{"meta":{"query_hash":"65b986286aaa","filters":{"venue":"Ottawa Law Review"},"cohort_total":46,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"exported":46,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/65b986286aaa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ottawa+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3179039051","doi":"","title":"Corporate Stakeholders in Canada—An Overview and a Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Statutory law; Stakeholder analysis; Statute; Stakeholder theory; Shareholder; Business; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.19511384780631877,"score_gpt":0.26623540703954557,"score_spread":0.0711215592332268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179039051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.471873,0.30558893,0.000011537434,0.012212227,0.0013494462,0.0043653105,0.000023813709,0.0003166015,0.20425914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565398,0.0067892554,0.00021743661,0.03469875,0.0006486582,0.00008636789,0.00014454332,0.0000830951,0.0007920846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988183,0.000030692227,0.00035716884,0.00028896675,0.0002549151,0.0002499842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926066,0.000007879696,0.00029018198,0.00027524313,0.00011451243,0.000051512197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052617706,0.00018928661,0.00039379162,0.00004030728,0.00006975179,0.00013618228,0.00018165316,0.000026125092,0.00023867699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010319752,0.00014767604,0.00002805689,0.00026222572,0.000052330866,0.0008126996,0.00007355743,0.0001071109,0.000087347464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040796685,0.000028106177,0.0038523872,0.002571201,0.000005895189,0.00009148371,0.000006547362,0.0000013751082,0.0000011993685,0.9730791,0.016486362,0.003872279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340651,0.000010579242,0.0017611241,0.0016094758,0.00005361244,0.000006545691,0.000020714973,0.00010503108,9.0340234e-7,0.059435256,0.93626857,0.0002941276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7383098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98796326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011097053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047878246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207379046","doi":"","title":"Litigating State Secrets: A Comparative Study of National Security Privilege in Canadian, US and English Civil Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; State (computer science); National security; Law; Computer security; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.031101902546021624,"score_gpt":0.3390622694390587,"score_spread":0.3079603668930371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207379046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306056,0.012175797,3.2977898e-8,0.00014036054,0.00009809875,0.0006266495,0.00007127053,0.000011265549,0.15627089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970825,0.002456193,0.00002380697,0.00029878956,0.000059697108,0.000039525272,0.000003949581,0.0000032275102,0.000032366446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986172,0.0003765411,0.0003135055,0.00018758123,0.00027374327,0.00023148082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900556,0.00038095005,0.000094012015,0.00009368236,0.00027875666,0.00014703702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016146355,0.00009594574,0.00034824226,0.000035199682,0.0003000785,0.000015773014,0.00009598364,0.000029614224,0.00015099901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010657576,0.00008781847,0.00002955773,0.00025490124,0.00029896558,0.00016701959,0.000032525255,0.00018339185,0.0000027041901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061014393,0.00032200836,0.24349083,0.001430289,0.00008525799,0.000066450666,0.24869448,0.000002002543,0.000005035899,0.5012731,0.0041487385,0.00047572874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050913106,0.00017271918,0.024503319,0.0014777496,0.00003937535,0.00000503134,0.015241439,0.000011405494,0.0000057070392,0.0059597795,0.9517356,0.00033871268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60840255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99798286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004387164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027252827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39420512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207756132","doi":"10.7202/1105757ar","title":"A Pandemic Federal Election: Democracy Under Conditions of Emergency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Democracy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public administration; Medicine; Law; Politics; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.04908734895265845,"score_gpt":0.3816702687375725,"score_spread":0.33258291978491406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207756132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041522317,0.14995271,0.000681745,0.029231356,0.0040138336,0.0016640619,0.00006945261,0.00042341638,0.7724411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236481,0.14365676,0.0005309644,0.008384048,0.00048232416,0.000086112384,0.00009235364,0.000036847137,0.023082508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983191,0.00037623796,0.0004490377,0.00022600712,0.00035695243,0.00027269358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921864,0.000049118433,0.00018811403,0.00023698804,0.00020230134,0.000104840794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005114927,0.00010704214,0.0003000444,0.000017826222,0.00065912993,0.0000216765,0.00017739917,0.000066898516,0.0064502787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017335532,0.00010072922,0.0001797913,0.00051078177,0.00010209796,0.00020590246,0.000032498632,0.000119291595,0.00013868083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8113374e-7,0.00015044471,0.007739908,0.0006393783,0.00009021227,0.000009567464,0.00026590883,0.0000011137515,0.00049737905,0.9250127,0.0635745,0.0020180712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013860613,0.000013379456,0.0028095827,0.0008859402,0.000083965846,0.0000045364345,0.00007143954,7.1965144e-7,0.00013887566,0.04162918,0.9540582,0.00016560877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015147247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012729376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103166334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024810454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99445796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214438174","doi":"","title":"Book Review - The Importance of Being Monogamous: Marriage and Nation Building in Western Canada to 1915","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.00981036278964261,"score_gpt":0.26090158412470926,"score_spread":0.25109122133506667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214438174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000508622,0.94015497,0.0000014542985,0.039230704,0.00007038456,0.0005453529,0.0000044431085,0.0000059953472,0.01947806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008015791,0.81676394,0.000039479688,0.17272921,0.00007065504,0.000021512196,0.0000021919307,0.000006122672,0.0023510747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990928,0.00013292416,0.0002882597,0.000127751,0.00021486911,0.00014337231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.000040786774,0.00012081875,0.00014691443,0.000034709163,0.000084668885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095618406,0.00005726054,0.00023567458,0.000034768986,0.00022406786,0.00003742474,0.00016586042,0.000020140018,0.0001812386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017355499,0.00005588271,0.00003248806,0.0002697073,0.00007224709,0.00013722785,0.000011976861,0.00006997555,0.0000029150838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.124327e-7,0.000009820335,0.0008119639,0.003314338,0.0000057806583,0.000021698277,0.0006562417,5.1211043e-7,0.000007652162,0.08117659,0.8874263,0.026568357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002151674,0.000005127349,0.00054007466,0.0062938095,0.000018505769,9.747297e-7,0.000008859231,1.4246535e-7,5.9748504e-7,0.00011660567,0.99293053,0.00006324109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92297006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041044242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003725448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22788307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019603","doi":"10.7202/olr","title":"Ottawa Law Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028347878023266385,"score_gpt":0.3589320265077607,"score_spread":0.3305841484844943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.966415e-8,0.45833912,0.0000049910404,0.01464974,0.0028276904,0.0008177054,0.00013392602,0.000055901513,0.5231709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000045342353,0.58081007,0.000060118455,0.03366838,0.0016986021,0.00017435719,0.0006002037,0.000048680384,0.38289428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587214,0.00068752526,0.0010760141,0.00068927155,0.001168843,0.0005062016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981557,0.00016965218,0.00054204103,0.00052647654,0.0004111626,0.0001949558],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024451893,0.00045813466,0.0011631362,0.00004415316,0.0004940381,0.00023076372,0.0008965774,0.0003587263,0.034935243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020390091,0.00038981644,0.0007061676,0.0004789608,0.00032050294,0.0002806626,0.000103262464,0.00065980986,0.11984853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5497176e-7,0.000011453274,8.605317e-8,0.01547442,0.0000336569,0.0000059198032,0.000010644094,4.798763e-8,2.1324699e-7,0.4927559,0.49021932,0.0014881989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036822854,0.000014782284,2.3875307e-7,0.11625015,0.00034584478,0.0000048053926,0.0000015172651,2.0698783e-7,0.0000025474526,0.001972237,0.88097763,0.00039323734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017735574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49078366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034659164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044749933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019642","doi":"10.7202/1105756ar","title":"What Meaning in a Right to Strike? MedReleaf and the Future of the Agricultural Employees Protection Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Agriculture; Business; Political