{"meta":{"query_hash":"a9f48a5af4e8","filters":{"venue":"Modern Law Review"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a9f48a5af4e8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Modern+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1533854209","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12046","title":"The Symbiosis of Property and English Environmental Law – Property Rights in a Public Law Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Environmental law; Law; Public property; Context (archaeology); Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Land law; Adverse possession; Business; Economics; Land tenure; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02285209322943195,"score_gpt":0.2443695302860826,"score_spread":0.22151743705665067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533854209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054406933,0.087356664,0.0000017780801,0.015901456,0.00016115347,0.00455557,0.00004299074,0.00006790394,0.8375056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758007,0.018139467,0.000019011399,0.0036741605,0.000053413092,0.000185254,0.0000044754606,0.000010648122,0.0021128708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983611,0.00040114214,0.00034254914,0.00024625377,0.00029913243,0.0003497895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993808,0.00007731309,0.00010444371,0.0002818125,0.000014795779,0.00014080528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057175546,0.00015182323,0.00031062463,0.000007718338,0.0005851759,0.000099801866,0.00030396183,0.00007641906,0.00030961365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024009529,0.00006794272,0.00007866365,0.00006261422,0.0016141516,0.00047400824,0.00011207494,0.00013271897,0.000077918055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023967623,0.000112184374,0.00038138515,0.0001861373,0.000015648693,8.1892034e-7,0.0018091113,2.853246e-8,0.00009478675,0.980491,0.0005200415,0.016386505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016366583,0.00003164869,0.00011701007,0.00039569108,0.000016638967,9.2098816e-7,0.00007611926,0.00000802658,0.00009643243,0.005870219,0.99308497,0.000138676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07136092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04724257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089248824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001849289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0988565991060648,"score_gpt":0.35926096953460457,"score_spread":0.26040437042853976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750822166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014179807,0.08020692,0.0018852989,0.004516124,0.00007955287,0.0010832027,0.000010687599,0.000045678622,0.89799273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827794,0.0155623,0.00039188468,0.0010433975,0.000016875754,0.000030014793,3.7667107e-7,0.0000029655346,0.0001728318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994595,0.00006128343,0.00017483858,0.00009062975,0.00010365004,0.000110093795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969476,0.000024521083,0.00006380094,0.00014989523,0.000029473551,0.000037563237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042655572,0.000037283666,0.00013961016,0.000006521441,0.000054075135,0.0000041250755,0.00018453112,0.00002361456,0.0003269379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035147543,0.000032057073,0.000045552566,0.00011115162,0.00009629879,0.00012080125,0.000017849943,0.00004948809,0.000056704146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.119809e-7,0.000055647968,0.00022016106,0.00011775845,0.0000012913987,6.071926e-7,0.0014788155,9.211853e-8,0.000016214428,0.9911881,0.000057678302,0.0068631414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516882,0.000014356386,0.0012616713,0.0008970028,0.000020693678,5.0574624e-7,0.00003053539,0.000044337117,0.00010044982,0.068500005,0.92892414,0.000121141165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015812226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007787938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96859956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018403882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041026047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99074155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16117987959311303,"score_gpt":0.3499320435283463,"score_spread":0.18875216393523325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893794509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041834495,0.03873227,0.000193902,0.000695756,0.00007427632,0.00015737055,0.0000064207097,0.000027808846,0.95969385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97274226,0.025057375,0.00012680837,0.0019262341,0.000034249842,0.000018755254,6.739809e-7,0.0000018654865,0.000091757625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943244,0.000071904156,0.00012954485,0.00009160402,0.00017057845,0.00010395162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997158,0.000030472436,0.00004686213,0.000088933455,0.00008014575,0.000037807244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021019907,0.000049936996,0.00015389352,0.0000052760383,0.0003111861,0.0000036976696,0.00012150609,0.000022262146,0.0001818316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000520557,0.000039958086,0.000058470057,0.0000664391,0.000583083,0.00005497566,0.000021424357,0.00004326832,0.00010701681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011507211,0.00003200764,0.000044287113,0.000041857606,0.000006507913,5.612194e-7,0.0005111376,9.069863e-8,0.0000016226745,0.9955788,0.00009543794,0.003686512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031597538,0.000026746531,0.00031036156,0.0016154395,0.00004083512,2.8936762e-7,0.000016570964,6.612895e-7,0.000022659517,0.5310187,0.46683133,0.00008484415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025583705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009735577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97232395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016784436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004646009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994567655","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00654.x","title":"Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; Subsidiary; Human rights; International law; Business; State (computer science); Corporate social responsibility; Law; Corporation; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.033765523301880734,"score_gpt":0.38678151496452345,"score_spread":0.35301599166264275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994567655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44793707,0.007167094,0.057874843,0.007867401,0.007967784,0.010867988,0.0047760103,0.00053424784,0.45500758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361587,0.00006676698,0.00124062,0.00047347805,0.00053359225,0.00006322299,0.0003773544,0.000015410342,0.003613718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735695,0.00035474478,0.0009026583,0.0004165653,0.0006636968,0.00030536903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976544,0.0005111419,0.00037450754,0.00037221928,0.00095425104,0.00013349649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003911686,0.00017007596,0.0003466838,0.000055843717,0.0012671778,0.000081985854,0.0004505997,0.0001103731,0.0003456475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014525419,0.00015395864,0.00021872084,0.000092782764,0.00066878775,0.0005059137,0.00003785654,0.00014330304,0.000011291347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013431962,0.00018371806,0.000038102822,0.000088588706,0.00003605694,0.0000011280666,0.00048364874,0.0000013110754,0.0005129767,0.99650997,0.0019026467,0.000107513384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024163886,0.000040221203,0.00007734382,0.00015231424,0.00002713243,3.009172e-7,0.0000027058982,0.00001670678,0.00041582246,0.53913254,0.4597772,0.00011605397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008298862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12682928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5456788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024920306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017852732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994898065","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00784.x","title":"Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Forced marriage; Harm; Refugee law; Forced migration; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03485341438807433,"score_gpt":0.38760187838474935,"score_spread":0.35274846399667503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994898065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3885692,0.09991886,0.0006981715,0.012547317,0.0028033552,0.002431002,0.00005092207,0.00014131138,0.49283987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833984,0.0033432718,0.00020172121,0.011010962,0.000097287084,0.00013270028,0.00002764108,0.000013886716,0.0017741254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913716,0.0000635377,0.00029064156,0.00023497253,0.000089539615,0.00018417131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.000061372295,0.00006550053,0.00024216498,0.000030886535,0.0001049832],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003365454,0.00010076301,0.00020799978,0.000026191854,0.000046263875,0.000019914183,0.00012628388,0.000071116934,0.0022376725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003962941,0.00008842087,0.000037165355,0.0000549532,0.000055762986,0.00007827357,0.000021803784,0.00022311474,0.00034311292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018392928,0.00005529449,0.0003249941,0.0005105338,0.00001282653,0.000024643148,0.0007216993,1.2773124e-7,0.000045454344,0.9718695,0.0007090639,0.02570746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001853821,0.000083192164,0.0065541626,0.0011152955,0.000049385246,0.00037009935,0.000015244601,0.0003264771,0.000008657858,0.10786024,0.8814548,0.00030862662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011009565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006254538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011317972