{"meta":{"query_hash":"a9f48a5af4e8","filters":{"venue":"Modern Law Review"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a9f48a5af4e8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Modern+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1533854209","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12046","title":"The Symbiosis of Property and English Environmental Law – Property Rights in a Public Law Context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Environmental law; Law; Public property; Context (archaeology); Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Land law; Adverse possession; Business; Economics; Land tenure; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02285209322943195,"score_gpt":0.2443695302860826,"score_spread":0.22151743705665067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533854209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105380185,0.03795487,0.036602348,0.11536082,0.0007048641,0.000036405872,0.00013499695,0.00004905701,0.7037764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970116,0.006228137,0.002062496,0.003799016,0.00048674885,0.000023872495,0.00003327711,0.000036288973,0.017214164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436593,0.0029362773,0.00021922986,0.0005316216,0.001327329,0.0006196789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990149,0.0074629923,0.00080466253,0.00053705106,0.0008115368,0.00023477188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462424,0.00016554903,0.00049668463,0.0017926039,0.0033694473,0.008271355,0.0009851819,0.002677921,0.0041931807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008042164,0.00032430227,0.00029383413,0.0017171933,0.033041723,0.01201654,0.003354727,0.0031726614,0.00039732558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029171874,0.0000065894624,0.0002167808,0.0000401777,0.0000019905524,0.00008331803,0.0029797966,0.0000943541,0.00007267787,0.9932894,0.0007114465,0.0025004281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014795871,0.00003459838,0.003799215,0.00047791342,0.000016239024,0.00023152055,0.008961075,0.0006745836,0.0005299717,0.73456323,0.250666,0.000030827483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016346667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016346667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059149535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04291624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0988565991060648,"score_gpt":0.35926096953460457,"score_spread":0.26040437042853976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750822166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016647734,0.030987328,0.16994421,0.17886354,0.0019251294,0.00012434387,0.00013327537,0.00012215033,0.6012523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8627357,0.010192141,0.021436375,0.043833874,0.0025895992,0.0006446993,0.00008921154,0.00014989272,0.0583286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97520906,0.015349273,0.0009006255,0.0023206382,0.0049960795,0.0012242526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824536,0.011838231,0.0012943803,0.002598428,0.0014098276,0.00040559476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02447721,0.0006340475,0.0012093529,0.0014699539,0.0052864817,0.008682879,0.002944019,0.011855438,0.005173544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025506776,0.0004791029,0.0015421397,0.0015857914,0.045141272,0.014020782,0.006765046,0.012472532,0.0011275997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012247712,9.4950536e-7,0.0000117860545,0.000007409548,0.0000010711371,0.000006816933,0.0001414856,0.000035088946,0.0000072949097,0.99902606,0.0003367583,0.00042405687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053892322,0.000008561475,0.00004341172,0.000073055344,0.0000029146322,0.000032805627,0.00010962075,0.0002443201,0.00006486618,0.9734952,0.025914893,0.000004925288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035084311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018794226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068611875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007259763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12944943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893794509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00867.x","title":"Deference on Questions of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Presumption; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Delegate; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16117987959311303,"score_gpt":0.3499320435283463,"score_spread":0.18875216393523325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893794509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09088803,0.06251297,0.039167218,0.16243216,0.0057128957,0.00018284377,0.00018613893,0.00009534913,0.6388224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367232,0.0085146,0.0035307838,0.024747737,0.005127664,0.00013047969,0.0000454306,0.000029208619,0.021150926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97405165,0.013092778,0.0011947886,0.0028398845,0.0072415504,0.0015792814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470038,0.03663555,0.0027531872,0.005524967,0.0068886224,0.00119386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026089186,0.00031385248,0.0008946088,0.0026611912,0.004137961,0.0069046067,0.0016505632,0.0045666057,0.004109834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205003,0.00037554043,0.0005400651,0.0014916458,0.032772865,0.009312893,0.0057540317,0.0062006954,0.000535352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134338825,0.000010124906,0.00025818823,0.00008715527,0.0000073530423,0.00007846432,0.0031599372,0.00006587507,0.00016082969,0.98448807,0.0028523055,0.00881833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014703372,0.000042000487,0.0008444765,0.00031356662,0.000012752405,0.00013644544,0.0011180994,0.00012384415,0.00016116576,0.9118417,0.085378766,0.000012640104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035934967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029888009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026089186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004806141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005070043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1379745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994567655","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00654.x","title":"Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; Subsidiary; Human rights; International law; Business; State (computer science); Corporate social responsibility; Law; Corporation; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Multinational corporation; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.033765523301880734,"score_gpt":0.38678151496452345,"score_spread":0.35301599166264275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994567655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18452053,0.011700722,0.025108198,0.03768494,0.00027035121,0.00008221392,0.000049240152,0.000042499672,0.74054134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879154,0.0016662932,0.0007442738,0.0016941662,0.00011741499,0.000028790688,0.000011610667,0.000007084008,0.007814968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939017,0.0031863095,0.00017725377,0.00053889607,0.0011700579,0.001025762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915706,0.004874624,0.0013743406,0.00079439493,0.001021293,0.0003647493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054676253,0.00015830922,0.00035040316,0.0012425226,0.0024330923,0.005394874,0.00072098785,0.0034555837,0.003967984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011780291,0.00020170723,0.0004687202,0.00084253476,0.009529262,0.0069902325,0.0034022212,0.003264078,0.00026649339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007553845,0.000020552581,0.0030100683,0.00003559661,0.00000767138,0.00022396859,0.003665657,0.0003032958,0.0001290761,0.9814455,0.0020597586,0.009091276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029737432,0.0000874854,0.017140858,0.00079835503,0.00007009606,0.0008859574,0.012533916,0.0026942713,0.0007312806,0.8313849,0.13359714,0.00004604857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005710478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005710478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00238295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005274532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028915882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994898065","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00784.x","title":"Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Forced marriage; Harm; Refugee law; Forced migration; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03485341438807433,"score_gpt":0.38760187838474935,"score_spread":0.35274846399667503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994898065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84824216,0.031978555,0.00069299963,0.008554662,0.00024232658,0.00005775727,0.00007186102,0.000011168464,0.11014856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874291,0.007815879,0.000121978985,0.0010974577,0.00005791248,0.000016384516,0.000033068038,0.0000065328486,0.0034217506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921286,0.0038838345,0.00041538215,0.00037229396,0.0018452733,0.0013546234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136144,0.0047264653,0.0020769115,0.00045211564,0.0009245902,0.00045841606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056673842,0.00018202246,0.000535649,0.0029720103,0.0056417584,0.0047179237,0.00065827725,0.001898535,0.0031527937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01438245,0.00024795168,0.00022101375,0.0051640207,0.009740504,0.0021221158,0.0053081806,0.0016256487,0.0002240713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006379007,0.00012540596,0.09638058,0.0008483268,0.000049922834,0.0057350574,0.6330393,0.00027550937,0.00047209678,0.16864833,0.009977191,0.084384516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010496815,0.00011496771,0.13380715,0.0023363368,0.00005573756,0.006678682,0.6373971,0.00014377695,0.00033345658,0.008061181,0.21100824,0.000052904892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053313505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09339687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053313505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047196187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057783504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