science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013065922082001444,"score_gpt":0.24718017459919633,"score_spread":0.2341142525171949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68744534,0.14934959,0.000005652455,0.120335385,0.0016845,0.005338402,0.000004642072,0.000087465836,0.035749003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072117,0.0048495024,0.000009079674,0.0038190668,0.00046331252,0.000041589017,0.0000034188763,0.00000809072,0.00008479488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904066,0.000119465716,0.00027470617,0.00017766468,0.00020821206,0.00017928238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999426,0.000029594667,0.0001477484,0.00020466458,0.00018017722,0.0000118325115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059416366,0.00013072962,0.00031847332,0.000014960352,0.00019356265,0.000264581,0.0001766131,0.00004798664,0.000034968438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027411073,0.00006061128,0.00013906068,0.00077189517,0.000081358376,0.00070782524,0.00012271517,0.00015303234,0.000004357935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046670455,0.00025077694,0.0075725312,0.014041643,0.00012213987,0.000016124508,0.0023135077,0.00002030446,0.00010546606,0.91908175,0.00537989,0.05104918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009908957,0.000017552107,0.047393687,0.006562866,0.00029621748,0.00000948086,0.010144195,0.000008534722,0.00008173667,0.011483754,0.9226682,0.00034284365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009326847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049381866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91728836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042659998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021124242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2755624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019924","doi":"10.7202/1105760ar","title":"Deceptive Design and Ongoing Consent in Privacy Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.048726572700979916,"score_gpt":0.2843932778620251,"score_spread":0.2356667051610452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091332366,0.061992917,0.0022420578,0.010939364,0.0002468396,0.0007383788,0.0000017901548,0.000115063514,0.92281026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7706463,0.08077434,0.006150711,0.13819073,0.0007118792,0.00027915623,0.00008824172,0.00010098378,0.0030576582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919665,0.000041271338,0.00024867864,0.0002219735,0.00011399877,0.00017743206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995599,0.000074264484,0.00009456036,0.00017483196,0.000080587844,0.000015893364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031393452,0.000113505615,0.00023657085,0.000030418934,0.00012294627,0.00015207456,0.00007632879,0.00003147398,0.0005784381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001148495,0.000105607025,0.000058747304,0.0003272945,0.000064446234,0.0004038351,0.000103861305,0.00009276802,0.00030412275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012102289,0.00005649896,0.0001873465,0.0011278352,0.000011128305,0.000025511825,0.000004656261,0.0000035402006,0.000041990454,0.98311675,0.010017389,0.005406141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021432152,0.0000020758546,0.00041785042,0.0019852282,0.00004730289,0.0000100831385,0.00001910496,0.0001304694,0.000016632112,0.0010958927,0.99593353,0.00012751472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041002218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001515553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98591614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028346263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031603522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6333492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019937","doi":"10.7202/1105758ar","title":"Callow in More Ways Than One: The Supreme Court Causes More Confusion in Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04844921608553188,"score_gpt":0.252253833694125,"score_spread":0.20380461760859314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16374736,0.52609074,0.00008202647,0.029945388,0.0018568807,0.0027044343,0.0004627932,0.00008314182,0.27502725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062276,0.085867345,0.00004143337,0.0071620955,0.00019913683,0.00010493334,0.000057637324,0.00004149063,0.0002983427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744236,0.000079192396,0.0014349946,0.0005506548,0.000060884577,0.0004319322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863,0.000115686365,0.00045402232,0.00065596524,0.00004845244,0.00009587035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535278,0.00020983818,0.0012033614,0.00006409556,0.00010309191,0.00008948231,0.0003561325,0.00015146211,0.0007925463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022202329,0.00022273224,0.00022202445,0.000294534,0.00016713704,0.00021830908,0.000088951565,0.00028265818,0.0004164473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005139563,0.00016491406,0.084560916,0.0008011804,0.000038113925,0.00005950415,0.0003073455,0.000017507236,0.000015163016,0.9106972,0.002641375,0.0006916435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010183519,0.00003077834,0.055562746,0.0027559092,0.00002528121,0.000024365634,0.00008206439,0.0002930953,0.00005106336,0.012005388,0.92761683,0.0005340952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013120965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03412162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020869843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000676879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99345076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019964","doi":"10.7202/1105761ar","title":"La place des autorités jurisprudentielles, de la doctrine et des faits d’intérêt public dans l’interprétation des lois au Canada : l’ascendance du contexte","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.026926064634788065,"score_gpt":0.33038732473353577,"score_spread":0.3034612600987477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10750303,0.64198697,0.0016218395,0.02026167,0.0011959431,0.00051222777,0.00009872343,0.00010246211,0.22671716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7409954,0.24532366,0.0013460285,0.0021672787,0.0003067265,0.000051843912,0.000020861104,0.000037924252,0.009750246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937488,0.0033705565,0.0006972032,0.00057585974,0.00064015226,0.00096746214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966707,0.0015875531,0.00029400823,0.00037179407,0.0005472334,0.0005286718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004205596,0.0003913174,0.0006841011,0.00002573971,0.0012405134,0.0004359023,0.0006060894,0.00020197955,0.0009257957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024046062,0.00040410613,0.00025894944,0.0008936587,0.0025863673,0.0010225668,0.00016342735,0.00045449284,0.00006947914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007129119,0.00017765997,0.007833605,0.0076198624,0.000095518866,0.00047763684,0.008727926,0.000008152187,0.000068336296,0.81288534,0.020035068,0.14206377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020786707,0.000045054177,0.0039320416,0.014347025,0.000293959,0.00028630527,0.0017798198,0.000023860135,0.00012837084,0.0018905216,0.9766532,0.00041198262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8659187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95661813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029380664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049910257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019965","doi":"10.7202/1105759ar","title":"Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario’s Intermediary Appellate Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Court of record; Business; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.013631076992749217,"score_gpt":0.2866863568475972,"score_spread":0.27305527985484795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019965","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02244054,0.49921376,0.00007134295,0.38565937,0.000961834,0.0011656024,0.000011894055,0.000030094066,0.09044558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8015639,0.17134401,0.00003912737,0.009648598,0.0032785202,0.00007519681,0.000014318352,0.000040138715,0.013996156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816126,0.00064254156,0.00030688147,0.00020045991,0.00046645707,0.00022240238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865496,0.0005215715,0.0002464493,0.00041538943,0.00011525457,0.000046387297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025696473,0.00012883177,0.00023275243,0.000007093353,0.0014863294,0.00013181713,0.00040511283,0.000049884315,0.00074960286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034241944,0.000050419683,0.00016807037,0.00021353489,0.00066147244,0.000098873745,0.00024611378,0.00030517406,0.000008941346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028242199,0.00011597517,0.060397163,0.00086519565,0.00069518917,0.000028743774,0.055225767,0.000028469367,0.00010084634,0.23749407,0.16622053,0.4787998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523574,0.000007208579,0.005263091,0.0008220027,0.00014505253,0.000010629299,0.0006604425,0.000013142553,0.0000069737366,0.00034070815,0.99259466,0.0000708749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011371327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19071002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008213032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017743575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020033","doi":"10.7202/1105957ar","title":"Le onzième sénateur. Une pause d’archéologie constitutionnelle récente","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05880410174452506,"score_gpt":0.26066869029273537,"score_spread":0.20186458854821032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014144418,0.42528313,0.000032838245,0.024722496,0.0008536116,0.00014062878,0.0001697576,0.00006127476,0.54872215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032538205,0.3169903,0.00025630512,0.029287895,0.0011256952,0.000028670522,0.00023265634,0.00008367968,0.6194566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664044,0.00089806836,0.00089031685,0.00060179457,0.00029719627,0.0006721725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979955,0.00022496007,0.00021250074,0.0008492161,0.0004029732,0.00031484413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005694901,0.00037052925,0.00088680186,0.000040856256,0.0011067262,0.00015456708,0.0003527544,0.00009495846,0.016737344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038576013,0.00037202574,0.0005964469,0.0002392447,0.0031746335,0.00030790674,0.00019432446,0.0004648264,0.008576264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016868432,0.00030302303,0.000004187611,0.0039182683,0.00017714246,0.00076560554,0.00012010899,0.0000023192745,0.000008426119,0.8598289,0.13350295,0.0013674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025500476,0.000043642667,0.000005918666,0.005454647,0.00087447313,0.000081048434,0.00010522597,0.0000041279377,0.000029403196,0.0053612883,0.98737156,0.00041364675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008630409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015342384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005404994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020093","doi":"10.7202/1105956ar","title":"“Other Materials” — Traitorous Love and Decolonizing