{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b4648abf5b5","filters":{"venue":"Negotiation Journal"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b4648abf5b5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Negotiation+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1849738471","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00311.x","title":"Rethinking Conflict: Perspectives from the Insight Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construct (python library); Conflict resolution research; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.10775107489193642,"score_gpt":0.28619862416897873,"score_spread":0.17844754927704232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849738471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06679737,0.02610658,0.21482947,0.1727887,0.003380305,0.00022483953,0.00010057268,0.0002045778,0.51556754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607938,0.005743944,0.019231139,0.0065797167,0.0007433418,0.00021291473,0.000038895836,0.00009418095,0.006562136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96873456,0.026485309,0.0004046148,0.000908743,0.0021462643,0.001320497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659882,0.028728897,0.0017458461,0.0013439283,0.0012435433,0.0009494998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021413606,0.0013945942,0.00093776436,0.0046592806,0.0104670115,0.02055199,0.0039938637,0.008334813,0.004457759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020297239,0.0006225476,0.0012265092,0.002885288,0.069941685,0.029153664,0.013847901,0.014486353,0.00061515253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026432679,0.000020879443,0.00017306702,0.00008712222,0.000008080971,0.00024852372,0.050044067,0.0002554513,0.00009893787,0.9435823,0.001093665,0.004361465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034550016,0.00004197175,0.00020829236,0.00057598937,0.000018437873,0.0004460328,0.059154585,0.0018925215,0.0003510537,0.8625542,0.07468721,0.000035170928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002183136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015496262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021413606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009501653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049866145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113247335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855957090","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12054","title":"Conflict Assessment in Energy Infrastructure Siting: Prospects for Consensus Building in the Northern Pass Transmission Line Project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Process (computing); Negotiation; Citizen journalism; Environmental planning; Public relations; Political science; Business; Environmental resource management; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.020238134402939284,"score_gpt":0.33048405251081975,"score_spread":0.3102459181078805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855957090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416654,0.00029079436,0.08564701,0.015809594,0.00009719451,0.0015100426,0.0000709359,0.000094559604,0.054814503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97650164,0.00009449893,0.02077934,0.00016011682,0.00001066403,0.00042505524,0.000035500892,0.000013919809,0.001979258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8698022,0.11816879,0.0018921565,0.0015987636,0.0058042677,0.0027338765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8680705,0.10649028,0.005361298,0.0028827924,0.012757301,0.0044378364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.117897384,0.00049520045,0.0005527797,0.0022015246,0.012672351,0.008404243,0.0029756718,0.0029275252,0.004292543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088122174,0.00038988882,0.00058296474,0.0018558918,0.0079872655,0.00579948,0.009630864,0.0034305917,0.00034253224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057771784,0.0017665576,0.035648398,0.00078462926,0.00011103443,0.0022014894,0.5867835,0.019824525,0.0037314165,0.1366659,0.006475053,0.20542978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007633479,0.00048998336,0.009205176,0.00047933817,0.000029872162,0.00020021635,0.88464516,0.023313427,0.0032937096,0.057233594,0.020931007,0.00010217238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009871351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015876831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117897384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008766222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015665848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62350845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973468005","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00774.x","title":"New Problem-Solving Scholarship: An Historical Tale with a Happy Ending","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Adversarial system; Scholarship; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Philosophy of law; Negotiation theory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Political science; Comparative law; History","score_opus":0.05375713648181519,"score_gpt":0.35540562041145257,"score_spread":0.3016484839296374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973468005","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019663742,0.2803586,0.015698673,0.33987382,0.0092238095,0.00004883556,0.00004693376,0.000077866316,0.3350077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7472019,0.16991615,0.009568986,0.022366503,0.01228842,0.0001952153,0.00006828088,0.0002029525,0.038191587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450463,0.003893232,0.00016274097,0.00036676743,0.0007783494,0.00029424828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277616,0.0051307315,0.00032513213,0.0004212338,0.0006937799,0.0006530033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064747958,0.0005279988,0.00044236984,0.0036750312,0.009171862,0.014264203,0.0012793166,0.0037647323,0.003349207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076977634,0.00028505555,0.00023615808,0.0032244406,0.046651017,0.014520846,0.0058356742,0.008838452,0.0005201636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008027793,0.000024112696,0.00008930487,0.00008805425,0.0000017604242,0.000070478745,0.009550937,0.000059881822,0.00003904493,0.9733854,0.008431414,0.008251616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104053715,0.00003276465,0.0002821773,0.000902332,0.000002875522,0.00029390733,0.016309632,0.00033840208,0.00016060792,0.3318448,0.64980835,0.000013681805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018381265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019577155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014264203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065488038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030996616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047515154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977857017","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00187.x","title":"Mega-Simulations in Negotiation Teaching: Extraordinary Investments with Extraordinary Benefits","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sophistication; Experiential learning; Diplomacy; International business; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.14666156704462446,"score_gpt":0.3859594520714634,"score_spread":0.23929788502683896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977857017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37075138,0.0036464988,0.23931065,0.0320691,0.0010285113,0.00037631625,0.000054520613,0.0008422237,0.3519209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90967077,0.0012043038,0.07810288,0.00079441123,0.00014976264,0.00022381428,0.00003459213,0.00009585284,0.009723741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577194,0.003190013,0.00006697841,0.00014337937,0.000569882,0.00025774862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181914,0.005343379,0.0003347285,0.0007464915,0.00035682402,0.0013994207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042447303,0.00041486174,0.00025569127,0.00039209917,0.0012836214,0.0040691965,0.0014961689,0.0013164368,0.015129861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011975014,0.00031916646,0.00029105134,0.00038440895,0.0018794048,0.0038056506,0.00803089,0.0018669544,0.0017996208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006915249,0.001703727,0.0061097993,0.000611144,0.000047601723,0.0006886174,0.015915982,0.020265117,0.006754088,0.48141542,0.028027121,0.43776986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029157184,0.0013167282,0.005763487,0.0013629976,0.000071103896,0.0014741241,0.020284321,0.060044605,0.0085447235,0.34838074,0.55234164,0.00012401567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026350046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086285075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015129861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011479871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013091767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050614417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989198639","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00281.x","title":"The Security Council: Adapting to Address Contemporary Conflicts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Security council; Political science; Cold war; Public administration; Security studies; International security; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07013457932889765,"score_gpt":0.3116653134287214,"score_spread":0.24153073409982373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989198639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26511484,0.0028899324,0.024119442,0.3921605,0.0063932557,0.00035787787,0.00005375104,0.00035326564,0.3085571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589155,0.0014455478,0.008151926,0.012652481,0.0010709687,0.00014513003,0.0000452969,0.000055766694,0.01751745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805551,0.012128654,0.000619864,0.00077619153,0.0025540206,0.0033661255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98122,0.005990868,0.0021718612,0.0010925571,0.0037402222,0.0057843737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021397341,0.00038918236,0.0002166062,0.0017920135,0.012756089,0.012380035,0.002731358,0.0095832385,0.007541161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03868636,0.0003328879,0.00036769416,0.0024157856,0.0076999264,0.0063698236,0.010328051,0.0064202375,0.0008658255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015416872,0.0005281646,0.02164001,0.00038240332,0.00007982943,0.004066632,0.073636815,0.01370621,0.0017229209,0.4851015,0.2143411,0.18464027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000673323,0.00020848423,0.00952488,0.00047555278,0.00003181493,0.0006692996,0.13072516,0.005885157,0.0006282675,0.054190498,0.7974876,0.0001059114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015526153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021948356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021397341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009920773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017434796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113161266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995259012","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00219.x","title":"Does Interest-Based Bargaining (IBB) Really Make a Difference in Collective Bargaining Outcomes?