{"meta":{"query_hash":"bbdffd7c95e3","filters":{"venue":"New Criminal Law Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bbdffd7c95e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=New+Criminal+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1968438279","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.135","title":"Offenses of Sex or Violence? Consent, Fraud, and HIV Transmission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminology; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Sexual assault; Jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.055899797069794234,"score_gpt":0.35183346936409543,"score_spread":0.2959336722943012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968438279","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34490222,0.41778356,0.032846246,0.013604278,0.00089249585,0.0023651237,0.000030978426,0.0003665651,0.18720852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5234051,0.4678679,0.001926136,0.0032063995,0.00032739833,0.0000139243,0.000006067358,0.0000165057,0.0032305734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876505,0.00025000563,0.00030816928,0.0002138837,0.00027710834,0.00018580581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990906,0.00034045588,0.00011766252,0.00017167037,0.00008965105,0.00018992939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199328,0.000115820156,0.0003904979,0.00003698231,0.00027579765,0.000026885577,0.00014639064,0.000055902958,0.0008489127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022350454,0.00008580161,0.0001290018,0.00023912631,0.00026775364,0.000091951464,0.000018348328,0.00008732485,0.000027161983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029409299,0.000048252077,0.00006673372,0.0028159043,0.00001810931,0.000003707364,0.0029200143,5.57459e-7,0.00007930398,0.02730018,0.002010189,0.9647076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016687548,0.00014709732,0.00003859547,0.0066116047,0.001815506,0.000017088183,0.013936248,0.000031745065,0.00020804598,0.00048436047,0.9763557,0.00018717253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135471895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005611174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97434545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015808551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016499202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99302167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978457321","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.239","title":"The Place of Translation in Jerusalem's Criminal Trial Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Obligation; Sociology","score_opus":0.10253327672857689,"score_gpt":0.37768693127656816,"score_spread":0.2751536545479913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978457321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02736606,0.68360555,0.0003588929,0.0065072635,0.0010012896,0.0019983186,0.000005001503,0.00004184674,0.27911577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85061806,0.14206801,0.0008196212,0.0017103784,0.0014176932,0.00003669007,0.0000057471407,0.00002446472,0.0032993413],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983449,0.00020956877,0.0005021965,0.0001556626,0.0004496845,0.00033799492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896955,0.0005551915,0.00015534477,0.00014467757,0.00007798448,0.000097239346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951222,0.000108498665,0.0003094343,0.00002398248,0.0002647227,0.00002325554,0.00023838035,0.0000554724,0.00002462922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002754188,0.000078430596,0.00012591216,0.00020713675,0.00028494443,0.000118323725,0.00001771624,0.00013232577,0.00002352671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00122053,0.000058148245,0.0001246327,0.00063725776,0.000013034773,0.0000070685633,0.003115944,1.8336705e-7,0.000006588592,0.4323343,0.0008368019,0.5616455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036725537,0.00019430429,0.00038035616,0.0015064741,0.0002449045,0.0000025364714,0.003595008,7.166104e-7,0.00003497942,0.0014081068,0.98881084,0.00014924123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036384037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048699733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004837209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016145737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96865904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025449700","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.3.364","title":"The Third-Party Doctrine and the Third Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Analogy; Appeal; Narrative; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.04260818328409051,"score_gpt":0.31472707615607504,"score_spread":0.27211889287198454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025449700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077931414,0.40277198,0.000002262559,0.1652899,0.00024423897,0.001010117,0.0000011824643,0.0000574866,0.42984352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029302629,0.87402374,0.0002545237,0.04073603,0.0012539605,0.0001578049,0.0000028128193,0.000014205747,0.054254305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985264,0.00040160966,0.00018692731,0.0001829912,0.0003923181,0.00030977032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990711,0.0003238521,0.00010173374,0.00026026915,0.00010271409,0.00014032715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014145544,0.00012827419,0.000248474,7.666826e-7,0.0019116317,0.00026552624,0.00043902113,0.00008132477,0.00047682103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