{"meta":{"query_hash":"df8a2b361fd2","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Federalism"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df8a2b361fd2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Perspectives+on+Federalism"},"results":[{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04691081642210825,"score_gpt":0.3473193465272077,"score_spread":0.30040853010509944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604134551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073106,0.00020619393,0.000017394137,0.03478592,0.00070759084,0.00014198566,0.000017417837,0.00006049952,0.890957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921465,0.00033256004,0.000031778818,0.00037249958,0.0007222385,0.000014781722,7.876197e-7,0.0000056458507,0.0063732145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998768,0.000060912043,0.000091425165,0.00026872248,0.0005359685,0.00027497005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939084,0.000054161243,0.00009405585,0.00021920704,0.00014942375,0.000092303184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022155415,0.00010810669,0.00014962435,0.000020090238,0.0058362396,0.0003730554,0.0003605104,0.000058215337,0.00018883808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060429715,0.000098881836,0.00006629459,0.000034425426,0.0006837784,0.00024534564,0.00009105999,0.00012336847,0.00037343375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024223076,0.000095825,0.007873787,8.574105e-7,0.000049728445,0.0000041960784,0.028887145,7.39496e-7,0.00002451341,0.9597758,0.0027703515,0.00049285474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010658349,0.00013365671,0.41396338,0.00007896619,0.000036025725,0.0000010246865,0.13659084,0.000006066966,0.000076008124,0.1181843,0.32924283,0.0006210662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012602209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018469876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9190405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032052136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008976383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613708823","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0005","title":"Commanders-in-chief beyond the border: analysing the powers of heads of state in Northern American federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Presidential system; State (computer science); Democracy; Multitude; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law; Democratic system; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016815681216089978,"score_gpt":0.34309709007875455,"score_spread":0.32628140886266455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613708823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271693,0.00027958237,0.000050881557,0.03257378,0.00010757664,0.00024235266,0.00003009934,0.000011037735,0.13953541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848276,0.00027111918,0.00004004456,0.0006703781,0.00007117757,0.00000691122,0.000001916983,0.000009430017,0.0004462847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982744,0.00040791128,0.0002978272,0.00023042578,0.00043830645,0.00035113693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984715,0.00042796283,0.00043431573,0.00045248758,0.00015393223,0.00005980129],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069361087,0.00014430493,0.00034111735,0.000097685224,0.0014127747,0.0001498775,0.0006181697,0.000035716854,0.000022229933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000284079,0.000097355594,0.00013848844,0.00022706545,0.005260174,0.00014911317,0.00006384458,0.00026608905,0.000002120395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070205686,0.00015274115,0.06724095,0.0000043208533,0.00007109049,0.0000065754034,0.10584715,0.0003833001,0.000041034356,0.82480216,0.000082236125,0.001298254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001385225,0.00028285047,0.38677272,0.000115606286,0.000060271526,0.0000031065795,0.55145526,0.00013325784,0.0001346851,0.036424603,0.022653246,0.0005791819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21915208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27914938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7883775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020871861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049131043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755856806","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0018","title":"Canadian Federalism in Design and Practice: The Mechanics of a Permanently Provisional Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Improvisation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Public administration; Law and economics; Architecture; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.03908113119585761,"score_gpt":0.34553837393775844,"score_spread":0.30645724274190084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755856806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16192926,0.001909218,0.0013201609,0.39141813,0.0010073107,0.002694924,0.00010957958,0.0000524234,0.43955898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00019733809,0.00021342895,0.00055452815,0.00011875748,0.000018399172,4.7245553e-7,0.0000043895993,0.0007027047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986473,0.00036716025,0.00014205521,0.0002177501,0.00032646707,0.00029930647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998968,0.0003858321,0.00016205429,0.00020399854,0.00012560259,0.00015452887],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011709685,0.00009089091,0.00013936913,0.000041013285,0.001812887,0.0003390354,0.00024806033,0.00008497627,0.000023595723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