{"meta":{"query_hash":"e72c25461911","filters":{"venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e72c25461911","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Oxford+University+Commonwealth+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1520347466","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651","title":"<i>R v Hart</i>: A New Common Law Confession Rule for Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Common law; Criminal law; Certainty; Exclusionary rule; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04186499080328038,"score_gpt":0.31676668930801893,"score_spread":0.27490169850473856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520347466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067774124,0.00016745046,0.06411686,0.07898476,0.0017800936,0.0008205812,0.000049975428,0.0001950562,0.7861111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708004,0.0003065304,0.0031603912,0.0031409406,0.00057884416,4.404938e-7,0.000011898889,0.000012944014,0.0057079527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839526,0.00038860727,0.00021946587,0.00018208691,0.00034943724,0.0004651503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855286,0.00033301374,0.00012771456,0.00019114053,0.00020069287,0.00059457263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376378,0.00013023667,0.00024011909,0.00005391443,0.0060892454,0.00030398698,0.00053455494,0.00013281454,0.000203219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048044974,0.00013455142,0.00014684009,0.00013762902,0.00031644545,0.0010874352,0.00008282277,0.00036321342,0.000013703283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845,0.000049776838,0.00035728482,0.000012189391,0.000011344494,0.000005448765,0.0014641095,0.0001157943,0.000021364986,0.98140055,0.013215202,0.003248468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008608386,0.00014907501,0.00015395133,0.000076521035,0.00004830439,0.000012373011,0.003408694,0.0002481718,0.000027504018,0.020011634,0.9748395,0.00016342902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030355997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28314072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028904964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039547205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01579050959091266,"score_gpt":0.2533316598242262,"score_spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591818506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195266,0.000019015468,0.00030415802,0.004302915,0.000102046615,0.00009264369,0.0000039836923,0.000028270173,0.57562035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764705,0.00055919774,0.00030059303,0.0003235517,0.00015389473,2.1354371e-7,0.0000014693795,0.0000043885275,0.0010096594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899113,0.00021134969,0.00014406703,0.0000993867,0.00021982397,0.00033425138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.00010612267,0.00013362193,0.000117381016,0.00008418508,0.0002124858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086603867,0.000071374634,0.00013411304,0.00006523562,0.0019900568,0.0000821711,0.00040300118,0.0000666139,0.00012112303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021720925,0.00007351188,0.000044045544,0.00022822738,0.00019821349,0.00048575015,0.000052049294,0.00040701337,0.000009571142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023195293,0.000047855065,0.030828618,0.0000049794376,0.000004654534,0.000004427906,0.001696101,0.00007435604,0.0000017956761,0.95935196,0.0001705648,0.0077914665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004935974,0.00004973472,0.026776431,0.000021147667,0.0000060205075,0.0000054030525,0.0027853162,0.00038478212,0.000004216673,0.0010619059,0.96831715,0.00009428158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006802718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05888196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016905079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031535197","doi":"10.5235/147293412803188829","title":"Ontario's Administrative Tribunal Clusters: A Glass Half-full or Half-empty for Administrative Justice?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Administrative law; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law","score_opus":0.14550716466108246,"score_gpt":0.40249299024392743,"score_spread":0.256985825582845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031535197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04873381,0.00007856274,0.014275205,0.12180866,0.0048174225,0.0014787639,0.00017831399,0.00012513567,0.8085041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968246,0.00009375719,0.008166559,0.0017713062,0.0011831811,0.0000047876447,0.000045285327,0.000015702415,0.02047345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973978,0.00064584997,0.0004235985,0.00022039025,0.0004929602,0.0008194261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619555,0.0012587768,0.0007139468,0.00019777214,0.0007546494,0.00087927724],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019586484,0.00022237188,0.00030730793,0.00015383477,0.005711875,0.00039775792,0.0005390092,0.00021340323,0.0020187795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053505006,0.00021566842,0.00017253692,0.0005447272,0.00043586246,0.003131818,0.00005806077,0.0012780748,0.000018267046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022764497,0.00080624496,0.0018209649,0.0000378906,0.00015285607,0.00003099161,0.065834604,0.0000038211683,0.0000033055028,0.9044339,0.022693837,0.0019051575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012429587,0.0005244874,0.0007119856,0.00003253301,0.00020145431,0.000087396365,0.10054961,0.000015315427,0.000009160291,0.0006622692,0.8957185,0.000244318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037344504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7149226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91951215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017855351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071869944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036854270","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2006.11421463","title":"Fairness