{"meta":{"query_hash":"df8a2b361fd2","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Federalism"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df8a2b361fd2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Perspectives+on+Federalism"},"results":[{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04691081642210825,"score_gpt":0.3473193465272077,"score_spread":0.30040853010509944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604134551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025942,0.0020124232,0.006746684,0.04325851,0.0002066521,0.000056578843,0.0002767413,0.000040502346,0.34480777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722856,0.00025967768,0.00021290136,0.0005095618,0.000019076011,0.0000052695655,0.000018226881,0.0000047590934,0.0017420964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959025,0.0018461755,0.00017160336,0.0004901624,0.00054741726,0.0010421922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98913467,0.0061076437,0.002066131,0.00055908726,0.0009319304,0.0012005921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003594856,0.000102889484,0.00030736803,0.0016614003,0.0032028533,0.006798939,0.0005886245,0.0015604456,0.010926924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698226,0.00017123682,0.00031847073,0.0018724782,0.0039778394,0.00796215,0.0025126606,0.0021245102,0.00085233635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054897842,0.00004705474,0.033723254,0.000071473114,0.000017421267,0.00035961534,0.009929179,0.0007029115,0.00013131095,0.9326655,0.0045515667,0.017745899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031755444,0.00008321058,0.04991031,0.00070226577,0.000047392205,0.00053535117,0.16974567,0.002736547,0.00096043665,0.68705696,0.08812831,0.000061860155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046859416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007393409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010926924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003408369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003268967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036554217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613708823","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0005","title":"Commanders-in-chief beyond the border: analysing the powers of heads of state in Northern American federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Presidential system; State (computer science); Democracy; Multitude; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law; Democratic system; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016815681216089978,"score_gpt":0.34309709007875455,"score_spread":0.32628140886266455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613708823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77107036,0.00062414084,0.0013326304,0.004251768,0.000025464908,0.000028040371,0.000060276383,0.000009109282,0.22259821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799,0.000114577444,0.00014268084,0.0000958486,0.0000053183676,0.0000068579157,0.000011741459,0.0000028663121,0.0016301256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971879,0.0013426294,0.0000627112,0.00017120787,0.00038488134,0.0008505432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921482,0.00499883,0.0008417269,0.00022974866,0.0009714918,0.0008099572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036674961,0.000092838585,0.00027585265,0.002162114,0.008796583,0.007221149,0.00068177056,0.000895256,0.003971611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007916529,0.00019393594,0.00017781719,0.0033302768,0.013880302,0.00312747,0.0030539206,0.0016458522,0.00011157028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039444785,0.00003052985,0.027501732,0.000043736705,0.000012183505,0.00037699388,0.16911174,0.0007720319,0.00031413342,0.7902223,0.0022083253,0.009366854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016814576,0.00003967646,0.15678011,0.00044196047,0.00006339669,0.00015397502,0.6384977,0.002472376,0.0005352237,0.10338972,0.09755679,0.000052239342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37994727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62964565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020608854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014712216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75547147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755856806","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0018","title":"Canadian Federalism in Design and Practice: The Mechanics of a Permanently Provisional Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Improvisation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Public administration; Law and economics; Architecture; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03908113119585761,"score_gpt":0.34553837393775844,"score_spread":0.30645724274190084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755856806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18469936,0.0013690245,0.02777649,0.028814409,0.00015904129,0.00022214671,0.0001774838,0.00018048123,0.75660163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898342,0.00017013875,0.0032646211,0.00023293344,0.000008507133,0.000030799383,0.000020083076,0.000017287206,0.0064214934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98771685,0.0050809705,0.00021699067,0.0010645846,0.0035759937,0.0023445769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416345,0.0019600117,0.00045613645,0.00085518125,0.0019712471,0.00059402257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009136431,0.00032319082,0.00043849598,0.0026003332,0.022217497,0.01123934,0.0020449755,0.0021736233,0.005511234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