the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02054674410615965,"score_gpt":0.31129869600413085,"score_spread":0.2907519518979712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031797644,0.048178587,0.0000073721185,0.12722753,0.00077426736,0.00075961556,0.000042555417,0.00003306732,0.8197972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41383758,0.08604459,0.00660483,0.38214177,0.0034309712,0.00017311242,0.000068145615,0.000101027035,0.10759796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909747,0.00019254471,0.00016312319,0.00014204676,0.00017918367,0.000225644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995253,0.00004047307,0.00004511124,0.0001248636,0.000114114744,0.00015015672],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008703896,0.000074494164,0.00014490189,0.000001670002,0.0006408559,0.00022643855,0.00013926906,0.00007684883,0.0011150636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015690735,0.000052189163,0.00004621264,0.00021571187,0.00011731401,0.0001290592,0.000016136853,0.000064314045,0.00013508092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8200188e-7,0.0000050094213,0.000024676285,0.0001479515,0.00001515407,0.000008431588,0.00516286,2.9173313e-7,0.00008953638,0.88867575,0.102729544,0.0031405147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036252513,0.0000049500063,0.00010550709,0.00030445508,0.000026715063,0.000004574533,0.0009912679,8.540303e-8,0.000069965026,0.00064161234,0.9977332,0.00008141456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20814285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95559186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015241849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003398348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020097","doi":"10.7202/1105763ar","title":"L’accès à la justice en temps de pandémie : leçons apprises dans une clinique juridique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.05683290319225533,"score_gpt":0.43044999421088836,"score_spread":0.37361709101863305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020097","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011668972,0.44870478,0.0028024567,0.19120164,0.0022876186,0.0019886952,0.00015823607,0.00017975377,0.35150993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005855701,0.7975982,0.006780892,0.15022536,0.0021163502,0.00033966813,0.0000965095,0.00012715094,0.036860175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783292,0.016624864,0.002189599,0.0008292209,0.0004802668,0.0015468765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874055,0.009001409,0.00061885855,0.0013060129,0.00051520293,0.0011530543],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012398711,0.00055316335,0.0017608313,0.000030359402,0.0011712337,0.000034664226,0.0004995875,0.0018242154,0.0021792857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063123526,0.0005097959,0.0005737929,0.0010016501,0.0004415586,0.00023015503,0.00025654086,0.0054571503,0.0012376554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058892947,0.00052611815,0.0016843067,0.14579123,0.0001511399,0.0006060685,0.0125103975,0.0000020694733,0.00004033941,0.29977906,0.49720266,0.041700736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006304184,0.00008616481,0.0010075679,0.049293987,0.0012446115,0.00016070675,0.0031069354,0.000013158452,0.00003623497,0.000940804,0.9430514,0.000428007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053403117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012154202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44584873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005576387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011881286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020117","doi":"10.7202/1105955ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]The Ecological Constitution: Reframing Environmental Law by Lynda Collins","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Constitution; Environmental law; Law; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Biology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.011903751924816455,"score_gpt":0.28490443542301547,"score_spread":0.273000683498199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008804741,0.02972388,0.0000020439734,0.0022288617,0.0001936105,0.00013323917,0.0000469474,0.000018315855,0.96756506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23626584,0.56939393,0.0006233601,0.039215025,0.00090628903,0.00008121522,0.00021104098,0.000027327058,0.15327595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992708,0.00014407738,0.00013448062,0.00012809693,0.00015431116,0.00016826212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967974,0.00006394358,0.000039329952,0.00014015747,0.0000044181443,0.00007240917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022967717,0.00006651577,0.000115910305,0.0000014651102,0.0006488588,0.00003541266,0.00011743825,0.000058424983,0.012556125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028432347,0.000049800452,0.00006614525,0.000046195797,0.00064158754,0.00004695456,0.000037493133,0.0000859277,0.0046672067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9215659e-7,0.000028374363,0.000029908937,0.000022642824,0.000005365032,0.00000689513,0.000012955075,3.5865874e-8,0.000041307656,0.9037532,0.09514106,0.0009580525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003791154,0.0000083466275,0.000011284559,0.00007801297,0.000015533175,0.0000033689644,0.000017312155,2.5892376e-7,0.00004533591,0.00022979536,0.99948525,0.00006758413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002541067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012330917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9043442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009746783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040742623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689851","doi":"10.7202/1111094ar","title":"Indemnité additionnelle, discrétion et démesure : pour une actualisation des paramètres de l’exception de la réclamation grossièrement exagérée","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04590768152160387,"score_gpt":0.3568684281283386,"score_spread":0.31096074660673473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026565863,0.20499218,0.0050963904,0.10618506,0.0018901783,0.0026279744,0.006567069,0.00034315934,0.6457321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7779654,0.19230586,0.0010089799,0.012288455,0.0007466137,0.0005044124,0.004270955,0.00005097226,0.010858312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941091,0.004103128,0.00051199796,0.0002991284,0.0006308231,0.000345847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988223,0.00036219234,0.00039464212,0.00016345456,0.00015134514,0.000106108135],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037333614,0.00021883323,0.00027279364,0.000043657597,0.0015027941,0.00014022921,0.000256899,0.00007297271,0.006812737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035554112,0.00022445623,0.00019761977,0.00047809456,0.0005563847,0.0005127548,0.00010466452,0.00032550943,0.00028802207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006506714,0.00031280718,0.00043349958,0.0005672668,0.00006349057,0.000007412313,0.0027298976,0.00024060762,0.000038860442,0.82194185,0.15755843,0.016099364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023959398,0.0000960831,0.011827494,0.0014953498,0.00015116441,0.000021235597,0.00066684955,0.00007104425,0.0000084837875,0.032796055,0.9523959,0.00023072756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004214268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032295564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009292195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017641649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689874","doi":"10.7202/1111096ar","title":"Different Ways to Get to “Everything”?: Judicializing Everything? The Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom by Mark S. Harding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.03311867358496082,"score_gpt":0.27591329658897296,"score_spread":0.24279462300401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11145986,0.11967519,0.0006753491,0.6391785,0.0034521993,0.0076653957,0.0006408582,0.00010878972,0.11714385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573565,0.005037131,0.000042778203,0.03711227,0.00012843455,0.00013053633,0.000014076397,0.0000073740525,0.00017086767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.00044553756,0.0004186813,0.00022247047,0.0007361282,0.00029958703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998967,0.0005470953,0.00014256833,0.00014511657,0.0000689338,0.00012931028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001667716,0.00014120713,0.00043538542,0.00003799255,0.0015961002,0.00004119624,0.00040007345,0.000020497439,0.00011328473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004761387,0.00008907451,0.00007362491,0.00072433206,0.0004796352,0.000057096848,0.0003149122,0.0002217397,0.0000030019573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014610525,0.000009211222,0.0023089498,0.000027623879,0.000030473835,0.000002907286,0.00092137064,0.000060073195,0.0000043556397,0.88443124,0.11145403,0.00073515804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026561765,0.000010511766,0.0008046307,0.00061822595,0.00005263393,0.000003038449,0.00042808303,0.0000036296162,0.0000023833727,0.00607247,0.99161077,0.00012800211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88015676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004881418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091864925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690151","doi":"10.7202/1111093ar","title":"Les articles de revues de droit les plus cités de tous les temps par la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.04623083932897598,"score_gpt":0.3195410683068861,"score_spread":0.27331022897791013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396690151","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18588418,0.6180842,0.00007976382,0.042329263,0.0004612002,0.00049296697,0.00019332682,0.000060130005,0.15241496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813557,0.102425545,0.00025762778,0.0028931517,0.00045237507,0.0001802262,0.000009880645,0.000024366944,0.01240112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648345,0.0015000575,0.00050656573,0.00033029693,0.00057502865,0.0006046175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845266,0.0007576501,0.00023769082,0.00019452379,0.00016664129,0.00019083539],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017924752,0.00024839703,0.00057085697,0.00002163415,0.0019240506,0.00008189867,0.000554725,0.00006362435,0.0024003128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038642352,0.00026091156,0.0002066912,0.00031037565,0.0005751347,0.00013672118,0.00019797822,0.00035680732,0.00002122434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059605504,0.00008265515,0.010224446,0.0006088549,0.0001252207,0.000108397406,0.0015863213,0.00008442796,0.000019234856,0.8649617,0.103041895,0.01915091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397647,0.000057851372,0.0022114099,0.001053022,0.00015218444,0.000073185045,0.0014365197,0.00010159182,0.000055048058,0.004248612,0.9901784,0.00029241934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.933441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9551244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021063092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012577446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690612","doi":"10.7202/1111095ar","title":"The Future of Treaty Interpretation in Yahey v British Columbia: Clarification on Cumulative Effects, Common Intentions, and Treaty