{"meta":{"query_hash":"66117b508ca1","filters":{"venue":"New Genetics and Society"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/66117b508ca1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=New+Genetics+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W1967802727","doi":"10.1080/14636770701843576","title":"Oocyte markets: women's reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; National Institutes of Health; California Institute of Regenerative Medicine; California Institute for Regenerative Medicine","keywords":"Somatic cell nuclear transfer; Scrutiny; Donation; Bioethics; Embryonic stem cell; Business; Biology; Biotechnology; Political science; Embryo; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Cell biology; Genetics; Blastocyst; Embryogenesis","score_opus":0.07212002798442509,"score_gpt":0.33169787339618195,"score_spread":0.2595778454117569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967802727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98203504,0.012130241,0.000011432804,0.0032393837,0.00009270351,0.00048883114,0.0000010843693,0.00005634038,0.001944943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596088,0.026298145,0.0028128684,0.00022104972,0.00027691264,0.00004114111,0.0000015962663,0.000021027941,0.010718494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821246,0.00006914006,0.00020243465,0.0006333733,0.0003203307,0.0005622828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989294,0.00007426343,0.00004397235,0.0006164677,0.00014523244,0.00019067913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009377579,0.00012551267,0.00026133857,0.00007378674,0.00019394002,0.000011348855,0.00009376874,0.00018741217,0.000017190963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055385182,0.00011029303,0.000057453333,0.0006626419,0.00034486127,0.000027372913,0.00013183522,0.000634414,0.00001155427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033728378,0.0010228489,0.38972715,0.001166976,0.00020204794,0.0002504093,0.07942132,0.00002757337,0.010288582,0.00038453835,0.2349919,0.27914384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00250961,0.0009244977,0.8509348,0.0000830188,0.000012259194,0.00006540378,0.013563926,0.00004145669,0.010232708,0.0014033506,0.11996121,0.000267757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022847262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010715106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46120766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021990408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042595886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44976193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967803105","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2010.507487","title":"Biobank governance: a lesson in trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biobank; Corporate governance; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Accountability; Political science; Acknowledgement; Public trust; Public engagement; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Business; Law; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.22458787157050072,"score_gpt":0.5193485744891884,"score_spread":0.2947607029186876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967803105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98649824,0.0009160484,0.00002572527,0.0075824615,0.00016272014,0.00011753887,0.0000038058072,0.000009542437,0.0046839123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97211283,0.013331093,0.00814152,0.001238335,0.00032169218,0.0000027135213,0.000001847677,0.000012314403,0.0048376643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990749,0.0000086033,0.00016181853,0.00020708004,0.0003558368,0.00019175909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991041,0.0003803275,0.000027308039,0.00023815689,0.00006994308,0.00018019823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070806296,0.00006498738,0.0001377262,0.0000065703,0.000038194452,0.000020876218,0.000082671635,0.00038250856,0.000117993404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060138066,0.000055880708,0.00007271924,0.00010381727,0.00017237749,0.000010392888,0.00008445285,0.0014810727,0.000008902347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101127844,0.00039258297,0.5893462,0.00041809925,0.00007840177,0.00003056747,0.0065754713,0.0000031896786,0.08676414,0.058129042,0.026863225,0.231298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025607375,0.00023574346,0.88740957,0.00008435144,0.000020568314,0.000008227321,0.00022967311,0.0015280285,0.0032265272,0.030262033,0.07428916,0.00014540156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106001775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004592604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2980634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001986848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003232625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64346063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986564954","doi":"10.1080/1463677042000237044","title":"Unpacking animal metaphors for commercial relationships in the biotechnology industry","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Unpacking; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Biology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06225792936176185,"score_gpt":0.3223887015439742,"score_spread":0.26013077218221237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986564954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907486,0.001285151,0.0025450238,0.0037792285,0.00015635761,0.0002560852,0.000012813819,0.000022263288,0.001194489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581856,0.00013718501,0.0025838292,0.0011261579,0.0001995786,0.00002631603,0.000014454654,0.000010926357,0.00008302075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993481,0.000062186744,0.00014646097,0.00017875804,0.000072092254,0.0001924038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996592,0.00008867803,0.00004620564,0.00015433424,0.00001871602,0.000032890064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036041046,0.00008797844,0.00010631733,0.000028008883,0.00017630763,0.000026146008,0.00011214446,0.0005192434,0.000025503276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002532762,0.00006922248,0.000082094564,0.0001844018,0.00008436593,0.000018392873,0.000020829271,0.0005101338,0.000004462266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016642173,0.0006742118,0.04773565,0.000055681314,0.00046029134,0.000019924497,0.25509277,0.00009524894,0.005536012,0.50803214,0.023057325,0.15907434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075042685,0.0007459984,0.706184,0.000037293194,0.00034863123,0.00006780969,0.122443974,0.00013880579,0.0031138877,0.11982936,0.038957767,0.0006281936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013940404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000169858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65844834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017668937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037598867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4004881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992184018","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2012.662051","title":"Knowledge, place, and power: geographies of value in the bioeconomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Capitalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Power (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Knowledge production; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Knowledge