{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc713587ff24","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Politics"},"cohort_total":196,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":196,"exported":196,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc713587ff24","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Perspectives+on+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1964012142","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705780257","title":"Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States, and Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Agriculture; Wildlife; Natural (archaeology); Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Environmental policy; Common Agricultural Policy; Business; Geography; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.006966641385297076,"score_gpt":0.2264077028961098,"score_spread":0.21944106151081275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964012142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100636,0.013950768,0.00004420159,0.1215671,0.00012608492,0.0005408988,0.000056211586,0.00002352814,0.053627584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843845,0.010821868,0.00000912579,0.0017628259,0.0004467127,0.000011480167,0.0000018676772,0.0000052210125,0.002556417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910057,0.0001775768,0.000092312075,0.00013015383,0.00018965195,0.00030973417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999362,0.00042599443,0.000033530247,0.000086990665,0.000016368802,0.00007514965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021632692,0.00008888193,0.00011280207,0.00002705565,0.0007314329,0.00004730046,0.0001011488,0.000034750436,0.000013431419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001465382,0.000055323657,0.000016480855,0.00012445684,0.0014505754,0.000025768233,0.000035748482,0.0001623172,6.098858e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005929565,0.000020581872,0.002667839,0.0000013105013,0.000021243703,8.0872286e-7,0.091759354,0.00067970867,4.5900183e-8,0.90221757,0.0023045237,0.00032109377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011072073,0.000025606278,0.06449425,0.000011849342,0.000018268982,3.16453e-7,0.24475792,0.002444596,0.0000010349064,0.011525664,0.6754148,0.00019845311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9451474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79225194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065857137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012029655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56256646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965187713","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091233","title":"Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. By Rogers Brubaker, Margit Feischmidt, Jon Fox, and Liana Grancea. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 504p. $24.95.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Eastern European Communism and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Ethnic group; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Ethnology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014976100461784849,"score_gpt":0.2611068942547296,"score_spread":0.24613079379294475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965187713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177521,0.0046708235,0.000092783164,0.009738813,0.00015126973,0.00060403167,0.00037844302,0.00013959568,0.1664721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97904146,0.006177399,0.00020378876,0.00043759163,0.00011833532,0.0000010718676,0.000014253757,0.000019510044,0.013986572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978484,0.00035851295,0.00023466049,0.00046072988,0.00043955454,0.0006581587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904686,0.0001369136,0.00010745933,0.0002824905,0.00012938153,0.0002968664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041147068,0.0002572292,0.00028899586,0.00011749876,0.0006900675,0.00012837972,0.0003755734,0.00016449235,0.000020673942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011110742,0.00024724545,0.00007285946,0.00023326249,0.0008907432,0.0004180489,0.000071472365,0.00046183856,0.0000036336835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010124103,0.00072192703,0.010489356,0.000051734274,0.000056356646,0.000053298874,0.057730835,0.000016263135,0.00008862843,0.92676944,0.0012261901,0.0026947162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040173805,0.00058030995,0.2434665,0.00034555324,0.000099793935,0.000023690363,0.06374257,0.00026703294,0.00040581397,0.013322093,0.6722231,0.001506206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004759096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009379065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051101536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016255723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966494172","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705940255","title":"Men, Militarism, and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peacekeeping; Militarism; Scrutiny; Contradiction; Political science; Hatred; Criminology; Gender studies; Aggression; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.025255030373715393,"score_gpt":0.3133669238634006,"score_spread":0.2881118934896852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966494172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6526296,0.005214341,0.0003594257,0.0111794025,0.000074798074,0.00022635504,0.00003167119,0.00015546652,0.3301289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947256,0.0008303062,0.00048254628,0.00046696007,0.00048784554,0.0000069372004,0.0000029751623,0.000010964063,0.0029858754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984196,0.0001803385,0.00016113084,0.0003829877,0.00036000554,0.0004959495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918884,0.000118185715,0.000050132352,0.00023889744,0.00013330313,0.00027061178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032065896,0.00014349147,0.00022195252,0.00022110969,0.00060628966,0.000083449195,0.00018045874,0.00010211063,0.00025417813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018678638,0.00015172089,0.00015042508,0.00040096734,0.00038353683,0.00010727751,0.00003889407,0.0001635129,0.000034413406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058456585,0.00015390561,0.002765639,0.0000034871632,0.00033901542,0.0000025131653,0.41742983,0.00001811763,0.000012417784,0.5780683,0.00026925805,0.0009316183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005276459,0.00009758199,0.059466388,0.0000048699467,0.0005192527,0.0000016782296,0.8420841,0.0009554798,0.00010429007,0.019415887,0.07637544,0.00044734665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035992626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012293808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55865246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025018078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009878904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61869985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967875522","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703810150","title":"Iberian Trade Unionism: Democratization under the Impact of the European Union. By José Magone. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2001. 335p. $49.95","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; European union; Corporate governance; Intermediation; Political science; Multi-level governance; European integration; Trade union; Database transaction; International trade; Economy; Economics; Political economy; Democracy; Law; Management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.015646393711641626,"score_gpt":0.2875455773572485,"score_spread":0.2718991836456069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967875522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39264137,0.0019217565,0.016882775,0.076879814,0.0012657532,0.0016145215,0.00029645697,0.00021659494,0.50828093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915208,0.0006522988,0.000058768394,0.0006295812,0.00021688844,0.000001353906,0.000006229587,0.000029515395,0.0068845274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710506,0.001618538,0.0002321587,0.00022934718,0.00037723765,0.00043765127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909425,0.000121483834,0.00013966949,0.00034522492,0.00010576299,0.00019359878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000700095,0.0001740553,0.00014007957,0.00004337406,0.0010874799,0.000112630376,0.00033863029,0.000069932365,0.00033415263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012963706,0.000107383035,0.00016609709,0.00053701934,0.0004709718,0.00016970493,0.000010574711,0.00022038557,0.000005608308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025908623,0.00023194432,0.00091689907,0.0000012221363,0.00008063448,3.078601e-7,0.022945197,0.0005320715,0.00038978204,0.95485103,0.019864796,0.00018350048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016173436,0.00031353682,0.5804764,0.000054669872,0.0001750159,0.0000051144375,0.18939628,0.000072783936,0.0016240762,0.06401283,0.16160245,0.00064950355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021469135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004408102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8908382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042869127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009289088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968816406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705670491","title":"Imagined Economies: The Sources of Russian Regionalism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Nationalism; Political science; Secession; Political economy; Economy; Positive economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016607882128947437,"score_gpt":0.2993470492611663,"score_spread":0.28273916713221886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968816406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16944183,0.00029635103,0.000022295464,0.09721408,0.000085158885,0.00014121852,0.00001845037,0.000044209788,0.7327364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897314,0.00012923687,0.00021780061,0.0017514379,0.0011355286,0.0000101091955,8.044706e-7,0.000010900947,0.007012822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988654,0.00012654642,0.00021808592,0.00019680876,0.00017014821,0.00042297583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901795,0.00041241027,0.000087803666,0.00025884958,0.000053721942,0.00016923854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029021368,0.0001090598,0.00017728913,0.00006431438,0.00040941424,0.000062347615,0.00033213076,0.00006339013,0.00047922213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022321194,0.00008152699,0.00013587261,0.00008173905,0.0014498037,0.00014926444,0.000025574034,0.00013958714,0.00011763099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034696438,0.00006089563,0.00043398576,0.0000024488825,0.000020958973,4.7888915e-7,0.048978217,0.000012702968,6.1502016e-7,0.9496412,0.0006837599,0.0001612453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003454975,0.00006486403,0.007284299,0.000018520033,0.000027489234,0.000002563781,0.16928227,0.0001197815,0.00017139188,0.2026785,0.61976314,0.00024166644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014637453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014929382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024272047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022976153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5341862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975111701","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712001119","title":"<i>Mobilizing Restraint: Democracy and Industrial Conflict in Post-Reform South Asia</i>. By Emmanuel Teitelbaum. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011. 248p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Politics; Development economics; Political economy; Political stability; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04046267378854979,"score_gpt":0.25956823032122917,"score_spread":0.21910555653267938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975111701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39236447,0.014851469,0.000011403706,0.0024714975,0.0007807233,0.0008650073,0.00055060926,0.00018135968,0.58792347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270374,0.0026303036,0.000049947677,0.00018341477,0.00086029654,0.0000037586374,0.000008862017,0.00002991128,0.003529799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776644,0.00024667897,0.00024528507,0.00045867826,0.00033560692,0.0009473281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988245,0.00019657901,0.00017308384,0.0002600758,0.00013375856,0.00041201565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049891847,0.00026918954,0.00035088992,0.00009983372,0.001066658,0.000054167285,0.00027593144,0.00029713166,0.000102573606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002556326,0.00028268303,0.000100486905,0.00014241517,0.0012344003,0.00048514092,0.00012912696,0.0005840008,0.000034298955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018515016,0.00051084126,0.0135736205,0.000022277485,0.00011271312,0.000023278155,0.24064034,0.0000016880454,0.000084070794,0.7279675,0.015930256,0.0009482549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010359839,0.00015172128,0.01128364,0.000027131216,0.000049772312,0.0000027334693,0.6611042,0.0000043775512,0.00002038569,0.00036172115,0.32557452,0.00038380388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020780358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007978631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72760576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016368715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002496811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977402475","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706610360","title":"New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New institutionalism; Institutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012074655929700782,"score_gpt":0.2802095247161806,"score_spread":0.2681348687864798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977402475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17589927,0.0005896109,0.0012566729,0.0019368229,0.000095244024,0.000040767387,0.000026489868,0.000047238056,0.8201079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581858,0.000041345644,0.00027410893,0.0003292118,0.0006240261,0.0000011488398,0.0000033780022,0.000002853145,0.040538117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993453,0.000070705944,0.00008527548,0.00015805659,0.00009546153,0.00024521793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00014571504,0.000020310312,0.00007500658,0.00002527016,0.00017280414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020726038,0.00006233648,0.00011196481,0.00010947016,0.00042407695,0.000036463727,0.00006743952,0.000045390025,0.00036287287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010067547,0.0000605124,0.00007292153,0.00011657845,0.00044953462,0.00007038688,0.000009506961,0.000057911326,0.000054273365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004356265,0.000027972277,0.00088352745,6.8437396e-7,0.00003889104,0.0000011644345,0.0049202326,0.000008941224,8.7713835e-7,0.9927231,0.0012428238,0.00014740955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016497947,0.000021703952,0.033116147,0.0000025098013,0.00012428645,5.7971164e-7,0.011808426,0.000014646189,0.0000068328463,0.6243855,0.33020267,0.00015178545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007773772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003973511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7822865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020447474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014115097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983671719","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706510369","title":"Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada <i>and</i> The Case for Gay Rights: From <i>Bowers</i> to <i>Lawrence</i> and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Scholarship; Gay rights; Autonomy; Political science; Classical liberalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.009089207930567467,"score_gpt":0.26204968804916223,"score_spread":0.2529604801185948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983671719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414385,0.0017256711,0.000047233454,0.023308206,0.0000994611,0.0006651558,0.0023226794,0.000024855044,0.030368233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98264354,0.0003389269,0.00032910838,0.015853725,0.0003392302,0.000027537912,0.000036499434,0.000011272082,0.00042016653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830467,0.0002806881,0.00023909501,0.00036751837,0.00025628466,0.00055173086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655783,0.002771784,0.00007538264,0.00017213158,0.00014471042,0.00027815902],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034984617,0.00023297447,0.0002783947,0.000059954797,0.001556241,0.0002729954,0.00012750845,0.000078594574,0.000004136261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000962355,0.00015247893,0.00002424318,0.00012530036,0.0046672383,0.00012554048,0.000054995522,0.00019394646,1.9289634e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024662482,0.00003036188,0.0003309395,0.000007970772,0.000021461301,0.000055219378,0.020082263,0.0000054468114,6.837836e-7,0.9773093,0.0021255142,0.0000061633937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013067626,0.0001033481,0.00038482796,0.00003130384,0.00010417593,0.00011693986,0.058385782,0.00008812357,0.000017238179,0.35925287,0.57986915,0.00033948797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97819436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8656224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6180564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016611154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038320725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984227925","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705380492","title":"Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Nationalism; Patriotism; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Confusion; Sociology; Global justice; Political science; Law; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.026334032152731876,"score_gpt":0.3686632590123231,"score_spread":0.3423292268595912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984227925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19084942,0.0019405744,0.00019251496,0.021358747,0.00030764675,0.0003248441,0.000110845285,0.00020502604,0.7847104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913033,0.000307547,0.0017618007,0.0016877264,0.0013642816,0.000007354342,0.0000048475113,0.000020750913,0.0035423385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984079,0.00011228876,0.00016317156,0.00030358482,0.00043736552,0.00057570083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.00021420482,0.0000630888,0.00017085997,0.00021743317,0.00032365465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002866429,0.00015290384,0.00015413896,0.00017884003,0.00086291076,0.00011918037,0.00016045658,0.00012039819,0.00009529896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028462015,0.00016234007,0.0000711714,0.00019144571,0.0008594359,0.000193743,0.00003073125,0.00020365039,0.00005284999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028753248,0.000081146056,0.0005517304,0.000007893974,0.000020315547,0.0000015409457,0.09258577,0.0000020883633,0.0000012627619,0.9054779,0.0008854891,0.00038202576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005497791,0.00011373676,0.0030967058,0.000030681713,0.00008819207,0.0000039313836,0.50059855,0.00009333722,0.000023552126,0.15325251,0.34176025,0.0003887373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010690108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022817554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80045396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002789595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019469664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6636899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985033627","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705880259","title":"Resisting Rebellion: The History and Politics of Counterinsurgency","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Constructive; Political science; Guerrilla warfare; Citizen journalism; Spanish Civil War; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03296781735600428,"score_gpt":0.29197682474448616,"score_spread":0.25900900738848187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985033627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4150175,0.01447416,0.000020847901,0.003987927,0.0003961343,0.00014996632,0.000025796664,0.000049223898,0.56587845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820597,0.0008155439,0.00014713978,0.00024336313,0.00063620467,0.000002769508,5.7911177e-7,0.000007839883,0.016086873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989202,0.00018750707,0.00018394816,0.0001772757,0.00024994568,0.00028113296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923444,0.0002564875,0.00007079858,0.00020481249,0.00012659369,0.00010684831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043570614,0.00009027083,0.00012621353,0.00006035722,0.0006870265,0.0000075251933,0.00015485319,0.00005825305,0.00027175128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003133933,0.00007753448,0.00005198794,0.00006688639,0.0011512289,0.000088240806,0.000017420776,0.00014110231,0.0000097763295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054425795,0.000050468203,0.00017644263,0.000009793078,0.000009276402,0.0000014525791,0.086314745,0.0000044300646,0.000022277749,0.9102929,0.0029622135,0.00015051407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111850146,0.000085812586,0.0025133674,0.000021971893,0.000019190766,0.0000024838273,0.08153588,0.000039789673,0.000026974736,0.0097036315,0.9057999,0.00013912952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023241586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004639343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071819103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52841216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988016899","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706730365","title":"The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin American Experience, 1881–2001","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Perspective (graphical); International relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014777106800646833,"score_gpt":0.3786815310754672,"score_spread":0.3639044242748204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988016899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63675547,0.000038692244,0.00009686819,0.003382486,0.00013022282,0.00012998929,0.000020310743,0.00001746893,0.3594285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476665,0.00012408884,0.000486877,0.00008248907,0.0003625735,0.000021597372,0.000002751371,0.000008560176,0.0041444004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867976,0.00009895862,0.00023177624,0.00015244285,0.0005167126,0.0003203489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983781,0.0009789634,0.00019219532,0.00017797067,0.0002380496,0.000034702167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033847438,0.000093366616,0.00010188606,0.00006638904,0.00044596594,0.00007201137,0.0004839253,0.000032355983,0.00011003997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007293081,0.000056528548,0.00016933541,0.00043145774,0.002128786,0.000093750605,0.0000409523,0.00019315205,0.000013616846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001028072,0.00012992106,0.05660628,2.780368e-7,0.000036965357,5.07123e-7,0.06696898,0.0012973918,0.000021877266,0.8720345,0.0023150975,0.0005779155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026488566,0.00011714609,0.59650344,0.000016211054,0.0000063766565,9.213442e-7,0.33705044,0.0043526413,0.000046807163,0.04353857,0.017916149,0.00018639566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037388276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008422226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8284959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010082478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025111035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96902186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999407592","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708081942","title":"The Challenges of Multiculturalism in Advanced Democracies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03020758537249669,"score_gpt":0.3205749403486895,"score_spread":0.2903673549761928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999407592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424503,0.0030896908,0.0000066202642,0.00409608,0.00010636242,0.00015432539,0.0000044481885,0.000024309064,0.050067876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985981,0.012009285,0.00012539516,0.000034586184,0.00012250639,0.000009636251,6.632595e-7,0.000003861843,0.0017131061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992061,0.00012956474,0.00014003305,0.000115808005,0.00021788785,0.0001905628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993656,0.00023202258,0.00006133871,0.000106917505,0.00019657343,0.000037511574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016542338,0.00006522106,0.00009039603,0.00004355411,0.00046206472,0.000011988398,0.000116711104,0.00004637879,0.000010106169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007485252,0.0000431517,0.000042823496,0.00009594953,0.00046437563,0.0001320321,0.0000065396357,0.00008397633,0.0000064262344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042114307,0.00003688133,0.00018027051,0.0000013837886,0.0000031345137,3.3445622e-7,0.31026432,0.000008493844,0.000053102827,0.68912894,0.0000684607,0.00025049818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028289066,0.000114739676,0.055599358,0.000031441443,0.0000043070204,0.0000013141116,0.8998005,0.00007398284,0.0012584557,0.0193702,0.02332193,0.0001409032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008550202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070828595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66975874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014724888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000690835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3952402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999658321","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706220140","title":"Denaturalizing Ecological Politics: Alienation from Nature from Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Alienation; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Social science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006310007714503633,"score_gpt":0.2358640636481682,"score_spread":0.22955405593366457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999658321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457381,0.00053951895,0.00007490654,0.017070638,0.00016617565,0.00024897762,0.0002603387,0.000051592717,0.035849784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870456,0.00005059155,0.0015658406,0.008431237,0.0007605882,0.000013949462,0.00004947639,0.000021526635,0.00040220201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827814,0.000107771964,0.0001893477,0.0005506377,0.00045830573,0.00041579703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900657,0.00037490597,0.00005739889,0.00033891734,0.000010164079,0.00021206496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012215403,0.00022849868,0.00015894987,0.000034576715,0.00045781184,0.000098019504,0.00029065003,0.00029306737,0.00069248874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017921958,0.0001684846,0.000064022985,0.000109579116,0.00042624568,0.00017761598,0.00023930144,0.0007941783,0.000529841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070480484,0.0010514025,0.083121814,0.0000078622725,0.00011955309,0.00005422736,0.017805165,0.003999463,0.007243653,0.87247324,0.013679808,0.00037335738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031708844,0.000120703444,0.6241213,0.000012095171,0.00003859436,0.000003416577,0.0053275316,0.00027635062,0.0015513714,0.35935688,0.008546385,0.00032829083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003262388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002873837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006085963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009326362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75822663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001262193","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704800975","title":"Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06032350709690475,"score_gpt":0.3561269798010161,"score_spread":0.29580347270411134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001262193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6193734,0.00013308185,0.00003586053,0.0052643847,0.00016634131,0.00018636372,0.000022678874,0.00005866884,0.37475923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955618,0.000071847,0.00011944576,0.0005770511,0.00047484846,0.00002022235,0.0000036815727,0.000017440881,0.0031537137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981196,0.00014067795,0.00020936427,0.00027831268,0.00038064588,0.00087141094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991463,0.00010451958,0.00005624367,0.00020791034,0.0001096285,0.00037544296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036293938,0.00012773395,0.00017633224,0.00021458468,0.00030841245,0.0000692263,0.00018892002,0.00009944796,0.000053038777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034789497,0.00013225035,0.00006129337,0.00023476135,0.00047417197,0.000119851225,0.000028040733,0.00019365313,0.000053826025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028342954,0.00017918486,0.001996181,0.0000040249724,0.000010540223,0.000011786517,0.20038387,0.000049702765,0.000010974847,0.79726815,0.00006692079,0.000015824202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070937496,0.000101646016,0.016251732,0.00001738393,0.0000031207858,0.0000012262695,0.52847916,0.0000057184893,0.00019752626,0.44716597,0.006870988,0.00019613051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014502882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028609158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37618837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001943188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009260139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99205965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006457004","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708080493","title":"Limits to Liberalization: Local Culture in a Global Marketplace","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Liberalization; Political science; CLARITY; Autonomy; Free trade; Publishing; European union; Political economy; International trade; Media studies; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03530452985334464,"score_gpt":0.3171189862689688,"score_spread":0.28181445641562414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006457004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36054286,0.00060466694,0.00051860424,0.03877238,0.00039851046,0.0006022966,0.000046725025,0.00017218385,0.59834176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145506,0.0002380511,0.00037925478,0.001210462,0.0003051141,0.000011148593,0.0000033265394,0.000006236746,0.08329578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998864,0.00008776776,0.00012864343,0.00022949981,0.00030874752,0.00038137325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949896,0.000032838387,0.000024727837,0.00009266345,0.0001368582,0.0002139542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009977274,0.00010971075,0.00011888692,0.000036424928,0.00038425773,0.000041120682,0.00014953385,0.00010903517,0.00022583062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024427366,0.00009907782,0.000036953406,0.00053837016,0.00023951427,0.00009200376,0.00002619265,0.00011982113,0.00007466352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003926524,0.00018854147,0.012489443,0.0000033291997,0.000016960425,0.000050699084,0.20925865,0.00014821423,0.0000018080074,0.46296823,0.31400105,0.0008338109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003408971,0.00010769434,0.049331576,0.000041588028,0.0000043159002,0.000010638289,0.19105583,0.000018424696,0.000034353536,0.0022123526,0.7565419,0.00030039274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020690183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016011819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55400777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012685467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002462075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4040276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008081560","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001921","title":"Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. By Stacie E. Goddard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 304p. $85.