{"meta":{"query_hash":"edd038b43887","filters":{"venue":"Nuevo Foro Penal"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/edd038b43887","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Nuevo+Foro+Penal"},"results":[{"id":"W3199049756","doi":"10.17230/nfp13.89.3","title":"Revisión de los conceptos de acción, omisión y comisión por omisión: un análisis a través de casos","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Nuevo Foro Penal","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"Universidad EAFIT","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02144180043366767,"score_gpt":0.36968465253100835,"score_spread":0.3482428520973407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199049756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211574,0.004988025,0.0012901354,0.017273173,0.0009122672,0.00131464,0.00037630994,0.00022607553,0.05246193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855818,0.00419702,0.0014952869,0.002780691,0.0027312026,0.00007920463,0.0000147876,0.00010959649,0.0030104062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355257,0.00055938144,0.0009321389,0.001158325,0.001287254,0.0025103453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949014,0.00053115265,0.0011593376,0.0014687378,0.0006024234,0.0013369588],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026801855,0.00077021256,0.0010610439,0.0001425354,0.004138374,0.0030155801,0.0036323152,0.00092715805,0.0026414376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028539994,0.0007697072,0.00065125554,0.00037040873,0.0014926391,0.0016622394,0.00049199007,0.0012155352,0.0003398162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030882647,0.0025118017,0.48657146,0.0039372914,0.0014816051,0.0027659107,0.067263484,0.00024520466,0.013367937,0.11559141,0.13282798,0.17034765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013338299,0.0014709943,0.37897885,0.0045253187,0.0017370066,0.0006694864,0.011986526,0.0048670587,0.021110348,0.034915585,0.5211992,0.005201309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016793627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015221828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38837123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090157037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002834229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}