{"meta":{"query_hash":"2c80e50ca43f","filters":{"venue":"Natural Language Semantics"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2c80e50ca43f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Natural+Language+Semantics"},"results":[{"id":"W1981463616","doi":"10.1007/s11050-010-9061-7","title":"Parasitic degree phrases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Adjective; Linguistics; Subject (documents); Specifier; Scope (computer science); Matrix (chemical analysis); Syntax; Similarity (geometry); Phrase; Computer science; Noun phrase; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Noun; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02087913086469701,"score_gpt":0.26177228827710997,"score_spread":0.24089315741241296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981463616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634337,0.0003532197,0.00008834084,0.0061701317,0.008762125,0.00023816778,0.000055379278,0.0003562784,0.020542692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900672,0.0000042947927,0.0015849024,0.00046326435,0.0040548206,0.00000490107,0.00008854948,0.000039772694,0.0036923203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875134,0.000031617365,0.00027691448,0.0002593195,0.00032606377,0.0003547158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.00021706684,0.00012840846,0.0003897828,0.00016807044,0.00008017398],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001787577,0.00021785444,0.00022427688,0.0001166047,0.0002735115,0.0002597373,0.0002667833,0.00009874676,0.0017954144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004373,0.00018383091,0.000103935025,0.000048015714,0.0001883751,0.00015568618,0.000038118127,0.0005334315,0.0004275791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002284243,0.0001491633,0.0010026908,0.00009923918,0.00009364573,0.00019297785,0.069697276,0.0000015791328,0.015460783,0.89845186,0.0009279007,0.013900058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012127488,0.0011974116,0.05466005,0.001178281,0.0035200708,0.0010862311,0.22846556,0.048546843,0.14248458,0.33499286,0.15911606,0.012624583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010353284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010101719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.563459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019845527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003348024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016503323","doi":"10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8","title":"Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Future tense; Semantics (computer science); History; Computer science; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01411529588007817,"score_gpt":0.2598194923863278,"score_spread":0.2457041965062496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016503323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910037,0.0011514245,0.00038501757,0.0022229422,0.002149207,0.00025068247,0.0000127286185,0.000100069454,0.002724262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964622,0.000019253454,0.0005727386,0.0002752276,0.0017366231,0.0000014882781,0.000031325326,0.000027630791,0.0008735116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870247,0.00004473514,0.0003836225,0.0002446238,0.00027753747,0.00034699557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919975,0.00027791713,0.00013059289,0.00019854093,0.00012931443,0.00006391268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005995435,0.00017808875,0.00023767125,0.00022637506,0.00013406455,0.0001749178,0.00011970796,0.000083326886,0.00021480031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009966595,0.0001573854,0.00004982136,0.00005648218,0.00012318471,0.00014191293,0.00006301101,0.0002641119,0.000041644555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002911631,0.0003318498,0.03582041,0.0005144283,0.0001951636,0.0018419668,0.42740414,0.00000714396,0.007253072,0.4587398,0.00029559789,0.06730528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012769822,0.00094484625,0.5488455,0.0024542683,0.0015613883,0.00060387026,0.2466667,0.033617504,0.033156607,0.10501258,0.008038072,0.006328814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007403852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056669746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051139566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017770553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021396458","doi":"10.1007/s11050-015-9113-0","title":"Experimental investigations of ambiguity: the case of most","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Superlative; Quantifier (linguistics); Ambiguity; Predicate (mathematical logic); Philosophy of language; Linguistics; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy; Programming language; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.022921182445520716,"score_gpt":0.29362107315337366,"score_spread":0.27069989070785294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021396458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98624885,0.0033314119,0.009029945,0.00044533468,0.0002847203,0.00010278722,0.0000054663365,0.000040559677,0.000510952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204494,0.00000127731,0.017620549,0.00020519466,0.000031736527,0.0000014817184,0.000002808377,0.0000034411526,0.00008858227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994571,0.000040025596,0.0001493306,0.00010711032,0.00014061367,0.00010580352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935704,0.000059444603,0.00009862836,0.00034365512,0.00009122833,0.00004998589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011297324,0.00006916004,0.00010550672,0.000033093376,0.000044161847,0.000015209727,0.00036086302,0.00003012466,0.0000026150167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014062616,0.00004379748,0.000033444892,0.00029519876,0.0001241157,0.00016265981,0.00017230184,0.00010843658,0.000002821215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648438,0.00030339425,0.00060597656,0.00007385622,0.000073423274,0.0019547853,0.062368397,0.00059607305,0.17373274,0.7276081,0.0021742594,0.030492514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088827964,0.00024975708,0.0003210492,0.000045880155,0.00002786554,0.0015126859,0.016539829,0.063897446,0.9040495,0.011825222,0.0003172863,0.00032519194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013189469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035732217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73031676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013556225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040339768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17860094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040265027","doi":"10.1007/s11050-007-9024-9","title":"Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Numeral