{"meta":{"query_hash":"24c3971de2b6","filters":{"venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/24c3971de2b6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Personnel+Assessment+and+Decisions"},"results":[{"id":"W2196021064","doi":"10.25035/pad.2015.002","title":"Cloud-based Meta-analysis to Bridge Science and Practice: Welcome to metaBUS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northern Alberta Institute of Technology; University of Calgary","funders":"SHRM Foundation; Virginia Commonwealth University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Computer science; Cloud computing; Data science; Interface (matter); The Internet; Interpretation (philosophy); World Wide Web; Information overload","score_opus":0.27955150299751713,"score_gpt":0.4648037222280033,"score_spread":0.18525221923048618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196021064","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009450881,0.010904701,0.56047255,0.25209123,0.022920331,0.00213854,0.010729693,0.09734916,0.03394293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035067115,0.00514878,0.8380474,0.03412779,0.012946013,0.0037625048,0.008080975,0.035306282,0.027513124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98494047,0.009374305,0.001153097,0.0007966612,0.0033063435,0.00042908685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79996705,0.15012139,0.00361084,0.016930157,0.016173813,0.013196654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04674892,0.0013826316,0.0014422998,0.0046669273,0.0013951608,0.0070276903,0.0034612452,0.0035587298,0.08302789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15103558,0.0012230193,0.002490931,0.0038169103,0.0016255125,0.014570702,0.010897351,0.0060722935,0.019446801],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006016093,0.000112688096,0.0014846827,0.0015942414,0.00023041706,0.0009534332,0.0048273476,0.00091069774,0.0023584177,0.012958633,0.74966246,0.22430544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003258987,0.000122048485,0.001634021,0.0017917474,0.00008278416,0.00073347,0.0013621902,0.006157661,0.0013956073,0.04633269,0.93989795,0.00016388262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013721557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004184894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95325106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015031492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004816024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27775598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957638829","doi":"10.25035/pad.2019.01.002","title":"Who Is Conducting \"Better\" Employment Interviews? Antecedents of Structured Interview Components Use","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Employer Branding and e-HRM","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Sophistication; Psychology; Personality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Big Five personality traits; Openness to experience; Interview; Standardization; Social psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16386161773110408,"score_gpt":0.3379295736937168,"score_spread":0.1740679559626127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957638829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93069047,0.004053824,0.018001229,0.032855883,0.0005118021,0.00072300836,0.0002696259,0.00020714676,0.012686984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851693,0.001102462,0.011461107,0.001459269,0.00012613814,0.00021407563,0.00008916726,0.0000354484,0.00034306935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.84315753,0.11997031,0.01276574,0.005986695,0.013671134,0.004448514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32164672,0.53635144,0.06898969,0.028735733,0.030778863,0.013497496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15218493,0.00027709996,0.00046799067,0.0021285557,0.0023125503,0.0044905436,0.0016472874,0.0020827497,0.0031827816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39552465,0.0008215052,0.00051544304,0.0025132284,0.0037789769,0.0053316364,0.0024927373,0.0025563913,0.00045421047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048765764,0.0004216684,0.77404225,0.0016733834,0.00015505702,0.0005458369,0.09691292,0.0006524528,0.0017354263,0.005122441,0.0035440985,0.11470679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009741917,0.0006336022,0.7744088,0.0039695883,0.00014026313,0.0019247616,0.17892502,0.004154641,0.0026475291,0.012954529,0.0199753,0.0001684905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067342394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009387028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15218493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028747155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80484045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958621914","doi":"10.25035/pad.2019.01.003","title":"Criterion-related Validity of Forced-Choice Personality Measures: A Cautionary Note Regarding Thurstonian IRT versus Classical Test Theory Scoring","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Two-alternative forced choice; Psychology; Item response theory; Personality; Criterion validity; Test (biology); Social psychology; Statistics; Personality test; Econometrics; Psychometrics; Mathematics; Test validity; Cognitive psychology; Construct