{"meta":{"query_hash":"90218fa1b51c","filters":{"venue":"Open Philosophy"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90218fa1b51c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Open+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W2890551471","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2018-0013","title":"Deleuze and Heidegger on Truth And Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy of science; Pragmatism; Hierarchy; Coherence theory of truth; Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Pragmatic theory of truth; Computer science","score_opus":0.10879974166398818,"score_gpt":0.3113255262492934,"score_spread":0.2025257845853052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890551471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05989559,0.048539802,0.043370955,0.25631765,0.002933068,0.00006816999,0.00013014211,0.00011551723,0.5886291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954442,0.0069792205,0.0050355475,0.01026082,0.0014167476,0.000077759294,0.000029802537,0.000055098797,0.021703029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955778,0.002800886,0.00013007659,0.00037251206,0.0008320933,0.00028669805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138886,0.0066132364,0.00030977954,0.00061728293,0.0008352973,0.00023551777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00559878,0.0004663893,0.0007370028,0.002089146,0.0039439043,0.0061204513,0.00080295006,0.0038101638,0.0039497153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011954163,0.00028714247,0.00050856377,0.0010650647,0.04054048,0.008490335,0.004162908,0.0061662416,0.0005238848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043993714,0.0000039728716,0.000025539346,0.0000072749235,0.0000012845144,0.000018528424,0.0008836805,0.00005788435,0.000023438926,0.9973889,0.0008549582,0.00073018513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058509904,0.000004880333,0.000044710563,0.000034120276,0.0000016607823,0.000018220055,0.00028213352,0.000106645646,0.000054469525,0.9875432,0.011900144,0.0000039541783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035888848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022993083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061204513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005668395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002049137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041127324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899168242","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2018-0020","title":"The Metaphysical Subject and Logical Space: Solipsism and Singularity in the Tractatus","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Solipsism; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Nonsense; Subject (documents); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07067356546090041,"score_gpt":0.2870229797674113,"score_spread":0.2163494143065109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899168242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21564741,0.008964401,0.14404306,0.032018308,0.0006013575,0.000059994116,0.00014352366,0.00023300877,0.5982889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960775,0.000471603,0.0026090047,0.00039119812,0.00010135373,0.000029158768,0.000019268065,0.00005305906,0.006717626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800926,0.0012894416,0.000065946384,0.00018762115,0.00033318848,0.00011449238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837816,0.0009988355,0.00016285713,0.00023122219,0.00013624103,0.00009270138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022669737,0.00031485854,0.00042543336,0.0014090986,0.0025244877,0.0060583204,0.0005997082,0.0014951134,0.0037944212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003976277,0.00018833877,0.00035591674,0.0011307773,0.03492717,0.007770136,0.0034732267,0.0024338008,0.0003966998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036776362,0.0000012845549,0.000025835274,0.0000069561556,9.700212e-7,0.000013963267,0.0014090092,0.000074996766,0.000039790164,0.99770385,0.00016381878,0.00055588165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004848042,0.0000050827884,0.00004921409,0.000024366645,0.0000016318719,0.000033025306,0.0009772952,0.00034443763,0.00010995132,0.9890069,0.0094395485,0.0000036979236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012213006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085507415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060583204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034996301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001377198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025391698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959939520","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0016","title":"How Public is Public Art? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Racial Subtext of Public Monuments at Canada’s Pier 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Subtext; Public space; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Inclusion (mineral); Multiculturalism; Sociology; Situated; Gender studies; White (mutation); Aesthetics; Political science; Media studies; History; Art; Law; Archaeology; Literature","score_opus":0.06162292235276018,"score_gpt":0.34074152426142446,"score_spread":0.2791186019086643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959939520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383051,0.0039224233,0.0056661637,0.07432919,0.0005684024,0.00013984478,0.00029716347,0.000109459346,0.37666222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353,0.00030625938,0.00034943377,0.00072061067,0.00003713874,0.000021314296,0.00001680598,0.000032511827,0.004985915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895644,0.005223589,0.00016142742,0.00065170473,0.0019364927,0.0024623629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819801,0.012756036,0.00088717573,0.00065391755,0.0023658606,0.0013569045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011674624,0.0009418619,0.0008601328,0.0046183714,0.06375065,0.029081883,0.0033447742,0.0054983436,0.004814587