{"meta":{"query_hash":"cd922aabf984","filters":{"venue":"Penn State international law review"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cd922aabf984","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Penn+State+international+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1505217071","doi":"","title":"Who's Afraid of Banning Corporal Punishment - A Comparative View on Current and Desirable Models","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Dignity; Punishment (psychology); Legislation; Law; Duty; Statute; Political science; Human rights; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1899159300083059,"score_gpt":0.45861140924959365,"score_spread":0.2686954792412878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505217071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00946532,0.034639552,0.0072785774,0.6101429,0.0018341222,0.000030234749,0.000038687576,0.000050819683,0.3365198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8285866,0.0518606,0.0057242266,0.07974414,0.0050098062,0.00026054445,0.00006679674,0.0001645082,0.028582884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681893,0.017740011,0.00094980816,0.0025975609,0.007364618,0.0031587589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96183604,0.022605052,0.0043154806,0.0025783707,0.0055151843,0.0031498775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029316096,0.0007476082,0.001035468,0.0042977305,0.016072012,0.029135814,0.0049166535,0.015130977,0.00489655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02863418,0.0005820026,0.0009821657,0.004278956,0.09787148,0.028055975,0.0074063116,0.017677944,0.00082432426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042530614,0.00001650142,0.00014564543,0.000038957205,0.0000016250788,0.000028848508,0.0056185597,0.00003895617,0.000015761389,0.9859584,0.003946275,0.00418626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035942518,0.00006857634,0.0014968467,0.0021143444,0.000018233637,0.00027962643,0.029089157,0.00079691864,0.00017240238,0.6211069,0.34476614,0.000054956425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025236659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029391699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029316096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01615641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0172048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1550402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609243848","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Existing Paradigm: How to Transnationalize the Legal Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Curriculum; Vision; Legal education; Presentation (obstetrics); Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.060860206944277864,"score_gpt":0.3973655496232002,"score_spread":0.33650534267892235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609243848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15037619,0.0073077464,0.14187641,0.22926848,0.0020852655,0.00028316933,0.000054519474,0.00039442285,0.46835375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86997485,0.003280629,0.089798026,0.017312933,0.00017846431,0.00033384,0.00006637805,0.00029246145,0.01876246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887933,0.0077717225,0.00031654656,0.0010931141,0.0012315986,0.0007937814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942443,0.0015415875,0.00044575674,0.0011218069,0.0012559718,0.0013905868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012814643,0.0003634343,0.00041102033,0.0012535792,0.0069285845,0.011819268,0.0017914209,0.0028000975,0.0076108957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01420651,0.00033408808,0.00056010694,0.0010917947,0.014128218,0.02329418,0.011694745,0.0077272383,0.0012641673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019046234,0.00010965662,0.0021987427,0.00014844733,0.000020778858,0.00011993999,0.04131475,0.00040896962,0.0009095532,0.85754716,0.0068635573,0.0903394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045760997,0.00019016635,0.003291656,0.0007422967,0.00004612752,0.00034417902,0.10648124,0.0020467145,0.0010966114,0.49598786,0.3896868,0.000040664283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070535787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0152498465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012814643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006048666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015769456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938728920","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Investment Dispute Settlement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Arbitration; Politics; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Foreign direct investment; International law; Status quo; Investment (military); Investor-state dispute settlement; Political economy; Sociology; International investment","score_opus":0.01895504425857517,"score_gpt":0.27520623552390877,"score_spread":0.2562511912653336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938728920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042014677,0.006661537,0.007752115,0.051719505,0.0003286327,0.00006269789,0.00003753307,0.00003772355,0.8913855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569775,0.0019791028,0.00084206933,0.0068543865,0.00052091293,0.00013095456,0.00001974804,0.00003357218,0.032641925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97166497,0.017413806,0.0008271423,0.0028045767,0.0037822307,0.0035072812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98668,0.009567361,0.0013495171,0.000808083,0.0009983632,0.0005967079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018482149,0.0003207386,0.00049128314,0.002270407,0.009861987,0.02223849,0.002000819,0.013623181,0.006795832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030384291,0.0006955516,0.000493009,0.0019388867,0.037053086,0.011604442,0.008487036,0.011177083,0.0012319373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049160317,0.0000063442412,0.0000918621,0.0000056396725,0.0000011064401,0.00003875013,0.00091957505,0.000070846,0.000028359449,0.99576545,0.0016150892,0.0014521684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004835762,0.000039669583,0.0012581529,0.00024376025,0.000017319866,0.00017494665,0.003541057,0.0013477359,0.00032219297,0.8627901,0.130182,0.000034669163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010175689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069344337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02223849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00940938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005811953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09774411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258736271","doi":"","title":"Transsystemia - Are We Approaching a New Langdellian Moment - Is McGill Leading the Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.10412803839665143,"score_gpt":0.3977357728599319,"score_spread":0.2936077344632805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258736271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028007831,0.022820765,0.005085387,0.65796375,0.0025509552,0.00004201408,0.000078993595,0.00016597458,0.2832843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62238497,0.012854168,0.003948961,0.15408239,0.0011239247,0.00008017412,0.00007449639,0.00010575236,0.20534514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960096,0.0013853188,0.00006601112,0.0005370212,0.0010109516,0.0009911649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962949,0.00066324516,0.0003334343,0.00027855943,0.0007829936,0.0016468811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028258746,0.00019991395,0.00021783232,0.00067666656,0.0038076579,0.0083195865,0.0008788749,0.0030108974,0.012385231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00525469,0.0001616663,0.00023730243,0.00061734713,0.00973484,0.0069610756,0.0034091123,0.0038045307,0.0012802845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031682248,0.000050868184,0.0032402745,0.00014043896,0.000011606674,0.00012830723,0.004990491,0.00009661411,0.0007121243,0.7429368,0.14640489,0.10125589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105754325,0.00008056632,0.004317512,0.00018852144,0.000010676128,0.000102802274,0.0044220234,0.00013788579,0.000426282,0.043415718,0.94686675,0.000020687927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091751255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22379556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012751536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023711212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18243438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300562490","doi":"","title":"Settlement Finality and Associated Risks in Funds Transfers - When Does Interbank Payment Occur","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Business; Payment; Financial system; Finance; Monetary economics; Economics","score_opus":0.036524497130943245,"score_gpt":0.2806797023674871,"score_spread":0.24415520523654388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300562490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39967647,0.0030422832,0.38998526,0.013057712,0.0004763145,0.00039394986,0.0005835399,0.0004421684,0.19234231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482645,0.00045242513,0.0071986183,0.00016601004,0.00015923746,0.00013969732,0.0000837359,0.00004619998,0.0069277375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823241,0.0050677173,0.0021286195,0.003446761,0.0048312796,0.0022015332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743532,0.01475417,0.0059662345,0.0021094736,0.0021570022,0.0006597963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01476459,0.0006031472,0.0010578366,0.001936196,0.0028361876,0.009849214,0.0019507647,0.004465409,0.0071261236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06288214,0.000588528,0.0012272338,0.0017548283,0.008542917,0.019129824,0.006253814,0.005135463,0.0011769986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088027715,0.000027440146,0.0030963898,0.000059204558,0.000014593879,0.00030284343,0.0016263201,0.0036245426,0.000274134,0.978023,0.00053501304,0.012328469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018805518,0.00004079995,0.0024442365,0.00010228037,0.000018325849,0.0002621808,0.0009175565,0.008376994,0.0005902124,0.98157805,0.0056087556,0.000041752122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013433683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064407685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01476459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040328247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026550526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078083575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508021301","doi":"","title":"Financing Insolvency Restructurings in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Stalking Horses, Rogue White Knights and Circling Vultures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Stalking; White (mutation); Business; Wake; Financial system; Finance; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.02894416360466291,"score_gpt":0.2402867322098203,"score_spread":0.2113425686051574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508021301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4894795,0.01827729,0.0034343048,0.3013776,0.00081237295,0.00005255706,0.00030776544,0.00011948586,0.18613905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978683,0.0041626063,0.00022267294,0.0036342577,0.000770878,0.000015627433,0.000053404663,0.000021728054,0.012435889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897456,0.00031092612,0.00005283065,0.0000838603,0.00021907868,0.00035864505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408686,0.002767871,0.0015230833,0.0001790679,0.0007943987,0.000648609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028799374,0.00017737993,0.00041416663,0.00085769105,0.001568489,0.009426484,0.00070815237,0.006546915,0.005450257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017233545,0.00023107314,0.0002007747,0.0008206579,0.0023724774,0.0052782535,0.0015189998,0.0041755945,0.00051714305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035833407,0.00021890229,0.022190105,0.0001350721,0.000042617514,0.0011322183,0.003421319,0.006398956,0.00060015643,0.7348123,0.15114047,0.079549536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024394742,0.00025858686,0.07893468,0.001018227,0.0001442852,0.0005124163,0.017198892,0.01841557,0.0015814533,0.59418243,0.28738546,0.0001241324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011019479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020619135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011019479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020497728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036223133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021910667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735572011","doi":"","title":"Doing Business in Montreal: The Effects of the Addition of Fifth Forum Jurisdiction under the Montreal Convention","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Convention; Political science; Law; Montreal