{"meta":{"query_hash":"26bc8496c543","filters":{"venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},"cohort_total":56,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":56,"exported":56,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/26bc8496c543","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Organizational+Behavior+and+Human+Decision+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W1749836545","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.12.002","title":"Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Social psychology; Perception; Social connectedness; Interpersonal communication; Preference; Affect (linguistics); Norm (philosophy); Communication","score_opus":0.13340383728816274,"score_gpt":0.3791108878982824,"score_spread":0.24570705061011966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749836545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99560803,0.00006853455,0.00059290655,0.00012214227,0.00001746259,0.000009632765,0.000022492057,0.0000053566628,0.0035535074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992316,0.000031539876,0.00020885718,0.000046567147,0.000010401659,0.0000063802736,0.00002093061,0.00000636706,0.00043740906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981055,0.00085847924,0.00013222368,0.00028143794,0.0004805984,0.00014177659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653458,0.022868523,0.004917948,0.0033954883,0.001304197,0.0021680007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025192113,0.00018749307,0.00030526103,0.00042167355,0.0005323465,0.0026015677,0.00027454313,0.00094715913,0.007310968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026580496,0.00030647003,0.0002647808,0.00024909189,0.0012289644,0.0012208836,0.0010373915,0.0013062546,0.00030890887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006637719,0.0082490565,0.81622696,0.0003239929,0.00054155156,0.0012453174,0.032382276,0.0011720115,0.06970885,0.013969842,0.0010290686,0.04851341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001046,0.0015202906,0.97453326,0.000056228604,0.0001803029,0.00056613033,0.0055979225,0.0014279663,0.0046432354,0.010120237,0.0011912176,0.000058481324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011072503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010774707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007310968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003115275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030142278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024457574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969624676","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2941","title":"Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumer choice; Econometric model; Consumer behaviour; Task (project management); Choice set; Empirical research; Econometrics; Construct (python library); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.15523496886584218,"score_gpt":0.3955967711956773,"score_spread":0.24036180232983514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969624676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38553888,0.0020802203,0.5706677,0.007968487,0.00009465137,0.00014962153,0.00019861749,0.00008979386,0.033212118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96093655,0.00073362276,0.03695352,0.00019073758,0.000107781845,0.00012944087,0.00004041372,0.000016779153,0.00089106534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.0009802228,0.00005293751,0.00013338374,0.0003198675,0.00012091013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980682,0.016339742,0.0013648082,0.00064257387,0.0004939386,0.00047694737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032871782,0.0007442477,0.0008313345,0.0019387215,0.00081379147,0.004383279,0.0011780972,0.0018333059,0.0032386035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016704516,0.0004884474,0.0010952455,0.00202712,0.0036916968,0.007056144,0.0019402547,0.0019966708,0.00019263593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007753601,0.00033359992,0.014928785,0.00011253529,0.00014144504,0.00011583127,0.0010408998,0.04766072,0.0005031956,0.91846186,0.00069820724,0.01592538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028336417,0.000049170005,0.0038610438,0.000027597976,0.000038823815,0.000063353815,0.00031660643,0.1309041,0.00011844339,0.8633903,0.0011729586,0.000029249435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023823257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022371344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004383279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015922785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013195662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01738447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987253013","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003","title":"Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Situational ethics; Ambiguity; Job satisfaction; Autonomy; Structural equation modeling; Social comparison theory; Developmental psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.018214809096140493,"score_gpt":0.2582630987137168,"score_spread":0.2400482896175763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987253013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969716,0.0000518243,0.00009367465,0.00016504635,0.000009223639,0.00001399178,0.000052916344,0.000005118144,0.0026365845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970835,0.000022622673,0.000073586445,0.000016827076,0.000009459231,0.000006032554,0.000024522065,0.0000027004398,0.00013602748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821967,0.0007276722,0.00013024973,0.0002255649,0.00037242993,0.0003242681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9412152,0.038513012,0.010336107,0.0027108053,0.0017315143,0.005493301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023283428,0.00017129708,0.00023657276,0.0012651146,0.0010745678,0.0014743045,0.000467202,0.0010389101,0.006263642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029341293,0.0003089033,0.00026923648,0.000784383,0.0013747842,0.0006917478,0.0007879955,0.0015063832,0.00026060204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011188579,0.0017651005,0.98123413,0.000025806145,0.000075224205,0.0002535843,0.0015248774,0.00034900362,0.002287639,0.0019896354,0.00021229609,0.009163935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025111774,0.00017352424,0.99622947,0.000008813934,0.000026908541,0.00017404696,0.0013330874,0.0005060862,0.00024331357,0.0010910679,0.00018017906,0.000008346075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034042266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004966478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006263642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005577493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091115583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020953953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988224984","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.002","title":"The hungry thief: Physiological deprivation and its effects on unethical behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Reinforcement; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06386560107190511,"score_gpt":0.31363784096735936,"score_spread":0.24977223989545425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988224984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99624854,0.0009506781,0.00032681524,0.0002827301,0.000035865112,0.000016106194,0.000078312245,0.0000055475407,0.0020554375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975872,0.0010163245,0.00043212986,0.00011242313,0.000032579657,0.000038561182,0.000050983694,0.000007137225,0.00072271784],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998894,0.000039587343,0.000006771614,0.000019023293,0.000022752836,0.00002249209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990125,0.0004849917,0.00014500845,0.00010154666,0.000027769944,0.00022810834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023016521,0.00022504076,0.00033003945,0.00016808684,0.0003760106,0.00055097044,0.00018716621,0.0005343502,0.003713842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001928765,0.0001965751,0.00013578971,0.0001746244,0.0015805584,0.00043751602,0.00047895516,0.0012532681,0.00014533501],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10452881,0.008146902,0.045537747,0.0014962868,0.00036529155,0.0018548522,0.0014691122,0.0018412779,0.6884443,0.0082997605,0.0020088744,0.13600676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016167585,0.029765822,0.85785323,0.00019747025,0.00035398474,0.002468376,0.0021471705,0.0060912836,0.0785375,0.014192593,0.0066629285,0.00011290286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013308959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018104876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003713842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038260894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000535921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012424052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989706212","doi":"10.1006/obhd.1999.2867","title":"Just Doing Business: Modern Racism and Obedience to Authority as Explanations for Employment Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":351,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Milgram experiment; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045425284353338174,"score_gpt":0.3896524482705285,"score_spread":0.3442271639171903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989706212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106927,0.0016345101,0.011485074,0.08140834,0.00039312526,0.000031434156,0.00006274604,0.000040713712,0.0942513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823487,0.00009769406,0.00032433952,0.00051134086,0.000068233254,0.0000058110986,0.000006649622,0.000004503884,0.00074660406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912745,0.0004107578,0.000023866985,0.00009324122,0.00014313638,0.00020163052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936354,0.0036914032,0.0009785107,0.0006743239,0.00039016418,0.0006301265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028757108,0.00027501993,0.0002506122,0.0010555604,0.0021857906,0.0031821085,0.0013779149,0.004687939,0.0068147536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009179926,0.00024678424,0.00036553547,0.0007016098,0.013511484,0.0057067974,0.0022848882,0.003156281,0.0003110292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013477009,0.00042722898,0.02290831,0.000054400596,0.000023732544,0.00065592054,0.019716822,0.00045297272,0.0003174807,0.9337746,0.0037387684,0.017795108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008354247,0.000034530356,0.014063262,0.000057784022,0.000026973177,0.00044479375,0.011425651,0.0032689085,0.00017259712,0.9637274,0.0066682776,0.000026181822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025960885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025833445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068147536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009240096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096804276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022797585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994190158","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.004","title":"Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Person–environment fit; Preference; Value (mathematics); Well-being; Dimension (graph theory); Moderated mediation; Multilevel model; Statistics","score_opus":0.09578338513297892,"score_gpt":0.3447116854141499,"score_spread":0.24892830028117102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994190158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987097,0.00013501731,0.00013817078,0.00017231633,0.0000054753605,0.000003788373,0.000016217573,6.196428e-7,0.0008187281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997315,0.00005824189,0.000084441024,0.000026329752,0.000003802904,0.000004454287,0.000020095214,6.697689e-7,0.0000704309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995023,0.00023630264,0.000023048673,0.000059380618,0.000053779717,0.00012530421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941812,0.002025372,0.0017265077,0.00027903297,0.00034638218,0.0014414159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019497455,0.00017749854,0.00026010186,0.0007769302,0.00084294466,0.0018958985,0.00028418395,0.0006278986,0.0022626314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049398625,0.0001787174,0.0003886231,0.00078898395,0.0012557816,0.0008412821,0.0013067257,0.0010893294,0.0000898454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024002303,0.0004255565,0.97827107,0.00004316673,0.00014592605,0.00011193405,0.0054269503,0.00016299018,0.00075303036,0.0027979698,0.00010920844,0.011512182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008286642,0.00015892078,0.99004596,0.000021941914,0.00003187504,0.000072555114,0.0072470573,0.0003168134,0.000088934285,0.0017103432,0.00028595678,0.0000113494525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002759611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007541379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002759611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005260961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007745458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010311365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015848817","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.09.001","title":"What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Construals; Psychology; Social psychology; Interdependence; Identity (music); Outcome (game theory); Self construal; Construal level theory; Independence (probability theory); Self; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03447805462571547,"score_gpt":0.36851809490377735,"score_spread":0.3340400402780619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015848817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661579,0.00035767804,0.0054958155,0.0035790137,0.000111700865,0.000047986996,0.000028375282,0.000030346464,0.02419129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824846,0.00006166697,0.00084356347,0.0003707443,0.000026988519,0.00001836647,0.000014019778,0.000020899492,0.00039518758],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946875,0.007347684,0.00029269632,0.0004596419,0.0018333307,0.00059795124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154319,0.055256866,0.014111442,0.0050546215,0.0063579837,0.003787185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012941343,0.00029832285,0.00032478123,0.0009000744,0.0019032449,0.005270896,0.00065358565,0.00292182,0.00191996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10013934,0.00041785795,0.00047500187,0.00057716214,0.005370821,0.0027647677,0.0020920746,0.0053633368,0.0002806358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030419277,0.0015104377,0.3061998,0.00045473917,0.0006428691,0.00059798395,0.4039427,0.004801709,0.02677241,0.16384988,0.005233474,0.08295207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027442674,0.001068653,0.56242627,0.0004600703,0.00044824553,0.0010603917,0.199416,0.016618596,0.010003671,0.18654706,0.021175712,0.0005009724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002352228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018375603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012941343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001016125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095078803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06844121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016480011","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.001","title":"Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Disposition; Psychology; Venture