{"meta":{"query_hash":"709f209e2cbe","filters":{"venue":"Obiter"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/709f209e2cbe","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Obiter"},"results":[{"id":"W107021197","doi":"","title":"Double inchoate crimes : serving a useful purpose or double trouble? : Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC) : cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Incitement; Law; Stalking; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Legislation; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0607728268755498,"score_gpt":0.3230944197212049,"score_spread":0.2623215928456551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107021197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555813,0.0003650808,0.000032263135,0.0051800623,0.0011962147,0.00057192496,0.000038109767,0.00008500013,0.03695003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622582,0.00023643738,0.00033626423,0.005536241,0.0002972876,0.000073605785,0.000017935618,0.000045181423,0.031198815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714345,0.00024243382,0.0005239593,0.0004683149,0.00081520295,0.00080666406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850386,0.00024178889,0.00031628515,0.0004967633,0.00019529033,0.0002459994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076345983,0.00031522408,0.0003988471,0.00010919361,0.00092684245,0.00016587885,0.000653094,0.00011020344,0.001750619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053708787,0.00022561794,0.00019415053,0.00035049478,0.00036448383,0.0004730475,0.00023121668,0.00028018112,0.000014408563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001643687,0.00048078256,0.105650954,0.00012441706,0.0005202199,0.0008764635,0.088324964,0.00042495635,0.00068231905,0.010920312,0.7890673,0.0012835725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024367836,0.00014109838,0.012231981,0.000113717564,0.00006728234,0.00004146016,0.0046396824,0.000058253583,0.0015399051,0.000073842784,0.97814184,0.00051413703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85292995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8232369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1890745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061720796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020436884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483718433","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i3.12000","title":"HUNG OUT TO DRY? ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE REPORTING DUTIES IMPOSED BY THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE ACT 38 OF 2001","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Money laundering; Privilege (computing); Law; Professional conduct; Position (finance); Confidentiality; Commission; Business; Order (exchange); Legal profession; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.032096614025555255,"score_gpt":0.3345268899074748,"score_spread":0.30243027588191956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483718433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86832637,0.002482548,0.00075556134,0.015128782,0.0020559218,0.0008504159,0.000037949852,0.00006117826,0.11030129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897092,0.00003967815,0.00015428192,0.00063693,0.00021215921,0.000007720864,0.0000026966534,0.0000066938055,0.009230648],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.00038925515,0.00058955746,0.00025013584,0.0004160919,0.00033898302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986027,0.0003715457,0.00042788277,0.00032489974,0.00019614313,0.00007681488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105909,0.00010077298,0.00022128032,0.000013552374,0.00040050058,0.00017425959,0.00029983468,0.00007180126,0.0005924604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039491444,0.00006270935,0.00009632421,0.00020680553,0.00064448884,0.00010195522,0.00021817058,0.00015976936,0.000029857416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009746829,0.00007284008,0.04097949,0.000032491786,0.00005090299,0.00002809489,0.9156397,0.000010648334,0.0010623528,0.016072856,0.01961824,0.006334923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037419636,0.000025495541,0.0040901955,0.00008356034,0.00007243035,0.0000021570197,0.054217696,0.00006986299,0.016258368,0.0021219987,0.92238367,0.00030034242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020717655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021853682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90276545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049872637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014840058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64870256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W148526578","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i1.12093","title":"THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION – STILL DEFENSIBLE IN A MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Political science; Freedom of the press; Commonwealth; Freedom of thought; Constitution; Democracy; Criminal law; Human rights; Reasonable doubt; Declaration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.025238675265186618,"score_gpt":0.3045188644110031,"score_spread":0.2792801891458165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W148526578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4690203,0.001141304,0.009829528,0.0067532593,0.0007977298,0.00028177127,0.000011885453,0.000050750365,0.51211345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711573,0.00004460145,0.0008234725,0.00020182676,0.000042036416,0.00000469167,0.0000057522425,0.000001763863,0.0017601328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.0001271897,0.00015308484,0.00008502953,0.00023386716,0.00011216355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.0001989046,0.00005375829,0.00009717145,0.00015481925,0.000030078572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033301985,0.000036158614,0.000061553495,0.000030678766,0.00018010336,0.00004205002,0.000071145274,0.000047227524,0.00016010135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040613668,0.00002761908,0.00003304133,0.00015415749,0.00032277973,0.0001609194,0.000022561066,0.000051703726,0.00003007226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022308841,0.000063862,0.007120396,0.0000089931345,0.0000062930894,0.000006083815,0.005381078,0.00023128584,0.007182256,0.9666615,0.006311098,0.007004804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002254924,0.000037892965,0.06226767,0.00037203098,0.000030899875,0.000013959222,0.011904714,0.011239637,0.01813383,0.576219,0.31703538,0.00049007643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118513664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005856751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032985972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023257195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17529975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485560714","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12130","title":"PROTECTING A WIFE FINANCIALLY AT THE TIME OF DIVORCE – A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN MARRIED IN TERMS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE MAHR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Islam; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Sharia; Family law; Marriage law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; History","score_opus":0.023699945893548076,"score_gpt":0.26153280056410455,"score_spread":0.23783285467055648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485560714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194871,0.00007352301,0.000039625498,0.00080348016,0.000029310162,0.000674113,0.00009254061,0.000024515297,0.1787758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970015,0.0000012239293,0.0002789421,0.00018008288,0.00009810274,0.000078731384,0.000003602945,0.000021735203,0.0023360793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975462,0.0005434584,0.00041349218,0.00041452327,0.00056903716,0.0005132919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865556,0.00033591385,0.00030308278,0.000519668,0.000098342105,0.00008741441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011425455,0.00018849655,0.0004628573,0.000051596144,0.00043268508,0.00010597361,0.0005249807,0.00009452404,0.0001673302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001601202,0.000117411495,0.000045331395,0.00082939083,0.0009723374,0.00009847324,0.0003793865,0.00033763447,0.000027977187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014099073,0.000036971724,0.029905943,0.00003261788,0.00003001919,0.000007966169,0.95967066,0.000022495451,0.0006402706,0.009085536,0.000060884468,0.00036561655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038990853,0.0016132243,0.10751838,0.0013628276,0.00022492386,0.0000075089215,0.4164976,0.00008239345,0.008781064,0.011793864,0.4459495,0.0022696592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002387463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021795694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016893909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011025834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510579985","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i1.12319","title":"AT LAST A SOUTH AFRICAN PROPER LAW OF DELICT Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Common law; Locus (genetics); Haploinsufficiency; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.027810237544735033,"score_gpt":0.2834699522834022,"score_spread":0.25565971473866717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510579985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31175613,0.00092154334,0.00004205321,0.0011068308,0.0007421137,0.0002569987,0.00006810246,0.000099379904,0.68500686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91746575,0.000005862156,0.0015138636,0.0004953468,0.0003192961,0.000014420879,0.000008557246,0.000021583777,0.08015532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983218,0.00022496989,0.0002463378,0.00032144823,0.00047259204,0.00041287977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902123,0.00007501047,0.00009979687,0.00038687818,0.00025164208,0.00016544189],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036147225,0.00013184208,0.00022979922,0.000036809324,0.00022888907,0.00007252536,0.00031113435,0.00014481928,0.00223002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018309917,0.00011358894,0.00012293014,0.00041294534,0.0005416447,0.00014664288,0.00021556701,0.00017578818,0.0010224447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699568,0.0003100279,0.032825436,0.00007712163,0.00010100316,0.00017538531,0.9057592,0.000011965177,0.007270083,0.019874701,0.03149773,0.0020103597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589061,0.000025645972,0.00038484274,0.000026440499,0.000025712672,0.0000013056309,0.0053790845,0.000012894626,0.005330284,0.00019176197,0.988169,0.00019411785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010002119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023554857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106119944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015248469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513938139","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i2.12036","title":"CURRENT ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DAMAGES LITIGATION: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT COMMONWEALTH DECISIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.07882269416384635,"score_gpt":0.4100255463537328,"score_spread":0.33120285218988643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513938139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572206,0.03455545,0.0060159056,0.014945137,0.002402727,0.0006549937,0.0014984801,0.00012529561,0.28258142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695694,0.0008472304,0.0013477317,0.000095300806,0.000094654606,0.000005257075,0.00008274454,0.0000026588286,0.00056746585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984647,0.00028344817,0.0003674671,0.00017218123,0.0005517382,0.00016046333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982689,0.00049392023,0.0001607934,0.0002459265,0.00073012855,0.00010034001],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045062532,0.000070573464,0.00030393756,0.00013462224,0.00015690227,0.000029723797,0.00018692618,0.00005582506,0.0032529936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010753571,0.00006686595,0.0001401692,0.0013125036,0.0012078739,0.000118585405,0.000075423864,0.00009620798,0.000019965966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025228594,0.00042705025,0.10319162,0.0000217329,0.00053557346,0.0000110578085,0.09905892,0.00009650741,0.00022313069,0.7723809,0.006924739,0.017103558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021328613,0.000018910883,0.01018497,0.000066998815,0.0002751314,2.4579322e-7,0.0042816964,0.00004677485,0.00079228246,0.0015640317,0.9824527,0.00010300795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025467898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006412834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97552794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006197648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044566704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536826666","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v27i3.14358","title":"SECTION 60 OF THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT 1998: WILL A COMPARATIVE APPROACH SHAKE THIS JOKER OUT OF THE PACK?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Labour law; Law; Sociology; Liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; History; Advertising","score_opus":0.06232965483382663,"score_gpt":0.25752140839399074,"score_spread":0.1951917535601641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536826666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93374705,0.000018760258,0.000033456403,0.00026647557,0.0007441198,0.00039470673,0.000012896557,0.00002082141,0.06476169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99166906,3.336055e-7,0.000008139642,0.00060485455,0.00030603298,0.00003233266,0.000014399524,0.00001041998,0.00735442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990722,0.00004869066,0.0002136065,0.0001692037,0.00035844158,0.00013787132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992508,0.000016775632,0.0003270255,0.00034270828,0.00005783355,0.0000048081765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026317078,0.00011507345,0.00017535979,0.00004473666,0.00041109728,0.00005849283,0.0003630795,0.000024926598,0.0009277978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000023664002,0.000061780585,0.00014990619,0.00021449412,0.0000908169,0.00026427608,0.0007441483,0.00020462033,0.000017756656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008993636,0.00406553,0.18953823,0.0013763099,0.0009793582,0.000010004297,0.037492864,0.002503932,0.027515365,0.37966913,0.35309803,0.0028519055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017855277,0.0000793036,0.16119748,0.00010321079,0.00034326623,0.0000034004695,0.0014072303,0.0036834355,0.0026674161,0.039165113,0.78896713,0.00059747347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015208438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025713144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43586913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043853976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019548177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547440466","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12258","title":"HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES: PERPETRATOR AND SERVICE PROVIDERS’ LIABILITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Liability; The Internet; Hatred; Service provider; Service (business); Political science; European union; Internet service provider; Law; Business; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.01938135336999929,"score_gpt":0.23803109722956314,"score_spread":0.21864974385956384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547440466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790659,0.000113334536,0.0048092953,0.009734515,0.0006119365,0.00019628178,0.000004182003,0.0002530578,0.0052115293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633234,0.000014235488,0.02138502,0.01162317,0.00095820794,0.000023810431,0.000013190811,0.000023850553,0.0026350725],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888915,0.000101043566,0.0001274479,0.00042826976,0.00018178012,0.0002722844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994152,0.000050367278,0.00003795329,0.00030814382,0.00010981118,0.00007852555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022379946,0.0001194652,0.00012315836,0.000023221426,0.00022304419,0.00032520643,0.00017403477,0.000084280946,0.000053268475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026693706,0.00011243151,0.000045414858,0.00038889583,0.000021591393,0.00028457015,0.00013507753,0.00016486629,0.0001504774],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002107783,0.00092154654,0.02167789,0.0006980464,0.0002376659,0.0010545872,0.01606251,0.00024529177,0.06385822,0.02491225,0.08043683,0.78968436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039501213,0.0009671457,0.13510847,0.00039460405,0.00010405636,0.0005614142,0.0007816858,0.043285295,0.13294025,0.038892247,0.63988346,0.0031312201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014891639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006752958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78655314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032908833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053748874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45848238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550168670","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i3.12241","title":"THE JURISDICTION OF THE LABOUR COURT IN INTERNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN RESPECT OF WORKPLACES OUTSIDE SOUTH AFRICA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Appeal; Labour law; Political science; Conflict of laws; International law; Pleading","score_opus":0.013634705260043808,"score_gpt":0.21323299023680928,"score_spread":0.19959828497676546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550168670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841789,0.00016610687,0.000006495312,0.0035556878,0.00046547072,0.000086563225,0.000004885942,0.0000048701577,0.011531038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975263,0.000019090598,0.000007949931,0.00033132252,0.00017991677,0.0000065821687,0.0000024630633,0.000005332159,0.0019210408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.000014252062,0.00022553444,0.0000960608,0.00020095348,0.00009829151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948317,0.000045860015,0.00023557777,0.00013933326,0.00009368058,0.0000023555049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000257509,0.00005617635,0.000091833324,0.000045104938,0.000028073217,0.000058677037,0.00015093423,0.000024900863,0.0000840472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074613454,0.00003509029,0.00004049217,0.00029007663,0.00003155274,0.0001919241,0.00009803264,0.00008357696,0.000009180499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023540977,0.00018578958,0.9624782,0.000033814937,0.000039329843,0.0000204555,0.0015319587,0.00034549282,0.003020105,0.023617117,0.005676977,0.0028153523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063949486,0.0000032661399,0.76361847,0.0001714736,0.000008963878,4.2338806e-7,0.00069665205,0.00021889713,0.0009595672,0.0020176806,0.23159952,0.00006560297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024925874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022602188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22592254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026484871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002609747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14309405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553136995","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12146","title":"THE PURPOSE AND AMBIT OF THE OFFENCE OF CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Dignity; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Memorandum; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01943973870665325,"score_gpt":0.2838164968300847,"score_spread":0.2643767581234314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553136995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860029,0.0038655489,0.000003544566,0.0036156496,0.00020115197,0.00022245811,0.000022190648,0.000005512246,0.0060610436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499315,0.00062985474,0.00008294777,0.00009999761,0.00003505858,0.0000075363887,3.411616e-7,0.0000030917263,0.00414805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990223,0.00017608613,0.00020399882,0.00010715187,0.00033395083,0.00015650979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922633,0.0002193603,0.00016449638,0.00015782105,0.00019975578,0.00003225312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029822864,0.000066332286,0.00016250125,0.0000052413498,0.0002774206,0.000016761122,0.00019176281,0.000040594645,0.000091377835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018738804,0.000033857268,0.00007347758,0.00015358756,0.00096647366,0.000079929225,0.00012852035,0.000065725566,0.0000021512624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011441684,0.0004375219,0.3623987,0.00045797287,0.0005867332,0.000008261757,0.35653418,0.000023914565,0.11652441,0.09704438,0.0218937,0.043975793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075315556,0.00009314448,0.5004286,0.00024301193,0.00008678395,0.0000014468665,0.049373854,0.00001722444,0.07748214,0.0013394301,0.36992088,0.00026032876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016953709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016239447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029105813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051240237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35610124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572964298","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i2.12437","title":"JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE DETERMINATION OF POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MAINTENANCE ACT 99 OF 1998 AS COMPARED TO THE CANADIAN FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES OF 1997","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Child support; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Family law","score_opus":0.027946106230464327,"score_gpt":0.32231501797889267,"score_spread":0.29436891174842833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572964298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84602225,0.0004933907,0.00027888577,0.06821867,0.0006435595,0.0038346986,0.0018055422,0.000018982091,0.078684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815965,0.000007160934,0.0001154615,0.001338883,0.00009028377,0.00002967192,0.000024766821,0.0000103548655,0.00022377956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976581,0.00044198762,0.00069794117,0.00020907528,0.0007416169,0.00025133006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981092,0.00008028196,0.00066959736,0.00061918155,0.00046733933,0.000054367374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011431514,0.00012584936,0.00030651514,0.00006126888,0.0002712774,0.000027614517,0.00093132874,0.0000878078,0.00007140284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817729,0.00006797975,0.00019173449,0.000913693,0.00053212856,0.000093939205,0.00011917761,0.00016763632,0.0000028940053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016565362,0.00040402033,0.06939345,0.00033906937,0.00009777091,0.000004519185,0.88254327,0.00025747993,0.00180307,0.031870723,0.004264507,0.008856489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014308931,0.00034024296,0.64957833,0.0013029083,0.00028329703,0.000018942006,0.063942686,0.00060687755,0.011858878,0.0022881012,0.26774004,0.00060878537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15843917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000976077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005746309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84716487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599648220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12131","title":"MUTUAL ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES IN THE WORKPLACE – A JOSTLING OF RIGHTS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Labour law; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Diversity (politics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03828939394755745,"score_gpt":0.23717641414802787,"score_spread":0.19888702020047042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599648220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95957464,0.000674847,0.0000122861875,0.0003082876,0.00016599405,0.000056930112,0.0000046862947,0.00000529214,0.03919706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983526,0.00013786301,0.000042075237,0.0001314288,0.00011857657,0.0000056681433,0.000011549539,0.0000035783194,0.0011967011],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940574,0.000057645637,0.00020359863,0.000092991344,0.00015204116,0.00008795965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.00007857178,0.000069029586,0.00015485153,0.000049691167,0.000009784893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001025116,0.000062685445,0.00012366424,0.00004119926,0.00005335701,0.000037921454,0.000101051584,0.000024270126,0.00019871022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061694745,0.000037089027,0.000048607195,0.000036387777,0.00006048043,0.00005551664,0.000020213554,0.000055551885,0.000009585574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044517197,0.00022990743,0.0067264903,0.00006583506,0.0000447596,0.000013611793,0.87007964,0.000013204603,0.0005500025,0.10167422,0.020023549,0.0005342747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024205353,0.0004271032,0.02120674,0.000885246,0.0001549321,0.000027582106,0.50645703,0.00047556902,0.01764599,0.10358839,0.3459452,0.00076567533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003205794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022565566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000088284105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015067369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21757376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261125889","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i3.12409","title":"THE REVISED CANADIAN TEST FOR THE EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06271134722376055,"score_gpt":0.34468097125984165,"score_spread":0.2819696240360811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261125889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04464972,0.026536362,0.0019710336,0.79993117,0.0028145423,0.0021652854,0.000116542324,0.00006583637,0.12174952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168104,0.00055561226,0.0001651326,0.0009755598,0.00018462383,0.00002201295,0.000001636748,0.0000025590189,0.0064118383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931747,0.00006817546,0.000119456054,0.00010318751,0.00020198655,0.00018974305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629927,0.00309501,0.000041348136,0.00017539757,0.00031561597,0.00007336172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094033516,0.000043278487,0.00005909012,0.000010587645,0.0013059794,0.0000824508,0.00025662832,0.000031812815,0.00016018885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004081686,0.00002488039,0.00006211196,0.00015840109,0.00036212264,0.00011297996,0.000030113497,0.000047438825,0.000015100557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627565,0.0000426771,0.015892148,0.00009930139,0.000036502286,0.000028502805,0.008299366,0.000042868316,0.004296286,0.8144263,0.11969761,0.037072156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005024646,0.000013864435,0.0039057233,0.00015735105,0.000021765083,0.0000017449959,0.0011577896,0.000043321867,0.0002155554,0.0016023545,0.99277985,0.00005044363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04682809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5291475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008637422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014908238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281213616","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14750","title":"COMMUNITY LEGAL WORKERS IN ONTARIO: A PARALEGAL CASE STUDY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Legislation; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Political science; Community organization; Public administration; Community standards; Economic Justice; Community development; Public relations; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.10086474531232464,"score_gpt":0.400237994083749,"score_spread":0.29937324877142435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281213616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969836,0.000003039362,0.0000011920376,0.007227707,0.00046047714,0.00023008586,0.0000018357541,0.000022289598,0.095069736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96859753,8.3364405e-8,0.000054365522,0.0011893455,0.000033686916,0.00011259579,0.0000052967193,0.000004251215,0.030002829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818707,0.0012132033,0.00014670622,0.000085392894,0.00021184448,0.00015577849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953103,0.00015984292,0.000051470022,0.00017716861,0.00003685379,0.000043662625],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015792325,0.000048860707,0.00006432917,0.00009725938,0.0015754293,0.00016713078,0.00016918534,0.000018416604,0.005703209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010785237,0.000054614007,0.000021094125,0.00057866174,0.000052686624,0.00052002387,0.00007825185,0.001244796,0.000029474004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001564187,0.0009095914,0.6690851,5.125155e-7,0.000007965745,0.00037824936,0.31557333,0.00002120729,0.0000011378676,0.0019697691,0.011677612,0.0003598667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001838231,0.00004036448,0.04884756,7.5164405e-7,0.0000040017976,0.00004558483,0.3989202,0.0000014789264,1.3496953e-7,0.000058665973,0.55184156,0.000055865192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6202375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004938248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011446831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482086321","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v36i3.11595","title":"RECONSIDERING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Privilege (computing); Law; Legislation; Power (physics); Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.29612549673656535,"score_gpt":0.32522373823901013,"score_spread":0.029098241502444777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482086321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74967647,0.0018069173,0.000002715794,0.0007654009,0.0002116832,0.00007962629,0.0000031651198,0.000021537959,0.24743247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967425,0.000046464,0.00024542838,0.000117696116,0.00009689841,0.000005093215,2.6203654e-7,0.0000044080793,0.002741253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936014,0.00013382678,0.000095689575,0.0000587356,0.00022081117,0.0001308049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994551,0.00019377179,0.00004259178,0.00016312591,0.000098942204,0.00004644659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008481006,0.000043528293,0.00008002474,0.000015942232,0.00013110628,0.000050524053,0.0001657066,0.00003615309,0.00006568173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029713096,0.000030015384,0.000016875392,0.000067656154,0.00057148206,0.00013701241,0.000060281553,0.000074414944,0.00001438571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004990193,0.000005974132,0.004128622,0.0000046248897,0.000009122445,0.0000013291875,0.9889373,0.0000018898091,0.00003304919,0.004925062,0.0010698832,0.0008781541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001423639,0.00002717994,0.00044109364,0.000025817511,0.000011167568,0.0000012003989,0.10663016,0.000017348219,0.0002606226,0.003939655,0.8884193,0.00008411336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010169591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88734937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003062276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006965645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21056494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801111753","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v28i1.14290","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SCHOOL RULES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03890829450555221,"score_gpt":0.31985550496035153,"score_spread":0.2809472104547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801111753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013702267,0.0012293134,0.00005445756,0.014063472,0.0009429841,0.00019578966,0.0000449694,0.00010661957,0.9696601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98422694,0.000012063021,0.00080826855,0.0017651782,0.00046195582,0.00008153348,0.000003844481,0.0000037410498,0.012636476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897796,0.00012910936,0.00007927849,0.00016621125,0.0004295197,0.00021790252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960405,0.00004908896,0.000018909039,0.00013306313,0.000035204037,0.00015967201],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003669191,0.00005079743,0.00006563416,0.000034158853,0.0006478783,0.00004041332,0.00027382316,0.000024505318,0.0115717575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016146133,0.00005369275,0.000034074215,0.00013316608,0.00025337253,0.00009226324,0.00017293965,0.0001358796,0.0022829971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011941662,0.000046450798,0.0012070257,0.0000025991108,0.000009950714,0.00002156601,0.07147423,0.000032362525,0.000030614894,0.8911155,0.033046253,0.0030015158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070667054,0.000018331388,0.000333279,0.0000020077061,0.0000024260569,7.909498e-7,0.0029507412,9.934338e-7,0.000005743017,0.0017048944,0.9948301,0.00008003118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112128546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004058866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97052467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019128078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013764162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980704029","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i2.11355","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 1)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Faith; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Fair dealing; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08262122442472057,"score_gpt":0.3696140038897634,"score_spread":0.2869927794650428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980704029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70371383,0.00008443406,0.00003316252,0.0027686516,0.0003247569,0.0003220462,0.0000027563758,0.000013412515,0.29273695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873865,0.0000039341353,0.000109227694,0.0006374288,0.00026594437,0.000015275373,7.094806e-7,0.0000037739806,0.00022504514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.00031898922,0.00016065348,0.00010299139,0.00027498804,0.00017580007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954885,0.00015617977,0.00007066303,0.0001631707,0.000047164107,0.00001396775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000982896,0.000051991687,0.000079992584,0.000025119945,0.00016063626,0.000039372284,0.00028055138,0.000038756694,0.00012451127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000659084,0.000030155297,0.000021745836,0.000347792,0.0004976849,0.00015874433,0.000037720056,0.000113262395,0.000034022924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024446506,0.00007713582,0.018051747,0.000005421273,0.000008629082,0.0000026128932,0.86589223,0.000005720109,0.0003080652,0.11413748,0.0007288849,0.00075760845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042642126,0.00010749264,0.013918595,0.00010128183,0.000011567235,3.282531e-7,0.09487925,0.000058590864,0.002759151,0.0051325387,0.88245714,0.00014762788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031694383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017280122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008996127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002654574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96427137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981107737","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11326","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Statutory law; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08242535669262861,"score_gpt":0.369411996836841,"score_spread":0.2869866401442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981107737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68951994,0.00008299126,0.00003292472,0.0026962657,0.00032578618,0.00032228744,0.000002765731,0.0000134160355,0.30700365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873734,0.0000038274934,0.000108624336,0.0006383289,0.00026652607,0.000015278503,7.0502375e-7,0.0000037740645,0.00022557621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896747,0.00031919632,0.00015961086,0.00010270188,0.00027513548,0.0001758862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00015646598,0.00007022377,0.00016317608,0.000047074333,0.000013972846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009743808,0.00005200534,0.000080052276,0.000025150195,0.00016071396,0.00003928926,0.000280704,0.000038764338,0.00012706737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006588226,0.00003016151,0.000021750418,0.00034839867,0.0004978638,0.00015885798,0.00003772538,0.000113290684,0.000034048753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002459438,0.00007822189,0.018169714,0.0000055044065,0.000008762704,0.0000026500998,0.86436534,0.000005724278,0.00029499232,0.11554006,0.00075227756,0.0007521498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041808136,0.000104039835,0.013909712,0.00009732568,0.000011337304,3.099145e-7,0.08975324,0.000057858528,0.0026659432,0.004954086,0.8878835,0.00014457524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00321775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018109044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026317844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139949028","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10546","title":"Contractual Capacity and the Conflict of Laws in Common-Law Jurisdictions (Part 2): Australasia, North America, Asia and Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Private law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Choice of law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.043301375399198275,"score_gpt":0.27123275677887093,"score_spread":0.22793138137967267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139949028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274706,0.00018774295,0.000024073332,0.01101969,0.00007907358,0.00030715019,0.000056203142,0.000028848379,0.06082658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.00019817795,0.000031828138,0.0006969894,0.00012616343,0.000013833824,0.000003820948,0.000005199515,0.00022787947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990815,0.00016663662,0.00023508836,0.0001595393,0.00017279242,0.00018443666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994471,0.0002149892,0.000088381006,0.00009169255,0.00003811116,0.00011970435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023620954,0.00008738892,0.00023861183,0.000023501912,0.00024761507,0.00005910816,0.00009013626,0.000062551335,0.000102993596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003192195,0.000067461544,0.000041955416,0.00018087219,0.0012715783,0.00015047748,0.00003379551,0.00018294387,0.0000054572038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005389552,0.0002688474,0.14607333,0.000060516148,0.00016081343,0.00001877575,0.6220609,0.000022488113,0.00034551142,0.19958489,0.008509817,0.02235519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009405326,0.000071202,0.03820752,0.000011453017,0.00003143264,0.0000013932889,0.0021104312,0.00016522603,0.000021397893,0.00019579455,0.9581477,0.00009589751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005465581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008104194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013985775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025415251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.826236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150636024","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10549","title":"Electricity Theft in South Africa: Examining the Need to Clarify the Offence