00247157,0.00006841329,0.000033922588,0.000039913946,0.00042812809,0.00036783147,0.000030557723,0.00015369263,0.0000067260426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030069128,0.000033054363,0.00011750669,0.0000032490314,0.0000094283505,0.000012379555,0.019710159,0.000009216649,0.000039478244,0.9793829,0.00042098673,0.0002315796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033348855,0.0004290959,0.084527545,0.00065644924,0.000073292664,0.00008928703,0.17530578,0.0022311648,0.00019294475,0.15057093,0.5814236,0.001165043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8162685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35814425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83626074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042496732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006274917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757537265","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0016","title":"Constitutional and administrative paradigms in judicial control over EU high and low politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Administrative law; Control (management); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Public law; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03051304378143667,"score_gpt":0.3438546395748842,"score_spread":0.31334159579344756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757537265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7011925,0.00022716372,0.000019912857,0.013237029,0.00015722259,0.00018965043,0.00013081593,0.00001993123,0.28482577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708104,0.0003103088,0.000024147444,0.0013484024,0.00042850967,0.0000044953135,8.636328e-7,0.000004071743,0.00079817104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990767,0.00013418024,0.000107832304,0.00025383313,0.00019204826,0.00023539872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945074,0.00015607759,0.00011179758,0.00012127823,0.000041547155,0.00011856777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002006091,0.00010460227,0.00015253517,0.000026790143,0.001325811,0.00029463423,0.0001231642,0.000058955007,0.000037930266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056781917,0.00010284915,0.000023815512,0.000024326202,0.0027468726,0.00025337274,0.000025771425,0.00015070908,0.000006079657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038826915,0.000047891506,0.004367429,0.000001889814,0.000010973559,0.000022108032,0.012822246,9.399398e-7,0.000011163722,0.98241365,0.00019167803,0.00007117915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024242804,0.00011781164,0.92546207,0.000070509755,0.0000095011,0.000004927001,0.0070137363,0.000022279226,0.000033685603,0.039269302,0.025308367,0.00026354013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074309893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021327422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009042958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012940608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780222313","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0024","title":"Franchises Lost and Gained: Post-Coloniality and the Development of Women’s Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Gender studies; Franchise; Politics; Indigenous; Universal suffrage; Enlightenment; Modernity; Indigenous rights; Law; Sociology; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.00849566290149294,"score_gpt":0.23739398596046454,"score_spread":0.2288983230589716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780222313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689248,0.00034880103,2.9340524e-7,0.006042872,0.00012216702,0.00014285932,0.0000115758,0.000002788683,0.024403825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874413,0.00007363965,0.000021831354,0.00016603201,0.00004259052,0.000011050857,2.660282e-7,0.0000023049126,0.0009381605],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.000097810225,0.00011440764,0.00015793592,0.0001875188,0.00019307241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953645,0.00008669818,0.00008952284,0.00013125318,0.000053704236,0.00010234449],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045356812,0.000059857513,0.0001551017,0.000075709635,0.002448808,0.0002671373,0.00015115639,0.000029147048,0.000102188365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022327118,0.000053382835,0.000014444969,0.000027513097,0.001061507,0.00011045404,0.000031341617,0.000088041736,0.000001574668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013489019,0.000033014032,0.0037107938,0.000013786994,0.000027779233,0.000008680993,0.78474736,4.296099e-7,0.000010104044,0.20962082,0.00046548128,0.0012268496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013550264,0.000019800575,0.70888764,0.000032166634,0.0000055588516,6.4835814e-7,0.116437875,0.0000026555235,0.000011553806,0.0047866874,0.16827844,0.00018197381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99916774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70517683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027449913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019220316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782783416","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0027","title":"An Opportunity for Reflection – A Special Issue on “The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Democracy; Separation of powers; Politics; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Bill of