014594684,0.00032989506,0.00043109202,0.003296147,0.05792321,0.00318329,0.004448825,0.0024919217,0.00020929138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066079597,0.0000051104835,0.0010430205,0.000017272789,0.0000035906473,0.00006710711,0.01112352,0.00090856076,0.0001259119,0.98047596,0.0014433304,0.0047800047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007032183,0.00007055171,0.01567306,0.00033503622,0.000073831434,0.00022733878,0.050938275,0.008968407,0.00083292625,0.5434725,0.3792003,0.00013744025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.932103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94739085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14241366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13307202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757537265","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0016","title":"Constitutional and administrative paradigms in judicial control over EU high and low politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Administrative law; Control (management); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Public law; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03051304378143667,"score_gpt":0.3438546395748842,"score_spread":0.31334159579344756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757537265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33811036,0.011245526,0.05626418,0.05668812,0.0006068343,0.0001230458,0.00010663004,0.00012194744,0.5367334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951049,0.00022010574,0.0010598437,0.0012427735,0.00013088228,0.000027488159,0.000008463271,0.000013834059,0.0021917485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94401616,0.03406704,0.0025279722,0.0073080827,0.006806428,0.0052743778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405309,0.04387456,0.0037652762,0.0044721863,0.0051441714,0.0022129237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060677014,0.00028619435,0.0010393808,0.0033908256,0.006490867,0.0340818,0.0016774277,0.0065502776,0.0030023013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047857996,0.00044928183,0.00059867674,0.0026789173,0.037426125,0.008145073,0.007713696,0.0070571997,0.00028765542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001434819,0.000008063479,0.00045400913,0.000017757367,0.000006644271,0.00003199971,0.0016904172,0.00017853011,0.0001634732,0.99410397,0.00039836744,0.0029324063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006514632,0.00007432766,0.0045363503,0.00030994264,0.00004361367,0.000109350374,0.004718275,0.0016462979,0.0011400571,0.94042176,0.046860807,0.000074158794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004860742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005529068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060677014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0120938085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007078466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32089454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780222313","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0024","title":"Franchises Lost and Gained: Post-Coloniality and the Development of Women’s Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Gender studies; Franchise; Politics; Indigenous; Universal suffrage; Enlightenment; Modernity; Indigenous rights; Law; Sociology; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.00849566290149294,"score_gpt":0.23739398596046454,"score_spread":0.2288983230589716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780222313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8186898,0.0048971656,0.00031244062,0.020010067,0.00016754327,0.000034503653,0.00032729428,0.000016247082,0.15554485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877131,0.0009537234,0.00007950685,0.00046086224,0.000012499556,0.0000042842016,0.00003357378,0.0000072806984,0.010735228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958252,0.00036676216,0.00004320956,0.00024431228,0.0007429856,0.0027775858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962953,0.0006293167,0.0003116186,0.00010795494,0.0012051061,0.0014506497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017846888,0.00026863033,0.00043693584,0.0026552344,0.030959187,0.009832288,0.0018342215,0.0015786054,0.0073347706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040016877,0.0002529185,0.00025516035,0.004260848,0.021784337,0.0022652186,0.004925957,0.0033578738,0.00015281336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014677734,0.00008024339,0.04277093,0.00016622568,0.00003904319,0.0020850375,0.58247524,0.0005509247,0.0008486845,0.29486895,0.016564436,0.059403498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017075286,0.00004234671,0.12395651,0.00053355854,0.00003217159,0.00036301895,0.5567507,0.00036793126,0.00058158964,0.0068368963,0.3103872,0.00013088938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21693541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21693541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17658892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90824395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782783416","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0027","title":"An Opportunity for Reflection – A Special Issue on “The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Democracy; Separation of