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018971326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15754106484424277,"score_gpt":0.4168717554287403,"score_spread":0.25933069058449754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014252366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020515252,0.3480262,0.03664632,0.013966545,0.00026966538,0.0015578809,0.000007296414,0.00022284816,0.578788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88941807,0.10322517,0.0032771514,0.0027776614,0.00010550253,0.00003113154,0.000004204839,0.000004704224,0.0011564016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.00021263059,0.00011631238,0.00011165001,0.00015373534,0.000091944115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970996,0.00005809345,0.000048822618,0.000066379565,0.00006159008,0.00005514857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045037598,0.000049870352,0.00016907975,0.000008110517,0.00040554276,0.000013270721,0.00004493243,0.00002561396,0.00006088733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020492023,0.000044384175,0.00003365095,0.00007536084,0.00014022698,0.00013567659,0.000010428279,0.00004526221,0.000023109593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040717896,0.00003216592,0.0003764391,0.00025894627,0.00001739393,0.0000033712406,0.019996913,0.0000017059559,0.00004835453,0.90549016,0.0020016655,0.07176881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007460128,0.00001548129,0.0010163087,0.00028299654,0.00002199344,0.000004340043,0.000032305656,0.00016904794,0.000010180168,0.0029223962,0.9953783,0.00007204107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001082538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007862114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018781513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027008611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041157133","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00501.x","title":"Sovereignty, Migration and the Rule of Law in Global Times","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Globalization; Political science; Immigration; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Reign; Rule of law; Law; Political economy; Immigration law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017984650500189693,"score_gpt":0.30598664750152565,"score_spread":0.28800199700133594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041157133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061856538,0.27960086,0.0019993505,0.020214306,0.00018085961,0.0022774094,0.000031610314,0.00006944754,0.63376963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632806,0.03465348,0.00014990072,0.0017157089,0.000040109637,0.000020347443,0.000008435765,0.0000027439478,0.00012865142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999204,0.00016286795,0.00023234733,0.00010745031,0.00019804596,0.000095328134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996922,0.000027222059,0.00008824122,0.00010779734,0.000059661208,0.000024859617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006556739,0.00006342658,0.00018497645,0.0000060056927,0.00014225961,0.000031342614,0.00009544397,0.000043061453,0.0000803228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062860956,0.00004060449,0.00005292144,0.0001065765,0.00030824967,0.00022356339,0.000011457052,0.00004311289,0.000010079294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004376595,0.00001556112,0.00006150848,0.00008522078,0.0000028305328,1.0756103e-7,0.0025980065,0.0000070566157,0.000004005812,0.99442226,0.000066999804,0.002732081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005442322,0.000019418449,0.0002077383,0.0009650635,0.000033289503,0.0000010941593,0.00008142809,0.00015441704,0.00006834491,0.83766514,0.16016516,0.000094669245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029047009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16110583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006053879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006388097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97741866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0792369281200715,"score_gpt":0.3500334249339207,"score_spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047361851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136756,0.10925519,0.003318526,0.021203943,0.00029496662,0.001532603,0.00006412037,0.000027362645,0.84293574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308467,0.005023677,0.000041665942,0.0016319334,0.000022997667,0.000012011015,3.4422385e-7,0.0000022330444,0.00018049488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.00054155954,0.0003738119,0.00010570998,0.00022639865,0.00022962247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891406,0.00059428404,0.00010848775,0.00025944863,0.00006541538,0.000058301095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010112463,0.00007081548,0.00030750912,0.000008430248,0.00031100053,0.0000061464307,0.00046511382,0.000055923654,0.00014903417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004930945,0.00003789099,0.00011494149,0.00015447194,0.0022288524,0.00004886106,0.00007393355,0.00012447931,0.000017418359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023579285,0.00003928368,0.00056561036,0.00004736834,0.000008718369,1.5033937e-7,0.00045637155,0.000062897874,0.000002835373,0.99664783,0.00015083373,0.002015712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010081825,0.000010569953,0.00059745,0.0007094505,0.000018892526,7.22957e-7,0.000045559984,0.0010999542,0.000053297437,0.9563687,0.04092875,0.00006583199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003453862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057329994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97171706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000621694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82122993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0361121533054164,"score_gpt":0.323076463333312,"score_spread":0.28696431002789563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053797283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009810092,0.08743686,0.00003154432,0.8517221,0.00018756397,0.0013470954,0.000095415424,0.00004431809,0.058154076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477627,0.0020860643,0.0000836824,0.049761523,0.0001661739,0.000055135693,0.00002309486,0.0000034253958,0.000058186823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985548,0.00025835802,0.00021388075,0.00019726719,0.00044658064,0.0003290889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00009986062,0.000081492195,0.000089622095,0.00010062721,0.0001150178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047660506,0.00012779562,0.00025674203,0.0000067832857,0.0070891497,0.000087689616,0.0001534871,0.00005803384,0.0000782663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024836734,0.00007575747,0.00007928602,0.00008130799,0.0009912275,0.00006052932,0.000032949265,0.00014064548,0.000025343026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012001373,0.000009705768,0.000021960208,0.00007226479,0.000007129102,0.0000014757192,0.002936168,7.432249e-7,4.4197357e-8,0.9530265,0.03915236,0.004770452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095887786,0.000009951327,0.00017832083,0.0002873197,0.000013554696,5.4050236e-7,0.00017478399,0.0000018357166,3.3343272e-7,0.0047499486,0.99438745,0.00010005571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75876904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9294023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008774457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080329056","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00606.x","title":"A Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To <i>Hello!</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appeal; Cause of action; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Privacy laws of the United States; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Liability","score_opus":0.030865595034546802,"score_gpt":0.3269577290358255,"score_spread":0.2960921340012787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080329056","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077108445,0.06897688,0.8471775,0.06263516,0.00087939564,0.005085804,0.00010980775,0.00040745048,0.013956907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5914393,0.053859446,0.18662511,0.15279657,0.008446328,0.0030758476,0.00028192744,0.0001890662,0.0032864108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983617,0.00016337926,0.00032668505,0.000399208,0.00034925214,0.00039975494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895525,0.00007048164,0.000113070564,0.0006123954,0.00011571806,0.00013305996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010223817,0.00013939492,0.00029859852,0.000024262428,0.0005906686,0.0001243416,0.00059702597,0.00010474195,0.000084599335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079300517,0.0001337821,0.00017743412,0.00025302797,0.00008949472,0.00026120496,0.00018401424,0.00014024902,0.0001340323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031914347,0.00014481244,0.000018648601,0.0011668367,0.000015359901,0.000004825205,0.0007951817,0.0000051275756,0.0001092696,0.87559074,0.08348506,0.03863225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007402016,0.000025123654,0.000009813248,0.00058545294,0.000033527518,0.0000012105402,0.0000054303946,0.000030877774,0.000037115387,0.31728014,0.6817895,0.00012777757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063050897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097343395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6605524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080739876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077376455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95314515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15153706500358632,"score_gpt":0.35434123078851204,"score_spread":0.20280416578492572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081855718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004437675,0.71097934,0.00029924742,0.029744716,0.0013113699,0.0033015604,0.00014503552,0.00024168109,0.24953935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8648077,0.12950453,0.00009181607,0.0038834708,0.00088290876,0.00043065735,0.000018966297,0.000009454368,0.00037046053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974083,0.00047935316,0.00034086552,0.00038818113,0.00069169194,0.0006916245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986983,0.00015270282,0.00020469892,0.0002651641,0.00032399857,0.00035516763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013699214,0.00029523033,0.0007188696,0.000039207935,0.0022398075,0.00037380224,0.0003973828,0.000106774976,0.00028459803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019409046,0.0002490692,0.00015712042,0.00030559662,0.0017519112,0.0025601296,0.00028442574,0.00030434865,0.00020465138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079379315,0.0003692854,0.0060641295,0.00013220983,0.00015735746,0.0000052172677,0.0106327385,1.9383195e-7,0.0000029847217,0.9433762,0.03356228,0.0056894943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029951395,0.00003975979,0.0012361044,0.00053934444,0.00023277428,0.0000059696604,0.0010741048,0.0000055696446,0.0000014758957,0.006781287,0.9894583,0.00032576386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012708042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001978438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096764311","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00807.x","title":"Parallel