rights","score_opus":0.03398625285613072,"score_gpt":0.29023280978099986,"score_spread":0.25624655692486914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782783416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23426035,0.00020232827,0.000022351778,0.022037202,0.0017791896,0.0006001713,0.00008638045,0.00003186211,0.74098015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907497,0.00007572043,0.000015120329,0.0003330784,0.0014183216,0.000017579207,0.000001724497,0.0000043357204,0.0073843948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992037,0.00008936591,0.00010744963,0.00019913194,0.0002373817,0.00016301149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916196,0.000037496466,0.00017402296,0.0002508958,0.00022366154,0.00015199205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041436573,0.00006889604,0.00010822072,0.00010951942,0.004442083,0.00017436351,0.00019430465,0.000062629966,0.000211158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077022443,0.0000713783,0.000032703825,0.000029667379,0.0014118599,0.00031877335,0.000009325964,0.00010621898,0.0000018609072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008011964,0.000040715677,0.00005665997,0.0000066378393,0.000011060724,0.0000019116435,0.02184662,0.0000041978406,0.000079236306,0.9104277,0.06684473,0.0006003923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018892864,0.00011479363,0.016021572,0.000020518597,0.0000085456295,9.2216317e-7,0.020824496,0.000008695409,0.000012702584,0.003661491,0.9590258,0.00011150745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90676624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008915798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035465444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782811191","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0023","title":"The Spanish vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: from idealization to myth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Referendum; Secession; Political science; Brexit; Prestige; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political economy; Sociology; European union; History; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016927292090933084,"score_gpt":0.3221870534681478,"score_spread":0.3052597613772147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782811191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52019686,0.00027938766,0.00019551623,0.14892052,0.0011654297,0.0004786558,0.00016944435,0.000035890727,0.32855833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537,0.00005551532,0.000033472756,0.0005491658,0.0003619265,0.000004810562,9.0045745e-7,0.0000058067517,0.0036184494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877656,0.00011511584,0.00013177216,0.00020407904,0.0005041053,0.00026837247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.00016668897,0.00015928691,0.00033771442,0.00013752843,0.00014927595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033452173,0.000074715404,0.00012904241,0.00000798111,0.0026418476,0.00033056887,0.00040389792,0.000056561446,0.000032209726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013771898,0.00005544652,0.000040605864,0.00003050713,0.00018303905,0.00013453134,0.000053002,0.00008689024,0.00000601173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021744941,0.00002359216,0.0012053788,0.0000015572413,0.000012335395,0.0000017457218,0.013694822,0.000003706733,0.00008521453,0.9650359,0.0193754,0.0005385833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000164523,0.000038114922,0.62074304,0.000048252703,0.0000045617053,8.418713e-8,0.009623764,0.000017158058,0.00015712001,0.013709221,0.35536918,0.00012497422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98483473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97100943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95132667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040716285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041980736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05670185527763862,"score_gpt":0.34854772004902723,"score_spread":0.29184586477138863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783105250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041057907,0.00072327355,0.0001972114,0.016415525,0.00027087456,0.00023724393,0.000038268547,0.00002298794,0.9410367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983849,0.00019005289,0.00008619623,0.00013236428,0.00016598782,0.00002275614,0.0000015777285,0.0000018597824,0.001014283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902487,0.00008718678,0.00013349649,0.00017802395,0.00035903676,0.00021739777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990002,0.00025408043,0.00013327067,0.00013777569,0.00037583555,0.00009882639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025642026,0.00009186638,0.0001350538,0.000055279666,0.010200647,0.00020276934,0.00029359956,0.00004720053,0.000037735546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082398107,0.00007262252,0.00007785349,0.00004791301,0.0047958614,0.00023905392,0.000045163197,0.00012255066,0.000030698975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034621968,0.000029106603,0.0006719687,5.340486e-7,0.000050809704,0.0000010591449,0.030642716,0.00030886102,0.000009876259,0.9673277,0.00064694934,0.0002758118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000730008,0.00019421229,0.121594295,0.00030569168,0.00006975625,0.0000056690524,0.19066763,0.01118223,0.000048027807,0.6482935,0.02626121,0.0006478023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38357395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71642345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005313403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013362278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783483970","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0022","title":"Constitutional Judges and Secession. Lessons from Canada … twenty years