{"meta":{"query_hash":"bbdffd7c95e3","filters":{"venue":"New Criminal Law Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bbdffd7c95e3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=New+Criminal+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1968438279","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.135","title":"Offenses of Sex or Violence? Consent, Fraud, and HIV Transmission","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminology; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Sexual assault; Jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.055899797069794234,"score_gpt":0.35183346936409543,"score_spread":0.2959336722943012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968438279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39316285,0.03968185,0.002758536,0.34477636,0.00071643223,0.00008785,0.00010781103,0.00001686318,0.21869148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739681,0.010181581,0.00041375912,0.009566252,0.00018589983,0.000012421288,0.0000144821115,0.000003839966,0.005653735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949786,0.0021692952,0.00018435193,0.0002353588,0.0008015256,0.001630862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947042,0.0030322673,0.00083099894,0.00018691513,0.00064393255,0.000601709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005377442,0.00022300436,0.0003969771,0.0014104559,0.005409881,0.0060594,0.0010161299,0.0037780113,0.002604623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013620023,0.00017842282,0.00037756827,0.0012964038,0.03571337,0.0038399422,0.003466461,0.0041053686,0.00016587644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016664124,0.00003421566,0.008486009,0.00008334431,0.0000064116407,0.0006482532,0.033964515,0.00012668267,0.00010443784,0.9362383,0.0026238547,0.017667308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036682926,0.000121683035,0.053706434,0.00316076,0.00004933827,0.0052400474,0.17333789,0.0011816807,0.0008609836,0.59925437,0.16289374,0.0001564451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36674523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33032924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36674523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01261505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018069552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978457321","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.239","title":"The Place of Translation in Jerusalem's Criminal Trial Court","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Obligation; Sociology","score_opus":0.10253327672857689,"score_gpt":0.37768693127656816,"score_spread":0.2751536545479913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978457321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6775981,0.007481367,0.0026537345,0.024117121,0.00055637764,0.00011340783,0.00006979973,0.000083641076,0.2873264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926157,0.00058131455,0.0003735311,0.00060110027,0.000059904603,0.00002096066,0.000014770609,0.000020455276,0.005712184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825604,0.008620489,0.00038780773,0.0007739991,0.0009789137,0.0009827658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939785,0.0037479221,0.00066830404,0.00032623013,0.0006636087,0.00061551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067875753,0.00038038153,0.00040740977,0.0014257262,0.022787075,0.012561795,0.0010296808,0.002288328,0.0041542156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014193194,0.00048411734,0.00014924037,0.0022574004,0.021639433,0.0039318986,0.0049495194,0.0036159153,0.0008211941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063477404,0.00004041208,0.0019057448,0.0001252102,0.000004553818,0.0028577067,0.84720665,0.0001273537,0.00095948955,0.109020665,0.005699297,0.031989526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003185492,0.00014579885,0.014102272,0.00059427187,0.000012629799,0.0013275631,0.77809995,0.00035904025,0.0007868939,0.01069895,0.19378076,0.000059910184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022146203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039923668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022787075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011681042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065864916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08475226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025449700","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.3.364","title":"The Third-Party Doctrine and the Third Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Analogy; Appeal; Narrative; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.04260818328409051,"score_gpt":0.31472707615607504,"score_spread":0.27211889287198454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025449700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043353967,0.011395523,0.096765816,0.059523992,0.0009554722,0.00009867606,0.000088370354,0.00008440363,0.7877338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94843566,0.0027194235,0.009131289,0.006411887,0.000550172,0.00014652942,0.000043858494,0.00007914339,0.03248212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929603,0.003990056,0.00029493222,0.0008524695,0.0014147738,0.00048745473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919076,0.0049999487,0.0006562228,0.0012933346,0.0008167301,0.00032613307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062531624,0.000377621,0.0005346549,0.0011699443,0.006037873,0.0066872365,0.0018309025,0.006754718,0.0035821418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141666,0.00032706815,0.00060518447,0.00097386335,0.05796027,0.008643908,0.005523523,0.007860