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01070577159856908,"score_gpt":0.24447773611080192,"score_spread":0.23377196451223284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008081560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6568068,0.009689211,0.000027469048,0.006253146,0.0003534914,0.000530079,0.0012159855,0.00008926025,0.32503456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745879,0.0023037873,0.000092677146,0.00013666418,0.0005246825,0.0000015940792,0.0000053844183,0.000015403519,0.022331903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854213,0.00015103669,0.0001561526,0.00029644638,0.0003454576,0.00050879765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989574,0.00032632175,0.00011192203,0.00020084811,0.00015150287,0.00025200876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028918855,0.00017115788,0.00027860174,0.00005783733,0.0008310999,0.00010535931,0.0002483837,0.00012196998,0.000011667696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002544757,0.00015119994,0.000069559086,0.00010135974,0.0032601529,0.00016019453,0.000115894414,0.0003492257,0.0000023633913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007124711,0.00019779764,0.027172169,0.00004712715,0.00018073081,0.000013714307,0.05939544,5.462693e-7,0.00004269885,0.63058656,0.28181764,0.0004743244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039345915,0.000238616,0.045203324,0.0000670094,0.00020017153,0.000013780437,0.20799081,0.000025106658,0.00020596011,0.00288243,0.7386095,0.00062870403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04237177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015696977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62770414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103761486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002961646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015462235","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705310255","title":"Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Haven; Politics; Gossip; Safe haven; Foreign policy; History; Classics; Economic history; Political science; Art history; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01153325641600629,"score_gpt":0.31726741636611455,"score_spread":0.3057341599501083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015462235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8474671,0.0005502672,0.000024529563,0.021505794,0.00004942408,0.00016191546,0.00005923223,0.000036341746,0.13014539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965135,0.0006612025,0.00023416195,0.0008630835,0.00038407103,0.0000022673573,0.0000011979812,0.000008094207,0.0013324626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988066,0.00017045476,0.00015397319,0.00016758993,0.00031188029,0.0003894997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918324,0.00026684554,0.00008994423,0.00018962953,0.00013447017,0.00013586813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002734134,0.000104033206,0.00019899654,0.000050422925,0.00040658793,0.000048449758,0.000204587,0.000047679125,0.00001806163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032857092,0.00008055283,0.000075702315,0.00016061541,0.0031007207,0.00007726942,0.00003436136,0.00015832104,0.000008740115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008512409,0.0000666211,0.0007022474,0.0000030343044,0.000018602677,5.0952065e-7,0.090103336,0.000010955098,0.0000014659823,0.90842,0.0001960488,0.0004686414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009887819,0.00018554619,0.00999385,0.00002166747,0.00006425778,0.00000303565,0.8548302,0.00058823585,0.000033312972,0.07153906,0.061472297,0.00027976013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00683758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020159364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.836881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017508438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012816094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016583115","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706820141","title":"Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Balkans: History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Constructivism (international relations); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Economic nationalism; Wish; Sociology; International relations; Law; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017591258232659168,"score_gpt":0.31497192377601546,"score_spread":0.2973806655433563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016583115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2286995,0.0005553345,0.000017428409,0.00479268,0.00051859743,0.00018422722,0.00007102402,0.00012019231,0.765041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865624,0.000048002606,0.00045337473,0.000672179,0.0014802928,0.000012451296,0.0000053279587,0.000019859108,0.010746154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998362,0.00019795797,0.00023722475,0.0003186946,0.00029326827,0.0005908688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992396,0.00031303865,0.000075287026,0.00017940853,0.000076087716,0.000116567964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043621683,0.000139827,0.00017087765,0.00019971137,0.0003321394,0.00006732225,0.00024638034,0.00010587094,0.00018422052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020970742,0.00017649397,0.00011201102,0.00015287883,0.00059002027,0.00015780277,0.000025605159,0.00021261688,0.00016569467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001551643,0.00009229388,0.0037829967,0.000003020501,0.0000072005105,0.0000026271307,0.036306605,0.00012840463,0.00000418724,0.9538528,0.0058094608,0.00000890319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081147254,0.000031620042,0.088945776,0.000044714063,0.000019436658,0.000001670628,0.12565103,0.00018936608,0.000042445725,0.2530872,0.5305935,0.0005817251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044231657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037977472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75786287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00896668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005173955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019430047","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070624","title":"How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stalemate; Demise; Political science; Political economy; International relations; Foreign policy; Power (physics); State (computer science); Great power; Asymmetric warfare; Development economics; Politics; International relations theory; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03344908643533258,"score_gpt":0.30525754215533374,"score_spread":0.2718084557200012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019430047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03410594,0.001879176,0.00061414874,0.0052439095,0.00017945764,0.00020413146,0.000025038189,0.00006951234,0.9576787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98054945,0.00025912788,0.00011135246,0.00034738772,0.0005596413,0.000001353909,7.574471e-7,0.000014343725,0.018156603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981694,0.00040171263,0.00018065493,0.00022284916,0.00040885375,0.00061649363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977813,0.0015054945,0.00006657847,0.00029279396,0.00015648046,0.00019735013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013402681,0.00013560755,0.0001709881,0.00016770788,0.00039888226,0.00007085244,0.00037689437,0.00007308484,0.00006210912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015665017,0.00009095769,0.00013470791,0.0004585441,0.0021970978,0.0001109348,0.000034277564,0.0002448953,0.000037426355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689192,0.000090105095,0.00015042364,0.0000064796172,0.000028932061,0.0000046526766,0.038645234,3.92461e-7,0.0000066341654,0.9601251,0.00023107,0.0006940817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019826477,0.00020890513,0.018871961,0.000021969217,0.000026924728,0.0000018668386,0.7662063,0.0000032815644,0.00019977734,0.13466959,0.079423316,0.00016782925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053751207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066412686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013738064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014007451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80952984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019873701","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711003835","title":"A Stability-Seeking Power: U.S. Foreign Policy and Secessionist Conflicts. By Jonathan Paquin. Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010. 230p. $85.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.021767339612610175,"score_gpt":0.26798311008408743,"score_spread":0.24621577047147725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019873701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08049668,0.0004088468,0.00012203163,0.002812112,0.00026892262,0.00079757586,0.002095143,0.00041358446,0.9125851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862421,0.001618609,0.00048122776,0.00074878504,0.0002716426,0.0000065809986,0.00003192685,0.00006552964,0.010533566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571764,0.00059669383,0.00038160954,0.0009618166,0.00077103474,0.0015711917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970681,0.000567833,0.00023258472,0.00065535627,0.00042335608,0.0010527777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055119593,0.0004842065,0.0005247771,0.00014742764,0.0016218977,0.0001529976,0.00066174206,0.00041990212,0.0003225694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012664731,0.0005124596,0.00020326137,0.00036589502,0.003167862,0.00061833527,0.00031339156,0.00062253245,0.00003476162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547072,0.00038813442,0.0013206836,0.000026090704,0.000069747824,0.000019638168,0.031508435,5.480289e-7,0.000054396387,0.9648932,0.001556841,0.00007678948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001962407,0.0006594601,0.016438393,0.00014157499,0.00017930589,0.000015189108,0.18440609,0.000114001596,0.0002654369,0.1386949,0.65544295,0.0016803294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14161941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001278228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90574545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015945176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000453702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021138409","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706640279","title":"The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media and International Activism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Political science; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Civil society; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017333256217703732,"score_gpt":0.2969369660030163,"score_spread":0.27960370978531257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021138409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35024258,0.0007262759,0.00006343259,0.012571754,0.00053893175,0.00016097243,0.000052120053,0.0000315309,0.6356124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972573,0.00043188472,0.00006143973,0.00001814179,0.00033666394,0.0000027892722,0.0000014304774,0.0000029859373,0.0018873797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931395,0.00011912104,0.00013088038,0.000075374264,0.0002177706,0.00014291446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.00047738268,0.00005662638,0.00006344671,0.000109389555,0.000036908776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118609,0.000044549444,0.00005780213,0.00004026852,0.00041491239,0.000049006034,0.00009636069,0.000025942629,0.00001975549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000266133,0.000034255958,0.00003084129,0.000092115515,0.00027070055,0.00007923182,0.000010245221,0.00005646362,0.0000027373644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056412705,0.000029715682,0.0018838886,0.0000024344083,0.000010661618,2.4118603e-7,0.011173946,0.0000027567144,0.000006665095,0.98565185,0.0006000737,0.0006321245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043210757,0.000022274224,0.2912142,0.000085913816,0.000017966393,0.0000027190267,0.22396022,0.00007896344,0.00011009722,0.07066342,0.4131994,0.00021275516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001544465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007157565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91498846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008460206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004306663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31912124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023611563","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710002823","title":"Defining the Sovereign Community: The Czech and Slovak Republics. By Nadya Nedelsky. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009. 340p. $65.00. - Governing the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Between State Socialism and the European Union. By John A. Scherpereel. Boulder, CO: First Forum, 2009. 263p. $65.00. - Governing the Post-communist City: Institutions and Democratic Development in Prague. By Martin Horak. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 270p. $61.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Eastern European Communism and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Slovak; State (computer science); Political science; Sovereignty; Socialism; Sovereign state; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.016077603751608598,"score_gpt":0.2535107732547926,"score_spread":0.237433169503184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023611563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7558772,0.07533542,0.00026423144,0.027035965,0.00019477522,0.002309543,0.0027373054,0.00013587177,0.13610972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805568,0.01737136,0.00009677996,0.00021862947,0.00006093211,0.000002595174,0.00007228621,0.00003954572,0.0015810874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361914,0.004189049,0.00047928758,0.00040882782,0.00062659435,0.00067712046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962032,0.0016394848,0.00068002735,0.000993054,0.00028455575,0.00019969697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054254145,0.00039782815,0.00047274958,0.000021296344,0.009014623,0.00053298735,0.0016652737,0.00018561077,0.000029154258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065572496,0.00024216688,0.000087295935,0.00015483421,0.0066465647,0.000886485,0.0015010077,0.0016524406,0.0000011102047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003556548,0.000699187,0.029153537,0.00016356417,0.0010168552,0.000017999533,0.59221095,0.000020334839,0.00016280355,0.31694862,0.05210915,0.0071413163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023041293,0.00017597231,0.04460968,0.00015605154,0.00018321976,0.000016064969,0.480041,0.00017507838,0.000021146885,0.0011268642,0.47066805,0.0005227721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23832697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14992894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4185589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039291347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003852971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024787455","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703930155","title":"Meanings of War and Peace. By Francis A. Beer. College Station: Texas A&amp;M University Press, 2001. 256p. $39.95 cloth, $19.95 paper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Taste; Meaning (existential); Politics; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012985150889522725,"score_gpt":0.2633839297701622,"score_spread":0.25039877888063944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024787455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56100214,0.022614285,0.00035890084,0.0038020583,0.00034827358,0.0008842336,0.0027615014,0.00018947988,0.4080391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96464306,0.023078647,0.0012724705,0.00048823433,0.000117878786,0.0000015568787,0.00002851782,0.00002720923,0.010342408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816906,0.0002899771,0.00018091689,0.00036014264,0.0004794271,0.00052046106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881744,0.00022752426,0.0001254472,0.000215563,0.00030537328,0.00030867092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034367095,0.00018276065,0.00025892403,0.00004527522,0.0004965164,0.0000327829,0.00021098796,0.00016834158,0.00017784603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005814579,0.00020739697,0.00008161893,0.00026325067,0.0007616017,0.00028467918,0.000036394966,0.00020796753,0.000013370977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000206726,0.00019706412,0.0013632339,0.000019352443,0.000044345656,0.0000050274843,0.037801906,0.000011314491,0.000037920814,0.8295015,0.13098527,0.000012380044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056979747,0.000100243466,0.00086701784,0.000014632005,0.000048616606,0.0000019459103,0.15071571,0.00004992806,0.000027001191,0.005259949,0.84209204,0.0002531185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012723731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018859184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042508738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002174937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99385065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026178734","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713001126","title":"Fighting Hunger: The Cold War and US Foreign Aid","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Cold war; Foreign policy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; International relations; Order (exchange); Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014491975465521056,"score_gpt":0.27807964701176713,"score_spread":0.26358767154624607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026178734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3531523,0.00018782644,0.00001471974,0.010150477,0.00010742495,0.00018745242,0.000004560142,0.000035993027,0.63615924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98975664,0.00013068358,0.00027916094,0.00082429487,0.0003802483,0.000015849439,7.990566e-7,0.000006101303,0.008606238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992854,0.000048696274,0.000077140045,0.00012290315,0.00022960965,0.00023622958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951565,0.00019362685,0.000033019573,0.0000631168,0.00013308914,0.000061505394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014901951,0.0000644019,0.00005762647,0.000034981036,0.00056304183,0.000089091845,0.00013372664,0.00003400993,0.00030085098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019823438,0.000046299538,0.0000267441,0.00005959768,0.00024004695,0.00012702412,0.00002773076,0.00008909299,0.00012202218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6291485e-7,0.000014087757,0.0025465607,0.000001133673,0.00001153921,5.4219174e-7,0.025049867,4.7549733e-7,0.000025806825,0.97019714,0.0020603728,0.00009168701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000492979,0.00011098551,0.09962207,0.00005584747,0.000021344778,0.000003244004,0.34035662,0.00024525632,0.00095366494,0.34348595,0.21419547,0.00045657187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012508185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000573676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6366043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012519925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056881025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43305194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026722665","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709991861","title":"International Cooperation as Interagency Cooperation: Examples from Wildlife and Habitat Preservation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Wildlife; Legislature; Unit (ring theory); Political science; Variation (astronomy); Business; Environmental resource management; International trade; Economics; Ecology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.014079828174494338,"score_gpt":0.26457613831190696,"score_spread":0.25049631013741264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026722665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8200786,0.000040307328,0.000461384,0.007956571,0.00013458074,0.00019198592,0.000023410283,0.00005392196,0.1710592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016994,0.0001388212,0.0010417579,0.0030460884,0.00031019014,0.0000074263153,0.000073465126,0.000008191867,0.0052041286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991695,0.00003852602,0.00014717334,0.00028183486,0.00020142988,0.0001614842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996541,0.00004082492,0.000042712854,0.00016199809,0.000025685751,0.00007469294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006447472,0.00012336532,0.00008183021,0.000053296677,0.00014290912,0.0001373441,0.00014918347,0.000040061732,0.002817501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014893163,0.000118380296,0.000023207616,0.00009146938,0.00010519104,0.000553543,0.00006226789,0.00008284065,0.00056660996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006503286,0.00034420824,0.025480954,0.000003141185,0.0000475484,0.000006340627,0.016159808,0.0014799467,0.0011245251,0.9040847,0.04767796,0.0035258704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020498615,0.0014226087,0.51349115,0.000067655004,0.00006629804,0.0000073803653,0.0034556491,0.041052774,0.0010029385,0.044673,0.391686,0.0010246707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070144184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070296024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85941166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016454878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007988751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031779032","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704900370","title":"Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Politics; Dynamics (music); Normative; Political science; International relations; Corporate governance; Global politics; Sociology; Global governance; Position (finance); Foreign policy; Political economy; Social science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.010307734738570844,"score_gpt":0.31283434958083517,"score_spread":0.30252661484226434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031779032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025805868,0.000059346847,0.007049162,0.0027923544,0.00012977923,0.000174156,0.000100979305,0.00008257782,0.9638058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392784,0.000080415564,0.00053407694,0.00032495914,0.0003703915,0.000008620787,0.00002131895,0.00001097142,0.0047213943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.000033432287,0.00012584677,0.0001636678,0.0003581238,0.0002750206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994632,0.000047631136,0.000053541484,0.00011522356,0.0002227701,0.00009764659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000113118986,0.00008518117,0.00007414535,0.000097219956,0.00047870888,0.0000839139,0.00013874711,0.000069540525,0.00009103253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032163018,0.000085810076,0.000058361526,0.00018568114,0.00026651533,0.00014592845,0.000015001589,0.00008867042,0.000069389105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032721123,0.000093180905,0.00018920226,0.0000017793748,0.000012521571,0.0000015549404,0.025739696,0.00024723675,7.2996386e-7,0.97358745,0.00007511329,0.00004826415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021360401,0.000053843796,0.0008002224,0.000014762139,0.000008349687,0.0000011093616,0.063745126,0.00024070106,0.000015841812,0.928004,0.0067853336,0.00011710594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013651141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035419423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021266679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028344488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5561163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041352576","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705510491","title":"Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Space (punctuation); Argument (complex analysis); Public space; Aside; Political science; Empowerment; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.039835240833230756,"score_gpt":0.29886043282169755,"score_spread":0.2590251919884668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041352576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10331239,0.00045093594,0.00078088226,0.059649564,0.00016972775,0.00013724889,0.000012432875,0.00004947758,0.83543736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204553,0.000106490676,0.0002279433,0.0006611424,0.0011054297,0.0000015484482,9.624465e-7,0.000006322266,0.015844647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917287,0.00008215954,0.00013333694,0.00013258608,0.00015256736,0.00032645732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993471,0.0001653027,0.000061494844,0.00015291598,0.00007539787,0.00019779078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022042463,0.000070112765,0.00010334658,0.000050175837,0.0003398762,0.000039180584,0.00020201523,0.000051888997,0.00044154245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005724647,0.000055259028,0.00006257894,0.00009712951,0.0004425535,0.00014152739,0.00001678663,0.0000899281,0.00009809973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014893534,0.000051930536,0.00025798028,0.0000013694654,0.0000096258145,8.214512e-8,0.041508432,0.0000073645483,0.0000048051843,0.9542156,0.0021290614,0.0018122619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022076865,0.000077653196,0.004094962,0.0000084694775,0.000012339826,4.752991e-7,0.049574662,0.00011465233,0.00010323059,0.08301385,0.86264116,0.00013776947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013832835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027514744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003174925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003224878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48345804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041733759","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712002861","title":"Beyond Patronage: Violent Struggle, Ruling Party Cohesion, and Authoritarian Durability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"African studies and sociopolitical issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":409,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Elite; Political economy; Opposition (politics); Political science; Ideology; Solidarity; Scholarship; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Development economics; Law; Politics; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.022476273946467805,"score_gpt":0.3298682679186253,"score_spread":0.3073919939721575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041733759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.816338,0.0029138464,0.00006115603,0.007392476,0.00038155343,0.00028106,0.000068798094,0.00012675632,0.17243633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676615,0.00038648132,0.00047457384,0.00025811265,0.0012753921,0.000013367898,0.0000021275578,0.000014977162,0.00080880773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978794,0.00027745494,0.00020588409,0.00030376847,0.00039106346,0.00094243005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983739,0.00065086735,0.000056645968,0.0002017276,0.00015743749,0.00055938127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006383195,0.00017395764,0.00026246917,0.00004204459,0.0014876614,0.00006620969,0.0001261656,0.00011890265,0.00014941239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011440031,0.00015681949,0.00008600229,0.00011649839,0.0012766898,0.00018712391,0.00008714166,0.0002371751,0.000032725784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042763963,0.00015178972,0.026244348,0.000007896989,0.000023746401,8.739425e-7,0.1271865,2.3559441e-7,0.0000016756985,0.8458801,0.00029458283,0.0002039822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001781729,0.000091373004,0.07576539,0.00001426026,0.00004342229,3.949257e-7,0.7859057,0.000006362737,0.000019121138,0.11799659,0.019716447,0.00026277106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002200933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009464938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7278835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004805588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074838616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044550001","doi":"10.1017/s153759270590025x","title":"Egalitarian Capitalism: Jobs, Incomes and Growth in Affluent Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Economics; Earnings; Inequality; Globalization; Wage; Economic inequality; Welfare state; Welfare; Development