{"meta":{"query_hash":"c855dff7b2f4","filters":{"venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c855dff7b2f4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Oxford+Journal+of+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1963957161","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.4.683","title":"Private Law and Private Narratives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Private law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0344943461739869,"score_gpt":0.3392931067860214,"score_spread":0.30479876061203454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963957161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83864063,0.0032966814,0.000032066833,0.01192861,0.00009713337,0.00010152341,0.0000025428342,0.000015224137,0.14588557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860609,0.00933051,0.0014742926,0.00043962005,0.00037079048,0.0000036595748,1.3008874e-7,0.000005973585,0.002314116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991447,0.00006916158,0.00027075727,0.00008804976,0.00024285933,0.00018449838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995039,0.00006931287,0.0001509117,0.000064617176,0.000117866846,0.00009340946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044132856,0.00008335663,0.00020649268,0.00002470935,0.0008040805,0.00009676483,0.00016305342,0.000029583824,0.00009528739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049945127,0.00006138791,0.00006240035,0.00012694346,0.00052493945,0.00045226674,0.000039162886,0.00015110725,0.0000050986782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032332995,0.000042663873,0.0010068786,0.000009003812,0.00013084713,0.000012092209,0.020038113,0.000009379613,0.00014451602,0.9676212,0.00070957845,0.0102433935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019681535,0.00007130057,0.0012468159,0.000030158997,0.000015138248,0.000008741108,0.0038551467,6.801261e-7,0.00007277241,0.015657932,0.9787689,0.000075589836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009800449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035588563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97805935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042183256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003704815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6184418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966706349","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqn022","title":"Assisting the Factually Innocent: The Contradictions and Compatibility of Innocence Projects and the Criminal Cases Review Commission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Commission; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.11955256119085896,"score_gpt":0.3720975451029989,"score_spread":0.25254498391214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966706349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90212655,0.0858985,0.00010228555,0.010253347,0.00013789532,0.00022066942,0.0000026761336,0.000004495801,0.0012535724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614911,0.13809265,0.00004040547,0.00023367487,0.000089079986,0.000003833572,8.552528e-8,0.0000019074394,0.00004729668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985108,0.00048669952,0.0004403748,0.00008055463,0.0003586758,0.00012291477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968178,0.0019155269,0.00047675974,0.00010523602,0.0006473959,0.000037235324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019783073,0.00008661266,0.00033771686,0.00003495799,0.0025810327,0.000042529326,0.00017869208,0.00001734143,0.0000061085975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031304036,0.00003522204,0.000099935,0.00034607807,0.0020403382,0.0001668714,0.00006749841,0.0002512586,7.3837505e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009217852,0.00045902524,0.09292537,0.0015909751,0.001839262,0.00012448036,0.5980594,0.000048308582,0.00004874391,0.024161423,0.011231586,0.2685896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007245483,0.000339244,0.046629194,0.0015526739,0.0029149547,0.0009140811,0.89037037,0.00010093754,0.000021561184,0.00022772874,0.05605346,0.00015126087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032217763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29231092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003747359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014728552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.047161122174245305,"score_gpt":0.36973777557530374,"score_spread":0.32257665340105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983103512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20746134,0.19544643,0.00017394219,0.035238694,0.0034301647,0.0003174811,0.000004099293,0.00003289478,0.55789495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916918,0.080602236,0.000703284,0.00041944374,0.0009155806,0.000003447205,1.7649387e-7,0.0000074260975,0.0004304434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998021,0.0002614572,0.0005377957,0.000083592306,0.000694208,0.00040193787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.0003706953,0.00063807814,0.000074816235,0.0005452242,0.0001269128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030525855,0.00010862105,0.00032694597,0.00008819318,0.0002546164,0.000071806615,0.0001696478,0.00005356611,0.000008036486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052540232,0.00008854563,0.00012961251,0.0002911636,0.00021207385,0.0014824398,0.00004617517,0.00024246833,0.000006888739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045928778,0.0008753174,0.030135464,0.00006249407,0.00044955022,0.0002949347,0.12567836,0.000061919825,0.0000846576,0.56855565,0.2285011,0.04484125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008846524,0.00020272903,0.007429712,0.00014718148,0.000107969136,0.000085506625,0.05681543,0.0000010430288,0.00006249764,0.01144486,0.9226431,0.00017526295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032901713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019394815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7094566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041624333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016764726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62899363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992116659","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.3.469","title":"Law, Reality, and the Oslo <<Peace>> Process","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03636209890835791,"score_gpt":0.3367810596233179,"score_spread":0.30041896071496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992116659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14380969,0.0221955,0.0000048315724,0.02192395,0.00037159794,0.00013548967,0.0000050283434,0.000019718289,0.81153417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322689,0.05347691,0.00005399589,0.00085992564,0.0008781066,0.0000037911068,2.1066249e-7,0.000009808512,0.01244835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823296,0.00027556228,0.00043912808,0.0001292041,0.00067554944,0.00024759633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873066,0.00032517506,0.00025696948,0.00007844096,0.0005310902,0.00007768063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017529085,0.00013895196,0.00036411942,0.000034454115,0.0011776404,0.00015493503,0.0003468572,0.000029034692,0.00010360017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041690364,0.00008026619,0.00013396633,0.00013943198,0.0016639554,0.0004473382,0.00007499451,0.0002043378,0.000009557884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036548916,0.000064469015,0.0005588399,0.000024298717,0.00056512444,0.000044013483,0.020262541,0.000018979883,0.000009275217,0.9466206,0.020897813,0.010568586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081780646,0.0001058198,0.0012424663,0.000083830426,0.00006344988,0.000025533853,0.0034808158,0.0000033044548,0.000012418226,0.007343157,0.9867163,0.00010512034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017468155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002235595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96581846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006324337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056550623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90575767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028351978","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs029","title":"Value Collectivism, Collective Rights, and Self-Threatening Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Political science; Reservation of rights; Liberalism; Minority rights; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Individualism; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.05356935510135198,"score_gpt":0.3510909317845046,"score_spread":0.29752157668315266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028351978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37794557,0.028242525,0.00035956322,0.008263487,0.0016923578,0.00027840154,0.000007264561,0.00006667486,0.5831441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942026,0.0016518735,0.00062822487,0.0002435726,0.0011801578,0.0000027034646,3.786543e-8,0.0000068495783,0.0020839374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849725,0.0003862431,0.00025321453,0.00007886461,0.0003717126,0.0004127042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720734,0.00202912,0.00016922377,0.00004489285,0.0003239186,0.00022548398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024516594,0.00011317671,0.00031017768,0.00008513425,0.0013771045,0.000054355663,0.00011208829,0.000085016196,0.0000108089025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015464796,0.00008138362,0.00009195919,0.00023722436,0.0006112952,0.0005936433,0.00005693582,0.00035786122,0.0000015214656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068125984,0.00015265508,0.0031583882,0.0000142760655,0.00039238864,0.000014922306,0.060460683,0.0000010849961,0.0000070747474,0.93412006,0.0012248412,0.00038549726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004607884,0.0003157122,0.0024511884,0.00006938504,0.0001776642,0.00004563296,0.0074014673,0.0000019117495,0.00014379655,0.7872213,0.20155273,0.00015838271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010055737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047194688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6162571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030391017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021902136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045937573","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqu001","title":"Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Library science; Media studies; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Law; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.03186637437268505,"score_gpt":0.3286171297088168,"score_spread":0.2967507553361317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045937573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.912098,0.018851176,0.000034630928,0.015662227,0.0009407342,0.000114725975,0.0000017780637,0.00000962793,0.05228709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330693,0.005284609,0.0006503588,0.00010617656,0.00028912516,0.0000015601213,2.5760032e-8,0.000004337394,0.00035684268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.00024701055,0.00034131916,0.000062221196,0.0003111672,0.0001566976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.00056298595,0.00041684005,0.00006400377,0.00042799657,0.000052205498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016479532,0.00007496912,0.00033074117,0.00010902474,0.0005290053,0.000059505343,0.0002121342,0.000026445228,0.000014921264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015473184,0.00004561562,0.00015758172,0.00013973485,0.0015620188,0.00015923506,0.00005265512,0.00017289082,5.384981e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010269267,0.00006318691,0.054758936,0.00004181865,0.0021337916,0.000011134619,0.055133864,0.000016634507,0.00018547541,0.7561812,0.12681192,0.0036351047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025486983,0.0009246951,0.04455316,0.00015374461,0.0004571989,0.000042754156,0.2897532,0.000011826688,0.0001324518,0.08674971,0.57442206,0.00025050118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016804942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001759987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6694315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002026829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022958948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5755323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071576387","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqq031","title":"The Landscape of Victim Rights in Australian Homicide Cases--Lessons from the International Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.032353275165603684,"score_gpt":0.3535857008888305,"score_spread":0.32123242572322686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071576387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97728145,0.00049567234,0.0000022376855,0.014797557,0.0016655616,0.00007307056,0.000009136249,0.0000045804977,0.0056707445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970489,0.0016978501,0.00010203979,0.0001261969,0.00075690757,0.0000025550228,4.2256818e-7,0.000003998055,0.00026110632],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998606,0.00010546814,0.00049106515,0.00010197961,0.00046633152,0.00022912267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980442,0.001092555,0.00040732167,0.00014646123,0.00025122394,0.000058234302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091803534,0.000104388426,0.00024180076,0.00004762904,0.00065328786,0.00011804317,0.0008120427,0.00005064743,0.00007009285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071812404,0.000053227126,0.00012700997,0.00014780097,0.0006350226,0.00030370321,0.000070120346,0.00041597296,0.0000018274137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003833824,0.00017537779,0.7086627,0.000003819088,0.00054236216,0.0002479981,0.19272557,0.000039319628,0.0019010929,0.07600977,0.01324711,0.006061528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068176974,0.00008337889,0.16150905,0.00011344209,0.00004693407,0.000038476526,0.08878624,0.0000086399905,0.001840678,0.0034391794,0.7432961,0.00015614888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049202223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08797849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73004895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004087293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012946509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92866355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0382762265684625,"score_gpt":0.3736142316878724,"score_spread":0.33533800511940987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091780201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76576066,0.0115743885,0.00052770285,0.047737982,0.00066579686,0.00019567179,0.000009227671,0.000044463442,0.1734841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769971,0.006196701,0.0035304555,0.0004525967,0.0023725308,0.0000033576046,2.2983221e-7,0.0000073670576,0.010439667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988344,0.000068941845,0.0003153301,0.00009846262,0.00043214724,0.00025075866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.000062602885,0.00025354096,0.00008471226,0.00033686517,0.0001216197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438017,0.000092750684,0.00022199098,0.00006431331,0.0006610644,0.000077777324,0.00031323347,0.000042748834,0.00006872549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012394309,0.00007256205,0.0001407474,0.00020824446,0.0002695031,0.0006431108,0.00007237585,0.00021481169,0.000014244279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010294669,0.000354448,0.008719889,0.000024625,0.00061048137,0.00010217305,0.050970044,0.0006972366,0.00049817335,0.7747021,0.09025398,0.07296392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381653,0.000056123652,0.0014489678,0.00002157204,0.000035525376,0.00001140431,0.00453082,0.000021563259,0.00007695444,0.0007676426,0.9926982,0.00009305549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001822492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000613426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90244424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024147888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029008032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50844395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919840808","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz010","title":"A Conservative Disposition and Constitutional Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Constitution; Relevance (law); Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06631842434658214,"score_gpt":0.3410341956654997,"score_spread":0.27471577131891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919840808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8786963,0.024529802,0.0002527402,0.020088715,0.0016400303,0.0003264538,0.00001741708,0.000019017512,0.07442948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210316,0.0064563863,0.00013408158,0.0005389658,0.00052940147,0.000005239358,3.8443733e-7,0.0000016791976,0.00023072802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991472,0.00006828526,0.0002154612,0.00008117321,0.00033553145,0.00015238786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.00019182706,0.00018345276,0.000025700228,0.00047492143,0.00005940537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041882688,0.00008113872,0.0002463754,0.000055488665,0.0005651508,0.00003358594,0.000070586684,0.00003082589,0.00003239704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002078211,0.000062043386,0.0000647062,0.00012826537,0.003165784,0.0005142659,0.00004865086,0.000111727284,0.0000069014623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061818755,0.000025632906,0.04715738,0.000007951301,0.0001996158,0.000018170407,0.0043466073,8.9742554e-7,0.000026444388,0.9454535,0.00056706974,0.0021349087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096303306,0.0003596037,0.058254972,0.00033420994,0.00010883187,0.00007052757,0.02652897,0.0000021945762,0.000027046379,0.036184743,0.8769354,0.00023046942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028062362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030534322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90926874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009147112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015979914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963039732","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz025","title":"Tort Liability for Belligerent Wrongs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Belligerent; Tort; Wrongdoing; Law; Liability; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Political science; International humanitarian law; Law and economics; Public international law; International