capital; Evolutionary theory; Social psychology; Entrepreneurship; Biology; Business; Epistemology; Finance","score_opus":0.033663844292028955,"score_gpt":0.2771020494358853,"score_spread":0.24343820514385633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016480011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85687566,0.08417881,0.0027692453,0.02307214,0.0010405419,0.00002046894,0.0003280538,0.00004346913,0.031671554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97931194,0.013437732,0.00066314597,0.00088501,0.0010377726,0.000008474327,0.000064696585,0.000013407188,0.0045778067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996226,0.0002487843,0.000008644424,0.000037801507,0.000046132693,0.000035978028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224514,0.006223767,0.00045155623,0.00016553786,0.00016927127,0.0007447027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014125584,0.00029216954,0.00029959204,0.00082200556,0.00044119466,0.0024175684,0.00040005564,0.0011473917,0.0063411985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006706985,0.00018820686,0.00020670038,0.00109854,0.001552787,0.0010885473,0.00055250997,0.0010708286,0.00033201627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00724535,0.0031947745,0.57349455,0.0010943955,0.0010414729,0.003141151,0.005642187,0.0034604752,0.013776703,0.1195948,0.008655578,0.25965858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035478736,0.0012860679,0.83052933,0.00039962275,0.0007725247,0.0020865418,0.003509691,0.004173237,0.002350896,0.12677148,0.027648497,0.00011721948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021316153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037002214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063411985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032472456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061854126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021213412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019243091","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2001.2979","title":"Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Social psychology; Disadvantage; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.300163925228215,"score_gpt":0.3587851679612153,"score_spread":0.05862124273300029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019243091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.749323,0.0004484906,0.03693506,0.0037022925,0.0000765836,0.000094136034,0.0000332906,0.00003449359,0.20935263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648666,0.000080896505,0.0019380456,0.00010580467,0.0000068969684,0.000021225042,0.0000061662095,0.000009233196,0.0013451105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978236,0.0013737218,0.000031133637,0.00015109403,0.00027748788,0.00034295244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941812,0.004036505,0.00055747206,0.00062176445,0.0002591769,0.00034381397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005039493,0.0001919804,0.00028531466,0.00083434937,0.002832069,0.0038428593,0.0012684236,0.0012396554,0.006932835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014222793,0.0001811949,0.00038906958,0.0007070808,0.007988829,0.0048389714,0.0033144145,0.0014763528,0.00030144144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027127567,0.0002735332,0.00859708,0.000109039895,0.000014671696,0.00028394302,0.06378886,0.0015101783,0.0025417162,0.8654318,0.0007031881,0.056474745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007983467,0.00017160112,0.013588269,0.000121370496,0.000024503453,0.00029733335,0.093691,0.009572183,0.002716821,0.8637606,0.015940743,0.00003576118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018001349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023132195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006932835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012952868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002191956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02665174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030299881","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2881","title":"Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion–Exclusion Effects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mindset; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Information processing; Inclusion (mineral); Need for cognition; Purchasing; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Decision quality; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0275843643319885,"score_gpt":0.3520217450133791,"score_spread":0.32443738068139055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030299881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8988278,0.0016947717,0.06675207,0.0031126796,0.0001632074,0.00021728834,0.00020772273,0.00025515584,0.028769385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878634,0.00032583557,0.010592233,0.00023541754,0.000106917025,0.00007792524,0.00009457538,0.00011320832,0.00059044093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969247,0.0011206437,0.00023041441,0.0006582824,0.00069347926,0.00037243875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69267863,0.27817988,0.007568779,0.013412046,0.004344142,0.0038165576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010988435,0.0006025996,0.0017522048,0.0017758936,0.0014922332,0.005318904,0.001603528,0.002455225,0.008771095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12627444,0.0010831445,0.001689898,0.001190969,0.0048849513,0.013025701,0.0035236997,0.0034765818,0.00032317635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021341149,0.0046384153,0.16792606,0.0028824217,0.0018225475,0.00097397075,0.009313294,0.031255424,0.050978698,0.42730802,0.0038933002,0.27766675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091677846,0.0008292816,0.27476057,0.00017037016,0.0011115316,0.0007192803,0.0008549793,0.06969459,0.00952425,0.6393283,0.0017615141,0.00032853807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003177565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024591556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010988435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011651586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016784254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05811304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030503897","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.004","title":"Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Derogation; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Job performance; Identity (music); Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.039816639943854044,"score_gpt":0.3421642891389443,"score_spread":0.3023476491950903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030503897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98626757,0.00017798228,0.0031327913,0.0005650083,0.00003249357,0.00004147668,0.00004688768,0.000013029355,0.009722823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988483,0.000028286015,0.00061742554,0.00010891371,0.000023574557,0.00001393678,0.00002013011,0.000007771729,0.00033160165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084115,0.006184196,0.0003241415,0.00074791745,0.0016550815,0.00024751716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81732285,0.14308847,0.01974494,0.012371212,0.005717369,0.0017551382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014515914,0.00028281007,0.0004674245,0.0007022316,0.0007077904,0.002240804,0.00066230854,0.0015065022,0.00544233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13014743,0.00041940575,0.00026290724,0.0006319155,0.0023271148,0.0024036132,0.0011986163,0.0019170977,0.00053317216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010006744,0.004829494,0.676803,0.0006705188,0.00074845337,0.0006842367,0.017843528,0.004301428,0.041599426,0.0907957,0.004189402,0.14752814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031903005,0.0012940324,0.90446615,0.00012829137,0.0003085076,0.00089919,0.00436266,0.018989164,0.0096688075,0.057494104,0.0019071413,0.00016295906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001146088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012962007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014515914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055282866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005661867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07676846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037677868","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.09.001","title":"Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Fallacy; Neglect; Focus (optics); Cognitive bias; Cognition; Quality (philosophy); Mental image; Plan (archaeology); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05754511247873817,"score_gpt":0.3568803890697421,"score_spread":0.29933527659100395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037677868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7796376,0.012434776,0.11805852,0.06436294,0.0009632802,0.0001572841,0.0010765297,0.0006620633,0.022646936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903198,0.00095810805,0.006691116,0.00083756365,0.00023286421,0.000034060293,0.00016813098,0.000025573214,0.00073260104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792457,0.0012784771,0.00007502352,0.0003589632,0.00023078347,0.00013210444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93976635,0.04733113,0.0046627065,0.004483855,0.0029752732,0.0007806204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008426501,0.0006771216,0.00098602,0.00075908116,0.00033335664,0.0029067376,0.0013164544,0.0017650343,0.004179508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0822086,0.00024708937,0.0006606577,0.0006969602,0.0016630009,0.0029314836,0.0009835411,0.0021822096,0.00065694674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041486504,0.0014555088,0.31446442,0.0005894644,0.0008609199,0.0002086307,0.0024594632,0.021557812,0.004542461,0.031143356,0.009295142,0.6092742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004517482,0.0031880857,0.49333945,0.0010287318,0.00068664673,0.00077254686,0.002940085,0.21371494,0.014569018,0.26099762,0.008023076,0.0002881167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058188667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003701442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008426501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006755138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086974644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044564128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047047857","doi":"10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00017-1","title":"Goal assignment and performance: Assessing the mediating roles of goal commitment and self-efficacy and the moderating role of power distance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Self-efficacy; Social psychology; Multilevel model; Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Structural equation modeling; Dimension (graph theory); Goal setting; Moderation; Power (physics); Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028936401514901882,"score_gpt":0.3237306559353363,"score_spread":0.2947942544204344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047047857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.000012426059,0.0002249293,0.000026453112,0.0000053096883,0.00001809007,0.0000138066725,0.0000029015719,0.00056961627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986003,0.00001702626,0.0005169898,0.0000125622455,0.000005147257,0.00007258855,0.000060797964,0.0000037238542,0.0007107816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986475,0.00081303314,0.000060697428,0.00015239116,0.00016793398,0.00015835644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98972136,0.0048331195,0.0018835383,0.00073510635,0.00060977135,0.002217238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031416395,0.00054523844,0.0003588016,0.0006016401,0.00076332793,0.0012069155,0.00053059525,0.0009795909,0.002452986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012808571,0.00037418265,0.00031227653,0.00046219188,0.00063749554,0.0006832416,0.00095125416,0.001656589,0.00057918095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066702026,0.023894684,0.89793575,0.00012570633,0.00054056087,0.00012338234,0.0039327503,0.0027552503,0.0097543355,0.0020514717,0.0006890147,0.051526915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004821662,0.0063010263,0.9769866,0.00002784424,0.00024675656,0.00007920347,0.0013221279,0.007973589,0.003986108,0.0019658173,0.00058861804,0.000040225354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001327935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020216028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031416395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029127923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009163355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016614795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053476798","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.007","title":"What types of advice do decision-makers prefer?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Situational ethics; Psychology; Decision maker; Perspective (graphical); Autonomy; Interpersonal communication; Decision analysis; Social psychology; Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05479233121572701,"score_gpt":0.4294093933916098,"score_spread":0.37461706217588275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053476798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76094687,0.01112,0.026564466,0.13837324,0.0017452204,0.00041627485,0.0010769428,0.0004495882,0.05930747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752068,0.0025521433,0.012518527,0.007731953,0.000560076,0.00011297608,0.0002246442,0.00005991732,0.0010329535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119097,0.005473027,0.00066974363,0.00053632853,0.0015612957,0.00056866964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9113127,0.07329467,0.0048257075,0.0014565337,0.006251436,0.0028589217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016423017,0.00046583387,0.0011793385,0.0019617595,0.0008840317,0.0032458678,0.0008299569,0.004399988,0.005933831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13972872,0.00026373094,0.0008245764,0.0012323644,0.0012733763,0.004052748,0.00070304924,0.0026573427,0.0017280434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061824108,0.0017271268,0.14302012,0.0025995676,0.0013070357,0.00055973156,0.007062315,0.0033762637,0.002193441,0.0058703804,0.03008585,0.79601574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066155307,0.0057984726,0.42573732,0.010845016,0.007942252,0.0043894276,0.06501605,0.073403105,0.010592336,0.28806344,0.10067236,0.0009246419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017669703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004167576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016423017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011129328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016357898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08685428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054821576","doi":"10.1016/s0749-5978(03)00089-x","title":"Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procrastination; Psychology; Focus (optics); Optimism; Task (project management); Trait; Neglect; Personality; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Optimism bias; Cognition; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Debiasing; Computer