Infringement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00900719023656461,"score_gpt":0.2936056872627835,"score_spread":0.2845984970262189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396690612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52239585,0.12928219,0.00013847275,0.025191221,0.002413602,0.008764623,0.0002163952,0.00015596187,0.31144166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883487,0.019476052,0.00002376789,0.0005252359,0.0000467802,0.00024168413,0.000053986838,0.000005693025,0.0007919576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833274,0.00073951547,0.00030957992,0.00014777058,0.00037071458,0.00009970391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.00023168707,0.00021769502,0.000106154854,0.00008547231,0.000023463865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012524934,0.000054844906,0.00016116786,0.000017739756,0.0006307152,0.00009244064,0.00013718892,0.000029941813,0.00008435005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009652418,0.000060971328,0.00005940184,0.00018737762,0.00009469314,0.00012176611,0.000035331235,0.00014633039,0.00000209627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014382323,0.00015758358,0.009924626,0.00028023095,0.000028931618,0.0000024196179,0.0007166736,0.00001201814,0.000008316617,0.76893896,0.0030518547,0.21686397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004230632,0.00019041297,0.09499471,0.0017217587,0.000062460575,0.0000023376517,0.00054130814,0.00012131919,0.000010675989,0.008596609,0.8931941,0.0001412494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03511194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38020977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89014226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022671999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032824788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97131336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784720","doi":"10.7202/1111191ar","title":"Le secret ministériel : fondements, enjeux et réforme — un entretien avec le professeur Yan Campagnolo","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Secrecy; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Law; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.028154911735765422,"score_gpt":0.2395193848602777,"score_spread":0.2113644731245123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784720","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037365244,0.6111429,0.00014075656,0.2127271,0.004239166,0.0016453149,0.00084751856,0.000052612344,0.16546814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20982039,0.53418386,0.0032694777,0.059614144,0.00040978446,0.0014149185,0.0012655181,0.00025390103,0.18976799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959395,0.0002507523,0.0018715753,0.00097572134,0.00013176426,0.0008306881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765897,0.000106045256,0.0011808322,0.0007672507,0.000060340466,0.00022657316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022259657,0.0004758202,0.0013024843,0.00011630165,0.00077596994,0.00009897511,0.0008054041,0.00016253047,0.008896695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006260557,0.0006047818,0.00050175143,0.0003838312,0.00021344819,0.0003682338,0.0007072426,0.0006092284,0.0012616474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067705064,0.0004562947,0.0012767086,0.0024695087,0.00025046046,0.000037018042,0.0006507014,0.000023455636,6.706354e-7,0.9035514,0.08685198,0.004425038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090742786,0.00014193791,0.0011242399,0.0011120897,0.000052990577,0.000102948965,0.00022777931,0.00008292759,0.000008755717,0.01788346,0.9776258,0.0007296833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021095215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006172752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040419112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000805341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784722","doi":"10.7202/1111190ar","title":"Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02260898432843,"score_gpt":0.31728082083192416,"score_spread":0.29467183650349416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09182888,0.2748637,0.0007337339,0.18535249,0.0024421278,0.0025350684,0.001331234,0.00019033976,0.44072244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568536,0.031634454,0.00093291904,0.0040024067,0.00024130433,0.00010810023,0.00005843955,0.000040300674,0.0061284653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386597,0.0029511452,0.00090808445,0.00053875556,0.0011209007,0.000615168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.0012962878,0.0005133959,0.0004890097,0.00020551328,0.0003303904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060728057,0.00034271824,0.0007029126,0.000013352702,0.001533746,0.000145321,0.00086388394,0.00022495983,0.0014564266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025822892,0.00036003417,0.00043341363,0.00070029136,0.0015386833,0.00045419534,0.00021954908,0.00068837864,0.0000063791445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011170803,0.00025771884,0.0009765578,0.0040886705,0.000059948426,0.000076656004,0.0075705694,0.000036222067,0.00023448547,0.88380325,0.09285832,0.0100264065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012492656,0.00013680334,0.0003184145,0.0016642023,0.000327723,0.00011504169,0.011345291,0.000046119574,0.00018215015,0.0013350612,0.98404694,0.00035731375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012440912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005264451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784727","doi":"10.7202/1111195ar","title":"Promoting Privacy, Fairness, and the Open Court Principle in Immigration and Refugee Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Internet privacy; Criminology; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0333068797050475,"score_gpt":0.337187332621475,"score_spread":0.3038804529164275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4864007,0.12811963,0.00007063947,0.14554572,0.00043801384,0.021112427,0.000037270813,0.00023988693,0.21803571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649558,0.031029804,0.00027221366,0.002681628,0.000096519914,0.0005038964,0.000011674128,0.000015967758,0.00043251616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988934,0.0003201951,0.0002227667,0.00021761791,0.00020959592,0.0001364386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963194,0.000052169682,0.00014713581,0.00009560153,0.000037084268,0.000036096866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004932551,0.00006808834,0.00016912367,0.000014502824,0.0009122594,0.00019816024,0.00031675946,0.000014474222,0.00004640112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034201058,0.000049672897,0.00001569484,0.0002308902,0.00016340897,0.00047624577,0.0005160828,0.00017174002,0.0000036857866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000212152,0.000032000615,0.0007112964,0.0014155431,0.000004712922,0.000003590138,0.008287309,8.664736e-8,0.000026386639,0.96330047,0.0010597282,0.025137672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025793855,0.000035104975,0.00039072623,0.0005334522,0.000042188833,0.000009548711,0.0013237057,0.000035198915,0.0000045905545,0.0010176494,0.99627346,0.00007646295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003076494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021138487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046950026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042981625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7016454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784731","doi":"10.7202/1111194ar","title":"Gatekeeping Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Piecemeal Erosion of Aboriginal Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Charter; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.02823347896043296,"score_gpt":0.3104470827724549,"score_spread":0.282213603812022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073615074,0.24844232,0.000017182618,0.14384994,0.002997538,0.0045418157,0.0002531562,0.00011119411,0.5261718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872628,0.01016568,0.00010078181,0.0010104624,0.00012785637,0.00007129359,0.000008693865,0.000006239122,0.0012462209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979159,0.0004905962,0.00041419407,0.00014447786,0.00081846863,0.00021635549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.00016137792,0.0003420832,0.00015868715,0.00022061034,0.00005255752],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013749838,0.00009154844,0.00033003927,0.0000061121013,0.0014763271,0.0000080895325,0.00034548296,0.000020561598,0.00096709875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009954566,0.000060619957,0.00009618983,0.00025294212,0.00028203992,0.000079452206,0.00004469433,0.00014057211,0.000002547025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008297336,0.00007572039,0.0013163926,0.0009093247,0.00008287768,0.000003622667,0.0078814095,0.00003032712,0.0001287205,0.83603984,0.1508803,0.0026431794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080345846,0.000020431211,0.0010954409,0.00046953635,0.00004677406,6.507661e-7,0.00048943365,0.0000033688211,0.000051047682,0.00026046147,0.997401,0.00008153373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8223768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8834199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004930085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005377979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784733","doi":"10.7202/1111193ar","title":"The Lawyer’s Professional Duty to Encourage Respect for—and to Improve—the Administration of Justice: Lessons from Failures by Attorneys General","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duty; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04560010974734654,"score_gpt":0.4368172844004749,"score_spread":0.3912171746531284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038150828,0.0072945496,0.00015798678,0.968288,0.0014197258,0.0019506422,0.0003733205,0.000022033619,0.016678678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975013,0.0042461175,0.0033616968,0.056834526,0.0012807315,0.0034430944,0.00018806089,0.000035476383,0.03310903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984381,0.0005319845,0.00031711557,0.00018691711,0.00036263454,0.00016321999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983664,0.0009450503,0.00020778479,0.00022974126,0.00016435272,0.000086675864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023021905,0.00007629988,0.00013322932,0.000012943008,0.0022610254,0.00011915421,0.00032302566,0.00002606272,0.00043281316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013661748,0.000050282488,0.00004823571,0.00036864233,0.00009848288,0.00015517863,0.000069913265,0.00020405688,0.000010094038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014545751,0.00003463038,0.0000082575825,0.00005084263,0.000008965717,1.2740541e-7,0.0011146176,6.323986e-7,0.0003494643,0.61589426,0.37780333,0.0047203363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058701575,0.00005508399,0.00013376362,0.000060176295,0.000057777685,4.910888e-7,0.0012476632,0.0000024703297,0.00007464615,0.0013673662,0.9968707,0.00007118099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010701126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006782131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064333266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784763","doi":"10.7202/1111192ar","title":"“Untethered”: How the majority decision in Toronto (City) v Ontario tries (but fails) to break away from the Supreme Court of Canada’s unwritten constitutional principle jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Obligation; Categorical variable; Constitutional review; High Court; Constitutional right; Constitutional theory; Normative; Political science; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.023964222277309002,"score_gpt":0.292511346107088,"score_spread":0.268547123829779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102494806,0.22959164,0.00016585972,0.28342742,0.002947007,0.006672759,0.0015427752,0.00010438871,0.37305334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731938,0.0075211693,0.00039496087,0.012209765,0.0002270702,0.00023439841,0.000033787215,0.000010881107,0.0061741252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973094,0.00060071837,0.00035246325,0.00028721197,0.0011386648,0.00031156692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.0005345459,0.00016893553,0.00041799402,0.00014171615,0.0001041772],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021554152,0.00014923007,0.00035342586,0.0000016998313,0.0014953119,0.000083966304,0.0010877928,0.00006389285,0.0034156658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032414403,0.00009126755,0.0001488874,0.00027264748,0.0006790921,0.00024350168,0.00024618907,0.00035333956,0.0000032972252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001775655,0.00006988541,0.005787536,0.00005688351,0.000044728833,0.000010618102,0.0065474724,0.000015887714,0.000011523429,0.83401436,0.1522222,0.0012011543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012853522,0.000015194549,0.004663148,0.0003498895,0.00003397748,0.000002411575,0.0059664017,5.8119554e-7,0.000009881794,0.0012439092,0.9874583,0.00012778801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87069905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019956557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031787409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879675","doi":"10.7202/1112505ar","title":"Mixing Oil and Water? Redrawing the Limits of Contract Freedom After the Criminalization of Usury","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usury; Criminalization; Mixing (physics); Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Islam","score_opus":0.04398418003195922,"score_gpt":0.2442726013845402,"score_spread":0.200288421352581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879675","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28543222,0.5215917,0.00017763366,0.009443611,0.0021652717,0.00095122313,0.00024475073,0.000078326964,0.17991525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317465,0.06721845,0.000014331724,0.0006090114,0.00012980329,0.000040502448,0.000010051553,0.000019210971,0.00021217421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856335,0.00005781164,0.0009483232,0.00020736089,0.000034605193,0.00018855109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989681,0.00014707862,0.0004583306,0.00035794912,0.000038459435,0.000030052375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019351051,0.000099589844,0.0005734428,0.000038517956,0.000106312335,0.000035529963,0.00020242513,0.00005429988,0.00011064588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100283134,0.00007083724,0.00013936173,0.00013502124,0.00019891612,0.0001367239,0.000052084124,0.00006775975,0.0000934302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016728094,0.00003810313,0.016662765,0.0055396175,0.0001615269,0.0000036394536,0.0014908031,0.00003865484,0.00010505365,0.9594129,0.0021020006,0.014428215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000538803,0.00007527207,0.011538794,0.003922087,0.00014038128,0.000015165039,0.00010471296,0.0007592874,0.00037318867,0.018782517,0.96334034,0.00040947934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013938361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029562574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018941708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073369984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2888659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879696","doi":"10.7202/1112504ar","title":"Speech of Justice McKinnon: Induction Into the Common Law Honour Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05323877694658328,"score_gpt":0.37113799284031673,"score_spread":0.31789921589373343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010873736,0.024517814,0.00005826382,0.14040203,0.0006540692,0.0018477995,0.000022611868,0.00032875652,0.8212949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87345755,0.107385546,0.0009688287,0.012947582,0.00097019173,0.0001852088,0.000033038148,0.000029602226,0.004022423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900305,0.00015919724,0.00025787824,0.00014342454,0.00026889445,0.00016753223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928695,0.00012296803,0.00014196984,0.00031060496,0.00008976248,0.000047728685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015429339,0.00007163259,0.00018230485,0.0000055762384,0.0007811159,0.000035644993,0.0003430865,0.000057836518,0.00010827008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003975104,0.000050483108,0.00014166425,0.00073957024,0.00034496005,0.00011977804,0.00007648591,0.00015056,0.0002740895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8496966e-7,0.000014541809,0.00001435215,0.00042619338,0.000008846212,2.6269927e-7,0.0011201218,0.0000010982411,0.00005026553,0.9645508,0.021644006,0.012169307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031310457,0.0000061412675,0.00010142113,0.0002644208,0.000077211065,5.4071165e-7,0.0005158013,0.0000063715584,0.000054859956,0.005459002,0.9934204,0.00006252278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012382505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010202396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97177637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042631564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056418274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99419415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879728","doi":"10.7202/1112503ar","title":"Allocution du juge McKinnon : Intronisation à la Société honorifique de common law","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027319031895876176,"score_gpt":0.3304635123510134,"score_spread":0.3031444804551372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012903212,0.07327822,0.000037430626,0.16827677,0.002026507,0.0008829821,0.00004333474,0.00031715215,0.7538473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6768754,0.28049517,0.00012373271,0.025597028,0.005004131,0.00017269184,0.00015628808,0.00006532631,0.011510226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957778,0.002151107,0.00056755106,0.0003705259,0.00047820632,0.0006548077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870944,0.00037448565,0.0002839683,0.00027265417,0.00013321039,0.00022625872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035573645,0.00027501167,0.00059309625,0.000026856791,0.0010479059,0.00015923298,0.00038613786,0.00041033974,0.0005024388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012448124,0.0002836206,0.00036493613,0.00095473166,0.0010175545,0.00059188704,0.00009710773,0.0004633681,0.0018979603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021718024,0.000074744305,0.00009459078,0.0013511264,0.000039726237,0.000018732608,0.0015050783,0.0000028057493,0.0000137367215,0.93439865,0.024937395,0.037561256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015209595,0.000035809546,0.00011604413,0.0017908702,0.00013851533,0.0000031019265,0.00006734232,0.000018203926,0.000013186304,0.18051021,0.81690174,0.00025285716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025455674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011766887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79196435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005938718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880635","doi":"10.7202/1112507ar","title":"Considérations sur l’équité en matière de pertes et préjudices","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.041809242749812146,"score_gpt":0.2662487581204763,"score_spread":0.22443951537066417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400880635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012491988,0.4201927,0.00009296933,0.05592874,0.0028536147,0.0009577547,0.00093034026,0.00014837804,0.5176463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.087137565,0.8132454,0.0004143198,0.01759127,0.0024674651,0.00035308173,0.0003047082,0.00016435627,0.07832181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638116,0.0002721872,0.0018269357,0.00068358687,0.000064526066,0.0007715937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766463,0.00055893825,0.0008238654,0.0006793074,0.00007727821,0.00019600231],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036723656,0.0003165297,0.001471352,0.00013729927,0.00030026247,0.0002661472,0.00045948135,0.00030674995,0.004678324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005785266,0.00047020408,0.00045575877,0.0005567397,0.0003229242,0.0006431484,0.00013812311,0.00030174176,0.016804248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0943405e-7,0.00006368848,0.0037182735,0.0037810276,0.00013702789,0.0000132840605,0.00036894245,0.000021161484,0.0000018760966,0.79898244,0.1899222,0.0029891504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029455204,0.0000512794,0.0014299941,0.0038047596,0.000084303174,0.000030764433,0.00005136986,0.0006397774,0.0000069697994,0.045529038,0.947568,0.00050921796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008773803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009982019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030927724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015339286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880852","doi":"10.7202/1112506ar","title":"Eliminating Guilt by Association: Reviewing the Limits of Ezokola in Canadian Refugee Law Complicity Decision‑Making (2013–2020)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Refugee; Association (psychology); Law; Refugee law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0331467607344857,"score_gpt":0.3531765005085518,"score_spread":0.3200297397740661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400880852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056733985,0.30819038,0.00016106266,0.08800595,0.0020785509,0.0064803585,0.00026057882,0.0004261087,0.53766304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8492057,0.13748136,0.0006811816,0.010271564,0.00034413117,0.00014477273,0.00010234758,0.000037000384,0.0017319531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682754,0.0008335568,0.00088519696,0.00028732992,0.0006635495,0.00050285034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774706,0.0008075619,0.000507919,0.00045566438,0.00034981105,0.00013200774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075565856,0.00016098455,0.00047616864,0.000057545025,0.0009230227,0.000103106795,0.00066070847,0.0001365569,0.00029654556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005004122,0.00012409089,0.00015779656,0.0013305084,0.00011089016,0.00033762064,0.00004712502,0.00024782555,0.00015145153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011447455,0.000023610888,0.0033291292,0.00065776083,0.000022723445,0.0000027363596,0.0022512358,0.0000074850946,0.000059733557,0.6452427,0.3094245,0.038977295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735836,0.000013212595,0.0006964198,0.0040276856,0.000030697785,6.036566e-7,0.00013376013,0.00006810465,0.000018650246,0.0013159122,0.99349874,0.00013886981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2854597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95658815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060631585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025769515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7192985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400881146","doi":"10.7202/1112508ar","title":"Mediator