{"meta":{"query_hash":"87301007d107","filters":{"venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/87301007d107","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Performance+Measurement+and+Metrics"},"results":[{"id":"W2034843707","doi":"10.1108/14678040410546082","title":"Utilizing points of differentiation to enhance competitiveness and growth: some thoughts for consideration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Process (computing); Business; Product (mathematics); Lever; Private sector; Marketing; Public relations; Process management; Computer science; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06011592710246489,"score_gpt":0.24758644657281606,"score_spread":0.18747051947035118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034843707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041404236,0.030330384,0.0115627255,0.9248996,0.0037024936,0.00009923138,0.0000783374,0.00012018522,0.025066683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36943668,0.105213806,0.10884947,0.3513563,0.019176207,0.0010031798,0.0002047539,0.0003723821,0.044387277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262285,0.004186138,0.00037203848,0.0004903584,0.0019047543,0.0004238614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97651833,0.0128134135,0.0007491446,0.0008345858,0.008060053,0.0010245317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137853455,0.0011406373,0.0009852753,0.0022321565,0.0020912276,0.009612725,0.0039740605,0.0067098704,0.005927601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025361625,0.00027590184,0.001043074,0.002471385,0.015868533,0.015184905,0.0029587552,0.008370323,0.0015675266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017493911,0.00016704829,0.004124232,0.0011802119,0.00008469334,0.0008271214,0.0075439042,0.0009865988,0.0007607332,0.6483245,0.23202284,0.10380318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000674195,0.0002552094,0.0050210287,0.0018414311,0.000047328904,0.00082537916,0.03136219,0.0022380014,0.00092269597,0.45602787,0.50117797,0.00021333562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009561093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021711083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137853455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038974392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045063966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072904766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044704951","doi":"10.1108/pmm-07-2012-0026","title":"A comparison of academic libraries: an analysis using a self‐organizing map","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Banana Cultivation and Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Service (business); Self-organizing map; Originality; Metric (unit); Identification (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Library catalog; Library classification; Academic library; Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Library science; Cluster analysis; Data mining; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19745739353519404,"score_gpt":0.32218970435225064,"score_spread":0.1247323108170566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044704951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97019595,0.0002666984,0.017109327,0.00019118348,0.00002485541,0.0005780795,0.0016756367,0.00040540454,0.009552978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875474,0.00009700288,0.0106165,0.000016586533,0.000010695057,0.00030059792,0.00075646816,0.000035548543,0.0006192898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559706,0.0011817961,0.0003867707,0.00035760825,0.0021807319,0.00029607717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848075,0.0067031076,0.0018361208,0.0008214891,0.0052228654,0.0006090112],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038673661,0.00034958488,0.0007391921,0.0160688,0.001595571,0.004228342,0.00070518843,0.00027023454,0.002603532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021659406,0.00017348028,0.00096207,0.021311967,0.0008836775,0.0016680142,0.0017676658,0.00037072238,0.00033964144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007742142,0.00033100543,0.7781965,0.0007791005,0.0008625682,0.0002785906,0.014445757,0.005211046,0.002560262,0.0042430805,0.0026196276,0.1896983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025053445,0.0003910163,0.92932385,0.000112619666,0.00015724998,0.00017811281,0.037768353,0.021087734,0.0021815482,0.0021532543,0.006536368,0.00008480379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04557865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037581384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99577165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034151298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003995114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09062672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061354363","doi":"10.1108/14678041011064070","title":"Benchmarking on a national scale: the 2007 LibQUAL+<sup>®</sup> Canada experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Mandate; Originality; Service (business); Library science; Scale (ratio); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Business; Computer science; Engineering management; Public relations; Sociology; Knowledge management; Process management; Political science; Marketing; Engineering; Qualitative