and Equality in The Criminal Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0364001800636866,"score_gpt":0.3040428577709776,"score_spread":0.267642677707291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036854270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695868,0.00008152065,0.001823607,0.0033836483,0.00011354574,0.00016759287,0.000007980629,0.00002485751,0.22481044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989645,0.00026501904,0.00011116852,0.00030516923,0.00021287176,1.6578731e-7,0.0000032400164,0.00000345899,0.00013441524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984166,0.0007621638,0.00014117594,0.00011533468,0.00030011224,0.00026462448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950075,0.00011633316,0.000122041776,0.000095188596,0.00008108085,0.00008459761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016298149,0.00007100451,0.00009461282,0.00006576806,0.0021773486,0.00014826849,0.00037031976,0.000048429934,0.000020820527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031277614,0.00005999834,0.000028089,0.00022305624,0.00028674566,0.0005854871,0.000041852774,0.00041577916,0.0000017771807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018037643,0.00014722365,0.006233323,0.00008890543,0.0000043683845,0.00020812584,0.017636599,0.000037566704,0.000005751695,0.965325,0.0004638337,0.00966895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076658325,0.00014672858,0.02213246,0.00006560414,0.00008401034,0.00012230511,0.28612217,0.0000435783,0.0000097245575,0.010418611,0.67988247,0.00020577831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022081321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09174038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95490634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112460315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008012863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040206","doi":"10.5235/147293411797394397","title":"Towards a Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conventions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Political science; Proposition; Enforcement; Politics; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055376148452998486,"score_gpt":0.2838432333722492,"score_spread":0.22846708491925072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081040206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019450853,0.00019242776,0.005355382,0.001072101,0.00045935824,0.000092794624,0.00003121956,0.00002786211,0.973318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732596,0.0010024296,0.0012394706,0.000121975325,0.0000990862,1.7452575e-7,0.0000012171608,0.0000014914397,0.00020817657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989908,0.00015516218,0.00018034858,0.000089897294,0.00034691935,0.00023690035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.000048213977,0.00018744664,0.00006688963,0.00033343118,0.00019773794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046775854,0.00007060305,0.00015790413,0.00007492606,0.0027865584,0.00001417855,0.00033269968,0.000059168266,0.00057671656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004255896,0.00007372513,0.00012157649,0.0002325567,0.0037123584,0.0003158331,0.000076750046,0.00020725712,0.0000067867145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047837268,0.00009003489,0.006604511,0.0000029768878,0.00004005668,0.000031462558,0.0017467773,0.000001375806,0.0000021051665,0.9901132,0.00034307953,0.0009765574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005452774,0.000097525415,0.0112863835,0.00007047982,0.000059904032,0.000035305547,0.010842548,0.000002337496,0.000025960873,0.10001854,0.87686867,0.00014710288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142165385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013036792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016941974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085276447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081954869","doi":"10.5235/147293410794895287","title":"Canada's ‘Orphan Works’ Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Copyright law; Law; Political science; Common law copyright; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.009360850431118319,"score_gpt":0.2184555939818756,"score_spread":0.2090947435507573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081954869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050113898,0.00035188696,0.00034920542,0.07075752,0.0022378732,0.0005640713,0.000020763737,0.000082826635,0.87552196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98260695,0.0010607629,0.0005373564,0.002708719,0.00042068382,4.485391e-7,0.0000034425746,0.000018415529,0.012643229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997397,0.000692822,0.00025071693,0.00023952546,0.000671737,0.00074820983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790126,0.00057763874,0.00025881417,0.00032988016,0.00029945938,0.0006329177],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017946452,0.00019821525,0.0003234467,0.0000749318,0.007599677,0.0003595388,0.0010899912,0.0001811702,0.0010138523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015893024,0.00013569517,0.00009268521,0.00039152487,0.0022880707,0.0006313922,0.00017918322,0.0015883455,0.000007936865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056898,0.000033692766,0.0003142185,0.00000900644,0.0000691923,0.00012256735,0.003657511,0.000007636657,0.000008520386,0.84784305,0.14396226,0.0034033402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014416022,0.000036935682,0.00005653272,0.000035868405,0.000044758086,0.00005636526,0.004971072,0.00019199436,0.00004035206,0.0026544032,0.99026173,0.0002083921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86329836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99152356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93249303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005540979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022425905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473080226","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2005.11421452","title":"Statutory