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Collective bargaining; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Bargaining power; Business; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Microeconomics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.028278657370695796,"score_gpt":0.30793376101227854,"score_spread":0.27965510364158275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995259012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55681,0.0015533307,0.041514948,0.01671764,0.00049892295,0.00022900203,0.00008005013,0.000060060473,0.382536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615854,0.00010758587,0.0013539357,0.0004867909,0.000038960894,0.000033790948,0.000010330572,0.000014407987,0.0017957092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807927,0.012186846,0.000569785,0.0010101597,0.0037082382,0.0017322868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722759,0.019544385,0.0036777365,0.002045111,0.0015192678,0.0009375192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023484869,0.00020564083,0.0006016544,0.0011484775,0.0022547203,0.005247193,0.0010731244,0.0032515347,0.011052411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058206126,0.00026755195,0.0005870602,0.0014276019,0.010205572,0.008308641,0.0027820412,0.002640388,0.0017077472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051301264,0.0004412865,0.030883402,0.00038033997,0.00011241311,0.00064792146,0.011762815,0.0018311675,0.0023794477,0.84276617,0.0024553037,0.10582673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021482853,0.0006531138,0.07642847,0.00071604934,0.00010891081,0.0014355446,0.04981099,0.0066101807,0.0035763397,0.8101119,0.050195213,0.00013849462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006663507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007181574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023484869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020077664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010023334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12420136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003052243","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00767.x","title":"The Challenge of Learning","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Key (lock); Psychology; Philosophy of law; Pedagogy; Rest (music); Cognitive science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.019902902257829973,"score_gpt":0.2911470049372865,"score_spread":0.27124410267945653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003052243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024388917,0.0069403555,0.040519238,0.43790138,0.0038465087,0.000056540983,0.00006924607,0.00020694835,0.48607093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596535,0.0052825836,0.0138134435,0.043765943,0.0035042057,0.00021304682,0.000103976796,0.00021714898,0.07344616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908524,0.0061211917,0.00016046104,0.00089871575,0.001391734,0.00057555153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98824394,0.006343864,0.00057681056,0.001765723,0.0011296612,0.0019400266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008275385,0.0004195951,0.0005630125,0.00052001467,0.004497688,0.0109854555,0.0019371813,0.004675687,0.0149281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021650596,0.00017169658,0.00042492937,0.00039995648,0.023363262,0.016195325,0.008768895,0.009623221,0.0036830748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018979332,0.00004618736,0.00034714089,0.000082608516,0.000009354333,0.00012526814,0.0069938023,0.00033359154,0.00019983629,0.92814195,0.03142239,0.03227892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011816538,0.000027611044,0.00014462614,0.00015860733,0.0000026981404,0.00013885791,0.0065736896,0.00055246375,0.00020118762,0.76356685,0.2286126,0.000009063001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006087265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052278384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024974642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031125084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049939454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004291310","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00227.x","title":"What Difference Does a Robe Make? Comparing Mediators with and without Prior Judicial Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014523573598143475,"score_gpt":0.24528401628998542,"score_spread":0.23076044269184195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004291310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943515,0.0004776798,0.00015619684,0.00071833417,0.000044577653,0.000024934308,0.000016318825,0.000004265464,0.0042062486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944085,0.00013650223,0.000046807698,0.000054786087,0.000019786328,0.000009978953,0.000010815845,0.0000019479153,0.00027843562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98606944,0.008345245,0.0008939546,0.0006937454,0.002292285,0.0017052981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238674,0.04916984,0.014031355,0.0026520344,0.0037771256,0.0065022735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013787205,0.00030375028,0.0009551926,0.0024511141,0.0020260573,0.006695651,0.0011982323,0.0020489115,0.008441834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11762993,0.00028406395,0.00059109903,0.00092046265,0.0028705935,0.0035728642,0.002833993,0.0017301637,0.0007797319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034807068,0.003299464,0.82842433,0.0003945333,0.0005493336,0.0046227365,0.08242743,0.00054447405,0.0036692696,0.007066264,0.0013843453,0.064137176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025900063,0.0029760953,0.6103973,0.0006919209,0.00040682143,0.003554712,0.3541508,0.0017443615,0.002979027,0.009418098,0.013224698,0.00019718787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016669822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002211077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013787205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009953134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012412848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0729146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010132249","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00251.x","title":"The Negative Impact of Attorneys on Mediation Outcomes: A Myth or a Reality?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04280736492586102,"score_gpt":0.39544006779894125,"score_spread":0.35263270287308024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010132249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977367,0.0049495096,0.0032472557,0.0596871,0.0005896769,0.000045835284,0.00020335648,0.000048970272,0.033491544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984712,0.00034251696,0.00034227897,0.00048407132,0.00010182058,0.000017627286,0.000019313778,0.000007195342,0.00021396669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94518983,0.039584167,0.0024287053,0.0017076655,0.0082961405,0.0027934492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6212912,0.31040317,0.033217218,0.013836931,0.016193012,0.005058538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04373967,0.00039434715,0.00091096223,0.0011298906,0.0020808973,0.005302891,0.0016887385,0.0015337454,0.012739687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20767964,0.0002951349,0.0006728384,0.0011351055,0.008736551,0.006631739,0.004472442,0.0036151286,0.00058389676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031445276,0.0015936381,0.6121404,0.0028782424,0.0018055453,0.0019138125,0.043441128,0.0017382922,0.0033295173,0.0979233,0.011119687,0.21897198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002001418,0.0014443115,0.78944105,0.0030843124,0.0011384021,0.0021829437,0.08374371,0.004155545,0.004673805,0.0928112,0.016864372,0.00026026234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012857622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016586478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04373967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014772112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021763088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2313202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013622019","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00269.x","title":"A Theory Matrix for Mediators","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Perspective (graphical); Dialectic; Psychology; Bridge (graph theory); Intervention (counseling); Dialogical self; Perception; Matrix (chemical analysis); Social psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012844655980423298,"score_gpt":0.3329675315850952,"score_spread":0.3201228756046719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013622019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006698731,0.0064936345,0.69577706,0.050603792,0.0026827403,0.0013091189,0.0011885713,0.00045949357,0.23478685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30328435,0.0057559223,0.65199554,0.0035445183,0.00094236876,0.0044878325,0.0014387891,0.000173295,0.028377354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923268,0.0051889457,0.00056049635,0.00073655206,0.0009195104,0.00026765847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877637,0.0077866185,0.00059677236,0.00077214895,0.0025755153,0.0005052492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010934243,0.001483851,0.0009316293,0.0074593686,0.005746935,0.0083497,0.0024852655,0.0028498445,0.03421112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013976902,0.0007584868,0.0014282968,0.00433389,0.009272011,0.010903083,0.005006931,0.0054604816,0.0042268545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064829374,0.000009392259,0.000093322655,0.00008755939,0.0000043435894,0.00009350723,0.0010853073,0.0002705745,0.00007071994,0.9877993,0.0030101675,0.0074692913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017780709,0.000039208895,0.0001653835,0.00045966203,0.000017296286,0.00033601877,0.0030632082,0.004188357,0.00023793522,0.84352285,0.14793514,0.000017048298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002639715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002033518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03421112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005246695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056458614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11444765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026637938","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00060.x","title":"Compensation Schemes and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Beyond the Obvious","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Dispute resolution; GRASP; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Political science; Law and economics; Core (optical fiber); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Dispute mechanism; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0156531217613471,"score_gpt":0.3615279847738509,"score_spread":0.3458748630125038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026637938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029281696,0.021627972,0.055060778,0.6198093,0.0024413343,0.0001558875,0.00006866285,0.000048484126,0.27150586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437272,0.007575182,0.005994242,0.019182589,0.0025023096,0.00015545277,0.000030365884,0.000026995873,0.020805568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834583,0.011466222,0.0006147521,0.00064252294,0.0028089618,0.0010091934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97503257,0.01822705,0.00134303,0.0012740904,0.0033839848,0.00073924614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022592729,0.00033415272,0.00049791636,0.0017693216,0.0041174092,0.013325343,0.0018001564,0.0079644285,0.016219648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031910107,0.00027622108,0.0004941428,0.0014200893,0.013124909,0.016518444,0.004396655,0.006474035,0.00065469753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012069319,0.000007699299,0.00009367598,0.000037624923,0.0000033448584,0.000016304717,0.00091539713,0.00034704257,0.00005775152,0.99028426,0.0028705818,0.00535426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044422137,0.000023338112,0.00043337353,0.0005888101,0.000010347587,0.000044038796,0.0032003345,0.0014709285,0.00027844208,0.85784,0.13603836,0.000027593882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024594818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024370898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022592729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061389157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00520215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11948317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039694717","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00076.x","title":"Improvisation and Teaching Negotiation: Developing Three Essential Skills","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Negotiation; Mediation; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Social science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.007204212614606896,"score_gpt":0.21467412157680832,"score_spread":0.2074699089622014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039694717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3054132,0.0023295349,0.39526954,0.021017374,0.0003772096,0.0012718192,0.000028902263,0.0008172505,0.27347514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87682736,0.0010899295,0.10705919,0.0010264707,0.000045150737,0.0007616249,0.000025305875,0.00011056589,0.013054412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944112,0.0037849504,0.00017930476,0.00026319394,0.00086504384,0.0004963286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868254,0.0094226,0.00079067436,0.0006839924,0.0007628522,0.0015144934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005482139,0.0005009799,0.00041138902,0.0008226501,0.0024691983,0.006596474,0.0017393404,0.0023347638,0.006238001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017194234,0.0004897086,0.0004293435,0.00063285517,0.008838984,0.0054412517,0.007189032,0.0059316596,0.0007753441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013384392,0.0014167224,0.004546739,0.0010917893,0.000020604646,0.0007779544,0.3011368,0.0018792809,0.010309475,0.46787798,0.0064501357,0.20435864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021340446,0.0004611273,0.0071890564,0.0020529798,0.0000373793,0.0023133452,0.20427397,0.016986048,0.019204661,0.52559316,0.2215588,0.00011599291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009226134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00122454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006596474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022010135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004427852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028992653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042750548","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00127.x","title":"Perceptions of Time and Their Impact on Negotiations in the Arabic-Speaking Islamic World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Islam; Conceptualization; Arabic; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017879963902908132,"score_gpt":0.31871911032221356,"score_spread":0.3008391464193054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042750548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827921,0.00026244976,0.00033121687,0.0003915666,0.000025734123,0.000008977514,0.000011713331,0.0000030286267,0.016173178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933666,0.00011544139,0.00006948128,0.00003400765,0.0000070224946,0.0000043919586,0.0000050962385,0.0000026219432,0.00042534483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970356,0.0018995837,0.00011258547,0.000116375755,0.0004978122,0.00033808977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871501,0.005953029,0.003799568,0.00028301947,0.0009980449,0.0018162742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034633905,0.00026684778,0.00028597153,0.0009300449,0.003156391,0.005291326,0.00036253873,0.0006092059,0.006565475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131721245,0.00020793622,0.00026892324,0.0005842831,0.0029643546,0.0016008529,0.002016738,0.0013613532,0.00043120832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013844196,0.00081717444,0.23906794,0.00021240603,0.00018081744,0.0023010604,0.67430544,0.001346521,0.005913871,0.023291744,0.0018635655,0.0493151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005126856,0.00040851688,0.28956088,0.000213428,0.00006437464,0.0005668567,0.6846871,0.0016869871,0.00092847185,0.006055849,0.015656518,0.000119776836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034960816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003154462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006565475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011143379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065648986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021963716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044933191","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00083.x","title":"The Risks of Peace: Implications for International Mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Negotiation; Mediation; Settlement (finance); Political science; International law; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.0672018413557321,"score_gpt":0.4156899184016398,"score_spread":0.34848807704590773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044933191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048306085,0.016949892,0.042899735,0.43332064,0.0014578829,0.00023734427,0.00005411714,0.000058447262,0.45671585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793059,0.0047906586,0.0044356575,0.005232661,0.0005879372,0.00020617506,0.000011417225,0.000014807233,0.0054149157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812618,0.014431434,0.00033694072,0.0006865729,0.0018739416,0.0014093124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96457005,0.026996505,0.0031469178,0.0008455695,0.0022824781,0.0021585322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020173317,0.0010236157,0.0008427471,0.0022678787,0.009311095,0.017556358,0.0025555757,0.008964287,0.012142182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037474852,0.00046865633,0.0008209735,0.0018896079,0.03240863,0.016424349,0.01103228,0.008838704,0.00062634965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023537556,0.000054377113,0.0005074529,0.00008435042,0.000008954286,0.00026455344,0.010722818,0.0008051706,0.00004927587,0.9785251,0.0021181935,0.0068362425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021013582,0.000032000236,0.0005695521,0.00049276126,0.000010053297,0.00021622656,0.0412274,0.0012096122,0.00010261807,0.93260264,0.023490794,0.00002533736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028682288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020545695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020173317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007155705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007884324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10668796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084002522","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00143.x","title":"The