789,0.000821157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015337504,0.000001175447,0.000023571509,0.0000075977614,5.9414435e-7,0.00003607952,0.002676908,0.000021357642,0.00002142625,0.996071,0.00057673035,0.00056198833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009334596,0.000013676967,0.00014723952,0.00017207266,0.0000048270153,0.00030875934,0.0034694276,0.00038400476,0.00028491262,0.8828145,0.11237983,0.000011329156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003855208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025414194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006754718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048522823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043239654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17075454377666324,"score_gpt":0.41894143163557107,"score_spread":0.24818688785890783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046543401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722902,0.07549464,0.04877661,0.8014881,0.02242565,0.00008401316,0.00019232508,0.0001908628,0.041624878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34471557,0.053595997,0.04204183,0.49486238,0.045537166,0.00044652945,0.0002311515,0.0004240355,0.018145394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94985723,0.013853038,0.0053780666,0.008485472,0.020769881,0.0016563314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8565334,0.109040834,0.0063848156,0.009226529,0.016151082,0.0026633951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08280656,0.00083038915,0.0032834902,0.00410348,0.008127187,0.016830035,0.006826547,0.03851474,0.0016884692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14686887,0.0010066067,0.001269249,0.003653913,0.06845255,0.019121956,0.0061432775,0.046327405,0.001641486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074735675,0.00003339811,0.0007037693,0.00029580356,0.00004169222,0.00011767623,0.0010803058,0.00022204373,0.00027588522,0.90106416,0.04754399,0.048546486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010195498,0.00016915365,0.0014262687,0.002767458,0.00016283382,0.00034707246,0.0007418154,0.0013864542,0.0009185465,0.76893353,0.22287406,0.00017099552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074009746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006581109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043430664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43792814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057903113","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.190","title":"Citizenship and Penal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Normative; Nothing; Proxy (statistics); Law; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04619434642369532,"score_gpt":0.35069597581474354,"score_spread":0.30450162939104825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057903113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1308566,0.1180622,0.0075452738,0.062229697,0.0006830976,0.000029107841,0.00008887042,0.000052152234,0.680453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96610516,0.015390772,0.0006353018,0.002564757,0.0004446372,0.000022518068,0.000036479494,0.000009615481,0.014790762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997459,0.0014345042,0.000072416995,0.00020319535,0.00043555288,0.0003953832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983565,0.0006863157,0.00029663404,0.00012698385,0.0003007917,0.00023288268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014671086,0.00016546666,0.00023752608,0.0014003642,0.0018990057,0.0035792615,0.00044088945,0.0014627869,0.0031937198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003127339,0.00009025473,0.0002163082,0.0013830285,0.010823323,0.0024985643,0.0018470997,0.0015881789,0.00032097567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000669427,0.000013775065,0.001725833,0.00005008866,0.0000065470786,0.000077872006,0.00081894937,0.00018271958,0.000037125767,0.9714407,0.0049115503,0.020728212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001044091,0.000047042588,0.0142290685,0.00044750032,0.000013261064,0.00034402043,0.0027763573,0.0005222798,0.00013576596,0.8043685,0.17708662,0.000019094203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068929084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008958367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068929084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022309793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002559271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016186893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093639882","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.103","title":"Capacity to Consent to Sexual Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Unconscious mind; Law; Morality; Sexual attraction; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.093634822695311,"score_gpt":0.3606355353221883,"score_spread":0.2670007126268773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093639882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04158654,0.0031234298,0.07461486,0.112841055,0.0008278854,0.0005452085,0.00034378492,0.0001900713,0.7659272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92454374,0.001753996,0.017261118,0.024522476,0.0007299391,0.00088743144,0.0002808897,0.0001070659,0.029913306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694278,0.013194297,0.002681291,0.004553209,0.007275799,0.0028674926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452502,0.030745147,0.004521611,0.009875366,0.0069516646,0.0026560198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04026672,0.00062001176,0.00090409385,0.0017865313,0.004571286,0.01067382,0.0031374756,0.009957343,0