{"meta":{"query_hash":"c855dff7b2f4","filters":{"venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c855dff7b2f4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Oxford+Journal+of+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1963957161","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.4.683","title":"Private Law and Private Narratives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Private law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0344943461739869,"score_gpt":0.3392931067860214,"score_spread":0.30479876061203454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963957161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079263486,0.0072879265,0.011068482,0.06520506,0.0003308408,0.00003467957,0.00036229595,0.00006620723,0.836381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723371,0.0011526488,0.0007539654,0.0005511291,0.00014866465,0.000019672592,0.00006297379,0.000035281933,0.024938514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775994,0.0010965633,0.000069106005,0.0002730192,0.0003691421,0.00043216348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918915,0.005431072,0.0006085297,0.00084945763,0.0004983071,0.0007211684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003339123,0.00043894304,0.00042433754,0.001918074,0.009396561,0.016009267,0.0009771177,0.0050750845,0.016151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010399889,0.0005497749,0.0002484183,0.0030047942,0.05373851,0.014198465,0.0056189974,0.004102046,0.00085479626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023605508,0.0000019254683,0.00008901243,0.0000055802807,5.304196e-7,0.000015750527,0.0066308663,0.000023042432,0.000007727329,0.99175066,0.0009618313,0.0005107051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010525524,0.0000037231391,0.0005300163,0.00005863918,0.000004853083,0.00005507664,0.015552966,0.0002528753,0.000064523774,0.92543536,0.05802398,0.0000074462528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062035684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06865143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062035684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012125567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008129026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12334919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966706349","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqn022","title":"Assisting the Factually Innocent: The Contradictions and Compatibility of Innocence Projects and the Criminal Cases Review Commission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Commission; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.11955256119085896,"score_gpt":0.3720975451029989,"score_spread":0.25254498391214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966706349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07740102,0.036208306,0.008329234,0.739286,0.002496143,0.00030137616,0.000091305636,0.000073796575,0.13581283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749968,0.008984372,0.007914006,0.08932808,0.0014564139,0.00043883506,0.00006627055,0.00013922581,0.016676022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7114134,0.2054479,0.01479665,0.010250204,0.037965845,0.02012603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4592798,0.44047153,0.026393076,0.01346353,0.0352085,0.025183512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20389533,0.0002607335,0.0011523041,0.008153159,0.013864607,0.044802092,0.0028600171,0.014309699,0.0034093831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32505465,0.0018766357,0.0008444175,0.005706554,0.041884135,0.021485148,0.019155707,0.015973821,0.00063789304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052963063,0.00004001085,0.005167915,0.0003285002,0.000038781694,0.0008127341,0.026536003,0.00023409398,0.00012450555,0.9069158,0.035680726,0.024068085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012243188,0.00016918223,0.02893623,0.0039080754,0.000102792954,0.0016266333,0.06808574,0.0010960447,0.0005923935,0.21185729,0.68306285,0.00044037309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03709327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044615224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20389533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030857809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064364605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.047161122174245305,"score_gpt":0.36973777557530374,"score_spread":0.32257665340105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983103512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5234341,0.0071506957,0.008888718,0.10162608,0.00070166594,0.0000798801,0.00002070201,0.000076150405,0.358022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057674,0.00030266782,0.00046867647,0.0019180023,0.000043903525,0.000012124481,0.000004514371,0.00000951128,0.0066637904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787957,0.0135571025,0.00051417144,0.001120716,0.0029448923,0.0030673128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98709434,0.0052369162,0.0013927568,0.0017501218,0.0011546427,0.0033712417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011609376,0.00013216819,0.00028464192,0.0007902537,0.013065693,0.009212464,0.0014164195,0.004817057,0.0055980366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023671396,0.00033351558,0.00021708982,0.0018794002,0.034986746,0.004542954,0.01240371,0.005318934,0.00058786257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027672479,0.0000992395,0.0068375156,0.00009872353,0.00000835652,0.00080048275,0.21632056,0.0002521191,0.00037111907,0.7145024,0.013005869,0.047676034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007987471,0.0002086907,0.035848126,0.0008493401,0.000013767453,0.000900721,0.29159456,0.0012392075,0.00031474547,0.17219104,0.49667627,0.000083729545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03909537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06315127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03909537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009630504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011676165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992116659","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.3.469","title":"Law, Reality, and the Oslo <<Peace>> Process","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03636209890835791,"score_gpt":0.3367810596233179,"score_spread":0.30041896071496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992116659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093387924,0.0039203633,0.003909254,0.04645758,0.0003009567,0.000035382334,0.00018431095,0.000033840523,0.8517704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97023815,0.0007596643,0.00077634177,0.0015953945,0.00010063126,0.00003700478,0.00003399307,0.000026673886,0.026432252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967913,0.0014425274,0.00009785822,0.00045772587,0.00043755118,0.0007729415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970283,0.0016980703,0.0004296136,0.0001720177,0.00025418957,0.00041777562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053370153,0.00032183764,0.00033050514,0.0018661692,0.011443638,0.019382933,0.0012294562,0.0037745347,0.013096713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075704665,0.0005230014,0.00036326767,0.0020394644,0.055697888,0.00990343,0.0051131425,0.0047711516,0.0006020646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088520255,0.0000097337,0.0002551969,0.0000063163825,0.0000010337234,0.000036952693,0.0039869994,0.000053646974,0.000022054332,0.99343807,0.0010956326,0.0010855331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064894724,0.00004065336,0.004615235,0.00038210463,0.000018112929,0.0000841881,0.038144685,0.0006448809,0.0002252653,0.7782015,0.17751911,0.000059302347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07796638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097529426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07796638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019855354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01611518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15502512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028351978","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs029","title":"Value Collectivism, Collective Rights, and Self-Threatening Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Political science; Reservation of rights; Liberalism; Minority rights; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Individualism; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.05356935510135198,"score_gpt":0.3510909317845046,"score_spread":0.29752157668315266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028351978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02346294,0.4681193,0.045522057,0.049021598,0.0018407914,0.000106221676,0.00008057762,0.000083635314,0.41176292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66127217,0.2860302,0.009994075,0.011220851,0.0029292828,0.0002864906,0.00015650822,0.000064463056,0.028045889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965617,0.0015477698,0.00011758972,0.00038342774,0.0010947963,0.00029459776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.0023346953,0.0003314392,0.00021098019,0.00027708238,0.00012989723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037652904,0.00046841064,0.0007356346,0.0026884673,0.001686383,0.0060581733,0.0014149433,0.002656346,0.0031931251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031205527,0.00019419,0.00077826955,0.0031157222,0.020510675,0.0073364517,0.003164822,0.0036582227,0.0004233021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002562533,0.000011040784,0.00010977701,0.00038044804,0.000008999709,0.000047873436,0.00096848817,0.00026453976,0.00004281847,0.9849165,0.0013370592,0.011909751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034320763,0.0000163933,0.00039927955,0.0012683488,0.000009622631,0.00011084072,0.0012274819,0.00025489778,0.00011114133,0.89289343,0.10369407,0.000011145259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019714385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016926741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060581733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042890245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028896928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045937573","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqu001","title":"Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Library science; Media studies; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Law; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.03186637437268505,"score_gpt":0.3286171297088168,"score_spread":0.2967507553361317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045937573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14801587,0.011664703,0.011496213,0.086217694,0.0003930718,0.000025881873,0.000057474103,0.000054956883,0.74207413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905466,0.0009484918,0.0006805716,0.0016595216,0.00011029223,0.000018648665,0.00001056075,0.000014545634,0.006010799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364763,0.004513494,0.000106073436,0.0004957557,0.0004617861,0.00077518297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507684,0.002745732,0.00045950816,0.0006925026,0.00032010826,0.0007052087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049863467,0.00021062142,0.00038161356,0.0013949064,0.006247606,0.009142935,0.00060389953,0.0034311248,0.0057705925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004313731,0.00019942979,0.00034422634,0.0008706876,0.08332661,0.0073107537,0.008933364,0.0036404238,0.0004972111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074273503,0.000006014306,0.00048810057,0.000010807391,0.0000021492228,0.00003169037,0.0046801427,0.00006222523,0.00006643908,0.99036646,0.00058671745,0.0036918367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007976334,0.00002881247,0.0016474475,0.00009969196,0.0000038338267,0.00007874372,0.0075144917,0.00013374539,0.00010543236,0.8887437,0.10162466,0.0000115586645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00312087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003553142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009142935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00373725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00236169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027115822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071576387","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqq031","title":"The Landscape of Victim Rights in Australian Homicide Cases--Lessons from the International Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Sociology; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.032353275165603684,"score_gpt":0.3535857008888305,"score_spread":0.32123242572322686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071576387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5781985,0.020188669,0.0018195746,0.08206141,0.0006260696,0.00013036079,0.000034491146,0.000033828965,0.31690708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740927,0.007480631,0.0006314603,0.0039252015,0.00018253492,0.000066034474,0.000017296426,0.00002677554,0.013577333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97708786,0.014366602,0.001007888,0.0010464188,0.0026974564,0.003793718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770005,0.013955234,0.0015890655,0.0016144584,0.0029745437,0.0028662118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024398776,0.00035416108,0.00076455896,0.0036780792,0.020071685,0.013105788,0.0025292917,0.004450847,0.005705504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037510358,0.0007740883,0.0005556642,0.003555437,0.0322285,0.010469447,0.018816149,0.008045733,0.00032703698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040120758,0.00011950838,0.0062342784,0.00027342362,0.000017288025,0.0035735772,0.76462257,0.00013345238,0.00046389413,0.16166899,0.003378679,0.05947421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016852622,0.00024052312,0.045531213,0.001585873,0.000051108553,0.0040587196,0.714639,0.00023252085,0.00048962707,0.028115222,0.20491809,0.000121254554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11635693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16259424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11635693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017763808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013508631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2313593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0382762265684625,"score_gpt":0.3736142316878724,"score_spread":0.33533800511940987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091780201","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010951948,0.070086025,0.000749369,0.39759877,0.4068637,0.00006206059,0.00017590048,0.00012855734,0.123240426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021164494,0.041761983,0.0017869611,0.15454516,0.29936513,0.00028435874,0.000445133,0.0002477336,0.48039904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435884,0.00080701173,0.00032800177,0.00059677963,0.0031262846,0.0007830558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99304867,0.0015306689,0.00032717714,0.000453148,0.0028559947,0.0017842317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361099,0.0015450588,0.0015039645,0.004445711,0.0066524786,0.011360182,0.0026073833,0.02591629,0.031420276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607512,0.0011441709,0.0019979968,0.00223879,0.0073385383,0.007289547,0.007844873,0.016762668,0.019711362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024996812,0.00006695021,0.00009514491,0.000112324706,0.00000833152,0.00019236194,0.00016405988,0.000094746414,0.00012491662,0.029685387,0.9522463,0.017184492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012907941,0.000022801249,0.00046770493,0.00028343525,0.000005568413,0.000098875935,0.00010835376,0.00003196736,0.000033037584,0.016159883,0.9827627,0.000012708465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048844647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009935288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031420276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10511124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919840808","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz010","title":"A Conservative Disposition and Constitutional Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Constitution; Relevance (law); Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06631842434658214,"score_gpt":0.3410341956654997,"score_spread":0.27471577131891756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919840808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18008071,0.02453655,0.024361478,0.1741242,0.0038039382,0.00009145368,0.00015689786,0.00012984783,0.5927149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985145,0.0010925081,0.0010175733,0.006636351,0.00030088617,0.000024566058,0.000023553004,0.000016646973,0.0057429215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900343,0.005355224,0.0004057038,0.0010517166,0.0019977116,0.0011552837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982655,0.010019972,0.0019102391,0.0018855307,0.0026480884,0.0008812473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011873266,0.00016569337,0.0004274507,0.0014994164,0.0035159497,0.006790218,0.00074215914,0.0039304704,0.003990606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024276724,0.00017870955,0.00035800345,0.0012165438,0.033954445,0.006021101,0.00396975,0.005937899,0.00048350784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011155133,0.0000066765265,0.000729703,0.000044577955,0.000005445315,0.000115746894,0.0025304637,0.00013943802,0.000119489894,0.989277,0.0017793376,0.005240896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015466643,0.000041856063,0.004510138,0.0005429129,0.00001599524,0.00018831054,0.005504012,0.00029251652,0.00040277373,0.852288,0.13615507,0.00004305539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045002787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004815782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011873266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053153685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003423106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06279254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963039732","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqz025","title":"Tort Liability for Belligerent Wrongs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Belligerent; Tort; Wrongdoing; Law; Liability; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Political science; International humanitarian law; Law and economics; Public international law; International