021397971,0.000054371252,0.00019047307,0.00014322448,0.0011324363,0.00021708697,0.000051230945,0.00027353823,0.00028206455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003716991,0.0000048251372,0.0000045011143,0.00014052102,0.0000118646785,4.1058564e-7,0.0053176745,1.5482652e-8,0.0000019114746,0.7273167,0.25318694,0.014010932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020209899,0.000014752269,0.000059792703,0.00031906067,0.00015545302,0.000004837855,0.004071096,0.0000011563757,0.0000037688612,0.008462579,0.98661345,0.00009195771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007943805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019319406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7334265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027746652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078550445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17075454377666324,"score_gpt":0.41894143163557107,"score_spread":0.24818688785890783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046543401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680643,0.46032426,0.000068812566,0.054419436,0.0046640374,0.0046673976,0.00012026461,0.00028143456,0.20739007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126218,0.0802368,0.00048369486,0.003385455,0.00056251267,0.000055634857,0.000012212448,0.000038287384,0.002603632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714226,0.00035079897,0.00060518907,0.00037623383,0.00092517014,0.00060035364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979924,0.0004997476,0.000457604,0.0004750236,0.00022324135,0.00035198493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024673268,0.0002487298,0.0004602438,0.000027254235,0.0012612635,0.00021027424,0.00095294765,0.000101635786,0.0006760907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011388892,0.00018153923,0.00026203037,0.00023720873,0.0006756715,0.00069983257,0.00012982874,0.00046802434,0.00028522994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009577838,0.0003470734,0.0011927574,0.009380716,0.000105621955,0.0000579308,0.023944236,4.4067124e-7,0.0021542136,0.47023067,0.07488605,0.4176045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016602778,0.00004936147,0.00018327445,0.0033754439,0.00021629907,0.000003232152,0.0016522717,0.0000033635108,0.00033160593,0.00033114522,0.9934598,0.00022814854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035565766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006357519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007227798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97007465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057903113","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.190","title":"Citizenship and Penal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Normative; Nothing; Proxy (statistics); Law; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04619434642369532,"score_gpt":0.35069597581474354,"score_spread":0.30450162939104825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057903113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06911995,0.047778234,0.00015869805,0.008961085,0.0009959938,0.00049978524,0.0000075678886,0.00016567833,0.872313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92749244,0.046827607,0.0017216943,0.016570473,0.0017091921,0.000028638466,0.0000115737175,0.000025001396,0.0056133717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887145,0.00010676525,0.0002177398,0.00024051506,0.000299583,0.00026397727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918413,0.00012942334,0.000071423754,0.00021756683,0.000106247346,0.0002912017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005980618,0.000119317425,0.000264815,0.000025780964,0.0006789042,0.00012251522,0.00019216994,0.000071627685,0.0017875036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017510493,0.000106307154,0.00013515053,0.00021755556,0.00037137474,0.00012738627,0.000037687154,0.00027877395,0.00017442014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041927306,0.000014342044,0.000019956044,0.0004171861,0.0000135461305,0.000009703169,0.00082861824,3.2211062e-8,0.00009606056,0.8983664,0.0064738067,0.093756154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008299795,0.00003597436,0.000039797655,0.00046052798,0.0014194774,0.00003762873,0.0036645897,0.000001969208,0.000026120622,0.0048935344,0.98914117,0.00019623656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030377384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085289806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017279282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010609219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093639882","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.103","title":"Capacity to Consent to Sexual Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Unconscious mind; Law; Morality; Sexual