Proceedings in Investor‐State Treaty Arbitration: Responses for Treaty‐Drafters, Arbitrators and Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.026633985045954052,"score_gpt":0.25862710407880113,"score_spread":0.23199311903284708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096764311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701525,0.010236934,0.00035872575,0.022777036,0.0006444796,0.0042055184,0.0000318699,0.0003836376,0.1912093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86592406,0.0018049942,0.0015320834,0.1278162,0.0005837804,0.0008870018,0.00007824872,0.000056627472,0.0013170125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877906,0.000009360578,0.0004427916,0.00033761206,0.0001951548,0.00023603663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.000038719973,0.0001948481,0.0001268297,0.0001633086,0.000028314766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044251198,0.00022884615,0.00031257997,0.00010379143,0.00014840042,0.00029146994,0.00014405542,0.000059011945,0.00007790788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010657733,0.0001929742,0.00009232339,0.00015642443,0.0001348337,0.0014025643,0.000036680576,0.00015918435,0.000036004174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009641513,0.000076356846,0.002193562,0.0012710828,0.000017940423,0.0000026594778,0.00007955911,0.000001156405,0.00075958605,0.992099,0.0028792163,0.00052349316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011712958,0.000041351635,0.0020520478,0.00094361015,0.000088437504,0.000008348351,0.000014056244,0.0051533724,0.00034726257,0.10460511,0.88510615,0.0004689778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020596386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011378146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88749385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021120251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028714376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","score_opus":0.05530293285794409,"score_gpt":0.372401103392749,"score_spread":0.31709817053480494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137437015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014876283,0.023312872,0.029984944,0.022675592,0.00014050526,0.0014753396,0.000021189855,0.00013769823,0.9221031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93557817,0.01598146,0.004110228,0.03681802,0.0007991368,0.00060090027,0.000025135263,0.000030395968,0.0060565732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993917,0.000047734877,0.0001388032,0.00013552429,0.00012583012,0.0001604567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995459,0.00006386613,0.00004691313,0.0002141519,0.000056934823,0.000072284936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061740907,0.000053191998,0.00014320348,0.0000023612008,0.00040283968,0.000036584624,0.00020185311,0.000033428954,0.000054851473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048983144,0.000045539666,0.00009001094,0.00005001763,0.00009266495,0.00007915824,0.000024118644,0.000039853297,0.000095360534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.3646015e-7,0.000010109271,0.0000015837761,0.00015745868,0.0000020878713,2.0992614e-8,0.00008849373,6.895399e-7,0.000005919072,0.9854992,0.0018331831,0.012400987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003837711,0.0000057107122,0.0000021894364,0.00013731937,0.000019070967,1.01382405e-7,0.0000021736519,0.00013702655,0.000007899915,0.061778184,0.9378097,0.00006222146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012255744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036129537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93597656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024989804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028151362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30983576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09085241872378821,"score_gpt":0.31817011782237875,"score_spread":0.22731769909859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140086801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011375864,0.14545982,0.000059025893,0.0012157635,0.00015743363,0.00019448336,0.0000035557455,0.000017511236,0.85175484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402338,0.059032194,0.000036182504,0.0003914712,0.000075939155,0.000016761243,3.0304608e-7,0.0000016661307,0.00021166196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949276,0.000067156514,0.00014660817,0.00007492881,0.000099874786,0.00011866724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973935,0.000048214235,0.0000655421,0.0000848128,0.000034756384,0.000027350163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037581596,0.00004552565,0.00014042406,0.000002614086,0.0007940578,0.0000061526275,0.00017427481,0.000019074727,0.00013126289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015212039,0.000027131118,0.00008091424,0.000019152358,0.0005763418,0.00005221316,0.000028429937,0.000031915024,0.000116444935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.178253e-7,0.0000063680022,0.0001863372,0.000015053333,0.000015002433,2.6136877e-7,0.00046159324,2.95267e-8,2.6034695e-7,0.995536,0.00025836893,0.0035197902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016455782,0.0000038847097,0.00020356565,0.00012704547,0.00001967245,1.3439556e-7,0.000014956981,6.905508e-7,0.000004477156,0.5263214,0.47325513,0.00003257775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029462835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00847786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033037217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006634245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97700006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155724317","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00627.x","title":"Incitement to Religious Hatred: All Talk and No Substance?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Incitement; Political science; Law; Criticism; Legislation; Parliament; Religious studies; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03120010831305469,"score_gpt":0.34645102120563515,"score_spread":0.31525091289258045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155724317","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4158377,0.42919195,0.011923102,0.020852428,0.0020586874,0.0035963524,0.00005546509,0.00051321415,0.11597108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202975,0.056221593,0.0001207484,0.022575181,0.00027461283,0.000026397935,0.0000032953828,0.00001511489,0.00046554473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981194,0.000103398226,0.00037979666,0.0003428547,0.0004442918,0.00061026885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990004,0.00009073376,0.00007023262,0.00029017252,0.00011098113,0.00043750115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012424248,0.00016737584,0.00031977877,0.00002595506,0.00019433074,0.000056009463,0.00027817112,0.00007943664,0.000084264175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000726466,0.00014806073,0.000079076,0.00013886332,0.00017232801,0.00015479302,0.000049155162,0.000121284276,0.00026492705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014793544,0.00057564443,0.0016428843,0.006151788,0.00019002068,0.00046695184,0.24477872,0.0000020516695,0.00051909295,0.13557099,0.10394596,0.50600797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010972061,0.000056352685,0.00012980652,0.0016608554,0.00003960152,0.0000044536546,0.0006553957,0.000008370793,0.000016751403,0.00281172,0.9942626,0.0002444251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031989191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008835514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013259378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036625595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60377413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","score_opus":0.07583192905293384,"score_gpt":0.36920301683825435,"score_spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167445073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015573775,0.18651639,0.00240463,0.047193684,0.00019403477,0.00074181845,0.000012273237,0.00007023806,0.76130956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492444,0.044786565,0.00016932505,0.0014488152,0.00018919205,0.000038191105,0.0000022028162,0.000005806247,0.004115495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.000064699154,0.00011812206,0.00004845936,0.00016271324,0.000091076625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996158,0.000033748573,0.000051680603,0.00014806181,0.00009128288,0.00005945395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056569075,0.000025751226,0.000067576046,0.000002078703,0.00028673117,0.000015083079,0.00013790329,0.000015932426,0.000007109766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057180063,0.000016669217,0.000035144174,0.0000678669,0.00014319415,0.00004404606,0.000019539131,0.00003444803,0.000034990226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.2818982e-7,0.0000062157483,0.00000916344,0.000029000714,0.0000016600198,2.7066875e-8,0.000388089,6.812972e-7,0.0000012503946,0.9912643,0.002382363,0.0059171664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017818755,0.0000032743844,0.0000088564775,0.00007127123,0.000010570808,1.2460178e-7,0.000027961827,0.00003425281,0.0000059632616,0.05774058,0.9420596,0.00001971981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017026154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000650002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94768703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002921408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085759224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25738567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901880838","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12378","title":"Developing