economics; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014382294026986375,"score_gpt":0.3212184531005783,"score_spread":0.3068361590735919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044550001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80527127,0.0018559073,0.0000037028897,0.05612248,0.00016804432,0.00023111462,0.00003992466,0.0000840164,0.13622354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943511,0.002359705,0.00006958313,0.000997947,0.0010776639,0.000011194246,7.0946777e-7,0.000010088208,0.0011219907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.000114795745,0.00015377533,0.00020715279,0.00026974082,0.0004601112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994812,0.00018196007,0.00004179146,0.00007990795,0.000094300965,0.000120819255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027666046,0.00012798497,0.00019441037,0.00013116976,0.00062557275,0.00006060258,0.00011438002,0.000097509284,0.000013543422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040089968,0.000111382986,0.000045416222,0.00015201006,0.0010184488,0.00019230547,0.000042389554,0.0001473514,0.00002267195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040019813,0.000047355425,0.014175466,0.0000055986598,0.000015910824,0.0000016273776,0.24633951,0.0000010843395,4.5927453e-7,0.73919284,0.00016318214,0.000052945277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060754805,0.000091350375,0.19113038,0.000033223845,0.000020598936,0.0000012852269,0.5889813,0.000011268904,0.000051768257,0.2046869,0.014020208,0.0003641881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02370794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098809935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53450596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046406564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011982217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9827933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628031","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250156","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Normative; Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03240449493424419,"score_gpt":0.3493862008147741,"score_spread":0.31698170588052993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0901726,0.00042854564,0.00006949453,0.31014705,0.00009262607,0.00022073927,0.000027686316,0.00008274008,0.5987585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917055,0.0002015216,0.00023875575,0.006732506,0.0016472444,0.000006740484,6.787546e-7,0.000008858634,0.0019931248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832875,0.00044966396,0.00014823808,0.00022193842,0.0003273728,0.00052402215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981232,0.0012472037,0.000040368763,0.00018020166,0.0001559182,0.00025309113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062950846,0.00012280472,0.00015834982,0.00003940587,0.0015163905,0.00010379616,0.00018948573,0.00010582625,0.000082876766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014330741,0.00008642902,0.00007814037,0.00008747076,0.0035531637,0.00019013697,0.000046760895,0.00041584467,0.00008679215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022511527,0.000047579386,0.0000485043,0.0000016788473,0.000015850286,6.6138693e-7,0.086948894,0.000002791389,0.0000011793438,0.9125593,0.0001886524,0.00016241244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005734422,0.000032927877,0.0010860736,0.0000065483937,0.000020305328,0.0000016884989,0.040666394,0.00011036496,0.00005217973,0.94306135,0.014254862,0.0001338722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016370966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020956976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89899796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000287627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017088211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048353853","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003294","title":"Between Market and State: Directions in Social Science Research on Disaster","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Terrorism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Accountability; Storm; Publishing; Economic history; History; Development economics; Geography; Law; Meteorology; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11734908886417855,"score_gpt":0.4251646265131892,"score_spread":0.30781553764901065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048353853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41781244,0.000015922187,0.0000032502357,0.00040657967,0.000053692307,0.00012085532,0.0000059239605,0.000019124293,0.5815622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567206,0.00007504485,0.00003626645,0.000047559744,0.00020822298,0.000010116698,1.9201077e-7,0.000006910568,0.013943618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803305,0.00026055658,0.00010586726,0.00035158655,0.0006360422,0.00061292853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993987,0.00020012721,0.000024781695,0.00012878103,0.00011246151,0.00013512437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013005274,0.00008119436,0.00009812556,0.00049158145,0.00120317,0.00013798715,0.00030179872,0.000037505775,0.00012238181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026072175,0.00007487293,0.000022093729,0.0008303793,0.0031930318,0.00024968042,0.00011045256,0.00022541979,0.00003292494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015330204,0.00015549539,0.018646955,0.0000043592645,0.000005122155,0.0000030354458,0.26432586,7.688928e-8,0.0000039066945,0.7142325,0.00055120065,0.0020561472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016723483,0.0001350113,0.5931404,0.00002316137,0.0000041603735,8.341258e-8,0.35713533,0.00000481503,0.000035265555,0.042923912,0.006293132,0.00013748962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011076657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025296168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6713086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031064148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110885725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048708683","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704470376","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.013846825684301596,"score_gpt":0.2967608833149278,"score_spread":0.28291405763062616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048708683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10721716,0.0014761399,0.0002893025,0.017912362,0.00027031288,0.00033716953,0.000011737363,0.000080870996,0.87240493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973639,0.00027411972,0.00003731723,0.0005491153,0.0006440026,0.0000069805146,3.0129146e-7,0.0000035416447,0.0011207119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992817,0.00008847945,0.00008706138,0.00013615767,0.00020053552,0.00020603917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995914,0.00013860122,0.00003866281,0.00008403008,0.00007109651,0.000076217104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034508077,0.000064517815,0.00010766233,0.000027301672,0.0007588962,0.00010484426,0.00008949028,0.000048160022,0.000022627168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054965337,0.000044319735,0.00003262936,0.0000950338,0.0016614017,0.0000977094,0.00001598445,0.0000993814,0.00002548265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074274335,0.000019996287,0.00007146924,0.0000035045205,0.0000080295695,0.0000014620955,0.06580924,0.000005081806,0.00000327093,0.9339384,0.000053853233,0.000078262034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015774752,0.000063528576,0.000905905,0.00004648483,0.000025344767,0.0000041480102,0.28695932,0.0000040966347,0.00010332781,0.64118016,0.06895256,0.00017767199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025532592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069252634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89014673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017865213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002125021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051333653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001076","title":"The Politics of Global Regulation. Edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. 289p. $24.95.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.0066473156493892915,"score_gpt":0.25742126826642675,"score_spread":0.25077395261703744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051333653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977194,0.0009361979,0.0000613878,0.009786754,0.000735742,0.00046040423,0.00085337926,0.00012197125,0.08932476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151,0.0011698435,0.00025688397,0.00013784188,0.00045812814,0.0000011797146,0.000011762525,0.000012019492,0.0064423657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823743,0.0001716168,0.00019815528,0.00032244486,0.00048664032,0.00058371574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869025,0.00019610247,0.00015170072,0.0003645668,0.00033447787,0.00026290363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029164145,0.0001788764,0.00019982601,0.000024485049,0.0010249842,0.00011385632,0.00041020007,0.0002097703,0.000017004704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032858716,0.00016167198,0.000079982856,0.00021159438,0.001697978,0.0002132626,0.0001213735,0.0003320925,0.0000048743636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016789441,0.0001237131,0.0051141684,0.000011474761,0.00003157633,0.0000018722027,0.005084453,0.000004665184,0.000033410248,0.9795772,0.0099041825,0.00009648333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007922054,0.0001670157,0.04013291,0.00004029908,0.000085450345,0.0000059857616,0.06234727,0.0006882475,0.00013047055,0.03695027,0.8581704,0.0004894933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037279844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013111614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94262695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004047363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002491908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056051810","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709090872","title":"Anti-Americanism and the Transatlantic Relationship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anti-Americanism; Political science; Transatlantic relations; Foreign policy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02526313394217033,"score_gpt":0.3025490768526887,"score_spread":0.2772859429105184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056051810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62999713,0.0007692535,0.000114188624,0.07816956,0.00007424402,0.00035172186,0.0000057283596,0.00015548692,0.2903627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970847,0.0001313713,0.000107657506,0.0011041136,0.00038323735,0.0000028555862,6.6557993e-7,0.0000074635072,0.0011779675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.0003393252,0.00012594722,0.0002249868,0.0003403846,0.0003870322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905366,0.0005397594,0.000055153076,0.00017800722,0.000041560605,0.0001318602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003833405,0.00011330569,0.00016502448,0.00006354372,0.00080855476,0.0001232345,0.00021537986,0.00006646221,0.000030132767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005305895,0.00008439348,0.00007387116,0.00019640362,0.0018008994,0.000082678474,0.000007129241,0.00023138727,0.000038296796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002775386,0.00003943298,0.0013285528,0.0000012712552,0.000008605129,0.0000020660977,0.18214636,0.0000042767997,0.0000013983581,0.8162187,0.00016924141,0.000077337514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010147173,0.00011318661,0.17928179,0.000021680304,0.00005510969,0.0000049505184,0.6312146,0.0000491683,0.000007209579,0.1776718,0.010323221,0.00024252832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007436831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037927482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001580286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006911321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6635489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057930404","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705460156","title":"The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More Than Canadians Do, but Join Much Less","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Divergence (linguistics); Democracy; Value (mathematics); Political science; Core (optical fiber); Politics; Political economy; Soviet union; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015344373905142436,"score_gpt":0.27515576697914584,"score_spread":0.2598113930740034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057930404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52635723,0.0020918194,0.00018615292,0.14572987,0.0007417494,0.00058057223,0.0011208637,0.00015886873,0.3230329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813973,0.0011761896,0.00017596305,0.0015531555,0.0004723925,0.000013063019,0.0000038679636,0.000022374748,0.015185731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826634,0.00022149581,0.0001992548,0.00026161704,0.00041847705,0.0006328244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859005,0.00023838464,0.00015084776,0.00038933492,0.00018521148,0.00044619417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021373227,0.0001325753,0.00021872876,0.00033828494,0.0021834816,0.00022374347,0.00044753245,0.000056676505,0.00007888045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018872334,0.00014099583,0.00013177074,0.0005635724,0.00555647,0.00010221304,0.000023447137,0.00024918478,0.00002549675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059947506,0.00009923817,0.00040731824,0.0000031580084,0.000048444643,0.0000072154417,0.13199735,0.00004167094,0.000010620859,0.84276587,0.020552127,0.004061023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007525011,0.000049207938,0.0038137021,0.000008544305,0.00001941926,0.0000016375359,0.41226065,0.0000139622525,0.0000046658956,0.0011039594,0.5825102,0.00013881281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9592713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8416619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026400476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018106212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064000534","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711000417","title":"<b>Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia.</b> By Dan Slater. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 342p. $85.00 cloth, $28.99 paper.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Power (physics); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Computer science; Democracy; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03656707817967502,"score_gpt":0.25847563428747994,"score_spread":0.2219085561078049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064000534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13865784,0.002517283,0.0002874241,0.0042192917,0.0005517741,0.00056307967,0.00073202443,0.0002334551,0.8522378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529875,0.00042041996,0.00017198242,0.00015473145,0.00023330253,0.0000021748044,0.0000057342786,0.000036613386,0.045987524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971919,0.00024065615,0.00029480454,0.00058088196,0.0004152954,0.0012764487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984821,0.00013681015,0.00013121366,0.00035507194,0.000120502336,0.0007743186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026092038,0.0003255523,0.00038657413,0.000107226435,0.00060930644,0.00011654634,0.00044607325,0.0002646014,0.000070418435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003169012,0.00036773918,0.00012428977,0.00019415075,0.0010717013,0.00038339407,0.00011486756,0.00047089325,0.000021175701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029003968,0.00018089663,0.0028119683,0.000010316205,0.000034479774,0.000028676308,0.033765364,2.3745747e-7,0.000053151274,0.9604536,0.0025868732,0.00004541425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022464567,0.00042249466,0.07203561,0.00015797073,0.000105136736,0.000012018898,0.42213023,0.00003774511,0.00034004802,0.006483163,0.4948601,0.0011689952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16708001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002395028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95397043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061578455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000402997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066213719","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070193","title":"Politics as Religion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Politics; Destiny (ISS module); Faith; Sociology; Democracy; Civil religion; Secularism; Religious studies; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01809328748502451,"score_gpt":0.3795926820366336,"score_spread":0.36149939455160907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066213719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17586547,0.00016922523,0.00037183176,0.009456306,0.0005486423,0.00013729278,0.00000771289,0.00018695235,0.81325656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688197,0.00084615825,0.00030314524,0.0037192602,0.0011691805,0.000003088872,0.0000023667292,0.000017447031,0.025119659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840283,0.000080246115,0.00019444074,0.00023362735,0.00045253118,0.00063632464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987104,0.0003947334,0.00006317345,0.00022253583,0.00026353972,0.00034561788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042217955,0.0001207616,0.00012187904,0.000121579,0.00088679686,0.00008992156,0.0001860027,0.00014762716,0.00019666113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083320116,0.00012650603,0.00016610524,0.00024174197,0.000427238,0.00011010817,0.000019468418,0.0002821445,0.00072884624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039526653,0.00010639821,0.00023685633,0.0000014689919,0.000015256018,0.000006799389,0.07177034,0.0000015025284,0.00002279483,0.9180361,0.009740386,0.00005815449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018766994,0.00011385235,0.0012860303,0.000018329934,0.00001528064,0.00000614567,0.3449204,0.0000060764473,0.00038544415,0.095505446,0.5573399,0.00021543047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006360462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021313324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008165639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002156374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96151584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069063419","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072039","title":"State Feminism and Political Representation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; State (computer science); Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03971854252460363,"score_gpt":0.38985415436582016,"score_spread":0.35013561184121655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069063419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51123184,0.000089150264,0.0011622849,0.003767082,0.00020289065,0.00018341107,0.00001406797,0.000074951524,0.48327434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947512,0.000076522636,0.0003978201,0.0004041237,0.00048456533,0.000002828246,0.0000031597044,0.000012665579,0.0038671265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840254,0.00009968304,0.00017329176,0.00027491743,0.0003700302,0.00067956606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890983,0.00035380485,0.000046205307,0.00015444463,0.00014572665,0.0003899708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046123008,0.0000969356,0.00010533359,0.00013887923,0.00041835313,0.00008738826,0.000082999926,0.00007127681,0.000033488726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036723283,0.000098028955,0.00004337818,0.00013287719,0.00055038737,0.0000980019,0.000027476233,0.00013328568,0.000025434123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000579035,0.000058586837,0.0035626797,0.0000030299366,0.000011529204,0.000007819439,0.06668676,0.0000012818513,0.00004689538,0.9291188,0.00010125806,0.00039558238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040213185,0.00009847785,0.08774782,0.000009723525,0.000019410423,0.00000641617,0.54740894,0.00003164864,0.0017970501,0.3565215,0.005718957,0.0002379502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003182061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016267161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5725973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024430393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010061908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48103458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077544977","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003349","title":"Politics, Identity, and Mexico's Indigenous Rights Movement. By Todd A. Eisenstadt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 226p. $82.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Movement (music); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Social movement; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.016160265268947833,"score_gpt":0.2541141739307817,"score_spread":0.23795390866183383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077544977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5559437,0.0032265112,0.00023017697,0.0028499088,0.0005330342,0.0014871851,0.0005499722,0.00028091733,0.43489856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112613,0.0015486958,0.00024623334,0.0009784399,0.0009779666,0.0000046491577,0.000033384636,0.00004568228,0.18490367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680394,0.00023526157,0.00026385346,0.0006144686,0.00070649077,0.00137599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815935,0.00015492909,0.00016538848,0.0004167289,0.000300397,0.0008032168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023105234,0.00034123496,0.0003601653,0.0001618305,0.0026694105,0.00046197232,0.0005476552,0.00024899928,0.0005534485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038565122,0.0003240247,0.00012646921,0.00015174948,0.00096759445,0.00077692844,0.00013047051,0.00032079406,0.00023737749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005828251,0.00025364984,0.00040571738,0.000010967421,0.00008504178,0.0000150367405,0.060266253,0.000001178488,0.000025417996,0.8544574,0.08443486,0.000038688624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010534719,0.0003050236,0.004147896,0.000032334403,0.00011800733,0.0000050944673,0.08093848,0.000018914361,0.00076636096,0.042465918,0.8691993,0.0009492101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5567416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010170218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81199145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011144993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006065736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078136211","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704320979","title":"Republicanism in the Modern World <i>and</i> Citizenship and Identity: Towards a New Republic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03449697359383265,"score_gpt":0.3314959499616626,"score_spread":0.29699897636782996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078136211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13818468,0.00087247527,0.0005685594,0.070215665,0.000109103836,0.00026611498,0.000034033812,0.00008066255,0.7896687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883002,0.00020050706,0.00045682813,0.005045099,0.00045904054,0.000007929979,0.0000017200778,0.000008630416,0.0055200267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985319,0.00015394448,0.00015897179,0.0002856378,0.00042515318,0.00044444262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991878,0.00022847649,0.000054134653,0.00020287005,0.000083919185,0.00024277772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005051827,0.00012346504,0.00015175142,0.00015816047,0.00045676914,0.00028570605,0.00022858904,0.000056250272,0.000028948363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071350025,0.000104552695,0.000044293913,0.00038236304,0.0014125004,0.00023004481,0.000049613736,0.00025455747,0.000004579492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003040614,0.00003430741,0.00044936978,0.0000025978534,0.000009925267,0.00000904318,0.03254748,0.0000033096258,0.0000010962743,0.9663124,0.0003758962,0.0002514996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039018964,0.000053632797,0.009466976,0.000023089535,0.000016906977,0.00001689235,0.030458411,0.000003917364,0.000003899436,0.91623825,0.043151163,0.00017665674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016983895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003982174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85011554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033458025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015928795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081248826","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704300976","title":"Lubavitchers as Citizens: A Paradox of Liberal Democracy.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013822581477690058,"score_gpt":0.3249335392256549,"score_spread":0.3111109577479648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081248826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6482685,0.0001548914,0.00017179307,0.008987476,0.0002214484,0.00029249804,0.000074783995,0.00014479515,0.34168378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936434,0.00013908822,0.0013253371,0.001112784,0.00035074272,0.000008764004,0.000004123762,0.00003111809,0.003384647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976157,0.00015797761,0.0003039497,0.00036772763,0.00064648705,0.0009081781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848944,0.00034749432,0.00011047571,0.0003425574,0.00027658738,0.00043343657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028203035,0.00020630022,0.000308616,0.00014254877,0.00037984745,0.000052389223,0.0003829902,0.00018289691,0.0001582763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016537205,0.00021749036,0.00019707954,0.000338672,0.0013957504,0.00016310629,0.000055386554,0.0003015996,0.00020604389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016191876,0.00025437408,0.00044194347,0.000009692181,0.000035084824,0.000015526686,0.03741021,0.000068702306,0.000031653464,0.9615228,0.00008800217,0.00010582876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069675397,0.00028580433,0.004405983,0.000059326885,0.00004001162,0.000006299357,0.07404448,0.000031349802,0.00038542168,0.91826,0.0014660255,0.00031857437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045383223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022279397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34537485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008886304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076008466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88689995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083864172","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071319","title":"Innocent Women and Children: Gender, Norms and the Protection of Civilians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Rest (music); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; History; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.019550318236567454,"score_gpt":0.28131959367641585,"score_spread":0.2617692754398484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083864172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631151,0.0008101584,0.00016679046,0.0010330538,0.00006517307,0.00036919327,0.0000076147744,0.000024862724,0.03440806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867547,0.0005376995,0.000024680206,0.00017410671,0.00021327376,0.000008897968,3.291519e-7,0.0000063330835,0.00035920631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906695,0.00008882196,0.00012246995,0.0001722603,0.00022871875,0.0003207602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.00007841966,0.00006045916,0.00011250377,0.00009208829,0.00010480878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007204528,0.0000839545,0.00012138661,0.0000680089,0.00036732937,0.000036383106,0.000086164284,0.000061009097,0.000019510733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016328364,0.00006174731,0.000028508539,0.00012838385,0.0009108482,0.000052412084,0.00002868796,0.0001338789,0.0000015149757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030904655,0.000059032147,0.003296545,0.000007667735,0.000026588785,3.2110114e-7,0.40727168,2.79428e-7,0.00001355607,0.5885094,0.0000066934385,0.00077732815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012951583,0.00019353248,0.2576137,0.000009450183,0.000019979716,0.000006850635,0.65741974,0.000017245035,0.00020596852,0.0804329,0.0025940605,0.00019145392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027460977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5080765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060423117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3356058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085992404","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706370363","title":"Origin Stories in Political Thought: Discourses on Gender, Power, and Citizenship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Legitimacy; Narrative; Identity (music); Power (physics); Nationalism; Sociology; Wright; Mythology; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; History; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.046665545604668235,"score_gpt":0.3761987000919047,"score_spread":0.32953315448723647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085992404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43817562,0.00066953787,0.000017395421,0.011264092,0.0004750629,0.0001730613,0.00006249042,0.00010387594,0.54905885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310565,0.00016179097,0.00014879167,0.0006361329,0.0009747977,0.000008497755,0.0000038833955,0.000026299802,0.004934168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747527,0.0002988893,0.00022127436,0.00043354853,0.00057826895,0.0009927321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985631,0.0007669785,0.000051493713,0.00023065075,0.00012173029,0.00026601437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042811464,0.00022490806,0.0002508765,0.00019431421,0.00050712976,0.00015189924,0.00018500784,0.00021672457,0.00006438023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085075357,0.0002145313,0.00007481104,0.00022267584,0.0015235912,0.00011242601,0.00003150468,0.0004945278,0.000034257544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020484467,0.00018384673,0.0060091685,0.000008958944,0.000010183293,0.000019443147,0.04505323,0.0000038983626,0.000004324073,0.9475362,0.0011360624,0.000014239513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005471556,0.00021759527,0.038417067,0.00005131342,0.000018776176,0.000003916923,0.35779825,0.000007704478,0.000086316664,0.5742504,0.028164532,0.00043699512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056299944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017469187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55493003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006569123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031250465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8748332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086860722","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003120","title":"Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Autocracy; Social media; Political science; Political economy; Framing (construction); Public sphere; Elite; Commons; Democracy; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Economic system; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.08634624639930258,"score_gpt":0.36786662746571325,"score_spread":0.28152038106641064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086860722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875714,0.00014198298,0.000011843968,0.0059713647,0.0006942237,0.0003115039,0.000054153203,0.000083123145,0.11701779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975107,0.000016143458,0.00010099009,0.00032305293,0.0017812497,0.0000237123,0.0000025482932,0.000017215401,0.00022440901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973924,0.0006793703,0.0003062104,0.0002148958,0.0008247126,0.0005823685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962172,0.0026338433,0.00016320829,0.0002532044,0.00049771793,0.00023483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008525248,0.00015149379,0.00027974852,0.00005734149,0.0006429011,0.000064087624,0.0003788872,0.00014794286,0.000113475275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01300827,0.00012435768,0.00013837953,0.00030767563,0.0017720206,0.00010496046,0.00005698352,0.00030966502,0.000057983307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000774889,0.0000873586,0.0017118502,0.0000043125146,0.000014650949,0.0000011304802,0.45056516,4.4313512e-7,0.0000068618224,0.5470416,0.00039838234,0.00016050694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028832635,0.00008026263,0.0029432531,0.000013275522,0.000042048643,7.077728e-7,0.852728,0.000014881968,0.0002328129,0.13817942,0.0053203166,0.000156693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041820197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008229992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40886217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062674616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012238302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086862524","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703990153","title":"Legalization and World Politics. Edited by Judith L. Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. 319p. $24.95","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Political science; International relations; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.013246564288692982,"score_gpt":0.2725980685205719,"score_spread":0.2593515042318789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086862524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1654492,0.019470904,0.00027116676,0.007601829,0.0018521707,0.0010172803,0.0010890083,0.00028272968,0.8029657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74734414,0.001261895,0.00035181496,0.0012385468,0.0014607793,0.000023572698,0.00009096601,0.000051227988,0.24817704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997778,0.0002337661,0.00028549065,0.0005211085,0.00048223528,0.00069939747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865425,0.00026112274,0.00013220524,0.00020606333,0.0004071352,0.00033922825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023962159,0.00027764484,0.00027324486,0.00014600727,0.0008897349,0.00034562044,0.00018747641,0.00014497034,0.00014993435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029288037,0.0002699176,0.00006352506,0.00012135545,0.00084362936,0.00037709047,0.000035400968,0.00021798318,0.000015078825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008846876,0.00014709463,0.00019008263,0.00001328938,0.000056531662,0.0000055059645,0.002700308,0.0000023699938,0.000015155581,0.86271906,0.13412924,0.0000124962735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006178967,0.000104159786,0.0009286171,0.00005913244,0.000067755806,0.0000049287155,0.0016969086,0.00012244174,0.000505151,0.079527386,0.91591585,0.00044978692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051784795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015815668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003580152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016427216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090727359","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070703","title":"Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Appeal; Human rights; Democratization; Politics; International relations; Political science; Promotion (chess); Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Criminology; Democracy","score_opus":0.047705611713386206,"score_gpt":0.24860614002034176,"score_spread":0.20090052830695554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090727359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06109462,0.000055903303,0.0007687437,0.0021556108,0.0011756599,0.00008376163,0.0000741116,0.000040290815,0.9345513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842382,0.0000049841733,0.000023003244,0.00042002284,0.0005754821,0.0000010313801,0.0000021214014,0.0000111243135,0.014724021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991603,0.000020939247,0.00019033761,0.00013696596,0.00025553015,0.00023595008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994558,0.00014762822,0.00006218485,0.0001643006,0.000094746225,0.00007530947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010876013,0.00009653013,0.00010687956,0.00007077394,0.00020870534,0.0000310187,0.00021800598,0.000032133998,0.0002997873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010039724,0.00006658176,0.00012015492,0.00003540925,0.00061163143,0.000068764326,0.000036391906,0.0001550727,0.000017643857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010696397,0.000092190014,0.00025283406,0.000005061202,0.000027154998,0.0000018114389,0.026275137,0.0000021317592,0.000010734205,0.97296137,0.00031795964,0.000042897762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006575902,0.00023690423,0.0029490818,0.000076707634,0.00004776618,0.000005063789,0.313201,0.00042682103,0.00019953678,0.35959762,0.32218173,0.00042017395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019354426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011308395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92314357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005259629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034829765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3282461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092213686","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703410153","title":"Reason and Horror: Critical Theory, Democracy and Aesthetic Individuality. By Morton Schoolman. New York: Routledge, 2001. 348p. $85.00 cloth, $24.95 paper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0377871597839886,"score_gpt":0.3396110491212492,"score_spread":0.30182388933726056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092213686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26991937,0.032936703,0.0005246948,0.05858617,0.0007098969,0.0008910236,0.00027222332,0.00036671179,0.6357932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242073,0.0015295737,0.00048328424,0.0017546158,0.00046840194,0.000010280704,0.000005020915,0.000043999025,0.0032840858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628127,0.001278362,0.00030316436,0.0006755616,0.00050307746,0.0009585736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972522,0.0012423455,0.000054991946,0.0003638201,0.00013151897,0.000955105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013175718,0.00033279863,0.00037698343,0.00008582919,0.0011435944,0.00030285312,0.00023504245,0.0002759377,0.0006973103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033038843,0.00032706282,0.00010638094,0.0002320647,0.0024530352,0.0003588032,0.000056745783,0.00055544055,0.000069211594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749225,0.00026440652,0.0007214535,0.000016120224,0.000023092141,0.000011073235,0.01284423,1.8132178e-7,0.000024763647,0.9798077,0.005769478,0.00048002775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045490288,0.0001970198,0.000298492,0.000050313956,0.000077145494,0.000028019802,0.025950637,0.0000031056393,0.000090925176,0.8759273,0.0965244,0.00039770323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006097038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025341735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019631667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020069291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098075126","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003118","title":"The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis: The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation. Edited by Wyn Grant and Graham K. Wilson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. 320p. $99.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Financial crisis; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Theology; Philosophy; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.017012518098074064,"score_gpt":0.2068257628412135,"score_spread":0.18981324474313946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098075126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86741,0.040356096,0.0004521156,0.02970788,0.00094923127,0.001161185,0.0014958268,0.000046105346,0.05842154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960095,0.0023835138,0.000058458972,0.00010824265,0.00008544203,0.0000024459548,0.000002166302,0.0000055594414,0.001344659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912035,0.000033769214,0.00030205114,0.00022520592,0.00008875132,0.0002298497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910325,0.00007718689,0.00033819285,0.00028526536,0.00012116271,0.00007491768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015232553,0.00013334682,0.00022263336,0.000032118187,0.00034570595,0.000050343446,0.00025590006,0.00008521496,0.000015546799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018300366,0.00008574966,0.0000810852,0.00022745658,0.00069896295,0.00017650046,0.00007506524,0.000097562144,0.0000015550896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017714654,0.000030199006,0.004102949,0.000007777209,0.000022347274,7.8827426e-8,0.00060590083,0.0000054268894,0.000004229445,0.9717397,0.023331646,0.0001320444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063429616,0.0001459974,0.3816801,0.000029792607,0.000030961794,0.000003876764,0.008497434,0.00016125197,0.00013747805,0.27069324,0.33777064,0.00021491678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006346594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012322691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70104647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020318433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008395837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9594194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099334900","doi":"10.1017/s153759270999291x","title":"Global Gender Inequality and the Empowerment of Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Empowerment; Eleventh; Gender studies; Narrative; Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.026567930301866115,"score_gpt":0.35833891503066095,"score_spread":0.33177098472879485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099334900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8859841,0.000045652836,0.000037799437,0.001995131,0.00018157711,0.00013619849,0.000019889398,0.000012333216,0.11158732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.000048309244,0.00007585631,0.00018248006,0.00019550764,0.00000817241,5.3801114e-7,0.0000031786305,0.00025976924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990144,0.0001623299,0.000119212695,0.00013437774,0.0002666057,0.00030307448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.00014251353,0.00005751297,0.00016393082,0.00011308098,0.00013070647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068961893,0.000060676186,0.00010594116,0.000021742904,0.0002290131,0.000035409248,0.0001110513,0.000049932645,0.00005963062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039804322,0.000041998308,0.000038941595,0.00008013841,0.0010921393,0.000034816745,0.000034596593,0.000091337984,0.0000028200893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000850616,0.00004994884,0.0074505988,0.0000035655287,0.000016926939,2.0431513e-7,0.166684,0.0000011254791,0.00001224836,0.82569313,0.000031941618,0.000047819995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063232984,0.000030449282,0.16153823,0.000001545029,0.000011564166,9.64328e-7,0.40216905,0.000021607639,0.000049189843,0.43309426,0.0023700343,0.00008077177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035160577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001793114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39259884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018389797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013397887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5315251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100231123","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714000863","title":"The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Autocracy; Political economy; Political science; Indigenous; Politics; Social movement; Victory; Democracy; Authoritarianism; Contentious politics; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013317650170929477,"score_gpt":0.31524216933300137,"score_spread":0.3019245191620719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100231123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8249869,0.00030363514,0.00009909932,0.010035705,0.00010565576,0.00055963185,0.000024055149,0.00004777022,0.16383757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.00006811939,0.00007011104,0.00029950362,0.00030298397,0.000021320599,4.6682206e-7,0.000008799006,0.0004309446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981511,0.0008900529,0.00015479908,0.00014225378,0.0002750543,0.00038672597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982216,0.0013870739,0.000089532696,0.00014196253,0.000095536576,0.00006430601],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015194619,0.00009073088,0.00015845212,0.000023393593,0.0009731823,0.00008035971,0.00025915934,0.000058108453,0.000011243152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010988269,0.000055877368,0.000064051885,0.00012831095,0.00414139,0.000060360515,0.0000331645,0.00019047646,0.0000011840389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014213815,0.000045993915,0.0008341637,0.000002123311,0.000010246043,7.127696e-8,0.10551884,9.4771883e-7,0.000006737673,0.89297926,0.00002617225,0.00056120765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007020583,0.00019619895,0.05295187,0.000010479317,0.000018116294,2.042984e-7,0.45231992,0.00047289155,0.000029893308,0.48278213,0.010349906,0.00016633759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021131265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063248613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41019717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010890443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013879575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104222669","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705660252","title":"Shocking Mother Russia: Democratization, Social Rights, and Pension Reform in Russia, 1990–2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Politics; Pension; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.018272237686952495,"score_gpt":0.3061799641999776,"score_spread":0.2879077265130251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104222669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.343995,0.00016094364,0.00006564852,0.018171834,0.000091338814,0.0002219999,0.000009945219,0.00007640482,0.6372069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935617,0.00010656038,0.0004816059,0.0009561443,0.0011158065,0.000010786052,0.0000032307223,0.000019408428,0.0037447987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982402,0.00015556165,0.00028405848,0.000350189,0.00025844818,0.00071157084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993729,0.000121916695,0.00007271619,0.00013633152,0.00005820782,0.00023794957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034243744,0.00017200668,0.00024782866,0.00016101045,0.0008377766,0.00011970229,0.0001472197,0.00018731164,0.0003706553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001297589,0.00015489667,0.00006477985,0.00018779792,0.00054510275,0.00033533666,0.00003369162,0.00024027294,0.000064284744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062170884,0.00010775845,0.0016525954,0.0000040831906,0.000009315053,0.0000033034162,0.04194962,0.0000042755405,0.000003277037,0.9556173,0.00031720087,0.00032507366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020242492,0.00017994865,0.11089607,0.00012047839,0.000055385553,0.000008911003,0.15297881,0.0016285707,0.00016146923,0.5281604,0.20261881,0.0011669338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005449947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029025692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64956665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001345786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001665084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8238726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104730993","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002090","title":"The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Authoritarianism; Dictatorship; Democracy; Political economy; Politics; Political science; China; Legitimation; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02134019514510362,"score_gpt":0.293421882800041,"score_spread":0.2720816876549374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104730993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91743505,0.00009415119,0.00001755029,0.0079653105,0.00013349738,0.00034597312,0.0000020971877,0.000037459467,0.07396889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588156,0.0001525404,0.0015418788,0.00028738866,0.00009565393,0.000057090456,9.786182e-7,0.000008639742,0.0019742611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999069,0.0000960353,0.00016481295,0.00018267868,0.00014629055,0.00034120344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.00036707387,0.000040208073,0.0000646283,0.000064449865,0.00011361253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026538788,0.000087901484,0.00008845802,0.00005635901,0.0006158534,0.00020123724,0.00013068072,0.000046895264,0.00008814013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005740324,0.0000773945,0.000013104289,0.000106768755,0.00031419127,0.0001543036,0.00003733863,0.00008901967,0.00012011298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028245581,0.000026693126,0.042246193,0.0000017909272,0.00001493294,4.7864006e-7,0.25649294,0.0000057175394,0.000020495767,0.6965138,0.00104436,0.0036297939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001828164,0.000021798616,0.14884426,0.000018802322,0.0000023573978,4.978729e-7,0.81768125,0.00005713554,0.00016770957,0.022351244,0.010491102,0.00018103943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007865363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007368468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67416257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006389137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020726364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4736709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104910264","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072192","title":"Modernizing Political Science: A Model-Based Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.06729568481957704,"score_gpt":0.4317742896870379,"score_spread":0.36447860486746086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104910264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17407507,0.000032413805,0.077243924,0.0051546446,0.0001199468,0.00025131044,0.000010510438,0.00013650814,0.74297565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911654,0.0000045278557,0.0065382817,0.00080753135,0.00060637324,0.000010049656,0.0000015971053,0.000012412959,0.0008537981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298817,0.00009328536,0.00019521144,0.0005218428,0.0016285811,0.004572931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957084,0.00037232653,0.0000350113,0.00030734,0.00046955064,0.003107336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00551375,0.00014211297,0.00014192805,0.00045390305,0.0016660187,0.00025369006,0.0006253017,0.00010130104,0.00005495988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053562094,0.00013244245,0.0000837408,0.00095063867,0.004582074,0.00035440506,0.00004887896,0.00032113338,0.00006136356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008347999,0.0003162166,0.00038718517,0.0000045551096,0.0000022628092,0.0000012560048,0.011721126,0.0001818199,0.0001275857,0.98688304,0.0000403379,0.00032625408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006406006,0.0002750718,0.0115353,0.00003968171,0.000021940892,0.0000036795204,0.37611282,0.13970631,0.0035673142,0.46463817,0.0026214249,0.00083765644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025279047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053020904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81709033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043355916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050431113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105967908","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071514","title":"Neorealists as Critical Theorists: The Purpose of Foreign Policy Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Foreign policy; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Public sphere; Deliberation; Presupposition; Political science; International relations; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017114374927363594,"score_gpt":0.39042810169337133,"score_spread":0.3733137267660077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105967908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023134243,0.00010548187,0.0010106916,0.003794854,0.00005453134,0.00016432008,0.00005160428,0.000034468987,0.9716498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938591,0.00007871316,0.00025168623,0.00083671196,0.0011703853,0.0000059702647,0.0000027899966,0.000013949196,0.0037806912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849725,0.0001170477,0.00023696925,0.0001676679,0.0005057891,0.00047525822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785715,0.0012417466,0.000076133656,0.00022250203,0.00044310043,0.00015939231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080983684,0.00010878031,0.000119696146,0.0002077414,0.0005357077,0.000053203217,0.00032900713,0.00009521248,0.00018711895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043426887,0.0000814457,0.00012432206,0.0003207793,0.0015178045,0.000102701044,0.00003451336,0.00018327135,0.00006208226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019162577,0.00009603515,0.00013496036,0.0000026219368,0.000019727393,0.0000049852174,0.028522847,0.0000030530243,0.000008609207,0.9706981,0.0002010381,0.0002888523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113782306,0.0000855751,0.0024478664,0.000012848493,0.0000120543855,0.0000062574836,0.060981292,0.000014796871,0.00020682803,0.9219506,0.0140783945,0.00008975603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00655005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012309669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045526464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036086657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99017596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106599748","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703000057","title":"Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Campaign finance; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political action; Action (physics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05730253961832161,"score_gpt":0.39127253180462107,"score_spread":0.33396999218629947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106599748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74558556,0.00041421477,0.000050396033,0.002082922,0.00019173026,0.00015923017,0.0000046307246,0.000049124657,0.2514622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982223,0.000050442304,0.00014392484,0.00017691303,0.00034116334,0.00000965281,2.3914578e-7,0.000008112877,0.0010472473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821997,0.0001503536,0.00014209097,0.00030332524,0.0003272352,0.00085703307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989136,0.00018291341,0.00003559083,0.00012921727,0.00032381518,0.00041490598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000922365,0.00010591569,0.0001336466,0.00010126251,0.0010473492,0.00013378369,0.000081163336,0.00008012752,0.00001505624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011567166,0.00009741871,0.000020292604,0.00031925834,0.0015871838,0.00023645045,0.000021038617,0.00015865498,0.000016378184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017833712,0.000043022068,0.0024515747,0.000011010279,0.000002442717,7.0527796e-7,0.009114736,1.4618796e-7,0.00005834084,0.9881043,0.000018682946,0.00019328858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010097509,0.0008322365,0.12376324,0.00026614874,0.00006548917,0.000036372156,0.16007169,0.0003204009,0.004965663,0.571176,0.13634543,0.001147559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029146892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005818667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41692826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012542999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005283241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80554694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107801218","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704360974","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Environment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.01855846093915664,"score_gpt":0.2614025783638405,"score_spread":0.24284411742468387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107801218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15216585,0.01044885,0.00062582793,0.080388576,0.0002558028,0.0005966926,0.000016472159,0.00009248851,0.7554094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375814,0.002395518,0.0002322589,0.0006540433,0.00028737684,0.000011200548,2.3713264e-7,0.000005361825,0.0026558726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999236,0.0001068501,0.000072002,0.00014144703,0.00021099846,0.00023273687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958336,0.00020770151,0.000028544062,0.000077633114,0.000030209389,0.00007256065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018366185,0.00007716833,0.00010635616,0.000017465432,0.0014814622,0.000051276416,0.00008361613,0.000034504395,0.000036343128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023993991,0.00005350209,0.000044907112,0.00004856722,0.0020120884,0.000051224648,0.00002986227,0.0001059093,0.000034056422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003198927,0.000028388691,0.000031650776,4.1729353e-7,0.00001789994,7.809464e-7,0.21781951,0.000008804707,6.6013854e-7,0.7818576,0.00012403996,0.00010700964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092465564,0.00004881702,0.0022724022,0.0000061127002,0.000019053434,2.7561347e-7,0.22276326,0.000003477524,0.000022828548,0.7466666,0.027158242,0.00011425246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00355258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025072807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048355776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005513077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108036419","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705940498","title":"The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":352,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Political science; Bond; Credit rating; Bond credit rating; Geopolitics; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Finance; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.01618803932196746,"score_gpt":0.22983294195892157,"score_spread":0.2136449026369541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108036419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94615656,0.0069312714,0.00049837324,0.005519559,0.00019306804,0.00018880308,0.00011659357,0.000018701206,0.04037707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429744,0.0012662765,0.00090279774,0.00037794982,0.00043052828,0.0000042067727,0.0000011682625,0.000022980506,0.0026966364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988068,0.000026831454,0.0005299798,0.00022501881,0.00007134521,0.00034002625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998584,0.00038136065,0.00054059934,0.00034942222,0.00006950712,0.00007512374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032619748,0.00015280058,0.00041720364,0.00009801498,0.00023201185,0.0000476491,0.00022296036,0.000038607646,0.000010115872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015410194,0.000112491405,0.000113415335,0.0001702118,0.0013401022,0.00011242562,0.00005585695,0.00014828952,0.0000066543043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016051672,0.000027495631,0.00092858926,0.000011089247,0.000042617856,4.0154384e-7,0.03958209,0.000057844245,0.0000065371923,0.9584438,0.0005227527,0.0003607223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077472804,0.0011132123,0.075493775,0.00021171932,0.00015812476,0.000049139526,0.31305668,0.0090172645,0.0031677159,0.3173789,0.27085102,0.001755207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019954853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009784515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64106494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105812054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006134704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49376622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.038291639937745425,"score_gpt":0.3127088943739497,"score_spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109547388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151054,0.00032155175,0.000041277333,0.0009979578,0.00015762931,0.00010654556,0.000012721497,0.000044976703,0.78321195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899286,0.000656092,0.00007318214,0.0006771399,0.000179352,0.000006976775,2.28902e-7,0.0000064888677,0.008471936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988482,0.00037386405,0.000103346065,0.00015487803,0.00013418804,0.0003855048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.00024117022,0.000030190766,0.00015010205,0.000060919578,0.00014462424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004577858,0.000079383855,0.00011187357,0.000028291752,0.00047885327,0.000013739074,0.00016299475,0.000056197736,0.00067977223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046711587,0.00005403949,0.000054373155,0.000065649765,0.0021518022,0.00007026619,0.000035773854,0.00015460412,0.000060412873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002694127,0.00003364112,0.00020470984,9.908523e-7,0.00001845714,0.0000016861934,0.11406458,6.957929e-8,8.810308e-8,0.8855324,0.00007811851,0.0000383562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002658045,0.000029405917,0.0050786883,0.0000020768582,0.000011602323,8.328046e-7,0.03285777,0.0000060061057,0.00002072003,0.9601312,0.0015200641,0.000075777105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017946544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003384339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048696103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050530834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7928405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110072580","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250259","title":"Feminist Interpretations of Niccolo Machiavelli","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Italian Fascism and Post-war Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015324258821863718,"score_gpt":0.318377463730526,"score_spread":0.3030532049086623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110072580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124130264,0.00029793388,0.00012728204,0.0047802185,0.00020856144,0.00017199125,0.00013787704,0.00006840027,0.8700775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028856,0.000078621204,0.0011845081,0.0006456109,0.00039361266,0.0000046050386,0.0000028388226,0.0000096378735,0.0073920223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990811,0.000090039386,0.00015305584,0.00015743049,0.00024149827,0.00027687722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999363,0.00018861082,0.000067474735,0.00016484529,0.00010515511,0.00011088678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020617823,0.00008281667,0.00011850516,0.000051280815,0.00032334393,0.000032034328,0.00019929254,0.00007508574,0.00030562273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022474122,0.00008578724,0.000117767886,0.0001505184,0.0006239134,0.00006841607,0.000020708721,0.00012048082,0.00012940189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002937934,0.00010727524,0.0004646543,0.000003433903,0.00001648264,3.223845e-7,0.25457194,0.000005680568,0.000015538772,0.74246156,0.0020583621,0.00029182885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036981396,0.00019225858,0.0033984478,0.000040725656,0.00004773457,0.0000014345657,0.7309486,0.0001500752,0.0007832468,0.010537055,0.2532142,0.00031636757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004198686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016651239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8661583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022397673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017894656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34983018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111153168","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706380140","title":"Which Rights Should Be Universal?