attraction; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.093634822695311,"score_gpt":0.3606355353221883,"score_spread":0.2670007126268773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093639882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04533953,0.034415837,0.0013068564,0.124645464,0.0016435994,0.0029770448,0.00005307949,0.00040373093,0.78921485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33007884,0.0692758,0.03344001,0.5048858,0.008239809,0.0002540056,0.000018650186,0.000090457885,0.053716652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834937,0.00040596188,0.00021182447,0.00027856656,0.00041685803,0.00033740987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887353,0.00013208979,0.00006722931,0.00025956685,0.00010442878,0.0005631612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011557078,0.00012996233,0.00029237758,0.000002207154,0.0005633663,0.000060112725,0.0003285868,0.00008524232,0.0006254252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077993446,0.00010504255,0.000114789575,0.00022847341,0.00014764497,0.00007646761,0.00005321102,0.00017237972,0.001330732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038505495,0.000023627228,0.00003852989,0.00044094268,0.0000100020325,8.6854254e-7,0.0096840765,0.0000012393749,0.000024986788,0.6150255,0.34278265,0.031963684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000579283,0.000078359844,0.00007801769,0.0005409363,0.00012718236,0.0000016355975,0.0005796116,2.0871333e-7,0.000022899465,0.0016307288,0.9967205,0.0001619888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014142436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015656946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007541821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010173876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14573273859255423,"score_gpt":0.4411455447944021,"score_spread":0.29541280620184784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115872543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036705073,0.0308864,0.00009564278,0.2861713,0.0015296118,0.0021633478,0.000036391844,0.00008275923,0.6423295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88792276,0.029326325,0.007220678,0.024264986,0.00095998944,0.00017003214,0.00007597158,0.000025595777,0.050033648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986993,0.00022993282,0.00047105522,0.00013732148,0.00032031187,0.00014205558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985426,0.00032310735,0.00031055274,0.00021011927,0.00049387274,0.00011974107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004514551,0.00008702456,0.00022551593,0.00003416004,0.0002385618,0.000037616705,0.00017054615,0.000045159533,0.011004902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008770202,0.000072299976,0.000056317407,0.00032056886,0.00045360852,0.0005877232,0.000021059015,0.00014182617,0.00039685916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048005704,0.00013636926,0.000030453462,0.0007782758,0.0000199291,4.318552e-7,0.002411358,2.277446e-7,0.0000918445,0.9325854,0.055713933,0.008226936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007494016,0.00008595467,0.0001550957,0.0007177659,0.00017833471,0.000009489328,0.0033621434,3.753907e-7,0.00008052486,0.002207445,0.99304175,0.000086176195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26712912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004683288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014024153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98989916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04345892375559509,"score_gpt":0.3566706915972829,"score_spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181301847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030041175,0.058917828,0.0005655988,0.2218469,0.0007746096,0.00090940186,0.0000022606623,0.00014109776,0.7165419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50347847,0.14876594,0.0049720416,0.22398002,0.0073889084,0.00033368418,0.0000121446965,0.00010923838,0.11095955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980492,0.00035687207,0.00030183097,0.0002798855,0.00054034987,0.00047183593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.0004900769,0.000080920625,0.00043083998,0.00011308409,0.0004195477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017209514,0.00014739491,0.0002773145,0.000012668303,0.0012583521,0.00016353218,0.0007416855,0.00005022958,0.00075882627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083532755,0.00009254239,0.00015813792,0.00023967751,0.00021515043,0.00017775489,0.00007772028,0.0001421555,0.0018873261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053028207,0.000006942635,0.000002117027,0.0002062725,0.000002768058,0.0000024217445,0.00037581005,1.14632456e-7,0.0000057241214,0.7403997,0.19365571,0.06533713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038493636,0.00006262611,0.000029723342,0.0013835107,0.00010884716,0.000004506594,0.000071450384,7.8195677e-7,0.000037742364,0.004880356,0.99323523,0.00014674729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006109453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01589042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062019244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014082689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306176763","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2016.19.1.42","title":"Engineering Comprehensible Youth Interrogation Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Waiver; Interrogation; Comprehension; Psychology; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06378796767360388,"score_gpt":0.3350382557161015,"score_spread":0.2712502880424976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306176763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051072013,0.042046245,0.050833713,0.0076060165,0.017322116,0.0015849974,0.00004750527,0.0013602037,0.8281272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675121,0.0013116929,0.0011558344,0.008377252,0.00074964686,0.0000469896,0.000020745965,0.000047200676,0.020778587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989154,0.000078142104,0.00033925223,0.00031090327,0.00012009869,0.00023625266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925584,0.000047748097,0.00009682381,0.0004000153,0.00005291946,0.00014664116],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015281052,0.0001559894,0.00027282126,0.000059217124,0.000046105182,0.000010