{"meta":{"query_hash":"cad19525a097","filters":{"venue":"Parliamentary Affairs"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cad19525a097","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Parliamentary+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1980063009","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst009","title":"Activism or Democracy? Judicial Review of Prerogative Powers and Executive Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Democracy; Politics; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Parliament; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.034420464553759154,"score_gpt":0.3157295645846952,"score_spread":0.28130910003093607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980063009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817606,0.023963667,0.00025358459,0.055434037,0.0016948051,0.004001503,0.00008608479,0.00019824205,0.63260746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731218,0.025615761,0.00016411439,0.0006119772,0.00015390932,0.00005925212,0.0000042640418,0.0000043666632,0.0002645456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989794,0.00013589545,0.00019294124,0.00018172417,0.0003101241,0.00019990843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999411,0.00016871348,0.00013795846,0.00006094482,0.00013586764,0.0000855455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020893475,0.000105753155,0.00022740575,0.00003393261,0.000452146,0.000015496475,0.00009031675,0.000039352297,0.0009270039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019435881,0.00008506129,0.0000528602,0.00019563692,0.00079031324,0.0004468543,0.000054489024,0.00008275987,0.00004092625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089683663,0.0012933708,0.04450153,0.0023588045,0.0022370003,0.000043496235,0.08882476,0.000004942568,0.0023035724,0.11608921,0.4023629,0.33908358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017312844,0.0008858271,0.05468279,0.008811963,0.0006165145,0.000012033351,0.6986019,0.000013904718,0.002787562,0.10481619,0.12578996,0.0012501045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017293392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031148363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009938961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013809052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000859904","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss065","title":"Presidentialism and Voter Turnout in Legislative Elections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Turnout; Political science; Public administration; Representation (politics); Political economy; Proportional representation; Democracy; Politics; Voting; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030545030758948533,"score_gpt":0.33227381097851216,"score_spread":0.3017287802195636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000859904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390365,0.00044381001,0.00008442791,0.0036248637,0.00066072383,0.0003218822,0.0000051585166,0.000041447925,0.055781174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821043,0.00001713248,0.000055730663,0.00009044753,0.00045165056,0.000034897996,0.0000035031712,0.000005341367,0.0011308546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998988,0.0002226152,0.00014394659,0.00010115437,0.00015072341,0.00039355972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.00008242022,0.000032298543,0.000059030466,0.0000135267255,0.00015771546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034264228,0.00006403661,0.000090546724,0.00005093863,0.00017236528,0.000039248487,0.000042789918,0.000049733575,0.00026403874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041123258,0.00006192153,0.00002213698,0.00013721045,0.00010951594,0.0005073571,0.000015046911,0.00008395708,0.000043535518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001911752,0.00012571615,0.8852243,0.000012730974,0.000024574589,0.0000017197234,0.053489547,0.0000041035555,0.00037158836,0.05643894,0.0034187294,0.000868976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012338827,0.0002517078,0.7738146,0.00015913048,0.00010472582,0.0000064012065,0.044993103,0.00012277682,0.0017652233,0.021066565,0.15561841,0.00086342957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07398188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070969656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15219969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001076559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026044876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9459827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001964183","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst015","title":"From Opposition to Government: Party Merger as a Step on the Road to Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Opposition (politics); Power sharing; Ratification; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Public relations; Public administration; Power (physics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0232991714323684,"score_gpt":0.2955528634126063,"score_spread":0.27225369198023786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001964183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88583475,0.000010882656,0.000042955035,0.05924644,0.0004364807,0.0009091221,0.00004325887,0.00004119844,0.053434882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991284,0.0000012210392,0.00007019629,0.0064197383,0.00038897747,0.0003341216,0.000007867207,0.000011240171,0.001482601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815506,0.00029475207,0.00020585152,0.00024549855,0.0006762218,0.00042260837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.00017245536,0.000044880395,0.00022255436,0.000032767442,0.00038579298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029125894,0.00012062666,0.00012432592,0.000016443926,0.0003297429,0.00013806387,0.00019462599,0.000051926647,0.008481983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010148547,0.00008561449,0.000059415463,0.00017104365,0.000047261125,0.00019415755,0.000039102797,0.0000837713,0.0077492683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020274872,0.00054537517,0.01352939,0.000007898394,0.00019757473,0.000008443376,0.049035043,0.000102208396,0.018839499,0.07946805,0.82234687,0.015716892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097426405,0.0027111708,0.122819155,0.00039203448,0.00013827052,7.2578763e-7,0.18902265,0.00023604101,0.01447552,0.018296883,0.6492904,0.0016428923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17152582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008650213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17305647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003187756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026902142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99302334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195698","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsq009","title":"French Electoral Reform and the Abstention Rate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Law","score_opus":0.016041253696349574,"score_gpt":0.2931366183630743,"score_spread":0.27709536466672474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95421004,0.00006079538,0.000017698656,0.008342812,0.00063557405,0.00029165953,0.0000031940024,0.000045762947,0.03639249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982052,0.000009392241,0.00004076249,0.00018356046,0.00041651935,0.000037894995,0.000006325523,0.0000053016124,0.0010950628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990587,0.0002010635,0.000157923,0.00012821025,0.00017157738,0.00028252718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995793,0.00010862773,0.00005358154,0.00011324891,0.0000303529,0.00011484877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097040634,0.00007023787,0.00010049499,0.000020009433,0.0004396868,0.00008983907,0.000098503835,0.000056976187,0.00038727635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006405543,0.000045614637,0.000041869323,0.00010384991,0.00041354712,0.00019121286,0.000018056788,0.00016181564,0.000063365966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011115404,0.0001003332,0.1457912,0.000029082974,0.00007443815,0.000003848669,0.010532398,0.0000018672567,0.0058987997,0.8245258,0.0045902655,0.008340816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007934984,0.00045978263,0.5046641,0.00010538497,0.00032490733,0.000012844626,0.033351257,0.0013383324,0.0038179632,0.19455029,0.25196812,0.001472018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17729083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18882398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6299755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006966399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003764379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82818764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015689969","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr028","title":"Transforming the Future Parliament Through the Effective Use of Digital Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Digital media; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.031129285006460488,"score_gpt":0.2599042559535575,"score_spread":0.228774970947097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015689969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7875597,0.0025431877,0.001397185,0.014669496,0.003596456,0.0037937323,0.00064740935,0.00014466299,0.18564819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986814,0.00018877162,0.00007436662,0.00027434027,0.0005149189,0.00006997571,0.0000035106907,0.000010382987,0.0001823175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847686,0.00019082263,0.00025130826,0.0001808682,0.000496006,0.0004041338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989488,0.0005636635,0.00012277022,0.00024545353,0.00003225609,0.00008704077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033127642,0.00013716203,0.00018035751,0.000009308121,0.00038083576,0.00007189628,0.0003815476,0.00006258265,0.00017901995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006907219,0.000071889925,0.00014804101,0.0001632805,0.0006671082,0.0007344851,0.000040171424,0.00015344807,0.000027282033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013800734,0.0003024599,0.019533657,0.000034251465,0.00027028605,0.000014860774,0.3849485,0.0000055473847,0.000044804543,0.5414135,0.008674648,0.04461951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000436868,0.00013598164,0.016185286,0.00009887992,0.00009262625,0.0000034091797,0.23678121,0.000006089932,0.0013982314,0.014717839,0.72984904,0.00029456094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04442585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010962505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72117436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104098996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052886135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017657956","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.1.12","title":"Canada: unity and diversity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01357255480699865,"score_gpt":0.22873023362191827,"score_spread":0.21515767881491962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017657956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78275,0.00011662318,0.0000015474677,0.0034358192,0.000106615196,0.000075520285,0.0000535602,0.000017997852,0.2134423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936856,0.000104018596,0.000015552065,0.00067521347,0.000102310456,0.0000014492341,0.0000014357129,0.0000019796498,0.005412437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992781,0.00007019895,0.00006388857,0.00010939346,0.00024070352,0.00023770933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999674,0.000046275112,0.000016082322,0.0000652065,0.0000075953435,0.00019084533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013738676,0.00004982354,0.00007456194,0.0000046155988,0.0006055061,0.000016851418,0.00010256058,0.000023259408,0.0016100571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014716701,0.00004912616,0.00001371137,0.000055365286,0.00013729095,0.00011136994,0.00004649954,0.000051486673,0.000019967621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051284376,0.00012001602,0.54724926,0.000034229924,0.00008133287,0.00010366231,0.012017021,0.000010625311,0.000008729579,0.1437178,0.23430067,0.06230539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013766534,0.000010432831,0.100702204,0.000009546149,0.0000074071777,7.215465e-7,0.00475605,0.0000052038536,0.000009366219,0.00077679084,0.8934815,0.00010310681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002163771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001956612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019464039","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsl026","title":"M. GALLAGHER and P. MITCHELL (eds), The Politics of ElectoralSystems, Oxford University Press, 2005, xxvi + 662 pp., £75, ISBN 0 19 925756 6.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Electoral reform; Alliance; Context (archaeology); Voting; Political science; Electoral system; Politics; Commit; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.01171217456464382,"score_gpt":0.23220379319427165,"score_spread":0.22049161862962782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019464039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.552197,0.042093497,0.00015941124,0.013264764,0.0011581419,0.0018815107,0.00087176415,0.00021275223,0.38816118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642184,0.0018327106,0.00007094649,0.00015706944,0.00048848387,0.000004049583,0.000009517707,0.000013664717,0.033205178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980182,0.00031459978,0.000295297,0.00026513435,0.00046262,0.0006441186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990542,0.00022125403,0.00020256275,0.0002558574,0.000049254435,0.00021688324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046080787,0.00016731398,0.0002739433,0.000021125086,0.00042951823,0.00005264508,0.000347936,0.00010718781,0.00012563494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035572615,0.00013712943,0.0000952982,0.0001430836,0.0005531992,0.00022107761,0.00007902822,0.00013042979,0.000008224385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048004324,0.00023274659,0.07700218,0.00019007006,0.00012316811,0.000025625497,0.0016271902,0.000028594397,0.00028250425,0.48248318,0.43762723,0.00032951514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032100917,0.00002926051,0.006080273,0.000048843845,0.000045519668,0.000002246581,0.004277648,0.000023709128,0.00020412939,0.0008475152,0.9879428,0.0001770149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34042266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017258694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5503156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024251716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001382177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96307564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021532673","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsl015","title":"One Step at a Time: Australian Parliamentarians, Professionalism and the Need for Staff","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Parliament; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Isolation (microbiology); Perception; Phenomenon; Sociology; Period (music); Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344040264307846,"score_gpt":0.27917234024225857,"score_spread":0.2528282999779507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021532673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420608,0.001041301,0.00031293888,0.10525831,0.0021007457,0.008012001,0.0007030081,0.0004915493,0.040019352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030862,0.00006385643,0.0017104027,0.0005885351,0.00052660285,0.00029570275,0.00015864368,0.00002850442,0.09354158],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788386,0.0003755678,0.00034232097,0.00037183648,0.00046399684,0.0005624323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908745,0.0003303372,0.00017669609,0.00023088646,0.000042007785,0.00013261392],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010715076,0.00020447819,0.0003011943,0.00003152043,0.0018311113,0.00008595809,0.00028622634,0.00015602248,0.0013528545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025244515,0.00017164809,0.00018269736,0.00014758018,0.0012863985,0.0002774448,0.00007573661,0.00017278174,0.0000768575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010140323,0.00049282593,0.0061151786,0.00007680623,0.00024892492,0.000007118054,0.034392454,0.000021777416,0.00046169243,0.08652906,0.8687774,0.001862735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058868984,0.00012243743,0.0025671565,0.00008112249,0.00024787468,0.000002144988,0.13312732,0.000045685392,0.000223509,0.0069292607,0.8501938,0.00057280896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014003514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041681025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10466978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048135224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010598681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075506508","doi":"10.1093/pa/53.2.328","title":"The encroachment of the law on