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023438673340410176,"score_gpt":0.3111496647261748,"score_spread":0.2877109913857646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111153168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02825847,0.000084111656,0.00020947888,0.010375332,0.00018955531,0.00010353187,0.00009793554,0.00013063011,0.96055096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698826,0.000019989904,0.00034457634,0.0006686806,0.0011619062,0.000002680053,0.000009689972,0.000008985234,0.027900903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858046,0.000119363096,0.00012379406,0.00024047085,0.0004227359,0.00051317335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00025131443,0.000050435454,0.00017724931,0.000284899,0.00017490659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012807036,0.00012813765,0.00013594233,0.000091758986,0.0008965789,0.000057019224,0.00019756064,0.000093136245,0.00035297926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012496355,0.00012591673,0.00007151945,0.00026098886,0.0012110684,0.00012031002,0.0000200693,0.00017196382,0.00008352476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035433807,0.00010012492,0.0003396884,0.0000012298932,0.000011477556,0.0000055525798,0.0028171246,0.000031568467,0.0000039877123,0.99145097,0.00523005,0.000004668244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016188777,0.00004843333,0.0010357769,0.0000076293,0.00002120817,0.0000018522132,0.021178262,0.000009037999,0.00005168237,0.054690484,0.9225803,0.00021343544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037682056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045787096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057074986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089179183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112029610","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704750379","title":"Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Politics; Momentum (technical analysis); Political science; System dynamics; Test (biology); Public administration; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012284376158252265,"score_gpt":0.2819742723982254,"score_spread":0.26968989623997314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112029610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62776214,0.0001605333,0.00007055336,0.009849036,0.00028325463,0.00014712942,0.00010080326,0.000031383748,0.36159515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778014,0.000029763232,0.00009535503,0.00072488515,0.00026395364,0.000004884022,0.0000010806868,0.000009316191,0.0010906197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859464,0.00006512051,0.00015567408,0.00019749286,0.00036581853,0.0006212626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948853,0.00012019179,0.0000482616,0.00012705222,0.000049620772,0.00016634155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016712492,0.00009086162,0.00012906465,0.000035020366,0.00020274225,0.000030511852,0.00016459,0.00004512336,0.000026297414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052303856,0.00009437362,0.00003344769,0.0001570945,0.00013393376,0.00006882293,0.000018079478,0.00016555059,0.000017540357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001076929,0.000029609475,0.0052659074,0.0000036445092,0.0000035064638,0.000022535576,0.0074201543,0.000064826294,7.2707064e-7,0.98700327,0.00010052531,0.00008424106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014476322,0.00010147258,0.18816063,0.00027261258,0.0000138146515,0.000006421854,0.5331791,0.0004251164,0.00011312877,0.17561634,0.0997234,0.00094032317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99667954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014887584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026013707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113541125","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711004919","title":"Is There a Trade-off between Multiculturalism and Socio-Political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":309,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Citizenship; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.04268001777465765,"score_gpt":0.37404366716036486,"score_spread":0.3313636493857072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113541125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564981,0.0014281281,0.0000963551,0.016714962,0.000059951017,0.0005139025,0.00008055176,0.000058445534,0.02454962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708647,0.00047486357,0.00030002158,0.0003493647,0.001137224,0.000030628566,0.000017475902,0.000014410947,0.0005895425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786377,0.0004678384,0.00030344908,0.00036334945,0.000412468,0.0005891438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987507,0.0003442781,0.00013000955,0.00013657684,0.0003141652,0.0003242923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047372014,0.00025217966,0.00033031672,0.00026109756,0.00055971136,0.00015453249,0.00010015223,0.00020799511,0.000028861687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060721795,0.00020770438,0.00007066951,0.0002971873,0.00090954563,0.0007734514,0.000022181788,0.0003241008,0.0000101352725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000749212,0.0000664509,0.014470742,0.0000029850264,0.00001798465,1.7776198e-7,0.4276147,1.7471599e-7,0.000030847474,0.55757385,0.00011310968,0.000101476195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037551142,0.00011547245,0.26672706,0.00003887402,0.000029396962,0.0000020804493,0.69768614,0.00009179842,0.0004136077,0.032909077,0.001374581,0.00023641156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020438915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013877723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025020243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98608404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114429929","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706630272","title":"The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Private security; Security forces; Political economy; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016451859507438195,"score_gpt":0.30830500737431676,"score_spread":0.29185314786687855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114429929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23334253,0.0047240113,0.00012872345,0.018352611,0.00026310128,0.00070728944,0.000110148714,0.00004912593,0.74232244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526405,0.00035148527,0.000111936395,0.000105779356,0.00035128678,0.000023654557,4.912472e-7,0.0000042595516,0.00378708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990546,0.00017048077,0.00014452083,0.00012606422,0.00021326896,0.00029104328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972819,0.002288973,0.000068886744,0.00015441448,0.0001812816,0.00002454859],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007273442,0.000073096395,0.00010237788,0.000017713724,0.0017251536,0.00003065409,0.00019877954,0.00003153413,0.00001705394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010414963,0.000041745938,0.000089655354,0.00009766262,0.002156715,0.000044780496,0.000024028923,0.00007395369,0.0000012747502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016510512,0.000022405271,0.00041604828,0.000006098854,0.000018981036,2.0348436e-7,0.039374318,0.0000019743486,0.000014450655,0.9549068,0.0051926626,0.00002953657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010263407,0.0000586226,0.0018629521,0.000010086148,0.000014549226,3.9182078e-7,0.29662117,0.000020331878,0.0002999182,0.6472264,0.05371485,0.00006811929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021566108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012134277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76192147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007014773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098938035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116386840","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709992660","title":"Gender, Diversity, and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Boy Scouts; Meaning (existential); Girl; Identity (music); Diversity (politics); Materialism; Sociology; Population; Gender studies; Genealogy; Political science; Law; Demography; History; Psychology; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03984199710744856,"score_gpt":0.3092407352709108,"score_spread":0.2693987381634622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116386840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980606,0.00014154738,0.000103609156,0.0024718868,0.0003251405,0.00018960923,0.00003440334,0.000045317265,0.016082458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855983,0.00013170375,0.00016228817,0.00032127358,0.00059596525,0.0000025425065,0.0000012204085,0.00000991245,0.00021527662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991303,0.00005309402,0.000077830526,0.00016863667,0.00032953706,0.00024057779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994169,0.000098830256,0.000055838766,0.00013789079,0.00019195086,0.000098592216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016249697,0.00008373766,0.00010507375,0.00005863685,0.0010670112,0.000032257685,0.00021365713,0.000057613204,0.0001472391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026072803,0.000069411595,0.000032504588,0.00019427214,0.0005277608,0.00010598231,0.00022970971,0.00017644174,0.000008737873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007195581,0.00007800952,0.30396214,0.0000118400285,0.00002838452,0.0000010766138,0.2971883,5.5201565e-7,0.0002608842,0.398106,0.00021815626,0.00013742021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030648342,0.00009914381,0.7383134,0.000015695581,0.000041986474,0.000002402171,0.24881247,0.0000716674,0.00046046783,0.009718636,0.0019099301,0.00024772866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057059005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041148468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43435124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006080854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007483876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8625653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116593380","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091129","title":"Cloaked in Virtue: Unveiling Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of American Foreign Policy. By Nicholas Xenos. New York: Routledge, 2007. 168p. $125.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Virtue; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02565373559184473,"score_gpt":0.2682822068594854,"score_spread":0.24262847126764067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116593380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14580652,0.015141401,0.00004228578,0.020486234,0.0003963469,0.0009276217,0.0005303797,0.00016557123,0.81650364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98994917,0.0011226629,0.000048952,0.0028589952,0.0023516286,0.000009087248,0.000015678752,0.00004013856,0.0036037196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746644,0.00022583283,0.0005860448,0.0005017255,0.00040879357,0.0008111462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998343,0.00054207625,0.00019871708,0.00043307486,0.00011262312,0.00037053277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023902021,0.00040779705,0.00065868907,0.00016359118,0.0002899921,0.00015041837,0.00035840736,0.00009900958,0.00033586542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031268885,0.00029262362,0.0002216713,0.0002196075,0.0016178109,0.00017732447,0.000055596334,0.00058791763,0.000028254071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018476555,0.00044820778,0.00006724757,0.000017460301,0.00006309816,0.0000032309151,0.012074857,0.00000673034,0.000024408846,0.9830481,0.0035610956,0.00050079945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003798051,0.0011044962,0.0016221134,0.00012952895,0.000094732575,0.000009080917,0.03274335,0.00014424992,0.00022309183,0.82219917,0.13725737,0.00067475496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029232106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006363426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002658132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013361951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121025856","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710000526","title":"East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability. Edited by Kent E. Calder and Francis Fukuyama. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. 296p. $25.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017076575358865916,"score_gpt":0.2618130679683392,"score_spread":0.24473649260947328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121025856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6177672,0.00018651345,0.0005323931,0.1473178,0.0028158596,0.0029280023,0.0016593521,0.0002670556,0.2265258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959802,0.00019804527,0.000464899,0.0003623042,0.00073478237,0.000012972583,0.00003143966,0.000014510099,0.0022008205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860173,0.000078939134,0.00013217675,0.00035138804,0.00042135722,0.00041441154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00015725325,0.000080116486,0.00016167351,0.00036950927,0.00017027683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026029474,0.00015922033,0.00013619475,0.000089097804,0.0008359481,0.0001123724,0.00028363251,0.00012120002,0.00014525703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024146479,0.0001327608,0.00007705992,0.00015050171,0.0007609592,0.00020613718,0.00005102343,0.0002772512,0.00000550446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057209618,0.00023943535,0.0028787528,0.000010996271,0.000056345223,0.00000311302,0.068097785,7.684378e-7,0.000097242264,0.90317506,0.025245018,0.00013826964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080743665,0.00007016534,0.028007483,0.000014194749,0.000022550777,0.0000022370382,0.033674736,0.00027942934,0.00023819658,0.0023707855,0.9342189,0.00029387145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041109244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002039923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026529166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015134006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64295214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122126892","doi":"10.1017/s153759270707199x","title":"Globalization and the Future of the Welfare State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Welfare state; Latin Americans; Welfare; State (computer science); Political science; Social Welfare; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.009248154182283457,"score_gpt":0.3130587238818024,"score_spread":0.3038105696995189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122126892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42060816,0.0028422421,0.00004773821,0.13776192,0.00088691805,0.0005546253,0.00005170529,0.000052317988,0.43719438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714744,0.00096217863,0.0000072569073,0.00037094753,0.0006953695,0.0000012169406,1.3769422e-7,0.0000032895248,0.0008121651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993388,0.00010363706,0.00008651971,0.00007217435,0.00020921002,0.000189656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960977,0.00010923569,0.000062402774,0.00008431579,0.00010258856,0.0000317012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039745853,0.00005246555,0.00008096973,0.000016858756,0.0010069212,0.00001572323,0.00011149529,0.00003917839,0.0000034024665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000212424,0.000025305671,0.000049685415,0.00017755221,0.0014712724,0.000031135794,0.000032722688,0.00007363609,6.6835247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010324545,0.000011023063,0.00074715685,0.0000022782053,0.00001462786,8.239598e-8,0.14721216,9.0891973e-7,3.9357212e-7,0.85152745,0.00006762411,0.00040594756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003513108,0.000016646205,0.08194653,0.000007406492,0.000017120348,2.995733e-7,0.68498176,0.0000021793817,0.000036006684,0.21785526,0.0147243105,0.00006120236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019759445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015088083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63367224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007628574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033594515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77445257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123584274","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003623","title":"Privatization and Protest: Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the Occupation of Public Space in a Democracy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public space; Appropriation; Politics; Democracy; Normative; Political science; Space (punctuation); State (computer science); Sociology; Power (physics); Public administration; Public sphere; Meaning (existential); Political economy; Autonomy; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02416930735949389,"score_gpt":0.3095735242333488,"score_spread":0.28540421687385487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123584274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89559555,0.0005660827,0.00027817817,0.035919,0.000053104435,0.0016584496,0.00002283556,0.00006090996,0.065845914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985707,0.0001731586,0.0004572844,0.00042740602,0.00014730284,0.000055493987,0.0000029275266,0.000012773509,0.00015298056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982286,0.00044869698,0.00025878547,0.00027817785,0.00034958406,0.00043616595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847203,0.00061220815,0.00012357412,0.00021545136,0.00028666196,0.00029006516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050702255,0.00014516173,0.00021864835,0.00009414612,0.00027004737,0.00011673282,0.00016906255,0.00009953453,0.00009033444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046914616,0.00011381802,0.000036119243,0.00019456315,0.0012050512,0.00057879445,0.000060810984,0.0001461368,0.0000059278887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011434903,0.00009549083,0.030289613,0.000016125534,0.000011083296,2.94433e-7,0.029105421,9.682276e-7,0.000010205192,0.94012696,0.00006157934,0.00027085314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015597958,0.0001922369,0.27407655,0.00006311354,0.000021819747,8.568894e-7,0.05119341,0.00095469394,0.000093051516,0.6707867,0.000773706,0.0002840922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024134822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029352794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26934025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003644174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021580329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125534817","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709990156","title":"From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive Adaptation. By Michael Kenney. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007. 293p. $45.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Terrorism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010330965112548048,"score_gpt":0.22888837421128289,"score_spread":0.21855740909873483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125534817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92228603,0.007086769,0.002335916,0.005359612,0.00045482066,0.00089039514,0.0040258756,0.0002233216,0.057337232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846577,0.008535125,0.00039455993,0.00042038236,0.0003205675,6.3228015e-7,0.000018797586,0.000016763604,0.0056354464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793875,0.00023334875,0.00014892986,0.0006037067,0.0004932688,0.0005819837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.00038843855,0.00016137004,0.0001999814,0.000109496614,0.00038514053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017009686,0.00027060672,0.00030790336,0.0000317069,0.0008883282,0.00013626169,0.00023656254,0.000118841876,0.00004120674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103529674,0.00032525693,0.00006094498,0.00015608632,0.0005492093,0.0004718351,0.00007617958,0.0002713334,0.0000024614078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007783083,0.0009056326,0.0019970823,0.00002057275,0.00027032162,0.00012404931,0.34368813,0.00090271945,0.00019696739,0.5866295,0.061448537,0.0030381512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008274359,0.00023918184,0.014762694,0.000060817252,0.000070158356,0.0000013568786,0.47574922,0.00052546075,0.000034759592,0.00079494325,0.50645065,0.00048333872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047937118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005894894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58583456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014109154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012533582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127322932","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709992684","title":"What do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Expansive; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02528375718134915,"score_gpt":0.35678201306026414,"score_spread":0.33149825587891496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127322932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509461,0.0003167475,0.00007335833,0.0008647423,0.0004472597,0.00015345305,0.000065140404,0.000030960073,0.14710219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970296,0.00034676277,0.00019160096,0.00004410653,0.00026080516,0.000010357991,0.000006105982,0.000013405659,0.0020972819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980271,0.00020491888,0.00034295657,0.0002947346,0.00045964826,0.00067065924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806094,0.0004025162,0.00014679554,0.0003853915,0.00067065755,0.00033369227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050666655,0.00013753744,0.00038196714,0.0005279804,0.00019381451,0.000090624846,0.00027223106,0.00016760436,0.0002979671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054400164,0.00013221934,0.00022351634,0.00066986075,0.0011601865,0.00016828756,0.00005489067,0.00021744709,0.00000774123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075090625,0.00030414344,0.0018545865,0.000015210999,0.00035628953,5.7339315e-7,0.22734489,0.000007263816,0.00033446337,0.76962525,0.000030192841,0.000119620236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002451289,0.00012386906,0.036446314,0.000012955694,0.0003066389,5.048273e-7,0.8181155,0.00013553366,0.0009957262,0.14158854,0.0018425935,0.00018671178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031615281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073095394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62803674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023710565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048711227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5391748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128105653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071733","title":"Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0418533646812325,"score_gpt":0.359923822845677,"score_spread":0.31807045816444446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128105653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21345972,0.0003807876,0.0014668987,0.02631729,0.0005661039,0.00038039277,0.0003085836,0.00022192302,0.7568983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591696,0.00012347201,0.0003504296,0.0017534024,0.0012732289,0.0000041355797,0.000008422902,0.00001745103,0.000552487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747527,0.00025658766,0.00027558557,0.00047769083,0.0005155623,0.0009992999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691856,0.0018550882,0.00005303579,0.00030615923,0.00020819937,0.00065893313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015970602,0.00020985617,0.00023237693,0.000053479922,0.0012358312,0.00008908648,0.00022401128,0.00027272958,0.000047826103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003926094,0.00021305878,0.000097774035,0.00020157364,0.0037100033,0.0002038507,0.00007237336,0.0005682712,0.000047711514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019179344,0.0002164896,0.00034644853,0.000022050013,0.000023404236,0.000012157405,0.047767725,5.165096e-7,0.000007434774,0.9512709,0.000060632236,0.00025307096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003118949,0.0001292004,0.018185299,0.000025421266,0.0000972255,0.0000015750588,0.20500374,0.000011222406,0.00007368438,0.7602425,0.015590409,0.00032783917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001862645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038064312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78245723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082809635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018899422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129048296","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706060221","title":"Mexican Immigrant Political and Economic Incorporation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.010487854063929788,"score_gpt":0.2886398727923599,"score_spread":0.27815201872843015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129048296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8186595,0.00006931872,0.00024099769,0.007921877,0.00010113516,0.00012613065,0.000054041866,0.00007653154,0.1727505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955429,0.00004407668,0.00022567293,0.00029416618,0.00054180605,0.00000433422,0.000009271171,0.0000083256,0.0033294503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916744,0.00008458176,0.00012931427,0.0001846037,0.00013103972,0.0003030416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958277,0.00008250747,0.00004239433,0.00009657475,0.00005448603,0.00014126331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014916154,0.00008259056,0.00009504356,0.00007658298,0.00029850763,0.000086827786,0.000064145745,0.00006506465,0.00006926041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059925802,0.00008397899,0.0000326884,0.00005723214,0.00039175127,0.000095820746,0.000010392002,0.00008161593,0.00003406644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031034565,0.00004060755,0.0019369529,0.000001310108,0.0000036900917,8.6106115e-7,0.007948035,0.000016094838,0.000013164438,0.9896778,0.00032234075,0.000036036232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008233074,0.00022213801,0.055822536,0.000017874783,0.000043002416,0.000005165322,0.32000852,0.0048814095,0.00021358277,0.54760295,0.069707535,0.00065200374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019872688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018381486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44207487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041290157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014907467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132262134","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708080468","title":"Islands of Agreement: Managing Enduring Armed Rivalries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Conflict resolution; Agreement; Neglect; International conflict; Armed conflict; Political science; Resolution (logic); Phenomenon; Conflict management; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.021900488944771795,"score_gpt":0.2958075384813768,"score_spread":0.273907049536605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132262134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65486544,0.0002164375,0.00007640571,0.0008621711,0.00010368529,0.00008619284,0.000019428746,0.000043450415,0.34372675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962411,0.0009871233,0.00019562921,0.00012319507,0.00020681652,0.00000219286,0.0000023839214,0.000007630311,0.0022339365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988148,0.0000748674,0.0001493337,0.00018088226,0.00039001793,0.0003900884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994599,0.000084421445,0.00006850038,0.00016847662,0.00011660007,0.00010209419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015476224,0.00009982258,0.00015734966,0.00010501375,0.00047733073,0.000019432688,0.0001960235,0.00005608256,0.00006611089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019219771,0.00010535605,0.0000842844,0.00016804102,0.0005941791,0.0001087883,0.000037743997,0.00011972914,0.000022756998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006543734,0.00010308756,0.004820778,0.000010764513,0.000026386086,0.000011660194,0.19345763,0.000019131427,0.000019798552,0.80124986,0.00023076856,0.00004362207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009950704,0.0002723115,0.03855938,0.00011111766,0.000057299207,0.000010085212,0.8480872,0.0003796975,0.0005538004,0.08705512,0.023304144,0.0006148118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019112864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031648917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7141947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020850917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009778991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4296295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135373554","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712003386","title":"<i>Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development</i>. By Justin Crowe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. 