{"meta":{"query_hash":"cd922aabf984","filters":{"venue":"Penn State international law review"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cd922aabf984","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Penn+State+international+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1505217071","doi":"","title":"Who's Afraid of Banning Corporal Punishment - A Comparative View on Current and Desirable Models","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Dignity; Punishment (psychology); Legislation; Law; Duty; Statute; Political science; Human rights; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1899159300083059,"score_gpt":0.45861140924959365,"score_spread":0.2686954792412878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505217071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03224285,0.64958566,0.005247397,0.012431626,0.0011802489,0.002937068,0.00022366973,0.000072943374,0.2960785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8368366,0.1591481,0.00095697277,0.002310713,0.00011301291,0.000017885757,0.00007228104,0.000012284415,0.0005321829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983611,0.00006508972,0.0006245264,0.00023561156,0.00052518427,0.0001884622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987392,0.00021035841,0.00026030093,0.00016148364,0.00046362032,0.00016503946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261415,0.00014777461,0.00052054564,0.00006082511,0.000048684826,0.000015544176,0.00011130928,0.000037151156,0.00015878712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000570858,0.000118669646,0.000078277204,0.0001142568,0.000103058985,0.000117255506,0.00005746483,0.00038274468,0.0000135597065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023861526,0.00036795545,0.0016778884,0.011206448,0.00013077883,0.000053347776,0.0013296077,0.000053073305,0.000011452897,0.93430877,0.004083908,0.046538178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082786864,0.00048152526,0.000984773,0.022273414,0.0001297444,0.000035350673,0.00004684129,0.0011641311,0.00015653162,0.011438942,0.9622272,0.00023366671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022720727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058205645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009641693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008626323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48392078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609243848","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Existing Paradigm: How to Transnationalize the Legal Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Curriculum; Vision; Legal education; Presentation (obstetrics); Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.060860206944277864,"score_gpt":0.3973655496232002,"score_spread":0.33650534267892235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609243848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022447431,0.0029171123,0.00076724245,0.66473,0.0006897719,0.00042930993,0.000017447144,0.00003780634,0.3301868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510206,0.0047018724,0.00039752756,0.024310227,0.0011139757,0.00027328418,0.00006674739,0.00001605738,0.018099686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836236,0.0002738883,0.00030694724,0.00018178242,0.00066510466,0.00020991004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986833,0.0005172443,0.00018596377,0.00016645696,0.00039744322,0.000049635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001753178,0.00010387448,0.00011168085,0.000034532,0.0009993853,0.00058461935,0.0005997503,0.000020150874,0.0007814571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005921394,0.00006550044,0.00008844181,0.00046103518,0.00013681517,0.0006948615,0.000028825838,0.0002575443,0.00013723956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.420862e-7,0.00003314423,0.00003178239,0.000019881818,0.000015279129,0.0000011117802,0.0006568396,0.000027319766,0.0000020688276,0.9753092,0.021285154,0.0026172686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000476794,0.0000034650336,0.00028062466,0.00014816619,0.000016986363,0.0000061959067,0.00036130362,0.000037587546,0.0000022377865,0.010762131,0.98824,0.00009359051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009397159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066029136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012539951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019902215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99719936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1938728920","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Investment Dispute Settlement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Arbitration; Politics; Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Foreign direct investment; International law; Status quo; Investment (military); Investor-state dispute settlement; Political economy; Sociology; International investment","score_opus":0.01895504425857517,"score_gpt":0.27520623552390877,"score_spread":0.2562511912653336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1938728920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033752015,0.0077519114,0.00010779322,0.012638446,0.0003914179,0.0004567625,0.00002619297,0.000022763532,0.9752295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73661435,0.008000793,0.00084486743,0.2509266,0.0005001398,0.00006201055,0.0001838353,0.00003132707,0.0028360428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.000017111324,0.0005869084,0.00016812126,0.000396701,0.00019042265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992506,0.00011818095,0.00027702903,0.00012817876,0.00021059981,0.000015449876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011470872,0.000119698,0.00015072923,0.000059269027,0.00015199622,0.00012049239,0.0002451612,0.000013957161,0.000078882505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066558816,0.00008982778,0.000050614723,0.00011358695,0.00015695725,0.00048681232,0.00011941044,0.00010242412,0.000029721323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011138747,0.000033235578,0.00026912504,0.00028383822,0.000023728735,0.0000048817824,0.000019905707,0.0000011738298,0.000030049996,0.99793667,0.0012317353,0.00015449467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023334654,0.000003373273,0.0010340272,0.00077003875,0.000012580105,0.0000011085651,0.000017932403,0.000096680786,0.00009770571,0.08221749,0.9154216,0.00009410591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056701223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004150234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97239345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000762793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012013308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36630705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258736271","doi":"","title":"Transsystemia - Are We Approaching a New Langdellian Moment - Is McGill Leading the Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.10412803839665143,"score_gpt":0.3977357728599319,"score_spread":0.2936077344632805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258736271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013336123,0.0075554624,0.0009205386,0.5209055,0.0007087178,0.0005084828,0.00008045439,0.000057317095,0.46913016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66771966,0.057869483,0.0015719807,0.05107837,0.0019152729,0.00024280982,0.0001764658,0.000053462474,0.21937247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985537,0.00019086814,0.00038737408,0.00018664317,0.00049910677,0.00018231355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916863,0.0001691726,0.0002762939,0.00015030363,0.00017234411,0.000063232255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010055592,0.00010337727,0.00015282269,0.00003527968,0.00054911163,0.00021724513,0.00039498348,0.000028241915,0.0014234432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007062404,0.000076542616,0.0000925291,0.0002885147,0.000063793166,0.00055103743,0.000019200023,0.00024241756,0.00035548385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002197478,0.00003969702,0.00005616661,0.00012872637,0.000029595767,0.0000015051927,0.0017661211,0.000012011828,0.000007758162,0.8945683,0.09608137,0.007306516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007138208,0.0000028903185,0.00003814249,0.0006677486,0.000023747021,0.000003524674,0.0003828382,0.00001677229,0.000014857906,0.005371458,0.993309,0.00009760312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024288978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062297685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89722764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020109274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013511477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300562490","doi":"","title":"Settlement Finality and Associated Risks in Funds Transfers - When Does Interbank Payment Occur","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Business; Payment; Financial system; Finance; Monetary economics; Economics","score_opus":0.036524497130943245,"score_gpt":0.2806797023674871,"score_spread":0.24415520523654388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300562490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7240747,0.038568567,0.0008377287,0.02070442,0.0040991968,0.0030990199,0.0023712292,0.00023348609,0.20601162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716606,0.017921457,0.00006056543,0.009416046,0.00008888387,0.000085080115,0.00022580443,0.000020784286,0.0005207383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984657,0.000037062844,0.00054417603,0.00034003035,0.00035345444,0.0002595376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.000044804285,0.00024780657,0.00014420746,0.0001352666,0.000018349961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008192363,0.00020780532,0.00032658858,0.000058031495,0.00006268583,0.00016151679,0.00022783982,0.000034073575,0.000902916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018950859,0.00016577185,0.0000923652,0.00014443151,0.00006074044,0.0006681499,0.000073588264,0.00014270743,0.00006695625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057262398,0.00031911815,0.06770844,0.0018376827,0.00013124688,0.000075192336,0.00021963997,0.000004367612,0.000026441241,0.90306103,0.010943558,0.015615989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008450376,0.0000149958505,0.06283035,0.0016607721,0.000052626925,0.00000192333,0.000032118904,0.000048618167,0.000017089102,0.024188034,0.91001123,0.0002972092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030407954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021683576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89906764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017480836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508021301","doi":"","title":"Financing Insolvency Restructurings in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Stalking Horses, Rogue White Knights and Circling Vultures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Stalking; White (mutation); Business; Wake; Financial system; Finance; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.02894416360466291,"score_gpt":0.2402867322098203,"score_spread":0.2113425686051574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508021301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145489,0.060563732,0.0006661166,0.0021097152,0.00092937314,0.000966528,0.00017068723,0.000025514059,0.020019451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931786,0.005705772,0.0004946322,0.0005032133,0.000037741887,0.000027106405,0.0000074822397,0.000011631585,0.00003383167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836385,0.00006389565,0.0009157778,0.00034590208,0.00012216641,0.00018840126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988852,0.000064627144,0.0005947255,0.00034851473,0.000086870095,0.000020020187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011831593,0.0001474305,0.0003323354,0.00007659757,0.00013407944,0.000047792735,0.0005929715,0.000045334356,0.0001164985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031359462,0.000107764696,0.00011466998,0.00025701162,0.00011830234,0.00026167958,0.00012434041,0.00020082346,0.000006755798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010250274,0.00009068239,0.060154825,0.0005909877,0.000020877837,0.0000034622524,0.0048492705,0.00006184353,0.000006314747,0.93151814,0.000104938736,0.0025884325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002907565,0.000031833733,0.7332985,0.0013317377,0.000016640843,0.000022348408,0.000062221094,0.00020530212,0.000054303528,0.22789727,0.03653018,0.00025891364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012978222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014826731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70362085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006853711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026302792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4394517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735572011","doi":"","title":"Doing Business in Montreal: The Effects of the Addition of Fifth Forum Jurisdiction under the Montreal Convention","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Convention; Political science; Law; Montreal