{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc713587ff24","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Politics"},"cohort_total":196,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":196,"exported":196,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc713587ff24","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Perspectives+on+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1964012142","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705780257","title":"Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States, and Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Agriculture; Wildlife; Natural (archaeology); Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Environmental policy; Common Agricultural Policy; Business; Geography; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.006966641385297076,"score_gpt":0.2264077028961098,"score_spread":0.21944106151081275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964012142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37233093,0.030719386,0.00069500256,0.36114913,0.0003261723,0.00004520732,0.00044622237,0.000047911515,0.23424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816217,0.0053239446,0.0000920562,0.0027124293,0.00005229965,0.0000138744645,0.000042905096,0.000014143797,0.010126637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945273,0.0015521625,0.00006695264,0.00018889157,0.0012563005,0.0024083469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083674,0.002921587,0.0011348167,0.00013594088,0.002090042,0.0028807875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043978933,0.00033031803,0.00042959407,0.0040791393,0.021756142,0.018010179,0.0013150088,0.003727404,0.007321205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011355691,0.0003155064,0.00024141757,0.0077783456,0.022897488,0.006492851,0.0051382068,0.0027510459,0.00024118219],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084561856,0.000071999726,0.039137337,0.00010764083,0.000055499397,0.0005249564,0.13128336,0.0024204561,0.000075986405,0.72070086,0.066661015,0.038876332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048864156,0.000042747524,0.09849887,0.00082298554,0.000040892646,0.0001702111,0.37912047,0.0023579323,0.00011368008,0.0858482,0.4327866,0.00014838518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1620654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1620654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10881074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965187713","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091233","title":"Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. By Rogers Brubaker, Margit Feischmidt, Jon Fox, and Liana Grancea. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 504p. $24.95.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Eastern European Communism and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Ethnic group; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Ethnology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014976100461784849,"score_gpt":0.2611068942547296,"score_spread":0.24613079379294475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965187713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056074136,0.8047355,0.0001445773,0.13340758,0.005629462,0.0000144338055,0.00034640363,0.000024369421,0.050090276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15092555,0.51634276,0.00073380896,0.023969518,0.0054635326,0.000059970986,0.0006160709,0.00010225408,0.30178657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996735,0.00014074333,0.00001748512,0.000039807812,0.00006177727,0.00006672591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999689,0.00009957305,0.000048514055,0.000011345033,0.000029135805,0.00012257615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068744255,0.00085430004,0.0004990615,0.0009002708,0.0021936167,0.0027874096,0.00075103005,0.0020222573,0.02262036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006973044,0.00052099454,0.00033215462,0.0022969316,0.0030498148,0.004196603,0.0022094303,0.0027058444,0.004691447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006827629,0.000051732797,0.001757096,0.00035974188,0.000027044063,0.00014961531,0.0065238914,0.00007299335,0.00017781598,0.02600645,0.91160566,0.05319974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024691448,0.000037841506,0.016587565,0.0010478985,0.0000237572,0.00023178609,0.010132424,0.00005459934,0.00007850961,0.007942674,0.9638172,0.000021036634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050181717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17638756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050181717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026618252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016017365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09977925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966494172","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705940255","title":"Men, Militarism, and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peacekeeping; Militarism; Scrutiny; Contradiction; Political science; Hatred; Criminology; Gender studies; Aggression; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025255030373715393,"score_gpt":0.3133669238634006,"score_spread":0.2881118934896852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966494172","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12994589,0.38568285,0.002139504,0.14111641,0.002728021,0.000072945906,0.0005143415,0.00002803676,0.33777204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82514733,0.120886475,0.0008882533,0.00664453,0.0022858346,0.00018740338,0.00019800595,0.000050749037,0.04371148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873537,0.0007147665,0.000019908104,0.000069655296,0.00020325948,0.00025711345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982028,0.0013177512,0.00017108067,0.000024199206,0.00012170174,0.0001623336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016687473,0.0006692561,0.000434528,0.0028799113,0.0049461857,0.0039754272,0.0007108946,0.0012506233,0.011597925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022000012,0.00029423615,0.00037642987,0.0042767604,0.006722648,0.004917533,0.0021756585,0.0019579858,0.0004693609],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013978544,0.00014386718,0.017993564,0.00058650837,0.00005758709,0.00072640687,0.1836331,0.00030502974,0.00022250564,0.53788894,0.13857462,0.11972797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020862199,0.000178582,0.07065762,0.002010301,0.00005294685,0.00043569467,0.35630003,0.00038620862,0.00022931737,0.071987465,0.49769863,0.000042303465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03270082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063545026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03270082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048610745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002738951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06502098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967875522","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703810150","title":"Iberian Trade Unionism: Democratization under the Impact of the European Union. By José Magone. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2001. 335p. $49.95","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; European union; Corporate governance; Intermediation; Political science; Multi-level governance; European integration; Trade union; Database transaction; International trade; Economy; Economics; Political economy; Democracy; Law; Management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.015646393711641626,"score_gpt":0.2875455773572485,"score_spread":0.2718991836456069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967875522","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007218315,0.862429,0.0004509095,0.035968807,0.0065122214,0.00000891456,0.00015977911,0.000058969792,0.09368952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027091488,0.6181283,0.0017306958,0.008746959,0.006672071,0.00006055756,0.00041593658,0.00018127644,0.33697274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996537,0.00010004174,0.000020353342,0.00006684789,0.000115013994,0.000044016248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997166,0.00011805426,0.000044342516,0.000018482102,0.00004783453,0.000054712793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082842365,0.0015338974,0.0007463277,0.001464693,0.0016096308,0.0054236837,0.00070097495,0.00207056,0.031483527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010858626,0.00073288666,0.0003164704,0.004842341,0.0024936919,0.006037364,0.0019479452,0.0035528336,0.012845165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041666615,0.000027028384,0.00024528633,0.00032702214,0.000010729199,0.000060770442,0.000848525,0.00019754362,0.000105899446,0.03009219,0.8263686,0.14167465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057260436,0.000008662599,0.0012490981,0.00062247325,0.000004490229,0.00008394098,0.00069099315,0.000079532256,0.000050412807,0.010553555,0.9866436,0.0000075883945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009457977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018486388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031483527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028724323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017774447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1053229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968816406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705670491","title":"Imagined Economies: The Sources of Russian Regionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nationalism; Political science; Secession; Political economy; Economy; Positive economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016607882128947437,"score_gpt":0.2993470492611663,"score_spread":0.28273916713221886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968816406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09809054,0.17757595,0.014938185,0.15222298,0.0013084676,0.000021880067,0.00028030775,0.00011409158,0.55544764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96477425,0.019456975,0.0013733549,0.0008749349,0.0005226381,0.000018933228,0.00006581108,0.000045560093,0.012867593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993826,0.00038343872,0.0000143962325,0.00006740423,0.00008359762,0.0000684418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947256,0.0003125823,0.00007918649,0.000065940614,0.00003241014,0.0000373529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011986494,0.0003579886,0.00027935684,0.0010380583,0.0024495078,0.006119033,0.0006191786,0.001657355,0.0036290952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017027217,0.0003609579,0.00026327698,0.0015650771,0.012276495,0.008223099,0.003084563,0.0025853403,0.0004810292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061686455,0.000003153275,0.00022509089,0.000024297018,0.00000364582,0.0000661995,0.008880978,0.00013484005,0.000046930843,0.9799698,0.006214668,0.0044242023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010157364,0.000009982728,0.0021215575,0.00017690423,0.0000074613827,0.00028054306,0.009732072,0.00044803132,0.00012921882,0.80327904,0.1837938,0.000011219218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002160294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031187066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006119033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003455807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008938897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025073707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975111701","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712001119","title":"<i>Mobilizing Restraint: Democracy and Industrial Conflict in Post-Reform South Asia</i>. By Emmanuel Teitelbaum. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011. 248p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Development economics; Political economy; Political stability; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04046267378854979,"score_gpt":0.25956823032122917,"score_spread":0.21910555653267938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975111701","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016335132,0.50621563,0.0004116793,0.3816923,0.0031364444,0.000032298794,0.00015205632,0.000035576853,0.09198889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36406216,0.54222065,0.0005557689,0.011659688,0.0043660426,0.0000775448,0.00017463493,0.000061202736,0.07682225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974245,0.00014934207,0.000010381145,0.000026060367,0.000031667787,0.000040112318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993936,0.00031899713,0.00012576056,0.00002186796,0.00004327714,0.000096480355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087240373,0.0004689099,0.00028857452,0.000824027,0.0017979607,0.0039154426,0.000675593,0.0016749185,0.009289246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00101948,0.00027900148,0.00024265029,0.0026831347,0.0060011433,0.0042357086,0.002069305,0.0029240015,0.0008777911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006706176,0.00010015719,0.004906608,0.0011355949,0.000042825486,0.00046351517,0.04785796,0.0005127943,0.00030821853,0.23624343,0.59485555,0.11350626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028871258,0.000059368813,0.023760019,0.003052251,0.00002682754,0.0004875151,0.0518828,0.0006835724,0.0003608606,0.11452969,0.8050931,0.00003511607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013049795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03257226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013049795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025636835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002785397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031075597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977402475","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706610360","title":"New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New institutionalism; Institutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012074655929700782,"score_gpt":0.2802095247161806,"score_spread":0.2681348687864798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977402475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011555487,0.34373656,0.17849953,0.088011846,0.0017812749,0.00019505977,0.0007429379,0.00038493518,0.37509242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67777085,0.2042505,0.06165107,0.004154097,0.0023196188,0.0006648795,0.0006360537,0.00034028568,0.048212625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737996,0.0014293272,0.00013062186,0.00028234217,0.00053432066,0.00024338556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955058,0.0027734267,0.00046197374,0.00049121963,0.0005195438,0.00024798262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912606,0.00078659446,0.0010613378,0.003999585,0.0019017535,0.0074041877,0.0015785904,0.0019399483,0.008240438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006255919,0.0007764102,0.0007949311,0.0060469885,0.025401624,0.00934178,0.002848804,0.0036059886,0.0009995035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000265742,0.000007484851,0.00018681923,0.00012648056,0.00001187856,0.000027936976,0.0007833281,0.00082782225,0.000020430009,0.97786695,0.00973073,0.010407462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035990633,0.0000031647332,0.00028343417,0.00022102946,0.000005071714,0.000024966685,0.0004516791,0.00064919086,0.00003199421,0.91805506,0.08026493,0.000005844247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011710606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008663167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011710606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010368207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064102598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07522702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983671719","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706510369","title":"Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada <i>and</i> The Case for Gay Rights: From <i>Bowers</i> to <i>Lawrence</i> and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Scholarship; Gay rights; Autonomy; Political science; Classical liberalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.009089207930567467,"score_gpt":0.26204968804916223,"score_spread":0.2529604801185948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983671719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021929247,0.40253636,0.0007009777,0.32536906,0.0019476061,0.000042292795,0.0003710349,0.000054140113,0.24704939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6065819,0.21941605,0.0011464482,0.031195784,0.0017607873,0.00007694687,0.00034186136,0.00008368841,0.13939647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976241,0.000407207,0.000030955416,0.00010292065,0.0010550215,0.0007798799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978156,0.0006394398,0.00015784307,0.00007004545,0.0005592587,0.00075774215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014960015,0.00064658927,0.00050269836,0.0028088894,0.017466258,0.013560338,0.0017486664,0.0047052274,0.0057510184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003306017,0.00042450443,0.00028112024,0.0067798006,0.04307641,0.0036969816,0.003636467,0.004927867,0.00048825442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022071836,0.00004640607,0.0026305388,0.0001712089,0.000017440821,0.00024343288,0.038405705,0.00043342917,0.00013002138,0.57727855,0.33721572,0.043405484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025845564,0.000012938659,0.018904017,0.0013758861,0.000025303834,0.00010366194,0.060530394,0.00039211856,0.00013769763,0.1545933,0.76381624,0.000082620274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97639287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11478881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11478881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15754731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.832855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984227925","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705380492","title":"Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Nationalism; Patriotism; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Confusion; Sociology; Global justice; Political science; Law; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.026334032152731876,"score_gpt":0.3686632590123231,"score_spread":0.3423292268595912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984227925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15775119,0.31348857,0.0017613369,0.14890829,0.0013669848,0.000039531933,0.0000761629,0.000019781082,0.37658814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116422,0.06930404,0.00039119876,0.003283425,0.00048835063,0.000042919095,0.000027614304,0.000015885202,0.014804277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942905,0.0004010328,0.000013176109,0.000035313795,0.000059175138,0.000062084415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915934,0.0005201337,0.00012250876,0.000030557083,0.00003996661,0.0001273552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008298806,0.00034589745,0.00036870208,0.00076413364,0.0021899336,0.0046776976,0.00047379764,0.0013549706,0.0026771813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014955635,0.00023256129,0.00016934438,0.0022156157,0.013339807,0.0057983743,0.0020941284,0.0021220874,0.0001850097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024188568,0.000053016007,0.0053509483,0.00027905215,0.000019458113,0.000665661,0.109225184,0.00015461363,0.00018804701,0.8123872,0.0365818,0.03507086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016833412,0.000060604816,0.025521995,0.0018116066,0.000031451593,0.0007979793,0.27438882,0.00037766123,0.00022739467,0.42408204,0.27264652,0.000037108228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067046224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015134828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067046224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019230171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002361463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013952494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985033627","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705880259","title":"Resisting Rebellion: The History and Politics of Counterinsurgency","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Constructive; Political science; Guerrilla warfare; Citizen journalism; Spanish Civil War; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03296781735600428,"score_gpt":0.29197682474448616,"score_spread":0.25900900738848187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985033627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051347423,0.24654292,0.0007644945,0.15068801,0.0030842216,0.000023636972,0.00008812252,0.00005946501,0.5474017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354514,0.078813,0.00021968973,0.010751174,0.00272684,0.000047142486,0.000070724454,0.00008704568,0.07183299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987147,0.0006647384,0.000022986671,0.0001080047,0.00018594797,0.00030364943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990225,0.0005938733,0.00014170924,0.00003955845,0.00006323641,0.0001390999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012708858,0.00045264149,0.00032123743,0.0015271548,0.006498578,0.008011437,0.00089601765,0.0028509994,0.0072273253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025134138,0.0003058337,0.00013867488,0.0026308694,0.019875925,0.005366599,0.00246726,0.0041980874,0.00080336595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051303643,0.000044507837,0.00097569136,0.00021869554,0.000013666203,0.0003526549,0.11755501,0.00018451907,0.00019149072,0.70326036,0.13556375,0.04158821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009758691,0.000022803219,0.0024792221,0.0004973058,0.0000046210002,0.00012514887,0.024065485,0.000049443814,0.00009297101,0.029171716,0.94346887,0.00001281962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02133634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029398516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02133634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008706066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032106221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063167214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988016899","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706730365","title":"The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin American Experience, 1881–2001","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Perspective (graphical); International relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014777106800646833,"score_gpt":0.3786815310754672,"score_spread":0.3639044242748204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988016899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5044722,0.049535837,0.0005081839,0.12379529,0.0007074931,0.000043372078,0.00022054701,0.000033992525,0.32068303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407638,0.024276285,0.00018844426,0.0042271107,0.0003422156,0.00007257694,0.00010213499,0.000038982467,0.0299885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970361,0.0016830374,0.00008875274,0.00015593758,0.00041762672,0.0006184871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971571,0.001301263,0.0006399194,0.00010698258,0.00042957652,0.00036520517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045934645,0.00034765538,0.00059157785,0.001192485,0.01045183,0.0074945497,0.00061801885,0.001912522,0.0047988845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076361652,0.00042267868,0.00019294936,0.0038693764,0.015656732,0.0068199136,0.005004977,0.0056188824,0.00045156406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060705705,0.00007477248,0.0069479994,0.00015958672,0.0000064324367,0.0003015934,0.8284757,0.00013462473,0.00019706613,0.102978885,0.018965714,0.041696962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015007826,0.000043125223,0.019263752,0.00047002354,0.0000071548875,0.00019091686,0.3992736,0.000056196674,0.000120539014,0.0059012743,0.5746262,0.000032253403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08410821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099488564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08410821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01312413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070426962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16723728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999407592","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708081942","title":"The Challenges of Multiculturalism in Advanced Democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03020758537249669,"score_gpt":0.3205749403486895,"score_spread":0.2903673549761928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999407592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091024816,0.06721738,0.00073302846,0.41452447,0.0017521428,0.000018768103,0.000066413246,0.000022089402,0.42464086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495911,0.0157838,0.00039797628,0.011118069,0.0012030767,0.000043624375,0.00002599084,0.000034494253,0.021801831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484223,0.0035690377,0.000069901216,0.00022349753,0.00040781792,0.0008875255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729294,0.0014831169,0.00024894957,0.00014741547,0.00020598335,0.00062148453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005059686,0.00036707093,0.00048624288,0.0010912098,0.014793078,0.014159194,0.0007919326,0.0034045258,0.0073835296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00557392,0.00036869015,0.0002796377,0.0018906521,0.030543402,0.010960885,0.0113735255,0.004630395,0.000722844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034929366,0.00006029891,0.0012260466,0.00009624387,0.000013763539,0.00038936897,0.13205282,0.00020613977,0.00013926542,0.7896508,0.045422833,0.03070749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031079086,0.000021555566,0.0034787115,0.00044271964,0.0000074973696,0.00023279712,0.14713828,0.00017549998,0.00010925231,0.52389306,0.32443947,0.000030087509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013340667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024191773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014793078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065444834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055895406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0474838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999658321","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706220140","title":"Denaturalizing Ecological Politics: Alienation from Nature from Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Alienation; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Social science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006310007714503633,"score_gpt":0.2358640636481682,"score_spread":0.22955405593366457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999658321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021836694,0.20491868,0.0060941805,0.3885904,0.002488029,0.000019136563,0.000060023372,0.000060561448,0.37593234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8283332,0.045074716,0.0025579736,0.024677327,0.0017200024,0.00007057297,0.00005543881,0.00016537702,0.0973454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.00096592744,0.000036759397,0.00025490831,0.0003114101,0.00033637567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908555,0.0005297565,0.00009647021,0.00008708536,0.00008778085,0.000113307105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019782647,0.00050608115,0.0004832215,0.0010293247,0.008757351,0.006729313,0.00076109404,0.0033662957,0.0059892144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024662074,0.00038825703,0.00032339056,0.0012950944,0.03224162,0.009381567,0.0037591564,0.0059682103,0.0009395924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076129604,0.000006536541,0.00010784332,0.000025500087,0.0000013296567,0.00004850886,0.011255127,0.000047445927,0.000061345745,0.958756,0.02062627,0.009056526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053754356,0.000009770877,0.0008472037,0.00027752484,0.0000027151978,0.00008141183,0.0057950336,0.000075419324,0.00009062618,0.27482367,0.71797824,0.000013123275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0928382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13273644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0928382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018882267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066332407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18459564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001262193","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704800975","title":"Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06032350709690475,"score_gpt":0.3561269798010161,"score_spread":0.29580347270411134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001262193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5536855,0.029230282,0.0003920687,0.10207481,0.00084367744,0.000022232158,0.00011037633,0.00000932,0.31363174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780628,0.0049256166,0.00006630221,0.0021008996,0.00036153666,0.000017936707,0.000024954026,0.0000074482864,0.0144325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882287,0.0006475359,0.000015537009,0.00007509184,0.00009733513,0.00034175193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964213,0.00013624644,0.000069654874,0.000015735117,0.000032655735,0.000103479666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020056446,0.00020563572,0.00023440385,0.00088910945,0.007861004,0.005292204,0.00043577031,0.0014552306,0.0053338474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017885827,0.00015039407,0.00011171763,0.001480623,0.008619549,0.002425574,0.0025742794,0.0016559298,0.00019714967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015435285,0.00009778402,0.01154643,0.00016074083,0.000016958464,0.00047087512,0.40382656,0.00008457839,0.00045297958,0.5265805,0.022863243,0.033745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030429826,0.00005877335,0.041951135,0.00036997517,0.000026007443,0.00025297576,0.49286675,0.00008650582,0.00019221847,0.02912259,0.4350245,0.000018165596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021423066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041812893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021423066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00378265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019154678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042596757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006457004","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708080493","title":"Limits to Liberalization: Local Culture in a Global Marketplace","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Liberalization; Political science; CLARITY; Autonomy; Free trade; Publishing; European union; Political economy; International trade; Media studies; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03530452985334464,"score_gpt":0.3171189862689688,"score_spread":0.28181445641562414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006457004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229583,0.0811747,0.0025082084,0.26064217,0.0009308418,0.000039469967,0.0000724427,0.00009782671,0.5622385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93938506,0.023067009,0.000593891,0.009228876,0.0004421379,0.00006316863,0.000032853593,0.000060784074,0.027126178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.0012350903,0.000037052934,0.00010614878,0.00023124012,0.00037000413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850154,0.0006742395,0.0002011373,0.000106707856,0.00014024678,0.00037613555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021723341,0.00040005732,0.00040709975,0.0009160002,0.0052774376,0.014521836,0.001007439,0.0023587716,0.008874064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00258113,0.00036360617,0.00023554465,0.0023394423,0.031115636,0.017506868,0.009657146,0.0043195374,0.0007739467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032271993,0.000059867056,0.0013207747,0.00018364939,0.000009471233,0.000385946,0.15310307,0.00022100942,0.00026258337,0.7448325,0.050938867,0.048649933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024606385,0.000057513967,0.0047640214,0.00105054,0.000014129032,0.00029722153,0.25674444,0.0003443609,0.0002072361,0.37257546,0.3638814,0.000039047947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008727025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013315954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014521836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060604364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047239955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043971777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008081560","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001921","title":"Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. By Stacie E. Goddard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 304p. $85.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01070577159856908,"score_gpt":0.24447773611080192,"score_spread":0.23377196451223284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008081560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019481845,0.7244764,0.00018754567,0.111321434,0.0019519228,0.000028229259,0.00019650083,0.000024072006,0.14233202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6097164,0.27007094,0.00051805476,0.007033416,0.0017331748,0.000079758276,0.00018823547,0.00006684492,0.1105932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932206,0.00033591938,0.00002470699,0.000053266776,0.00010540066,0.00015873597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929404,0.0003466911,0.0001227819,0.000026937134,0.00006446181,0.00014506634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420163,0.00090738665,0.00059306173,0.0017690422,0.0041829906,0.005203011,0.0009367815,0.0019034088,0.008706276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020665566,0.00074735784,0.0002662168,0.0030624368,0.012232877,0.0037413891,0.0023765462,0.0025875214,0.0010908108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018271581,0.000099457655,0.003806901,0.0013997555,0.00005685022,0.00049877155,0.0691814,0.0005830091,0.000297088,0.33909008,0.47126767,0.11353629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005493977,0.00004405123,0.028284062,0.0036719884,0.000024067514,0.00030777932,0.049221314,0.00023169984,0.00012233011,0.055406246,0.8625719,0.000059599548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17932144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38804498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17932144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015149883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005539571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35655534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015462235","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705310255","title":"Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Haven; Politics; Gossip; Safe haven; Foreign policy; History; Classics; Economic history; Political science; Art history; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01153325641600629,"score_gpt":0.31726741636611455,"score_spread":0.3057341599501083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015462235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010736982,0.3675968,0.00047283308,0.18764651,0.001189123,0.000011590275,0.000048212925,0.0000136931185,0.4322843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5400162,0.17567456,0.0007615008,0.01754461,0.002184043,0.000034472145,0.00006205395,0.000041705334,0.2636809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999382,0.0003132666,0.000012047139,0.000047626556,0.0001288957,0.00011613115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.0002336651,0.000058658108,0.000023035473,0.00009268752,0.00005613789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007431354,0.00039365157,0.00022375789,0.0013081577,0.0039022884,0.004038486,0.0003788083,0.0019126012,0.0037469189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017272794,0.00020548166,0.00014141135,0.0016361612,0.00840317,0.0034438414,0.0013333408,0.0025525654,0.000902374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001880603,0.000012472359,0.0004190462,0.00004893419,0.0000032184646,0.00007073671,0.004261692,0.0002925033,0.000068812435,0.8706327,0.10548423,0.018686786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060629372,0.000010016993,0.0012819428,0.0003822199,0.0000029350394,0.000072146424,0.0034263865,0.00021104341,0.000056789002,0.27524284,0.71929896,0.000008827008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06088532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11443106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06088532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071369344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037804728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12106186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016583115","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706820141","title":"Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Balkans: History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Constructivism (international relations); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Economic nationalism; Wish; Sociology; International relations; Law; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017591258232659168,"score_gpt":0.31497192377601546,"score_spread":0.2973806655433563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016583115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012199905,0.3570998,0.0016615664,0.119396865,0.0087359315,0.000018977475,0.00012479017,0.00006168336,0.5007005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4508781,0.31346637,0.0026760683,0.014917293,0.005467161,0.00008819062,0.00034208363,0.00011459787,0.21205015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997634,0.00009838964,0.000007123611,0.000029840741,0.00005200631,0.00004926315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998367,0.00005889867,0.000021349657,0.000012505329,0.000030988558,0.000039614257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055733236,0.00057631364,0.00036150508,0.000925559,0.001789585,0.0059937523,0.00039789017,0.0010413988,0.0037059744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000720816,0.0002385856,0.00022604503,0.0018313786,0.004818525,0.0036496054,0.0015521632,0.0025862248,0.0005422059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007257727,0.00002525325,0.0007891915,0.00012600893,0.000014270603,0.00008379152,0.0067991083,0.000296847,0.000068223315,0.6992091,0.2479663,0.044614647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029729101,0.0000055891537,0.0018422544,0.0003998581,0.0000049667983,0.000086178996,0.0045300312,0.00012052286,0.000038147864,0.14816545,0.8447977,0.00000627339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00639365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010975757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00639365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028611093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034636408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020758927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019430047","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070624","title":"How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Demise; Political science; Political economy; International relations; Foreign policy; Power (physics); State (computer science); Great power; Asymmetric warfare; Development economics; Politics; International relations theory; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03344908643533258,"score_gpt":0.30525754215533374,"score_spread":0.2718084557200012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019430047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009312567,0.10079598,0.1618504,0.10322661,0.004323341,0.00018848076,0.00031066663,0.00014544163,0.61984664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.765851,0.07174493,0.0421146,0.013645049,0.005558731,0.00074717554,0.0003292742,0.00033674887,0.09967248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812716,0.001054466,0.00006741818,0.00020243679,0.00028655116,0.00026192397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976853,0.0015103911,0.0002198952,0.00017341904,0.00020149739,0.000209455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030338506,0.0011059316,0.0008467134,0.0022414406,0.0042552254,0.008680621,0.002121302,0.0045112274,0.011619433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047981283,0.0008209465,0.0013461533,0.002952304,0.018517978,0.017861523,0.003916899,0.00687186,0.0023289032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048736733,0.0000068570857,0.00003827348,0.000026637603,0.000006222233,0.000023534947,0.00054225576,0.00058762985,0.000010764382,0.99017453,0.0055818604,0.0029965776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056952085,0.0000033570245,0.000027221677,0.000033146836,0.0000031728887,0.000022735669,0.0001485677,0.00045353954,0.000008100161,0.9816413,0.017648464,0.00000463155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031334457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023053577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011619433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037040662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025433202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03887081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019873701","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711003835","title":"A Stability-Seeking Power: U.S. Foreign Policy and Secessionist Conflicts. By Jonathan Paquin. Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010. 230p. $85.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.021767339612610175,"score_gpt":0.26798311008408743,"score_spread":0.24621577047147725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019873701","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01582209,0.50001216,0.00046745554,0.36413413,0.0019127532,0.000013112791,0.0002073553,0.00003438247,0.11739657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.683331,0.25008672,0.00046238574,0.007682991,0.0021844245,0.000025972156,0.00013389895,0.00004670866,0.056045823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959236,0.00023110765,0.000009412279,0.00003148105,0.000043548796,0.00009213312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.0005926644,0.00016767767,0.000027990505,0.00011687362,0.00020310374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011145927,0.0007157735,0.0003205231,0.0011445725,0.004472204,0.005147397,0.0006935202,0.002337778,0.00996166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018572411,0.0004846705,0.00025387472,0.0038861963,0.010501368,0.003975845,0.0015646301,0.0021005904,0.0007351993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009370045,0.000042201656,0.0041705356,0.0003417019,0.000028333821,0.00039288972,0.03618876,0.00038317475,0.00017821116,0.3346609,0.5441379,0.079381704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055594173,0.00005133086,0.029577864,0.0022251173,0.000037566744,0.0005524653,0.069713645,0.000824973,0.00026585272,0.19747387,0.6991818,0.00003983764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12003627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27559564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12003627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080104405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004722364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23867518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021138409","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706640279","title":"The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media and International Activism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Political science; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Civil society; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017333256217703732,"score_gpt":0.2969369660030163,"score_spread":0.27960370978531257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021138409","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01621063,0.47177815,0.00038495768,0.37125638,0.0028559198,0.00002093221,0.000034990724,0.00003300849,0.13742508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.524096,0.34754825,0.00058909674,0.042140596,0.009923129,0.00011417673,0.000057676894,0.00008838078,0.07544269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854076,0.0008991083,0.000019164298,0.00007767214,0.00017931424,0.0002840625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965758,0.0024423904,0.0003292382,0.00006835294,0.0001385943,0.00044563093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002590744,0.00094519433,0.00058028416,0.0028236492,0.0057891123,0.014442001,0.0008989473,0.006079311,0.012465369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032959136,0.00048884377,0.0002692611,0.0040956596,0.017340032,0.012790037,0.003694406,0.004679987,0.0011303142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115610615,0.00019999415,0.0017768827,0.0006459955,0.000035397647,0.00053125934,0.06460013,0.0001573126,0.0002680261,0.4308554,0.4189645,0.08184947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019577,0.000060866125,0.004745386,0.0022283308,0.000019874453,0.00032411033,0.08937528,0.00016871549,0.0001895346,0.101243906,0.80156875,0.00003500311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006710163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012930638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014442001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057381904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025555526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04170078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023611563","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710002823","title":"Defining the Sovereign Community: The Czech and Slovak Republics. By Nadya Nedelsky. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009. 340p. $65.00. - Governing the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Between State Socialism and the European Union. By John A. Scherpereel. Boulder, CO: First Forum, 2009. 263p. $65.00. - Governing the Post-communist City: Institutions and Democratic Development in Prague. By Martin Horak. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 270p. $61.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Eastern European Communism and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Slovak; State (computer science); Political science; Sovereignty; Socialism; Sovereign state; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.016077603751608598,"score_gpt":0.2535107732547926,"score_spread":0.237433169503184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023611563","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015805132,0.9286638,0.00031201748,0.03399913,0.0021534588,0.000015351303,0.00031395064,0.000034444776,0.032927252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10083862,0.7918025,0.0016874465,0.007689049,0.0021607599,0.00008031615,0.00089416775,0.00016738287,0.09467966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905545,0.00027011946,0.000107636864,0.00015885169,0.00023662875,0.00017128314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994223,0.00018355962,0.00012106532,0.0000341861,0.00009014726,0.00014867535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016303889,0.0017910796,0.00092822703,0.0028456957,0.002725803,0.007008901,0.0013138021,0.0025377884,0.01476389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018334028,0.0009905258,0.0005341827,0.005628301,0.0052111377,0.008575353,0.0039860546,0.0055791843,0.0043580597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008637463,0.00006809351,0.0018027206,0.0014314085,0.000047898167,0.00021565949,0.009933623,0.00048104374,0.0002753076,0.11480565,0.7226073,0.14824499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152169105,0.000013913177,0.008732469,0.0019187316,0.000013929109,0.00020146015,0.0060794353,0.000078094505,0.00008499632,0.022866314,0.9599664,0.000029084933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03996589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10762033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03996589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070215827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007439572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07946652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024787455","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703930155","title":"Meanings of War and Peace. By Francis A. Beer. College Station: Texas A&amp;M University Press, 2001. 