{"meta":{"query_hash":"548fe427fbf8","filters":{"venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/548fe427fbf8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Pacific+philosophical+quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03470307404019345,"score_gpt":0.25083842446667476,"score_spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484922772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063823365,0.0053264857,0.12424369,0.028844468,0.0021943254,0.00012371558,0.00018372877,0.00039558267,0.7748647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755307,0.00080129976,0.0071314084,0.0014363669,0.0007398707,0.00009586036,0.000069180875,0.0001131251,0.014082212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903244,0.006297751,0.0005292007,0.0009966162,0.0012518495,0.0006002007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866605,0.007387285,0.0012466876,0.00202637,0.0022811617,0.0003981242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384907,0.0005372428,0.0004989511,0.0011601229,0.003531677,0.0057965084,0.0019498921,0.0027951954,0.0077166534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016813623,0.00037326364,0.00044254615,0.000939217,0.022062276,0.009421663,0.0057190508,0.004997735,0.0013588539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017956336,0.000004781792,0.00007055196,0.00004260335,0.0000034726027,0.00007517361,0.0047381865,0.00006923574,0.00020445476,0.99084127,0.0012179449,0.0027145138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025217732,0.000045740122,0.0002802494,0.00030727405,0.000025650274,0.00030373028,0.0050531253,0.0014378652,0.0020096723,0.8949353,0.09553908,0.00003702117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015027283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008002723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077166534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021744715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014684554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039055586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061458039001556795,"score_gpt":0.2717297105392614,"score_spread":0.21027167153770462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494846022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0809823,0.006326211,0.22950312,0.07924055,0.00090689986,0.00013513457,0.00020110793,0.00021103767,0.60249364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810363,0.0007708407,0.0120892385,0.001215488,0.00038508492,0.00015582678,0.000037475544,0.000040667102,0.0042689983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800805,0.01192914,0.0009363468,0.0022330533,0.0040529803,0.00076804304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768811,0.014423575,0.0016973151,0.0028934241,0.0032123644,0.00089223194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427939,0.00045130376,0.00067369465,0.0020091515,0.0040305383,0.0077484394,0.0015588506,0.0030055873,0.0027945044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020806456,0.00048035078,0.00046438852,0.0015604448,0.051543012,0.010224494,0.0061338698,0.004525806,0.0003597037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001821437,0.0000017055751,0.00002501842,0.000007696972,9.826497e-7,0.0000065410254,0.00045085218,0.000077618875,0.000014956672,0.9986243,0.0001279237,0.0006606246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004138519,0.000002394004,0.0000472776,0.000023171142,0.0000017095605,0.000007611794,0.00024989515,0.00024620935,0.000044811037,0.9949116,0.004458412,0.0000028516095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041380296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024210473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055846795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052936957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075517535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536369043","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01403.x","title":"DISENABLING LEVY'S FRANKFURT‐STYLE ENABLING CASES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Style (visual arts); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.09809195847360846,"score_gpt":0.25759122047202393,"score_spread":0.15949926199841546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536369043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115635045,0.0006416668,0.090569004,0.013982224,0.0002689367,0.000094580304,0.00009337862,0.00026209894,0.778453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820495,0.00024039052,0.0070965714,0.00078099634,0.000063981526,0.00008662985,0.000024374001,0.00004331821,0.009614086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571794,0.0017437076,0.00018793145,0.0005219472,0.0009414172,0.00088715204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958788,0.0024008676,0.00030533082,0.00082507834,0.0003682807,0.00022158005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059116073,0.0005485869,0.0006385174,0.0019281546,0.0037639828,0.00546431,0.0012321738,0.004554263,0.007655826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011178664,0.00055457896,0.0010528339,0.000887791,0.017209752,0.012067296,0.0101603065,0.00416502,0.0011693343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041003855,0.000002185242,0.000035546123,0.0000031520801,8.3471315e-7,0.00006733899,0.0003489178,0.000087490545,0.00003960664,0.99856204,0.00027403852,0.00057481794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001493627,0.000004786035,0.000059716596,0.000019315958,0.00000413229,0.00009203772,0.00032348285,0.00083772454,0.00020139905,0.9856117,0.012821386,0.0000093178105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032499526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034165352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007655826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003406272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017645916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