Liability 23 Years Later: The “Three C’s” of Case Law, Codes, &amp; Custom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediator; Liability; Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03205114993770327,"score_gpt":0.27947457692898076,"score_spread":0.24742342699127748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400881146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06057802,0.024905648,0.00015983166,0.02537546,0.0025090287,0.0033019695,0.00015212056,0.0010246948,0.88199323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775483,0.0064774454,0.00010489482,0.011930261,0.0008810769,0.00021262946,0.00021050053,0.00006962081,0.002565256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891603,0.00002757855,0.0003832083,0.00020923268,0.00023677347,0.00022717487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906665,0.0000734948,0.0002011351,0.0005290358,0.00010873563,0.000020959582],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009107946,0.00013189271,0.0003019155,0.000039561535,0.00018736666,0.00007886026,0.0002440251,0.00005052954,0.00073568826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010340853,0.00009391145,0.00018449969,0.00071080955,0.00016736396,0.0002895833,0.00014723139,0.00012349484,0.0034454155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002429404,0.00008002723,0.0010304832,0.0032935825,0.00005182841,0.00005778937,0.000010621805,0.0000070424608,0.000019043477,0.7318617,0.25536838,0.008217091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010923158,0.000001888696,0.0011968258,0.00037350212,0.00013293476,0.000013550868,0.000011659073,0.00011330993,0.0000018816856,0.0007188545,0.9972176,0.00010879077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017391797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011422954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020227559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017026743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99733055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696509","doi":"10.7202/1114750ar","title":"Droit électoral québécois : repères et enjeux contemporains de Pierre Vallée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2075482075410895,"score_gpt":0.44865955049136363,"score_spread":0.24111134295027414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696509","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012342491,0.4840679,0.000042113403,0.28561297,0.003601294,0.0023654953,0.0003037367,0.0007447084,0.21091932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11753365,0.39060143,0.0007448113,0.14675952,0.0020112528,0.0002405408,0.0003880714,0.00016677905,0.34155396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492943,0.001708128,0.0009359116,0.0006310334,0.00070684316,0.001088644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763876,0.000389742,0.00042172495,0.00063409505,0.00041726226,0.0004984176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030727666,0.00041295466,0.00079448306,0.00005121931,0.00052113936,0.00017599479,0.00057961355,0.00029319603,0.001844366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014604063,0.00039519215,0.00049469015,0.00081584,0.00116407,0.00052578974,0.00011244867,0.00038399038,0.0020889333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010577714,0.00005510851,0.001086388,0.002038109,0.000074324395,0.000037896927,0.010572243,0.000004182529,0.000015101644,0.6885189,0.29524547,0.002351222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020623328,0.00003757637,0.003329274,0.0035489122,0.00019068945,0.000018832336,0.0012461443,0.000056403518,0.00001466818,0.0021211836,0.98875827,0.00047179384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25788084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43020064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014447009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020911046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696533","doi":"10.7202/1114749ar","title":"Debt, Deals, and Dominion: Insights on Canadian Insolvency Law from Debt and Federalism by Thomas G.W. Telfer and Virginia Torrie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Dominion; Debt; Federalism; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.019887758426220873,"score_gpt":0.2977578292982002,"score_spread":0.27787007087197935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19319387,0.193096,0.0000047067797,0.054549407,0.00030922293,0.0019197518,0.00042164765,0.00020452436,0.5563009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87951833,0.10849453,0.00013767015,0.010178347,0.00018532497,0.000095471645,0.000072519615,0.000022875358,0.0012949582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00013865952,0.00021712325,0.00033744055,0.00016998022,0.000269728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991379,0.00015729999,0.000061833205,0.00019714686,0.000027648437,0.00041817833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031889835,0.00014302657,0.00026768324,0.000021384012,0.0010495738,0.00019246333,0.00013535141,0.000097067656,0.00007286854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043003583,0.000119349155,0.000032163964,0.00020719222,0.0002512338,0.00017155589,0.000050369308,0.000116781426,0.000057312503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.248226e-7,0.000008880819,0.0004926809,0.00008260466,0.000010608206,0.0000062764047,0.00055851287,2.1624079e-8,0.000019034354,0.9659538,0.026681902,0.006184801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013634426,0.000015806141,0.0021487018,0.0003339391,0.000023487228,0.000001107937,0.000057818103,0.0000029089572,0.000008134796,0.005679443,0.9914331,0.00015919516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4679804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7944755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047178448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008410541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8072579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696545","doi":"10.7202/1114752ar","title":"One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Supreme court; Lawmaking; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Ultra vires; Rule of law; Legislature; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06088305575232307,"score_gpt":0.33318139531767976,"score_spread":0.2722983395653567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040806222,0.30167276,0.000007015279,0.10031287,0.00017277224,0.001125475,0.000016503529,0.00006745761,0.5962171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19589548,0.77954024,0.000062375264,0.023796879,0.0002422195,0.000113173104,0.000010210223,0.000008558861,0.0003308559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985935,0.00028976332,0.00034193057,0.00017027599,0.00039354162,0.00021097511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933493,0.00019246398,0.00013211806,0.00014188261,0.00013503163,0.00006358433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023184523,0.00009484634,0.00046612218,0.000011136576,0.000554608,0.000020041856,0.00019512298,0.000030911036,0.00013821271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035413518,0.00006623415,0.00011386109,0.0005510057,0.0008983342,0.00010105363,0.000096336546,0.00007097434,0.00031250404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029291828,0.00000984733,0.00005137414,0.0004967117,0.000028246895,6.9490034e-7,0.00018943584,9.574829e-8,0.0000033417778,0.98001796,0.008655997,0.010543342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011973947,0.00000824861,0.00042894532,0.005014975,0.00014067885,4.638511e-7,0.000031540476,2.3641694e-7,0.0000047194962,0.05215983,0.942003,0.00008759332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015088715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93334705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023154633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055112432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696590","doi":"10.7202/1114751ar","title":"L’accompagnement des personnes victimes lors d’entrevues sur les faits au Québec : pratique ou droit ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07283077099402628,"score_gpt":0.3271521683299568,"score_spread":0.2543213973359305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696590","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03177145,0.6700732,0.000018791194,0.21609356,0.0011859218,0.0012029865,0.00003474021,0.0003235516,0.07929578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37358505,0.5365547,0.00035319047,0.0029735595,0.0013068548,0.00023047393,0.000028893588,0.00007895756,0.0848883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961353,0.0007483721,0.0007863864,0.00064495974,0.0006647824,0.001020216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795157,0.0006464617,0.00032874808,0.00042671684,0.00028112833,0.00036540293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002086721,0.00044208713,0.0008414149,0.000054149077,0.0015146368,0.00017869117,0.00067703746,0.0001784857,0.0046243872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065499626,0.00041760935,0.00045834781,0.0010553618,0.0013837799,0.0007850186,0.00016143128,0.0002755211,0.0041941023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005762355,0.00020216375,0.0053371233,0.018848475,0.00012327069,0.00010069201,0.017840158,0.0000082567585,0.000018976294,0.61636776,0.1394934,0.20165396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009932184,0.000103864426,0.0021999066,0.016894072,0.0003767988,0.00001312148,0.0039477223,0.000022097289,0.000028965034,0.0009663644,0.9748705,0.00047723597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5802798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87971103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8353771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008770272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696846","doi":"10.7202/1114754ar","title":"Return to <i>Smith</i>? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008–2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Charter; Judicial deference; Jurisdiction; Political science; Discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.036966572389436986,"score_gpt":0.34042043962415347,"score_spread":0.30345386723471646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02762002,0.14645526,0.000002548831,0.28409058,0.0026202407,0.0025399455,0.000110941764,0.00033171993,0.5362287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7161137,0.20087324,0.00031771872,0.053055476,0.0009106856,0.000344559,0.00004797889,0.00007039488,0.02826628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975091,0.00027288048,0.00040786993,0.0004135447,0.00050150865,0.00089508906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986193,0.00014987685,0.000073002855,0.00032472616,0.00010168727,0.00073141657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606593,0.00017340784,0.0003942606,0.00011837764,0.0004635997,0.00010205381,0.0005358896,0.00009279562,0.0009929066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005006513,0.0001624095,0.00010495724,0.0011047607,0.00019949261,0.00027086714,0.00005651787,0.00019252965,0.002337257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003265124,0.000019972149,0.005273409,0.0010572525,0.000010112829,0.00034212548,0.0014144819,0.0000016276567,0.000015823036,0.058865912,0.9219269,0.011069092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047367063,0.00001947641,0.0015133376,0.003272938,0.00002095998,0.0000034960958,0.00026860778,0.0000037744076,0.000005685564,0.0002468004,0.9943798,0.00021774441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6856051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68849367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026401426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086742983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696867","doi":"10.7202/1114748ar","title":"Techno-Utopianism for Lawyers?: Abdi Aidid &amp; Benjamin Alarie, The Legal Singularity (2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Transformation in Law","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Singularity; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.048472664326298945,"score_gpt":0.26926694680309693,"score_spread":0.220794282476798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030971423,0.040656812,0.012042446,0.023917012,0.0012127564,0.0028046514,0.0014175371,0.0005172392,0.9171218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41511714,0.17470731,0.034300286,0.11031032,0.0025043974,0.008036483,0.0049081473,0.0010510451,0.24906486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981763,0.000018604816,0.0009139045,0.00039359898,0.00008043894,0.00041716962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873155,0.0001298082,0.00028383217,0.000716326,0.00006199435,0.000076482334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015950933,0.00021535346,0.00054077525,0.00007219561,0.00029062733,0.00024214164,0.0005330716,0.000117574,0.00041220133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024872384,0.00019253447,0.00032575353,0.000660378,0.00016019915,0.00056847674,0.000068966445,0.00019166947,0.0039998754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.983504e-7,0.000023948629,0.0000547551,0.0011093618,0.000029751462,0.0000010391885,0.000015986003,0.0000031929137,0.0000011330571,0.97753054,0.018189836,0.003039475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019896399,0.000019889472,0.00011873572,0.00034519678,0.000017012488,0.0000062997037,0.0000031031855,0.000048255275,0.000017004462,0.08092443,0.9180735,0.0002276486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002274412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043172238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006291011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000213199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161229912","doi":"10.7202/1125044ar","title":"Law School Success: A Matter of Heart","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Artificial Intelligence Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Key (lock); Word (group theory); Subject matter; Free speech","score_opus":0.048983064060842414,"score_gpt":0.34904820835494493,"score_spread":0.3000651442941025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161229912","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022665425,0.6948838,0.032242317,0.12428043,0.0011690913,0.0008615482,0.000029888091,0.00012732025,0.14638291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3212696,0.23486172,0.08803684,0.2591232,0.0025750182,0.0015708423,0.000051294923,0.00033967686,0.0921718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756396,0.00019640349,0.000888137,0.0006127685,0.00033908832,0.00039961524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805385,0.00019119553,0.00012116059,0.0012247621,0.00019838935,0.0002106444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008226048,0.00023872402,0.0005031243,0.000039041704,0.00013152791,0.00031993835,0.00097253616,0.00010187722,0.00660245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039022303,0.000226168,0.00030333444,0.0010373021,0.00048730226,0.00094967417,0.0002610446,0.00030343185,0.044767138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8640566e-7,0.00005225615,0.00004109986,0.005641896,0.000022651184,0.00000865917,0.000037485122,0.0000026123287,0.00011002197,0.8249046,0.15809968,0.0110788345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011442589,0.000027863722,0.00003071434,0.014187029,0.00009200609,0.00006293967,0.0000017268793,0.0007645752,0.0014671648,0.015723579,0.9674209,0.00021009248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003445901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007140157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80932117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006952393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018978026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161236244","doi":"10.7202/1125048ar","title":"Les modifications de fond à la <i>Loi sur les langues officielles</i> du Canada expliquées","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sedition; Poison control","score_opus":0.030572076613328416,"score_gpt":0.2981455261160358,"score_spread":0.2675734495027074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161236244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032463295,0.31767714,0.00017036298,0.024681298,0.00026943782,0.00033547057,0.00013322974,0.00013712914,0.65334964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422047,0.04311549,0.00008338629,0.0020576764,0.00043002708,0.00007598027,0.0000073389106,0.000019009989,0.012006386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883324,0.00022648106,0.0002202454,0.00017706437,0.00026164146,0.0002813036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992031,0.00040262128,0.00004619537,0.0001575535,0.000055077693,0.00013547791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005982232,0.00009597909,0.00020199014,0.0000069965054,0.00029106395,0.00008661176,0.0002223131,0.00005714302,0.00018079829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032863734,0.00007790881,0.00008116503,0.00016523284,0.00013544841,0.000081840495,0.00001981391,0.00009980152,0.00003968691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.0083482e-7,0.0000093749695,0.00006945234,0.0006230054,0.0000075649805,0.000012066728,0.00014477674,5.410186e-7,0.000014508137,0.8847466,0.10901773,0.0053542852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018855913,0.0000026830628,0.00018912498,0.0016487167,0.000022685006,0.000004079583,0.000050176222,0.000009816585,0.000015127995,0.00038521714,0.9975524,0.0001011443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9578935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017957813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007176339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3177029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161248724","doi":"10.7202/1125043ar","title":"Réussir ses études en droit : une affaire de coeur","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Identity (music); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01416774154994264,"score_gpt":0.25823657225210433,"score_spread":0.2440688307021617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161248724","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007950798,0.5650895,0.0001165022,0.04554823,0.0020293691,0.0004674782,0.000016211778,0.00019466812,0.3864585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084452,0.20620202,0.0003882328,0.023335615,0.009435527,0.0002458707,0.0001251579,0.00017213702,0.15165024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981227,0.000061700586,0.0006127764,0.00043248705,0.00026943957,0.0005008763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992472,0.00006374231,0.00014253957,0.00037828303,0.00011997938,0.00004828597],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009262816,0.00033164528,0.00055935537,0.000068388865,0.000319184,0.0008759665,0.00033788392,0.0001472314,0.0020069713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012592402,0.0002877155,0.00035756713,0.0010501685,0.00017223321,0.0020123331,0.00015770555,0.0003173489,0.0067401584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.814747e-7,0.00005073253,0.00009494909,0.047049284,0.000080914855,0.00013322773,0.000017268118,0.0000030173053,0.000010659073,0.7515321,0.1729502,0.028077189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086889995,0.000009667923,0.00008398201,0.055226937,0.00056599255,0.000053099022,0.000018811297,0.0002466826,0.0000025058314,0.0018893753,0.94147545,0.00034063635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011653885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003437356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76852524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019017815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016218022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161251050","doi":"10.7202/1125051ar","title":"Assessing Gross Disproportionality in Climate Change Litigation: The Case for a Justificatory Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Harm; Scope (computer science); Global warming; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.13073845640055584,"score_gpt":0.42592906000201,"score_spread":0.2951906036014541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161251050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013571673,0.446216,0.0002978983,0.06675661,0.0010791416,0.00686995,0.00032455067,0.000277134,0.46460706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97674793,0.016649049,0.00042098828,0.003961268,0.0007717822,0.0010999248,0.00005364159,0.000017821161,0.0002776034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989029,0.00025566772,0.000253051,0.00021084692,0.00014619442,0.00023133951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.00013978784,0.00005654952,0.00015970581,0.000009601381,0.00005794137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024702568,0.000081553284,0.00014244133,0.000010184686,0.00051032635,0.00016894977,0.00011735947,0.000045866094,0.00008769353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043872384,0.000056265315,0.00009894978,0.00020288031,0.00031679115,0.00038350487,0.000026026166,0.000101508056,0.000035842615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.525738e-7,0.000023215021,0.00011853399,0.002420601,0.0000034126224,0.000023852512,0.000521449,1.10957686e-7,0.0000011109566,0.977909,0.00051576534,0.018462671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033428092,0.000004000942,0.0005004615,0.0010400022,0.000049216545,0.00003078591,0.00025602427,0.00003015606,0.0000018978025,0.0022204411,0.9957404,0.00009317947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022412909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022378638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99522465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039893977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39250693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161262478","doi":"10.7202/1125041ar","title":"Les débats sur le secret ministériel sont loin d’être clos","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Secrecy; Power (physics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06832099190877544,"score_gpt":0.3557559540289905,"score_spread":0.2874349621202151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161262478","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008628905,0.7032878,0.000008699353,0.09292526,0.003560447,0.00044631897,0.00006694327,0.000091668044,0.19874997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10475905,0.76414454,0.00024143633,0.00475312,0.0021999623,0.00012574809,0.000040859053,0.000047740294,0.12368757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969011,0.00065466,0.0006771037,0.0006026909,0.0004820102,0.00068241183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864274,0.00038155046,0.0001135493,0.00039655328,0.00018639168,0.00027922008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018429125,0.00034077337,0.0007060988,0.000034654764,0.0008133532,0.00014764564,0.0003758715,0.00018497373,0.004139695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027339358,0.0003150975,0.00043379617,0.0006857832,0.00089860224,0.0003520702,0.00009652609,0.00032234084,0.0020596092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.839848e-7,0.00010223366,0.00008638289,0.007732325,0.00007255283,0.000016228722,0.0056645707,8.533162e-8,6.684733e-7,0.5176006,0.43297726,0.03574651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007137796,0.000038111448,0.0002146337,0.009022031,0.00023839925,0.000009717669,0.0014719395,0.000008535888,0.000003479486,0.003763141,0.98481286,0.0003457604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081579015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064557254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5518356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020575737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007699027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161281364","doi":"10.7202/1125046ar","title":"Incalculable Harm: Analyzing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immigration Detention in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration detention; Pandemic; Immigration; Dehumanization; Agency (philosophy); Mental health; Racism; Refugee","score_opus":0.04310444225365894,"score_gpt":0.3605109815044349,"score_spread":0.31740653925077594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161281364","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16007493,0.7809539,0.00051024137,0.038561646,0.0024516764,0.002398135,0.00012759781,0.0000464668,0.014875436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791316,0.11607848,0.0000068004365,0.0020674285,0.00015750222,0.00004104812,0.000027338918,0.000011577668,0.0024781974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971597,0.001258329,0.00063911267,0.00025732946,0.00042701006,0.00025848887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898183,0.00028602575,0.00025052833,0.0002937293,0.000093103794,0.0000947881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022913555,0.00017876619,0.0003032176,0.00003728287,0.00035874633,0.000083855724,0.00029299143,0.000087370994,0.0009417393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004273211,0.00009515011,0.00032120378,0.0013477596,0.00018856274,0.0003207329,0.000019408597,0.00029758376,0.000032854507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010393253,0.0001017918,0.05182107,0.004671391,0.00018485685,0.0000061931005,0.0044718822,0.0015505968,0.00032249393,0.6546556,0.1928169,0.08938686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078469544,0.00004558978,0.0038109743,0.0047524213,0.0001459088,0.0000057077064,0.00022533067,0.0027738467,0.00002526802,0.0015157204,0.9864677,0.00015305245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7936508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028685625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034942846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161304462","doi":"10.7202/1125042ar","title":"Debates About Cabinet Secrecy Are Far From Over","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Accountability; Mandate; Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.0394326879247478,"score_gpt":0.3489361584514766,"score_spread":0.3095034705267288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161304462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089633855,0.81783485,0.000019061028,0.061507512,0.0038042224,0.00050695485,0.0007434153,0.00012238487,0.11456527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12223626,0.7558809,0.00015400662,0.023786489,0.003212681,0.000058431495,0.00013996034,0.00008926065,0.094441995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969146,0.00051803055,0.00070328615,0.00058159145,0.0004571715,0.0008252746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984829,0.0003203174,0.00017466207,0.00048104415,0.000080821526,0.00046029084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007196406,0.00037197786,0.00074348116,0.000029609237,0.00043625434,0.0004551493,0.00046062237,0.00027025703,0.014817041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008125662,0.0003463578,0.00042987225,0.00049477565,0.0005089605,0.00033433564,0.00008466948,0.00048399108,0.0026844542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.378395e-7,0.000035462785,0.00014905169,0.0038644958,0.00007062124,0.000080332116,0.00047536386,3.3937718e-7,0.0000013385009,0.77154714,0.20227394,0.021501504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082400154,0.000021033762,0.0006416655,0.017379878,0.0002853719,0.0000053529006,0.00004957379,0.0000396216,0.0000048175752,0.03538333,0.9457191,0.00038785872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13118477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048458133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74344516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024361837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024332301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161308614","doi":"10.7202/1125047ar","title":"Putting Practice into Theory: Ruth Sullivan’s Contribution to Legislative Scholarship, Practice, and Teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012330954898794313,"score_gpt":0.3845760872051047,"score_spread":0.3722451323063104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161308614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015149602,0.18330376,0.0046906574,0.04919135,0.0003807489,0.0009606117,0.000006010274,0.00018092009,0.76113445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504645,0.011434443,0.009825263,0.026183223,0.0005200885,0.00007372324,0.00002015547,0.000027769554,0.001450861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655664,0.0022463691,0.00028778703,0.00031582772,0.00035230082,0.00024104827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739146,0.001950102,0.0001397609,0.0001468982,0.00023849682,0.00013326158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910362,0.00012538616,0.00021403753,0.000039891675,0.0005806661,0.0006111851,0.00014111133,0.0000704142,0.000119661774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028580762,0.00010464629,0.00006349585,0.0002111041,0.00008545456,0.003364497,0.000053712338,0.000435292,0.000240677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059648964,0.000013397703,0.0000058734518,0.00023566931,0.00003319945,0.000019827914,0.016488448,1.2057612e-7,0.00004007084,0.83866453,0.00063449575,0.14385839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004771171,0.000049824488,0.0000043608406,0.003913464,0.00017881735,0.000011911849,0.00070546457,0.0000073392534,0.000035250225,0.004837261,0.99008703,0.000121547506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026413344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067682203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98945254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017791802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011604657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161309311","doi":"10.7202/1125049ar","title":"Security of Tenure in Foreclosure Proceedings: The Judicial Role when Borrowers are Absent or Self-Represented","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Adversarial system; Consistency (knowledge bases); Security interest; Balance (ability); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.019482780086007144,"score_gpt":0.30902905460111485,"score_spread":0.2895462745151077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161309311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008037285,0.2890771,0.0000015183922,0.0839763,0.0006633569,0.0034336005,0.000048167225,0.00034974117,0.61441296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499202,0.044804066,0.0000567076,0.0019906044,0.00060825486,0.00012630528,0.0000056017043,0.000027408407,0.0024608853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984677,0.0001245806,0.00039246876,0.00027452665,0.00044886614,0.00029186945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.00006876067,0.000120304285,0.00016066639,0.00012824745,0.00007920338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013421917,0.00013971489,0.00037021236,0.000032094038,0.00019494786,0.0000938056,0.00034822494,0.00008609654,0.00057038874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001911446,0.000066109234,0.00014746298,0.0006096102,0.00020844422,0.0002420835,0.00005833078,0.00027635484,0.000038551967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002878785,0.00022730604,0.0018684523,0.005651461,0.00012477163,0.00007069016,0.012129352,4.0379726e-7,0.000026054544,0.788849,0.18416274,0.0068610036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089075525,0.00003198743,0.0001200277,0.004095569,0.00007052615,0.0000036688975,0.00038131993,0.000034967587,0.000026864574,0.0039647534,0.99107087,0.0001103684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076969145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022860564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007781551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017460632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161345549","doi":"10.7202/1125050ar","title":"Freedom of Association and the Resurrection of Effective Impossibility? A Comment on <i>Société des casinos du Québec</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Supreme court; Impossibility; Freedom of association; Legislature; Section (typography); Subject (documents); Scope (computer science); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.009596155487293988,"score_gpt":0.27739631410102866,"score_spread":0.2678001586137347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161345549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012342367,0.071500935,0.00009696741,0.03359235,0.00048270225,0.0023598203,0.00003794694,0.00006187349,0.87952507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831748,0.015785854,0.00000985172,0.0008539531,0.000043014934,0.000052142106,0.0000027389865,0.000003491677,0.000074142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898124,0.000396736,0.00029689193,0.00009437595,0.0001476386,0.0000831003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985342,0.0011536874,0.00014006344,0.000077679346,0.00007121937,0.000023125449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002832474,0.000060320042,0.00022415546,0.000013249366,0.00015788879,0.000044290147,0.000061061386,0.00003910254,0.00002666979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033186204,0.000040303337,0.00011354463,0.00016738131,0.00034457273,0.00027403512,0.000008047466,0.000069873495,0.00000827938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022074844,0.000046644593,0.00092481205,0.001695197,0.00006390498,1.5964918e-7,0.003785605,0.0000018480416,0.0000013933852,0.7931819,0.0037552067,0.19652127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038485925,0.000097700824,0.0006348825,0.0036839866,0.00013228515,6.059518e-7,0.00025858879,0.000027636232,0.00010812221,0.00930129,0.98529345,0.000076583776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027000153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016410727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98153824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022450351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000763599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97947913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}