{"meta":{"query_hash":"548fe427fbf8","filters":{"venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/548fe427fbf8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Pacific+philosophical+quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03470307404019345,"score_gpt":0.25083842446667476,"score_spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484922772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80140764,0.000057206606,0.00010251555,0.018476825,0.0021696517,0.00018573795,0.000025140658,0.00017409024,0.1774012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967876,0.0000030302297,0.00008416593,0.00019487826,0.0019821534,0.00001335675,0.000026044707,0.000015450525,0.0008933417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991061,0.000060044124,0.00021855913,0.00024881985,0.00016097401,0.00020547591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.000107034575,0.00007135645,0.00021802579,0.00010516732,0.00011702672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003056796,0.00013490288,0.00016978555,0.000060164937,0.0003595845,0.00013351183,0.000077158795,0.00013536793,0.00032392138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033542663,0.000117722186,0.00005992917,0.000020903248,0.0005135765,0.00024490053,0.000006818027,0.00049922254,0.00009929106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013447383,0.00005760137,0.000103948885,0.000020422996,0.0000125564575,0.0000024225549,0.021802988,7.396079e-8,0.0027013987,0.97168964,0.00018089195,0.0034146071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027379944,0.00027743628,0.00095169083,0.000008812921,0.000024915233,0.000009374951,0.002183547,0.00024456275,0.000052486535,0.961288,0.034473155,0.00021222908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003106528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025801166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19537994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060308207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016878135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48005715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061458039001556795,"score_gpt":0.2717297105392614,"score_spread":0.21027167153770462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494846022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048644803,0.0045645265,0.000084086845,0.04011063,0.002821223,0.0004278188,0.000042495034,0.00016690705,0.9031375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99065906,0.000020640988,0.00001120787,0.0007650102,0.0043957406,0.000041898023,0.000007580922,0.000021746691,0.004077087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985908,0.00028702433,0.00030561708,0.00020931309,0.00016505402,0.00044213538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986654,0.00062408583,0.00009010816,0.00032121208,0.000105029416,0.0001941424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000999709,0.00020611961,0.0003488328,0.000044612992,0.000619069,0.00013165899,0.00017772072,0.0001106763,0.00020569895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056127297,0.0001201195,0.00013690804,0.000030561525,0.0025390307,0.00027524983,0.000023916351,0.00046377836,0.00039909032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045656092,0.00009467362,0.000023581091,0.000024133848,0.000038797178,7.8603983e-7,0.1698471,6.0064416e-9,0.000011459075,0.82717526,0.0007228399,0.002015719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012164932,0.00017775904,0.00013754265,0.00001842882,0.00006301258,0.000015220382,0.014144447,0.000028046761,0.0000051600214,0.8050321,0.17891729,0.00024450463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027150409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046924008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012557132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018731265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536369043","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01403.x","title":"DISENABLING LEVY'S FRANKFURT‐STYLE ENABLING CASES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Style (visual arts); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.09809195847360846,"score_gpt":0.25759122047202393,"score_spread":0.15949926199841546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536369043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7754344,0.00034377832,0.0012993999,0.0043592043,0.0017696905,0.0005903733,0.0000832081,0.000848394,0.21527158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979016,0.000023514302,0.00021853978,0.00042483278,0.0007924817,0.000038877122,0.0000035493485,0.00004964572,0.00054694316],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972642,0.00017354405,0.00046247346,0.0008592766,0.00048103227,0.00075945305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854136,0.00026339982,0.000120833865,0.00063914875,0.0000463249,0.00038895596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022640338,0.00033505802,0.0003127814,0.00018126762,0.00049368176,0.00010030851,0.00050844153,0.00015591572,0.0006419569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040329015,0.00028769317,0.00020016632,0.0004774969,0.00030148617,0.00035590585,0.00004501091,0.00041919833,0.00075417256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081207807,0.0027231993,0.0016014533,0.00024189326,0.00006171097,0.005337244,0.024917793,0.000007876493,0.6439963,0.25374573,0.0015967684,0.06495795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023720276,0.0039921645,0.0017208653,0.00020905386,0.000084961175,0.0010821733,0.002504682,0.0016167407,0.09253606,0.88051546,0.010800923,0.0025648905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022468394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029702546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026630369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039