law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04110685952970302,"score_gpt":0.38125806899854986,"score_spread":0.34015120946884686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963039732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93896216,0.0005673425,0.00009476573,0.0022664296,0.0019088855,0.00020132496,0.0000040908762,0.000007993458,0.055986978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694753,0.00020230107,0.00038205902,0.00009874094,0.00088976783,0.000003488553,3.3898027e-7,0.000004513145,0.028943446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903417,0.00003829142,0.00029635945,0.00008194117,0.00037852133,0.00017071053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876744,0.00021069874,0.00021729102,0.000054038814,0.00069779163,0.000052724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007968127,0.00006987816,0.00022119173,0.000039053033,0.00033585186,0.000049132792,0.00019409988,0.000030957213,0.000148622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000134195,0.000048529575,0.00017743872,0.000024791478,0.00013339326,0.00029421473,0.000025279496,0.00009167614,0.00000995212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070193484,0.000051541152,0.002327264,0.000018665898,0.00014770395,0.0000028622017,0.0027824903,0.00000772326,0.000015187346,0.99167633,0.0021898847,0.0007101362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025621406,0.00023451442,0.0014868458,0.00003524441,0.00002348008,0.0000021294322,0.0008484507,0.0000017652778,0.000109040884,0.06812361,0.92880815,0.00007055468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008502311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005820273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018081888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011932201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020911063","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa015","title":"Rights in Search of Protection†","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fundamental rights; Political science; Abuse of power; Law and economics; Democracy; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1757290176738067,"score_gpt":0.3946782900397401,"score_spread":0.2189492723659334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020911063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66859215,0.0020830424,0.00016502592,0.16519693,0.00046884228,0.00022716877,0.0000038638223,0.000013962145,0.163249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998755,0.00032050253,0.00012117155,0.00021866307,0.0005127175,8.0717876e-7,1.915102e-8,0.0000017340249,0.00006942951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893785,0.0001607046,0.000288863,0.000052381343,0.0003964906,0.00016373607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00014634061,0.00009650617,0.000026432032,0.0002810816,0.000100408935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007679433,0.00004664331,0.00021482767,0.000049072958,0.00017268703,0.000012099852,0.00013574936,0.00004478414,0.000015153428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008491536,0.00003454915,0.000070961694,0.00024178848,0.0003957476,0.00020763956,0.000032678687,0.00037442055,0.0000018312073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001507957,0.00007551589,0.0011360818,0.00007803632,0.000108803186,0.00005356808,0.038729712,0.00005032498,0.00012212474,0.9579896,0.00033297585,0.0011725079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010747126,0.0011426419,0.0029910884,0.0002759327,0.00004478845,0.000008418175,0.015105751,0.000021377307,0.0019406559,0.3574903,0.61969936,0.00020493816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068878365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042869538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058393718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012889304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16266918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109939883","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa032","title":"Conceptualising the Victim in England and Wales and the United States within a Spectrum of Public and Private Interests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059934967742272395,"score_gpt":0.3230514577663623,"score_spread":0.2631164900240899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109939883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96999395,0.0064891595,0.000066929955,0.023267323,0.000053668016,0.00005353412,0.0000010466196,0.0000024631765,0.00007191829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794227,0.020224668,0.00003490494,0.00021692646,0.000089451154,8.43365e-7,1.4814589e-7,0.000002474496,0.000007899598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912924,0.00027227442,0.00027060293,0.00006657865,0.00015819297,0.00010312454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896055,0.0006121442,0.00023237152,0.000031787175,0.00011565283,0.000047514015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097551465,0.00006531011,0.0002351499,0.000078303325,0.000327681,0.00012069422,0.000089391135,0.000016044654,0.0000029371324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078203523,0.000032903477,0.000031703836,0.0003595154,0.0010002255,0.00018931927,0.00007984495,0.00016844057,2.9199825e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003066006,0.000022062279,0.05032719,0.000048372825,0.00041863456,0.000018958122,0.9236042,0.00008070974,0.000026086482,0.013111876,0.00004414168,0.011991159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008846063,0.000175871,0.0032781493,0.00008217547,0.00023308957,0.000020736288,0.9711448,0.0004547386,0.000024291177,0.00096369884,0.022677202,0.000060665574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022159673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023572344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047540568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015893493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026583282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99424493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128361470","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab001","title":"Punishment and Precious Emotions: A Hope Standard for