{"meta":{"query_hash":"e86e17063c2a","filters":{"venue":"New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, The"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e86e17063c2a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=New+Zealand+Yearbook+of+International+Law%2C+The"},"results":[{"id":"W2259856028","doi":"","title":"New Zealand in the WTO: The Canada-dairy Dispute 'Canada - Measures Affecting the Importation of Milk and the Exportation of Dairy Products'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, The","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; Business; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; World trade; Milk products; Dairy industry; International economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Food science","score_opus":0.0084570596108187,"score_gpt":0.23287436420016697,"score_spread":0.22441730458934828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259856028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020937921,0.044034712,0.001135509,0.16994849,0.001975989,0.00012393213,0.00050782354,0.00005121619,0.7612845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3034455,0.03460856,0.003215528,0.079023145,0.0009881308,0.0002542587,0.00040708887,0.00014412122,0.5779137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967313,0.00039014407,0.00014035024,0.00025087775,0.0017447466,0.0007426163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998904,0.00034662205,0.0001453865,0.00006991006,0.00037042174,0.0001636493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020607815,0.00050595833,0.00034172955,0.001191465,0.009136465,0.01083197,0.0014176111,0.009793614,0.007943005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065859556,0.00042178272,0.00039017253,0.0034296347,0.009207808,0.0046950285,0.002917152,0.0074888947,0.00087856385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034447305,0.000026893857,0.0011810485,0.00014313648,0.000013605288,0.0008757793,0.010983891,0.00022151323,0.0005692504,0.69624513,0.26800472,0.021700496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001881646,0.000010809928,0.0057456023,0.00024539148,0.000015283222,0.0002187913,0.0057254042,0.00016529464,0.00016961177,0.01974498,0.96790296,0.000036938218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92444295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.951262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07555705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032983962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054444294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23931646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298473769","doi":"","title":"'Australia - Apples': How the WTO appellate body dealt with the application of jurisprudence from the 'Continued Suspension' dispute","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, The","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisprudence; Law; Standard of review; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Arbitration; Judicial review; Computer science","score_opus":0.010453979719364018,"score_gpt":0.26600230399685026,"score_spread":0.25554832427748625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298473769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075628854,0.011637682,0.036025394,0.39430085,0.0066608214,0.00071493926,0.00010244073,0.00024361888,0.4746854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5113904,0.004493245,0.018360706,0.2659754,0.002754062,0.0005680928,0.00008636912,0.0003764297,0.19599529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.880403,0.04711082,0.0069221575,0.014243109,0.043321434,0.007999534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93667305,0.03744823,0.0032882756,0.0036015415,0.016284427,0.0027044711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.110110536,0.000597836,0.0012268202,0.0023489334,0.017495323,0.028807692,0.005423562,0.04297418,0.004060296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13524948,0.0019593951,0.002304258,0.0020688756,0.02204546,0.01659671,0.01372902,0.03434118,0.0012801198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031078824,0.00006392085,0.0013815763,0.00018923724,0.00005895858,0.0014625952,0.038233537,0.00060326984,0.0016513588,0.8937333,0.039872635,0.022718513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005255753,0.00016173151,0.004791832,0.000901961,0.00008835952,0.00057412667,0.008049309,0.0018365432,0.00091752183,0.10849542,0.873871,0.00025960177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12662236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10903662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12662236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021767689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04917759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5823271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596688436","doi":"","title":"Open trade negotiations as opposed to secret trade negotiations: From transparency to public participation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, The","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; International trade; General partnership; Political science; Free trade agreement; Trade agreement; Free trade; Business; Law","score_opus":0.04775574279952115,"score_gpt":0.3412475393813271,"score_spread":0.29349179658180596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596688436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049940225,0.0063587464,0.060378544,0.34922355,0.0025908563,0.00024337854,0.00012881908,0.00021532594,0.53092045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640652,0.0019092894,0.0041627674,0.018589225,0.0010470122,0.00024740605,0.00004081462,0.0001389427,0.009799348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8318173,0.11688715,0.004680851,0.006456605,0.03161238,0.008545707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7171426,0.23537293,0.016303131,0.014184688,0.010495094,0.0065016104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.086723916,0.00057562935,0.0007309703,0.0022215133,0.011561391,0.036561824,0.0025071097,0.0121896025,0.011461842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20472507,0.00088376517,0.0008586196,0.0031243835,0.03840525,0.04408309,0.021967392,0.020070486,0.0014795631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007346022,0.00003215664,0.0005372331,0.000118807744,0.000011802124,0.00009610542,0.014364247,0.0004092266,0.0001541064,0.953118,0.008844599,0.022240303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008910679,0.000057838086,0.000799734,0.00069796894,0.00002438252,0.000104674626,0.012335592,0.0012326449,0.00057339325,0.8877431,0.09628659,0.000054948745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031732982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086723916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009792662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019050369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4586454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}