168375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1963590482312692,"score_gpt":0.30964752311100197,"score_spread":0.11328847487973276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850974401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043715514,0.0007597096,0.00025854522,0.091732614,0.0033186125,0.00035150858,0.000064576016,0.00022536,0.85957354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954147,0.000006539748,0.000035123914,0.0012041103,0.0014538798,0.00001719457,0.000014997532,0.000031138763,0.0018223284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809545,0.00018303898,0.00043645783,0.00042604312,0.00038618475,0.0004728162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895436,0.00019539022,0.00011107837,0.00037678765,0.00011272137,0.00024966628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075688044,0.00024571738,0.00039042463,0.00018020111,0.00020435997,0.0001439295,0.00025141926,0.00031314144,0.00016573578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061551604,0.00022093326,0.00014068729,0.00009152974,0.0006439962,0.00027317888,0.000017619908,0.0011093975,0.00030878632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043817294,0.00009775952,0.00015157602,0.000036123,0.000022845483,0.000029745954,0.07097793,4.012262e-7,0.00002053511,0.9262222,0.0022600067,0.00013703291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063885935,0.0003237945,0.00002541788,0.000055303375,0.00001543736,0.000009565998,0.025187474,0.00009047839,0.000009970741,0.958678,0.014688467,0.00027723092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041452873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018040287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020936567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009428384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09897644136040398,"score_gpt":0.27387017781486467,"score_spread":0.17489373645446069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869766104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014566099,0.07332521,0.00011933842,0.19220272,0.009462404,0.0009445158,0.0002463117,0.0007385977,0.7083948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96517754,0.0010786207,0.000070229384,0.00018993007,0.014176746,0.00011034779,0.000043691627,0.00012696233,0.019025935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584115,0.0006173962,0.00041197962,0.0009704294,0.0006618733,0.001497157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686676,0.0004699398,0.0003274844,0.0012269404,0.00037669853,0.0007321872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012654486,0.00081217784,0.0010236279,0.00026194614,0.0008607547,0.00086927944,0.00067122263,0.0005497951,0.00042846907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011094416,0.0006820343,0.0005903002,0.00010587046,0.0016047495,0.0011884292,0.00008246361,0.0013454476,0.0010267516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058073434,0.0008047586,0.00009283974,0.0002755822,0.00021568642,0.000018209192,0.12416675,4.947856e-8,0.00007043329,0.83066404,0.0039604027,0.03967315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069292774,0.00075491215,0.000114080656,0.00015406197,0.00014794256,0.000029965599,0.038545273,0.000012275518,0.00004139291,0.26733825,0.69134015,0.00082878885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008229771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010937935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009542533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008131579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","score_opus":0.06398916241848439,"score_gpt":0.2429104741561115,"score_spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943661646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27661648,0.0005576208,0.000021098676,0.04949172,0.0011048331,0.00035584305,0.00018952508,0.00019791715,0.671465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758214,0.000014951299,0.000043042353,0.00036286432,0.0012918307,0.0000071061118,0.000018490102,0.000022907425,0.0006566762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816847,0.00012745678,0.00039615025,0.0004046277,0.00049583043,0.00040747432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.00018710367,0.00011558618,0.00031132117,0.00015539983,0.00054552255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026825117,0.00026429415,0.00040450893,0.000118325144,0.00016285907,0.000078470664,0.00021487074,0.000117007476,0.00029121042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079183934,0.0002097431,0.00011794482,0.00007768674,0.00086016743,0.0002070155,0.000028412001,0.0003104165,0.00013241266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700885,0.00026459823,0.00004466404,0.000037932725,0.000032333024,0.00001964216,0.006953686,2.6986692e-7,0.000020937008,0.98992765,0.00075935194,0.0017688175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007861787,0.0021017604,0.00006740575,0.000112823735,0.00003782461,0.0000098632045,0.003954269,0.000074383934,0.00005777762,0.941645,0.05085172,0.00030098046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004848168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004674291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003502889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038369053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8553076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03424912674816231,"score_gpt":0.30475801335278524,"score_spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047409688","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032810934,0.00022650663,0.00014817253,0.573287,0.00026359785,0.00018500692,0.00000399682,0.000059631206,0.42254502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543816,0.00016565979,0.00001566252,0.0015108708,0.0018327492,0.000035115787,0.0000015460188,0.000007421107,0.000992804