256p. $39.95 cloth, $19.95 paper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Taste; Meaning (existential); Politics; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012985150889522725,"score_gpt":0.2633839297701622,"score_spread":0.25039877888063944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024787455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006431559,0.7548238,0.0010175364,0.04028276,0.008939159,0.00002799234,0.00031880604,0.00014192006,0.19380489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020905,0.4899532,0.0017951716,0.010441396,0.0040246425,0.00010646478,0.00054339954,0.00029398783,0.47193673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997584,0.000062114006,0.000019878025,0.00003910758,0.00008663217,0.000033868426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.00022548843,0.000063492116,0.00002425124,0.00011673201,0.00010203846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005147122,0.0016592005,0.0007554412,0.0018252253,0.0020042467,0.004908453,0.00095087994,0.0019172599,0.04391639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015216041,0.0012888354,0.00036003598,0.0031203553,0.00305599,0.009252754,0.0017952321,0.0046116468,0.023263108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017267395,0.0000189124,0.00013196318,0.0003178104,0.0000064914734,0.00006351784,0.0015029805,0.000065822736,0.00006767819,0.021884669,0.91733456,0.058588378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049943233,0.000008529045,0.0008109692,0.000904818,0.00000443305,0.00015651948,0.0015295331,0.00004310419,0.000037346672,0.013805053,0.98268616,0.000008527076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009803918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02011924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04391639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024904783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002231044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1469149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026178734","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713001126","title":"Fighting Hunger: The Cold War and US Foreign Aid","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Cold war; Foreign policy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; International relations; Order (exchange); Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014491975465521056,"score_gpt":0.27807964701176713,"score_spread":0.26358767154624607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026178734","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026635945,0.39912254,0.0004697247,0.20169729,0.0032076114,0.000007669723,0.00007526411,0.000015163434,0.36876884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6179313,0.27853844,0.00038146772,0.0353941,0.0048922766,0.000045983277,0.000102753715,0.000024203264,0.06268947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915755,0.00043201383,0.000016929032,0.000042500527,0.00011757376,0.00023352206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992187,0.0004406739,0.00012215483,0.000019624245,0.000073837706,0.00012495129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010562772,0.00032964573,0.00025849836,0.0016414735,0.0039443276,0.0072606564,0.0004738062,0.0023324213,0.005328057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019636957,0.0001459441,0.0002556964,0.0038802389,0.010368788,0.004300654,0.0018622642,0.0023091491,0.0003254588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007120661,0.000036727783,0.0033398222,0.00031593116,0.000033469678,0.00045175105,0.022298686,0.0006352813,0.000082740895,0.71995157,0.17650323,0.07627952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010713641,0.000027683058,0.0059860935,0.0010743693,0.000014322581,0.0002097076,0.029368654,0.00017845909,0.000057604026,0.12576625,0.83728534,0.000020733532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02693206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057230666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02693206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006997832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031784761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0535506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026722665","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709991861","title":"International Cooperation as Interagency Cooperation: Examples from Wildlife and Habitat Preservation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Wildlife; Legislature; Unit (ring theory); Political science; Variation (astronomy); Business; Environmental resource management; International trade; Economics; Ecology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.014079828174494338,"score_gpt":0.26457613831190696,"score_spread":0.25049631013741264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026722665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04071243,0.011479828,0.021024298,0.02481937,0.0004347024,0.00006878201,0.000054828542,0.00003792726,0.90136766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520456,0.011308801,0.006870834,0.0035244066,0.0002658618,0.0002473276,0.000099178025,0.00007954296,0.025558293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879666,0.007631385,0.00023254406,0.00050777185,0.001916342,0.00174548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944179,0.0033139465,0.00048250597,0.00047856983,0.0008022773,0.0005047708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005139772,0.0006427247,0.00034205973,0.0037743803,0.014721426,0.007980415,0.0012015159,0.004169397,0.0036110086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00742838,0.0002802569,0.0006574224,0.010136893,0.020328816,0.008084811,0.007980249,0.004908903,0.0005490559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007579509,0.000017729542,0.0007329007,0.000058351612,0.000005046601,0.00026550336,0.025410984,0.00031454372,0.000038702987,0.95854074,0.007748065,0.006859837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013992796,0.000021462363,0.004539145,0.00031141163,0.0000103276425,0.00050210184,0.046887908,0.00097194634,0.00016890006,0.26681978,0.6797252,0.000027737196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016385477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019291142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016385477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008398551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004978902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060936034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031779032","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704900370","title":"Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Politics; Dynamics (music); Normative; Political science; International relations; Corporate governance; Global politics; Sociology; Global governance; Position (finance); Foreign policy; Political economy; Social science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.010307734738570844,"score_gpt":0.31283434958083517,"score_spread":0.30252661484226434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031779032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027056592,0.08096484,0.01737855,0.13476053,0.0014353797,0.00005711215,0.0002542777,0.000118519834,0.73797417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484577,0.037343565,0.0041099982,0.0075712367,0.0013272323,0.000089326146,0.00017155879,0.0001978439,0.10073161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.0005542356,0.000029609933,0.00023830867,0.0002937151,0.00019356831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989673,0.00044140388,0.00014426891,0.00010587826,0.0001195468,0.00022160876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014698424,0.000523583,0.00048005255,0.0015652784,0.0047093644,0.009603645,0.0006845943,0.0021594032,0.020300701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518968,0.00038293935,0.0004952944,0.0030442828,0.017062247,0.018580545,0.009375821,0.0045388625,0.0021097672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082144015,0.000008501724,0.0002734683,0.000042799384,0.0000044129038,0.00005030108,0.0044718916,0.00016695655,0.00004147266,0.97318256,0.012976366,0.008773091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049259065,0.000009834161,0.00063162495,0.00016123748,0.000005285896,0.00011433133,0.0044809105,0.00019000156,0.000041147505,0.7847821,0.2095701,0.00000852325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032031334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034624003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020300701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043479064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023706611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06791264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041352576","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705510491","title":"Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Space (punctuation); Argument (complex analysis); Public space; Aside; Political science; Empowerment; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.039835240833230756,"score_gpt":0.29886043282169755,"score_spread":0.2590251919884668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041352576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024133036,0.20723845,0.0038673424,0.23080617,0.005351899,0.000095780095,0.000247248,0.00026957825,0.52799046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37006974,0.11732986,0.0053296834,0.025522089,0.0015989194,0.00035613947,0.00029946136,0.0003832303,0.47911084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992078,0.00030963172,0.000021740578,0.00010394098,0.00019785235,0.00015896093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996026,0.000087992616,0.00007369481,0.00004598844,0.00005722601,0.00013254369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010146498,0.00033205585,0.00029922323,0.0005545475,0.006472385,0.008903719,0.0010968648,0.0028195183,0.016316531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011068519,0.0005097686,0.00026278294,0.0013721205,0.007879968,0.015393574,0.0068925126,0.0029643814,0.0019645034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165253,0.000081526865,0.0009152527,0.00035824455,0.0000091762695,0.00024481208,0.029427642,0.00022028778,0.00023988499,0.41633937,0.44178912,0.110342965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036252038,0.0000096564845,0.00081231317,0.00027390872,0.0000030576605,0.00008162059,0.01137352,0.000049694172,0.000062126244,0.015898056,0.9714248,0.000007468296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036387704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1168486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036387704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006212637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007098865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07235181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041733759","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712002861","title":"Beyond Patronage: Violent Struggle, Ruling Party Cohesion, and Authoritarian Durability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"African studies and sociopolitical issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":409,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Elite; Political economy; Opposition (politics); Political science; Ideology; Solidarity; Scholarship; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Development economics; Law; Politics; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.022476273946467805,"score_gpt":0.3298682679186253,"score_spread":0.3073919939721575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041733759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590136,0.0005017214,0.001581136,0.001415057,0.00001806806,0.000014779807,0.000023786828,0.0000045880033,0.037427258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990252,0.00007428033,0.000078679244,0.000036798792,0.000012681872,0.0000051373117,0.0000072801768,0.0000015574211,0.0007583512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.00042885754,0.000031848675,0.000082948,0.000098213706,0.00049014826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950782,0.0017414592,0.0019633456,0.00022507817,0.00025388334,0.00073809153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015072908,0.00019712318,0.00025058043,0.0014678318,0.0041374206,0.004687848,0.000754222,0.0008075717,0.005186169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061910744,0.00012498425,0.00015771002,0.0014309441,0.007899182,0.00298141,0.0038274825,0.0013176567,0.00026709368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026137967,0.0003726675,0.43866497,0.00016486864,0.00006846287,0.0025352023,0.23647419,0.0015721715,0.0019373724,0.25167555,0.0024349873,0.06383823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058187943,0.0002895774,0.59544504,0.00040259052,0.00006511864,0.0012412393,0.28877726,0.003233595,0.0011736607,0.07078785,0.038467027,0.000058870868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053424044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008754864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053424044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001992724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006864082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017349482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044550001","doi":"10.1017/s153759270590025x","title":"Egalitarian Capitalism: Jobs, Incomes and Growth in Affluent Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Economics; Earnings; Inequality; Globalization; Wage; Economic inequality; Welfare state; Welfare; Development economics; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014382294026986375,"score_gpt":0.3212184531005783,"score_spread":0.3068361590735919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044550001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07550489,0.31197977,0.0021449034,0.16220605,0.0021192099,0.000021773843,0.00029760395,0.000048713715,0.44567713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84094954,0.12113397,0.00083393214,0.006830301,0.0018950609,0.000040467035,0.00011819791,0.000022484217,0.028175984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961746,0.00017022753,0.0000066839953,0.000028417722,0.000065570064,0.000111655936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960285,0.00020679642,0.000064863634,0.000018508237,0.000028618862,0.00007844265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764985,0.00043696977,0.0002943374,0.00097572454,0.0014809502,0.0045855874,0.00046144397,0.0011904472,0.003902163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014050197,0.0001545578,0.00014050343,0.003071193,0.0057902816,0.004923676,0.0018601986,0.0017538121,0.0003633482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414673,0.000051627976,0.0038580955,0.0001200383,0.000014575067,0.00015726847,0.013256924,0.00059882336,0.00006529033,0.8281582,0.104807116,0.04887792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013991891,0.000034825196,0.024990601,0.000749792,0.000012944259,0.000115892406,0.014584773,0.00045103816,0.000095366595,0.7044902,0.254442,0.000018520694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075072516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011800708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075072516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024197658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015822357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017556727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628031","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250156","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Normative; Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03240449493424419,"score_gpt":0.3493862008147741,"score_spread":0.31698170588052993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050912653,0.28266385,0.007866754,0.24344018,0.0031397187,0.000040273244,0.00007174965,0.000078797435,0.4576074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6108012,0.107397586,0.007418842,0.024424631,0.006518866,0.00020797193,0.00010648761,0.00018970024,0.24293476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740773,0.0014663375,0.0000600657,0.00024123743,0.0005124291,0.00031221152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982286,0.001099087,0.00021155845,0.00013618138,0.00014587937,0.00017865778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002837875,0.0005928478,0.00038245777,0.0008629823,0.0045446875,0.0070542432,0.00058313424,0.0033327737,0.00658438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037636738,0.00047627205,0.00036227962,0.0017066224,0.020644683,0.007371482,0.003522501,0.0056859558,0.0015531946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010226685,0.000013824201,0.000053696334,0.000072294155,0.0000049750747,0.000035834,0.002043022,0.00025432915,0.000049211976,0.9376579,0.04803794,0.011766753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008016982,0.000008865227,0.00016859744,0.00021088774,0.0000024918177,0.00003961254,0.00070935953,0.00016052293,0.000048795548,0.7076006,0.29103622,0.0000059921886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055844015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060074185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070542432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064545423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04683119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048353853","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003294","title":"Between Market and State: Directions in Social Science Research on Disaster","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Terrorism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Accountability; Storm; Publishing; Economic history; History; Development economics; Geography; Law; Meteorology; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11734908886417855,"score_gpt":0.4251646265131892,"score_spread":0.30781553764901065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048353853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005200507,0.46769726,0.019242506,0.4455655,0.0031417166,0.00004810222,0.0003520467,0.0000817655,0.058670606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40018886,0.5288604,0.01490036,0.030127648,0.011651461,0.00042702898,0.00037728003,0.00019125658,0.013275797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994616,0.0037507657,0.00013315548,0.0005499756,0.0005213556,0.00042883662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96385574,0.031301603,0.0011492741,0.0013876986,0.00097088167,0.0013348358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012075758,0.0014262865,0.0020461504,0.0072618257,0.0036691467,0.014623583,0.002306637,0.0064327638,0.016122717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014026556,0.0007479349,0.0011152572,0.012621579,0.043487523,0.04052687,0.0060114544,0.007074529,0.0012440627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019849265,0.00007416354,0.00092806556,0.00046662157,0.000044311313,0.00006995076,0.0043827556,0.0005441423,0.00003885853,0.9348333,0.03179623,0.026801785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001582372,0.000018684344,0.0010780734,0.00090715033,0.0000071382096,0.000049291706,0.0066577387,0.0007117558,0.000026996595,0.8969924,0.09351039,0.000024548373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00945928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008634609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016122717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009196822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007306028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06672788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048708683","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704470376","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.013846825684301596,"score_gpt":0.2967608833149278,"score_spread":0.28291405763062616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048708683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002413348,0.47122076,0.0005709478,0.119036324,0.0060648774,0.000025144882,0.0001612493,0.00003137226,0.40047592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20839688,0.3577526,0.0010098143,0.044413455,0.010963296,0.00020373192,0.00046914682,0.00011041491,0.37668067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902785,0.00039638556,0.00002923752,0.00012539412,0.00019173347,0.00022932571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952257,0.00021504507,0.00007317482,0.00004852347,0.00006178514,0.0000788845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013305531,0.0006849934,0.00037483455,0.0010290429,0.003142449,0.003973549,0.00076914264,0.0044031013,0.015996037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025153607,0.00041386316,0.00031214886,0.0015866191,0.007009641,0.00533325,0.0019298143,0.0048405947,0.0037786358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012728395,0.00002908692,0.00026659362,0.000063703854,0.0000056777167,0.000112875634,0.0017928206,0.000093238865,0.00003023249,0.6526434,0.31289855,0.032051075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009556258,0.000012308428,0.0011941104,0.0005076227,0.000003841186,0.00010841199,0.0009779643,0.00005228426,0.000025224927,0.1470467,0.85005397,0.000008024278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015144072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025909338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015996037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00315143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040218728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053512096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051333653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001076","title":"The Politics of Global Regulation. Edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. 289p. $24.95.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.0066473156493892915,"score_gpt":0.25742126826642675,"score_spread":0.25077395261703744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051333653","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006955613,0.8727686,0.001981638,0.028815344,0.0045316904,0.00001779306,0.0005388872,0.00013617123,0.0905144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037076212,0.79231894,0.0038827455,0.0055770334,0.0039965813,0.000118794786,0.00074640766,0.0003260882,0.15595712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994455,0.00017817786,0.000036472225,0.00010224695,0.00016723167,0.00007035156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999521,0.00021905579,0.00007895738,0.000053631575,0.00007591259,0.000051415114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009321674,0.0018074517,0.0011978808,0.0018978411,0.0011728789,0.0034681386,0.00100596,0.0020331242,0.025478203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015256889,0.0015133282,0.00073749083,0.0033785275,0.0037258798,0.0044044247,0.0014394027,0.003457392,0.008264271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751387,0.000032985427,0.00034151247,0.00074155483,0.000037490907,0.0000896695,0.00087261095,0.00069530413,0.00032768975,0.08632034,0.8059477,0.10455562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010576464,0.000009155707,0.0014769891,0.0011123888,0.000015245599,0.00015997583,0.0003935553,0.00020026922,0.00013333684,0.081665926,0.9148059,0.000016705191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012460721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029062418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025478203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034068776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036141654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08523309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056051810","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709090872","title":"Anti-Americanism and the Transatlantic Relationship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anti-Americanism; Political science; Transatlantic relations; Foreign policy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02526313394217033,"score_gpt":0.3025490768526887,"score_spread":0.2772859429105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056051810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27534312,0.0034906124,0.00018611796,0.034759644,0.00017975853,0.0000020355444,0.000024541167,0.0000046869004,0.68600947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99015826,0.0006931204,0.000030863986,0.001540524,0.00006777374,0.0000017272384,0.0000045553306,0.0000026404389,0.0075006573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986278,0.00070818333,0.000015005672,0.000085996646,0.00011974426,0.00044329363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988055,0.00039516666,0.00024440797,0.000050598457,0.00015118894,0.00035304116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012725531,0.00008058734,0.00010800486,0.00056415854,0.0048509864,0.0049364367,0.00020926046,0.0013075336,0.009863682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016955117,0.00006506402,0.00012302403,0.0011339854,0.004937034,0.0013508764,0.0017041934,0.002126714,0.00042800704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044021912,0.00005602876,0.0115129445,0.000021539112,0.00001339831,0.00031453196,0.014422349,0.0000660352,0.0002666424,0.9521848,0.008081679,0.0130160935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048245376,0.0000840734,0.07776246,0.00033770484,0.000043829157,0.0008966547,0.09706184,0.0005172287,0.000577527,0.28330806,0.5393224,0.000040007995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011048674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024996217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011048674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002159856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015786798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03299725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057930404","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705460156","title":"The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More Than Canadians Do, but Join Much Less","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Divergence (linguistics); Democracy; Value (mathematics); Political science; Core (optical fiber); Politics; Political economy; Soviet union; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015344373905142436,"score_gpt":0.27515576697914584,"score_spread":0.2598113930740034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057930404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09192656,0.03582341,0.00045652487,0.5623314,0.0031687203,0.000022336082,0.0005591206,0.000042875807,0.305669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8783883,0.018649844,0.00043277774,0.051707704,0.0008697651,0.000028343778,0.00024991538,0.00005948081,0.049613975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716455,0.0006181897,0.000028000524,0.00025290903,0.0011275352,0.00080884824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981006,0.0004066166,0.00018992022,0.000052393036,0.00047536075,0.0007752089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017208299,0.0003106629,0.00037635007,0.0015157214,0.020905023,0.0071045132,0.00090879964,0.0020688558,0.007012788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038113063,0.00022780403,0.00016580005,0.0053955084,0.012834818,0.003166507,0.0017263046,0.0032243824,0.00064028706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011270417,0.000052313033,0.022131294,0.00015701822,0.000041172847,0.00012817702,0.097023614,0.00008559931,0.00032659373,0.24138734,0.5573524,0.0812018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005454051,0.000036956924,0.10112546,0.00035669736,0.00003961135,0.00014882424,0.16935976,0.00015289351,0.00017955981,0.04777429,0.68070084,0.00007055139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8713961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9264853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12860388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027909635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026007306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25872248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064000534","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711000417","title":"<b>Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia.</b> By Dan Slater. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 342p. $85.00 cloth, $28.99 paper.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Computer science; Democracy; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03656707817967502,"score_gpt":0.25847563428747994,"score_spread":0.2219085561078049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064000534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009597542,0.32035312,0.003008859,0.1457117,0.00458313,0.0000405123,0.0002047035,0.00008546628,0.51641494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37069896,0.21927269,0.002292904,0.016123643,0.0045871115,0.0001358004,0.00033706945,0.00015590698,0.3863959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999826,0.00007767234,0.000007763425,0.000017731109,0.00003809066,0.000032698208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997563,0.00013296986,0.00003431628,0.000011784268,0.000033911114,0.000030666244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003962215,0.00042357654,0.00021885824,0.0007450954,0.0017485121,0.0030102776,0.0003877178,0.0009391127,0.0078860205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007805337,0.00025637576,0.00016219266,0.001511915,0.004325877,0.0044720764,0.001024647,0.0019486303,0.0012287662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000161577,0.000019659485,0.00086621405,0.00023319336,0.000008008182,0.00013555461,0.00978394,0.00017511098,0.00014775823,0.40166518,0.52306646,0.06388271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005988119,0.000014965423,0.0029188006,0.00052707765,0.0000046915834,0.00021780324,0.0062298933,0.00021242778,0.00016706389,0.18331306,0.8063789,0.000009338197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069488445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018185278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078860205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018235416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015792871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026381373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066213719","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070193","title":"Politics as Religion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Politics; Destiny (ISS module); Faith; Sociology; Democracy; Civil religion; Secularism; Religious studies; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01809328748502451,"score_gpt":0.3795926820366336,"score_spread":0.36149939455160907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066213719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004164076,0.7499671,0.0004553869,0.06254322,0.013244701,0.000019652207,0.00024557565,0.000087262095,0.17302065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048879996,0.36469254,0.0013993989,0.041953646,0.014766235,0.00012552812,0.00048057476,0.00027304617,0.5274291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961203,0.00015293455,0.000014718566,0.00006480858,0.00010294817,0.00005246407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975663,0.00009375993,0.00003630809,0.000019923214,0.00004404526,0.000049184375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052244536,0.0018034556,0.00055125466,0.0017302107,0.0020671445,0.00370442,0.0007098537,0.0035796785,0.044635728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010014657,0.00051045127,0.00033844291,0.0017640885,0.0031948418,0.004433601,0.0020052018,0.004253169,0.021300748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017286646,0.000017878265,0.00019800657,0.00025396704,0.0000066928123,0.00005253366,0.0010905926,0.00007945573,0.00007290246,0.07121694,0.8545512,0.07244248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034313864,0.000004565081,0.00046297288,0.0003262834,0.0000013770838,0.00007296771,0.00034413018,0.00002223478,0.000013003924,0.012372309,0.98637426,0.0000025098407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013793224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02396445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044635728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031665177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015522069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14932144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069063419","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072039","title":"State Feminism and Political Representation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; State (computer science); Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03971854252460363,"score_gpt":0.38985415436582016,"score_spread":0.35013561184121655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069063419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011445559,0.27674934,0.0022624687,0.08396173,0.0021758124,0.000017424883,0.000106882355,0.000038672362,0.623242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736619,0.09224048,0.000998678,0.0060695475,0.0034464856,0.00007593858,0.000120997975,0.00007300163,0.16035585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.0006129319,0.000018470588,0.000100331,0.00013141181,0.00014414839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996356,0.00021885765,0.000047410842,0.000031208114,0.000030517233,0.000036410554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010037042,0.00041878966,0.0002483094,0.0010151312,0.002213381,0.0052122646,0.00040568959,0.0015228298,0.010938288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013186622,0.00018950028,0.00019308463,0.0018895377,0.011162878,0.0036229417,0.0016842313,0.0017529157,0.00094224245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007852711,0.000012029856,0.00026013464,0.00007074406,0.0000034515454,0.00003602635,0.007649535,0.00009221813,0.00005879993,0.9097226,0.053018067,0.029068485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057097727,0.000010595457,0.0014047461,0.00035865698,0.000003537838,0.00009598896,0.0067209178,0.00011769957,0.000104836035,0.32822075,0.6629505,0.000005981811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004068839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005806894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010938288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028544527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017112235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036592185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077544977","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003349","title":"Politics, Identity, and Mexico's Indigenous Rights Movement. By Todd A. Eisenstadt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 226p. $82.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Movement (music); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Social movement; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.016160265268947833,"score_gpt":0.2541141739307817,"score_spread":0.23795390866183383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077544977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001144462,0.90990096,0.00022369847,0.063018754,0.001610447,0.000009087833,0.00012339096,0.00002458939,0.023944568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10202319,0.7585882,0.0012509555,0.006797673,0.00392359,0.00009885562,0.00022385134,0.00007686229,0.12701677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996809,0.00014092997,0.000019097262,0.000043532928,0.00006666934,0.000049052305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.0002861098,0.000093669514,0.000022168631,0.00005264887,0.000074536474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011918684,0.001301721,0.0004520374,0.002153339,0.0030915549,0.0031787162,0.0008788799,0.0024053964,0.013837011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014404579,0.00080289686,0.0003066489,0.0032337813,0.0048361984,0.005285717,0.0017139545,0.0034436127,0.0020289354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051849132,0.000056756835,0.0011408774,0.0009232848,0.000022130396,0.0002159184,0.008656259,0.0002291497,0.00020809947,0.103519134,0.7547323,0.1302443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018519053,0.000025630492,0.011423576,0.0033139852,0.000021817988,0.00035800785,0.0075184973,0.00023531924,0.0001627233,0.04419845,0.9326974,0.000025976156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057081137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121866636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057081137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005016771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00311826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11349779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078136211","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704320979","title":"Republicanism in the Modern World <i>and</i> Citizenship and Identity: Towards a New Republic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03449697359383265,"score_gpt":0.3314959499616626,"score_spread":0.29699897636782996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078136211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2284912,0.011889447,0.0023284608,0.13839947,0.00046236496,0.000012102794,0.000044323286,0.000018501662,0.61835414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897648,0.0011107342,0.00021940823,0.0021059895,0.00012972682,0.0000064294104,0.000008492229,0.00000476053,0.006649596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986123,0.0008229916,0.000022713506,0.00008178815,0.00011847123,0.00034167207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916947,0.00024805707,0.00018674525,0.000065412234,0.00009164539,0.0002387465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017398926,0.0001110034,0.00012587145,0.0007314438,0.0045484817,0.006956262,0.0003299435,0.0015300259,0.0026685176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014348023,0.00009085073,0.00014088201,0.000911461,0.021582182,0.005688577,0.002961098,0.0026617304,0.00017754915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040171626,0.000012179605,0.00084177643,0.000005434795,0.0000012062054,0.00001858814,0.009283734,0.000022704966,0.000030727235,0.983993,0.002597174,0.0031895142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011591001,0.000020326823,0.009006276,0.00008850967,0.000005984841,0.00009746905,0.031845976,0.0002736404,0.00017695122,0.8166548,0.14180332,0.000015153371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052652485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013047647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006956262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031357869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037189708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022751808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081248826","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704300976","title":"Lubavitchers as Citizens: A Paradox of Liberal Democracy.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013822581477690058,"score_gpt":0.3249335392256549,"score_spread":0.3111109577479648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081248826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22979622,0.01479298,0.0029995597,0.3289137,0.0006142216,0.00002399476,0.0001866378,0.000069000234,0.4226038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839993,0.0019074621,0.00024853513,0.0045867995,0.00014796192,0.000017520606,0.000031737098,0.00001926888,0.009041484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978254,0.0010082354,0.00004392158,0.00019324466,0.0002911711,0.0006380769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687284,0.0017947645,0.0004323553,0.0001946447,0.00027655513,0.00042892728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025172,0.00018928666,0.00039417014,0.0012982659,0.007685494,0.008777926,0.0006386242,0.0036834003,0.004477846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069647953,0.00022332116,0.0001624705,0.002143907,0.017019324,0.008861319,0.00462502,0.0039204783,0.0004466284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014959418,0.000007836631,0.00047653212,0.000012527404,0.0000017017237,0.000035606954,0.00538649,0.0000613139,0.00003508311,0.98274416,0.0078059044,0.003417885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003517561,0.000011408017,0.0026168518,0.00008410464,0.0000066849966,0.00008924931,0.013824813,0.0003278563,0.00015819917,0.89164,0.091191866,0.000013802844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010092102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013682919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010092102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047927806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004559108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034774184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083864172","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071319","title":"Innocent Women and Children: Gender, Norms and the Protection of Civilians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Rest (music); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; History; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.019550318236567454,"score_gpt":0.28131959367641585,"score_spread":0.2617692754398484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083864172","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05462095,0.4679773,0.0003420914,0.29973307,0.001620247,0.00003536016,0.00019654354,0.000023863377,0.17545062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7595672,0.17614162,0.00038436364,0.011089803,0.0011785303,0.00008558509,0.00007640146,0.000038008046,0.05143835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976943,0.0015061981,0.000042930267,0.00010538473,0.0003268715,0.00032429004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969959,0.0017212764,0.00040255676,0.00007922761,0.00021891578,0.00058207265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033914316,0.0005527876,0.0004674753,0.0011355139,0.0054883403,0.0065002157,0.0008049338,0.0026042773,0.007817449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004880246,0.00042450387,0.00011885528,0.0018959164,0.0201045,0.0054935403,0.002826638,0.0029439488,0.00070372596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072934396,0.000117721655,0.010370902,0.0004172075,0.000024933453,0.00059405,0.3653155,0.0001377618,0.00023363635,0.29223564,0.21711612,0.11336367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025372232,0.00005655906,0.023591146,0.0026067223,0.00001885515,0.00042522413,0.44381842,0.000058897767,0.00011796736,0.073713124,0.45552364,0.000044120887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1030765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21716405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1030765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004707226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007289288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20495307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085992404","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706370363","title":"Origin Stories in Political Thought: Discourses on Gender, Power, and Citizenship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Legitimacy; Narrative; Identity (music); Power (physics); Nationalism; Sociology; Wright; Mythology; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; History; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.046665545604668235,"score_gpt":0.3761987000919047,"score_spread":0.32953315448723647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085992404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082993805,0.1709636,0.0048920126,0.18265425,0.0026025933,0.000050368333,0.00025724203,0.00008415383,0.555502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107724,0.032525495,0.0007451698,0.0053471015,0.00089857593,0.00009276804,0.00010472162,0.000092977505,0.049420796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964882,0.0026964077,0.00004740498,0.00011905195,0.00031039963,0.00033852636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954266,0.0036312283,0.0003213,0.00010078173,0.00017359202,0.0003464939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002971551,0.00080138457,0.0004779944,0.0014432281,0.010121684,0.009683313,0.001054376,0.0036075055,0.006085933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004809148,0.0003864331,0.0001808273,0.0036418405,0.03679812,0.012316397,0.0045055794,0.0040441747,0.00059438957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021796568,0.0000136112,0.0004906713,0.00012347761,0.0000042727715,0.00041940628,0.47477695,0.000034331846,0.000064775275,0.46300736,0.050053466,0.01098996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014470633,0.000018112942,0.0023211257,0.00081071554,0.000008068097,0.00034800536,0.36890024,0.00011712983,0.0001674738,0.13059935,0.49667564,0.000019738836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026542343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043877486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026542343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008243424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032032686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05981052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086860722","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003120","title":"Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Autocracy; Social media; Political science; Political economy; Framing (construction); Public sphere; Elite; Commons; Democracy; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Economic system; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.08634624639930258,"score_gpt":0.36786662746571325,"score_spread":0.28152038106641064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086860722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5098706,0.00684863,0.026163833,0.059243765,0.0005991187,0.00009291318,0.000101479854,0.00025583734,0.3968238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518025,0.0007046964,0.0007007074,0.0005677827,0.00013423526,0.00001863863,0.000008768051,0.00001871713,0.0026661803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656904,0.0023238559,0.000077488316,0.00026600246,0.0004349547,0.00032870952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921908,0.005146374,0.0009700901,0.0010064563,0.00029059162,0.0003956797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003915809,0.0002968903,0.00024118565,0.0025924242,0.004352686,0.01397608,0.00085935293,0.0016399076,0.003957429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007030865,0.00024409407,0.00025202663,0.0017613053,0.023401663,0.0107271345,0.0065178354,0.0020317603,0.00041454448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005954724,0.000048840328,0.008188695,0.00012331804,0.000027205833,0.0004175539,0.049278602,0.00059476896,0.0010104101,0.8838059,0.0029548444,0.053490337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033277553,0.00013263489,0.017967306,0.0009863228,0.00005260789,0.0007155945,0.08393972,0.005628147,0.0041484474,0.66935927,0.21696387,0.000072830226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014553276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018235936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01397608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002475438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019311393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020708978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086862524","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703990153","title":"Legalization and World Politics. Edited by Judith L. Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. 319p. $24.95","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Political science; International relations; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.013246564288692982,"score_gpt":0.2725980685205719,"score_spread":0.2593515042318789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086862524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044909274,0.9057431,0.0012830733,0.020509357,0.0044725086,0.000016784834,0.00033349937,0.000095508905,0.06709717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025874637,0.8402632,0.0026580314,0.0057563423,0.00684243,0.00011593861,0.00064282597,0.00022004785,0.11762661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950314,0.00017967253,0.000032873217,0.00006977163,0.00016443947,0.000050140727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991014,0.00052542245,0.00009937588,0.00006235567,0.00012479514,0.000086661144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009861848,0.0019983316,0.0014614349,0.003014392,0.0017088848,0.0044359397,0.0011264312,0.0023709836,0.032434415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020361955,0.0013807649,0.00057346903,0.00552346,0.004406267,0.007630769,0.0019745785,0.0035324101,0.01081346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023052238,0.000040637286,0.00035014382,0.0006173514,0.000025660625,0.00009707503,0.0013317612,0.000343404,0.00017507716,0.08117152,0.80356103,0.11226337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116743795,0.000010404799,0.0012451621,0.0011697204,0.000010296396,0.0002286571,0.0006650269,0.00014127488,0.000060875143,0.08195023,0.9144929,0.0000137471125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012160034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027044982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032434415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030767457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003140975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10850388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090727359","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070703","title":"Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Appeal; Human rights; Democratization; Politics; International relations; Political science; Promotion (chess); Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Criminology; Democracy","score_opus":0.047705611713386206,"score_gpt":0.24860614002034176,"score_spread":0.20090052830695554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090727359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029383497,0.23513037,0.0038160132,0.2917649,0.003592965,0.00006037138,0.00013111372,0.00008514144,0.43603563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6805828,0.12984987,0.0039908146,0.027653709,0.0030086718,0.00019466739,0.00012787874,0.00023790105,0.15435374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925655,0.0003597745,0.00001637838,0.00007312152,0.00013528063,0.00015888443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990717,0.00048417083,0.0001551299,0.00003415847,0.000067596826,0.00018708882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021507845,0.000623728,0.00031451412,0.0023742386,0.00822002,0.007955448,0.0010114767,0.003055268,0.006653758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002389993,0.0005650459,0.00030063756,0.0027016865,0.015051526,0.018937295,0.0050430135,0.0056025777,0.00073257176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017814753,0.000030351144,0.0006348412,0.00011794157,0.000005873982,0.0003226181,0.18139108,0.00006664919,0.00011718077,0.6519071,0.14830013,0.017088486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005328287,0.000014057164,0.0012266717,0.0006984731,0.000004985225,0.00029734377,0.12994015,0.00011201583,0.000088919616,0.09963949,0.76795906,0.000013509104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020055884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02901113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020055884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044588977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030859357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03987831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092213686","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703410153","title":"Reason and Horror: Critical Theory, Democracy and Aesthetic Individuality. By Morton Schoolman. New York: Routledge, 2001. 348p. $85.00 cloth, $24.95 paper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0377871597839886,"score_gpt":0.3396110491212492,"score_spread":0.30182388933726056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092213686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005705988,0.8794985,0.002961371,0.08876331,0.002805661,0.000041835592,0.00010885447,0.00008026349,0.025169615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06512782,0.7844067,0.010034149,0.020181749,0.0081885485,0.00053043297,0.00033037981,0.00032591537,0.11087423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984347,0.0008006829,0.00008140014,0.00021336104,0.0003592173,0.00011065499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573344,0.0029554714,0.00035117628,0.00019400456,0.00049072836,0.0002751731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003425778,0.0027280787,0.0010613585,0.0049011037,0.0028074032,0.005541287,0.0022495643,0.00588771,0.013700762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007448859,0.001786169,0.0006766766,0.0071140253,0.014094743,0.019337283,0.003142824,0.0075892196,0.0044625737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004860276,0.000052950854,0.0003035938,0.0009602762,0.000026106196,0.00016382718,0.005795101,0.0005659068,0.0001301834,0.17218545,0.7223224,0.09744563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033704957,0.00002260915,0.00081910385,0.0040789046,0.00001888345,0.0002764738,0.0038224715,0.00040781288,0.00013437503,0.3188385,0.6715125,0.0000346308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017323863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028642304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017323863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005836889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005623131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045833588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098075126","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003118","title":"The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis: The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation. Edited by Wyn Grant and Graham K. Wilson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. 320p. $99.