validity; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.11774793521150201,"score_gpt":0.41457566786228944,"score_spread":0.29682773265078743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958621914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73790294,0.033066086,0.17682838,0.019879265,0.0050762547,0.0014059825,0.0014367154,0.0005096074,0.023894776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92841434,0.001433986,0.06400712,0.002761422,0.0005997377,0.00082372216,0.0004814708,0.0001826421,0.0012955564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8735476,0.07876231,0.016109267,0.0059861974,0.024658617,0.00093591394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58829904,0.31021404,0.019237434,0.030669441,0.050234962,0.0013449996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.231363,0.0005468425,0.001644019,0.0028301883,0.0018158928,0.0027628266,0.0025426478,0.00081326853,0.0008020137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36561093,0.00049432606,0.0024206075,0.0024641145,0.003668758,0.0022558018,0.0018388343,0.0028338633,0.00021329816],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011231477,0.000278285,0.7342243,0.0035630984,0.005673042,0.00040759277,0.011940422,0.0015164987,0.0038082043,0.01265519,0.013029579,0.21178053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022583398,0.001961049,0.90142,0.00493422,0.0020209532,0.0013784636,0.0053975973,0.010675509,0.010069501,0.029325696,0.032255083,0.00033610835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006592582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015758995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.768637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014424181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002673399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94786626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958889885","doi":"10.25035/pad.2019.01.004","title":"Selection Tool Use: A Focus on Personality Testing in Canada, the United States, and Germany","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Personality; Selection (genetic algorithm); Personnel selection; Sample (material); Psychology; Preference; Big Five personality traits; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Management; Nursing; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.07728232524667215,"score_gpt":0.3553081366775148,"score_spread":0.27802581143084265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958889885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847882,0.0048840633,0.00023879977,0.0026935153,0.00006382539,0.00005660093,0.0006749469,0.000012272345,0.0065878257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931671,0.0041240896,0.00044587784,0.0009235874,0.000018201861,0.00002889123,0.00040118978,0.000012490573,0.0008784797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934274,0.00076492684,0.00035313552,0.00058292435,0.00286857,0.0020030218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98357695,0.0028730677,0.0022196732,0.00034601256,0.0071468963,0.0038373277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005266862,0.00027765878,0.0005902492,0.005085926,0.0044835783,0.003902124,0.0010474115,0.0005819441,0.0014892521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010824901,0.0002672111,0.00041628012,0.011563844,0.0023060434,0.0010914926,0.0019264459,0.0012224901,0.00011402209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019134275,0.00014493588,0.8786576,0.0003181068,0.00007199872,0.0004969997,0.023852747,0.00015814943,0.00059185096,0.0015575184,0.003425531,0.0905332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005647968,0.00006320725,0.96662885,0.0003793802,0.000023733659,0.00020422568,0.026026608,0.0001496373,0.00023804305,0.00006239465,0.00618619,0.000032121316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03584483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03584483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06151167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26007366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962502504","doi":"10.25035/pad.2019.01.006","title":"Are Consensus Ratings of Functional Job Analysis Scales More Reliable than Ratings Made by Independent Raters?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Employer Branding and e-HRM","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Job analysis; Social psychology; Job performance; Rating scale; Relevance (law); Scale (ratio); Applied psychology; Job satisfaction; Developmental psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029273421085129855,"score_gpt":0.27379461430047397,"score_spread":0.2445211932153441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962502504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974772,0.002066076,0.05851116,0.0019607167,0.0014814821,0.00057483383,0.0005634468,0.00028197648,0.037083156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860399,0.00025268435,0.011667081,0.00027534534,0.00020661883,0.00034135574,0.0003014428,0.00006902204,0.00084660976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86568785,0.08386323,0.011006399,0.009789826,0.028051512,0.0016012162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50110006,0.31376553,0.06278331,0.030593969,0.08826293,0.003494174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.097851284,0.00049821264,0.0011306233,0.0028714724,0.0013725739,0.0022263369,0.001172493,0.0011881449,0.0025430843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33467722,0.00048239547,0.0010066254,0.0019976755,0.0022648382,0.0033087595,0.0020209248,0.0012798827,0.0013519233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024328216,0.0006600452,0.6333852,0.0023884983,0.0022788513,0.00020560835,0.02724203,0.0018842358,0.011168648,0.005572412,0.008869753,0.30391186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032969788,0.0030128264,0.9334958,0.0011506473,0.00075531524,0.0006030099,0.02005753,0.009611827,0.008730091,0.009630784,0.012209951,0.0004124609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012993545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002433656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097851284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006645473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009159593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51749325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164414837","doi":"10.25035/pad.2021.01.006","title":"Unintended Consequences of Interview Faking: Impact on Perceived Fit and Affective Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Person–environment fit; Job attitude; Job performance; Job interview; Impression management; Job stress; Applied psychology; Employee engagement; Job satisfaction; Public