system; Mathematics; Linguistics; Denotation (semiotics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01506019862156062,"score_gpt":0.24199267117415862,"score_spread":0.22693247255259802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040265027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839747,0.00072292396,0.000017038601,0.0030255022,0.0012986616,0.00016635076,0.00002696501,0.00010134088,0.010666497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946533,0.000056423876,0.00061854924,0.00034131858,0.0010849755,0.0000032637781,0.00005316501,0.000027612085,0.003161394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895424,0.00003701496,0.0002639876,0.00023349229,0.00023609077,0.00027520166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999456,0.00011802138,0.000056772635,0.0001982124,0.0001196647,0.0000513194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121971796,0.00017371573,0.00022953456,0.00009535003,0.00019989186,0.00008481552,0.00011745716,0.00007976992,0.00055490114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037597952,0.00015365987,0.000046864312,0.000055493718,0.00015634234,0.00014431005,0.000056137516,0.00028850485,0.0001392516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064774664,0.00023651337,0.05263566,0.00025581275,0.00010538587,0.0013631715,0.5327391,0.000008072695,0.0008002183,0.40655538,0.0016244807,0.0036114098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017941304,0.00064939144,0.372703,0.0021492734,0.00088408333,0.0027652045,0.38957903,0.04418405,0.007203444,0.08122435,0.071590036,0.009126834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001999942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052648624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32533103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000387011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024527064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62660676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091615204","doi":"10.1007/s11050-008-9038-y","title":"Proportions in time: interactions of quantification and aspect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Predicate (mathematical logic); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Operator (biology); Semantics (computer science); Scope (computer science); Homogeneous; Computer science; Quantifier (linguistics); Event (particle physics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Programming language; Physics","score_opus":0.022802446534058402,"score_gpt":0.26481483039449527,"score_spread":0.24201238386043686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091615204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99298054,0.0002796233,0.00006549016,0.0023770824,0.0006172042,0.00022658966,0.0000940364,0.000067467634,0.0032919757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522877,0.000017077811,0.00074260647,0.000029727358,0.00027637454,0.0000050389476,0.00016015045,0.000012754048,0.003527503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922615,0.000031886277,0.00030099877,0.0001489407,0.00017300698,0.00011900484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938166,0.0001284736,0.00015869316,0.00015931654,0.00014904769,0.000022784445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001087283,0.00009384735,0.00015889962,0.0001773004,0.00012681472,0.000034474204,0.00008282228,0.000033479348,0.0008847462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051076675,0.000084670115,0.000036416834,0.00006791514,0.00015338819,0.00012955983,0.000027154545,0.00016711546,0.00004855296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096452284,0.0008610384,0.014119456,0.0003378345,0.00017431543,0.00018502423,0.39423105,0.00002767953,0.02324866,0.5569105,0.003639953,0.0061680027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0080297785,0.00092958723,0.51127464,0.0027615093,0.0011044114,0.0012527151,0.15532197,0.16005151,0.05147265,0.06591558,0.0367294,0.0051562632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008804977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023884766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49715516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027133485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024256695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532343671","doi":"10.1007/s11050-016-9126-3","title":"Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Conjunction (astronomy); Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Syntax; Psychology; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Physics","score_opus":0.006875922696099795,"score_gpt":0.23523339743387328,"score_spread":0.22835747473777349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532343671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718729,0.0017001271,0.0029761584,0.015972393,0.0032414973,0.00081858796,0.0002132681,0.00016910257,0.0030359349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970729,0.000023460683,0.0007148704,0.00018172059,0.0009229417,0.000014059779,0.00006894996,0.000017589908,0.0009835284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991463,0.000025785817,0.00027796748,0.00022193388,0.00015842333,0.00016960251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.00019540718,0.00014583327,0.00015526779,0.00022155239,0.000035743094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001616547,0.0001612817,0.00020754963,0.000076703385,0.00022269932,0.00007192838,0.0001074943,0.000073712436,0.00012545183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005404847,0.000100032456,0.00005429521,0.0000256813,0.00035550282,0.0001265851,0.000043202133,0.00009319074,0.000009168616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001289967,0.000034624845,0.0013976753,0.00011798301,0.00017178888,0.0000016836018,0.035719734,1.1677097e-7,0.0018742994,0.9488527,0.00012050276,0.011579881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009268733,0.0015839889,0.053907238,0.004659776,0.0013061339,0.0005546344,0.072559826,0.00026828103,0.25793415,0.56900716,0.025439443,0.0035106528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017293655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005620835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3798456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029069579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034893008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4079205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903213390","doi":"10.1007/s11050-018-9146-2","title":"Factive