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Financial crisis; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Theology; Philosophy; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.017012518098074064,"score_gpt":0.2068257628412135,"score_spread":0.18981324474313946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098075126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006167698,0.7147727,0.0013177576,0.21408391,0.006128964,0.000016611519,0.00015303053,0.000032879772,0.06287737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058934346,0.805952,0.002489161,0.03928796,0.012236538,0.00009425488,0.0002485605,0.00018847875,0.080568776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981481,0.0008620047,0.00007704061,0.00018973264,0.0005467952,0.00017649023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806374,0.0011041648,0.00032521336,0.000081520884,0.00025516798,0.00017020934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023968003,0.0017086741,0.0010187741,0.0022422173,0.0028392328,0.006746466,0.0013599558,0.0051733507,0.015868735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047534173,0.0010007174,0.00057023554,0.0042185416,0.011067232,0.010508322,0.0031184824,0.008609327,0.003959826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003397851,0.000025216703,0.00021650964,0.00048771058,0.00001849292,0.00008125091,0.0018561239,0.00026006106,0.0001661567,0.20620805,0.7418208,0.04882573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012640738,0.0000105154695,0.0007218305,0.0009751052,0.000009554423,0.00010962597,0.00089369563,0.00009854409,0.000119039985,0.15523379,0.84179515,0.000020534779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015869576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022095246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015869576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058769668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007199501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05308616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099334900","doi":"10.1017/s153759270999291x","title":"Global Gender Inequality and the Empowerment of Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Empowerment; Eleventh; Gender studies; Narrative; Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.026567930301866115,"score_gpt":0.35833891503066095,"score_spread":0.33177098472879485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099334900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096891455,0.027925443,0.0014721124,0.12588689,0.0013572015,0.000023374256,0.000054612574,0.000032888027,0.74635595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93374735,0.011511373,0.00031230607,0.006503207,0.00068506703,0.0000572131,0.000029069772,0.000034613517,0.047119647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984553,0.0008933525,0.000018196142,0.00009453895,0.00017120947,0.00036748682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922824,0.0004798843,0.00008224875,0.000047630307,0.000037048172,0.00012496237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016605329,0.0004813915,0.00039108394,0.00085337297,0.0053573647,0.008956055,0.00043646732,0.0020526152,0.007175907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018482633,0.00014993171,0.00021713825,0.0013551958,0.020321285,0.0054675243,0.0055052526,0.0022224477,0.00048072985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001854985,0.000020815345,0.0012700901,0.000056146044,0.000005133042,0.00018027594,0.0613511,0.000085979125,0.00014207693,0.89822674,0.018953104,0.01968995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016913737,0.000042362542,0.0041984883,0.000558919,0.000010301061,0.00023893728,0.13198328,0.00016153311,0.00029918703,0.39368,0.468798,0.0000120368095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025794904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005301294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008956055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002850426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029277217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02400577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100231123","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714000863","title":"The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Autocracy; Political economy; Political science; Indigenous; Politics; Social movement; Victory; Democracy; Authoritarianism; Contentious politics; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013317650170929477,"score_gpt":0.31524216933300137,"score_spread":0.3019245191620719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100231123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2799166,0.002736172,0.09464578,0.023096021,0.0006029524,0.00023823089,0.00030126798,0.00010624949,0.5983567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97816604,0.00050189934,0.0033359001,0.00040169214,0.00020513691,0.00009323564,0.000052976084,0.000018828683,0.017224334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871933,0.0007102422,0.000034101966,0.00014957545,0.00015112819,0.0002357971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876654,0.0006269199,0.00023901464,0.00011162623,0.00011129151,0.0001446165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544922,0.0003120697,0.00036348836,0.0021687804,0.003865502,0.0038886634,0.0010007828,0.0015618006,0.013748133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027673813,0.00022673034,0.0005375773,0.0016353187,0.00572582,0.0040776134,0.0024161532,0.0011956259,0.0008409334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018255878,0.0000345701,0.0023305984,0.000028035905,0.0000067419646,0.00009366538,0.0032893582,0.0011056795,0.00004046487,0.98572785,0.0014621195,0.005862749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073418174,0.00011334872,0.0116431555,0.00017691881,0.00002585255,0.00029005675,0.011682942,0.01714205,0.00013425903,0.8427927,0.115894355,0.000030987398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006540269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066199596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013748133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012068328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045992136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104222669","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705660252","title":"Shocking Mother Russia: Democratization, Social Rights, and Pension Reform in Russia, 1990–2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Politics; Pension; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.018272237686952495,"score_gpt":0.3061799641999776,"score_spread":0.2879077265130251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104222669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5376723,0.25761974,0.0003230245,0.11076819,0.001444628,0.00003891129,0.0025397702,0.000041814652,0.08955161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87783426,0.10342031,0.00013762042,0.001159955,0.00047916162,0.00003240706,0.0008049472,0.000010729564,0.016120639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979645,0.000057794554,0.0000075951143,0.000018226632,0.0000503335,0.0000696615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994299,0.00015592041,0.0002260185,0.000012050153,0.000048938276,0.00012710958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047580875,0.00019512563,0.00021600212,0.00085904915,0.001006778,0.0012362566,0.00031759022,0.0006497298,0.002117463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016070809,0.00019451986,0.00009138892,0.0025813472,0.0009402359,0.0011300499,0.0009992465,0.0012686502,0.00024441685],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025753665,0.00017861037,0.11753372,0.00085063366,0.00009213788,0.0005826907,0.15141925,0.0012841342,0.0005144967,0.17532821,0.41039392,0.14156467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026048654,0.00006325252,0.55724746,0.00071787107,0.000057733407,0.00022632035,0.041963495,0.0003700384,0.00027841373,0.006902095,0.3921278,0.00001956303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13133197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32039788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13133197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051488015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004470109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104730993","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002090","title":"The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Authoritarianism; Dictatorship; Democracy; Political economy; Politics; Political science; China; Legitimation; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02134019514510362,"score_gpt":0.293421882800041,"score_spread":0.2720816876549374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104730993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95723486,0.00032380392,0.00018435578,0.000785078,0.000005150749,0.0000048126785,0.000022535964,0.0000022504275,0.04143721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00010324491,0.000024289226,0.00001699806,0.0000016053485,0.000001756034,0.0000063633584,6.8582654e-7,0.00045705074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951935,0.00016992602,0.000026175616,0.000049050082,0.000038450027,0.00019700281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867934,0.0004632165,0.0004439757,0.000066684275,0.00010869079,0.00023806749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011658714,0.000098158824,0.00013270884,0.0011094016,0.0020199614,0.0035496019,0.00038349628,0.00045609998,0.0041668536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001993517,0.00008359459,0.00015400024,0.0014100174,0.006912412,0.002104959,0.002781884,0.0010959948,0.00014415193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012071563,0.00011504516,0.37197924,0.0000823608,0.000041037165,0.0035373857,0.08471014,0.0011812045,0.0010143371,0.5179137,0.00073934277,0.018565511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034673438,0.00016518348,0.6457818,0.00026673463,0.0000786065,0.0017455324,0.2619207,0.0020049945,0.0027855856,0.051351517,0.03381796,0.00004671342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011666765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02937956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011666765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029814425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017330783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02319771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104910264","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072192","title":"Modernizing Political Science: A Model-Based Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.06729568481957704,"score_gpt":0.4317742896870379,"score_spread":0.36447860486746086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104910264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008765494,0.0077316244,0.801303,0.060776133,0.00067570776,0.00015020274,0.00020776803,0.00031652377,0.120073535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6074453,0.011269242,0.3599604,0.004545289,0.0017450298,0.0007788137,0.00025000653,0.00030158096,0.013704331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99131995,0.0063936454,0.00022966396,0.0005618861,0.001126091,0.0003688124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98457277,0.011635393,0.00070486637,0.0018209115,0.00084668095,0.00041939836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011928974,0.001350558,0.0013488868,0.0046971617,0.0027711962,0.010029698,0.0037776306,0.0040229117,0.0052368045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01603588,0.0009665056,0.0021758324,0.0028157188,0.015614357,0.011604863,0.005032037,0.008042818,0.0007234887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034014436,0.000011840388,0.000091949005,0.000031632502,0.000014938518,0.000023493005,0.00021688733,0.008075272,0.00002183387,0.9878106,0.00082570396,0.002872341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035944256,0.0000041999133,0.00002277009,0.00003285306,0.0000049519836,0.000012155448,0.00006815257,0.009593709,0.00002447246,0.9832924,0.006935838,0.000004911948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041872673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011928974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009004123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06532973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105967908","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071514","title":"Neorealists as Critical Theorists: The Purpose of Foreign Policy Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Foreign policy; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Public sphere; Deliberation; Presupposition; Political science; International relations; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017114374927363594,"score_gpt":0.39042810169337133,"score_spread":0.3733137267660077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105967908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0139848245,0.054166056,0.011615181,0.77444375,0.004925678,0.00004629806,0.00004054713,0.000098445795,0.14067927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726435,0.019130949,0.006636179,0.07433278,0.010054998,0.00031493796,0.00004925622,0.0002453977,0.016592149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.975503,0.019961262,0.00031006974,0.001226642,0.0019959568,0.001003107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951311,0.04094655,0.0013229231,0.0024569868,0.002123355,0.0018391717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03466612,0.0011199804,0.001222103,0.0060485224,0.0122846505,0.028911123,0.002847596,0.01363116,0.0031319924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031108694,0.00064049463,0.00067597587,0.0032650866,0.11946959,0.032997046,0.009544805,0.020647723,0.00068148377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092430255,0.000008561471,0.00004128684,0.00003709459,0.0000024176206,0.00001928997,0.008772568,0.00008504334,0.000025102012,0.9856983,0.0031476167,0.002153433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013609853,0.0000045762577,0.000030077059,0.00020822916,0.0000023026544,0.000020111644,0.005779757,0.00033480572,0.000067042776,0.94450766,0.049022723,0.000008979064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003063414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018624628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03466612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019065434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008945143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18333417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106599748","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703000057","title":"Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Campaign finance; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political action; Action (physics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05730253961832161,"score_gpt":0.39127253180462107,"score_spread":0.33396999218629947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106599748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049724735,0.022199677,0.006365065,0.5011879,0.0008945774,0.000040364852,0.00008683102,0.00003627943,0.41946453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580954,0.012767081,0.0011833796,0.013942178,0.0013661751,0.00007861956,0.00006164908,0.000018057717,0.012487334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98795694,0.00855611,0.00019778147,0.000668697,0.0012952321,0.0013252633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722596,0.02292913,0.0016673103,0.00089661416,0.0011903553,0.0010570552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012376001,0.00041478226,0.00057851616,0.003871502,0.0058006397,0.013224676,0.0012443169,0.0064602387,0.0074368967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030981513,0.00023889929,0.00033801165,0.0052851504,0.034569092,0.010727894,0.004983563,0.004292983,0.0006217269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020908985,0.00006511381,0.0010490622,0.000104707564,0.000011724515,0.00006579144,0.005507896,0.00090776524,0.000037539172,0.95933276,0.0080512175,0.024845548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021236861,0.000013688241,0.0014826993,0.00028140083,0.000008554127,0.000020304746,0.0062056435,0.00073757325,0.00014196016,0.9285565,0.06251654,0.000013882811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010577493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009743734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013224676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012302843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013228455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0892638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107801218","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704360974","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Environment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.01855846093915664,"score_gpt":0.2614025783638405,"score_spread":0.24284411742468387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107801218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020452095,0.087367564,0.011704424,0.12057085,0.0007528172,0.000024616409,0.00010872265,0.00006166784,0.7589573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356918,0.014979149,0.0021207673,0.007532557,0.000827576,0.000055515135,0.000040633404,0.00003916627,0.038713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534285,0.003185511,0.00005818348,0.00023741109,0.00056820025,0.0006078297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975684,0.0016403409,0.00023028323,0.00020902362,0.0002003221,0.00015152417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032975369,0.0004147275,0.00030291273,0.001109725,0.004196276,0.0072290697,0.0005100104,0.0032870956,0.0052978047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038681705,0.00016726457,0.0002504402,0.0017261937,0.016161907,0.005378766,0.002382821,0.0023285046,0.00060547004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034131554,0.0000049321666,0.00006687297,0.000014972037,0.0000023714497,0.000016962726,0.00069810316,0.0002195614,0.000018978157,0.9922559,0.0040517366,0.0026462108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062796717,0.000006157548,0.00039911474,0.000081028455,0.0000031415148,0.000023134393,0.00089494797,0.00016566148,0.00006364632,0.88504857,0.11330441,0.000003966939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006985169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010018961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072290697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053962944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004577259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03915304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108036419","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705940498","title":"The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":352,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Political science; Bond; Credit rating; Bond credit rating; Geopolitics; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Finance; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.01618803932196746,"score_gpt":0.22983294195892157,"score_spread":0.2136449026369541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108036419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007950995,0.23543143,0.0028241237,0.5285682,0.0026638075,0.000018756753,0.00010869297,0.00005234519,0.22238168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52488947,0.21351464,0.0027076667,0.048678532,0.012194053,0.00010878554,0.00010059473,0.00010678475,0.19769949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832267,0.0007036469,0.000045755205,0.00019277794,0.0005723212,0.00016284653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978613,0.001172723,0.00036384026,0.00009526108,0.00023038138,0.0002763907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003523904,0.00054740463,0.00033806,0.0011596411,0.0037272149,0.010463125,0.0007441726,0.0048567583,0.010018085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064055906,0.0006181411,0.00016611448,0.0028948933,0.0095475465,0.014899237,0.0023698425,0.0063279714,0.0014989282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024873756,0.000022721368,0.00087159115,0.00003725393,0.0000049690234,0.00006126964,0.0026429603,0.00014066808,0.00007598155,0.6444974,0.31498903,0.036631305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018310162,0.00001476986,0.0038087594,0.00033369652,0.0000067125193,0.000080715065,0.0024072076,0.0004886283,0.0000685257,0.28055468,0.7121892,0.000028774926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020120462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042477746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020120462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068129054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030442323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049431264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.038291639937745425,"score_gpt":0.3127088943739497,"score_spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109547388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008274965,0.08427382,0.0012093203,0.22856548,0.0012441501,0.000008544723,0.00006380393,0.000028705334,0.6763312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684833,0.029560545,0.0009545006,0.022430358,0.0031518487,0.00004165021,0.00006261418,0.000051215782,0.075264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850756,0.00085042376,0.000028589851,0.00012885823,0.000269073,0.00021548022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980703,0.0011918253,0.00017109318,0.00015165088,0.00015919452,0.00025595442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018050607,0.00028343417,0.00027174546,0.0010425022,0.0036621771,0.0066718194,0.00042618797,0.0022903231,0.009195023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039054037,0.00020110155,0.00020754068,0.0012689559,0.018769521,0.0048199957,0.002784327,0.0046726232,0.0010004239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051655525,0.000007772374,0.00012546933,0.000014760294,0.0000016087795,0.000020583797,0.0010753444,0.00012581523,0.00001356068,0.9687673,0.02438676,0.005456016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057762377,0.000004641275,0.0003980425,0.0001449146,0.0000012949539,0.00003284239,0.0015239832,0.00012835098,0.000024152525,0.7842656,0.21346478,0.0000056228405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035409974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053576366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009195023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004266844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036354167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030958235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110072580","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250259","title":"Feminist Interpretations of Niccolo Machiavelli","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015324258821863718,"score_gpt":0.318377463730526,"score_spread":0.3030532049086623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110072580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011091276,0.10022772,0.0012558736,0.23125784,0.0020914443,0.000025739806,0.000064552565,0.000028995652,0.65395653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6528757,0.056505676,0.002728195,0.03635339,0.004737358,0.00035855683,0.000085469626,0.00014402719,0.24621166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987331,0.0007885776,0.000017313301,0.00012483136,0.00018649679,0.00014975079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955827,0.0002386568,0.00007040715,0.000033329103,0.000057329653,0.000042036176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013748902,0.000722491,0.00036304627,0.0013462526,0.0069918004,0.004537701,0.0009962252,0.0021339871,0.0028514995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021522555,0.0002849599,0.00023546607,0.0013324071,0.01516268,0.0026616075,0.0027256513,0.0033380522,0.00050946575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021305099,0.000012835092,0.00025984846,0.00006336903,0.0000030676051,0.00013039162,0.048000157,0.000074348274,0.00009127516,0.83309746,0.10622794,0.012018067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036507545,0.0000034623804,0.0008510846,0.00027885794,0.000001795778,0.00008674735,0.007579965,0.000053031083,0.00006836048,0.061773323,0.92929405,0.000005746128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01578851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036193866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01578851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008740322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029724187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063415766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111153168","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706380140","title":"Which Rights Should Be Universal?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023438673340410176,"score_gpt":0.3111496647261748,"score_spread":0.2877109913857646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111153168","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013322835,0.50931084,0.0020993948,0.24842057,0.0071137524,0.000031352418,0.00021934898,0.00005256018,0.23141992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19831601,0.40542856,0.003805934,0.083363175,0.012206862,0.00020696688,0.00037949052,0.0001818659,0.2961112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.00034950933,0.000025720841,0.00014287687,0.00015498402,0.00008407953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.000324681,0.000054869135,0.00003529449,0.00006128489,0.00007039252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013930432,0.0010459975,0.00043788005,0.00087122375,0.002219074,0.0036065935,0.0007810649,0.0025633129,0.013884865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002759603,0.00044242592,0.00033547962,0.0008435646,0.009261732,0.009029516,0.0019410104,0.0050917873,0.0035297007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015237476,0.000017447508,0.00016089465,0.0002520249,0.000008311219,0.00004155467,0.0025209966,0.00009149167,0.000076953605,0.47099838,0.49073985,0.035076886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007821878,0.00000745683,0.00065599964,0.00084459095,0.0000049541395,0.000108706234,0.0019500804,0.00008334613,0.00005389818,0.26289496,0.73337966,0.000008398856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007960775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012423966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013884865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030172248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019603933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046449542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112029610","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704750379","title":"Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Politics; Momentum (technical analysis); Political science; System dynamics; Test (biology); Public administration; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012284376158252265,"score_gpt":0.2819742723982254,"score_spread":0.26968989623997314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112029610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083028115,0.04298629,0.0057040267,0.14244625,0.0011396884,0.0002612728,0.003232881,0.0002755663,0.720926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81895494,0.023953767,0.0057280646,0.0043851254,0.00012043769,0.00013433887,0.0011993389,0.00014357103,0.14538036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963062,0.0004273118,0.00009241217,0.00032080218,0.0014527756,0.001400509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693894,0.00038006634,0.00017998286,0.00007848012,0.0015557104,0.0008669723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001917867,0.00048936263,0.00049138616,0.0026542472,0.019122919,0.008870177,0.0017261681,0.0018544667,0.012889204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007945628,0.00050984125,0.00044525508,0.008415039,0.0063805045,0.0022459733,0.0033377113,0.0032280611,0.0007167226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005644474,0.000040864594,0.008921577,0.0002276611,0.000033873257,0.00031257645,0.02220025,0.0044486085,0.00023466494,0.6656236,0.2049566,0.092943236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003792951,0.00001575371,0.026522843,0.00033253443,0.00002792022,0.00008321284,0.012870239,0.0035381957,0.00024024853,0.054689895,0.90153897,0.00010221727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99797934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67961824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32038176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3308073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7882608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113541125","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711004919","title":"Is There a Trade-off between Multiculturalism and Socio-Political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":309,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Citizenship; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.04268001777465765,"score_gpt":0.37404366716036486,"score_spread":0.3313636493857072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113541125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85348225,0.0039245207,0.0006283668,0.009494293,0.000053411888,0.000009258864,0.000024396046,0.000004915756,0.13237856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983583,0.00064279564,0.000082633975,0.00027270502,0.000022417697,0.0000058458145,0.0000058992878,0.0000016471274,0.0006077442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981317,0.0011399443,0.000046156016,0.00013076034,0.00013204583,0.0004193503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979882,0.0010777464,0.0003856214,0.00013002669,0.0001495538,0.0002689077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003413786,0.0001640052,0.00036545726,0.001855603,0.0039655874,0.0070795957,0.0005168511,0.001041453,0.0047508106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041437712,0.00010894906,0.00020596379,0.0018022716,0.011539278,0.0035104589,0.0045788516,0.0011013856,0.00011161966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011767319,0.00017371673,0.072908856,0.00029583374,0.000072065865,0.00058501225,0.20120198,0.00031496322,0.0007777148,0.68006545,0.0012222191,0.04226449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030494084,0.00019079953,0.16756049,0.0012803287,0.000098172204,0.000541107,0.68846357,0.0005977725,0.0010436497,0.08029817,0.059848137,0.000047313202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073568355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017132113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073568355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030036545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015646614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021793187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114429929","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706630272","title":"The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Private security; Security forces; Political economy; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016451859507438195,"score_gpt":0.30830500737431676,"score_spread":0.29185314786687855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114429929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031231893,0.05510588,0.001164138,0.6917956,0.0015523208,0.000018189769,0.00014562247,0.00003479681,0.21895155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81621945,0.05049763,0.00059499807,0.05807366,0.0024371783,0.00007757115,0.0000843562,0.00009673838,0.07191839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982236,0.0006761726,0.00002807885,0.00014021789,0.00034954894,0.00058242766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970048,0.001439244,0.0005705,0.00019690904,0.00025535657,0.00053309737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027766135,0.0002757196,0.00035781748,0.00065693294,0.0053258585,0.0077862553,0.0007117857,0.007047356,0.02103607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00619348,0.00029326935,0.00042742683,0.0014509473,0.016669659,0.012523355,0.004417808,0.006943516,0.0014148792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005408463,0.000059173115,0.00089177676,0.000052590723,0.00001093447,0.00024437084,0.0028714535,0.00039711932,0.00012855521,0.8268178,0.15219802,0.016274214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000644529,0.00006258665,0.004854049,0.00048412802,0.0000129312475,0.00043023445,0.009398291,0.00078784593,0.00017496137,0.5279602,0.45573273,0.000037623377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017729605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02103607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006051301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005463144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07037264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116386840","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709992660","title":"Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Boy Scouts; Meaning (existential); Girl; Identity (music); Diversity (politics); Materialism; Sociology; Population; Gender studies; Genealogy; Political science; Law; Demography; History; Psychology; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03984199710744856,"score_gpt":0.3092407352709108,"score_spread":0.2693987381634622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116386840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8766784,0.004308699,0.0005251268,0.04189571,0.00031483863,0.00001571075,0.000075279466,0.0000068368195,0.076179355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966016,0.0007676358,0.000078670855,0.0012779621,0.000105093364,0.000010281854,0.000015266187,0.0000034580623,0.0011399236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969627,0.0017528913,0.000047551694,0.00025528108,0.00031470676,0.00066689466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559444,0.0019454615,0.000712466,0.00012505986,0.00035522762,0.0012673251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038108123,0.00025943908,0.00030355193,0.001773791,0.008608928,0.0064539188,0.0010834406,0.0014440013,0.0039998316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004047904,0.00010965781,0.00021141839,0.0019127096,0.020868376,0.00523128,0.0046868734,0.0025302493,0.00016802964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077088014,0.00019989694,0.1232049,0.000092695474,0.000022893033,0.0005567535,0.676574,0.00013229364,0.00034855964,0.17270562,0.005826125,0.020259274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011268073,0.00006551797,0.083818436,0.00017751842,0.000012913341,0.00016308705,0.8747632,0.000115774594,0.00014206635,0.018557966,0.022151016,0.000021339856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04130246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06410504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04130246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00572067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003770187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082124114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116593380","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091129","title":"Cloaked in Virtue: Unveiling Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of American Foreign Policy. By Nicholas Xenos. New York: Routledge, 2007. 168p. $125.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Virtue; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02565373559184473,"score_gpt":0.2682822068594854,"score_spread":0.24262847126764067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116593380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009297247,0.17192887,0.0035873253,0.37387788,0.002865211,0.000019440142,0.000043027216,0.000058241527,0.4383228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7255273,0.065425605,0.0027080763,0.043323644,0.0031948015,0.0001044012,0.00003945044,0.00018474089,0.159492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985915,0.0010176097,0.000020462063,0.00007686424,0.00014907983,0.00014451546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859685,0.001030066,0.00008952728,0.000060702972,0.00014024196,0.00008266184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024515898,0.0005501838,0.0003484323,0.0015936078,0.006950068,0.006070596,0.0007001578,0.0038302469,0.005486914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037626135,0.0003300347,0.00021380438,0.0018522984,0.018666487,0.010165243,0.0026674187,0.005507365,0.0007447326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017263621,0.000009203719,0.00015019071,0.000050661503,0.0000029826745,0.00006480818,0.014520669,0.000068025925,0.000039327006,0.89840925,0.07302054,0.013647023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308403,0.000013874424,0.0005885913,0.0006853663,0.0000067197475,0.00009397969,0.01742902,0.00029345014,0.00014371345,0.41555715,0.5651577,0.000017379689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020672204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048744638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020672204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064335684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00326005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04667896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121025856","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710000526","title":"East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability. Edited by Kent E. Calder and Francis Fukuyama. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. 296p. $25.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017076575358865916,"score_gpt":0.2618130679683392,"score_spread":0.24473649260947328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121025856","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018527905,0.91253924,0.0013187176,0.029312648,0.0034175534,0.000010669837,0.000334482,0.00007698947,0.051136974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060233474,0.85565186,0.0020307507,0.0017457716,0.0028747052,0.00003624771,0.00037676224,0.00012024646,0.07693026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998124,0.000076346,0.000011357044,0.000022661567,0.000044793112,0.00003243223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997459,0.00007460079,0.00004673334,0.000017514712,0.00005858455,0.00005663348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075848965,0.001585824,0.0007194082,0.0013034348,0.00072811317,0.0030976287,0.00072229584,0.0010299811,0.019985395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008043204,0.00071219855,0.00040994695,0.0034135054,0.0017728346,0.004108421,0.0012574674,0.0019614059,0.004422103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007527451,0.00003807886,0.0012381208,0.0009466224,0.000068614805,0.0002951518,0.0016742265,0.0010048102,0.0005247468,0.0695417,0.7491587,0.17543395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020901238,0.000023702598,0.0068040197,0.0016280798,0.00004890573,0.00048044894,0.0020847856,0.00058053766,0.0004543722,0.07579724,0.91205335,0.000023645793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011301461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021700015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019985395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020991226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031401138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066857874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122126892","doi":"10.1017/s153759270707199x","title":"Globalization and the Future of the Welfare State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Welfare state; Latin Americans; Welfare; State (computer science); Political science; Social Welfare; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.009248154182283457,"score_gpt":0.3130587238818024,"score_spread":0.3038105696995189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122126892","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017544425,0.7722236,0.001011106,0.117062636,0.021241369,0.000019469158,0.00011345267,0.000050690855,0.08652329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083481885,0.74826473,0.0018993077,0.01851483,0.023597777,0.00008452258,0.00023552163,0.00010053868,0.12382088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954385,0.00022462745,0.000019511031,0.000049853676,0.00009520037,0.000066867135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965644,0.00016606535,0.00004681909,0.000015441577,0.000050816598,0.00006444867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081502344,0.0013032517,0.000496593,0.0017955167,0.0016304238,0.0057367897,0.00088793563,0.0024819567,0.0068161385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011843183,0.00035825968,0.00047114538,0.0024081578,0.0036396817,0.005537693,0.0024854548,0.0035191486,0.0011702464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015960963,0.000025820327,0.00035827555,0.0003537982,0.000015053396,0.00010707098,0.005816645,0.00034279661,0.000067874695,0.27673766,0.6440028,0.07215619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004099291,0.00000859693,0.0008112612,0.0009657956,0.000005906189,0.00009436681,0.0023280694,0.0000913497,0.000036055106,0.08226589,0.9133778,0.000010829196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004714622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075566117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068161385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029043052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035082095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022802293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123584274","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003623","title":"Privatization and Protest: Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the Occupation of Public Space in a Democracy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public space; Appropriation; Politics; Democracy; Normative; Political science; Space (punctuation); State (computer science); Sociology; Power (physics); Public administration; Public sphere; Meaning (existential); Political economy; Autonomy; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02416930735949389,"score_gpt":0.3095735242333488,"score_spread":0.28540421687385487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123584274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3838281,0.007814171,0.0030914266,0.08993038,0.00049418176,0.000030403913,0.000047696736,0.000027437774,0.5147362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98166156,0.00061172195,0.00008303854,0.0010032738,0.000055217402,0.000009065849,0.000005508509,0.000007916987,0.016562598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711597,0.0014676893,0.000040878873,0.00017986791,0.00038532366,0.00081026024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882454,0.0005728397,0.00016059633,0.000058614907,0.00007653469,0.00030687012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015750028,0.00028613844,0.00021983679,0.00079146744,0.021342868,0.0093790945,0.00068914506,0.0027523285,0.00381005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017933275,0.00026679516,0.00018832512,0.0011112166,0.05458082,0.0042033014,0.0056662154,0.0030249432,0.00016988843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014225113,0.000012120226,0.0009146026,0.000027031876,0.0000040156815,0.00027079496,0.1577549,0.00020665399,0.00012291847,0.83220714,0.005818066,0.0026474865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025824265,0.000046180437,0.0078122145,0.00023935997,0.00002232022,0.00026326423,0.43793792,0.000769675,0.0005097093,0.13717544,0.41514552,0.00005256251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3732282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55142415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037806332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010797237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74211156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125534817","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709990156","title":"From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive Adaptation. By Michael Kenney. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007. 293p. $45.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Terrorism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010330965112548048,"score_gpt":0.22888837421128289,"score_spread":0.21855740909873483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125534817","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020404365,0.8374894,0.00041863404,0.110016264,0.0030217778,0.000014848036,0.00011655898,0.000032108088,0.046849884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12551977,0.7233061,0.0009966303,0.011211552,0.0052806786,0.00008965354,0.00020619477,0.00008744944,0.13330196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997228,0.00013704419,0.000009171639,0.000033707205,0.00004557702,0.000051709943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946696,0.00024783082,0.000078066994,0.000019216131,0.00006337192,0.00012452998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068242155,0.0012175947,0.0005534732,0.0013765981,0.0027472498,0.0046419073,0.0008559619,0.0025772036,0.024273561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001237767,0.0007771671,0.00030758587,0.002651763,0.005078071,0.0075159497,0.0024202783,0.003773011,0.0035050039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005558353,0.000056842757,0.001035824,0.00066317106,0.000018660421,0.00021203054,0.0079651745,0.00019808083,0.00011848041,0.09571864,0.79554933,0.09840823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017443715,0.000030318692,0.005672261,0.0027642958,0.000016347287,0.00042977885,0.0150469,0.00024290312,0.000092178125,0.05987318,0.915796,0.000018452653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01898194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04823771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024273561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024719164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023594396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08120322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127322932","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709992684","title":"What do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Expansive; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02528375718134915,"score_gpt":0.35678201306026414,"score_spread":0.33149825587891496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127322932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192322,0.0012493207,0.001899899,0.0023938885,0.000027848408,0.000029534478,0.00047634676,0.000009522756,0.07468145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985122,0.00019229283,0.0001994039,0.00006830033,0.0000088359675,0.000010882781,0.00007169865,0.000002844135,0.00093341904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705863,0.0011792879,0.00009700959,0.00028653364,0.00081482413,0.00056383654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914403,0.005955739,0.0009316441,0.0004615966,0.0007551328,0.00045556578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038237115,0.0001814271,0.00041844553,0.0044299318,0.0027614436,0.004479685,0.000562991,0.00060678634,0.003954449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013787608,0.00013039948,0.00031978416,0.0049532615,0.008219161,0.0038029295,0.0025375276,0.00074790255,0.00019845384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002962232,0.00007432662,0.25536245,0.00019401066,0.000082658604,0.00025826885,0.5389235,0.000239645,0.001340507,0.1348037,0.001986296,0.06643852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014141845,0.00007945224,0.4768879,0.000264762,0.00006028444,0.00024774225,0.4562303,0.00082657096,0.00040125917,0.039161775,0.025784316,0.000041507832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11106748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15732267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11106748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048230137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032173619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128105653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071733","title":"Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0418533646812325,"score_gpt":0.359923822845677,"score_spread":0.31807045816444446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128105653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010379468,0.06433544,0.02528118,0.39777195,0.0022508204,0.000041556115,0.00008775241,0.00007190792,0.4997799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069226,0.034155343,0.010445431,0.054969482,0.005201528,0.00025325755,0.000081377955,0.00024219161,0.08772868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909842,0.005809364,0.00017664481,0.00060048746,0.0016772449,0.00075206935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947915,0.0037574228,0.00030053477,0.00042592,0.00046609124,0.000258585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008832399,0.00091124565,0.0008340628,0.0013385637,0.00471793,0.010747414,0.0010941791,0.0056630303,0.0067089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010127065,0.00039769692,0.0004874641,0.0019799815,0.045614667,0.015605556,0.0067218966,0.01096948,0.001569522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005558653,0.000005886542,0.00003705039,0.000011629928,0.0000023056473,0.000014415793,0.00096010434,0.000051568455,0.00001687859,0.9864966,0.008872006,0.0035259183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067502683,0.0000052661667,0.00009792763,0.00006362277,0.0000015913438,0.00002255321,0.0004563087,0.000100420046,0.000034368128,0.95810896,0.041097507,0.0000047237454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005018278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051051076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010747414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007134962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038236063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051768005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129048296","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706060221","title":"Mexican Immigrant Political and Economic Incorporation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.010487854063929788,"score_gpt":0.2886398727923599,"score_spread":0.27815201872843015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129048296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3962674,0.0012586056,0.00020315421,0.011916572,0.00034722144,0.000061654275,0.00045927527,0.000015945127,0.58947015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929679,0.0026416513,0.00026455766,0.0020669142,0.00019721626,0.00008898486,0.00048430343,0.000014356498,0.10127416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996598,0.000093853014,0.000008335881,0.0000234126,0.000057896705,0.00015664852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997048,0.00003272169,0.00005978476,0.000025755417,0.00007487791,0.00010205552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714466,0.00017676486,0.00014011863,0.0010644636,0.0043932977,0.0030478262,0.0004010566,0.00044980482,0.018444568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013613183,0.0000800935,0.00019035868,0.00091759366,0.00086932804,0.00095695246,0.0026856153,0.00086218666,0.0009471095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004198043,0.0009635937,0.12713018,0.0002420478,0.00004191772,0.0028713094,0.13298556,0.00018170499,0.0011038231,0.3750278,0.12513337,0.23389882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024789468,0.00006498946,0.14910778,0.00031032422,0.00002106979,0.0003763325,0.14934757,0.00021107792,0.00027938385,0.004963246,0.69527376,0.000019643325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024120416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053630635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024120416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019822244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014077346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061703205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132262134","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708080468","title":"Islands of Agreement: Managing Enduring Armed Rivalries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Conflict resolution; Agreement; Neglect; International conflict; Armed conflict; Political science; Resolution (logic); Phenomenon; Conflict management; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.021900488944771795,"score_gpt":0.2958075384813768,"score_spread":0.273907049536605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132262134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044464543,0.05867889,0.15289654,0.06623471,0.0023748595,0.0004037794,0.00018809513,0.0014198404,0.6733388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6404482,0.032322545,0.072645485,0.0050788475,0.00069473987,0.00047028382,0.00034226783,0.00044073284,0.24755682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991955,0.0002955257,0.000023187396,0.00006824234,0.00024448082,0.0001729096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916184,0.00030471504,0.00012483388,0.00005377345,0.000099782665,0.00025509376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014974452,0.00047295605,0.00033833468,0.0006809621,0.0019389874,0.0036165786,0.0013715429,0.0016229377,0.01714021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026439503,0.0003250346,0.0002333638,0.0010590708,0.0024605654,0.009375405,0.0072668428,0.0023571253,0.0030930205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238797,0.0001493105,0.0012822368,0.0003899745,0.000032394448,0.00078245974,0.009449215,0.007895641,0.0014809523,0.29612893,0.25273052,0.4295544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026304044,0.000120522505,0.0011168413,0.0003040647,0.000023324392,0.00041450188,0.010511604,0.008868959,0.00089854875,0.17471068,0.80297107,0.000033515356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038512144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006668745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011811436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002469022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057339728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135373554","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003386","title":"<i>Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development</i>. By Justin Crowe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. 328p. $80.