a European Standard for International Data Transfers after Snowden: <i>Opinion 1/15</i> on the EU‐Canada PNR Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; European union; Context (archaeology); Public opinion; European commission; Politics; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Balance (ability); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.1460417835108257,"score_gpt":0.3649301308831934,"score_spread":0.21888834737236773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901880838","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015898582,0.022119477,0.35517475,0.33895347,0.008456538,0.0075660003,0.0034704467,0.00023937304,0.2624301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6611933,0.1081444,0.005967172,0.21412331,0.0078070937,0.00033746107,0.001087195,0.00014145557,0.0011986035],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983616,0.00035307792,0.00025860104,0.00031893264,0.0004934764,0.00021431927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991224,0.000091124464,0.0000730338,0.00045089232,0.00020549519,0.000057060104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017757668,0.00011377884,0.00013072291,0.000011355276,0.0004925693,0.00010074313,0.00081381336,0.000016215921,0.00020733623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028796724,0.00008142375,0.00004075669,0.00007849923,0.0001354842,0.0002315824,0.00012402743,0.00009310264,0.000078183584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984762,0.000048305057,0.00000811935,0.001780933,0.00012134259,0.00001577539,0.0026909898,0.000001436806,0.000025818841,0.2483514,0.25080875,0.49584866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010171833,0.000066969966,0.000009485501,0.0016896516,0.00004708375,8.3966574e-7,0.00012223759,0.00003788308,0.000033623466,0.00023734459,0.997533,0.00012012893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014057204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21968985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015823924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024482244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912126940","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12415","title":"Thinking Outside the Box – Eliminating the Perniciousness of Box‐Ticking in the New Corporate Governance Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Process (computing); Business; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Accounting; Law and economics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Finance; History; Social psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.03591423212146928,"score_gpt":0.23888906188928835,"score_spread":0.20297482976781905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912126940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5429744,0.1894949,0.0032192494,0.09298421,0.0020003202,0.009339373,0.000020051804,0.00034545016,0.15962203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793728,0.0016014953,0.000046287078,0.01775272,0.00042057864,0.000027979628,0.000007843335,0.000036436446,0.0007338837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980321,0.000091050315,0.0005990755,0.00032135512,0.0006243038,0.00033214598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997659,0.00021251668,0.0011506743,0.00084553566,0.00012365768,0.000008597308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020160994,0.00025851806,0.00046994077,0.000020838435,0.0003853824,0.00036322384,0.0014167117,0.000046857134,0.00015607027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039998387,0.000118501936,0.00017233955,0.0003389707,0.0001177799,0.00057664915,0.00029501395,0.0003575871,0.00017639468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008717349,0.000031386535,0.0012037893,0.0017475844,0.000018187822,0.000009420666,0.0007008268,0.00014169922,0.000037303496,0.9866604,0.0017467156,0.0076939273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007654287,0.000019275514,0.006266825,0.010738882,0.00035778634,0.000014963371,0.00023113015,0.008569784,0.00003316576,0.5177563,0.45464194,0.00060454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011948812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004036731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46890417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029803194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004382503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48323685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999072153","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12512","title":"Harry W.Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer, Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill‐Queen's University Press/Toronto: the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2019, 170 pp, hb £33.00.WilliamTwining, Jurist In Context: A Memoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 382 pp, pb £24.99.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.0349188198400008,"score_gpt":0.2223655660411032,"score_spread":0.18744674620110238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999072153","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008845623,0.6970246,0.00013671882,0.24424052,0.0012597131,0.0053259335,0.0064961133,0.00031797192,0.03635281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40541735,0.48076454,0.00011556514,0.027590437,0.0019319073,0.00006984023,0.000478366,0.00017250933,0.08345946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743533,0.0004434642,0.0005414971,0.0005900241,0.00038696543,0.0006026939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802536,0.00030551414,0.0005249722,0.0005111428,0.00029901607,0.0003340216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064225734,0.00042357316,0.00091741345,0.000009256104,0.0044511566,0.00006426384,0.0011054756,0.00016231973,0.000062458275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011818881,0.00025906693,0.00081471493,0.00008438955,0.000765681,0.0005767302,0.0002292823,0.0007358941,0.000005795841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058205373,0.000041303436,0.0000149956595,0.0003948666,0.0004327422,0.000008083855,0.019328097,0.00003631448,0.0000031269103,0.17051978,0.80807036,0.0010921073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049859803,0.00005964118,0.000036908063,0.00025815621,0.000817312,0.0000015382795,0.0030824137,0.000589369,0.0000010578588,0.000014802467,0.9942875,0.00035269823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87836504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6826655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39657176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00264582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021784802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044181713","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12565","title":"Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fingerprint (computing); Scientific evidence; Categorical variable; Mainstream; Adversarial system; Psychology; Identity (music); Legislation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11016723743248086,"score_gpt":0.3317582871389124,"score_spread":0.22159104970643156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044181713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059533592,0.9106772,0.0034747717,0.025237823,0.0001290249,0.00047251518,0.0000031178047,0.000008746363,0.00046322698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95999855,0.0363169,0.0003005159,0.0030033365,0.000097336204,0.000014141196,0.000006317943,0.0000074204318,0.00025548637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00008329576,0.00014464445,0.00030526312,0.00015004765,0.00012456875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.000020489615,0.000035209683,0.0002321715,0.000045265147,0.00009861536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034653337,0.00007852424,0.00015639103,0.0000036551614,0.00013869896,0.00004776284,0.00014242849,0.000036511203,0.000009988678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017214318,0.000051671224,0.000036747748,0.000050835733,0.0002490191,0.0000027338292,0.00022577557,0.000080428574,0.0000065403588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026367628,0.000118547185,0.004481793,0.007828201,0.00018763744,0.000018396648,0.001712359,0.000054553166,0.18417291,0.0141069945,0.34907082,0.4379841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011567132,0.00013717065,0.0002305181,0.00033049655,0.000036521356,0.000009407405,0.000004459813,0.0012900995,0.0018309928,0.00024343285,0.9956579,0.00011328701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046138088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002030985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90046495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009391349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031582036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21070912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128090591","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12616","title":"Being Conscious of Unconscionability in Modern Times: <i>Heller</i> v <i>Uber Technologies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Supreme court; Doctrine; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Law; Arbitration