management; Geography; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.01773708695671763,"score_gpt":0.2854115658815342,"score_spread":0.2676744789248166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992184018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722821,0.021638177,0.00006865149,0.0038187904,0.00007085376,0.000116574505,0.0000017372813,0.000003165857,0.0019999305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920452,0.0062406086,0.0011300483,0.00037480544,0.00009199766,0.00000109904,0.0000025635304,0.00000337522,0.00011026549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996584,0.0000154291,0.00010022962,0.00006181959,0.000070598144,0.0000935128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997648,0.00004898031,0.000024187988,0.000071653645,0.000017403501,0.00007296041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031318323,0.00004649053,0.00009260572,0.000018818402,0.00003286178,0.000005923861,0.000022577813,0.00011778793,0.00000858365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004148283,0.000028564518,0.000039860584,0.00009220641,0.00037981203,0.000011643034,0.000022946631,0.00010116491,3.3462095e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049190367,0.00080802414,0.5466262,0.0007755972,0.0003011848,8.8296736e-7,0.14159198,0.0000071399922,0.0050553726,0.092899956,0.028429337,0.18345511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010184932,0.00014495249,0.88964987,0.000040386483,0.000049786948,0.000009523568,0.0025136236,0.0007456114,0.00021769642,0.002043296,0.103494234,0.00007251289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026866945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046499354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34302366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000030456001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033938453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13994333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994264880","doi":"10.1080/14636770220122764","title":"Between tradition and innovation in new genetics: The continuity of medical pedigrees and the development of combination work in the case of Huntington's disease","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Pedigree chart; Medical genetics; Novelty; Dialectic; Intersection (aeronautics); Genetics; Data science; Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05294350139337931,"score_gpt":0.2842860992181589,"score_spread":0.2313425978247796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994264880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970009,0.0006184638,0.00024539864,0.0017249379,0.000021299378,0.0003532916,0.0000101054775,0.0000019265462,0.00002367658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860877,0.0007791778,0.0003419675,0.00021383297,0.000032129374,0.0000063007533,0.0000022873676,0.0000053302406,0.000010209447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987285,0.00022515208,0.00042556087,0.0001839695,0.0003366597,0.00010016922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.00049562135,0.00018935376,0.00014205297,0.00004509117,0.000052699503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006384961,0.00009360131,0.0001558284,0.00003853163,0.00009043665,0.000026116495,0.00014855141,0.00004867987,0.000005552995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030189482,0.00005716384,0.000028196302,0.0004443293,0.0004646702,0.00002280151,0.000074219046,0.000110904715,4.8902102e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010525027,0.00051048514,0.59329665,0.0002981004,0.000036516576,0.000007875252,0.11281788,0.00010315915,0.0125225475,0.019280452,0.0007931809,0.26022792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021296744,0.000052162537,0.96238893,0.000047543697,0.00003992836,0.0000029500886,0.0015862931,0.0024133448,0.028355286,0.0028202634,0.000074149815,0.00008948277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003234199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069780326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3690923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060401244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011067097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23310737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009661252","doi":"10.1080/14636770500349791","title":"The Human Genome Project: an examination of its challenge to the technological imperative 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Process (computing); Public relations; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.3610611506953212,"score_gpt":0.44557244993148687,"score_spread":0.08451129923616568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009661252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96594197,0.0016562864,0.000061372935,0.02159144,0.000022885195,0.00046378144,0.0000065606564,0.000028465438,0.010227219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610891,0.037536565,0.0003530391,0.00020159947,0.00017363584,0.000017164384,0.000005260036,0.0000031975187,0.0006204581],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994541,0.00012588064,0.0000936948,0.00008878199,0.00013423605,0.00010333338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996321,0.000046954174,0.000037993592,0.0001654196,0.000080313956,0.00003717461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006844876,0.000044387154,0.00004773053,0.000007909849,0.0009827743,0.00005506184,0.00023089773,0.00008024108,0.000039388917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023910572,0.000027260536,0.000028916516,0.000109956025,0.00018844978,0.000033099583,0.00006909317,0.00008020162,0.0000033900003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012685833,0.000055247277,0.00004129849,0.0000035013877,0.0000082430415,1.502711e-8,0.45239574,0.0000093535255,0.008172771,0.03550673,0.00054137147,0.5032645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016969001,0.00016510994,0.0592757,0.00000592103,0.000009954796,2.2002658e-7,0.14143555,0.0006207916,0.00018492037,0.0004632968,0.7975527,0.00011615453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055134788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029667898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7970113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003371893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029093912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7558805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038410162","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2010.484227","title":"Seeing and knowing in twenty-first century genetic medicine: the clinical pedigree as epistemological tool and hybrid risk technique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Subjectivity; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Corporate governance; Relation (database); Citizenship; Politics; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Law; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.012870382602006354,"score_gpt":0.30023985685569154,"score_spread":0.2873694742536852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038410162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98824704,0.00859143,0.0012518791,0.001001702,0.00027596677,0.00036679875,0.000008204721,0.000009263692,0.0002477055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95189375,0.03573086,0.010860323,0.0006522115,0.00070258294,0.000029859966,0.000009101197,0.000020217984,0.000101115205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987361,0.00008688077,0.00034110417,0.00047802718,0.00012409624,0.00023378305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993018,0.00011144426,0.00009976542,0.0003205776,0.000044565484,0.00012187294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068596425,0.00017619881,0.00018991783,0.000015550917,0.00022636642,0.00004138287,0.00015058483,0.00027787787,0.000013376624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018936861,0.00013139419,0.00007081882,0.000065949076,0.0005552467,0.000003101589,0.00026774683,0.00044264414,6.709244e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065618755,0.000102054066,0.6538713,0.00010673784,0.00019537676,0.00001893773,0.0025270467,0.00008098143,0.090309545,0.00029568555,0.013589257,0.23883745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026781792,0.00082626403,0.65949714,0.000062817606,0.00017380228,0.00042281472,0.0010292092,0.0015951043,0.007726467,0.003480729,0.3218342,0.00067329605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085960666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014958535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30824494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012389816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012697109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048095477","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2010.528189","title":"Genetic discrimination in private insurance: global perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic discrimination; Genetic testing; Population; Politics; Dilemma; Social insurance; State (computer science); Political science; Actuarial science; Public economics; Business; Economics; Law; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Environmental