{"meta":{"query_hash":"65b986286aaa","filters":{"venue":"Ottawa Law Review"},"cohort_total":46,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"exported":46,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/65b986286aaa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ottawa+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3179039051","doi":"","title":"Corporate Stakeholders in Canada—An Overview and a Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Statutory law; Stakeholder analysis; Statute; Stakeholder theory; Shareholder; Business; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.19511384780631877,"score_gpt":0.26623540703954557,"score_spread":0.0711215592332268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179039051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019297523,0.23525587,0.0036584614,0.3106341,0.0037515217,0.00051319925,0.00076187897,0.00012304689,0.42600432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33725965,0.37288105,0.011020521,0.07037994,0.0018615198,0.00046668726,0.0008194335,0.000105486855,0.20520578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597377,0.00040658528,0.00012000726,0.00020922693,0.0017442638,0.0015460794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971418,0.00036761235,0.00010787451,0.000045765413,0.0015335035,0.00080333324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028917224,0.00078033627,0.0005529333,0.0068573933,0.018565556,0.01257578,0.0026247096,0.007784145,0.0059869895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00280874,0.00057314365,0.00097472843,0.010737777,0.0067039425,0.00555912,0.004444916,0.0040870896,0.000718307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019266115,0.00011269513,0.0028904055,0.00079975225,0.00001024064,0.0019501699,0.0054805893,0.0007001946,0.00034632324,0.7920071,0.11603265,0.07965059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064451315,0.00001439792,0.0035430484,0.0010501435,0.00001229658,0.0003603856,0.0071307644,0.00043790526,0.00011735778,0.019409213,0.96786547,0.000052584095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97968537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18816042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18816042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33443198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94161886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207379046","doi":"","title":"Litigating State Secrets: A Comparative Study of National Security Privilege in Canadian, US and English Civil Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; State (computer science); National security; Law; Computer security; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.031101902546021624,"score_gpt":0.3390622694390587,"score_spread":0.3079603668930371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207379046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951166,0.010567246,0.00018283568,0.0059230346,0.000072801886,0.00010325311,0.00038415886,0.00000905885,0.08764094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98582286,0.0073442487,0.00012218376,0.00083642395,0.000019898796,0.000024024079,0.00018688475,0.000008403467,0.0056351167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879943,0.0013506513,0.0003494762,0.0003778715,0.004597453,0.005330284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742783,0.01092709,0.0031980083,0.00041241807,0.008975688,0.0022085384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070059113,0.00028746598,0.00073495274,0.00951509,0.018955685,0.008171967,0.0027607032,0.002608971,0.004463432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041218363,0.0005565977,0.00054901873,0.017330846,0.009251508,0.0034927956,0.0044119833,0.0025375108,0.00029478903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005800198,0.0005691528,0.32723132,0.00085645553,0.00019637926,0.0041451496,0.38995084,0.00092633266,0.001108692,0.12974529,0.043812677,0.100877665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038529215,0.000076641525,0.6103646,0.0007743717,0.0002347683,0.0008477309,0.3132072,0.0003401296,0.00041798287,0.0027535327,0.07083962,0.0001048304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99033314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99796534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109365694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109365694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16483454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79350734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207756132","doi":"10.7202/1105757ar","title":"A Pandemic Federal Election: Democracy Under Conditions of Emergency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Democracy; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public administration; Medicine; Law; Politics; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.04908734895265845,"score_gpt":0.3816702687375725,"score_spread":0.33258291978491406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207756132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057030036,0.11595421,0.0007685971,0.6302725,0.0067040343,0.000075205666,0.00062276877,0.000046306846,0.23985346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5385492,0.10617223,0.0011180403,0.273458,0.010572323,0.00018034293,0.0005896335,0.00007993257,0.069280334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913201,0.0031665033,0.00047579381,0.00065015286,0.0018821214,0.0025053094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912617,0.004589174,0.000989182,0.00062292407,0.0016909698,0.0008459466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075291824,0.00027837633,0.0004966938,0.0009860384,0.0065515963,0.007876629,0.0012000484,0.012346881,0.0047679488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018100962,0.00038589546,0.0005475471,0.0011849079,0.012586762,0.0073448564,0.0029083581,0.010584892,0.0009536494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043422584,0.000015212003,0.0008411412,0.00031272043,0.00001726638,0.00020749685,0.001199374,0.00024051264,0.00011210676,0.6486455,0.32997417,0.018391024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036778307,0.000025704747,0.006927219,0.0010852705,0.00003148162,0.0002263849,0.002178622,0.00015403799,0.000229953,0.08950013,0.8995246,0.000079800004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24568187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43231976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24568187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01877153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03858363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4885037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214438174","doi":"","title":"Book Review - The Importance of Being Monogamous: Marriage and Nation Building in Western Canada to 1915","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.00981036278964261,"score_gpt":0.26090158412470926,"score_spread":0.25109122133506667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214438174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018787779,0.80735266,0.00012879107,0.062420785,0.0147734005,0.00007115476,0.0017616885,0.00003573603,0.11157702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028326323,0.76792413,0.00027121065,0.020060629,0.005121244,0.00006432174,0.0009512817,0.000045283283,0.1772355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843794,0.00010683433,0.000073022056,0.00009067734,0.0009985039,0.00029299827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932423,0.00080209,0.00018199586,0.0000904981,0.005281447,0.0004016706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013051399,0.00058676815,0.000789781,0.005136082,0.0049686558,0.0040989188,0.0019298668,0.002622783,0.014450215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005415926,0.00043859,0.0003482794,0.0111225005,0.0034046988,0.0010693901,0.00082599977,0.0027111808,0.001665449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149630905,0.000010885516,0.0006132596,0.0008460454,0.000015686806,0.00005426463,0.0006209589,0.00016798773,0.000039587052,0.014829,0.9400774,0.042709913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033783533,0.0000042481106,0.004575642,0.0009926233,0.000022778228,0.00003245606,0.0006371394,0.000018656925,0.00002893609,0.0005187619,0.99315095,0.000014357474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98803395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07329332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07329332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14908446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53178275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019603","doi":"10.7202/olr","title":"Ottawa Law Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028347878023266385,"score_gpt":0.3589320265077607,"score_spread":0.3305841484844943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070545333,0.018231342,0.00040320854,0.029410366,0.0027750875,0.00035513059,0.010617803,0.00038669392,0.93711495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00436578,0.00663161,0.00035998572,0.009233444,0.0005186536,0.0004414067,0.0014575329,0.00020540153,0.97678626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916425,0.0007362358,0.00060590333,0.0009619823,0.004829352,0.0012240636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083775,0.0020992171,0.0004174674,0.001026465,0.004980292,0.00063879363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031766768,0.0013288347,0.0023203657,0.008780437,0.014120655,0.02057297,0.0039809747,0.017698523,0.19599406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764376,0.0027015514,0.0017025329,0.010659503,0.004539899,0.0044620656,0.0032888253,0.011372331,0.115580834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021295222,0.000021931786,0.00018163279,0.00020566914,0.000013364939,0.000072423056,0.00010067669,0.00009443324,0.000041132414,0.036098033,0.9467096,0.016439825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014001808,0.000005596294,0.00081479823,0.00043711482,0.000024029765,0.000026059222,0.000104791965,0.00006649089,0.00006773922,0.0047142226,0.9936941,0.00003096965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64468145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8352751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35531855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038632248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08044393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7148222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019642","doi":"10.7202/1105756ar","title":"What Meaning in a Right to Strike? MedReleaf and the Future of the Agricultural Employees Protection Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Agriculture; Business; Political