powers; Politics; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.03398625285613072,"score_gpt":0.29023280978099986,"score_spread":0.25624655692486914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782783416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002159319,0.06897907,0.00039251937,0.7929765,0.06303103,0.000039294315,0.0003868991,0.000046382353,0.07198897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20740628,0.2169642,0.0022328668,0.28056404,0.08499739,0.00013756535,0.0009388127,0.00044236676,0.20631647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597603,0.0008509772,0.000087015156,0.00026672307,0.0018226015,0.0009966699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920724,0.0026016934,0.00022173193,0.00028493325,0.0035930835,0.0012261416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038429617,0.0006150913,0.0007215566,0.0031671275,0.015108518,0.012577859,0.0017196726,0.006914442,0.0103207175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008951549,0.00033648286,0.00047993776,0.00495939,0.015609857,0.00469567,0.002798282,0.008289489,0.0010879008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006470834,0.000010260784,0.00016475334,0.000077766614,0.000004141618,0.00006636707,0.0029289748,0.000070303875,0.00008311708,0.06584962,0.92085534,0.009882811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017916747,0.000001724217,0.0007254858,0.0002577567,0.0000030213428,0.000018923758,0.0031542578,0.000037017366,0.000050097868,0.004104626,0.99162877,0.000016577973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9027851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95035136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90380216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09619784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089358844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69796747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782811191","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0023","title":"The Spanish vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: from idealization to myth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Referendum; Secession; Political science; Brexit; Prestige; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political economy; Sociology; European union; History; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016927292090933084,"score_gpt":0.3221870534681478,"score_spread":0.3052597613772147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782811191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10845748,0.0077930265,0.009346153,0.19591607,0.001238507,0.00010193566,0.0003587461,0.00009354731,0.6766946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711567,0.0008765309,0.0016591025,0.006874933,0.000111132744,0.000031198684,0.00006511815,0.00003374148,0.019191556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882586,0.0034471313,0.00022509469,0.00087900914,0.003881279,0.0033088548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069875,0.001832936,0.00036607604,0.00047323052,0.005583958,0.0010450623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010680886,0.00043271316,0.0004460351,0.0018950928,0.015170039,0.018508209,0.0019204664,0.0048528416,0.0024746633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013896661,0.0002925776,0.00045605307,0.0020760272,0.035992455,0.0024050635,0.0033233485,0.005962572,0.00021573827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000164216,0.000006612022,0.000514851,0.000014346742,0.0000027900842,0.00004895128,0.0054580183,0.00027032857,0.00006230039,0.98314303,0.007347554,0.003114849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100066936,0.00004185637,0.009970634,0.0007078466,0.000046447218,0.00014341326,0.04763882,0.0033480502,0.0008681353,0.34727445,0.5896484,0.00021182271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96174055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9375561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15142807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17660458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05670185527763862,"score_gpt":0.34854772004902723,"score_spread":0.29184586477138863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783105250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032391634,0.0014044001,0.023930239,0.014182444,0.00014970398,0.000055959335,0.000237587,0.000056672234,0.9275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755887,0.00071591546,0.006014592,0.00072885613,0.00005839065,0.000030276959,0.00007492376,0.000022562283,0.016765777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971206,0.0008502377,0.000043203876,0.0003774541,0.0010837237,0.00052482326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973042,0.0008953218,0.000155348,0.00026880356,0.0010911148,0.00028515622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003082738,0.00030252832,0.00037916724,0.0026352808,0.007333917,0.0058782008,0.0021909694,0.0022954196,0.009488724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053830687,0.00013143625,0.0003455863,0.0030231618,0.022588497,0.0030516814,0.0021196664,0.0025291066,0.00033636513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3812326e-7,6.610488e-7,0.000049494123,0.0000026189305,4.973302e-7,0.000012616302,0.00036228137,0.00016378725,0.000013183004,0.9982722,0.0004022662,0.0007194656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898462,0.000008034565,0.0011826757,0.0000726234,0.00001067972,0.00007230055,0.0016958724,0.0036644067,0.00008482718,0.9172322,0.07594412,0.00002140964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78834456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.834267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21165544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043737188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035172004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42580378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783483970","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0022","title":"Constitutional