relations","score_opus":0.1241528507952383,"score_gpt":0.45245149955892133,"score_spread":0.32829864876368303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164414837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988996,0.00005233986,0.00023113059,0.00009651924,0.000006625467,0.0000125777715,0.000022521099,0.000002474807,0.00067615963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996107,0.000025085776,0.00015165177,0.000038296464,0.0000066055695,0.000011323221,0.000017659087,0.0000011378844,0.00013762563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521965,0.0029386554,0.00031786063,0.00022764143,0.0008483189,0.0004478844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94797766,0.026156258,0.017829046,0.0031136435,0.0020912448,0.0028321913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007887718,0.0002501467,0.00027543952,0.00068004633,0.0007817671,0.0016836221,0.00024851187,0.0005364911,0.0023478968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04378375,0.00017404625,0.00038514496,0.00033832178,0.00084863533,0.00072793703,0.0015287662,0.0009913255,0.0002712004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015481709,0.0011772147,0.95662963,0.00007523895,0.00012052425,0.0003700175,0.006798949,0.00029942507,0.0027151962,0.0003604241,0.00021059792,0.029694622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014322244,0.0007393766,0.99317354,0.000029906081,0.000032628734,0.00026540627,0.0035168533,0.0007882619,0.00090308936,0.00031362788,0.00020196995,0.000021031083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010290027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014380813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007887718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045918114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039124337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041714728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164860570","doi":"10.25035/pad.2021.01.010","title":"Job Seekers’ Impression Management on Facebook: Scale Development, Antecedents, and Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Provincial Health Services Authority; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Impression management; Seekers; Psychology; Honesty; Social psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Assertiveness; Social media; Scale (ratio); Big Five personality traits; Impression formation; Personality; Social perception; Perception","score_opus":0.06589102469096705,"score_gpt":0.4043962743231362,"score_spread":0.3385052496321691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164860570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971233,0.00005112993,0.00019687628,0.000057652018,0.000008996215,0.00022935089,0.00014075442,0.000012034662,0.0021799493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962435,0.00010939661,0.0014482286,0.000034499782,0.000021258997,0.00056167017,0.00036644237,0.000006991031,0.001208094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991021,0.00022847675,0.00012393737,0.00006755589,0.00037222952,0.00010573472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471754,0.00167991,0.0015548011,0.00035763666,0.00091266556,0.000777372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025595557,0.00029043207,0.0002696629,0.001419214,0.0009903125,0.001122315,0.00042699702,0.00055546965,0.0022737463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006172785,0.00028121754,0.000753612,0.00067817234,0.0004981912,0.00056521373,0.001266498,0.0007046131,0.0005575853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012683347,0.00060189096,0.97296983,0.00008842226,0.000070609814,0.000085060165,0.0036688896,0.00014712111,0.0009196368,0.00014739018,0.0006292808,0.02054509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109170105,0.00014585015,0.9960347,0.00001998491,0.0000196662,0.00006309199,0.0022107635,0.00042721533,0.00029571817,0.00009134775,0.0006691477,0.000011617353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021335261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047877864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025595557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049461616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060920074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013536394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164988270","doi":"10.25035/pad.2021.01.008","title":"The Effect of Organizational Culture on Faking in the Job Interview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Agreeableness; Organizational culture; Personality; Situational ethics; Honesty; Job performance; Perception; Personnel selection; Impression management; Big Five personality traits; Applied psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Job satisfaction; Public relations; Management","score_opus":0.043222224869469625,"score_gpt":0.3961988628570387,"score_spread":0.35297663798756906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164988270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99621373,0.00006473163,0.0010553335,0.00007688105,0.000020028783,0.00007926208,0.000019300713,0.000008343859,0.0024622884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779797,0.000063494204,0.001250826,0.000076404285,0.00001615731,0.0000698114,0.000023899916,0.0000061976625,0.00069521624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648447,0.009343329,0.0010075256,0.0006328714,0.0019489287,0.0005828603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8586902,0.097135216,0.027400441,0.009871875,0.004371389,0.0025309431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014600589,0.00040599133,0.00032549666,0.00049918354,0.0010730021,0.0017771858,0.0003083219,0.0005331775,0.0036347066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06443649,0.0003013383,0.00038018925,0.0003105593,0.0012475501,0.0007301282,0.0011316373,0.0010058772,0.00043368878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0084072435,0.0041146833,0.7915052,0.0005200266,0.00035436108,0.00054458185,0.019855827,0.0009274592,0.06603873,0.001966484,0.0006657298,0.10509967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007826294,0.0033162993,0.97319794,0.0001365202,0.00014813998,0.00038475817,0.0047240118,0.001864451,0.014742707,0.000561397,0.0007775568,0.00006803404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087507407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001405098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014600589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005812185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067784416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07721621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165041081","doi":"10.25035/pad.2021.01.001","title":"Put