{"meta":{"query_hash":"cad19525a097","filters":{"venue":"Parliamentary Affairs"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cad19525a097","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Parliamentary+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1980063009","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst009","title":"Activism or Democracy? Judicial Review of Prerogative Powers and Executive Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Democracy; Politics; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Parliament; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.034420464553759154,"score_gpt":0.3157295645846952,"score_spread":0.28130910003093607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980063009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13615361,0.13278879,0.006571649,0.20294957,0.001948121,0.00016123804,0.00016041457,0.000059101985,0.51920754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95361537,0.01840169,0.0009319214,0.010252911,0.0014215724,0.000041095132,0.00003719646,0.00001856349,0.015279751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840804,0.007925584,0.00059158326,0.0011891217,0.0036679786,0.0025453838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93951374,0.039796423,0.006541471,0.0026286724,0.009933552,0.0015861521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018513462,0.000113414084,0.00045114118,0.002975423,0.003267502,0.0071429545,0.0011895694,0.0023183841,0.00317454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06779404,0.00018289757,0.0001977842,0.0030606408,0.01638096,0.0044418885,0.0012925946,0.002870293,0.0002782781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037082304,0.00003925111,0.004189084,0.000307238,0.00002533527,0.000102443,0.010104298,0.00024561232,0.00040027354,0.88380826,0.017327238,0.08341381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007141372,0.00017558,0.048267853,0.0026235187,0.00007588392,0.00027134456,0.017923651,0.0005123052,0.0020462163,0.2700632,0.65786284,0.000106137355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09336641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1544266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09336641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010792415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022074718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18564594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000859904","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss065","title":"Presidentialism and Voter Turnout in Legislative Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Turnout; Political science; Public administration; Representation (politics); Political economy; Proportional representation; Democracy; Politics; Voting; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030545030758948533,"score_gpt":0.33227381097851216,"score_spread":0.3017287802195636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000859904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99836296,0.00013583574,0.000066136745,0.000055084583,0.000006624725,0.0000029332934,0.000088414614,0.0000033242534,0.0012786072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.00004719899,0.000017466144,0.0000057794978,0.000018600645,0.0000020954524,0.00012911297,0.0000021823676,0.00037642088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986333,0.00064399693,0.00007359921,0.00015439559,0.0001505358,0.00034405282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877724,0.0045120465,0.0049924464,0.00051676505,0.0004723466,0.0017340052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024004949,0.00017777327,0.00042769036,0.0013013844,0.00059542066,0.0013766735,0.0002553962,0.00031279708,0.0039354316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799822,0.00017756812,0.00052438263,0.0011363757,0.00055237307,0.00052189216,0.0008907019,0.00060277135,0.00062370417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002673693,0.00006360973,0.9939241,0.000013646975,0.000101426114,0.000047952726,0.0005303711,0.00018739299,0.00032848652,0.00021105459,0.00014060325,0.0041839792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026965145,0.0000458632,0.99928766,0.0000026647485,0.000013525032,0.000028497512,0.00018590831,0.00009908624,0.000071134105,0.000048791382,0.00021210247,0.0000020066295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003976717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009922009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003976717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039414555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020857839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013165295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001964183","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst015","title":"From Opposition to Government: Party Merger as a Step on the Road to Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Opposition (politics); Power sharing; Ratification; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Public relations; Public administration; Power (physics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0232991714323684,"score_gpt":0.2955528634126063,"score_spread":0.27225369198023786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001964183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6791461,0.0006579424,0.0030466486,0.0142712975,0.00011438581,0.00008059821,0.000025574334,0.00002532358,0.3026321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461836,0.00009563754,0.00019416932,0.00046280536,0.000017392109,0.0000145540635,0.000009761859,0.000008693678,0.0045785652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98275006,0.009662505,0.00020494105,0.0005240308,0.0032953243,0.0035632802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931564,0.0035388274,0.0011688059,0.00028026337,0.00082868215,0.0010270613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062223743,0.00021513354,0.0003511747,0.0013019589,0.019614808,0.014163115,0.0010081842,0.0028577254,0.0044861143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017901316,0.00031019887,0.00032661262,0.0017907361,0.021074947,0.0055711423,0.009687959,0.0058182497,0.0006084516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024357754,0.00012551984,0.01840641,0.00010436233,0.000013589084,0.001847148,0.5424594,0.00028853506,0.001966551,0.3944294,0.005142977,0.034972508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041060463,0.00010969461,0.022639556,0.00019245691,0.00001587176,0.0008132682,0.7560507,0.00079376786,0.0010172672,0.059499353,0.1587658,0.000061240506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055821396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08316049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055821396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011014158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014005017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11099297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195698","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsq009","title":"French Electoral Reform and the Abstention Rate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Law","score_opus":0.016041253696349574,"score_gpt":0.2931366183630743,"score_spread":0.27709536466672474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971003,0.00020212133,0.00017297687,0.00021084426,0.0000049118453,0.0000053698764,0.0001773165,0.000008426365,0.0021178478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993082,0.000032819727,0.00004544274,0.000012044929,0.000012358197,0.0000034337997,0.0001787729,0.0000016001869,0.00040527535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982792,0.0007965592,0.00009183361,0.00022019487,0.00032480957,0.00028747157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861384,0.004162977,0.00469234,0.000634177,0.0011597864,0.0007367932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027788165,0.00013021956,0.00043388226,0.0016692994,0.0005358418,0.0011580024,0.0002791553,0.00048579558,0.002716786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011760213,0.000067757974,0.00028389285,0.0013288163,0.0007621616,0.0004019634,0.0004369852,0.00060789456,0.0004196981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074764364,0.00017501196,0.9614353,0.000045578297,0.000113506976,0.000112123504,0.0020880601,0.002430861,0.0015692192,0.004465115,0.0008267296,0.025990756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007833795,0.000096482254,0.996923,0.000004663075,0.000008093103,0.00003170761,0.00023155486,0.00065313024,0.00012872063,0.0002986173,0.0016092266,0.000006960834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024775475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023345925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024775475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020418814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004567576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049262524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015689969","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr028","title":"Transforming the Future Parliament Through the Effective Use of Digital Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Digital media; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.031129285006460488,"score_gpt":0.2599042559535575,"score_spread":0.228774970947097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015689969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25384644,0.0022402597,0.027394801,0.024732992,0.00040624922,0.00009758121,0.000068990244,0.00034090024,0.6908718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177195,0.00060718955,0.0036343716,0.00071756856,0.0001409094,0.000043099546,0.00002603928,0.000047254856,0.013011617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902278,0.0071423207,0.00027702475,0.0004992041,0.0010915184,0.0007620677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896477,0.006519321,0.001346156,0.0010549587,0.00057187624,0.0008599851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008642499,0.0002208227,0.00023807841,0.0023108171,0.0060748872,0.015283969,0.00083599234,0.0013365975,0.0054378747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014696996,0.00029767904,0.0003204904,0.0017276997,0.013101632,0.0066333315,0.006331396,0.001957917,0.001178873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007527983,0.00017954937,0.011574965,0.00030713587,0.00004548746,0.0004774336,0.20056933,0.0010111453,0.0037169359,0.54964834,0.0103605585,0.22203389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047073427,0.00012993634,0.010986711,0.0005642744,0.000054013977,0.0003940457,0.106112376,0.0016821243,0.004023924,0.1527661,0.72316897,0.000070499256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029007695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047010933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015283969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029275906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039526974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04570645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017657956","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.1.12","title":"Canada: unity and diversity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01357255480699865,"score_gpt":0.22873023362191827,"score_spread":0.21515767881491962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017657956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010706275,0.040917184,0.00039163374,0.22015086,0.002668241,0.000038922957,0.0029397348,0.00010899818,0.7220781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40136746,0.035138298,0.0010531117,0.026892284,0.0013518527,0.000044760163,0.0016227779,0.00022577467,0.5323037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973168,0.00021339547,0.000051751944,0.00019495827,0.0012925359,0.0009306014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588215,0.0002584109,0.00013335845,0.00011973605,0.0012360812,0.0023702697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096402445,0.00032176584,0.0005450794,0.001698948,0.016887017,0.013465363,0.00085220113,0.0023379605,0.05326855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049592415,0.00028201067,0.00020188156,0.0057847337,0.007222253,0.002936994,0.00470154,0.0025599455,0.0033683986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023632836,0.000010473314,0.0020050379,0.0001721873,0.000011007429,0.00012693497,0.0038079494,0.00014172347,0.000074682735,0.13926092,0.80791056,0.046454974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006440718,0.0000035213318,0.005811985,0.0002306445,0.000004867304,0.000047338242,0.0037106355,0.000042243068,0.00003093668,0.008222981,0.9818719,0.00001641921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0719267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0719267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1968238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52186716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019464039","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsl026","title":"M. GALLAGHER and P. MITCHELL (eds), The Politics of ElectoralSystems, Oxford University Press, 2005, xxvi + 662 pp., £75, ISBN 0 19 925756 6.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Electoral reform; Alliance; Context (archaeology); Voting; Political science; Electoral system; Politics; Commit; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.01171217456464382,"score_gpt":0.23220379319427165,"score_spread":0.22049161862962782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019464039","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028545942,0.96430326,0.0007472746,0.007282907,0.0014560167,0.000008760519,0.00013119674,0.000056639925,0.025728524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0078292675,0.92977667,0.0017039744,0.001785599,0.0018437179,0.000031919702,0.00031661126,0.000088069435,0.056624115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883205,0.000337943,0.00009187219,0.00019453908,0.00042310328,0.00012052234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998723,0.0007155792,0.00014183034,0.000083617844,0.00016613162,0.00016995652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017276076,0.0017106337,0.0013902652,0.0028091243,0.0014894223,0.006971816,0.0013811475,0.003055185,0.04622912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026237434,0.0011777136,0.00053788896,0.0059994366,0.0037872344,0.0071971393,0.0022020338,0.002626765,0.027973622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045082972,0.000040200244,0.0006871364,0.002393687,0.000029649036,0.00008424078,0.0015495565,0.0003916785,0.00013611412,0.041230045,0.6188715,0.33454105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053722774,0.000008838369,0.0014003367,0.001292836,0.000008619535,0.00015926755,0.0005515971,0.000061084684,0.000039683153,0.010135362,0.9863258,0.000011132721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019327505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04482098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04622912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041219676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043530082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15465182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021532673","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsl015","title":"One Step at a Time: Australian Parliamentarians, Professionalism and the Need for Staff","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Parliament; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Isolation (microbiology); Perception; Phenomenon; Sociology; Period (music); Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344040264307846,"score_gpt":0.27917234024225857,"score_spread":0.2528282999779507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021532673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75238746,0.0066340766,0.0007785961,0.10378728,0.00054649037,0.000026852485,0.000018916466,0.000019856,0.13580036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98425967,0.0016414952,0.0002595967,0.0042435667,0.000098868295,0.000014646379,0.000004900176,0.000008661463,0.009468565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914268,0.0049846317,0.00022718971,0.00031466334,0.0016485467,0.0013981803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940532,0.0021545265,0.0009883166,0.0001751392,0.0008518124,0.0017770429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006153887,0.00015710996,0.0002742279,0.0012347526,0.018580262,0.007223614,0.0010410507,0.0036906956,0.0018870259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011534205,0.00041530546,0.0001810224,0.0021000607,0.014672056,0.003994615,0.0050152903,0.0035913428,0.00036212063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034612254,0.000085221975,0.0072024544,0.00014712459,0.000006928375,0.0007622892,0.89880776,0.000052702493,0.00032379036,0.059286296,0.008187012,0.025103852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012582292,0.00015266471,0.061589625,0.000386094,0.000024959405,0.00095209014,0.71056926,0.00023351987,0.000293891,0.019763334,0.20595545,0.00006645916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13765493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19563545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13765493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012399417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018903961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2737074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075506508","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.2.328","title":"The encroachment of the law on