law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04110685952970302,"score_gpt":0.38125806899854986,"score_spread":0.34015120946884686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963039732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41066462,0.002171008,0.043753237,0.031708766,0.0004535124,0.000112771566,0.0002489081,0.00022342744,0.51066375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369675,0.00019068358,0.000592434,0.0007328387,0.00007989603,0.000023175713,0.000026325517,0.00000566929,0.0046522617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993881,0.0016138487,0.00051802007,0.0007591642,0.0017884831,0.0014395089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897977,0.0040545682,0.0022292119,0.002029138,0.0012839256,0.0006054401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057391725,0.00031933235,0.0005483694,0.0018387003,0.0034552126,0.0039450866,0.0013097117,0.0071461243,0.005941993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014541023,0.00033127735,0.000567257,0.0008541006,0.012761867,0.0033142115,0.0064056665,0.005412611,0.00060324464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024568175,0.00003911457,0.005601934,0.000027087204,0.000019260258,0.00063874014,0.0028624872,0.0012093337,0.0004063296,0.9799748,0.0035569791,0.0056392085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002781316,0.000079411446,0.008838077,0.00028013144,0.00004561347,0.0017127276,0.0027865039,0.0051590954,0.000935879,0.9533612,0.026719268,0.000054299533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002795727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022617455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071461243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024305868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001986611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030351996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020911063","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa015","title":"Rights in Search of Protection†","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fundamental rights; Political science; Abuse of power; Law and economics; Democracy; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1757290176738067,"score_gpt":0.3946782900397401,"score_spread":0.2189492723659334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020911063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014185028,0.0855131,0.078888014,0.12759508,0.0033550756,0.000071615425,0.0003650518,0.00018077166,0.6898463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8326752,0.0480912,0.014712952,0.02005812,0.003231347,0.000209903,0.00047988756,0.00016647983,0.080374785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956857,0.0021138298,0.00019714102,0.00083245616,0.00080512156,0.00036573253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969283,0.00149637,0.00031942278,0.000691523,0.00041112656,0.00015334641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045700776,0.00040071228,0.0005828792,0.0009151227,0.0017472012,0.0065134615,0.0010327612,0.0036803985,0.013223506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055043125,0.00023216826,0.000605335,0.0010503082,0.018565433,0.008952501,0.003975871,0.0065108575,0.0025758285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019560268,0.0000016240439,0.000019400584,0.00003218216,0.0000018109796,0.000008706931,0.00015428725,0.000050277537,0.000060693208,0.99439764,0.0017409057,0.0035305845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052740565,0.000009872649,0.00012629243,0.00043634616,0.000005083599,0.0000789975,0.00033383138,0.0001401673,0.00022632354,0.79127735,0.2073529,0.0000076027363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016723267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009810419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013223506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002701161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036496143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044237018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109939883","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa032","title":"Conceptualising the Victim in England and Wales and the United States within a Spectrum of Public and Private Interests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059934967742272395,"score_gpt":0.3230514577663623,"score_spread":0.2631164900240899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109939883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82637393,0.0050298274,0.0039704395,0.028159365,0.00033367513,0.000082423765,0.000039211165,0.000019280313,0.13599192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207085,0.0010821696,0.00035483346,0.001302703,0.000026368656,0.000035980687,0.0000072267826,0.000009319566,0.0051106038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98803455,0.00868576,0.00033447394,0.00037918182,0.0008296143,0.0017363802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956774,0.002146014,0.0005711208,0.00017860951,0.00074139936,0.0006854387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005817684,0.00033678082,0.00072133826,0.004015931,0.012469871,0.013723301,0.0014503325,0.004298641,0.0046570725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061887065,0.000534973,0.000278935,0.0019997747,0.03314595,0.009057446,0.013403344,0.0033379346,0.00033497502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029028373,0.000036068424,0.00711785,0.0001088494,0.000010491725,0.0016897396,0.62229973,0.00012474136,0.0002872801,0.36158922,0.0016663903,0.0050405473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005937434,0.000045516095,0.004960335,0.00050643756,0.00001592031,0.0010698487,0.9334757,0.00027296168,0.000114656395,0.024178218,0.035315726,0.000038763632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07315539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088798895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07315539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009994454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009179887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14545918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128361470","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab001","title":"Punishment and Precious Emotions: A Hope Standard for