research; Geography","score_opus":0.05704789990463855,"score_gpt":0.28035440630463554,"score_spread":0.223306506399997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061354363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76033914,0.004387171,0.0033677637,0.06723294,0.00044283847,0.0003395616,0.0024686416,0.00044712477,0.16097485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97776425,0.0017713853,0.0030989868,0.0024666137,0.000024136498,0.000099172954,0.0009660425,0.000117594376,0.013691899],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843636,0.0030907888,0.00047671824,0.0007219922,0.007040267,0.0043065585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966569,0.0026008473,0.0008194992,0.0011653604,0.019144272,0.00970104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018239293,0.00027241942,0.00054218806,0.001256657,0.013827929,0.0064563532,0.0018687343,0.0007864944,0.004483742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022306917,0.0003322075,0.00031800894,0.0064740074,0.0038216414,0.002950515,0.0060415347,0.0020815518,0.00054576073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006290368,0.0006486657,0.16512811,0.00066013075,0.0000712247,0.00096522924,0.10848772,0.0025479912,0.0019527521,0.042761896,0.21410953,0.46203777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005213581,0.00035775243,0.31296107,0.00054470025,0.00004645997,0.00035775485,0.27502272,0.0020942967,0.0020839225,0.0020415743,0.40423298,0.0002046593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85221046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14778955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2784815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084548729","doi":"10.1108/14678041111124270","title":"Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Spanish version of LibQUAL+™","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomological network; Discriminant validity; Scale (ratio); Reliability (semiconductor); Service quality; Psychology; Convergent validity; Validity; Service (business); Originality; Confirmatory factor analysis; Computer science; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Marketing; Business; Creativity; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.11583662605994999,"score_gpt":0.22327006467242985,"score_spread":0.10743343861247986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084548729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98626477,0.00032723558,0.004513197,0.00032818475,0.000050502087,0.00028211516,0.0010463023,0.000060490085,0.0071271476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842096,0.0001916471,0.0077195386,0.000088365356,0.000026793485,0.00032295773,0.0019519016,0.000028935267,0.0012490216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.0006511139,0.00024947003,0.00020064796,0.00071480393,0.0001318546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99159944,0.0031672732,0.0008656817,0.00044879716,0.003633755,0.00028516052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054271566,0.00036290562,0.00031707075,0.0013128758,0.00035827368,0.0010396343,0.00032318127,0.00023926128,0.004865898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012028361,0.00013199062,0.00077916664,0.0013885834,0.00038648487,0.00071169616,0.0006879387,0.0003619741,0.0005483561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004994627,0.00038288906,0.77780014,0.00019244383,0.00021150983,0.00009307715,0.0014202747,0.0017454638,0.0014209346,0.0018566957,0.0036364854,0.21074057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013381844,0.00075613364,0.96912307,0.00026416904,0.00014138465,0.0002405699,0.0025878802,0.012280802,0.0012818013,0.0016768584,0.011467426,0.000046117148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029906826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028824992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054271566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009102265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012256369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028701842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345715841","doi":"10.1108/pmm-03-2016-0007","title":"Capturing digital developments through qualitative inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Leverage (statistics); Context (archaeology); Narrative; Digital library; Computer science; Work (physics); World Wide Web; Best practice; Digital collections; Qualitative research; Data science; Knowledge management; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.37523893229491595,"score_gpt":0.3892765577624661,"score_spread":0.014037625467550163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345715841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7263563,0.003672421,0.101430014,0.03150508,0.00060645654,0.004191997,0.0025666535,0.00027012973,0.12940086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533611,0.0018131917,0.029098593,0.0020324783,0.00007135646,0.003099291,0.00045153993,0.00011601344,0.009956467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410432,0.05034523,0.001355038,0.0018658926,0.0034504994,0.0019400953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223467,0.062848166,0.0033270407,0.003970547,0.005741332,0.0017661129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057808857,0.00067965663,0.0007234646,0.0066807806,0.010600603,0.014775763,0.0031038194,0.002064908,0.0067250654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053337406,0.0006605557,0.00067862176,0.008064505,0.021201469,0.013290793,0.014251515,0.0038948578,0.0010464854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029796636,0.000037752536,0.0015815649,0.0003117669,0.0000057609427,0.00029931762,0.94501734,0.0002489772,0.00030689008,0.039552927,0.0015834777,0.011024405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063225475,0.000019690291,0.00040885273,0.00043780956,0.0000038344383,0.00010500992,0.95317304,0.00044639496,0.0003532964,0.0087572895,0.036274098,0.000014348686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060395193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007565718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057808857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015451087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107497005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3057261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554252311","doi":"10.1108/pmm-07-2016-0034","title":"Publication