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011082267787910511,"score_gpt":0.2530248284594771,"score_spread":0.24194256067156658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135373554","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010541261,0.5234974,0.0010486133,0.38145354,0.0035902034,0.000014155909,0.000111975365,0.00005391916,0.08917601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15654624,0.5252667,0.004147465,0.09020543,0.011742906,0.00012237589,0.0003113831,0.00020796641,0.2114495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883896,0.00055149704,0.000032015054,0.00011191009,0.00032230705,0.00014328814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843603,0.0008521505,0.00017714339,0.00007303807,0.0002031174,0.00025846108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012327002,0.0006287858,0.00031384855,0.0016304944,0.0037422015,0.007253827,0.00094637077,0.0029799019,0.010144661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033231166,0.00056790916,0.00026237313,0.0026369218,0.009245505,0.009890365,0.0028733038,0.004871093,0.0026754097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006850921,0.000011389453,0.00023325032,0.00010635488,0.0000054200727,0.000041786465,0.0009673403,0.000060030594,0.000071455404,0.12636912,0.8458797,0.026247377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005344936,0.0000050785457,0.0009469407,0.00050251436,0.0000030685894,0.000057004825,0.0011912343,0.00008239243,0.00009009608,0.12013585,0.87696767,0.000012843779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02623853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07324415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02623853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056269877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006335946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052171588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136325762","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071551","title":"Europe's Democratic Deficits through the Looking Glass: The European Union as a Challenge for Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Context (archaeology); Normative; European union; Globalization; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; History","score_opus":0.032723160392688806,"score_gpt":0.330345928964575,"score_spread":0.2976227685718862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136325762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048859537,0.031004054,0.0060277428,0.4391831,0.003838353,0.00002007829,0.00003867196,0.000080193844,0.47094828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228812,0.007901744,0.001441209,0.044901047,0.0013006687,0.000041849296,0.000030636704,0.00007351676,0.021428129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929986,0.0042571677,0.00012836586,0.0004972688,0.00087193603,0.0012467224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967236,0.0020712588,0.00024445576,0.00027712068,0.00022896791,0.0004547122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008033184,0.00033809093,0.00066202733,0.0014353769,0.009369937,0.019101633,0.00079949445,0.007911669,0.003303438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00813296,0.00025895078,0.00068458426,0.0018848806,0.024662813,0.017411392,0.009410767,0.010481769,0.0003453444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009317219,0.000007264414,0.00013968654,0.000016688016,0.000003136584,0.000049684084,0.003319606,0.0001681126,0.000025641702,0.9823867,0.0077151656,0.0061590113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001161976,0.000011965607,0.00036982924,0.0002195708,0.0000058857554,0.00005355938,0.0042827646,0.00022111951,0.000050203897,0.8600708,0.13468905,0.000013574709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049743145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007112237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019101633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070669367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006511231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05127442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137157836","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713000911","title":"Afghanistan: What Went Wrong?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Afghan; Insurgency; Political science; Legitimacy; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Terrorism; Development economics; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01885707935037703,"score_gpt":0.3026460609155396,"score_spread":0.2837889815651626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137157836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01493481,0.033273008,0.00016277359,0.9309494,0.007205316,0.000007658176,0.00008181929,0.00001622574,0.013368958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.503121,0.0979012,0.0006400077,0.37402847,0.009453696,0.000046349185,0.00022587701,0.000061185536,0.014522213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768925,0.0010915517,0.0000862141,0.00019371959,0.0002735388,0.000665714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982918,0.0005171416,0.00014843183,0.000074153344,0.0004338681,0.000534596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038669824,0.0005513056,0.00052099925,0.0013771186,0.011622582,0.008817337,0.00069009245,0.0060070455,0.0061662938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049524084,0.0002063601,0.0003690821,0.0021541365,0.011748791,0.009845086,0.0025078703,0.009553117,0.0014921863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017298675,0.00019002828,0.026617171,0.0009540627,0.00011089523,0.0034610997,0.108597375,0.00016334101,0.0006680488,0.15818211,0.39434347,0.30653948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045653807,0.00009987612,0.015886009,0.0026244505,0.00004613935,0.0021366477,0.34058592,0.00013442543,0.00036610125,0.1082894,0.52968144,0.00010391338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03959915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046152137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03959915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058428273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009004522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07873732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138034957","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071927","title":"Reprogramming Japan: The High Tech Crisis Under Communitarian Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Industrial and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Outsourcing; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Economic history; Law; Communism; Politics","score_opus":0.033067148031156575,"score_gpt":0.3111729667146258,"score_spread":0.27810581868346923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138034957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01821822,0.18553357,0.0007215598,0.66701096,0.015198096,0.000032516316,0.00019757186,0.00011818761,0.112969376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33726463,0.25014973,0.0016493107,0.20870712,0.015886808,0.00014995334,0.00042622714,0.00028089128,0.18548536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999432,0.00018748552,0.000022644173,0.0000568945,0.000110748515,0.00019008781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952984,0.00011614766,0.00007254409,0.00002444179,0.000063826206,0.000193125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010946513,0.0007137314,0.00030003168,0.0005904087,0.004648694,0.008163415,0.00048666622,0.003907371,0.0062439865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010165448,0.0003670774,0.0002930539,0.0011611361,0.0045384686,0.011289378,0.005016392,0.0060231164,0.0016792301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047669564,0.000024370995,0.00113901,0.0002695395,0.000009607213,0.000785298,0.022014875,0.0001303178,0.0006272099,0.07379891,0.84684664,0.054306515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082702,0.000018494757,0.0030388555,0.00030576173,0.000005117367,0.00022790862,0.015143103,0.000072979004,0.00012646058,0.011599641,0.9694296,0.00002379217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014351309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03039095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014351309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004103944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039569647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029776335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138748776","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706680146","title":"Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Surrender; Argument (complex analysis); Social policy; State (computer science); Political science; Welfare; Moral responsibility; Public policy; Social Welfare; Political economy; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03465644369722955,"score_gpt":0.32996338052889235,"score_spread":0.2953069368316628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138748776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028205984,0.12643945,0.0023513215,0.79402006,0.0036446261,0.000017117078,0.000039929862,0.000037794776,0.070629105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.568357,0.20030057,0.0036100992,0.13375105,0.009025326,0.00018872214,0.00011611908,0.00020046537,0.08445075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951887,0.0031898571,0.000083692335,0.00032849412,0.0007340758,0.0004751226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974082,0.0016150877,0.00020030944,0.00020680831,0.00023341621,0.00033618085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052167466,0.0006181411,0.00049229024,0.0009246719,0.0049161804,0.0102545535,0.0009971572,0.0053884787,0.0041153333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062315953,0.0003740373,0.00043509644,0.0014698593,0.033189822,0.014857171,0.0063247876,0.010264533,0.0010157257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016477825,0.000020890238,0.00011218553,0.00009952822,0.000006132325,0.000070854396,0.006948153,0.00018032374,0.00008931731,0.8086651,0.1585946,0.025196489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134172205,0.000015726133,0.00030377985,0.0005294424,0.000004848313,0.00006510416,0.0048096594,0.00014804625,0.0001420496,0.5187307,0.4752241,0.00001305352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007923041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102545535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008317796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012285108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06035012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147231010","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070545","title":"Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Democracy; Census; Face (sociological concept); Audit; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Social science; Politics; Law; Management; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.026861235988642054,"score_gpt":0.3515364850421814,"score_spread":0.32467524905353934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147231010","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09949075,0.41264102,0.00083758414,0.1989288,0.0017684659,0.000041242885,0.00016412024,0.000036963258,0.2860911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88364166,0.07252334,0.00040393602,0.004291313,0.0006598953,0.000044013286,0.00011986471,0.000027510365,0.03828839],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810034,0.0011529683,0.000045919587,0.000081401675,0.00032070387,0.00029872908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987966,0.0005417941,0.00014797505,0.000045642573,0.00012385233,0.00034417174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015515042,0.0002656137,0.00032679917,0.00080313097,0.0022783775,0.005655013,0.00035898038,0.0012428962,0.0046839006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024650581,0.00022599373,0.000105412684,0.0032670328,0.009431099,0.00249962,0.0021625245,0.0016256014,0.0005509216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052795844,0.00007232472,0.011956303,0.00077668286,0.000031834912,0.00028865592,0.16853242,0.00030990434,0.00029761868,0.28359422,0.28832707,0.2457602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000194322,0.00006016632,0.07286797,0.0016458617,0.000011122001,0.00023079533,0.0866303,0.00015411952,0.00007649702,0.06206501,0.7762059,0.000032859472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111589484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005529113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051359623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10388976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148157538","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705050413","title":"Humanitarianism as Political Fusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Politics; Power (physics); Identity (music); Counterintuitive; Political science; Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025387804993796635,"score_gpt":0.36011569874060817,"score_spread":0.33472789374681156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148157538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018451087,0.012865923,0.012781405,0.078338705,0.0011747571,0.000033741748,0.000022047048,0.00005293399,0.8762794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581362,0.0040920745,0.0020845062,0.008104356,0.0012870384,0.00007096562,0.000027404521,0.00005527952,0.026142187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991548,0.0047990642,0.00018544437,0.000782317,0.0012333494,0.0014518147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770194,0.0011030384,0.00030841416,0.00025157104,0.00021780466,0.00041734686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007193757,0.0006123658,0.0005837245,0.0020062088,0.010297588,0.012196057,0.0007934315,0.0035993322,0.0056014457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040450124,0.00034451523,0.0006167388,0.0018526616,0.06452125,0.011701058,0.01320271,0.006245839,0.0008241986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031431914,0.0000029514488,0.000030430869,0.000006398573,0.0000013887196,0.000016858092,0.0016500265,0.000063843676,0.000015806458,0.99601114,0.0010791299,0.0011188999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095293335,0.000009881837,0.00007987958,0.000032945078,0.0000021707888,0.000036742764,0.0013582571,0.00011153812,0.00005455185,0.9302125,0.0680864,0.000005712006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024503516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001682466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012196057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008151305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00473036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059142172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151031264","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705610158","title":"The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Competition (biology); Politics; Electoral system; Political economy; Regionalism (politics); Realigning election; Economics; Socialism; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.012896219900699129,"score_gpt":0.2607792895908995,"score_spread":0.24788306969020038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151031264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49935102,0.12068309,0.0007409304,0.08747789,0.00057679095,0.000106589265,0.0021961995,0.00006422441,0.2888032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697435,0.01612727,0.00024583723,0.0006858914,0.0001275202,0.0000251984,0.00049972313,0.000014864064,0.0125302235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977946,0.00034811953,0.000033486947,0.00011420094,0.00054512057,0.0011644136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729925,0.0007129486,0.00033983157,0.00005779834,0.0006884035,0.0009018593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015879424,0.00028050822,0.0005732177,0.0031038695,0.009307528,0.006088711,0.0013249012,0.0011168459,0.007544031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004598768,0.00028874213,0.00028968375,0.012076304,0.010142914,0.0019715382,0.0025651008,0.0017525761,0.0003405214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023683702,0.00019649089,0.12414599,0.0004047318,0.00011169474,0.000380584,0.05087394,0.0022621593,0.00022205568,0.5136232,0.17584515,0.13169725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008041074,0.00005198951,0.6273401,0.0006880096,0.00009266188,0.00017380071,0.05169458,0.0017406835,0.0002125773,0.06669128,0.25112903,0.000104840685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06440798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06440798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061905857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46731478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152247345","doi":"10.1017/s153759270909121x","title":"Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. By Irene Bloemraad. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. 382p. $60 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Political science; Gerontology; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.008568834593389899,"score_gpt":0.24841647173300246,"score_spread":0.23984763713961257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152247345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.361848,0.15438402,0.0007940709,0.32569596,0.0052431407,0.00027307947,0.0010548156,0.000107583175,0.15059935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7839233,0.1123286,0.0013239331,0.01777643,0.00031295713,0.0002088517,0.0004689408,0.00011930032,0.08353765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781513,0.00067526323,0.000044492885,0.00010975106,0.0005222762,0.0008330288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975969,0.00043521528,0.00010856046,0.000038552294,0.0004874849,0.0013333155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034706378,0.0008713798,0.00077163585,0.0023800682,0.0338044,0.012759398,0.0021370822,0.0031897011,0.008840233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003607385,0.00058872043,0.0004860663,0.0053027174,0.01210578,0.008138138,0.010208279,0.0048178,0.00058227975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034648856,0.00008084254,0.009232252,0.00026780218,0.00001763003,0.0006097175,0.7858953,0.000109481385,0.00013097322,0.018286904,0.10774981,0.07758466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003865704,0.000015337555,0.0084384,0.00049597776,0.000016251059,0.00010736527,0.82774526,0.00004127718,0.000052526888,0.0010449558,0.16201264,0.000026161542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061261665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061261665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1663992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44448662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152288470","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712000667","title":"A Plague of Initials: Fragmentation, Cohesion, and Infighting in Civil Wars","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Cohesion (chemistry); Politics; Institutionalisation; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03295597102245114,"score_gpt":0.355027011331418,"score_spread":0.3220710403089669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152288470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826476,0.0018969605,0.0047435774,0.002195642,0.000010544454,0.00001182654,0.000034923014,0.0000050737654,0.008453845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00021802008,0.00021357434,0.000032663724,0.00001027496,0.000004905438,0.000013915378,0.0000019052898,0.0001168063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973477,0.0015830335,0.00013437415,0.00028000554,0.00033018558,0.00032466065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829888,0.009102944,0.005270579,0.00092863623,0.0006440599,0.0010650126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047850874,0.00020194604,0.00044543197,0.0030724925,0.00246993,0.004095924,0.00056529883,0.00096118037,0.0017750984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02284255,0.00023098853,0.0002723511,0.0040689297,0.015662583,0.004525993,0.004114456,0.0011883473,0.00014041048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004284915,0.00014561028,0.5326044,0.00020424569,0.00018472847,0.00060104474,0.088887036,0.010223563,0.0011762965,0.28887296,0.0013115442,0.075360104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024018565,0.00013963973,0.6193505,0.00029176645,0.000066231296,0.00060047075,0.057201453,0.006638152,0.00043570987,0.308189,0.007010416,0.00005273616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004205879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043950253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047850874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024933158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078364933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025306284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153237779","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070880","title":"Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship <i>and</i> Plato and the Virtue of Courage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Virtue; Philosophy; Civic virtue; Citizenship; Literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Theology; Law; Art; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.017719253267389372,"score_gpt":0.28970565375017365,"score_spread":0.2719864004827843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153237779","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007407547,0.49814615,0.0021881594,0.14793706,0.0051403856,0.000027286676,0.000075351854,0.000034977827,0.339043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5691796,0.17341019,0.0036875498,0.027713984,0.0070502297,0.000109530105,0.00010643636,0.000107703316,0.21863478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989195,0.00049186917,0.00004317406,0.000120757824,0.00025805435,0.00016669156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990534,0.0005419686,0.000108862856,0.00006338564,0.00010544238,0.00012700912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011736824,0.0006794018,0.00049634074,0.0014310123,0.0058900914,0.005521585,0.0005437093,0.0031436665,0.007314381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019787287,0.00037909028,0.00031806141,0.0015428293,0.028865319,0.0077571003,0.0018859493,0.0054674568,0.0012028825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030288593,0.000016306953,0.00015275745,0.00006458073,0.000004618034,0.0000832015,0.0050202995,0.000087765744,0.000050154704,0.9019803,0.07492894,0.017580666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012634619,0.000019055231,0.00093454967,0.00028605154,0.0000028367187,0.00007132807,0.002679389,0.00008282948,0.00006213215,0.64019716,0.35563704,0.000014914859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011000112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023166409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011000112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059868563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036538667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0434379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154954871","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002806","title":"E-Bandits in Global Activism: WikiLeaks, Anonymous, and the Politics of No One","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political activism; Political science; State (computer science); Media studies; Action (physics); The Internet; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015943141200400704,"score_gpt":0.30010178485825073,"score_spread":0.28415864365785004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154954871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13009407,0.011250166,0.0049434663,0.09921141,0.0017327401,0.000028083443,0.000051049632,0.00009700247,0.752592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584088,0.004002768,0.00076738594,0.0058109225,0.0006794084,0.000037936006,0.00002824741,0.00011061249,0.030153913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967231,0.002281676,0.000045673096,0.00026026438,0.00023787595,0.00045147337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953844,0.003189316,0.0004526148,0.00029263223,0.0001555003,0.000525627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003178381,0.0004841187,0.00021769672,0.0015507117,0.008688146,0.015248957,0.00067660236,0.0034506514,0.0056761643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00418165,0.0002537414,0.00024733355,0.0017577157,0.030873785,0.01408835,0.0070234523,0.0042061266,0.0007111975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029417846,0.0000279872,0.0007742065,0.00005685714,0.0000034540583,0.00022155742,0.055485327,0.00012340974,0.00009811712,0.92214286,0.009812526,0.011224343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002938214,0.00003987276,0.0026282328,0.0006076632,0.000013624354,0.0003967925,0.13288926,0.0006269263,0.0005247816,0.32509997,0.53709096,0.00005255345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029762718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042535025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015248957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011565048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01898861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155060474","doi":"10.1017/s153759270487097x","title":"Globalization and Human Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Human rights; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01095925195843406,"score_gpt":0.31421497741986454,"score_spread":0.3032557254614305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155060474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007051527,0.26242438,0.0021698007,0.10263529,0.0019905153,0.000018296225,0.00010291828,0.000024773568,0.62358254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69905096,0.16151135,0.0018589819,0.022679325,0.0056746886,0.000092709575,0.000119688484,0.00005241254,0.108959965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916875,0.00043717097,0.000019670553,0.000101265236,0.00014623793,0.0001268618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923193,0.00045370767,0.00007789939,0.00007455867,0.0000731802,0.000088787776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011843042,0.0006592495,0.00038078212,0.0010544042,0.002471814,0.0054891654,0.0004430685,0.0035000392,0.011024197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002091974,0.00017491171,0.0001788391,0.0016080238,0.014818597,0.005903556,0.0019647821,0.0032166648,0.0009997579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004692148,0.00000980406,0.00013184309,0.00003681854,0.0000033334502,0.00003193888,0.0012222617,0.00007438082,0.00003367568,0.96943384,0.020791842,0.008225586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006659976,0.000008892836,0.0005496593,0.0002425222,0.0000042396173,0.00007055618,0.001403451,0.000072937495,0.000043925378,0.7854563,0.21213669,0.0000041254925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042257006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005513592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011024197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002914594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021733865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03687966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155175849","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705720156","title":"God Willing: The Politics of Islamism in Bangladesh","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Religious studies; History; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0218654434633259,"score_gpt":0.31052900826156304,"score_spread":0.2886635647982371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155175849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032658342,0.119806945,0.00041611976,0.19217458,0.0019502983,0.00004135484,0.00021180515,0.000031883243,0.65270865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70923114,0.078155324,0.00030758564,0.014068462,0.0010363897,0.0000768448,0.0001122776,0.000059884926,0.19695207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943846,0.00028557715,0.000011791111,0.000032042546,0.00010952057,0.00012258517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966085,0.00018130073,0.000044925946,0.000014085668,0.000030083862,0.00006878959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008126233,0.00053344335,0.0002668254,0.0006266333,0.0061102444,0.0059367367,0.00055937143,0.0021589654,0.009747724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011618187,0.00030278455,0.00010864176,0.0019801727,0.0069586732,0.0036252146,0.0025847417,0.0027467848,0.0010945455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000879594,0.00004035267,0.0014418174,0.00032597833,0.000012070455,0.00086992735,0.08147036,0.0002684668,0.00088068226,0.60604167,0.2772228,0.031337827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021383754,0.00002311476,0.004314565,0.0004609604,0.0000073754954,0.00022766742,0.07643634,0.000082420454,0.00022102888,0.053455275,0.86473006,0.000019806996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023648199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05557939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023648199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067919646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029382133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04927939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156717033","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003235","title":"Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community. By Bernard Yack. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. 344p. $75.00","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.049913130462587926,"score_gpt":0.3493063546373647,"score_spread":0.29939322417477676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156717033","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038305778,0.9226923,0.0002291353,0.052939434,0.0030472255,0.000008391706,0.00009231146,0.000025907158,0.020582264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038996056,0.845656,0.0011384509,0.0108405305,0.007727658,0.0001086409,0.00021162485,0.000108611996,0.09521235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.0003035867,0.000030421053,0.000076496544,0.00014277894,0.00006667828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987072,0.0006204251,0.0001665662,0.000058919835,0.00020643012,0.00024044025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001677312,0.0021409264,0.00095181714,0.0030069535,0.00275037,0.003889731,0.0012618966,0.0033577317,0.018526655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025480532,0.0012235269,0.0004887419,0.0037654438,0.007866916,0.008815258,0.002321913,0.005728853,0.0064136283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060089274,0.000047790258,0.0004933193,0.0005781323,0.000018224568,0.00009485122,0.00240025,0.00019097571,0.000086417225,0.06890144,0.8536404,0.07348812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032635602,0.000027807288,0.0053098127,0.0038045652,0.000015894528,0.0003793833,0.004181194,0.00029288884,0.00006947743,0.095554836,0.89029604,0.00003558937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02363563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046104457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02363563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041178274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031253623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061977804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160639212","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705680140","title":"The Nation-State in Question","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Ethnic group; Political science; Nation state; Media studies; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.015993422746954877,"score_gpt":0.3268220345482703,"score_spread":0.31082861180131544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160639212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023869267,0.64095974,0.0012432231,0.12465041,0.010441857,0.000018069684,0.00020171545,0.000041218114,0.2200569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28626797,0.42200488,0.0026431591,0.037496034,0.011526088,0.00014330946,0.0006892194,0.00020602629,0.23902325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990301,0.0005631843,0.00003234399,0.00012420281,0.00014680854,0.00010333054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.00033496873,0.000066626744,0.000049515158,0.0000809922,0.00008547941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011500393,0.00078207266,0.0005806673,0.0011729755,0.0023427089,0.008021087,0.00092484494,0.0024243896,0.009133165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021698899,0.00027287533,0.0003493112,0.0018750402,0.0075395657,0.0073341043,0.00253525,0.003517221,0.00171037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009591845,0.0000105315185,0.0002705049,0.0002551984,0.000009887852,0.000077525605,0.0076532145,0.00013756998,0.00006913279,0.5603352,0.39469463,0.036476947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017559837,0.000004268101,0.00045022988,0.00057006656,0.000002780322,0.00007163067,0.0038727627,0.0000448699,0.000035022313,0.116765045,0.87817675,0.0000046691653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008353384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010958032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009133165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004029107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056294696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03055346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162740085","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706550273","title":"The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Politics; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Autonomy; Separation of powers; Law; History","score_opus":0.031202614270858086,"score_gpt":0.3199043054016276,"score_spread":0.28870169113076954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162740085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33518618,0.27517584,0.0016149662,0.011980622,0.0009946682,0.000043045973,0.00035091312,0.000028347435,0.37462538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93522215,0.055561196,0.0006118243,0.0006372459,0.00075943186,0.000049874125,0.00021758564,0.00002416203,0.0069164205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728024,0.0020419806,0.0000673852,0.000105469764,0.0002567386,0.00024806074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954457,0.0034883525,0.0004500081,0.00012323826,0.00029897862,0.00019374922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029262768,0.00025119685,0.0004280691,0.0041851564,0.0025326118,0.005272444,0.00045763492,0.00072632177,0.005288463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049424456,0.00025225047,0.00023320298,0.011977655,0.0045169718,0.0050758356,0.001294561,0.0012760753,0.00026084192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019093305,0.00014475857,0.01686491,0.0021515498,0.0001942154,0.0004703367,0.25402603,0.00054869463,0.00074485847,0.5684783,0.030077774,0.12610771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040144285,0.00026977638,0.1702386,0.0023890254,0.0001016085,0.0009824303,0.18980944,0.000281873,0.0005023856,0.057083957,0.5782543,0.000046425757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036384112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007873868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005288463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033973227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001171009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024649382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163522983","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711000892","title":"Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); China; Political economy; Democracy; Democratization; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03175936990206697,"score_gpt":0.30864203458145156,"score_spread":0.2768826646793846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163522983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031671,0.00054978416,0.0043268004,0.003336979,0.000024370383,0.00006671117,0.000028793098,0.000017323795,0.08848212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826115,0.00007752593,0.0002395261,0.00003301813,0.0000035821822,0.0000076290053,0.000004294705,0.000001371622,0.0013719022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811053,0.00089207274,0.00009229022,0.00019738455,0.00023150769,0.00047617045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987431,0.0004933489,0.00023948202,0.0001017783,0.000179931,0.00024240551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033615527,0.00017769124,0.00018892405,0.0014268319,0.0032915196,0.0023510007,0.00037233764,0.00042088685,0.0015513138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002377567,0.00017105226,0.00026070394,0.0014729559,0.008725961,0.0014767135,0.0020839076,0.0007117789,0.0000583209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013518287,0.00006930318,0.083291896,0.0001655485,0.000036833644,0.0011565521,0.12556139,0.003190494,0.002214556,0.7306172,0.0014086983,0.052152283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011147704,0.00022390431,0.39884537,0.0002165146,0.00010696183,0.00048506848,0.07365268,0.01966127,0.0045725075,0.4202002,0.08180331,0.00012071108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025869546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032667898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025869546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077929744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066347276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056542277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163650424","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704300587","title":"Machiavelli, Hobbes, and the Formation of a Liberal Republicanism in England","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Consummation; Liberalism; Classics; Law; Political science; History; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.01157250320119084,"score_gpt":0.27870918485414126,"score_spread":0.2671366816529504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163650424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05353882,0.21129565,0.004158084,0.13259232,0.001631318,0.00003886186,0.00010006327,0.000035863282,0.596609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85914046,0.025799768,0.0015338934,0.0053547923,0.0011041152,0.000073227595,0.000034116143,0.000040850766,0.10691871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991659,0.0004479449,0.000025633939,0.000070007714,0.00016196868,0.00012858989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993586,0.00042118784,0.00006779315,0.000047718226,0.00004695903,0.00005779465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010010379,0.00023528136,0.00029541162,0.00066656317,0.004230352,0.0058694547,0.00045347246,0.0017566576,0.0030030394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019465516,0.00022149515,0.00009884968,0.00092936854,0.0153655,0.0044806357,0.0020703606,0.0030349423,0.0005477987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014755799,0.000008184808,0.00015608309,0.000032596574,9.2130836e-7,0.00006493803,0.018085955,0.000041427178,0.00007473431,0.9578595,0.016701804,0.0069589783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001496703,0.000015579451,0.0017132862,0.00020148304,0.0000024431117,0.000121809106,0.010281561,0.0001389579,0.00014344697,0.4840902,0.5032602,0.000015950274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019725632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038918715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019725632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006363622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024664386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046171486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169293164","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072623","title":"Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Comparative politics; Democracy; The Republic; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033160930601302534,"score_gpt":0.31498430176629355,"score_spread":0.281823371164991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169293164","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21587841,0.30404848,0.002867656,0.18949191,0.0009741132,0.00004336249,0.00033166708,0.00008778279,0.2862766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96343064,0.019315047,0.00048092727,0.0027795807,0.00026054407,0.00003207026,0.000074922355,0.000014404433,0.013611805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971711,0.0020176282,0.000048144495,0.00014706216,0.00020416293,0.00041190948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857366,0.0010773531,0.00015452363,0.000051350366,0.00007590735,0.00006716495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033442876,0.00042352793,0.0003070037,0.0021047776,0.0052328785,0.006715727,0.00090898975,0.0028978842,0.0037005453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004257808,0.00029352697,0.00028362256,0.0035998141,0.011748862,0.0052502477,0.0018362367,0.0015229537,0.00018876811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032812786,0.0000184042,0.0010688808,0.000072071576,0.000013420673,0.0001805652,0.015905105,0.00043832656,0.00009601385,0.9428448,0.017492218,0.021837236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112541,0.000091114125,0.025880342,0.0010522351,0.00004957632,0.00029623634,0.032462724,0.0008942288,0.00031183314,0.34144822,0.5973623,0.000100028745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14030856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23186457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14030856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051111993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27898377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169715952","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708082261","title":"Building States without Society: European Union Enlargement and the Transfer of EU Social Policy to Poland and Hungary. By Beate Sissenich. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2006. 252p. $80.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; European union; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.01817913468664313,"score_gpt":0.3100115114289897,"score_spread":0.2918323767423466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169715952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02686174,0.20746018,0.00074800424,0.4413211,0.00403182,0.00003931908,0.00023584507,0.000057769565,0.3192442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5626649,0.1701653,0.0015283048,0.038909364,0.0022322629,0.00014071015,0.0003267792,0.00007265497,0.22395965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931204,0.0002582336,0.000021378437,0.000056616354,0.00015174864,0.0002000709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968886,0.00010319338,0.00006853345,0.000018907207,0.000025028114,0.00009547678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014799746,0.00035132354,0.00026932888,0.00047627452,0.0014396165,0.0033106678,0.0006388988,0.002870143,0.010226135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024489206,0.00023060782,0.00025003462,0.0016049683,0.003154162,0.0051390915,0.00430412,0.0024754605,0.0009746003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001228182,0.00004763175,0.00066262175,0.00030379943,0.00001752052,0.00031000157,0.0046131974,0.00042840725,0.0002523033,0.4287768,0.48736584,0.07709907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046049783,0.000039027196,0.011126002,0.0008824976,0.000017038228,0.0001375169,0.00822112,0.00018501551,0.0003532361,0.0743976,0.9045739,0.000020969552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013672807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026506282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013672807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034738006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048308517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034209788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170019553","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703230152","title":"The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. By April Carter. New York: Routledge, 2001. 277p. $90.00","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Globalization; Global citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Political philosophy; Political economy; Social science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05448065112208743,"score_gpt":0.3401994724388308,"score_spread":0.28571882131674337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170019553","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000580305,0.73200864,0.0031902047,0.056812845,0.004607149,0.000045026827,0.00064791995,0.00018466052,0.20192331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04267365,0.62612647,0.004000671,0.011200521,0.004365963,0.0003025944,0.00083013275,0.00050057087,0.3099994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937856,0.00023629345,0.00004590759,0.00010758392,0.0001474635,0.00008415424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902785,0.0005440401,0.000115165385,0.00005845856,0.00014807806,0.00010652195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011685631,0.0017006302,0.0010491788,0.0030128018,0.002069235,0.003969716,0.0011147732,0.0034755873,0.049922153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427869,0.0014532773,0.00064433407,0.0066901413,0.0053751627,0.010936147,0.0022243974,0.0040964046,0.024342382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029013283,0.000019628056,0.00017466105,0.0007211904,0.000018324572,0.0000866099,0.0013974024,0.00032029822,0.00008138994,0.14924029,0.7747302,0.073181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010146357,0.00001018401,0.0005678866,0.0012553873,0.000010253729,0.00012249826,0.00086472166,0.00013461028,0.000039308095,0.0930989,0.9038713,0.000014891738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016573558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03308501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049922153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038107992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033336135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16700625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285232714","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715000638","title":"Impressions of Hume: Cinematic Thinking and the Politics of Discontinuity. By Davide Panagia. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2013. 188p. $70.00.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Discontinuity (linguistics); Politics; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031881336581659925,"score_gpt":0.26962410868771675,"score_spread":0.23774277210605682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285232714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026411982,0.29625696,0.003675825,0.10282139,0.0026876142,0.000042029027,0.0001840984,0.00024371324,0.5676764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70668924,0.094847254,0.0022138872,0.0043262346,0.0021760657,0.0000617028,0.000078083525,0.00017017788,0.18943734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993325,0.00045035273,0.000012392923,0.000052373074,0.0001141295,0.00003820702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985869,0.0009633176,0.00014805634,0.00006082452,0.00011332424,0.00012761574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016093234,0.0004502649,0.00019987543,0.0010889289,0.0025062382,0.0052921996,0.00048074452,0.0012796614,0.018638588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004068447,0.00032024822,0.00012705007,0.00076747965,0.008529034,0.0062289266,0.0025378668,0.0016315216,0.0015328345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013158578,0.000031978703,0.0013382933,0.00078728696,0.000021488577,0.0004974044,0.11151387,0.00015459047,0.0013015147,0.2128214,0.43516722,0.23623341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000156473,0.00003650914,0.006905812,0.0013727071,0.00001861311,0.0007575688,0.060597364,0.00021570582,0.0005323203,0.048391994,0.88113046,0.000025303376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037023632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008345488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018638588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017331138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061823183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06235224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312301942","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711004981","title":"Unraveling Internal Conflicts in East Asia and the Pacific: Incidence, Consequences, and Resolutions. Edited by Jacob Bercovitch and Karl DeRouen, Jr. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2011. 342p. $85.00. - No Man's Land: Globalization, Territory, and Clandestine Groups in Southeast Asia. By Justin V. Hastings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010. 256p. $65.00 cloth, $22.95 paper.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"East Asia; Religious studies; History; Philosophy; China; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01674449589285576,"score_gpt":0.25016220143916873,"score_spread":0.23341770554631297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312301942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002366475,0.9086126,0.00069862435,0.04498475,0.003496745,0.000020493313,0.00019411054,0.00003729859,0.039588884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038144913,0.89860046,0.0016372346,0.004328695,0.0025199596,0.000045647415,0.00028126247,0.00006159507,0.05438025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994023,0.00026179702,0.000033597058,0.00005450377,0.00015647619,0.0000913862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993579,0.00020263268,0.000106433734,0.000029765552,0.00015396175,0.0001494238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222571,0.0017265773,0.00081193825,0.0023889542,0.0017946315,0.0055319215,0.0009766988,0.0016379997,0.016978225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013780172,0.00073146645,0.00048496117,0.0055116704,0.005169254,0.008794059,0.0031792088,0.003932001,0.0032525533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026789388,0.00006333121,0.002808607,0.0015230051,0.000040180974,0.00030973417,0.017737066,0.00026629234,0.00032458454,0.054596275,0.6689079,0.25339627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006466194,0.00001777789,0.0065105674,0.0036247289,0.000023062863,0.000613875,0.027131053,0.00012359652,0.0001962766,0.040301602,0.92142624,0.000024809804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016602822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03187369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016978225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023560915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067556067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056797862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314426863","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704250587","title":"Bound by Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Denial; Indigenous; Identity (music); Poverty; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05738563731984698,"score_gpt":0.3538357958820708,"score_spread":0.29645015856222384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314426863","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045244858,0.55802166,0.0020503541,0.15597689,0.026209239,0.000044823497,0.00027112116,0.00028023263,0.25669324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010495962,0.12633745,0.0017680571,0.039475564,0.006639987,0.00010290354,0.00022251238,0.00033314878,0.8146244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908006,0.00027416603,0.000051406452,0.0002250257,0.00025022237,0.000119076794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999326,0.00022410332,0.0000727761,0.000072330775,0.00015034399,0.00015452212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011093519,0.0015525151,0.0007006604,0.0014678206,0.002521531,0.0051100114,0.0013089197,0.004446794,0.08030489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003317275,0.0007221675,0.00052789564,0.001509346,0.0037225205,0.010686445,0.0036269529,0.0065541263,0.052496325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009258767,0.0000101192545,0.00006443656,0.000116387695,0.0000027974856,0.000025586154,0.00043821326,0.000025502815,0.0000392624,0.022035863,0.93009174,0.04714091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019531376,0.00000395911,0.00013856072,0.000218504,0.0000012305018,0.00006983342,0.00030709567,0.000020249901,0.00001971202,0.007867481,0.99134785,0.0000035135095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009937722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018523538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08030489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024358262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024674337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331598413","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002624","title":"Welfare through Work: Conservative Ideas, Partisan Dynamics, and Social Protection in Japan. By Mari Miura. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012. 224p. $39.95. - The Evolution of Japan's Party System: Politics and Policy in an Era of Institutional Change. Edited by Leonard J. Schoppa. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2011. 256p. $60.