{"meta":{"query_hash":"c21b78fd561b","filters":{"venue":"Northwestern University law review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c21b78fd561b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Northwestern+University+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1599073479","doi":"","title":"Erie's International Effect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Choice of law; International law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Foreign policy; Conflict of laws; Federal common law; Federal law; Common law; Sociology; Politics; Legislation; History","score_opus":0.01065900333818217,"score_gpt":0.2619199546243652,"score_spread":0.25126095128618303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599073479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08326361,0.0008295663,0.00015875544,0.010050822,0.00088450254,0.00090316293,0.000029405712,0.00015707308,0.9037231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96692234,0.010515021,0.00012427213,0.0030157948,0.00028759261,0.0000045896495,0.00010240935,0.000008826495,0.019019146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991947,0.00015292245,0.000091708534,0.00013513249,0.0002953655,0.00013017231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952376,0.000059937458,0.00007146035,0.000094362906,0.00017489085,0.00007556531],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021418478,0.000069908914,0.000114684735,0.000025004269,0.00025272137,0.0000500619,0.00031974626,0.0000403794,0.0025096505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002189459,0.00006911795,0.00009162169,0.00009666596,0.00009718523,0.00060022285,0.000045208588,0.00006751408,0.0011670538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005003365,0.000031019223,0.0148559855,0.00011616327,0.00003903149,0.0000141554965,0.00029225094,7.0873176e-7,0.000008084327,0.96398324,0.0028990132,0.017755356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011905603,0.000014565917,0.0032650188,0.00026864553,0.000019993407,9.955883e-7,0.00003268311,0.0000021117946,0.0000056213867,0.0002182236,0.99597156,0.00008153858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020856155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028605899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001384135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035667937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221667329","doi":"","title":"WHEN CONSUMER FRAUD CROSSES THE INTERNATIONAL LINE: THE BASIS FOR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION UNDER THE FTC ACT[dagger]","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Business; Law; Presumption; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.039449740947664326,"score_gpt":0.26583582639364994,"score_spread":0.22638608544598562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221667329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27843103,0.03013311,0.049188737,0.48779678,0.04568295,0.010695976,0.00030966953,0.0011426487,0.09661911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939827,0.0062481924,0.00009196457,0.043294966,0.008274919,0.000012261193,0.00016432414,0.00004872715,0.002037608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988798,0.000030397012,0.00024735703,0.00024068498,0.0003512887,0.00025047833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.0003917968,0.00026292476,0.00039801712,0.00044418997,0.000013778135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012157073,0.00018617074,0.00018846845,0.000036181627,0.0010757617,0.0003777969,0.0008595661,0.00010167801,0.00017152246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004347159,0.00010118112,0.00020045062,0.00023137525,0.0003131727,0.000832534,0.00022647313,0.00027803078,0.0000849359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051863916,0.000281272,0.021077566,0.0025829773,0.0006803215,0.000035199893,0.0005542072,0.00008666117,0.00006090981,0.8952153,0.053340502,0.025566446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032827954,0.0000044271055,0.0037112925,0.00033437822,0.00032519113,0.000003907944,0.00018866379,0.00003277968,0.000009992603,0.00080369547,0.99411595,0.00014142829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045521925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02818052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94077545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005936898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052718853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344148760","doi":"","title":"Ignorance Is Neither Bliss nor Ethical","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern University law review","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Context (archaeology); Law; Mandate; Liability; Sociology; Politics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.26913483952150585,"score_gpt":0.5034133392905238,"score_spread":0.23427849976901793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344148760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26452428,0.03891887,0.00715753,0.14121434,0.0008317224,0.0044113756,0.00016289279,0.0005913156,0.54218763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6486627,0.12381127,0.0022864067,0.18631673,0.0005431947,0.0000016011975,0.000049735838,0.00008156042,0.03824679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976055,0.0001239726,0.00036831878,0.00047572705,0.0009987777,0.0004276739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960739,0.0018832154,0.0001150595,0.00082623045,0.00062587264,0.00047572615],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033280286,0.00017275847,0.0005295395,0.000059760052,0.00014988966,0.000015164791,0.00041510662,0.00060841965,0.0005955889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059600495,0.00015718225,0.0002802184,0.0004751053,0.00047322235,0.00008152729,0.00022408122,0.002915862,0.000696521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014634271,0.0013324786,0.3253723,0.038197875,0.0006046817,0.0069315033,0.0009923076,7.8839616e-7,0.00028735198,0.49124762,0.007823399,0.12574624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000974674,0.000197104,0.0176342,0.006124616,0.00019893904,0.00004484175,0.000040191328,0.0000012751648,0.00011431048,0.000550882,0.9739165,0.00020249862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009554306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015506639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96609306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014331473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002549051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}