.010113876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07914603,0.00078058575,0.0013884282,0.000794774,0.045860067,0.011474123,0.012194035,0.010538047,0.0023395927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013384108,0.000025324176,0.0009963918,0.00005100951,0.000011291377,0.00012693246,0.005004571,0.00024793128,0.00036930625,0.9823775,0.0020439075,0.008732447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003514966,0.0000611431,0.0011214222,0.000421429,0.000023060285,0.00051125657,0.0015396926,0.0005306846,0.0007665057,0.90781564,0.087093435,0.000080630125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005609723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035974786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004408644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016505297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21295333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14573273859255423,"score_gpt":0.4411455447944021,"score_spread":0.29541280620184784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115872543","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037226643,0.009330507,0.3848123,0.25724673,0.0029500287,0.0005357081,0.00014293092,0.00033905744,0.3074161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748274,0.0038386602,0.07218828,0.022650657,0.001413364,0.0008427405,0.00007446609,0.00033170579,0.023832714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9371158,0.046162035,0.0020579437,0.0042195753,0.008657353,0.001787357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9184753,0.06468857,0.0035486943,0.008470949,0.003989356,0.0008271453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06665879,0.0008686508,0.0010179761,0.004195794,0.010812495,0.01841866,0.0036758007,0.011676644,0.0045420565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1058129,0.0010697708,0.0013529023,0.0027406525,0.18138279,0.048053116,0.011428129,0.015075793,0.0009763885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062997174,0.000007678019,0.00013212975,0.00002404362,0.000002963716,0.000031443815,0.012818809,0.000078925295,0.000039498922,0.981716,0.000783752,0.0043584052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009627521,0.000015641263,0.00014499166,0.00019958879,0.000005101774,0.00007215988,0.0061478172,0.00038221513,0.00022135781,0.949017,0.043759573,0.000024883408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009907952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053914594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06665879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008559783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013222816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04345892375559509,"score_gpt":0.3566706915972829,"score_spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181301847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025721354,0.109166175,0.009448115,0.08210673,0.0027077035,0.00012767916,0.00017110797,0.000036878464,0.7705142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114133,0.06585472,0.0050384263,0.04715124,0.0023848463,0.00028271688,0.00018901416,0.00003107723,0.06765471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416406,0.006722311,0.0009934283,0.0014167054,0.0053577763,0.0013457327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888916,0.0072111986,0.0013274623,0.00082796894,0.0012181642,0.0005236681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010450583,0.00036181143,0.0009086425,0.0017235038,0.0030390339,0.0045163333,0.0017829788,0.0056285677,0.008295618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026377412,0.00034813763,0.0005286424,0.0008529168,0.017794635,0.0054781158,0.004526906,0.00435973,0.001507786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024228604,0.000039955055,0.0009207476,0.00036210284,0.000015653295,0.00017532223,0.0015446878,0.00015979263,0.00016729109,0.94689554,0.009081547,0.04061311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260372,0.00017177063,0.006692638,0.0042615524,0.000056801848,0.0008942711,0.0030983386,0.00012445878,0.0005053056,0.32989436,0.65420324,0.000054609445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067710914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010695649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010450583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014431607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077181435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055268645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306176763","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2016.19.1.42","title":"Engineering Comprehensible Youth Interrogation Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Waiver; Interrogation; Comprehension; Psychology; Computer security; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06378796767360388,"score_gpt":0.3350382557161015,"score_spread":0.2712502880424976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306176763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93300295,0.0024404924,0.023947261,0.001669826,0.00003815097,0.00022642981,0.00019429486,0.00014749322,0.0383331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799619,0.0017912741,0.015012708,0.00021255064,0.000023878836,0.000096740005,0.00014891374,0.000023924698,0.002728131],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950896,0.0029605513,0.00040493655,0.00024777732,0.0010199067,0.00027721308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97299767,0.015298105,0.005208915,0.002308444,0.003718971,0.00046790345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061706877,0.00026537347,0.00020535084,0.0010145734,0.0003045256,0.0021637618,0.0005128979,0.00059460825,0.0034011996