{"meta":{"query_hash":"c18d2f1a64c1","filters":{"venue":"Nature Conservation"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c18d2f1a64c1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Nature+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W2752937487","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.21.12429","title":"Caching behaviour by red squirrels may contribute to food conditioning of grizzly bears","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transect; Grizzly Bears; Digging; Ground squirrel; Midden; Ursus; Ecology; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Archaeology; Biology; Squirrel monkey; Demography","score_opus":0.01686392445676811,"score_gpt":0.2822628687643203,"score_spread":0.2653989443075522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752937487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99270153,0.000048592647,0.00013598791,0.0054877875,0.00021452752,0.00023280157,0.00009489112,0.000022959264,0.0010609325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998227,0.0000042108823,0.00035405465,0.0008578493,0.00001761891,0.000022257307,0.000044568773,0.0000072324115,0.0004651833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992182,0.000033772612,0.00018001207,0.00021911657,0.00017597301,0.00017288233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942183,0.000055653287,0.00022504885,0.0002112589,0.000036267465,0.00004990922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002489899,0.00010136216,0.00015866215,0.000020609477,0.00062704465,0.00002863506,0.00022631764,0.00022761564,0.00020135936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003324534,0.00009923252,0.000040157916,0.0000548586,0.00017643627,0.00026895275,0.00015324313,0.0002785828,0.000031431206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029649102,0.000037411846,0.9477147,0.0000027565466,0.0000115035045,0.000002511574,0.000094461524,0.000011960074,0.029117731,0.0002582864,0.022364609,0.00035442068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034009235,0.00016827456,0.98706007,0.00001766858,0.000035701793,0.0000021570388,0.000039507955,0.000012395527,0.008786659,0.00012905536,0.0032991185,0.00010932557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030387985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087678566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039345346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007482488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009245535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48227838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994686078","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.37.39501","title":"Large carnivores and zoos as catalysts for engaging the public in the protection of biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Council for Christian Colleges and Universities","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Wilderness; Flagship species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Conservation biology; Environmental resource management; Conservation science; Ecology; Environmental planning; Environmental ethics; Biology; Endangered species; Habitat","score_opus":0.031763906298919314,"score_gpt":0.29669414152928114,"score_spread":0.26493023523036185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994686078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805335,0.00016750954,0.0000455722,0.017799156,0.00032895722,0.00058510015,0.000014614509,0.000006027614,0.0005195596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879515,0.000002496686,0.000011611183,0.0009675572,0.000028752564,0.00002589549,0.000036312264,0.0000010023791,0.00013121289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955046,0.00010397241,0.00006813679,0.00010996679,0.000083860024,0.000083592626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995473,0.00020949528,0.00007317322,0.00009654015,0.00006586809,0.000007592553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082608464,0.00003782243,0.000044959415,0.000052786378,0.00011634329,0.000017826598,0.000101731996,0.000095347496,0.000021289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015140677,0.000022241518,0.000014705717,0.00020590404,0.000027665792,0.000117725096,0.000009049491,0.00020121387,0.000014888164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010529166,0.00006189936,0.9278402,0.000033999208,0.000011711587,3.491598e-7,0.017726472,2.8927386e-7,0.0020553872,0.039486744,0.011055882,0.0016218163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027147352,0.00005876727,0.9649079,0.000007897485,0.000007714434,0.000007727699,0.008555575,0.000139067,0.0002099532,0.0006748311,0.025116885,0.000042206226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055090943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046395688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03881191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010066156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029615594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09069828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088268194","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.42.51081","title":"Mapping Rocky Mountain ridged mussel beds with preliminary identification of overlapping Eurasian watermilfoil within the Canadian range","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mussel; Habitat; Invasive species; Endangered species; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Myriophyllum; Introduced species; Biology; Fishery; Macrophyte; Aquatic plant; Engineering","score_opus":0.013984216581739869,"score_gpt":0.21535589957953186,"score_spread":0.20137168299779198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088268194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807151,0.000020047295,0.00041382527,0.017812708,0.00010606838,0.00042531587,0.000010257916,0.000026084093,0.00047060108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941206,0.0000011689998,0.0002865643,0.005274666,0.000033238695,0.000029535397,0.00005818664,0.000011211908,0.00018482056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896365,0.00010232878,0.00028077344,0.00023964459,0.00024232408,0.00017125308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941283,0.000059727772,0.0002249492,0.000183795,0.00003753438,0.000081145685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004025082,0.00011882711,0.000120847246,0.00003812715,0.00035980757,0.000028141967,0.00023464998,0.00023084045,0.0002619429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014865004,0.00008451565,0.000026195612,0.0003933508,0.0001646838,0.00025898928,0.000038021888,0.00040057092,0.000111603775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014344511,0.00004384195,0.9262332,0.000051543277,0.00003362966,0.000023897199,0.011557499,0.0008944292,0.050706133,0.00056342426,0.008721094,0.0010279093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031118,0.00008144414,0.97220355,0.000021184507,0.00003737813,0.00000915099,0.0008986566,0.019679178,0.0058128242,0.000106471416,0.0007000345,0.00013892446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012237997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10103503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08879703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016696993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099897086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153725971","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.43.62750","title":"The