health","score_opus":0.04261346759056526,"score_gpt":0.23252456990603948,"score_spread":0.18991110231547423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048095477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929872,0.0003279768,0.00027699492,0.00033805764,0.00024186946,0.000116886884,0.0000016213473,0.000019841664,0.005689508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971996,0.00028321383,0.0011986059,0.0005606602,0.0005735436,0.000002895733,0.0000034769316,0.000008266929,0.0001697593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994253,0.0000034066495,0.00011245198,0.00018832303,0.00011158637,0.00015895489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997968,0.000006336754,0.000039800132,0.00009203173,0.00005233289,0.000012713959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007989196,0.00009654015,0.00008255367,0.000017613449,0.000101328165,0.00013880059,0.00009261782,0.00008228325,0.0000795722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025799916,0.00008258604,0.000046139445,0.00016976416,0.000058847574,0.0001326957,0.00007806092,0.00013519928,0.000026589627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004689581,0.00023278991,0.79384536,0.00020871441,0.000046908757,0.0000049177074,0.008935198,0.00015048606,0.0096502425,0.034337386,0.0069946935,0.1455464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051784795,0.000011297279,0.9677561,0.000012909373,0.000011510091,0.0000014350649,0.00092195784,0.008400416,0.00006880101,0.008378228,0.013747661,0.00017186112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042514945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002779731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1739107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012354358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001570991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33677608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053969668","doi":"10.1080/14636770903314509","title":"Framing genetic risk: trust and credibility markers in online direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Framing (construction); Genetic testing; Advertising; The Internet; Context (archaeology); Business; Public relations; Source credibility; Marketing; Internet privacy; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.24202017145088,"score_gpt":0.489581152270045,"score_spread":0.247560980819165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053969668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885197,0.008184696,0.0005570743,0.0012558325,0.00025000234,0.0008239246,0.00013783289,0.000050199487,0.00022068515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408988,0.0044342238,0.048803817,0.005242828,0.00041980855,0.00001858237,0.0000107160995,0.00002537725,0.00014587512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977857,0.00023878849,0.0005205405,0.000618302,0.00012700756,0.0007096958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981084,0.00069050316,0.00011139333,0.00018975593,0.00009306096,0.0008068821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007012368,0.0002859833,0.00035975757,0.000049100836,0.0004572117,0.00004395194,0.00014914428,0.0006164133,0.00004599115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033073948,0.00030101606,0.00009184101,0.00027168827,0.0001614228,0.000042521133,0.000082269355,0.0011234235,0.0000019082406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014904015,0.00015876793,0.45095962,0.00012052794,0.000057447243,0.0000071292743,0.0015699283,0.0013804703,0.0052234624,0.000010666517,0.001476815,0.53888613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002132789,0.000348149,0.855353,0.000052293708,0.00018003819,0.000013465593,0.00039580785,0.11702844,0.001083304,0.0009808636,0.022053633,0.00037819342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010773742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073226285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53850794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076979406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017439123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067791604","doi":"10.1080/14636770701843675","title":"The social uses of DNA in the political realm or how politics constructs DNA technology in the fight against crime","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institute of Justice","keywords":"Realm; Politics; Idealization; Innovator; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Professionalization; Law; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.027192768120323937,"score_gpt":0.3014086573445268,"score_spread":0.27421588922420287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067791604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98148096,0.001389801,0.000024996145,0.015532561,0.00004432945,0.00028842056,0.000022332706,0.0000031994186,0.0012134095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325037,0.0037785608,0.00035915995,0.0019882333,0.0002376731,0.000017607505,0.000014911847,0.000011641624,0.00034184108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998634,0.00014772933,0.00022116234,0.00023234465,0.00026475353,0.00050003926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993271,0.00012406008,0.000053470365,0.00035821955,0.00008177185,0.00005537857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029778844,0.00014385507,0.00016396126,0.000023627485,0.0003275048,0.000035791814,0.0004513687,0.0002796541,0.0000022184038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001248558,0.00007452095,0.00009807322,0.00022205245,0.0014356908,0.0000018251953,0.00014551276,0.00024523961,5.2318916e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028360993,0.00067359424,0.07147575,0.00021848525,0.00045491135,0.00012101505,0.024283765,0.000019374691,0.21269356,0.29725182,0.3585155,0.034008607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006629881,0.0022957213,0.2181118,0.000071486495,0.00010868516,0.00064970274,0.115535855,0.0005179806,0.22472657,0.035061784,0.39508665,0.0012038795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053632742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010192162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26219004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013486582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003740718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083065230","doi":"10.1080/1463677042000237071","title":"Genes and geneticization? The social construction of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre; University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Disease; Context (archaeology); Polycystic kidney disease; Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; Qualitative research; Medicine; Genetics; Pathology; Biology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.005570041084475619,"score_gpt":0.2320044711178477,"score_spread":0.22643443003337207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083065230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98572475,0.007192953,0.0054290956,0.0011692934,0.00012304647,0.00020375781,0.0000807078,0.0000064171295,0.000070008246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98980904,0.004021633,0.0049692206,0.00062754506,0.000352538,0.000008407744,0.000055699496,0.000018081568,0.00013785946],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991851,0.000027603199,0.00019151632,0.00027248356,0.00013964083,0.00018365942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993777,0.0000068232066,0.00008410891,0.00017583904,0.000060754614,0.00029473717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000059871552,0.00015235749,0.00012852768,0.000011186315,0.00025853844,0.00003182322,0.00009687656,0.00010615375,0.000008464189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031278836,0.000121569356,0.00010632256,0.000063880354,0.00042071432,0.0000022685886,0.000110525165,0.000045404206,6.3951836e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029623357,0.00019798068,0.02819815,0.00024313272,0.0003756519,0.000002816777,0.0023198274,0.00060290954,0.94149953,0.0030628692,0.0062392037,0.016961716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009103082,0.00084266695,0.56572855,0.00009722463,0.0011278603,0.00008912921,0.0036017236,0.0011998452,0.34607086,0.012453093,0.058377672,0.0013082854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024310084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029096955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59542865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006672951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004218491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49574545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096446521","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2015.1105130","title":"Beyond