106006324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15754106484424277,"score_gpt":0.4168717554287403,"score_spread":0.25933069058449754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014252366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038012,0.03381641,0.23697929,0.0077676754,0.0031577712,0.012149513,0.002755463,0.0002064893,0.59936607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6076173,0.014520898,0.23680583,0.0074499766,0.0010957641,0.051210802,0.0018166093,0.00029573851,0.079187036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716375,0.023209462,0.0006950548,0.002153657,0.0016154452,0.0006888557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661196,0.007880609,0.0008254727,0.0020045533,0.0022629185,0.00041444463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753388,0.00062271726,0.0010369547,0.006297975,0.005179054,0.0026238132,0.0032288316,0.0014829335,0.036199946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02997822,0.00037549852,0.00048591764,0.008447364,0.005568657,0.0038267458,0.004958543,0.0017625282,0.0021468122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024212651,0.00017195493,0.00461722,0.0015169088,0.00007137533,0.0004201315,0.026435876,0.00021024382,0.0005356929,0.8258078,0.011213282,0.12875724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018074375,0.00046685676,0.011620217,0.0021981562,0.00016811748,0.0010412121,0.042775072,0.0012178705,0.0015636499,0.31607932,0.62261057,0.00007822253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005204075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006043207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036199946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00354607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002865819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1211009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041157133","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00501.x","title":"Sovereignty, Migration and the Rule of Law in Global Times","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Globalization; Political science; Immigration; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Reign; Rule of law; Law; Political economy; Immigration law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017984650500189693,"score_gpt":0.30598664750152565,"score_spread":0.28800199700133594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041157133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09640323,0.15377106,0.012910217,0.13942342,0.0009586052,0.000033536267,0.000068574474,0.0000291262,0.5964023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95580953,0.024595005,0.00094347144,0.006135759,0.0007125677,0.000033376724,0.000029646379,0.000013356173,0.011727194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963092,0.0022469715,0.00016182059,0.0003365689,0.00054222625,0.00040324472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968766,0.0020839227,0.00039541392,0.00020559557,0.0002961898,0.00014232851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005209074,0.00021278528,0.0004669805,0.0012864629,0.004025471,0.007740488,0.0005040034,0.0033950454,0.002140304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006376715,0.00018635881,0.00027777342,0.0021348738,0.027048785,0.0078091915,0.0025295913,0.0043042246,0.00019808898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023242615,0.000003827406,0.00013745391,0.000021597814,0.0000023494174,0.000037346123,0.0014854427,0.0001335921,0.000016455511,0.99387026,0.0011873126,0.0031021321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007944398,0.000015231694,0.0007805949,0.00018937295,0.0000057996103,0.0000646935,0.0022526924,0.00018480363,0.00003695787,0.9210398,0.075413965,0.000008088582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009232982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007107689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009232982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003614852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042197676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027548552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0792369281200715,"score_gpt":0.3500334249339207,"score_spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047361851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06312616,0.04606555,0.01682074,0.24283475,0.0017571797,0.00004122013,0.000073122035,0.000059591635,0.62922174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589021,0.012220031,0.0029154855,0.011286941,0.002587832,0.00006433675,0.00003056131,0.000054116972,0.011938703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97747016,0.014028088,0.000545295,0.001647209,0.005056531,0.0012526426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98204124,0.011924366,0.001531183,0.001966485,0.0017959697,0.0007408711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021206932,0.00026776246,0.00057914894,0.00270828,0.0057505546,0.011796088,0.0009801674,0.0028198063,0.0024347133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025753373,0.0003021801,0.00033392472,0.002378996,0.06357101,0.012529471,0.0052448786,0.007874989,0.00037205324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053693334,0.0000029535545,0.00013531209,0.000019727155,0.0000025286133,0.000011547422,0.002346186,0.00005125724,0.000018832923,0.99336064,0.0011285791,0.0029169242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009803343,0.000022673436,0.0009194839,0.00014480964,0.0000044662224,0.00007904431,0.003553095,0.00020193969,0.00007396957,0.8343706,0.1606107,0.000009309259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040321713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021206932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053202235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042125885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112154305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053797283","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602_1.x","title":"Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian <i>Chaoulli</i> Health Care Decision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Health care; Judicial deference; Social security; Legislature; Judicial review; Social Welfare; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0361121533054164,"score_gpt":0.323076463333312,"score_spread":0.28696431002789563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053797283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041811825,0.007340509,0.00033329966,0.94344985,0.002637017,0.0000362635,0.00026620625,0.000035388606,0.04172023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07250974,0.0033880922,0.0005522241,0.89005214,0.0037875394,0.00006264412,0.00008566594,0.000059855414,0.029502073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876687,0.0015307883,0.00035648755,0.0013333684,0.0050764363,0.0040342435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841302,0.009652476,0.0005994399,0.00038045458,0.0037448492,0.0014924406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012703669,0.0010246949,0.0015781884,0.0021638286,0.033465844,0.014235634,0.0081377225,0.06446041,0.0056335176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020478835,0.0011789555,0.0019440453,0.004287591,0.026762204,0.0039592227,0.0026945486,0.036252152,0.0009531398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553146,0.000026729647,0.00079561374,0.000119435084,0.00002919175,0.00061170536,0.006026966,0.00032464552,0.0003299854,0.37743393,0.60895467,0.0052916124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001550442,0.000035999088,0.004158459,0.00065059547,0.00013802835,0.00019805903,0.0069509116,0.00065228186,0.00063673564,0.04881819,0.9373554,0.0002502982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9641997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10514109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10514109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12437588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7628555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080329056","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00606.x","title":"A Potential Framework For Privacy? A Reply To <i>Hello!</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appeal; Cause of action; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Privacy laws of the United States; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Liability","score_opus":0.030865595034546802,"score_gpt":0.3269577290358255,"score_spread":0.2960921340012787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080329056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018680446,0.003540392,0.00038720595,0.9923516,0.0014431688,0.0000031473253,0.000016371027,0.0000067406495,0.002064589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015797116,0.0044494793,0.0008990925,0.968997,0.0050253756,0.000034301458,0.000019176194,0.000027642493,0.004750886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855011,0.0068939016,0.0008294414,0.002242703,0.0032084992,0.0013243298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96921176,0.02505782,0.0008753262,0.0007991803,0.002780569,0.0012753643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02265716,0.0010114016,0.001489645,0.0014328912,0.0112383915,0.012560666,0.006278634,0.05664051,0.005873855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033070106,0.00094900775,0.0018335345,0.0018501485,0.046288114,0.031832233,0.0076894774,0.06470077,0.001994443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002115358,0.000015655807,0.000111873946,0.00010955233,0.000008028902,0.00021771892,0.004083462,0.00009991267,0.000083053346,0.5999626,0.39015967,0.0051273974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005328258,0.00003066562,0.0003556685,0.0006338567,0.000010912847,0.0002812596,0.006562886,0.0002576131,0.00013073898,0.29552272,0.6960768,0.0000836274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03851495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044515964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05664051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012416445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014908723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11982393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081855718","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00931_3.x","title":"DawnOliver<i>and</i>CarloFusaro<i>(eds)</i>, How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011, 510 pp, hb £55.