{"meta":{"query_hash":"c1150dadfe2a","filters":{"venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c1150dadfe2a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Multicultural+Education+%26+Technology+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1969793700","doi":"10.1108/17504970910967573","title":"Using digital technologies to address Aboriginal adolescents' education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Sociology; Literacy; Inclusion (mineral); Digital literacy; Situated; Originality; Critical literacy; Technology integration; Mathematics education; Teaching method; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Computer science","score_opus":0.02352588244577253,"score_gpt":0.3216826626382115,"score_spread":0.29815678019243896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969793700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750293,0.0005950967,0.0013894701,0.001414718,0.000037617254,0.00020390227,0.000015412938,0.00004785201,0.021266658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861627,0.0013677945,0.0058254744,0.00026257042,0.000016834094,0.00026177207,0.000015235643,0.000010724183,0.0060768696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989893,0.0004856694,0.000031855274,0.000063186875,0.00015275678,0.00027721314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.0005347274,0.00016397703,0.000074713105,0.00016036087,0.00035196418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015916403,0.0003534885,0.0001988649,0.0008726715,0.0042371326,0.0018171662,0.00066208007,0.00062401814,0.0021599056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028064009,0.0001581707,0.0002364395,0.0004189506,0.0024273482,0.0007920219,0.0032271668,0.0010169665,0.00025675443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009310673,0.00090818777,0.03417287,0.000623591,0.000020851418,0.0025782774,0.8009329,0.00023152029,0.0059125973,0.004505685,0.0013384955,0.14868195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009019797,0.0014752737,0.056172933,0.0011220733,0.00013024766,0.0016983413,0.7902121,0.00043581988,0.006049594,0.002157336,0.14040555,0.00005054564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075189516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13684776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075189516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025015455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006540111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14950377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058783006","doi":"10.1108/17504970910984853","title":"Preparing teachers to teach literacy in responsive ways that capitalize on students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds through weblog technology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Diversity (politics); Pedagogy; Teacher education; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Psychology; Focus group; Service (business); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03520820028844519,"score_gpt":0.41064747599344725,"score_spread":0.3754392757050021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058783006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80179316,0.0010815596,0.07439592,0.00851912,0.00043937544,0.0012569716,0.00017339585,0.0025874865,0.10975297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8725381,0.0017828874,0.089893736,0.0013104538,0.00009843861,0.0007741106,0.00027941083,0.00022101255,0.03310193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928445,0.00035075014,0.000035577268,0.00007504176,0.00014563579,0.00010848131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973929,0.0011210721,0.000255739,0.0002496245,0.00025832086,0.0007222967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014647668,0.00025014573,0.00018150115,0.0005541378,0.0013882132,0.0028309503,0.00069080474,0.000687782,0.005677618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004803423,0.00025710766,0.00021384473,0.00029816676,0.0008299395,0.0027012497,0.0021768338,0.0011350617,0.002280603],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001917085,0.0047192364,0.035228424,0.0014841567,0.000020222717,0.0016179001,0.1092246,0.000870555,0.032316085,0.0073681627,0.043400414,0.7635586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027055803,0.0019973142,0.061641533,0.0019349903,0.00009331021,0.0027106008,0.25612736,0.002791289,0.041487996,0.017119383,0.6136838,0.00014184618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060991966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024703436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005677618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005924866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024234105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018993497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084747679","doi":"10.1108/17504970710832844","title":"How to manage multiple faculty identifications during change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Institution; Higher education; Identification (biology); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Faculty development; Public relations; Change management (ITSM); Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Professional development; Computer science; Marketing; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.044081896021317075,"score_gpt":0.36079475216820706,"score_spread":0.31671285614689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084747679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5482673,0.0011634972,0.3035064,0.069731355,0.001315958,0.001217652,0.00008813258,0.0015343927,0.07317529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91728157,0.00021992205,0.075491495,0.0010038587,0.00010893172,0.0003714986,0.000057614798,0.000055096196,0.0054099634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97280294,0.012945975,0.0014127542,0.003747164,0.005717027,0.0033741798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520378,0.012161788,0.010462398,0.007295921,0.008780034,0.009262043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029998284,0.00059604435,0.00059507205,0.0028950488,0.010514779,0.00961228,0.002806026,0.0032721474,0.0038692183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061791368,0.0005060881,0.00073186634,0.0017539806,0.0051471577,0.014278557,0.009593836,0.0033100243,0.0011648812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017041565,0.00087193795,0.08145266,0.0004999436,0.000115924806,0.00082064397,0.10772181,0.0044380752,0.005458158,0.06893204,0.017671488,0.7118469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020571417,0.0012847638,0.08362967,0.0012495148,0.00018760737,0.0018481992,0.41393226,0.04070228,0.012706469,0.2610623,0.18258555,0.00060567824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040343474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057930797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029998284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00644158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021159234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15864801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}