science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013065922082001444,"score_gpt":0.24718017459919633,"score_spread":0.2341142525171949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006019112,0.03255456,0.0008724146,0.66390485,0.0028308858,0.00005267418,0.0003934676,0.00003851859,0.29333353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3548057,0.01521641,0.0014879254,0.46867302,0.003961194,0.0002248563,0.0002468673,0.00009592473,0.1552881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774894,0.006379483,0.0016364236,0.002351456,0.0062956535,0.0058476585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793881,0.012155278,0.0012609799,0.0014519326,0.004599668,0.001144132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150630735,0.00056461175,0.0012242408,0.0011803899,0.013215172,0.020570742,0.0031781376,0.044773683,0.0072078835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02895209,0.0010827009,0.0010122644,0.0014528331,0.027637312,0.012165069,0.0033960491,0.024005232,0.0028698551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034823373,0.000022228056,0.00045640752,0.00008027756,0.000008541619,0.00015215766,0.0027491986,0.00011767997,0.00010940364,0.85414296,0.1369081,0.005218368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005232165,0.000028564804,0.0021003112,0.0011050366,0.000039903,0.00016454502,0.004607056,0.00019982156,0.00025287003,0.16741288,0.8238807,0.00015598642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38794523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5017554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61205477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029190734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049289953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7713743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019924","doi":"10.7202/1105760ar","title":"Deceptive Design and Ongoing Consent in Privacy Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.048726572700979916,"score_gpt":0.2843932778620251,"score_spread":0.2356667051610452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03791133,0.085224286,0.114247635,0.21961705,0.0019438902,0.00045394409,0.00018112389,0.00014457888,0.5402761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901755,0.02919494,0.020055275,0.0233921,0.0015174709,0.00050262857,0.000060599465,0.000071018425,0.023451079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92648494,0.046189774,0.0042221216,0.004756648,0.014216501,0.0041300296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131784,0.07066214,0.004008221,0.006288581,0.0047673606,0.0010952778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047593728,0.000552874,0.00088626833,0.0029730955,0.0081094215,0.015994115,0.0027478547,0.012035673,0.0031606965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061062783,0.0007279696,0.0011510492,0.0034477306,0.11146817,0.0181989,0.0056723547,0.012814414,0.00051222736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029972005,0.000004922489,0.0000831003,0.00003215869,0.0000014062502,0.000028866887,0.0009381888,0.00011499853,0.000019367231,0.9956558,0.00056791375,0.0025503044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001778566,0.000027656528,0.000409557,0.00047389843,0.000009508002,0.000088031775,0.0011131448,0.0004280354,0.00018550873,0.9449144,0.052301537,0.000030874984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03821062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030279567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047593728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021421783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031984404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25170273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019937","doi":"10.7202/1105758ar","title":"Callow in More Ways Than One: The Supreme Court Causes More Confusion in Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04844921608553188,"score_gpt":0.252253833694125,"score_spread":0.20380461760859314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066718645,0.035229616,0.007206815,0.5294399,0.0038109638,0.000060411705,0.00038342728,0.000081810955,0.3570683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89995325,0.0057817735,0.0010704114,0.07017112,0.001828044,0.000050349223,0.00009576625,0.00014249113,0.02090689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968646,0.012688523,0.0012052986,0.0027588087,0.010748028,0.0039534564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548929,0.030748088,0.0028069403,0.0035645308,0.006383028,0.0016045086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014925364,0.00023548401,0.0006890751,0.0016447909,0.009224702,0.011762179,0.0011274909,0.008534847,0.0064201043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05269291,0.00047619874,0.0006832174,0.002811344,0.028782004,0.010672888,0.004653398,0.01115952,0.0007901241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047715086,0.000012228621,0.0011070938,0.00005213991,0.000015618927,0.00020308414,0.003334478,0.000118948665,0.00012965828,0.92581785,0.060199264,0.00896195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007718165,0.000034615874,0.00789732,0.0005302708,0.00008424337,0.00046642247,0.008833789,0.0005204788,0.0008899215,0.7368632,0.24367955,0.00012309973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09447319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13906606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09447319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02193447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017821783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1878466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019964","doi":"10.7202/1105761ar","title":"La place des autorités jurisprudentielles, de la doctrine et des faits d’intérêt public dans l’interprétation des lois au Canada : l’ascendance du contexte","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.026926064634788065,"score_gpt":0.33038732473353577,"score_spread":0.3034612600987477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050980482,0.2101202,0.007243111,0.381812,0.0024858415,0.00009062262,0.00086832145,0.00006535337,0.34633416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391302,0.088097766,0.0043710363,0.02550045,0.00092469464,0.000074074436,0.00023930594,0.00011964492,0.041542746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747967,0.0060397214,0.0006661484,0.002211147,0.0123394225,0.0039468366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96989095,0.011073226,0.0015225883,0.0015793174,0.013487037,0.0024468366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012032578,0.0005545843,0.0010485972,0.006646286,0.022924822,0.02471817,0.0030419438,0.0068140635,0.0051716473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019628812,0.00089982705,0.0005907175,0.007457555,0.06663209,0.009644376,0.0065590087,0.012956976,0.00049001403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031096366,0.000017378856,0.0018336381,0.00046373837,0.000032818512,0.000189044,0.019715236,0.00019078361,0.00028840313,0.9213877,0.026002875,0.029847383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039570208,0.00003083471,0.01640065,0.0027026571,0.000100734236,0.00026121418,0.029903129,0.0003712337,0.00075520744,0.16632774,0.78292716,0.00017988568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95963466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98080325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1548637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1548637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31151748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019965","doi":"10.7202/1105759ar","title":"Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario’s Intermediary Appellate Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Court of record; Business; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.013631076992749217,"score_gpt":0.2866863568475972,"score_spread":0.27305527985484795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053821295,0.03587412,0.0013644582,0.73769385,0.0011498693,0.000085757376,0.0059537324,0.00007165529,0.1639853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84838676,0.03491613,0.0037312994,0.05815662,0.0011490252,0.00010406165,0.0024278513,0.00011660878,0.051011667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834715,0.0032543754,0.00070088234,0.0017097015,0.0061159604,0.0047475277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96824014,0.00832296,0.003302591,0.001673468,0.01446366,0.003997168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015185391,0.000335268,0.0007636881,0.0027021861,0.018610781,0.021408182,0.0029588987,0.0063731414,0.010972247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044261742,0.0006594015,0.00072095694,0.008662401,0.016064541,0.019296095,0.0031601558,0.0061905696,0.0013719042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013935064,0.000043635457,0.044033967,0.0005602025,0.00008782702,0.0007735514,0.031776734,0.00063703646,0.00040640793,0.34516913,0.50860745,0.0677647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004136803,0.000030479698,0.04971244,0.0019343871,0.00018004447,0.00024887756,0.10719609,0.00090739323,0.0004902667,0.08736795,0.7516159,0.0002748507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97119504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99112064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15812474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15812474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17862691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020033","doi":"10.7202/1105957ar","title":"Le onzième sénateur. Une pause d’archéologie constitutionnelle récente","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05880410174452506,"score_gpt":0.26066869029273537,"score_spread":0.20186458854821032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075345035,0.35588858,0.0012816677,0.22462288,0.010949173,0.00004125851,0.0016170877,0.000070645634,0.3979943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28168046,0.11207197,0.0017336984,0.067824624,0.003699791,0.00017601094,0.0009055399,0.00028182074,0.531626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487454,0.0015102704,0.00021802187,0.0006530406,0.0015653503,0.0011788005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830353,0.0004857701,0.00017617228,0.00023660541,0.0006131058,0.00018484914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028614537,0.0006332986,0.00062587793,0.001924306,0.00717342,0.0076366104,0.0013005239,0.004280866,0.01386091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042914753,0.0007186842,0.0006068109,0.0029290176,0.014897054,0.005634861,0.00366129,0.008154389,0.0037265506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069907604,0.000011316663,0.0005593459,0.00026730506,0.0000127469375,0.00015211363,0.004413769,0.00012385315,0.0003347571,0.6339608,0.3345146,0.025579572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039361908,0.000005904602,0.0018024076,0.00027568234,0.0000052719997,0.000046794787,0.0007880822,0.000013340864,0.00016602759,0.010000192,0.9868759,0.000016318496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4659106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6798665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4659106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027147653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02168348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92639744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020093","doi":"10.7202/1105956ar","title":"“Other Materials” — Traitorous Love and Decolonizing