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Work (physics); Welfare state; Content (measure theory); Welfare; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.01701019220099408,"score_gpt":0.23796059057126953,"score_spread":0.22095039837027544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331598413","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004429717,0.9101847,0.00019877849,0.06768234,0.0013539694,0.000011595868,0.0000950314,0.000017606071,0.016026309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14737886,0.7899922,0.00079926726,0.006837497,0.0033815198,0.00008126583,0.00014227371,0.000061460254,0.051325735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961746,0.0001790487,0.000023082875,0.00005084157,0.0000669727,0.000062557854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962866,0.00012649292,0.00008997004,0.000015610534,0.00004024162,0.00009897441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014675215,0.0013558167,0.00070824986,0.0015187184,0.0032294209,0.0040936703,0.00068644126,0.0017888577,0.00908566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008305067,0.0007538979,0.00033841873,0.0036270581,0.007214069,0.0050098966,0.002041687,0.0022316256,0.0011333677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000138476,0.00011419309,0.0060685994,0.0023601803,0.00009074188,0.00036653684,0.08074553,0.00024835207,0.00065513904,0.090519324,0.60884637,0.20984654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033892436,0.000066682594,0.059593692,0.0027104204,0.00007325907,0.00034865655,0.049057778,0.0002620555,0.00019547885,0.033925552,0.85367453,0.00005793324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039432388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14110973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039432388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005480059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003416076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07840574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334047054","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713001060","title":"The Puzzle of Extra-Lethal Violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Typology; Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Criminology; Dance; Genocide; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science; Visual arts; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.024041916604501598,"score_gpt":0.3080869776156022,"score_spread":0.2840450610111006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334047054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28646892,0.009332517,0.105055586,0.054284457,0.0007283847,0.00006447419,0.000055634424,0.00010280519,0.5439072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231863,0.00094253477,0.0026747691,0.00060948567,0.00009080781,0.000026006875,0.000009726284,0.000021602526,0.003306454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909731,0.0067768423,0.00017766733,0.00046910375,0.0010666722,0.0005366936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603856,0.0026123922,0.00038046256,0.0005234108,0.00023170383,0.00021349099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044418825,0.0006246408,0.00031894227,0.0017619797,0.006583192,0.0070006987,0.0012819824,0.0020831204,0.002992614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063324342,0.00023107002,0.00033721584,0.0010903816,0.05307396,0.009583751,0.008699275,0.003647307,0.0002851651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050100734,0.0000041201442,0.00051021425,0.000026895377,0.0000023914981,0.000091601076,0.04429254,0.00013673314,0.000108979686,0.94886327,0.0004446814,0.0055134916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005118898,0.000028016058,0.0013446561,0.0003086395,0.000007717352,0.00059078296,0.10113623,0.0005142061,0.0004327781,0.8073218,0.08829021,0.00001978989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016644155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017302361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070006987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029781077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022125598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023491204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334947435","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003843","title":"Transnational Citizenship in the European Union: Past, Present, and Future. By Espen D. H. Olsen. London and New York: Continuum, 2012. 208p. $130.00. - Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. By Richard Rose. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 176p. $48.95.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; European union; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0357721719602278,"score_gpt":0.26608217414980123,"score_spread":0.23031000218957343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334947435","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032071787,0.85847276,0.00044220465,0.09336856,0.004898698,0.000014182782,0.00015246357,0.000040790183,0.042289592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033511706,0.7779083,0.0021289615,0.025472393,0.0067516197,0.00013308194,0.0005019156,0.00022164769,0.15337035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974968,0.0012136952,0.000164084,0.00035184433,0.000554261,0.00021936168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982279,0.00087854854,0.00022223154,0.0000840709,0.00027208906,0.00031506017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028903794,0.0023562852,0.001263318,0.0025346146,0.0031441103,0.008000663,0.0013917966,0.006504152,0.035685983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034864247,0.0010330363,0.0006902385,0.006973573,0.0068200263,0.0152983,0.004859043,0.00846815,0.012709102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030793886,0.000022795422,0.00018488707,0.000495397,0.000011876031,0.00004731829,0.0017631886,0.00010214602,0.000042149062,0.04212867,0.89326644,0.061904293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000660826,0.000013690999,0.0008327708,0.0018409626,0.0000065890094,0.00008456531,0.0020667065,0.000050302984,0.00003347685,0.032261692,0.96278685,0.000015695192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013766189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024099426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035685983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005795648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11938149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604378853","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001851","title":"Expect Us: Online Communities and Political Mobilization. By Jessica L. Beyer. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 192p. $99.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political mobilization; Mobilization; Politics; Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Sociology; Political economy; History; Law","score_opus":0.05014823336610888,"score_gpt":0.31490440509959927,"score_spread":0.2647561717334904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604378853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093458174,0.80077255,0.00089366833,0.1545733,0.0036524083,0.00001767748,0.0003829679,0.000095099516,0.038677763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052531876,0.7970333,0.001928721,0.016177299,0.0054750172,0.0001482618,0.00058799505,0.00020342127,0.12591413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994387,0.00026644956,0.000030054238,0.00006483017,0.00013162114,0.000068298796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844605,0.0009087343,0.00022130205,0.000048956917,0.0001458178,0.0002291596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015053054,0.001592327,0.00060626573,0.0022288382,0.0021938297,0.0039778654,0.00092716893,0.0027354679,0.02940365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030221115,0.0009884202,0.00042616035,0.003981903,0.0028359299,0.012957267,0.0025544455,0.0038205236,0.008829664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030980016,0.000030224843,0.0005341208,0.0004946117,0.000013192047,0.00009222325,0.00213295,0.0000786033,0.00007246007,0.029688522,0.87958026,0.087251864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020455302,0.00002446195,0.004705922,0.0024044428,0.000017934368,0.00031276856,0.004491398,0.0002311211,0.000120307115,0.051690865,0.9359554,0.000024945703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009985531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019493543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02940365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020780682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023803532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09836501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604533277","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001590","title":"Thucydides on Politics: Back to the Present. By Geoffrey Hawthorn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 274 p. $85.00 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03323406828909197,"score_gpt":0.3001942671937581,"score_spread":0.2669601989046661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604533277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054848153,0.8708485,0.00035868492,0.08019158,0.003960378,0.0000043882706,0.00006972515,0.000019533609,0.04399882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06034266,0.6880215,0.0010362245,0.017136676,0.007911635,0.000043840573,0.00011393611,0.00012528228,0.22526826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995746,0.00019642743,0.00001793246,0.00006083094,0.00009659119,0.00005362289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.0003388696,0.000058057296,0.000034976973,0.00009131849,0.00008428128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009025894,0.000842658,0.0005688534,0.0020533204,0.0028432573,0.003241395,0.0006315636,0.0022781498,0.02559117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001627219,0.00060770166,0.0002948053,0.0027258096,0.006970486,0.006263732,0.0015590941,0.0037908955,0.0055641597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003622767,0.000014621718,0.00018701577,0.00040979256,0.000008544282,0.00007139113,0.004476687,0.00007336289,0.00009918391,0.22097315,0.71834105,0.055308912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004441159,0.000004931302,0.0005262939,0.00073690154,0.000002959065,0.00008793316,0.0018464453,0.000032399403,0.000049353697,0.055475928,0.94122666,0.0000057296434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015956178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03510165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02559117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043429635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022622698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085610986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606539563","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715002169","title":"The Covert Sphere: Secrecy, Fiction, and the National Security State. By Timothy Melley. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012. 304p. $78.95 cloth, $26.95 paper. - Secrets and Leaks: The Dilemmas of State Secrecy. By Rahul Sagar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. 340p. $35.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Secrecy; State (computer science); National security; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019927922232867563,"score_gpt":0.24796045718096266,"score_spread":0.22803253494809508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606539563","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070720224,0.67634,0.00080974493,0.1798318,0.0061361548,0.000021904394,0.00016987202,0.000057904894,0.13592549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06443307,0.5256721,0.001982255,0.040835656,0.016923718,0.000119675766,0.00027474246,0.00020762118,0.34955123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990031,0.00047356568,0.000040416522,0.000118674136,0.0002738601,0.00009033411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976864,0.001673355,0.00021578709,0.00007431674,0.000190511,0.00015971104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014208258,0.0016991672,0.00067277363,0.002412796,0.0035428538,0.005755401,0.0010803991,0.00455935,0.033536013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039330493,0.0007270097,0.0004630677,0.0030779408,0.008872957,0.0131662,0.0027956804,0.005969534,0.010313049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021815573,0.000013460298,0.00009614363,0.00024801528,0.000007893343,0.00007881755,0.0016941092,0.00012223602,0.00006788953,0.07133226,0.90062803,0.025689425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006774361,0.000011355734,0.00051994034,0.00084006716,0.00000539342,0.00014108584,0.0015042699,0.00012191903,0.00006576668,0.05173132,0.9450375,0.000014673354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010191795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023094976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033536013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062109292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025641653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11218917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607011360","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001954","title":"Contemporary Majority Nationalism. Edited by Alain-G. Gagnon, André Lecours and Geneviève Nootens. Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011. 248p. $95 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Nationalism; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Art; Political science; Politics; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.020936522348570775,"score_gpt":0.2445213763549181,"score_spread":0.22358485400634734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607011360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020826848,0.6637812,0.0005109391,0.061981197,0.007958149,0.000017663653,0.0006640837,0.00010136184,0.2629028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073381156,0.29812413,0.0011664215,0.00725513,0.002246977,0.00003322562,0.00053564354,0.00025671968,0.6170005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925715,0.00012769093,0.000021265387,0.00009712555,0.0003160619,0.00018066858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952865,0.00006685649,0.000031362033,0.000025644003,0.00021377575,0.00013371788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088823563,0.001270522,0.00066220685,0.0014942125,0.005869936,0.00468388,0.001276702,0.0014620076,0.037256178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011460821,0.0006487484,0.00038010426,0.0039424114,0.0046842718,0.0023328066,0.00161209,0.0019789417,0.007682161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148436375,0.000007090406,0.0002445803,0.000187821,0.000006680325,0.00004544384,0.002374741,0.000055952136,0.0000948258,0.03040935,0.9157456,0.050813038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022939823,0.0000022712038,0.0014339797,0.00023190738,0.0000035578175,0.0000443767,0.0014287679,0.000018795958,0.000040985098,0.0037389959,0.993046,0.000008087843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85041296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9441812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14958704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032827053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028672656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30093592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746735433","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717001931","title":"The Sunni Tragedy in the Middle East: Northern Lebanon from al-Qaeda to ISIS. By Bernard Rougier. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. 288p. $35.00.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Al qaeda; Middle East; Tragedy (event); Political science; Theology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Art; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Terrorism","score_opus":0.04036809940722561,"score_gpt":0.2971383137817953,"score_spread":0.25677021437456965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746735433","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008604384,0.8196034,0.00007224452,0.116952114,0.012276902,0.000013341454,0.00036862015,0.00003430929,0.042074647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21830574,0.51900095,0.0004000861,0.013363461,0.011610543,0.000053114953,0.0005434387,0.00010561699,0.23661706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998254,0.00006884916,0.0000055349956,0.000017153363,0.000023036477,0.000060095474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985015,0.000034515488,0.00003256583,0.0000040501063,0.000022171822,0.000056541594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000602481,0.0013977913,0.00042785428,0.0011250917,0.0057793534,0.0029838074,0.00060940924,0.0019205889,0.025277752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046065488,0.00038457024,0.00030663368,0.0021422736,0.0024700451,0.0028529097,0.002226601,0.002539364,0.0033789577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013986754,0.00004697368,0.0030764507,0.0008810132,0.000027894623,0.0009861095,0.024993401,0.00012272793,0.00039545112,0.021359408,0.8511484,0.096822314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015811398,0.000023615086,0.016577857,0.0016632221,0.000017636183,0.0003117065,0.035042234,0.00006756973,0.00017920246,0.0048878896,0.9411947,0.000018469682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0812345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19714439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0812345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064652385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030646406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16152334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769437310","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717002286","title":"What Is a Human? What the Answers Mean for Human Rights. By John H. Evans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. 260p. $35.00 cloth. - Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human. By Samantha Frost. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. 203p. $22.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Natural (archaeology); Archaeology","score_opus":0.045519258494341804,"score_gpt":0.30693661103457004,"score_spread":0.26141735254022824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769437310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022155873,0.6783776,0.00090295286,0.21053545,0.010683419,0.000018251007,0.00044248553,0.000075395365,0.098742925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015330167,0.554371,0.0022307234,0.03363725,0.011044467,0.0001494096,0.0005577053,0.00042434028,0.38225484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981274,0.00063632097,0.00013638228,0.00031134818,0.0006228196,0.00016583632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997009,0.0017174358,0.0002967975,0.00016768051,0.00042742182,0.00038173574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023664718,0.0025103672,0.0013055276,0.002732908,0.0028377655,0.0059038526,0.0013567416,0.004747968,0.08142913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046974556,0.0010973859,0.0007002765,0.004017043,0.007808486,0.013653439,0.0031691843,0.010271021,0.040430125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018256975,0.000014065379,0.00010459826,0.0003501709,0.000009009348,0.000034149693,0.0005845127,0.00007993362,0.00009835998,0.04306114,0.9188275,0.03681837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047635654,0.0000071273944,0.0004933204,0.0011844042,0.0000045285637,0.00005560678,0.0009009055,0.000043281663,0.000045149223,0.040392432,0.95685446,0.000014081845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014488913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03007353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08142913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055787456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037481082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27240753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796131283","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718000981","title":"“Thugs-for-Hire”: Subcontracting of State Coercion and State Capacity in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); State (computer science); Population; Autonomy; China; Business; Evasion (ethics); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02434508401755405,"score_gpt":0.30541079403056687,"score_spread":0.28106571001301284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796131283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860497,0.00019683833,0.0002887418,0.0010796641,0.00000787011,0.000011549639,0.000018233073,0.0000051788275,0.01234207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921477,0.000051452425,0.000029417111,0.000035835856,0.0000019941197,0.0000024406033,0.0000044312965,5.852523e-7,0.00065900886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992448,0.0001864648,0.000032331136,0.00008761727,0.00008959452,0.00035928353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.00016187552,0.0003241797,0.00006180054,0.00009287913,0.0002536837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000992939,0.00013316733,0.0002356664,0.0011545841,0.0026658247,0.0019808204,0.00039741083,0.00038717224,0.002105687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011207877,0.00012501428,0.000170624,0.0015065287,0.005818313,0.0007479374,0.0017857034,0.0005323226,0.000051125404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009167041,0.000106743515,0.50508225,0.00014345456,0.00009828854,0.0016250176,0.03394459,0.0034408842,0.0026934273,0.4143681,0.0027210137,0.0356846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026954915,0.00011885661,0.914294,0.00010868115,0.000071081115,0.0001860959,0.023623941,0.0073201987,0.0011327964,0.032343302,0.020693634,0.000080412676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10290809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18301384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10290809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071296734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053660823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20461816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888142878","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001603","title":"A Moral Theory of Solidarity. By Avery Kolers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 208p. $80.00 cloth.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.036980333530267445,"score_gpt":0.29963901509350743,"score_spread":0.26265868156324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888142878","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074199867,0.78310734,0.0054162163,0.10236371,0.005060317,0.000022449902,0.00028436675,0.00009388167,0.10290975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.104958914,0.66851115,0.008357695,0.011321757,0.008827284,0.00021357473,0.00048071228,0.00032622987,0.19700262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986255,0.00070804125,0.00008916023,0.00014878706,0.00031826508,0.00011031407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979493,0.0011922485,0.00023584683,0.00011988118,0.00031883066,0.00018401399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028427828,0.0017008351,0.00090722716,0.002952575,0.0025979597,0.004452294,0.0014376177,0.0036331997,0.025173744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037806428,0.0013123726,0.0008137601,0.0033341155,0.009698218,0.010502532,0.0022558898,0.0065777707,0.008655304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003320111,0.000037862876,0.00019298457,0.00054727925,0.000021344635,0.00009644827,0.0015780104,0.0005088051,0.00007813606,0.40477046,0.51699936,0.07513616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018535393,0.00001463514,0.00087990455,0.0015043969,0.000009643238,0.00019152673,0.0010554198,0.00038734413,0.000068312256,0.47561315,0.52023584,0.0000213324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007777143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011045481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025173744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045922245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003460543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08421457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888591179","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001548","title":"Asymmetry and International Relationships. By Brantly Womack. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 244p. $99.99 cloth, $34.99 paper.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.022892480992476535,"score_gpt":0.23898900138433757,"score_spread":0.21609652039186103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888591179","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029783425,0.94647264,0.00054795464,0.028399374,0.002184238,0.000006990957,0.00020071285,0.000038146565,0.02185213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02060396,0.88424724,0.0010631979,0.004971263,0.00531659,0.00006410968,0.00031658268,0.00014310595,0.08327386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999532,0.000144848,0.00004685426,0.00008845856,0.0001224255,0.00006554664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989945,0.0005817502,0.0001361139,0.00006025014,0.00013537653,0.000091925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011020997,0.0022788784,0.0010955151,0.0037839669,0.0015149992,0.0038990278,0.0012154087,0.002741286,0.030053813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025044424,0.0013807531,0.0006847826,0.005932478,0.004320659,0.010843466,0.0020244005,0.0035217497,0.010764802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040416642,0.000026367623,0.0003835848,0.0009154809,0.000027029206,0.00013602764,0.0012812763,0.00022937192,0.00010428257,0.085112095,0.8055538,0.10619033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014462669,0.000012230758,0.002181701,0.0019892652,0.000015560308,0.0003769855,0.0011622789,0.00015599765,0.00009377402,0.106683396,0.8872897,0.000024766048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012498719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01894882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030053813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026871406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020317275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10054004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911888365","doi":"10.1017/s153759271800395x","title":"Rising Powers and Foreign Policy Revisionism: Understanding BRICS Identity and Behavior Through Time. By Cameron G. Thies and Mark David Nieman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017. 219p. $70.00 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Volume (thermodynamics); Art history; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art; Physics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02684098860342161,"score_gpt":0.3141389963263206,"score_spread":0.287298007722899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911888365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058914055,0.40322146,0.0010134858,0.49062997,0.005045262,0.000019238296,0.00038260705,0.00007191003,0.093724616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21333887,0.59655,0.0020326583,0.030710014,0.0076904036,0.00013388417,0.00073304045,0.00024549587,0.14856572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988207,0.00063696824,0.00002815621,0.00009523807,0.0002662762,0.00015271151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742573,0.001534254,0.00036205066,0.00008718687,0.00023283514,0.00035789318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027308734,0.0008295971,0.0005050065,0.002077838,0.0034639437,0.0064234086,0.0007848372,0.0028802468,0.025088437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005215749,0.0005498855,0.00054162246,0.0047786976,0.007435263,0.012975784,0.003660608,0.006019843,0.0042413054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033117,0.00004066663,0.002492684,0.00033515404,0.00001738757,0.000114777344,0.032734495,0.00023856199,0.00017111318,0.16229725,0.71644413,0.08506355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097752145,0.000029224897,0.008330593,0.0020351615,0.000014200896,0.0001440268,0.02984407,0.00021834263,0.00014562978,0.08680298,0.8723846,0.0000413942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031592067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060780108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031592067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006559217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044627623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08392918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913383528","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718004553","title":"The Mortality and Morality of Nations. By Uriel Abulof. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 384p. $95.00 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Content (measure theory); Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07027564017608051,"score_gpt":0.3945491957805861,"score_spread":0.3242735556045056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913383528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002489444,0.9290485,0.00021161814,0.055541135,0.0054228026,0.0000047832677,0.00017898808,0.000024948256,0.009318382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02273983,0.85556257,0.0008149649,0.00995911,0.013592706,0.0000662207,0.00035647993,0.000115612056,0.09679252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939466,0.00028012917,0.000042396925,0.0000705393,0.00014946051,0.0000626868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986804,0.0007023327,0.00017796677,0.00005222527,0.00023783492,0.00014917234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017073131,0.0020379866,0.0010338259,0.0026032967,0.0016278373,0.0026341781,0.0010751842,0.0024449062,0.023062993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037626103,0.001012467,0.00056577695,0.002689722,0.0031695098,0.0058785295,0.0017602225,0.0041829073,0.0083076665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002822805,0.000010808123,0.00026787035,0.00036462897,0.000011670018,0.00004280913,0.0007064602,0.00010386367,0.000039947925,0.017581906,0.9198154,0.061026435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012962443,0.000020921509,0.0037976236,0.0024127509,0.000011006854,0.0003159528,0.0017637027,0.00020543292,0.000073085605,0.03194383,0.959415,0.000027682974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019054454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031725943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023062993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032259275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001959577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077153444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940594362","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712000758","title":"Genocide and the Psychology of Perpetrators, Bystanders, and Victims","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Politics; Criminology; Psychology; Political violence; Narrative; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013268864438450597,"score_gpt":0.33228555517588626,"score_spread":0.31901669073743566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940594362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024023922,0.11692305,0.0009449875,0.7825308,0.021581056,0.000023862855,0.0000483775,0.000025739524,0.053898208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62961864,0.12202163,0.0013924282,0.14039722,0.045995925,0.00018411463,0.00009932873,0.00008241044,0.06020833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814665,0.001298623,0.000036958518,0.000096726784,0.00029784403,0.00012317472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995369,0.0037785275,0.0002766654,0.000074317766,0.0001876459,0.00031386196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029540171,0.0007946243,0.00052935537,0.001161509,0.0041597565,0.007575811,0.00097035733,0.004164128,0.0017524961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008338344,0.00031504018,0.00031299604,0.001015007,0.01567903,0.009169367,0.0019033725,0.007084786,0.0002690884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009775484,0.00015334386,0.007586487,0.00036315672,0.000050338793,0.0005793421,0.0735367,0.00024102035,0.00020443907,0.39122364,0.48204607,0.04391771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010859146,0.00012057339,0.022102304,0.0011384838,0.000044126948,0.0009068205,0.07655557,0.00042659053,0.00016008789,0.27598038,0.6224133,0.000043193388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033112422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007367168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007575811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024304884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019797883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017634451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941007576","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719002391","title":"Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Voting; Politics; Popularity; Leverage (statistics); Political capital; Power (physics); Political science; Advertising; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028416893064497843,"score_gpt":0.35019199696225783,"score_spread":0.32177510389776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941007576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6655292,0.0074508362,0.001003467,0.045449074,0.00024111649,0.000032935677,0.00043998705,0.000030094137,0.2798233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948125,0.000905166,0.000103811944,0.0006416596,0.0002201609,0.000007324405,0.000060096303,0.000010322193,0.0032391124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917525,0.0004010321,0.00001686259,0.00012589627,0.0001081962,0.00017270273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936795,0.0032554702,0.0019053533,0.00024242545,0.0002321317,0.0006850456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002107634,0.00018118783,0.00032998217,0.0022862374,0.0018949115,0.00379449,0.00035394356,0.0007896015,0.008729195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008573423,0.00014481723,0.00017136309,0.0021692736,0.0026438434,0.0013895895,0.0011712209,0.001280754,0.0011307342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007112319,0.0002651907,0.6634234,0.00022741249,0.00021969949,0.00034663934,0.02253214,0.0011711635,0.0008284969,0.16334777,0.04681623,0.10011066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063815816,0.00009273731,0.8494018,0.00020218789,0.000102110134,0.00021837968,0.020652795,0.0024136438,0.00046197572,0.03691266,0.08941325,0.00006471707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017664261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029546143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017664261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016023017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050714903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03512287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941044677","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001349","title":"Democracy and Distrust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Democracy; Politics; Dissent; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Representative democracy; State (computer science); Political economy; Social capital; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.01160584238086693,"score_gpt":0.3277397816231907,"score_spread":0.31613393924232375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941044677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037333178,0.18464854,0.0015113989,0.6455313,0.013700567,0.000011365846,0.000040296152,0.00003750967,0.15078582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39605743,0.19991022,0.0015513868,0.120318145,0.055699106,0.00007344986,0.00008054289,0.00014305756,0.22616664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989184,0.0005533725,0.000018226627,0.00014417492,0.00024909913,0.00011673972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997773,0.0016362761,0.00012425693,0.000058074824,0.00018862956,0.0002196341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013779354,0.0004467193,0.0003844863,0.001020969,0.0029995907,0.0063494155,0.00045380305,0.0024592222,0.003972764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004490648,0.00017732328,0.00019987562,0.0009955538,0.00623626,0.0055278176,0.0018241196,0.004368585,0.0006914786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012044748,0.000013940687,0.00043547014,0.00008257178,0.00000623513,0.00011488657,0.0026589907,0.00017573731,0.00004263434,0.6687314,0.29601198,0.031714085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063730295,0.000008567323,0.00060618256,0.00021981857,0.000003398819,0.00013295683,0.0014792361,0.00017417129,0.00004448377,0.21836126,0.77895504,0.000008580537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002968769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004689581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063494155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027887379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019430417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02023381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945374827","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719000574","title":"Of Limits and Growth: The Rise of Global Sustainable Development in the Twentieth Century. By Stephen J. Macekura. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 333p. $38.43 cloth, $26.88 paper.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.006993508459058164,"score_gpt":0.20653870697880414,"score_spread":0.19954519851974598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945374827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009590213,0.80589557,0.0005947085,0.13871205,0.0044243904,0.000009962358,0.000086510765,0.000032819033,0.049284995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0703056,0.79695016,0.0014439195,0.012416774,0.0040414836,0.00005598651,0.00014497554,0.00011129906,0.114529856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994814,0.00017459995,0.000023363395,0.000075957585,0.00015694892,0.00008781044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991937,0.00041105546,0.00011006821,0.000039285344,0.000113677546,0.00013229641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010888319,0.0010571334,0.00046642593,0.0011251518,0.0016389919,0.004391025,0.00062988704,0.002361653,0.0123317195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026954596,0.0004980512,0.0002908433,0.0021685874,0.007814421,0.008170557,0.0024953398,0.0038292753,0.0021810066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035703648,0.000013686275,0.0003463711,0.00063759513,0.000017267477,0.00013345074,0.004114463,0.0002882907,0.00018649481,0.21301705,0.70272326,0.07848628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037480695,0.000006636118,0.00090942404,0.0010591394,0.0000050115746,0.00008788624,0.0022041996,0.00008492627,0.00006731053,0.106856674,0.8887027,0.000012329983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012092704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028530186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123317195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049415645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036773924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041253746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946032237","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719000161","title":"Deliberative Democracy Now: LGBT Equality and the Emergence of Large-Scale Deliberative Systems. By Edwina Barvosa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 308p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Scale (ratio); Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Physics; Law; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.023633639736037024,"score_gpt":0.29608826995953974,"score_spread":0.2724546302235027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946032237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034090583,0.4135236,0.002469489,0.4820182,0.0040005986,0.000023585473,0.00013977298,0.000098360666,0.094317384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39166832,0.39148116,0.00445423,0.03416689,0.006996336,0.00024833242,0.00031804026,0.0003601326,0.17030662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763405,0.0017118698,0.00005057981,0.00014719093,0.00026235168,0.00019399615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740845,0.0017101585,0.00024053235,0.0001713256,0.00017607359,0.00029346396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036945655,0.0006870705,0.00048429848,0.0008509435,0.002942586,0.0062917774,0.00089446775,0.0030504037,0.017134467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005587503,0.0004939888,0.00029902763,0.0017193443,0.01293675,0.008577233,0.0041797105,0.0055375695,0.0035215507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005110165,0.000033731772,0.00048132794,0.0005330936,0.000020168956,0.00013412871,0.017449036,0.00028658393,0.00021976422,0.40003613,0.47694263,0.10381222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011604406,0.000015728801,0.0018192788,0.0013915591,0.000006442474,0.00013716152,0.0071184253,0.00019373374,0.00014894962,0.33459187,0.65454555,0.000019704703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064267754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011490209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017134467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003689847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035491432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057320476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969321747","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719002305","title":"Politics with Beauvoir: Freedom in the Encounter. By Lori Jo Marso. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017. 272p. $94.95 cloth, $26.95 paper. - Emancipatory Thinking: Simone de Beauvoir and Contemporary Political Thought. By Elaine Stavro. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2018. 392p. $39.95 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Media studies; Art; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.013482991534220494,"score_gpt":0.2101981356274396,"score_spread":0.1967151440932191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969321747","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001492218,0.5305961,0.0006586213,0.15936837,0.0063040606,0.00001890322,0.00025102668,0.00008751687,0.30122328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10342213,0.2767609,0.0013037126,0.018504433,0.0044593257,0.00006273035,0.00024079806,0.00042669903,0.5948193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987674,0.00053096685,0.000037009795,0.00014509294,0.0003418963,0.00017766176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988576,0.0005900303,0.00012047486,0.00007936549,0.0001003093,0.00025226487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018686302,0.0009939645,0.00054659444,0.0010557078,0.0071206023,0.007179196,0.0007909299,0.0032360386,0.048377432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030989705,0.000717805,0.00040785296,0.0025997208,0.009266004,0.0068030967,0.0032210064,0.00531026,0.010399198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019620824,0.000012085883,0.0001030839,0.00015613758,0.000003821202,0.0000857084,0.00610319,0.000057902078,0.00006733267,0.06804602,0.89538825,0.029956777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026390742,0.0000027756614,0.0005298142,0.0002646588,0.0000011407816,0.00007856915,0.0031681021,0.0000166721,0.000025735177,0.009923133,0.9859801,0.000006628769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048041936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16024381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048377432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00607417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004640954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16183859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969914360","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719001920","title":"Force and Contention in Contemporary China: Memory and Resistance in the Long Shadow of the Catastrophic Past. By Ralph A. ThaxtonJr. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 488p. $99.99 cloth, $39.99 paper.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Resistance (ecology); China; History; Art history; Economic history; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021523383755671394,"score_gpt":0.24357027201016143,"score_spread":0.22204688825449004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969914360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037456125,0.43416095,0.00048594666,0.42103866,0.003169674,0.000026672247,0.000119270364,0.000042365846,0.10350036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334539,0.17126448,0.00038844964,0.012150594,0.004421169,0.00004699685,0.00007921229,0.00003914007,0.07815603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956876,0.0001692811,0.000013543644,0.000048569185,0.00008754919,0.000112260794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931633,0.00030850343,0.00009098356,0.000043784476,0.00007474945,0.00016571098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011613226,0.0006792099,0.0004689486,0.0013189976,0.0045766137,0.0040270025,0.0007848073,0.0019086758,0.010219717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017448216,0.00028068744,0.00025479207,0.0033233168,0.01483523,0.006973573,0.0021709371,0.002684771,0.0006066814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000694487,0.000038272792,0.0039368644,0.0005209652,0.000028201379,0.0005375767,0.08969692,0.0003791736,0.00029223677,0.51348966,0.31836975,0.072641045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036870802,0.00006820117,0.019891502,0.0012729431,0.000020314239,0.00029325308,0.055221353,0.00048892276,0.0002122187,0.23095752,0.6914741,0.00006285539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039629564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07254254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039629564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070720376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006098276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07879782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982627803","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719003402","title":"Democracy versus Security as Standards of Political Legitimacy: The Case of National Policy on Irregular Migrant Arrivals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Normative; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Corporate governance; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02278781833099053,"score_gpt":0.3927881244990058,"score_spread":0.37000030616801527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982627803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158471,0.0006114068,0.016148018,0.10935698,0.00022401495,0.00016637253,0.000045476172,0.000032228985,0.35756838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954196,0.0000919641,0.00074905995,0.000803552,0.00003240551,0.000043094446,0.000004336235,0.000007956618,0.0028480366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983497,0.010627293,0.0003028641,0.00085640297,0.001259678,0.0034567444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856009,0.009858993,0.0014096735,0.0010969186,0.001090178,0.00094327016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01860624,0.00038535008,0.00067377306,0.0015620013,0.019728854,0.010789559,0.0016677523,0.0084180785,0.0037470683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023776371,0.00030808037,0.00054925797,0.0015110975,0.04597351,0.006616374,0.00982203,0.0078281155,0.00020828507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014597445,0.000022686809,0.0010009875,0.000010544884,0.0000031406403,0.0002482173,0.018477837,0.0005269353,0.000077997705,0.9777714,0.0004914456,0.0013540066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010644036,0.00005265498,0.004703478,0.00018813292,0.000028667659,0.00019990085,0.051341187,0.0060012913,0.0007075546,0.88805366,0.048565306,0.000051845862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07926716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08886468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07926716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021884728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017894318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15878552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999595175","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719004626","title":"Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Elite; Compromise; Democracy; Law and economics; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Federalism; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04728064222518964,"score_gpt":0.35337209365556366,"score_spread":0.30609145143037403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999595175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18417157,0.0011110832,0.09646472,0.06750941,0.0013358893,0.00021827238,0.00017886116,0.00014254969,0.64886755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684275,0.00010080649,0.005766077,0.0033897632,0.00013229197,0.000106585336,0.000027433747,0.00003382799,0.022015654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878549,0.0050832657,0.00022821693,0.0013535294,0.0022194695,0.0032606637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620396,0.0010151234,0.000478501,0.0008543217,0.00076010235,0.0006880666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071505713,0.0003257369,0.00056021445,0.00093220867,0.011108475,0.008962973,0.0017952473,0.0028725553,0.004613976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011948369,0.0002821691,0.00058972347,0.0010013259,0.03518913,0.0036629774,0.004802117,0.004736045,0.0005199277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015341977,0.000005068437,0.00031514672,0.000004551445,0.0000020262703,0.000015800222,0.0018132589,0.00014100727,0.000051520037,0.9943533,0.0010059241,0.00227714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114455186,0.000094526506,0.0043671844,0.00011913698,0.0000570951,0.00012057135,0.005631233,0.003734321,0.0015934638,0.82261515,0.16146563,0.00008723009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23233286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30687866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23233286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016363375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016840626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46196103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008428873","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719004444","title":"Immigration and the Politics of Welfare Exclusion: Selective Solidarity in Western Democracies. By Edward Anthony Koning. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2019. 307p. $67.50 cloth, $29.96 paper.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Immigration; Politics; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Social exclusion; Political economy; Religious studies; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00829083220835487,"score_gpt":0.2623299158718988,"score_spread":0.25403908366354394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008428873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027380688,0.5959348,0.00012779022,0.31675854,0.0039798073,0.00001140598,0.00021798217,0.000020666253,0.08021091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12924826,0.6307043,0.00034900967,0.02474883,0.0062548337,0.00005293924,0.00029930746,0.00007019452,0.20827234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929345,0.00027047488,0.000026218813,0.000058866553,0.00014868326,0.00020230855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994313,0.00016831825,0.00008269834,0.000021730368,0.00007225428,0.00022371649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062109,0.000704362,0.0004566451,0.0008650969,0.0043828026,0.0045277784,0.0005377562,0.0025277175,0.020426698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013927314,0.0004235138,0.0002779064,0.0033332757,0.007361092,0.0040127663,0.0029531578,0.0034608603,0.0031579034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038124876,0.00001829283,0.00073466566,0.00035595498,0.000010840179,0.000097889395,0.006385824,0.00007950326,0.00010332616,0.07034721,0.8894176,0.03241089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012448621,0.000011737682,0.006822385,0.0012926022,0.00001099695,0.00009546378,0.009441312,0.000040590916,0.00004530252,0.023358582,0.9588516,0.000017159513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14031196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31888306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14031196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008746831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008544892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2789905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033777831","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720000146","title":"Shaping the Metropolis: Institutions and Urbanization in the United States and Canada. By Zack Taylor. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019. 472p. $120.