science","score_opus":0.03458387996993406,"score_gpt":0.33035030470469373,"score_spread":0.29576642473475967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054821576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96907187,0.0029889317,0.0100437375,0.002949372,0.00006903585,0.000021815584,0.00011119747,0.000020159365,0.014723933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782866,0.00048560437,0.0012300164,0.00007322295,0.000036535283,0.000009632657,0.000027727674,0.000004579067,0.0003039888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992644,0.0005115645,0.0000197384,0.00007022165,0.000082329425,0.00005169915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96768713,0.026798043,0.0022141165,0.0012305869,0.000759677,0.001310449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040064747,0.00039542097,0.0003294459,0.00060397125,0.000449087,0.0029616542,0.0004170851,0.001115325,0.0030750423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032022264,0.000347954,0.00029521005,0.00079101877,0.001562487,0.0018163925,0.0007808376,0.0014209929,0.00022210293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029668233,0.0014338351,0.69298667,0.0002491821,0.0004920925,0.0004942061,0.004858491,0.02915812,0.0030386369,0.078813866,0.0022731288,0.18323497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014893345,0.0005445149,0.66338825,0.00013520152,0.00030941074,0.00036432318,0.0016266067,0.07024968,0.0007320847,0.26049045,0.0018867601,0.00012382865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028254932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003687972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040064747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052036525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005720407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021188498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057943930","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.003","title":"Do I want to know? How the motivation to acquire relationship-threatening information in groups contributes to paranoid thought, suspicion behavior, and social rejection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Social cognition; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Anger; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04974545921882258,"score_gpt":0.3261371016521119,"score_spread":0.27639164243328934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057943930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973442,0.00004396333,0.00017877154,0.0007224692,0.000006271753,0.0000064478754,0.0000036471552,0.0000025963075,0.0016917012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00003783036,0.00014062575,0.00016344406,0.000007622555,0.000006263276,0.000004918052,0.0000030893777,0.00013642607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971143,0.0016715584,0.00007497326,0.00019188816,0.00067452836,0.0002726568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529437,0.0258329,0.014303255,0.001671858,0.0015789747,0.0036693867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042362735,0.00021659031,0.00035745147,0.0008529218,0.0013916747,0.0033014573,0.00066019665,0.0020662881,0.0019450753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043258984,0.00048034417,0.00033907997,0.00040503597,0.003552133,0.002151848,0.001064912,0.0035692186,0.00030988405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007816651,0.0020880692,0.9168486,0.00008719591,0.00028202002,0.00095195195,0.047086585,0.00029929713,0.006600415,0.0044967216,0.00071897614,0.019758537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016219326,0.0006666286,0.9271907,0.00008329024,0.00023675917,0.0024932956,0.0476773,0.002836893,0.0010398743,0.01604817,0.0014633166,0.000101495534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019813192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029926382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042362735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065985357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010288748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022403777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059164392","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2885","title":"An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Competitor analysis; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Organizational learning; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04298982692889501,"score_gpt":0.34457878582277285,"score_spread":0.3015889588938778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059164392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99603987,0.000028097886,0.00039984725,0.000042841093,0.0000015128477,0.000015650674,0.000013450601,0.000001772893,0.0034568785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975926,0.000008432719,0.00013864589,0.0000039455654,9.807371e-7,0.0000065641843,0.0000101514215,0.0000010079461,0.00007097498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975737,0.0014128207,0.00012317541,0.0001680224,0.0005402174,0.00018197724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345796,0.053949583,0.0043317527,0.0028745553,0.002266733,0.0019977558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004085535,0.00016336482,0.0004011943,0.0012514485,0.00089097605,0.0022329267,0.00046514967,0.0007218211,0.002708002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040788367,0.00016671207,0.00025567593,0.0014156846,0.0014776953,0.002677944,0.0024175213,0.0007215982,0.00016210592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035922362,0.0029080233,0.8424249,0.00015790072,0.00019450167,0.00038648603,0.021599593,0.0021640542,0.010107603,0.018747099,0.00029614408,0.09742143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114154915,0.0013381677,0.9507597,0.000039679464,0.00016122391,0.00035960114,0.018658357,0.009815056,0.003408103,0.014208274,0.0010955001,0.000042030268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012602619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013341873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004085535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010548965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088729116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021606684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068574046","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.004","title":"Location in negotiation: Is there a home field advantage?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Singapore Management University; Lee Foundation","keywords":"Negotiation; Visitor pattern; Disadvantage; Psychology; Space (punctuation); Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.01672252414758224,"score_gpt":0.36002338468359485,"score_spread":0.3433008605360126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068574046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363572,0.0008494313,0.0021381783,0.0033864353,0.00004968257,0.000021010537,0.000026573742,0.000010284953,0.057161093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989881,0.00008209577,0.00020401267,0.000077460245,0.000023365741,0.000004226777,0.0000054328507,0.000003561972,0.00061178766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878055,0.00076424226,0.000030254252,0.0001043807,0.00013751016,0.00018310353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901951,0.0060147806,0.0014198091,0.000545481,0.00045514898,0.0013697392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024113837,0.00014013547,0.0004373953,0.00079242844,0.0010416553,0.004366356,0.000758947,0.002006037,0.018549563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013148443,0.0002454172,0.00022275932,0.00067153317,0.0022253343,0.004652391,0.0015656047,0.0008944865,0.0008967654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0094874995,0.0038687864,0.5336874,0.0005322166,0.0004355316,0.0027677803,0.030253848,0.0028944742,0.009432429,0.15259549,0.005138533,0.248906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009809198,0.0016565371,0.7330944,0.0003731231,0.00041602468,0.0019055491,0.09537301,0.008584901,0.0018171852,0.13945204,0.01621067,0.00013575846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002058052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026029686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018549563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006084638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050612644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062054455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072436783","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.005","title":"Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: Effects of group decision-making mechanisms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Mechanism (biology); Dictator game; Social dilemma; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02912733385876866,"score_gpt":0.3365004001285343,"score_spread":0.3073730662697657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072436783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907849,0.0002521078,0.0026336561,0.00035572858,0.000018632403,0.00003944367,0.00003397245,0.0000090521135,0.0058724503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980762,0.00017695597,0.0011146566,0.000039940194,0.00001960622,0.000038472543,0.000018685845,0.000011933352,0.00050348137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945087,0.0040136315,0.00015698424,0.00045821312,0.00047784278,0.00038458355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82872677,0.14684953,0.010643593,0.008228752,0.0017428037,0.0038085524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010881625,0.0007415215,0.0010139125,0.0007283155,0.0010113819,0.0043379166,0.00091934303,0.0021912293,0.006070351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08599328,0.00082613324,0.00057032495,0.0005891139,0.0033118136,0.004197352,0.0020424752,0.0029755165,0.0004639912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036654383,0.017811956,0.30633384,0.0016657845,0.0026311437,0.0017451263,0.022258002,0.07014484,0.07263507,0.31721118,0.0033467528,0.14756198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027658213,0.0035183916,0.5869126,0.00022054465,0.0020889104,0.0008618662,0.0034927893,0.09666565,0.010102197,0.29084986,0.002134907,0.00038637183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016313345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017811888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010881625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011246095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010836043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057548165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072895574","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2908","title":"Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Retributive justice; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.022767414162415584,"score_gpt":0.3335386243858938,"score_spread":0.31077121022347826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072895574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97341025,0.0008865861,0.011171154,0.0013061473,0.000078471814,0.000035933594,0.000023545474,0.000019540892,0.013068468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962452,0.00027395444,0.0013271858,0.00008179826,0.000037963582,0.00002175216,0.000010782835,0.0000064499473,0.001994805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968059,0.0022067993,0.00013442454,0.00018952867,0.00035337757,0.00030993234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89744407,0.089009814,0.0075123683,0.0037606335,0.0012998008,0.00097327883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011834827,0.0006362534,0.00096584146,0.0006650156,0.0008697357,0.0027550468,0.0013029781,0.0026821678,0.0063299504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08869817,0.00069758255,0.000465481,0.0008220808,0.0027131825,0.0037257578,0.0009928065,0.0037348098,0.00043127534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007053953,0.0052770413,0.05735633,0.00073685416,0.00048286942,0.0017266381,0.01146659,0.13713306,0.009735639,0.66055,0.0032074738,0.1052736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006071238,0.0013818054,0.054161742,0.00010968353,0.0002643396,0.0006460735,0.0029621671,0.29566455,0.0018928784,0.6408227,0.0013155794,0.00017133917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021271068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016178286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011834827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011430379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009625234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06258929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074869549","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.001","title":"Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deviance (statistics); Social psychology; Conscientiousness; Agreeableness; Neuroticism; Personality; Organizational commitment; Belongingness; Big Five personality traits; Extraversion and introversion; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.010998637320356856,"score_gpt":0.2743699300671661,"score_spread":0.26337129274680926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074869549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.00012191623,0.00006697656,0.00024910146,0.0000050511426,0.0000027187457,0.0000074271848,0.0000010655506,0.0015730512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997844,0.00004432912,0.000029019617,0.000014491961,0.000004937856,0.0000015492138,0.000004986631,7.550129e-7,0.00011556363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992168,0.00041663018,0.000024763545,0.0000698856,0.00013200885,0.00013994935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970276,0.005626183,0.0019601018,0.0004793044,0.00032286625,0.0019086434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015239735,0.00039470935,0.00027017682,0.0008024887,0.0007573568,0.0018737564,0.00047885676,0.000837633,0.0028314672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071598324,0.00016973284,0.00026384112,0.00032109107,0.0018683875,0.0007272079,0.0013288966,0.0012340177,0.00011291995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010751636,0.0023528163,0.96500343,0.000053583022,0.00026210627,0.0005895893,0.0047485805,0.00036833397,0.0022543734,0.0061494033,0.00022176022,0.01692073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006927556,0.00033911315,0.99118805,0.000031301803,0.00010048063,0.00021953983,0.0033933977,0.00097600155,0.00032556007,0.0029669679,0.0003752262,0.000014965384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017154171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002620111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028314672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029535446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007041013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009472191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078002573","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2905","title":"Information Technology Support For Debiasing Group Judgments: An Empirical Evaluation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Empirical research; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03521472714740092,"score_gpt":0.3851471276042106,"score_spread":0.3499324004568097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078002573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932969,0.0005900743,0.0010860914,0.00029423423,0.000038625105,0.000225142,0.000093506416,0.000058271013,0.00431709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597687,0.00055740675,0.0020714044,0.00011443523,0.000075297794,0.00017931804,0.00011876434,0.000021911654,0.0008846842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913373,0.0059368955,0.0005329511,0.0004901097,0.0014323248,0.0002703965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56641024,0.40519425,0.01208547,0.0076857423,0.0048744115,0.0037498367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112088155,0.00081645907,0.00066964555,0.002059355,0.0010066283,0.0015876626,0.0014991367,0.001492998,0.007982797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17180641,0.00030565972,0.00047655564,0.0012514574,0.0010753179,0.0024650253,0.0009273903,0.0010468499,0.0011941673],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045237616,0.054619543,0.3090008,0.0024750032,0.0007356503,0.0006909903,0.009285844,0.0030708846,0.0063559674,0.0024096642,0.0026570158,0.56346107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009946959,0.10322942,0.802771,0.0014469519,0.0033509051,0.002075142,0.010088384,0.029816741,0.018492797,0.0068021473,0.011685406,0.0002942122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011601781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009988686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112088155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057796366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011878065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059278607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086309276","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2943","title":"Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Operationalization; Group decision-making; Cognition; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Unanimity; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02085135856079764,"score_gpt":0.3167991813581006,"score_spread":0.295947822797303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086309276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89862317,0.0022736136,0.078027464,0.0030236128,0.0001061844,0.000077066026,0.000041793035,0.0000414214,0.017785776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961514,0.00022747004,0.0033167314,0.000045325633,0.000046392444,0.000028706341,0.0000109532175,0.000007659386,0.00016546856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878386,0.008518177,0.00033981778,0.0007832161,0.0017927695,0.0007274045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8686382,0.11570994,0.0056231786,0.0035182948,0.0035890867,0.00292122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019481713,0.00056055316,0.001049853,0.0015661638,0.001717261,0.006315819,0.00094529707,0.002041958,0.0022246165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09875203,0.00035797837,0.0006322794,0.0012780062,0.0066315094,0.006525055,0.0042666416,0.002632773,0.00022051025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026242435,0.0013148569,0.14310923,0.0010515936,0.0008479475,0.0007742689,0.029990075,0.077081755,0.007256397,0.43068656,0.0017267371,0.30353624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017579812,0.00029564864,0.037715703,0.0001650219,0.00018051453,0.00015718548,0.004362457,0.053427503,0.0017579335,0.9003973,0.0012662391,0.00009879897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011820084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010789493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019481713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011477454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017780437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10303038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093461983","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.008","title":"When vigilance prevails: The effect of regulatory focus and accountability on integrative negotiation outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Negotiation; Accountability; Psychology; Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.00898429089182713,"score_gpt":0.26131971107387353,"score_spread":0.2523354201820464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093461983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957253,0.00005365196,0.00018599028,0.00017241937,0.000011947692,0.0000065694103,0.000009006936,0.0000048784896,0.0038301772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956363,0.000015098233,0.000102577054,0.000040357983,0.000008331543,0.0000066843495,0.0000093553435,0.000009220532,0.00024477945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980247,0.0009964966,0.000099734134,0.00021974523,0.00027482462,0.00038457406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95194423,0.03666033,0.0049145883,0.001816798,0.00091855007,0.0037454546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474186,0.0002013836,0.00039745172,0.00044163057,0.00078464125,0.0030749033,0.0005078803,0.001229041,0.0052021053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03903577,0.00031960677,0.0002562008,0.00039545944,0.0011781085,0.0014243083,0.0012580809,0.0022826002,0.00029695313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041094437,0.010452317,0.7164845,0.00032040488,0.00064052106,0.0010272153,0.023641981,0.004639393,0.083778515,0.018942952,0.0017692692,0.09720851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005751374,0.0021750964,0.97099733,0.00009048401,0.00027044935,0.00022765539,0.0038479608,0.0058603403,0.004437897,0.010631067,0.0008234756,0.000063180734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016265567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016828545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005474186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053918635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011894068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028950572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096285078","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.10.002","title":"Willingness to pay for advice: The role of rational and experiential processing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Willingness to pay; Experiential learning; Priming (agriculture); Information processing; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.050387135522687684,"score_gpt":0.364274753712633,"score_spread":0.3138876181899453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096285078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135224,0.001047813,0.0357669,0.005272022,0.00011698678,0.00015046504,0.000121327335,0.000071537754,0.04393048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359024,0.0002444442,0.005062455,0.00025278237,0.000049030412,0.000033536624,0.00003551746,0.000021315549,0.0007106823],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964735,0.0021694954,0.000119141274,0.00032911025,0.0006542187,0.00025458506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046266,0.08388264,0.00399787,0.0029132338,0.0025065134,0.0020732032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007528139,0.0004420937,0.00040505332,0.00074550306,0.00044994915,0.0051805237,0.0007982898,0.0021203302,0.008267832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084874414,0.00038109656,0.00040884287,0.0005237233,0.0017647006,0.003017873,0.00092697993,0.0021519565,0.00040904034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00479265,0.00640637,0.16688783,0.0010348024,0.00092974195,0.00081264094,0.009576159,0.033137318,0.014172135,0.36376217,0.0040486027,0.39443955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038112537,0.0007208511,0.14890812,0.00023229569,0.00027618094,0.00042377214,0.0029300754,0.08836619,0.0027454896,0.7512667,0.0035601386,0.00018899397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012808773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008267832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008068437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013664634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0398131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114531238","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.02.002","title":"Self-selection bias in hypothesis comparison","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Statistical hypothesis testing; Probabilistic logic; Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive bias; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.17833366672650422,"score_gpt":0.40100230785089935,"score_spread":0.22266864112439513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114531238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.762849,0.0049468963,0.19187142,0.0074151247,0.0042051086,0.0014306806,0.0004669563,0.0003822423,0.026432633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97762716,0.00018646749,0.017876534,0.0017940929,0.0006410985,0.00047561995,0.00015609537,0.000087924396,0.0011550575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81729436,0.1476564,0.008609882,0.012059419,0.0126176,0.0017624175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29062122,0.66016763,0.0121785095,0.027500175,0.0073807994,0.0021516879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20843321,0.00065982866,0.0019534447,0.0030971738,0.0017464769,0.0035341561,0.002303621,0.002526137,0.01153615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45149726,0.0005027106,0.0022590258,0.0016407171,0.004893598,0.0040746788,0.0028427108,0.0034307612,0.00067175715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017639888,0.002173211,0.3542535,0.0031141657,0.018397508,0.0026585239,0.006877942,0.007101064,0.010291525,0.19728182,0.015985183,0.36422566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044865627,0.004158476,0.22435732,0.0008563964,0.006281935,0.0041545434,0.0035670863,0.075291134,0.022982225,0.63347965,0.020087117,0.00029753047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042925062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061045616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010983229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014075219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97614276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117723935","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.002","title":"Goal choices and planning: Distinct expectancy and value effects in two goal processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Goal setting; Social psychology; Goal orientation; Goal pursuit; Life expectancy; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.026995949006127475,"score_gpt":0.3898238932968682,"score_spread":0.3628279442907407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117723935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828241,0.00028559763,0.0084200995,0.00026087495,0.000022208991,0.00009905493,0.00011237043,0.00004413775,0.00793163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959416,0.00013131065,0.0030237488,0.00006749231,0.000015082769,0.00009110285,0.0001543483,0.000042580676,0.00053283334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978598,0.000881115,0.00009051955,0.00037155187,0.00060133135,0.000195686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93211997,0.059384402,0.0034997275,0.0024642088,0.00093993644,0.0015917245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066332314,0.0006700595,0.00066758605,0.0014252241,0.00043829888,0.0030261497,0.00087379635,0.0016820865,0.0045427834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05648967,0.0010353576,0.00094755815,0.00093570095,0.0018275367,0.0036056857,0.0022374708,0.002461515,0.00026793306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025410948,0.010467459,0.4264512,0.0013882284,0.00125917,0.00035167043,0.013724373,0.025216745,0.05628105,0.220642,0.0014150162,0.21739225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082189206,0.0020939198,0.79794574,0.00015424621,0.0008306074,0.00025098358,0.0011174732,0.039954986,0.007926675,0.1478691,0.0008679698,0.00016630898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015653752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015252924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066332314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085515185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009232963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035080314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122342105","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.001","title":"The effect of conspicuous consumption on men’s testosterone levels","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Testosterone (patch); Psychology; Conspicuous consumption; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Mechanism (biology); Developmental psychology; Endocrinology; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.030437986716891206,"score_gpt":0.35602184408902116,"score_spread":0.32558385737212997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122342105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993469,0.00013407829,0.000024709396,0.00004306014,0.000010943729,0.0000013282875,0.00003723404,0.0000043965933,0.0003972593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984346,0.00007029655,0.000053970143,0.000021999287,0.000012218796,0.0000022020645,0.000040542145,0.0000044068324,0.0013597561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988675,0.000045721423,0.0000046368564,0.000019649728,0.000013670185,0.000029482128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985709,0.00066803925,0.00017903635,0.00013529757,0.00004138469,0.00040529066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031716994,0.00040007127,0.00042025858,0.00021714819,0.00034049945,0.0006268194,0.0001729046,0.00037640834,0.004441347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014601015,0.00035240065,0.00033669607,0.00024709973,0.00065916654,0.00031085106,0.0003427573,0.0006475291,0.00021168707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.26494655,0.006444041,0.426183,0.00025278513,0.0011515319,0.000827051,0.0017487393,0.0012863615,0.24075101,0.001387223,0.0007658515,0.054255884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015186498,0.004670529,0.9862884,0.0000046293612,0.00017188989,0.00009806795,0.00026604044,0.00047529346,0.007234957,0.00017668903,0.0004421502,0.000019330735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031350818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003377924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004441347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000295297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033542112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014857769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123119462","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.008","title":"Defensive reactions to slim female images in advertising: The moderating role of mode of exposure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Mode (computer