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Constitutional law; Democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15153706500358632,"score_gpt":0.35434123078851204,"score_spread":0.20280416578492572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081855718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074067083,0.9162124,0.0012290308,0.019546134,0.0017716687,0.000010863052,0.0001595781,0.000036127873,0.06029361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02796953,0.88465273,0.0019696883,0.0030310797,0.001626489,0.00004626726,0.00036180133,0.00011914432,0.08022325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801743,0.0006464867,0.000103809834,0.00025027178,0.00074613607,0.0002359113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852943,0.00094749016,0.00017650597,0.00008769384,0.00014216616,0.00011671295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020198557,0.0008794842,0.0006737001,0.0027197034,0.0023543928,0.00754852,0.0010186606,0.002536222,0.02314678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003350272,0.00079303095,0.00039710975,0.0071450993,0.007032293,0.01017981,0.0014936215,0.0037675821,0.0056859176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005266921,0.000038581416,0.00069152156,0.001645613,0.000024304469,0.00012831768,0.0065179863,0.00038475578,0.00029024755,0.2883154,0.4774659,0.2244447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004006503,0.000007760449,0.0009445448,0.00079424534,0.0000046666387,0.00007544347,0.0014239417,0.000031784024,0.00008902988,0.027523924,0.9690906,0.000010002784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024472611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053079944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024472611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064483467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00665165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077433705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096764311","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00807.x","title":"Parallel Proceedings in Investor‐State Treaty Arbitration: Responses for Treaty‐Drafters, Arbitrators and Parties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.026633985045954052,"score_gpt":0.25862710407880113,"score_spread":0.23199311903284708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096764311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17768233,0.007145002,0.1060025,0.1740458,0.006641018,0.0013530903,0.00014704917,0.0004258053,0.52655745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826754,0.0021311075,0.02051023,0.022084989,0.0024666619,0.001065883,0.00008786506,0.00018782714,0.06879014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90716183,0.046606667,0.005492798,0.004432854,0.02953937,0.0067665093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91256136,0.06679583,0.00685775,0.004694039,0.0077269087,0.0013640443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06628714,0.0007593547,0.00081162615,0.0023753738,0.016122779,0.015610758,0.003801515,0.018780634,0.00865494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15576191,0.00082029356,0.0019317203,0.0027933817,0.011595355,0.011465344,0.0136928,0.02159047,0.0013596577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008463036,0.00011453523,0.0011634406,0.00016570705,0.00005308963,0.0007167128,0.013554798,0.0011792072,0.0006984869,0.91684234,0.027563043,0.037863817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023436747,0.00032440262,0.0039650803,0.0007391535,0.0001941676,0.000864287,0.016466746,0.004929056,0.0036261708,0.57440364,0.3939654,0.0002875175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045968234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060386313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06628714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010919659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35056406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","score_opus":0.05530293285794409,"score_gpt":0.372401103392749,"score_spread":0.31709817053480494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137437015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059793335,0.058741648,0.004748184,0.8450689,0.0047064684,0.000024416322,0.000032193697,0.00006243357,0.08063641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3783928,0.04040747,0.0047608786,0.50534606,0.023473993,0.00021621006,0.000071166454,0.00019498984,0.04713649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796415,0.0060484475,0.00042442532,0.0011181488,0.0036020854,0.0008426052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97766715,0.015415443,0.0018397124,0.0011648117,0.0029000125,0.0010128237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011700038,0.0005791313,0.0010035153,0.0034084872,0.0054648644,0.008891922,0.0013652849,0.008942226,0.006581917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025466297,0.00029311085,0.0008438616,0.0014881372,0.026701475,0.010697572,0.00556369,0.016636543,0.0017680909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014082373,0.0000328667,0.00035328697,0.00017464823,0.00001425699,0.00010189512,0.0042519676,0.00012679854,0.000112923226,0.884606,0.09187224,0.018338993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016324135,0.00002765191,0.000668453,0.00071047107,0.00000941385,0.00015689617,0.0020314942,0.00026670872,0.00009424176,0.62677044,0.369233,0.000014859922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017396118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017586708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011700038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061332765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00460768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061876416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140086801","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00859.x","title":"The Death of Socio‐Economic Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; De facto; Globalization; Law and economics; Hegemony; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09085241872378821,"score_gpt":0.31817011782237875,"score_spread":0.22731769909859054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140086801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028845461,0.034504376,0.013667205,0.29526156,0.0024010036,0.000042807045,0.00019348759,0.000057308003,0.6250269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8524958,0.01560406,0.003119925,0.038682844,0.0033184392,0.000097752156,0.00012239393,0.00008005736,0.08647869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298084,0.0032648908,0.00020567817,0.0008244909,0.002047877,0.0006762057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918761,0.0041385572,0.00048987713,0.0012750372,0.0017260516,0.0004942905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009597225,0.00035327187,0.00058955257,0.0010439841,0.0038030453,0.0056747547,0.0010164571,0.0034648902,0.004650404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015558043,0.0002562472,0.0003268157,0.0008351376,0.03486893,0.0074827126,0.004287886,0.008724629,0.000883271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027265871,0.0000027126928,0.000050901937,0.000012317822,0.0000014339822,0.0000119974975,0.0004236853,0.000033560584,0.000023122695,0.9925559,0.0031195686,0.0037620354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001286322,0.000019244679,0.00041566722,0.00017770934,0.000003556318,0.000054308905,0.00066468393,0.00012841875,0.00016208497,0.6833134,0.31503838,0.000009567406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006615534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009597225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053453315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073613464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05075562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155724317","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00627.x","title":"Incitement to Religious Hatred: All Talk and No Substance?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Incitement; Political science; Law; Criticism; Legislation; Parliament; Religious studies; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03120010831305469,"score_gpt":0.34645102120563515,"score_spread":0.31525091289258045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155724317","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025123835,0.7691227,0.0004885865,0.18130404,0.0028193123,0.0000157166,0.000059033697,0.0000105080035,0.043667737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089801,0.7843097,0.00042857637,0.102592446,0.009113378,0.000050374583,0.000084440595,0.000019972435,0.013600043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954373,0.002492721,0.00017416966,0.00023806305,0.001335165,0.00032247734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890526,0.0067266566,0.001131904,0.00027494435,0.00245174,0.0003622578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060520666,0.00027119208,0.0011175781,0.0017252201,0.0015408269,0.0039818254,0.0009502917,0.004530728,0.006187563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019704424,0.0003454272,0.00039632688,0.0017324779,0.006310979,0.0052426574,0.0010981769,0.004288544,0.0018576989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001601216,0.000095242394,0.0022211664,0.005345193,0.00019134681,0.00040457968,0.0026376136,0.00013410929,0.0002530243,0.24488662,0.31089565,0.43277538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077744095,0.00013457042,0.00789371,0.008683724,0.0002112304,0.0006244671,0.004932431,0.000069172755,0.00026572877,0.07307732,0.90399677,0.00003327045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016668135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031442966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016668135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030621835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062999893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03314227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","score_opus":0.07583192905293384,"score_gpt":0.36920301683825435,"score_spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167445073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034996387,0.07223823,0.06374978,0.09127521,0.0013871177,0.000068072106,0.00017842148,0.00007718672,0.7360295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564552,0.013482153,0.0046828836,0.007884169,0.0011753746,0.00010225841,0.00006563589,0.000044329292,0.016108094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852468,0.009443734,0.00037077116,0.0017490956,0.0021992926,0.0009902755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930734,0.0045557376,0.0005255216,0.00082835177,0.0006948174,0.00032219544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008562733,0.00024174326,0.0006347885,0.0019818074,0.005543386,0.009599387,0.0011765631,0.0031282294,0.0047214334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013560588,0.00027563865,0.00040946266,0.00246958,0.046676565,0.00959771,0.00572755,0.004715419,0.0006555776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.134695e-7,6.44309e-7,0.000054789798,0.000009745049,0.0000014128514,0.000007938294,0.00058026623,0.00003754707,0.000017114515,0.9964012,0.0006561218,0.0022323069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037065752,0.000010907069,0.00040095413,0.00018069248,0.0000072202165,0.00006746848,0.0011708984,0.00012739822,0.00007020069,0.85304517,0.14490636,0.000009168465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073543712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052682185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009599387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006327147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072999857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0459069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901880838","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12378","title":"Developing