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03784465,0.00019657586,0.00032163918,0.00037332805,0.0012289516,0.0030237827,0.0018182165,0.0006108793,0.00045285834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029265284,0.000527498,0.17026103,0.0016311551,0.00009289961,0.0012417057,0.07271553,0.0019326124,0.031993125,0.04587144,0.005783775,0.66765654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011517321,0.0025424012,0.5770556,0.0032633124,0.0002820891,0.007916733,0.07527555,0.00899114,0.05713126,0.07244344,0.19478378,0.00019958075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013417017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017984152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061706877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005075299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013652256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03263414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09892597009970915,"score_gpt":0.39100292239636747,"score_spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738361053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075774556,0.09326778,0.004646309,0.8499409,0.0045820116,0.00009037414,0.00015237021,0.00010851952,0.039634325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38449398,0.12410122,0.024239007,0.44032663,0.012280954,0.00054698705,0.0004961967,0.00017499378,0.013339997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592233,0.02120623,0.0031526054,0.004150748,0.008546308,0.0037208959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8563385,0.086550854,0.01344698,0.010362482,0.02539923,0.007902037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06869956,0.0005224354,0.0015391455,0.0043570814,0.005763776,0.012183138,0.0064416323,0.016071295,0.010636874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17662777,0.00084685255,0.0009769691,0.0045479313,0.018415727,0.018855117,0.006440125,0.015160474,0.0010192654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035301753,0.0001628336,0.000749863,0.0011976943,0.0000324387,0.00017631917,0.0024364067,0.00079514337,0.00014716362,0.7908453,0.058040004,0.14538166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007349201,0.00015531175,0.0067086876,0.011514453,0.000047052923,0.0003965351,0.00547249,0.0006265131,0.0003060474,0.19758278,0.7770023,0.00011436112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029431066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033987235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06869956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019271784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05564116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36332238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896385499","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.640","title":"The Prison as Reserve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Scholarship; Indigenous; Governmentality; Criminology; Sociology; Centrality; Punishment (psychology); Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06360111537930566,"score_gpt":0.3974796558095016,"score_spread":0.33387854043019594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896385499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25449944,0.08026337,0.0058161984,0.17604947,0.0012813307,0.00006854725,0.00015768054,0.00007991471,0.4817841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98638064,0.0035714132,0.00023988311,0.0017683267,0.000087272856,0.000010154089,0.000009904785,0.000013426964,0.007919062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978567,0.0009845467,0.000039685554,0.00020067356,0.00032383998,0.00059461576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786925,0.0007737848,0.00021768188,0.00017702155,0.0005547109,0.00040753162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016200567,0.0002115301,0.0002552156,0.0012277366,0.0093840975,0.0077544767,0.0009523723,0.0019221451,0.002840321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040885005,0.0001230022,0.00017387341,0.000949294,0.0363088,0.0053597894,0.0029000484,0.002543389,0.00015305221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024656123,0.000008572138,0.0012447268,0.00012454031,0.000005239278,0.0002457641,0.04310901,0.00014632285,0.00014357676,0.9319228,0.0106487535,0.012376053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144429,0.000045534598,0.009878402,0.0017153281,0.000028926886,0.0005170788,0.15757152,0.0004678065,0.00042015786,0.20069835,0.6286024,0.00004004375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30899176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38643727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30899176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018517803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02748221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61438644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897199180","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.545","title":"Seropolitics and the Criminal Accusation of HIV Non-Disclosure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Biopower; Criminal law; Public health; Political science; Governmentality; False