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786496,0.00063580106,0.00023920293,0.00021297098,0.0005688615,0.00047820012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968306,0.0025369667,0.000049070477,0.00024527116,0.000092108996,0.00024601654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021374277,0.00011641475,0.0001395142,0.000019807096,0.0032625254,0.0002587906,0.0003349677,0.00014700057,0.000055344743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059571053,0.00006220578,0.00009252666,0.00018934192,0.004204302,0.00016609508,0.000019256066,0.00047318227,0.00010706221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098038945,0.000019820636,0.000030847237,0.0000013530886,0.000011749453,0.000003857561,0.006114553,1.6835223e-7,0.0000025124546,0.9907566,0.00032092223,0.002639604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041739762,0.000054030712,0.0002562579,0.0000044537683,0.000009694412,0.0000065940535,0.002394236,0.000094811876,4.3281625e-7,0.9279626,0.0687091,0.00009040512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079977406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008475375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031699878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052006286","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01336.x","title":"INTUITIVE NON‐NATURALISM MEETS COSMIC COINCIDENCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuitionism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Face (sociological concept); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02129149548421103,"score_gpt":0.23796858418335928,"score_spread":0.21667708869914826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052006286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085696205,0.00055750186,0.000077333745,0.15577249,0.0017895071,0.0004878685,0.00010738538,0.00044379107,0.75506794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925551,0.000009833915,0.00006010434,0.0031500154,0.0025696706,0.000018647579,0.000031913925,0.000021790338,0.0015829625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997926,0.0001397708,0.00045747796,0.0005515851,0.0003410139,0.0005841741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874043,0.00020205238,0.00015499709,0.00046771095,0.00017490811,0.00025987125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002985561,0.0003792672,0.00045448067,0.00015038555,0.0006755859,0.00015544612,0.00046204822,0.00019775894,0.0015000314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040858475,0.00032437066,0.00022308464,0.00007502746,0.00083818444,0.00047936317,0.000016021635,0.0006670951,0.0011207305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015275975,0.00016644012,0.000004171399,0.0000095946325,0.000036385096,0.00010648582,0.02040272,4.824471e-7,0.0003763576,0.9716787,0.0023289057,0.00473704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005374589,0.0015094855,0.00039189955,0.00006376936,0.000036027228,0.000059157665,0.000978734,0.00006163877,0.000053971253,0.9812155,0.0146424305,0.000449963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012389131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001587967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90685886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042107044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039901595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054207533","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01346.x","title":"DIS‐UNIFIED PLURALIST ACCOUNTS OF CAUSATION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Causality (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.024706368649579237,"score_gpt":0.30217156659389244,"score_spread":0.2774651979443132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054207533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18264152,0.000076233904,0.00083397434,0.03340914,0.0006685541,0.0002829384,0.00005827246,0.00014333929,0.78188604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884754,0.0000016738106,0.00007007128,0.00043097092,0.00043279465,0.000012894181,0.000015872916,0.000010831642,0.00017732542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979145,0.00016934576,0.0004966083,0.0004877317,0.00044696347,0.0004848718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873435,0.00015605384,0.00016041813,0.0005987403,0.00009059444,0.00025986464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004329204,0.00021890516,0.00032624605,0.00011066271,0.0001393444,0.00003519449,0.0004288045,0.00020615492,0.0008402642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005924567,0.00018429096,0.0001405189,0.00049474585,0.0004743686,0.00020430055,0.000010615929,0.0002894115,0.0003980956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018978919,0.00036393377,0.00005171436,0.000005555495,0.000016218557,0.000019503124,0.0023312778,5.372786e-7,0.003130438,0.9849044,0.00012940481,0.0088572055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050743925,0.0010975298,0.012920519,0.000020104993,0.000018342404,0.00001720131,0.00027503006,0.000053727483,0.00017335366,0.98448455,0.00020874102,0.00022342907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009724749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.56744e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81620604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000350587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002245494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92003036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083137785","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00317.x","title":"DISPOSITIONAL COMPATIBILISM AND FRANKFURT‐TYPE EXAMPLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Explication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Free will; Moral