and within public engagement: a broadened approach to engagement in biobanking","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Tekes","keywords":"Biobank; Public engagement; Sustainability; Public relations; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Plan (archaeology); Political science; Business; Geography; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.5247737202768076,"score_gpt":0.4949165311273274,"score_spread":0.029857189149480157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096446521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97425765,0.0021847917,0.0016860891,0.008042955,0.00010712322,0.0007228046,0.0000029215532,0.000026998738,0.012968658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166655,0.0017607618,0.07688222,0.0031580457,0.00017483914,0.000020544652,0.0000069842868,0.000020988355,0.001310103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816036,0.00012304388,0.0003063211,0.00041303568,0.00068173214,0.00031547854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846256,0.00044195165,0.000039821563,0.00028287407,0.00015680326,0.0006160202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005700286,0.00012280351,0.00022413356,0.00005534228,0.00010386343,0.00010807555,0.00012318576,0.00024324624,0.000008791394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001314227,0.00010934102,0.000048045782,0.00027244588,0.00013521404,0.00003033659,0.0004389085,0.001139177,0.000003483464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029261952,0.0018391217,0.397947,0.0017300462,0.000664283,0.00003952985,0.26973078,0.00032109412,0.0075033065,0.15956981,0.04105889,0.11930352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040330604,0.005867422,0.30961505,0.0009668719,0.0004358004,0.00007041128,0.08634264,0.047135904,0.0040446124,0.36438054,0.13844723,0.0023629228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057777328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054014676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20481074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081271006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048272868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49492204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143611818","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2010.507485","title":"Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Case Western Reserve University","keywords":"Personal genomics; Variety (cybernetics); Skepticism; Genomics; Biomedicine; Psychology; Data science; Genomic medicine; Optimism; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; Genome; Social psychology; Computer science; Biology; Epistemology; Genetics; Computational biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010701111615499179,"score_gpt":0.2663685938121081,"score_spread":0.2556674821966089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143611818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974173,0.0012653401,0.001060119,0.000044412966,0.00005789198,0.000066529676,0.000036618287,0.0000031471616,0.00004868495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99109805,0.0017065924,0.0068453755,0.00005297055,0.000111072884,0.0000018820924,0.00001700084,0.000010889897,0.0001561883],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995553,0.0000054794937,0.00010061374,0.0001666635,0.000062943625,0.000109008986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997694,0.000008528279,0.000026632197,0.00007944167,0.00003043394,0.000085556356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005999642,0.00009300459,0.00008687988,0.000011588607,0.0000732368,0.000041538315,0.00004444056,0.00010894353,0.0000047147205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000900627,0.00009550557,0.000038043643,0.000024749854,0.00014701723,0.000003330172,0.00008971008,0.00008342697,7.167065e-8],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043544833,0.000011676106,0.08609259,0.000026731837,0.00009090927,1.510375e-7,0.0063594915,0.000027290533,0.9044704,0.00023482638,0.0005325959,0.0021489826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076986,0.00031347017,0.86681974,0.000007950698,0.000070496106,0.00001758315,0.0024866303,0.001250381,0.1248439,0.00035635766,0.00243686,0.00031963413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018902885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001810427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78072715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001435444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004153518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38946044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318600772","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2015.1133280","title":"Exploring the post-genomic world: differing explanatory and manipulatory functions of post-genomic sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Dalhousie University","funders":"Australia Awards; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Relevance (law); Genomics; Narrative; Proteomics; Function (biology); Conceptual framework; Heredity; Data science; Biology; Epistemology; Sociology; Genetics; Social science; Genome; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4333238514796196,"score_gpt":0.3664805683226741,"score_spread":0.06684328315694549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318600772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99418545,0.001296549,0.000038685324,0.0017083472,0.00017574981,0.00010640574,0.000010626597,0.00001862695,0.0024595733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717307,0.027064795,0.00021106597,0.00024259661,0.00012311639,0.000007655452,0.0000015702227,0.000006985592,0.00061150535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993836,0.00006571693,0.00013182039,0.00014391691,0.00011948427,0.0001554432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953246,0.00012311222,0.000059754093,0.00015525315,0.000046534948,0.00008290683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037190257,0.00007155108,0.00008255828,0.000035160363,0.00080266263,0.000043470587,0.00017379684,0.000033318254,0.00012772191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000139384665,0.00004875881,0.000054551063,0.00010637219,0.0005477538,0.00009796973,0.00011573627,0.00005495183,0.0000048761112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021984213,0.00006120938,0.114630036,0.000047441088,0.000072941584,2.448526e-7,0.3287274,0.000008976686,0.23353419,0.017035518,0.00093894714,0.30492112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025627238,0.000057815996,0.91772044,0.0000358404,0.000026349157,9.616623e-7,0.052909166,0.00003650102,0.00016130491,0.00047707418,0.0281588,0.00015945722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065179897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023155794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042486296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007258425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61735135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753248813","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2017.1368374","title":"Measuring the performance of international genomics research projects in fostering genomic capacity in the developing world","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Broad Institute; Harvard University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Developing country; Genomics; Set (abstract data type); Genomic medicine; Business; Political science; Engineering ethics; Economic