Protocol; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.008507001430232112,"score_gpt":0.2852355212244584,"score_spread":0.2767285197942263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735572011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40417552,0.024121339,0.0098084435,0.22391173,0.010580653,0.009273983,0.0005809069,0.00014000334,0.31740743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714626,0.01132203,0.000021301415,0.0008387927,0.00009371956,0.000067295325,0.00004725672,0.0000069149532,0.0004564402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844253,0.00025109906,0.00042086202,0.00012904956,0.0006255343,0.00013095129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986725,0.00031514873,0.00044589522,0.0001437075,0.0004061734,0.000016614687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006859008,0.00009073114,0.00014977116,0.000032073458,0.00021307323,0.00003173724,0.00040842177,0.000034441342,0.000072767965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016689835,0.00005013976,0.0001333797,0.00027140946,0.00021732654,0.00028309264,0.0000508245,0.00011373815,0.000009531873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020513951,0.000096229334,0.0002724932,0.00020860291,0.000046746925,9.370456e-7,0.0007846866,0.00055824564,0.0000768247,0.9888264,0.00029033024,0.008817989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021900183,0.00008836492,0.2910461,0.013331251,0.00022051414,0.00001122422,0.0007104944,0.00019346806,0.0012991949,0.3351162,0.35544527,0.00034785247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05393721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09712439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6537102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018494371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092494614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9523627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746497207","doi":"","title":"Class Actions to Remedy Mass Consumer Wrongs: Repugnant Solution or Controllable Genie? The Canadian Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07535851725690046,"score_gpt":0.37926044476319215,"score_spread":0.3039019275062917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746497207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010899444,0.0046941694,0.00030361803,0.13518722,0.0014796837,0.0013475982,0.0001308689,0.000090400834,0.8556765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8822545,0.01863411,0.00028505147,0.05703786,0.00033038238,0.00010105213,0.000039360904,0.000016155705,0.041301537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977756,0.00026865173,0.00047665703,0.0003161173,0.00074007566,0.0004228631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839354,0.00016219392,0.00018081907,0.00026146905,0.0006690626,0.00033289945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010871959,0.00015634387,0.0002180511,0.00006556254,0.0009271024,0.00031879806,0.00079141563,0.000039583643,0.0019538305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000802437,0.000109398956,0.00011737323,0.00024142272,0.00020897196,0.00048269983,0.000029533505,0.00019742838,0.0007200065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004741863,0.00003492558,0.000043724147,0.000011842014,0.000050418756,0.000032971486,0.00063197076,0.000013201468,0.00032886278,0.9772069,0.0145857055,0.007012097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016092647,0.00003219417,0.0002577063,0.0003365823,0.000020210431,0.000007422636,0.00007120986,0.00009112202,0.000053179345,0.00087362045,0.9979369,0.00015891649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083009295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4959328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98335123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068884896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005055859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747861587","doi":"","title":"Integrating Civil and Common Law Teaching Throughout the Curriculum: The Canadian Experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.06457611961266785,"score_gpt":0.4282295086886362,"score_spread":0.36365338907596834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747861587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000740492,0.0049211094,0.000018203642,0.24976279,0.00044933078,0.0002867999,0.0000119653105,0.000021352285,0.74378794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490493,0.0072721224,0.000119319455,0.04112196,0.00016953453,0.000074128686,0.0000102229515,0.000006333782,0.0021770592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986388,0.00039508042,0.0002736152,0.00014612405,0.00035920177,0.00018714108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897814,0.00040721602,0.0001620274,0.000168312,0.00019963956,0.00008467238],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382401,0.00008869037,0.000102198785,0.00001842126,0.00239109,0.0006745617,0.0005043875,0.000022867134,0.0014757781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006398682,0.000052340813,0.000039857645,0.00018358733,0.00042633337,0.0007899769,0.000043038468,0.0004958149,0.00009912812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7420328e-7,0.000013892866,0.0002670821,0.000009853657,0.00000941482,8.992884e-7,0.014702893,4.5887177e-7,4.7652e-7,0.9710163,0.007003758,0.0069747916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026819647,0.0000034880568,0.00008323515,0.00019848181,0.000010137006,0.0000082916085,0.0024378723,0.00010838201,7.559976e-7,0.004456032,0.99259216,0.00007432579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8000679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9384315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98558843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016588092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011734045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788092532","doi":"","title":"Court Jurisdiction and Recognition in Multi-National Political Structures: Canada and the European Union","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Politics; European union; Law; Public administration; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.06689453653551183,"score_gpt":0.31963678135376145,"score_spread":0.2527422448182496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788092532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006145998,0.0040726815,0.000115821174,0.010115628,0.0004999792,0.0004216295,0.00013311573,0.000026208576,0.97846895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97059387,0.024598476,0.00024577582,0.0036559177,0.00012071189,0.000013503363,0.00003834069,0.000009866219,0.00072354724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998116,0.0008171673,0.00029555522,0.00017963916,0.0004371798,0.00015445637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932086,0.00016387098,0.00010062936,0.000047045884,0.0002967406,0.00007082777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019571413,0.00009428257,0.00013243996,0.000030354522,0.00019456903,0.000046001,0.00016114408,0.0000130196295,0.000142054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003495178,0.00006964258,0.00002753326,0.00005851248,0.0004111949,0.00019273548,0.00007104513,0.00012351104,0.000012451499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001313471,0.000017901802,0.00075027096,0.000034578956,0.00002919457,0.0000076229703,0.0005254344,1.4576375e-7,6.617036e-7,0.9933447,0.0007137359,0.004562617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016807747,0.000024108294,0.09888877,0.0009835537,0.00004363788,0.000032038177,0.00060462183,0.000081587656,0.000007577644,0.08618162,0.8111537,0.00031801467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5257797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7182018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022306392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009658755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47737816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}