Punishment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Harm; Prison; Imprisonment; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Psychology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.05818256338828292,"score_gpt":0.39888545875225934,"score_spread":0.3407028953639764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128361470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56213206,0.25388992,0.0019589385,0.17338541,0.0024235111,0.0009832862,0.00008476838,0.000033414217,0.0051087323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8901895,0.09107919,0.014108329,0.0014406237,0.0011665737,0.000018294813,0.0000046608184,0.000021863445,0.0019709237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984657,0.00006431865,0.00059710705,0.00016441518,0.000461846,0.00024657816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972859,0.0002965983,0.00024535815,0.00013936005,0.0018322808,0.00020052846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091879355,0.00014568081,0.0005923987,0.00008472861,0.0002248909,0.000057141773,0.00005918111,0.00008315027,0.000017071758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011848744,0.0001082958,0.0001584261,0.00014106835,0.00010566834,0.00013435632,0.00008678615,0.000457038,3.5465342e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007833687,0.0023480966,0.060115196,0.01347309,0.011053128,0.007743114,0.049465153,0.000076868724,0.0009441851,0.09137026,0.21292682,0.5426504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024410328,0.0025366435,0.0021543049,0.00053948426,0.00039301527,0.0007908613,0.005347843,0.000007721285,0.00043920803,0.0024862278,0.98273623,0.00012740848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000097934335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040268136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7698094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001978897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047720454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44161743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135137383","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa055","title":"Is Majority Rule Justified in Constitutional Adjudication?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Majority rule; Voting; Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08701728811984924,"score_gpt":0.3589860886832909,"score_spread":0.27196880056344164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135137383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30870262,0.041513864,0.0012479085,0.34856886,0.0026374662,0.00046160724,0.00007225789,0.000070747374,0.29672468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095565,0.0056686383,0.00033363464,0.0019808789,0.0009594873,0.000004247573,5.8034897e-7,0.000002406327,0.00009446837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851465,0.00008844481,0.00046475726,0.0001305257,0.0005751371,0.00022646016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.0001592483,0.000245129,0.00003825144,0.00051384396,0.00012913307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053770957,0.00010681379,0.00034361827,0.00006780475,0.00065167574,0.000036405712,0.00021507246,0.00004812575,0.000095566276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010751963,0.000090744754,0.000123935,0.00040549252,0.0018234245,0.00036024902,0.00007486487,0.0002467075,0.0000181051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012814239,0.000092691385,0.051297277,0.00001698831,0.00027546484,0.000081609454,0.010840507,0.000035514473,0.000053468633,0.9194697,0.014738039,0.0029706105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082103704,0.00010409693,0.019487638,0.00009905461,0.00007728156,0.000011134432,0.016215635,0.0000045287484,0.00005659851,0.0318425,0.9310864,0.0001940693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043307003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048295298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9163484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001614369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055720913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67184836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164077844","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab019","title":"The e-Banknote as a ‘Banknote’: A Monetary Law Interpreted","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Banknote; Cryptocurrency; Context (archaeology); Security token; Central bank; Currency; Terminology; Salient; Economics; Digital currency; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Monetary policy; Commerce; Computer security; Computer science; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.012774073449455569,"score_gpt":0.2737501976427196,"score_spread":0.260976124193264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164077844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44741553,0.19082992,0.15811239,0.17636475,0.0029919685,0.0004292003,0.000006663945,0.00033871725,0.023510853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869258,0.004147369,0.007551732,0.0009964798,0.000094428426,0.000009018329,1.7344406e-7,0.000005866566,0.00026916797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883056,0.00008213006,0.00042445623,0.00017569672,0.00025493567,0.0002322024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843776,0.0002860251,0.00026522542,0.00044342197,0.0005149794,0.00005259049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046167863,0.00012726572,0.00027199351,0.00004943702,0.00055819,0.00014263466,0.00092099374,0.00006417718,0.0000035825253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020864884,0.00008150712,0.00015468222,0.00038182992,0.00028018604,0.00025507662,0.0005074335,0.00045975635,0.000006095662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003160901,0.00008017635,0.00009150958,0.000009706146,0.00049231405,0.00030032694,0.0011899741,0.000017029484,0.00042306512,0.93252575,0.0035969,0.06124164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047406918,0.0003070923,0.00032592102,0.00008283894,0.000048499867,0.001321134,0.00076834415,0.0011548852,0.00724164,0.1515168,0.83656615,0.00019262446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022519253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015147582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83296925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049520924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010115875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42932025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312219645","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac031","title":"Do Unjust States Have the Standing to Blame? Three Reservations About Scepticism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Skepticism; Appeal; Commit; State (computer