growth; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Biology; Genome","score_opus":0.21038679911324867,"score_gpt":0.334254817529291,"score_spread":0.12386801841604231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753248813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98751503,0.0004934401,0.000018918154,0.010682469,0.00007170735,0.00017254992,3.391902e-7,0.0000024110175,0.001043123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923935,0.0057948534,0.0014790427,0.00017944133,0.000056274883,0.0000038177755,3.1945538e-7,0.0000037794741,0.00008896507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995249,0.000019835432,0.000118865515,0.00009651762,0.000112036476,0.00012786475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967736,0.0000338228,0.00004124545,0.0002047189,0.000031041705,0.000011818565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007834153,0.000044249893,0.00007692051,0.000037449267,0.000196594,0.000022457618,0.00024043537,0.00026920647,0.0000013346232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025499776,0.000027201419,0.00002387157,0.00006834519,0.00019503782,0.00001796682,0.00020176308,0.0010866758,4.2734902e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098350865,0.000073860065,0.80941623,0.00024837433,0.00015540334,0.00000917508,0.05573079,0.0001719145,0.06900533,0.0030642399,0.0004433617,0.06158296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063565315,0.000038584047,0.9804524,0.00014982608,0.0000068846903,0.000014997764,0.0012587673,0.004737004,0.009436854,0.00021497582,0.0030021176,0.00005194413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001012907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025185966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17103615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004914195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010793098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4721126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902669977","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2018.1549477","title":"Organizational challenges to equity in the delivery of services within a new personalized risk-based approach to breast cancer screening","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Government of Canada; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Mammography; Inclusion (mineral); Breast cancer; Breast cancer screening; Business; Knowledge management; Medicine; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Cancer","score_opus":0.09222118932452074,"score_gpt":0.3466075834383833,"score_spread":0.2543863941138626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902669977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98450065,0.0033618254,0.005947034,0.004958055,0.000038891394,0.00033850194,0.000038054684,0.000012547962,0.000804416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95069903,0.0006607388,0.04258371,0.005573423,0.00040817994,0.0000061386327,0.0000068294507,0.000010967925,0.000050948835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990119,0.000030078823,0.0001648058,0.00023195392,0.00038646255,0.00017482815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993884,0.000025636105,0.00006673982,0.00014886772,0.00019047051,0.00017991307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031608448,0.000107624954,0.00017824638,0.000022681705,0.00009162417,0.000024143805,0.00014867455,0.00007235413,0.000036014102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011022438,0.000080127094,0.00005375635,0.00030056227,0.000054501503,0.000023340783,0.00008358501,0.00010384018,0.0000012084855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014714242,0.00033671912,0.531831,0.0007637985,0.00044726697,0.0000045642237,0.3098842,0.0073904316,0.0071109673,0.0022563615,0.015352154,0.12315111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036981928,0.0006693672,0.936207,0.00062668865,0.00025209563,0.000027381435,0.028740887,0.025036572,0.0011099229,0.00042186875,0.0028521374,0.0003578633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037891413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010105609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.404376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039650542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035877753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5728074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960122422","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2019.1637722","title":"The turn towards prevention – moral narratives and the vascularization of Alzheimer’s disease","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Dementia; Fallacy; Disease; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Public health; Vascular dementia; Medicine; Epistemology; Pathology","score_opus":0.030718768948042048,"score_gpt":0.26699064934540795,"score_spread":0.2362718803973659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960122422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95588994,0.03354151,0.00006210369,0.0033768092,0.0006296586,0.0005748994,0.00001543278,0.00000770195,0.005901931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934981,0.0029883494,0.000121065365,0.00032867395,0.00020906134,0.0000048293045,0.000008882478,0.0000048456823,0.0028361783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961376,0.000039190403,0.00010673422,0.000073993186,0.000092912436,0.00007343087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997671,0.000015626147,0.000055034398,0.00008819185,0.000022617713,0.000051423605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015185018,0.000051101364,0.00006692879,0.000002835803,0.00030671523,0.000059567054,0.000037179565,0.000017831573,0.00006168372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000012701008,0.000026862452,0.000065926695,0.000009803193,0.00018176931,0.000025709678,0.000020672702,0.000043030108,0.000001030242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015256803,0.000058825826,0.0077657625,0.00020171699,0.00023444147,5.2495942e-8,0.20970955,0.00001352642,0.000023558217,0.72063535,0.0073198956,0.05388475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008576091,0.00064178085,0.17083035,0.0001587941,0.0005212004,0.0000015023951,0.10328272,0.009490052,0.000111045,0.29965338,0.40621713,0.0005159411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005729761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004800507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42098197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002005818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049182367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23590367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005816517","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2020.1724778","title":"Psychiatric genetics: from hereditary madness to big biology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychiatric genetics; Forensic genetics; Behavioural genetics; Psychiatry; Biology; Genetics; Psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Gene","score_opus":0.024217989255187526,"score_gpt":0.2530287609896222,"score_spread":0.22881077173443465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005816517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797103,0.0012079956,0.012040041,0.0053802547,0.000255508,0.00027658092,0.00006217913,0.000028954402,0.001038206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94173336,0.0025846045,0.033682793,0.020987622,0.00087462016,0.00000913905,0.00002398073,0.000030656003,0.00007320831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986022,0.000051648978,0.00019972306,0.00064038974,0.00016876013,0.00033725024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913675,0.00004305857,0.00004709384,0.00021775933,0.0000035337077,0.0005518119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105252475,0.00016482372,0.00016154826,0.000007341034,0.00014332541,0.000022905666,0.00019687759,0.00013322357,0.00059670646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011471338,0.00016703673,0.000068858244,0.00017817743,0.000110687324,0.000021919217,0.00033960352,0.00016885983,0.00033582788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017648785,0.000079015896,0.37898195,0.000023012686,0.00006484677,0.000006737568,0.011692337,0.0010699823,0.030038323,0.000020027992,0.04788809,0.53011805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010729181,0.00041070508,0.6743936,0.0000074667582,0.00006385294,0.0000025157203,0.0011362416,0.0058096177,0.0018434889,0.002036187,0.312621,0.0006023959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042166252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051995798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5295156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052378586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028899562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68115604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006908109","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2020.1730165","title":"Clinical