responsibility; Incompatibilism","score_opus":0.06037728995766115,"score_gpt":0.24955215286427823,"score_spread":0.1891748629066171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083137785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758809,0.00012620586,0.00014574875,0.0060894527,0.00034364712,0.00016380845,0.00004744465,0.00015523772,0.017047524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.000038368053,0.00015355986,0.00045523077,0.0003757818,0.000010929627,0.000009154688,0.000017245922,0.00019640788],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983782,0.000118376825,0.00026004738,0.0005340887,0.0003755085,0.00033376232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912536,0.00027187925,0.000052644882,0.00027666308,0.00003466061,0.0002387718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000082180835,0.00019394196,0.0002166162,0.00007132415,0.00049338787,0.000036218127,0.00018577196,0.00008988231,0.00022755268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008933756,0.00016264785,0.00006240206,0.00023111078,0.0005468974,0.00021605376,0.0000218712,0.00024172592,0.0002302497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003297503,0.0010569525,0.0041402057,0.00007563634,0.000021568936,0.00082029204,0.0077914745,0.0000064064716,0.56032884,0.41469383,0.0028269761,0.007908051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001561514,0.0021003017,0.05905967,0.000057847203,0.000022168007,0.0012982416,0.0001767871,0.0018283866,0.0074995332,0.9216684,0.003741868,0.0009852907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005923456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.247858e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013409689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026843905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104958832","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00180.x","title":"THE TROUBLE WITH MARY","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Physicalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Consciousness; Modal; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01575516668011224,"score_gpt":0.2591353873303521,"score_spread":0.24338022065023984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104958832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010590259,0.00020921654,0.0009469124,0.020193245,0.0005974555,0.00022823304,0.000006199195,0.00011882222,0.9671097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976925,0.0000026955013,0.000121981735,0.00035227917,0.00025245076,0.00008459352,0.0000015097547,0.000021754407,0.0014702171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976717,0.0003729405,0.00027927588,0.0005137492,0.0004064671,0.0007558306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982826,0.00049999764,0.00007218516,0.00075930584,0.00005176407,0.0003341071],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007698778,0.00022593154,0.000201812,0.00003837964,0.0006594959,0.000102906655,0.00045495588,0.00012818532,0.0007622993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005116028,0.00012502604,0.00009607205,0.00040179715,0.0010290294,0.00011438983,0.000009704984,0.0004299177,0.0011183018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002026356,0.00015022571,0.000064570006,0.0000020251518,0.000032210944,0.000050415532,0.0006568864,2.3484849e-7,0.00006261542,0.9952114,0.0003138412,0.003252902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056951644,0.0010449309,0.0005180138,0.0000078579915,0.000014309293,0.000120477096,0.0006085877,0.00000902065,0.000028961107,0.9836864,0.013170329,0.00022162938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026493494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015732518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98710227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026446827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038533708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616958750","doi":"10.1111/papq.12199","title":"How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Epistemology; Tree (set theory); Mathematics","score_opus":0.055503050482700836,"score_gpt":0.23547257561663837,"score_spread":0.17996952513393755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616958750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00670298,0.00016790532,0.000052942203,0.10162069,0.0020692933,0.0002024868,0.00003826563,0.00019180967,0.8889536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96244615,0.000006165605,0.000065718246,0.00028014652,0.005178299,0.000042927826,0.0000048073744,0.00003531878,0.03194047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975575,0.00008739216,0.00034367948,0.000704987,0.0006394573,0.00066697487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977298,0.00009124542,0.00025271633,0.0013113765,0.00016969648,0.00044518718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034118432,0.00036831183,0.0004480644,0.00010967274,0.0029302456,0.0015867039,0.001183614,0.00016447598,0.00095154566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014868357,0.00029867282,0.0003051051,0.000036638645,0.0015932679,0.0009894363,0.000056092136,0.0005014776,0.0007066407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006970527,0.00022152715,0.000020238835,0.000024342706,0.000034469816,0.000054313565,0.012247631,1.3601593e-7,0.0004940795,0.96584606,0.0068244296,0.014163038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053005444,0.00054073654,0.0002184022,0.000026680998,0.000029370827,0.00000756856,0.0006913726,0.000098988094,0.000016652282,0.5613959,0.43594077,0.0005035267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034269964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114075716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098647826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004712671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968405612","doi":"10.1111/papq.12288","title":"Not