487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7061821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020815295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004934222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9257405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406848780","doi":"10.1017/s1479244324000222","title":"Planetary Politics and the Climates of History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Astrobiology; History; Geography; Geology; Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.02233258876253971,"score_gpt":0.17417989663297612,"score_spread":0.1518473078704364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406848780","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14771608,0.46903104,0.000102857084,0.00052484736,0.003771128,0.00021326404,0.00015487558,0.00016401015,0.37832192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95156825,0.000547427,0.000017593999,0.00074060605,0.0002356616,0.0000075011712,0.00002963048,0.000021152327,0.04683218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993803,0.000038624017,0.00017786771,0.0001536894,0.00010616275,0.00014335277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942446,0.0003749181,0.000019249104,0.00013603878,0.000010514148,0.000034805442],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009559125,0.00011653789,0.00015442664,0.000070757655,0.00007536392,0.00002000764,0.00009797401,0.000037214388,0.0056080883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025562611,0.00007978418,0.00006693502,0.0000054462944,0.0015057814,0.000097959375,0.000041031406,0.00018645867,0.00008527908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047387945,0.000024083847,0.0000054727066,0.00021219547,0.00004043043,0.000009337668,0.5439713,0.0000021474402,0.000106382264,0.25786752,0.197046,0.0006677276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012784134,0.000042861015,0.000006506829,0.000051764087,0.00004212981,0.000011776091,0.0004976257,0.0026580498,0.0000188448,0.0047033043,0.9917403,0.00009903208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020906566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062918705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8038522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027233124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031267016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99530095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290450","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100085","title":"Du Bois’s Eugenic Democracy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Neurology and Historical Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Eugenics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03652093191379489,"score_gpt":0.24025928157408943,"score_spread":0.20373834966029453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5267146,0.016388161,0.035039667,0.006224742,0.01034486,0.00051263167,0.000007349354,0.001008045,0.40375993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275999,0.00039318518,0.000027390419,0.008193096,0.000081646605,0.000025909609,4.0506754e-7,0.000016349,0.0636621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860466,0.00014864991,0.00023401935,0.00052761927,0.00016262263,0.00032241296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846095,0.001108208,0.000048987935,0.00028242808,0.000036500598,0.00006292794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092166774,0.00018213809,0.00023351537,0.00018972401,0.00049448595,0.000007202631,0.00038054757,0.00010148987,0.00078570755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026145433,0.00017882697,0.000121768746,0.00019200178,0.00048104112,0.000077696124,0.00018298306,0.00037628936,0.00077137194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003395604,0.00029504084,0.00019181639,0.000029516097,0.000025075802,0.00007719934,0.01432464,0.000030789884,0.06480465,0.0097136535,0.89920396,0.010964107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020462504,0.00008626226,0.00008953056,0.000005721311,0.000020243155,0.000011011681,0.0000038360267,0.0012548006,0.0068963254,0.0075124637,0.98375404,0.00016114382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023482706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022831855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4008853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076355704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012826617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414765408","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100188","title":"British Legal Opinion about Immigration and Sovereignty, 1833–1906","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Immigration; Skepticism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Colonialism; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.02144342996793228,"score_gpt":0.20601194669386258,"score_spread":0.1845685167259303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414765408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030219723,0.020890072,0.011219645,0.000466154,0.003731081,0.0002488995,0.000045061963,0.00026633037,0.932913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75435114,0.0002492174,0.000021221016,0.0011454289,0.00030622564,0.000020238289,0.00003622415,0.000016117583,0.2438542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989807,0.00004819178,0.0002813753,0.00030297297,0.00014869285,0.00023807437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994995,0.00013501826,0.000039713097,0.00014839492,0.000087923756,0.000089443514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007165431,0.00015601245,0.00021175465,0.000110886394,0.00023920601,0.00010089503,0.0001298234,0.00008041904,0.0046090693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008712266,0.0001750871,0.0000877609,0.000025803092,0.00044668023,0.0002495191,0.00006184295,0.00021429073,0.00007366561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004608542,0.00009403795,0.0000076937995,0.00006479406,0.000028872502,0.0000058501173,0.026657084,0.0000020657515,0.00002668218,0.7441758,0.19944604,0.02944502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018706416,0.00007547008,0.00002186288,0.00006252436,0.0000135956425,0.0000041489066,0.00014336972,0.008090652,0.0000041461503,0.015415793,0.975789,0.00019233968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037365728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021829328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051635806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013227423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416607970","doi":"10.1017/s1479244325100279","title":"Civil Society Divided against Itself: The Fight for Shorter Hours in Antebellum America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; York University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Power (physics); Civil society; Articulation (sociology); Spanish Civil War; Wage; Suffrage","score_opus":0.016804873347200735,"score_gpt":0.20544481811791696,"score_spread":0.18863994477071622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416607970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20084575,0.03355799,0.22738202,0.008767463,0.008980699,0.0052380795,0.000049459803,0.0013997824,0.51377875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90770364,0.00010895618,0.00015565343,0.055282023,0.0006813087,0.0004423223,0.00007625999,0.00005870404,0.03549113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986657,0.000023030863,0.00030795403,0.00043186665,0.00018525014,0.00038621266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919575,0.00019908808,0.00014023115,0.00033655763,0.0001153682,0.000013020979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020881883,0.00026525077,0.00030701148,0.00015694107,0.0003379899,0.00004577508,0.00048862526,0.0001110866,0.00054093247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021193769,0.00020843439,0.0003041936,0.00040035372,0.00037342744,0.00031666335,0.00013757826,0.00034354193,0.000089309455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008829729,0.00010601691,0.00016527448,0.00007464296,0.0000527283,0.0000021755734,0.011961862,0.00019602974,0.0004891215,0.00017455372,0.973216,0.013473289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003072181,0.000012045909,0.0000885467,0.000058971895,0.000050178143,2.8930683e-7,0.0006972244,0.023203284,0.000012558268,0.00041013854,0.9749033,0.00025623752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009446715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027244733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006181901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011514586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}