a European Standard for International Data Transfers after Snowden: <i>Opinion 1/15</i> on the EU‐Canada PNR Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; European union; Context (archaeology); Public opinion; European commission; Politics; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Balance (ability); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; International trade; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.1460417835108257,"score_gpt":0.3649301308831934,"score_spread":0.21888834737236773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901880838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025708534,0.03174976,0.07065359,0.31707224,0.01122272,0.0018237305,0.0028474887,0.000536407,0.53838557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38729456,0.019591985,0.11828521,0.34370494,0.0026708506,0.002444892,0.0035535328,0.0003677752,0.12208627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9310494,0.019517813,0.008143022,0.006192072,0.0288881,0.0062096654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446972,0.016277177,0.0031894825,0.0066586067,0.027639464,0.001537972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081296146,0.0006236522,0.0011726343,0.0038145918,0.0052102157,0.015617977,0.006435269,0.02285169,0.003697881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08134516,0.00077704416,0.002203461,0.0036142885,0.01077479,0.009458146,0.0062899794,0.013541369,0.0014600737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017269133,0.000023763658,0.00040026326,0.00020511741,0.000016662041,0.00013898102,0.0009971473,0.0004550227,0.00031100452,0.9265925,0.058829114,0.01201315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004845344,0.00008474795,0.002837008,0.002724211,0.00006024133,0.00020614946,0.0013413666,0.00083779264,0.0015525105,0.0998932,0.8902847,0.00012952612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.203357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12999286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.796643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022788214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08972375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42994022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912126940","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12415","title":"Thinking Outside the Box – Eliminating the Perniciousness of Box‐Ticking in the New Corporate Governance Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Flexibility (engineering); Code (set theory); Process (computing); Business; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Accounting; Law and economics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Finance; History; Social psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.03591423212146928,"score_gpt":0.23888906188928835,"score_spread":0.20297482976781905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912126940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05559737,0.02165416,0.042259082,0.55464953,0.010437172,0.0001298744,0.00014233706,0.00021506964,0.31491542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322618,0.007318576,0.011612435,0.07739221,0.004245008,0.00018442163,0.00010725515,0.00023531938,0.06664296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98453045,0.00797035,0.00047861406,0.0009671724,0.004662031,0.0013914398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969599,0.019782735,0.0017486083,0.0023983584,0.005473952,0.0009972857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148654785,0.00023565562,0.0003171524,0.0014716646,0.0048172832,0.010630758,0.0008687116,0.005851084,0.003128228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03691826,0.00035512584,0.00030465657,0.0011719554,0.027812721,0.012018868,0.0035229567,0.0096115125,0.0005784897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000874162,0.000007553606,0.00021877741,0.000028588469,0.0000015514262,0.000043633514,0.0023187646,0.00016154589,0.000074576594,0.9604489,0.027571367,0.0091159865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020949836,0.000047654805,0.00136263,0.0009063527,0.000008562961,0.000115265204,0.0031500037,0.0010065674,0.00082445174,0.29303375,0.6994484,0.00007527867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018881865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021143071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018881865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006328361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011885059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078617096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999072153","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12512","title":"Harry W.Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer, Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill‐Queen's University Press/Toronto: the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2019, 170 pp, hb £33.00.WilliamTwining, Jurist In Context: A Memoir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 382 pp, pb £24.99.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.0349188198400008,"score_gpt":0.2223655660411032,"score_spread":0.18744674620110238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999072153","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041433974,0.8223343,0.0006723195,0.14029445,0.0033884814,0.0000387227,0.00041463654,0.000091874404,0.03235089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027840931,0.7548711,0.0025237587,0.043292593,0.0034473788,0.00010274461,0.0003874706,0.000273631,0.16726041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773955,0.000534782,0.000099304234,0.00019175065,0.0010860318,0.00034860376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960238,0.0014697808,0.0003055996,0.000098586075,0.0012217836,0.00088040304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025864618,0.0011751087,0.000692191,0.0032522855,0.008798417,0.0083446475,0.00337689,0.006405921,0.038059812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00780546,0.0014241474,0.00046391334,0.005899651,0.008507453,0.013526498,0.0025913157,0.0053381748,0.01035237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104726005,0.000009035009,0.00020761028,0.00017623066,0.000004336757,0.00006192943,0.0020728929,0.000031370302,0.000036070516,0.008186911,0.9592131,0.029990017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072073326,0.000004844223,0.0021385641,0.0006487797,0.000005809786,0.00007499249,0.00354889,0.000025111574,0.0000557493,0.0056584794,0.98781127,0.000020237345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.735998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8666884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018033866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03383758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044181713","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12565","title":"Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fingerprint (computing); Scientific evidence; Categorical variable; Mainstream; Adversarial system; Psychology; Identity (music); Legislation; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11016723743248086,"score_gpt":0.3317582871389124,"score_spread":0.22159104970643156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044181713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1202468,0.34537745,0.047888998,0.19538127,0.0033371279,0.00011326984,0.00029884293,0.00009212796,0.28726414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92390853,0.05907228,0.0048691356,0.00614369,0.0016655595,0.00004576191,0.000058311864,0.000044245473,0.004192563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97153723,0.017641414,0.0011340155,0.0032426273,0.005688112,0.00075662846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7889331,0.18480204,0.011149064,0.0072918567,0.0068250024,0.0009989834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047022995,0.00036689985,0.0007847807,0.0060635107,0.0030558489,0.008890935,0.0024245037,0.0043856436,0.007389459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08998927,0.00035230594,0.00037648247,0.0034834656,0.03765063,0.015887944,0.004466889,0.0065046544,0.0006414558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007689723,0.000051506362,0.003134331,0.0007490513,0.000043918848,0.0004063858,0.010279566,0.00033497682,0.00022271821,0.9078606,0.003673081,0.07316701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031652497,0.00020003352,0.013497897,0.007911718,0.00009167535,0.0019817266,0.019395573,0.0014711156,0.0026147168,0.6267752,0.3259116,0.00011701562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023911167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026871392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041769627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029388433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24868435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128090591","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12616","title":"Being Conscious of Unconscionability in Modern Times: <i>Heller</i> v <i>Uber Technologies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Arbitration; Supreme