usefulness of genetic testing for drug toxicity in cancer care: decision-makers’ framing, knowledge and perceptions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Pharmacogenomics; Genetic testing; Perception; Ethnic group; Medicine; Pharmacogenetics; Drug; Context (archaeology); Risk perception; Psychology; Pharmacology; Political science; Internal medicine; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.17496592695984658,"score_gpt":0.47352497549923805,"score_spread":0.29855904853939147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006908109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709231,0.025676074,0.0016763344,0.00038665545,0.0005424198,0.00049550534,0.00014656286,0.000019012523,0.00013432612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966163,0.013557417,0.017729063,0.0017842518,0.0006473779,0.000039408034,0.0000055685923,0.000029233524,0.000044700464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983631,0.00014781729,0.00058556156,0.00046021832,0.0001082313,0.00033510666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818957,0.00092429883,0.0001403611,0.000120094635,0.0001626594,0.0004630267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041078788,0.00021587669,0.00041871142,0.000028742448,0.0002000094,0.000020879543,0.00018129275,0.0003034574,0.00007528393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014944983,0.00021838203,0.00015849549,0.00022926922,0.00025469222,0.000026978863,0.00019021805,0.00047016004,0.0000017535219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007972465,0.00018328136,0.38058463,0.00025133454,0.00011655051,0.0000017934791,0.026420634,0.001042657,0.016058924,0.000057274818,0.0064777094,0.56872547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010151653,0.00042911532,0.671775,0.00009296888,0.00077328284,0.000005529862,0.0043478566,0.11893383,0.010689016,0.0014291446,0.18052359,0.0008490578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003977691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006925428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5678764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021899266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027519435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89053607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008663039","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2020.1726737","title":"Posthumous planning following fertility preservation: a study of adolescent cancer patients in Israel","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Fertility; Fertility preservation; Reproduction; Qualitative research; Recall; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; History; Social science; Environmental health; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.07048687839218915,"score_gpt":0.3467057519159601,"score_spread":0.27621887352377095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008663039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99625534,0.0016709117,0.00002125413,0.0014394013,0.000039461724,0.0005228634,0.0000018439116,0.000019371408,0.000029544528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884015,0.00018654324,0.0003451138,0.00056518917,0.000036887148,0.000008543494,0.000002102019,0.000005748365,0.000009722247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999347,0.000011815694,0.00018077072,0.00020495035,0.00014556592,0.00010990325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997066,0.000008243374,0.00004637906,0.00011383274,0.000054135708,0.0000707777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000063190666,0.00006360034,0.00017044166,0.000009603006,0.000032399636,0.0000041390695,0.000039625127,0.00005142219,0.0000014643114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060486982,0.000054777895,0.00003841321,0.0001286742,0.000017359422,0.000018816072,0.00005755009,0.0001256951,1.11418736e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073625735,0.00023006437,0.9873849,0.00011670218,0.0000228705,0.0000011456606,0.0073221494,0.000032165124,0.00028215398,0.0000016775799,0.00028789698,0.0042446386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017582432,0.0007133706,0.99186826,0.00004432102,0.000022382786,6.497607e-8,0.004551647,0.000421104,0.00038177264,0.00002384416,0.00017273868,0.000042251657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046846538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020946809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004483349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027242402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007504782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22337776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047331065","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2020.1799343","title":"The consumer representation of DNA ancestry testing on YouTube","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Genetic genealogy; Ethnic group; Race (biology); Representation (politics); Promotion (chess); Identity (music); Social media; Phrase; Psychology; Sociology; Anthropology; Gender studies; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Demography; Law; Politics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03842493702971653,"score_gpt":0.3211931823059316,"score_spread":0.282768245276215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047331065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99298924,0.0028167437,0.0030606135,0.00043470238,0.00006864592,0.00008408442,0.0000058119017,0.0000065105824,0.00053363765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948115,0.0018466954,0.002708328,0.00032267976,0.00021970156,0.0000015508595,0.0000072942194,0.000009618958,0.000072632276],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995374,0.000009723513,0.00011499125,0.00015937927,0.00007744098,0.0001010777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969614,0.000028574803,0.00003758961,0.00013079678,0.00003781546,0.000069063906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004357878,0.00007101863,0.00006748456,0.0000021173123,0.00007138312,0.000016343609,0.00007139131,0.00005894975,0.0000012173678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067473855,0.00005675409,0.00005257456,0.000060736173,0.000054074684,7.2026967e-7,0.00004905329,0.000052378884,6.0300255e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019237186,0.000011370932,0.008916391,0.000027510314,0.00006536528,3.0708043e-7,0.00074507797,0.0020693692,0.9383678,0.000060388407,0.0082339775,0.041483194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082729623,0.00058148865,0.033455186,0.00001647043,0.00003889046,0.000004226763,0.0013860719,0.007948794,0.9241973,0.00010487089,0.031188782,0.00025060461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000058849287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019211789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04123259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000016388188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027623679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23143645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119827990","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2020.1868985","title":"Assessing public opinions on the likelihood and permissibility of gene editing through construal level theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Construal level theory; Public opinion; Psychology; Social psychology; Sample (material); Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.2227272524481837,"score_gpt":0.4354050517351198,"score_spread":0.2126777992869361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119827990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98732746,0.0027497075,0.0021604865,0.0033585392,0.0004803587,0.000110057554,0.000093025265,0.000011662,0.003708701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406785,0.00018026287,0.0043262453,0.0008902454,0.00020987168,0.000005946528,0.000021353606,0.000009155632,0.00028904882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990506,0.00016850089,0.00023928299,0.00022996971,0.00009755311,0.00021408635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929965,0.0001785621,0.000084308296,0.00023335942,0.000093100694,0.000111036905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003873958,0.00008772338,0.00013032608,0.0000060673087,0.00028466352,0.000069293405,0.00006573407,0.00011780058,0.00039354307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043801283,0.00006814613,0.00011125739,0.000083017294,0.00021293193,0.000047015612,0.00005657332,0.00021192717,0.0000016670143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015064079,0.0008389933,0.047049195,0.00011055783,0.00021669969,0.0000045655183,0.024155132,6.942109e-7,0.0036397276,0.25385228,0.029607715,0.64050937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016333613,0.00033145657,0.8952199,0.00013207356,0.00010477945,0.00005590927,0.06375808,0.00012114599,0.0028856932,0.022933811,0.012531866,0.00029190702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005250449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014367161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8481707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000116967885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018679809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43090206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132539521","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2021.1883501","title":"Organizing precision oncology: introduction to the special issue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut National Du Cancer","keywords":"Precision oncology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Medicine; Precision medicine; Engineering; Pathology","score_opus":0.02724569623871471,"score_gpt":0.3452241333549534,"score_spread":0.3179784371162387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132539521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7252183,0.0026058431,0.0015116512,0.25684503,0.002539569,0.0004698379,0.0000021764392,0.000025252142,0.010782331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29841444,0.041227076,0.060929485,0.0470197,0.38380548,0.000012277276,0.000060507067,0.00008088934,0.16845015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991537,0.000024196139,0.000106195585,0.00022985072,0.00031052844,0.0001755758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935555,0.000039784765,0.000016763915,0.00020380199,0.00015899913,0.00022506969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039309697,0.00005907021,0.00012379266,0.000013405902,0.00013191407,0.000025171112,0.000058730726,0.00006863119,0.0005717662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021095452,0.000037927228,0.00004167648,0.00031778438,0.000073017225,0.000013812627,0.00009031511,0.00016815556,0.000046722787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013904502,0.00002872768,0.00060417154,0.0000090313715,0.000013993118,0.000005764173,0.0073200692,0.000004821658,0.033694368,0.000046612586,0.6952719,0.26298666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000535878,0.00026373536,0.013179992,0.000012184395,0.000029871493,0.00005610868,0.0045507597,0.00013491345,0.013108689,0.00007200905,0.9680143,0.000041535626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015615231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028505645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4268039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055707947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039714688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6260439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216925343","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2021.1997576","title":"The omics of our lives: practices and policies of direct-to-consumer epigenetic and microbiomic testing companies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Institute of Genetics; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Omics; Promotion (chess); Product (mathematics); Service (business); Data science; Genetic testing; Internet privacy; Business; Marketing; Biology; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Genetics","score_opus":0.021874586433259697,"score_gpt":0.2830581313813956,"score_spread":0.2611835449481359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216925343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94501776,0.054262497,0.000061246836,0.00031937525,0.000056826582,0.00011711091,0.00006169973,0.0000030854812,0.00010039868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94922274,0.041584786,0.008676006,0.00020661239,0.000113928996,0.000003118261,0.000014871301,0.0000146596885,0.00016327444],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992167,0.000047393,0.00022831716,0.00026418027,0.00007476187,0.0001686474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991904,0.00007638643,0.00018606213,0.00022246053,0.00019042702,0.00013425018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012070415,0.00013053938,0.00017544153,0.000012547981,0.0001555435,0.000053127013,0.00008152042,0.00007976781,5.465578e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018076901,0.000115747695,0.00005972955,0.0000755319,0.00019719648,0.0000024494036,0.00019195357,0.000044276527,1.4134629e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028988568,0.000056564266,0.034484826,0.00014117562,0.000118802905,4.1709146e-7,0.0012645362,0.000026486772,0.9586213,0.00002642752,0.0013519858,0.0038784505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015001782,0.00047397186,0.12877327,0.00008166424,0.00026476456,0.000040838222,0.013298302,0.00027664946,0.8369189,0.0005336005,0.017422693,0.00041515217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007191981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006277478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121702425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003331826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015607475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4720054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238563920","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2013.869965","title":"Editorial Board","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0278355630775524,"score_gpt":0.21070041035462037,"score_spread":0.18286484727706798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238563920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028768714,0.017820403,0.00012707844,0.000172004,0.30867973,0.00019455739,0.0008381601,0.000013655047,0.6718667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000896396,0.030364683,0.0008963792,0.00029446068,0.06618126,0.000012001505,0.000053479922,0.000031299547,0.9020768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850297,0.000003992017,0.00044512356,0.00065009185,0.000046999914,0.00035079833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916714,0.000022261684,0.00028852545,0.00031334898,0.000036127338,0.00017259725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018374612,0.00026016348,0.0005815443,0.000041851465,0.00018606964,0.0002925032,0.00023813907,0.00046876518,0.024728775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009953881,0.00029618648,0.00028623577,0.00006717399,0.00014063722,0.00006209081,0.00024176975,0.00025043215,0.098688096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.594492e-7,0.000009977944,0.000043556425,0.000026173922,0.00013643972,4.562602e-8,0.00071701757,0.000012036159,9.879329e-7,0.0016625278,0.99696684,0.0004234221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039547984,0.000024443067,0.00006520016,0.000009089425,0.000012492263,1.9140312e-7,0.00020756443,0.00017705305,0.0000025672139,0.0016212965,0.9971476,0.00033700131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004549133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029319779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24249847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006834728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060659982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386077183","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2023.2248363","title":"Siloed discourses: a year-long study of twitter engagement on the use of CRISPR in food and agriculture","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"CRISPR; Skepticism; Agriculture; Work (physics); Public relations; Civil society; Emerging technologies; Political science; Sociology; Internet privacy; Biology; Computer