031263947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1963590482312692,"score_gpt":0.30964752311100197,"score_spread":0.11328847487973276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850974401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04427634,0.019337008,0.06787084,0.5200787,0.0024479635,0.00005289744,0.00014274385,0.00011213008,0.34568134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716787,0.006028409,0.004273592,0.0114254905,0.0013483532,0.00006173514,0.00005730383,0.000048530277,0.0050780466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144167,0.0056936005,0.00024052139,0.00084536383,0.0013291832,0.00044965665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827692,0.011724721,0.0012061946,0.0014320282,0.0020724258,0.00079543394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013291456,0.0004224835,0.0009483656,0.0024653033,0.0051099313,0.01369776,0.0014485664,0.005004319,0.0042814864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016936652,0.0002761932,0.0005218628,0.002207163,0.06747151,0.024082715,0.0045656543,0.0067411507,0.0005856139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073790325,0.00000795903,0.000100642224,0.00003974626,0.000004697776,0.0000349513,0.00399691,0.000108803484,0.000047484424,0.99197185,0.0015957205,0.0020838743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019260488,0.0000031266018,0.00007448035,0.00011073054,0.000004249539,0.000026220418,0.001995749,0.00015836615,0.000057592988,0.9810961,0.016466405,0.00000507037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033117915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014650046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053328048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058108866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07029283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09897644136040398,"score_gpt":0.27387017781486467,"score_spread":0.17489373645446069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869766104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.442512,0.0020201292,0.060243145,0.14807762,0.0013596726,0.00007582224,0.0004797383,0.00010884853,0.34512308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948336,0.00023798832,0.0011988846,0.0019545301,0.00018405121,0.00002113655,0.00004429129,0.00002916955,0.0014963187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725627,0.016764795,0.0013166182,0.002455076,0.005894262,0.0010065762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8829488,0.09158385,0.007963445,0.008755488,0.0075709233,0.0011774984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024677848,0.00031947394,0.00080177793,0.0013271859,0.003810253,0.008877953,0.0016251674,0.0051108506,0.006955715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078468405,0.0004219454,0.00039847186,0.0013936602,0.038096096,0.021324767,0.006068769,0.008622752,0.0009485648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015415193,0.0000629821,0.0038870163,0.00035408637,0.000045938188,0.00061173283,0.22672476,0.0002797771,0.0017265737,0.75098014,0.00393126,0.01124152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002562252,0.000063083375,0.004345124,0.0009389312,0.0000593767,0.0005877183,0.2305065,0.0015786414,0.004015882,0.68186516,0.07591121,0.00010282323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030439212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016314021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024677848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024817868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13051045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","score_opus":0.06398916241848439,"score_gpt":0.2429104741561115,"score_spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943661646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16515368,0.012141882,0.20002574,0.06308913,0.0010230648,0.000076158176,0.00026403213,0.0002280958,0.55799824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854754,0.0008743663,0.007999452,0.0009544296,0.00014479276,0.00003868097,0.000025074974,0.000028363094,0.004459336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.0011904528,0.000090654146,0.00032969544,0.00038252654,0.00020578502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774617,0.0012649498,0.00019712932,0.00038196807,0.0002266412,0.00018322153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036820807,0.00036875485,0.0006393967,0.002169607,0.0034236282,0.006155208,0.00065277703,0.0016061043,0.0027243465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034526144,0.0002912387,0.0005521975,0.0011222621,0.044816345,0.0100653125,0.0034870098,0.0038603626,0.0002098855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027160227,0.0000014172506,0.00003140794,0.0000058282926,0.0000010410959,0.000008266808,0.0006913181,0.0000430959,0.0000213547,0.9985757,0.0001312032,0.0004866977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004593929,0.0000028869867,0.00009105349,0.0000178839,0.0000030232259,0.000019695794,0.0005341752,0.00025238257,0.000042831423,0.99057335,0.008454358,0.0000038268286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065714614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004734706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065714614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024532776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036552727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03424912674816231,"score_gpt":0.30475801335278524,"score_spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047409688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023129428,0.007986245,0.06275081,0.1571279,0.0012427822,0.00015059672,0.00019021638,0.00012796576,0.74729395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92266417,0.0028211083,0.01634864,0.011933518,0.0011409663,0.00025627916,0.00008113352,0.00012918148,0.044625066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