science); Proscription; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criticism; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11056101664857143,"score_gpt":0.33983732995263766,"score_spread":0.22927631330406623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312219645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96378434,0.0031384348,0.0005345363,0.0252714,0.0012745447,0.00024701972,0.000054041742,0.00002149558,0.0056742057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492365,0.0013028391,0.00022365664,0.0013545443,0.00026797163,0.000020395843,2.3520745e-7,0.0000150338055,0.001891651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981898,0.00013521357,0.0004509282,0.00017112851,0.0007484767,0.00030446824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988193,0.00046539298,0.00028309907,0.00018461968,0.00017144298,0.000076139506],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073337153,0.00013561173,0.00024353353,0.00013278365,0.0016234088,0.0001276828,0.0005833202,0.0000116945,0.00014156461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095775386,0.00008251999,0.00012533736,0.0004478543,0.00016469843,0.00029923485,0.00046379596,0.00045102523,0.0000044935096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017171776,0.001190188,0.06811911,0.00020019116,0.0010622991,0.0025096056,0.08920668,0.0667326,0.101704925,0.19435927,0.41570088,0.057497066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008581529,0.0016096366,0.010327964,0.00013605105,0.00010304269,0.00026801162,0.027424112,0.00033242413,0.003986642,0.020410668,0.93417865,0.0003646686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025192772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001583815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51847774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015597968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057221212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319342492","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqad001","title":"From the Inside Out: The Coercive Power of Deportation and the Erosion of the Liberal Democratic State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Principle of legality; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Virtue; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Immigration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03711156370495888,"score_gpt":0.25145559715871596,"score_spread":0.21434403345375708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319342492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771193,0.0029524553,0.000023838425,0.013520383,0.0007523385,0.00015153119,0.000041198375,0.0000051716793,0.0054337606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951174,0.0006505022,0.0000059638915,0.00037050285,0.00017024933,0.000003037885,7.037128e-7,0.000005928426,0.003675671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989257,0.00015509455,0.0004737503,0.00005404892,0.00028498203,0.000106443775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839604,0.0008479745,0.00040417773,0.00011098814,0.00022006585,0.000020736186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036593035,0.00008862731,0.0002548043,0.000016733049,0.0004255189,0.000042602696,0.00018997065,0.000013642437,0.000012865535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021907559,0.00002828795,0.00013965856,0.00004840153,0.0010305461,0.00013955108,0.00007469703,0.00019764953,9.195418e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006044609,0.00011305829,0.005001009,0.000053084754,0.0010577207,0.000019784551,0.48799136,0.000109417,0.00012001172,0.45950103,0.041966014,0.0034630469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025496315,0.000678219,0.060227763,0.0006674379,0.0006751517,0.000014816851,0.12053997,0.0005752841,0.00013208645,0.6558651,0.15780258,0.000271994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021737492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007947352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3674514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019338331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003590411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.379709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410313106","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf014","title":"Devolution, National Pluralism and the Role of the UK Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Devolution (biology); Political science; Law; Statute; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.015437288382056834,"score_gpt":0.3033560439604644,"score_spread":0.28791875557840757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410313106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65020055,0.0480125,0.000068150795,0.118997596,0.0015489334,0.0002872969,0.000023008302,0.0000066166504,0.18085535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995883,0.0012250915,0.000022541179,0.00032585804,0.00021875852,0.0000018073271,1.9801796e-8,0.0000011664376,0.002321778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898934,0.00013291283,0.00026341603,0.00004187926,0.00045265164,0.000119792305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886435,0.00033872254,0.00022674863,0.000040449213,0.0005058429,0.000023880244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010441894,0.000046922152,0.00017364555,0.000016529571,0.00045404842,0.000026333722,0.00019027838,0.000023996057,0.0000052394817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013417503,0.000022157748,0.00008609511,0.00012983722,0.0007889971,0.00010110074,0.00006478532,0.000104207415,1.8076263e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022483184,0.0000072598805,0.024309685,0.0000046414384,0.00010115822,2.4006542e-7,0.0018568161,0.0000038558333,0.000010170675,0.9671538,0.0062290947,0.00030082907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042506895,0.000011483141,0.070397995,0.00010135601,0.000029796905,0.0000034042162,0.0032028316,0.000006230643,0.000037491507,0.081767,0.84398675,0.0000305996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027973806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022859382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88538677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009946027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020550172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42288214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}