Punishment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Harm; Prison; Imprisonment; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Psychology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.05818256338828292,"score_gpt":0.39888545875225934,"score_spread":0.3407028953639764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128361470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26836297,0.0036039269,0.0946625,0.12075489,0.0017324975,0.00025859362,0.00018285657,0.00021663046,0.5102251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445987,0.00015482417,0.0029875687,0.0011507641,0.00007600829,0.000039602844,0.000011483799,0.000013643477,0.0011063555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205315,0.0047494387,0.0004670825,0.0004283734,0.0017043832,0.00059747713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98658943,0.004678723,0.002756745,0.0019352831,0.0024178887,0.0016218545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075239115,0.0003640885,0.00040025546,0.0009200366,0.003084884,0.00743696,0.0012364472,0.0030164504,0.00242564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017373694,0.00028664467,0.0005271354,0.0004641334,0.038791157,0.0063635465,0.008067149,0.007409569,0.00031849317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004973848,0.00005110802,0.0037067982,0.000047863967,0.0000113813485,0.00016647765,0.009482545,0.00018598653,0.0002654808,0.97565436,0.0019972383,0.0083811795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047753372,0.00017273246,0.010163312,0.00028251755,0.000025237154,0.0012107707,0.016598376,0.0016079131,0.0006815156,0.94203746,0.027105868,0.000066531255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071137334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095406524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075239115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029208143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025245596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03979069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135137383","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa055","title":"Is Majority Rule Justified in Constitutional Adjudication?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Majority rule; Voting; Statute; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08701728811984924,"score_gpt":0.3589860886832909,"score_spread":0.27196880056344164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135137383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12678194,0.005320617,0.37704083,0.13790421,0.003876199,0.00029562844,0.00032278406,0.00029502655,0.3481628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622572,0.00053967093,0.02438964,0.006089867,0.001397751,0.00019100064,0.000052478812,0.00007950701,0.005002957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91863436,0.047566663,0.00397641,0.008112987,0.017542176,0.0041673966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90185547,0.06859009,0.0064372104,0.010869108,0.011113361,0.0011346795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068614855,0.00040083608,0.0021021233,0.0018119592,0.003816834,0.0070371334,0.003419482,0.0071243797,0.0053720386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12854925,0.00048038535,0.0012843466,0.0015980357,0.019273058,0.009312885,0.003676121,0.007954933,0.0016191354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005618042,0.00001469991,0.0006044458,0.00004338443,0.000036701567,0.00007930752,0.00047799054,0.00043452918,0.00017357263,0.98551404,0.0024574767,0.010107684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057792,0.000032191467,0.0003963723,0.00012128581,0.000024690813,0.0000620927,0.00027101094,0.003193451,0.0005981155,0.98561066,0.00961708,0.000022505308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022335513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018539318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068614855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026344438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037074361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3628744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164077844","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab019","title":"The e-Banknote as a ‘Banknote’: A Monetary Law Interpreted","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Banknote; Cryptocurrency; Context (archaeology); Security token; Central bank; Currency; Terminology; Salient; Economics; Digital currency; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Monetary policy; Commerce; Computer security; Computer science; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.012774073449455569,"score_gpt":0.2737501976427196,"score_spread":0.260976124193264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164077844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06161914,0.0025365108,0.18608129,0.03813619,0.0017036704,0.0001984467,0.0001676161,0.00023845599,0.70931864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903275,0.0011869781,0.029198444,0.006052771,0.0005627546,0.00027596907,0.00005565281,0.000088576424,0.07225145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951864,0.0026314456,0.00040109258,0.00050933124,0.0009324054,0.00033943678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928387,0.004016859,0.00058267417,0.0013343975,0.0010136518,0.0002138021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052901795,0.00027512404,0.00032356635,0.0009278658,0.0031232925,0.013425065,0.0011726203,0.006234762,0.011608764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123807285,0.00038974205,0.00033433628,0.0011602521,0.021022381,0.012304002,0.0033415202,0.004316446,0.0016535548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005579967,0.000003928581,0.00004801975,0.000010157635,5.7513233e-7,0.000049651808,0.000374521,0.00012761877,0.00009221274,0.99671435,0.0009456853,0.0016277307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028214869,0.000050742852,0.00035379504,0.0003855061,0.000010399218,0.00037058807,0.0019948601,0.0021893522,0.0013442582,0.8048608,0.18837771,0.000033846703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015488141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014133367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013425065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024781972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025500741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03883511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312219645","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac031","title":"Do Unjust States Have the Standing to Blame? Three Reservations About