politics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016117836920532803,"score_gpt":0.26485079145478935,"score_spread":0.24873295453425653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075506508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116965294,0.0003584158,6.2680687e-7,0.015875403,0.00032836339,0.00017217823,0.000014891046,0.000015098147,0.8662697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716663,0.00036904815,0.000008288636,0.00087920204,0.00018227086,0.000011571038,6.136567e-7,0.0000019247425,0.0013804464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916476,0.00009474137,0.00011440381,0.00008179099,0.00034693128,0.00019738013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966955,0.00013118333,0.000031618027,0.00011637331,0.000016274513,0.00003502847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019098197,0.000055939377,0.00006323152,0.00000453027,0.0016802775,0.000019046638,0.00024012136,0.000018412778,0.00032968365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001282655,0.000030439924,0.00006752223,0.000089293266,0.0013263655,0.000036303703,0.000028223913,0.000060598566,0.00006212189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009737115,0.000045881712,0.0017887775,6.6983426e-7,0.000028353037,4.1349347e-7,0.0023136127,0.000020345306,0.000003923353,0.9893499,0.0026657926,0.0037725808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015592355,0.00005057667,0.0046380106,0.000029373667,0.000026332847,3.5641966e-7,0.045978658,0.000002176949,0.00039534035,0.0721209,0.8765029,0.00009947355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019466901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00942269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000782899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061101644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086487938","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss075","title":"French Election Theory: Why Sarkozy Lost","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.018878239858642128,"score_gpt":0.29325331040542035,"score_spread":0.27437507054677823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086487938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16039453,0.00049710815,0.00079471496,0.0014701285,0.0011715002,0.00023734142,0.000015810645,0.00013921311,0.83527964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486786,0.00006521867,0.00017669723,0.001910235,0.00086611713,0.000014798933,0.00000612662,0.000010066228,0.0020828568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981199,0.00053451955,0.00015834198,0.00016778766,0.000285949,0.00073351193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991548,0.00026334496,0.000047876827,0.0001722773,0.000024707251,0.00033699878],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013473866,0.00011888419,0.00012256313,0.00004805238,0.00045487203,0.00004734806,0.00022144783,0.00008154216,0.0055674044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019124593,0.0001128573,0.00007308479,0.00023056123,0.00043487147,0.00087867567,0.00003729783,0.00015448654,0.0012965973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030676096,0.00017886554,0.021039903,0.0000073986907,0.000038152066,0.0000017848856,0.008229489,0.0000017706274,0.0003998115,0.95023,0.0131490715,0.006693051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036827466,0.000118803684,0.009559241,0.00004178812,0.0000696141,0.0000055719943,0.037554108,0.000007528118,0.004625935,0.29270768,0.6543869,0.0005545866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002978995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033842228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018251217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048254115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091839077","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss091","title":"A Powerful Weapon in the Right Hands? How Members of Parliament have used Freedom of Information in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Opposition (politics); Creatures; Freedom of information; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01777150176184071,"score_gpt":0.2626345562561618,"score_spread":0.24486305449432105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091839077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476719,0.00014260148,0.00001444416,0.002850316,0.00026388775,0.0007696453,0.000017472314,0.000010021316,0.048259735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.00005285078,0.000082457795,0.0001975024,0.0001077252,0.000029976405,0.000022282273,0.000004800344,0.00009777426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785984,0.00050484366,0.00039051345,0.0001047414,0.0007454558,0.0003945837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00027718392,0.0002610518,0.00028820915,0.000028220877,0.0000573005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020618474,0.00013991361,0.00022686254,0.00017005007,0.00014267799,0.00006878366,0.000556795,0.00007696028,0.0007403516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031791584,0.00008269464,0.000097355885,0.00026348405,0.0004063962,0.0008418925,0.00003300769,0.00017806211,0.000021463957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099565594,0.00054789643,0.10255143,0.000054544504,0.000046789493,0.0000040944637,0.8512831,0.00005277184,0.000045556877,0.03057502,0.014149212,0.0005900697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021777,0.00023502161,0.05019829,0.00013559555,0.00005908184,0.0000019124348,0.90209055,0.00008809047,0.0009668845,0.0024645769,0.04128189,0.00030037947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009771359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06150029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05235314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121990655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005506991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093765104","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss092","title":"Why do Publics Support Minority Governments? Three Tests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Publics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Outcome (game theory); Minority rights; Political economy; Minority group; Federal election; Public administration; Sociology; Ethnic group; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.044218153293746947,"score_gpt":0.32136843641272966,"score_spread":0.2771502831189827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093765104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282892,0.00024991474,0.00015754584,0.008710583,0.0018037044,0.000599056,0.00006705055,0.00016667163,0.2599563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708617,0.000006959657,0.000114405084,0.0009422945,0.001147067,0.000043778546,0.000024091598,0.000010289181,0.00062492955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794036,0.00016310424,0.00024892963,0.0001799117,0.0006483443,0.0008193395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906373,0.00011593812,0.00008814601,0.00019777396,0.00003829827,0.0004961196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007321652,0.00013050257,0.00015558169,0.000029159995,0.00033280108,0.000108897235,0.00019301203,0.00009465576,0.0027054006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048012,0.00012523959,0.00007453498,0.00019777093,0.00015727879,0.0008542919,0.000047165922,0.00011692989,0.00040492284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006885941,0.000172516,0.8989064,0.000012034606,0.000023068218,0.0000012425502,0.0015516186,4.122487e-7,0.000050356513,0.036503486,0.061270114,0.0015018638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038798133,0.0001397775,0.24032044,0.000019286974,0.00006992792,0.0000018960312,0.0074688913,0.000011250951,0.0002659845,0.0036651425,0.74720633,0.0004430861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052527677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045304265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039745573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096184668","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr063","title":"Women's Representation around the World: The Importance of Women's Participation in the Workforce","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Workforce; Demographic economics; Aside; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06878359742759102,"score_gpt":0.3420049495537449,"score_spread":0.27322135212615384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096184668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94521517,0.00006570045,0.000033838503,0.0036986815,0.00023325029,0.0005537532,0.0000025639204,0.0000141482815,0.050182894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979859,0.000061006136,0.000039290517,0.00069299294,0.00015888631,0.0003895807,0.0000056884815,0.0000076011247,0.00065907795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978184,0.0006565078,0.00033884338,0.00018897209,0.0004921761,0.00050507195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988979,0.0003952248,0.00021735874,0.00038958288,0.000036537946,0.00006341103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020515376,0.00009782335,0.00011687815,0.00006058046,0.00040749548,0.000060921648,0.0004612956,0.00003176286,0.00035516865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009058432,0.000052617543,0.00005363269,0.00067039166,0.00044278087,0.00024050835,0.0000402102,0.00014227476,0.000012860852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004984466,0.00016993869,0.3003405,0.0000068630948,0.000036186437,0.0000033509211,0.6442971,0.00014921623,0.000024404411,0.0519581,0.00069215155,0.0022723216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020017523,0.000035376284,0.13671055,0.000008306083,0.000015191826,4.874313e-7,0.8302967,0.00007741349,0.00016885315,0.029251898,0.0031518303,0.00008322367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040324368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009550271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18599956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002685166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007366208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6095865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107563466","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsr065","title":"Strengthening