Judges and Secession. Lessons from Canada … twenty years later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.02685168043430914,"score_gpt":0.3211501995924507,"score_spread":0.2942985191581416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783483970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062304143,0.034904066,0.00092796027,0.35601825,0.0022779694,0.000083847415,0.00043139447,0.00004000554,0.54301226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112038,0.022139296,0.0010237733,0.06018314,0.0008984598,0.000058225993,0.00026017104,0.00006526527,0.10416793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924896,0.0014435754,0.00016665162,0.00087392307,0.002193886,0.002832375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871796,0.0049455683,0.00042885187,0.00048168117,0.0053268024,0.0016375441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074293436,0.0003350226,0.00072295073,0.0023546899,0.01915063,0.012535945,0.0022151172,0.006681119,0.009171914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020570843,0.00035731093,0.00051640027,0.0047646486,0.021575028,0.0050192205,0.0034621088,0.009677279,0.00050990103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005584853,0.00004487526,0.0024113916,0.000097150536,0.000016796059,0.00048594637,0.011668909,0.00037453335,0.0000931081,0.89536,0.0599146,0.029476812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095123185,0.00003831953,0.011650597,0.0009970493,0.00004587301,0.0001033852,0.019354638,0.00062352495,0.00028002873,0.09870043,0.8679969,0.000114111244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98847175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13842015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13842015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1695929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344527004380475,"score_gpt":0.28402513399984786,"score_spread":0.25768060699546735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783786080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39989084,0.0101617,0.0030046236,0.09651304,0.00055675907,0.00006269672,0.0011922998,0.00013931222,0.48847872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98194754,0.0012346609,0.00027992344,0.000990962,0.000035223708,0.000009260252,0.00010014597,0.000026963948,0.015375183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691087,0.0005133847,0.00005914036,0.0002984528,0.0010099745,0.001208138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931132,0.002330243,0.00043767603,0.00038310033,0.002577056,0.0011586781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029230078,0.00019171186,0.00035302943,0.0023639323,0.029583843,0.013366891,0.0016423528,0.0016843949,0.005653471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009131805,0.00022537314,0.00018031233,0.005052864,0.02862854,0.0025958861,0.0029430478,0.0044083404,0.00015665189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026865982,0.000012616184,0.0041682757,0.000054593864,0.000007933507,0.00025850182,0.10582924,0.00033538678,0.00020668491,0.8477983,0.024417402,0.016884245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017477072,0.000015642847,0.021893047,0.00033953504,0.000032284308,0.0001594787,0.13844939,0.001220831,0.00065787666,0.053357758,0.78376216,0.000094503324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20556387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21208264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9214333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.034550493574795255,"score_gpt":0.3060064664540142,"score_spread":0.27145597287921897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783926903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29727602,0.014874808,0.0032785789,0.14043254,0.00061106076,0.00011758062,0.00017379328,0.00004453856,0.54319113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749274,0.0016525435,0.00091278047,0.0056136344,0.000073887146,0.00003452436,0.00002239582,0.000017689908,0.01674506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886,0.0018523361,0.00020933643,0.0008798612,0.0041857264,0.0040127467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394447,0.0028414899,0.00030907473,0.00022796178,0.0014834068,0.0011935057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006941372,0.00041164574,0.00083398377,0.002137615,0.053758893,0.01893133,0.0030279327,0.006983863,0.00414219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00990413,0.0005529691,0.0006473316,0.0033151046,0.04661859,0.003440709,0.008144965,0.008796055,0.00016052347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012629892,0.000015983167,0.0015429877,0.000036215988,0.000010115261,0.0003926847,0.03323041,0.00025697582,0.00017630118,0.95208657,0.0046119634,0.007627162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007041469,0.000051226307,0.02366453,0.0013187572,0.00011334626,0.0004757447,0.1980122,0.0029979914,0.0014269694,0.37021333,0.40131226,0.0003431448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98702997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14658657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14658657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21248896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784109776","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0020","title":"Immigration and Federalism in Canada: beyond Quebec Exceptionalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Immigration; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Exceptionalism; Politics; Public administration; Delegation; Immigration law; Ethnic group; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015950206849974377,"score_gpt":0.28683756229683477,"score_spread":0.2708873554468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784109776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5148864,0.010917447,0.0015533362,0.1419462,0.00041871995,0.000058912545,0.0010661007,0.000072310206,0.32908064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98809624,0.0012660283,0.00028788668,0.002157661,0.00003217833,0.0000064183205,0.00009669269,0.000005805967,0.00805113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750715,0.0003288985,0.000043933796,0.0001753212,0.0004475029,0.0014972946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608165,0.00061440555,0.00036181838,0.00013191001,0.0014932754,0.0013169057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018253704,0.00015138135,0.0003270881,0.0014947263,0.011785638,0.0058847135,0.000986308,0.0011001319,0.007093976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040792245,0.00014308089,0.0002896904,0.0029532025,0.0055850106,0.0011556365,0.0016393305,0.0017686379,0.00013727149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111224566,0.000054910393,0.07494429,0.00016760617,0.00006761234,0.0006058342,0.014853847,0.0019902312,0.00045333835,0.8102665,0.04931372,0.04717099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054341413,0.000056106026,0.41285497,0.0009418686,0.00012406908,0.00023547836,0.03772196,0.0040810416,0.00068669656,0.04991747,0.49313176,0.00019435611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15117654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15117654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14101416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800980875","doi":"10.2478/pof-2018-0011","title":"The Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Evaluation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Strengths and weaknesses; Construct (python library); Point (geometry); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics; Decentralization; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0732006269023147,"score_gpt":0.29615529130875595,"score_spread":0.22295466440644124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800980875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11214715,0.060594745,0.14436893,0.27091676,0.005217565,0.0003619652,0.00026852632,0.00012495345,0.40599936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732213,0.008528167,0.008243033,0.0042784275,0.0016277665,0.00011850986,0.00004024458,0.00002460186,0.0039180308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956975,0.0030276168,0.000089427704,0.00029279914,0.00067085115,0.00022182235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96673614,0.02835147,0.0007656363,0.000740456,0.003133953,0.00027229724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01740383,0.0005754105,0.00069895905,0.0059095,0.0028234571,0.003912396,0.0011683494,0.0022635898,0.005138431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023785448,0.00022358814,0.00060896005,0.0023569064,0.019610591,0.008102275,0.002365749,0.003673724,0.00030681264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008812235,0.0000050875774,0.00010375417,0.000032624852,0.0000033565316,0.000030502446,0.00027392682,0.00038812365,0.000007702648,0.99582076,0.0012728281,0.0020524242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014917954,0.000017190729,0.00028214065,0.00023782316,0.000007990017,0.000047584686,0.0011868455,0.0037083935,0.000087335284,0.9794662,0.014935344,0.00000819158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039241263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028199928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01740383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009903949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031162256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09204131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.04712162325057034,"score_gpt":0.3015334131619888,"score_spread":0.25441178991141844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170833626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28041863,0.010727032,0.002129079,0.27014017,0.0007883621,0.000053435277,0.00013473078,0.00003901304,0.43556955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327625,0.0013626632,0.00049860973,0.0054002316,0.00009148296,0.00000957542,0.000011742123,0.000010265228,0.009339327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929798,0.0017518259,0.00012194933,0.0005702969,0.00198018,0.0025959855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903593,0.00421717,0.00047092824,0.0002597334,0.0027969417,0.0018958427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060980218,0.00017628347,0.00047310666,0.0016220756,0.045873318,0.012650981,0.0016506496,0.0035788398,0.0025523214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01397583,0.00024765826,0.00031704447,0.0030372129,0.025726888,0.0026135624,0.0045257392,0.005716622,0.00009798432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432996,0.00001504673,0.0038394935,0.00005234085,0.000016437141,0.0003680211,0.043325268,0.00077626493,0.00019502145,0.91668016,0.020904034,0.013793489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065337714,0.000060103357,0.039104298,0.0008089067,0.00012370691,0.00025804382,0.13879813,0.004568883,0.000821528,0.20207657,0.61307275,0.00024173976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98907274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99502546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17213896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17213896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18958434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96020144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}