Scepticism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Skepticism; Appeal; Commit; State (computer science); Proscription; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criticism; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11056101664857143,"score_gpt":0.33983732995263766,"score_spread":0.22927631330406623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312219645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099806644,0.004075459,0.030448942,0.7152409,0.0022078238,0.00006619161,0.00011043246,0.0002283895,0.14781515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94599867,0.001528597,0.0032365676,0.043394525,0.00093358645,0.0000863316,0.000032018637,0.00005533295,0.004734404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908116,0.0045187715,0.00053318636,0.0012152961,0.0022498327,0.00067141146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649907,0.02289839,0.002760833,0.0035437746,0.0044278577,0.0013784983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023208067,0.00035255958,0.00080241845,0.0017836755,0.0044222753,0.009423364,0.003459144,0.008572637,0.0040674945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046349585,0.0003677399,0.0005253071,0.0011657992,0.06900419,0.01068639,0.0043040793,0.014027005,0.00078865176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005785548,0.000031306616,0.0010147935,0.00007765395,0.000024758489,0.00030407216,0.019171841,0.00018096613,0.0002507224,0.95695543,0.012007339,0.009923458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027217966,0.00002616593,0.0009886556,0.00035512296,0.000016669886,0.00018667028,0.011953725,0.0007901615,0.0003939637,0.9633978,0.021823427,0.000040521405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042730845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023208067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036744778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031288927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12273747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319342492","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqad001","title":"From the Inside Out: The Coercive Power of Deportation and the Erosion of the Liberal Democratic State","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Principle of legality; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Virtue; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Immigration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03711156370495888,"score_gpt":0.25145559715871596,"score_spread":0.21434403345375708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319342492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27089584,0.002334805,0.005291995,0.044431258,0.00015744392,0.000024191042,0.000027032496,0.0000423909,0.6767952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937598,0.00014755903,0.00015289824,0.00067276676,0.0000437609,0.0000070607857,0.0000024199987,0.000011498743,0.005202285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940621,0.0037181498,0.000099663055,0.00040273488,0.00071821484,0.000999142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940544,0.0034573278,0.0007308076,0.00080344774,0.00043922933,0.0005147374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006233879,0.00014524344,0.0002776969,0.0013110196,0.013452053,0.011859897,0.0007740076,0.002630245,0.0038944967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076183327,0.00025347277,0.00022257207,0.0011437164,0.07410554,0.0054982444,0.0072804918,0.0057189562,0.0003624102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008785285,0.000010171195,0.00032028722,0.000006192401,0.000001241227,0.0001089127,0.03013404,0.00009378285,0.00007018674,0.96625775,0.0011278772,0.0018607127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030273939,0.000045244607,0.003004903,0.00033373552,0.0000107236865,0.0003438067,0.048172444,0.0010768072,0.0008898697,0.7084063,0.23762985,0.00005598367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013554752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014393127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013554752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00923351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005761107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06699407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410313106","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaf014","title":"Devolution, National Pluralism and the Role of the UK Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Devolution (biology); Political science; Law; Statute; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.015437288382056834,"score_gpt":0.3033560439604644,"score_spread":0.28791875557840757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410313106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11055847,0.016035844,0.0046977084,0.12420212,0.0014133477,0.000049644943,0.00007816938,0.000047373076,0.74291736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776438,0.0010758629,0.0005093642,0.0056130374,0.0001769077,0.000022983215,0.00001620319,0.000016934257,0.014924911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214794,0.014323927,0.0010025246,0.0022048075,0.0044375234,0.0058833174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97245646,0.017306216,0.0012948018,0.0015749751,0.0053368495,0.0020307081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01566762,0.00024902492,0.00066733133,0.0022251224,0.015175118,0.018492004,0.0019116583,0.00967382,0.006313939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03879435,0.00044004992,0.00041220593,0.0017738845,0.029653339,0.00627343,0.00774358,0.00852433,0.0006223987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001777437,0.000005130807,0.0005422994,0.00002718445,0.0000062400213,0.00040275318,0.006028216,0.00020893502,0.000073839416,0.981413,0.0071536168,0.004120964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078977704,0.000059795482,0.00714441,0.0016683695,0.00005723426,0.00074685185,0.022278339,0.0018167747,0.00058322516,0.50330484,0.46204305,0.00021811215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31974533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35909736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31974533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04177832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017609116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}