illegal hunting and exploitation of porcupines for meat and medicine in Indonesia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Porcupine; CITES; Poaching; Wildlife; Threatened species; Wildlife trade; Geography; Habitat destruction; Hystrix; Business; Agroforestry; Fishery; Habitat; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.018797438218203982,"score_gpt":0.2994096608610942,"score_spread":0.2806122226428902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153725971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888273,0.002563627,0.00078427384,0.007467347,0.00012536896,0.000131395,0.0000032651556,0.0000026328375,0.00009477895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985446,0.00036227138,0.00033306898,0.00031158468,0.00004871948,0.000017796074,0.00014032652,0.0000042164083,0.00023743781],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995808,0.00003241685,0.00016144995,0.00012621398,0.000053861444,0.00004527745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.000069431124,0.00008691364,0.000095788164,0.00030005325,0.00001041928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022829806,0.00004109931,0.000055450477,0.0000262891,0.00007214103,0.000013274688,0.000028695284,0.00010077039,9.67479e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066496234,0.000032771586,0.000010060573,0.00008995564,0.000064206324,0.000005664547,0.000012414295,0.00004730607,5.975007e-8],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005667657,0.00001251897,0.05091117,0.00005820382,0.000013699249,1.2421974e-7,0.00018016441,0.0000014221765,0.91184133,0.031611275,0.0017828866,0.0035305133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010255398,0.000046288184,0.5375229,0.000046315043,0.00001677633,0.000008698083,0.0012420405,0.00042870233,0.42730668,0.0007212532,0.031542897,0.00009188286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007777428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018832782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48661175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001984691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026599635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13363865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213209005","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.46.80064","title":"Online trade as a serious additional threat to the Critically Endangered silvery pigeon Columba argentina in Indonesia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Critically endangered; Endangered species; Population; Geography; Habitat; International trade; Fishery; Business; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015669989599604115,"score_gpt":0.2628819645880589,"score_spread":0.2472119749884548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213209005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89122546,0.000088362634,0.000028775925,0.10712612,0.00017559872,0.00035913082,0.00044765905,0.000045954228,0.0005029217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8946241,0.000008244643,0.000276262,0.10318047,0.000052321193,0.00020435546,0.0012103965,0.000011211259,0.000432636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984728,0.00022160842,0.00026563735,0.00033751738,0.00045693596,0.0002455084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993695,0.0002432744,0.000074124815,0.00023205881,0.0000219444,0.00005909445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026788694,0.00013382614,0.00013866487,0.00008477916,0.00041304497,0.000028744513,0.00031938215,0.00014534497,0.013364126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038603166,0.00012534311,0.000062991116,0.0007377222,0.00011024438,0.00015857579,0.00017566244,0.00068519294,0.00014087907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021273132,0.00059557555,0.34011045,0.000007856163,0.000029181421,0.00007388556,0.00078513124,0.0010133508,0.0026940978,0.0016126948,0.64935064,0.0035143995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028167892,0.00006411633,0.8229781,0.000006248718,0.000016617103,0.000037401416,0.00038372612,0.0006082442,0.0000637785,0.00054947933,0.17488205,0.00012856783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004603341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050673555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48286763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023291976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007602168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220997110","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060","title":"Co-use of existing crossing structures along roads by wildlife and humans: Wishful thinking?