court; Doctrine; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Law; Arbitration clause; Power (physics); Political science; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Economics; Compulsory arbitration","score_opus":0.022120180920941673,"score_gpt":0.30424259611416016,"score_spread":0.28212241519321846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128090591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13256055,0.018331103,0.008480815,0.22177137,0.0010685086,0.000060195653,0.000063369465,0.000048692822,0.6176154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94575465,0.0030006797,0.0010277308,0.028877836,0.00047440486,0.000026871661,0.000012385407,0.00002747105,0.02079796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869344,0.005533571,0.0003843377,0.0011422981,0.0038909111,0.0021144995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98827165,0.007599253,0.0010540014,0.0008396955,0.0017693116,0.00046599793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019150173,0.00017650936,0.00046227738,0.0013973741,0.0106041245,0.014475566,0.0016208853,0.014346757,0.003400435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01606491,0.00039901753,0.00030537279,0.0014985459,0.048125196,0.00990327,0.0035589342,0.011456602,0.00029883836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005359651,0.0000071838135,0.00023499613,0.000013935832,0.0000023423804,0.00013409367,0.008051558,0.00006443101,0.00008734883,0.98265636,0.0050184885,0.0037239774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018020615,0.000050888535,0.0034325938,0.0006658751,0.000022915721,0.00044518776,0.0204854,0.0006834403,0.00095039024,0.46419817,0.508917,0.0001300894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16147205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21088251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16147205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018437764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015285441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32106435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06491810052361464,"score_gpt":0.40136967097037346,"score_spread":0.33645157044675883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176229594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798736,0.008166175,0.0008073418,0.9422425,0.0048043425,0.00005759087,0.000101198,0.000025530993,0.04099651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07474101,0.0047786403,0.0009312882,0.8803032,0.008499554,0.00017174048,0.000036560465,0.0000670333,0.030471051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741078,0.010105531,0.0010436829,0.0041742544,0.006732723,0.003836027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962256,0.030815147,0.0009451677,0.0008397256,0.0041162297,0.0010276667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622377,0.000704601,0.001541104,0.001710226,0.014750032,0.014964366,0.0066127297,0.051480297,0.0042086397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043167695,0.0010293111,0.001920619,0.001943051,0.038554348,0.008557161,0.004202535,0.053380266,0.0010512092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003470853,0.000020748032,0.00015587508,0.0001374992,0.0000114632785,0.00041018025,0.007542517,0.00015202006,0.000105661034,0.6051331,0.38312924,0.0031670136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008844433,0.000056157016,0.00088887126,0.0012297556,0.000046690748,0.00016496652,0.010020202,0.00039811851,0.0005339744,0.1249686,0.8614329,0.000171252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24623457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2835407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24623457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032701213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035137516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48960263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178424575","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12671","title":"Boycott, Resistance and the Law: Cause Lawyering in Conflict and Authoritarianism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Boycott; Authoritarianism; Resistance (ecology); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.036929623822674194,"score_gpt":0.31536100757675817,"score_spread":0.278431383754084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178424575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09154814,0.6970537,0.002015703,0.08629126,0.00081179925,0.000039756018,0.000027214322,0.000012029294,0.122200504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906932,0.10022995,0.00031960066,0.0038224298,0.0006618838,0.000026680684,0.00001173691,0.000007208633,0.0042272727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162865,0.0069084107,0.00013639692,0.00023236372,0.00070450536,0.00038959237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98447543,0.011880952,0.001985582,0.000258666,0.00092525367,0.00047409412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006009628,0.00018426219,0.0006074501,0.0019657875,0.0018509332,0.004596915,0.00077707676,0.0024265214,0.0034056571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012224664,0.0001587556,0.00018404254,0.0019483495,0.012341783,0.0036613874,0.0021364691,0.0023075696,0.00022670679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010504054,0.00020909896,0.006226082,0.002845276,0.00007286236,0.00096885115,0.05353544,0.0005899592,0.00031291632,0.78254354,0.02013748,0.13245343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010646329,0.0004536148,0.032510433,0.007503874,0.00010606411,0.0018482188,0.10623666,0.00066006824,0.00059987686,0.31068328,0.5392253,0.00006612442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006099169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006099169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003196496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003978308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196845151","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12678","title":"The Independence of Justice in the Cauldron of International Relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Democracy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03683912035728569,"score_gpt":0.3536374860870511,"score_spread":0.3167983657297654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196845151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049888726,0.18980539,0.0031485606,0.124387294,0.0009993217,0.000028366272,0.00004059373,0.000014813599,0.6316869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635007,0.019624123,0.00039356935,0.007128925,0.0011534649,0.000023586568,0.000015881793,0.000011319593,0.008148433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889607,0.006696886,0.00032474392,0.0007577863,0.001932495,0.0013273322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886607,0.0077591464,0.00095385936,0.0007846076,0.0011959274,0.00064589316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011058954,0.00018625312,0.0006285716,0.002723888,0.005160358,0.012342731,0.0007327341,0.0042178323,0.0023215471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010061636,0.00023541623,0.00026970278,0.0019830547,0.027283853,0.009591435,0.0038952648,0.005905636,0.00023636645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011176352,0.000008871214,0.00029608372,0.00006744055,0.000005359369,0.0000685546,0.0039086277,0.0000788051,0.000054174292,0.98269,0.0029988473,0.009812065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026949063,0.00004683159,0.005637852,0.0016453089,0.000027417422,0.00020019694,0.011776451,0.00031427527,0.0003144186,0.61369646,0.36628038,0.00003344593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010423955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013785306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012342731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065068766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008716244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058486044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12790","title":"K.Bowrey, Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author, Routledge, 2020, 228 pp, hb, £36.99.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Creativity; Section (typography); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06395492923406,"score_gpt":0.3489646009622671,"score_spread":0.2850096717282071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315700262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010667902,0.79288507,0.001977113,0.058566406,0.0042258007,0.00004173781,0.0003097542,0.0001786361,0.14074865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017905992,0.6583532,0.0031396367,0.014378901,0.002502369,0.00017709898,0.00027211002,0.00032771003,0.3029429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.00042787788,0.000087277964,0.00014433521,0.0006565547,0.000120786484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964469,0.0026077726,0.00021774259,0.00011660401,0.00033022542,0.0002807897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017283075,0.000988247,0.0007292645,0.002023764,0.0025355308,0.011146337,0.0014840701,0.004699418,0.028182726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068524075,0.0010234138,0.00037687132,0.0048961923,0.0038155068,0.018241625,0.0032670798,0.00428404,0.014309812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002014515,0.000017848142,0.00016064952,0.0009698561,0.0000058706014,0.0001791102,0.006634407,0.00008773132,0.00016927984,0.053006954,0.82776576,0.11098246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002716341,0.0000052182577,0.0003681794,0.0009760879,0.000003402866,0.00014989605,0.0024807688,0.00004170016,0.000046807865,0.011990908,0.98392606,0.000008331884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141805895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03504436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028182726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035450158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0942806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04293725953304092,"score_gpt":0.28859468771083135,"score_spread":0.24565742817779043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351784","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021676732,0.90149564,0.0009783228,0.035491828,0.0032437192,0.000015475604,0.00026014858,0.0000856789,0.058212504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011587066,0.7821711,0.0017202805,0.010907278,0.0036255054,0.00009086166,0.00045382502,0.00023361445,0.18921044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892956,0.00026396633,0.000086515116,0.00015036835,0.00045610813,0.00011338735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987679,0.00080640335,0.000108192005,0.00005257718,0.00014989791,0.0001149009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016652199,0.0016876189,0.00095179403,0.001959122,0.0013961451,0.004659093,0.0012661073,0.004418183,0.057816595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026515306,0.0011486766,0.00047778236,0.00301475,0.0035533921,0.01009406,0.0020974842,0.0049830307,0.024879811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022862887,0.000017313829,0.00010996857,0.0005170978,0.000008618958,0.00008690291,0.00057956215,0.00012841752,0.00007854663,0.052269973,0.86936,0.076820694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008547042,0.000005962656,0.0006702543,0.0010440878,0.000004178394,0.0001357089,0.00046601804,0.0000681753,0.00003363801,0.03586711,0.96168554,0.000010727285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014072443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032572377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057816595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039694845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003263572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19341576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383225277","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12826","title":"The