interface); Advertising; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.021305369600555814,"score_gpt":0.2840938187693984,"score_spread":0.2627884491688426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123119462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976708,0.000044658434,0.000077666366,0.00008954583,0.000009784742,0.000008308109,0.000017610202,0.000003326406,0.0020782773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978802,0.000054275326,0.00016194441,0.000091846116,0.000025604666,0.000015162596,0.000024646719,0.000011122303,0.0017351912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995432,0.0002117791,0.000020716156,0.00006568792,0.00009657037,0.00006216083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094373,0.006366581,0.0013791604,0.00046792504,0.00023440056,0.00060820865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009811517,0.00034972155,0.00025981138,0.00040372607,0.0004437759,0.0019549783,0.00025498527,0.0011301107,0.010343341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011817446,0.0004172495,0.00022279414,0.00021088729,0.0005540744,0.0007289057,0.0006725707,0.0013414365,0.000596231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034129962,0.008722476,0.7224815,0.00032373035,0.00037710104,0.0012270891,0.020171417,0.0007682172,0.1555845,0.0035056435,0.0011292825,0.051579036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121781784,0.0013533157,0.9885988,0.000041673804,0.000105616025,0.00037050483,0.0024944288,0.00083594624,0.0046050483,0.00089522393,0.0005525557,0.00002504188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080611126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011051307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010343341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030861335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034601927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123780659","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.002","title":"Short horizons and tempting situations: Lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Cheating; Psychology; Negotiation; Trait; Personality; Identity (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.14050977307417495,"score_gpt":0.37424400533940044,"score_spread":0.2337342322652255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123780659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443567,0.00014091408,0.0006130277,0.0008881622,0.0000120679215,0.0000043914893,0.00000526726,0.000004368549,0.0038960504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944633,0.000052685395,0.00020812197,0.00008447581,0.000007837739,0.0000025679735,0.000005304924,0.0000030931928,0.00018955485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876773,0.000628487,0.00004067191,0.000084867024,0.0003639003,0.00011431995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98350775,0.007175181,0.0048067253,0.0011063522,0.00041305163,0.002990945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022713298,0.00016789157,0.00022035494,0.00071513973,0.0012879646,0.0031851046,0.0004452961,0.0013944317,0.003627768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025414106,0.0002824113,0.00021045824,0.0003959806,0.0033261073,0.001705012,0.0017510877,0.0026034762,0.00018268632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024619957,0.0032724508,0.76103026,0.0001251106,0.00031485336,0.005285718,0.028591098,0.0016116085,0.01109782,0.06915055,0.0026421773,0.11441641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018381374,0.000764573,0.70489943,0.00017048829,0.0002053156,0.0061013554,0.026084516,0.005971413,0.0022361728,0.24933231,0.0039373105,0.0001132327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008817956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017371782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003627768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055555644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008284347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012136102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129808449","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003","title":"Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":315,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Psychology; Social exchange theory; Abusive supervision; Moderation; Social psychology; Organizational justice; Organizational commitment; Affective events theory; Perception; Perceived organizational support; Job satisfaction; Job performance","score_opus":0.023323251340416608,"score_gpt":0.2593853088062995,"score_spread":0.2360620574658829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129808449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99824524,0.00012872416,0.00005239319,0.0006035577,0.000011628488,0.0000044559865,0.00002032703,0.000002780789,0.00093090156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960977,0.000052400097,0.000046656267,0.00008008362,0.000009223614,0.000002761993,0.00001642881,0.0000044452922,0.000178335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530846,0.002769898,0.00016927115,0.00030901993,0.00064196053,0.00080130703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817448,0.008049683,0.004746529,0.0007979956,0.0010122317,0.003648784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002941727,0.00033577226,0.0006649389,0.00086339755,0.0014986356,0.0032753758,0.00075439166,0.001796935,0.005143853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017370146,0.00051674125,0.0009113208,0.00068230875,0.0023187029,0.0014969826,0.0014581188,0.0018646102,0.00042855495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035594052,0.001159619,0.9856838,0.000026668373,0.00040835934,0.00013905551,0.0028879116,0.00017494643,0.00045918548,0.00043832543,0.0003543093,0.007912003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029647153,0.0002673565,0.9932094,0.000025598181,0.00016795007,0.00010646153,0.0046368744,0.0004413415,0.00013061715,0.0006424268,0.0003271163,0.000015181296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008130806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015790489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008130806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087564334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018241649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01720792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148627868","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.003","title":"Wolves in sheep’s clothing: How and when hypothetical questions influence behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Clothing; Social psychology; Elaboration; Consumption (sociology); Voting; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10346009134150429,"score_gpt":0.3518660322923991,"score_spread":0.2484059409508948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148627868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966689,0.000046813442,0.00090630056,0.00017337294,0.0000040217606,0.000009508641,0.0000068543195,0.0000026624075,0.0021815198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990306,0.000032483047,0.0006430491,0.000055635654,0.0000025624295,0.000008045856,0.00001723744,0.0000029681191,0.00020749724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967188,0.0027293493,0.000065522,0.00019932917,0.00016554071,0.00012147563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96928126,0.026492147,0.0018695064,0.0011356185,0.0006150658,0.00060633186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034209948,0.00021771167,0.0002544517,0.00024005849,0.00047189038,0.0019148699,0.00029020262,0.0013705642,0.0025968787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03649338,0.00031378993,0.00028499876,0.00014807576,0.0012307621,0.0010464207,0.0005640822,0.0007127574,0.00024923205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045387666,0.003018623,0.83731025,0.0003712302,0.0007304308,0.00088859606,0.025162881,0.013978499,0.04183021,0.021911385,0.0014086273,0.048850488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018633084,0.001634538,0.8405995,0.00018668639,0.0005128139,0.00061562314,0.013848347,0.08572498,0.01103641,0.041690502,0.0038541935,0.00011003411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00144378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018268913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034209948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038957654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020898608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018092155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160706434","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.10.001","title":"Why more can be less: An inference-based explanation for hyper-subadditivity in bundle valuation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subadditivity; Superadditivity; Inference; Valuation (finance); Bundle; Econometrics; Economics; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1510030533674116,"score_gpt":0.30175940690107034,"score_spread":0.15075635353365874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160706434","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20340514,0.0010383396,0.7265982,0.021785412,0.00027143463,0.000085397834,0.00045292746,0.00038350624,0.045979667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596766,0.0002561342,0.036473077,0.0009120739,0.00020195692,0.000053423923,0.0000884544,0.0001055473,0.0022327686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969163,0.001494025,0.00019238908,0.0005501982,0.00049486494,0.0003522449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97067475,0.02101892,0.002320225,0.0037762707,0.0014893218,0.00072060566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008223021,0.00062064733,0.0011456716,0.0014711939,0.0011202429,0.0040444667,0.001961097,0.0029465884,0.012618971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052124128,0.0007431588,0.0016425889,0.0017533394,0.0063567837,0.012907622,0.002796856,0.0040838225,0.00070976577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008882243,0.0000944134,0.0018321839,0.000064526954,0.00006738971,0.00015496374,0.0005419408,0.007885541,0.0005051771,0.9745335,0.0015022231,0.012729283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102582535,0.000007296661,0.0003712262,0.000006651445,0.000008821124,0.000032565673,0.00003220623,0.012005904,0.000078936464,0.98715603,0.00028193148,0.0000080962245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013740596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079891225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012618971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013815791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043488026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168350273","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.001","title":"An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Psychology; Brainstorming; Social psychology; Goal setting; Task (project management); Control (management); Applied psychology; Marketing; Management","score_opus":0.023684802514367283,"score_gpt":0.37132234133541375,"score_spread":0.3476375388210465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168350273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977592,0.000014422718,0.00055158796,0.00004646493,0.00002497187,0.0003038123,0.000079002355,0.000018805065,0.0012016136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929328,0.00004674166,0.0033722622,0.0001940974,0.000046264868,0.0011324321,0.00011556123,0.00002445994,0.0021354898],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868935,0.0004233774,0.000095677686,0.0003682663,0.00018219398,0.00024118235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712464,0.023493377,0.0010828231,0.001441836,0.00046582666,0.0022698108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223089,0.0013240908,0.0007467491,0.00032148373,0.0012457917,0.0010680584,0.0012593337,0.0017111283,0.0062189577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011603136,0.0009728405,0.00038178582,0.00029721315,0.0013682181,0.0010151273,0.0011701783,0.002831427,0.00046091905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20991263,0.38066417,0.0123910215,0.0008397143,0.00021275529,0.00036975188,0.012855878,0.0021614023,0.3342128,0.0037452094,0.0015647958,0.041069876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04739406,0.6686092,0.16400015,0.00012633347,0.0005852198,0.0002728358,0.0043142242,0.0067522707,0.09480976,0.008912816,0.0038450835,0.00037805154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001514479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016187254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062189577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049157866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014889027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020804524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278734235","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.002","title":"Can peers’ ethical and transformational leadership improve coworkers’ service quality? A latent growth analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Service (business); Leadership style; Service quality; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.04243790523907523,"score_gpt":0.2839891249702708,"score_spread":0.24155121973119556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278734235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996953,0.000047034413,0.00080467894,0.0005348636,0.000009524096,0.00001885032,0.0000530003,0.000008667538,0.0015703195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962854,0.0000111363925,0.00011890096,0.0000137024135,0.000004791978,0.000009409532,0.000041485775,0.0000027508202,0.00016931658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386275,0.003769276,0.00022796541,0.00039768533,0.000782583,0.0009597492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96574056,0.019598562,0.006585143,0.0027711971,0.0026196265,0.0026848146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069225673,0.00046021532,0.00056133454,0.0013353182,0.0015878463,0.0027977047,0.0010046087,0.0012263102,0.0053960946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026133493,0.00033671662,0.0010818858,0.0014849777,0.002367009,0.0021076761,0.0018813306,0.0019259334,0.0005627209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053520506,0.0017263761,0.97929925,0.000025199963,0.00031025452,0.00010915872,0.003237383,0.001018901,0.00031011284,0.0026381558,0.0004145664,0.0103754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085313055,0.0005086282,0.9691237,0.000035966485,0.00025192348,0.00007672088,0.007202708,0.017381718,0.000531121,0.0039173295,0.0008507078,0.000034158642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010623097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013570936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010623097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015499914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026823157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036610484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411098340","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.004","title":"Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Psychology; Reputation; Social psychology; Self construal; Advice (programming); Interdependence","score_opus":0.08118225863232126,"score_gpt":0.3704155334995473,"score_spread":0.28923327486722605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411098340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650463,0.00027695572,0.004293133,0.007411239,0.000044616023,0.000033972847,0.000077754456,0.000017529266,0.022798428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999131,0.00003427484,0.0005262961,0.0001528101,0.000011743522,0.000007659633,0.000017587989,0.000009203524,0.000109455556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890525,0.0075545227,0.0003028648,0.000822304,0.0017410176,0.0005268812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8640257,0.10028834,0.01289712,0.008933684,0.006744483,0.007110637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01466513,0.00027671666,0.00049139786,0.0023960173,0.004017772,0.006739373,0.001112645,0.0025018014,0.004941222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08878192,0.00055310305,0.00043464935,0.0016117723,0.010514774,0.0045522614,0.0035202692,0.004035932,0.00024479348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009110136,0.0011046806,0.59596443,0.00025960206,0.0005242293,0.00066282856,0.21709342,0.0017373033,0.004003925,0.114560574,0.0020327412,0.06114518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019357106,0.0005089059,0.64534557,0.00021826591,0.0003413604,0.00051776913,0.10058949,0.00862531,0.0012172328,0.23656672,0.0056631635,0.00021266067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005791155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006231823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01466513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001984998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022027618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077557504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884592515","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.002","title":"The