accusation; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03270405688430883,"score_gpt":0.3158556688594977,"score_spread":0.28315161197518884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897199180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6849695,0.016909553,0.0011854831,0.0752966,0.0004938375,0.00020501601,0.00042319435,0.0000477503,0.22046904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727476,0.0052997987,0.00029261332,0.006805339,0.000049927407,0.000016486685,0.000067856534,0.000016613265,0.014703613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926859,0.0008936656,0.00021090348,0.00048015438,0.0032137954,0.0025156036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885699,0.003274068,0.0015549886,0.00031980398,0.004391094,0.0018901393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035237735,0.00022725301,0.0004052557,0.002298207,0.02337107,0.0069444734,0.0021309168,0.0029289478,0.0036120072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017844394,0.0003916936,0.00030023168,0.0032370323,0.010447921,0.0014074878,0.0035226904,0.0056965007,0.00014625574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020660515,0.00026429334,0.14039186,0.0006621872,0.00012129763,0.006092165,0.15629463,0.0018209183,0.0014528021,0.49639043,0.06876229,0.12754053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032386,0.00013273314,0.33481303,0.0019792493,0.00030681785,0.002354373,0.15098906,0.0034889346,0.0030928056,0.025509117,0.476802,0.00042854017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12684911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12684911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21744873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9203591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022522540","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Popularity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.16196151140294437,"score_gpt":0.4086180467847368,"score_spread":0.2466565353817924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022522540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011011574,0.025445335,0.031043462,0.07275517,0.0036952489,0.0004763085,0.00025733837,0.00046040912,0.8548551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52303636,0.040263936,0.054230936,0.075379334,0.0037733424,0.0011349341,0.0006092517,0.0008383254,0.30073363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854902,0.004681662,0.00079906685,0.0017022471,0.005483078,0.0018436942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852473,0.003314365,0.001314625,0.0025680768,0.002886777,0.0013914669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009509604,0.00078777556,0.0009132757,0.0031245248,0.010208592,0.0075563616,0.003050489,0.0057343203,0.031509914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023838867,0.00037473862,0.0011108853,0.0016210404,0.01466586,0.0069166757,0.013430207,0.0073763626,0.0063217888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020011661,0.0001761019,0.0019290085,0.0008221657,0.000047617003,0.00036480336,0.0075133466,0.00033667727,0.0009526526,0.65684474,0.106013246,0.22497965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070265087,0.00005834652,0.0024012963,0.0012620353,0.000015059968,0.00052904524,0.00475495,0.000114389666,0.00044652857,0.12803228,0.86235106,0.000027879629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003980003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009522877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031509914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011475546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10541111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123639769","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2012.15.2.277","title":"<i>Ex ante</i> Fairness in Criminal Law and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Supreme court; Discretion; Criminal law; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06051355066028592,"score_gpt":0.2621809337231436,"score_spread":0.2016673830628577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123639769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09548839,0.002306236,0.1805807,0.060844194,0.0007797132,0.00015958173,0.0002904153,0.00018206755,0.65936863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94501615,0.00051434484,0.020915456,0.010448589,0.0004180097,0.00022546083,0.00006938714,0.000037848455,0.022354597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928235,0.00315796,0.00039656786,0.00091135653,0.0016163288,0.0010942778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.0015079075,0.00057322974,0.0008263179,0.000489258,0.00012850038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009443112,0.00033183527,0.00031158273,0.00060496357,0.0037415312,0.0068317926,0.0012281956,0.003949507,0.0028143253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026979,0.00029215947,0.0005508696,0.00057646475,0.015166782,0.00488205,0.0030567253,0.0040737037,0.00064068934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922295,0.000008317596,0.00038855145,0.000009060649,0.0000030758824,0.000015776062,0.00041935255,0.00020452253,0.00011215806,0.99401337,0.0010643143,0.003752542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018375502,0.000055856886,0.0023327381,0.00007072632,0.00001444672,0.00010689147,0.00036679945,0.0012767126,0.0010491586,0.95746213,0.03722107,0.00002504095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048944736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054605743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009443112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003100282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049940586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123699039","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2007.10.2.278","title":"The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03353621523045861,"score_gpt":0.3526770687852039,"score_spread":0.31914085355474525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123699039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14703049,0.05097603,0.07025703,0.49727473,0.0025483149,0.00009252311,0.00044062687,0.00011369905,0.23126656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97713655,0