{"meta":{"query_hash":"90218fa1b51c","filters":{"venue":"Open Philosophy"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90218fa1b51c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Open+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W2890551471","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2018-0013","title":"Deleuze and Heidegger on Truth And Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy of science; Pragmatism; Hierarchy; Coherence theory of truth; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.10879974166398818,"score_gpt":0.3113255262492934,"score_spread":0.2025257845853052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890551471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11081314,0.000105138606,0.0000010780174,0.0064222817,0.000853929,0.00019462574,0.00002991729,0.000032714408,0.88154715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925501,0.000027653414,0.00007742461,0.0036222269,0.0023729904,0.000010436779,0.0000033005756,0.00001846262,0.0013174119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885565,0.00002894406,0.00016527392,0.00044605127,0.00025132264,0.0002527364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992639,0.00005847351,0.000062703,0.00030226828,0.00016102866,0.00015164712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040206377,0.00015983451,0.00018938367,0.00010912065,0.0012596779,0.0010054805,0.00043178527,0.000042000465,0.00036683455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006452814,0.00013166839,0.000025485886,0.000052687137,0.0033580961,0.0006932797,0.00037686332,0.00015080329,0.00019714754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048005866,0.000035646728,0.000020553955,0.0000125291435,0.000011312866,0.0000032286423,0.0064363764,2.974712e-8,0.00007348288,0.9916025,0.00066863815,0.0010877219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056204095,0.00045668083,0.00021390476,0.0000698583,0.000019072018,0.000007629683,0.00028041587,0.000027403996,0.00030228109,0.8664976,0.13128525,0.00027786085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001706766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007440026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88173693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015623711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050364186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899168242","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2018-0020","title":"The Metaphysical Subject and Logical Space: Solipsism and Singularity in the Tractatus","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Solipsism; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Nonsense; Subject (documents); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07067356546090041,"score_gpt":0.2870229797674113,"score_spread":0.2163494143065109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899168242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3126778,0.00048931164,0.000004958957,0.07571077,0.00013916117,0.00087438955,0.000038050573,0.000027047425,0.6100385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692017,0.000036488604,0.00006465859,0.0013648286,0.0012899798,0.00006663089,0.0000043532355,0.0000104058745,0.00024248354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00013668973,0.00017306743,0.00027075756,0.00014446284,0.00020800623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924153,0.00027594386,0.000060178198,0.00032223208,0.000044466367,0.000055645713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123592,0.00014321618,0.0001714285,0.000025630732,0.0013096653,0.00093157374,0.00043877822,0.000042043743,0.00006116088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030538074,0.00007570842,0.000041851927,0.00006680698,0.0014396003,0.00025071585,0.00017790814,0.00023438803,0.00004127774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275889,0.00009015794,0.00004363534,0.0000037686245,0.000016034632,0.000003151118,0.0075605162,2.3169681e-8,0.000032416036,0.9900938,0.0005996141,0.001524117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029743457,0.0001418538,0.0024017023,0.00001095999,0.000025856292,0.00000981963,0.0006774109,0.00002249193,0.00003316872,0.831874,0.16437425,0.00013106404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012230696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031970756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68424237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064471888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016721777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959939520","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0016","title":"How Public is Public Art? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Racial Subtext of Public Monuments at Canada’s Pier 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Subtext; Public space; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Inclusion (mineral); Multiculturalism; Sociology; Situated; Gender studies; White (mutation); Aesthetics; Political science; Media studies; History; Art; Law; Archaeology; Literature","score_opus":0.06162292235276018,"score_gpt":0.34074152426142446,"score_spread":0.2791186019086643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959939520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30757862,0.000086745145,0.000010954595,0.45737216,0.00069032144,0.00077258964,0.0002781208,0.000017311422,0.23319316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97999173,0.000015345442,0.00006765957,0.0016387941,0.00015913314,0.0000443291,0.000039527753,0.00002724927,0.018016234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951893,0.0006816579,0.00051129935,0.00063851714,0.002062923,0.00091627706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967289,0.0002935719,0.00047284644,0.0012820425,0.0007014366,0.0005212047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014644433,0.0002733518,0.0007775163,0.00035589468,0.00065720454,0.00097253185,0.003229892,0.0001826974,0.0052737743