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013229363,0.00054698845,0.0004893948,0.004960343,0.08882098,0.0077976245,0.009475105,0.007978094,0.00022464158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019174002,0.000012878402,0.00048288552,0.00005861545,0.0000041165654,0.0003813211,0.8326124,0.00012404277,0.00019958838,0.16072449,0.0026348834,0.0027455015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038441726,0.000005571507,0.0009628445,0.0002581454,0.00001266327,0.000066614484,0.917909,0.00022984373,0.00029692182,0.008416115,0.07181524,0.000023199209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8570026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8735049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14299738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13810535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08183324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966569253","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0019","title":"Object-hood’s Indecencies: <i>Tilted Arc</i> and the Lessons Learnt in Breakdown","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Arc (geometry); Interpretation (philosophy); Object (grammar); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Moment (physics); Autonomy; Possessive; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Art; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Politics; Geometry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04335888750909855,"score_gpt":0.2716812185720167,"score_spread":0.22832233106291816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966569253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12595926,0.002619548,0.021644356,0.025407787,0.0006040509,0.00003803961,0.000044171855,0.00014891774,0.82353383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97325,0.00047581465,0.0016956297,0.00096619636,0.00007870665,0.000016275248,0.000015824264,0.00013499458,0.023366684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678767,0.0015145751,0.000078995006,0.00040782394,0.0007207392,0.00049025903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698997,0.0012715657,0.00019592325,0.00088716776,0.00039303987,0.00026240092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038417461,0.00035497232,0.00045053737,0.0013333021,0.006669181,0.014002606,0.0015092187,0.00197957,0.010820327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384817,0.00030549453,0.00039526005,0.0010890528,0.049114317,0.0138828205,0.0071583376,0.0068327896,0.0010313281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016528391,0.000010717602,0.00018683053,0.000017662402,0.0000019542713,0.00007277051,0.03781095,0.00007444195,0.00010421558,0.9543837,0.001677653,0.005642501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016933292,0.00002745739,0.00077604526,0.00018448343,0.0000071135723,0.0002215326,0.08770488,0.0005195698,0.0006961728,0.6964601,0.21336386,0.000021815848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008606563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006806013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014002606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007066776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023137147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051273227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978934231","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0028","title":"Silent Spaces: Allowing Objects to Talk","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Object (grammar); Silence; Space (punctuation); Aesthetics; The Thing; Ontology; Epistemology; Computer science; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04850307770339947,"score_gpt":0.27788857349492385,"score_spread":0.2293854957915244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978934231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08420674,0.0042910324,0.27613434,0.013365266,0.0011061665,0.00011471927,0.0001419442,0.0006330741,0.6200067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95418274,0.0009721466,0.019956246,0.0010647108,0.0002564842,0.00015233201,0.000077961035,0.00026804642,0.02306923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958692,0.0026403423,0.00013927696,0.00044399383,0.0005891914,0.00031801045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957211,0.0023817522,0.00029922934,0.0008372381,0.00037100632,0.00038958222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039422316,0.00072960905,0.00046149144,0.0011894658,0.0053318236,0.0105289025,0.0016961165,0.0023021388,0.00919465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007121287,0.00053160643,0.0007647615,0.00069422176,0.028449921,0.017308658,0.010934202,0.0037727456,0.0014659655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014712809,0.000005754212,0.00006405537,0.000029370376,0.0000031029804,0.00008959103,0.021443726,0.00013904426,0.000419085,0.9739886,0.0007098913,0.0030929372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024960274,0.00003278364,0.00013574607,0.00016019634,0.000016683021,0.00021204035,0.014020439,0.0011369295,0.0010300047,0.87474513,0.10845888,0.000026410538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018069037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011182133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105289025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002507416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001459567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030759156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989370794","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0033","title":"Hegel’s <i>Phenomenology</i>: On the Logical Structure of