embedding forces of network commitment: An examination of the psychological processes linking advice centrality and susceptibility to social influence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Embeddedness; Psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Normative; Social psychology; Personal network; Social media; Sociology","score_opus":0.031953872875259415,"score_gpt":0.4153573579674378,"score_spread":0.38340348509217836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884592515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99197066,0.00004583062,0.0020723168,0.00032123327,0.000003485318,0.000012073292,0.000011814632,0.0000039208016,0.0055587804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994784,0.000025550782,0.00030583856,0.000008929661,0.0000022700697,0.0000041457765,0.000005406762,0.0000017714153,0.00016777248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933547,0.000353444,0.000020485608,0.000067340276,0.00015274213,0.000070474205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851671,0.011081094,0.0018533224,0.00060508767,0.00053481356,0.00075860554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001776007,0.00016646982,0.00014878697,0.0009954547,0.0008503784,0.0018383143,0.0004402215,0.0006152458,0.0047569443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018441996,0.0002224522,0.00016582757,0.00089813274,0.0019708278,0.0020478396,0.0012760564,0.0010604969,0.00010648927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093912287,0.0012383402,0.6692598,0.00020148868,0.00023685943,0.00056215463,0.062374916,0.003919933,0.017801132,0.13741878,0.0005559043,0.10549163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048331516,0.00028746252,0.88191974,0.0000669938,0.00013334672,0.00037935213,0.028333072,0.018124918,0.0014591287,0.067051135,0.0021577894,0.000038815804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025704058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046427143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047569443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007254204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015913606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944437944","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.001","title":"Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ostracism; Psychology; Temperament; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Norm (philosophy); Personality","score_opus":0.026719983054574535,"score_gpt":0.34188460955103733,"score_spread":0.3151646264964628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944437944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828387,0.000114439805,0.0019279884,0.00097458705,0.000023372439,0.000013583655,0.000013217814,0.000005348191,0.014088767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937123,0.000034433186,0.0002785376,0.00012951162,0.000011531098,0.0000041351886,0.000004234677,0.00000244566,0.00016393489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992766,0.00037303517,0.000015666217,0.000068988775,0.00017509102,0.000090600784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973985,0.0011954162,0.0005796123,0.00021918074,0.00023322791,0.00037399406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012714064,0.00024484462,0.00019445903,0.0005314238,0.000831367,0.001800536,0.00027453605,0.0007199981,0.0009839296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030046857,0.00018748414,0.000219053,0.00023966492,0.0020945012,0.0007353657,0.0008654848,0.0021801963,0.00005523672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020279035,0.0020695159,0.57275224,0.00027000008,0.00040977215,0.0014997672,0.104855865,0.0027757937,0.10950464,0.11340841,0.0017257525,0.08870037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047289395,0.0007070511,0.92473096,0.000088009496,0.00014459835,0.0008191641,0.037948985,0.0031314192,0.0036918658,0.025602298,0.003021054,0.00006732713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012317337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022638708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001800536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043196473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004210544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067239404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945717469","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.06.002","title":"The gravitational pull of expressing passion: When and how expressing passion elicits status conferral and support from others","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Intrapersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication","score_opus":0.028485267719006252,"score_gpt":0.3093627914269143,"score_spread":0.2808775237079081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945717469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98734933,0.00012023254,0.0017945999,0.00042284373,0.00004472609,0.000020364143,0.000025993826,0.000014127963,0.010207789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978654,0.000053203235,0.00083870714,0.00008147905,0.000014567887,0.00001863471,0.000020775678,0.000015003198,0.0010923401],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993063,0.00027081856,0.000024657735,0.00007806852,0.00018763597,0.00013251249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841475,0.00060980197,0.0003619756,0.00011617277,0.00012424521,0.00037307653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006561852,0.00022081574,0.00025025403,0.0003175742,0.0006069425,0.0018879125,0.00030802988,0.0008338196,0.0038565833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049997317,0.00023236003,0.00023247085,0.00026175048,0.0011481111,0.0009912098,0.0016419354,0.0010202543,0.00021300389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037626976,0.0011433616,0.0856478,0.0007182806,0.00024405659,0.0012728872,0.017973319,0.0017233155,0.7451312,0.044859793,0.002163545,0.09535972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003305732,0.0030100255,0.808969,0.0003215437,0.00046949708,0.0012939842,0.020769492,0.016500747,0.09117385,0.047975235,0.008992102,0.00019396865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009229181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013493964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038565833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003730966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004681542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012901485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979469729","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.001","title":"History backfires: Reminders of past injustices against women undermine support for workplace policies promoting women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Denial; Disadvantaged; Social identity theory; System justification; Psychology; Equity (law); Identity (music); Social psychology; Rhetoric; Public policy; Social group; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05360309982985568,"score_gpt":0.30731661359250056,"score_spread":0.2537135137626449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979469729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236317,0.0009007543,0.0006886517,0.05565334,0.00069561735,0.0000271061,0.00012455376,0.00005880239,0.01821941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915177,0.0003726755,0.00024782208,0.005215322,0.00016332619,0.0000144636,0.000042169442,0.000020220003,0.002406228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997575,0.0011992465,0.0001510368,0.00015735177,0.00045869013,0.0004587098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97031295,0.013111172,0.0077317376,0.0017010828,0.0022066827,0.0049364152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004465634,0.00021532254,0.00024459657,0.0011940935,0.0067689656,0.0031724188,0.0009186398,0.0032519286,0.008912386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047678683,0.00045888076,0.00019752918,0.00076609384,0.0021905766,0.003145701,0.0034107685,0.0042794133,0.0006841573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050632027,0.0007329124,0.40784305,0.0003925445,0.00015669953,0.0029181102,0.32658362,0.00023746872,0.002892652,0.007966411,0.052112564,0.19765769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042583695,0.000506953,0.29076424,0.0014239138,0.000120137745,0.0016702955,0.5874797,0.00072473823,0.0017677953,0.007840662,0.107555516,0.00010340878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012633617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031574298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012633617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002163564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035000425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029814899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990163669","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.004","title":"Lead the horse to water, but don’t make him drink: The effects of moral identity symbolization on coworker behavior depend on perceptions of proselytization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Scrutiny; Moral disengagement; Identity (music); Perception; Autonomy; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Observer (physics); Moral psychology; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.017011413780596674,"score_gpt":0.3321419909801587,"score_spread":0.315130577199562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990163669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99845815,0.0000109007005,0.00007885401,0.00012321939,0.000007282431,0.000002957735,0.000006209717,0.0000015901749,0.0013108795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927276,0.00001768289,0.00014626376,0.00007240091,0.000005794119,0.000007808225,0.000019861756,0.000009759098,0.00044759587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819106,0.001228389,0.00004409215,0.00017545011,0.00022387272,0.00013708236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703917,0.018930381,0.004682596,0.0026039963,0.00088656525,0.0025048098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030761608,0.00023396355,0.00023572125,0.00028717204,0.0008961227,0.0020055778,0.0005058595,0.00083263865,0.006169667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019365381,0.00047952755,0.000294621,0.00019328116,0.0022482858,0.001204716,0.0010484817,0.0024210394,0.00045099022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0125963865,0.017071834,0.78099203,0.00020259626,0.0005925682,0.0008273168,0.07131363,0.0015236695,0.06740507,0.0043391003,0.0017765464,0.041359216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014065136,0.00080405414,0.98076594,0.000028339842,0.00006732474,0.00012366747,0.012049621,0.0013028355,0.0027529309,0.0012303488,0.00069352123,0.0000407153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020466712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031511919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006169667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003537543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049821875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020639598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011918826","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.010","title":"Authenticity at work: Its shapes, triggers, and consequences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Psychology; Humility; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Identity (music); Foundation (evidence); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Interpersonal communication; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.034650257361697565,"score_gpt":0.2627648845013226,"score_spread":0.22811462713962505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011918826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687553,0.00041002446,0.0027156717,0.0014966873,0.000034040346,0.000039097595,0.000041592906,0.000026242174,0.026481276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944025,0.00003532106,0.0002572456,0.000028258735,0.000008582077,0.0000054756097,0.000009589973,0.0000065209783,0.00020869508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942516,0.0031253437,0.0002107576,0.0006360833,0.0012206711,0.00055551436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672006,0.016809322,0.0062866327,0.0025004027,0.0024005368,0.004802628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042047487,0.00022408922,0.00039246996,0.001415066,0.0019703018,0.0062145125,0.00076222164,0.0019059777,0.0034926794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020610109,0.0003767501,0.00027803413,0.0007653765,0.005853403,0.002311545,0.0041996907,0.0019998262,0.00035877322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020539977,0.0023021153,0.6862827,0.00047209745,0.00015593352,0.0014047909,0.08392111,0.0015456084,0.016424345,0.10192294,0.001351435,0.10216286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001423631,0.0014671272,0.816611,0.00029269682,0.00008224013,0.0012329274,0.07642775,0.0041277916,0.0036396552,0.08760087,0.008243094,0.00013256822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007951709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008703193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062145125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010304075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016096055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022237122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023449517","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.005","title":"Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Cognitive reappraisal; Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Task (project management); Cognition; Burnout; Management; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07193674624577125,"score_gpt":0.37297425529245,"score_spread":0.30103750904667875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023449517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53050464,0.036330234,0.103057586,0.18122007,0.005879233,0.00012565518,0.00010311961,0.00061328657,0.14216627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684437,0.0041287327,0.011685158,0.010975394,0.0008334452,0.000080141894,0.000013507666,0.00020756204,0.0036324356],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932766,0.0044032135,0.0001076761,0.00062436203,0.0012496377,0.00033853704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98406696,0.010302153,0.0010699118,0.0022530893,0.0013047096,0.0010032513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160628,0.00045149977,0.0005745378,0.0005703848,0.0018562947,0.0069340565,0.0012804436,0.0026241466,0.0025488664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025519531,0.00037842517,0.00040038335,0.00037175012,0.011651659,0.0051386533,0.0036810366,0.0060510226,0.0006534464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007610243,0.0006887468,0.01608931,0.0013636173,0.00039008947,0.0006512695,0.12797962,0.0020131194,0.044619832,0.16326837,0.023805484,0.6183696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021784955,0.0008843504,0.056753084,0.002130497,0.00027181377,0.0010225073,0.065197244,0.0048576947,0.011651516,0.7271053,0.12950546,0.00040260027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010497766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013416492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008160628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075450266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025284595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043158054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038547382","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.06.001","title":"The