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001682862,0.00021804617,0.0003885647,0.0034926028,0.001043118,0.0028546157,0.0014400879,0.00024506182,0.000068382986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036841404,0.00060010987,0.31158704,0.000034673005,0.0016994717,0.0000044760504,0.00766956,0.0000025764643,0.00014177652,0.6164524,0.060584147,0.0011869322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011746408,0.0000963873,0.030760398,0.000038023256,0.0006093046,0.0000013002781,0.005015522,0.0002569245,0.00017608366,0.016205586,0.94495136,0.0007144487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12620398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72652483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000804014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035460142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99563557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966569253","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0019","title":"Object-hood’s Indecencies: <i>Tilted Arc</i> and the Lessons Learnt in Breakdown","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Arc (geometry); Interpretation (philosophy); Object (grammar); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Moment (physics); Autonomy; Possessive; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Art; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Politics; Geometry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04335888750909855,"score_gpt":0.2716812185720167,"score_spread":0.22832233106291816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966569253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15724425,0.0002951971,4.4467532e-7,0.011571247,0.0002365897,0.00067906885,0.000018878312,0.000026300526,0.82992804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98423094,0.000038360453,0.000008011526,0.0037190202,0.00032230708,0.000043152457,0.000011928823,0.000019305224,0.0116070025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990104,0.00014041245,0.00020884794,0.00027033433,0.00015045232,0.00021955726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994426,0.00009612123,0.00007204351,0.000298521,0.000041380612,0.000049381986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004391577,0.00016477023,0.0002894298,0.00005177851,0.00029491677,0.00047976346,0.00048163196,0.000043845186,0.0017391753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015999542,0.00009779597,0.000059546048,0.000058861187,0.00037624408,0.000395071,0.00033739838,0.00025691043,0.00058366265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015330529,0.000061330116,0.00015422057,0.000015727734,0.000022378146,0.0000032132677,0.044209152,0.0000013204818,0.000069518064,0.95280874,0.0020124028,0.00048871955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028905633,0.00012876125,0.0002750802,0.000107129745,0.00001557818,0.0000060613224,0.009257058,0.000013934226,0.00005979975,0.522615,0.46435705,0.00027399856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035368552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007070935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8269867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013959927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030956933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978934231","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0028","title":"Silent Spaces: Allowing Objects to Talk","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Object (grammar); Silence; Space (punctuation); Aesthetics; The Thing; Ontology; Epistemology; Computer science; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04850307770339947,"score_gpt":0.27788857349492385,"score_spread":0.2293854957915244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978934231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13921234,0.00005266844,0.0000011332576,0.0020408102,0.0007016967,0.0005689587,0.0000124241815,0.000047361293,0.8573626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438539,0.000001548518,0.000048829814,0.005476117,0.0009770298,0.000028544764,0.000014427788,0.000024885745,0.049574703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991673,0.00003434825,0.00014152862,0.0002739526,0.00016255846,0.00022030606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949825,0.000024091949,0.000038849386,0.00028561722,0.00004626983,0.00010693348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014586757,0.00015171882,0.00020523516,0.00004821303,0.0002322898,0.0005973455,0.00047576491,0.000028351373,0.00810828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009838075,0.00011836642,0.000078586774,0.00003635274,0.00003726314,0.00047937917,0.00030417964,0.0000971824,0.0078364825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038281403,0.00007519377,0.000024148118,0.000022741768,0.000035666704,0.000010368713,0.026734686,0.000008030263,0.0009967491,0.9632115,0.008390355,0.00045231773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033935747,0.0002715983,0.000010808134,0.000103497565,0.000012644513,0.0000015324384,0.002914011,0.000004071291,0.0007529317,0.061435506,0.9338785,0.0002755898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009686874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011862442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018377066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001685906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989370794","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0033","title":"Hegel’s <i>Phenomenology</i>: On the Logical Structure of