later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitution","score_opus":0.02685168043430914,"score_gpt":0.3211501995924507,"score_spread":0.2942985191581416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783483970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425875,0.0003158177,0.000007257103,0.035897534,0.00047170112,0.00008759596,0.00024231483,0.000019961803,0.12037036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996704,0.00008396455,0.000024686733,0.000531534,0.00041016052,0.000004788735,0.0000021292815,0.0000029654084,0.002235813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991029,0.000058852427,0.000074442054,0.00023532203,0.00030297914,0.00022550167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994825,0.00008672203,0.00007376768,0.00016113634,0.00004193308,0.00015394832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103427294,0.000075142285,0.00011702598,0.000006465314,0.0014819043,0.00030025214,0.00017709701,0.000054360473,0.00020586213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026154376,0.0000661168,0.000025573992,0.000012340737,0.0008322303,0.00016393818,0.000046653826,0.000099041994,0.000012766335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004409835,0.000017949966,0.018522615,0.0000012191155,0.00001788001,0.000017963555,0.0047653164,5.2726904e-7,0.000016496488,0.9705351,0.005689556,0.00041097205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445207,0.000006049118,0.7527883,0.000031576885,0.000004484344,4.709152e-7,0.0043613985,0.000003181941,0.000024740417,0.007046616,0.23536287,0.00012579234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8022034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96348846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025295548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029022119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026344527004380475,"score_gpt":0.28402513399984786,"score_spread":0.25768060699546735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783786080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051013328,0.004947291,0.000117283955,0.05208483,0.0011165354,0.00087708497,0.00006365379,0.000044857064,0.88973516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980011,0.0003443624,0.000037060894,0.00027853367,0.00033301295,0.000047967078,6.721277e-7,0.0000033858084,0.0009539024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875736,0.00015394171,0.00018349316,0.0002525921,0.00040861763,0.00024399649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.00015909129,0.0002314514,0.00020442154,0.00026206943,0.000077550445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004034249,0.0001286068,0.00024889625,0.000029217801,0.008644629,0.00010684853,0.0002920608,0.00004768223,0.000038083766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019611625,0.00009517949,0.00006584603,0.000036048576,0.01397518,0.00022811448,0.00007779966,0.00015895245,0.000001684892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118787684,0.000035141333,0.00048652373,0.0000034711347,0.000042990967,0.000003921069,0.04681363,0.0000032497287,0.000008439003,0.9501416,0.0021915168,0.00015073176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003984861,0.00010741195,0.025073456,0.00028331898,0.00011489834,0.0000098776545,0.3553689,0.000032238946,0.000039122886,0.08009,0.5341909,0.00070503645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85655725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9125644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94698775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007415836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047344165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.034550493574795255,"score_gpt":0.3060064664540142,"score_spread":0.27145597287921897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783926903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95472187,0.0010260693,1.4568504e-7,0.020136226,0.00023425899,0.00023738522,0.000010685684,0.00000877553,0.023624603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905103,0.00038716878,0.000011738057,0.00004769351,0.00012095793,0.000048720587,1.8235595e-7,0.000002908053,0.00032957757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0002415036,0.00018650903,0.0002988435,0.00041779896,0.00031997127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922884,0.0002607151,0.00013464532,0.00019548941,0.000113553135,0.00006673715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000499358,0.00013410175,0.00024908574,0.00003602736,0.0014441,0.000098403594,0.00035319937,0.00005734076,0.000043451426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023034558,0.0000902463,0.00003198057,0.00004517869,0.00080002,0.00024913158,0.00008232975,0.00021763277,0.0000011961707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056075165,0.00009447341,0.019001082,0.000016459064,0.00004503871,0.000014063341,0.66188276,0.0000035835503,0.0000114356135,0.3182891,0.00040549817,0.00018041913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034986722,0.000025328884,0.681715,0.00006144806,0.0000027713031,5.255763e-7,0.29464993,0.000006070229,0.000029486404,0.019020295,0.003997046,0.0001422281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99140334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66271394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021034663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016728397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784109776","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0020","title":"Immigration and Federalism in Canada: beyond Quebec Exceptionalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Immigration; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Exceptionalism; Politics; Public