the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02054674410615965,"score_gpt":0.31129869600413085,"score_spread":0.2907519518979712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001242487,0.10407944,0.009467865,0.16991003,0.009527142,0.0008830986,0.007715399,0.0010775002,0.696097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03809285,0.104217805,0.028600601,0.08616542,0.0027678781,0.0014231697,0.005247859,0.001156083,0.7323284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95891327,0.0036128326,0.0031245684,0.0017788236,0.028953733,0.0036168075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391179,0.009306323,0.0014478004,0.0026295981,0.045426868,0.0020715648],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015274463,0.0014396666,0.0012354107,0.011627452,0.018183954,0.0134449545,0.0066651357,0.0111703435,0.0318859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049327403,0.0019398752,0.0012672197,0.013607396,0.014974063,0.0071818237,0.003880379,0.007895592,0.013891846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000667546,0.000011048934,0.00017779434,0.00020881493,0.0000039543283,0.000027981365,0.0008733972,0.000098687065,0.00007729647,0.10959375,0.866413,0.022507716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056761705,0.0000035841074,0.00088100997,0.0004447515,0.0000074044565,0.000032926728,0.00036253393,0.000082525476,0.00009928637,0.0073779393,0.99066204,0.000040413408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98655504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09147215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27059332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66367996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020097","doi":"10.7202/1105763ar","title":"L’accès à la justice en temps de pandémie : leçons apprises dans une clinique juridique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.05683290319225533,"score_gpt":0.43044999421088836,"score_spread":0.37361709101863305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014431712,0.03804322,0.00086808554,0.85246164,0.0040093767,0.00010808523,0.00038728886,0.000034195647,0.08965633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39299735,0.032408115,0.0016574833,0.50611603,0.0053561493,0.00036588623,0.00027074484,0.0000731898,0.060755063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428496,0.009040249,0.0029695164,0.0031879873,0.010769029,0.0097482465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93831056,0.038174964,0.0030830204,0.0016774676,0.01321182,0.005542128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025762254,0.00060612627,0.0012186477,0.0019781732,0.02388158,0.013770288,0.003285068,0.030445311,0.0057237926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08154953,0.0012922302,0.00095027086,0.0020552042,0.029344328,0.00855346,0.0077060387,0.03733477,0.0010235377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016506358,0.000071688824,0.009963353,0.0005609462,0.0000612373,0.0024226,0.033966664,0.00026256253,0.00045641104,0.52005094,0.40005094,0.03196755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010455711,0.0001301784,0.02618746,0.0040674643,0.00017340136,0.0013673914,0.028915364,0.00032855626,0.00073367154,0.058742274,0.8788696,0.00038011483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64726096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77574193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35273904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042399704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12002672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70963275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020117","doi":"10.7202/1105955ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]The Ecological Constitution: Reframing Environmental Law by Lynda Collins","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Constitution; Environmental law; Law; Ecology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Biology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.011903751924816455,"score_gpt":0.28490443542301547,"score_spread":0.273000683498199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020117","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044746973,0.23991142,0.0009849907,0.52697206,0.049506597,0.00008910552,0.00068540935,0.00013570781,0.1812673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037728533,0.16201432,0.0016410275,0.31439286,0.029274924,0.00044567417,0.00087481074,0.00036278437,0.453265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995141,0.0011617318,0.0003254761,0.00064737664,0.0022052978,0.00051897747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99098116,0.0034957044,0.00071286695,0.00044773397,0.0039140326,0.00044850665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052778204,0.0009488735,0.00082094886,0.002719146,0.005597349,0.010795362,0.002994655,0.00985447,0.028366439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019514207,0.0008875871,0.0006590221,0.003965934,0.0071936073,0.009333153,0.0029568553,0.012101412,0.014949993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058143874,0.0000032269577,0.000047059344,0.00012303033,0.000003123013,0.000014891547,0.00022220094,0.000025939982,0.000046954756,0.03232565,0.96242625,0.0047559044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004316932,0.0000030310073,0.00027451298,0.0003441826,0.0000049272526,0.000013599106,0.00020132563,0.000020150494,0.00003630792,0.0033011262,0.99578214,0.000014331118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32020873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44972783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32020873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014702501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019410945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689851","doi":"10.7202/1111094ar","title":"Indemnité additionnelle, discrétion et démesure : pour une actualisation des paramètres de l’exception de la réclamation grossièrement exagérée","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04590768152160387,"score_gpt":0.3568684281283386,"score_spread":0.31096074660673473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8355754,0.0020645086,0.012737272,0.0061633703,0.00008305257,0.00011741097,0.0004950718,0.00006757311,0.14269629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98638815,0.00021793874,0.0022352624,0.00031489966,0.000014201825,0.000027212027,0.00006656449,0.00002063736,0.010715107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899685,0.002321118,0.0005479472,0.0012889899,0.0046612923,0.0012121863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97834146,0.009108995,0.004108768,0.001224174,0.0064200116,0.0007966281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007026981,0.00028043977,0.00049915805,0.0014159272,0.0042344616,0.006074375,0.0012885334,0.0012718545,0.005793895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028843096,0.00024183131,0.00044970625,0.0018136563,0.008378841,0.002595044,0.003014055,0.0027560964,0.0004237791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044666408,0.00012655181,0.35016894,0.0007175722,0.00030009513,0.00165477,0.078096196,0.023977207,0.0040835864,0.4255599,0.0073263464,0.107542224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040404102,0.00033174013,0.734402,0.0010797124,0.00017287675,0.0004161465,0.060875494,0.009892759,0.004998676,0.053625587,0.13376893,0.00039563657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5138623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6849232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018865643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012649069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396689874","doi":"10.7202/1111096ar","title":"Different Ways to Get to “Everything”?: Judicializing Everything? The Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom by Mark S. Harding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.03311867358496082,"score_gpt":0.27591329658897296,"score_spread":0.24279462300401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396689874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021653706,0.2565428,0.0008410312,0.55799294,0.002489627,0.00007921032,0.00047027227,0.000027256505,0.15990315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7113905,0.13399495,0.001695256,0.082014896,0.0015375406,0.00011733811,0.00031085208,0.00010160948,0.06883702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145144,0.0023894706,0.00028652552,0.0005426659,0.0034733466,0.0018566042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901967,0.0043314113,0.00065644307,0.00038906,0.0035951214,0.0008312641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065767146,0.0004647986,0.00067753217,0.0022548845,0.014838206,0.010264648,0.0016771627,0.0049856016,0.0028436156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016484031,0.00044899923,0.0004633112,0.00457134,0.027034087,0.0044135293,0.0024578387,0.0072870934,0.00042805093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040929117,0.000023428644,0.001573717,0.00024272129,0.000027939033,0.00021681192,0.012196264,0.000377029,0.00022173661,0.6986849,0.26788896,0.018505616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051602103,0.000021545613,0.018549722,0.0016347795,0.00007135209,0.00013774636,0.024940237,0.00036070088,0.00039255444,0.12358282,0.83010364,0.00015344002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9454687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07208926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07208926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10531495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5230466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690151","doi":"10.7202/1111093ar","title":"Les articles de revues de droit les plus cités de tous les temps par la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.04623083932897598,"score_gpt":0.3195410683068861,"score_spread":0.27331022897791013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396690151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024807684,0.19549116,0.0019139732,0.0935765,0.024430552,0.00045716664,0.026547961,0.00036356953,0.6324114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20241153,0.09968138,0.0026140925,0.052707117,0.0078300545,0.00048164936,0.01202338,0.00048866187,0.62176216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798753,0.001428675,0.0011088186,0.0011818428,0.013961809,0.0024434978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95007044,0.009439763,0.0021584446,0.001613159,0.035038404,0.0016798453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057307873,0.0005782058,0.000771919,0.011306721,0.008805834,0.009552065,0.0018082346,0.00405502,0.020282453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032869924,0.0006525926,0.0009910426,0.01339399,0.0052027297,0.0026618051,0.001745093,0.0037926286,0.0048620477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001311135,0.00003136106,0.0023959822,0.0013903992,0.00008577331,0.00025085203,0.0027929507,0.00022902891,0.0009699124,0.07716497,0.87393594,0.04062163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015740125,0.000009457409,0.0084465975,0.0006817401,0.000043400105,0.00008112508,0.00085262477,0.000044264205,0.00059187534,0.0014191703,0.98776186,0.000052120326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89939106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04844977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086404055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3515293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396690612","doi":"10.7202/1111095ar","title":"The Future of Treaty Interpretation in Yahey v British Columbia: Clarification on Cumulative Effects, Common Intentions, and Treaty