Human Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Hegelianism; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.09789066430077367,"score_gpt":0.29543412268938984,"score_spread":0.19754345838861617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989370794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4324438,0.000021488324,1.4457618e-7,0.0070104813,0.00021207085,0.00028825947,0.000042549418,0.000013352699,0.5599679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941742,0.0000033731224,0.000005683238,0.004739892,0.00043930518,0.00001411809,0.000010689782,0.000017780763,0.00059494993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988873,0.00011286887,0.0002551494,0.0003033491,0.00024175111,0.00019956962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989567,0.0001910291,0.00013514816,0.00058620947,0.000077012395,0.000053892047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017867626,0.00017149179,0.00028349512,0.00003926065,0.00035142872,0.00014116592,0.0011663884,0.000089696274,0.013658185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030339386,0.00009895027,0.000080280566,0.00004220855,0.0008233401,0.00015327873,0.0003742919,0.0004310519,0.00026514183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004773077,0.00008428327,0.000025003017,0.0000125589195,0.000023211891,0.000001914669,0.0058008065,0.0000023843968,0.002625094,0.9912622,0.0000754782,0.00003933697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026478776,0.00040030305,0.0000322164,0.00003820122,0.0000059513955,9.3600835e-7,0.000462634,0.0000035958712,0.0010007706,0.9838754,0.013768089,0.0001471043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038435097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000134843895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5617304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012018704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019629837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997661912","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0042","title":"Editorial for the Second Volume of <i>Open Philosophy</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Philosophy; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.029681015266693075,"score_gpt":0.2579412217481973,"score_spread":0.2282602064815042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997661912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008339503,0.00009408114,0.0000970451,0.0075728116,0.04308873,0.0044003637,0.00015201725,0.00006341607,0.93619204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130882,0.0000029599976,0.00019396412,0.0028733772,0.07270269,0.00023117627,0.0000661373,0.00008757792,0.010753926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829847,0.0000075297535,0.00045781885,0.0005307386,0.00034480786,0.0003606591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.00013825849,0.0005420602,0.00077082554,0.00031089492,0.000016001373],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006249763,0.00028188044,0.0004678416,0.000106137086,0.00023981818,0.0015304978,0.0034685647,0.00012299667,0.0011405622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014246033,0.00022440644,0.00017207018,0.00047252746,0.0001217162,0.004361165,0.0024656388,0.00020273651,0.0015089769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036362183,0.00011796931,0.0015801769,0.00031424224,0.000057588884,8.049597e-7,0.000014394444,0.000007637245,0.00055367267,0.42866737,0.5675289,0.00079364196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012417674,0.00005375577,0.00023827783,0.00009858839,0.00002650714,4.846471e-7,0.000010391304,0.00015401702,0.00022104716,0.24276443,0.7549344,0.00025635946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027286177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034977504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028448174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055091958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044853770","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0101","title":"Fetish-Oriented Ontology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Materialism; Object (grammar); Realism; Epistemology; Historical materialism; Order (exchange); Fundamental ontology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08374115792596214,"score_gpt":0.3655992905560185,"score_spread":0.2818581326300563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044853770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017509846,0.000054804168,0.0000068367303,0.13538133,0.00038524056,0.0004050611,0.000011039552,0.00009882085,0.846147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217886,0.000021849975,0.0006238972,0.0055963476,0.00056247984,0.00003559861,0.0000090459625,0.000011814264,0.00096011563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989352,0.00013490133,0.00016899152,0.00029322185,0.00020814707,0.00025951792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993559,0.000064681444,0.00007884712,0.00016452964,0.00010501035,0.00023104146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014137103,0.00009519325,0.00016908946,0.00005208251,0.00066723354,0.00018974312,0.0008720735,0.000070580194,0.003938622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024224794,0.00010315925,0.00008122254,0.00040949756,0.00030779198,0.00054657535,0.00027401958,0.00018235263,0.0012098706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078871206,0.000098801174,0.0026300922,0.000004714663,0.000047889866,0.000024512745,0.0103242,0.0000019968654,0.00013524368,0.9404683,0.04580911,0.0003762808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037055992,0.00020198095,0.002217748,0.000011183646,0.000020391746,0.000001585479,0.004293518,0.0000081556345,0.000037405316,0.053354982,0.93927056,0.00021190303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030574948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007098128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026598776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059007536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082059863","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0115","title":"City in Code: The Politics of Urban Modeling in the Age of Big Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Politics; Framing (construction); Sociology; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.22405068219710325,"score_gpt":0.2796914671405888,"score_spread":0.05564078494348554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082059863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165183,0.0011387386,0.0010365295,0.014692724,0.00017097313,0.00072671735,0.00040135227,0.00008604566,0.06522865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.000051455478,0.00016391996,0.00023392872,0.00007092782,0.0000066525236,0.000018644778,0.000009069268,0.0000021528654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994766,0.000018336264,0.00020874564,0.000097268356,0.0000940875,0.00010493579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933845,0.000058527592,0.000022368724,0.0005628299,0.000008881088,0.0000089409195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017727562,0.00006679577,0.00015940693,0.000030120618,0.00001850907,0.000019131001,0.001598519,0.000041432624,0.0000038721732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007281926,0.000043164997,0.000016775039,0.00024301189,0.000057668633,0.000084639076,0.00052819133,0.0001761135,9.613349e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008457555,0.00029222196,0.030924316,0.00094465615,0.00021264204,0.000106576066,0.021986743,0.17239556,0.0018414804,0.7517005,0.01133231,0.008178368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010750182,0.00011748228,0.0017036329,0.0002023745,0.00003060407,0.0000024683973,0.00385522,0.7447993,0.00160796,0.23520719,0.011048959,0.00034980293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003573914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093531686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5724037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008167908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011312465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2970473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200342412","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0156","title":"<i>Fleabag’s</i> Pedagogy of the Gimmick","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Criticism; Object (grammar); Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06607518857053618,"score_gpt":0.275974420264799,"score_spread":0.20989923169426283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200342412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04559235,0.004637502,0.000020918906,0.025426133,0.0010191624,0.00022039714,0.00012335673,0.000007485727,0.9229527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896913,0.00030847048,0.00022188661,0.0013533598,0.00018431853,0.000017825621,0.0000058242354,0.000013270087,0.008203735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992878,0.000011261604,0.0003126647,0.00023021695,0.000027397924,0.00013068171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992884,0.000032571683,0.00017339473,0.00043470203,0.000039474166,0.00003146774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001320538,0.00008190269,0.00031011907,0.000027918837,0.00008576833,0.00002887969,0.00042585775,0.000035778565,0.000524385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117831216,0.00007085143,0.000112784815,0.0002161728,0.00006697545,0.00009410383,0.0004971197,0.00008405576,0.00028948532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009560389,0.000115003415,0.031491995,0.00003609659,0.00007037245,0.000005554993,0.0005582678,0.0000033985782,0.00021236257,0.95281833,0.014156242,0.0005227853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072604883,0.000031339354,0.015487333,0.00003336582,0.000010689693,0.000008258635,0.00013707028,0.000008795789,0.003029484,0.4367704,0.5435845,0.00017265994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103479004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051800806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94409895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015526039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038953393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5741648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323645179","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2022-0235","title":"Nihilism: Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Now","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Nihilism; Philosophy; Nothing; Asceticism; Epistemology; Pessimism; Atheism; Rationalism; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.06890340385116513,"score_gpt":0.2818272435127535,"score_spread":0.2129238396615884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323645179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046496794,0.00125183,0.0000014590419,0.009786446,0.0010011308,0.00081402034,0.000106893414,0.00029941578,0.940242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032401,0.0018341037,0.00024959905,0.0037904985,0.0029030473,0.0002146552,0.00016677452,0.00013210204,0.18746911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818283,0.000072629104,0.00035698814,0.0005892478,0.0003120315,0.00048626497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.00009691422,0.000106446576,0.0005585281,0.00011142101,0.00023978119],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000522912,0.0003107835,0.0004129168,0.00019603502,0.00094335945,0.0015826136,0.0008914847,0.000093350034,0.0074451193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044612116,0.0002716463,0.00009967936,0.00018705527,0.00032505623,0.0011160255,0.0008707076,0.00032451857,0.011799464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006776044,0.000090222944,0.00036738694,0.0000645893,0.000078101664,0.00003955471,0.00628297,9.393045e-7,0.00020267714,0.4895923,0.50027734,0.0029361097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009517471,0.00011492029,0.00038242352,0.000073383235,0.000034883436,0.000006418534,0.0012237371,0.00003504972,0.00012934758,0.06018422,0.93642944,0.00043442912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023109204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044448115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7567433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020636264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006190946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400000192","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2024-0018","title":"From