politics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016117836920532803,"score_gpt":0.26485079145478935,"score_spread":0.24873295453425653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075506508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029636705,0.009523531,0.0025488562,0.11828003,0.00095938734,0.000021272153,0.000051897925,0.00007348231,0.8389049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92092943,0.0051022773,0.0005494478,0.014748878,0.0016958169,0.00003929549,0.000027256543,0.00009845665,0.056809146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843164,0.0069646575,0.000370299,0.0012523872,0.0051476574,0.0019485754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982957,0.011675038,0.0010407852,0.0019104199,0.0013588816,0.0010578338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006694966,0.00022807742,0.0004975027,0.0022154355,0.009990161,0.021967435,0.0008607703,0.008003279,0.016730633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025148433,0.00062748283,0.00038597602,0.0029671437,0.07080999,0.013138492,0.011015482,0.011909734,0.0021085136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075389135,0.000008151275,0.00013335202,0.000018397795,0.0000030721412,0.000077426885,0.004449646,0.000042927568,0.00012411295,0.9812014,0.008983038,0.004950932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029505416,0.00002665628,0.0027854738,0.00037838513,0.000008972746,0.00020750205,0.0050185,0.00022615223,0.00036916698,0.56473565,0.4261893,0.000024723475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016482253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014509341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021967435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008285018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008006421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060112298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086487938","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss075","title":"French Election Theory: Why Sarkozy Lost","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.018878239858642128,"score_gpt":0.29325331040542035,"score_spread":0.27437507054677823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086487938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08805427,0.1496803,0.02285465,0.2016283,0.002794304,0.000039135244,0.00027059633,0.00021671008,0.5344617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391842,0.020875545,0.0013026694,0.008195345,0.0023972567,0.000035116806,0.000118265976,0.00007079083,0.027820764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972466,0.0013823066,0.000065948545,0.00036035714,0.00044303449,0.0005016428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631906,0.0023092933,0.0003691499,0.00021430454,0.00059560273,0.00019253272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004253555,0.00048946345,0.0006422875,0.0026934042,0.0033466201,0.0048013106,0.00082449045,0.002184045,0.0074109584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006568965,0.00025015647,0.00072695606,0.0021445008,0.006565074,0.004292176,0.00097051583,0.0023405366,0.0016006663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067784,0.00002061503,0.0032893224,0.00015700667,0.000028474336,0.000115464245,0.004422851,0.0010698916,0.000052405998,0.9316508,0.02302108,0.03614141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030351788,0.00010061311,0.016865442,0.00061374105,0.000046876805,0.00041224243,0.005070632,0.003044456,0.00022742621,0.3306585,0.64286256,0.00006728356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043829728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027111027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043829728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084809195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018953102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08714926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091839077","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss091","title":"A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have used Freedom of Information in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Opposition (politics); Creatures; Freedom of information; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01777150176184071,"score_gpt":0.2626345562561618,"score_spread":0.24486305449432105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091839077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6030417,0.0068023843,0.0026899257,0.13106439,0.0014262919,0.00006137567,0.00013040799,0.00007360418,0.25471002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97600955,0.00082252995,0.00015292731,0.0058687027,0.00009264726,0.0000123851105,0.000016813014,0.000037511814,0.016986845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632616,0.02017565,0.0019034818,0.002088303,0.0058200066,0.0067508235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786751,0.010728462,0.0034960152,0.0014967779,0.002818885,0.0027846787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014853348,0.00018865404,0.00048864365,0.0012349696,0.014323923,0.014129885,0.0009415528,0.004880806,0.008200078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050837573,0.0004877318,0.00045848222,0.0021634344,0.017290022,0.01009925,0.0068035126,0.0058120796,0.0014723144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017182523,0.000057611524,0.018271198,0.00021969512,0.00003823037,0.0014406337,0.67628324,0.00031890135,0.0010248375,0.22902355,0.025462015,0.04768822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000406742,0.00015148633,0.03258174,0.00063127186,0.000029502658,0.00074791507,0.25150672,0.00027443568,0.0009185153,0.012413055,0.700404,0.00030083986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.170465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1457952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.170465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014630325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007352133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33894557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093765104","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss092","title":"Why do Publics Support Minority Governments? Three Tests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Publics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Outcome (game theory); Minority rights; Political economy; Minority group; Federal election; Public administration; Sociology; Ethnic group; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.044218153293746947,"score_gpt":0.32136843641272966,"score_spread":0.2771502831189827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093765104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505983,0.00019750666,0.0005731222,0.0052878945,0.000037312642,0.000114028044,0.000924926,0.000017327568,0.042249653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865866,0.000034702985,0.00010668261,0.00014691555,0.00001707555,0.000034777062,0.00014696627,0.0000018564533,0.0008523535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965581,0.0009614036,0.00014860288,0.0005460468,0.00080237933,0.0009833752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542208,0.028872116,0.0095640905,0.0018377436,0.002526801,0.0029785798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055504777,0.0003948729,0.0005245421,0.00092045264,0.001716019,0.0019048859,0.0015897478,0.0015847937,0.024177317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028810019,0.000141878,0.0007229546,0.0011335431,0.0038856817,0.0020695482,0.0015698569,0.00086781644,0.0010530795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002740421,0.00072766474,0.8829972,0.00046995925,0.00062869635,0.00045742298,0.012278213,0.00061679765,0.0012647288,0.05366803,0.0056540486,0.03849685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044076683,0.0005350146,0.94498956,0.000101042795,0.00030201787,0.00013271747,0.02695914,0.0033632207,0.0007677747,0.012536088,0.0098309,0.0000418892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059805203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049133472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059805203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024078223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031160598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11891425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096184668","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr063","title":"Women's Representation around the World: The Importance of Women's Participation in the Workforce","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Workforce; Demographic economics; Aside; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06878359742759102,"score_gpt":0.3420049495537449,"score_spread":0.27322135212615384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096184668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367737,0.002141723,0.0005512706,0.009185387,0.00013558462,0.0000104012015,0.0002512127,0.00000730979,0.05094352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832684,0.00042898222,0.000047151767,0.0002015931,0.000061978346,0.0000040092377,0.000052639032,0.0000028479683,0.0008739323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666154,0.002036621,0.00008329673,0.00020041982,0.00041686234,0.00060128444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940503,0.0027322487,0.0018872151,0.00027008666,0.0005090145,0.00055111287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030792214,0.00010614569,0.00022333332,0.0011320695,0.0007505696,0.0027419848,0.00036767646,0.000503523,0.0041653067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012705409,0.000089579604,0.00015226501,0.0023706104,0.0017479357,0.0019891218,0.0016084388,0.00065028114,0.00029612926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003915749,0.00016566472,0.63749206,0.00035986898,0.00022683777,0.00059437077,0.08491814,0.00090285606,0.0011639069,0.039150007,0.009203021,0.22543176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061161704,0.00011742746,0.89521056,0.000286387,0.000038996666,0.00021499673,0.06299577,0.00041311095,0.00035190006,0.005590217,0.03474472,0.000029740015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065852287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009570417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065852287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007344413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006549559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016284645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107563466","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr065","title":"Strengthening