Your Best Foot Forward: Introduction to the Special Issue on Understanding Effects of Impression Management on Assessment Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Educational and Psychological Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Impression; Impression management; Foot (prosody); Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09108115549204618,"score_gpt":0.4347577152175446,"score_spread":0.3436765597254984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165041081","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019985913,0.036026873,0.0028047839,0.28233546,0.6749993,0.00011953919,0.0004018855,0.00026970217,0.0028425574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012863693,0.021538258,0.0027506803,0.21056245,0.7512073,0.00027399472,0.00030225946,0.0003740488,0.011704609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938053,0.0020555174,0.00090903055,0.00059990725,0.0023778442,0.0002524205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89388496,0.070471264,0.004070402,0.0022890947,0.025409851,0.00387446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012210347,0.0023022539,0.003757725,0.003242229,0.0018503633,0.007519191,0.0033903036,0.01248445,0.038275063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0936714,0.0010095643,0.0025061688,0.0018104083,0.002574627,0.0075330925,0.0026167936,0.022808056,0.018314509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029771936,0.000041337196,0.0001697337,0.00027460654,0.000023722407,0.000029407493,0.000037458398,0.00002034035,0.000067108536,0.0003436686,0.9773031,0.021659695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010913071,0.0002563837,0.0044427873,0.0032210436,0.00018043749,0.0006451303,0.00041019492,0.00045065925,0.00030802508,0.009259083,0.98057944,0.00013768744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038564221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009563071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038275063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024648143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037172681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12804282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210832383","doi":"10.25035/pad.2021.02.003","title":"A Test of Expectancy Theory and Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Faking and Honesty in Employment Interviews","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Honesty; Expectancy theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Normative; Valence (chemistry); Test (biology); Life expectancy; Developmental psychology; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.03775209002045824,"score_gpt":0.3676089818574591,"score_spread":0.32985689183700084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210832383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850744,0.000029112973,0.0005558826,0.00007844357,0.0000051259112,0.00004418064,0.000080067286,0.000002544654,0.0006971741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992072,0.000017337634,0.00043473727,0.000018967468,0.000007462814,0.00006286589,0.00010861827,0.0000014153148,0.00014137891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936149,0.0033702515,0.00073625136,0.000539061,0.0011697989,0.00056964165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8566195,0.08821207,0.039350845,0.0068064043,0.005229415,0.0037817773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151093975,0.000366016,0.0003290435,0.001771017,0.001023684,0.0011576638,0.0007748089,0.0009273377,0.0033484101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0578144,0.00041027885,0.0008785567,0.0010852618,0.0014129638,0.0017170012,0.0013896227,0.001521439,0.0003476163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012231365,0.00019077948,0.99687946,0.000011638965,0.00004408304,0.000024073068,0.0008742559,0.0000785725,0.000097761185,0.00015400306,0.000045543977,0.0014774859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010243406,0.000228514,0.99610907,0.000017693652,0.000018161469,0.00008322467,0.0014784884,0.0015167634,0.00014454869,0.00029138997,0.000092784176,0.000009116984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037551033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042637377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151093975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075587584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078473176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07990712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376958851","doi":"10.25035/pad.2023.01.003","title":"Effects of Background Cues on Videoconference Interview Ratings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Psychology; Attribution; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Personality; Applied psychology; Job interview; Job performance; Videoconferencing; Extraversion and introversion; Job