328p. $80.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011082267787910511,"score_gpt":0.2530248284594771,"score_spread":0.24194256067156658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135373554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12937525,0.0060304697,0.0010146615,0.015376543,0.00039866587,0.0011985975,0.00042716673,0.00013240169,0.8460462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125445,0.0009792623,0.0011030769,0.0013641709,0.00043027446,0.0000124309045,0.000009074322,0.000015415268,0.0048318636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754,0.00039162274,0.00032491967,0.000359511,0.000667052,0.0007169146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788314,0.0009113187,0.00023037067,0.00031316752,0.00038866547,0.00027331838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053225266,0.0002529009,0.00031770993,0.000049465274,0.0027133771,0.00012384435,0.00057741435,0.0001357844,0.00016232465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031645375,0.00018742269,0.00010031094,0.00014864441,0.010719692,0.00043255906,0.00019506857,0.00037775803,0.000012632193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019426154,0.00010919739,0.00024124116,0.000013221301,0.0000792504,0.0000031122727,0.0059550917,0.000024110781,0.000020930567,0.9876921,0.0057898113,0.000052488675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006917272,0.000038764072,0.0012980015,0.000058481506,0.00006172588,0.000011054843,0.01396509,0.000028118722,0.00020903142,0.020637274,0.96271884,0.0002819075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025199782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012785777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96705484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006273009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020921133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136325762","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071551","title":"Europe's Democratic Deficits through the Looking Glass: The European Union as a Challenge for Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Context (archaeology); Normative; European union; Globalization; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; History","score_opus":0.032723160392688806,"score_gpt":0.330345928964575,"score_spread":0.2976227685718862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136325762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01805525,0.00092403917,0.0060512694,0.031748533,0.0003116597,0.00060315966,0.000023728013,0.00013305934,0.9421493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796678,0.00078518316,0.00018753452,0.0038580087,0.0019275034,0.000006103638,0.0000016949294,0.000058725924,0.013507467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965111,0.0015039709,0.00029981707,0.00037506165,0.0004932442,0.00081679283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971349,0.0017460774,0.00022465683,0.0004847049,0.0002830762,0.00012654084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033011292,0.00022114953,0.00015671729,0.000045847395,0.0025436815,0.00015956112,0.00080314185,0.000052870142,0.000018187851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027211984,0.0001425638,0.0001395826,0.0003690197,0.00079504546,0.00020402236,0.00009541253,0.00036944897,0.00016380365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010653975,0.000086429485,0.00004648687,0.000006277028,0.00002363592,0.000009912181,0.08469835,0.00001353228,0.000010351113,0.91248226,0.0013460305,0.0012660526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058741006,0.00030759154,0.012263369,0.000096419586,0.00006354379,0.000011572773,0.13217326,0.000023151379,0.0001464395,0.14627278,0.7076475,0.00040693875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010809483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006304961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002173641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013871372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137157836","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713000911","title":"Afghanistan: What Went Wrong?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Afghan; Insurgency; Political science; Legitimacy; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Terrorism; Development economics; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01885707935037703,"score_gpt":0.3026460609155396,"score_spread":0.2837889815651626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137157836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075915568,0.001483803,0.00022974188,0.0009735441,0.0010316854,0.00043711477,0.00003739636,0.0001809833,0.9880342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63647157,0.0012204527,0.00020708329,0.0013227888,0.0010542059,0.000043641987,0.0000044177114,0.000031898195,0.3596439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975294,0.00015237698,0.0002601365,0.00043505925,0.00060033705,0.0010226935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984515,0.00013916426,0.000094031944,0.0004183741,0.00035057953,0.0005463979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026001348,0.00024385538,0.00023918139,0.000118733784,0.00092620455,0.00091974187,0.00041107897,0.00014417175,0.0016936221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018506245,0.00024094024,0.00015361836,0.0001788153,0.00077894895,0.0005317922,0.00005090257,0.00024067906,0.00091884675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003793307,0.00016650703,0.000055497305,0.0000071828217,0.000027436348,0.000005204942,0.010697238,9.242984e-7,0.000030323534,0.9881656,0.00017895228,0.0006613063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022727135,0.00011214372,0.0004580043,0.000047988757,0.000016501328,0.0000016204729,0.14752853,0.000022908986,0.00010757348,0.04693297,0.8042278,0.00031667124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029669078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028885345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006648621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003139368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138034957","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071927","title":"Reprogramming Japan: The High Tech Crisis Under Communitarian Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Industrial and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Outsourcing; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Economic history; Law; Communism; Politics","score_opus":0.033067148031156575,"score_gpt":0.3111729667146258,"score_spread":0.27810581868346923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138034957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.585732,0.00015305798,0.00030854784,0.049801733,0.00088761246,0.00041596696,0.000012474654,0.00016737585,0.36252126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398845,0.000036028014,0.00051144836,0.00096250005,0.00081499486,0.000008596108,0.000002667365,0.000014386818,0.0036609513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986186,0.000114349656,0.00022121942,0.00022620609,0.00022833921,0.0005912695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990306,0.00029122696,0.00007999929,0.00035068233,0.00008621603,0.00016126622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013612321,0.00012328013,0.00013993679,0.00008688817,0.0013852175,0.00013259605,0.00039213366,0.00013046095,0.00020412575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021026215,0.00009984583,0.000070605354,0.00019126643,0.0004974729,0.00009153007,0.00006714316,0.00032827485,0.00012283234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056886233,0.000060517163,0.00033419643,7.2202965e-7,0.000035133722,0.0000020250955,0.14287497,0.0000031839118,9.051403e-7,0.85334015,0.001647986,0.0016945105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016845393,0.000037283226,0.0059469193,0.00000758038,0.0000128192105,0.0000015605748,0.88271886,8.192273e-7,0.00004955456,0.038506974,0.07239036,0.00015880828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025719987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028382828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81483316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017464854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138748776","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706680146","title":"Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Surrender; Argument (complex analysis); Social policy; State (computer science); Political science; Welfare; Moral responsibility; Public policy; Social Welfare; Political economy; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03465644369722955,"score_gpt":0.32996338052889235,"score_spread":0.2953069368316628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138748776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235191,0.00021828034,0.000014262098,0.041500557,0.00017683291,0.00031414165,0.000116446405,0.000021432923,0.13411896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990351,0.00009125302,0.0000039437577,0.000049360817,0.00015160262,0.000005749582,7.587684e-7,0.000004029726,0.00065818813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998599,0.00044669752,0.00021624201,0.000092960545,0.00039771004,0.00024740197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991786,0.00023888679,0.000121641366,0.0001789517,0.00025492854,0.00002701017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007137767,0.00007180301,0.00012225735,0.000040910178,0.0007771529,0.000015142412,0.00020608986,0.00004789827,0.000013052756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047790192,0.000037826823,0.00012993245,0.0002909559,0.0013953372,0.000082553364,0.000022203365,0.000114711496,9.899152e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070818173,0.000096536154,0.0013764787,0.000008961954,0.000017520082,2.6165639e-8,0.13126649,0.000009513046,0.000009835473,0.86693615,0.000076201206,0.00019519127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020945465,0.000048176873,0.33938238,0.000011234915,0.000020623605,1.5118898e-7,0.47978678,0.000006921062,0.0008284721,0.17574842,0.003866848,0.00009053511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008728029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025208157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69118774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016910449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001641789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99787295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147231010","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070545","title":"Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Democracy; Census; Face (sociological concept); Audit; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Social science; Politics; Law; Management; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.026861235988642054,"score_gpt":0.3515364850421814,"score_spread":0.32467524905353934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147231010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73190796,0.0006529848,0.000043384545,0.002614734,0.00006759366,0.00010560742,0.0000040963646,0.00003783917,0.2645658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764776,0.00034843938,0.000174409,0.0003280652,0.00035286444,0.0000033422923,7.920052e-7,0.0000066716093,0.0011376624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989137,0.00009090425,0.00013346015,0.00018316861,0.00021015026,0.00046861838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935037,0.00034402806,0.000030101133,0.00006593027,0.000092740345,0.0001168546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063085003,0.000072297924,0.00010927167,0.00009619641,0.0004155318,0.000049101298,0.000057906003,0.00005719094,0.00001726439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011055558,0.00008190265,0.000024013307,0.00016802481,0.00040314987,0.00006843621,0.000019618941,0.00011291698,0.000011104956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003049293,0.00020625493,0.14824553,0.000015763748,0.000028138897,0.00006670779,0.1605876,0.0000021445167,0.000016105201,0.67596805,0.010506981,0.004326233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037686466,0.000080516875,0.7154945,0.000032656575,0.000010685307,0.0000014687206,0.18383892,0.000009748104,0.00007363509,0.09875435,0.0011482886,0.00017837467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012433601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005208964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5772137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022311695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043571017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33398932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148157538","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705050413","title":"Humanitarianism as Political Fusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Politics; Power (physics); Identity (music); Counterintuitive; Political science; Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025387804993796635,"score_gpt":0.36011569874060817,"score_spread":0.33472789374681156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148157538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13689743,0.00013636574,0.000020265907,0.06023957,0.00017267413,0.00014245708,0.00002071692,0.00013079465,0.8022397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870093,0.00008855506,0.00025987925,0.006538626,0.002284212,0.000004134689,0.000003231551,0.000010411145,0.0038016455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997969,0.00022079571,0.00015459851,0.0002587103,0.0004795338,0.00091739406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988529,0.00016346737,0.00003343322,0.00018585727,0.00015190862,0.0006124102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041934088,0.00011290897,0.0001295483,0.00008428008,0.00090130325,0.00010714039,0.00023281372,0.00014478517,0.0014297512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007598131,0.00011679076,0.00007276713,0.00014666432,0.00040409382,0.00017786512,0.000034611745,0.00026097783,0.0011725213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037563773,0.00019473408,0.000055055945,0.000002293677,0.000005417365,0.0000032278472,0.04547231,6.491394e-7,0.0000019336173,0.9521635,0.0016883502,0.00040873853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001807823,0.0001271626,0.0010699026,0.000008979644,0.0000060520892,0.000002847411,0.10259471,0.000010883432,0.000020505255,0.16425014,0.7315792,0.0001488538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014000068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015062758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009915644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051416294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151031264","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705610158","title":"The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Competition (biology); Politics; Electoral system; Political economy; Regionalism (politics); Realigning election; Economics; Socialism; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.012896219900699129,"score_gpt":0.2607792895908995,"score_spread":0.24788306969020038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151031264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691319,0.0011418179,0.000018848197,0.01495085,0.00006351126,0.0003111166,0.00019238816,0.0000080217815,0.014181586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864316,0.000576243,0.000003884016,0.00037393102,0.00011695811,0.000013382251,0.000005856996,0.0000028711065,0.00026372072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988769,0.00027707755,0.0001876291,0.00008558666,0.00034883784,0.00022394267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00073965045,0.00009613422,0.000054635017,0.00016007018,0.000065631044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005135674,0.00006130515,0.00010919203,0.000026995856,0.00038652783,0.0000808115,0.00006631802,0.00002811161,0.000002479201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033014538,0.000038552524,0.000013417707,0.00009436106,0.00047283657,0.00011597012,0.000013829245,0.00008205055,5.4727633e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607708,0.000008443498,0.001320121,0.000009740611,0.000005601719,2.590009e-7,0.01638276,0.00006910797,2.415137e-7,0.9817854,0.0003853208,0.000024366713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027755247,0.00007256202,0.20812455,0.00025893704,0.000021355092,0.000012303486,0.44538903,0.02047865,0.000031437023,0.08200616,0.2404606,0.00036889012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94215983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8338066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89977926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075546297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026606472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29728988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152247345","doi":"10.1017/s153759270909121x","title":"Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. By Irene Bloemraad. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. 382p. $60 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Political science; Gerontology; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.008568834593389899,"score_gpt":0.24841647173300246,"score_spread":0.23984763713961257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152247345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99352753,0.0013307331,0.000025253265,0.0026814747,0.00001931891,0.00020025916,0.00031912254,0.000017132079,0.0018791496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667984,0.0022784756,0.00011421213,0.00047233305,0.000055605993,8.936935e-7,0.000060678583,0.000005827004,0.00033212113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987948,0.00028145307,0.0001807916,0.00021369246,0.00027881993,0.00025045007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929506,0.00021897543,0.00013564514,0.00011479695,0.00014697935,0.00008853091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034077643,0.00012642366,0.00016979015,0.000064274,0.0004832789,0.00005780711,0.000138458,0.00007370169,0.000011326225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022342712,0.00010935842,0.000021477841,0.00020067081,0.00032092925,0.00015635528,0.000013161151,0.00015511064,3.4272935e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013227337,0.00045865105,0.03246569,0.000056641435,0.00008131082,0.000024661527,0.4401974,0.00011079481,0.0009270717,0.46820363,0.05616696,0.0011748911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014144264,0.00039008897,0.06123845,0.00018166132,0.00008783429,0.000004837976,0.7477355,0.0021880234,0.00049704744,0.018044405,0.16760802,0.0006096802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8499056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88068444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45015925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022050008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023970586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4459507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152288470","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712000667","title":"A Plague of Initials: Fragmentation, Cohesion, and Infighting in Civil Wars","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Cohesion (chemistry); Politics; Institutionalisation; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03295597102245114,"score_gpt":0.355027011331418,"score_spread":0.3220710403089669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152288470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.869209,0.0005143538,0.000020788608,0.00076747814,0.00007045841,0.000095867974,0.000022064703,0.000015878657,0.1292841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885577,0.00016960438,0.00010866214,0.00032888658,0.00019494948,0.0000053113204,8.0008374e-7,0.0000063573184,0.000329667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895394,0.00012343886,0.00017387798,0.00011061336,0.0002362469,0.00040189968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917793,0.00043908937,0.00007204955,0.000077309385,0.000076282966,0.00015731654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003673185,0.00007463019,0.00013523894,0.00007729187,0.00012343955,0.000016705837,0.000075951095,0.00006388215,0.00006052452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012151095,0.00007480509,0.000024549854,0.00013910413,0.00036491622,0.0002039541,0.00002191031,0.00010431199,0.000007708664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044460576,0.00007650686,0.041175425,0.000008713838,0.000004494249,5.530344e-7,0.112710945,6.01874e-7,0.00003728015,0.84584975,0.00004436609,0.00008689088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007708004,0.00010394043,0.7131105,0.0001509217,0.000020493238,0.0000013847148,0.22457471,0.000022675093,0.0013512629,0.037818357,0.021750776,0.00032413387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044782744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054765504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80803144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015493378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008515893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6769841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153237779","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707070880","title":"Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship <i>and</i> Plato and the Virtue of Courage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Virtue; Philosophy; Civic virtue; Citizenship; Literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Theology; Law; Art; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.017719253267389372,"score_gpt":0.28970565375017365,"score_spread":0.2719864004827843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153237779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9085979,0.008299809,0.00008952058,0.0041825483,0.0001313667,0.00023267727,0.000037078895,0.000012958215,0.078416176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984185,0.0004226691,0.000023950708,0.00029412317,0.0001450572,0.000005447069,4.7542997e-7,0.000013759474,0.0006759886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990257,0.00014719299,0.00023192652,0.00020363154,0.000155862,0.00023566555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736696,0.002131765,0.00013033603,0.0002528586,0.000067862245,0.000050192997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008069669,0.00013394484,0.0003239442,0.000057355584,0.00016170226,0.000015458474,0.000097386466,0.00007290427,0.00001227958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024355431,0.00007578424,0.000060656967,0.0000633889,0.0031748812,0.000022492524,0.00005423037,0.00023286756,0.0000018392311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006266195,0.000039197144,0.0008432306,0.00002527634,0.00016190777,0.0000036676722,0.19541875,2.5970334e-7,0.00002005183,0.8024529,0.0003571408,0.000051002196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005576266,0.00018616949,0.028716892,0.00004019752,0.00014254532,0.00003238967,0.7836619,0.0000123991285,0.00020711577,0.1811386,0.00015041343,0.00013511494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002863653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002880317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6213143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022012217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001562713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154954871","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002806","title":"E-Bandits in Global Activism: WikiLeaks, Anonymous, and the Politics of No One","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political activism; Political science; State (computer science); Media studies; Action (physics); The Internet; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015943141200400704,"score_gpt":0.30010178485825073,"score_spread":0.28415864365785004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154954871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5881236,0.00016232226,0.000029098017,0.0048819478,0.00008617262,0.0003588214,0.000033738615,0.000025852567,0.4062984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963115,0.00020088082,0.000115592185,0.00065488415,0.00018795524,0.000003257318,0.0000014579986,0.000005428424,0.0025190585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987761,0.00016470105,0.00020409403,0.00011700223,0.00035076923,0.0003873258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991153,0.00025793366,0.00009919276,0.00016142824,0.00020441953,0.00016175737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031756618,0.00010102671,0.00019092813,0.00006735087,0.0002278901,0.000091305024,0.00015697807,0.00007676724,0.00023978396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010612367,0.00007689801,0.000041271287,0.00019615972,0.000929263,0.00030091006,0.00003077951,0.00012787562,0.00008053084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012180438,0.00008701633,0.0004859158,0.00000840063,0.000012573414,1.8799956e-7,0.086321905,0.0000022134857,0.000004342603,0.91184336,0.0009865765,0.00023531147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004523129,0.00033163588,0.18080662,0.000133789,0.000042050968,0.000005085268,0.5987594,0.00054931093,0.0002531021,0.20065038,0.013427898,0.00051759975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008434409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021292645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.711193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002770225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002008977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155060474","doi":"10.1017/s153759270487097x","title":"Globalization and Human Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Human rights; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01095925195843406,"score_gpt":0.31421497741986454,"score_spread":0.3032557254614305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155060474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7335471,0.00009298438,0.00013732747,0.0017643016,0.000068810084,0.000098539815,0.000013091278,0.000075104086,0.26420274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989288,0.000037916754,0.0001445932,0.0001944408,0.00019111371,0.0000012182769,0.0000037339241,0.000004176286,0.00049399986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992746,0.000041844556,0.00007209839,0.00016333531,0.00020303919,0.00024509855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966365,0.000016872023,0.000025698371,0.00009084642,0.000082043276,0.00012089207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008897919,0.0000713879,0.00007471394,0.000042485968,0.00079429924,0.00007269032,0.00008408089,0.00006611677,0.000018337205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005248099,0.0000719889,0.000026882399,0.00010825505,0.0003265736,0.00010123291,0.000015137068,0.00006741177,0.000021313295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.708976e-7,0.000065977176,0.00033747908,0.0000015823564,0.0000051968573,0.0000023630666,0.02770875,0.000017645198,0.0000039420897,0.9717751,0.00007344953,0.000007528399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000391414,0.00010487629,0.0055137933,0.00001911365,0.0000139392105,0.0000015458251,0.040363774,0.000010673482,0.00002024813,0.91471934,0.038661934,0.0001793602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011845529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005784592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2653817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036044008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004314908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155175849","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705720156","title":"God Willing: The Politics of Islamism in Bangladesh","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Religious studies; History; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0218654434633259,"score_gpt":0.31052900826156304,"score_spread":0.2886635647982371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155175849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044083547,0.0012573439,0.00012168875,0.0018287256,0.00026524928,0.0002667614,0.0001153029,0.00005447551,0.9520069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853085,0.00034999187,0.00018370982,0.00085209106,0.0010426409,0.000008234986,0.0000022981678,0.00002017958,0.112232365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979314,0.00017687108,0.00034847672,0.00027262646,0.0004780172,0.000792589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886036,0.00028546166,0.000116930074,0.000366352,0.00019483085,0.00017608095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048766803,0.00018019085,0.00023802415,0.00014204504,0.0004973488,0.000071938994,0.00045479808,0.00013003778,0.00013872862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003226704,0.00015225119,0.00012952468,0.00025585957,0.0010064763,0.00009445483,0.0000394131,0.00029276076,0.000030207473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044120125,0.00019321257,0.00039283014,0.000007404571,0.000017095423,0.000002529583,0.030626154,0.000018858309,0.000020152429,0.968497,0.00003581131,0.00018453249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040072543,0.000084577834,0.0014758031,0.00005117744,0.000021604399,0.000001914262,0.06679036,0.000117475516,0.00038380598,0.04227158,0.8881571,0.00024381903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010544683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005215047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038790744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62086236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156717033","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003235","title":"Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community. By Bernard Yack. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. 