evolution of unethical behavior engagement amongst longshoremen in France: A 70-year perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.02834790142638759,"score_gpt":0.32606234936749107,"score_spread":0.29771444794110347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038547382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943193,0.0012547544,0.000099058154,0.0014824456,0.00001525581,0.0000060283346,0.00022458522,0.0000060473594,0.0025924763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681,0.0007729612,0.00008777432,0.0001861375,0.000023881901,0.0000081508015,0.00020539528,0.0000043452455,0.0019013712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999,0.00021655332,0.000025141488,0.00011504011,0.00012458116,0.0005186508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973635,0.00046810592,0.0007312697,0.000082750514,0.0007183125,0.0006360043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013807189,0.00023916754,0.00026554987,0.002909474,0.0017144106,0.00264027,0.00065006583,0.001499822,0.0028957261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020398563,0.00017263097,0.00037101406,0.0021406207,0.0015395867,0.0016860372,0.0017823838,0.0012843993,0.00031011223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001775722,0.00035010488,0.88821733,0.000095480544,0.00014974242,0.001064645,0.049586732,0.0008686625,0.0010345824,0.0090934485,0.0026071148,0.046754654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002125069,0.0000992165,0.9695367,0.000054717202,0.000012636454,0.00014605302,0.019699931,0.00020203272,0.00007088276,0.00030649183,0.009844374,0.000024950294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28863332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3484089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28863332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00686072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040148385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57390654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040619016","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.05.002","title":"Man up and take it: Gender bias in moral typecasting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Harm; Joke; Harassment; Social psychology; Cognitive bias; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.20420217007045946,"score_gpt":0.3954427018876451,"score_spread":0.19124053181718562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040619016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432761,0.00026765777,0.004155133,0.002724557,0.00026014796,0.000028441102,0.00008761287,0.000017910741,0.049182437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980837,0.000036217443,0.000505302,0.00023184657,0.00003695414,0.000006628034,0.000014837989,0.000017398163,0.0010670507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955824,0.0025266567,0.00014297715,0.000484449,0.00096459116,0.00029899602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563452,0.02516003,0.0073569277,0.005059601,0.0039675822,0.0021106917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010239107,0.00018535118,0.00025334713,0.0008449853,0.0012556472,0.0030111277,0.0005819222,0.0012033983,0.011133105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06883972,0.00022308475,0.00016760464,0.0005387779,0.0025682782,0.0021058554,0.0012438223,0.002155618,0.00064010004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035873745,0.0012458503,0.56066746,0.00028941702,0.00023897874,0.00082689524,0.0615362,0.0012957702,0.021064892,0.15513055,0.008794761,0.18532188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022088064,0.00042661096,0.75423354,0.00028613702,0.00021115772,0.0012013696,0.048980393,0.006855993,0.009079434,0.16055582,0.017780576,0.00016811874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022668377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029298717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011133105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089004607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009160784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054150224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091293017","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002","title":"Creative destruction in science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California State University, Fresno; Harvard Kennedy School; University of California, Santa Barbara; Technische Universität Dortmund; Singapore Management University; Universität Kassel; Universität Konstanz; Stockholms Universitet; School of Psychology, Cardiff University; Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Universiteit van Tilburg; Syddansk Universitet; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria; Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Universitetet i Bergen; Linköpings Universitet; KU Leuven; Universiteit Maastricht; Université de Genève; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Radboud Universiteit; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Warwick; Trinity College Dublin; University of Otago; Northern Illinois University; University of Limerick; Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; University of Auckland; Universidad de Alicante; Cardiff University; Ariel University; De Montfort University; University of Toronto; Macquarie University; University of Alberta; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Chittagong; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology; Universidad de La Laguna; Trinity Western University; Universität Wien; American University of Sharjah; Slovenská Akadémia Vied; Toulouse School of Economics; Central Queensland University; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; University College Dublin; University of Essex; Carnegie Mellon University; Western Kentucky University; Kingston University; University of Regina; King's College London; Indian Institute of Technology Delhi; Universiteit Gent; Georgia Southern University; Louisiana State University; Lunds Universitet; Pennsylvania State University; University of Cincinnati; Karolinska Institutet; Yale University; University of Queensland; Emory University; Tulane University; National University of Singapore; Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg; University of Texas at Austin; Loyola University Chicago; International Research and Exchanges Board; Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach; University of Washington; Loughborough University; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Technische Universität Dresden; University of Pennsylvania; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Umeå Universitet; University of Denver; Fordham University; University of Oxford; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse; Florida State University; York University; University of Missouri","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2942668498997326,"score_gpt":0.4532838181846081,"score_spread":0.1590169682848755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091293017","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027542174,0.02420773,0.5181837,0.09968102,0.010636013,0.0012168064,0.00022719898,0.0017280127,0.3165774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6131831,0.008357193,0.30092543,0.027603218,0.0056996867,0.004441762,0.00024335807,0.0015114042,0.03803482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.901358,0.06789307,0.004095386,0.00963712,0.014841476,0.002174988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7548815,0.16216697,0.006580075,0.06501822,0.0084002465,0.0029529512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09782828,0.0015710576,0.001805101,0.006787591,0.010085601,0.022447854,0.0045825695,0.0066023855,0.0077137877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14031209,0.0011384685,0.0026082986,0.003008309,0.12617846,0.02558651,0.02010156,0.01382126,0.002436406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038520182,0.000024940093,0.00034546282,0.0002810278,0.0000311802,0.00009067879,0.008066716,0.0005010751,0.00020346457,0.96967655,0.0033554388,0.017384985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032112257,0.00003161446,0.00014028666,0.0002857833,0.000011586802,0.00014524633,0.0008419925,0.0006806991,0.0003165371,0.9387447,0.058740754,0.00002865134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001423018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011281655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90217173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006921954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00971837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51737154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115767181","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.01.003","title":"Reputational and cooperative benefits of third-party compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Compensation (psychology); Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Narcissism; Third party; Machiavellianism; Injustice; Trait; Psychopathy; Personality; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.07928856821865791,"score_gpt":0.31279254819966573,"score_spread":0.2335039799810078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115767181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306843,0.0010204574,0.003300325,0.0014960344,0.000048065853,0.00001763722,0.000032183834,0.000016802176,0.0633841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915504,0.00005265412,0.00016783547,0.000030254456,0.000013002852,0.0000025575873,0.00000390717,0.000001639446,0.0005731352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986451,0.00061227824,0.000052458632,0.00010755664,0.00036916105,0.00021337831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98440415,0.008421948,0.00290974,0.0015398492,0.0010510869,0.0016732562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032524092,0.0001848598,0.00029324475,0.0006317057,0.0007931314,0.0021212688,0.00040485873,0.0012348349,0.006426909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023039764,0.0001403995,0.00025398488,0.00035744056,0.0014239318,0.0014194206,0.0010534634,0.0009705487,0.00024097004],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006988575,0.003544449,0.17063248,0.00040939567,0.00045819566,0.0011361414,0.004266644,0.014962995,0.034152552,0.52105945,0.0040984633,0.23829061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034684848,0.001182679,0.6358354,0.00008537311,0.00024081364,0.0009886351,0.0027451534,0.017096633,0.0036730394,0.33315295,0.004565673,0.000086889406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088483485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017691752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006426909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011856039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008305879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02150011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169848230","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003","title":"Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Psychology; Test (biology); Empirical research; Econometrics; Dispersion (optics); Social psychology; Statistics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40184467338185004,"score_gpt":0.5088002697968736,"score_spread":0.10695559641502361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169848230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52058846,0.0038918864,0.4114423,0.02176025,0.0027501788,0.0032797921,0.0033338105,0.001856562,0.031096686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221911,0.00028524306,0.16518246,0.005764284,0.0005722091,0.0025555335,0.0015174696,0.00072844134,0.0012032643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.70233464,0.16260065,0.023400627,0.044584263,0.063380316,0.003699381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3147424,0.4542759,0.04384037,0.14221726,0.041948687,0.0029754573],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2736568,0.0012110468,0.002066579,0.008604383,0.0038005526,0.0137675945,0.0035411841,0.0031558808,0.0025472655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5709922,0.00096749695,0.0026563837,0.00678899,0.013515991,0.010339403,0.009692393,0.0056295954,0.00096544356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003529248,0.0010473198,0.2155009,0.0039222916,0.0080960365,0.0015002092,0.14399289,0.004893637,0.025985992,0.27498287,0.025969023,0.29057965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074336067,0.00082073075,0.20625256,0.0025706387,0.0029789319,0.00083569915,0.048142906,0.02521282,0.025802761,0.59728754,0.08857501,0.0007771231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021111178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014935653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036888446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039037645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89571047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296858316","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104184","title":"Social undermining as a dark side of symbolic awards: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Psychology; Social psychology; Great Rift; Discontinuity (linguistics); Statistics","score_opus":0.08564123287154952,"score_gpt":0.3931062349317414,"score_spread":0.3074650020601919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296858316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97826767,0.00029353326,0.01818647,0.00054068206,0.00007132287,0.0002759379,0.00036779104,0.000065700195,0.0019309043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930663,0.000061506056,0.0043057804,0.00020158313,0.000037157923,0.00048243618,0.0002235151,0.000014923982,0.0016066835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96266204,0.028518433,0.0010854761,0.0035501411,0.0024416486,0.0017422688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.860693,0.09035499,0.028710304,0.015069306,0.0022239313,0.002948604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032292213,0.0007659383,0.0018210835,0.0012911446,0.0015515758,0.0023728837,0.003452775,0.002558739,0.009042778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09449451,0.0005718144,0.0016750451,0.0009885258,0.0029792476,0.0012830268,0.0030285649,0.004134559,0.0010529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022690915,0.012466817,0.83121,0.00062465837,0.0038818244,0.0013665383,0.007875315,0.01016196,0.007806625,0.037530057,0.0031238042,0.061261427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002465512,0.012010859,0.8111705,0.0001818323,0.0019568736,0.0007194721,0.0043579447,0.119416706,0.006298476,0.035804387,0.0052860156,0.00033139475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005059909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023332848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032292213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010314495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082852633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17077959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306148656","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104192","title":"Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychological and Educational Research Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Psychology; Incentive; Work (physics); Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Nudge theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22820616141246128,"score_gpt":0.4853280506973012,"score_spread":0.2571218892848399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306148656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428936,0.00031609242,0.047927886,0.0047448766,0.00023728749,0.00025761907,0.00014148775,0.00048428003,0.102996744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98775566,0.00006999654,0.007941567,0.00034044802,0.000018762717,0.000074043266,0.000025384743,0.000043145916,0.0037310224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981718,0.00087936077,0.000077853714,0.0002502296,0.00039890362,0.00022196192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97321004,0.02081165,0.002204363,0.0016171572,0.00080010743,0.0013566188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038596308,0.00049532414,0.00037055084,0.00055983337,0.00056762726,0.0018395326,0.000630695,0.0012771818,0.015110362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03261043,0.00023670228,0.00029194288,0.00034230435,0.00081343285,0.0016657353,0.0013877169,0.0019685538,0.0010515146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005990857,0.007738442,0.07684027,0.0013001247,0.0005744619,0.0010301191,0.0036642507,0.04780812,0.08337138,0.40883097,0.014325785,0.34852526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394753,0.0024858266,0.040151715,0.00037824523,0.0004598398,0.0004498105,0.0020421164,0.22388254,0.034437276,0.64960873,0.044717506,0.00024689268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000717298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019477912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015110362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067871646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013097579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05054921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313373035","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104208","title":"How conflict expressions affect recipients’ conflict management behaviors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Ambiguity; Psychology; Expression (computer science); Role conflict; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Conflict management; Facet (psychology); Forcing (mathematics); Group conflict; Communication; Computer science; Political science; Personality","score_opus":0.03582507723233724,"score_gpt":0.3257518668058452,"score_spread":0.289926789573508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313373035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213284,0.000032523934,0.0008158816,0.00023050708,0.000023404316,0.000013269372,0.000016884786,0.000010093757,0.006724707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989635,0.000022829052,0.00023955245,0.000047093545,0.000007563029,0.000015726293,0.000014446214,0.000008931923,0.00068037544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721575,0.0019071193,0.00010816211,0.00014015115,0.00037118496,0.00025768476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869266,0.009086848,0.0018295232,0.00044508363,0.0008110663,0.0009009059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003557786,0.00022112968,0.00019044073,0.00034418103,0.000737914,0.0035117422,0.0002753143,0.00060059247,0.006047049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027373297,0.00014815175,0.00018560019,0.00027271098,0.0006274714,0.0010368046,0.00093621947,0.0013997762,0.00047368585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007986613,0.006980245,0.65866226,0.00038170823,0.00043526336,0.0011701304,0.06031901,0.0062454143,0.08510758,0.03363049,0.003710675,0.1353706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005499685,0.003768368,0.8680557,0.00020172754,0.0007471864,0.0011871478,0.038679034,0.019631185,0.029163582,0.028099453,0.009740313,0.00017629807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003289952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027037296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006047049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047070754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045799976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02022934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377047662","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104250","title":"The role of CEO accounts and perceived integrity in analysts’ forecasts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attribution; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Accounting; Earnings; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.013730653925021168,"score_gpt":0.254365352312798,"score_spread":0.24063469838777682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377047662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961986,0.00006608438,0.00051948114,0.0002513089,0.000010209684,0.000007391375,0.000027189186,0.0000055388837,0.0029141796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974567,0.00001599379,0.000098444485,0.000008033438,0.0000071243135,0.0000019915124,0.000016776397,0.00000197799,0.000103886814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954912,0.0025599163,0.00030048698,0.00031863307,0.0010112671,0.00031850243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8369965,0.10247275,0.043189622,0.0062972778,0.0071032275,0.0039406684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008213919,0.00025763377,0.00017179959,0.0011244483,0.0008513611,0.0025501386,0.00040284795,0.00054237933,0.0018028264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08195158,0.00023107952,0.00023340274,0.00061193574,0.0014461895,0.0021699385,0.0013656508,0.0010160374,0.00019846292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027061114,0.000161157,0.97444284,0.000022102262,0.00005594302,0.00007961767,0.009128917,0.00040361704,0.0007485368,0.0012155862,0.00021510737,0.013255965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009088749,0.000079030004,0.9903466,0.000030033816,0.000031928965,0.000060110695,0.0048045516,0.002227762,0.0006959918,0.0011843629,0.0005070467,0.00002347389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063306796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007231884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008213919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007827074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010588343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043439865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402891806","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104365","title":"On time or on thin ice: How deadline violations negatively affect perceived work quality and worker evaluations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Quality (philosophy); Applied psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04660942241081497,"score_gpt":0.3477840674876694,"score_spread":0.30117464507685443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402891806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989618,0.0000997155,0.000046666908,0.00022069432,0.000014896718,0.0000037223685,0.000025197942,0.0000019862914,0.0006253546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947554,0.000039593342,0.000060441136,0.00008649135,0.0000070675615,0.000006681192,0.000031149008,0.0000028950276,0.00029006458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788696,0.0011834664,0.00012488714,0.00015899763,0.00039130633,0.00025445264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772264,0.009376963,0.008097956,0.00072081195,0.0013123043,0.003265567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002710495,0.00024904654,0.00033774186,0.0005530426,0.0012835413,0.0028366528,0.00053876307,0.0012353002,0.0026283592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019892972,0.00044593477,0.00048333485,0.0005370805,0.0006498332,0.000996281,0.0009966053,0.0015016112,0.00037237385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006377088,0.0010106516,0.98160297,0.000041980526,0.00017474897,0.00010308115,0.0041751033,0.00020124132,0.0009917179,0.00016852516,0.000675377,0.010216803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016279364,0.00018728171,0.99476635,0.000022867382,0.00007470119,0.00005252268,0.0038271109,0.00037589407,0.00016673456,0.00015507347,0.0003396163,0.00001561736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009983052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024299335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009983052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008013456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012965982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019849896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630891","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104391","title":"The motivating power of streaks: Increasing persistence is as easy as 1, 2, 3","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Psychology; Power (physics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.020364954027325084,"score_gpt":0.2598212147782751,"score_spread":0.23945626075095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407630891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681278,0.010359674,0.03512953,0.023210565,0.00088130217,0.0010587869,0.00035817255,0.00034366662,0.060530484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784697,0.0015929197,0.013186979,0.0022965546,0.00025724276,0.0006736255,0.00009940564,0.000046211957,0.0033773284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328256,0.0037430287,0.00043468282,0.0006965303,0.0014218842,0.00042136732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539243,0.02854045,0.008616013,0.004528353,0.001842668,0.002548303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012007932,0.0005625297,0.00057201914,0.0008529929,0.0013691338,0.003418731,0.0011140481,0.0020153786,0.012517317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047975414,0.00042718512,0.0008544543,0.0007356156,0.0020179525,0.003605564,0.0028217796,0.001564225,0.0010951494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004750793,0.005284771,0.12546496,0.0042553274,0.000978694,0.00019829432,0.0029630293,0.003700874,0.006731773,0.056342945,0.008550489,0.780778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038399533,0.022524878,0.5326054,0.007277769,0.002209773,0.0012291042,0.006455077,0.015284227,0.013931002,0.2253796,0.16876784,0.00049542444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062196073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013362303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012517317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001036255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017557993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063504815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408339516","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104402","title":"Chronic monitoring for wrongdoing as a signal of immoral character","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Sociale en Geesteswetenschappen, NWO; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Psychology; Character (mathematics); Social psychology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06334835799775602,"score_gpt":0.34227243801971036,"score_spread":0.27892408002195435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408339516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945885,0.00013808977,0.0015902587,0.00024285972,0.000016984044,0.0000184165,0.00004437016,0.00001072407,0.0033498455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986696,0.00004701544,0.0008348064,0.000068833666,0.000012688352,0.000017925504,0.00003712516,0.0000032884461,0.0003086783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801266,0.000994748,0.00014084585,0.00028711348,0.00040591075,0.00015871118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639798,0.012057471,0.016263148,0.0038553078,0.0018582053,0.0019860505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028717427,0.00024224161,0.00023647715,0.0008299917,0.0008041713,0.0024676754,0.0004167624,0.000866921,0.0039578164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01688803,0.00020250192,0.00031330445,0.0004136328,0.0014230879,0.0012017665,0.0017901141,0.00092603365,0.0002616038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032827465,0.00046859146,0.93935657,0.00026406176,0.00015828866,0.00042297816,0.017707337,0.0002703916,0.011282859,0.003024995,0.00069765805,0.02601813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012224716,0.000372221,0.984582,0.0000786214,0.00006747309,0.000388965,0.0075696474,0.00072833285,0.0018230675,0.002208247,0.00212641,0.000042852123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008273464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00205245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039578164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046211501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000539716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015187383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414995552","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104455","title":"The power of pausing in collaborative conversations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Silence; Perception; Style (visual arts); Power (physics); Conversation analysis; Nonverbal communication","score_opus":0.019668025666621992,"score_gpt":0.3137083437547785,"score_spread":0.2940403180881565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414995552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90685636,0.0017126655,0.030213403,0.0014702663,0.00015824482,0.00025160413,0.00006697556,0.00030978504,0.058960646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933171,0.0002693906,0.0048244847,0.00018417822,0.000081214006,0.000105448016,0.000028738177,0.000057542748,0.0011318447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707333,0.021960966,0.0010673549,0.0021121155,0.003409762,0.0007163921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88365924,0.094000526,0.010924556,0.005329799,0.003330777,0.0027551898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050436,0.000837275,0.0005876872,0.0016534256,0.003462917,0.006415719,0.0012618466,0.0019533928,0.0028859412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06691934,0.0006660104,0.00059462985,0.00081313687,0.005301706,0.0049371957,0.005616331,0.0016641795,0.00065081497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013200571,0.0003802167,0.055776525,0.002400351,0.0003694991,0.0018833844,0.6605772,0.0010796435,0.08376103,0.019641854,0.0015295855,0.17128071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038693516,0.0035843973,0.24465466,0.003097358,0.0013637247,0.012136411,0.48744926,0.009570235,0.051744685,0.063437715,0.12175616,0.0008184924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009842358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001027111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01050436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009907363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010650373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05555308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}