as a Means: Killing as a Side Effect in Self‐defense","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Liability; FREAK; Pedestrian; Conflation; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.028148412364602485,"score_gpt":0.2523809947056704,"score_spread":0.2242325823410679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968405612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63656116,0.00010582448,0.000016372653,0.014134399,0.0011832357,0.00070188934,0.000022186156,0.00032064086,0.34695432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956466,0.000011216196,0.000039175477,0.00077701703,0.0012045437,0.00007100322,0.000029421422,0.000050036007,0.0021710128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974683,0.00030060424,0.000555578,0.0006299552,0.00051696744,0.0005286132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983381,0.0006555685,0.00014115003,0.00055759,0.00012445459,0.00018314585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094021764,0.00033151367,0.00046893992,0.00023581076,0.00027638898,0.00026486826,0.0002626401,0.00023289166,0.0008696218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011326242,0.00029328285,0.00019277539,0.00009585164,0.00021650792,0.00034799744,0.000016365158,0.00075646973,0.0066550253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039693984,0.00031911492,0.00016027247,0.00027492078,0.000064487205,0.000059662463,0.16480519,0.000009196982,0.001355883,0.8290401,0.00019238982,0.00332182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023142295,0.0034086315,0.00019077191,0.0003728341,0.00010135299,0.000030573672,0.014815025,0.0023565006,0.00039988616,0.943758,0.031205516,0.0010466384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019924006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011270563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35908544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008366983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007284388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.056002850331290994,"score_gpt":0.2697287505763414,"score_spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978502643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13047627,0.0009989019,0.000021863507,0.014243083,0.002139314,0.00029469255,0.00003567024,0.00018238141,0.85160786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934991,0.000029150362,0.000031201056,0.0001643545,0.0020296385,0.000021709175,0.00001122053,0.000033375298,0.004180222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.00015021906,0.00033236056,0.00048991083,0.00020261024,0.0004341298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872345,0.0004744741,0.0000680806,0.00038933379,0.00011368984,0.0002309965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035893492,0.0002574276,0.00043085444,0.000089388064,0.0002498815,0.00012196116,0.0001746443,0.00018771974,0.0007870663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003454923,0.00021692488,0.0001430825,0.00003422233,0.000786318,0.00020272614,0.000027132899,0.00055490446,0.001708987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032505624,0.00022053997,0.000027120968,0.00010796643,0.000040119,0.0000069451244,0.041228216,2.3632314e-8,0.000050585357,0.9545914,0.0002452769,0.003449333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007080059,0.0013480114,0.000117323914,0.000049776445,0.00003902401,0.000011190298,0.004833773,0.0001473303,0.0000055909345,0.9003702,0.09199344,0.0003763805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055829805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002230353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86302286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019200554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036597423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011821939","doi":"10.1111/papq.12308","title":"Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.049343989748643326,"score_gpt":0.2555141702994389,"score_spread":0.20617018055079558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011821939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44507214,0.0002843413,0.011514659,0.20086962,0.001865609,0.001024306,0.0002560468,0.0012298527,0.3378834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792594,0.000026784388,0.00006658429,0.0012093331,0.0005633711,0.000022426364,0.0000065169893,0.000025866218,0.00015317915],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980644,0.00012761954,0.00033621604,0.00067096966,0.00039740044,0.00040340546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912345,0.00013210153,0.00008149004,0.00018249603,0.00004504112,0.0004354383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009838398,0.00023819278,0.00025774006,0.000075669435,0.0002824283,0.0001406808,0.00024024342,0.00010416634,0.00028522985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038010255,0.00020869481,0.00011111339,0.00026783795,0.000352734,0.00026883508,0.00006282357,0.00043352548,0.00040186467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023553471,0.00048457808,0.0006884773,0.00012362492,0.000034353936,0.00023838562,0.0047081294,4.5571318e-7,0.5537913,0.3909787,0.0023710274,0.04634545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004940831,0.0071163466,0.0036825554,0.00031017314,0.0001708027,0.0006724522,0.002727423,0.009150779,0.028767828,0.9188933,0.02116235,0.0024051557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020524765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.6601926e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011824751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026188533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85103273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046505692","doi":"10.1111/papq.12320","title":"Some Hallucinations Are Experiences of the Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Hallucinations in medical conditions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SGS (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hallucinating; Object (grammar); Visual Hallucination; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sensory system; Causal chain; Attribution; sort; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.049506578069390746,"score_gpt":0.27567342117674637,"score_spread":0.22616684310735563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046505692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54255366,0.000071192415,0.0013397892,0.4296165,0.001051908,0.00065100536,0.000121481375,0.00027928886,0.024315173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679154,0.0000033783251,0.00006833691,0.0023338955,0.0006024398,0.00011045973,0.0000017136088,0.000014661718,0.00007355445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978738,0.00027395602,0.00040752857,0.00043933638,0.0007330047,0.0002724175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986896,0.0003811129,0.00019110632,0.00042178854,0.00007201011,0.00024437584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012931046,0.00015397667,0.00021194927,0.00006403828,0.00042324612,0.00004198634,0.00076715305,0.00009416461,0.00027721332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015064566,0.00011023246,0.00014704547,0.0007553949,0.0007882229,0.00027369524,0.000052547784,0.00039402806,0.000100760124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030169978,0.0006370447,0.0002330909,0.00008897915,0.00001619246,0.00003969479,0.08244462,0.000026414897,0.074697845,0.83645105,0.003743232,0.0015916601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012546469,0.001124475,0.003723362,0.0001283327,0.000057530564,0.000045034245,0.042357437,0.004267964,0.039725203,0.9022323,0.004329259,0.00075444876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.9277854e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6876324e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4542379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022952307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005379953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44951493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0519382189520884,"score_gpt":0.27408270464061174,"score_spread":0.22214448568852335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138020732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021746757,0.00044608375,0.0013469477,0.39794427,0.0045794877,0.0010122635,0.0017320588,0.0007717003,0.57042044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872541,0.000006829078,0.00021203958,0.0026262417,0.0073874467,0.00015630886,0.00022538939,0.0000888915,0.002042754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966955,0.00024065386,0.00070161995,0.000865171,0.00066808844,0.0008289525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975226,0.00035819525,0.0002055588,0.0008262417,0.00072177843,0.0003656175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067143084,0.00042889875,0.0006231412,0.00013848627,0.001032254,0.0005816386,0.00058232,0.00032118635,0.0013853712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036522964,0.00039663585,0.0005537425,0.00011444253,0.00095182145,0.00053380185,0.000098150915,0.0007406502,0.00011568545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014812656,0.00048081306,0.0000050212047,0.000082412815,0.00018772071,0.000034966266,0.013680323,2.402439e-7,0.0002074955,0.9805342,0.0035676593,0.0010710513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015053719,0.00039667502,0.000011400536,0.000032869142,0.00007853096,0.000013854306,0.0015379477,0.00017694404,0.00002015278,0.8352277,0.16054538,0.00045312312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001219418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058700378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006704142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015281244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204643877","doi":"10.1111/papq.12388","title":"‘True’ as Polysemous","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Extensibility; Epistemology; Philosophy; Polysemy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.019313032145618022,"score_gpt":0.3018161903339666,"score_spread":0.2825031581883486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204643877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054846086,0.0003315427,0.00041707946,0.041896336,0.0013508566,0.00011947857,0.000024202389,0.0002235741,0.90079087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994185,0.00000318057,0.00013672857,0.0016053148,0.0009826032,0.000037591544,0.000013122633,0.00002893381,0.0030075482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970386,0.000337615,0.0004152845,0.0008780264,0.0005059967,0.000824501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979786,0.00028538017,0.00007617169,0.00094719895,0.00011016213,0.00060247234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036451145,0.00028032972,0.0003486518,0.00007907798,0.00028221446,0.0000961262,0.00045397395,0.0002691093,0.008518403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013533747,0.00025290114,0.00022760824,0.00062871096,0.00056701334,0.0001412154,0.000043958094,0.0005248495,0.008968181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008806887,0.00040428413,0.000032653767,0.0000053796525,0.000041662955,0.0008669786,0.001668523,1.4008039e-7,0.0024885908,0.9834345,0.0003133792,0.010655811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052114466,0.00057767093,0.0006327354,0.000014521699,0.000022576505,0.00040593208,0.00069254386,0.000017002641,0.00047812407,0.99255174,0.003745512,0.00034048737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009181882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010868739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93933886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003846155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008241312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208017042","doi":"10.1111/papq.12371","title":"Frege's