Human Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Hegelianism; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.09789066430077367,"score_gpt":0.29543412268938984,"score_spread":0.19754345838861617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989370794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17036444,0.010008974,0.14594172,0.055718992,0.000660288,0.00016858819,0.0002787271,0.00024378569,0.61661446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98372793,0.0013669103,0.005373169,0.0016605892,0.00009681237,0.000064608146,0.00003447776,0.0000409748,0.0076344465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978974,0.0015642956,0.00005097567,0.00014956956,0.00020138938,0.00013629351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975783,0.0017332978,0.00013581316,0.00026301536,0.0001853434,0.000104155384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030498668,0.00030730446,0.0002766243,0.0013248817,0.0030340166,0.0053209076,0.0005740498,0.0014944188,0.0026626433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037124555,0.00023367394,0.0003516184,0.000888971,0.05902542,0.008962245,0.0029978072,0.0029686692,0.00032037005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013157619,0.0000064764536,0.00012793543,0.000038363905,0.0000033834253,0.00007289875,0.03616638,0.00025632014,0.00020064093,0.9602066,0.0013861352,0.0015216823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019631247,0.000023066186,0.00028050246,0.00018341129,0.0000064592546,0.00026007884,0.03352298,0.0006906931,0.0004885292,0.89824986,0.06624717,0.000027601529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027204936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012565217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053209076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003821186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017788156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027724743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997661912","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0042","title":"Editorial for the Second Volume of <i>Open Philosophy</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Philosophy; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.029681015266693075,"score_gpt":0.2579412217481973,"score_spread":0.2282602064815042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997661912","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006469869,0.0012294948,0.0002287823,0.034366414,0.95967454,0.000023458068,0.000083111445,0.00014382476,0.0041856635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011567385,0.001440626,0.00018513507,0.02362561,0.9443115,0.000038145183,0.000121190686,0.00020631419,0.0289147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943357,0.0006633172,0.00041689182,0.00073224417,0.0034012792,0.000450523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708138,0.008512532,0.0016499739,0.0012463301,0.013445509,0.004331875],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044409735,0.0018296682,0.0015677365,0.0027237183,0.0036568465,0.009730469,0.0029336126,0.0066494322,0.059386093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030777156,0.00058788946,0.0019098915,0.0010594119,0.0029159067,0.003976836,0.0018995473,0.0123387445,0.030747937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001405282,0.0000056601903,0.000019844905,0.000056968285,0.0000034427476,0.000024692323,0.000011739321,0.000007962615,0.000058093046,0.00047033635,0.99677724,0.0025499817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014867379,0.00002306223,0.00022556039,0.00022781239,0.000009580325,0.000103099235,0.000063350504,0.000090202695,0.00012882502,0.0012323328,0.99786854,0.000012826618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013851448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031083464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99026954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028365462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036959632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19866627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044853770","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0101","title":"Fetish-Oriented Ontology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Materialism; Object (grammar); Realism; Epistemology; Historical materialism; Order (exchange); Fundamental ontology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08374115792596214,"score_gpt":0.3655992905560185,"score_spread":0.2818581326300563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044853770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021385364,0.0067008096,0.13280366,0.040500205,0.0014325801,0.00006914149,0.00017490186,0.00015510734,0.79677826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137464,0.003693378,0.016404746,0.004759549,0.0007578435,0.00011427362,0.000152844,0.00016317928,0.060207814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976004,0.0012040283,0.00008018588,0.00033352652,0.0005902516,0.00019168184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983425,0.0007281185,0.00012785601,0.00037699708,0.00030812755,0.000116472744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028573452,0.00043161918,0.00034955805,0.0012849217,0.004036145,0.00535892,0.0011150972,0.002859812,0.0052071866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039308136,0.00020201634,0.0004446615,0.0010028395,0.031823106,0.0104585,0.0043342337,0.004308931,0.000768632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.877671e-7,9.4677256e-7,0.000015044903,0.000004200006,4.4110425e-7,0.000009679329,0.0005981357,0.000025287354,0.000015243909,0.998204,0.00048437397,0.00064168946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025811269,0.0000025605887,0.000043970755,0.000035918252,0.0000014121683,0.000034124645,0.00064126507,0.00020055939,0.00006449742,0.92109686,0.07787327,0.0000030348904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036013247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032379692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00535892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042882385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022827932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031113505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082059863","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0115","title":"City in Code: The Politics of Urban Modeling in the Age of Big Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Politics; Framing (construction); Sociology; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.22405068219710325,"score_gpt":0.2796914671405888,"score_spread":0.05564078494348554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082059863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026078815,0.0054483474,0.114136934,0.6363592,0.002375117,0.000074036936,0.00051374227,0.0004852987,0.21452856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102257,0.0050477046,0.028297571,0.030870855,0.0021115968,0.00026791415,0.0004931064,0.0010218123,0.021663781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97597563,0.015969358,0.0006305937,0.001386484,0.0050910967,0.0009468608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228335,0.057499107,0.001771747,0.009227083,0.0061919596,0.0024767458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038224474,0.0004923825,0.0007619482,0.0033936645,0.010354765,0.024438296,0.0023023305,0.006304528,0.004515293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06478079,0.0007610977,0.00081662013,0.005771057,0.046568196,0.022041108,0.015031605,0.013251162,0.0008316403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007836635,0.0000043940763,0.0002774988,0.000015783917,0.000005272499,0.00002871562,0.002671704,0.0014868088,0.000018856714,0.9796913,0.012731682,0.0030601397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009752341,0.0000057575317,0.00022596265,0.00016171292,0.000007108314,0.000027393824,0.004001376,0.00938528,0.00010874373,0.8034742,0.1825643,0.00002849784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034223955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031423017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98964524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013952399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012864758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20215273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200342412","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2020-0156","title":"<i>Fleabag’s</i> Pedagogy of the Gimmick","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Criticism; Object (grammar); Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Art; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06607518857053618,"score_gpt":0.275974420264799,"score_spread":0.20989923169426283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200342412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043473132,0.005747655,0.027673446,0.09929518,0.0016322125,0.00005898398,0.00006430806,0.0003710731,0.82168406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921062,0.0016862755,0.004282115,0.00500221,0.00033945803,0.000065671455,0.000019075249,0.00023993503,0.0962591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987159,0.0008604264,0.000014774136,0.00012871879,0.00013463253,0.00014556748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846125,0.0010396114,0.000088160785,0.00013796841,0.00010211568,0.00017082052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296312,0.0004208315,0.00016856528,0.0007992488,0.0044801827,0.0063819946,0.00071896514,0.0022707745,0.012887541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042978656,0.00021233049,0.00025325705,0.00043936982,0.01766834,0.0061284425,0.0032657944,0.0043432503,0.0016203715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030130568,0.000016835646,0.00032784074,0.000069138216,0.0000029232763,0.0001365867,0.04172694,0.00014322643,0.0004708481,0.9131348,0.032224763,0.011715844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012498408,0.000035488003,0.00083308824,0.00032512078,0.0000073877727,0.00031644249,0.020976787,0.0008525398,0.00091288355,0.1500996,0.82560426,0.000023964662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055395784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007979501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012887541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013287144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043113112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323645179","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2022-0235","title":"Nihilism: Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Now","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Nihilism; Philosophy; Nothing; Asceticism; Epistemology; Pessimism; Atheism; Rationalism; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.06890340385116513,"score_gpt":0.2818272435127535,"score_spread":0.2129238396615884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323645179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05400605,0.02077843,0.009565023,0.15322524,0.0013223658,0.000016962462,0.00004213383,0.00007288798,0.76097095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599995,0.0035693704,0.0010949466,0.006547651,0.0004754916,0.000023459568,0.000015165064,0.000040622577,0.028233849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973947,0.0012520537,0.000055001357,0.00028916326,0.0006896927,0.0003192551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737453,0.001682015,0.00018048614,0.00030192663,0.0003170961,0.0001439359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037313127,0.00030875314,0.00042384636,0.0013505747,0.0041365502,0.0067783366,0.00077756785,0.0032429674,0.005339846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006660471,0.00022047557,0.0002661115,0.0008990797,0.03654335,0.008613923,0.004002817,0.004971311,0.00061935297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044248322,0.0000036218453,0.00003657617,0.000006811879,0.0000012453135,0.000019540488,0.0015861848,0.0000520796,0.000023872104,0.99559754,0.00136268,0.001305404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057269767,0.0000053203617,0.00012714429,0.000075981225,0.0000026179334,0.00004321183,0.0017653492,0.00014143436,0.00008837038,0.938619,0.059115656,0.0000101610285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045654485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005563938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067783366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005170367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030307742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037513793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400000192","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2024-0018","title":"From