islands and meaning-driven unacceptability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Triviality; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sentence; Psychology; Denotation (semiotics); Philosophy of language; Logical consequence; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Mathematics; Semiotics","score_opus":0.0069199576637714155,"score_gpt":0.27415016142679355,"score_spread":0.26723020376302214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903213390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6085967,0.016189162,0.35122436,0.0032862138,0.0031379187,0.0011253367,0.00003625132,0.005149494,0.0112546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78886515,0.000009754002,0.21031152,0.00037101872,0.00017763319,0.0000028695556,0.00000472025,0.000012362233,0.0002449424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00006935281,0.00019774184,0.0005111553,0.0003209603,0.00035836198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988988,0.00010369755,0.000111188274,0.00056724774,0.00022767475,0.00009137123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002148957,0.00022228014,0.00022673988,0.00012187451,0.00020018201,0.00023261934,0.0007809682,0.00013851812,0.000027006448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026472195,0.00017284625,0.000055555676,0.00039557565,0.0002141651,0.0006570454,0.00055443944,0.00041423802,0.00002098694],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011340669,0.00023476135,0.010412889,0.00033639665,0.00021030822,0.00048776256,0.0821159,0.0000015968862,0.14034224,0.20632634,0.004182509,0.5552359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00218941,0.0011584898,0.00925464,0.00039021898,0.00013139131,0.00073348865,0.00234291,0.21172403,0.67529315,0.090494365,0.0031772687,0.0031106453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005321754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009366521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055301985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035718567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70484656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391941255","doi":"10.1007/s11050-023-09218-9","title":"Eventive modal projection: the case of Spanish subjunctive relative clauses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Linguistics; Modality (human–computer interaction); Modal; Philosophy of language; Interpretation (philosophy); Modal verb; Present perfect; Semantics (computer science); Event (particle physics); Pragmatics; Relative clause; Philosophy of mind; Semantic interpretation; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Verb; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Physics","score_opus":0.0176041700724153,"score_gpt":0.2693319415773575,"score_spread":0.2517277715049422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391941255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341775,0.0076845996,0.0018576528,0.013129073,0.015546483,0.001456039,0.00036389477,0.0005868798,0.025197843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922265,0.000013675836,0.0002747525,0.00007396976,0.0019491892,0.00001116145,0.000037155085,0.000034573164,0.0053790435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988179,0.00011472833,0.00032422558,0.00027907273,0.00024274833,0.00022128949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871063,0.00050316297,0.00014561402,0.0002447733,0.0003670723,0.00002872792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028906812,0.00020267215,0.00022125462,0.00013400278,0.0002998636,0.00021446675,0.00014400571,0.00008199318,0.00035343046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561083,0.00013278637,0.0001572264,0.00014137206,0.00028755158,0.00028051023,0.00006933391,0.00047116293,0.000060639104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831843,0.000040793482,0.00002432405,0.00013464908,0.00027784106,0.0009172784,0.20722385,0.0000047822887,0.00016635646,0.78816026,0.000377341,0.0026442304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014208092,0.0007000251,0.0008968747,0.001253417,0.0024394388,0.0025556928,0.60427207,0.077875,0.010307188,0.28717512,0.009455268,0.0016491092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003563172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066503715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50098515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079757476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071469076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5414871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393990725","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09221-8","title":"Mental states via possessive predication: the grammar of possessive experiencer complex predicates in Persian","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Possessive; Linguistics; Transitive