889535,0.0050247316,0.00038417405,0.0019762672,0.0023969538,0.0012643484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928169,0.0033680925,0.0006401416,0.001793612,0.00088374264,0.0004974697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119881155,0.0006292561,0.00084151374,0.0012272098,0.0046451297,0.010138027,0.0015451469,0.0071338704,0.00842635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018329212,0.00048193792,0.00079461,0.0007248752,0.054384004,0.010507712,0.004801235,0.006699286,0.0013971407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032391333,0.0000030610634,0.000033470817,0.0000068154413,0.0000029589276,0.0000079272195,0.000103449674,0.00012184807,0.000015805277,0.99799997,0.0009537459,0.0007476473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074450436,0.0000028715547,0.000062310486,0.000019329858,0.0000024398405,0.000010848581,0.00009409259,0.00023492824,0.00003489523,0.9866502,0.012877121,0.0000036069234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070278263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050273356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119881155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007697351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007655421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06339997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052006286","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01336.x","title":"INTUITIVE NON‐NATURALISM MEETS COSMIC COINCIDENCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuitionism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Face (sociological concept); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02129149548421103,"score_gpt":0.23796858418335928,"score_spread":0.21667708869914826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052006286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094535485,0.0024218129,0.20654418,0.042161204,0.0011960202,0.00008694886,0.00014592054,0.0002771241,0.6526314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98369884,0.00031272523,0.009455335,0.0015546164,0.00028571475,0.000058455833,0.00004336324,0.00004655446,0.004544568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949067,0.0025826,0.00020955261,0.0007775933,0.001153053,0.0003704866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220055,0.004124876,0.0005910435,0.0014546126,0.0011876273,0.0004412827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965408,0.00036442344,0.0007549497,0.001432272,0.0030960226,0.004610962,0.00095299684,0.0027680448,0.006578662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012294583,0.00036378895,0.00074835203,0.0006220144,0.02424196,0.007043563,0.0049654176,0.0049269903,0.0005620648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034826737,0.000004079424,0.000046039804,0.000010259749,0.000002305314,0.000031406093,0.00016833018,0.000105497376,0.000035108205,0.9986131,0.00036402218,0.00061635394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003684995,0.000003155829,0.000058743946,0.0000110008905,0.0000013342654,0.000046622856,0.00009082931,0.00033480776,0.000043924192,0.99617034,0.0032321548,0.0000032801881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006262049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005966995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006578662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002494495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013697454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0262599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054207533","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01346.x","title":"DIS‐UNIFIED PLURALIST ACCOUNTS OF CAUSATION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Causality (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.024706368649579237,"score_gpt":0.30217156659389244,"score_spread":0.2774651979443132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054207533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0645968,0.004312162,0.41753837,0.041347735,0.00070713984,0.00006984767,0.00023032888,0.00037189736,0.47082573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96920824,0.0008880456,0.01841919,0.00080427795,0.0003265137,0.000066247405,0.00007030209,0.00009161823,0.010125438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995756,0.0019727636,0.00019625413,0.00055601756,0.001201706,0.00031721045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442977,0.0024616972,0.0005768177,0.0012117919,0.0009737974,0.00034597827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055912267,0.0005900703,0.0009830194,0.0030196672,0.0030213443,0.005883037,0.0016552899,0.0026431673,0.00901235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008339512,0.0005205922,0.0011564267,0.0018573815,0.0155937085,0.0121503975,0.007409527,0.0037898533,0.0007481859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028936126,0.0000027145463,0.000057902285,0.000008550056,0.000003943815,0.000017646606,0.00026560627,0.00049088855,0.000022790522,0.99818903,0.0002689361,0.00066905963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024329333,0.0000013627568,0.000034110963,0.0000075197354,0.0000029820922,0.000013623456,0.000072788374,0.0014753288,0.000016728764,0.99509096,0.0032801505,0.0000020816215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002948134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003197944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00901235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004610773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019473352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033453703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083137785","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00317.x","title":"DISPOSITIONAL COMPATIBILISM AND FRANKFURT‐TYPE EXAMPLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Explication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Free