the Visual to the Auditory in Heidegger’s <i>Being and Time</i> and Augustine’s <i>Confessions</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.02666491798929875,"score_gpt":0.330956474633589,"score_spread":0.30429155664429025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400000192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29092577,0.0053622215,0.000022894228,0.19017778,0.0034361093,0.0013959617,0.00013849162,0.00012171348,0.50841904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98599786,0.000027690716,0.000047809095,0.009514578,0.0025542334,0.00012829267,0.000019124333,0.000035492416,0.0016748948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00029893388,0.00027434182,0.0005976402,0.00011652804,0.00029922804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889976,0.0005608824,0.00004277169,0.00037194788,0.000017001157,0.00010761152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050744583,0.0002161252,0.00025461137,0.00006590118,0.00033226042,0.00025814268,0.00062373554,0.00013392279,0.0005123549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039709343,0.00013190512,0.00004060233,0.00026883866,0.00023291756,0.00020848085,0.0008278083,0.0004945362,0.0011849565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010690617,0.00040982044,0.0017990674,0.00005080184,0.0007232977,0.00048108405,0.031453405,0.0000161786,0.0040743076,0.515721,0.4100259,0.03417606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010192894,0.000245251,0.011028865,0.0002941036,0.000106020016,0.000048990783,0.0006253962,0.00012812612,0.000029680647,0.7275796,0.25843343,0.00046122808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047290864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003356515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000178715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038654474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405139301","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2024-0054","title":"Heidegger’s Critical Confrontation with the Concept of Truth as Validity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.14092245844846932,"score_gpt":0.3426473959797596,"score_spread":0.20172493753129025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405139301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058606514,0.0005928042,0.000065260814,0.050339337,0.0018129485,0.00041917097,0.00023282193,0.00007840044,0.9405986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942712,0.000009665589,0.000039497307,0.0015971324,0.0018550572,0.000036928388,0.00004457763,0.00003028437,0.0021156305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988049,0.00013262892,0.00025119257,0.00029775593,0.0003293734,0.00018409689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989008,0.00043692673,0.000059238104,0.00031148558,0.0002240525,0.0000675064],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032204005,0.0001714844,0.00025439134,0.000045190856,0.00038156638,0.00079585006,0.00048466265,0.000056884084,0.0019133739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007813149,0.00010587831,0.00010245123,0.00004596581,0.001279528,0.00060991663,0.00011663244,0.0002804569,0.00023718526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007024415,0.00004875185,0.0000014382507,0.00007147645,0.00006997047,0.000020008756,0.023508862,0.0000014194983,0.000015706162,0.97070867,0.005276922,0.00020655792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030459548,0.0003627843,0.000010946962,0.00016471025,0.00012033735,0.000010743127,0.0019226487,0.000033981207,0.00041828727,0.83214116,0.16430989,0.0001998911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005841491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011377508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001993888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012066106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362060","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2025-0066","title":"Did Aristotle have a Doctrine of Existential Import?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.050380294477572286,"score_gpt":0.41143757792315333,"score_spread":0.361057283445581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00843325,0.000060368377,0.00008852671,0.013608391,0.00010695874,0.00040254876,0.00002063909,0.00001757407,0.9772617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98723704,0.000024921395,0.00035324556,0.00029683448,0.00014406991,0.000041638523,0.000007892882,0.000003970636,0.011890416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932003,0.000036763173,0.00019568732,0.00016794544,0.00014973473,0.00012983911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.00003385098,0.00008718823,0.0002515442,0.000063434505,0.000054060372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026887222,0.000057388406,0.0001385729,0.00003902414,0.00031117565,0.00008372653,0.0006145868,0.00004554065,0.00032633284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004257535,0.000054582768,0.00006372982,0.00023985973,0.00016047517,0.00014258521,0.00028697483,0.00007331538,0.0000362002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013259627,0.00008844913,0.0010507252,0.000007357175,0.000014892862,9.300617e-7,0.00041393406,0.0000014828539,0.00018348782,0.99492055,0.0021553154,0.0011496061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028415414,0.000015729853,0.0011544906,0.000021019292,0.000017232056,1.2239452e-7,0.0001794263,0.000010344086,0.00047342767,0.34484807,0.6529213,0.000074695155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005781566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97880375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035840894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017773351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.813641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}