Infringement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00900719023656461,"score_gpt":0.2936056872627835,"score_spread":0.2845984970262189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396690612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062323328,0.113064036,0.0024007685,0.33660948,0.002708692,0.00016314314,0.00032018396,0.00010219923,0.48230824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7597526,0.028726472,0.0024935033,0.12008564,0.0009001549,0.00021279434,0.00016217791,0.000087315966,0.087579384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98210984,0.004642709,0.00081593834,0.0012193004,0.0060786586,0.005133591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98542213,0.008398439,0.0005833181,0.0005728614,0.00399523,0.0010279698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011671578,0.00044250564,0.0010074856,0.0032554653,0.026986886,0.021886956,0.0041274577,0.019798368,0.004437831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021740966,0.0010625907,0.0008342579,0.0046886536,0.02583881,0.0049669915,0.003794746,0.027618617,0.00054696086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037149377,0.00002689913,0.0014403479,0.00023853152,0.000024482317,0.0008134781,0.009198169,0.0006589731,0.0003940596,0.9056538,0.05853534,0.022978839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121153804,0.00006455315,0.014290745,0.0034830258,0.00017381662,0.000335226,0.016143357,0.0011464078,0.0008055608,0.172703,0.79026747,0.00046560034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8867568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11324325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17579888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82164115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784720","doi":"10.7202/1111191ar","title":"Le secret ministériel : fondements, enjeux et réforme — un entretien avec le professeur Yan Campagnolo","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Secrecy; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Law; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.028154911735765422,"score_gpt":0.2395193848602777,"score_spread":0.2113644731245123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006739342,0.12478316,0.0011050026,0.69116545,0.005107902,0.000056675657,0.00048520483,0.00006562833,0.17049164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39724228,0.08775599,0.002406842,0.15907508,0.0034994641,0.00021201116,0.00044809928,0.00020260211,0.34915766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920094,0.0017897142,0.00026682578,0.00068789517,0.003296546,0.0019497436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941095,0.0024967964,0.0004943421,0.00047739095,0.0014817123,0.0009402797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00612024,0.00051860913,0.00059196836,0.0010691436,0.00822012,0.013029593,0.0014301075,0.008949227,0.008554185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145367,0.00075923384,0.00038252995,0.002182674,0.012352721,0.0069075893,0.0042870394,0.012588729,0.0018984652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042999796,0.000012608734,0.0006625562,0.00013976969,0.0000073186666,0.000083245985,0.0025241289,0.00010887745,0.00014001784,0.57764643,0.40427354,0.01435852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012110021,0.000005983523,0.0016037773,0.00025988056,0.000007591169,0.00005085878,0.0013305865,0.000059863232,0.00015383221,0.016486121,0.9800008,0.000028522552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5864302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6762897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4135698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04370177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073127106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8320108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784722","doi":"10.7202/1111190ar","title":"Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02260898432843,"score_gpt":0.31728082083192416,"score_spread":0.29467183650349416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049840815,0.14110963,0.0007854017,0.65434706,0.006096968,0.00021015001,0.0010267198,0.000034965058,0.1465482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56392217,0.1007064,0.0012008104,0.1481412,0.0015659701,0.00020756011,0.00048412167,0.00007797048,0.18369378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676896,0.0025720668,0.0007596235,0.0010212434,0.005161692,0.0037163827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832444,0.006112431,0.0006585144,0.00035241514,0.006882692,0.0027494768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009774037,0.0005307703,0.00083012175,0.0026268647,0.0152993705,0.013661609,0.0021064437,0.0094164,0.0068313335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016380053,0.000905626,0.00062917575,0.0036161165,0.011355589,0.0034607782,0.0038794982,0.011711302,0.0007061794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014794181,0.000047739195,0.008711874,0.00080996077,0.00014670935,0.0011350857,0.012310114,0.00076114456,0.001128718,0.4132255,0.5224782,0.039097022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010034982,0.00005167271,0.037827242,0.0027083538,0.00020143356,0.000268474,0.023742888,0.00037909133,0.0011748697,0.022499222,0.9106232,0.00042321318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99152136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11859801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11859801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27759892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784727","doi":"10.7202/1111195ar","title":"Promoting Privacy, Fairness, and the Open Court Principle in Immigration and Refugee Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Internet privacy; Criminology; Law; Computer security; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0333068797050475,"score_gpt":0.337187332621475,"score_spread":0.3038804529164275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009442899,0.25593606,0.009535933,0.471142,0.0046450086,0.0003624201,0.00039909006,0.000067073466,0.2484694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709387,0.16578627,0.015390566,0.19372767,0.0074965386,0.0007223489,0.00045152105,0.00012155759,0.045364887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8735215,0.056857523,0.009949898,0.0060899095,0.04263656,0.010944513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88774276,0.07885528,0.00611712,0.004692341,0.01933134,0.003261123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07300905,0.00046900782,0.001325165,0.0045815823,0.008682981,0.01687774,0.0034013467,0.017607316,0.0033669055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113173746,0.001045364,0.0010749615,0.004742377,0.03277645,0.012277958,0.007793434,0.013521104,0.0008777526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004499427,0.00004000553,0.0010251472,0.0009810166,0.000048589525,0.00017662988,0.0028046002,0.00037529622,0.00019103472,0.85299987,0.08824835,0.053064544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012034285,0.00008438632,0.006939014,0.0063993996,0.00019707308,0.00033801046,0.0028312716,0.0003084731,0.0008987972,0.40553987,0.5761606,0.00018273534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21903814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34377345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21903814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027615255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09755222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43552637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784731","doi":"10.7202/1111194ar","title":"Gatekeeping Reconciliation: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Piecemeal Erosion of Aboriginal Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Charter; Sociology; History; Business","score_opus":0.02823347896043296,"score_gpt":0.3104470827724549,"score_spread":0.282213603812022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061213188,0.023475993,0.0031966462,0.46679258,0.002846645,0.00019319497,0.0008356922,0.000104660154,0.44134137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77451336,0.006491655,0.0023293314,0.11909497,0.0009259907,0.00012492579,0.00023058325,0.00012437788,0.09616485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974962,0.0031602278,0.00061609433,0.0023298368,0.010681088,0.008250785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981012,0.006639238,0.0006780265,0.0012024738,0.008648994,0.0018193057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015251007,0.0004871719,0.00088543486,0.0014859863,0.040527325,0.019972092,0.0059505105,0.019304208,0.004755981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03229275,0.0008070151,0.0007524631,0.0033160755,0.024028039,0.0050998307,0.0055639725,0.02305312,0.00044536125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041611278,0.00002036548,0.0015696043,0.00007207133,0.000037623573,0.0005340776,0.012550532,0.00043911036,0.00026611023,0.77710176,0.19283052,0.014536718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337223,0.00003619619,0.012464087,0.00090368104,0.00022943468,0.00029490326,0.017821243,0.0016338397,0.001376851,0.13501869,0.8297554,0.00033190555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1432853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1432853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30889392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784733","doi":"10.7202/1111193ar","title":"The Lawyer’s Professional Duty to Encourage Respect for—and to Improve—the Administration of Justice: Lessons from Failures by Attorneys General","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duty; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04560010974734654,"score_gpt":0.4368172844004749,"score_spread":0.3912171746531284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006309928,0.012623429,0.000563105,0.95639354,0.0010200449,0.000024454836,0.00002589274,0.000033510376,0.023006048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5501649,0.03229766,0.0025625965,0.34882402,0.0011938316,0.0002089406,0.00009396563,0.0002730281,0.06438101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471508,0.025078848,0.0018486807,0.00300533,0.011692928,0.011223471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8576408,0.07604867,0.006558792,0.008564947,0.02440233,0.02678438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052511595,0.00058466214,0.0010786195,0.0013465463,0.022216689,0.016139071,0.0038203003,0.021876613,0.0049926937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11059403,0.0011824083,0.00066296366,0.0016895811,0.06519026,0.018690515,0.013587109,0.03610211,0.0019598857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000680066,0.00014809988,0.0037487966,0.000657897,0.000045035176,0.00063383137,0.097938225,0.0003538894,0.0002503316,0.16367115,0.61629695,0.11618786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090806265,0.00018356336,0.0105035715,0.002818388,0.000059783855,0.0003352515,0.095362335,0.00015329542,0.0005942671,0.08699208,0.8027325,0.00017410751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4104443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5846146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4104443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038892932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18343359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8161105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784763","doi":"10.7202/1111192ar","title":"“Untethered”: How the majority decision in Toronto (City) v Ontario tries (but fails) to break away from the Supreme Court of Canada’s unwritten constitutional principle jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Obligation; Categorical variable; Constitutional review; High Court; Constitutional right; Constitutional theory; Normative; Political science; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.023964222277309002,"score_gpt":0.292511346107088,"score_spread":0.268547123829779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12186247,0.00942421,0.0038203376,0.28202078,0.0023694271,0.00019703465,0.0007730221,0.0000672922,0.57946545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87993366,0.0015369673,0.0008250372,0.032390054,0.00028288033,0.00006259838,0.00014882244,0.00007714447,0.084742874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791957,0.0028255093,0.00029604742,0.0014622818,0.0029945616,0.0045020836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480224,0.0015798539,0.0002941329,0.00032631616,0.0018799828,0.0011174694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064199246,0.00039654004,0.0006041736,0.0007721231,0.038922783,0.012904082,0.0034175878,0.011765307,0.0069619357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012897354,0.00070300535,0.000761361,0.0015237137,0.029679734,0.004911559,0.0049507753,0.011982045,0.0007192067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067872956,0.00001596378,0.0025246246,0.00006841886,0.0000440317,0.0009430576,0.043236498,0.00031716452,0.00042581026,0.83115304,0.11269416,0.008509451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016771855,0.0000472039,0.018087415,0.00042805015,0.00028166437,0.00030346774,0.0630321,0.0010264732,0.0021004835,0.14332336,0.7708403,0.00036172144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99108875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13488336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13488336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12259799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879675","doi":"10.7202/1112505ar","title":"Mixing Oil and Water? Redrawing the Limits of Contract Freedom After the Criminalization of Usury","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usury; Criminalization; Mixing (physics); Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Islam","score_opus":0.04398418003195922,"score_gpt":0.2442726013845402,"score_spread":0.200288421352581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039857272,0.0556489,0.00472303,0.33268505,0.0033398676,0.00013417922,0.0004787811,0.00008864029,0.5630443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7480442,0.018450435,0.0024203954,0.09305055,0.001647887,0.00016446544,0.00016102895,0.00014171643,0.13591932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874117,0.0029015134,0.0007314978,0.0014607094,0.0038210393,0.003673666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882316,0.005649564,0.0012026316,0.0015961297,0.0025949953,0.0007249682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01123738,0.00032253642,0.0007640473,0.0012473156,0.010536257,0.012352558,0.0023111876,0.018525783,0.006511515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03326506,0.0007111324,0.00064099656,0.0012354449,0.029706964,0.01354809,0.0056097414,0.012939893,0.0012871762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005128497,0.000015298463,0.0003574838,0.00004947229,0.000008258366,0.00014518046,0.0024566562,0.000083414656,0.0002086585,0.9499039,0.03702,0.009700455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045480625,0.000059266855,0.005209462,0.0008670657,0.000059761038,0.00022674115,0.007198284,0.0003055238,0.0023108118,0.3541152,0.6294388,0.00016362013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31183437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42944258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31183437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023164963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028871667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62003857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879696","doi":"10.7202/1112504ar","title":"Speech of Justice McKinnon: Induction Into the Common Law Honour Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05323877694658328,"score_gpt":0.37113799284031673,"score_spread":0.31789921589373343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073291725,0.0377097,0.0019454389,0.7196818,0.0052934936,0.000115746836,0.00026382098,0.00005472032,0.22760612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39107233,0.02146685,0.0026990178,0.33923745,0.005538067,0.00043738223,0.00019459389,0.00014152337,0.23921277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98623484,0.004979618,0.0007211519,0.0017133123,0.0037677723,0.0025832031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97677386,0.01613373,0.0013703771,0.00097161037,0.0032257766,0.00152464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013469701,0.0005362087,0.000619193,0.0012744659,0.011477044,0.008270198,0.0025151263,0.017403277,0.0068730023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04779942,0.0007274571,0.00039721426,0.0010967791,0.015144726,0.010468829,0.007330339,0.017352022,0.0022923793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005533247,0.000021023461,0.00033037853,0.00016110786,0.000005927384,0.00035599235,0.011545936,0.000069863665,0.00038898026,0.5572505,0.40892756,0.020887448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003490046,0.000023517607,0.0028872427,0.0007364878,0.000017781535,0.00015512921,0.006210221,0.0001518872,0.00087408896,0.093988806,0.8948358,0.000084071486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22513056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25668126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22513056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019818062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038106877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4476403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879728","doi":"10.7202/1112503ar","title":"Allocution du juge McKinnon : Intronisation à la Société honorifique de common law","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027319031895876176,"score_gpt":0.3304635123510134,"score_spread":0.3031444804551372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027952064,0.076012656,0.0074749114,0.31940567,0.004208898,0.00014946921,0.00043652175,0.00009149652,0.5642683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56722033,0.036185782,0.004419201,0.11897006,0.0023309875,0.000401269,0.0003105306,0.00015868599,0.27000317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901237,0.0024438007,0.00047567437,0.0012874039,0.00362059,0.0020488745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908214,0.0047661015,0.0010077733,0.0007955245,0.0019492072,0.0006600239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008150476,0.000435234,0.00052642415,0.001386693,0.008402891,0.008399559,0.0021375439,0.010979344,0.0070552723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021817992,0.00048245682,0.00046013022,0.0022277567,0.016454186,0.0066847596,0.0042741075,0.009592435,0.0011212282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019272915,0.000008439892,0.00054574106,0.00006617201,0.0000044667063,0.00011690969,0.0026961719,0.000060766124,0.000107154345,0.9066907,0.07734116,0.012343021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003168136,0.000030204286,0.0060322196,0.00075386383,0.000033965225,0.00031189492,0.0032668996,0.00027272225,0.0007517617,0.14071395,0.84771776,0.000082968494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3151111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4040627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3151111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022665022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03634385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6265539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880635","doi":"10.7202/1112507ar","title":"Considérations sur l’équité en matière de pertes et préjudices","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.041809242749812146,"score_gpt":0.2662487581204763,"score_spread":0.22443951537066417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400880635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017740315,0.13802226,0.031844817,0.19232391,0.0044495505,0.000089445835,0.00080568687,0.000096558346,0.6146275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7230897,0.04939291,0.016454987,0.044927016,0.009590286,0.00028302,0.00044441767,0.0002593341,0.15555838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976546,0.006105449,0.0017681123,0.0019392014,0.011601641,0.0020396458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670708,0.014266076,0.0023969181,0.0023492277,0.012869748,0.0010472814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020205142,0.00067546935,0.0011152639,0.0040450143,0.0054369234,0.010740872,0.0036954293,0.008861571,0.0132727325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056937657,0.0009212216,0.0011073401,0.0031794142,0.0246173,0.010346847,0.0037782374,0.009839987,0.0021681397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017462982,0.000011146737,0.00049615616,0.000078488556,0.000012318655,0.0000883257,0.0006132156,0.00025829606,0.00010371869,0.9695124,0.019180238,0.009628343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010401006,0.000027540334,0.0032727204,0.0005544268,0.00003076592,0.00045012502,0.0008192772,0.00046406005,0.0003454991,0.7732208,0.2207557,0.000048694103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08151231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1036474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08151231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012919512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00940117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1620757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880852","doi":"10.7202/1112506ar","title":"Eliminating Guilt by Association: Reviewing the Limits of Ezokola in Canadian Refugee Law Complicity Decision‑Making (2013–2020)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Refugee; Association (psychology); Law; Refugee law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0331467607344857,"score_gpt":0.3531765005085518,"score_spread":0.3200297397740661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400880852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016377773,0.33246866,0.0016568811,0.5315969,0.0051825084,0.0005363364,0.0009456844,0.00007365464,0.11116161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41193992,0.27239674,0.007775237,0.27692974,0.0034183466,0.0008645275,0.00094396365,0.00017393038,0.025557593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.923683,0.016074609,0.005433587,0.0032114207,0.03940857,0.012188794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6845668,0.108035505,0.007961955,0.0040654265,0.18656935,0.008800973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09402403,0.00078279217,0.0013637741,0.0094415415,0.02080115,0.020756422,0.0071565253,0.009807858,0.0031134302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22587512,0.0011325437,0.0013890425,0.009637562,0.023482287,0.009391934,0.005254456,0.016195925,0.00055804255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120775316,0.000047820187,0.0057834876,0.0047476315,0.00017295251,0.00052275625,0.040637583,0.0010797582,0.00041251635,0.23946722,0.55110145,0.15590604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064859,0.000051947107,0.017184434,0.020197172,0.0005492857,0.00018721186,0.029891169,0.00044325762,0.00063668785,0.016033456,0.91446155,0.00029901962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98539585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99289674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22162333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22162333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53170484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90280664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400881146","doi":"10.7202/1112508ar","title":"Mediator