Limitation Periods and the Traditional Representative Action Procedure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Political science; Commonwealth; Statutory interpretation; High Court; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04205754940978738,"score_gpt":0.24605602946236166,"score_spread":0.2039984800525743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473080226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26233393,0.00022294116,0.0036651816,0.06270581,0.00055811665,0.0004910016,0.000018048137,0.00015280975,0.6698522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514806,0.00036293783,0.00024518976,0.002274319,0.0008581579,9.554466e-7,0.000024498058,0.000007947369,0.0010779286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930054,0.000049603947,0.0001408536,0.00012035073,0.00021890232,0.00016972992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.00007194261,0.00023813966,0.000080065016,0.00014617013,0.00003415747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030992154,0.00009331558,0.00010893797,0.00011765396,0.0019161352,0.00026376653,0.00013390931,0.000043632634,0.00014855461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024955709,0.00007677908,0.00007405245,0.00019155281,0.00024238955,0.002021115,0.0000495258,0.00033754832,0.000014091056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026811849,0.00007791364,0.0007519543,0.000023083949,0.000036947586,0.0000050547083,0.00024735506,0.00021968345,0.0000060206053,0.9750538,0.016901953,0.0064081363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018220049,0.000011182349,0.01552331,0.000016558846,0.000055804197,0.000053453405,0.0065347166,0.0052268803,0.0000011226139,0.0022913509,0.96836954,0.000094050636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018446535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018790857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014369305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005107207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547042486","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2016.1244451","title":"The meta-constitution: amendment, recognition, and the continuing puzzle of supreme law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitutional law; Limited government; Judicial review","score_opus":0.039699736664320764,"score_gpt":0.23535951758762744,"score_spread":0.19565978092330666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547042486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18728544,0.0026802795,0.000246102,0.0756589,0.00076360966,0.0004880011,0.000115194336,0.00001686751,0.7327456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480575,0.00473991,0.000019243835,0.00024675883,0.000055514076,6.0030305e-7,3.5948227e-7,0.0000010834633,0.0001307553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.00039640436,0.00019097526,0.00007570191,0.00027177852,0.00022493668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.0006480936,0.0001847992,0.000062960076,0.00016252117,0.000085655665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011313263,0.000065414315,0.00019226286,0.000018040853,0.002858827,0.00003182917,0.00023031892,0.000022982053,0.00004069096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006964018,0.000033697404,0.00006354198,0.00012309694,0.0024280492,0.00022137965,0.00006623621,0.0001396833,5.197778e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092814975,0.000006435306,0.0018940192,0.0000011103448,0.00009712386,0.000008864045,0.00058603426,0.0000010141579,0.0000015989095,0.99361736,0.00014050158,0.0035531118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001432001,0.0000149941825,0.0007218564,0.00005814501,0.00014680084,0.000012291198,0.0136373965,7.510306e-7,0.000016501916,0.06412328,0.9197511,0.000084864165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92500615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99794114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037148804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005396543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556718980","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2002.11421416","title":"Lord Cooke of Thorndon's Final Appeal (<i>Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council</i>)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Art","score_opus":0.10216009995123092,"score_gpt":0.27387997332235225,"score_spread":0.17171987337112132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556718980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25155726,0.0002125807,0.0027131941,0.011884966,0.00032513426,0.000362488,0.00013903124,0.00008664648,0.7327187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976445,0.0013862877,0.0010527039,0.00047093048,0.0002168268,4.470492e-7,0.0000044876892,0.000010458993,0.007093379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980038,0.00024683922,0.00029911537,0.00019910398,0.0007711236,0.00048004303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983005,0.00012566935,0.0003327327,0.00027546776,0.0005103819,0.00045525603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008078914,0.00014575693,0.0002616548,0.0000669274,0.0032779728,0.00007986678,0.00070975017,0.00014249375,0.00086872745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003356583,0.00015248249,0.00018126119,0.0003647524,0.0005371689,0.000459393,0.00014246005,0.000602302,0.00002110982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014465916,0.0006530909,0.013980124,0.00004257801,0.00007693409,0.00012869974,0.008205564,0.0001499751,0.00003140563,0.940044,0.02451316,0.012029805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070190063,0.00009402257,0.0014943748,0.000042718228,0.00004044449,0.000026952104,0.0038096649,0.00014378215,0.0000067637343,0.0008813428,0.9925933,0.00016472032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043132477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03678565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96808016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068664865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038657303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896173369","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2018.1530862","title":"Exclusive