will; Moral responsibility; Incompatibilism","score_opus":0.06037728995766115,"score_gpt":0.24955215286427823,"score_spread":0.1891748629066171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083137785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18271738,0.0010124013,0.060113035,0.009231048,0.00020625666,0.000031044674,0.00005452149,0.00010559796,0.7465287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932348,0.00008754396,0.003584708,0.00019205957,0.00002331881,0.000018359664,0.00001239503,0.000008844308,0.0028379979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969612,0.0017999046,0.00009591192,0.00036173867,0.00052656763,0.0002546567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972053,0.0017177208,0.00025628388,0.00045493714,0.00025703927,0.000108695785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030701435,0.00020322614,0.00026280148,0.0009969814,0.0024529826,0.0027113098,0.0006640415,0.0019436076,0.006085166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065667,0.00020720593,0.00035225824,0.00058194576,0.008339922,0.0047028917,0.0036574355,0.0019024913,0.00044302735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000539745,0.0000044251155,0.00009318557,0.00000805336,0.0000018598114,0.00004228614,0.0006624693,0.00010318578,0.000054160882,0.997408,0.0003660922,0.0012508245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007964611,0.0000063375624,0.0002995606,0.00002433877,0.0000030472315,0.00014434202,0.00046080374,0.00068645156,0.00023481903,0.9864906,0.011634944,0.0000067541478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060418056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071571145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006085166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013377297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006029173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020356894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104958832","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00180.x","title":"THE TROUBLE WITH MARY","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Physicalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Consciousness; Modal; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01575516668011224,"score_gpt":0.2591353873303521,"score_spread":0.24338022065023984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104958832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009361827,0.0038331067,0.0060242224,0.22923937,0.0056186044,0.00002242173,0.00007918339,0.00019774253,0.74562347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51803404,0.0034908052,0.0028331124,0.078324325,0.0029273217,0.00006308842,0.00008779675,0.00074641715,0.3934931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867636,0.00050158676,0.000040477193,0.00029690738,0.00029761498,0.0001870353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982704,0.00073883345,0.00009070891,0.00024783151,0.00043851775,0.00021370812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021038314,0.00035576627,0.0003724608,0.0005453853,0.009310386,0.0057096984,0.00073907385,0.003630577,0.030621545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007732801,0.0003932566,0.0002801076,0.00054776063,0.011807243,0.009246602,0.0042680036,0.0095542995,0.009426445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032793378,0.000013304867,0.00032751015,0.000039240116,0.0000071340755,0.00020804434,0.009220237,0.000040151594,0.00026866025,0.77898663,0.19662355,0.014232847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009273557,0.000011597166,0.00032606506,0.00012200451,0.000007483745,0.0003085312,0.005849828,0.00013847365,0.00045374696,0.17559001,0.81716627,0.000016815544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006262263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008615108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030621545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022838144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015359356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102439344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616958750","doi":"10.1111/papq.12199","title":"How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Epistemology; Tree (set theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.055503050482700836,"score_gpt":0.23547257561663837,"score_spread":0.17996952513393755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616958750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10732495,0.0072267936,0.035871617,0.12443651,0.0012572412,0.000038890972,0.00016747157,0.00040544514,0.7232711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97492665,0.00074422755,0.0023976099,0.002952565,0.000104871906,0.000015014136,0.00002794474,0.00015098185,0.018680247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934187,0.0040008905,0.000120636716,0.0008707,0.0009401117,0.0006490301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947916,0.00361484,0.00027340816,0.0003674046,0.00058776524,0.0003649496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057303174,0.00034502795,0.00071741967,0.0015506793,0.011101301,0.008772766,0.0014725891,0.0050944407,0.010105072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009888381,0.0005613396,0.0003486925,0.0011335609,0.038018785,0.011480756,0.004486746,0.005657724,0.0011518806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003066892,0.000012461426,0.00038277646,0.000042833886,0.000008457126,0.00021473678,0.11540959,0.0001411672,0.00023180971,0.86513156,0.013129095,0.0052648666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019348552,0.000035749348,0.0011320589,0.0003759745,0.000030148847,0.000434108,0.081922635,0.00061549264,0.00070468796,0.3561833,0.5584617,0.00008477294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019398846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019246878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019398846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066236984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002720658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04805851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968405612","doi":"10.1111/papq.12288","title":"Not