{"meta":{"query_hash":"c1150dadfe2a","filters":{"venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c1150dadfe2a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Multicultural+Education+%26+Technology+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1969793700","doi":"10.1108/17504970910967573","title":"Using digital technologies to address Aboriginal adolescents' education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Sociology; Literacy; Inclusion (mineral); Digital literacy; Situated; Originality; Critical literacy; Technology integration; Mathematics education; Teaching method; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Computer science","score_opus":0.02352588244577253,"score_gpt":0.3216826626382115,"score_spread":0.29815678019243896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969793700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700495,0.00085302116,0.0000638337,0.021384075,0.005913543,0.00039019977,0.000009245135,0.00046847525,0.00086813123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928155,0.000047296304,0.002617732,0.0007285289,0.0020200603,0.000035579043,0.000036973895,0.000016302096,0.0016820357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850553,0.000022803015,0.00047297624,0.00031180863,0.00024825984,0.00043860212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829257,0.000012851906,0.00027958475,0.00028655198,0.00097437284,0.00015404946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000100423524,0.0002708034,0.0002239329,0.00081133755,0.0007426649,0.0008643686,0.00047346053,0.00018425507,0.00014046037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002524829,0.0002116987,0.00008856922,0.00031582802,0.00022450098,0.0013251636,0.000025137919,0.0005874546,0.00016545982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006929904,0.002507298,0.0066741137,0.000052079842,0.000050814502,0.0000040905493,0.24426578,0.00001994722,0.0018821788,0.017567309,0.040987305,0.68591976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005582006,0.00032179058,0.00434602,0.0009468748,0.00010180879,0.0007582319,0.6443391,0.00007437929,0.0021719157,0.015083686,0.33044097,0.0008570293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035136152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001859302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68506277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038366328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008471352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86328226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058783006","doi":"10.1108/17504970910984853","title":"Preparing teachers to teach literacy in responsive ways that capitalize on students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds through weblog technology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Diversity (politics); Pedagogy; Teacher education; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Psychology; Focus group; Service (business); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03520820028844519,"score_gpt":0.41064747599344725,"score_spread":0.3754392757050021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058783006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372694,0.0008115451,0.0000071846703,0.057117205,0.0014822896,0.0006988538,0.0000024520175,0.0002593627,0.0023516954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874456,0.00045553397,0.0076928674,0.0022479359,0.0003270771,0.00007351685,0.000010428082,0.000013129911,0.0017339307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997413,0.00020121357,0.0005517778,0.00058070425,0.000510616,0.0007427004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981121,0.00009089086,0.0003013656,0.0002926965,0.00090626476,0.00029668264],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053306995,0.00035392592,0.00037840844,0.00073092844,0.0010377334,0.00054781727,0.0007849466,0.00052041037,0.00004301394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042109904,0.00027494034,0.00008547259,0.0012803776,0.00044777629,0.00067393394,0.00009733635,0.0010951872,0.000065725384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017325449,0.0017696901,0.019175308,0.000012355,0.00009000556,0.0000351502,0.8458433,0.0000462487,0.0062630815,0.039806776,0.023530656,0.06325415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016014404,0.00045141822,0.06734053,0.00047501628,0.000069300455,0.00041629188,0.49723804,0.000011880968,0.00097394135,0.0052210265,0.42537144,0.0008296555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051052053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045227582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4018408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011096507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031564647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084747679","doi":"10.1108/17504970710832844","title":"How to manage multiple faculty identifications during change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multicultural Education & Technology Journal","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Institution; Higher education; Identification (biology); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Faculty development; Public relations; Change management (ITSM); Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Professional development; Computer science; Marketing; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.044081896021317075,"score_gpt":0.36079475216820706,"score_spread":0.31671285614689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084747679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89119184,0.00018234918,0.00045971439,0.10478539,0.0021248758,0.00046749145,0.0000040117143,0.00017458599,0.00060973817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96575165,0.00009431773,0.012777572,0.0005240065,0.00093835685,0.00011999087,0.000014559538,0.000010957566,0.019768573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984867,0.000038141006,0.0003107023,0.0002601884,0.00040323785,0.0005010245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851936,0.000031979373,0.0002511195,0.0001924992,0.0007016504,0.00030336075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048983033,0.00014408964,0.00013209613,0.000453358,0.0015575556,0.00034311798,0.00045132128,0.0001785124,0.0000941926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007923958,0.00012646441,0.00006271568,0.0011213253,0.00014183404,0.00071224425,0.00004783776,0.00032719105,0.00020594081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050832066,0.0012809632,0.30421877,0.000036395413,0.00014233231,0.000026898522,0.3905343,0.0000068352315,0.027282273,0.012808571,0.040478323,0.22313347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018084448,0.000008151201,0.45987695,0.00003481382,0.000009622706,0.00003395231,0.07321826,4.810375e-7,0.0024296672,0.00019500541,0.46383268,0.00017955255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031253413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016729751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42335436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007137007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022419445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}