Paradox of Accepting One's Share of Responsibility in Mediation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Context (archaeology); Moral responsibility; Social psychology; Psychology; Process (computing); Social responsibility; Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03978653731585803,"score_gpt":0.3542404391273831,"score_spread":0.3144539018115251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084002522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74342364,0.0029378599,0.024009772,0.097002655,0.00050482067,0.00009130583,0.000019171699,0.00008329697,0.13192746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983228,0.00017647314,0.00051245117,0.00055203005,0.000031384625,0.000019037063,0.0000014992956,0.0000073565334,0.00037689775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9172664,0.0708674,0.0012380119,0.0018435508,0.006593461,0.002191111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8733175,0.10774971,0.0074417926,0.005082369,0.0037199082,0.0026887693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04694523,0.00034688367,0.0007166779,0.0009857283,0.008360691,0.011989594,0.0018953941,0.005339598,0.0044902386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11834028,0.00063399225,0.00064545975,0.0008973393,0.035287537,0.0099137025,0.011603634,0.008465196,0.00038064108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028500965,0.0003835171,0.011639544,0.00037940146,0.00010142977,0.0020881612,0.24718298,0.0007175101,0.0014631393,0.6938264,0.0032851452,0.03864772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034243093,0.0003062481,0.0116524985,0.000677106,0.00009956483,0.0026392536,0.17480636,0.004224344,0.0018560378,0.7704128,0.032837115,0.00014626389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015046856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010720285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04694523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030665991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040645725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24827307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085269292","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00249.x","title":"Supporting Accountability in the Field of Mediation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Mediation; Field (mathematics); Comprehension; Work (physics); Public relations; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02205254047965057,"score_gpt":0.29281674696918636,"score_spread":0.2707642064895358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085269292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098794915,0.0016284547,0.121930845,0.29821232,0.0031391426,0.00043154345,0.000082592596,0.0008972873,0.47488284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98067045,0.0002733747,0.0093908375,0.0040207785,0.0005483115,0.00017707993,0.000016907135,0.0000672648,0.0048351004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80596507,0.15273821,0.0054987776,0.0054518296,0.017476112,0.012870036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44128487,0.42571905,0.033294633,0.030122094,0.048559006,0.021020336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1537288,0.00070749235,0.0008264868,0.0050291414,0.024767855,0.024704132,0.0031495912,0.007919492,0.007888334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32121986,0.0007520531,0.00076884805,0.0025213857,0.038591936,0.024026785,0.021717105,0.011452661,0.0014723163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014497369,0.00033374157,0.01698671,0.00033052472,0.000048965194,0.00091588637,0.06835418,0.0018082819,0.0009286501,0.7685917,0.024790963,0.11676543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016791825,0.0002554148,0.0068011596,0.0011110522,0.000072281444,0.00033145494,0.03720739,0.006153484,0.003159166,0.785167,0.15938976,0.00018389699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007249567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006139416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1537288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010861458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05124304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087607390","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00743.x","title":"Common Language, Different Meaning: What Meidators Mean When They Talk About Their Work","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Affect (linguistics); Facilitation; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Perception; Transformative learning; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Exploratory research; Social psychology; Work (physics); Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; History; Communication","score_opus":0.022990103173911407,"score_gpt":0.27130688508485973,"score_spread":0.24831678191094833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087607390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42829955,0.015526862,0.051506896,0.29431742,0.004558185,0.0002492895,0.00015288881,0.00035343572,0.20503551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850264,0.0013914591,0.0027386392,0.004919339,0.00024191708,0.00010188679,0.00002395822,0.000096070435,0.0054603466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622151,0.030141082,0.0012685349,0.0011001538,0.0034665465,0.0018086521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752621,0.016595153,0.002567108,0.0014910332,0.0021935212,0.0018910193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019073421,0.0005426373,0.0006981808,0.0024266383,0.01206097,0.016415784,0.0014825764,0.004023336,0.00483741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04112298,0.0005406837,0.00036464012,0.0019787636,0.027287599,0.017654888,0.009479071,0.008758245,0.0009035247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003877768,0.000029646371,0.0032391825,0.00009513602,0.000011154442,0.0003105226,0.87073576,0.000028496717,0.00050420366,0.109715864,0.0034385377,0.011852692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013489385,0.00003758304,0.0021447465,0.0006635344,0.000013982242,0.0005172754,0.88165194,0.00016836466,0.0006072468,0.030549593,0.08359439,0.000037876216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003028231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032020418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019073421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057450687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004699505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100871146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107365024","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00782.x","title":"Bringing Horses to Water? Overcoming Bad Relationships in the Pre-Negotiating Stage of Consensus Building","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Negotiation; Incentive; Public relations; Political science; Process (computing); Business; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.18810384495929627,"score_gpt":0.45181518145445715,"score_spread":0.2637113364951609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107365024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7776065,0.0011213898,0.109903626,0.018594999,0.0003192757,0.0014477097,0.000032841,0.00020202337,0.09077168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97530705,0.0002283457,0.022511195,0.00020601359,0.000025304253,0.00024711707,0.000010717837,0.00001603029,0.0014482541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84527534,0.14093885,0.0019543066,0.0013521694,0.006173182,0.004306186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8582171,0.111021705,0.009018799,0.0067895013,0.007082435,0.007870464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09079977,0.00064966973,0.0007974751,0.0016991155,0.00889505,0.010395076,0.002831722,0.004432528,0.005312374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12565906,0.00048678755,0.00055321533,0.0012872185,0.009120305,0.010535329,0.009473324,0.0037794812,0.00084173994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014438346,0.0030780574,0.03165616,0.0023187757,0.00027866324,0.0062188315,0.19470875,0.015538986,0.008367832,0.37592,0.009023195,0.35144705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004437462,0.005284543,0.015123327,0.0022329085,0.0003283597,0.002336927,0.34910616,0.061651085,0.022194093,0.42574623,0.11517697,0.00037568292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010599595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020157823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09079977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028682305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059419144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48020083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112049446","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00203.x","title":"The Practice of One