as a Means: Killing as a Side Effect in Self‐defense","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Liability; FREAK; Pedestrian; Conflation; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.028148412364602485,"score_gpt":0.2523809947056704,"score_spread":0.2242325823410679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968405612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06009042,0.004054297,0.022230415,0.073977076,0.0009969452,0.000053203534,0.00002604596,0.00003559012,0.838536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736453,0.00070825143,0.0012614693,0.004011182,0.00022828016,0.000039785456,0.0000060018147,0.00002326138,0.020076428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930248,0.0048306976,0.00015698519,0.00038042953,0.0009872928,0.000619862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946255,0.0032159854,0.000425016,0.0007138977,0.00072803884,0.00029149366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069807484,0.00039091287,0.00043095314,0.000977865,0.006083211,0.0059375865,0.00086691976,0.007867824,0.0049809837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076647648,0.00029793603,0.0003989348,0.00046103878,0.058029924,0.0077555478,0.0055766697,0.0077735675,0.0005472954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036788138,0.0000073956476,0.00009297525,0.000010283402,0.0000015308282,0.0000712376,0.0025617278,0.000059926493,0.00004795879,0.99512744,0.0009913804,0.0010243551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011228515,0.000030650146,0.0002866554,0.00019354557,0.000007762456,0.00024274872,0.0047900956,0.0003716075,0.0002989499,0.9282993,0.06545258,0.000014803728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024004756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028264285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007867824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037579834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030003537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036918163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.056002850331290994,"score_gpt":0.2697287505763414,"score_spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978502643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036771223,0.004591301,0.06587136,0.7753178,0.0022679288,0.000050624676,0.000090355374,0.00013121954,0.11490819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95224845,0.0012590426,0.0073679653,0.03327269,0.002584085,0.00007314885,0.000035448385,0.00007584061,0.0030832593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360731,0.040675975,0.0027730416,0.0047978926,0.014269557,0.0014104272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73011345,0.20492361,0.011392214,0.02309173,0.0265737,0.0039053177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060677227,0.00060151046,0.001670208,0.003773963,0.0071571814,0.015645001,0.0033476828,0.01917773,0.0056733983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15151575,0.00081861037,0.001007546,0.0024215577,0.08181175,0.029409327,0.009784911,0.023264885,0.0014252871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048504127,0.000027902415,0.0003495646,0.0000723012,0.000016655717,0.00016994373,0.003967157,0.00031876215,0.00012750649,0.98333585,0.006330313,0.0052354992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018355047,0.0000114392005,0.000111087444,0.0001388785,0.000007330282,0.000114198156,0.0011019305,0.0007082625,0.00016118058,0.98663133,0.010977681,0.00001837659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008472476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060677227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065171807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004973118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32089567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011821939","doi":"10.1111/papq.12308","title":"Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.049343989748643326,"score_gpt":0.2555141702994389,"score_spread":0.20617018055079558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011821939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2552443,0.005473953,0.17481324,0.063956805,0.0007395925,0.000072501985,0.0001372381,0.00015544634,0.49940693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840547,0.00054098736,0.005265395,0.0010995165,0.00015806983,0.00003195646,0.000027241507,0.000014254709,0.0044570128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987255,0.0004637646,0.00008227748,0.00025988996,0.00037745616,0.000091205075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663156,0.0018153684,0.00035844833,0.00046331336,0.00048595492,0.00024541936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003426364,0.0003278508,0.0003531348,0.0012121085,0.0009445281,0.0031917214,0.00083841756,0.0014556638,0.0039164564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064014154,0.00024550897,0.00040368814,0.0006136745,0.017093183,0.0075179455,0.0027804766,0.003266687,0.00030356206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135014725,0.000010536217,0.00036034893,0.000018118764,0.000005562648,0.000031556625,0.0006640713,0.0001105118,0.00011001326,0.9950205,0.0003160534,0.0033392033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145957,0.000006343172,0.00031941378,0.000009431823,0.000003008018,0.00002656883,0.000115101415,0.000563267,0.000115892704,0.99704945,0.0017832791,0.000004033027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014345482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008664519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039164564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019599744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087876554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018120527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046505692","doi":"10.1111/papq.12320","title":"Some