485457,0.00014677006,0.00008417573,0.011552526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000114979275,0.00010389836,0.00012805234,0.00012378977,0.000062044724,0.00009207725,0.000022187054,0.00010791643,0.007282714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084170606,0.00010013073,0.000011107214,0.00037360372,0.0000931771,0.00002426829,0.0009312475,3.6994584e-7,0.0008215567,0.6809209,0.091974325,0.22466515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006371918,0.00011767018,0.0003456183,0.0014058072,0.00012394064,0.00015027114,0.000051927622,0.0000012102577,0.0001300067,0.00051069976,0.99634796,0.00017771505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017096699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050387982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046399156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012471348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09892597009970915,"score_gpt":0.39100292239636747,"score_spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738361053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036999271,0.16199893,0.00013613112,0.4228654,0.0009976276,0.0028883044,0.0000074605514,0.000066772394,0.40733945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79225147,0.11943159,0.0009087757,0.04951175,0.0036985928,0.00027563542,0.000004789039,0.000044037293,0.03387335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00014462417,0.00024639087,0.00020929248,0.00030857584,0.00030692897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985692,0.00041710367,0.00022665608,0.0005749071,0.000088268185,0.0001238585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027726134,0.00012807692,0.00030415304,0.000009758382,0.003778182,0.00042519803,0.00078190863,0.000032166696,0.000063828236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051766424,0.00006343255,0.00016099685,0.000049534552,0.0012759236,0.00038512194,0.00012569386,0.00015287017,0.000025044828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794306,0.00000456442,0.000017965896,0.0006308769,0.00001089213,0.0000018865486,0.0008598914,2.7091128e-8,0.0000021106312,0.9516627,0.012593792,0.03416735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002792809,0.000017882763,0.00012993264,0.0016287657,0.00037671995,0.000007648018,0.0019696609,0.0000049648465,0.0000073147266,0.007498538,0.9879759,0.00010341021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04289961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075453736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007875207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012572705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385499","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.640","title":"The Prison as Reserve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Scholarship; Indigenous; Governmentality; Criminology; Sociology; Centrality; Punishment (psychology); Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06360111537930566,"score_gpt":0.3974796558095016,"score_spread":0.33387854043019594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896385499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014627648,0.16624951,0.00025382356,0.027307896,0.0012001443,0.0006524005,0.0000014931908,0.00014616438,0.7895609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37705347,0.52055264,0.0008433743,0.023913832,0.007145015,0.00009884276,0.000008203314,0.000048062448,0.07033656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985312,0.00025721465,0.00025097406,0.00020700818,0.00043735004,0.00031622933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988867,0.0002034638,0.00010133163,0.00036955468,0.00026386572,0.0001750728],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010538255,0.00009944233,0.00018892645,0.000018422668,0.0019132744,0.00015003035,0.0004492884,0.000046152076,0.0012731175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061399105,0.000066902285,0.00018126167,0.00046110034,0.0004514184,0.00014445811,0.00005330638,0.00013113942,0.0016324085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001524024,0.000021659325,0.000011162195,0.00019172924,0.000021847516,0.000004531918,0.0027629882,4.7124036e-8,0.000005288948,0.47626662,0.06096262,0.45973626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003132083,0.00009205762,0.0000111077825,0.0005150536,0.0006951413,0.000005003123,0.01189866,0.0000022707104,0.000026349331,0.0010950537,0.9855357,0.00009227923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09883227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16399404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92457306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000651692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025228152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897199180","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.545","title":"Seropolitics and the Criminal Accusation of HIV Non-Disclosure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Biopower; Criminal law; Public health; Political science; Governmentality; False