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Urbanization; Political science; Regional science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.021709998413604353,"score_gpt":0.2480400858535102,"score_spread":0.22633008743990585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033777831","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015848072,0.7431664,0.00084755605,0.13560183,0.0019225887,0.00006486154,0.0041868137,0.0001307659,0.098231114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33014923,0.5026067,0.0020974372,0.0040326193,0.00049449946,0.00006556269,0.0018820213,0.00019794048,0.15847403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961346,0.000059174425,0.000012934124,0.00003547817,0.00015081982,0.00012812272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999408,0.00007065995,0.000059516347,0.000018779392,0.00023549276,0.0002074543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005155182,0.0009572191,0.0004565983,0.0017035957,0.005077936,0.0053783352,0.0010149509,0.0012262296,0.01107601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012653894,0.0006526386,0.0003274132,0.008396084,0.007324942,0.0022748713,0.0017902282,0.0018312914,0.0009703466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045249344,0.00003128268,0.010571014,0.00067385106,0.000047803864,0.0002153864,0.018135263,0.0015696803,0.00022995954,0.10069594,0.7143436,0.15344101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012087663,0.000009661631,0.06415406,0.0015122764,0.000052066316,0.00011593731,0.022672802,0.00066884607,0.00019966463,0.017829034,0.89270455,0.0000690239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07091397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07091397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07836814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083986913","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002091","title":"Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Openness to experience; Ideology; Corporate governance; Political economy; Political science; Conservatism; Populism; Democracy; Politics; Public opinion; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05145243570883068,"score_gpt":0.36005235486125886,"score_spread":0.3085999191524282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083986913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685786,0.00039368303,0.00022562341,0.002423762,0.000021632897,0.0000040835216,0.000015724148,0.0000032595722,0.02833376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.00015056894,0.000036820646,0.00020096557,0.000011511622,0.0000018234034,0.000006172237,0.000001818546,0.0007092798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902,0.00039765277,0.000040201547,0.00012102904,0.000106730375,0.00031436046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785703,0.0005263263,0.00074920635,0.00018246866,0.00015760053,0.0005274136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016020408,0.00007710831,0.00020588587,0.0010349513,0.002451648,0.0038495408,0.00015857012,0.00047858368,0.0023725359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026914172,0.00012720826,0.00011282696,0.0010927427,0.0044941534,0.002471613,0.0012490377,0.0007455493,0.00020005563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008693762,0.00010840312,0.5142531,0.00008735799,0.00004907434,0.00075178745,0.34298816,0.00010052878,0.0018871999,0.06254658,0.0027960413,0.07434482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013243043,0.000057569832,0.59018767,0.00028269616,0.000029728104,0.0006729225,0.32479575,0.00029517032,0.0006270377,0.022819571,0.06018313,0.000035491565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059487172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013505333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059487172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090310775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007224304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011828184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110945770","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002832","title":"Merging Interests: When Domestic Firms Shape FDI Policy. By Sarah Bauerle Danzman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 308p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Foreign direct investment; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015023917556371915,"score_gpt":0.23870190619219567,"score_spread":0.22367798863582375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110945770","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008620697,0.6731691,0.00034809078,0.2927016,0.0027665384,0.0000048614306,0.00016370749,0.000030172776,0.029953865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07920931,0.74134856,0.0008917697,0.03148915,0.005065064,0.000036278143,0.00031104218,0.000106802225,0.14154203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994128,0.0002532422,0.000026490487,0.00008002753,0.00011310278,0.00011450249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909985,0.0005349787,0.00010113521,0.000024723648,0.000118682,0.00012072459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014692065,0.0008365812,0.00046386558,0.0014543807,0.0015981627,0.0049100467,0.00063853565,0.0031942318,0.016556818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025179773,0.0006290504,0.00034442163,0.0026693565,0.0038318648,0.008826493,0.0021835703,0.0032242616,0.0039495598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030294077,0.000010303384,0.0003807551,0.0002526196,0.000011012545,0.00006798321,0.0014592217,0.00017556216,0.00010484036,0.07248456,0.85551983,0.069503084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898004,0.000008351224,0.0026663686,0.0014062519,0.0000107827855,0.00014079607,0.0023261518,0.00025484787,0.0001463411,0.060647063,0.93236166,0.000020384183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021408152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04132635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021408152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055078533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025188169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055388093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111340396","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002704","title":"Crippling Leviathan: How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State. By Melissa M. Lee. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020. 248p. $39.95 cloth.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; State (computer science); LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political science; Computer security; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.029781382908142896,"score_gpt":0.2613281017371312,"score_spread":0.23154671882898833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111340396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010318296,0.20565026,0.00039415743,0.44856304,0.0032441511,0.000017385102,0.00012715798,0.00007930177,0.33160615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39212644,0.17774379,0.0007804316,0.039573245,0.0014884013,0.000058464888,0.00016429153,0.0002241057,0.38784084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995896,0.00021664126,0.000007770121,0.000032526244,0.000042011045,0.00011145229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997266,0.0001113936,0.000034099594,0.0000140468055,0.000032297994,0.0000815546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009875783,0.00032413812,0.0002296606,0.00042637996,0.00327532,0.0038526778,0.00058000354,0.0019974303,0.018577086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014922397,0.00021628717,0.00026821572,0.0007634094,0.0041730613,0.0044802106,0.0025382459,0.0030368648,0.0025128387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006607547,0.000026214067,0.00072350714,0.0002884638,0.000018743765,0.000334957,0.014851409,0.00016737728,0.00029635202,0.27381805,0.63501644,0.07439241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012684528,0.00002688051,0.0025647813,0.0006720077,0.000011468328,0.00015405875,0.014067448,0.00012863416,0.0001673214,0.050334763,0.93184465,0.00001531322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022449857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06171375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022449857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034085778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032463663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062146604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133902933","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720003862","title":"Participation Without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. By Garry Rodan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018. 300p. $115.00 cloth, $32.95 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03684640036767413,"score_gpt":0.3042481006287189,"score_spread":0.26740170026104476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133902933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013065463,0.65177256,0.00092709693,0.19951357,0.005012123,0.0000354928,0.00025698644,0.00008561089,0.1293311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28931826,0.55574465,0.0012436198,0.009718329,0.0031790761,0.00012775366,0.00028183847,0.00013987948,0.14024663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996884,0.0001760575,0.000016443912,0.00003013362,0.000040339546,0.000048709855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952567,0.0001859182,0.00008369111,0.000023210812,0.000049046368,0.00013242684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010941171,0.000901427,0.0003672764,0.0006997488,0.0026150008,0.003684016,0.0005323637,0.0015311248,0.015746124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009841162,0.0003700825,0.00026965828,0.0020411818,0.0048723114,0.005585193,0.0028085473,0.0023530426,0.0021541836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007555806,0.00005800939,0.0029099465,0.0015164727,0.00003080265,0.0006208747,0.054118767,0.00025570425,0.00042741495,0.1968241,0.5408623,0.20230004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015486381,0.00004569611,0.009088537,0.0028201584,0.0000201428,0.0005726935,0.035994556,0.00023145089,0.00026511386,0.08265413,0.8682721,0.00001987861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011425883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024420006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015746124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021755437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034435096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052676022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135302181","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720004521","title":"The New Twenty Years’ Crisis: A Critique of International Relations, 1999–2019. By Philip Cunliffe. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2020. 168p. $91.33 cloth, $21.27 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Sociology; History; Biology","score_opus":0.009050593770760703,"score_gpt":0.2834923954472745,"score_spread":0.2744418016765138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135302181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024659096,0.3502045,0.00046660562,0.5024197,0.004834963,0.000013748703,0.00023405082,0.000025447915,0.13933514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45565036,0.28324002,0.00091396645,0.1045212,0.008355143,0.0002148446,0.00037500128,0.00027782287,0.1464516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974917,0.0011059768,0.000091449285,0.00021814226,0.0005228541,0.00056986697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978967,0.0011361231,0.00027096187,0.00009465155,0.00026354258,0.00033804632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004760777,0.001139484,0.0005537809,0.0026471927,0.008593363,0.014611708,0.0016603984,0.008772638,0.008100485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008231246,0.0005529773,0.00057132985,0.0063380115,0.020501785,0.013999663,0.004738766,0.009771042,0.0009429474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004394001,0.000010644197,0.00030031812,0.00013705304,0.000011597375,0.00016242177,0.014656277,0.00024855233,0.00003264401,0.6229242,0.34715435,0.014318048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115604735,0.000006344199,0.0015009231,0.0008584986,0.000005784463,0.00008407228,0.01021488,0.00009620393,0.000048942493,0.076732874,0.9104203,0.00001961584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17472301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24226266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17472301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034814727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018392377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34741205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164612247","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721000876","title":"Just Property, Volume Three: Property in an Age of Ideologies. By Christopher Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 344p. $85.00 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Ideology; Content (measure theory); Volume (thermodynamics); Media studies; Economic history; Gerontology; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Law; Medicine; Politics; Physics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027359632239261033,"score_gpt":0.275448121176771,"score_spread":0.24808848893750995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164612247","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004960446,0.8207026,0.0005924423,0.11246504,0.0077179554,0.000010591492,0.00019246023,0.000061928906,0.057760984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026121968,0.6712748,0.0012983466,0.015963456,0.008301227,0.000080676655,0.00044451197,0.00022913527,0.2762859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925,0.00022667844,0.0000511389,0.00009349853,0.00027179165,0.00010687219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0005191008,0.00013162813,0.000067922745,0.00020965221,0.00020424656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013302921,0.0012611834,0.00070855266,0.0018039941,0.0023088502,0.006700508,0.001014066,0.0034315358,0.027861336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027672497,0.00086550997,0.00055135106,0.002977809,0.00543574,0.01196626,0.0026413163,0.004342609,0.009930561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014022255,0.000007893334,0.00013990459,0.0002782611,0.0000047711687,0.00005078866,0.00094995444,0.00004390239,0.00004739824,0.029436192,0.9270697,0.04195718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029970713,0.0000036449194,0.00047292112,0.0006313239,0.0000030938425,0.000121408535,0.0010416725,0.000026185644,0.000027121416,0.017473163,0.98019034,0.000006193503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012531424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024425551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027861336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003756074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041984324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09320545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200101919","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721002978","title":"Uncivil Mirth: Ridicule in Enlightenment Britain. By Ross Carroll. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021. 280p. $35.00 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Media studies; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011206935664499566,"score_gpt":0.24931469251699967,"score_spread":0.2381077568525001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200101919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029683798,0.6901003,0.00016874376,0.21918638,0.008880583,0.000013479645,0.0000793255,0.000042353313,0.0785605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16996534,0.3532254,0.0005246019,0.025759624,0.0055810073,0.00006942381,0.0001337911,0.0002668605,0.44447392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988814,0.0005777303,0.000032180826,0.000081798884,0.00023939392,0.00018753599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987663,0.0005915956,0.00015602031,0.000048715767,0.00014865755,0.00028876754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015519903,0.0008414312,0.00052721275,0.0014325605,0.00656978,0.0052451524,0.00080173556,0.0030466672,0.020333646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004186321,0.000764457,0.00023765136,0.0022686622,0.009055456,0.0044894246,0.002511442,0.0040097563,0.004900978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027624115,0.00001147994,0.00019297205,0.00028429102,0.000007013204,0.00016911191,0.015122361,0.000028889177,0.000074256364,0.039386455,0.9139947,0.030700913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004158545,0.0000052880737,0.0015770269,0.00061560894,0.0000028885206,0.00011074875,0.009318312,0.000018173205,0.000035558103,0.0055820104,0.98272115,0.000009057286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048258383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1271988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048258383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052879187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038305654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095955014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200129279","doi":"10.1017/s153759272100267x","title":"Policing Citizens: Minority Policy in Israel. By Guy Ben-Porat and Fany Yuval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper. - Reconstructing the Civic: Palestinian Activism in Israel. By Amal Jamal. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2020. 316p. $95.00 cloth, $32.95 paper. - The Sword Is Not Enough: Arabs, Israelis, and the Limits of Military Force. By Jeremy Pressman. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020. 296p. $36.95 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.015183140757536979,"score_gpt":0.24540363433945767,"score_spread":0.23022049358192068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200129279","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076091045,0.7187207,0.00010124609,0.24393773,0.005514762,0.00001887791,0.00017679032,0.000042988857,0.030726044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027882563,0.62126166,0.00054141495,0.05303635,0.009805008,0.00013425892,0.0004464387,0.00012962423,0.28676268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992449,0.00026144122,0.00003776694,0.00008459865,0.00020572996,0.0001655979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.00022703018,0.0000933273,0.000019777435,0.00012691919,0.0003373323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016613915,0.0015273199,0.00058820494,0.0017950544,0.0031151758,0.00481212,0.0012298409,0.004033445,0.044848364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015292692,0.0005623989,0.00037521194,0.0028254986,0.002701667,0.0058456245,0.0032927385,0.0038014392,0.017323798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015108709,0.000016077094,0.00027549587,0.00022688918,0.0000034624522,0.0000354432,0.001385452,0.000023182367,0.000051935476,0.004418114,0.9468411,0.046707597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010365038,0.000010118532,0.0016272473,0.0013145586,0.000004157666,0.00005363025,0.0045884093,0.00003239178,0.000046447032,0.0033619576,0.9889415,0.000009283012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03593825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07854291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044848364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005719113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052756732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1500327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200414843","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721002309","title":"Good Enough for Government Work: The Public Reputation Crisis in America (And What We Can Do to Fix It). By Amy E. Lerman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. 304p. $82.50 cloth, $27.50 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hendrix Genetics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.019126091932960863,"score_gpt":0.2391829576109721,"score_spread":0.22005686567801125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200414843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076948374,0.23209599,0.00007283586,0.73856264,0.006611681,0.000005520034,0.00007961947,0.000034079385,0.021768125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10472846,0.48165414,0.00072766654,0.22297312,0.025005298,0.00007962336,0.00034856747,0.00019425417,0.16428886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814224,0.00072525267,0.000047163237,0.00017440741,0.00052060286,0.00039039654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967248,0.00093342294,0.00046871888,0.000102926366,0.0005272376,0.0012429536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024213076,0.0008016496,0.00051073846,0.0014534025,0.004834225,0.010994826,0.00090654066,0.007516324,0.02092953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049668807,0.00050590315,0.0003655775,0.002930076,0.0064449967,0.016377848,0.0036080845,0.009045616,0.009183661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007696511,0.000011898872,0.00024234455,0.0000644636,0.00000316313,0.00003076136,0.0006881395,0.000015574149,0.000021674012,0.009814872,0.97082496,0.018274441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008982959,0.000015237875,0.0043219216,0.0011711575,0.000007865824,0.00010905384,0.0067477813,0.00005122235,0.000046666108,0.018685471,0.9688062,0.000028498385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01859641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04656657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02092953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056003463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007416878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070016325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205983442","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705320494","title":"Just Work","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Identity (music); Constitution; Politics; Sociology; Hegelianism; Work (physics); Maturity (psychological); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03336930429010505,"score_gpt":0.3367301079165405,"score_spread":0.30336080362643547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205983442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070494396,0.22921157,0.0020547307,0.17377086,0.017970353,0.00006795031,0.00055884564,0.00072345766,0.57493734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012553358,0.05895155,0.001539739,0.03703308,0.0036454343,0.00013408848,0.00045359987,0.00052055554,0.88516855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873453,0.0003922547,0.00006050655,0.00021736571,0.00039063976,0.00020473886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898833,0.0002435366,0.000096503696,0.00011569174,0.0002253349,0.00033063977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012589032,0.0012859575,0.00050138286,0.0015670619,0.0031855574,0.00672475,0.0011995444,0.0039047454,0.12534173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003624717,0.0006005221,0.0004848761,0.0018749196,0.0031252569,0.010405672,0.0040136487,0.00414303,0.12152618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000701708,0.0000109706,0.00006052861,0.00008287202,0.0000014987004,0.000018661227,0.00061318546,0.000011598594,0.000025773526,0.016560651,0.93268704,0.04992023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013333653,0.0000033163872,0.00009825059,0.00013688125,5.1965304e-7,0.000040982883,0.00036970488,0.000006005511,0.000011533446,0.0038015083,0.9955277,0.0000022376714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005822432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012156219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12534173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002800244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035069727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206977528","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721003029","title":"PPS volume 19 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.021192533642591962,"score_gpt":0.2189267828919214,"score_spread":0.19773424924932945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206977528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005604634,0.001854832,0.00040460879,0.0056509785,0.020095464,0.00008652419,0.0018493751,0.00081088854,0.96868694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018494213,0.0012942867,0.0001535263,0.0016597952,0.005740351,0.000025736146,0.0008727521,0.00030641037,0.9880976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992803,0.000059222722,0.0000303996,0.00015215362,0.00039229708,0.000085750136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980392,0.00032569483,0.000073871684,0.00021623119,0.0007287538,0.00061628205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067913864,0.0010317223,0.0008647643,0.0020149213,0.0015832817,0.006481207,0.0008349589,0.0025690799,0.86600995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028101665,0.0004209968,0.00068392,0.0020513125,0.00076376053,0.0023707636,0.0020076423,0.0022956599,0.8524438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002210104,0.000033684508,0.00012708206,0.00009525444,0.0000025758436,0.00003553324,0.000011713306,0.000042617932,0.00026821246,0.0016178628,0.95412564,0.043617755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057398843,0.000009941569,0.00043995312,0.00007465719,0.0000012372041,0.00003951183,0.000022081487,0.00005485125,0.00009585259,0.00058363355,0.9986695,0.0000030203998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012384228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017959448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13399005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013485131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013674039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19112045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220928813","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721003790","title":"All Politics Are God’s Politics: Moroccan Islamism and the Sacralization of Democracy. By Ahmed Khanani. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2021. 230p. $120.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Content (measure theory); Religious studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010824277640327671,"score_gpt":0.24103042207690378,"score_spread":0.2302061444365761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220928813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115186805,0.7340919,0.00013695283,0.21155593,0.0041911737,0.000011368549,0.00011314735,0.00001797688,0.038362823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55206823,0.35177812,0.0004944334,0.016040139,0.0059025018,0.00003786338,0.00012237868,0.000046920035,0.073509395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995484,0.00026107332,0.0000108512495,0.000030055586,0.000057455083,0.00009217354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.00028409023,0.00009824142,0.000021181984,0.00006169793,0.0001027966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013678324,0.00093488203,0.00035366142,0.00087048346,0.0041105947,0.0032908127,0.0006164535,0.00171331,0.0059797973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001220915,0.00040012941,0.00023102069,0.0014707393,0.0053806975,0.003121661,0.0013784734,0.0021233591,0.00083304854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022644397,0.0000750217,0.0031111606,0.0009390569,0.00004758766,0.0011187245,0.048814323,0.00032362816,0.0008262306,0.19505969,0.6159829,0.13347521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042944477,0.00006453545,0.020734573,0.00182938,0.000029736302,0.0005659885,0.027658796,0.00031553765,0.00038695429,0.039143004,0.9091954,0.00003303827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050350603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12573203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050350603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060624564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003144109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10011506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236509450","doi":"10.1017/s1537592716004072","title":"PPS volume 15 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; York University; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; International Atomic Energy Agency; George Washington University; Australian Government; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; City University of New York; University of Southern California; Yale University; U.S. Department of Homeland Security","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012983426494799378,"score_gpt":0.25599809175217925,"score_spread":0.24301466525737986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236509450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093804894,0.0020684444,0.00027072872,0.0033343295,0.0055686403,0.000052228363,0.00080505793,0.00051279634,0.9864498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028539468,0.0012329292,0.00012763134,0.00076398125,0.0011990434,0.000011712528,0.0004033161,0.0001638661,0.99324363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942064,0.00004804981,0.000019033023,0.00010944553,0.0003141763,0.00008864843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912137,0.00010423922,0.000034904777,0.00010597773,0.0002939727,0.00033960675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041409244,0.0008629535,0.00056114065,0.0015820061,0.0017727055,0.006482892,0.0006718721,0.002180689,0.8754851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014839465,0.000333912,0.00043046108,0.001532404,0.0008766777,0.0020053268,0.0027689806,0.001708166,0.776623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033985645,0.000060611506,0.0003817789,0.00023550542,0.000004028502,0.00009927359,0.00007534847,0.00006139912,0.0007489081,0.0037979884,0.8703621,0.12413913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020472169,0.000006418811,0.00046893427,0.00005719693,8.1741166e-7,0.00005229589,0.000063516665,0.000026146063,0.00008348448,0.000270302,0.99896705,0.000001774407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022966156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004241309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12451488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014859297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014025772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17760539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240359696","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001188","title":"PPS volume 13 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Mathematics; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Mathematical analysis; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016233764859657093,"score_gpt":0.24608080842542104,"score_spread":0.22984704356576396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240359696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009901687,0.0017170252,0.00047575598,0.006426128,0.012632058,0.00006698874,0.0013284178,0.00091205136,0.9754515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003414649,0.0011371499,0.00018084738,0.0015325259,0.0027707461,0.000021493277,0.00067816477,0.000248788,0.99001557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994597,0.000046955272,0.000019847255,0.0000828841,0.0003150656,0.000075602045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917823,0.0001398907,0.000024790945,0.000110144,0.00029783582,0.00024917533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054646085,0.00077652157,0.00057799555,0.0014948986,0.0015741332,0.0050170184,0.0005554347,0.0019638557,0.81749445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001749732,0.00033746508,0.0004963439,0.0013985863,0.0007795897,0.0014698502,0.0018338766,0.0019737668,0.7276844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024653471,0.000035760026,0.00015960258,0.00010795658,0.0000029484497,0.000060932216,0.000032881497,0.00006077749,0.00050039135,0.0029897562,0.9485841,0.04744025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043338305,0.000008580273,0.00056566816,0.0000648752,0.0000015223743,0.000054014745,0.000044326105,0.00006148292,0.00016606136,0.00070762896,0.9983187,0.000002831174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002271748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003362171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18250555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015389175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013064805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26032203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244404172","doi":"10.1017/s153759271500314x","title":"PPS volume 13 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Meteorology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01637738156858993,"score_gpt":0.24651200305319731,"score_spread":0.2301346214846074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244404172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009740847,0.0016861192,0.00044078627,0.00646154,0.01252512,0.00006811342,0.0013284134,0.0008842851,0.9756315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031308352,0.0010542879,0.00016585192,0.0014046499,0.00262717,0.00002086236,0.0006650604,0.00023059595,0.9907006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942136,0.00005151644,0.00002134956,0.000087737026,0.00033521667,0.00008283328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991364,0.00014248787,0.000026156007,0.000114198556,0.00031313166,0.0002676654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057168666,0.00081653695,0.0006055081,0.0016302537,0.0016290064,0.0050479956,0.0005872661,0.002010585,0.8286314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001846894,0.00036239068,0.0005070611,0.0014395843,0.0007986238,0.0015271724,0.0019529336,0.001990704,0.73795164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025208978,0.00003780276,0.00016579084,0.00011194789,0.0000030977733,0.00005945009,0.00003215848,0.000063068896,0.000487842,0.0029064545,0.9484981,0.047609217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044733447,0.000008843085,0.00055786263,0.00006371516,0.0000015305753,0.00005013294,0.00004422711,0.000058827398,0.00016230471,0.0006679267,0.9983773,0.0000028589131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023034776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003359111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1713686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016500698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013808005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24443644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245770698","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710000599","title":"PPS volume 8 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.021512016791382017,"score_gpt":0.22885569000052658,"score_spread":0.20734367320914457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245770698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049129105,0.0020646928,0.0003133715,0.006104762,0.025708746,0.000070104914,0.0037702413,0.0006987034,0.9607783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001416151,0.0008686538,0.00007100825,0.00093856535,0.0024626167,0.000023003942,0.0009971116,0.0002845305,0.99293834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910647,0.00010039613,0.00003946245,0.00014151819,0.0004992912,0.00011294236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850947,0.0003145452,0.00006297435,0.00018106135,0.00063680374,0.0002951527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000594355,0.0009368892,0.0009973643,0.0022248323,0.0017138665,0.0067021456,0.0007843527,0.0019025403,0.7934132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038635528,0.00037691215,0.00046581676,0.003132238,0.00085749576,0.002646484,0.0019191599,0.002714234,0.78252643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001573705,0.000013499887,0.000045933924,0.000076618955,0.0000011244421,0.000013702505,0.000013292429,0.000036315454,0.00009008739,0.0016000005,0.9796352,0.018458584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005047863,0.000011405134,0.00042892882,0.00009466065,0.0000011354241,0.000023668346,0.000032816086,0.00005068893,0.00008724908,0.00075230724,0.99850863,0.0000034673703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028615994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004068184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20658678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020846725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015337704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29467094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253663531","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705050279","title":"Counterpoint","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Section (typography); Style (visual arts); Publication; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.03046351387453963,"score_gpt":0.2275458090015227,"score_spread":0.19708229512698305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253663531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031680618,0.0058031618,0.007564701,0.23424983,0.16206323,0.0002493043,0.00066072703,0.00065167906,0.58558935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083182804,0.003849523,0.0035208769,0.1833588,0.02920833,0.00049854256,0.0005567992,0.0007571251,0.69506717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895494,0.002170018,0.0006905434,0.002193701,0.0038416313,0.0015547964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97718686,0.007202087,0.0012822363,0.0032216716,0.008852233,0.0022548332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008569176,0.0010024431,0.0008303153,0.0020530059,0.0043002088,0.01264015,0.0030008957,0.011158089,0.22808076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05874181,0.00050650554,0.0010938972,0.001534405,0.004151474,0.0089733945,0.006542534,0.011035589,0.075467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023183235,0.000023050132,0.00037348628,0.00016113647,0.000015505264,0.0005540939,0.00056283415,0.000060722406,0.00022034365,0.302256,0.66718525,0.028355794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026985332,0.000029381074,0.00011729498,0.00015403115,0.000008040019,0.00026271987,0.00034491895,0.00007657187,0.00024841438,0.026185574,0.97253215,0.000013851729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028091085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022072103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77191925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042192084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005390051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76300615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256273261","doi":"10.1017/s1537592716000013","title":"PPS volume 14 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.008490782548254019,"score_gpt":0.2288752356387661,"score_spread":0.22038445309051208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256273261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001064891,0.002004167,0.00047986407,0.0074398466,0.0146707315,0.000069431764,0.0013774603,0.0009049588,0.9719886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033118422,0.0012115805,0.00018290427,0.0015474855,0.0032232057,0.00002234514,0.00068520696,0.0002482815,0.9895671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938536,0.000058203183,0.00002279578,0.000096291034,0.00035256275,0.00008482408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990897,0.000156598,0.000028655422,0.0001243955,0.00031855545,0.00028199123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058583415,0.00082805863,0.00060051604,0.0016065852,0.0015554545,0.0052471883,0.00057882833,0.002106506,0.81344336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001953204,0.0003665356,0.0004858419,0.0014368561,0.0008124994,0.0016002205,0.0019860873,0.0020397594,0.7239736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026621688,0.00004076493,0.0001698393,0.00011864568,0.0000030693243,0.00006577856,0.000035840447,0.00006438239,0.0005106864,0.0030933195,0.94596386,0.049907222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044367166,0.000008684018,0.0004927561,0.0000624002,0.0000013877518,0.000056130433,0.00004143115,0.000053846226,0.00015104024,0.0006575406,0.9984676,0.000002720841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019631379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029086454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81344336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015247661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013171303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2661004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256596304","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715003163","title":"PPS volume 14 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.008830143202025327,"score_gpt":0.22942273487088383,"score_spread":0.2205925916688585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256596304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006089053,0.0009167219,0.00021531044,0.0029867887,0.0053057666,0.00003865122,0.00067945936,0.00050818763,0.98874027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001823904,0.00057625846,0.00009562859,0.00081787474,0.00095229025,0.000010875392,0.00035489595,0.0001569499,0.9952113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994684,0.000050539893,0.000018000423,0.00010337065,0.00027096143,0.00008873336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992256,0.00010608678,0.000027828606,0.00010907451,0.00024221865,0.0002891528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043663607,0.0008587934,0.00055031123,0.0015812936,0.0023083393,0.0064670797,0.0006794057,0.0024243041,0.88661665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016571807,0.00039861683,0.0005275845,0.0015443425,0.00087350165,0.0021790515,0.0031220273,0.0019473882,0.83650553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023452321,0.000049582508,0.0002170389,0.000110546374,0.000002330627,0.00007609343,0.00005198815,0.00004114492,0.0004706784,0.0029200616,0.9260726,0.06996455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023614057,0.000006440563,0.00039191326,0.000044101576,7.111869e-7,0.000044665965,0.00006485443,0.000025893041,0.000087447545,0.00041475202,0.99891496,0.000001930885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017893278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88661665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012622788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011665256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1617276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281848607","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722000482","title":"Revealing Schemes: The Politics of Conspiracy in Russia and the Post-Soviet Region. By Scott Radnitz. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 264p. $99.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Media studies; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024093205731615264,"score_gpt":0.27319441145777407,"score_spread":0.2491012057261588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281848607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03228066,0.5564781,0.0028274043,0.24706389,0.0016994626,0.000027315482,0.00031080624,0.00006997953,0.1592424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7096785,0.20512614,0.001160664,0.0032267212,0.001233222,0.000051509553,0.0001456714,0.000061502236,0.0793162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986939,0.000844828,0.00003340509,0.00007114101,0.00020014535,0.00015661033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984345,0.0010010138,0.00026783982,0.000090137895,0.00009243505,0.000114033035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021631708,0.0005294936,0.0004197119,0.0012623672,0.0029697826,0.0043858415,0.0007768361,0.0025413914,0.006757687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003661415,0.00044893078,0.00029027293,0.0029476185,0.0101666,0.0057998425,0.0023911179,0.00201393,0.0010795221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008355536,0.000027437469,0.0013200863,0.00035194194,0.00002633344,0.00017112576,0.022470528,0.0005795291,0.00020765704,0.7307267,0.1519929,0.09204225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029383338,0.000046727422,0.011115456,0.0020387864,0.000023141878,0.00032956977,0.01642001,0.00069395616,0.0003255117,0.35207608,0.61686563,0.000035679823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012354147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019717911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012354147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041996245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027355277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03047055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282033905","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722000196","title":"The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation. By André Blais and Jean-François Daoust. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020. 156p. $34.95 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.025270651157026723,"score_gpt":0.2826865342509501,"score_spread":0.2574158830939234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282033905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04261868,0.5673384,0.0031329666,0.24347484,0.0020759657,0.0000898334,0.0043229884,0.00015060959,0.13679577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56871116,0.27899858,0.002996395,0.0075498708,0.0023287118,0.0001965859,0.003084793,0.00023966303,0.13589422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.0004685792,0.000019126428,0.00005652082,0.0001259433,0.00010046201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962302,0.0026693381,0.00034599437,0.00005462691,0.00037636177,0.0003235425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023082923,0.00086453033,0.0006703259,0.002583638,0.001270153,0.0028199863,0.0008167143,0.0015541286,0.024608422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065915575,0.0007628106,0.00057508424,0.0053432737,0.0024456123,0.0017941754,0.00090177153,0.001557218,0.005075843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012263743,0.00016512052,0.04667225,0.0011757261,0.00016024128,0.00026305532,0.014710949,0.0016243854,0.00019510934,0.053593066,0.6478009,0.23351654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005996795,0.00007807762,0.2587553,0.0049927616,0.000118027,0.00035646983,0.02533211,0.0026016803,0.00016289977,0.085015975,0.6224251,0.00010173457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14827764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29596838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14827764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035375298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022044028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29482913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293835078","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722001530","title":"Undermining American Hegemony: Goods Substitution in World Politics. Edited by Morten Skumsrud Andersen, Alexander Cooley, and Daniel H. Nexon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 235p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Politics; Economic history; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01795722615849247,"score_gpt":0.2886816626608211,"score_spread":0.27072443650232864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293835078","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002476325,0.7460528,0.0012434709,0.1306795,0.0059107183,0.000008303874,0.00008346951,0.00004381507,0.11350162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11229626,0.7336172,0.002332025,0.020350287,0.0080642495,0.00005961688,0.00016572632,0.00013733128,0.12297735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990138,0.0005519858,0.000016744112,0.000060314596,0.00022569827,0.00013146646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994216,0.00032281692,0.000059848076,0.000027326256,0.000086102686,0.00008232816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012750062,0.0013658747,0.00078435085,0.0016347776,0.002785545,0.0069956756,0.0008437222,0.003118911,0.01950741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001582482,0.00066417916,0.00047668742,0.0041131824,0.0066997497,0.007654373,0.0026347197,0.0045939465,0.0035267852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046060075,0.00003781698,0.00037520306,0.00050963706,0.000023573155,0.00009957633,0.0046869265,0.00032609588,0.0003011074,0.30133826,0.6030799,0.089175776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008391725,0.000008485585,0.00097655674,0.0006828341,0.000012632637,0.000066728375,0.0026791373,0.00012569959,0.0001273143,0.20898701,0.7863096,0.000015578216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017808726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040883027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01950741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059133726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005647393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0652588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155308","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002663","title":"What Happened to Civility: The Promise and Failure of Montaigne’s Modern Project. By Ann Hartle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2022. 190p. $100.00 cloth, $30.00 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01385531718372544,"score_gpt":0.2176103678733732,"score_spread":0.20375505068964778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010712872,0.07828078,0.0006706476,0.6524505,0.0025148161,0.000009721857,0.00003150702,0.00005892847,0.25527018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72479665,0.022241909,0.0009200138,0.060532685,0.0031105522,0.00005550783,0.0000288484,0.0002095467,0.18810423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950906,0.003303526,0.000037066053,0.00028301158,0.00055030576,0.0007355289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755317,0.0014240673,0.00016826364,0.00019068332,0.00028643824,0.0003773744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007249485,0.00055620103,0.0005171009,0.0010404285,0.01613817,0.012178182,0.00095884985,0.007872356,0.009000664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006887332,0.00039844622,0.0003678358,0.0009804902,0.042432737,0.007014143,0.004092102,0.007316469,0.0009818526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003496122,0.000013316359,0.00019274885,0.00005073722,0.000007894951,0.00019132183,0.021273298,0.0001033126,0.00009624607,0.7966535,0.16748963,0.013892902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013863294,0.000015751415,0.001270097,0.0003132824,0.000005052024,0.0001422184,0.013265647,0.000106336614,0.00011517307,0.08294051,0.90179104,0.000021050924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0886136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14206932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0886136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021239301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075449906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17619562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155325","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002705","title":"Citizenship in Hard Times: How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat. By Sara Wallace Goodman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.042449408465253864,"score_gpt":0.2882642408829057,"score_spread":0.24581483241765184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032984084,0.42344734,0.0010814156,0.49980706,0.0046801707,0.000029625775,0.000110409106,0.00006969427,0.06747578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24252205,0.45177004,0.0026315157,0.07537045,0.0055354387,0.00027091854,0.00024973258,0.00040282257,0.22124699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792165,0.0013876373,0.000057694157,0.00015806548,0.0002522769,0.00022270725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778724,0.0013315099,0.00020369186,0.00009776523,0.00018593355,0.00039393827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035020036,0.0010000608,0.0005637737,0.00094109453,0.003761974,0.00621423,0.000782486,0.003803907,0.010799258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051076533,0.0006750231,0.0003326157,0.0017111436,0.012774982,0.0100039225,0.00349658,0.0064101624,0.0032507295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004107433,0.000033282966,0.00054419343,0.00050588534,0.000020664584,0.00014114127,0.026132898,0.00015843639,0.00017923088,0.11305078,0.77173495,0.087457545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011726527,0.00001814014,0.0022021339,0.0013106719,0.00000839682,0.0001509498,0.018837389,0.00011639317,0.0001044327,0.075967014,0.9012483,0.000024523883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009167747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025491348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010799258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033650352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004520267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03612709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002560","title":"Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. By Rochelle DuFord. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Media studies; Economic history; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025632758150779363,"score_gpt":0.2963620235976352,"score_spread":0.2707292654468558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155406","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001015633,0.66559446,0.0045013847,0.22062762,0.0037757338,0.000031003707,0.00018161394,0.00007579002,0.10419675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23067518,0.52149117,0.0065501495,0.024778964,0.00751868,0.00030641898,0.00038571944,0.0002304882,0.20806322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977307,0.0013535026,0.00008825419,0.00021241499,0.000426606,0.00018854675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977145,0.0014889175,0.00023554817,0.00011360445,0.00020919842,0.00023826974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00359859,0.0014829357,0.000837868,0.0018824885,0.003737502,0.004925344,0.0013511344,0.0040895767,0.01608464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004416072,0.0012753711,0.00061275397,0.0029843112,0.01272275,0.009732823,0.003185927,0.0064710327,0.004165805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034573586,0.00003392292,0.0002477693,0.00035014423,0.000019753521,0.00008267216,0.0025569738,0.0006136549,0.000059480735,0.38509536,0.5566122,0.05429344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023007353,0.000011371373,0.0010241594,0.0009767384,0.000009605399,0.00017191243,0.0015311535,0.0005021864,0.00005873817,0.37131014,0.6243637,0.000017265811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013266589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018521328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01608464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064026862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047363443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05380851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156100","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003152","title":"Women, Power, and Property: The Paradox of Gender Equality Laws in India. By Rachel Brulé. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 394p. $120.00 cloth, $32.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.027124057727788205,"score_gpt":0.2708318733335281,"score_spread":0.2437078156057399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027707675,0.6214918,0.00031670977,0.32346815,0.004038462,0.000012370303,0.0001854508,0.000033665146,0.04768265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19249143,0.6606144,0.0008897853,0.0294422,0.0064239516,0.0000834235,0.0002824302,0.00013116088,0.109641366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897027,0.00043972273,0.000038271635,0.00010556169,0.0002449297,0.00020123269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813473,0.0012048513,0.00018556105,0.000065867935,0.0001885037,0.00022036591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708618,0.00095372024,0.00060588913,0.0017876516,0.0032405867,0.005070038,0.0013189763,0.0032406005,0.009228381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030250782,0.0007668615,0.00039142842,0.0038300594,0.0094479965,0.007456852,0.002645666,0.0054496317,0.0016642727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054372118,0.000035862253,0.00069506175,0.0006417465,0.000023397894,0.00020272446,0.008683724,0.00021843468,0.00015225788,0.18020977,0.7448691,0.06421345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017798642,0.000022114,0.0069628214,0.0019444461,0.000022187176,0.00037100053,0.012097441,0.00024073654,0.00023392851,0.0989775,0.8790545,0.000055495002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034432482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0654821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034432482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046225404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046845316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0684641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156206","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002584","title":"Normalizing Corruption: Failures of Accountability in Ukraine. By Erik S. Herron. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020. 240p. $75.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Content (measure theory); Language change; Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Art; Literature; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01702599529401734,"score_gpt":0.2697767837591898,"score_spread":0.25275078846517246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156206","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020207665,0.90615326,0.0003022859,0.07236658,0.0025829882,0.000009220908,0.00011962863,0.000042697313,0.016402649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12119502,0.79297316,0.00082370284,0.008380953,0.0027648183,0.000041457522,0.0002220864,0.00009496511,0.07350383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960095,0.00018718347,0.000032016076,0.000042298077,0.000074112846,0.00006347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942905,0.0002325575,0.00013495938,0.00002438415,0.000099935256,0.000079036145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036887,0.00085875863,0.00052124733,0.00097537093,0.0020129604,0.0025152804,0.00051913806,0.0017077016,0.005145544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013911308,0.00044463458,0.00021855441,0.0020424936,0.002599689,0.0034962476,0.0016733038,0.0023683447,0.0016627547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048229416,0.000038820523,0.0015685402,0.0010860419,0.000033735123,0.00028446253,0.0071019055,0.0004633772,0.00020356604,0.04766165,0.78031325,0.1611964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010147171,0.000027429258,0.011748647,0.002831845,0.000021465588,0.00047691574,0.005662438,0.00038701625,0.00037075227,0.029750908,0.9486884,0.000024052657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023096252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042246163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023096252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036385597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031458281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04592365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156235","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002717","title":"Catastrophic Success: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Goes Wrong. By Alexander B. Downes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2021. 424p. $49.95 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Theology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03156450419917367,"score_gpt":0.2705045908904938,"score_spread":0.2389400866913201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011714105,0.5508089,0.000295638,0.40992096,0.0076712435,0.000009184,0.00018439608,0.000054880427,0.02988343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09257187,0.6925208,0.00086988095,0.053674728,0.008918265,0.00006165318,0.00034414022,0.0001516883,0.15088704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996773,0.0001224608,0.000014452924,0.00005582005,0.00007166862,0.000058387548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992761,0.00036381982,0.00010653967,0.000027791262,0.000101683945,0.00012407923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013856125,0.000997664,0.00041789003,0.00070426974,0.0016389927,0.0029031439,0.0007162931,0.0029912929,0.01854178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00290188,0.0005114751,0.00036252078,0.0010656787,0.003993257,0.0043951585,0.0015703008,0.004412109,0.004761114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888701,0.000008820832,0.00042902477,0.0002273593,0.0000117752,0.00008804456,0.0007509185,0.00012995822,0.0000645763,0.019254034,0.9303752,0.048641324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015032814,0.000017578877,0.0047096736,0.0016102528,0.000012299849,0.00027241855,0.002532771,0.00024989806,0.00011522931,0.033874813,0.9565665,0.000023617276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016529527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032089707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01854178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002526792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025780126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062028468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156324","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002602","title":"The Architects of International Relations: Building a Discipline, Designing the World, 1914–1940. By Jan Stöckmann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 280p. $110.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.013881439923414379,"score_gpt":0.22844444045097906,"score_spread":0.2145630005275647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156324","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010573913,0.8535399,0.0010077322,0.05853331,0.0036487742,0.000019362256,0.00029145757,0.00004769526,0.081854485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06735682,0.59308726,0.0029756473,0.006423124,0.0037475897,0.000072444716,0.00030646182,0.00016588549,0.32586473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987984,0.00054450345,0.000071186936,0.00014075886,0.000312188,0.00013300053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915373,0.00041910008,0.00012606091,0.000055170076,0.00012657276,0.000119314864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189645,0.0018479343,0.000508837,0.0033099267,0.0027533458,0.004511615,0.0006923417,0.0021209922,0.018801374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003208009,0.0011205625,0.00038734113,0.005450298,0.009194888,0.0075651845,0.0019094779,0.0033472374,0.005028929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049017628,0.000019303596,0.00056065293,0.00029787753,0.000012874722,0.000080305035,0.005536172,0.00038079664,0.00013510446,0.18558928,0.74257,0.06476859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006393183,0.000007971217,0.0011106011,0.00055899547,0.0000066952775,0.00007204627,0.002187671,0.00004713217,0.000088371395,0.027978856,0.96792555,0.000009690424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045043625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09133674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009477482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064632692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08956289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323364702","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722004182","title":"On the Outside Looking In: Ethnography and Authoritarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Exeter; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Insider; Deference; Ethnography; Authoritarianism; Value (mathematics); Incentive; Politics; Conformity; Sociology; Unintended consequences; Respondent; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.1878246696210174,"score_gpt":0.5084751228832902,"score_spread":0.3206504532622728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323364702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8293825,0.0030800102,0.06725908,0.010961831,0.00043264945,0.000998671,0.00024382946,0.00009726135,0.087544225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987519,0.0008962354,0.0069621718,0.0008170459,0.00008123031,0.0004698948,0.000047939277,0.000058670088,0.003147733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.924277,0.07109591,0.0006815511,0.0014434108,0.001242037,0.0012599977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419838,0.050625987,0.0020179045,0.0033245548,0.0011862994,0.0008614769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031276654,0.0006215575,0.0006568256,0.003977537,0.007811293,0.008189083,0.0013006551,0.0013461199,0.0024601617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029850947,0.00056295,0.0004048082,0.0026589064,0.032417048,0.009671148,0.007906824,0.0024313615,0.00026143348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027025348,0.000033734552,0.0026453417,0.00011357108,0.0000079204265,0.00024444386,0.96126115,0.000076717675,0.00043471667,0.026368232,0.000644385,0.008142726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017615708,0.0000628303,0.0023455333,0.00073213736,0.0000115807925,0.00046146754,0.93240714,0.00032348084,0.0006579409,0.030728336,0.03222397,0.000027946156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002699077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046266075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028087345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029643266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16540873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360874977","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003577","title":"Democracy Here and Now: The Exemplary Case of Spain. By Pablo Ouziel. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Democracy; Action (physics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.01265607569210329,"score_gpt":0.28045390526836605,"score_spread":0.26779782957626275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360874977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04441283,0.23590633,0.0006495225,0.19822903,0.0025502807,0.000023631268,0.00071042165,0.000049430273,0.51746845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7069032,0.060489,0.00047794246,0.009542661,0.0005587668,0.00003899711,0.00039450437,0.00009753337,0.22149728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923,0.0002913967,0.0000150060605,0.000048050588,0.00009044705,0.00032515958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950826,0.00017360011,0.00006468219,0.000028515711,0.00007801046,0.00014682306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010784997,0.0004569205,0.00043289489,0.0005790383,0.0044238605,0.0051669246,0.000998952,0.002227475,0.011218397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014001996,0.00033855846,0.000356948,0.0025897447,0.0044066473,0.0020010236,0.00232221,0.0024656926,0.0013809346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019906393,0.00008073103,0.004133139,0.0004538954,0.000037399335,0.0034159916,0.028058734,0.0012417297,0.00015150601,0.3425573,0.5801031,0.039567456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005895647,0.0000111842855,0.01227651,0.00080444844,0.000015985053,0.00037580536,0.021533126,0.0002913097,0.0000857369,0.031732045,0.9327883,0.000026684284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3416812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5425587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3416812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015810125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076212822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6793848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360874989","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003474","title":"Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions. By Kristen Ghodsee and Mitchell Orenstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 300p. $99.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Economic history; Shock (circulatory); Gerontology; Media studies; History; Sociology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04713365040305196,"score_gpt":0.30811956051510836,"score_spread":0.2609859101120564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360874989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031705014,0.42811453,0.00024232898,0.46889383,0.004899956,0.000018806877,0.0004249179,0.000021343281,0.06567925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5929489,0.3126174,0.00032590795,0.022851788,0.0051412163,0.000044027922,0.00034056697,0.00006290376,0.06566733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946374,0.00026823537,0.000013056034,0.00003836972,0.000077972254,0.0001386468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00041723147,0.00019761034,0.000024333449,0.0000566693,0.000111912086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010029968,0.0005252741,0.0002796164,0.00070151594,0.0020910725,0.0024793444,0.0004654832,0.002128654,0.006091254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002418806,0.00026978584,0.0002702549,0.0013700749,0.003861492,0.0025383327,0.001649126,0.002433583,0.00073137414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016188745,0.00008346821,0.0036448499,0.00047505196,0.000066523055,0.00064320577,0.016718194,0.00060046784,0.0002579866,0.090256296,0.7764721,0.11061991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057559955,0.00005483449,0.057670716,0.002339789,0.000039761675,0.0004326666,0.029272575,0.00044967816,0.00028097047,0.08063205,0.8287173,0.000052077463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022370297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06814934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022370297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028081976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016074375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044480205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360875780","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003784","title":"The Comparative Politics of Immigration: Policy Choices in Germany, Canada, Switzerland, and the United States. By Antje Ellermann. Cambridge, UK, 2021. 435p. $130.00 cloth, $39.99 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Public administration; Political economy; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.012710048138795657,"score_gpt":0.29755814448789164,"score_spread":0.28484809634909597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360875780","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12856711,0.4293116,0.0003658263,0.15043363,0.0015365788,0.000023289454,0.0019366409,0.00005020424,0.28777504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82778865,0.09121462,0.0005452141,0.0027349032,0.00028325067,0.000026422837,0.00070727733,0.000057703644,0.07664208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911433,0.00029634268,0.000017579092,0.00006394159,0.0001866406,0.0003210799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991959,0.0002856271,0.000094337076,0.0000137354355,0.00013860503,0.00027177486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014681044,0.00033640602,0.0003631562,0.0022030743,0.003951027,0.003710735,0.00054146507,0.0015134001,0.022614324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023169178,0.0002720602,0.0002146897,0.0066927713,0.0052978,0.001872757,0.0013547455,0.00083051855,0.0008789477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003379561,0.00005643312,0.012916988,0.0006527576,0.00007391696,0.0002759504,0.019504422,0.0014363764,0.0004160679,0.35014504,0.46766332,0.14652078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047816357,0.00003416036,0.16347116,0.0024928092,0.00004575248,0.00018946538,0.03968316,0.0008322053,0.00026536928,0.029668722,0.76318645,0.00008294032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7147006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88837135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28529942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031350903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016119527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57395923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360876946","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003504","title":"Political Economies of Energy Transition: Wind and Solar Power in Brazil and South Africa. By Kathryn Hochstetler. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 270p. $114.95 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.010652223785055545,"score_gpt":0.22690769691012458,"score_spread":0.21625547312506904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360876946","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004879748,0.8387725,0.0003347821,0.13463913,0.0016234142,0.000013284107,0.00025561417,0.000014630393,0.019466992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19790378,0.76124644,0.0006955916,0.0035693615,0.0012643532,0.00003775781,0.00019111246,0.00004089849,0.0350506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975175,0.00011643266,0.000011655559,0.000027366583,0.00004482505,0.00004797469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995414,0.00027336765,0.00007130324,0.000012841482,0.000034285844,0.00006683503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008483491,0.00075295445,0.000357774,0.001020636,0.0010951562,0.0022796264,0.0004049483,0.0014145148,0.007708263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00160644,0.00045215807,0.00032973092,0.0028205481,0.002955551,0.0032132128,0.0014149009,0.0018765542,0.00064596225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011635892,0.00004726126,0.0037527299,0.0016720302,0.00006952682,0.00048038032,0.014227208,0.0020890974,0.00089518074,0.25490624,0.5158445,0.20589963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021649686,0.000024239773,0.021620307,0.0031118072,0.00003441846,0.0003388716,0.0086801695,0.0009825551,0.00028842036,0.09349221,0.87136835,0.000037173304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05701239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13116035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05701239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046737324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027677761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11336106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378981605","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000531","title":"Asylum as Reparation: Refuge and Responsibility for the Harms of Displacement. By James Souter. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 194p. $119.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Physics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.016350530382329132,"score_gpt":0.33860726863167434,"score_spread":0.3222567382493452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378981605","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088000554,0.8438461,0.00025852016,0.12520103,0.004739215,0.00001632832,0.00006694101,0.000018054612,0.024973901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06663232,0.76165336,0.00062644744,0.015684463,0.003836836,0.00010347651,0.00011258898,0.00007052186,0.15127999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991055,0.00049131113,0.00004258627,0.00008152127,0.00014050624,0.00013847281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994772,0.00023752669,0.00009291165,0.0000275599,0.00005481207,0.00011000141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018519423,0.0012486047,0.0005665581,0.0009073344,0.0028799141,0.0035239945,0.00089067814,0.00384855,0.013659553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024764957,0.0006044311,0.00037255636,0.0014818903,0.008030661,0.005578047,0.0037654513,0.004346367,0.0030712879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046261357,0.000022477756,0.00023037095,0.0006373084,0.0000099916,0.00016614042,0.0062452476,0.00015107621,0.00012326778,0.08933343,0.82188874,0.08114576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018314473,0.000023517863,0.0011585845,0.0023512496,0.0000067854285,0.00034463935,0.007398478,0.00010097949,0.00008123221,0.043575462,0.94492185,0.00001897754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018412303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03550112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018412303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032028684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052217627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04569578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378981772","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000178","title":"Legitimation as Political Practice: Crafting Everyday Authority in Tanzania. By Kathy Dodworth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 256p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Tanzania; Content (measure theory); Politics; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019844560579668342,"score_gpt":0.25707906338558845,"score_spread":0.2372345028059201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378981772","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011615257,0.8058536,0.0013035717,0.119449146,0.0017922093,0.000036492027,0.0001045394,0.00007359995,0.059771575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56161517,0.31065404,0.0029297255,0.0053251204,0.0016547671,0.00014173408,0.0001256164,0.00013519912,0.11741864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932384,0.0003909685,0.000025463327,0.000046160312,0.00010062954,0.00011283319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868697,0.00084125693,0.000168372,0.000056357665,0.00009295991,0.00015404118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021642456,0.0007040463,0.00037974984,0.001496384,0.0032010907,0.0043339147,0.0007259131,0.0020151716,0.010874067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029771253,0.000808424,0.00021319935,0.0027587216,0.013958625,0.006751334,0.0019186566,0.0024816499,0.0013727549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000862953,0.000047133788,0.0023144188,0.0016345802,0.00002029648,0.0006967667,0.09769925,0.00038807504,0.00077526463,0.40216678,0.30049863,0.19367246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004243045,0.000060974635,0.015946304,0.0044220607,0.000025044279,0.000655406,0.033959515,0.0005000208,0.0003188149,0.111886,0.8321428,0.000040683382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031163085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06844858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031163085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005258228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044890004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06196344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014862","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000634","title":"Coalitions of the Weak: Elite Politics in China from Mao’s Stratagem to the Rise of Xi. By Victor C. Shih. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 280p. $87.00 cloth, $32.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Content (measure theory); China; Politics; Political science; Action (physics); Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Law; History; Physics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.013770955572572617,"score_gpt":0.2580783035077306,"score_spread":0.24430734793515796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37864357,0.06448653,0.00080046727,0.27512887,0.0010467647,0.000058846126,0.00022129712,0.000042250886,0.2795714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589236,0.008198826,0.0001351533,0.0017101578,0.00017969494,0.000017906224,0.000032175216,0.0000101412825,0.030792242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999448,0.00018322084,0.000011357041,0.00004046484,0.00007850444,0.00023845895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.000086878754,0.00006411061,0.00002331807,0.000038149457,0.00023093526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011956042,0.00032623418,0.00027675307,0.001106605,0.0064850673,0.003421597,0.00046920945,0.00078895275,0.0060562934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010858228,0.00019108973,0.00016743531,0.0023147627,0.008523226,0.0024525684,0.0029178842,0.00158865,0.0002678097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012436039,0.00003595549,0.013965277,0.00020961167,0.00003478703,0.000514895,0.09320722,0.0004993864,0.00057919417,0.75150967,0.07675135,0.0625684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059301736,0.00013246141,0.14851099,0.00060666393,0.000046865567,0.00013020485,0.06819017,0.0012788187,0.00061067095,0.20558521,0.5747964,0.00005225829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080163024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20771198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080163024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009294281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006590515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15939283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014872","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000543","title":"Native Bias: Overcoming Discrimination against Immigrants. By Donghyun Danny Choi, Mathias Poertner, and Nicholas Sambanis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022. 312p. $120.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Art; Law and economics; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026395623972206374,"score_gpt":0.29268880662569147,"score_spread":0.2662931826534851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016885683,0.6344947,0.0006761507,0.29636863,0.010744045,0.00006212642,0.00016930379,0.00005718525,0.04054218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25671968,0.50500333,0.002433591,0.05033105,0.0063879592,0.00030652655,0.00025194214,0.0001440934,0.17842187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938893,0.00040282356,0.000023717424,0.00004843192,0.000059728492,0.00007640432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992675,0.00041176067,0.000083282124,0.000024679503,0.00007414602,0.00013867553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023065438,0.0008860024,0.00042391708,0.000949275,0.0026457843,0.0016190321,0.00063574174,0.0016487585,0.007069614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025835484,0.00035654975,0.00030372158,0.0014978838,0.00331176,0.0030687118,0.0022015644,0.0023799005,0.0017635955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063813204,0.00005962783,0.0031043873,0.0010032527,0.000028605216,0.00029640258,0.03784783,0.000047625985,0.0004755403,0.017363677,0.73786396,0.20184533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003933606,0.00011664042,0.01869758,0.0033226018,0.000048439168,0.0007379237,0.07804014,0.00019901105,0.0006143573,0.015804786,0.8823395,0.000039783576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012775426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027678834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012775426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009427534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001755724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025402129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014970","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000270","title":"Popular Politics and the Path to Durable Democracy. By Mohammad Ali Kadivar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022. 192p. $120.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Democracy; Path (computing); Politics; Political science; Operations research; Media studies; Advertising; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Law; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.013923485892161558,"score_gpt":0.2742417369519205,"score_spread":0.2603182510597589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014970","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014360535,0.87350124,0.0002973317,0.08618282,0.00257241,0.000007285547,0.00026781645,0.000041682,0.03569335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14120378,0.6813202,0.0012326722,0.0077529205,0.004281486,0.00006233396,0.00041879286,0.00012461901,0.16360317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994942,0.00021887908,0.00003297327,0.00006226784,0.00010518221,0.000086465014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994916,0.00019738718,0.00013021324,0.00003818356,0.00007343836,0.000069268404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010965472,0.0012973425,0.0005509993,0.0012479995,0.0017427283,0.0028049438,0.0006546745,0.0019330048,0.016636426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013808814,0.00081461034,0.00040418544,0.0038236063,0.0043114135,0.0046512475,0.0015001406,0.0030948427,0.0041205934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006992244,0.00003582115,0.0010025379,0.0007255538,0.000040698287,0.00023097468,0.0040549464,0.00030933187,0.0002578026,0.13444136,0.74840486,0.110426225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022131358,0.000022673046,0.008404801,0.0011823156,0.000021563583,0.00025969069,0.0025341553,0.00020443082,0.00013691657,0.05147006,0.9357225,0.000018798642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019812759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042320445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019812759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033095668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025058112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055654407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314881","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001846","title":"Dictatorship and Information: Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Communist Europe and China. By Martin K. Dimitrov. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023. 496p. $99.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Communism; Authoritarianism; China; Resilience (materials science); Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Economics; Democracy; Physics; Politics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020944986318297755,"score_gpt":0.2741020772353039,"score_spread":0.2531570909170061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314881","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013350422,0.7933374,0.0010713633,0.12841049,0.0027136428,0.000033062828,0.00032978432,0.000052841406,0.06070099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37305376,0.4600715,0.0010523344,0.0035228706,0.0028148773,0.00007316849,0.00030806244,0.00008967271,0.15901381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997036,0.00014505329,0.00001591857,0.000044482815,0.000044849276,0.00004602371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.0002335449,0.00007381077,0.000022416769,0.00004954017,0.0000777203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010172321,0.0007389502,0.0004332906,0.0010597162,0.0012699135,0.0022974778,0.0007279321,0.0011144,0.00955499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012512113,0.00040375663,0.00023085908,0.0023069233,0.00459695,0.0035079347,0.0013009357,0.0015120843,0.0011552712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012638117,0.000056055535,0.004130935,0.00131126,0.00006818989,0.00025678772,0.012720036,0.0009552055,0.00037916578,0.2316371,0.52254,0.225819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034851848,0.00007259857,0.030152315,0.0022291509,0.000025413094,0.00030154357,0.007768568,0.0015768405,0.00040228473,0.117581174,0.8398036,0.000051699037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016673129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030474732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016673129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033555685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033152163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314887","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001767","title":"Contending Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law. By Geoffrey Swenson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 288p. $74.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03284308120416296,"score_gpt":0.27990432705217866,"score_spread":0.2470612458480157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016468329,0.7466102,0.0024199835,0.14880283,0.00261658,0.00001527819,0.0001380939,0.00004340807,0.097706646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2577347,0.5618329,0.0051898444,0.01585528,0.009907183,0.00013693763,0.00029317572,0.00017856064,0.14887138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980111,0.0010329245,0.00010282604,0.00020728885,0.00048411274,0.00016171193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660707,0.0023273893,0.00033907875,0.00017070815,0.00033927365,0.0002165158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032269307,0.0010830794,0.00071770104,0.002234489,0.002850781,0.006553658,0.001431721,0.004244508,0.011106731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068106432,0.00090897887,0.00047577044,0.0030199212,0.019493375,0.008904349,0.0020461718,0.004204697,0.0025094324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859589,0.000030016865,0.00022438484,0.00033630873,0.000015031687,0.00013280284,0.0038671002,0.00046206373,0.0001455937,0.6464288,0.3027733,0.045555945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018144056,0.000010024466,0.00086341886,0.000983106,0.000007945342,0.00012407977,0.0018168878,0.00031667206,0.00007119209,0.62586707,0.36990637,0.000015049453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016498353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027440827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005882926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049293987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04268378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314890","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001366","title":"Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Selen A. Ercan, Hans Asenbaum, Nicole Curato, and Ricardo F. Mendonça. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 508p. $145.00 cloth, $40.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Political science; Philosophy; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.050390359269110396,"score_gpt":0.41475802584049487,"score_spread":0.3643676665713845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010648873,0.8915611,0.035191786,0.028695269,0.009143804,0.0003318802,0.0011812665,0.000310078,0.03251998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02559748,0.82869714,0.08785882,0.0046793665,0.0060086315,0.0019692872,0.0012564892,0.0007384067,0.04319445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98550826,0.011829301,0.00063722424,0.0006799976,0.0011876647,0.00015762362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96483195,0.02952243,0.0013606666,0.0013465583,0.002478725,0.00045968243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02233492,0.0025289382,0.0021032218,0.0051907175,0.0015428558,0.0045891213,0.0015918162,0.0022246407,0.017308608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023171088,0.0024449134,0.0011036809,0.0069359383,0.006000264,0.0074449116,0.0029304468,0.004377074,0.007064451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012278109,0.00014468211,0.0009212017,0.006350702,0.00022883838,0.00019347464,0.004162593,0.0010491168,0.0005499011,0.079386145,0.52239484,0.38449565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005952558,0.000086235275,0.0022278153,0.008148191,0.00008029422,0.0004242439,0.0021248956,0.00056057156,0.00047419313,0.13558596,0.8501654,0.00006272876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044388887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072995634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02233492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030269928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006927027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118119776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386318794","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001731","title":"Support the Troops: Military Obligation, Gender, and the Making of Political Community. By Katharine M. Millar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 304p. $83.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Content (measure theory); Politics; Action (physics); Political science; Gerontology; Law; Medicine; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054392879550988704,"score_gpt":0.30470298319378225,"score_spread":0.25031010364279355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386318794","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017909429,0.8313435,0.00023238613,0.13590094,0.0027357284,0.000013221297,0.000079436875,0.000013812105,0.02789005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09444683,0.8131828,0.0006394627,0.008615923,0.004442213,0.00007171255,0.00011136735,0.000052618907,0.07843706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927694,0.0004649775,0.0000240464,0.000049673665,0.00011443541,0.00006989687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883217,0.0006452641,0.00015784363,0.000025231846,0.00010143861,0.00023796657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015080658,0.001159317,0.0005901595,0.0011557131,0.0024011997,0.0037501864,0.00075988274,0.002384169,0.01841575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021089753,0.0006218016,0.0002316376,0.0023940576,0.0053233337,0.0055251634,0.0021440275,0.0038387182,0.0034964439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240024,0.000043641976,0.0009794792,0.0009249114,0.000023356746,0.0001927996,0.013500239,0.00013512533,0.00021374293,0.056300737,0.79928744,0.12833616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029628967,0.000047981193,0.007991468,0.004594343,0.000022471224,0.0005429538,0.026220014,0.00023468515,0.0001393897,0.054046236,0.906102,0.000028846416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013123605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036529746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01841575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022701598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023516626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061606824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208659","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002141","title":"The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: A New Interpretive Approach. By Andrew Erueti. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 240p. $99.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.015438734379057427,"score_gpt":0.2508503008767505,"score_spread":0.23541156649769304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208659","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012730252,0.6398601,0.0012606411,0.24968517,0.014516189,0.000038687893,0.0004787522,0.000048886446,0.09283854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11199432,0.54560095,0.008576207,0.036052432,0.009795508,0.00038153518,0.00088811,0.00031813068,0.2863928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966419,0.0016987992,0.0002029716,0.00019816353,0.00094761304,0.00031058813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682754,0.0019119116,0.000356622,0.00017678128,0.00044756386,0.00027963915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063773766,0.0010801469,0.00080260925,0.0016252153,0.0035303477,0.0043635503,0.0012803314,0.0044680554,0.008447715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007698379,0.0008016587,0.00042512122,0.0027693969,0.0095824525,0.0063269907,0.0030987642,0.007215989,0.0018301237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005012609,0.000024828962,0.00024075809,0.0010159041,0.000012627966,0.00021706418,0.013874791,0.00014573765,0.00026104925,0.16188638,0.7331436,0.08912706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005965423,0.0000089113355,0.00132737,0.0023248265,0.0000051943784,0.00013144535,0.0048542065,0.000049669517,0.00009512498,0.034335215,0.9568429,0.00001908906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03843578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05419114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03843578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004300833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010584807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07642412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208662","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002499","title":"On Target: Gun Culture, Storytelling, and the NRA. By Noah S. Schwartz. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 264p. $85.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Art; Narrative; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.006799467701284998,"score_gpt":0.23068085613620679,"score_spread":0.22388138843492178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208662","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035460873,0.78232527,0.0002793606,0.089435555,0.0021558818,0.000016176371,0.0004834969,0.00009389638,0.12166433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16545577,0.4887452,0.0007465858,0.005648123,0.0008017262,0.0000442853,0.00052585005,0.00017426453,0.3378581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992655,0.0002146413,0.000022306449,0.000046062367,0.00030448954,0.00014704786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909174,0.0002586602,0.000118420445,0.000029372592,0.0002717846,0.00023009838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009214253,0.0009009405,0.00040644873,0.0014670898,0.0038560338,0.0039824517,0.0010679465,0.0015634983,0.0327937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023252987,0.00050619425,0.00018140582,0.004007854,0.004875987,0.0033817673,0.0017272013,0.0017113921,0.0045281914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022918204,0.0000139135645,0.0006147899,0.00047273154,0.000007077717,0.000117680036,0.01927393,0.00006874625,0.00015193649,0.025447547,0.835609,0.118199736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000367701,0.0000093860635,0.005963987,0.0010503185,0.000006991554,0.0001232214,0.02388052,0.000036365935,0.00007752585,0.0034356038,0.9653975,0.00001490327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7917217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9123078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7917217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019094145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016384702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41900975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208722","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002177","title":"The Political Regulation Wave: A Case of How Local Incentives Systematically Shape Air Quality in China. By Shiran Victoria Shen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 161p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper. - Local Politics and Social Policy in China: Let Some Get Healthy First. By Kerry E. Ratigan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 200p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; China; Politics; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.029772719894777585,"score_gpt":0.3324362893286063,"score_spread":0.3026635694338287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039668,0.016724505,0.0036783605,0.45329005,0.0012525498,0.00015780785,0.00037368864,0.00011050904,0.22044577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87543553,0.004443509,0.00072878995,0.017460115,0.0002836167,0.0001277214,0.00008512916,0.00006320913,0.101372354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988991,0.00046647002,0.000023585606,0.00009354185,0.00021022564,0.00030711145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986179,0.0007160499,0.00019975317,0.00009577637,0.00013880547,0.00023174267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034615514,0.00023389954,0.00029105245,0.0005356258,0.0042407676,0.0025426066,0.00087319006,0.001819058,0.009634198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032697204,0.0003669091,0.000523583,0.00143719,0.0057669,0.002076799,0.0025074757,0.0025480315,0.0006624313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025928736,0.00015219244,0.021972515,0.0002870931,0.00010005432,0.0014242255,0.056216616,0.0025484073,0.002233978,0.54887664,0.29875895,0.067169964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022913015,0.00016981564,0.13287146,0.00047121692,0.000119352226,0.000185424,0.03399912,0.0066219904,0.0019357534,0.09961334,0.7235291,0.00025432152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115398824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19422303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115398824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071848365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006684297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22945428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390779593","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002906","title":"“Fit for Purpose?” Assessing the Ecological Fit of the Social Institutions that Globally Govern Antimicrobial Resistance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Global governance; Business; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Biology; Economics; Antibiotics","score_opus":0.07708571670880514,"score_gpt":0.3747353560115798,"score_spread":0.29764963930277466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390779593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239641,0.0016258082,0.0240573,0.008117595,0.00013352072,0.00020580915,0.0006314394,0.00008470534,0.041179813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959241,0.00019141818,0.0030599947,0.0002546921,0.000024689782,0.00006778928,0.00017958593,0.000010468529,0.00028721793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105084,0.0054706023,0.00051765656,0.0007454723,0.0014771027,0.00073825946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788962,0.009512955,0.005709676,0.001787942,0.002232996,0.0018601116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021871,0.0007014972,0.00068950345,0.0039650695,0.0018681446,0.0057568364,0.0008289768,0.0018677225,0.0043187067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036982205,0.00022704748,0.0010342584,0.0037148301,0.0045231683,0.006513415,0.0050369618,0.0013213665,0.0005504253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016944075,0.00025592916,0.8707453,0.0002922471,0.00046464833,0.00038798913,0.009358906,0.004340977,0.0006404147,0.053475652,0.0027751415,0.057093423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034128905,0.0006396227,0.7689009,0.0005396168,0.00027132162,0.0006498034,0.035042785,0.022464225,0.0007909188,0.14960144,0.020916622,0.0001485865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024274648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003926725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01021871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020083562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001773915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05404234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393182744","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000240","title":"Critical Race Theory: How Policy Language Differentially Engages Symbolic Racism and Partisanship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Race (biology); Critical race theory; Sociology; Positive economics; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.028592961433277015,"score_gpt":0.38050639230038263,"score_spread":0.35191343086710564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393182744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8540636,0.00021242142,0.013716229,0.006887475,0.00009268764,0.00011675711,0.000030529394,0.000038471466,0.12484181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962054,0.00008300063,0.0011852707,0.00057510653,0.000011840088,0.00005441799,0.000007936243,0.000027267271,0.0018498931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860909,0.010653568,0.00015186192,0.0010904969,0.0012079179,0.0008051981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98238087,0.013336825,0.0018805814,0.0011124588,0.0006796571,0.00060962397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010987891,0.0003074041,0.00032283698,0.0011293482,0.0034460337,0.006606741,0.0008380341,0.0011175951,0.007255026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025155604,0.00026316027,0.00024590534,0.00088707736,0.013386922,0.005065489,0.0042938986,0.0026657574,0.00050755165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694701,0.00077541557,0.040578406,0.00035653962,0.00003182707,0.0002516429,0.60317343,0.0003256116,0.012617802,0.29555455,0.0015240767,0.0444412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013126816,0.00087040296,0.09837171,0.00076039264,0.00008377097,0.00041844355,0.5726561,0.0030671307,0.014570847,0.24612524,0.06281455,0.0001302742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031344588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003804518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010987891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028489977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00225485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058110237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393864622","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000410","title":"The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Politics of Public Opinion: Evidence from Hungary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central European University; York University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Refugee; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Ukrainian; Authoritarianism; Development economics; Democracy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.039917942520744126,"score_gpt":0.34974195374561967,"score_spread":0.3098240112248756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393864622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816483,0.0001224389,0.000025650099,0.00016558525,0.0000028395577,0.00000395965,0.00006787108,6.218152e-7,0.0014461728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996692,0.00011286972,0.000012593298,0.000056236317,0.0000045463858,0.000002253689,0.00006230084,7.3833735e-7,0.00007932323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889743,0.00045299708,0.0000632624,0.00010082247,0.00015472226,0.00033083744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929917,0.0033126133,0.0022288095,0.00039698905,0.00051897735,0.0005508658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020984046,0.00016918637,0.00047320203,0.0007975096,0.0011169912,0.0025170303,0.00055236625,0.00065007294,0.0018916748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004161823,0.0001835366,0.00025905893,0.0018246319,0.0024283829,0.0011743853,0.0020162305,0.00082335674,0.0002481189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011546793,0.00095795875,0.9237265,0.0002471374,0.00027598895,0.002302749,0.039821174,0.0011002109,0.0014387318,0.007906194,0.0025431442,0.018525492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000446069,0.00013466933,0.96041036,0.000046640715,0.000056412882,0.00013882181,0.035907183,0.0003859327,0.00040347647,0.00035519068,0.002100386,0.000016339487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026557127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022968119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026557127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016319271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009370664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052805066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395044484","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000057","title":"Political