rate of presentation abstracts presented at the Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA/ABSC) annual meetings from 2004-2009","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Presentation (obstetrics); Publishing; Library science; Citation; Medical library; Scholarly communication; Value (mathematics); MEDLINE; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.14393990216815644,"score_gpt":0.38294208829642595,"score_spread":0.2390021861282695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554252311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64152586,0.1003825,0.0027767841,0.026860349,0.0044172104,0.0013338826,0.16107334,0.0013712966,0.060258757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283574,0.0296732,0.002177061,0.0018143543,0.0018552259,0.0010147222,0.02103382,0.00025695737,0.013817189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95799714,0.005569666,0.0051249578,0.0021691541,0.027513286,0.0016258658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7772723,0.05037523,0.048244543,0.0063704043,0.107873216,0.009864295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02578629,0.00043158172,0.0007398599,0.020522794,0.0015576376,0.005729429,0.0015720122,0.0006956848,0.008664469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16018432,0.0002272348,0.0007835552,0.027265329,0.0006702186,0.0021331566,0.001815197,0.00071351207,0.0023715305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008585303,0.00015428592,0.50102407,0.008973884,0.0005988354,0.00054701715,0.005379672,0.00035098658,0.0018329553,0.0008913895,0.16681214,0.31257623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059409434,0.00037209984,0.8904986,0.001953319,0.00036637727,0.001282993,0.004883537,0.00056460575,0.0021610756,0.0002987331,0.09742278,0.00013637215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07367791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08373934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99262446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00737551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013597683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14649808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604547414","doi":"10.1108/pmm-07-2016-0031","title":"Constructing a sentiment analysis model for LibQUAL+ comments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sentiment analysis; Originality; Terminology; Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Information retrieval; Data science; Operations research; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Sociology; Marketing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14843098060347337,"score_gpt":0.31420248474130114,"score_spread":0.16577150413782776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604547414","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3835181,0.00023873088,0.5885126,0.0024489793,0.00020528022,0.0022023132,0.008871211,0.00295027,0.011052531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7525613,0.00018341685,0.2289682,0.0003054076,0.00010408029,0.0024874886,0.0081537925,0.00018020853,0.007056122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787784,0.0007893045,0.00018049491,0.00056638446,0.00043650146,0.00014963839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932828,0.0038326334,0.0007377977,0.00028113538,0.0017409435,0.00012461597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00455832,0.0010144768,0.0005421245,0.002315926,0.00070054055,0.0018607546,0.0010625463,0.0007008193,0.0045781694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01143962,0.0003793039,0.0014508098,0.0013025568,0.0005278272,0.001761925,0.000870136,0.0013150759,0.002848387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013480864,0.0011368574,0.17889369,0.000997956,0.00041128625,0.0009183152,0.006611041,0.13709766,0.02162749,0.019345531,0.034551367,0.5970608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027285714,0.00015250598,0.020407347,0.000094418705,0.000038944192,0.00011152128,0.0012456265,0.95892346,0.0030040347,0.0075385,0.008407523,0.000048785136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008081497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008046676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008081497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024625126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013218921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024107039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620750768","doi":"10.1108/pmm-05-2017-0022","title":"How Canadian librarians practice and assess individualized research consultations in academic libraries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Medical education; Service (business); Computer-assisted web interviewing; Order (exchange); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.6561178785739781,"score_gpt":0.5509471446353372,"score_spread":0.10517073393864085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620750768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8696334,0.008352437,0.0021488876,0.021495737,0.00023018573,0.0008265002,0.0012732835,0.0005933181,0.09544621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97920084,0.0031090204,0.0044263797,0.0036544562,0.000049526363,0.00017391251,0.00041449806,0.0000786158,0.008892723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532974,0.019442162,0.0026436648,0.0024035757,0.015541592,0.0066716634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92387575,0.017030787,0.0076223123,0.0018268103,0.037534397,0.012109987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028030694,0.0005023633,0.0008284493,0.0075159646,0.014684648,0.011925991,0.0032444242,0.001918023,0.00724816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07998302,0.0006476414,0.00054324383,0.013666377,0.004492243,0.0037131787,0.006023881,0.0015995093,0.001964322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040639262,0.00039021356,0.23300107,0.0017273934,0.000105918545,0.0010674908,0.4030942,0.00043212768,0.0015983626,0.0032191223,0.04872316,0.30623457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057287285,0.00028749334,0.30399483,0.0013362349,0.00012338314,0.0006828602,0.5480883,0.0009176032,0.0015261166,0.00095795165,0.14163817,0.00038985402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9258012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95297366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09766192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15507418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70859015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887160804","doi":"10.1108/pmm-12-2017-0061","title":"How assessment websites of academic libraries convey information and show value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Active listening; Alliance; Academic library; Higher education; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.05482503358781615,"score_gpt":0.28791128637820285,"score_spread":0.2330862527903867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887160804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75734586,0.048058517,0.01182,0.019993333,0.0003953135,0.0005981045,0.0011341897,0.0005246538,0.16013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830337,0.009022252,0.004540283,0.0011486751,0.00006461417,0.000097505515,0.00019734692,0.000059592843,0.0018361385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94997287,0.029763702,0.004062047,0.0008790739,0.014221591,0.0011007362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7679221,0.16631356,0.019018859,0.004324706,0.03985236,0.002568405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02932851,0.00021643795,0.0006640817,0.017522128,0.0020779357,0.01959276,0.0010417923,0.0011839912,0.0017949586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19148886,0.00034693695,0.0004363552,0.014467291,0.0048797987,0.017556112,0.0032360216,0.00089639594,0.0005904017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023675158,0.00015852513,0.2103651,0.0092017995,0.00032795398,0.0006699941,0.1413866,0.00083145156,0.0016858418,0.024634922,0.017804561,0.5926964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027597034,0.00046912231,0.32416993,0.016232293,0.0006667696,0.0017506212,0.37171876,0.0015337967,0.005273604,0.014985715,0.26285738,0.00031447012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008468418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01226901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02932851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004759024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007936815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15510583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107275649","doi":"10.1108/pmm-03-2020-0015","title":"Bibliometric analysis of a controversial paper on predatory publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Originality; Impact factor; Analytics; Library science; Value (mathematics); Bibliometrics; History; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.6294773381878578,"score_gpt":0.47341826438102474,"score_spread":0.15605907380683304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107275649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701674,0.029180858,0.011415366,0.03305419,0.0041085263,0.0008050669,0.0037799452,0.00031447178,0.14717412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97991484,0.006795287,0.0040737814,0.0015156545,0.0022456828,0.00023830158,0.0013098065,0.000089114415,0.0038176007],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.948014,0.01299564,0.006617105,0.002378908,0.029057158,0.0009371872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6493657,0.22389236,0.05060981,0.015705878,0.0577429,0.0026832994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04430075,0.0005106104,0.0010695944,0.06079674,0.003808903,0.010859399,0.0014493744,0.0015271017,0.0038289735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22621037,0.00022849752,0.0008581235,0.09412334,0.004464697,0.0052425824,0.003511887,0.0011603013,0.0009388363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055878295,0.00033999636,0.35830778,0.007861382,0.0012456159,0.0026853164,0.049567975,0.0017474203,0.0032579086,0.103766024,0.063921176,0.40674067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008969022,0.00044291193,0.5463405,0.007093478,0.0011230209,0.0038361994,0.060697183,0.0057890974,0.009245469,0.041800715,0.323287,0.00025462458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022843718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021316845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95569927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055703134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23428756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}