Citizen Participation in Public Policy-Making: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Public administration; Public participation; Accountability; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09295272999640955,"score_gpt":0.3897693587419152,"score_spread":0.29681662874550563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107563466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02600373,0.019051408,0.0048015583,0.39793342,0.0013003163,0.00023992617,0.00040649145,0.000107224645,0.5501559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8972071,0.025496827,0.008295308,0.02220015,0.0005059547,0.0002149174,0.0002460569,0.00009816297,0.045735512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96993756,0.011536123,0.0005713124,0.0013154546,0.007375032,0.009264489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750955,0.007090223,0.00091088936,0.0006784711,0.009205809,0.0070191463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019374127,0.0009334401,0.0010039633,0.006618894,0.037466098,0.020672895,0.0034393163,0.006538748,0.008984651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416589,0.0004490611,0.00084479,0.011399854,0.026234737,0.008297482,0.008013877,0.007321908,0.00059319683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058505233,0.00008629378,0.0039666966,0.0005391209,0.00003471348,0.0004240454,0.051268633,0.0012527338,0.00028065965,0.84484255,0.052714933,0.04453115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045693032,0.00004637525,0.010513227,0.0017423953,0.00008253733,0.00014236847,0.08666555,0.0014711436,0.00039405056,0.119997665,0.7787176,0.0001814901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98799706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98903614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78680086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21319917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44019926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91257745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118072304","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss022","title":"World Bank Institute's Approach to Parliamentary Capacity Strengthening","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.043208706116970835,"score_gpt":0.2815677802250787,"score_spread":0.2383590741081079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118072304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00185434,0.0038026494,0.057744112,0.14289406,0.0040867347,0.0007813629,0.0003874362,0.0004573389,0.787992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25251505,0.009788634,0.19164851,0.07476495,0.0028035732,0.0067530745,0.0005057949,0.000485636,0.46073475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812061,0.008154208,0.0009768127,0.0019067732,0.0058129155,0.0019431702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924488,0.0023236847,0.00069441414,0.0006914774,0.002381345,0.0014603299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016931787,0.0009701914,0.00072311575,0.0071704085,0.006254567,0.019689938,0.0031743753,0.009398302,0.00917383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016817005,0.00080935203,0.0013678038,0.005639544,0.012202516,0.0065383604,0.011299953,0.01729871,0.0027968052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058574324,0.00003654118,0.00014448733,0.0001029733,0.000014086133,0.00009150655,0.0011474899,0.0004242592,0.00009880874,0.9348631,0.050189763,0.012881094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019459478,0.000022030825,0.0006017286,0.0004320899,0.000018350742,0.00017791096,0.0010155978,0.00063006073,0.00034231867,0.18633176,0.8103697,0.00003895574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022929467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021865357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022929467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019110324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05321594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13865572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151790217","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss001","title":"The Problem of the 'Lame Duck' Government: A Critique of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Term (time); Law; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Classics; Philosophy; Art; History; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013543596393313003,"score_gpt":0.28047263661647676,"score_spread":0.26692904022316377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151790217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017718293,0.00801615,0.0135327745,0.43968964,0.0015615962,0.000060140017,0.00012741699,0.00009457943,0.5191995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265752,0.0021185207,0.0063346885,0.08585551,0.0015911332,0.00031466168,0.00006298394,0.00020129082,0.07694592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96666425,0.0171415,0.0009925149,0.002969517,0.009226375,0.0030059104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98287857,0.011915853,0.0008768968,0.0014153725,0.0022468497,0.00066656986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019716261,0.0004881495,0.0009735916,0.0016264367,0.0150576,0.017759359,0.0038963214,0.026512938,0.0034349437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033114012,0.0007225819,0.0010997573,0.0019733207,0.06442315,0.0077407993,0.0053520347,0.024891607,0.0011552696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028547315,0.0000016273544,0.00002240447,0.0000061215087,0.0000011036778,0.000016471615,0.0014586204,0.00003881093,0.00000911025,0.99345857,0.00435495,0.0006294279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042578493,0.000015477324,0.0005581649,0.00022170189,0.00001455053,0.000107207314,0.0026312706,0.0006368753,0.00013201976,0.76235926,0.23323564,0.00004523221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10298952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08732982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10298952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022322038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01883267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2047801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162995758","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss087","title":"BAME Candidates in Local Elections in Britain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Ethnic group; White (mutation); Political science; Strong ties; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Interpersonal ties; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.01888868794184056,"score_gpt":0.29148159505337795,"score_spread":0.2725929071115374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162995758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979588,0.00010247157,0.000011427077,0.0001334558,0.000007852644,0.000004592006,0.000043070508,0.0000010582181,0.0017372553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980484,0.00007512971,0.000013136868,0.000038287988,0.000006814544,0.000006089637,0.000055533168,0.0000019444335,0.0017546151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847716,0.00063027797,0.00008120131,0.00011738976,0.0002451901,0.00044875577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975968,0.00035945565,0.00060708413,0.000051617648,0.00028526082,0.0010997255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088576815,0.00010022061,0.00036988113,0.0012373622,0.0025550409,0.0013540109,0.00027028171,0.00042759004,0.006388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003107813,0.00023038237,0.0001250627,0.0017059523,0.0007466457,0.0003744747,0.00139277,0.0006314986,0.00093803956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049714145,0.00035185902,0.92877245,0.00012494421,0.000030353945,0.00095647067,0.048953343,0.000073021234,0.001388281,0.00092170003,0.002547071,0.015383315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008313482,0.00012732515,0.9727937,0.000020704661,0.000004026672,0.00012901377,0.024013007,0.000033829918,0.0000511908,0.00002923347,0.0027829236,0.0000067236083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03919956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13428333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03919956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009767648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064037344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07794279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319668209","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw008","title":"Presence