Citizen Participation in Public Policy-Making: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Public administration; Public participation; Accountability; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09295272999640955,"score_gpt":0.3897693587419152,"score_spread":0.29681662874550563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107563466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15452716,0.000027422499,0.000019417672,0.02122172,0.000087842374,0.00029062937,0.00003242061,0.000059870763,0.8237335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985822,0.000021561973,0.00017220843,0.0005256233,0.00023033615,0.000077242934,0.000010751398,0.000009832527,0.00037026632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.00033273903,0.00021869274,0.0002456882,0.00034479419,0.00084219186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910074,0.00008774798,0.000060097806,0.00015104868,0.000079742116,0.00052060105],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008163955,0.00010351122,0.00011440751,0.0005979758,0.00044437783,0.00013792493,0.00031908113,0.0000800954,0.0021362999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000773279,0.00011524769,0.000044748867,0.00083892065,0.00027605216,0.0005766279,0.000033679906,0.0001843129,0.0000753496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018653167,0.00014296274,0.043693244,0.0000027415317,0.000029306164,0.000028114686,0.11876031,0.0000027967253,0.0000099595345,0.83301467,0.0010561855,0.0032410808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008640465,0.00018006722,0.077204295,0.000055094395,0.000013775772,0.000002913244,0.78652227,0.00029595417,0.00018122591,0.08167732,0.052404318,0.0005987447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87460566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.844055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001266019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030219948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118072304","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss022","title":"World Bank Institute's Approach to Parliamentary Capacity Strengthening","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.043208706116970835,"score_gpt":0.2815677802250787,"score_spread":0.2383590741081079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118072304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38899785,0.00011238529,0.0007189607,0.0030791238,0.0027718956,0.000548923,0.000029205261,0.00018168415,0.60356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97901016,0.000023216717,0.015315732,0.0012396977,0.0012921921,0.000094607385,0.00008606698,0.000020390751,0.0029179205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771935,0.00013613788,0.0003146465,0.00031488593,0.0007303023,0.0007846512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917346,0.00007064455,0.000088535766,0.00017902254,0.00004439465,0.00044393062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007934927,0.00022190834,0.00020216532,0.0002305215,0.0005980492,0.000104926556,0.00044434596,0.000058701262,0.0011734909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004600318,0.00022599359,0.0000979034,0.0004633621,0.00020377873,0.001262682,0.0001244762,0.00020177821,0.0005098241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001419363,0.0016655746,0.33825904,0.000054031796,0.000489639,0.000010516789,0.14489105,0.00031399023,0.00044175022,0.3413158,0.14417629,0.028240362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006719599,0.00004160378,0.019850388,0.00009963577,0.000059109414,0.0000037708314,0.09772451,0.00004949415,0.0014108947,0.001605647,0.87751395,0.0009690466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064787967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054485193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73333764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051433634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008736905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151790217","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss001","title":"The Problem of the 'Lame Duck' Government: A Critique of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Term (time); Law; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Classics; Philosophy; Art; History; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013543596393313003,"score_gpt":0.28047263661647676,"score_spread":0.26692904022316377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151790217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8649888,0.0006012187,0.000031030515,0.022599915,0.00062064634,0.0019025822,0.00017139498,0.00003433445,0.1090501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758315,0.00019475646,0.00013122315,0.00024714656,0.00016890423,0.00011703325,0.0000013542524,0.000012021356,0.0015444012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803346,0.00029241084,0.00033837525,0.000150402,0.0007763314,0.00040899604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880517,0.00022452342,0.00031699947,0.00052712404,0.000036572408,0.000089641966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078923034,0.00012528426,0.0001412897,0.000006785673,0.0008675512,0.00004316783,0.0009823752,0.00005670641,0.00014148487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043377528,0.00006447721,0.00019279822,0.00025050124,0.00064814783,0.0002354354,0.0002939227,0.00017882093,0.000012915457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062879575,0.0010861524,0.6786683,0.00010292467,0.00031102926,3.666957e-7,0.053690985,0.000033456043,0.0065689567,0.22480467,0.01809008,0.016580183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007893463,0.00007289782,0.20239384,0.0002585819,0.00023117226,0.000002657437,0.13537118,0.000021278493,0.0328251,0.0056919516,0.621897,0.00044498974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029812085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031462254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020520846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010838825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66725904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162995758","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss087","title":"BAME Candidates in Local Elections in Britain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Ethnic group; White (mutation); Political science; Strong ties; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Interpersonal ties; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.01888868794184056,"score_gpt":0.29148159505337795,"score_spread":0.2725929071115374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162995758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8149864,0.0038448751,0.00055281416,0.005751736,0.0010804395,0.00063609704,0.00002523766,0.00014347423,0.17297891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981717,0.0003257361,0.00010539671,0.00019733861,0.0002141985,0.000056362016,0.0000104698665,0.000008292211,0.00091049203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986409,0.00020214054,0.00022083613,0.00016387756,0.00023287299,0.00053936534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995501,0.00018209536,0.000040340412,0.00009076534,0.000017316763,0.00011937281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053545367,0.00010404586,0.00016283963,0.00015744938,0.0002436879,0.000028430519,0.00011526355,0.000059546033,0.0005382078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006530923,0.00010885747,0.000039688097,0.00054135354,0.00022709568,0.00045415515,0.000031802036,0.00014532768,0.000120432545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014963051,0.00018581019,0.9529391,0.0000040162613,0.000016561069,0.0000039774645,0.033287484,0.00002922325,0.000013661433,0.002933053,0.006507109,0.0040650237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012186351,0.0000720479,0.26700395,0.00006357516,0.000025756968,0.0000026529387,0.6063527,0.0002704694,0.00024214703,0.002314635,0.12189199,0.0005414467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05518521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2430923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003933093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074553085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95110637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319668209","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw008","title":"Presence and Purpose in the Canadian House of Commons: The Standing Committee on the Status of Women","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; House of Commons; Government (linguistics); Commons; Gender mainstreaming; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Work (physics); Law; Gender