Ombudsman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01666754751172351,"score_gpt":0.31042120874887597,"score_spread":0.29375366123715246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112049446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36231834,0.013740934,0.028075943,0.3038661,0.004151936,0.00025580326,0.00005602316,0.0003622134,0.2871727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94463944,0.0010851308,0.0041102367,0.008004689,0.0001082964,0.000046652032,0.0000072838243,0.00010794746,0.041890424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94972634,0.030045355,0.0012660075,0.0044256216,0.0074308356,0.0071058455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95753455,0.013559418,0.0030638776,0.0027616494,0.011169171,0.011911237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03885305,0.00037745002,0.0007404262,0.0024706174,0.03607139,0.011839239,0.002426068,0.005642114,0.006909968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059891675,0.00062952307,0.00033337568,0.0024637382,0.03662276,0.0068356832,0.0083433185,0.008444345,0.00084459205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009095169,0.00007365036,0.009114171,0.00010307099,0.0000170408,0.00057518575,0.30475238,0.00026418065,0.0012798721,0.5862228,0.03797425,0.05953241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015668818,0.00009277233,0.0028095138,0.0008662321,0.000018957915,0.00029424785,0.2286514,0.00082056824,0.0010230769,0.030262295,0.7350356,0.00010962875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2525389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2862395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2525389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045014568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09375796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5021379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114936236","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00741.x","title":"A Framework for Understanding Consensus-Building Initiation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Process (computing); Political science; Washington Consensus; Table (database); Management science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Data mining; Politics","score_opus":0.13388505626700312,"score_gpt":0.29389084943636495,"score_spread":0.16000579316936184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114936236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007586573,0.0023634424,0.77751327,0.014877392,0.00034404956,0.00096236845,0.00016083934,0.00029517923,0.1958969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5371327,0.0013302802,0.4471214,0.0009368665,0.00020313883,0.0019778009,0.00038678857,0.00014965623,0.010761412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96061414,0.028619697,0.001732921,0.0026498726,0.004343166,0.0020402023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016037,0.01748219,0.002353153,0.0027902005,0.00535662,0.0018574628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044363882,0.0016207225,0.0011737619,0.006580685,0.010225643,0.014923409,0.0066706594,0.0070238938,0.013153269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037229102,0.0009022837,0.0023037363,0.0046678865,0.034335654,0.018568771,0.008808407,0.0063479026,0.002223043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002723974,0.0000076292786,0.00005912823,0.000029894114,0.0000038599715,0.000045840156,0.0017611921,0.00060214236,0.000024523106,0.9949713,0.00042752974,0.0020642742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013625439,0.000013115547,0.00007858439,0.00014768082,0.0000056820304,0.000048992093,0.002532569,0.004766305,0.00008008528,0.96849906,0.023801856,0.000012405122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009124366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044363882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01591017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014518281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23462147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117366544","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00228.x","title":"What Makes Parties Trust Mediators?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.023091230534505354,"score_gpt":0.30608041067631253,"score_spread":0.2829891801418072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117366544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49166664,0.011357832,0.05141978,0.12924361,0.0012556863,0.00033115977,0.00014055116,0.0001991351,0.3143856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969014,0.00055945065,0.00063667283,0.00061988534,0.00006780469,0.000028771381,0.000011239647,0.000016631777,0.0011581125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.942978,0.042978164,0.0019363575,0.0023529301,0.005932128,0.0038223597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87239975,0.091242634,0.017025895,0.0067817997,0.007863793,0.0046861516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03154914,0.000344141,0.0006653706,0.0015922079,0.0050154263,0.011352538,0.0013391759,0.004518259,0.009349449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15691695,0.0005604017,0.0004496087,0.0013379782,0.009745878,0.013798985,0.0057930276,0.0027954476,0.0013255368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058382953,0.00021510544,0.076819785,0.0011315404,0.00040796216,0.0034851169,0.20643005,0.000847985,0.001503784,0.58339804,0.010887998,0.11428885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023932396,0.0003091104,0.032219525,0.0022270249,0.0004414396,0.0029171966,0.2169105,0.0037588803,0.002268781,0.58474314,0.15378955,0.00017552692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027932064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015145217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03154914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039699026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036838728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16684979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125576498","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00773.x","title":"Ready for Prime Time: The When, Who, and Why of International Mediation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Dimension (graph theory); Prime (order theory); Alternative dispute resolution; Politics; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028103529330784107,"score_gpt":0.30694627850403006,"score_spread":0.278842749173246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125576498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14530848,0.035132,0.03864948,0.34051788,0.0014949411,0.0002393747,0.000091325055,0.00008758581,0.4384789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988727,0.0031255756,0.0018642513,0.0027206098,0.00034410905,0.00006348324,0.000015875412,0.00002521408,0.0031138624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98141634,0.014565507,0.0005503941,0.00091371196,0.0011303936,0.0014237429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501449,0.039380997,0.0035909882,0.0013574449,0.0034122975,0.0021134422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02698393,0.00034683823,0.0007132558,0.0021556735,0.0056093605,0.017257983,0.0022883813,0.006276822,0.0139335105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08576654,0.0005599265,0.0005527573,0.0021240655,0.026571937,0.023681289,0.005159758,0.006871746,0.0010788209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014779715,0.00006681273,0.0033833208,0.00022150492,0.000019990883,0.00048396582,0.020626338,0.00046587878,0.00016029665,0.9494937,0.0048760953,0.02005427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057038615,0.00004005711,0.0026119375,0.0008106168,0.000038472615,0.0004677632,0.04663966,0.0018227004,0.00029737945,0.90986097,0.03730711,0.00004633714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005167692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031828799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02698393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005457468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072854212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1427064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131086407","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00277.x","title":"Dispute Resolution and the Politics of Cultural Generalization","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Politics; Generalization; Dispute resolution; Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014476933826640755,"score_gpt":0.2261922906804805,"score_spread":0.21171535685383974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131086407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13329762,0.004914125,0.116296194,0.13188715,0.0006922457,0.00020627878,0.000037164704,0.00008281632,0.6125865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99053836,0.00041582406,0.0036002225,0.002262689,0.00014971178,0.00006536526,0.000008062865,0.000017542394,0.002942088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.912232,0.06568478,0.002715731,0.0052999,0.009766479,0.0043011005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170001,0.06106019,0.005666751,0.008415466,0.0058746543,0.0019827327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0793691,0.0003933582,0.0009964885,0.0023382395,0.012432563,0.015495892,0.0033997209,0.007148682,0.0038287113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092683986,0.0005253617,0.00082954695,0.0020635014,0.07243482,0.015391941,0.016398009,0.01048693,0.00048168734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009875928,0.000009812371,0.00018317287,0.000017641343,0.0000057999036,0.00006611571,0.007320898,0.00048110553,0.000054347558,0.9857906,0.00050479587,0.0055557536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000202064,0.000013972624,0.00021789368,0.00012176435,0.0000072611974,0.0000571515,0.005338241,0.0009858102,0.00018634893,0.9704413,0.022595016,0.000015013773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004831654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023523094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0793691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010692859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008119081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4197489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131326349","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2004.00036.x","title":"Constraining a Principal’s Choice: Outcome versus Behavior Contingent Agency Contracts in Representative