relation; Grammar; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013926318990877389,"score_gpt":0.27262324110965624,"score_spread":0.25869692211877887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393990725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508324,0.007440921,0.00045880795,0.032265276,0.0044495068,0.000987164,0.00038904097,0.00026622528,0.0029106236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976667,0.000056391862,0.00027823847,0.00017822674,0.0008336766,0.000020579564,0.00036226702,0.000028200511,0.00057572324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985257,0.00007766646,0.0004112292,0.00028216673,0.00043155157,0.00027170233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990917,0.0002610379,0.00016410154,0.00025880767,0.00018095935,0.000043395572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000204327,0.00019886925,0.00022738731,0.00015646855,0.00019372208,0.00023640318,0.00033430965,0.00006568244,0.00078747567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020429409,0.00013515312,0.00009404914,0.00013604006,0.00046823875,0.00022551698,0.00008849153,0.0002983008,0.000026862443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036779813,0.000119700206,0.0007855273,0.0003025727,0.00017020162,0.00010326982,0.8656476,0.000026810996,0.002327236,0.12489045,0.0010117668,0.0045780907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011224427,0.00028923506,0.008183509,0.0010095683,0.00034863965,0.00009466398,0.71631837,0.23362778,0.0056048874,0.026775997,0.0056712274,0.00095366046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019169195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017294618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23360097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008196113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000631996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403100095","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09223-6","title":"An experimental investigation of implicature and homogeneity approaches to free choice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Connaught Fund; University of Western Sydney; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Implicature; Philosophy of language; Linguistics; Syntax; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Pragmatics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.10542860585512574,"score_gpt":0.25015540748436843,"score_spread":0.14472680162924267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403100095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98285717,0.015692538,0.00018475218,0.00046334666,0.0001758727,0.00015025282,0.0001091386,0.00003060936,0.0003363403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969917,0.000023445382,0.0025204674,0.00014688387,0.000103695944,0.000008080435,0.000067311776,0.000015263857,0.00012313243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993757,0.000008385307,0.00021286242,0.00027172317,0.000025791707,0.00010552861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996238,0.000023694303,0.000056226396,0.00023148638,0.000002534223,0.000062296494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016231493,0.00009266862,0.00014834038,0.00008863698,0.000033357748,0.00004647489,0.00012207427,0.00007489143,0.00004299903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002375766,0.000097346376,0.000035232562,0.000087109634,0.000043551165,0.00022349213,0.00005987799,0.00010445294,0.000035365025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029595703,0.0001774006,0.53142613,0.00047889547,0.00018752422,0.000010189354,0.030579846,0.00032089322,0.1789088,0.24366176,0.0018360898,0.012382868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691783,0.00024553697,0.8380798,0.00006016189,0.000028849368,0.000018901712,0.0021094258,0.031249406,0.11947404,0.006497826,0.001050515,0.00061636855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012155388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032379223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30665365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058368638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004387491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.396967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630188","doi":"10.1007/s11050-024-09227-2","title":"Quantization and quantification: scope of bare nouns in Kaingang and beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Syntax; Philosophy of language; Mathematics; Quantization (signal processing); Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Programming language","score_opus":0.011427432825684375,"score_gpt":0.25714443992945074,"score_spread":0.24571700710376637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407630188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807951,0.0065491837,0.00047454928,0.0056840405,0.001113818,0.0003064857,0.00003205425,0.00005334043,0.0049914573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818325,0.00012579469,0.0007051793,0.00015812152,0.00014496414,0.0000024356166,0.00006163304,0.000011039756,0.0006075981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917406,0.00004367069,0.00031241472,0.00020258331,0.00013462685,0.0001326587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.00016475173,0.0000876838,0.00016176615,0.0001736081,0.000019904322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023200022,0.000117449665,0.00020522192,0.00022885048,0.00012387375,0.000109325854,0.00007919103,0.00006464599,0.000038004928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005533743,0.00010989342,0.000022111542,0.000104843544,0.00014005948,0.00012230233,0.00004769653,0.0001393297,0.0000024796798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021728658,0.00004687659,0.004163864,0.00041589324,0.00003337774,0.000008828527,0.06020287,0.0000065860013,0.0036276942,0.92652714,0.000075960874,0.0048691826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009740861,0.00048180693,0.22774056,0.005573392,0.001255351,0.000053655825,0.4129258,0.12967515,0.06616511,0.13469642,0.0082391035,0.003452795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007867923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053837863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001955556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026775111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44813237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408362091","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09231-0","title":"Timing of evidence and epistemic modal claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jacobs Research Funds","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Modal; Philosophy of science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Epistemic