{"meta":{"query_hash":"9a41351577b9","filters":{"venue":"Notre Dame philosophical reviews"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9a41351577b9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Notre+Dame+philosophical+reviews"},"results":[{"id":"W2768914995","doi":"","title":"Philosophy and Psychiatry: Problems, Intersections, and New Perspectives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame philosophical reviews","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.1439005710558419,"score_gpt":0.3385277906456251,"score_spread":0.1946272195897832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768914995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020526694,0.18623562,0.00002236224,0.43348503,0.003287993,0.0021096377,0.00011638964,0.00015877587,0.3540575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93721724,0.04467251,0.0007293884,0.0058125043,0.009221022,0.00008431067,0.000017553213,0.000048825208,0.0021966759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985654,0.0000896861,0.00042688075,0.0004997139,0.00014540378,0.0002729688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987147,0.000038117796,0.00028277468,0.0005235245,0.000028216698,0.00041270192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023257271,0.0002729887,0.0004478831,0.00006619988,0.0013213442,0.00035913585,0.0002398089,0.00008307506,0.0007582603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001298065,0.00020855883,0.00010797201,0.000018191928,0.00053234794,0.0003593764,0.00011780598,0.00037538147,0.00016107464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043367378,0.00010323716,0.00084105995,0.0005727691,0.000017163145,0.000001281117,0.0043428275,1.262165e-8,0.0000030211133,0.96386206,0.011724497,0.018488716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049728015,0.0002017813,0.00041278414,0.000502787,0.00003757011,0.000017691587,0.00025726634,0.000006283704,4.869526e-7,0.4252144,0.5726273,0.00022434861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025040508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000540765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021066127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004936984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005739631","doi":"","title":"Review of John Dupre, Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford, 2012, 350 pp","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame philosophical reviews","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12251774089517393,"score_gpt":0.3095385385298134,"score_spread":0.18702079763463947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005739631","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013216172,0.80248827,0.000009542028,0.013257245,0.00033635882,0.0010337471,0.00019975266,0.000018370563,0.1813351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7457354,0.24860999,0.00012597986,0.0042996164,0.0010319417,0.00010124269,0.000033855194,0.00001835994,0.00004358176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676865,0.0004405774,0.0016493314,0.00033362894,0.00041510756,0.00039270215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728775,0.0004146523,0.0011048409,0.0007408028,0.00030216711,0.00014980657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023707398,0.00033010027,0.0013682309,0.00015059585,0.00013303489,0.000010906297,0.0011213073,0.00011609289,0.0011078942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016667001,0.00020336667,0.00036601743,0.0004248003,0.0020350092,0.0006017131,0.00012333055,0.00040319568,0.000055628665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004320811,0.00084924436,0.00057097856,0.022822807,0.000026408568,6.3100373e-7,0.0031074842,2.782615e-7,0.00008198065,0.96106863,0.007738303,0.0036900577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002722939,0.00026632132,0.00011442189,0.008926172,0.000111173234,0.0000034215605,0.000050014292,0.0000012916779,0.000024973764,0.15691659,0.8330513,0.00026199245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004035956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002601516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82531303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018910476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012664795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006552491","doi":"","title":"Review of Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame philosophical reviews","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive science; Cognition; Psychology; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.05167248778476537,"score_gpt":0.32704934297804866,"score_spread":0.2753768551932833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006552491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030659514,0.8179331,0.038223796,0.097408585,0.0016579719,0.0062671313,0.00003854691,0.00008752152,0.03531743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72523886,0.25585958,0.0028149525,0.015135659,0.0005247075,0.0003071676,0.000008663212,0.000014632725,0.00009574339],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802154,0.00036290765,0.0006096288,0.0004541827,0.00032334513,0.00022840378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977969,0.00090123044,0.0003330424,0.0005707765,0.00026272915,0.00013534444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028576436,0.00018087956,0.0006520527,0.00004877455,0.000112709175,0.00007477881,0.0007626572,0.00006132305,0.000034689434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004236098,0.00009937086,0.00017482713,0.0005220187,0.00061185303,0.00029241634,0.00033881929,0.00041222782,0.00009709204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001706094,0.0000905568,0.000028966635,0.0030031297,0.000023597639,0.000008956038,0.0003759929,2.9845836e-8,0.0005778685,0.38003755,0.00084773643,0.61498857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004298335,0.00038727807,0.001622237,0.09053126,0.0004708357,0.0005388774,0.000068458816,0.0059172264,0.00037732738,0.21078774,0.68361,0.0013904137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008611444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002617436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7221729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005018267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057603313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5071311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006555209","doi":"","title":"Review of The Act of Thinking: Derek Melser, The Act of Thinking, MIT Press, 2004, 304pp, $35.00 (hbk), ISBN 0262134462.","year":2005,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame philosophical reviews","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08087954919197769,"score_gpt":0.3776543301848858,"score_spread":0.2967747809929081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006555209","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074069225,0.77613497,0.000022714126,0.20029835,0.0010034716,0.0032120089,0.00024310888,0.000046871945,0.018297788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1428174,0.83565754,0.000700376,0.01755998,0.002721446,0.00012353122,0.000036576654,0.0000911086,0.00029204407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837331,0.006660293,0.0043829256,0.0011633848,0.0027427312,0.0013175504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987451,0.005126572,0.0032283817,0.0029338233,0.0008110696,0.00044916078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010380508,0.00095035066,0.0037051768,0.00007006523,0.0007107357,0.0000738253,0.00572853,0.0010824071,0.0020853996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022555042,0.0005506341,0.0026308065,0.0013550108,0.0060464605,0.0003764509,0.0012086604,0.0024081224,0.000245587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019888606,0.0023421918,0.0010579367,0.033762407,0.001107317,0.000013180108,0.02330461,0.000024172996,0.00032829487,0.6496759,0.17392875,0.114256345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040269096,0.0001945087,0.00018612113,0.020418648,0.0014493901,0.000005138599,0.0000874826,0.000027493857,0.00018133636,0.13801284,0.83856857,0.00046578964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073645986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018413125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6646398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028384454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083894725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}