{"meta":{"query_hash":"c21b78fd561b","filters":{"venue":"Northwestern University law review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c21b78fd561b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Northwestern+University+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1599073479","doi":"","title":"Erie's International Effect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Choice of law; International law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Foreign policy; Conflict of laws; Federal common law; Federal law; Common law; Sociology; Politics; Legislation; History","score_opus":0.01065900333818217,"score_gpt":0.2619199546243652,"score_spread":0.25126095128618303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599073479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042169136,0.0005514564,0.00066640787,0.004981647,0.0011625335,0.00007023281,0.00035691867,0.00009748832,0.98789644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09779058,0.0010306491,0.0008032327,0.024792233,0.001114729,0.00027809205,0.0005711637,0.00022122389,0.8733982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562943,0.00035567032,0.00013846296,0.0010389655,0.0012430355,0.0015944126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834144,0.00040087383,0.000082705665,0.00029329758,0.0006645768,0.00021713536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036816245,0.0015111113,0.0008474358,0.002447472,0.0073320423,0.011909662,0.0017844093,0.010764934,0.08454648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007050253,0.000866669,0.0014845422,0.0011483392,0.0028384363,0.004998344,0.006784654,0.012491099,0.01344968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007900377,0.00007300191,0.0011072072,0.00006234235,0.00003475193,0.00046289377,0.0010972406,0.0001600668,0.0006572462,0.76173955,0.2154334,0.019093268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035462654,0.000049239243,0.0020574732,0.00014080122,0.000073614785,0.00012861918,0.00066178595,0.00015520709,0.0009192174,0.013443346,0.98229617,0.000039036495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088864945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14979544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088864945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006889341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007929126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28283614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221667329","doi":"","title":"WHEN CONSUMER FRAUD CROSSES THE INTERNATIONAL LINE: THE BASIS FOR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION UNDER THE FTC ACT[dagger]","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Business; Law; Presumption; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.039449740947664326,"score_gpt":0.26583582639364994,"score_spread":0.22638608544598562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221667329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02405743,0.033654056,0.0031110994,0.17176434,0.002257925,0.000111725676,0.00019907646,0.000075891876,0.76476836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5224825,0.051534217,0.003920837,0.111595206,0.0058674095,0.0002894328,0.00048780782,0.00013374936,0.30368885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760914,0.0007985207,0.00009363825,0.00024825145,0.0007705488,0.00047999943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970642,0.0017770629,0.000312889,0.000089286106,0.00057858083,0.00017807791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018623177,0.00036664982,0.00023241344,0.0028243407,0.0064512803,0.010777377,0.0015698726,0.012325409,0.010503107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063927895,0.00035047968,0.0003958885,0.0036852204,0.008847919,0.0071621854,0.002204296,0.0070448606,0.0015212281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019802892,0.0000663318,0.002093077,0.0000883604,0.00000220324,0.0009050591,0.006777522,0.00021405022,0.000116783325,0.7389961,0.20502605,0.04569468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001402531,0.0000506332,0.008397861,0.0019811878,0.000009798755,0.00083031267,0.014562377,0.0005770772,0.00031205502,0.1307684,0.84241813,0.00007800519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037717678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041859746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037717678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00824024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074856947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07499623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344148760","doi":"","title":"Ignorance Is Neither Bliss nor Ethical","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Context (archaeology); Law; Mandate; Liability; Sociology; Politics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.26913483952150585,"score_gpt":0.5034133392905238,"score_spread":0.23427849976901793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344148760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032206122,0.01510123,0.015305816,0.7688473,0.011293882,0.00008801259,0.0000944204,0.00019540737,0.18585339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34590966,0.01563081,0.012490457,0.4899865,0.015670614,0.00041010568,0.00017868004,0.00056390936,0.11915925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93338007,0.037041586,0.0024087823,0.0071301353,0.016451294,0.003588134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92934775,0.036488093,0.0060900054,0.0116274245,0.010598235,0.005848541],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060225815,0.0014226427,0.0023857676,0.0017163312,0.013706073,0.02072001,0.0032186238,0.014939316,0.010230045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0891411,0.000991137,0.0008110212,0.0012563709,0.103272796,0.031231228,0.012934498,0.034908265,0.0068697776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028014458,0.000036529902,0.00030417828,0.00016156545,0.000036468115,0.00013569178,0.0076459344,0.00014622945,0.00014208027,0.87408423,0.10600396,0.011275128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019723404,0.000028587849,0.00011935916,0.0009166071,0.000014633432,0.00020066634,0.0037766672,0.00018255673,0.00017528872,0.48904717,0.5054738,0.00004495167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004555742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00421548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077796383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017409483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3185084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}