and Pursue Private Prosecution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Electricity Theft Detection Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Statutory law; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Business; Context (archaeology); Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.01964106993845125,"score_gpt":0.20410547978106364,"score_spread":0.1844644098426124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150636024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97720337,0.00022719329,0.01787103,0.0023981153,0.000044863278,0.00068935775,0.0000029949015,0.00051428506,0.0010488081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.000013063398,0.000392706,0.0010520641,0.000071553746,0.00009555095,5.009209e-7,0.000025093508,0.000045672117],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999162,0.00007163862,0.00016912745,0.00018598174,0.00013836152,0.00027285688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959695,0.00009668224,0.000026968188,0.00020559528,0.00001864013,0.000055171982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002866456,0.00013884489,0.00012707377,0.00007733539,0.00009092055,0.00007676049,0.00025917563,0.00011022539,0.000010081901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011378417,0.00008778088,0.000022036389,0.00083068624,0.000033416243,0.0000887542,0.00007251479,0.0006815868,0.000019177316],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019788776,0.00006730572,0.040175427,0.00020160258,0.00015735748,0.000032225926,0.151646,0.0050835107,0.7530662,0.0048915786,0.00771658,0.036764324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011060385,0.0010834483,0.10972228,0.000142636,0.000076021126,0.000041847798,0.0013714078,0.094923995,0.733068,0.0035285733,0.053511817,0.0014239764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000686116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049459677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15027459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004778014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007941939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35796002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167561673","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11229","title":"An Analysis of Mandatory Auditor Rotation Requirements in South Africa in light of International Legislative Trends","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Auditor independence; Audit; Joint audit; External auditor; Audit plan; Business; Quality audit; Chief audit executive; Transparency (behavior); Auditor's report; Corporate governance; Audit committee; Internal audit; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016588323646509338,"score_gpt":0.24313186956986974,"score_spread":0.2265435459233604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167561673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97290176,0.000018572506,0.000045975063,0.000060155366,0.000255667,0.000054444114,0.0000137183515,0.00000485559,0.026644843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898994,0.0000010862689,0.000035855614,0.000045220713,0.000101247904,0.0000050866415,0.000058889305,0.0000048305196,0.0007578718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.000008282895,0.00026819037,0.00015139555,0.00019229283,0.000080243866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942744,0.000008791925,0.00035445666,0.00013293022,0.000073214636,0.0000031746156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016390986,0.0000661712,0.00016472978,0.00071959686,0.000006243651,0.000018900302,0.00013342134,0.000031025025,0.00054293126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012007416,0.00006291101,0.000051826453,0.0008715098,0.000011924402,0.0008906092,0.00003235748,0.00004347812,0.000017974375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007559461,0.00012715421,0.9928183,0.00002313249,0.000060507296,0.0000020651983,0.001646727,0.00067024655,0.0025158273,0.001038569,0.00015254313,0.00086935255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056242297,0.0000128778065,0.9732432,0.000059227666,0.0000494766,1.0739987e-8,0.00021457535,0.0142836515,0.00016744183,0.00012956648,0.011187946,0.00008960268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018559475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048200804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02608814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030818162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007128028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59447163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179505124","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11341","title":"EXTRA-CURIAL STATEMENTS BY A NON- TESTIFYING CO-ACCUSED, THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT AND CHANGE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hearsay; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Common law; Law of the case; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0769069062069869,"score_gpt":0.36522825698616346,"score_spread":0.28832135077917653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179505124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75889254,0.00085533876,0.00002639275,0.005496012,0.0015144695,0.0018332654,0.00038843718,0.00009501988,0.23089853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968606,0.0000056117337,0.00011907128,0.0006610443,0.00066206674,0.000060045943,0.000006313592,0.000015763557,0.0016094785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853003,0.00013033357,0.00016308465,0.000245512,0.00033343487,0.00059757725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937594,0.00007488585,0.00005656986,0.00018807147,0.00006161905,0.00024292931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680098,0.00011903595,0.00012313198,0.000097663644,0.00064431946,0.00026993442,0.00030653644,0.000104474144,0.0006052805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001250901,0.000093328024,0.00002063252,0.0003057434,0.0005476229,0.00031565505,0.000044737677,0.00015743746,0.00023119646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130315475,0.000014727012,0.056399506,0.0000045329703,0.00000835794,0.000010746059,0.93211675,4.4142485e-8,0.00006991936,0.00016661534,0.010505615,0.00069013383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045367522,0.000049849503,0.0042673475,0.000027723741,0.000009769545,2.3331323e-7,0.004166027,0.000061030634,0.000039717106,0.00015601283,0.99057436,0.00019423192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20054168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40522355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98006874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021120427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017963247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.804782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185509208","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v38i2.11441","title":"RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND CASES OF SERIOUS OFFENDING: A SOUTH AFRICAN AND CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Ambiguity; Criminal justice; Criminology; Restorative justice; Criminal law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Conviction; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04253305625274366,"score_gpt":0.33341189988477343,"score_spread":0.29087884363202976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185509208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96758944,0.00014702787,0.0000101364985,0.0008010756,0.000089328554,0.000058274214,0.000019188257,0.0000053804765,0.031280126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989864,0.000054945758,0.000053318337,0.00004647665,0.0000852257,0.0000032007695,3.7962408e-7,0.000003118064,0.00076688704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995652,0.000038990267,0.00005552989,0.00012985697,0.00008015155,0.00013031294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949425,0.00006067258,0.000070980954,0.000120017285,0.00012102391,0.00013304995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011648049,0.000050160223,0.00009536353,0.00009372871,0.0010933918,0.00013268432,0.00006792225,0.00003263091,0.000043233573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041634502,0.000047215173,0.000021416989,0.000068206224,0.00036712037,0.00014287113,0.00002369099,0.000050061208,0.0000024124715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065553904,0.000031369756,0.025568226,0.00004313559,0.00010588783,0.00014747954,0.9362246,0.0000022472466,0.00011523708,0.023279686,0.0005819248,0.013834696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007559408,0.0000629802,0.017321778,0.000015988286,0.0004409861,0.0000068851996,0.9787927,0.000026141195,0.000014187562,0.00016453989,0.0029942235,0.00008397346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8076819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91129285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10361093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014111864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8409596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186537419","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11191","title":"Caveat Jurisconsultus: Warrantless Access to the Client Records of Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Warrant; Law; Legislature; Confidentiality; Political science; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.024129306489278527,"score_gpt":0.34774169685732614,"score_spread":0.3236123903680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186537419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268259,0.0000813294,0.000055142096,0.010358729,0.0018850754,0.0005891283,0.000026813244,0.000038971717,0.4601389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97394454,0.000013501739,0.00021400761,0.0011057747,0.00028151454,0.000026336484,0.000003251676,0.000010565853,0.024400508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987096,0.00017567204,0.00019942879,0.00021094651,0.00043341436,0.00027091068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991458,0.0001584067,0.00010712978,0.0003491861,0.00014792252,0.0000915441],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055919157,0.00008661644,0.00014306224,0.000053295433,0.00017466355,0.00019016406,0.00061409466,0.00006844984,0.001325797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019021014,0.000059252725,0.00006425798,0.00040245036,0.00015017383,0.00052661286,0.00013321973,0.00014352253,0.0010279195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025227747,0.00027777508,0.09226061,0.0000758258,0.00012538982,0.000019513447,0.6113681,0.00022930514,0.001274109,0.052413035,0.23340218,0.008301849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334037,0.000029446112,0.0016365582,0.000025259167,0.000010854315,4.3354677e-7,0.003970651,0.000005482718,0.00046895424,0.00008612953,0.99353164,0.000101168065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030148965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010460536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008177104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001349016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186550581","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11328","title":"CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS IN COMMON-LAW JURISDICTIONS (PART 1): THE UNITED KINGDOM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Choice of law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.07260518125190656,"score_gpt":0.3266917376229886,"score_spread":0.254086556371082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186550581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205071,0.000036343554,0.00003462041,0.0065296437,0.00030229063,0.00027746026,0.000014761066,0.000023436727,0.07227438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768716,0.000043756914,0.000011041502,0.0014973963,0.00033510706,0.000014723168,0.0000029051369,0.000004985405,0.00040291803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989535,0.00033267177,0.00022664158,0.00011046406,0.00019371556,0.00018295675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990852,0.0004850665,0.00009692128,0.00018557948,0.00010406666,0.000043157164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182709,0.000072755094,0.00015381185,0.000045425848,0.0006408391,0.000071444105,0.00015860172,0.0000764975,0.00018878448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047576876,0.000042398857,0.000045607445,0.00025260018,0.002860923,0.00011056055,0.000035599114,0.00016855296,0.000010241253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108307664,0.000055528762,0.0062892064,0.0000032331468,0.00003064297,7.718097e-7,0.07009267,0.0000011905719,0.00010742331,0.9207489,0.0016222505,0.00093988836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082887075,0.000036547986,0.010617024,0.000020182515,0.00002232134,0.0000016195327,0.0008551276,0.0001570418,0.00010393278,0.0015882087,0.9857079,0.00006125227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043044556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037907027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022285538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029005552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192292574","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11189","title":"The Role of Expert Evidence in the Defence of Provocation and Emotional Stress in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; CLARITY; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Liability; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04652257504750107,"score_gpt":0.31233174186825174,"score_spread":0.2658091668207507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192292574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941494,0.0014719983,0.0000034733978,0.0010198107,0.000026475695,0.00015703455,0.0000011049849,0.0000014550134,0.0031692642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997206,0.00008306759,0.000028265285,0.000022675356,0.000016758415,0.000009466195,1.6955953e-7,0.0000010788407,0.00011794021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.000122056794,0.00010647089,0.00007651018,0.00021035038,0.000087111344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942774,0.00038285824,0.000049615694,0.00009429246,0.00003599147,0.000009520269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064718997,0.000028523333,0.000048379246,0.000017800221,0.000047683887,0.00001977205,0.00017624452,0.000021430627,0.000017185792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001587537,0.000016641696,0.000012757042,0.00012009687,0.00014329552,0.00015452006,0.00002116409,0.000042917873,0.0000035362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042434804,0.000049067527,0.56175005,0.000034036915,0.0000017058894,4.202083e-7,0.39762098,0.000015426096,0.003182378,0.031150147,0.00005235259,0.006100982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024211903,0.00014449863,0.7437435,0.0015077787,0.0000076269134,8.91987e-7,0.22742413,0.00039251603,0.0031482961,0.009776419,0.013433388,0.00017884765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008725091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001266345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011953158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004273419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13189785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977776","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12265","title":"WHICH STRUCTURES DOES THE HOUSEBREAKING CRIME PROTECT?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Fence (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017192545392954086,"score_gpt":0.3081281536896537,"score_spread":0.2909356082966996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199977776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18835524,0.0010258319,0.00016168864,0.01475418,0.0020497546,0.0005549458,0.000014513303,0.00033527068,0.7927486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957235,0.00000554048,0.00068105425,0.00075325085,0.0007720164,0.000021345195,0.0000011937232,0.000013542446,0.008179733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878776,0.000248544,0.00010639378,0.00020322551,0.0003492949,0.00030477703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993303,0.00011226794,0.000043145952,0.00030355572,0.00015608009,0.000054641037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030411442,0.00008155882,0.00009089857,0.000017072462,0.0005574734,0.00029507975,0.00031680052,0.00008258026,0.0014187865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004940918,0.00004491894,0.000047508922,0.00034925013,0.00016346425,0.00014073592,0.000106242005,0.00019971903,0.000115722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022134755,0.00006312858,0.012894998,0.00004351001,0.000100031946,0.00008360699,0.73187864,0.000016483293,0.004022553,0.22632675,0.011830994,0.012717174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089702415,0.00000639005,0.004074802,0.000015328787,0.000015814332,0.0000020539997,0.0042298753,0.000004260941,0.0046488564,0.01539,0.97137886,0.00014403848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006609833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017622801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044168093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013341178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210534343","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i1.12607","title":"CONTRACT AND AGENCY LAW AND THE 2008 COMPANIES BILL","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Law; Agency (philosophy); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Finance; Social science","score_opus":0.013438124418155084,"score_gpt":0.19207530301787054,"score_spread":0.17863717859971545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210534343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947469,0.0021448035,0.000012554041,0.005886984,0.00019142075,0.000102782535,0.0000032122252,0.00002856965,0.09688275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98483074,0.00011263462,0.000013767872,0.013285694,0.0003147552,0.0000037970399,0.000005946993,0.0000065728204,0.0014260854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996319,0.0000057871653,0.00008180238,0.00011705068,0.00006708263,0.000096391675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975187,0.000032694647,0.00005838451,0.000105091865,0.00004736116,0.0000046027476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008753722,0.00006814336,0.00010450267,0.000010183927,0.000117802985,0.00027617303,0.00004102052,0.000019528754,0.00027741375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000142929675,0.000037427566,0.000022904378,0.00007597484,0.00012116839,0.00038179132,0.00008712196,0.000050524304,0.0000524584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012391573,0.000066353125,0.033572868,0.00013602372,0.000064079126,0.000144783,0.00050548604,0.0000025630927,0.001066663,0.9169838,0.03597744,0.011356038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013384154,0.0000021676815,0.06585045,0.00002906158,0.000039338935,0.000010803565,0.0000662165,0.0004361276,0.000058285328,0.015129977,0.9169126,0.00012651856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095515593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066432316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002045768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042011447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3037486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297235682","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i2.14860","title":"DNA EVIDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: FALLACIES AND THE FUTURE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Political science; Law; DNA profiling; Common