Hallucinations Are Experiences of the Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Hallucinations in medical conditions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SGS (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hallucinating; Object (grammar); Visual Hallucination; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sensory system; Causal chain; Attribution; sort; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.049506578069390746,"score_gpt":0.27567342117674637,"score_spread":0.22616684310735563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046505692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288928,0.008095612,0.0051843273,0.005095893,0.00036831378,0.000023574858,0.00011499415,0.000150606,0.05207387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804115,0.0006727271,0.00014290525,0.00020074264,0.000058032343,0.0000011390096,0.000008407397,0.000004786614,0.0008700424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981624,0.00006879431,0.000015376898,0.000013957977,0.000054329666,0.000031324147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921346,0.000297519,0.00020790905,0.00008144716,0.00010033719,0.000099375364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037843347,0.00017893872,0.00015970104,0.0004676859,0.0008260655,0.0008904944,0.00017391272,0.0005228833,0.001797497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024503411,0.00012600691,0.00014229909,0.00027447953,0.0024072027,0.00096552685,0.00072613003,0.0007068497,0.0001864027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016146979,0.000149287,0.08451104,0.0016150844,0.00023716137,0.11103132,0.42455584,0.0008595816,0.09844115,0.11371664,0.013301537,0.14996658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014597784,0.001399952,0.15591395,0.0011543421,0.00017414785,0.29638034,0.22085266,0.0013569235,0.020666437,0.09338569,0.20827933,0.0002902709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074815983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066331326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001797497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002485396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012858158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0060132146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0519382189520884,"score_gpt":0.27408270464061174,"score_spread":0.22214448568852335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138020732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591681,0.002263577,0.032074712,0.08997135,0.00059799827,0.000073364725,0.000101644124,0.000045438173,0.81570387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98055226,0.0005819593,0.0024865335,0.003941927,0.00025850863,0.00007140958,0.0000254558,0.000023296594,0.01205853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951805,0.0029735002,0.00014428426,0.00047567402,0.0006481585,0.00057802175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959061,0.0019071529,0.00034820236,0.00086133956,0.00047046336,0.0005067266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060697533,0.00027450544,0.0005234715,0.0007250147,0.005392968,0.0056526004,0.0006442374,0.0041255374,0.005443068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054000425,0.0002237167,0.00057299883,0.0005523128,0.053773485,0.006955336,0.00627944,0.0059069013,0.0005898654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002039965,0.0000029799644,0.000030698255,0.0000039483607,0.0000011889606,0.000013406343,0.00038889106,0.000057222845,0.000025886095,0.99860793,0.0004641075,0.00040171613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004595848,0.0000056046024,0.000089845445,0.0000206876,0.000002097969,0.000024324281,0.00029338629,0.00016251463,0.000043172622,0.98771685,0.0116323205,0.0000044360077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002479935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002034452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060697533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028823072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031643647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204643877","doi":"10.1111/papq.12388","title":"‘True’ as Polysemous","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Extensibility; Epistemology; Philosophy; Polysemy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.019313032145618022,"score_gpt":0.3018161903339666,"score_spread":0.2825031581883486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204643877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32351002,0.0040706364,0.3034182,0.027754523,0.0022040925,0.00011719955,0.0005506774,0.0005910375,0.33778352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717135,0.0002605599,0.009411025,0.0008438293,0.00022486849,0.000020995049,0.0000962396,0.00006791557,0.0019032479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955902,0.0017357777,0.00035541417,0.0007616445,0.0012906588,0.0002662767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901758,0.0045051314,0.0010595539,0.0013710128,0.0023509653,0.000537597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047547575,0.00056567695,0.0004944024,0.0019307606,0.0025379814,0.0049962196,0.0012308025,0.002009506,0.0068046753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010550021,0.0006385673,0.00045553406,0.0012712501,0.019049754,0.017684957,0.0037614608,0.0040934253,0.000672806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048508216,0.000013024644,0.00051992387,0.00009175014,0.000013004748,0.0002563514,0.005076673,0.00015813048,0.0010478505,0.98744196,0.0009781959,0.0043545607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130905355,0.000023043618,0.00087095145,0.00007589017,0.00002209482,0.00035921388,0.0014805885,0.0013801444,0.0009281399,0.9807891,0.014022355,0.000035383942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010305891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076265546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068046753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001166249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025145829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208017042","doi":"10.1111/papq.12371","title":"Frege's