the Visual to the Auditory in Heidegger’s <i>Being and Time</i> and Augustine’s <i>Confessions</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.02666491798929875,"score_gpt":0.330956474633589,"score_spread":0.30429155664429025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400000192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677574,0.008316215,0.01598308,0.06473012,0.0011204397,0.000050683226,0.000041697487,0.00016504734,0.34183535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931068,0.00038778453,0.0004762256,0.0007703342,0.000077211305,0.000011310919,0.0000034699005,0.000019995321,0.0051469095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759835,0.0017958556,0.00004054247,0.00014766594,0.00026074421,0.00015672405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719775,0.0018413662,0.0003477804,0.00017793014,0.00017460484,0.000260436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024072349,0.00035419347,0.0002292495,0.00091327826,0.00501212,0.005388952,0.0006084812,0.002081024,0.0017390688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004795647,0.0002302697,0.00017632265,0.0004686945,0.041825984,0.005040227,0.0040497216,0.004817478,0.00020280898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052922514,0.000024810863,0.00043732443,0.000052877367,0.0000056790923,0.0005472852,0.6511215,0.00008846125,0.0012415805,0.33704516,0.0038442533,0.005538098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028636317,0.00012075222,0.003232306,0.00038150564,0.00001473665,0.0025131488,0.5403002,0.0006154497,0.0023180945,0.13069604,0.31967786,0.0001012741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022316808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023591141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005388952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019799909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007696383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0143659115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405139301","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2024-0054","title":"Heidegger’s Critical Confrontation with the Concept of Truth as Validity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.14092245844846932,"score_gpt":0.3426473959797596,"score_spread":0.20172493753129025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405139301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049309712,0.039620515,0.050307777,0.56321967,0.004740225,0.00011846647,0.00018692393,0.00010468078,0.29239208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93476164,0.007585731,0.006958061,0.030538805,0.002981374,0.00019102787,0.000043818196,0.00011755951,0.016822089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818118,0.014110811,0.00034705424,0.0012583078,0.0018433942,0.0006286996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767675,0.020528454,0.00049406796,0.0005919655,0.0012529538,0.0003650212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016422486,0.0006249168,0.0008432717,0.004358488,0.007847424,0.00995045,0.0016727614,0.008283114,0.0022536542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022420125,0.00054947945,0.00053431327,0.0021766785,0.07450335,0.021853998,0.0053069848,0.013914957,0.00040953758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008959418,0.000003460593,0.000027646449,0.000012206185,0.0000014332621,0.000054273696,0.0054959306,0.00007100172,0.000036578087,0.9897961,0.003442601,0.0010498519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012934431,0.000012978296,0.00009711127,0.00021871926,0.000004195,0.00010066446,0.0054137926,0.0006293149,0.00030653473,0.90807146,0.08510918,0.000023042201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008033735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052988105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016422486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014548098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10555434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362060","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2025-0066","title":"Did Aristotle have a Doctrine of Existential Import?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.050380294477572286,"score_gpt":0.41143757792315333,"score_spread":0.361057283445581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10807803,0.0045424607,0.0749227,0.11899745,0.001167822,0.00005760541,0.00015548583,0.00019000772,0.6918884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994345,0.0006655237,0.0047695357,0.004260357,0.00046246377,0.00002790293,0.000036684076,0.00005293601,0.009781031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997088,0.0009349883,0.00015442196,0.0005004584,0.000988426,0.00033372326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949812,0.0024219234,0.00036371002,0.000936059,0.001012984,0.00028425796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005904821,0.0002775082,0.0007121633,0.0013700482,0.003664128,0.004982787,0.0012798803,0.004288491,0.0042661377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007908014,0.00036406732,0.0006918315,0.00079891266,0.0343862,0.01200709,0.0039872434,0.006545495,0.0006848909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047456415,0.0000046381583,0.00008553963,0.0000072447874,0.000001849828,0.000029366418,0.00064343994,0.00004115046,0.000031682735,0.9976926,0.00053013273,0.00092768087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007928168,0.0000046936575,0.00013141466,0.000025710353,0.0000027450726,0.000044245717,0.00029469994,0.00020969706,0.00008599666,0.99077517,0.008412384,0.0000051289935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00307808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023489448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005904821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005081153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021903599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036866486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}