and Purpose in the Canadian House of Commons: The Standing Committee on the Status of Women","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Commons; Gender mainstreaming; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Work (physics); Law; Gender equality; Politics","score_opus":0.04024181020108458,"score_gpt":0.29025226721401276,"score_spread":0.2500104570129282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319668209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50056976,0.008477535,0.0020447292,0.0797765,0.0016057023,0.00024581776,0.0007705159,0.00007404341,0.40643537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611898,0.0012692581,0.0004974391,0.0030740926,0.00011049443,0.000042024112,0.00011864467,0.000044078668,0.033654198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716591,0.0051999534,0.00046442493,0.001467595,0.012229294,0.008979562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726862,0.0067290976,0.0020991492,0.0009247979,0.010811148,0.0067497347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020672124,0.0003694313,0.0006328135,0.0044967574,0.043548632,0.01877111,0.0026515713,0.0029524346,0.004382216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035814706,0.00063004915,0.00039627947,0.0069230194,0.029694777,0.0037620342,0.006560587,0.0039054577,0.0003338219],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013563177,0.00006763904,0.048697848,0.00023907873,0.000051583535,0.0008704262,0.3972099,0.00045162172,0.0015009389,0.38176388,0.072111726,0.096899696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011165741,0.000034806282,0.09608805,0.00050533016,0.000036670284,0.00007876812,0.27392086,0.00022682558,0.0009238813,0.0083285235,0.6196684,0.00017670797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18139204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3021594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331784301","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst017","title":"Television in the Legislature: The Impact of Cameras in the House of Commons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; Commons; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03261840524710502,"score_gpt":0.3417323945801023,"score_spread":0.3091139893329973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331784301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88994396,0.0012406643,0.0002855873,0.0040799757,0.000049954942,0.000038584043,0.00014999861,0.000012225628,0.10419907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676657,0.00027488158,0.00006942775,0.00014389824,0.000024611067,0.0000053526,0.000036738467,0.0000060502816,0.002672606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915923,0.0043326933,0.00015442233,0.00041716942,0.0020336516,0.0014698094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97682106,0.013760494,0.0036962861,0.0007404125,0.0030377922,0.0019439154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049627395,0.00014343837,0.00025587052,0.0022507461,0.006155057,0.0069106715,0.00084151496,0.0010109127,0.009101597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029129988,0.00020742297,0.00028882886,0.0039587542,0.0077416087,0.002838076,0.0033906004,0.0018688606,0.00033986947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074620114,0.000455053,0.41989657,0.00041391622,0.00012241246,0.00064107677,0.31641713,0.00127413,0.0021095066,0.07658883,0.009077664,0.17225751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019851826,0.00016268448,0.76795,0.00027400145,0.000059018603,0.00013287395,0.15419929,0.00038318403,0.0008793398,0.0018695563,0.07402117,0.000049106435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47722974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58559406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021682914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007471424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9489039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517252592","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw026","title":"The Presidentialisation Thesis and Parliamentary Budget Offices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Presidential system; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.023012603946736043,"score_gpt":0.29612920901809764,"score_spread":0.2731166050713616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517252592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14373262,0.0048177773,0.022539552,0.053828556,0.0005987224,0.00006310885,0.00016357361,0.000053265165,0.7742029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97119147,0.0008607786,0.0019533853,0.0015921021,0.00078538427,0.000072484174,0.00006775812,0.000031550568,0.023445051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320686,0.0035926942,0.00018193801,0.00083252735,0.0008367456,0.0013492103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306905,0.003999887,0.0012590423,0.00042940443,0.00057335116,0.0006692896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005863626,0.00032203714,0.00035764423,0.00150083,0.004154087,0.00674345,0.0008773537,0.0018907028,0.01010708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01003749,0.00023641379,0.00035800633,0.0018725599,0.015182766,0.0058169533,0.0032994025,0.003362911,0.0011101797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068481427,0.000006763507,0.00038342277,0.000009768472,0.0000021677502,0.000013651485,0.0007510262,0.000116528114,0.000029093906,0.9950872,0.00084029644,0.0027533032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064582695,0.000043438733,0.00618729,0.00015525003,0.000010613695,0.0000920593,0.0028073743,0.00080613245,0.00034784194,0.86350036,0.12596439,0.000020776642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028368968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024534608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039090044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028715967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03381151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519699960","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw029","title":"Parliament and the War Prerogative in the United Kingdom and Canada: Explaining Variations in Institutional Change and Legislative Control","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prerogative; Legislature; Parliament; House of Commons; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Public administration; Convention; Politics","score_opus":0.04063121156884298,"score_gpt":0.2681038655097625,"score_spread":0.22747265394091953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519699960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601587,0.001468242,0.00038302274,0.0033905634,0.000034788965,0.00006503291,0.0008159425,0.000022566503,0.033661194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635726,0.00036732265,0.00014772153,0.00017986652,0.000005009307,0.000015416192,0.00028866614,0.00001315823,0.0026255494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938087,0.0007392295,0.00019332087,0.000545259,0.0017008838,0.0030126122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795583,0.0047590164,0.0038479455,0.0008498735,0.0069417763,0.0040430906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036440992,0.0003743387,0.0008104842,0.004505186,0.010744925,0.0065678484,0.0019787985,0.0011428451,0.005957001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021947252,0.00039581943,0.000542971,0.010980525,0.009009383,0.0019968734,0.0037173775,0.0017043962,0.0003496287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004986934,0.00037405395,0.74049914,0.00020932808,0.00028292404,0.0006101027,0.07686509,0.0065241833,0.0006247314,0.11254927,0.011936695,0.049025726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063513646,0.00003894764,0.90259063,0.00027785363,0.00011416604,0.000042764197,0.06252774,0.00380889,0.00037394604,0.004449736,0.025593244,0.000118504184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99831057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80531025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19468972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12000672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9340458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590968381","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsx002","title":"Constituency Pressures on Committee Selection: Evidence from the Northern Ireland Assembly and Dáil Éireann","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legislature; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Order (exchange); Public relations; Public administration; Primary election; Law; General