{"meta":{"query_hash":"13590407c9d0","filters":{"venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/13590407c9d0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=North+Carolina+Journal+of+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1622609718","doi":"","title":"Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in Emerging Securities Markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Emerging markets; Business; China; Financial market; Accounting; Financial system; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.01392247924374707,"score_gpt":0.20812608974422378,"score_spread":0.19420361050047671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622609718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73970336,0.0052170022,0.0056442665,0.017742164,0.00007562899,0.00006770591,0.00013124544,0.000023802098,0.23139483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962907,0.0011106085,0.00022009833,0.00032380168,0.00004440318,0.0000076202655,0.0000138493415,0.000002159174,0.001986731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806195,0.00075154274,0.00011201003,0.00016072707,0.00052907795,0.00038468748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909589,0.0035531332,0.0035440433,0.0003666081,0.0010298888,0.0005473688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037866484,0.00009509998,0.00019327526,0.0011697119,0.0018851875,0.0050826236,0.00035237562,0.0015524869,0.0026160008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831596,0.00012136759,0.00021861444,0.0012566526,0.0058356575,0.0044842726,0.0017574021,0.0018671073,0.00013444257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056902925,0.00007874448,0.022023613,0.000043167514,0.000007635194,0.00062553026,0.0038073172,0.0020009598,0.00038412274,0.9466369,0.0027380744,0.021596977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007604077,0.00014050397,0.1089509,0.0005901782,0.000032276825,0.0011392257,0.016228437,0.016744288,0.003388386,0.7638407,0.08876088,0.00010822859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005743748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073253023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005743748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032433695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031796077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02353239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201423329","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Criminal justice; Law; Identification (biology); Political science; Psychology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.012924781916645959,"score_gpt":0.30627195417558384,"score_spread":0.29334717225893786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201423329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615709,0.011631548,0.02063305,0.18773474,0.0009005421,0.0001426077,0.00006281082,0.00007151513,0.21725228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247664,0.0011829664,0.0005638974,0.0028107348,0.00016086946,0.000021781321,0.000006999622,0.000009609421,0.0027665065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864537,0.008321897,0.0005302032,0.00079121743,0.0019432278,0.00195967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97527903,0.01638845,0.0034147238,0.0013489579,0.0020932688,0.0014754718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019739665,0.0003366916,0.00035429565,0.0032472007,0.014059146,0.009570113,0.0023713808,0.003444894,0.0017383994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030134782,0.00039388976,0.00034241713,0.0014766199,0.056404244,0.0072565204,0.011660417,0.008449976,0.00016391953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020203208,0.00005753657,0.008423325,0.00011076988,0.00001622511,0.0011428373,0.27784085,0.00030720208,0.00013881642,0.6900967,0.003992042,0.0178536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013682081,0.000073239964,0.024173595,0.0011821053,0.000037421196,0.0018678284,0.50078875,0.0019386729,0.00084790477,0.35609713,0.1128652,0.0001144535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012383668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011009084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019739665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009167071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006904332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104394615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257566288","doi":"","title":"Regional Trade Agreements in the Era of Globalization: A Legal Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Government procurement; International trade law; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Regional trade; International economics; Order (exchange); Globalization; Liberalization; Free trade; Trade barrier; Investment (military); Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); World trade; Economic integration; Business; Economics; Procurement; Political science; Politics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.019150593583112784,"score_gpt":0.2846251619880397,"score_spread":0.26547456840492695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257566288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023231035,0.03181636,0.024130493,0.029114747,0.00036211475,0.00006883153,0.00016852448,0.000053070067,0.89105475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8488939,0.047073618,0.019220741,0.0072005414,0.0015537537,0.0002037445,0.00025109493,0.00018295125,0.075419664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996813,0.0013566851,0.000104707455,0.00045395526,0.00073381263,0.00053789205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.0011453227,0.0004329998,0.00021210729,0.00045497585,0.0001524173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035523605,0.0004180745,0.0004679579,0.002897905,0.004739281,0.0100596165,0.0017762546,0.0042403103,0.010184202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005465204,0.00037946235,0.00096733385,0.005088122,0.01298364,0.012129959,0.004723852,0.0042913468,0.0013912587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.265532e-7,0.0000018161492,0.000058123176,0.000011544449,7.93771e-7,0.00005957915,0.0004905264,0.00025397527,0.000009017987,0.9966163,0.0012108182,0.0012866416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007937742,0.000019439341,0.0011490932,0.0005869193,0.000018491426,0.00055451645,0.0036591352,0.0021114168,0.000100049445,0.57697976,0.41478664,0.000026650188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017063862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110371085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017063862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008723507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005106798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063293815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730428860","doi":"","title":"A