Travels of Treason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Constructive; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); English law; Legal history; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046419352683187295,"score_gpt":0.34444011671069935,"score_spread":0.29802076402751204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383225277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008173595,0.7941206,0.00033336802,0.03663789,0.0014907257,0.000016113807,0.0001369347,0.000013625673,0.15907721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22807263,0.7111383,0.00016464798,0.012702055,0.0016308671,0.000031263517,0.00015170325,0.000043912933,0.046064567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770665,0.0012372715,0.00012541664,0.00019400952,0.00048814013,0.0002485752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978084,0.0011631694,0.00023757784,0.00011886887,0.0005239032,0.00014823198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002669,0.0002533401,0.0004700652,0.001673448,0.0018679295,0.0026020305,0.0004938968,0.0013143759,0.0075696427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046423883,0.00020881041,0.00020884305,0.0021827072,0.0072335447,0.003349516,0.0011568718,0.0029660312,0.000993655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048317186,0.00003719922,0.0012122365,0.0037041302,0.000036527,0.0005196829,0.015175076,0.0003118142,0.00024626046,0.6470292,0.14393537,0.18774408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040345262,0.000024819105,0.0017602814,0.0016483442,0.000005926615,0.00019776243,0.0024467737,0.000013528704,0.00006518665,0.008225847,0.9856015,0.0000059295553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05737746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055709086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05737746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069958707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009221082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114086986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387330817","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12845","title":"Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Relevance (law); Punishment (psychology); Blame; Sentence; Typology; Prison; Legitimacy; Criminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Retributive justice; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03769700447173646,"score_gpt":0.33473672153816975,"score_spread":0.2970397170664333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387330817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80396384,0.006790419,0.017805422,0.016375506,0.0001933579,0.00018394542,0.00027966953,0.000060129856,0.15434766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877995,0.0004523058,0.0003348856,0.00010032847,0.000022451713,0.00001707095,0.00001214524,0.000003810468,0.00027694396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812135,0.013073976,0.001037003,0.0008177998,0.0024621433,0.0013955705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94481957,0.039208613,0.008913726,0.0026884833,0.0031642294,0.001205306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010031029,0.00025132837,0.00050618505,0.002440752,0.0038058027,0.005329005,0.0011366928,0.0020482535,0.0029192106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050661843,0.0002681618,0.00042659158,0.0013377934,0.01838771,0.008874706,0.006180855,0.0025893336,0.0002081711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051175535,0.00015803265,0.043812018,0.0014209368,0.00010083713,0.0035014495,0.23870845,0.002028511,0.0024561153,0.619778,0.0018960871,0.08562781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058586895,0.0006248098,0.20863666,0.003506072,0.000275022,0.00518373,0.31758684,0.0027356485,0.0040394804,0.41040525,0.046619922,0.00032794313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006413419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072236513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010031029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045658713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047170953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053049803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046857292845601334,"score_gpt":0.3459466951516419,"score_spread":0.29908940230604053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010353602,0.022419099,0.0017284356,0.49670193,0.018676946,0.0005730395,0.002120178,0.0003463775,0.44708043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04310167,0.0066471356,0.0014258258,0.79245913,0.00549946,0.0005320341,0.0005268129,0.00009880584,0.14970908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992722,0.0011852889,0.0007749318,0.0009844039,0.0026378466,0.0016956021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928275,0.0043386817,0.0005263619,0.00028266944,0.0016389065,0.00038595713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071650706,0.0008035746,0.0010057306,0.0019156219,0.0061255354,0.0060938094,0.0033204358,0.02811304,0.012001797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019876992,0.0011868253,0.0018183222,0.0018872764,0.0057250466,0.003172921,0.002527381,0.01587394,0.011055971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587962,0.000029539255,0.00054599915,0.00016956717,0.000018930506,0.00047236448,0.00078645884,0.00007152916,0.00062783284,0.11609056,0.8730095,0.008141875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005969044,0.00010332278,0.005650286,0.0010554307,0.000046098063,0.00027950495,0.0015533568,0.0001328438,0.00076665496,0.01627471,0.97395116,0.00012699736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1107417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21993376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1107417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071943128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011866007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22019422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394684636","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12891","title":"ElizabethWicks, Suicide and the Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2023, 221 pp, hb £85.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02556924349383541,"score_gpt":0.3053255106053442,"score_spread":0.2797562671115088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394684636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004339012,0.7635444,0.0008146833,0.023559283,0.010203514,0.000039954866,0.00072332256,0.00024670555,0.20043425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050410405,0.37601098,0.00092095655,0.006178421,0.0026824684,0.00007320212,0.0006502178,0.00023097411,0.6082118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899036,0.00024831723,0.000089912755,0.00010029871,0.00046333755,0.000107681706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856925,0.00075842295,0.00014850027,0.000054544307,0.00023874831,0.0002304714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011364456,0.0014162031,0.0008450422,0.0020714141,0.0014170024,0.0054933317,0.0011143809,0.0035336323,0.13761202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003536029,0.0009344082,0.0004640529,0.0034862494,0.0015510819,0.0064010303,0.0019042168,0.003539327,0.060622655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011013391,0.000009627529,0.00006849756,0.00042933883,0.0000033490428,0.00006668334,0.00047913616,0.000074062395,0.00004773622,0.0063817226,0.934736,0.057692815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032713056,0.00000651087,0.0003413603,0.0012008089,0.0000019832808,0.00013429855,0.0005108436,0.000024599503,0.000019349442,0.0024797455,0.9952716,0.0000055870223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012028111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033072922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13761202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029585399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034010736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46035802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394688929","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12890","title":"AbdiAidid and BenjaminAlarie, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2023, 218 pp, hb £31.