.00609805,0.005043677,0.007315699,0.0014245419,0.00008583503,0.00012561155,0.00006608105,0.0027037747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94133765,0.04309972,0.0014698941,0.0027681724,0.009229694,0.0020949165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81527656,0.15690933,0.004442797,0.006314416,0.014983449,0.002073489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059094228,0.00047192394,0.0020187122,0.0065738587,0.0041844887,0.013915525,0.0047709956,0.0076148985,0.00671469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19055817,0.00044769485,0.00085592555,0.0048083514,0.028473297,0.019368285,0.005125324,0.0110803135,0.00058983365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044131513,0.000026705919,0.0010943185,0.000121721634,0.000041299634,0.000035246972,0.0013338146,0.0006314892,0.000019108626,0.97153676,0.0044803023,0.020635078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016292206,0.000015020266,0.0014998724,0.00021720289,0.000024993878,0.000034081037,0.0011263728,0.001098311,0.000065712404,0.9887206,0.0071686595,0.000012991904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005508185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061958493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059094228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008842602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011111916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3125239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123779146","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.2.203","title":"The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Legal liability; Civil law (Civil law); Delict; Political science; Strict liability; Comparative law; Mens rea; Legal history; German; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Geography","score_opus":0.18514222997101856,"score_gpt":0.37005431349581563,"score_spread":0.18491208352479707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123779146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049436357,0.18880756,0.021604491,0.056218546,0.0007648171,0.00003443632,0.000121943885,0.000028305105,0.68298346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051627,0.06708942,0.0033644438,0.0033873552,0.0012641444,0.00007078839,0.00009467638,0.000029826753,0.019536704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693066,0.001944506,0.000073170726,0.00031467743,0.0005212962,0.00021573884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994909,0.003766792,0.0004149848,0.00030598915,0.00041536687,0.00018790149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032458387,0.0002901299,0.00041206626,0.005630983,0.002614466,0.004153679,0.0011501482,0.0026263315,0.0069038183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758088,0.00021532686,0.00028606915,0.0048891394,0.022413304,0.007513575,0.0019132757,0.0021737576,0.00040361524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014620282,0.0000052973905,0.00015251116,0.000022512673,0.0000021863266,0.000024329704,0.00043626459,0.00019253568,0.0000075651333,0.9939513,0.00076205423,0.004442031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005395661,0.00002581442,0.002158451,0.00033153457,0.000006198735,0.00017453714,0.0019317835,0.00062701234,0.00007742543,0.8157217,0.17892984,0.000010410987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059252074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061930926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007429723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007429723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026784802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05390662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188325","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.665","title":"The Age of Innocence: A Cautious Defense of Raising the Age of Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Innocence; Criminalization; Law; Informed consent; Girl; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06048393632447276,"score_gpt":0.3578498590280782,"score_spread":0.29736592270360546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125188325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07591752,0.046800226,0.0063667186,0.4472742,0.0030135945,0.0002737111,0.00024497582,0.000104046325,0.42000508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84343016,0.016253924,0.0036807396,0.09082055,0.00086113706,0.00010916897,0.000053703272,0.00008131587,0.04470924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817379,0.0032290653,0.0006729215,0.0012564954,0.007666086,0.005437461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97851634,0.00988246,0.0011390246,0.00054904463,0.007881442,0.0020316467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012329752,0.0007337599,0.0007832731,0.0047681932,0.032684077,0.0145050585,0.0050473893,0.012610602,0.0031092388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032492094,0.0007577622,0.0008942262,0.004255296,0.037813377,0.0061844145,0.0054666577,0.01709481,0.00024181147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013040508,0.000015644595,0.0021938607,0.00011851135,0.0000085311,0.00049059937,0.017368486,0.00029432384,0.00014654365,0.9414767,0.021968024,0.01590583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005507705,0.00007534274,0.025428582,0.002414198,0.000160094,0.00069874286,0.056520723,0.0025105134,0.00088678004,0.20511457,0.7057522,0.00038320554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99245477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1407878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1407878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2965407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}