law; Biology; DNA; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03152925795317972,"score_gpt":0.2845128952228036,"score_spread":0.25298363726962386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297235682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72177666,0.036618963,0.000012711644,0.036433294,0.0016982427,0.0008647782,0.00002265316,0.00013622834,0.20243648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908652,0.000037732727,0.00006719621,0.0004904417,0.00028411738,0.000060712133,2.873791e-7,0.0000053050885,0.00818902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987316,0.00043572907,0.000099380326,0.00015835158,0.0003565617,0.00021835178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950284,0.00024702784,0.000038377857,0.00015607862,0.000017384098,0.000038280163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010482816,0.000060363647,0.00009770062,0.000036842153,0.00053565553,0.000096195035,0.0003227649,0.000029731158,0.00050445885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017363245,0.000041511048,0.000031832682,0.00036098048,0.0004041302,0.00014522101,0.00024174286,0.00021431054,0.000029781788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355103,0.000007209705,0.007335918,0.0000029031964,0.0000031699892,0.000007890284,0.971107,0.0000036208048,0.000008813506,0.019408807,0.0016456277,0.00043351884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026596643,0.000012688625,0.0011000329,0.0000069153043,0.0000059362587,4.180646e-7,0.08443748,0.000011187194,0.000002735736,0.002074269,0.9120002,0.00008217563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001505295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023089226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91035455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006945017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044676526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383375884","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.14052","title":"TACIT CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: PROGRESS OR STAGNATION IN THE COMMON- LAW JURISDICTIONS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Comparative law; Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.056463391715519694,"score_gpt":0.387100000997883,"score_spread":0.3306366092823633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383375884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841284,0.000032871354,0.0000066661314,0.016853737,0.00068580324,0.0004599224,0.000038857426,0.00006161113,0.14057657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.000038836715,0.00001569706,0.0008440932,0.00023899258,0.00005790704,0.000034217057,0.0000055069454,0.0004957938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889666,0.0001886115,0.00026431063,0.00011382331,0.0003656975,0.00017087495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.00032287615,0.00008553861,0.00010290837,0.00006915442,0.00002379013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086558907,0.000061888866,0.00011168713,0.00011295649,0.00016639342,0.000087084605,0.00023932676,0.00007677641,0.0001658885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041221072,0.000047332545,0.000036559642,0.0004265278,0.00024304111,0.00034413568,0.00002899499,0.00014813576,0.000019161915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017560514,0.0005327446,0.17323849,0.000019611094,0.000029473751,0.000031181506,0.09666494,0.00003560558,0.00008916772,0.6994386,0.0022443815,0.027500255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059155317,0.00003590092,0.2300343,0.000041614385,0.0000050223302,5.186618e-7,0.0012566189,0.0001413896,0.000028532511,0.0009516115,0.76684296,0.00006997895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013202896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14795019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76459855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007200556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037214042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99336827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16525","title":"SENTENCING OF PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS IN CANADA. LESSONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Punishment (psychology); Prison; Criminology; Legislation; Sentence; Attendance; Political science; Service (business); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.08449379811015129,"score_gpt":0.33569306580244274,"score_spread":0.25119926769229145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385241220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96309537,0.0000942146,0.00008720024,0.0033796444,0.00048353765,0.00034336734,0.000094639385,0.00007016883,0.032351863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974855,0.000002810457,0.00035076053,0.000082162005,0.000065120264,0.000027402859,0.000003192358,0.000006897676,0.0019761636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899954,0.000073981624,0.00015820863,0.00015756249,0.0002454505,0.00036526617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951833,0.00021201187,0.00004999275,0.00010797822,0.000045974146,0.00006570889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004618412,0.00005873276,0.00013870085,0.00006151601,0.000085646665,0.000013103414,0.00018248465,0.000054110067,0.00006342137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004107414,0.000052023894,0.00004067012,0.0004811826,0.00009060786,0.000048758557,0.000047245496,0.00007553601,0.000019962536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932136,0.000037387956,0.11625015,0.000053801934,0.000017083361,0.00013358273,0.85128444,0.00024381619,0.0008198368,0.011853949,0.016544346,0.002722261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011765542,0.00007613915,0.05801909,0.00012740199,0.00003306686,5.9599387e-7,0.3439007,0.0008717597,0.0005669847,0.0041001244,0.5904961,0.0006314766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3459341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70597494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021527313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004559486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6584214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385309200","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.16558","title":"THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CERTAIN CAPITAL ALLOWANCES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES POLICY OBJECTIVES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Property tax; Allowance (engineering); Context (archaeology); Income tax; Incentive; Tax policy; Economic policy; Economics; Tax reform; Market economy; Law; Operations management; Political science","score_opus":0.01805645931809351,"score_gpt":0.3217493208971571,"score_spread":0.30369286157906356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385309200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86955506,0.00034488708,4.923535e-7,0.025424458,0.00041538934,0.00043251622,0.000028427297,0.000038939543,0.10375986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075663,0.00020169577,0.000006209204,0.00025400807,0.004977326,0.00004925045,0.0000022114102,0.000009799405,0.0037428504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983403,0.00064564124,0.00019389436,0.00019532944,0.00023082031,0.00039403472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751407,0.0021183225,0.00007986772,0.000228093,0.000015477735,0.000044173372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017705221,0.000116308984,0.00017125218,0.000068026406,0.00085759617,0.00042648416,0.0006860649,0.00007109727,0.000054244094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035969916,0.000055606193,0.000070690985,0.00032608857,0.0015467472,0.00020381733,0.00014159596,0.00021074591,0.00023882787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041039548,0.0000057176826,0.08804949,0.0000031358693,0.00003739561,0.0000054790244,0.8011456,0.0000053545427,0.0000016607011,0.10539734,0.002249942,0.0030578563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798387,0.000026387177,0.22139855,0.000009657052,0.000013317186,5.607717e-7,0.04435979,0.000015188917,0.0000072650446,0.021631368,0.7118012,0.00015693095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011491003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7567858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009896024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013731093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533342","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i3.16964","title":"A CRITICAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVE ON STATUTORY INTOXICATION – TIME TO SOBER UP?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Government (linguistics); Environmental health; Alcohol abuse; Statutory law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Zero tolerance; Falling (accident); Alcoholic liver disease; Mortality rate; Psychiatry; Political science; Cirrhosis; Geography; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.05681382074834623,"score_gpt":0.4995697204961752,"score_spread":0.442755899747829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387533342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3456464,0.00001890473,0.00011563301,0.33990234,0.0014310138,0.00089861697,0.00003609127,0.00046585288,0.31148514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75059235,0.000004998925,0.00027354705,0.02773528,0.0012524059,0.00029296218,0.000030592317,0.000033736673,0.21978411],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983786,0.00041244004,0.00022678159,0.00029206503,0.00028910945,0.0004010282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973258,0.0018754631,0.000031550357,0.0003001545,0.00022006815,0.0002469691],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007308419,0.000096210104,0.00015211214,0.00011491752,0.00024227968,0.000016645676,0.000102820864,0.00013781492,0.016976008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005821571,0.000078689016,0.000040935363,0.000263324,0.00006019756,0.00018397016,0.0000813371,0.0005427626,0.1319929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018998477,0.0001254404,0.00047762654,0.00009718221,0.000015228649,0.00001833232,0.017591303,0.0000011123602,0.0012513283,0.08444638,0.8941875,0.0015985934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022622949,0.00017299877,0.009654745,0.000115592535,0.000013155127,4.3590046e-7,0.0062974044,0.00009279298,0.00006182936,0.0020272692,0.98122,0.00011756071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013519806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000134057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40494597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002096315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015949232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390143988","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i4.17505","title":"PROVIDING A LEGAL DEFINITION FOR CYBERBULLYING IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; CLARITY; Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Confusion; Phenomenon; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Public relations; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04178065195820064,"score_gpt":0.24337168207147306,"score_spread":0.20159103011327242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390143988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5206819,0.000073453295,0.45405635,0.0013703363,0.0013654322,0.001085086,0.00001227883,0.0015537728,0.019801373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796943,0.0000016254153,0.018758278,0.00012224127,0.000082793966,0.00016530647,0.0000070128735,0.0000126423365,0.0011557802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990679,0.00002790019,0.00015002707,0.00028747617,0.00012933198,0.00033737914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.00006666299,0.00003995399,0.0001984924,0.00002921327,0.000043394844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034268168,0.000088342465,0.00009107482,0.00024727578,0.00011027296,0.00018957093,0.00021101738,0.000054300326,0.0000050062695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060040737,0.00008653137,0.000056501747,0.0006567673,0.000009229742,0.00038289977,0.000078088924,0.00008893525,0.0002374799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003256751,0.00042875315,0.007216421,0.00070574903,0.00012350653,0.00072966947,0.11030591,0.0019112406,0.13885114,0.37412012,0.024548361,0.34073344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067057014,0.0011255451,0.009041769,0.0007447446,0.00004144075,0.00011580996,0.0017542364,0.40279993,0.06302229,0.085485846,0.42656505,0.002597648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008834231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007796042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45901242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004029328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032864547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35286468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407032580","doi":"10.17159/wh71jh46","title":"DOUBLE INCHOATE CRIMES: SERVING A USEFUL PURPOSE OR DOUBLE TROUBLE? Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Law; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05560598496038626,"score_gpt":0.3316085947277179,"score_spread":0.27600260976733165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407032580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93804467,0.0004367806,0.000021549733,0.033909924,0.0016525798,0.0005597469,0.00004867335,0.00006586937,0.02526018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522987,0.00006669925,0.00018392004,0.011833467,0.00019944033,0.00013666444,0.00001607513,0.00003287704,0.035232138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734414,0.00036569507,0.0004231641,0.00039412285,0.0008490367,0.00062384777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881846,0.00020061905,0.00020762485,0.0004603534,0.0001324303,0.00018052295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001469688,0.00020909884,0.00028549373,0.00006420506,0.00095679663,0.00017641962,0.00096409884,0.00005229449,0.0034069007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004143606,0.00015526309,0.00014461145,0.00037888705,0.00019098732,0.00045253476,0.00049037475,0.00036357503,0.000014494382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018330156,0.00021922277,0.014268838,0.00012701414,0.00014426495,0.00015119728,0.027284326,0.0016022983,0.00075107504,0.01836234,0.93448055,0.0007758805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091722154,0.00010020296,0.0010811558,0.000050763567,0.000043772772,0.0000075817534,0.005214321,0.00007996168,0.00051132526,0.00010858955,0.9916216,0.00026347677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.871536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7716795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09985644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005515502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001633754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412454440","doi":"10.17159/zvd30693","title":"A Critical Analysis of the Application of Section 37C(1) of the Income Tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Economics; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.006322872847640396,"score_gpt":0.2551360647828392,"score_spread":0.2488131919351988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412454440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627818,0.000030797673,0.0024292404,0.0015991026,0.00021881207,0.00014285195,0.0000043824443,0.000010948743,0.03278205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885255,3.5141323e-7,0.000020542298,0.00038285519,0.00005483986,0.000005851653,0.0000023065948,0.0000018730923,0.0006788146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996301,0.000010392128,0.00015932543,0.00006184106,0.00010068108,0.000037666672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948215,0.000028494305,0.00014998112,0.00019976922,0.00013832474,0.0000012465853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009912996,0.000034411838,0.00009690638,0.0001329132,0.000034211695,0.000015774256,0.00012439756,0.000026165617,0.000085978296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010431372,0.000019841174,0.00010211964,0.0011666222,0.000057164943,0.000117565665,0.00006917296,0.00003803231,0.000002581813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019597343,0.000100753576,0.7241896,0.0002948277,0.00017866722,2.7939118e-8,0.0001639587,0.00025102985,0.01397437,0.25747505,0.0011773554,0.0021747712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100832505,0.0000014933646,0.9317043,0.00003964747,0.00044062317,2.112507e-8,0.000086732936,0.006795994,0.0031856291,0.0012861482,0.05632359,0.00003500827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010151961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025884662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2561889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005683722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004950841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15346797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417005967","doi":"10.17159/r3n3gv92","title":"What the Doctor Ordered: Lessons From Abroad to Strengthen South Africa’s Medical-Parole System","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Dignity; Legislation; Imprisonment; Criminal Conviction; Sentence; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.028892530347944798,"score_gpt":0.3352269723553151,"score_spread":0.3063344420073703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417005967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13899456,0.029287606,0.00060565956,0.13816702,0.03325647,0.0032948512,0.0008662712,0.00072786433,0.6547997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90995055,0.00015199861,0.00019247651,0.0023483306,0.0016973462,0.0001723172,0.000011759488,0.00004632572,0.085428916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926868,0.0012948188,0.0010175538,0.0012790405,0.002287054,0.0014347495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955138,0.0013503826,0.00029800265,0.0017048848,0.00029684076,0.00083606434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723038,0.0006076861,0.0008262944,0.00019981225,0.0014627796,0.002277747,0.003392553,0.0007496042,0.007583579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010924437,0.00043443224,0.0003806275,0.0020008828,0.00095055415,0.00070911524,0.001247747,0.00094408164,0.005131221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007958991,0.00016602624,0.0008638903,0.000080319915,0.0003838212,0.000050769435,0.903797,0.000019826586,0.000017808921,0.02731058,0.054575935,0.0126544805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005038537,0.0000418037,0.00022386384,0.0012680417,0.0002282016,3.011527e-7,0.15920427,0.0003702865,0.000042378786,0.0005389434,0.8371312,0.00044687217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003015392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013004021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005541176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010166181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124602040","doi":"10.17159/pjdnzz54","title":"Criminal Justice for Female Victims of Domestic Violence: Time to Deal Defencelessness a Final Blow","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Legislature; Plea; Notice; Legislation; Law enforcement; Presidential system","score_opus":0.025197674508300676,"score_gpt":0.3496766400808022,"score_spread":0.3244789655725015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124602040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90325963,0.002256761,0.009060608,0.0011319482,0.002670275,0.0026457228,0.00031798898,0.000113032125,0.07854403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708477,0.000034253364,0.009692929,0.00077086204,0.00057609315,0.00020853976,0.000007522455,0.000031233736,0.017830815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961856,0.00025916143,0.0008355785,0.00086203986,0.00075698685,0.0011006525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968882,0.0012284525,0.00027875497,0.0005382855,0.00071529334,0.00035100657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010472062,0.00041839166,0.0007581242,0.00029972263,0.00071466435,0.00021530349,0.0012362065,0.0003741406,0.0034155461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007680627,0.00042834133,0.0003183658,0.0015720197,0.0008221053,0.0002946914,0.00035243446,0.00031294004,0.001058955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003456133,0.0021246343,0.0049399654,0.008923991,0.0005243512,0.00014364149,0.74468267,0.0008939289,0.00360731,0.031894393,0.009365938,0.18944307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007810007,0.0038936061,0.006216111,0.012485193,0.013939524,0.000017592547,0.09615028,0.010031137,0.009652147,0.014177553,0.8211317,0.0044951686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021726222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045747114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81176573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025932313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089601916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}