Critical Arguments for Axioms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principle of sufficient reason; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03357800758751189,"score_gpt":0.34048962371306585,"score_spread":0.30691161612555395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208017042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012125401,0.00052882975,0.03309667,0.11096131,0.004106565,0.00051692774,0.00025956926,0.00031803452,0.83808666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959696,0.0000015907844,0.00074854697,0.0011104195,0.0012051084,0.00018689451,0.000027721459,0.00003263471,0.0007174763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697715,0.0002447421,0.00046377824,0.00093976414,0.0004277153,0.0009468783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974731,0.0009701466,0.000056078305,0.00074321294,0.00017133188,0.000586082],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048675682,0.00028096783,0.0003792699,0.00006852675,0.0003505882,0.000107208514,0.00041494684,0.0002833315,0.0025921068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041341005,0.00025697533,0.0002836034,0.0003860474,0.00074712967,0.00016525641,0.000035397123,0.00036826378,0.0010826931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135218,0.0006342543,0.000014815518,0.000020843672,0.00004433089,0.00015853942,0.0009909145,1.06632626e-7,0.0013580784,0.9909071,0.00053450745,0.0052012946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080009166,0.0008039447,0.00027745593,0.00002518393,0.000036993253,0.000104463375,0.000492515,0.0001005036,0.00033878238,0.9933002,0.003379208,0.0003406753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018281982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.373129e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040335257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056723715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206038229","doi":"10.1111/papq.12404","title":"Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0426968052843611,"score_gpt":0.21681907196566763,"score_spread":0.17412226668130654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206038229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.335739,0.0006219116,0.00001263434,0.102401644,0.0013255151,0.00081074645,0.00029319324,0.000104052626,0.5586913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828887,7.944285e-7,0.000011947379,0.00027660807,0.0002740736,0.00005382564,0.000005219195,0.000004713571,0.0010839632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879944,0.00019017246,0.00024577422,0.00021606188,0.00040483367,0.00014370322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.000115234994,0.00011326719,0.00020102343,0.00006366931,0.00005555734],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050667743,0.00009953401,0.00018051272,0.000036607486,0.0015038085,0.000056300734,0.00028137103,0.0000138305595,0.0014081183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018863104,0.000053655116,0.000065184635,0.00004603224,0.0026595353,0.00017671725,0.000041455703,0.00023217793,0.0000062781005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015937605,0.000028194387,0.000018731003,0.000011596525,0.000009243843,0.0000013535832,0.03220132,0.0000025284235,0.000084510924,0.9663058,0.00027735293,0.0009000197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061809976,0.00040918792,0.00017517532,0.0000038838134,0.000011462102,0.000012479225,0.0035172591,0.0005262077,0.0000036539889,0.9799735,0.0146296,0.000119486365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005389131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013505559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66254985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021429516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004179789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09859490224146784,"score_gpt":0.26310399378009874,"score_spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245134956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017085,0.00037698908,0.00024294533,0.14199153,0.0016486543,0.0002836053,0.000066545,0.0005274001,0.8377773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889696,0.000006669373,0.000049179213,0.0024822217,0.005620627,0.000019460225,0.000021650425,0.000041349205,0.0027892122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982931,0.0001638737,0.00038185922,0.0004637038,0.00027878178,0.00041868052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884075,0.00015739333,0.00009889739,0.00030565503,0.0001848838,0.00041242046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020084699,0.00026434055,0.00039925508,0.00004775639,0.0004412134,0.00015443457,0.00030006966,0.00013855322,0.0014660833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009661763,0.00023064594,0.00022755217,0.0000615485,0.00071800273,0.0002018868,0.000020766847,0.00062558515,0.002201748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041864074,0.00011190745,0.000013085182,0.000087566805,0.000050219096,0.000026945128,0.10320393,2.2048431e-7,0.00038427033,0.88734776,0.00618951,0.0025427325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056416716,0.0009210028,0.000031138024,0.000028573568,0.000051639036,0.00000388907,0.0068408363,0.00030026174,0.000048888487,0.6614719,0.32929212,0.00044560505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000053264253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012913791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018259552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005791638