equality; Politics","score_opus":0.04024181020108458,"score_gpt":0.29025226721401276,"score_spread":0.2500104570129282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319668209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689748,0.0001214861,0.0000039106912,0.018026514,0.000073283074,0.00042867076,0.000044024808,0.000004623588,0.012322652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936104,0.00031008146,0.000006810004,0.00020686246,0.000023369028,0.000032299766,5.5380895e-7,0.000004721345,0.000054286786],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985622,0.0004755074,0.00014399577,0.00008858396,0.00030116297,0.0004285232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985932,0.0009872433,0.00007390546,0.00021876834,0.000020267275,0.000106578365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010818726,0.000056464003,0.00008230667,0.0000456973,0.0003390326,0.00003354027,0.00029085908,0.000024721761,0.00005538104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014889827,0.000023661392,0.000020416246,0.00013514912,0.0006173841,0.00007094375,0.000030878353,0.000074789845,0.0000018307468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384572,0.000093064875,0.38851053,0.000016608294,0.00005252679,0.000004997115,0.45438516,0.000023967119,0.00019579973,0.1458389,0.004377643,0.0064623584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035972946,0.00009840367,0.091628894,0.00006033253,0.000011143603,5.6007946e-7,0.87637764,0.000014529117,0.0004398357,0.016304545,0.014617354,0.00008702867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56134486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7417064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42199248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028549152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019579862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44157618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331784301","doi":"10.1093/pa/gst017","title":"Television in the Legislature: The Impact of Cameras in the House of Commons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; Commons; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03261840524710502,"score_gpt":0.3417323945801023,"score_spread":0.3091139893329973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331784301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846258,0.00016902576,0.000002624601,0.008023611,0.000046101617,0.00064128876,0.0000064353376,0.0000060385883,0.00647906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969673,0.000015265356,0.000006769176,0.00014192578,0.00007107493,0.000048836133,0.0000021285357,0.0000047148656,0.0000125577835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806505,0.0010083783,0.00027116237,0.00008026151,0.00032017636,0.00025497642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998901,0.00071593706,0.00010052948,0.00022815216,0.00002479465,0.000029558747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011795918,0.000073661286,0.00013824081,0.000032846423,0.00011187892,0.000034941404,0.00038707923,0.000045432873,0.00013876647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083883206,0.000031497548,0.00008385531,0.00038861253,0.00026914506,0.00015454982,0.000016500315,0.00017449877,0.000015162586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028249933,0.00044702794,0.82087237,0.000019461919,0.000034140354,0.0000025103457,0.13155897,0.0002250569,0.00072466914,0.02105505,0.022437224,0.002595254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030523993,0.0002507988,0.9091478,0.00006662762,0.000017014401,9.672215e-7,0.08096476,0.00013218021,0.000121065146,0.007804596,0.0010814271,0.00010750169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4912481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09228782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3989603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062650935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053687276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9242756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517252592","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw026","title":"The Presidentialisation Thesis and Parliamentary Budget Offices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Presidential system; Parliament; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.023012603946736043,"score_gpt":0.29612920901809764,"score_spread":0.2731166050713616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517252592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506787,0.0006375028,0.00016907661,0.037905917,0.0006148141,0.00051237515,0.00002081395,0.000100088,0.009360678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977469,0.00030196973,0.0000327492,0.00017678158,0.0004398759,0.00006081873,0.0000031672207,0.000009357441,0.0012283826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984209,0.00040660618,0.00023479304,0.00020064936,0.00034302776,0.00039402212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988877,0.000672645,0.00009097259,0.00015734347,0.00003315701,0.00015814394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072027626,0.00010227179,0.00010559318,0.000025160733,0.00082231814,0.00014687044,0.00015619265,0.00005166336,0.00029926776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011327826,0.000057828667,0.000043710716,0.00008609283,0.0004045845,0.00041639936,0.0000345346,0.00004283401,0.00008085659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025489964,0.00019713775,0.49652103,0.0000548642,0.0003164726,0.000009202659,0.017352832,0.0000070974943,0.005319301,0.18695061,0.07021656,0.22280002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020606522,0.0004896873,0.19996394,0.00035048995,0.00029952978,0.000004706097,0.09650667,0.000097891156,0.009494462,0.08551373,0.6040014,0.0012168254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032921717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048126247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53378487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012057148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049497696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97351813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519699960","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsw029","title":"Parliament and the War Prerogative in the United Kingdom and Canada: Explaining Variations in Institutional Change and Legislative Control","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prerogative; Legislature; Parliament; House of Commons; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Public administration; Convention; Politics","score_opus":0.04063121156884298,"score_gpt":0.2681038655097625,"score_spread":0.22747265394091953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519699960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97094923,0.00012818993,0.00015077028,0.023077408,0.00012287391,0.0007566551,0.00006333915,0.000007104973,0.004744399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.00008350041,0.000030681054,0.00083596614,0.000103606704,0.00015790637,0.000006554505,0.0000027497977,0.000053240517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887186,0.0003940178,0.00014852939,0.00015522495,0.00026128563,0.0001690889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989143,0.0009020999,0.00006424602,0.000052846954,0.000027997516,0.000038517413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071457797,0.00008484058,0.000107623084,0.000067084875,0.00049585477,0.000038602993,0.000103946564,0.000026422815,0.000039656596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057637742,0.000043271797,0.000010570978,0.0000618482,0.0006677833,0.00028740632,0.000027305947,0.000085393476,5.1231433e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000642435,0.000014776849,0.017541248,0.0000017094346,0.000026395957,0.000008201808,0.058268245,0.0000032835705,0.0000020573264,0.92376125,0.000051200073,0.00025738182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025670094,0.00022719413,0.5164297,0.000754836,0.00013586304,0.000018530083,0.17096725,0.0022365192,0.000031890733,0.20968287,0.07298711,0.00085809006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8042045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95481956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71407837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021010995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001382003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3813764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590968381","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsx002","title":"Constituency Pressures on Committee Selection: Evidence from the Northern Ireland Assembly and Dáil Éireann","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legislature; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Order (exchange); Public relations; Public administration; Primary election; Law; General