accusation; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03270405688430883,"score_gpt":0.3158556688594977,"score_spread":0.28315161197518884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897199180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21187602,0.17268507,0.000056515393,0.08214231,0.0012264728,0.0027983114,0.00005637789,0.000043126078,0.5291158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95133525,0.038901344,0.00027923356,0.007769505,0.00052780006,0.0000111343625,0.0000051797715,0.000007463409,0.0011630973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988665,0.0001985472,0.00025417274,0.00013062642,0.0003388479,0.0002113079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994249,0.00009932069,0.000111344794,0.0001462411,0.00012598519,0.00009222136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006146198,0.00008956278,0.00025624558,0.0000017709259,0.0002709603,0.00002041587,0.0002175661,0.00005291321,0.00023092575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221853,0.000056943438,0.000058171274,0.00015103898,0.00081192906,0.00010190877,0.00003368476,0.00012776056,0.000006190818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014932283,0.000010690557,0.00030709273,0.0011088409,0.000009835305,0.0000020072382,0.013232811,1.665517e-7,0.000004285485,0.9518794,0.029660054,0.0037699186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005921344,0.00003514642,0.0017239167,0.001922012,0.0003677507,0.0000053210756,0.015785862,0.0000076254896,0.000080287675,0.0060781343,0.9732252,0.00017661334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8811648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95554644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94580126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014070397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010433403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29915863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022522540","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Popularity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.16196151140294437,"score_gpt":0.4086180467847368,"score_spread":0.2466565353817924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022522540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007288032,0.18735585,0.000030069128,0.015578649,0.00050997024,0.00028007608,0.0000022307756,0.00007795008,0.79609233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03151385,0.5842017,0.015012325,0.17216238,0.010126424,0.00011251112,0.00004779032,0.00006975419,0.18675324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.00025103235,0.00015449342,0.00015838188,0.0004366559,0.00021631365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.00004783725,0.0000726678,0.0001571625,0.00020239408,0.0003415218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077264215,0.000091408205,0.00019692958,0.0000010108054,0.00035848081,0.000046067875,0.00025604686,0.00008205935,0.0003658289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039640607,0.0000717427,0.00009727099,0.00019833885,0.00024393921,0.00023721515,0.000028463966,0.00015156317,0.0005679764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020896507,0.000009235778,8.890372e-7,0.00024642688,0.0000036544077,0.0000034149023,0.0068797213,1.2379367e-7,8.079928e-7,0.60381764,0.38667184,0.0023641651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000874365,0.000029757983,0.0000022790582,0.0006268828,0.0002962308,0.0000025022005,0.004700128,1.3811704e-7,0.000005055615,0.00572187,0.98842406,0.00010368217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012574828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010121327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003980149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7300377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06051355066028592,"score_gpt":0.2621809337231436,"score_spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123639769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009439287,0.7188013,0.000060985465,0.002223822,0.00025477898,0.00032423396,0.00003358993,0.000025046702,0.26883695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93471736,0.05102387,0.0003711398,0.012934324,0.0002992347,0.000041252468,0.000009399689,0.000014482712,0.00058892416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987814,0.000014543579,0.00049780903,0.00029369097,0.000052484706,0.0003600608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995037,0.000028302915,0.0001393239,0.00015444413,0.000024513127,0.00014972163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003571012,0.00019070684,0.00054817816,0.00003371371,0.00012764659,0.000037793998,0.00013693541,0.00005793791,0.00020264364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004838739,0.00017682336,0.00009108104,0.0001425309,0.00018164916,0.00044376004,0.00008707757,0.00016339104,0.0004476001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093258805,0.00006475638,0.0028980402,0.0020390102,0.000012884788,0.0000046581963,0.00017421806,1.3325707e-7,0.0000012512556,0.991313,0.0017554031,0.0017273171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028645576,0.000044075015,0.004808455,0.0010049628,0.00006601075,0.00007437033,0.00004172811,0.0000022588058,0.000012814432,0.010266704,0.98311037,0.0002818024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019254169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042801708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98135495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052754553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002670711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72106475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123699039","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.278","title":"The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03353621523045861,"score_gpt":0.3526770687852039,"score_spread":0.31914085355474525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123699039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5936706,0.31240633,0.0076365583,0.0059143235,0.0028195367,0.0017022884,0.000003224494,0.00017278868,0.075674355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8948932,0.10131179,0.0002955737,0.002204802,0.000121242876,0.00001631578,0.0000015248011