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mammal; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.023218500193697082,"score_gpt":0.2827320479271681,"score_spread":0.259513547733471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220997110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99681455,0.0001613202,0.00027234296,0.0014825481,0.00021291025,0.00019785372,0.000045609777,0.00005089521,0.0007619742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906367,0.0000065857935,0.0018749305,0.0066971118,0.000036496123,0.00002195845,0.000154685,0.000016874008,0.0005546613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986023,0.000118758144,0.00033227188,0.00031495487,0.00046637503,0.00016535916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992283,0.00018127827,0.00030755246,0.00020734222,0.000034143148,0.000041394956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003325526,0.00014119573,0.00014535867,0.00005932436,0.001013248,0.00018225003,0.00015953166,0.00011927793,0.00057063095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022762695,0.00014828706,0.00003987209,0.00028401837,0.00020542681,0.0007289603,0.000117413,0.0005231699,0.0000025882152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006761581,0.00005432879,0.8446881,0.000016486327,0.000021387203,0.0000028745337,0.0012807014,0.00071927183,0.03279363,0.0014939951,0.11508849,0.0037730946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041664526,0.000085664265,0.69784385,0.000027380489,0.00002616377,0.000025262336,0.00043024434,0.003672087,0.0022135885,0.0018853678,0.29310814,0.00026558962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020059694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020444987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17801964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014935658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002997563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7793187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309595448","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.50.85292","title":"The extent and nature of the commercial captive lion industry in the Free State province, South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Captivity; Wildlife; Captive breeding; Threatened species; Geography; Fishery; Wildlife trade; Wildlife conservation; Panthera; Business; Environmental protection; Predation; Ecology; Endangered species; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.007588266052088026,"score_gpt":0.20697199920429502,"score_spread":0.19938373315220698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309595448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691507,0.0002038514,0.000003896852,0.029213531,0.00023891848,0.00048466522,0.00002778701,0.0000073375277,0.0006693091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925644,0.000005995011,0.000018858254,0.006917121,0.000021809103,0.0000716893,0.000006733167,0.000004651201,0.00038875974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882907,0.00035399763,0.00016932566,0.00016625473,0.00034227554,0.00013905737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991249,0.00037391533,0.00017742357,0.00029276015,0.000017546667,0.000013497305],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008502247,0.00008493966,0.000071338916,0.000020760737,0.00065872906,0.000018036488,0.00048382027,0.00034010262,0.00004283674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003278682,0.000047035446,0.000027046988,0.00044021482,0.0002482117,0.00010402904,0.00033877292,0.0026350855,0.0000013416868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105924075,0.000049982635,0.9694774,0.0000028491065,0.000008354665,0.000001955174,0.0038883227,0.00021746045,0.00011685046,0.0024041086,0.022560405,0.0011663709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026856718,0.00004178673,0.9792133,0.0000045486554,0.00001021947,0.0000029114624,0.0010991133,0.00040678537,0.00005003399,0.004107877,0.014737179,0.000057656434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014825728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002545691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02341368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009686859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006005366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320915226","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.51.96366","title":"Using drone imagery to obtain population data of colony-nesting seabirds to support Canada’s transition to the global Key Biodiversity Areas program","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Biodiversity; Population; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Fishery; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.04980991920416383,"score_gpt":0.31416939052731957,"score_spread":0.26435947132315574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320915226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98028654,0.0000013905932,0.00036732806,0.017973043,0.00020679162,0.0007442162,0.00032882404,0.000055596185,0.000036293037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176186,2.0223247e-7,0.0034586594,0.004068278,0.000024407062,0.000011272365,0.00063949404,0.000003852451,0.00003197638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989965,0.00008323845,0.00014837304,0.00028329785,0.0002888273,0.00019976292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949896,0.00004481814,0.000064915635,0.0002631559,0.000037410813,0.000090715694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005511829,0.00008783162,0.00009912446,0.000032720258,0.00022996533,0.00001618747,0.00026896963,0.00012648302,0.000065201246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025230166,0.000080940496,0.000016037417,0.0009065294,0.000031320906,0.00016839468,0.0001952899,0.00012599278,0.00004363093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000530671,0.000027563656,0.95983404,0.0000060808434,0.0000044409544,0.000009552764,0.00015999057,0.001840043,0.0010636064,0.0000038118883,0.032265812,0.004731988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008635764,0.000069250156,0.9940195,0.00001033096,0.000034318884,0.0000042196166,0.00011287246,0.0011702717,0.0001324287,0.000011226406,0.004256473,0.00009272555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1379934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7636324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.625639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004900932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012171626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8677468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388833769","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.53.113548","title":"Corrigendum: Using drone imagery to obtain population data of colony-nesting seabirds to support Canada’s transition to the global Key Biodiversity Areas program. Nature Conservation 51: 155–166. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.51.96366","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Drone; Nesting (process); Biodiversity; Population; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Demography; Engineering; Sociology; Environmental science; Botany","score_opus":0.04443125955045402,"score_gpt":0.2974754486059466,"score_spread":0.2530441890554926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388833769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94868934,0.000016440312,0.00047446645,0.046328444,0.0011431911,0.0021098042,0.0009411253,0.00018939792,0.000107774365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694284,0.0000024585631,0.0051363297,0.019919189,0.00010981725,0.00006700252,0.0047752676,0.00002333381,0.0005381573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683726,0.00030797225,0.00056836236,0.00087848195,0.00084161863,0.0005662836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981408,0.00020334261,0.00034644062,0.00075514574,0.00029213444,0.00026211195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013970864,0.0003489069,0.00035556417,0.00015662803,0.00070716836,0.00008218527,0.00078408053,0.0007857714,0.00041613553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011125488,0.00033634304,0.000070225775,0.0027551134,0.0001125899,0.00066245627,0.0004047141,0.0007551602,0.00017461633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002557447,0.00008107623,0.75959754,0.000029439809,0.00002606726,0.000025427787,0.00024749254,0.00156994,0.00146827,0.000028248121,0.23400204,0.0026687244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003522165,0.0001636645,0.96276337,0.000053507738,0.00012915472,0.000017881024,0.00024290984,0.0040288977,0.00034897358,0.00006556783,0.031466346,0.00036750615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08814924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5757246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48757535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012578836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006070644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405446302","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.57.116972","title":"The potential of electrified barriers to keep black bears out of fenced road corridors at low volume access roads","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Oregon Department of Transportation; Iowa Department of Transportation; Nevada Department of Transportation; New Mexico Department of Transportation; Federal Highway Administration; Parks Canada; Montana Department of Transportation; California Department of Transportation; Minnesota Department of Transportation; Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; Michigan Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Fencing; Fence (mathematics); Netting; Transport engineering; Wildlife; Channel (broadcasting); Traffic volume; Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Telecommunications; Ecology","score_opus":0.006338600689272459,"score_gpt":0.25439623341040113,"score_spread":0.24805763272112866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405446302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99094564,0.00010981149,0.00066537265,0.005781642,0.0011786525,0.00040199954,0.000021080985,0.000044061053,0.0008517603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943953,0.000042385058,0.00010815629,0.001284474,0.000059771657,0.00002625973,0.000032889435,0.000016598962,0.004034121],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850607,0.00007899597,0.00041071366,0.00032118327,0.0004649692,0.00021808749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920934,0.000101753045,0.00017352415,0.00031531393,0.00009359068,0.00010644885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003543113,0.00014743711,0.00015719299,0.000070870905,0.00020184543,0.00010028787,0.0003971613,0.00020970604,0.00079339003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040959837,0.00011937412,0.00010819657,0.0006934968,0.00018806352,0.0004859241,0.00013088569,0.0003312273,0.00013846687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007994035,0.00008523543,0.1499465,0.00009491833,0.00016127412,0.000009212934,0.0017766004,0.013784274,0.51911306,0.00046118753,0.27707583,0.036692534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004116132,0.00021489892,0.7471517,0.00016824946,0.00009149401,0.00000726815,0.00037986645,0.13954733,0.047810014,0.0005818417,0.06326208,0.00037367045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006437821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083048246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59720516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023671628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009718735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8687064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412159385","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.59.149423","title":"Integrating herbarium data with spatial biodiversity assessment into conservation plans: A case study of the genus Carex L. (Cyperaceae) in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cyperaceae; Herbarium; Carex; Genus; Geography; Biodiversity; Botany; Biology; Ecology; Poaceae","score_opus":0.0225675006032536,"score_gpt":0.24675688131842433,"score_spread":0.22418938071517072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412159385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913341,0.000113708076,0.00001029767,0.007482166,0.00026685145,0.0006057728,0.00011647717,0.000011703563,0.000058919897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983558,0.0000025531099,0.000120838224,0.0014052589,0.000026434742,0.00001812369,0.000040613417,3.946518e-7,0.000029964609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901366,0.00017023248,0.00023379108,0.00029029464,0.0001699419,0.00012205901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.00033535156,0.0001669939,0.00014812709,0.0002256883,0.000017989345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026649624,0.00012009047,0.00018409616,0.00001414217,0.00032760244,0.000023879458,0.0002924717,0.0001271529,0.0000067591586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013089988,0.000047534766,0.000014900117,0.00047693815,0.000060265837,0.000113684495,0.00020320862,0.00034515877,8.5607866e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003642546,0.00010551053,0.9946186,0.000012258837,0.00005052581,0.000043792148,0.00020708375,0.0000064840756,0.00035402243,0.0000050720087,0.0025433789,0.0020168764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037420884,0.000110111825,0.9326295,0.000030502584,0.00004616421,0.000009140128,0.06313469,0.00054208294,0.00004804208,0.000008707775,0.0029810898,0.000085762666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8197232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18011163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015575411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003269843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25196862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}