Negotiations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Negotiation; Outcome (game theory); Principal–agent problem; Agency (philosophy); Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Management; Computer science; Corporate governance; Computer security","score_opus":0.12135776752456862,"score_gpt":0.4255336989870671,"score_spread":0.3041759314624985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131326349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6047422,0.0008942587,0.24322367,0.004409935,0.000092074195,0.00032300624,0.000060578514,0.00005659898,0.14619768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924076,0.00010159571,0.006662187,0.00005422837,0.00002162644,0.00006667589,0.000010425549,0.000004022156,0.00067165564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782195,0.016000945,0.0009122795,0.0010765725,0.0025419737,0.0012487423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94820535,0.037541565,0.005853987,0.0038094015,0.0026374601,0.0019522754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019640418,0.00033940436,0.0006465208,0.000895236,0.0019479601,0.0063148947,0.0010310251,0.002209361,0.0046057757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04891286,0.00045856964,0.00047189646,0.0008043166,0.008050214,0.007008108,0.00313822,0.0022858765,0.0003255069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018611937,0.00012289638,0.0046354677,0.000084385894,0.000028746965,0.00025117217,0.0022287855,0.008767046,0.0007116704,0.9687865,0.00025666866,0.013940568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012996672,0.00020165918,0.004674162,0.00011030511,0.00004263154,0.00022516408,0.0030505157,0.039102424,0.001055563,0.94623727,0.0051190476,0.00005140188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009536199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011205807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019640418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019271694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032874579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10386968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147508824","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00126.x","title":"Insight Mediation: A Learning-Centered Mediation Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Transformative learning; Party-directed mediation; Narrative; Transformative mediation; Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Relation (database); Psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Social science; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.023973726344932795,"score_gpt":0.3047423765918821,"score_spread":0.2807686502469493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147508824","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05564076,0.001425031,0.61917365,0.02978187,0.00038086323,0.0010086517,0.0004419667,0.00065020996,0.29149696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93592805,0.00063348253,0.050662536,0.0009727929,0.00011846162,0.0006655909,0.00012317907,0.00006009002,0.01083577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900932,0.007403484,0.00020322693,0.0005979658,0.00095799885,0.00074404204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792644,0.01521297,0.0013938028,0.001235332,0.0019340484,0.00095931394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113550965,0.0008962145,0.0006365372,0.0022448227,0.0027015295,0.006264008,0.0036909448,0.003030718,0.023975996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026429862,0.0004930029,0.0012740836,0.0015555923,0.007032207,0.008041292,0.005111568,0.0038868575,0.0016913774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006764057,0.00014250437,0.0014248645,0.00013041505,0.00005482189,0.00027978356,0.003985061,0.003931878,0.00009996628,0.9735777,0.0017242318,0.014581202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096553835,0.0000927987,0.0005811344,0.00017938598,0.00007255906,0.00025402353,0.0021067436,0.037029516,0.00019453993,0.94884205,0.010517176,0.000033634984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041130707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021581992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023975996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003393963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005358516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080207705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160896102","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2005.00064.x","title":"A Study of the Emergence of Cooperation in Mediation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Party-directed mediation; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02930148637681134,"score_gpt":0.32740141300968695,"score_spread":0.2980999266328756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160896102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412248,0.0007875556,0.008004496,0.0018226455,0.000044992452,0.00009908819,0.000010402942,0.000015257075,0.047990806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990006,0.000103567414,0.0005092534,0.000025984938,0.0000052549544,0.000022501412,0.0000025273225,0.0000018585365,0.00032856202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98538417,0.012892709,0.00012836396,0.00034638643,0.0005917025,0.0006566167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751256,0.020530563,0.0016527683,0.0007253441,0.00083561114,0.0011300951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091656465,0.000211658,0.00033653819,0.00091586774,0.0058539356,0.004814242,0.00081608735,0.0010491302,0.0025927247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020993093,0.00034290864,0.00030754303,0.0009961056,0.011423939,0.003999127,0.0045492025,0.0028191323,0.00015574071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002646454,0.000620127,0.03434479,0.00044028077,0.000061312065,0.0026936396,0.608245,0.0009855536,0.0027798736,0.3110026,0.0011326103,0.037429534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017959665,0.001057988,0.038478367,0.0005987229,0.00006677813,0.0031168174,0.7253816,0.009853134,0.002013626,0.16530415,0.05385931,0.00008990634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010233915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008583594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091656465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00164945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019448327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04847312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162222815","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2001.tb00245.x","title":"The On-line Auction Phenomenon: Growth, Strategies, Promise, and Problems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Auction theory; Generalized second-price auction; Eauction; Computer science; Phenomenon; Reverse auction; Spectrum auction; Microeconomics; Revenue equivalence; Economics; Common value auction","score_opus":0.10496702434378398,"score_gpt":0.36647735251623625,"score_spread":0.2615103281724523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162222815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21762574,0.041684806,0.084004045,0.3233818,0.0007807687,0.00010899708,0.0001803333,0.00018398918,0.33204946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97118676,0.011132686,0.007432533,0.0026708003,0.0011347464,0.00009790538,0.000058212954,0.000049134516,0.0062373183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486214,0.0033231399,0.00011652209,0.0004994884,0.00085657305,0.0003419967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479916,0.041265123,0.002974,0.003608355,0.0027413664,0.0014196159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010512144,0.0003621553,0.00088017376,0.0011396854,0.0019775257,0.011603842,0.002194239,0.0041689295,0.0049286103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029247217,0.00039379796,0.00051912793,0.0024267097,0.013111909,0.016009852,0.002909008,0.005714782,0.0005781777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006880008,0.000107225314,0.0030153312,0.0001330339,0.000016131873,0.00014740867,0.0012870155,0.0021675092,0.00017328285,0.9327278,0.007066324,0.053090144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028479684,0.000057382324,0.0022209084,0.00018766035,0.000011510433,0.00025856338,0.003357371,0.0093144355,0.0002633409,0.94581497,0.038455874,0.000029539973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014882613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011284552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011603842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029122434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055594206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169533127","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00305.x","title":"How We Feel about the Deal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ASTER","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07840073462613543,"score_gpt":0.2905375490812439,"score_spread":0.21213681445510846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169533127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33680514,0.009425439,0.050255533,0.14145252,0.0033434553,0.000094017145,0.00032428076,0.00034950016,0.45795015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97862726,0.0012988297,0.0018390402,0.0049336837,0.00030534522,0.000035369034,0.00009514178,0.00013661107,0.012728811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915446,0.004778731,0.00025439393,0.0009358256,0.0018190342,0.00066745357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861936,0.0054246304,0.0027422411,0.0015125916,0.002211616,0.0019153078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064877714,0.000424377,0.00032479424,0.0009538997,0.004227818,0.013737513,0.0009794557,0.0034561749,0.011276755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033938102,0.00040109467,0.00046206854,0.0005703557,0.015403386,0.01046005,0.0042507164,0.00437841,0.0027437652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048628653,0.000098619814,0.02417318,0.00034595345,0.00031914967,0.0013802514,0.48659715,0.0010563327,0.006068981,0.35355097,0.0556189,0.070304215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006934253,0.00016723867,0.017771812,0.00062878116,0.0001389271,0.0012536,0.2717616,0.001995643,0.0021575205,0.27983502,0.4239973,0.00022322424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020575742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001060398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013737513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014102363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011681698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037724495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573467095","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12172","title":"Sport