clause; Power (physics); Political science; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Economics; Compulsory arbitration","score_opus":0.022120180920941673,"score_gpt":0.30424259611416016,"score_spread":0.28212241519321846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128090591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014066711,0.16260308,0.0007579679,0.014010088,0.00028345504,0.0008196277,0.000032282594,0.00026500886,0.8071618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95390373,0.039869253,0.00030565838,0.003930254,0.000029744624,0.000019894904,0.000008975736,0.000015236386,0.001917233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980947,0.00037506243,0.00051214674,0.00033805644,0.00041164114,0.0002684301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890125,0.00021408673,0.00013618721,0.0003815758,0.0003149869,0.000051897325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010875099,0.00013141148,0.00041280736,0.000028766974,0.0001241076,0.000030674102,0.00038549642,0.000089270434,0.0002557641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007286162,0.00012451406,0.00015273769,0.00030094356,0.00048388733,0.00021189399,0.00013060145,0.00022154905,0.00004818464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051755374,0.00015819648,0.00070063764,0.0004751495,0.000022322685,0.000040370673,0.00045932145,0.00001398612,0.00050296844,0.9660058,0.00065006193,0.030966036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029879072,0.000013915756,0.000049577207,0.0025394575,0.000034988305,0.000004842299,0.00009337731,0.0003746456,0.0008622884,0.13136907,0.8641098,0.0002492082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003659656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002515522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93983704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010577478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025158562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5077536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06491810052361464,"score_gpt":0.40136967097037346,"score_spread":0.33645157044675883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176229594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036532388,0.08465009,0.010793008,0.65711814,0.00016031649,0.003473539,0.00015205576,0.000061591774,0.24322595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942438,0.01629097,0.00060565106,0.087506,0.00015661752,0.00044750047,0.00002577304,0.0000130942235,0.00071063446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.00017138937,0.00024377032,0.00018071054,0.00020335859,0.00015036153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989962,0.00052102195,0.00007541159,0.00019058582,0.00015684935,0.000059957318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068440184,0.0000773043,0.0002190411,0.0000039033994,0.00039138153,0.00006590572,0.00012077882,0.000039302904,0.000023525143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052557373,0.00005466982,0.00008812686,0.000083297506,0.0003286513,0.000047507045,0.000029889094,0.000076315475,0.000003682183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013194146,0.00003938728,0.0000020574446,0.001466516,0.000010405742,3.1303364e-7,0.00056838716,8.8344376e-7,0.00002251893,0.9818714,0.014719218,0.0012857039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999749,0.000027300088,0.0000030076876,0.0010128757,0.00021419895,0.0000017129474,0.00015993355,0.00016408513,0.000113169284,0.03568437,0.96213275,0.00008659202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037422276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015497829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94741356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002322086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30102298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178424575","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12671","title":"Boycott, Resistance and the Law: Cause Lawyering in Conflict and Authoritarianism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Boycott; Authoritarianism; Resistance (ecology); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.036929623822674194,"score_gpt":0.31536100757675817,"score_spread":0.278431383754084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178424575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012132133,0.85509694,0.000019790408,0.025709763,0.00009327121,0.00037347228,0.0000061108335,0.000032266267,0.11745516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1718239,0.80629784,0.00040955376,0.013203432,0.00012940928,0.000056555913,0.0000037084112,0.000012643802,0.008062923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887425,0.00036449387,0.0001739218,0.0002144826,0.00018189805,0.00019096104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995651,0.00010783795,0.000045606164,0.00017136161,0.000049101454,0.000060976272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009006253,0.00008846262,0.0002625157,7.3891937e-7,0.0005656562,0.000111840985,0.00011104154,0.000082190614,0.000036959296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000865492,0.000061762155,0.000054538534,0.000111321126,0.0006131556,0.0001447794,0.000063249885,0.00017718409,0.0000034617422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024672495,0.000006248822,0.0000121246885,0.00033242448,0.000010342689,0.000013245779,0.008348377,1.3598626e-7,0.000012883304,0.9897765,0.0010375468,0.00044772975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025904382,0.0000015326196,0.00002514695,0.0009983114,0.00003870513,0.0000036662632,0.00050029665,0.0000071207596,0.0000105792005,0.03729967,0.96075916,0.00009675877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001244385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032034747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026957518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041747084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98562807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196845151","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12678","title":"The Independence of Justice in the Cauldron of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Democracy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03683912035728569,"score_gpt":0.3536374860870511,"score_spread":0.3167983657297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196845151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019858772,0.053387213,0.0008079852,0.06344826,0.00095935253,0.00065736833,0.00003216921,0.00001501113,0.8608339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857573,0.005074716,0.000060795668,0.00064788316,0.000063922176,0.000011578242,0.0000052432415,0.00000225066,0.008376322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889547,0.00023227624,0.00023811041,0.00007508439,0.00048721177,0.00007183635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916154,0.00031028665,0.00011279378,0.0001379852,0.00026666882,0.000010714146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009438191,0.00003526528,0.00008869756,0.00000868522,0.00020923563,0.00001934545,0.00038440907,0.000026827578,0.00028340367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020346147,0.000020607195,0.00005683991,0.00006642779,0.00018006378,0.0000918211,0.00002728493,0.00010138377,0.000015449923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010459612,0.000021834509,0.000043205546,0.000059534603,0.0000069220437,0.0000020251218,0.00095362804,0.000007834158,0.000005991626,0.9979628,0.0005194653,0.0004157198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007315665,0.000005483432,0.0007606356,0.0008369189,0.000045921264,0.0000026784933,0.000090439884,0.00010499581,0.000036807527,0.2879459,0.7100495,0.00004754972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011081983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020286322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031176198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013095837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12790","title":"K.Bowrey, Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author, Routledge, 2020, 228 pp, hb, £36.99.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Creativity; Section (typography); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06395492923406,"score_gpt":0.3489646009622671,"score_spread":0.2850096717282071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315700262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013728762,0.59253246,0.00016454214,0.122148804,0.0023474358,0.0032398824,0.00013852994,0.0012202295,0.26447934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45600608,0.5160172,0.00055419863,0.009427896,0.0026592293,0.0002850612,0.00013662539,0.000069086585,0.0148446215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973108,0.00074897794,0.00037329269,0.00041678478,0.0006954112,0.00045473338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987337,0.0003730685,0.00021320945,0.00032987044,0.0001591091,0.0001910284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023159655,0.00024728474,0.00047383815,0.0000030938206,0.0019340927,0.00027571112,0.00050717185,0.00019953946,0.00017078235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004095307,0.00014428764,0.00022234349,0.00077868823,0.0009828758,0.00034745914,0.00023741744,0.00039010722,0.00020282833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005589288,0.000055112312,0.0003288542,0.0009841153,0.00009525493,0.000024761799,0.039652605,0.000006437589,0.00006951335,0.63852215,0.29131547,0.02894014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017538245,0.000016524567,0.0002229123,0.0012845304,0.00015922597,0.00000620827,0.0012491443,0.00036014567,0.000013239897,0.08356543,0.9126174,0.00032985435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009531297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028310483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62130195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007594374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011401244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04293725953304092,"score_gpt":0.28859468771083135,"score_spread":0.24565742817779043