,0.000010490513,0.0011450605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793184,0.00036379453,0.00051532633,0.00026487294,0.00041584094,0.00050831976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862283,0.00076215813,0.00013257565,0.00025397202,0.000086359876,0.00014209788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004975712,0.00013751148,0.00030141982,0.00006764655,0.00058326346,0.000052442047,0.00041686898,0.000054678676,0.0002575768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011230374,0.00010087375,0.000145672,0.0009195048,0.00019438958,0.00019232005,0.00006415149,0.00025967538,0.0000766479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711311,0.000057290406,0.031238228,0.00035300566,0.00001821562,0.00012913399,0.007976193,0.000010381809,0.000012684653,0.5042877,0.00039347177,0.45548654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000518736,0.00009018421,0.046291977,0.009257133,0.0014754437,0.000040001447,0.40303996,0.00010076299,0.00007872188,0.005079831,0.53299785,0.0010294189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1434601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49515143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53260434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021373319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018052997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86224365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123779146","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.2.203","title":"The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Legal liability; Civil law (Civil law); Delict; Political science; Strict liability; Comparative law; Mens rea; Legal history; German; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Geography","score_opus":0.18514222997101856,"score_gpt":0.37005431349581563,"score_spread":0.18491208352479707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123779146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08265639,0.34566426,0.000046388894,0.0076014944,0.00057464465,0.0019727289,0.000010480457,0.00007381479,0.5613998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92371017,0.053732324,0.0005913246,0.0058708484,0.0005246124,0.00010083052,0.0000061440455,0.000022245526,0.015441501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775696,0.00089920114,0.00043692807,0.00023854472,0.0003394049,0.00032893918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979942,0.00078325934,0.00036081093,0.00033938614,0.00025555366,0.00026682968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016835596,0.00017230744,0.00044896884,0.000016174992,0.00045323904,0.000043039967,0.00036030868,0.00006228107,0.0011132404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002633583,0.000116082556,0.00013345045,0.0000964426,0.00210584,0.00022943006,0.00006584507,0.00018504675,0.00013018498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020988864,0.000026874783,0.000026625,0.0007734574,0.00001099843,7.986663e-7,0.005247488,2.6931612e-8,0.000022409986,0.9435305,0.024756065,0.025583759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000859215,0.00010169313,0.000947622,0.00048237562,0.00030177386,0.0000045909546,0.0017826062,9.557154e-7,0.000035001845,0.034414746,0.96169615,0.00014659174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024454456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002552534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013476703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042944116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188325","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.665","title":"The Age of Innocence: A Cautious Defense of Raising the Age of Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Innocence; Criminalization; Law; Informed consent; Girl; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06048393632447276,"score_gpt":0.3578498590280782,"score_spread":0.29736592270360546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125188325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484495,0.04330435,0.000064964246,0.0067867734,0.00081829476,0.0011749939,0.000042585238,0.000022349028,0.09933614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99218446,0.006469654,0.0000671556,0.0009573462,0.00007027207,0.000008597349,0.000005306095,0.0000064591827,0.00023075451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819297,0.00033306712,0.00056011276,0.00015981386,0.0004331942,0.0003208477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843806,0.0005629355,0.0002513978,0.00036608786,0.0002616249,0.00011987334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019504257,0.000113106,0.00039252738,0.000054378223,0.00043214182,0.000034779496,0.0004102525,0.000084586325,0.000095225776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007841901,0.0000736094,0.00014798656,0.0006338906,0.0011134354,0.00006480759,0.00003379777,0.00031741703,0.0000047599715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028466773,0.00010677486,0.0007090812,0.0018330012,0.00007254296,0.00007967179,0.021483447,0.000008570131,0.0015807812,0.8764265,0.0016989993,0.09597211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019795592,0.000116085794,0.00080782303,0.0016596414,0.0017335922,0.000026729196,0.045377754,0.000009758516,0.00019464594,0.0009872569,0.9486574,0.00023139466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97133875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94695836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066362154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011257723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4102499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}