Liability 23 Years Later: The “Three C’s” of Case Law, Codes, &amp; Custom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediator; Liability; Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03205114993770327,"score_gpt":0.27947457692898076,"score_spread":0.24742342699127748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400881146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008960285,0.092641085,0.0046689343,0.62691104,0.021989608,0.00019175682,0.0006713427,0.00008242082,0.24388346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24671923,0.023508467,0.0034717089,0.36212474,0.0059916424,0.00033181548,0.00038709844,0.00020552447,0.35725978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811064,0.003920501,0.0011503963,0.0028314786,0.0073302495,0.0036609168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881053,0.004632622,0.00079760264,0.0013626835,0.0037640652,0.0013377434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015850917,0.00060055585,0.000733919,0.0014483926,0.011390019,0.016884768,0.0029018095,0.03149274,0.01015291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034178697,0.00087743776,0.0017652377,0.0016238426,0.026080495,0.017465692,0.0069614444,0.0318004,0.0027324348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046044588,0.000027518612,0.00046491818,0.00005945302,0.00001347905,0.0005686729,0.0033378743,0.00008255817,0.00021249946,0.7778942,0.20255092,0.014741859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028423212,0.000025256972,0.0017002093,0.00043783474,0.000021785621,0.00041120255,0.001564162,0.00007384552,0.0003355957,0.058220692,0.9370959,0.00008503937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35751966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4320952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35751966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03889066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051902868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7108773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696509","doi":"10.7202/1114750ar","title":"Droit électoral québécois : repères et enjeux contemporains de Pierre Vallée","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2075482075410895,"score_gpt":0.44865955049136363,"score_spread":0.24111134295027414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39196843,0.04436679,0.00035581904,0.17696184,0.0016096908,0.0000685059,0.0020329398,0.00004235328,0.38259363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83429253,0.009676364,0.00013888087,0.013380089,0.00022445971,0.000045525932,0.00025578256,0.000032778844,0.14195359],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978948,0.00038850942,0.000037814123,0.00019190069,0.00049998093,0.0009870098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717134,0.00079191243,0.00018144542,0.000088305715,0.0009932093,0.0007738297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022009748,0.00026330358,0.00047200805,0.0015741603,0.02231345,0.0062662726,0.0010406268,0.0026687752,0.009083187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00453289,0.00036252907,0.00025275841,0.002946912,0.0069456436,0.0019671088,0.002835261,0.005134839,0.0005199173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020113631,0.00008501655,0.051064294,0.00037414845,0.00009406732,0.0027613551,0.18439138,0.0004471785,0.0005784765,0.34015417,0.35182327,0.06802562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362456,0.00002685723,0.10188437,0.00062892755,0.000046324923,0.00023309112,0.09193152,0.00014185243,0.00022846069,0.0030565443,0.80170345,0.00009497845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99118644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99619055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05356775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05356775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06691366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38866305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696533","doi":"10.7202/1114749ar","title":"Debt, Deals, and Dominion: Insights on Canadian Insolvency Law from Debt and Federalism by Thomas G.W. Telfer and Virginia Torrie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Dominion; Debt; Federalism; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.019887758426220873,"score_gpt":0.2977578292982002,"score_spread":0.27787007087197935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013084956,0.32259884,0.0011745922,0.38405275,0.0019145967,0.00006988055,0.0013840989,0.00003981355,0.27568036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38800198,0.41952962,0.0018584209,0.039648175,0.0018865278,0.00010465223,0.00088725047,0.0000965652,0.1479868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959182,0.0004608773,0.000108805485,0.00021797018,0.0024067776,0.0008875124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938883,0.0022445738,0.0002582029,0.0001232658,0.0029174022,0.00056837883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026375405,0.00062301947,0.00064839364,0.006566669,0.016103668,0.010753738,0.001468905,0.004329771,0.008788973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008739727,0.0005846892,0.0006069061,0.013295139,0.012669141,0.0045082816,0.0024024781,0.005189435,0.0006202314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025527648,0.0000148183235,0.0021122508,0.00024455984,0.000017366525,0.00022487856,0.0061563104,0.0005584441,0.00011527571,0.6324063,0.33077168,0.027352646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016953902,0.000008811797,0.012336691,0.0013038141,0.00004341842,0.000112354704,0.008165245,0.00066621084,0.00014808151,0.11078758,0.8662846,0.000126085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98569554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14232205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14232205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15078168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696545","doi":"10.7202/1114752ar","title":"One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Supreme court; Lawmaking; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Ultra vires; Rule of law; Legislature; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.06088305575232307,"score_gpt":0.33318139531767976,"score_spread":0.2722983395653567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0568102,0.032254666,0.23990336,0.23740327,0.004018504,0.00031610846,0.0002961624,0.00054289785,0.42845476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534597,0.0063847876,0.060569957,0.043273937,0.0033277771,0.00038350432,0.000114078364,0.00022336587,0.03226274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9637002,0.012389835,0.0023843835,0.008498809,0.009811794,0.0032149584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765213,0.013728887,0.002372426,0.0034308976,0.0029857233,0.00096072763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022818282,0.00037584198,0.0011250827,0.0023396683,0.005874638,0.013818563,0.0028899547,0.011419437,0.0018552374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037437726,0.00094626885,0.0015207849,0.0015599768,0.03402075,0.009175399,0.003700614,0.014526852,0.00089651934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036279403,0.0000044158996,0.00010583746,0.00000944782,0.0000036311178,0.000013257361,0.00028451247,0.000107346896,0.000059882972,0.9954846,0.0017306623,0.0021928358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004449553,0.000048954655,0.0005289609,0.00016263778,0.00002187818,0.000084388164,0.00020664113,0.0012605498,0.00048131653,0.90769595,0.08939928,0.00006511578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022893248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019145668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022893248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010884104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017139686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12067604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696590","doi":"10.7202/1114751ar","title":"L’accompagnement des personnes victimes lors d’entrevues sur les faits au Québec : pratique ou droit ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07283077099402628,"score_gpt":0.3271521683299568,"score_spread":0.2543213973359305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5871767,0.016545726,0.005249917,0.2180998,0.002595577,0.00022565025,0.00042536287,0.00019725233,0.16948403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950112,0.0108857,0.0019934108,0.013641979,0.00032652254,0.00009953177,0.00016972472,0.00007551202,0.07779651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960336,0.00147533,0.00009753479,0.00029397814,0.0009819507,0.0011176188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226815,0.0011187709,0.00091551995,0.0003304946,0.0033475137,0.0020195323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034622108,0.00047584888,0.00048032586,0.0010281041,0.016665524,0.005415459,0.001766342,0.0029413917,0.015549778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011505822,0.00036353065,0.00036733068,0.0009621159,0.007947023,0.0033430434,0.0035627529,0.004908712,0.0016040854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011126856,0.00021995066,0.08881598,0.0006984886,0.00007937518,0.0051178853,0.58292085,0.00031883593,0.0020615598,0.034515493,0.088182606,0.19695762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001433971,0.00015827121,0.07123929,0.0015822491,0.000062768246,0.0022572058,0.5973821,0.00037495093,0.00068153744,0.0032083995,0.32290292,0.00013596527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8304949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91947204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16950512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01998734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040610794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3410067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696846","doi":"10.7202/1114754ar","title":"Return to <i>Smith</i>? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008–2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Charter; Judicial deference; Jurisdiction; Political science; Discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.036966572389436986,"score_gpt":0.34042043962415347,"score_spread":0.30345386723471646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29828745,0.020108156,0.0016576316,0.2300274,0.0041266475,0.0004095215,0.022627486,0.00044575828,0.4223099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7580532,0.008813879,0.0029969504,0.0759424,0.00059449015,0.00014606686,0.0048075723,0.0002092265,0.14843619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430484,0.00018426645,0.00012949195,0.00043537884,0.0026043155,0.002341719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058187,0.0007674306,0.00042889445,0.00027187518,0.006309285,0.00164062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003705381,0.0003296492,0.00031755542,0.002530577,0.013697167,0.0054659247,0.0019808712,0.0034049302,0.0064879563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012486577,0.00047043458,0.00079981226,0.0031289598,0.0027124987,0.001324519,0.001435286,0.0043775,0.00074484583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111233334,0.00007421102,0.040588137,0.00029162358,0.00006634348,0.001499962,0.015401183,0.0007678658,0.0015939876,0.12395478,0.74330527,0.07234546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561181,0.00003843441,0.22023925,0.0005981317,0.00006713476,0.00037582766,0.0076082502,0.00058250787,0.0011536207,0.00302472,0.7660629,0.00021350791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99807966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99944264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13820125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13820125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21562926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696867","doi":"10.7202/1114748ar","title":"Techno-Utopianism for Lawyers?: Abdi Aidid &amp; Benjamin Alarie, The Legal Singularity (2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Transformation in Law","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Singularity; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.048472664326298945,"score_gpt":0.26926694680309693,"score_spread":0.220794282476798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003144843,0.46189517,0.00071494124,0.4881441,0.0071253306,0.000026345851,0.00025043302,0.000055620236,0.04147365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049749568,0.4558483,0.0028538702,0.27271295,0.017514097,0.00020516789,0.00042019403,0.00028062722,0.20041521],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996912,0.0006889945,0.00017548367,0.00042110117,0.0014668119,0.00033551283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589443,0.0019417153,0.00035972832,0.00017623337,0.0013795763,0.00024835806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037138916,0.00082405726,0.00062924024,0.0023356583,0.0051421425,0.011520736,0.0016779046,0.012053785,0.01837664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093399715,0.000823598,0.0003790957,0.0039420933,0.009087931,0.012914976,0.0034383603,0.008113903,0.0090387715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001086509,0.000008248762,0.00011886711,0.00015106949,0.0000037645518,0.000034803485,0.000569099,0.000028306718,0.000036614856,0.06180908,0.9142169,0.02301241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007931013,0.000003292941,0.0005355797,0.00060089165,0.000005536085,0.000074544536,0.00063345785,0.00004206632,0.00008279981,0.021618135,0.9763716,0.00002429882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14669679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2766677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14669679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013829368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014246379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29168588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161229912","doi":"10.7202/1125044ar","title":"Law School Success: A Matter of Heart","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Artificial Intelligence Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Key (lock); Word (group theory); Subject matter; Free speech","score_opus":0.048983064060842414,"score_gpt":0.34904820835494493,"score_spread":0.3000651442941025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161229912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037826464,0.14918171,0.00026709298,0.6289467,0.0045804386,0.00005834144,0.00076935795,0.000071106384,0.17829876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7660605,0.09239615,0.00019075214,0.0772559,0.0030395498,0.000052355786,0.00057692215,0.00012247413,0.060305443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893532,0.0022134855,0.00042061377,0.0009113043,0.0039104023,0.0031909992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96648616,0.005304307,0.0025386058,0.000843545,0.012024723,0.012802736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058723018,0.00023352607,0.00089654967,0.0031099985,0.009102951,0.013477295,0.0014136517,0.0026914238,0.009339698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02156983,0.00044795164,0.00032685776,0.0031307645,0.012406801,0.004848984,0.0036775004,0.0071879528,0.002587535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634244,0.00009359066,0.024330117,0.0003727984,0.000083615516,0.00019647728,0.0056435307,0.00008847162,0.000059812675,0.11165233,0.78075206,0.07668078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020576936,0.000052238513,0.097279556,0.0017419655,0.00006826129,0.00009952477,0.013420632,0.000054620436,0.00012066191,0.0103104515,0.8767751,0.00005648486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38924715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6161626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38924715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02761605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03384384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.773963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161236244","doi":"10.7202/1125048ar","title":"Les modifications de fond à la <i>Loi sur les langues officielles</i> du Canada expliquées","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sedition; Poison control","score_opus":0.030572076613328416,"score_gpt":0.2981455261160358,"score_spread":0.2675734495027074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161236244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07393361,0.006741847,0.006872852,0.053991362,0.0013468271,0.0002922426,0.0016037163,0.00031591335,0.85490155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48061803,0.0037872011,0.003991764,0.016935276,0.00024663808,0.00019803595,0.0004906591,0.0001658145,0.49356657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993159,0.00063904084,0.00016339072,0.00058590696,0.0032538485,0.002198829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966589,0.0005916871,0.00021806991,0.0002178745,0.0018981826,0.00041536658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002620911,0.0005911911,0.00030727108,0.0014665428,0.012314819,0.009663392,0.001838905,0.0033999006,0.010041305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005698548,0.0004642305,0.00054727733,0.0019630585,0.010149963,0.0021934446,0.003475805,0.0065540797,0.0014479877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051472758,0.000030113206,0.0043442384,0.00016372648,0.000022628552,0.00045428186,0.037017945,0.0004701369,0.0012879315,0.842215,0.082157224,0.03178522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011409595,0.000018041319,0.010393188,0.00023659466,0.000018552975,0.00010462482,0.008278289,0.00019932807,0.00085547287,0.0067520626,0.9730555,0.00007694183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9572446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91147745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08852257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13762203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6422792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161248724","doi":"10.7202/1125043ar","title":"Réussir ses études en droit : une affaire de coeur","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Identity (music); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01416774154994264,"score_gpt":0.25823657225210433,"score_spread":0.2440688307021617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161248724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13815904,0.03707104,0.002782239,0.27248666,0.0031525788,0.00017212979,0.0006248243,0.000088112625,0.5454633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6686777,0.008051393,0.001211967,0.038775023,0.0007701619,0.0000807304,0.0001322123,0.00007037295,0.28223044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733306,0.0026961511,0.00055626075,0.0012593033,0.004548771,0.0036065348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934144,0.0033592354,0.0008401749,0.001246606,0.0037549727,0.0014576553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056833606,0.00033911262,0.00043940314,0.0015931207,0.01588236,0.012271118,0.0020241782,0.006064758,0.0052710134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014460717,0.000511358,0.0004393143,0.002340059,0.020024892,0.004294508,0.0060327044,0.0082513485,0.00086435286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004993582,0.000022914019,0.006402019,0.000102004204,0.000014703748,0.0009990542,0.031272296,0.00017317824,0.00031742762,0.84882736,0.08454773,0.027271427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011729815,0.00003270127,0.0115601495,0.00034786414,0.000015452584,0.00042269565,0.017429596,0.00014012984,0.0005837128,0.013879293,0.9555033,0.00007328514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.760047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8754888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23995298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052357443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050289374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48273218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161251050","doi":"10.7202/1125051ar","title":"Assessing Gross Disproportionality in Climate Change Litigation: The Case for a Justificatory Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Harm; Scope (computer science); Global warming; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.13073845640055584,"score_gpt":0.42592906000201,"score_spread":0.2951906036014541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161251050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08136795,0.022617564,0.057028253,0.5389181,0.002650547,0.0008412471,0.00043013372,0.00017791409,0.29596835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082987,0.0034696194,0.017736083,0.06369389,0.0026436031,0.0006818504,0.00012939672,0.0000632172,0.0032835961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8224961,0.095612936,0.009392308,0.00879536,0.05083433,0.012868867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67773974,0.25502056,0.01726755,0.01270107,0.031851854,0.005419206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17592376,0.0011358616,0.0022567657,0.01345984,0.013720178,0.026682349,0.0065444,0.025927128,0.005044361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3226896,0.0011184574,0.0021119567,0.005443422,0.035365127,0.036910083,0.013030623,0.018706867,0.00059709203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004364522,0.000054381053,0.0042438554,0.00016721558,0.00009322512,0.0001453433,0.0019074903,0.0009658264,0.00007573838,0.9709999,0.010244545,0.011058755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007323974,0.000073180665,0.0033398115,0.0012379148,0.00014775207,0.00015975197,0.0032850266,0.0028723194,0.00025623757,0.9635469,0.024916073,0.00009177398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039124165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064314686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9608758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029871825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056903295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93038493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161262478","doi":"10.7202/1125041ar","title":"Les débats sur le secret ministériel sont loin d’être clos","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Secrecy; Power (physics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06832099190877544,"score_gpt":0.3557559540289905,"score_spread":0.2874349621202151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161262478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06765908,0.03979614,0.0019026581,0.18224679,0.0029730748,0.00015824787,0.0013890525,0.00015451926,0.7037205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49346465,0.023234967,0.0011241187,0.030269593,0.0006448399,0.00007228764,0.00058070215,0.000114950686,0.4504939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898073,0.0010606393,0.00031678326,0.000660542,0.00517208,0.0029826246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907115,0.0018663799,0.00054137013,0.00051271485,0.0054097245,0.0009582622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004525911,0.0003484353,0.00050688203,0.0016688823,0.012005529,0.008995332,0.0013218787,0.0029047679,0.017793652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012587616,0.00053137593,0.0004476174,0.0023849562,0.0068947067,0.002754519,0.00219066,0.0059980582,0.0022548651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013249976,0.000038888822,0.007210169,0.00050992356,0.000052228967,0.0004372744,0.009153497,0.0004585272,0.0012846824,0.63072914,0.27161768,0.07837546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012565703,0.000019046873,0.01092234,0.00030120154,0.00001930973,0.00007809262,0.0032726359,0.00006906078,0.00037920344,0.0034074632,0.98148996,0.000029214129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9340306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9648252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05805906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14205378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42124993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161281364","doi":"10.7202/1125046ar","title":"Incalculable Harm: Analyzing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immigration Detention in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration detention; Pandemic; Immigration; Dehumanization; Agency (philosophy); Mental health; Racism; Refugee","score_opus":0.04310444225365894,"score_gpt":0.3605109815044349,"score_spread":0.31740653925077594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161281364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513724,0.0025646943,0.0004864477,0.013805306,0.00013013033,0.00017509563,0.005598643,0.000025372525,0.025841903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910177,0.0020561384,0.000373066,0.0016506597,0.00003068972,0.00003741197,0.0014714857,0.00002279903,0.0033401547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549943,0.00038791628,0.00010311276,0.0002037892,0.0014905179,0.0023152155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921776,0.0011825286,0.0014057346,0.00024687493,0.0052863206,0.0026607728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001958532,0.00041041776,0.000497213,0.0031742062,0.007739306,0.003992644,0.0022797207,0.0010069655,0.0039093904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010616373,0.00029449913,0.0010089369,0.006791389,0.003294155,0.0014362452,0.0041260743,0.0034888543,0.00025855802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019349567,0.00016381174,0.91825426,0.00028407158,0.00019125505,0.0005322844,0.017147917,0.002307873,0.00018185783,0.008015333,0.018735318,0.033992566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015160442,0.00007635559,0.9019543,0.00041483398,0.000120637254,0.00011063584,0.07569492,0.0024991864,0.00020966622,0.000938142,0.017878763,0.00008736304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99779046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99885106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12842889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12842889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17617097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93182117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161304462","doi":"10.7202/1125042ar","title":"Debates About Cabinet Secrecy Are Far From Over","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Cabinet (room); Accountability; Mandate; Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.0394326879247478,"score_gpt":0.3489361584514766,"score_spread":0.3095034705267288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161304462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01344555,0.020482244,0.00206846,0.7705187,0.0033562642,0.000015805997,0.00014871225,0.00006336602,0.18990092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6475434,0.014414526,0.0012996806,0.28180274,0.0045461315,0.000040776446,0.000155767,0.00011979494,0.050077174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775263,0.0061797258,0.00083578203,0.0022756013,0.009460531,0.0037220654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396285,0.021538105,0.001753885,0.0016178994,0.008727176,0.0023999873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022168217,0.00031325905,0.0007387911,0.001311408,0.018664291,0.017620873,0.0021159179,0.011252575,0.005770603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0398188,0.0005960961,0.0006251691,0.0022816088,0.030948918,0.010793626,0.0033228686,0.027596645,0.0013697396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024430075,0.0000072907224,0.00036592467,0.00006436222,0.000010308487,0.000072605224,0.0067086387,0.0000850323,0.000111457666,0.9167752,0.06538102,0.010393774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020888014,0.00001931319,0.0018455613,0.00070749084,0.00002460083,0.00009720997,0.0073844567,0.00016859913,0.00040713846,0.10667438,0.88259435,0.000056113186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30622652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33862463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30622652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02600036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044875465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60888815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161308614","doi":"10.7202/1125047ar","title":"Putting Practice into Theory: Ruth Sullivan’s Contribution to Legislative Scholarship, Practice, and Teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012330954898794313,"score_gpt":0.3845760872051047,"score_spread":0.3722451323063104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161308614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008817957,0.06709365,0.017050428,0.68289846,0.0049850633,0.00006964463,0.00005399075,0.00018538315,0.21884543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961648,0.053417306,0.023844363,0.068577565,0.005468866,0.00032038867,0.000060550585,0.00036711904,0.051779065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9377758,0.038959086,0.0013665247,0.0028803712,0.015146672,0.0038715836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273787,0.056827504,0.0019191656,0.0036413234,0.0065613645,0.0036718866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038506016,0.0006210793,0.0013405188,0.005081454,0.027654385,0.018081374,0.0044386555,0.008296207,0.0028079252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047406122,0.00079754274,0.0006857047,0.004437831,0.12117875,0.008276794,0.008879837,0.0148023935,0.00071157573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058654778,0.00002197312,0.0002885453,0.0001469235,0.000009080455,0.00014493744,0.07038145,0.00029649446,0.000062774816,0.8506972,0.05246205,0.025482625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011658844,0.000014197076,0.000657812,0.00079227885,0.0000125593815,0.00013984299,0.018305138,0.00038713467,0.00019109073,0.21757,0.7618607,0.000057446417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5696764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6636365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08711984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16123511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86571574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161309311","doi":"10.7202/1125049ar","title":"Security of Tenure in Foreclosure Proceedings: The Judicial Role when Borrowers are Absent or Self-Represented","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Adversarial system; Consistency (knowledge bases); Security interest; Balance (ability); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.019482780086007144,"score_gpt":0.30902905460111485,"score_spread":0.2895462745151077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161309311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75214386,0.0068333093,0.015167896,0.04873194,0.0009330153,0.00019361771,0.000059432492,0.00008294366,0.17585394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785025,0.00072730484,0.0016369222,0.0032364947,0.00015849607,0.000036971815,0.000012380793,0.000012130738,0.0063289665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98501575,0.0071661104,0.00071955397,0.0014917762,0.0027167276,0.0028901163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98026556,0.013315789,0.0021198108,0.0009380714,0.0018721008,0.0014886837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016028885,0.00021203957,0.00037005113,0.0011909402,0.0206567,0.013285372,0.0020085338,0.007754227,0.0017479357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04517928,0.00046039867,0.00053573994,0.0008443427,0.017976165,0.0069794892,0.0058423537,0.008421582,0.00024213124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013513357,0.00024318938,0.0450009,0.00025227212,0.000052046686,0.010608874,0.29779264,0.0010735668,0.0074318256,0.5246491,0.023117056,0.08964348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012619716,0.0006879682,0.10970389,0.0015253237,0.00028442143,0.006738621,0.315794,0.004581285,0.009977578,0.20730105,0.3427699,0.000509826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027730657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09281431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027730657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008695554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013260236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084769845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161345549","doi":"10.7202/1125050ar","title":"Freedom of Association and the Resurrection of Effective Impossibility? A Comment on <i>Société des casinos du Québec</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Supreme court; Impossibility; Freedom of association; Legislature; Section (typography); Subject (documents); Scope (computer science); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.009596155487293988,"score_gpt":0.27739631410102866,"score_spread":0.2678001586137347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161345549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013687784,0.01744897,0.0013858431,0.6901235,0.003878723,0.00012177701,0.0007972421,0.00014529267,0.27241087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29873636,0.00621514,0.0013581932,0.5157838,0.0023935349,0.0002288404,0.00020488545,0.00013314007,0.17494614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251134,0.002921408,0.00063682906,0.0022934384,0.005786587,0.0058504967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98358995,0.0063783443,0.0005793395,0.0010376574,0.006595661,0.0018189689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013079885,0.0008020049,0.001262615,0.0019335569,0.032243807,0.018434487,0.00695979,0.029739771,0.009294408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016539093,0.0010210653,0.0019166716,0.00234629,0.039745856,0.0050464603,0.0030834533,0.024600474,0.001580277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029618237,0.000025915559,0.0011077846,0.000083400424,0.000017996985,0.00034287383,0.0070089395,0.00018769017,0.00022790636,0.72099054,0.26545635,0.0045209825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009672183,0.000029915427,0.0068533714,0.00063773186,0.00006535102,0.00017322104,0.008903095,0.000405461,0.00053153036,0.04422304,0.93780726,0.00027338357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13307719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17268883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}