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012009011,0.057738207,0.0015998045,0.048723415,0.0004392295,0.0038713887,0.00035128562,0.0012816422,0.873986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3922528,0.5811269,0.00086622103,0.0043464457,0.000606844,0.00014833896,0.00021791611,0.00007870481,0.020355787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980893,0.00021106942,0.00028214883,0.00048604963,0.0004086444,0.00052278326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988946,0.000098037024,0.00014180201,0.00047633093,0.000108235654,0.00028103238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007499347,0.00019073703,0.00036308053,0.000022696213,0.0012069114,0.0001741301,0.0006307513,0.0001276562,0.00015846791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005965186,0.00017410974,0.00013098695,0.00056965655,0.0005915363,0.00058171863,0.000370642,0.00024511138,0.000075172065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028819031,0.00004469844,0.00009438371,0.00030012918,0.000018016575,0.000009580714,0.00014735393,0.000002704745,0.000007227256,0.9902245,0.0060369857,0.0031115436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846915,0.000014187213,0.00006656721,0.00025273432,0.000051585637,0.000001932845,0.000028283666,0.00042515594,0.0000052579153,0.009173889,0.98957336,0.00022236393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044655525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065058568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98353636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010614996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010366807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383225277","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12826","title":"The Travels of Treason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Constructive; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); English law; Legal history; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046419352683187295,"score_gpt":0.34444011671069935,"score_spread":0.29802076402751204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383225277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004743561,0.5227793,0.000025155392,0.023558471,0.00030095162,0.00048090503,0.000006305103,0.00011900231,0.45225558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5837841,0.3867874,0.000021422284,0.001165654,0.0001862759,0.000110422356,0.0000034385478,0.0000126360865,0.027928635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932116,0.00014818083,0.00012513023,0.000079454556,0.00019259943,0.0001334634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971855,0.000032233424,0.000052431973,0.00012411582,0.000045729324,0.000026928943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000741756,0.000047660033,0.00015462139,0.0000037316652,0.0010226826,0.000007800519,0.00015948043,0.000019996845,0.000041955373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010675844,0.00002763247,0.000095293806,0.00019833322,0.00029146828,0.000039426428,0.000017177646,0.000040250456,0.00009844157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019223435,0.000012734935,0.0000104856645,0.00044426142,0.000028182976,0.0000018258454,0.03183843,5.4961697e-7,0.000021132202,0.7759074,0.038476374,0.15325671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021614567,0.000005427526,0.000027324995,0.00035896117,0.00002140065,1.16166426e-7,0.00043082662,0.0000024005265,0.0000023220962,0.0078834575,0.99120957,0.000036557376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009303013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018661993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016766018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025011104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78657514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387330817","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12845","title":"Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Relevance (law); Punishment (psychology); Blame; Sentence; Typology; Prison; Legitimacy; Criminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Retributive justice; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03769700447173646,"score_gpt":0.33473672153816975,"score_spread":0.2970397170664333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387330817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819529,0.013968903,0.000050122697,0.0033080694,0.000033608572,0.00026153753,0.00001260547,0.000007769162,0.00040450622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499391,0.049854327,0.000015841906,0.00008506432,0.000008480642,0.000015102289,0.0000013122725,0.0000024138508,0.000078371966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991238,0.00023943279,0.00026158444,0.00007188279,0.00022368545,0.00007962529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00033148483,0.00027988444,0.00034127143,0.00008361872,0.000012760234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068326964,0.000042919793,0.00013582964,0.0000075330267,0.00068845623,0.0000068964196,0.00023239884,0.000014267925,0.000010473983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018892289,0.000022918073,0.000090078385,0.0003309928,0.00039673937,0.000038692993,0.00011834051,0.00006843627,9.4767233e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014177199,0.00070912146,0.035949398,0.032176524,0.0010568046,0.000008199426,0.31741664,0.0027390237,0.14260387,0.14833042,0.0015101497,0.31735808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009945948,0.0002856282,0.11336899,0.042645358,0.0090005025,0.00010054943,0.69494826,0.035060544,0.031362966,0.0074998415,0.063562796,0.0011699423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032484382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013941459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37753165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026167236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027788054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77796614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046857292845601334,"score_gpt":0.3459466951516419,"score_spread":0.29908940230604053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75099546,0.10503264,0.0019717983,0.020965954,0.0013304736,0.004471668,0.00019525361,0.00016196875,0.11487477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863033,0.012016909,0.000019741561,0.0009676013,0.00013352548,0.00003807016,0.000004425053,0.000011680722,0.0005046957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986521,0.00022739208,0.0003657839,0.00016765256,0.00046131722,0.00012577072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.00025652576,0.00022325735,0.00031109422,0.00019794866,0.00003070387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009901734,0.00009637192,0.00027446848,0.000017089389,0.00014170815,0.000020886366,0.00032095096,0.00005755675,0.00010120569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009596946,0.00005031291,0.00012710603,0.00049522024,0.00019321505,0.000078416735,0.000051858016,0.00010565707,0.000008419145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005476653,0.00014475739,0.000108283144,0.0034072339,0.000096596086,8.2525685e-7,0.0051174005,0.0000774294,0.011079721,0.9392018,0.001116442,0.039594743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015327423,0.000041755713,0.0004453332,0.0038759343,0.00021770151,0.0000048811003,0.00007417653,0.0005622155,0.0025295587,0.002448727,0.98949057,0.00015588007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019907892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034962073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030475212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019124732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98661864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394684636","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12891","title":"ElizabethWicks, Suicide and the Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2023, 221 pp, hb £85.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02556924349383541,"score_gpt":0.3053255106053442,"score_spread":0.2797562671115088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394684636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013711735,0.6601014,0.00022999407,0.043035377,0.00063186756,0.0009849606,0.00003355609,0.00025237378,0.2933593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30968714,0.64711666,0.00014775064,0.036513135,0.0010077382,0.00009926393,0.00004182515,0.00006671721,0.0053197443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971167,0.0005658937,0.0005515206,0.00052976684,0.0006313913,0.00060476415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985569,0.00043128102,0.00011564341,0.0005558369,0.0001135824,0.00022672213],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034908124,0.00027231366,0.0006141718,0.000028069118,0.0008836473,0.0017560679,0.00072842446,0.00015791778,0.00071156595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039744843,0.00017850309,0.00029012904,0.00038604773,0.0013631027,0.0012850104,0.00016106272,0.00048764006,0.00020398379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060434854,0.000016521879,0.000096514894,0.0007138605,0.000057928533,0.000016426113,0.0030093829,7.6204157e-7,0.0000036438175,0.9464986,0.037224934,0.012355383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026112873,0.0000099447125,0.000044719698,0.0029003185,0.00016223043,0.000008229197,0.00012555973,0.00024944392,0.000007998691,0.0398922,0.95609343,0.0002448102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012059955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017149229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006527366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017224354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394688929","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12890","title":"AbdiAidid and BenjaminAlarie, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2023, 218 pp, hb £31.