Protocol; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.008507001430232112,"score_gpt":0.2852355212244584,"score_spread":0.2767285197942263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735572011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1439676,0.0058607413,0.0025823475,0.12559131,0.0013010679,0.00036402422,0.002383903,0.00020938461,0.7177397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82703125,0.0019472765,0.0018177775,0.020272832,0.00033482243,0.00019432035,0.00044474984,0.000094720344,0.14786229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896069,0.0017198304,0.0001701117,0.000984885,0.0034889565,0.004029319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876708,0.003142769,0.0010362789,0.00064718584,0.0038573968,0.003645634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006243415,0.0005008104,0.00052232883,0.0021222127,0.018635347,0.016805798,0.0037248232,0.0057831435,0.021191081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020062191,0.0008293932,0.00087602175,0.0036664316,0.008037955,0.004220102,0.004390124,0.0070327898,0.0006576505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022735658,0.00017126572,0.014435596,0.00016180574,0.000110587906,0.0008087575,0.005876067,0.0019252325,0.0010695506,0.7761334,0.17272104,0.026359431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039799526,0.00022768295,0.17836238,0.0005283881,0.00036787908,0.00019679565,0.015075984,0.0030762434,0.0029575184,0.038729068,0.7596171,0.00046295856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071861476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071861476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12410144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5213939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746497207","doi":"","title":"Class Actions to Remedy Mass Consumer Wrongs: Repugnant Solution or Controllable Genie? The Canadian Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07535851725690046,"score_gpt":0.37926044476319215,"score_spread":0.3039019275062917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746497207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051035795,0.006496312,0.004189953,0.23782627,0.00084480067,0.00018804893,0.00030998647,0.0001258817,0.6989829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.763821,0.008904263,0.002549757,0.062403914,0.00041336365,0.00013541366,0.00013373945,0.00017638985,0.16146213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829989,0.0031397217,0.00027387906,0.0014901634,0.0062704845,0.005826903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863382,0.005064797,0.00061569514,0.0010126962,0.004620595,0.0023480908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011199718,0.00083855615,0.0009827525,0.002496172,0.038060572,0.01116372,0.0041712485,0.015696486,0.020694053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023809774,0.0006439068,0.0010586057,0.003481781,0.02812699,0.004794546,0.005115881,0.014222847,0.0012405715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006393203,0.00011063027,0.002382537,0.00010025044,0.000026769945,0.00035687303,0.014242451,0.0005244536,0.00032186476,0.8664023,0.08250003,0.03296781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027283415,0.00008188123,0.013260803,0.0006098156,0.00018223893,0.00031777626,0.02076875,0.0011243477,0.0011828295,0.07764725,0.88435674,0.0001948469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09777424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09777424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23098965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70940506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747861587","doi":"","title":"Integrating Civil and Common Law Teaching Throughout the Curriculum: The Canadian Experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.06457611961266785,"score_gpt":0.4282295086886362,"score_spread":0.36365338907596834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747861587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42665252,0.014411028,0.0023885071,0.21434702,0.0028151073,0.00067044597,0.0007395095,0.00023065493,0.3377452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8117394,0.016453162,0.005251925,0.01975078,0.00028515834,0.00022027786,0.00042150664,0.00018609872,0.14569172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029946,0.0013808516,0.0001949285,0.00056184933,0.0042089983,0.0033539322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784224,0.0025822676,0.00058717484,0.00033766497,0.0073726904,0.010697798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008425776,0.0005022675,0.0007425192,0.0025963553,0.05186664,0.010458184,0.0029845792,0.0048589734,0.01167112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014143907,0.0008203154,0.00053662306,0.0092966305,0.006825839,0.0034850931,0.005627292,0.0056676366,0.00070166134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002983146,0.0019357603,0.034276363,0.00064837246,0.00006124081,0.00295994,0.19304287,0.0013691178,0.0020410002,0.07960048,0.2863712,0.39739534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089935114,0.00021864564,0.06250524,0.0003573517,0.000045136298,0.00059696316,0.11778659,0.000629238,0.000533114,0.002538801,0.81455684,0.00014218129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18385653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18385653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49255213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94661075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788092532","doi":"","title":"Court Jurisdiction and Recognition in Multi-National Political Structures: Canada and the European Union","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Politics; European union; Law; Public administration; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.06689453653551183,"score_gpt":0.31963678135376145,"score_spread":0.2527422448182496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788092532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3695829,0.029251102,0.0018787864,0.101222865,0.00057412597,0.00009221237,0.0006044526,0.00003857108,0.49675497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741537,0.0036894125,0.00034189873,0.0037032026,0.000102524,0.000021960792,0.00009703056,0.000020766376,0.017869433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98621285,0.0015519706,0.00033636473,0.0010901928,0.004074643,0.006734038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98182803,0.0055597527,0.0010998875,0.0004668508,0.0075593097,0.0034861793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008079701,0.0003480721,0.0014269542,0.0048748692,0.02954719,0.025516175,0.004337025,0.008979078,0.008244558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03106132,0.0005862008,0.0007269446,0.010708544,0.023622544,0.005729353,0.0054791886,0.007571678,0.00041170226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080950194,0.00007056899,0.011313151,0.00008199647,0.00006142734,0.0002481632,0.00860509,0.0018214723,0.00010410321,0.9232663,0.028343901,0.026002944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002278956,0.00009014661,0.17488512,0.0017878196,0.00048810753,0.0002950945,0.07861166,0.006360889,0.0008214518,0.3991822,0.33682644,0.00042317042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15889283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15889283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26574028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9755651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}