modality; Philosophy; Syntax; Metaphysics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04595098856795716,"score_gpt":0.2996282537600079,"score_spread":0.25367726519205075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408362091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712545,0.005624662,0.0004752642,0.014084004,0.0025824702,0.00029617557,0.000024124598,0.00011729381,0.005541503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942568,0.000047039553,0.000932107,0.00018044333,0.00036284514,0.0000020728032,0.000010404678,0.000011447038,0.004196825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.000039114657,0.00029095652,0.00018854778,0.0001846174,0.00016960339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.000348309,0.00012967015,0.0002091094,0.00018929112,0.000024833245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002130547,0.00012981401,0.00022323291,0.00013199067,0.00013170284,0.00008431793,0.00014498601,0.0000615913,0.00010585254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075869943,0.00010104055,0.00005208208,0.00005529212,0.00016090121,0.000121451776,0.00008261452,0.00018318815,0.0000084350695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004204505,0.000050813425,0.0018429814,0.0008410447,0.0001109121,0.00002757664,0.070991725,0.000007996882,0.005416368,0.9088802,0.00030542116,0.011482952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00504013,0.0005753165,0.035015848,0.015011156,0.002517047,0.00010825658,0.17580564,0.22256349,0.053317677,0.48124722,0.0053019733,0.003496234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008631835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007453423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42763296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030678035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003290361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41203138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413833211","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09238-7","title":"Semantics of obviation in Atchan: disjointness and long-distance obligatory binding","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of language; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language; Theology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.009921979835485338,"score_gpt":0.24976472696030477,"score_spread":0.23984274712481943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413833211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909319,0.0013891201,0.0010269056,0.002904426,0.001923568,0.0002984879,0.000037515685,0.00007049369,0.0014175301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.000048191025,0.00046109714,0.00010679897,0.00026082745,0.0000045349984,0.000053689626,0.000021027525,0.0018578275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867594,0.000059528647,0.00047467367,0.0002761715,0.00025716497,0.00025650414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.0002012179,0.00023497743,0.00025364792,0.0001647712,0.000033640168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030536726,0.00020010691,0.0003433532,0.00030344585,0.0001280462,0.0001019163,0.00015817158,0.00010213253,0.000077898294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005870994,0.00019190778,0.00005979583,0.00018525177,0.0001782514,0.00017017868,0.00010578101,0.0002619492,0.000010017933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022923,0.00016287235,0.07343494,0.0012815858,0.00011343276,0.00007661405,0.083544545,0.000040036128,0.0024750868,0.8330214,0.00021049255,0.0055687902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011884153,0.00042700372,0.46033436,0.010064434,0.0014209715,0.000053418258,0.18510902,0.12749638,0.046353735,0.14718948,0.0046333424,0.0050337054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008080202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00904108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008321249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003716883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78257716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414169560","doi":"10.1007/s11050-025-09239-6","title":"Polar questions in nɬeʔkepmxcín: monopolar, bipolar, and exhaustive","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Language Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Philosophy of language; Semantics (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Singleton; Natural language; Contrast (vision); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.008949057745737028,"score_gpt":0.25512764054904946,"score_spread":0.24617858280331242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414169560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92367727,0.030098623,0.0004734376,0.022495357,0.005997325,0.00085546944,0.00017287831,0.0004130927,0.015816577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993375,0.00009793199,0.00095012377,0.00044649554,0.0005079789,0.0000070206665,0.0000569045,0.000020600113,0.004537954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988156,0.00007479238,0.00032706838,0.00029652068,0.00017972947,0.00030631796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992277,0.00021505094,0.00009347461,0.00024770663,0.00016787353,0.000048202193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029294036,0.00021230207,0.00026565613,0.00038582346,0.00024112801,0.00021276918,0.0001600232,0.000111377514,0.00012142897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008616096,0.0001978431,0.000054219327,0.00014025385,0.00017386075,0.00018224375,0.00009483505,0.00042944815,0.000030355315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038780483,0.000103287195,0.00816472,0.00014303197,0.00008066183,0.0000712124,0.04970032,0.0000049063738,0.00068711507,0.9354168,0.0003027003,0.005286443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009316299,0.0004855119,0.27418387,0.0037472676,0.0016069588,0.00009907067,0.21898957,0.055072483,0.0063458965,0.2976221,0.12770283,0.0048281425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070527806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013333767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63779473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008416067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052746018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}