{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ed86bd5c287","filters":{"venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ed86bd5c287","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Multiple+Criteria+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W2602855750","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.06","title":"An Impact of Negotiation Profiles on the Accuracy of Negotiation Offer Scoring System? Experimental Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Cooperativeness; Computer science; Negotiation theory; Scoring system; Principal (computer security); Mode (computer interface); Social psychology; Operations research; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Political science; Computer security; Law; Personality","score_opus":0.10283530595209105,"score_gpt":0.43451271966972105,"score_spread":0.33167741371763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602855750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99226683,0.00009695156,0.0036146,0.000066914465,0.000040492465,0.00034867166,0.000053742784,0.000027944905,0.0034838628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962263,0.000049877068,0.0026277343,0.000039452098,0.00002787014,0.00033061925,0.000045643534,0.000020281042,0.00063216157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532727,0.033095732,0.0034948129,0.0028058786,0.0062336926,0.0010971498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61038655,0.34514245,0.016807318,0.01756156,0.0076719346,0.002430185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025662253,0.0006520986,0.00070632115,0.00087823195,0.00070726883,0.002299059,0.000919562,0.0013284923,0.0054711374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20990895,0.0005393737,0.000411961,0.0007181304,0.0017014189,0.0022497494,0.0017029723,0.001366518,0.00087282486],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.088183135,0.047345467,0.32191965,0.0024173495,0.0008964103,0.001684191,0.04450318,0.019683342,0.1594275,0.012711817,0.0022526856,0.29897535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036794425,0.15131263,0.55732524,0.0007223526,0.00139624,0.0024396614,0.022137057,0.086221136,0.14474931,0.017189644,0.011967397,0.0008598462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002645469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017054495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025662253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005663316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005469264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13571662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008255186","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.07","title":"Development and evaluation of an AHP model for software systems selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Usability; Vendor; Software; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision support system; Process management; Software system; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Management science; Operations research; Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.29697467292032753,"score_gpt":0.4721880332666652,"score_spread":0.17521336034633767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008255186","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040802985,0.00013875103,0.9526377,0.00036873043,0.00005351176,0.0013517381,0.00027987667,0.00028409055,0.004082809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22716759,0.00016710421,0.76971346,0.00006723696,0.00001800589,0.0019337088,0.0002566619,0.00003031052,0.0006459412],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257624,0.0050504636,0.00034496604,0.00023035865,0.001585233,0.00021286882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837652,0.012326347,0.00046357384,0.00027951135,0.0029617655,0.00020359566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011178464,0.0010004444,0.0012468992,0.0027000115,0.0014937773,0.0019755033,0.0016572154,0.0012871707,0.0024107676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018819816,0.00058900303,0.0011382202,0.0026023549,0.00067182374,0.0015162865,0.0013963757,0.0015731255,0.00025360403],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023738961,0.00032550114,0.0019389002,0.0004946626,0.00012188751,0.00011716633,0.00047899602,0.88187116,0.0017640853,0.017821856,0.0011086307,0.09371985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033940123,0.00009229701,0.00016345351,0.000031852367,0.000013173946,0.000010246766,0.000109852685,0.99581355,0.0004084086,0.0028990337,0.00041317515,0.000010974645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013385335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009791039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013385335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029835054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045050574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059118092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008441098","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2019.14.09","title":"Identifying strategic development objectives for European Union states using the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach: the case of Poland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Dominance (genetics); Ranking (information retrieval); Order (exchange); Stochastic dominance; Rough set; Regional science; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Econometrics; International trade; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.11778117724362072,"score_gpt":0.34275354458462026,"score_spread":0.22497236734099954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008441098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240382,0.00041973617,0.053346246,0.0009984456,0.000020600462,0.00022347916,0.0001730639,0.00003874197,0.020741584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96468306,0.00041083738,0.032358255,0.000030023999,0.000002897289,0.00006604546,0.000069556954,0.0000068797976,0.0023724476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989945,0.00048585588,0.0000842339,0.000058007456,0.00020343908,0.0001739705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913895,0.00048118364,0.00013950364,0.000044918383,0.00014220817,0.00005326352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026758271,0.00038293804,0.00042833155,0.0029483936,0.0014457798,0.0034483303,0.000391812,0.00072282297,0.0007936649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036793356,0.00025618955,0.0008691223,0.002449523,0.0009874979,0.0017230158,0.0019113373,0.0006476081,0.00010870943],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060814695,0.0003117319,0.06470041,0.00062102696,0.00023429222,0.014018121,0.012169884,0.41267973,0.005214621,0.28726846,0.0029411698,0.1992324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016743303,0.00040657003,0.046887737,0.0006489382,0.0003597949,0.0020984933,0.051709343,0.71151656,0.00971742,0.14720216,0.029041894,0.00024360411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021624455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02990124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021624455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026622936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027777175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04299718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205430479","doi":"10.22367/mcdm.2020.15.05","title":"COMPLEMENTARITY OF THE GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERACTIVE AID AND DOMINANCE-BASED ROUGH SET APPROACH APPLIED TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF NON-URBAN MUNICIPALITIES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making","topic":"Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Rough set; Complementarity (molecular biology); Dominance (genetics); Ranking (information retrieval); Dominance-based rough set approach; Computer science; Decision maker; Sorting; Decision support system; Operations research; sort; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.10431762042112973,"score_gpt":0.3406669406967003,"score_spread":0.23634932027557054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205430479","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039995886,0.000737655,0.9459456,0.00063759106,0.00008273233,0.00030918987,0.0004403699,0.0007362539,0.011114706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47379988,0.0005792501,0.5223185,0.00010721141,0.000048579495,0.00037331134,0.0003849913,0.00008057341,0.0023077568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949084,0.0034150418,0.00016743962,0.00020079115,0.0011170495,0.00019136051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926354,0.005315581,0.0003602381,0.0003904367,0.0011657055,0.0001327019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003555858,0.00096256693,0.0008974125,0.0067355856,0.00073668925,0.0033558463,0.00083359884,0.00044511745,0.0032323063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014845555,0.0002480673,0.0013781348,0.004140894,0.0009536916,0.0014409183,0.0012405992,0.00067508226,0.0005004651],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043375572,0.00014390245,0.007770203,0.00095386547,0.00032182402,0.0003371849,0.0016087741,0.19058886,0.0058654943,0.15127411,0.004971984,0.63573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065651795,0.00026646018,0.00880805,0.00028639124,0.00022593014,0.00032253278,0.0012795578,0.8456286,0.0038492626,0.12534645,0.013772526,0.00014855203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011001242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013562565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011001242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021812941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002526049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021874368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}