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Singularity; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027821035302239748,"score_gpt":0.2758808243345855,"score_spread":0.24805978903234574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394688929","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000241443,0.9125031,0.00071756006,0.026306018,0.0003801086,0.00067232875,0.00010380793,0.00008996552,0.058985673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08772237,0.8989898,0.0011686619,0.0049683116,0.00069145224,0.000011936215,0.000032057927,0.00003048271,0.0063849287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982851,0.0002991361,0.00022175141,0.00038217093,0.00048748445,0.00032432796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924713,0.00010450049,0.00009009383,0.00031098246,0.000107745946,0.00013955566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009089631,0.00018317159,0.0003576784,5.195815e-7,0.00081984745,0.00028079186,0.0005066568,0.00018925618,0.00028702852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041313673,0.0001417259,0.00019341482,0.000059658647,0.0012736252,0.00040991523,0.00014097101,0.00025012332,0.000004325835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005812577,0.000046156227,0.0000019858007,0.0008161509,0.000069175076,0.000020280528,0.00666765,3.9170595e-7,0.0000303909,0.8899387,0.008408556,0.09399477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030076191,0.00002878461,0.0000051442435,0.00092557323,0.00018856695,0.0000038504613,0.00073177996,0.00015953477,0.00002173526,0.012496343,0.9852302,0.00017842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13712658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58419037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97682166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023285711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016672592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8686194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400327859","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12906","title":"SuzanneLenon<i>and</i>DanielMonk<i>(eds)</i>, Inheritance Matters: Kinship, Property, Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 326 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Publishing; Law; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.05595393304530727,"score_gpt":0.3027440661794995,"score_spread":0.24679013313419224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400327859","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003915769,0.6696702,0.00016915846,0.062049273,0.00095682545,0.000896386,0.00008355493,0.0005571862,0.2652258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43293652,0.51725656,0.000639128,0.03208622,0.00083974766,0.00038835802,0.00006816864,0.00010892751,0.015676335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962868,0.00046894606,0.00062414876,0.0009396764,0.00085712166,0.0008232684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986977,0.00013624634,0.00013339726,0.00052864564,0.00013964274,0.00036434934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019206397,0.00040837345,0.00065818714,0.000068402,0.00084806053,0.0022614887,0.00090389344,0.00022770146,0.00079884514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081811515,0.00028713985,0.00027753157,0.0008209533,0.0006622883,0.0023971943,0.00023469911,0.0005739058,0.00016972663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009006484,0.00011363287,0.00032472762,0.004912086,0.00015091812,0.00007109815,0.0047736457,7.53525e-7,0.000015616426,0.44521672,0.23323618,0.3111756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119839046,0.000051617313,0.000066623244,0.0041098045,0.00009330887,0.000011621249,0.00010757066,0.0000695302,0.0000035984622,0.025571182,0.96936274,0.00043255006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008755285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02897878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7361266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056822133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015891998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.061545574966751164,"score_gpt":0.38017783196986965,"score_spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403213404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021650456,0.115282424,0.00013166509,0.0016191719,0.00018219945,0.00044851893,0.00000521946,0.00014023387,0.8800255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783042,0.0048421863,0.000070343194,0.0012341106,0.00017123511,0.000017710383,0.0000036540607,0.000011343539,0.015345198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.00016566983,0.00023847452,0.00021923555,0.00031469375,0.00018874672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.00007793058,0.000051722378,0.00018423713,0.000051698098,0.000100270445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039131372,0.000104878185,0.00028029032,0.000015157958,0.00030359876,0.00007241875,0.00021505177,0.00005406007,0.0013253369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009502229,0.00007523951,0.00015563371,0.0001113629,0.0004948757,0.00016558067,0.000021924523,0.00010873574,0.0006276799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012214913,0.000022142525,2.9329644e-7,0.00068793824,0.000019263252,0.000013634784,0.00444048,7.3158766e-8,0.000004204796,0.99152637,0.0013940032,0.0018903726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024727302,0.000024853363,6.223515e-7,0.001988646,0.000041270814,0.0000015663355,0.000014765368,0.000010728485,0.000057762943,0.2878086,0.70995075,0.000075679156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050197816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153804375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011747142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406408310","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12941","title":"Matthew C.Canfield, Translating Food Sovereignty: Cultivating Justice in an Age of Transnational Governance, Stanford University Press, 2022, 280 pp, hb US/CAN $105.00, pb US/CAN $26.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03543973588508367,"score_gpt":0.23720491823494166,"score_spread":0.201765182349858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406408310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14517038,0.26035315,0.0039318907,0.09435487,0.0011413201,0.0044485773,0.0039791563,0.0005438043,0.48607686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662068,0.026812779,0.0002722741,0.0015417348,0.00011912689,0.000018381741,0.00009339649,0.000025355806,0.0049101682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836355,0.00013478627,0.000531391,0.00033327946,0.00035612218,0.00028089562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926174,0.00009279573,0.00022204751,0.00019216957,0.00016660834,0.0000646401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021026997,0.00023831034,0.00068865326,0.000022878685,0.0009958702,0.00005088449,0.00029708256,0.00007006159,0.0005352621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023305953,0.00019954168,0.00029823428,0.0001642391,0.00017278746,0.00025190922,0.0000458251,0.00026181762,8.613298e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016774808,0.00010813497,0.00007473711,0.0027650842,0.00015408712,0.000006964196,0.009048472,0.000074020194,0.000030491161,0.98312724,0.0009240808,0.0036699204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007549566,0.000107052554,0.000104611754,0.0017843164,0.0007065473,4.3267738e-7,0.0015903088,0.0007807062,0.000015433683,0.00902886,0.98467356,0.00045319097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026568098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031154338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046256877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047776022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407367795","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12946","title":"LeahTrueblood, Referendums as Representative Democracy, London, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024, 168 pp, hb £76.50","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Democracy; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03722827369326225,"score_gpt":0.35280851318939926,"score_spread":0.315580239496137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407367795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012177641,0.3891368,0.00048903684,0.03200906,0.0009413192,0.0010301954,0.00005614208,0.00016005816,0.57495964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19484949,0.40307552,0.0004607335,0.051070914,0.0012604139,0.00038600626,0.000048339843,0.00007471235,0.34877387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962222,0.00073557376,0.00070608343,0.0006879698,0.0008453346,0.0008028635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806195,0.00032492736,0.00029711635,0.00070838456,0.0002695738,0.00033806177],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016024131,0.0002746407,0.00074559543,0.000032195352,0.0006756294,0.00050442957,0.00088879204,0.0002184695,0.0010143429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214318,0.000235513,0.00027945676,0.00057169853,0.0004171073,0.0011282496,0.00025035423,0.00049821474,0.0004113971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046587447,0.000052363335,0.00032262554,0.00059652596,0.000050170547,0.000014229411,0.00022268717,3.8828932e-7,0.0000063092866,0.7468261,0.23796031,0.0139436275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024755127,0.0000166666,0.0004431693,0.0032754547,0.000103216604,0.0000030472702,0.000035529858,0.000013353615,0.00003020829,0.08984053,0.9057566,0.00023470381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14834584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015561461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66779625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002343188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041369363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407589855","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12945","title":"BeckyBatagol, KateSeear, HeliAskola and JamieWalvisch (eds), The Feminist Legislation Project: Rewriting Laws for Gender‐Based Justice, London, Routledge, 2024, 392 pp, hb, £145.