Critical Arguments for Axioms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principle of sufficient reason; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03357800758751189,"score_gpt":0.34048962371306585,"score_spread":0.30691161612555395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208017042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025394224,0.0073156552,0.19598886,0.12951382,0.0025244968,0.00022053433,0.00040808774,0.00027932308,0.63835496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9225035,0.002278453,0.034003787,0.012079274,0.0033709432,0.0004798651,0.00017395995,0.00021875682,0.02489145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861448,0.008018931,0.0005044427,0.0013752879,0.003022552,0.00093405164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628125,0.027656361,0.0013767607,0.0022120283,0.0052452465,0.00069703936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019667502,0.0011724036,0.0012574992,0.008527692,0.004859296,0.0060234447,0.0023487771,0.0077181356,0.010904344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044654336,0.0008508401,0.0017247071,0.0023781124,0.03257458,0.013114604,0.004394668,0.009214118,0.0013674331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003880526,0.0000029555292,0.0000132396,0.000012315551,0.0000037495565,0.00001076069,0.000104866136,0.00005462484,0.000012804412,0.9984503,0.000920768,0.0004097125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011225218,0.0000024866322,0.000032790056,0.000040955216,0.0000045981164,0.000011578022,0.0000807032,0.0002739138,0.00006304471,0.9917846,0.0076895985,0.0000046224654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026738057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021251158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019667502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008684606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104012966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206038229","doi":"10.1111/papq.12404","title":"Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0426968052843611,"score_gpt":0.21681907196566763,"score_spread":0.17412226668130654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206038229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16518734,0.0065262765,0.3471527,0.078417234,0.0003624769,0.00012504037,0.00041329887,0.00031040265,0.4015052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892113,0.00044985287,0.0072562983,0.0006490335,0.00014370347,0.000044632758,0.000057806916,0.000030394285,0.002156962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907046,0.0054461965,0.00045997248,0.0010674412,0.0014965875,0.0008251694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728185,0.01711286,0.0021032635,0.0036317606,0.0035047522,0.00082893495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095031075,0.0003500908,0.0008478942,0.0018346187,0.0024043464,0.0049557486,0.000968756,0.0021519198,0.006653897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020150384,0.00036919033,0.0008175794,0.002235965,0.026427336,0.008423091,0.0044377265,0.0027547313,0.0005577094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007734757,0.0000034668526,0.00016008131,0.000014826032,0.000007745105,0.000011223351,0.00019622345,0.000510756,0.000057569116,0.9973984,0.00039302412,0.0012389529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056497815,0.000003549533,0.00009784219,0.000012959555,0.0000027655315,0.0000073823007,0.000108371576,0.00070410676,0.000049351147,0.9975732,0.0014323458,0.0000025635666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033721034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017425043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095031075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035374358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00261707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05025786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09859490224146784,"score_gpt":0.26310399378009874,"score_spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245134956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083617665,0.005020896,0.34930193,0.091450065,0.002494682,0.00036648402,0.0005559163,0.00043684768,0.46675548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661401,0.0009003529,0.020889452,0.0049946224,0.0009330858,0.00022238017,0.00011872691,0.00008905753,0.0057120835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584621,0.018627966,0.003571105,0.008585218,0.008998431,0.001755117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92357963,0.04112359,0.006995026,0.01861224,0.008400991,0.0012884479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184502,0.0008471608,0.0012544187,0.0029296207,0.0046109334,0.01019754,0.004739418,0.009247636,0.0083067035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08784476,0.0010765526,0.0012914342,0.0019062336,0.050446704,0.024423653,0.010669625,0.012084988,0.0014054023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022660732,0.000010207351,0.00026824386,0.000059892755,0.000023561186,0.00013497529,0.0009403319,0.00024703346,0.00013029958,0.9943709,0.00065655576,0.0031353035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009793543,0.000009414434,0.00007262727,0.00008977085,0.000012311004,0.000110259665,0.00022295742,0.00045763425,0.00039353478,0.99165654,0.006951872,0.0000132106015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010586708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007007833