satisfaction; Multimedia","score_opus":0.12561410560463585,"score_gpt":0.4445712729560596,"score_spread":0.31895716735142376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376958851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866366,0.00005258217,0.00044787093,0.000012098328,0.000009053205,0.000038248578,0.00003890374,0.000010975826,0.00072662043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976808,0.000054227123,0.0014774965,0.00003255339,0.00001657538,0.00009995271,0.000102614045,0.0000082784445,0.0005275038],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976689,0.0012217207,0.00016461236,0.00025492744,0.0005601244,0.00012960719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725018,0.018910049,0.004697583,0.0011766799,0.0016164875,0.0010973325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002394544,0.00033664517,0.00024664967,0.00024387772,0.00026355626,0.00047178494,0.00020617699,0.00023702634,0.0027087796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026565263,0.0001385357,0.00014886203,0.00015279703,0.00031717235,0.00023231041,0.0004835074,0.000469605,0.00020263327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020071045,0.0030284408,0.34912127,0.00069570093,0.00037852605,0.00075206027,0.018279532,0.0008643337,0.4905427,0.00018599474,0.0010088687,0.115071505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010154538,0.0034582256,0.96854746,0.000032651256,0.000073380594,0.00016065335,0.002324468,0.0008405721,0.023641223,0.00005429774,0.00073343347,0.0000322089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008818813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00185914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027087796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020065623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014569965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012663722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377043166","doi":"10.25035/pad.2023.01.001","title":"Interventions to Improve the Candidate Experience of Structured Videoconference Interviews","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Employer Branding and e-HRM","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Bowling Green State University","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Context (archaeology); Videoconferencing; Psychology; Perception; Anxiety; Intervention (counseling); Focus group; Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Control (management); Applied psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Marketing; Business; Multimedia","score_opus":0.08369568829734111,"score_gpt":0.3637873020834145,"score_spread":0.2800916137860734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377043166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733681,0.00012581561,0.011822289,0.0006353763,0.00013141075,0.009197527,0.00010793998,0.00031564198,0.00429587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109311,0.00043500937,0.06232189,0.00050013675,0.00031407687,0.021401392,0.00021357194,0.000038163453,0.0038447313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939767,0.004146414,0.0003953166,0.00036984758,0.0004930412,0.00061867235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772125,0.015249153,0.0029881813,0.0013152218,0.00096221716,0.0022727486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009705277,0.0009199226,0.0005417846,0.0007085432,0.0009422945,0.0005698362,0.001357477,0.00073831563,0.010673638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030944955,0.00037074642,0.0004682843,0.000500977,0.00046329026,0.00061580574,0.0015376455,0.0009722724,0.0008147466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013483528,0.08598764,0.018103953,0.003605005,0.00012652385,0.0011968664,0.02338833,0.002713791,0.07012088,0.0011264695,0.006520678,0.7736264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024003683,0.3216066,0.40077153,0.0021184217,0.0009127873,0.0021887296,0.028886134,0.020186516,0.10382124,0.003206005,0.091772966,0.00052528427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050462974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013464508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010673638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005576568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012710455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05132699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386652238","doi":"10.25035/pad.2022.01.003","title":"The Effect of English Language Proficiency and Glossary Provision on Personality Measurement","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Glossary; Personality; Test (biology); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Language proficiency; Construct validity; Linguistics; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Clinical psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.044853021270806474,"score_gpt":0.3754509610040812,"score_spread":0.3305979397332747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386652238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.00010820319,0.00040137733,0.00006063678,0.000016045466,0.00007444679,0.000045852918,0.0000128477,0.0013664156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968612,0.00009711896,0.0020315282,0.00011144209,0.000021282,0.00014701409,0.00008788396,0.000013684968,0.00062891893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882648,0.0076162936,0.0013657717,0.00089645083,0.0014622698,0.00039445964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8665224,0.100285254,0.017383546,0.0071889195,0.0045205373,0.004099423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010163449,0.00036699537,0.00044403487,0.0004460978,0.0008020599,0.0018747733,0.00044255226,0.0004957516,0.004755114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10146363,0.00031991984,0.00036708493,0.00032782299,0.0008618182,0.0013197233,0.0012470086,0.0008167513,0.000662975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019521888,0.0074115917,0.6914105,0.0013061618,0.0006287041,0.0011582683,0.021440871,0.0006864692,0.08173352,0.00059825083,0.0020681198,0.17203566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033411864,0.012540765,0.96724397,0.00030136463,0.00023674151,0.0006249955,0.006075927,0.001071227,0.007880889,0.00041197203,0.0031693222,0.00010865083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010311439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016492263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010163449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033983527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003964119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05375004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391037845","doi":"10.25035/pad.2024.01.002","title":"Does Background Type and Blurring Affect Performance Ratings in Video Interviews?