election; Business; Politics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.057283284343789924,"score_gpt":0.33915883225473725,"score_spread":0.2818755479109473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590968381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616745,0.00059900526,0.000024022216,0.018312156,0.00044982962,0.00034800847,0.000021628268,0.00004716172,0.018523695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985544,0.00007666158,0.000024168894,0.00021946106,0.0006395207,0.000030437615,0.0000035869139,0.000006769865,0.00044497548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871016,0.00030722495,0.00016102807,0.0002235108,0.00031977185,0.00027832008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987212,0.0006938758,0.00012788025,0.00027569648,0.00004776345,0.00013358485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044312538,0.000110332476,0.00013605946,0.000011409356,0.0020666663,0.0003406508,0.000295429,0.000065389795,0.0001671685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003603319,0.000079094236,0.000037538186,0.000039382845,0.000486451,0.0003939406,0.000042615677,0.0001408421,0.00007341361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032296935,0.000032679287,0.9840952,0.0000060537695,0.000042557433,0.000003104619,0.0028496652,0.000011095794,0.00010706511,0.0043424373,0.0059066424,0.0025712047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053816155,0.00025958766,0.9458383,0.00047917233,0.00014526863,0.0000016859055,0.0052494123,0.0001903052,0.0006238519,0.0055841883,0.04069342,0.00039666353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23267123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3142199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006621613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075154174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786137037","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy012","title":"Constituency Preferences and Assignment to Agriculture Committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Research council; Agriculture; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03184539299533034,"score_gpt":0.3178541298041017,"score_spread":0.28600873680877137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786137037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85722303,0.00011601804,0.00020513695,0.01022862,0.0005283927,0.0005276014,0.000017938082,0.00008351246,0.13106975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824065,0.000009280084,0.00022819234,0.00042688666,0.00050350174,0.000036696,0.000004204262,0.00000318002,0.0005473852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990139,0.00014361301,0.00014108857,0.00017298992,0.00023419346,0.00029420582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999515,0.00006582335,0.00003322862,0.00007759903,0.00004688261,0.0002614459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022449631,0.00008350944,0.00010751413,0.000024570441,0.00040509956,0.0000762294,0.00009760071,0.00004880464,0.0005269125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004392073,0.00006483575,0.000018473478,0.00013602285,0.0003102255,0.00014296746,0.000029330931,0.000050368042,0.00018663851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050425406,0.00023769411,0.57723886,0.000040055682,0.000096348114,0.000005559464,0.039267886,0.000005415175,0.0042050136,0.23168342,0.13113649,0.016032841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071029464,0.0014792376,0.122216195,0.00027047592,0.0001070007,0.0000033019483,0.081521705,0.00001919493,0.007838971,0.02022187,0.76462424,0.0009875464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019236641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039866596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6334877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007209409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037308528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888149020","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy032","title":"Political Staff and the Gendered Division of Political Labour in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; House of Commons; Parliament; Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Division of labour; Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.01929826906323828,"score_gpt":0.28830324108170563,"score_spread":0.26900497201846735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888149020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378037,0.000054459084,0.000035140896,0.009660956,0.00024315121,0.00020500207,0.000030639898,0.0000064349692,0.051960558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936116,0.000011131512,0.000070812195,0.0002976951,0.00014812005,0.0000057680736,0.0000035368744,0.000005174956,0.00009659837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849325,0.00026360183,0.00020983766,0.00015078721,0.00036450475,0.00051800325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993659,0.00022871184,0.000038565187,0.00012309071,0.000044927536,0.00019877338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003347983,0.000070801914,0.00013653743,0.00003620524,0.00016524592,0.000021934045,0.00013239527,0.00003268203,0.00014560221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084230065,0.00005167624,0.000025276886,0.00010988145,0.0008235093,0.000064367545,0.00006417712,0.000076978686,0.0000028746233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020668875,0.00003491442,0.037539396,0.000008444197,0.000012586424,0.0000030225349,0.0041319495,8.794019e-7,0.000016412661,0.9576209,0.00029042677,0.0003203834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018240146,0.00008872368,0.12832601,0.000025886522,0.000024007752,0.0000023095104,0.75047296,0.0003562642,0.0010514737,0.11572737,0.0019123094,0.00018866123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96089745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84189355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030662413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007054705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30342543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910475278","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsy051","title":"Learning from Divided Parties? Legislator Dissent as a Cue for Opinion Formation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislator; Opposition (politics); Ideology; Politics; Public opinion; Political dissent; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Legislation","score_opus":0.05132984095190216,"score_gpt":0.35062655367203804,"score_spread":0.29929671272013586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910475278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97626597,0.000100008845,0.0034115806,0.0058538066,0.0014483961,0.00089112454,0.000026075333,0.00016617212,0.011836884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969998,0.000011847,0.00018146857,0.00015650774,0.0018296606,0.00015213083,0.00011481587,0.000012182332,0.0005416116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998609,0.00021422387,0.0002731551,0.00019600688,0.0002834518,0.0004241486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931073,0.00020979332,0.000117976015,0.00010808435,0.00007452732,0.00017888368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038189368,0.00010620108,0.00014360946,0.000032665168,0.0006732263,0.000104921986,0.00011009946,0.000072759205,0.00049488805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020311814,0.000102072314,0.00006305363,0.00010966366,0.00016783195,0.0005397365,0.000022009473,0.00007360126,0.00028690245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001212482,0.00085347734,0.21629606,0.00028674578,0.0005004444,0.0000052350033,0.30811086,0.00024022741,0.017350461,0.27721995,0.12249179,0.05543226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001988636,0.002524794,0.009368302,0.0003953659,0.00013434196,0.0000011498988,0.10030691,0.005962674,0.019447567,0.055707477,0.8031189,0.0010439053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034813453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012232518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017548318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005527979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011839109","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaa004","title":"Boys’ Club or Good Ol’ Boys Club? Corruption and the Parliamentary Representation of Young and Old Men and Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Representation (politics); Club; Bivariate analysis; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Capital (architecture); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Medicine; History; Statistics","score_opus":0.03288369719331496,"score_gpt":0.295847952793116,"score_spread":0.262964255599801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011839109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783715,0.00048734527,0.00011209961,0.011265169,0.00020802119,0.00096790737,0.00004609354,0.000045653494,0.008496238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996073,0.0021951827,0.00025758886,0.0006443235,0.00021803427,0.00007087311,0.00003190393,0.0000161358,0.0004929386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998014,0.00039856823,0.00037584198,0.0004150182,0.00044068,0.00035593266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906933,0.00024224239,0.00020984285,0.00016683154,0.000043263837,0.00026848013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059166376,0.00017252847,0.00029927655,0.000053490843,0.00043469892,0.00013619268,0.00013987138,0.00007958686,0.00014744722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008283464,0.00012876197,0.000046093282,0.00021695309,0.0006903618,0.00039573386,0.0001523033,0.00013424855,0.000003562727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017290409,0.00020306675,0.36080846,0.0002792908,0.0005345038,0.00002494612,0.59440607,0.00006480603,0.0017524038,0.01027083,0.0059804707,0.023946121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039308346,0.00032180708,0.048792675,0.00003430699,0.00016805572,0.000012613837,0.93804467,0.0015627268,0.0006415309,0.004743591,0.0014434116,0.00030377915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014065147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001055498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34363863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081234175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057252964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169385919","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaa068","title":"The Electoral Consequences of Scandals: A Meta-Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Ballot; Political science; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.13648810993952168,"score_gpt":0.36218469395383457,"score_spread":0.2256965840143129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169385919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6175444,0.012958972,0.00092787633,0.32156926,0.00049392146,0.0017598773,0.0001976437,0.00025924662,0.04428878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922657,0.000020863297,0.0000556905,0.00038555556,0.000106197935,0.00003276055,0.00000342066,0.0000037914888,0.00016513735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983657,0.00049649307,0.00030535003,0.00015327953,0.0003879496,0.0002912563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916416,0.00034870315,0.00013076332,0.000111004054,0.00006236783,0.00018298783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005788623,0.000082226514,0.00036710777,0.000024273148,0.0003454833,0.0000582072,0.00021013831,0.00003381575,0.0009583316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014498396,0.000051971536,0.00043963786,0.0006434599,0.0004992259,0.00010985249,0.000016573356,0.00006461122,0.00002808235],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034388193,0.000279184,0.29847482,0.00010969989,0.23255485,0.000018151724,0.046934646,0.0009804552,0.0070227054,0.3863114,0.02421846,0.0027517178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015840312,0.0019995132,0.012741058,0.000025455343,0.46308753,0.00000172391,0.15840204,0.0019096982,0.046453126,0.041016657,0.27047774,0.0023014296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045934673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035644505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38168216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035740573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102661186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180582544","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsab003","title":"Guns for Votes: Wedge Politics in the Canadian Multiparty System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Electoral system; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Wedge (geometry); Empirical evidence; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04903063701379223,"score_gpt":0.32720882317321853,"score_spread":0.2781781861594263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180582544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7160275,0.00072683697,0.00027433404,0.07072594,0.0027553814,0.0031892017,0.00047419465,0.00015696496,0.20566966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978705,0.0000022127804,0.00012214368,0.00068835437,0.00048603336,0.00014525207,0.000046092944,0.000008479507,0.00063091266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983296,0.00038680542,0.00023305426,0.00017285309,0.00023774226,0.0006399858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991542,0.00032014976,0.000037257774,0.0001641923,0.00007476157,0.00024943674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006960552,0.00008752229,0.00013512342,0.00004401343,0.0006460014,0.00011910943,0.00016844823,0.00008254876,0.00008041189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015887483,0.00007268825,0.00006825504,0.00023444218,0.00010114849,0.000109571505,0.000008759432,0.00009644592,0.00005923018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007870223,0.00011579984,0.071994565,0.00014217234,0.00003682977,0.000055481596,0.028176492,0.00004999338,0.000052629377,0.8785792,0.020164223,0.0006247286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012850304,0.00012230322,0.02124882,0.00025462057,0.00010225161,0.0000099403815,0.35409072,0.001486006,0.0006444629,0.00820337,0.61190957,0.00064293394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83497834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8703759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007700566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006259217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4968586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360938675","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsad006","title":"‘Such Cold, Dispassionate Terms Fail Us’: Reading <i>Hansard</i> as an ‘Archive of Feelings”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scholarship; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Feeling; Reflexivity; Reading (process); Politics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social science; Law; Political science; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015565317001511043,"score_gpt":0.2963193237466997,"score_spread":0.2807540067451887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360938675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95939314,0.000024970168,0.00003391575,0.0019662401,0.0007340015,0.00036394453,0.00013353594,0.0002762153,0.037074048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959238,0.0003280255,0.00023518149,0.0002519615,0.00028543637,0.00003879829,0.00016597415,0.000020684884,0.0027501357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812514,0.00020513457,0.00027984456,0.00033087426,0.0005712631,0.0004877387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992581,0.0001355959,0.00013906858,0.00018098594,0.000049315553,0.00023695096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045049295,0.00016485903,0.00024264792,0.000072426265,0.0006808967,0.000072310926,0.00041141035,0.000099021425,0.00033679022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007202339,0.00014658539,0.0001352395,0.0005711667,0.0003562242,0.00046225364,0.000100790945,0.00014946543,0.00021596836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045821376,0.0007202927,0.17543231,0.00021612218,0.0005687116,0.00023324855,0.47927362,0.0006694987,0.06121187,0.17734061,0.056759354,0.04711615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011670766,0.00040266156,0.016677242,0.00028139373,0.00014312136,0.0000030192182,0.8426969,0.0012799166,0.0031593875,0.050347462,0.08279187,0.0010499451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014342597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007653676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3634233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012052006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091249734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362548804","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsad005","title":"Ministerial Advisers as Power Resources: Exploring Expansion, Stability and Contraction in Westminster Ministers’ Offices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Politics; Narrative; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Proxy (statistics); Sociology; Political stability; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09439327971764992,"score_gpt":0.3536274338616676,"score_spread":0.2592341541440177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362548804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94994783,0.00002491512,0.0000013138089,0.007586058,0.00046879912,0.00037102823,0.00002677216,0.000109053166,0.041464224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854606,0.00015968368,0.000023935998,0.000262126,0.00018436112,0.000118417134,0.00002363295,0.000011740159,0.0006700496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778396,0.00041210576,0.00033795967,0.00039717,0.00053398166,0.0005348193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990245,0.00039391147,0.00008279918,0.0001936589,0.00003334133,0.00027179255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001423594,0.00014009442,0.00018554371,0.00021680092,0.00039739214,0.000245799,0.0002023778,0.000088554145,0.0009180949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027334152,0.00014517369,0.00004915684,0.00048452633,0.0004288133,0.0009413536,0.000082871906,0.00015469248,0.000104591156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003199025,0.0012451394,0.18074131,0.0002690208,0.0001817461,0.00047167751,0.7523824,0.000030826435,0.012765705,0.010147327,0.013702802,0.024863025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011734971,0.00028958166,0.03935222,0.000076171695,0.000009479982,0.0000031724385,0.7652883,0.00004359169,0.00096239435,0.00042386432,0.19205557,0.00032219372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047700508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075105727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17835276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013306228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023129901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412929343","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf037","title":"Parliamentarians’ perspectives on parenthood and politics in Canada’s House of Commons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Commons; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Parliament","score_opus":0.01764684623637566,"score_gpt":0.28255350075022156,"score_spread":0.26490665451384593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412929343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437769,0.00041133072,0.000020981033,0.007763169,0.00029776563,0.00030744632,0.000052012045,0.000019721694,0.04735065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991717,0.00026586116,0.000085371765,0.00020741763,0.000035387566,0.000012574891,0.000005092938,0.000007504175,0.00020909373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988593,0.0001612857,0.00022346126,0.00020716288,0.00024919325,0.0002996325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.0001658188,0.000059266917,0.00015128292,0.000027667571,0.00009510017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016353866,0.0000980625,0.00016690294,0.00012267685,0.0001650701,0.000022849987,0.00012961167,0.00003516969,0.0000497911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039101073,0.000101642116,0.000029190307,0.00016520687,0.00019210085,0.000066623776,0.000040647577,0.00010351916,0.0000011429572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027212402,0.00029808885,0.6870463,0.000042231564,0.00009755508,0.000013317684,0.06331861,0.00014978221,0.000040721603,0.24241804,0.005245863,0.0013022961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054515956,0.00003639461,0.09665976,0.000063117164,0.00002578859,2.6662022e-7,0.89439636,0.0000343623,0.00046388624,0.0047167335,0.0029328805,0.0001252726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98737496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83107775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007457887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011247742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41448453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415757198","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf052","title":"Understanding politicians’ discourse on inflation and cost of living in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Inflation (cosmology); Perspective (graphical); Commons; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.042778749844489955,"score_gpt":0.23561364787445238,"score_spread":0.19283489802996243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415757198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713148,0.00040713133,0.001064931,0.0007176218,0.0004005053,0.00020356773,0.00009356502,0.0000078227395,0.12579004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.00016484334,0.000051256266,0.00031676886,0.000019732388,0.000007916105,0.000004831474,0.0000080686705,0.00020040463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920493,0.000012075686,0.0003504668,0.00019898952,0.00002986032,0.00020365353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995792,0.00013225833,0.00012842368,0.00012215675,0.0000038914827,0.000034097768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014435517,0.00009363742,0.00022898981,0.00020857372,0.000049644983,0.000015267871,0.00006548944,0.000030347339,0.000063471794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015048618,0.00011579143,0.000022546747,0.00017363849,0.00004525169,0.00012475197,0.000026756874,0.00008287704,0.0000031321406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016014666,0.000041337935,0.66383815,0.000049227652,0.000025268404,0.000005572412,0.0011549752,0.00069378124,0.000006818452,0.3327307,0.000777288,0.000660855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014953419,0.00012338413,0.91706496,0.0018985303,0.000024928177,0.0000024366534,0.041858424,0.008998006,0.0003499068,0.017624058,0.009787292,0.0007727537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71910304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80748284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31510666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009082615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106510204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47218373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416087981","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf053","title":"Digital integration in political advertising: Insights from expenditures in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Politics; Political advertising; Federal election; Digital advertising; Investment (military); State (computer science); Digital media; Political communication","score_opus":0.009646932399126203,"score_gpt":0.28077504676220966,"score_spread":0.27112811436308343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416087981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84136266,0.0005333023,0.000014810746,0.01459086,0.0006849061,0.00026967318,0.000056461326,0.000010655391,0.1424767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864274,0.000060178078,0.000016186232,0.00082157186,0.00021373748,0.000019730225,0.00006204611,0.000002957293,0.00016085246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991254,0.00016073394,0.00013544681,0.00013624226,0.00013379405,0.00030838326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999415,0.00036781165,0.0000138168825,0.000074590724,0.000009197704,0.00011961026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000061191146,0.00007147242,0.00009086002,0.00015610828,0.00021532236,0.00012868384,0.00012000346,0.00008102707,0.00006768877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013065885,0.00006113312,0.000022273824,0.00022886677,0.00017826412,0.0002319415,0.000011962863,0.00016940171,0.0000100555635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020694075,0.00016251845,0.4153978,0.0000039205893,0.00003239364,0.000052423777,0.13843867,0.000002832959,0.000082023165,0.40454423,0.018409777,0.022852734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033022455,0.000022259112,0.08147535,0.000079389785,0.000015693637,4.300005e-7,0.8032589,0.000023977671,0.0001867874,0.06639755,0.04805525,0.00015420037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79228467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9433694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036938544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003301524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24929363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7082265406","doi":"10.1093/pa/gsaf046","title":"Questions to the Prime Minister in the Canadian House of Commons: Transformation or tweak?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; House of Commons; Prime (order theory); Period (music); Attendance","score_opus":0.01767263652393983,"score_gpt":0.25259066733450114,"score_spread":0.2349180308105613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7082265406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05159036,0.00020127984,0.035496008,0.72746015,0.0005827173,0.0018339353,0.000038998147,0.00012809719,0.18266846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611354,0.000003918913,0.0008714386,0.002588053,0.000010601896,0.00006312999,0.000004238385,0.0000010593587,0.00034401575],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927145,0.000104936364,0.00019763404,0.00012935091,0.00011452514,0.00018210133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993607,0.00012237493,0.00003141726,0.00041976746,0.000024250356,0.000041484192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042431723,0.00007578814,0.00008394033,0.00007687052,0.00017182884,0.000059513848,0.00081056467,0.000033083397,0.000024556028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034609835,0.0000440172,0.000031131403,0.0004722987,0.000044549095,0.00012878269,0.000047593443,0.0001120752,0.000014893128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025926667,0.0011454988,0.035853602,0.0005558503,0.00032140114,0.0001596905,0.3189332,0.0148575725,0.0013602221,0.22365351,0.24945843,0.15344179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010778276,0.00026979388,0.036642987,0.0004359187,0.000052163847,0.000049598624,0.055684023,0.011179238,0.00763606,0.008120267,0.87834984,0.0005023073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041978642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48827967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94452316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059447942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017020825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}