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00403042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004908747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05132110497605342,"score_gpt":0.26061929141733786,"score_spread":0.20929818644128445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286488953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63530236,0.00095349655,0.017241767,0.011551198,0.00009008367,0.000025119467,0.00008390365,0.000052313288,0.3346998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887174,0.00007130332,0.0003606098,0.00008296476,0.000016210091,0.000004645031,0.000009714,0.0000035315431,0.0005792797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972389,0.0015939028,0.00008033298,0.00030946048,0.0005536199,0.00022381791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884644,0.00693145,0.0012621465,0.0012814199,0.0010855932,0.00097496336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002401788,0.00022836444,0.00021078275,0.0008377682,0.0018998059,0.0032104496,0.00058994803,0.0013376531,0.0066447817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011891445,0.0002523859,0.00020617875,0.00055341783,0.00911046,0.005043241,0.0036111411,0.0015194366,0.00033304884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014599538,0.00013689672,0.013807059,0.00024386191,0.000064306776,0.00054594304,0.041611224,0.0011157952,0.002647027,0.9095144,0.0030990737,0.027068427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044466105,0.00010059005,0.0390969,0.00013920481,0.000064072054,0.00051797024,0.030045172,0.0045123957,0.0011949175,0.8881268,0.036094747,0.00006277433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026687179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020871696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066447817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052097987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022229016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698627","doi":"10.1111/papq.12447","title":"A Regularity Theory of Causation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Transitive relation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Causal theory of reference; Causality (physics); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Data mining; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.045275931415539386,"score_gpt":0.23554930431762042,"score_spread":0.19027337290208102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390698627","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06656375,0.0011018307,0.7499241,0.0109409485,0.00035219413,0.0001339315,0.0005079471,0.00028513285,0.17019013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494281,0.00046771133,0.038582277,0.0007075828,0.00041868916,0.00015520201,0.00033895747,0.00008746348,0.009814095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676514,0.0014289435,0.00017844622,0.00057452713,0.0007718377,0.0002809887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912196,0.0049357256,0.0006581475,0.001528418,0.0013207028,0.00033741895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042851106,0.00038145535,0.00062237016,0.0024384288,0.0015217983,0.0020593638,0.001277169,0.0015454943,0.007004956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009546464,0.00041723443,0.0012958464,0.0010118681,0.008394263,0.005959778,0.0028094212,0.0024517647,0.0005980508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041649173,0.0000043060236,0.00017408117,0.000010714703,0.0000056847266,0.00002427176,0.00006449905,0.0010888259,0.00008606211,0.9970374,0.00036109812,0.0011389905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058087967,0.000008380836,0.0001806969,0.000010744174,0.0000042441766,0.000040169016,0.000038775106,0.0049936567,0.00007619534,0.99077505,0.00386123,0.000005040632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016886089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009592633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002151284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013568313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023433864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.04134218617910647,"score_gpt":0.2678413251231641,"score_spread":0.22649913894405765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099341564,0.002703766,0.16040541,0.04386983,0.0013601694,0.0001371892,0.00028764058,0.0005145535,0.69137985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93725294,0.0009041473,0.03017247,0.00360791,0.0004714662,0.000103518294,0.00014611958,0.00031382375,0.027027493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439937,0.0023665049,0.00024746047,0.00084402616,0.0015308138,0.0006116925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260825,0.002992631,0.0004916042,0.001622711,0.0016163369,0.0006684108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004414024,0.0007030331,0.0007019282,0.0025661453,0.005122942,0.0071908874,0.0012717176,0.0026042515,0.0144321015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012721917,0.00062529783,0.00072655716,0.0015364921,0.023085194,0.018306151,0.008657423,0.0056747734,0.0023458905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014866721,0.0000067543506,0.00033967412,0.000042957574,0.000005582438,0.000068408575,0.0054188636,0.00013979005,0.00037773635,0.98530734,0.0020917128,0.006186304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015367306,0.0000182398,0.00026129387,0.000099417164,0.0000103684515,0.000075598415,0.0025727113,0.00072044384,0.00032199646,0.9487522,0.04713896,0.0000134793345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065242266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006753134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144321015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004048558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028922614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04828018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}