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Singularity; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027821035302239748,"score_gpt":0.2758808243345855,"score_spread":0.24805978903234574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394688929","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002193895,0.9133088,0.00066881726,0.04931373,0.002798513,0.000014458498,0.00022013352,0.000053473676,0.033402618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071288384,0.91000557,0.0011666707,0.007573993,0.0028605154,0.00003406622,0.00033688013,0.000073136325,0.070820294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853134,0.00031454192,0.00010545363,0.00009761725,0.00083832414,0.00011269932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971391,0.001587701,0.00020414549,0.00008253354,0.0007522763,0.00023426834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019721414,0.0010982581,0.00086078746,0.002310261,0.0024258834,0.007435942,0.0013901057,0.0038452768,0.02771788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052824365,0.0011675796,0.00050193013,0.005048213,0.0034992595,0.0067756083,0.0012322465,0.0042576487,0.011183229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022106033,0.000010341817,0.00021616438,0.0006957256,0.000014632169,0.00007614761,0.0009730849,0.00009926549,0.00008015836,0.028905407,0.921853,0.04705389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007188241,0.0000044187177,0.0009476953,0.00063367566,0.0000104032215,0.00008422676,0.0006548671,0.000049325412,0.000051185063,0.010307405,0.98723745,0.000012190374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0963776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26294047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0963776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009737616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19163328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400327859","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12906","title":"SuzanneLenon<i>and</i>DanielMonk<i>(eds)</i>, Inheritance Matters: Kinship, Property, Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 326 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Publishing; Law; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.05595393304530727,"score_gpt":0.3027440661794995,"score_spread":0.24679013313419224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400327859","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025423712,0.9548745,0.0007126586,0.018769026,0.006380194,0.000010744354,0.000082605344,0.000054337248,0.018861765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029933094,0.9269062,0.0009942426,0.0034818333,0.004330712,0.000027504271,0.00018614023,0.00006963424,0.06101039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990578,0.00025186586,0.00007800692,0.00011952981,0.00040100314,0.00009182515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.00083786,0.000145998,0.000044260993,0.00022868995,0.0002916104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017931074,0.0016798307,0.0010563723,0.0015778631,0.0012158365,0.0056842524,0.001421734,0.0023703554,0.052473314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026412357,0.0009272926,0.00059467915,0.0025446087,0.0023016515,0.008269271,0.0020723045,0.0042984774,0.028980108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028915198,0.000024915382,0.00031843732,0.0018405167,0.000013237861,0.00015659786,0.0012448257,0.00008923418,0.00014683102,0.0071562184,0.7258807,0.26309958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036101749,0.000010963978,0.00076573464,0.0016475967,0.00000883539,0.00056697184,0.0010715367,0.000043809137,0.000066789355,0.0037343886,0.99206585,0.000013843254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108184945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025508096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052473314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020718894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003946239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17554069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403213404","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12925","title":"Administrative Law as a Source of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.061545574966751164,"score_gpt":0.38017783196986965,"score_spread":0.3186322570031185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403213404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006888375,0.023291964,0.101768374,0.120091625,0.0019116501,0.00011751843,0.00013003168,0.00013365922,0.74566674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83745277,0.023127673,0.024436118,0.023457672,0.008184705,0.00046541094,0.00013681049,0.00022234909,0.08251643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96700066,0.014128587,0.0015624528,0.0032799346,0.01233055,0.0016978243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311457,0.049368553,0.0036899785,0.008654167,0.0062413123,0.00090033776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02598719,0.00039927286,0.0011817896,0.0038029472,0.004258754,0.016502548,0.0025959183,0.008068259,0.008799955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048668426,0.0007067894,0.0006713828,0.002627736,0.031026337,0.017345339,0.0063748537,0.009999433,0.0015132229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.939881e-7,0.0000014483995,0.000021237867,0.000014043345,0.0000011358312,0.000007143415,0.00013615984,0.0000422531,0.000014954026,0.9969072,0.0007149672,0.0021385995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001066203,0.000011231414,0.00016031797,0.00019767196,0.000008131763,0.000065832835,0.00017370995,0.0002706864,0.00016998868,0.8701239,0.1287992,0.0000086455575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024197842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021858143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02598719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061465134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014094451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13743508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406408310","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12941","title":"Matthew C.Canfield, Translating Food Sovereignty: Cultivating Justice in an Age of Transnational Governance, Stanford University Press, 2022, 280 pp, hb US/CAN $105.00, pb US/CAN $26.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03543973588508367,"score_gpt":0.23720491823494166,"score_spread":0.201765182349858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406408310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012937338,0.6083166,0.0025008318,0.22342639,0.006485127,0.00006005423,0.00039300427,0.00022232096,0.15730199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036651213,0.51307607,0.004306337,0.043529257,0.0044127274,0.00024437133,0.0007458561,0.00057537755,0.39645883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988205,0.00033175945,0.00006691657,0.00013419463,0.0005208439,0.00012579816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.00091068656,0.00008591865,0.00004406538,0.00020425275,0.00013817624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016397241,0.0008239115,0.0005554704,0.0012647604,0.0029369856,0.005723022,0.0013925974,0.0033187035,0.02076089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036027352,0.00086861895,0.00034278867,0.002798536,0.0043819807,0.012012385,0.001898225,0.005271178,0.0072344486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009839991,0.000018459667,0.00016094967,0.00025450942,0.000004870527,0.00006560874,0.0035865046,0.00011723784,0.000081376675,0.04537062,0.9071129,0.043217104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000448803,0.0000049722275,0.00084555644,0.0005038384,0.0000031432176,0.000057679925,0.0023789003,0.00007392721,0.000058612506,0.02159495,0.974464,0.000009916588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042191487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06406736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042191487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060861954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08389181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407367795","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12946","title":"LeahTrueblood, Referendums as Representative Democracy, London, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024, 168 pp, hb £76.50","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Democracy; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03722827369326225,"score_gpt":0.35280851318939926,"score_spread":0.315580239496137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407367795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031272834,0.8576713,0.0013182085,0.04664226,0.0040455316,0.000024654753,0.0004900224,0.00016371884,0.08933162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019548591,0.7002697,0.002162794,0.012043422,0.005245565,0.00015556545,0.0007168647,0.00026989006,0.25958747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981975,0.0006860219,0.00013915518,0.00016193844,0.00066669553,0.00014878034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975757,0.0014847929,0.00019110709,0.00012716182,0.0004658218,0.0001554819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002433281,0.0011090001,0.00086781185,0.0025678363,0.0018065717,0.0059178057,0.0014096422,0.0047598667,0.070920035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065287594,0.0011515986,0.00054672995,0.004256755,0.0032377983,0.01003395,0.0017809744,0.0035194645,0.02916969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003441856,0.000011436711,0.000110135195,0.000454996,0.000008728258,0.000038128044,0.00039580875,0.00010399385,0.000058682162,0.059990004,0.87565356,0.06314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009977197,0.0000057784737,0.00060566753,0.0007471001,0.0000059769022,0.00006102007,0.00034854273,0.000074780044,0.00005530645,0.028126827,0.9699516,0.0000075257412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029479757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060607363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070920035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005181236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005040952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23725116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407589855","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12945","title":"BeckyBatagol, KateSeear, HeliAskola and JamieWalvisch (eds), The Feminist Legislation Project: Rewriting Laws for Gender‐Based Justice, London, Routledge, 2024, 392 pp, hb, £145.