election; Business; Politics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.057283284343789924,"score_gpt":0.33915883225473725,"score_spread":0.2818755479109473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590968381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92516315,0.00072795525,0.000261564,0.0027899735,0.0000692841,0.00006717218,0.00020625199,0.000009969848,0.070704706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917468,0.00039028216,0.000113744434,0.0006737747,0.00007753383,0.00006624191,0.00018640525,0.000018909917,0.006726261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776324,0.012563358,0.0007515662,0.0014460854,0.0042823176,0.0033242316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89400816,0.054037556,0.028200554,0.0042664264,0.0102401655,0.009247117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02359752,0.00020741743,0.00069011026,0.0020279295,0.0039372374,0.0047932696,0.001428175,0.0013977701,0.012226212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06303945,0.00049609767,0.0005002815,0.0032050386,0.004212268,0.0020089373,0.0048246663,0.0020335817,0.0022504004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019015319,0.00064753834,0.81420887,0.0005910885,0.00031357585,0.00059313665,0.08784285,0.00035452071,0.0007078209,0.009022961,0.017411256,0.06640493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004897644,0.00019721776,0.93663126,0.00019296915,0.000050441948,0.00004928108,0.040323768,0.0001406613,0.00020966589,0.00052659225,0.021598186,0.000030925217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07176914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15748388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07176914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004976604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038596326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14270282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786137037","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy012","title":"Constituency Preferences and Assignment to Agriculture Committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Research council; Agriculture; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03184539299533034,"score_gpt":0.3178541298041017,"score_spread":0.28600873680877137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786137037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92591834,0.0003151358,0.0024498056,0.00058665505,0.000048591344,0.000107891516,0.0002144836,0.000021023314,0.07033804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947069,0.000063019485,0.0005377046,0.00006834994,0.000018657218,0.00003474486,0.00012892389,0.000013493472,0.0044282232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886882,0.007429402,0.00047070737,0.000817936,0.0014673198,0.0011263681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788609,0.010486201,0.0043291613,0.0014513641,0.0023286904,0.002543677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008295179,0.00017699659,0.00033367393,0.0012636381,0.0030453973,0.0029122601,0.0006002663,0.0005268152,0.018835055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031180143,0.00022443327,0.00028595436,0.0015677804,0.0012582061,0.001095724,0.002235233,0.0009142443,0.0015648641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018057155,0.0007068742,0.73366416,0.00038249404,0.00027562206,0.0005041613,0.022875296,0.0035431352,0.00647426,0.039298642,0.008804489,0.18166521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006089289,0.000439855,0.9282978,0.0001245084,0.000061481966,0.0001701987,0.017259518,0.0017719424,0.0021553135,0.010635827,0.038984545,0.000038146412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029124497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010173364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018835055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017272506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007538555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888149020","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy032","title":"Political Staff and the Gendered Division of Political Labour in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; House of Commons; Parliament; Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Division of labour; Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.01929826906323828,"score_gpt":0.28830324108170563,"score_spread":0.26900497201846735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888149020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336601,0.0016242521,0.00049889955,0.009922331,0.00017267736,0.000069858506,0.0008940874,0.000022372285,0.053135544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921618,0.0003113473,0.00014768101,0.00045983726,0.000015815258,0.00002009863,0.0001132477,0.0000133622725,0.0067568044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911856,0.0014056537,0.00016718081,0.00076476275,0.0026202956,0.0038565067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98827386,0.0020906148,0.0015273021,0.0003126741,0.002670945,0.005124645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004755261,0.0002414134,0.0006286788,0.0030218845,0.020895608,0.005474423,0.0015279666,0.0009076565,0.008933411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011194999,0.00034947324,0.00029994387,0.00598464,0.00676995,0.0009019846,0.0036287315,0.0016344913,0.0004267506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004110067,0.00016049501,0.5626775,0.00032389513,0.00009390741,0.0005605815,0.25994417,0.0006053966,0.0011122982,0.05351252,0.03296807,0.08763012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038056998,0.000059019596,0.6980589,0.0005051106,0.000042122647,0.000088965535,0.2131829,0.0007000585,0.0003886533,0.002641172,0.084204875,0.000090233225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119010225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14390612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86348367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910475278","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy051","title":"Learning from Divided Parties? Legislator Dissent as a Cue for Opinion Formation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislator; Opposition (politics); Ideology; Politics; Public opinion; Political dissent; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Legislation","score_opus":0.05132984095190216,"score_gpt":0.35062655367203804,"score_spread":0.29929671272013586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910475278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566096,0.00018345726,0.0036827296,0.002739368,0.000079895544,0.00005280078,0.000062313215,0.000045549386,0.036544174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788505,0.000044521385,0.00087662967,0.00032003623,0.000026642902,0.000019913548,0.00003418199,0.000010018548,0.00078301126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959388,0.0026459412,0.00014057581,0.0005084281,0.00048457715,0.00028160284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758421,0.01679021,0.0038331412,0.0017590057,0.0007528245,0.0010227765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00395183,0.00019907454,0.0003817682,0.00048234005,0.0011939086,0.002305179,0.0003329091,0.0013474758,0.010438391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042460885,0.00029667042,0.00027341442,0.00033890593,0.0018178461,0.0022676985,0.0020261449,0.0018081133,0.00070376013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062088077,0.003059023,0.40467334,0.0014815918,0.00037548158,0.0014777022,0.073779196,0.0037160309,0.075549416,0.094614446,0.008636365,0.32642856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070541055,0.0029074359,0.7140829,0.00049096096,0.00035600862,0.000822677,0.045741826,0.011045754,0.030978374,0.1508409,0.04174387,0.00028390886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008590594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014113756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010438391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063675473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005540274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034919858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011839109","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaa004","title":"Boys’ Club or Good Ol’ Boys Club? Corruption and the Parliamentary Representation of Young and Old Men and Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Representation (politics); Club; Bivariate analysis; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Capital (architecture); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Medicine; History; Statistics","score_opus":0.03288369719331496,"score_gpt":0.295847952793116,"score_spread":0.262964255599801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011839109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953702,0.0002511536,0.000055158653,0.00074514945,0.000017954742,0.000002582633,0.00013745934,0.0000011716284,0.00341929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897015,0.00006562504,0.000013142969,0.000043970886,0.00001663412,0.0000015180424,0.000048830567,8.3898084e-7,0.0008392767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.0002422891,0.000029946072,0.000069634676,0.00010733473,0.00018713066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465805,0.0011289566,0.0025386899,0.00016581401,0.0002943021,0.0012141658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009822957,0.00005909229,0.00016940608,0.00059894845,0.0006352182,0.0011725639,0.00018454104,0.00026987898,0.0072889873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006910118,0.00007164173,0.000108416156,0.0007390917,0.00071412395,0.0008969953,0.00067760964,0.00048603618,0.00050930626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000891063,0.00006051816,0.9740084,0.000020742222,0.000024340521,0.00010224881,0.008975274,0.000044824777,0.00011052926,0.0015275967,0.0020074642,0.013029047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025805155,0.00003712179,0.9796469,0.000042385484,0.0000074629256,0.000072542105,0.01516085,0.00012020994,0.000082213824,0.0003390944,0.0044835526,0.0000050734075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008230374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018144928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008230374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045876837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027706247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024384081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169385919","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaa068","title":"The Electoral Consequences of Scandals: A Meta-Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Ballot; Political science; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.13648810993952168,"score_gpt":0.36218469395383457,"score_spread":0.2256965840143129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169385919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094259,0.8967647,0.0025116096,0.00073870487,0.0006257289,0.00041217977,0.0030489643,0.000060524097,0.0015784937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8527627,0.14066383,0.0018616875,0.0008067363,0.00047164565,0.00076701,0.0020114125,0.000052105363,0.0006027244],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781578,0.014028261,0.0039661867,0.0018720077,0.0015038807,0.00047189795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92300236,0.06222584,0.008882006,0.002710541,0.0026465042,0.00053282274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02082009,0.0017143274,0.0075103436,0.0043169768,0.0007267503,0.0035779593,0.0015781696,0.0019385972,0.00535892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052554127,0.0008821919,0.023931025,0.0055041844,0.0009453857,0.0013175487,0.0012749394,0.0017684586,0.00042923834],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031415503,0.00007211663,0.04976158,0.11203201,0.8217401,0.00017126973,0.00020054188,0.0005794532,0.00019607165,0.0003507162,0.0009750649,0.010779453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006020467,0.00057626475,0.04225346,0.01570142,0.9365502,0.00015759829,0.00023537724,0.00045321675,0.00021253026,0.00057791936,0.0026444534,0.000035615667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003135584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068519632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02082009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012335993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014541958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110108495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180582544","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsab003","title":"Guns for Votes: Wedge Politics in the Canadian Multiparty System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Electoral system; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Wedge (geometry); Empirical evidence; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04903063701379223,"score_gpt":0.32720882317321853,"score_spread":0.2781781861594263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180582544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075475,0.00029894005,0.003164436,0.0032119274,0.00005484112,0.00011669475,0.00027311395,0.00005533353,0.18527722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437153,0.000042957865,0.00037404164,0.00013505224,0.000005633314,0.000011237875,0.00004267245,0.000008859176,0.005008002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414563,0.0014002775,0.00010998238,0.0005095274,0.0018500285,0.0019844768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527234,0.0015319883,0.00043879767,0.00041489967,0.0013359187,0.0010060465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004113905,0.00021604601,0.00034890784,0.0028212375,0.01835855,0.006379153,0.001000706,0.0009205486,0.010442267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013027508,0.00019199688,0.00017852307,0.003585176,0.005880213,0.0016473078,0.004432955,0.0012740508,0.00048922736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003766697,0.0001451601,0.15554683,0.00017758872,0.00006750627,0.0011931281,0.22338364,0.0015779041,0.0036266157,0.4170746,0.017556623,0.17927377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006955815,0.000119401644,0.33896482,0.00021263144,0.000069223366,0.00035094464,0.3102648,0.006068214,0.0026382534,0.03808924,0.30297875,0.00017416498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85420686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9320717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14579314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029426536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029377561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29330343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360938675","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsad006","title":"‘Such Cold, Dispassionate Terms Fail Us’: Reading <i>Hansard</i> as an ‘Archive of Feelings”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scholarship; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Feeling; Reflexivity; Reading (process); Politics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social science; Law; Political science; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015565317001511043,"score_gpt":0.2963193237466997,"score_spread":0.2807540067451887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360938675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60325587,0.0036838392,0.013575971,0.060105897,0.0020203723,0.00017975984,0.0006299169,0.0002957957,0.3162526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769354,0.0004581994,0.0015338775,0.0013074047,0.00008984135,0.00003669672,0.00005965885,0.00012385308,0.019455181],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925869,0.004530343,0.00011645845,0.0005094765,0.0013615288,0.0008952572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904289,0.005957485,0.0006434903,0.000579959,0.0015966428,0.0007935064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064275577,0.00044717477,0.00046257622,0.0018439059,0.026048228,0.009938037,0.0013152781,0.0017430709,0.004443751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016854377,0.0003640491,0.00022823733,0.0026129012,0.031729873,0.0037019062,0.0035780512,0.003499961,0.00052287977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029064957,0.0000056872645,0.0012472508,0.000057725836,0.0000042975976,0.00038536606,0.91988236,0.000062512954,0.0007847386,0.061958984,0.009116675,0.006465369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036053143,0.000010326458,0.005049678,0.00020003409,0.00001073535,0.00024548717,0.6807987,0.00024058821,0.0013427201,0.005884016,0.30616283,0.000051302894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62260497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7371295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62260497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029269632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020500751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75923514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362548804","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsad005","title":"Ministerial Advisers as Power Resources: Exploring Expansion, Stability and Contraction in Westminster Ministers’ Offices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Politics; Narrative; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Proxy (statistics); Sociology; Political stability; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09439327971764992,"score_gpt":0.3536274338616676,"score_spread":0.2592341541440177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362548804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98553604,0.00047061744,0.00031999766,0.0006329924,0.000011937541,0.000017702254,0.0010181514,0.000007181165,0.011985298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969633,0.00019807664,0.00021538306,0.00005231687,0.00001046136,0.000016034059,0.00048166743,0.000007967938,0.0020547323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660397,0.0012319488,0.00026495827,0.00047843045,0.00076782145,0.0006528819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760967,0.010669836,0.0077487794,0.0016651407,0.0022963178,0.0015231965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004415321,0.00015314505,0.00037275619,0.004975726,0.0011573413,0.0038363596,0.00076623587,0.00041007946,0.0076693646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02374903,0.00022588944,0.00014532267,0.008845495,0.0033776541,0.0040366626,0.00328193,0.0008414569,0.00080962776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026299662,0.00005394521,0.8247989,0.00027873763,0.0000726699,0.0002767995,0.11248371,0.00073819887,0.00038983277,0.017726855,0.005533686,0.037383735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008982428,0.000032811673,0.89605665,0.0001494662,0.000022780217,0.00007319233,0.0793808,0.000631432,0.00029281457,0.0013783025,0.021950398,0.000022309372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121320195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2216915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121320195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047735227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030827834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24122804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412929343","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf037","title":"Parliamentarians’ perspectives on parenthood and politics in Canada’s House of Commons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Commons; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Parliament","score_opus":0.01764684623637566,"score_gpt":0.28255350075022156,"score_spread":0.26490665451384593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412929343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95618457,0.00039508563,0.00011386374,0.005327965,0.000061909115,0.000016276781,0.0000768644,0.000008044016,0.03781542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954094,0.00012323096,0.000035185218,0.0004000668,0.000009069594,0.0000043312516,0.000014971612,0.0000039438223,0.003999716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944137,0.0015106553,0.00009822266,0.00020906681,0.0014289317,0.0023394118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277776,0.0017305847,0.0009659295,0.00011353911,0.0015437836,0.002868428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032964777,0.00016107544,0.00030045674,0.0013307368,0.027153028,0.005337448,0.0009389539,0.0011496679,0.005381573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057124957,0.00028192546,0.00020594044,0.0019563064,0.00719853,0.00084379216,0.0026926743,0.001801954,0.00024557614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013211099,0.00006527207,0.09794715,0.000067076995,0.000020312924,0.0015544752,0.8539169,0.0001697915,0.0017416993,0.01569867,0.011788604,0.016897969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005858402,0.000029095174,0.11883765,0.00007913762,0.000008215551,0.00017506821,0.8107648,0.00013936055,0.00034710302,0.00043727903,0.06913707,0.000039375456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98078394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043937635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0422205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3187914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415757198","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf052","title":"Understanding politicians’ discourse on inflation and cost of living in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Inflation (cosmology); Perspective (graphical); Commons; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.042778749844489955,"score_gpt":0.23561364787445238,"score_spread":0.19283489802996243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415757198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747591,0.0022720583,0.00053543027,0.030357098,0.00022240182,0.000050808976,0.00074666203,0.000034894765,0.0910215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456364,0.0005001163,0.00012968546,0.00088495726,0.000024410741,0.000010926783,0.00010915248,0.000014140039,0.003762986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946247,0.00094900717,0.0001224268,0.0003957832,0.0021705844,0.0017373752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882764,0.0037166544,0.0013507137,0.00024813533,0.0043549873,0.0020530168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164756,0.00029366638,0.00054238294,0.0037082639,0.024633901,0.009218036,0.001442015,0.0015998633,0.004874481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014883975,0.00031102565,0.00029913598,0.006046456,0.009707793,0.001743343,0.003300544,0.002893696,0.00020848792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024574244,0.00006978251,0.09497171,0.00024167013,0.00004759275,0.0006908719,0.78097284,0.0006901765,0.0015985743,0.059391364,0.027571028,0.033508673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026704,0.000029154326,0.17093101,0.00038524214,0.000049026996,0.00008350676,0.6355697,0.0010330218,0.00065115467,0.0029576907,0.18813744,0.00015277974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21079007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21079007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15651162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91537166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416087981","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf053","title":"Digital integration in political advertising: Insights from expenditures in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Politics; Political advertising; Federal election; Digital advertising; Investment (military); State (computer science); Digital media; Political communication","score_opus":0.009646932399126203,"score_gpt":0.28077504676220966,"score_spread":0.27112811436308343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416087981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496644,0.0006301119,0.00011711285,0.0014645274,0.000016081189,0.000048531954,0.0045904852,0.000012168529,0.04345661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923734,0.00042286073,0.00012623248,0.00010184249,0.000014072563,0.000016758824,0.0025489388,0.000009723463,0.004386177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983473,0.000108816006,0.00004139421,0.000091027534,0.0008358185,0.00057561084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516594,0.0007155149,0.0009027728,0.00013866271,0.0023206992,0.00075635803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013378813,0.00030210434,0.00033780467,0.005842403,0.0040834458,0.0040236036,0.0008094677,0.00045906843,0.006378797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005196993,0.00021477447,0.0003804207,0.011185445,0.0010822873,0.0009862263,0.0016447557,0.0011787461,0.00053572207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024422156,0.00018903466,0.90624875,0.00016932905,0.0000822181,0.0002711784,0.021045456,0.00093309546,0.00054796727,0.010852828,0.013449928,0.045966066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034173188,0.00001009898,0.9721609,0.000040702656,0.000021489639,0.000017111022,0.014577871,0.0004855374,0.00010116596,0.00016061975,0.012404379,0.000016685277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99492365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048601154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048601154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024604479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3526277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7082265406","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf046","title":"Questions to the Prime Minister in the Canadian House of Commons: Transformation or tweak?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; House of Commons; Prime (order theory); Period (music); Attendance","score_opus":0.01767263652393983,"score_gpt":0.25259066733450114,"score_spread":0.2349180308105613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7082265406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69258976,0.001819311,0.010128812,0.05536143,0.0008015595,0.001145621,0.0016981058,0.0002567194,0.23619865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713345,0.00034736487,0.0022866689,0.0029680808,0.000057724337,0.00020881274,0.00024648354,0.000065622364,0.022484636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797221,0.0101165585,0.0006520992,0.0015956286,0.0045865295,0.003327143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493332,0.028905611,0.0030707892,0.0021808739,0.012963994,0.003545599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023270141,0.00036994,0.0004412073,0.0014939728,0.015026106,0.007582309,0.0019708504,0.0022431272,0.0081666475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06341499,0.00044049812,0.00033213786,0.00384675,0.015445356,0.0033225731,0.004931574,0.004312857,0.0007622674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033942173,0.0000831152,0.018875143,0.000651062,0.000016985268,0.0008008833,0.789051,0.0007236606,0.004844679,0.09743643,0.035208367,0.051969264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025753634,0.00006596068,0.038499117,0.00047297968,0.00002091638,0.0001297202,0.45616242,0.0005966105,0.0027993028,0.0073595126,0.4937072,0.00016037078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8770792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8676023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12292081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091001935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07248871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6602683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}