administration; Delegation; Immigration law; Ethnic group; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015950206849974377,"score_gpt":0.28683756229683477,"score_spread":0.2708873554468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784109776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820401,0.00032207643,0.000009471608,0.046570845,0.00033605832,0.00020751575,0.000034012763,0.000018798422,0.070461154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99086666,0.0001702611,0.000024006351,0.00076500414,0.0004425736,0.000021672398,0.0000023819432,0.000009057882,0.0076983958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.00012743523,0.0001726306,0.00033832778,0.00044279525,0.00037722284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.00009483592,0.00013609538,0.00022525777,0.00007490218,0.00016831799],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027334588,0.0001310488,0.00019450345,0.00003334918,0.0015827398,0.0005057259,0.00022134214,0.00007499841,0.0000902935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030871,0.00012656784,0.000037245925,0.000037100257,0.00027241386,0.00041817955,0.000039082563,0.00015358005,0.000010277102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012905286,0.000028243256,0.010011114,0.0000043825867,0.000008575362,0.000020863823,0.016569199,0.000001911864,0.0000321171,0.9700252,0.0023441277,0.00094137253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049119163,0.000017553164,0.90193504,0.00005174408,0.000003752939,0.0000019803208,0.02552889,0.00003703,0.000019099958,0.012638578,0.059006058,0.00026909838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016166958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008392017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800980875","doi":"10.2478/pof-2018-0011","title":"The Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Evaluation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Strengths and weaknesses; Construct (python library); Point (geometry); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics; Decentralization; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0732006269023147,"score_gpt":0.29615529130875595,"score_spread":0.22295466440644124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800980875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963747,0.0015836067,0.00088658667,0.0135757085,0.0013012217,0.00043236752,0.0001794342,0.00004957412,0.3856168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614173,0.000022659797,0.00011758601,0.0009102693,0.001259317,0.000049232065,0.000010110052,0.000023822246,0.0014652438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998458,0.00012898713,0.0005425967,0.0004696029,0.000077789555,0.0003229841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.00030927043,0.00021437136,0.0003796443,0.00011592228,0.000076347686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016312973,0.0001736873,0.00028732856,0.00012228456,0.0007170347,0.00020725401,0.00023001368,0.00011947949,0.0011563739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085232273,0.00015429649,0.00015381495,0.00010910434,0.0005130887,0.0002548089,0.000044625398,0.0001712119,0.00042858048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903328,0.00008023589,0.00026021185,0.000006302893,0.00005074487,2.5449214e-7,0.004802251,0.0000031672323,0.0001352242,0.98674834,0.0073127747,0.0005314382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007508304,0.00035595268,0.017248794,0.000011101579,0.0000116746105,0.0000053509975,0.0026417775,0.006807915,0.0014139137,0.9582155,0.012236355,0.00030084845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007223722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019016955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39976707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019652826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002324191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.04712162325057034,"score_gpt":0.3015334131619888,"score_spread":0.25441178991141844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170833626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78623843,0.0005252634,7.8329117e-7,0.16929595,0.000115898976,0.00031628794,0.000029304128,0.0000049342802,0.04347314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.00024135204,0.0000011077171,0.00046426346,0.00010894794,0.000007841204,4.9952615e-7,0.0000019746285,0.000013870549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988007,0.00024829112,0.00015488402,0.00014257037,0.00050365244,0.00014987902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.00044363266,0.000101899444,0.000075920616,0.00011645434,0.000028903196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025866693,0.00008066026,0.00013122876,0.000018053312,0.0015610626,0.000020530037,0.00028987616,0.000026341702,0.000025948586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046897162,0.000041584364,0.00008660019,0.000253384,0.00046169784,0.000054855987,0.000117616124,0.00018374366,9.324859e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014530658,0.0001103791,0.04200413,0.0000014372634,0.000060367034,0.0000035203875,0.1475744,0.0014147839,0.000010186376,0.8071718,0.0011328842,0.00037077905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040217326,0.00006506816,0.872054,0.000033877328,0.0000043812374,1.152056e-7,0.104035884,0.00015098554,0.00001470833,0.022818146,0.00033432245,0.0000863587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9658987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96456593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006960498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008248494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}