{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ed86bd5c287","filters":{"venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ed86bd5c287","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Multiple+Criteria+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W2602855750","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.06","title":"An Impact of Negotiation Profiles on the Accuracy of Negotiation Offer Scoring System? Experimental Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Cooperativeness; Computer science; Negotiation theory; Scoring system; Principal (computer security); Mode (computer interface); Social psychology; Operations research; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Political science; Computer security; Law; Personality","score_opus":0.10283530595209105,"score_gpt":0.43451271966972105,"score_spread":0.33167741371763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602855750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99314916,0.000022197097,0.004531258,0.000064484935,0.0004560491,0.001204044,0.0000119015795,0.000063944026,0.0004969864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943995,0.000006259398,0.0002615649,0.000011417217,0.00019839246,0.000045829223,0.0000033421702,0.00001748417,0.000015729665],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976727,0.00053790037,0.0005454642,0.00029871392,0.0007197614,0.00022549782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710524,0.001686612,0.00052180333,0.00043009096,0.00020992038,0.000046326113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014095819,0.00015852242,0.00023504144,0.00023661669,0.0003737097,0.0001303775,0.00038472042,0.000063241445,0.00031342852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014461749,0.00009539565,0.00012727422,0.0003209632,0.00006969021,0.00078675244,0.00008417408,0.00004952081,0.000014082186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013204092,0.0015543016,0.37756616,0.0000509921,0.0001319376,0.0000037590428,0.067057446,0.0003056441,0.43980497,0.010390335,0.00029691352,0.10151716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023953635,0.0013228598,0.9135711,0.0011936823,0.00006072399,4.959527e-7,0.04469443,0.011431833,0.024497593,0.00028279453,0.00016475245,0.00038434457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005228036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015326831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53600496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027056754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050650204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008255186","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.07","title":"Development and evaluation of an AHP model for software systems selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Usability; Vendor; Software; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision support system; Process management; Software system; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Management science; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29697467292032753,"score_gpt":0.4721880332666652,"score_spread":0.17521336034633767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008255186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5749722,0.00012737316,0.42260486,0.0000067917745,0.00094013056,0.0012136302,0.000041426105,0.00005619091,0.000037410788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6350274,0.0000015334127,0.36461714,0.000036839483,0.00006913638,0.000115506504,0.000014052377,0.000042581243,0.00007578221],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910853,0.0005462209,0.0022786066,0.0014448848,0.004130335,0.0005146883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980343,0.004685842,0.00095371844,0.0010907486,0.0032809516,0.00018532728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01619132,0.00040568225,0.0008377037,0.0010926279,0.00037345485,0.00096780644,0.0008895205,0.0002737367,0.0002707682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012551434,0.00034419182,0.00015670859,0.0007359443,0.000058691483,0.0013375528,0.00038228914,0.00015617337,0.00006916775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008331637,0.00013966135,0.007577676,0.0000707566,0.000029069324,0.0000012572484,0.0026735365,0.14624059,0.024518907,0.00032467867,0.000409139,0.8171816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024716016,0.0000813879,0.00954203,0.00034336094,0.000036368903,0.00002360107,0.0009767349,0.97539455,0.00091224525,0.007916155,0.0019032937,0.00039867606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000889635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007278496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82915395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023855652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029233278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008441098","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.09","title":"Identifying strategic development objectives for European Union states using the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach: the case of Poland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Dominance (genetics); Ranking (information retrieval); Order (exchange); Stochastic dominance; Rough set; Regional science; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Econometrics; International trade; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.11778117724362072,"score_gpt":0.34275354458462026,"score_spread":0.22497236734099954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008441098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44633424,0.000109056375,0.5526832,0.00002738936,0.00028862062,0.0004126485,0.000010956987,0.00002287421,0.00011101362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71725523,0.000003339263,0.28260064,0.00006708949,0.000037682275,0.000011352986,0.0000063312364,0.000015398831,0.0000029477453],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800694,0.00047234862,0.00048424417,0.00047199914,0.00023860371,0.0003258567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977662,0.0010627524,0.00030302236,0.00069222634,0.0001431959,0.000032624735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002265952,0.00020999539,0.00023453952,0.00010409556,0.0005647311,0.0005962184,0.0008670071,0.000041710147,0.0000053757735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008060891,0.000117709744,0.00010140252,0.00033678228,0.00006436567,0.00033496664,0.00035983935,0.00012078995,0.0000042171578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000838373,0.0006180958,0.007693568,0.0008140144,0.00021782407,0.00056634046,0.068711326,0.2347675,0.026285011,0.009718893,0.00026627,0.6495028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009778327,0.00005877907,0.003450058,0.00021369236,0.0000109776265,0.00014367841,0.0029003688,0.98739886,0.0007172945,0.0036444042,0.0002626752,0.00022140464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055959386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025908652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75263137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054599655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007190621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5749348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205430479","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2020.15.05","title":"COMPLEMENTARITY OF THE GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERACTIVE AID AND DOMINANCE-BASED ROUGH SET APPROACH APPLIED TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF NON-URBAN MUNICIPALITIES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Rough set; Complementarity (molecular biology); Dominance (genetics); Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance-based rough set approach; Computer science; Decision maker; Sorting; Decision support system; Operations research; sort; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.10431762042112973,"score_gpt":0.3406669406967003,"score_spread":0.23634932027557054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205430479","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25379962,0.00001944762,0.7445647,0.00082344207,0.0000739164,0.00055032235,0.00009545856,0.000010540827,0.000062543775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8176806,0.0000016783515,0.1816611,0.00054154167,0.000026945432,0.000069183145,0.000013332234,0.000005157058,4.750772e-7],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855787,0.000115829316,0.00046716284,0.0004016102,0.0002910368,0.00016652445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801075,0.0009327467,0.00027153819,0.000619725,0.000121629484,0.000043596254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000515464,0.0001375862,0.00034568284,0.00010545423,0.00020399173,0.00011828256,0.0009604238,0.000044053624,0.0000040742484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019841446,0.00008285399,0.00017232346,0.00091243524,0.00010269378,0.00011546137,0.00045426583,0.00010169426,2.9899294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009676265,0.0015333147,0.21325026,0.0012357117,0.0017690106,0.000003895652,0.24306205,0.09909306,0.04561458,0.09897566,0.009063903,0.27672228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066435063,0.000070427435,0.10692398,0.000031876443,0.00006100049,2.852159e-7,0.0012649753,0.88864595,0.0004674876,0.00092421373,0.00084458606,0.00010089581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006410208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007057508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78955287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020832898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000200828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33786878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}