{"meta":{"query_hash":"8294806385f3","filters":{"venue":"Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8294806385f3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Modern+Journal+of+Language+Teaching+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W173099238","doi":"","title":"A Study on Indicators of Writing Instruction in Iranian English as a Foreign Language Curriculum at Guidance and High School Educational Levels","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Psychology; Christian ministry; English as a foreign language; Pedagogy; Foreign language; English language; Political science","score_opus":0.02240936030533093,"score_gpt":0.3295905382673611,"score_spread":0.3071811779620302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173099238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99796873,0.000050108367,0.0001390384,0.000066648085,0.0000041995972,0.000025076857,0.00003784796,0.0000061211094,0.0017021936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990982,0.000048728103,0.0003680343,0.000013449725,0.0000027305393,0.00004374003,0.00007022069,0.0000018940264,0.00035296616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690634,0.0006696956,0.00033307748,0.0002506786,0.0014786208,0.00036157045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759055,0.0027943046,0.0035746535,0.00038201152,0.0042437427,0.0014147719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036987297,0.00027614055,0.00032464348,0.0032486117,0.0010230576,0.0018412056,0.00052938715,0.00033927508,0.0013238877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015750669,0.00020325945,0.00029407826,0.0031874126,0.0008005816,0.0013927573,0.0010201819,0.00093439,0.0001682188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004810852,0.0004763184,0.88321906,0.00016426592,0.000021573482,0.0001528938,0.056927994,0.0001227762,0.0007642832,0.0009014122,0.00067204953,0.056529187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043290765,0.00016290476,0.95818216,0.00008085571,0.000012535382,0.000047626454,0.038272053,0.00019977598,0.0006158782,0.00013803203,0.002272132,0.000011732722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007218917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01094194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007218917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021618488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039274655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019560993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605728678","doi":"","title":"Ma Students' Viewpoints about Academic Misconduct, Its Reasons and Anti-Plagiarism Policies and Procedures in Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Viewpoints; The Internet; Higher education; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04879961989108166,"score_gpt":0.43977940953979267,"score_spread":0.390979789648711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605728678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246766,0.005035543,0.00038404923,0.034426186,0.00044474337,0.000051798066,0.00005540727,0.000030657982,0.03489502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922035,0.0017184486,0.00012709778,0.0021349918,0.00011156439,0.000013330579,0.000013585078,0.0000053666704,0.0036722012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510163,0.0017202209,0.00029153586,0.00020815944,0.0016608102,0.0010177214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910527,0.002211008,0.0019627295,0.00019930353,0.0027121492,0.0018620827],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005928194,0.00028070726,0.0003631735,0.0021898502,0.008340675,0.0045604217,0.0007678779,0.002185901,0.003930702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012055585,0.00022398114,0.00039685413,0.0015650204,0.0038131515,0.001716694,0.0020691357,0.0029858937,0.00052634865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017232471,0.000336248,0.17888774,0.0007846264,0.000050246097,0.004703659,0.67519647,0.00023492886,0.003231879,0.022968901,0.025580097,0.08785292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011608396,0.00024436353,0.12011189,0.0007138411,0.000053149928,0.0026700585,0.68940973,0.00022052482,0.0011610402,0.0031969098,0.18211529,0.00009160374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007751498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009486201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006117688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007033026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044387102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W789560557","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Pushed Output on Oral Proficiency of Iranian Efl Learners","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language proficiency; Psychology; Second-language acquisition; Test (biology); Control (management); Language assessment; Language acquisition; Applied linguistics; Linguistics; First language; Mathematics education; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044305531948274766,"score_gpt":0.3734257540803804,"score_spread":0.3291202221321057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W789560557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982047,0.000111414694,0.00007574317,0.000045261582,0.0000060292105,0.000007976529,0.00004506174,0.0000043875784,0.0014993224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807006,0.00013018215,0.00018587011,0.000026125525,0.000004813174,0.00002218122,0.00006531061,0.0000032184523,0.0014924099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.00016544868,0.00009397611,0.00012326696,0.00048596383,0.0001801701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967805,0.0009443327,0.00086586206,0.00013034369,0.00079854333,0.000480422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011389501,0.0005594893,0.00037243828,0.00086452503,0.0005751769,0.0016171763,0.0004974175,0.0004761887,0.006278283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056808465,0.00015672376,0.00033215937,0.00036490444,0.00083265215,0.00068296515,0.0012901023,0.0008282567,0.00081119005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005517642,0.0013842825,0.8478895,0.00046478427,0.00007714821,0.0013854917,0.027713984,0.00029570475,0.010928007,0.00037071723,0.00087127736,0.108067356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015680576,0.0020439525,0.9578827,0.00014670011,0.00005082601,0.00046714174,0.032512426,0.00033893008,0.0038159247,0.0005766296,0.0021126943,0.000036357327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013705499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016838498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006278283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003589424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005878387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021002948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}