Mediation: Mediating High-Performance Sports Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Law; Public law","score_opus":0.01635534872521845,"score_gpt":0.23020068599465238,"score_spread":0.21384533726943392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573467095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40967974,0.004951059,0.033505525,0.026705978,0.0006750336,0.0013942168,0.00015941166,0.00016070975,0.5227683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98759115,0.00059704715,0.0029344773,0.0008310669,0.00005154676,0.0001143713,0.000023235805,0.000014509594,0.007842561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9589371,0.02922744,0.00082799146,0.0013712702,0.0046333014,0.005002985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96427023,0.02456333,0.0032876604,0.00167936,0.0036177253,0.0025816713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02788126,0.00061524904,0.0005463585,0.0028273384,0.028100783,0.014660864,0.004117836,0.005253334,0.012396195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038034942,0.00034437826,0.00065946433,0.0029572784,0.016673584,0.0052736565,0.010951198,0.0036139127,0.00091414544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015381938,0.0005331066,0.027211873,0.0010216678,0.0001249825,0.016972532,0.30473617,0.0025882397,0.0016933297,0.541489,0.027857572,0.0756177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001612751,0.00022882507,0.015950985,0.0019175293,0.00017938681,0.0041027623,0.53674537,0.006468274,0.0036455682,0.08196776,0.34848946,0.00014278386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12743157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20763417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12743157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017283054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0309057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2533797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606272886","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12177","title":"Precedents in Negotiated Decisions: Korea–Australia Free Trade Agreement Negotiations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Political science; International trade; Philosophy of law; Agreement; International economics; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Free trade; Comparative law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11972317244025212,"score_gpt":0.3946480700785601,"score_spread":0.274924897638308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606272886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8928034,0.00041630203,0.01789673,0.002420413,0.00005427254,0.00018137661,0.00003306798,0.000018111397,0.08617629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969537,0.000058731584,0.0019277107,0.000035677276,0.0000017551042,0.000017687287,0.0000074308455,0.000002129515,0.0009951264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355465,0.0046815206,0.00029007645,0.00034777384,0.000629826,0.000496121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847425,0.009879134,0.0023828174,0.00058581174,0.0013279576,0.0010818462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008077312,0.00018566569,0.00020159571,0.0011674962,0.005514732,0.0055962475,0.000647797,0.0009778668,0.0045957323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018371481,0.00033668292,0.00029037366,0.0015939425,0.005984027,0.005144148,0.003977484,0.0020079557,0.00025677792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047469707,0.0003746065,0.057676993,0.00046549586,0.000066800065,0.002469692,0.21472992,0.009556043,0.0028443513,0.61584973,0.0018298228,0.09366181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001316967,0.00042487515,0.12952435,0.0011662858,0.00015172834,0.00086587074,0.4448923,0.046367545,0.004766951,0.2527256,0.11869528,0.0002875289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019603053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038295824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019603053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076600183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006391212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055577576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036362989","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12329","title":"Triangulation of Salient Studies to Date on Trust-Building in Mediation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Salient; Triangulation; Test (biology); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Psychology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.11662807399532102,"score_gpt":0.40668238538020973,"score_spread":0.2900543113848887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036362989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73069453,0.08525799,0.066821195,0.008350835,0.0012712298,0.003112365,0.0022238828,0.000090947055,0.10217705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794531,0.0071788677,0.01056956,0.0004517875,0.00007105199,0.000980467,0.00045014548,0.000035188114,0.0008098408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8228357,0.14838263,0.009943823,0.005756759,0.010258893,0.0028222408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62460643,0.2679878,0.024089713,0.03940874,0.04182922,0.002078142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.100066565,0.0007825785,0.0016258925,0.01881012,0.0076851454,0.009079871,0.0034828251,0.0019387503,0.0065250057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2742228,0.0009918143,0.0012133856,0.018202461,0.010522387,0.007783961,0.014921279,0.0027360753,0.00045620478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076982076,0.00027510835,0.07754576,0.016044965,0.0013893342,0.0015610942,0.6147937,0.0006557661,0.0023636403,0.08906904,0.0028796473,0.19265202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092828166,0.00046412714,0.105401866,0.045240603,0.0012663367,0.0012964845,0.7172002,0.0009831383,0.0052385433,0.04195327,0.08069882,0.00016382684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008378171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013591544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100066565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007851364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093160225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5292089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122211520","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00771.x","title":"The Illusion of Transparency in Negotiations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Illusion; Social psychology; Psychology; Curse; Feeling; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019252408496771074,"score_gpt":0.30511052030880437,"score_spread":0.2858581118120333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122211520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82386434,0.00151399,0.06119514,0.011321772,0.00017213203,0.00008395007,0.000032091266,0.000096109536,0.10172056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884963,0.000072188,0.0007629962,0.00010881419,0.000012821805,0.0000069519347,0.0000024038488,0.0000064824862,0.00017764521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538727,0.034475975,0.0013998431,0.0009798988,0.007795337,0.0014762493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8346185,0.11805398,0.026494797,0.011702738,0.006369103,0.0027607968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018766966,0.00037623776,0.00042126657,0.0015348843,0.003237003,0.008713526,0.00077638106,0.0021787873,0.0027829567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10709761,0.0006647472,0.00045038768,0.00088094355,0.021503711,0.010951616,0.009253397,0.0063048988,0.00024167664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013718298,0.00023553592,0.039194725,0.0007811316,0.00017034086,0.0013689487,0.21677762,0.005104372,0.015090819,0.6546111,0.0018261102,0.06346743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021633002,0.00046639974,0.023491168,0.0011157448,0.00016739644,0.0030577169,0.061900463,0.023099555,0.010995699,0.84212786,0.03309406,0.0002676021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008257208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003289353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018766966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022563708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001871146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099250436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123243168","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00101.x","title":"Confectionery and Conflict Resolution? What <i>Chocolat</i> Reveals about Mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Metaphor; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Directive; Mediator; Privilege (computing); Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Pleasure; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; Art; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Literature","score_opus":0.014643647979983184,"score_gpt":0.28063367280205753,"score_spread":0.26599002482207434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123243168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3571432,0.05717043,0.0063925004,0.2753706,0.0018004215,0.00004997631,0.00011467764,0.000065819164,0.30189246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98313093,0.0059349774,0.00049083785,0.0040950035,0.00036660142,0.000019282268,0.000018582114,0.000028213944,0.005915485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.0016495894,0.000036881996,0.00015557665,0.00016090756,0.0002360064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964585,0.0024885552,0.00044957025,0.00022136401,0.00023210168,0.0001498934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023565118,0.00030610795,0.00046768118,0.0009749579,0.0053012585,0.009878037,0.00079624495,0.0029245315,0.0055279434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006808757,0.0002547316,0.00029557702,0.0012276506,0.019133398,0.009138901,0.002811197,0.0044711893,0.000437874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024159132,0.000060662267,0.003412302,0.0005695816,0.0000645656,0.0017941773,0.51854897,0.00020041807,0.0014540207,0.42582682,0.01782519,0.030001707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050831124,0.000090427224,0.012038445,0.0010607092,0.00007428898,0.0017987032,0.40058175,0.00071925967,0.001947372,0.17123263,0.4102941,0.000111531175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009370189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010625432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009878037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003394287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012066201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024627447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211118972","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12376","title":"Toward a Normative Turn in Track Two Diplomacy? A Review of the Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Normative; Negotiation; Epistemology; Sociology; Conflict resolution; Mediation; Political science; Diplomacy; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.061833165303075734,"score_gpt":0.4268249410700567,"score_spread":0.36499177576698094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211118972","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005670107,0.9686637,0.0007539974,0.013624022,0.00082271086,0.000015543643,0.000023786704,0.000009304158,0.010416847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093288355,0.9001236,0.000617585,0.004166187,0.00087318907,0.000046877874,0.000063829764,0.000017851304,0.0008025452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959558,0.0020260666,0.00039504684,0.0005448611,0.00077994174,0.0002983441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97674507,0.018922668,0.0017337292,0.0002660477,0.0018250233,0.0005074634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069251964,0.0006246146,0.0011663563,0.008197872,0.0024500065,0.009403205,0.0020963596,0.0040284907,0.0034809422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017719682,0.0004893232,0.0006007963,0.013604304,0.010500149,0.009867661,0.0027665866,0.0049593663,0.0007100211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012577791,0.0002649564,0.0040229764,0.03542307,0.00012542983,0.0010734547,0.03198288,0.0005012941,0.00028736042,0.46465865,0.023436153,0.43809792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024712985,0.00010639953,0.010796857,0.14808585,0.00019499207,0.0019718024,0.05563888,0.0006219588,0.00041812283,0.09756337,0.68444294,0.0001342612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066960407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070935027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009403205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050462787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012578095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036624372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211911331","doi":"10.1111/nejo.12377","title":"Teaching Entrepreneurial Negotiation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Entrepreneurship; Class (philosophy); Public relations; Sociology; Entrepreneurship education; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.012659748508299698,"score_gpt":0.2225846832459292,"score_spread":0.2099249347376295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211911331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083758704,0.0040479344,0.09170549,0.023829473,0.0031018688,0.0005597614,0.00008608134,0.00066989113,0.79224074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7119123,0.007223405,0.07161863,0.0052993186,0.0007629254,0.0005261061,0.00013798053,0.0002277076,0.20229168],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890935,0.00040866513,0.000051848034,0.000097295575,0.00030871088,0.00022419989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704796,0.0011726484,0.0002136733,0.00016585283,0.0002685132,0.001131378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001798595,0.00041748307,0.00027534526,0.00059993885,0.0024463686,0.0034588135,0.000836958,0.0010421114,0.026602073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005083899,0.00024389631,0.00034505627,0.00038349518,0.001480169,0.002593767,0.0032900476,0.0031761683,0.0051450753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073268806,0.0019592152,0.004471121,0.0006624403,0.000011735077,0.0013658964,0.026967859,0.0018160657,0.0053523793,0.32271248,0.14497717,0.48963037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041015788,0.00019664328,0.0020686754,0.0011794227,0.0000072362927,0.0013894637,0.014266171,0.0023374974,0.0044682836,0.14115846,0.8328626,0.000024472454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029655872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008453143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026602073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014543661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028743835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088992774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106311730","doi":"10.1162/ngtn.a.41","title":"Domestic Veto Players and Negotiation Dynamics: Canadian Internal Politics and International Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Negotiation; Power (physics); Politics; Subject (documents); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.009286008594494122,"score_gpt":0.30315400386720565,"score_spread":0.2938679952727115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106311730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39574242,0.0010863887,0.0036223582,0.0049541756,0.00006033159,0.00009018206,0.00017050162,0.000048815953,0.5942248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935821,0.00018833575,0.00026045815,0.000100863384,0.0000045795127,0.0000084605845,0.000031456388,0.000011017911,0.0058126883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99369335,0.0011338223,0.00011480712,0.0004650254,0.0019780663,0.002614875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248284,0.0027506198,0.0009129016,0.00034916733,0.0017589156,0.0017454573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044910936,0.00024761527,0.00045036303,0.003555285,0.014545432,0.015410749,0.0011977084,0.001358088,0.012378141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012773936,0.00031396706,0.00030172872,0.00488265,0.011623787,0.0021757816,0.004392457,0.0021353003,0.00038437505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109676446,0.000074232026,0.051430922,0.00014028525,0.00004333365,0.00070133765,0.11711035,0.0027870694,0.00082648767,0.76953465,0.008791944,0.048449792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054695727,0.000051513765,0.16785778,0.0006794126,0.00008829282,0.00031083357,0.3659764,0.010639898,0.0011361599,0.094585925,0.3584322,0.00018683964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8957273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93233544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10427272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082607605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060531043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59936297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116082608","doi":"10.1162/ngtn.a.54","title":"A Tale of Two Cities: Amazon HQ2 Negotiations in New York and Virginia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Amazon rainforest; Politics; Surprise; Stakeholder","score_opus":0.020342544274026767,"score_gpt":0.3169139940140778,"score_spread":0.29657144974005106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116082608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82055503,0.0006645975,0.0010287269,0.014194069,0.00027284975,0.00014630344,0.000107268315,0.000026894479,0.16300435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98175794,0.00019880566,0.00038330446,0.0010477281,0.000027170467,0.00006378362,0.000044619923,0.00002330963,0.016453387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687743,0.0014170138,0.00005554138,0.00025948847,0.0003842126,0.0010063342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756014,0.0011271574,0.00017818161,0.00010221391,0.0002915204,0.0007408381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016396412,0.00024816595,0.00028024035,0.0007364454,0.023087485,0.0103402715,0.0014784399,0.0026952098,0.008849199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046607675,0.00035723756,0.00024055479,0.001607547,0.0059848875,0.0030778942,0.004774862,0.0039995806,0.00047586838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037820052,0.0004711506,0.026578724,0.00018822351,0.00007655286,0.025057454,0.488629,0.0020152312,0.002894023,0.33878213,0.0810649,0.033864394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058957838,0.00006117264,0.013550025,0.00015567534,0.000017389053,0.0006170599,0.6858812,0.0016849663,0.00075644907,0.0076871505,0.2894463,0.000083721454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34128574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62416697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34128574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019953003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007851657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67859846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}