science; Politics; Epistemology; Engineering; Law; Gene; Ecology","score_opus":0.03699395140392055,"score_gpt":0.3089875160764588,"score_spread":0.27199356467253827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386077183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989999,0.00034382893,0.00023503051,0.00013550697,0.00003152008,0.00022647184,0.000007346705,0.00000286123,0.00001756368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985631,0.00091125036,0.00026989667,0.00006630424,0.000043499902,0.000007706538,0.0000068038503,0.000008437957,0.00012296175],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994904,0.000026995123,0.00012697658,0.00015724808,0.00009345181,0.00010492545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997345,0.000024125857,0.000031167885,0.00015897691,0.00001990008,0.000031305655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010669055,0.00008559707,0.00009836283,0.000012658855,0.000029795106,0.000013150604,0.000057317404,0.000058233418,0.000001932565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014900663,0.00005862522,0.000041344523,0.00009100139,0.000030206947,0.0000010770088,0.00010245007,0.0000697713,1.5686582e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055210083,0.00054173695,0.13147849,0.00018097767,0.0005453133,0.0000029054559,0.031012654,0.0105305035,0.7896867,0.00016110665,0.031299613,0.0045048213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022568773,0.002314449,0.8096851,0.00005989093,0.00007526258,0.0000016462131,0.022456815,0.00082667696,0.15850195,0.000070326765,0.0034288415,0.00032214087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025513518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007604448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6782066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000021906797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011543875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23906672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393902762","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2024.2332306","title":"Genetic subjectivities of prospective fathers: men’s attitudes toward epigenetics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epigenetics; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Genetics; Biology; Gene","score_opus":0.029134126377325573,"score_gpt":0.31128868015112227,"score_spread":0.28215455377379667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393902762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370435,0.05799405,0.0013700972,0.0011024984,0.0001567131,0.00048663138,0.000010514714,0.00014260875,0.0016933938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633541,0.020490788,0.015076843,0.00007982875,0.00024538153,0.000019503075,0.0000017600572,0.000025893049,0.0007059023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.000012502857,0.00021882293,0.00038382484,0.00020134398,0.00023233835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945354,0.00004551425,0.00003945077,0.00026289118,0.000092615504,0.00010599201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011770361,0.00015296233,0.00027447593,0.000043932847,0.000055648565,0.000030228864,0.000062074956,0.00015137097,0.000019843454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034758217,0.00012537854,0.00013398871,0.00018119268,0.000275363,0.000023483826,0.000068386165,0.00019664285,0.000003118353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010453697,0.00031644123,0.6745866,0.0046222894,0.0011548894,0.00003314313,0.030825324,0.000052362786,0.042144082,0.008253081,0.01337725,0.22453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008200735,0.0012893714,0.91254693,0.00022962275,0.00022799254,0.000057688398,0.0044361753,0.000799854,0.057596233,0.012296048,0.0094220685,0.00027792598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007059921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000040484365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23796035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006073211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029755232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51127887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402796455","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2024.2400964","title":"How we get Mendel wrong, and why it matters: challenging the narrative of Mendelian genetics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mendelian inheritance; Narrative; Genetics; Epistemology; Biology; Psychology; Evolutionary biology; Philosophy; Gene","score_opus":0.015824955918749044,"score_gpt":0.253782211674328,"score_spread":0.23795725575557897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402796455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63579786,0.2523797,0.017369624,0.09200169,0.0008077112,0.00075899885,0.00012733506,0.00004854017,0.00070855353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8342202,0.1547495,0.005128006,0.0025492604,0.00066052476,0.000013642642,0.00003245269,0.000059242502,0.0025871913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856895,0.00005906148,0.0002500144,0.0005477633,0.00023396352,0.00034026042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992445,0.000034430584,0.00007830987,0.00039782596,0.00008464154,0.00016030755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027527532,0.000282465,0.00022958581,0.00001877062,0.00026581256,0.00020064054,0.00020967558,0.00028045007,0.000009241872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009848416,0.00022471944,0.00021615627,0.0000939381,0.00037786554,0.0000068348927,0.00024011615,0.00019483858,6.992673e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026612895,0.00008598985,0.00063545693,0.00064827787,0.0014663166,0.000004599386,0.11168426,0.0005176332,0.3987859,0.0011022091,0.44346768,0.041575067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009322445,0.0005583154,0.00054716365,0.000114651346,0.00022185151,0.000034058965,0.06248324,0.012314049,0.05773341,0.0017364812,0.8626289,0.00069563265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014475901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032673666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41916123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014726131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117651645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410345262","doi":"10.1080/14636778.2025.2500756","title":"Capitalizing a cure: how finance controls the price and value of medicines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Genetics and Society","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Economics; Finance; Financial economics; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02679235073809223,"score_gpt":0.269839559880074,"score_spread":0.2430472091419818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410345262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123364,0.1031363,0.004071383,0.06620009,0.00040080212,0.00038898483,0.00010575976,0.000013323235,0.013346991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568349,0.036004253,0.0009191991,0.005449432,0.00011199062,0.0000060696984,0.0000012755519,0.000007650891,0.000665198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936026,0.0000072125895,0.00024812482,0.0001991615,0.00001748846,0.00016774757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952626,0.000108825916,0.00013495027,0.00015811689,0.000016647267,0.000055199296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028073453,0.00009815472,0.0002663788,0.000022268201,0.00009943449,0.000053658016,0.00011875964,0.000075853735,0.000009013314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035107783,0.000084889776,0.000078763645,0.0000990944,0.0001576842,0.00003451224,0.00007956997,0.00010414072,0.0000013913104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005422346,0.000019731264,0.012220519,0.00007622826,0.00012344836,1.752191e-7,0.0019467833,0.000051592986,0.00022214072,0.95726144,0.02349405,0.004578438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001724965,0.00006223262,0.048270423,0.000034781842,0.000038291088,0.0000021877531,0.00033543978,0.048587922,0.00035741169,0.18040317,0.71996135,0.00022181626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007150924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050265758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77685827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014843067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003885905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34617046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}