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05132110497605342,"score_gpt":0.26061929141733786,"score_spread":0.20929818644128445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286488953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107805274,0.00087206444,0.00008980185,0.025754238,0.0025942193,0.00042579527,0.0003860739,0.00013259772,0.8619399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704117,0.0000068590266,0.0000051593756,0.00028062816,0.0008067002,0.00009773829,0.000024356317,0.000020266294,0.001717105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822325,0.00037757348,0.00039318713,0.0002554987,0.0004203351,0.00033016928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834126,0.00093392364,0.00018859105,0.00028360361,0.00016725036,0.00008536106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008461738,0.00015706333,0.00026357468,0.000056987843,0.0017008276,0.00006379071,0.00030857034,0.000046933368,0.0005694155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067974455,0.00011551961,0.00019070093,0.000066747714,0.0012490008,0.000085177075,0.000043560038,0.0006228508,0.000043106033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010979689,0.00014166701,0.000036790778,0.000018809078,0.000068895475,0.000007412972,0.0451783,4.750253e-7,0.000031107138,0.95154583,0.00046964543,0.002391262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039360343,0.0011578614,0.0000655369,0.00001058889,0.000050096136,0.00000759091,0.04872525,0.0000380508,0.000024597552,0.89366853,0.05568645,0.00017186177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017055245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003290746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8892359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021052356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006264377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698627","doi":"10.1111/papq.12447","title":"A Regularity Theory of Causation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Transitive relation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Causal theory of reference; Causality (physics); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Data mining; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.045275931415539386,"score_gpt":0.23554930431762042,"score_spread":0.19027337290208102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390698627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02613694,0.0011982947,0.00053754635,0.015817557,0.0021422375,0.00020661498,0.00010472646,0.0003672365,0.9534888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964217,0.0000035202884,0.000036359295,0.000077995195,0.0010762342,0.0000123685095,0.000007859485,0.000013113985,0.0023508451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877423,0.00008598935,0.0002960316,0.00031210433,0.00032426586,0.00020735677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993899,0.00013096757,0.000051502477,0.0002566617,0.00007414798,0.000096844975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056124665,0.00013813449,0.00018750053,0.00016870095,0.00028296464,0.00012696812,0.00020079159,0.00006052751,0.0012177455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020933037,0.00011597458,0.00013722901,0.000084021965,0.0010615074,0.00042135123,0.0000096655185,0.00021750832,0.00023629963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027647404,0.00006085919,0.000001348312,0.000078279954,0.000019186691,0.00001220335,0.03274821,2.2737245e-7,0.00063441804,0.9594811,0.00059056387,0.0063459603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072843155,0.00037493822,0.000030467567,0.00007072594,0.000021515238,0.0000062911613,0.0012364094,0.00015609228,0.00004486197,0.96157205,0.036270462,0.00014334237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007822341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000082070865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97028476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003612988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005512531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.04134218617910647,"score_gpt":0.2678413251231641,"score_spread":0.22649913894405765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011252508,0.0005840116,0.00049284654,0.1341893,0.0026162479,0.00030912587,0.000033392294,0.00021066671,0.8503119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842296,0.000014243867,0.000033622968,0.0021038952,0.001917864,0.00004705076,0.000012318764,0.000016673494,0.011624697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840677,0.00021681054,0.00037619745,0.0003475649,0.000239838,0.0004128263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986719,0.00049003854,0.00008089805,0.0005270634,0.00014516471,0.00008492688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059765996,0.00021477319,0.0002889495,0.00010023009,0.0010160494,0.0002491383,0.00040145573,0.00012158059,0.00030790226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054804314,0.00014235449,0.00020866055,0.000091226604,0.0011868471,0.00014340559,0.000024636121,0.00073619385,0.00026437402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025476129,0.00007779142,0.000016077967,0.0000386042,0.000064794716,0.0000057295556,0.022606786,6.8065725e-7,0.00006501565,0.9696529,0.0025586793,0.0048874626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001928595,0.00013349905,0.00003164772,0.000033127388,0.00003812071,0.0000019159252,0.0039429357,0.000079689045,0.000018608027,0.7901318,0.20525156,0.00014420663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033261706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062549254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026449483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006973865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78147334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}