rights of patent owners versus rights of chattel owners: the implied licence approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Patent law; Business; Common law; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Political science; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.049150318670832915,"score_gpt":0.2853740135228697,"score_spread":0.23622369485203676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896173369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39990237,0.000068398425,0.0012092444,0.0022900908,0.0010974255,0.00037711594,0.00001989258,0.000037661797,0.5949978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828863,0.0002344053,0.0005188749,0.000068981986,0.00038159417,2.7228296e-7,0.0000034362467,0.000005665562,0.00049815077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981118,0.00037551523,0.00031777238,0.00018542467,0.000594372,0.00041514324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822044,0.00019281212,0.0006707244,0.00027598397,0.00037825605,0.00026179553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078062655,0.00014330515,0.00028272232,0.00012039261,0.0035054039,0.000044066837,0.0007834799,0.00013147436,0.00016804902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012643064,0.00009909314,0.00017372271,0.00040653214,0.0014590798,0.0003885226,0.0001130475,0.0003558794,0.0000025110603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017935068,0.00037618546,0.00101753,0.00002757248,0.0002449086,0.00002083271,0.059409976,0.000035950165,0.00013717507,0.9299997,0.0013667289,0.0055699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024449367,0.00070334494,0.0020822955,0.00007444715,0.00013696255,0.00001347876,0.030461367,0.00014992851,0.00043306628,0.002503057,0.9607542,0.00024287758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012078142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017421598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020215478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033719684","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2020.1773017","title":"Remedying formal irregularities in wills: a comparative analysis of testamentary rescue in Canada and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03996326956342198,"score_gpt":0.2599483294766122,"score_spread":0.21998505991319026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033719684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606287,0.00037435064,0.0000564519,0.0015184804,0.000054343574,0.00014928254,0.00006729194,0.000009425532,0.037141662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990118,0.000119655546,0.00060263893,0.00020273925,0.000025981031,1.6539471e-7,0.000003526256,0.000003260096,0.000030205887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0004669295,0.00032559322,0.00015846871,0.0004400937,0.0004304686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990889,0.00019926805,0.00020948185,0.00009215341,0.00008251583,0.00032772537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781958,0.000107322165,0.00045573,0.00025816457,0.00056204834,0.00003746202,0.00037136103,0.000053008564,0.000045181405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020436,0.00012014974,0.00006254851,0.0014938513,0.00031185016,0.0005464399,0.00015398762,0.00047444488,1.1575285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368317,0.000034265606,0.44562656,0.000029316428,0.00015918474,0.000218016,0.534805,0.0013619574,0.0000023255568,0.017091667,0.000101217425,0.00033365353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016266509,0.00014719876,0.073663145,0.00012294513,0.00026194486,0.0000019990189,0.78391474,0.0036822585,0.000007644053,0.00023038723,0.1360085,0.00033256185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9009472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3719634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011026668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48995644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210046552","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2021.1991648","title":"The HMCS Unconscionability: adrift in the Atlantic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Reinterpretation; Law; Commonwealth; Supreme court; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017214623016518733,"score_gpt":0.2026091340541372,"score_spread":0.18539451103761845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210046552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86672634,0.00014599398,0.00006813267,0.022407735,0.0005588818,0.00016832528,0.0000016593765,0.000034079356,0.109888844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958988,0.0001751233,0.000030767944,0.00262925,0.00054910267,2.61117e-7,0.000010932925,0.000008027177,0.0006977468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883366,0.00012213207,0.0002241021,0.00015826951,0.00031283865,0.00034898735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989825,0.0002144016,0.00021565222,0.00033366113,0.00022807338,0.000025708847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009437914,0.00012530056,0.00015764052,0.00007258532,0.002987509,0.0006106981,0.0006867131,0.00005073327,0.0001613614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018218403,0.00007797368,0.00011407832,0.00043541234,0.00018502705,0.00068562484,0.00020119698,0.0005710445,0.000023445938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051267034,0.00007366764,0.026575686,0.000022577382,0.000013710628,0.000475892,0.0000934955,0.000016898797,0.0000012567486,0.9666924,0.004570126,0.0014130261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005316367,0.000008475326,0.016500108,0.000028200242,0.000028595192,0.00006990931,0.0020543376,0.00013117884,6.411268e-7,0.08628135,0.8942612,0.000104396066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012855938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15546496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88969105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009210462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012393622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}