Science as a Dependent Variable: The National Science Foundation and the Shaping of a Discipline","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Pennsylvania; American Political Science Association; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Politics; Political science; Variable (mathematics); Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05403394760549243,"score_gpt":0.45257755482440687,"score_spread":0.39854360721891446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395044484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7786076,0.0021180555,0.0012511524,0.038210295,0.00032923368,0.000062130726,0.0016703624,0.000030118354,0.177721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963534,0.00044958544,0.0003030696,0.0006940969,0.0001853518,0.00005184475,0.00031171885,0.000019886436,0.0016310422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814094,0.005638464,0.00048572588,0.00085552793,0.003166438,0.00171298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89564437,0.051779673,0.022120113,0.0031983259,0.010240944,0.017016508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011278281,0.00013667383,0.0005316926,0.004849039,0.005603749,0.0077687176,0.00091249065,0.0015641184,0.01131909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06743922,0.00014165035,0.00032126653,0.008521043,0.0062956773,0.004445251,0.0042126267,0.004433694,0.0007681495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022674543,0.00063608773,0.6887585,0.000171307,0.00016214969,0.00023337755,0.018297212,0.000722878,0.0001567002,0.22351886,0.021895293,0.045220844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006117837,0.00016812787,0.7896727,0.00071950123,0.00010649031,0.00018537644,0.037019257,0.0012188659,0.00029847608,0.071610644,0.09885748,0.00008196891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019215202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019422123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99439627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066953623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009496458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05964601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396617179","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000306","title":"American Global Pre-Eminence: The Development and Erosion of Systemic Leadership. By William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 286p. $110.00 cloth, $32.99 paper. - Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders. By Ayşe Zarakol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 313p. $34.99 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"American west; Median eminence; Economic history; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; History; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.014339290346529218,"score_gpt":0.24377735960980887,"score_spread":0.22943806926327964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396617179","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011168768,0.8734373,0.00043714736,0.080867745,0.004517307,0.000012999556,0.00017422765,0.000052866813,0.039383523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07024987,0.7619971,0.0015693626,0.007979786,0.0033934799,0.0000792109,0.00036657846,0.0001539693,0.15421072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930835,0.0002475525,0.00003853712,0.000075872704,0.00021110653,0.000118665004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918145,0.0002720313,0.00014663319,0.000045588717,0.00014514853,0.00020912492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012465685,0.001531291,0.0005286278,0.001914264,0.0018898697,0.0040873126,0.0008531859,0.0022891893,0.022675883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001790697,0.00094681134,0.00036749704,0.0049721976,0.0052906885,0.0049394686,0.0017709647,0.0036583028,0.007712543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027429824,0.000018822291,0.00069969293,0.00039566067,0.000012338252,0.00006514399,0.0020437906,0.00008546299,0.00012307033,0.026769208,0.8514533,0.11830618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007677118,0.000016625887,0.0062767165,0.0010463918,0.000008517009,0.00013927057,0.002481261,0.00007211879,0.000086777516,0.022022514,0.96782595,0.00001618371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033284657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0850175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033284657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045133005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004631197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075858355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401397071","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000975","title":"From Gender Gap to Gender Gaps: Bringing Nonbinary People into Political Behavior Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Queen's University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Identification (biology); Democracy; Political science; Politics; Gender gap; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14751457061235393,"score_gpt":0.4746492568622696,"score_spread":0.3271346862499157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401397071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75517195,0.02379239,0.07114388,0.07151799,0.002781417,0.00026904445,0.001538261,0.000110463014,0.07367463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733506,0.00380899,0.010015049,0.008534478,0.00088734797,0.0005112989,0.00038201743,0.000082225975,0.0024279656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759183,0.017061112,0.000571145,0.0025772017,0.0025561373,0.0013161268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94372976,0.041006207,0.005168705,0.004732707,0.002962025,0.002400664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036789533,0.0007299244,0.0013796103,0.0061980663,0.0048961253,0.0063608517,0.0018078544,0.0023422742,0.007746412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06366262,0.0005901885,0.00083963556,0.0063680466,0.012666906,0.016138088,0.013168399,0.0053727594,0.0006965731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033935756,0.00037157247,0.21786547,0.0010248107,0.00032906377,0.0005377998,0.25535607,0.00044390408,0.0006598693,0.33550364,0.010020218,0.17754824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051585586,0.00043869036,0.16135164,0.0037152679,0.00020261144,0.0004586015,0.21028988,0.0024197747,0.0008586618,0.5273232,0.09278444,0.00010566803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011154097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014120118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96321046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032344642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040080673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19456398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401976213","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000963","title":"Deviant Cohesion and Unauthorized Atrocities: Evidence from the American War in Vietnam","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnam War; Political science; Criminology; Cohesion (chemistry); Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0339101263025969,"score_gpt":0.3574002560300491,"score_spread":0.3234901297274522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401976213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982357,0.00037595956,0.00002885972,0.00024919654,0.0000035701441,0.0000033895672,0.000032693868,2.9235937e-7,0.0010703444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927384,0.0004832916,0.000018175819,0.00005192684,0.000008288848,0.0000037588352,0.000046284338,8.550884e-7,0.00011356725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904555,0.00047367206,0.000046487312,0.00011180606,0.000116597344,0.00020591148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946461,0.002507559,0.0016189879,0.0002261955,0.00040021108,0.0006010043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015372811,0.00014340953,0.00024764455,0.0014101691,0.0017654621,0.0013582872,0.00038400514,0.00045980903,0.0017722338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005590935,0.00024160223,0.00012157029,0.0020392693,0.0024417706,0.00077290495,0.0013968439,0.00068639056,0.00012263539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087525565,0.00015362166,0.9067995,0.00007181258,0.000068471454,0.00039036994,0.07872782,0.00005200045,0.00016865443,0.0011793324,0.0004956961,0.0118051665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066302077,0.000057628284,0.92145455,0.0000645304,0.000018242577,0.00013716123,0.07603744,0.00006398257,0.000050131486,0.00023184899,0.0018713985,0.0000064125475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07166419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09855527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07166419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089619186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009689669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14249408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403897715","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001294","title":"Navigating Uncertainty: Rebel Risk Management Strategies during War-to-Peace Transitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03322042317985938,"score_gpt":0.435790579197102,"score_spread":0.4025701560172426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403897715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70113003,0.0050519044,0.06835638,0.052188303,0.00048060002,0.0003150406,0.000070657974,0.00014058329,0.17226645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931137,0.0008711568,0.0032887184,0.0005862821,0.00006401989,0.000044386623,0.000011866061,0.000010980228,0.0020089215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944377,0.0036585755,0.00010715826,0.00024082183,0.0005772328,0.0009785026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949532,0.0025075178,0.0010832524,0.00012160102,0.0004122851,0.0009221547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007602465,0.00070792256,0.00037929343,0.0015393134,0.006021926,0.00998959,0.0012901359,0.002399067,0.004499892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013447733,0.00033700885,0.0004356731,0.00062686176,0.005569481,0.0052063293,0.007463239,0.0031585565,0.0005102336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050791836,0.0008848266,0.04920713,0.00062689773,0.00023217959,0.0028977687,0.3987236,0.015034056,0.003614316,0.23333277,0.010624661,0.28431392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050865547,0.0006900526,0.019644033,0.000990877,0.0000767382,0.0009850031,0.6835641,0.010143102,0.001557349,0.21368828,0.06845575,0.00015377624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018681402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043970393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00998959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022512379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046185707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040206194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404358728","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001804","title":"Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought. By David Myer Temin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023. 288p. $99.00 cloth, $32.50 paper. - Indigenous Peoples and Borders. Edited by Sheryl Lightfoot and Elsa Stamatopoulou. Durham: Duke University Press, 2024. 384p. $114.95 cloth, $30.95 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Decolonization; Politics; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Ecology","score_opus":0.005604605221820283,"score_gpt":0.2363107472338668,"score_spread":0.23070614201204653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404358728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03148004,0.6570405,0.0009521285,0.18197535,0.0018385454,0.00002951582,0.00007391235,0.00002294472,0.1265871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72129697,0.18358092,0.00093236647,0.0049544848,0.0011693158,0.000059280617,0.000044191926,0.000050077877,0.087912366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999424,0.0004061043,0.000013966719,0.00003891242,0.00005383292,0.000063249165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.0004222783,0.00007410848,0.00003561122,0.000069669884,0.000090838665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708135,0.00045213546,0.000265884,0.00061661616,0.0038937277,0.003293837,0.00047292476,0.0010540361,0.0047885203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015046383,0.00026369726,0.00013141143,0.0012330079,0.015260741,0.0044778716,0.0014494391,0.0019601497,0.00031649813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004283687,0.000039760704,0.0013783568,0.0005132334,0.000013169862,0.00037190493,0.20829107,0.00029019674,0.00026411412,0.5648884,0.15162632,0.07228066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001921814,0.0000291098,0.008445276,0.001911002,0.00001159843,0.0003082254,0.14399189,0.00042702543,0.0002568643,0.2238405,0.6207315,0.000027814194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07581502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13551627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07581502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064804326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054259268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15074748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405006184","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002305","title":"Basic Equality. By Paul Sagar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024. 240p. $35.00 cloth","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.029997635384592082,"score_gpt":0.3279776011930108,"score_spread":0.2979799658084187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405006184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002719822,0.7562744,0.0014109411,0.070587,0.009867158,0.000030264748,0.0018767937,0.00033616694,0.15934524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009370592,0.42400306,0.0030808933,0.012819955,0.0038583074,0.00016634104,0.0017720417,0.0005408794,0.5443879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993395,0.00014901732,0.00006251124,0.00011958734,0.0002520222,0.00007728588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933124,0.00020613936,0.00009271275,0.00007058893,0.00017815783,0.00012134117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013919139,0.0018347934,0.0010992974,0.0020539097,0.0014425259,0.002637286,0.0011930946,0.0029248705,0.11619593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002086546,0.0014239392,0.0005402639,0.00423413,0.0019348826,0.005669755,0.0023226663,0.0050259857,0.08688242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014196499,0.0000066060534,0.00006052839,0.00019554238,0.000004418284,0.000019998652,0.00010497568,0.000048613205,0.000035110075,0.0077725514,0.9354585,0.056278974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004401361,0.0000037998234,0.00036635587,0.00037841938,0.0000030026642,0.00006361313,0.0001213303,0.00002597456,0.00002115922,0.005600727,0.9934058,0.0000053573217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012400953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024170775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11619593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002119508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022431028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38871413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405687395","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001750","title":"Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.028564514916492846,"score_gpt":0.31928076948239925,"score_spread":0.2907162545659064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405687395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49275437,0.0059944945,0.019078001,0.032914165,0.0003682162,0.00003514138,0.00007766535,0.00012109409,0.4486569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506277,0.0004025732,0.0007095584,0.0003756792,0.000036132107,0.000012050177,0.000011569592,0.000025714766,0.00336397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967084,0.0020443217,0.00009578871,0.00033882936,0.00032381204,0.0004889122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612266,0.0015375861,0.0008341298,0.0008015756,0.00027771664,0.00042636594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033817352,0.00030513125,0.00032584375,0.0014588938,0.0079323035,0.013870411,0.0011596096,0.002264042,0.0048909257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009084424,0.00026870103,0.0002770693,0.0012732956,0.04046926,0.012691649,0.006925052,0.0031463888,0.0007086529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058315036,0.000019894522,0.0020468181,0.00004111122,0.000008177864,0.00015746246,0.2065539,0.0001997748,0.00022776023,0.77673095,0.0024223665,0.011533436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003909561,0.00005806061,0.003996284,0.00039160223,0.000026859643,0.0003688986,0.21450576,0.0010447915,0.0007128556,0.6562437,0.12254266,0.00006939343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005109813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058769607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013870411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034936818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001623375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025348544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406335568","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001610","title":"Nation Branding and International Politics. By Christopher S. Browning. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2023. 240p. $130.00 cloth, $39.95 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Art history; Art; History; Sociology; Law; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.017388142836761166,"score_gpt":0.21870420985760922,"score_spread":0.20131606702084806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406335568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037993366,0.89150083,0.0003528433,0.042321056,0.004162189,0.000014796068,0.0005661494,0.00010705989,0.060595226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014488263,0.58414507,0.00081604166,0.0053492063,0.0019144719,0.000047126643,0.00045145917,0.0002132166,0.39257511],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995291,0.000097627424,0.00002632824,0.0000671027,0.0001958521,0.00008399485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991142,0.0002756433,0.0001311472,0.000054939926,0.0002237157,0.00020041375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011687,0.0020267603,0.00080495793,0.002011953,0.002111841,0.0036782555,0.0013268549,0.0022580922,0.06397933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019673056,0.0014475922,0.00043968405,0.0064360555,0.0033741153,0.005527574,0.0018152102,0.0036392342,0.020670135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012708827,0.000008926602,0.00016378007,0.00024956002,0.0000063890225,0.000027969516,0.0005036861,0.0000643474,0.000076499666,0.0078424495,0.9454922,0.045551546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054959455,0.000005721298,0.0020894336,0.00061070966,0.0000061665946,0.000084297535,0.0006374199,0.000047098638,0.000052484134,0.003640605,0.9928076,0.00001298391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.276713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5073612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.276713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008321368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080745965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55020475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670797","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002482","title":"The New Experts: Populist Elites and Technocratic Promises in Modi’s India. By Anuradha Sajjanhar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. 189p. $105.00 cloth, $34.99 paper.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Media studies; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.00853657274951892,"score_gpt":0.2717113364900647,"score_spread":0.26317476374054577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670797","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01074689,0.47924158,0.00028262511,0.38546094,0.0051085833,0.000017729366,0.00016237923,0.0000535285,0.11892572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41707563,0.2473978,0.00074616284,0.027395913,0.0049310313,0.00007496035,0.00016555372,0.00012224838,0.30209073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937075,0.00024034547,0.000020493426,0.0000582752,0.00013555426,0.00017455812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931014,0.00038997686,0.000068943475,0.00003282114,0.000054441913,0.00014370041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011186987,0.000776593,0.0003494411,0.0014698033,0.0046755387,0.005101749,0.0008408585,0.002599417,0.010411208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017301004,0.0004853383,0.00026639734,0.0027716747,0.0064790766,0.004846136,0.0030006988,0.003850497,0.0016846715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007966248,0.000034159766,0.0009430352,0.00045861176,0.000017464998,0.00045838574,0.028290885,0.00015834077,0.00027756536,0.30972528,0.598817,0.060739614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017140468,0.000015252522,0.00609474,0.000564059,0.00001169911,0.00021061482,0.019907283,0.00016134651,0.00016823286,0.04559338,0.92722917,0.000027092769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020934075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066503055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020934075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004440337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004101351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041624427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670810","doi":"10.1017/s153759272400224x","title":"A Discussion of David W. Blight’s <i>Yale and Slavery: A History</i>.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blight; History; Horticulture; Biology","score_opus":0.014219110527262411,"score_gpt":0.300104203524188,"score_spread":0.28588509299692555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002519718,0.06409418,0.00072722964,0.7579125,0.009464599,0.000025400737,0.00011175141,0.000013738547,0.16513093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12832147,0.036616437,0.0009661203,0.5887637,0.007316989,0.00016597792,0.00009534574,0.0000659818,0.23768792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970311,0.0015015479,0.000064984786,0.00029013163,0.00061717804,0.0004949361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826354,0.0012072037,0.00009363169,0.000051564097,0.00013925188,0.0002448386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043797595,0.0005653363,0.00044225977,0.0020751336,0.01679225,0.006976787,0.0019031332,0.018419119,0.011404874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005776666,0.00049989467,0.000624779,0.0028353985,0.018422212,0.010311166,0.0035923838,0.014904571,0.0012122199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008349421,0.000017815239,0.00019511626,0.000041557072,0.0000022992701,0.0001969016,0.0033418424,0.000034615572,0.000048132904,0.6300711,0.35974893,0.006293351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067074366,0.000009154821,0.0011357033,0.00039864506,0.0000023034265,0.00012520466,0.0030045381,0.00004628109,0.000095520685,0.059621956,0.9355354,0.000018596886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07116339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17887817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07116339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01369434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077936715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14149833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670940","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002512","title":"A Discussion of David W. Blight’s <i>Yale and Slavery: A History</i>.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blight; Economic history; History; Horticulture; Biology","score_opus":0.014219110527262411,"score_gpt":0.300104203524188,"score_spread":0.28588509299692555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002519718,0.06409418,0.00072722964,0.7579125,0.009464599,0.000025400737,0.00011175141,0.000013738547,0.16513093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12832147,0.036616437,0.0009661203,0.5887637,0.007316989,0.00016597792,0.00009534574,0.0000659818,0.23768792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970311,0.0015015479,0.000064984786,0.00029013163,0.00061717804,0.0004949361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826354,0.0012072037,0.00009363169,0.000051564097,0.00013925188,0.0002448386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043797595,0.0005653363,0.00044225977,0.0020751336,0.01679225,0.006976787,0.0019031332,0.018419119,0.011404874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005776666,0.00049989467,0.000624779,0.0028353985,0.018422212,0.010311166,0.0035923838,0.014904571,0.0012122199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008349421,0.000017815239,0.00019511626,0.000041557072,0.0000022992701,0.0001969016,0.0033418424,0.000034615572,0.000048132904,0.6300711,0.35974893,0.006293351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067074366,0.000009154821,0.0011357033,0.00039864506,0.0000023034265,0.00012520466,0.0030045381,0.00004628109,0.000095520685,0.059621956,0.9355354,0.000018596886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07116339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17887817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07116339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01369434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077936715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14149833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409407372","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000246","title":"The Elements of Deterrence: Strategy, Technology, and Complexity in Global Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Political science; Computer security; Law and economics; Political economy; Economic system; Business; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0269509395794265,"score_gpt":0.3658017587664119,"score_spread":0.3388508191869854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409407372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19043043,0.009790591,0.05838608,0.09920205,0.00029601614,0.00008827095,0.000107046275,0.00007216189,0.6416273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929294,0.0014837846,0.0018962299,0.0006109275,0.00011120004,0.00003243323,0.0000141936835,0.000013573978,0.0029082668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304914,0.0048292405,0.00014743368,0.00037018827,0.0010906203,0.00051338505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886171,0.008195238,0.0011339867,0.00078417396,0.00072366744,0.0005458451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005295298,0.0004178163,0.0005456585,0.0021542523,0.002539922,0.012056028,0.0006862777,0.0022059074,0.0063484013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010211695,0.00030217087,0.00045209928,0.0018464765,0.029999476,0.008411852,0.0037101193,0.0024333561,0.0004933115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001404445,0.000011872415,0.0017008404,0.00006357098,0.0000110024,0.000038768947,0.0020114777,0.0010997282,0.00011872432,0.9852793,0.0006522798,0.008998411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013286814,0.000038219612,0.0030889648,0.00021413097,0.000012716801,0.00010589622,0.0042993217,0.002381914,0.00024901007,0.9661089,0.023466509,0.00002122494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001930292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025800548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012056028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004854599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031626201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03522277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409708338","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000611","title":"Platforms are People Too: Social Media Firms and International Relations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Social media; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02643923617701283,"score_gpt":0.2734519860825242,"score_spread":0.24701274990551136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409708338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3095771,0.0073660756,0.0021993336,0.07456647,0.00044852393,0.00004185356,0.00015874651,0.000040331553,0.60560155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105144,0.0018847211,0.00015986666,0.0011441751,0.00016583425,0.00001284515,0.000023819868,0.000012580352,0.0055446536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756014,0.0012781249,0.000066889006,0.00020518713,0.00037595996,0.0005137999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359715,0.0037149081,0.0012117141,0.0002399963,0.00028282087,0.0009534079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024554257,0.00021832323,0.00019992156,0.0027176,0.0045563797,0.021504324,0.0005398132,0.002180711,0.010711095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00515229,0.0002087465,0.00015352052,0.005178875,0.012096047,0.016690439,0.004507539,0.001934635,0.0007818405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004614941,0.000083262945,0.033904348,0.000104201135,0.000027897118,0.00068472826,0.10119059,0.00023832778,0.0003023845,0.80678064,0.012229935,0.044407453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021483009,0.00007231326,0.06416345,0.00062159833,0.000036405523,0.00041922985,0.42308152,0.0009738551,0.00034630776,0.17836171,0.3318317,0.00007044666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073120235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009753576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021504324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033454038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001866337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035832226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411160654","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000519","title":"Risky Business: Organizational Challenges in International Support for Civilian Self-Protection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Oxford; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; European University Institute; McGill University","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03145243177585923,"score_gpt":0.33107852441367946,"score_spread":0.29962609263782025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411160654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94333684,0.0004375944,0.0032582039,0.009199012,0.000052956173,0.000073535615,0.000016694446,0.000011870707,0.04361323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775213,0.00018856933,0.00059039664,0.00037624704,0.000017661658,0.000041987438,0.000009086969,0.0000055012642,0.001018472],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904923,0.0064379233,0.00020056116,0.0005058415,0.0008316051,0.0015317658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795179,0.01045924,0.004456438,0.0014549973,0.00093102327,0.003180474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008913405,0.00039188133,0.00025622497,0.0013375424,0.011837794,0.010076017,0.0015052968,0.0020245856,0.0052334694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015836649,0.00027361052,0.0002207589,0.0015699121,0.014289285,0.0057383594,0.012060902,0.0030079784,0.0003650469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012309187,0.00062464847,0.13957144,0.0002441651,0.000033321332,0.0030579653,0.60574174,0.0010242334,0.0013078605,0.17481838,0.0037117198,0.06974139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140407365,0.000170645,0.042266324,0.00035345167,0.000015869673,0.001010643,0.8735026,0.00075684825,0.0006271101,0.040615167,0.040632132,0.000035126308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025124408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004273945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011837794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038882438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061393254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047139168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411386715","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000635","title":"Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Refugee; Autonomy; Negotiation; Political science; Syrian refugees; Law","score_opus":0.015100397017790675,"score_gpt":0.3169128750648675,"score_spread":0.3018124780470768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411386715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99132806,0.00024170164,0.00034652223,0.0018036875,0.000034851488,0.000015861562,0.0000074262425,0.000006078094,0.006215759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998762,0.00014798615,0.00007979943,0.00019060475,0.000007450126,0.000009614617,0.0000053373747,0.000005542449,0.00079162314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914545,0.005898851,0.00018284463,0.00035736547,0.0004404075,0.0016660799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330384,0.0040107365,0.0010233808,0.00023943288,0.00042985383,0.0009927008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077477866,0.0004361452,0.0004904217,0.0011678376,0.013291706,0.0103029115,0.0012712695,0.0021923513,0.0027708036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016856322,0.00043439335,0.0002508656,0.0010308926,0.016713087,0.004772128,0.008129575,0.0038964197,0.00029086546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002459073,0.000026436077,0.00588533,0.000029137122,0.000004954943,0.00059751753,0.9864101,0.00004068479,0.00033137298,0.0030496067,0.00029611652,0.0033041758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020597713,0.000017836966,0.002068479,0.00003298162,0.0000026578105,0.00014610327,0.9927054,0.000054509066,0.00008273553,0.00036418394,0.004515846,0.000007177751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009164733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014925183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013291706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036092696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038530421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040974677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412468660","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725001100","title":"The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy. By Samuel Ely Bagg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. 284p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Power (physics); Democracy; Dispersion (optics); Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Theology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01499067399875533,"score_gpt":0.3304447967435262,"score_spread":0.3154541227447709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412468660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007381279,0.79036236,0.004705128,0.15432535,0.004166223,0.000023436973,0.00024368237,0.000063069674,0.045372527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1312986,0.69923085,0.008919406,0.021516051,0.011609984,0.0002962818,0.0005595785,0.00038077743,0.12618853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997624,0.0014792209,0.00008798728,0.0002406277,0.00044432105,0.00012391308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566084,0.0032558513,0.0003320822,0.00016012782,0.00040824496,0.00018281625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003890548,0.002239845,0.0009939001,0.0045523825,0.0029185573,0.0050859763,0.0016642135,0.004580467,0.010552445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006472189,0.0013836714,0.00070151425,0.0056768376,0.013902739,0.013061408,0.002577211,0.007071488,0.003363857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054391556,0.000022132108,0.00023556722,0.00054205395,0.000032126693,0.00011894696,0.0028177255,0.00077905215,0.000070390124,0.39370787,0.542637,0.05898274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023396899,0.000012084029,0.0008383044,0.001389558,0.000013015693,0.00012675425,0.0009771588,0.0005272537,0.000100479076,0.5702512,0.42571682,0.00002392795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011252097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015707048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011252097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072120344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003047558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052327156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412769058","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725101825","title":"Making Political Parties Accessible for People with Disabilities: A New Research Agenda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.200632317684884,"score_gpt":0.5118427040844772,"score_spread":0.3112103863995932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412769058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4231142,0.04659271,0.008371966,0.29589868,0.0012741014,0.00023821142,0.00019153442,0.000031774063,0.22428688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96543694,0.02365069,0.002123728,0.0040402426,0.0005946247,0.0001631047,0.00006923631,0.000014510036,0.0039067636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882189,0.007518732,0.00023091133,0.0004885962,0.001361262,0.0021815603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694706,0.021564396,0.0025238167,0.0012010281,0.002194072,0.003046071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015502193,0.0002865567,0.00094498595,0.003629561,0.00798897,0.013907472,0.0017581608,0.0033014729,0.010497736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02392936,0.0003115192,0.0006548385,0.005653166,0.02152439,0.029413573,0.00934777,0.00429367,0.0004698786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077526565,0.00022737667,0.024062326,0.0015303408,0.000042339736,0.00049477065,0.26749837,0.00022092553,0.00031325137,0.5240001,0.0066856304,0.17484707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025818788,0.00016115197,0.03810858,0.0042450386,0.000051061757,0.0005941154,0.64767647,0.00037454368,0.00019562984,0.14352706,0.1649907,0.00004980586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025817256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04952682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025817256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061531113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015550077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08198446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413032680","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102089","title":"Against American Ethnic Democracy: White Rule and Black Rebellion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Memphis","keywords":"Democracy; Ethnic group; White (mutation); Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.013526537522255131,"score_gpt":0.3236997240709553,"score_spread":0.3101731865487002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413032680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5057217,0.0019855176,0.0011126448,0.068731226,0.00056243455,0.000014073923,0.0000138088835,0.000015530202,0.42184305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943895,0.0003329809,0.00008085891,0.0025418124,0.000084658874,0.00000692495,0.00000236515,0.000007760119,0.0075036157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977597,0.0012760028,0.000021975886,0.00018034245,0.0001984244,0.00056349894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.0004673365,0.00021710037,0.00008857146,0.00015463804,0.00031864003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032628851,0.0001892161,0.00020327691,0.0006021159,0.014051177,0.0065374654,0.00044642965,0.0015186013,0.00553737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00376536,0.00011455402,0.00015002998,0.00040725988,0.017045293,0.0035524787,0.0047082785,0.0029815543,0.00032229975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047555794,0.00006175489,0.004126508,0.000022770411,0.000010668166,0.00032140507,0.117923915,0.000062027524,0.00030161798,0.85090125,0.0072106686,0.019009747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042945245,0.00009142529,0.013906819,0.0003651549,0.000035337423,0.0003183251,0.3441976,0.00048421783,0.0011424756,0.39850056,0.24086548,0.000049640796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009691144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018765038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014051177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024938008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025393846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019269466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413415944","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102661","title":"“Talkin’ ‘bout a Revolution”: Change for Care, and Care for Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08127414213245265,"score_gpt":0.39440308857021666,"score_spread":0.313128946437764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413415944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070039555,0.044572834,0.0044450914,0.56500584,0.0060710744,0.00005197626,0.00005185179,0.00008998027,0.37270734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.631885,0.02339173,0.004260292,0.1991806,0.004903772,0.00041532362,0.000087621076,0.00034744723,0.13552824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98514,0.01041721,0.00016869394,0.0010208734,0.001473056,0.0017802847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949963,0.0028181945,0.00035377013,0.00035110247,0.0004056182,0.0010748695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087173525,0.0008359477,0.0006739278,0.0016707886,0.022158839,0.021828705,0.0016293539,0.008881486,0.011050305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010921601,0.00039496308,0.0006141417,0.0020269724,0.1045246,0.019782541,0.010593873,0.013939067,0.0014706329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016380673,0.000017971082,0.0001803405,0.000081499216,0.000004538249,0.00008276267,0.056946896,0.00003712798,0.000064563974,0.86322856,0.069534376,0.009805018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011630977,0.000023618935,0.00040402243,0.00049688906,0.000005441014,0.00013398494,0.051595096,0.00007075595,0.00010291073,0.2419134,0.70521873,0.000023482873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019499196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022282057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022158839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0204389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01671068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14829528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413764077","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102260","title":"On the Decline of Elite-Educated Republicans in Congress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; Haverford College; Swarthmore College; Dartmouth College; Association for Psychological Science; Princeton University; Johns Hopkins University; Pomona College; Vassar College; Harvard University; York University; Northwestern University; Washington University in St. Louis; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Grinnell College; American Political Science Association; Rice University; Yale University; Vanderbilt University; University of Notre Dame; Williams College; University of Southern California; Wellesley College; Georgetown University; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Elite; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02199570611692038,"score_gpt":0.35576618485311706,"score_spread":0.3337704787361967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413764077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98229146,0.00017046799,0.00006785483,0.001380174,0.000008088029,0.000003582079,0.00013047742,0.000004344513,0.015943553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978206,0.00012811327,0.000017586426,0.00018482633,0.000022216616,0.000002711087,0.00010015185,0.0000024970277,0.0017212452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991248,0.00020147968,0.000030589094,0.0001181063,0.00017070047,0.00035432214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594206,0.0008721145,0.0013408441,0.00028619365,0.0007828454,0.0007759048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016772802,0.00007280169,0.00025289872,0.0019024133,0.0020648884,0.0021997143,0.0003523039,0.00045317103,0.0063329954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054067154,0.000092319664,0.00010951747,0.0018962945,0.0018230798,0.0013787841,0.0017515578,0.0009627444,0.00076714106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027814682,0.00019927038,0.86521775,0.000056209574,0.00003988651,0.0002321235,0.03843881,0.00022047714,0.0021081527,0.021178713,0.0050220964,0.06700835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038239814,0.000044582568,0.9755931,0.000021129685,0.0000052101705,0.000050432747,0.012375488,0.00011895433,0.00036863497,0.0011270224,0.010284004,0.000007638272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009402706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02186501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009402706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097181636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062981143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021185994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414020510","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725101503","title":"Strategic Taxation: Fiscal Capacity and Accountability in African States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Fiscal capacity; Economics; Economic policy; Business; Public economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042027170859852046,"score_gpt":0.2552436489719109,"score_spread":0.21321647811205882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414020510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7422845,0.0027700502,0.0022350976,0.05096614,0.00014458707,0.00004081729,0.00043656127,0.000028196675,0.20109408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968419,0.000395364,0.000139905,0.00026976888,0.00001617971,0.000005939839,0.000019908675,0.000002901701,0.002308129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867815,0.0005355956,0.000051639265,0.000063382446,0.00014109777,0.0005300755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716383,0.0013074571,0.00074488035,0.0001263337,0.00038292102,0.0002746627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029892612,0.00011391678,0.00019188652,0.0008634033,0.0017247045,0.00363136,0.00029700974,0.00086965493,0.0065481775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011055434,0.00015119785,0.00014029966,0.0018608131,0.0020121452,0.0034875982,0.0018450341,0.0012267944,0.00020452465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006672273,0.000021398962,0.014572883,0.0000636098,0.000015408199,0.00015941072,0.0023161948,0.002734055,0.000139643,0.9564439,0.0050912984,0.01837544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000708374,0.00006372846,0.07179994,0.0009586617,0.00005686947,0.00025563006,0.013136164,0.013819903,0.0013279708,0.80105805,0.09739689,0.00005544677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020523217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030566651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020523217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005563157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00634814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040807545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415788515","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725103356","title":"Migration Governance in North America: Policy, Politics, and Community. Edited by Kiran Banerjee and Craig Damian Smith. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2024. 510p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance","score_opus":0.007299811025917464,"score_gpt":0.25738219957802805,"score_spread":0.25008238855211057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415788515","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004198082,0.7735363,0.0006121647,0.16708216,0.004001523,0.00002096497,0.00042571503,0.00006226252,0.050060786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12204179,0.7495159,0.0022787245,0.009684578,0.003499698,0.00014201162,0.0005626324,0.00013377359,0.11214102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999388,0.00033070677,0.00002603029,0.000055498407,0.00011035808,0.00008951903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919623,0.00021366472,0.00011392951,0.00004580769,0.00021206788,0.00021838106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013451653,0.0009720312,0.00079827645,0.0012178557,0.0030390944,0.0042117205,0.00085730944,0.001666864,0.012896679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014744188,0.00080520386,0.00031106273,0.0043549533,0.004402006,0.002975873,0.0018057319,0.0029047222,0.0015928737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019982963,0.000053311996,0.002120882,0.00070715044,0.000029178842,0.00014092708,0.009904646,0.0003994276,0.00023733445,0.050136562,0.8359048,0.10034575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011457068,0.00001048306,0.015595119,0.0018522585,0.000018611772,0.00011861302,0.009511415,0.00019185872,0.000084273335,0.02745601,0.9451318,0.00001817803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21488257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40771082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78511745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008301025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019000145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42726362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417270926","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102673","title":"Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men - Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men. By Patricia Owens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2025. 409p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"World history; Political history; International relations; Intellectual history","score_opus":0.016578105366899513,"score_gpt":0.22854418980015034,"score_spread":0.21196608443325082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417270926","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029017304,0.61221725,0.0007065657,0.13450031,0.0061473935,0.000010460703,0.00014155281,0.000037613576,0.24333723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2682817,0.37544692,0.0013006515,0.025364498,0.009243993,0.000090004396,0.00020237958,0.00024511808,0.31982478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983198,0.0007917836,0.000059255413,0.00017493105,0.00034223354,0.00031193695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887663,0.00057922036,0.00015606196,0.00008385448,0.00009190714,0.00021230151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019861148,0.0008601631,0.0004411394,0.0025131423,0.006241475,0.008397451,0.00094008807,0.0029342864,0.015427276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030094376,0.00063770794,0.00033693272,0.004904291,0.016581176,0.014120994,0.003980394,0.0065875123,0.0022864563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039763945,0.000025090721,0.00023420235,0.00027140498,0.000009669866,0.00016918471,0.026458519,0.0000822282,0.00006197754,0.6092179,0.32108974,0.0423403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057632897,0.000007839105,0.0006398986,0.00054997316,0.000003161545,0.00009467492,0.0051664882,0.000025625946,0.000055501478,0.04272286,0.9507205,0.000007818379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01704376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033839762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01704376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007433089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048503163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053931057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}