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04920755559461061,"score_gpt":0.36013142014116367,"score_spread":0.3109238645465531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407589855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028510217,0.9666445,0.001496612,0.008148641,0.0030592731,0.00003533443,0.00022624097,0.00014044353,0.019963754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030097791,0.92929435,0.0024607906,0.0016085217,0.0011480139,0.000104641906,0.00042390564,0.0002256963,0.061724275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829036,0.00047027646,0.00012983281,0.0001737173,0.00078243227,0.00015333011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982266,0.000943035,0.00017528894,0.000081333594,0.0003325651,0.00024116486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032515563,0.0021720787,0.0014060511,0.0031752654,0.002068652,0.0077345716,0.0016659471,0.003192659,0.037106957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035564508,0.0019104633,0.0008938258,0.0069270167,0.0027600704,0.009956083,0.0029624542,0.0053279535,0.027118625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030510404,0.000041562147,0.00024590624,0.0031127275,0.000017952023,0.00010175519,0.0033573245,0.00017397448,0.00025262785,0.008636054,0.6544634,0.32956615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004222447,0.000010437887,0.0007481459,0.0023173948,0.000009955211,0.000114306284,0.0013246648,0.00004777257,0.00010884279,0.0027903283,0.99251103,0.000012940183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029040689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05659161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037106957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008511291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12413514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408381554","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12947","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.025614316086055466,"score_gpt":0.3013011847277057,"score_spread":0.2756868686416502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408381554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019090982,0.0009162059,0.0007214212,0.002250388,0.011674024,0.00044555558,0.008300329,0.0014830128,0.9740182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006705548,0.00070560456,0.00037017907,0.0010160793,0.0014738227,0.00010438383,0.0037774632,0.00038014847,0.9915018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.000075118405,0.00007844537,0.00017328528,0.00057390303,0.00012310685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968131,0.0002742032,0.000116179035,0.0004392306,0.0015894555,0.0007677204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097532204,0.0012060996,0.001361291,0.0031011456,0.0019239436,0.0077431947,0.0017369442,0.0026927397,0.8953174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052967975,0.00058617117,0.0009032583,0.0030002152,0.00046547523,0.004075329,0.002025077,0.0021902702,0.8778714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012692454,0.000019319032,0.00005126242,0.0001069005,0.0000015478818,0.000019741308,0.000008365145,0.000017171433,0.00012512603,0.0013085707,0.9606969,0.03763244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005020045,0.000008779696,0.00017181429,0.00004997573,9.728266e-7,0.000022390617,0.000017466355,0.000020156042,0.000048559643,0.00044578855,0.9992065,0.0000026673238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019293845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033655537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104682624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011104706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023121324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14931709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409246270","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12953","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409246270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018189513,0.0006530077,0.00064955896,0.0018509278,0.010014418,0.00038309034,0.008928009,0.0014544042,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068409514,0.00059201586,0.00038361803,0.00094314606,0.0012404937,0.000094334035,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.000073481104,0.00016289657,0.0005097074,0.00011398583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.00025987418,0.00010227071,0.00041517834,0.0012920371,0.0007248584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090390834,0.0012848857,0.0013485015,0.0030406786,0.0019247176,0.007932337,0.0017979164,0.0026442923,0.91291183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047347355,0.0006048437,0.00092605397,0.0030786095,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.0022294172,0.0022909062,0.8919314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013753761,0.000020349686,0.00005370768,0.00010590117,0.0000015827757,0.000021412372,0.000009773864,0.000019016552,0.00012921738,0.0014449492,0.96195704,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055441246,0.000008770845,0.00016565494,0.000049515857,9.925999e-7,0.000024219713,0.000019841042,0.000021881542,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017429837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028342314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91291183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020501064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12422073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412080299","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12972","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412080299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018189513,0.0006530077,0.00064955896,0.0018509278,0.010014418,0.00038309034,0.008928009,0.0014544042,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068409514,0.00059201586,0.00038361803,0.00094314606,0.0012404937,0.000094334035,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.000073481104,0.00016289657,0.0005097074,0.00011398583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.00025987418,0.00010227071,0.00041517834,0.0012920371,0.0007248584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090390834,0.0012848857,0.0013485015,0.0030406786,0.0019247176,0.007932337,0.0017979164,0.0026442923,0.91291183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047347355,0.0006048437,0.00092605397,0.0030786095,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.0022294172,0.0022909062,0.8919314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013753761,0.000020349686,0.00005370768,0.00010590117,0.0000015827757,0.000021412372,0.000009773864,0.000019016552,0.00012921738,0.0014449492,0.96195704,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055441246,0.000008770845,0.00016565494,0.000049515857,9.925999e-7,0.000024219713,0.000019841042,0.000021881542,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017429837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028342314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020501064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12422073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413359504","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12977","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.022859943937809605,"score_gpt":0.34779951770119427,"score_spread":0.32493957376338467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413359504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018189513,0.0006530077,0.00064955896,0.0018509278,0.010014418,0.00038309034,0.008928009,0.0014544042,0.9758847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068409514,0.00059201586,0.00038361803,0.00094314606,0.0012404937,0.000094334035,0.004600298,0.0004386658,0.9910233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00007122372,0.000073481104,0.00016289657,0.0005097074,0.00011398583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972058,0.00025987418,0.00010227071,0.00041517834,0.0012920371,0.0007248584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090390834,0.0012848857,0.0013485015,0.0030406786,0.0019247176,0.007932337,0.0017979164,0.0026442923,0.91291183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047347355,0.0006048437,0.00092605397,0.0030786095,0.0004735299,0.004204026,0.0022294172,0.0022909062,0.8919314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013753761,0.000020349686,0.00005370768,0.00010590117,0.0000015827757,0.000021412372,0.000009773864,0.000019016552,0.00012921738,0.0014449492,0.96195704,0.03622326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055441246,0.000008770845,0.00016565494,0.000049515857,9.925999e-7,0.000024219713,0.000019841042,0.000021881542,0.00005060532,0.0004983371,0.9991516,0.000002946513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017429837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028342314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020501064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12422073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416826384","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.70007","title":"<i>Allan C. Hutchinson</i> , Rethinking Legitimacy: Courts, Constitutions and Politics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2025, 192 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Judicial restraint; Politics; Dissenting opinion; Judicial review; Constitutional law; Judicial independence; Nothing; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.04213518038715577,"score_gpt":0.32086423742568954,"score_spread":0.2787290570385338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416826384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037571753,0.5758809,0.0011352004,0.31041268,0.0150729185,0.00003776423,0.00022483461,0.00012919118,0.0967308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03251451,0.4718583,0.0029441218,0.16680409,0.018666983,0.00023136429,0.00062292797,0.0005837152,0.30577397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568427,0.001503831,0.00022442474,0.00036592703,0.0018284665,0.0003930113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962411,0.0025163381,0.00027843897,0.00018061747,0.0005346652,0.00024878094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028180305,0.0013878326,0.0006927404,0.0022305048,0.0034050099,0.008758722,0.0023992085,0.0067767696,0.02233012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008355837,0.0009998169,0.00038392225,0.0036381017,0.012376648,0.016517887,0.0036210609,0.009201464,0.010551485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007266064,0.0000052694886,0.00006875669,0.00013985425,0.0000034389034,0.000044664223,0.0011474972,0.000024860947,0.000039492792,0.0532028,0.926951,0.018365161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004186096,0.0000026524533,0.00027439397,0.00045426862,0.0000015922363,0.00005174216,0.00060687505,0.000020941723,0.000035518824,0.02868843,0.96985036,0.000009107359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05605534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10905915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05605534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008718552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11145812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}