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Bedroom; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.12912757807475103,"score_gpt":0.482716289885629,"score_spread":0.3535887118108779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391037845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99205446,0.00040534622,0.0041200644,0.00022582183,0.00006174667,0.00013526296,0.00008781573,0.000026328518,0.0028831728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961648,0.00021613817,0.0028030884,0.000117177115,0.0000608401,0.000086474356,0.00009178779,0.00001497313,0.00044485496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97573584,0.015752653,0.002167277,0.001062936,0.004602895,0.0006783582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8483507,0.09164161,0.039626013,0.0053883367,0.011404357,0.0035890434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026658347,0.00025384134,0.0003408689,0.0011372907,0.0004857215,0.0014061655,0.00036892958,0.00048375243,0.0016422606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12686884,0.00029191002,0.00043599223,0.00073208776,0.00070586184,0.0008798636,0.0009773597,0.0004664195,0.00044400222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019183188,0.00029655691,0.8613892,0.00049374095,0.00023322183,0.0003679898,0.019698024,0.00028634377,0.02034259,0.00020692835,0.0007304305,0.09403668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021746193,0.0008993758,0.9864275,0.000106846666,0.00005087629,0.00058270525,0.007913202,0.00066143484,0.0022629083,0.00013592264,0.00090080936,0.000036626163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014915038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026054147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026658347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047400835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003675284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14098448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391037889","doi":"10.25035/pad.2024.01.003","title":"Calculator Provision as an Accommodation for the Canadian Forces Aptitude Test (CFAT)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Test (biology); Aptitude; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Accommodation; Mathematics education; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09007763641916103,"score_gpt":0.4371027858237127,"score_spread":0.34702514940455165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391037889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925161,0.00017682256,0.0012878521,0.00043708325,0.000044785116,0.00093125075,0.00021095246,0.000076670156,0.0043184403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933483,0.00009912898,0.0050945515,0.00009562169,0.0000127607,0.0004425362,0.00017726424,0.000008210705,0.0007216331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98647785,0.0056976443,0.0009301525,0.00062018237,0.005385364,0.00088882534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530052,0.022332286,0.010662376,0.0025009662,0.007804321,0.003694793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0163655,0.0003617271,0.0004951915,0.0016050715,0.0021428852,0.0012451558,0.0016605114,0.00059586944,0.0018663345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07913245,0.0003339518,0.0004460385,0.0018838249,0.0014701057,0.00077237625,0.0011349969,0.00078435795,0.00022704249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038524505,0.0027219173,0.79815817,0.00034621634,0.00008514046,0.00011713504,0.0027125767,0.0017198854,0.004872012,0.0008738156,0.0033903732,0.18115027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117724914,0.002553702,0.98906285,0.000072989715,0.000041415446,0.00006837199,0.00088527496,0.003052466,0.0018291423,0.00014229238,0.0021279023,0.000045855355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26712582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4672428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007989234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02101083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53114194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391038007","doi":"10.25035/pad.2024.01.001","title":"Enhancing Consistency of Maximal Responding in Behavior Description Interviews: An Exploration of Priming and Response Length","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Assessment and Decisions","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.270722103725277,"score_gpt":0.48344229198163985,"score_spread":0.21272018825636285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391038007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75024694,0.0015791681,0.22622024,0.0019270523,0.00029730194,0.0076386747,0.0003068505,0.00057699316,0.011206751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86774445,0.0004039259,0.11757085,0.0007245647,0.00016059073,0.011979343,0.00026194987,0.0002685703,0.0008857839],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.67558277,0.26946536,0.020131173,0.008700146,0.023973996,0.0021465602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2298824,0.6850694,0.032308754,0.028388131,0.023309214,0.0010421282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30807525,0.0009606617,0.001003079,0.0020518894,0.0016471188,0.002261128,0.0020706928,0.0012084092,0.0019634482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.560671,0.0010986081,0.0010868809,0.0016533376,0.0029637797,0.0043312204,0.0044559017,0.0022879,0.00052670547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009002613,0.0026360776,0.25807434,0.005025434,0.00083806855,0.0004925853,0.18207172,0.0042237598,0.045865074,0.013554161,0.0025989513,0.47561714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109959,0.012874761,0.76318824,0.004843339,0.0010229376,0.001682375,0.037114024,0.045642365,0.072143815,0.027430195,0.032023057,0.00093533937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011359563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019186045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30807525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029983586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027873034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}