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04920755559461061,"score_gpt":0.36013142014116367,"score_spread":0.3109238645465531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407589855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027151997,0.67554957,0.0033050464,0.019743139,0.00077967835,0.0048507024,0.00015123752,0.00022499297,0.29512414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18410632,0.6768673,0.005556466,0.061692294,0.0025095406,0.0028306274,0.00037954233,0.00015464173,0.06590327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760395,0.0004072287,0.00051023054,0.0005320238,0.0004332203,0.0005133717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984585,0.0005062485,0.00023142033,0.0004211725,0.00029399586,0.00008867883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022527762,0.0002701462,0.0004748649,0.000008255333,0.0023145513,0.00033062632,0.00046966836,0.00023039286,0.00007509696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050127547,0.00019559251,0.00026892257,0.00054271624,0.0005041581,0.000275372,0.00010045304,0.00034655456,0.000016083002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034949957,0.00015858265,0.00020801814,0.012235158,0.00014726972,0.000004563605,0.010653342,0.000014854322,0.00009437891,0.64047885,0.2876581,0.048311945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038402114,0.000020156025,0.000013144719,0.002075251,0.00043213958,0.0000015572031,0.0010613957,0.0011542181,0.000025384457,0.006370336,0.988214,0.00024840407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062389777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012766437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009924796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036140738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408381554","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12947","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025614316086055466,"score_gpt":0.3013011847277057,"score_spread":0.2756868686416502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408381554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010196366,0.107016385,0.0102885375,0.0001863865,0.0053962087,0.0005667406,0.00007080707,0.00018997485,0.87628394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000103130566,0.46033925,0.00018307488,0.009109087,0.0012738664,0.00028959088,0.00387225,0.000049720074,0.52478004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906456,0.00004341493,0.0004326942,0.000106095096,0.00021162085,0.0001416099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948174,0.000010141186,0.00006444698,0.00032550085,0.000076405115,0.000041745825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017604437,0.00022121827,0.00039857053,0.00006260085,0.000053328087,0.00005505276,0.00015619863,0.00018754583,0.17830342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000105597455,0.00021902547,0.00011685013,0.00009003967,0.000015567332,0.0002783435,0.000021868243,0.00025616185,0.55229545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5553808e-7,0.0000019680667,6.941538e-9,0.015225003,0.000017467866,5.8709134e-8,0.000048539663,0.0016921957,0.0000026100167,0.000046152276,0.93112665,0.051839083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000600371,0.0000034913617,8.9137865e-7,0.0060335067,0.000064249274,6.1082113e-7,6.7166985e-7,0.0068939417,0.0000038033415,0.000043263244,0.98669785,0.00019765673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019510558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053728345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37399206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013695464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034499324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8931599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409246270","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12953","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409246270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.6410332e-8,0.25869077,0.0003177086,0.010288183,0.0018958492,0.00055757817,0.000074706055,0.000024045901,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.00013361401,0.00033894193,0.00013323592,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.000042213564,0.00016434412,0.00023928104,0.00020265547,0.00005639988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032547445,0.00014982374,0.00041996647,0.000031293326,0.00078500947,0.000092725364,0.00021751529,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062089646,0.00012201699,0.00017966436,0.00023454566,0.00016029394,0.00029483973,0.00007964655,0.00018312845,0.017185774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5062595e-7,0.0000042992547,4.4282483e-8,0.002757208,0.000022389484,1.9974682e-7,0.000653853,0.0000032586506,1.0449572e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.030389715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.0000036449344,3.443716e-7,0.0040308163,0.000085431464,1.6707186e-7,0.000022499578,0.000007070056,1.3586325e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.00013643467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010113039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15804963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030153577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99467653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412080299","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12972","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412080299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.6410332e-8,0.25869077,0.0003177086,0.010288183,0.0018958492,0.00055757817,0.000074706055,0.000024045901,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.00013361401,0.00033894193,0.00013323592,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.000042213564,0.00016434412,0.00023928104,0.00020265547,0.00005639988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032547445,0.00014982374,0.00041996647,0.000031293326,0.00078500947,0.000092725364,0.00021751529,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062089646,0.00012201699,0.00017966436,0.00023454566,0.00016029394,0.00029483973,0.00007964655,0.00018312845,0.017185774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5062595e-7,0.0000042992547,4.4282483e-8,0.002757208,0.000022389484,1.9974682e-7,0.000653853,0.0000032586506,1.0449572e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.030389715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.0000036449344,3.443716e-7,0.0040308163,0.000085431464,1.6707186e-7,0.000022499578,0.000007070056,1.3586325e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.00013643467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010113039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15804963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030153577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99467653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413359504","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12977","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413359504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.6410332e-8,0.25869077,0.0003177086,0.010288183,0.0018958492,0.00055757817,0.000074706055,0.000024045901,0.7281511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006442476,0.4167404,0.00005443212,0.007962858,0.0005393691,0.0000765412,0.0002648927,0.000005192623,0.5742919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.00013361401,0.00033894193,0.00013323592,0.0003165414,0.0002154576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.000042213564,0.00016434412,0.00023928104,0.00020265547,0.00005639988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032547445,0.00014982374,0.00041996647,0.000031293326,0.00078500947,0.000092725364,0.00021751529,0.0001775047,0.006231891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062089646,0.00012201699,0.00017966436,0.00023454566,0.00016029394,0.00029483973,0.00007964655,0.00018312845,0.017185774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5062595e-7,0.0000042992547,4.4282483e-8,0.002757208,0.000022389484,1.9974682e-7,0.000653853,0.0000032586506,1.0449572e-8,0.06653007,0.8996386,0.030389715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367527,0.0000036449344,3.443716e-7,0.0040308163,0.000085431464,1.6707186e-7,0.000022499578,0.000007070056,1.3586325e-7,0.0004038566,0.9952759,0.00013643467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010113039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15804963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030153577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99467653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.04213518038715577,"score_gpt":0.32086423742568954,"score_spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416826384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025750956,0.27083203,0.0010431065,0.06121726,0.0006390885,0.0006483772,0.00007805758,0.00016690983,0.6651177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6204514,0.3318843,0.00063163106,0.042841606,0.0007642077,0.00013237055,0.00005993835,0.000016155875,0.0032183744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979439,0.00021022982,0.00043989482,0.00041401674,0.00048176292,0.00051023776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989738,0.00019040582,0.00012697665,0.0002435652,0.00029002337,0.00017521519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035918,0.0002187821,0.0005077352,0.000042569434,0.0028353552,0.0005314599,0.00037679155,0.00012797334,0.00013078819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000674639,0.00020176882,0.00014745031,0.00029363664,0.0020019698,0.00073188863,0.00022695662,0.0003442862,0.000027951026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016171728,0.000035796667,0.0005570291,0.00024271039,0.00005873544,0.0000073338683,0.0004715043,0.000001048335,0.0000013303187,0.9502705,0.04456126,0.0037911765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012390217,0.0000058477676,0.00005181395,0.0018364764,0.00009577643,0.0000029281491,0.000053564283,0.000013304036,0.000001490155,0.29631537,0.70134616,0.00015333339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019683605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010387229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66189927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016675518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008003665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}