Destruction of Muslim Identity: Ontario's Decision to Stop Shari'a-based Arbitration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Identity (music); Islam; Law; Business; Political science; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.018163909956121736,"score_gpt":0.3205209524441682,"score_spread":0.30235704248804646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730428860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3240064,0.0011659911,0.0010996484,0.30071408,0.0015716519,0.00026474815,0.00023548915,0.00008355215,0.37085846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6643185,0.00061536074,0.0010416199,0.07740482,0.00037869212,0.00009786317,0.000053983877,0.000070218346,0.25601885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949602,0.00045636445,0.00014912208,0.00026482972,0.0015216878,0.0026477594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472356,0.0017487542,0.00023723397,0.00018991064,0.0014314491,0.0016690422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232578,0.0002783779,0.00035998604,0.00061571767,0.045575876,0.007854473,0.0022129158,0.015335411,0.00810984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007211655,0.00073749817,0.0006630285,0.0007183498,0.007242954,0.001394095,0.0030245304,0.012376917,0.0006782946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063080766,0.0002643995,0.038914207,0.0001967315,0.00017384,0.008245801,0.067375414,0.001473028,0.0056229653,0.31907907,0.5157678,0.04225587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023620321,0.00010037881,0.041924745,0.00019402477,0.00015891225,0.0006277979,0.04099953,0.0013543833,0.0020846722,0.0131422905,0.8989529,0.00022420971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99343467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07227391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07227391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13250726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5243864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762133947","doi":"","title":"Protection of Pharmaceuticals as Foreign Policy: The Canada-U.S. Trade Agreement and Bill C-22 Versus the North American Free Trade Agreement and Bill C-91","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; Agreement; International trade; International economics; Rules of origin; Economics; Free trade; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024228734102697005,"score_gpt":0.29447604930141735,"score_spread":0.27024731519872036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762133947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018329028,0.007083038,0.0015129629,0.14773338,0.0010279584,0.000088581466,0.00044669368,0.000055536046,0.82372284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5233321,0.006150483,0.0032839947,0.23556255,0.0009669145,0.00020108408,0.00030905445,0.00008736482,0.23010641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860422,0.0016883145,0.000296587,0.0010016903,0.0060893996,0.0048817554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941346,0.0026423133,0.00045547445,0.00033593498,0.0016428282,0.00078895513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005872238,0.0006930412,0.000827643,0.0018820605,0.014431579,0.013967592,0.0018065495,0.022988534,0.0064094877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015065077,0.00057017955,0.0012727518,0.0024755653,0.012236911,0.0031279842,0.002795465,0.008992114,0.0010460967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007371711,0.000022807983,0.00068971363,0.00003415408,0.000011514899,0.00014998886,0.00086338195,0.00020725525,0.00021563182,0.9477317,0.045368925,0.004631216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026496753,0.00011873429,0.011397264,0.00074881496,0.00017230852,0.0003927553,0.0030351614,0.0016445244,0.0017471196,0.19317508,0.787159,0.00014418432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8759131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95522326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04477671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111031026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3790325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124371131","doi":"","title":"Converging Trends in Investment Treaty Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Arbitration; Sovereignty; Capital (architecture); State (computer science); Foreign direct investment; Ignorance; Investment (military); Bilateral investment treaty; Convergence (economics); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Economics; International economics; Business; Market economy; Law; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01784714352561786,"score_gpt":0.26318067661303446,"score_spread":0.2453335330874166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124371131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268216,0.039206408,0.019323517,0.18746325,0.0013647956,0.00005771663,0.00019644391,0.00021066975,0.62535554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90290797,0.019908164,0.007675935,0.024092592,0.0015228079,0.00013398909,0.00022563408,0.00024977655,0.0432832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698379,0.011523679,0.00168382,0.0044480646,0.010105002,0.0024015575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96793324,0.01988342,0.0036279617,0.0025180017,0.004911186,0.001126147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02502563,0.0002796673,0.0006805968,0.005013561,0.0054235347,0.019335268,0.0023288478,0.0052622026,0.0061211823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055035744,0.00057757954,0.00052493595,0.010380116,0.018880026,0.01274424,0.008211519,0.012892438,0.0008599079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014205022,0.000012231022,0.000881613,0.000052631593,0.000004040562,0.000057616762,0.008237401,0.00020894641,0.00015446024,0.96324724,0.006042736,0.021086818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023069873,0.00006403771,0.008117808,0.0010069278,0.000015591824,0.0003026168,0.014563995,0.0014782662,0.00091320206,0.25747323,0.71595705,0.00008427639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010504187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007865197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02502563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01897919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009702999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13770431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125943388","doi":"","title":"Compliance & Enforcement in International Law: Achieving Global Uniformity in Aviation Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation law; International law; Civil aviation; Aviation; Enforcement; Harmony (color); International community; Aviation safety; Law; Sovereignty; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Public international law; Politics; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.01958291196257689,"score_gpt":0.31452014268094847,"score_spread":0.2949372307183716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125943388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07409678,0.016321223,0.08201366,0.22994986,0.0016971289,0.00043888338,0.00014055066,0.00035803916,0.5949838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217492,0.0037326545,0.024338694,0.032053754,0.0012372647,0.00046898948,0.00016337387,0.00012942635,0.016126744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94824666,0.026150074,0.0035413115,0.0062871864,0.011639108,0.004135674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96136516,0.016359765,0.005978797,0.007033151,0.007907264,0.0013558441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07582486,0.00057890447,0.00071657303,0.0029273762,0.005745644,0.013718584,0.0027092178,0.008044945,0.0029596386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055715095,0.0005644885,0.0008395947,0.0037924338,0.037437934,0.016830264,0.01354841,0.00876642,0.00056967954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010068082,0.00003314734,0.0020191239,0.000086767664,0.000014330564,0.000049099814,0.0065297973,0.0005110098,0.00016850102,0.9443574,0.0052182903,0.0410025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681334,0.00018787476,0.0128299445,0.0012163846,0.000046778747,0.00017238318,0.009515306,0.0011648939,0.0009973934,0.76773477,0.20601195,0.00008537966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010477566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006257688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07582486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007707742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017497994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40100497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996001635","doi":"","title":"Public Policy and the Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Public policy; Policy analysis; Policy studies","score_opus":0.023819617179996835,"score_gpt":0.24938570273082156,"score_spread":0.22556608555082472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996001635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4047791,0.0037299045,0.00088057906,0.16759528,0.00072453177,0.00014154473,0.0004187905,0.00008215797,0.42164814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583936,0.0006956271,0.00020061858,0.008932229,0.000090871705,0.000024544193,0.000054424185,0.000031201478,0.03157706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837112,0.0018288179,0.00030194537,0.00085859123,0.0036147712,0.009684698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689905,0.008560064,0.0014375997,0.0006256051,0.012719798,0.0076664235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087649,0.00034127245,0.00084212015,0.0030989808,0.043065876,0.02168248,0.002891153,0.009484234,0.014112307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04302253,0.0006615234,0.0007282378,0.004595711,0.0120455595,0.0029594388,0.0051845117,0.011500417,0.00053776236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038395255,0.0002624862,0.04910292,0.00016804627,0.000138661,0.0015124381,0.044142,0.0028903096,0.0005675433,0.7193433,0.14543991,0.036048528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033666598,0.00014656602,0.13971016,0.0007541,0.00036517123,0.00033792533,0.1385633,0.0073806443,0.0021614963,0.100703545,0.60887426,0.00066611357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99654007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25791174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25791174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4227324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8607172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006949948","doi":"","title":"World Trade Organization's Decision in United States - Tax Treatment for Foreign Sales Corporations: Round Three in the Transatlantic Tax Dispute","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; European union; Member states; World trade; Value-added tax","score_opus":0.025755993966756402,"score_gpt":0.2583147261265426,"score_spread":0.2325587321597862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006949948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057159897,0.008448446,0.003325414,0.33502877,0.020822084,0.0004617527,0.0019853509,0.00036648606,0.5724017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21073096,0.0023310913,0.00353801,0.39517227,0.0028407024,0.0005059014,0.0005043676,0.00034213215,0.38403445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591124,0.0007293134,0.0003504049,0.0005249326,0.0011187439,0.0013655131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971855,0.0011124443,0.00024344139,0.00018016754,0.0008088683,0.00046962276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061142733,0.000829864,0.000600559,0.001395911,0.009532719,0.013700447,0.0019029859,0.041971937,0.0048208237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008220677,0.0010370674,0.001332015,0.0020793572,0.0031325954,0.0047609443,0.0021042968,0.017102582,0.0024106244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013383724,0.00014332945,0.0024974847,0.00007943323,0.000028292017,0.0013823438,0.0022482444,0.0002453368,0.0009718298,0.2892851,0.69129,0.011694774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098582525,0.000078968,0.0046929885,0.0004006656,0.00007084312,0.0002648872,0.0022440234,0.00036525892,0.0019274215,0.01809346,0.9716447,0.000118262265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11110803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20344578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11110803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008609017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016469218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22092265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}