344p. $75.00","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.049913130462587926,"score_gpt":0.3493063546373647,"score_spread":0.29939322417477676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156717033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268973,0.0020110984,0.00003841998,0.030547306,0.00018473656,0.0002581769,0.00012264439,0.000025307034,0.43991503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381644,0.0014756712,0.00009975839,0.00038399352,0.00007781676,9.557305e-7,0.0000061458677,0.0000050923777,0.0041341423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855316,0.0007858923,0.0001228693,0.000099711906,0.00028025795,0.00015810538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988253,0.00033179505,0.00013223462,0.00023980513,0.0003366531,0.00013422285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006956328,0.000071411334,0.00016439466,0.00004331911,0.00031979382,0.000017457209,0.00033233225,0.000083313265,0.000057526395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048279957,0.00006169423,0.000050475657,0.00009915135,0.001812599,0.00005255956,0.000044036926,0.00025364483,0.0000060379007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045377437,0.000111694266,0.0011000583,0.000002957773,0.000028868448,1.147702e-7,0.121001475,0.0000024554731,0.0000057149614,0.7637624,0.11390319,0.000035660596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003369021,0.00022196051,0.029546956,0.000024681704,0.00006195025,0.0000032655903,0.40354705,0.000025126845,0.0000658849,0.42514125,0.13775231,0.00024055573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008009952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013949555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46691912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008099892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016381612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160639212","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705680140","title":"The Nation-State in Question","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Ethnic group; Political science; Nation state; Media studies; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.015993422746954877,"score_gpt":0.3268220345482703,"score_spread":0.31082861180131544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160639212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37824458,0.00093421125,0.00015237248,0.04336051,0.00034677386,0.0002800075,0.000026829477,0.00007915522,0.5765755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807096,0.00034774505,0.000038136863,0.00028720842,0.00059082155,0.000009415025,2.3031293e-7,0.0000046838527,0.010650793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901253,0.00014699347,0.00011700691,0.000116213174,0.0002607422,0.00034650156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941945,0.00029578898,0.000037856596,0.00009600666,0.00007054006,0.00008036492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044350853,0.000052795327,0.00005852616,0.000026016036,0.0003484334,0.00006627019,0.00012221301,0.000033336124,0.000012975633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007865704,0.000040286952,0.000027636426,0.000107579566,0.0002354543,0.00010090589,0.000008994521,0.00010592913,0.00009059679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017957078,0.0000321849,0.00061868475,6.5254466e-7,0.000001875406,5.118526e-7,0.012546495,0.00001683379,0.0000017161346,0.98586714,0.00028552962,0.000626578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020027853,0.000032229993,0.044816907,0.000030278792,0.0000019915121,3.7580372e-7,0.014456552,0.00015398557,0.00004450526,0.21463184,0.7254927,0.00013832352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025271509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014832562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007163006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096901094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162740085","doi":"10.1017/s1537592706550273","title":"The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Politics; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Autonomy; Separation of powers; Law; History","score_opus":0.031202614270858086,"score_gpt":0.3199043054016276,"score_spread":0.28870169113076954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162740085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8429938,0.0003797832,0.00008750358,0.00027289387,0.00009957736,0.00019451154,0.000022320495,0.000016982845,0.15593264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494034,0.000026343318,0.000019864228,0.0000150272635,0.00022995497,0.00000645654,0.0000010160697,0.0000049815885,0.0047560325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988975,0.00017068656,0.00027522177,0.00013925068,0.00022387426,0.00029348562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991613,0.00030984776,0.00012946519,0.0001522665,0.00018140898,0.00006568765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018983551,0.000082012164,0.00019105809,0.000059231643,0.0006337798,0.000025195584,0.00018082732,0.0000380333,0.00002549055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010806998,0.00006640309,0.000063178886,0.00007126694,0.0008517256,0.00007523236,0.000020112555,0.00006187698,0.0000064639344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008793652,0.00042036775,0.0011962738,0.000004439872,0.00002494203,2.6905494e-7,0.10739437,0.00012361654,0.000013175596,0.89049035,0.00030101227,0.000022386597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005534623,0.00040700063,0.023930226,0.000016717651,0.000061014227,3.6820944e-7,0.4731708,0.0004297939,0.00039393484,0.49438506,0.0064737485,0.00017789681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009331859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001955675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3961053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016786004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012081222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163522983","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711000892","title":"Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); China; Political economy; Democracy; Democratization; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03175936990206697,"score_gpt":0.30864203458145156,"score_spread":0.2768826646793846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163522983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146906,0.00011829055,0.0000971979,0.0051494692,0.00021563703,0.00022802965,0.000010431425,0.00003537175,0.27945495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950752,0.000034932465,0.00090621464,0.00063681,0.00046485942,0.000028288507,0.0000017331464,0.000012885489,0.0028390526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985519,0.00013157348,0.00025409795,0.0002673974,0.00023158545,0.00056341157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993322,0.00014016146,0.00006994427,0.00018994969,0.00009755599,0.00017018052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042008216,0.0001533278,0.0001623792,0.000051834933,0.0006918331,0.00007295191,0.0002673392,0.000095211246,0.00020120005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028777754,0.000103358965,0.00006580955,0.00013738671,0.0004348769,0.0002210394,0.0000412489,0.00028021118,0.000078122815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001064771,0.00008374148,0.0033779454,0.0000010515205,0.000010711988,0.0000028521952,0.28723505,0.0000012872013,3.788659e-7,0.7090046,0.000060837578,0.00021091958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007995142,0.00007764602,0.39239192,0.000021939428,0.000007211648,0.000002942538,0.23813947,0.00005441811,0.00006815804,0.35786676,0.010213808,0.00035620495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00858918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007533467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38901398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011950699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005024879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163650424","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704300587","title":"Machiavelli, Hobbes, and the Formation of a Liberal Republicanism in England","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Consummation; Liberalism; Classics; Law; Political science; History; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.01157250320119084,"score_gpt":0.27870918485414126,"score_spread":0.2671366816529504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163650424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5585273,0.0004439885,0.00041835397,0.013991554,0.00007378157,0.0002698208,0.00004813106,0.00002578634,0.4262013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984347,0.00023798915,0.00028859676,0.00043162215,0.00014260157,0.0000056159297,0.0000017553682,0.0000032769349,0.00045380977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926996,0.00011642887,0.00013652253,0.00009342276,0.00018280055,0.00020085013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994754,0.0002379068,0.000060024235,0.000088983215,0.000074219155,0.000063450854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029963153,0.00005941789,0.0001121272,0.00006220338,0.00019493095,0.000026074933,0.000087702334,0.000036789363,0.000012435451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032042255,0.00004488822,0.000032268872,0.00011819492,0.0017586538,0.00011134688,0.000016230837,0.00010780359,0.0000019212844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013728747,0.00003646364,0.00023373919,0.0000029877122,0.0000039465544,8.420651e-7,0.050493993,0.000021814267,0.0000012777232,0.94912213,0.000010480339,0.000058618658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00624,0.00024127375,0.009951972,0.00008639478,0.000039246526,0.0000219893,0.13433371,0.00010182022,0.00018558983,0.6976569,0.15077111,0.0003699569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006879437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007964011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43990746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018613508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044891058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169293164","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707072623","title":"Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Weimar Republic; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Comparative politics; Democracy; The Republic; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033160930601302534,"score_gpt":0.31498430176629355,"score_spread":0.281823371164991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169293164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048787598,0.003862964,0.0030116695,0.011207674,0.00042318524,0.00043067354,0.00005248819,0.00007969549,0.93214405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973689,0.00024131569,0.00022071172,0.0014604405,0.0005309843,0.000014264371,0.000002574482,0.0000027343813,0.00015813022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839103,0.00015240567,0.00024503283,0.0002721074,0.0004690725,0.0004703379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985487,0.0009741885,0.000060744347,0.00009859376,0.000196933,0.000120852485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013647807,0.00013401509,0.00019003202,0.00010775293,0.0017087057,0.00008461971,0.00015227593,0.00008113361,0.000066215674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084491965,0.00010552236,0.00006944047,0.00025603964,0.025320461,0.00019948636,0.00005392315,0.00024755255,0.000019192905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025000816,0.000071906805,0.0020641175,0.0000016384868,0.000029007297,0.000015416992,0.011245627,0.000007748333,0.0000031163856,0.98634195,0.00012889775,0.000065549495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020206498,0.000047209698,0.04251729,0.000082847495,0.000040482315,0.000026349924,0.05922068,0.000026068168,0.000019330964,0.7580578,0.13755132,0.00038999107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009462964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002945662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041263204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006036649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169715952","doi":"10.1017/s1537592708082261","title":"Building States without Society: European Union Enlargement and the Transfer of EU Social Policy to Poland and Hungary. By Beate Sissenich. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2006. 252p. $80.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; European union; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.01817913468664313,"score_gpt":0.3100115114289897,"score_spread":0.2918323767423466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169715952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8963117,0.0049887025,0.00020163295,0.06691658,0.00011437154,0.00069057324,0.0003151123,0.00010867447,0.030352676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780326,0.016890822,0.00016927617,0.0024779518,0.001319243,0.00001139456,0.0000063476546,0.00003381512,0.0010585509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777555,0.00058618997,0.00028239685,0.00033934182,0.000397445,0.0006190583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991716,0.00028294517,0.00007609905,0.00014219258,0.0001373676,0.00018979082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081777084,0.0002468445,0.00038337376,0.00006640752,0.0020088276,0.00006881311,0.00018873255,0.00010835241,0.00001101088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024923816,0.00018062785,0.00015465719,0.00026302802,0.0018102247,0.00012337846,0.00009625545,0.0002513348,0.0000036865054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074293384,0.00015812066,0.002763696,0.000036211026,0.00032192757,0.0000017944462,0.68848413,0.0000045843994,0.00049040536,0.29305738,0.014047105,0.00056033925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069889897,0.000716845,0.061820034,0.00016082535,0.00037022788,0.000012452862,0.6279751,0.00002108051,0.0008479059,0.040651888,0.25879228,0.0016423413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021385768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010772357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2524055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014744235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103479244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170019553","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703230152","title":"The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. By April Carter. New York: Routledge, 2001. 277p. $90.00","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Globalization; Global citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Political philosophy; Political economy; Social science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05448065112208743,"score_gpt":0.3401994724388308,"score_spread":0.28571882131674337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170019553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008787708,0.0027167618,0.00043424877,0.024894388,0.0005402007,0.00026593378,0.00025793744,0.00010433323,0.96199846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914118,0.00013577093,0.000111305686,0.0021292665,0.00092150754,0.000006470391,0.00000264689,0.000023459028,0.005257784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954848,0.0011974704,0.00039180214,0.0004107309,0.0007904216,0.001724761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586153,0.002248098,0.00010069276,0.00049878395,0.00026698026,0.0010239094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011881756,0.00027157905,0.00033645245,0.0000343404,0.0010016834,0.00012245982,0.0005558323,0.0003188507,0.00022684503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005598066,0.00022071206,0.00024479532,0.00033079265,0.0032838476,0.00007645117,0.000045107965,0.000538516,0.000095862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023945699,0.0001318914,0.00032543167,0.0000074836294,0.00006217721,0.0000024526428,0.0064362595,6.286711e-7,0.0000052895884,0.9765851,0.016362682,0.00005666954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032711428,0.00011555909,0.00027067936,0.000021453934,0.000042588013,0.000003188434,0.06558053,0.0000024894043,0.00016834108,0.90157366,0.031662237,0.00023213492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019078269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014376345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98262405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009658099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011787922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285232714","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715000638","title":"Impressions of Hume: Cinematic Thinking and the Politics of Discontinuity. By Davide Panagia. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2013. 188p. $70.00.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Discontinuity (linguistics); Politics; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031881336581659925,"score_gpt":0.26962410868771675,"score_spread":0.23774277210605682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285232714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79026616,0.016418302,0.00031575267,0.0060766563,0.0005822738,0.000733229,0.0010188664,0.00011259554,0.18447615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98461753,0.0002651653,0.00020261864,0.0003953501,0.00049097295,0.000012457935,0.000040138115,0.000030809562,0.013944973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982875,0.00019626126,0.000497101,0.0002529264,0.00040448134,0.00036170773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802643,0.0007273001,0.00022429017,0.000453866,0.00040759548,0.00016050752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036526183,0.00023044442,0.0004395411,0.00013012374,0.00033940386,0.00014169271,0.0002728486,0.00006663709,0.00025624828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048391262,0.0001593308,0.000120664656,0.0000497773,0.0014000476,0.00024814927,0.000080437756,0.00024039872,0.000009878763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017708971,0.00011051375,0.00010449539,0.000066781475,0.000056548055,7.336592e-7,0.3260934,0.000002767988,0.000018327273,0.6622327,0.011275756,0.000020249532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023890024,0.0002808281,0.00040877602,0.00040235164,0.00025476355,0.00001065601,0.5340772,0.00018637316,0.00029231407,0.3794609,0.0818075,0.0004293387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00334203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003482669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28277183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045799312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077638506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6497321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312301942","doi":"10.1017/s1537592711004981","title":"Unraveling Internal Conflicts in East Asia and the Pacific: Incidence, Consequences, and Resolutions. Edited by Jacob Bercovitch and Karl DeRouen, Jr. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2011. 342p. $85.00. - No Man's Land: Globalization, Territory, and Clandestine Groups in Southeast Asia. By Justin V. Hastings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010. 256p. $65.00 cloth, $22.95 paper.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"East Asia; Religious studies; History; Philosophy; China; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01674449589285576,"score_gpt":0.25016220143916873,"score_spread":0.23341770554631297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312301942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286828,0.049123164,0.00061934534,0.011872693,0.0007250278,0.0022606307,0.0016896961,0.00029303198,0.10473365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959546,0.0024239335,0.00010766683,0.00013203875,0.00043427187,0.0000114693075,0.000022399778,0.000026034213,0.0008876059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699515,0.0006972562,0.00038961362,0.00060497655,0.00040418186,0.00090882386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983869,0.000573476,0.00020929374,0.00018463566,0.00020541126,0.00044023694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989344,0.00036687023,0.0004782491,0.00009855597,0.00084186485,0.00020750225,0.00022728893,0.0002671236,0.000027146807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092185836,0.0003266335,0.00004093202,0.00017163617,0.0059440914,0.00042427235,0.00021260796,0.0005226087,0.0000063620664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032160315,0.00022473936,0.5776655,0.000072986935,0.00008614671,0.000015963078,0.06287754,0.000002609238,0.00005233592,0.34681776,0.01180642,0.00005637333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070897,0.00024349835,0.1878185,0.0006188122,0.00021677319,0.00008152684,0.7579492,0.0008299862,0.000025997528,0.00870591,0.035184257,0.0012358712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054180022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019529527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69507164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000431691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001068765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314426863","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704250587","title":"Bound by Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Denial; Indigenous; Identity (music); Poverty; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05738563731984698,"score_gpt":0.3538357958820708,"score_spread":0.29645015856222384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314426863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11089965,0.00026797707,0.00019128111,0.037181113,0.00024688873,0.00014118702,0.00012706031,0.00016441561,0.8507804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538386,0.00015707934,0.00016659574,0.0024438954,0.00080372405,0.000006104687,0.000008378799,0.000011788033,0.0010185917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.00009654437,0.00010879518,0.00021215511,0.00033617442,0.0004849091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992625,0.00018539732,0.0000287924,0.00012748069,0.0001298636,0.00026598005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024006826,0.00009583692,0.00009710182,0.000051228635,0.0006261759,0.000074871394,0.00013430924,0.00014128094,0.00012303666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008721954,0.00010152567,0.0000645925,0.00012777065,0.0008653769,0.0001452831,0.000013132746,0.0002822462,0.0004436064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040993755,0.00015749421,0.000007104033,0.000002861488,0.000008630105,0.0000022566146,0.025270611,0.0000012821175,0.000022104237,0.9739052,0.00050380005,0.00011453703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023394487,0.00008576986,0.00007258418,0.000016455504,0.000009888545,6.774706e-7,0.024641931,4.711981e-7,0.00047051263,0.95227474,0.0220478,0.00014521251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022845282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007185583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061300717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023443556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5701811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331598413","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713002624","title":"Welfare through Work: Conservative Ideas, Partisan Dynamics, and Social Protection in Japan. By Mari Miura. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012. 224p. $39.95. - The Evolution of Japan's Party System: Politics and Policy in an Era of Institutional Change. Edited by Leonard J. Schoppa. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2011. 256p. $60.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Work (physics); Welfare state; Content (measure theory); Welfare; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.01701019220099408,"score_gpt":0.23796059057126953,"score_spread":0.22095039837027544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331598413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962035,0.015565748,0.000036431647,0.004325755,0.00029839197,0.00228604,0.0023558645,0.00009313881,0.013003654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620074,0.0019314812,0.000022464916,0.000055860528,0.00023100148,0.000014746422,0.00007810052,0.000014472686,0.0014511612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974385,0.00086718774,0.00029403527,0.00048808567,0.00037920027,0.0005330052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988314,0.00007880122,0.00031289115,0.00022482609,0.000383136,0.0001689258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029172775,0.00027892384,0.00039862646,0.000026626682,0.0009024783,0.000045321358,0.0002953608,0.00039058214,0.00007624025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008157486,0.00027474147,0.00006966737,0.00016063545,0.0020152438,0.0022010116,0.00009510394,0.0003937101,0.0000011089012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024088047,0.0005415721,0.0112527,0.00017796534,0.00008316563,0.0000025115853,0.10911009,0.000012320937,0.00008183851,0.8686123,0.00976511,0.00011954783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016620775,0.0003151234,0.17188969,0.00017088547,0.00009675028,0.0000037091352,0.77999437,0.0007176274,0.000014915875,0.0008959233,0.043700464,0.0005384729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69159186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08782272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005926001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032904133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334047054","doi":"10.1017/s1537592713001060","title":"The Puzzle of Extra-Lethal Violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Typology; Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Criminology; Dance; Genocide; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science; Visual arts; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.024041916604501598,"score_gpt":0.3080869776156022,"score_spread":0.2840450610111006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334047054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6163326,0.0014743576,0.000038919927,0.0048388606,0.00027703313,0.0002647988,0.000009227611,0.000046618476,0.3767176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961686,0.00075131305,0.000044367578,0.00011513036,0.00029268966,0.000014914114,2.636302e-7,0.0000069503644,0.0026057388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988669,0.00013648346,0.0001252738,0.00016132824,0.00032689946,0.00038312687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990903,0.00028774265,0.000058294907,0.0002251437,0.00022287134,0.00011565384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023465733,0.00008158333,0.00009525551,0.000031335083,0.00060132873,0.00007108159,0.00033221106,0.000058022782,0.00019682327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003388491,0.00006195276,0.00007397625,0.00010529789,0.0007658025,0.000081505816,0.00002766265,0.00012850676,0.00011281518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016189524,0.00006159135,0.00062908715,0.0000027377398,0.000011155322,4.871532e-7,0.075988084,7.2973177e-7,0.000051812563,0.92184573,0.00030589025,0.0011010494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017885132,0.000108404005,0.026188126,0.000027711865,0.0000138786545,0.0000011828372,0.7306019,0.00003354277,0.00079100946,0.20914686,0.0327072,0.00020133324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006466094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027150876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7126989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008831715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108964334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97748435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334947435","doi":"10.1017/s1537592714003843","title":"Transnational Citizenship in the European Union: Past, Present, and Future. By Espen D. H. Olsen. London and New York: Continuum, 2012. 208p. $130.00. - Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. By Richard Rose. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 176p. $48.95.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; European union; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0357721719602278,"score_gpt":0.26608217414980123,"score_spread":0.23031000218957343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334947435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028549101,0.011409669,0.0009324834,0.055959623,0.00024345044,0.0012553271,0.00060315576,0.00017324691,0.90087396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91054285,0.0069458494,0.0006095628,0.00093504996,0.0038989983,0.0000071398435,0.00012178679,0.000108072105,0.076830685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940299,0.003644006,0.00033247532,0.0006379824,0.0006861229,0.0006695325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983588,0.00040843015,0.00027486918,0.00037869092,0.00014878971,0.00043044623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022936224,0.00031286536,0.00029266623,0.0000880139,0.0005274451,0.0003116022,0.0006431934,0.000091287046,0.000021594404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021631416,0.0002818805,0.000076350465,0.00034542446,0.00066508766,0.00047510336,0.00014121796,0.00050280977,0.000004538941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000376503,0.00017120493,0.0010669987,0.000022561862,0.000043458855,0.000021618858,0.041122124,0.000009824835,0.000008252704,0.4204288,0.5367571,0.00031041176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015461443,0.00007265633,0.009115613,0.00002521323,0.000036508467,0.000011219852,0.041160677,0.00007157299,0.0000069889625,0.0015887377,0.94603586,0.00032880108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016336486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014963895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8819938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015090013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116086565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604378853","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001851","title":"Expect Us: Online Communities and Political Mobilization. By Jessica L. Beyer. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 192p. $99.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political mobilization; Mobilization; Politics; Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Sociology; Political economy; History; Law","score_opus":0.05014823336610888,"score_gpt":0.31490440509959927,"score_spread":0.2647561717334904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604378853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6898396,0.016612092,0.00023751425,0.018719895,0.0016761413,0.0010719732,0.0016706217,0.0006829534,0.2694892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808302,0.005294902,0.0005208339,0.001427739,0.0020006672,0.000004442135,0.00009231848,0.00005119248,0.00977771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971189,0.00064848625,0.00024876435,0.00033432344,0.00061296887,0.0010365715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970075,0.000879108,0.000108884706,0.00038545037,0.00033657494,0.0012824808],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020126787,0.0002927053,0.00037845166,0.00008442641,0.0007665873,0.00015165743,0.00047075874,0.00029115524,0.00014206646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007245289,0.000319452,0.00010472226,0.00020659166,0.0019328198,0.00033733327,0.0001318453,0.00041929985,0.000014117678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025796304,0.00030518824,0.0060721203,0.000010234729,0.00004584007,0.0000043118075,0.09716942,0.0000026456341,0.000005065663,0.7850804,0.111222014,0.000057014226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005485991,0.00014672018,0.00034313602,0.00002226192,0.00004764514,0.0000015391621,0.50905514,0.00002620639,0.000041163054,0.009219133,0.48029292,0.0002555184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056281455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014891016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7758612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009456696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010732864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604533277","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001590","title":"Thucydides on Politics: Back to the Present. By Geoffrey Hawthorn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 274 p. $85.00 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03323406828909197,"score_gpt":0.3001942671937581,"score_spread":0.2669601989046661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604533277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057486426,0.0023359496,0.000074170115,0.14921229,0.00085754646,0.0012842129,0.0014523229,0.0003066361,0.78699046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6724542,0.0018414203,0.00013904818,0.0029048093,0.0027536878,0.000016977127,0.000019148454,0.00006844908,0.31980228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995502,0.00072957244,0.00029783975,0.00083527894,0.0011893766,0.0014459161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670756,0.0008526491,0.00014564862,0.0007716299,0.00060448895,0.0009180177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065637904,0.00043004876,0.0004686844,0.00011315011,0.0014474671,0.00025092775,0.0010636509,0.00020241424,0.00006506981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016506286,0.00035845587,0.00022885828,0.00034898004,0.0019480599,0.0003154322,0.0004483337,0.0005575036,0.0008534134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003539207,0.0002304381,0.00031094116,0.000007826434,0.00006819512,0.000008483169,0.008786293,0.00001588346,0.00000883201,0.45715493,0.5333243,0.00004848874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045554354,0.0003254649,0.0033507212,0.00003566665,0.00005868261,0.0000016873901,0.09793244,0.00003084426,0.0002085982,0.0005840088,0.8965843,0.0004320696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032900296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013857149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61496776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017220137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048659823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606539563","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715002169","title":"The Covert Sphere: Secrecy, Fiction, and the National Security State. By Timothy Melley. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012. 304p. $78.95 cloth, $26.95 paper. - Secrets and Leaks: The Dilemmas of State Secrecy. By Rahul Sagar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. 340p. $35.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Secrecy; State (computer science); National security; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019927922232867563,"score_gpt":0.24796045718096266,"score_spread":0.22803253494809508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606539563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44518515,0.10308987,0.0012136896,0.016186608,0.0022941465,0.008359369,0.00947033,0.0009005573,0.41330028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811008,0.10352145,0.000040466533,0.0003366056,0.00030419455,0.000008298892,0.000044232045,0.00006511353,0.0145788435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411476,0.0019578305,0.00052147714,0.00095432095,0.0014060966,0.0010455435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542946,0.0016865929,0.00058627565,0.00062713935,0.0011391988,0.00053130777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154751,0.0005676605,0.0005781161,0.000038275946,0.0020810522,0.00034623052,0.0012156704,0.00032942646,0.00014520757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005173878,0.00042188776,0.00018566019,0.00035012752,0.0055315313,0.0010888664,0.00046304584,0.00097633933,0.000013065532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010293567,0.00039501092,0.00101729,0.000055526358,0.00037456068,0.0000106228945,0.043312088,0.00020706034,0.000050731906,0.7594012,0.1940413,0.000105240324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020953175,0.00031058243,0.0006810363,0.00005305884,0.00013397177,0.00001145367,0.07673651,0.0012914415,0.00045604937,0.040394414,0.8772158,0.0006203831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036280423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004428251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7190068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011011006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011331616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607011360","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001954","title":"Contemporary Majority Nationalism. Edited by Alain-G. Gagnon, André Lecours and Geneviève Nootens. Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011. 248p. $95 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Nationalism; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Art; Political science; Politics; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.020936522348570775,"score_gpt":0.2445213763549181,"score_spread":0.22358485400634734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607011360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06412856,0.023921633,0.00006461508,0.046034608,0.0023529988,0.0012636913,0.0072627193,0.0005103923,0.8544608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90300196,0.016499242,0.0004640961,0.002051988,0.0019124607,0.000012073725,0.00023104076,0.00007768099,0.075749464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980442,0.00028160666,0.00017426284,0.000468021,0.0005766829,0.0004552469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825436,0.00016289581,0.00014336874,0.00023774596,0.0005122942,0.00068932964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003793188,0.00019047913,0.00025915724,0.00018134784,0.0012644194,0.00017732113,0.00025673863,0.00021600044,0.00013485283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032688785,0.00025695603,0.00009285278,0.00014092226,0.0012914136,0.00051053794,0.00006202241,0.00029221812,0.000039357965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038449984,0.00013383679,0.0003452164,0.0000088850065,0.000052823263,0.000025758054,0.011077933,0.0000037844593,0.0000065910285,0.19286953,0.79538983,0.00004739077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007321772,0.00005852553,0.0023104658,0.000012766079,0.00003785483,0.0000030229708,0.020163203,0.000011706896,0.0000035705543,0.0019561285,0.97441393,0.00029666422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75358474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11843947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025765665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093960995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746735433","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717001931","title":"The Sunni Tragedy in the Middle East: Northern Lebanon from al-Qaeda to ISIS. By Bernard Rougier. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. 288p. $35.00.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Al qaeda; Middle East; Tragedy (event); Political science; Theology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Art; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Terrorism","score_opus":0.04036809940722561,"score_gpt":0.2971383137817953,"score_spread":0.25677021437456965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746735433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972718,0.00097274006,0.000053807562,0.044660155,0.00044835042,0.00083352806,0.00047023428,0.000071041744,0.15521835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811282,0.0010105245,0.00008509386,0.0008594287,0.00066885765,0.000012143305,0.0000084085505,0.000029094548,0.016198253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966822,0.0005507633,0.0002591499,0.0006015526,0.00087103684,0.0010352876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975576,0.00045529098,0.00023178301,0.0012083397,0.00020282043,0.00034417387],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010017308,0.0002904624,0.00030241406,0.000035682096,0.0037050257,0.00064941146,0.0021513135,0.00018284551,0.0000429452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060829136,0.00022307204,0.00022453285,0.00012674877,0.0011524633,0.000297746,0.00024123781,0.0005785374,0.000053079773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005015126,0.00038849228,0.008944557,0.000007474247,0.00009677713,0.000026742615,0.29234672,0.00002554022,0.000017420218,0.68510497,0.012653399,0.0003377546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005727358,0.00009706259,0.026910728,0.000049677106,0.000039244762,8.3964477e-7,0.2544751,0.00006786873,0.000049361493,0.0035180238,0.7138447,0.00037465323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047755726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016243035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7011913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009480267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000355894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99759203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769437310","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717002286","title":"What Is a Human? What the Answers Mean for Human Rights. By John H. Evans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. 260p. $35.00 cloth. - Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human. By Samantha Frost. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. 203p. $22.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Natural (archaeology); Archaeology","score_opus":0.045519258494341804,"score_gpt":0.30693661103457004,"score_spread":0.26141735254022824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769437310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14298916,0.054139942,0.000240202,0.16495432,0.0042766104,0.008194857,0.008962604,0.00078805484,0.61545426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644612,0.009814289,0.000044775123,0.0012390901,0.0012554443,0.0000041053936,0.000055994624,0.000056439807,0.1230687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957868,0.0008113256,0.00037041586,0.00084711943,0.00092885894,0.001255512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622077,0.0007508391,0.00053644757,0.0014339443,0.0003680555,0.0006899606],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007313902,0.0005722781,0.0006035862,0.000062367646,0.008289252,0.0009810647,0.0029996543,0.00064303883,0.00023565028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002722705,0.0004125656,0.0006739202,0.00012995095,0.0058083492,0.0025569568,0.00043428203,0.00097093725,0.0000051765765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180661,0.00021859023,0.000039991064,0.000033097866,0.00023916153,0.0000026384641,0.060831264,0.0000012180539,0.00018789244,0.7359326,0.20235091,0.000044582535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013865978,0.00020007904,0.0004317093,0.00032460375,0.00034358204,9.836778e-7,0.12830228,0.0000025916165,0.001349774,0.18746904,0.6796519,0.0005368486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074287064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024680751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009433273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006142842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796131283","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718000981","title":"“Thugs-for-Hire”: Subcontracting of State Coercion and State Capacity in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); State (computer science); Population; Autonomy; China; Business; Evasion (ethics); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02434508401755405,"score_gpt":0.30541079403056687,"score_spread":0.28106571001301284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796131283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98421884,0.00008993453,0.00008781228,0.0007741979,0.00013104311,0.0002285131,0.000106605825,0.000016358514,0.014346698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836975,0.00032672947,0.00022639248,0.00006169014,0.00020055204,0.000005247665,7.1859023e-7,0.000010331987,0.00079860573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00005614226,0.00020440717,0.0002204326,0.00012855671,0.00035702426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935657,0.00017543783,0.00017215009,0.000111653746,0.0000976902,0.000086472224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005349395,0.000099386765,0.00019915955,0.000053103577,0.00025750438,0.000039484876,0.00009795221,0.000049085083,0.000014416638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038176036,0.00009304275,0.00004706427,0.000066311186,0.00068961363,0.00023573679,0.00001943224,0.00012974291,0.0000031245968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094147836,0.00011698482,0.020301834,0.000024752242,0.0000227577,9.2630927e-7,0.48436293,0.000009442058,0.0001283888,0.4928554,0.000056879686,0.0020255595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025098845,0.0004910061,0.5662682,0.000099811805,0.0000140585535,0.0000014948927,0.0933862,0.00047914157,0.0021296921,0.32871097,0.0054671005,0.00044243725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02302966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066634477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5459664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044602493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011573034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98347604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888142878","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001603","title":"A Moral Theory of Solidarity. By Avery Kolers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 208p. $80.00 cloth.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.036980333530267445,"score_gpt":0.29963901509350743,"score_spread":0.26265868156324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888142878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029328538,0.00043903035,0.0003501036,0.0041894238,0.0003512201,0.00024883077,0.00065156847,0.00013632953,0.964305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858736,0.00075026345,0.00015855966,0.00065743196,0.0009907205,0.0000013952781,0.0000074835584,0.000021551106,0.011539025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975072,0.0005109553,0.00021852077,0.00039642095,0.0005308928,0.0008359768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981161,0.0005827799,0.00012321645,0.00037614265,0.00040096222,0.00040081918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063279184,0.00021296409,0.0002993229,0.00010290245,0.00075951323,0.000047246165,0.0005431762,0.00031633468,0.00023598218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075702305,0.00022396604,0.00017908234,0.00020819377,0.0046844305,0.0003088377,0.0001244583,0.0004667554,0.000025489479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096069365,0.00028381738,0.0001776319,0.000019524417,0.00006114399,0.0000043247574,0.02269202,0.0000010197223,0.000014609507,0.9690262,0.007574081,0.000049547318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046037167,0.0003383435,0.00041151245,0.00004841417,0.0000542403,8.446024e-7,0.054687735,0.000031489104,0.00047928854,0.6221522,0.32100782,0.00032774083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027633577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006414775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95654505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053314026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054196373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888591179","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001548","title":"Asymmetry and International Relationships. By Brantly Womack. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 244p. $99.99 cloth, $34.99 paper.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.022892480992476535,"score_gpt":0.23898900138433757,"score_spread":0.21609652039186103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888591179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.410164,0.001875988,0.00011050157,0.0005233002,0.0070221433,0.00029800172,0.0036908826,0.0002352075,0.57607996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90595984,0.0006110405,0.00006777265,0.0003941461,0.007973082,8.2927835e-7,0.00008263808,0.000025952142,0.08488472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861205,0.00010956451,0.00018429433,0.0004405066,0.0002848935,0.00036868127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979907,0.000162106,0.00012307634,0.00028254595,0.0012568561,0.00018469905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015762949,0.00022817185,0.00020760167,0.00015894744,0.0009306895,0.0002891459,0.0003135109,0.00009647403,0.00028872138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017129926,0.0002449918,0.000094669966,0.000045559824,0.0010140747,0.00041963407,0.00017538061,0.0003254465,0.00014917103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004009945,0.00017287162,0.0026722567,0.000018434308,0.00012015264,0.000012143541,0.01892456,1.9246353e-7,0.0000049590735,0.6344235,0.34358355,0.000027289412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014364882,0.00025396023,0.012936681,0.0000663262,0.0002060183,0.0000039672477,0.20389794,0.00016988063,0.00016679674,0.0010508077,0.7791015,0.0007096565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059641465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036590983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63337266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038333194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007148922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911888365","doi":"10.1017/s153759271800395x","title":"Rising Powers and Foreign Policy Revisionism: Understanding BRICS Identity and Behavior Through Time. By Cameron G. Thies and Mark David Nieman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017. 219p. $70.00 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Volume (thermodynamics); Art history; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art; Physics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02684098860342161,"score_gpt":0.3141389963263206,"score_spread":0.287298007722899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911888365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6744251,0.0030200623,0.0004632478,0.00077962177,0.00004452983,0.0004354402,0.00031681842,0.00003764458,0.32047755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900765,0.006040503,0.00032810302,0.000076984754,0.00008668444,5.6176134e-7,0.000007742799,0.000013866039,0.0033690527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988283,0.00010018344,0.00015030747,0.00030215713,0.0003256925,0.0002933681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.00019305632,0.0001552709,0.000147204,0.00011869846,0.000119420576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024195459,0.00014310637,0.00020751484,0.00012895973,0.0006026677,0.0001301508,0.00013742152,0.000121989266,0.00005541428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014789376,0.00015675402,0.0000492735,0.00014005837,0.00092149124,0.0006111315,0.000097476484,0.0001599344,0.000005382038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143244915,0.000056028362,0.004460681,0.000022604167,0.000035638135,0.0000018295513,0.031529438,0.0000018748157,0.00006867967,0.9632099,0.00057435187,0.000024632573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016612539,0.00046481492,0.037315965,0.00031028833,0.0002709405,0.000019874444,0.5078085,0.00036091462,0.000134573,0.4364664,0.014416757,0.0007697207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012158093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013039587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52674353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003537096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011772043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99442005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913383528","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718004553","title":"The Mortality and Morality of Nations. By Uriel Abulof. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 384p. $95.00 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Content (measure theory); Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07027564017608051,"score_gpt":0.3945491957805861,"score_spread":0.3242735556045056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913383528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69924754,0.016950384,0.000053627868,0.034449726,0.00090202497,0.0020536075,0.0010619668,0.00014654838,0.2451346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266066,0.004621604,0.000044925728,0.0009917651,0.00020618484,0.000008532827,0.000011056816,0.000018359127,0.06749096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817455,0.00032814537,0.0003327485,0.0003142091,0.00027295164,0.00057738187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977148,0.0010318547,0.00022416313,0.0004707744,0.0002769439,0.00028146774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041414698,0.00016828904,0.00029656713,0.000043982443,0.0011213538,0.000009944428,0.00020124503,0.00013834031,0.000039015435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000354552,0.00013567254,0.00006092663,0.00014244334,0.00029578147,0.00008398301,0.0001290833,0.00045639658,0.000038712533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005981787,0.00011116604,0.051600475,0.0001777111,0.00010980075,7.447464e-7,0.01807062,9.980342e-7,0.000012122137,0.74025595,0.18954936,0.00005125196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078369735,0.00010714605,0.14126378,0.000051936568,0.000034474586,3.0082822e-7,0.050746072,0.00004667675,0.000025544201,0.00016660272,0.8066263,0.00014743589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023594694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014990517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74008936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032297277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066812715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940594362","doi":"10.1017/s1537592712000758","title":"Genocide and the Psychology of Perpetrators, Bystanders, and Victims","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Politics; Criminology; Psychology; Political violence; Narrative; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013268864438450597,"score_gpt":0.33228555517588626,"score_spread":0.31901669073743566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940594362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89197785,0.0050803903,0.00010854811,0.0053396877,0.00011751236,0.00015725262,0.000021127737,0.000021350945,0.09717627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964456,0.0024349808,0.00020133858,0.0006114666,0.00014607175,0.0000019746653,5.7360603e-7,0.00000530766,0.00015270885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914235,0.00017598133,0.00009773808,0.00011774576,0.00015925018,0.00030694925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.00019147049,0.000046656016,0.00011622902,0.000059108483,0.00012352501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045307385,0.000075302385,0.0001361349,0.00003624113,0.00027432884,0.000023546769,0.00008848073,0.00007450208,0.000016260865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020808121,0.00005609852,0.0000339109,0.000081319944,0.0015246075,0.00008497858,0.00002442382,0.00011730126,0.0000024420408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014632058,0.000028916618,0.0058155586,0.0000033522415,0.00001757791,2.2993362e-7,0.11988534,1.6064809e-7,0.000007809805,0.8739712,0.00018217044,0.00007300299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015707669,0.00013206607,0.07020265,0.00001633696,0.000079257086,0.000012016347,0.74879456,0.000042072075,0.0000122256115,0.13713364,0.041737787,0.00026661254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010454014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018077575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7368376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005663441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003359167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.561748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941007576","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719002391","title":"Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Voting; Politics; Popularity; Leverage (statistics); Political capital; Power (physics); Political science; Advertising; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.028416893064497843,"score_gpt":0.35019199696225783,"score_spread":0.32177510389776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941007576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8692204,0.0021986011,0.0000698452,0.03991951,0.00050463376,0.0019011219,0.000101885016,0.000027684695,0.08605634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99249494,0.0002218807,0.00006861777,0.002232337,0.0006758854,0.00006594973,0.0000011381441,0.0000119751285,0.0042272746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998228,0.00035322324,0.00025758252,0.0001969837,0.00040090643,0.00056329195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325716,0.006082549,0.00012316309,0.00027728916,0.00019332871,0.00006648639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014316272,0.00013217906,0.00020652486,0.0000898929,0.0008068253,0.00009945559,0.00041599077,0.00007294,0.00005259048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012665524,0.00007188039,0.00011001286,0.00029223872,0.0013202223,0.00010370498,0.000035005156,0.00035420933,0.000012990449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012710478,0.0000605114,0.00908607,0.000014834146,0.000024405583,2.0477616e-7,0.06606978,0.000020068874,0.0000034073244,0.92430675,0.00035182107,0.00004941393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018103366,0.00017307594,0.018367535,0.000107655724,0.00015981865,0.000004162626,0.7439893,0.00096551166,0.0001868444,0.16299014,0.07092243,0.00032322627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006713854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036375397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76131666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015770877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026682447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941044677","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710001349","title":"Democracy and Distrust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Democracy; Politics; Dissent; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Representative democracy; State (computer science); Political economy; Social capital; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.01160584238086693,"score_gpt":0.3277397816231907,"score_spread":0.31613393924232375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941044677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59459317,0.000022997856,0.000018659044,0.0029499999,0.00018893156,0.000050718518,0.000014429963,0.000049789476,0.4021113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609905,0.000040030078,0.00022814149,0.00057661626,0.00047760954,0.0000023210569,3.5464893e-7,0.000006012071,0.0025698731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991642,0.00007072762,0.00007497335,0.0001729484,0.00015007381,0.0003670374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919397,0.00030502147,0.000019774532,0.00014602675,0.000060972045,0.0002742366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022898687,0.00007298793,0.00007944213,0.000032921365,0.0006600104,0.0000674256,0.00013193526,0.00007094984,0.0002863525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014505174,0.00006862271,0.00002936134,0.00006831297,0.0013441258,0.00013891608,0.000024633848,0.00025128352,0.000075156735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002623908,0.000035317567,0.0009305932,0.0000015459298,0.0000034573661,0.0000017652648,0.009234279,6.363114e-8,0.0001753103,0.98928034,0.000061890845,0.0002728191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011130299,0.00004169047,0.014036552,0.0000057378907,0.0000073090564,0.000002728572,0.026785024,0.000007762642,0.00035750703,0.91669416,0.041800033,0.00015019802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003451159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004075689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40150586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046154342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007156208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5076333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945374827","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719000574","title":"Of Limits and Growth: The Rise of Global Sustainable Development in the Twentieth Century. By Stephen J. Macekura. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 333p. $38.43 cloth, $26.88 paper.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.006993508459058164,"score_gpt":0.20653870697880414,"score_spread":0.19954519851974598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945374827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588697,0.0013139937,0.000010204196,0.0014719638,0.00004662839,0.00068388507,0.000037530765,0.000017846452,0.03754825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871456,0.0005545497,0.00016351623,0.00015403416,0.000015268148,0.0000036055574,0.0000046816936,0.000017464543,0.011941302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813914,0.00014817467,0.00024998732,0.00037422756,0.0004718762,0.0006165978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925756,0.00010318384,0.00015393627,0.00033876207,0.000019622948,0.00012692243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030237154,0.00023830787,0.00023167038,0.00003437747,0.00016145289,0.000029729807,0.00052937196,0.000084044405,0.00029824587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045493933,0.00017699502,0.00005781785,0.0003146274,0.0004944792,0.00024184193,0.00033727929,0.00017661302,0.000021060912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035413133,0.0012450452,0.4591605,0.00023577415,0.00019069838,0.00003995011,0.05117387,0.00029423943,0.0004543109,0.36551523,0.120608054,0.0007281872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014297514,0.00018088397,0.6396085,0.000024790175,0.000039995768,0.000006548881,0.19847766,0.00003106562,0.0009722434,0.0005914999,0.15825939,0.00037767173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036981655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36492372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011714919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010242639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946032237","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719000161","title":"Deliberative Democracy Now: LGBT Equality and the Emergence of Large-Scale Deliberative Systems. By Edwina Barvosa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 308p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Scale (ratio); Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Physics; Law; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.023633639736037024,"score_gpt":0.29608826995953974,"score_spread":0.2724546302235027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946032237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48611474,0.011514682,0.006468328,0.012465378,0.0016046853,0.0034268682,0.001722709,0.00017430907,0.4765083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499928,0.0018000709,0.00017234623,0.00014729534,0.00025122223,0.0000038782823,0.000014577724,0.000018396182,0.04759942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970601,0.0009618473,0.0003224243,0.00049585185,0.00055887306,0.000600867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981902,0.0004889291,0.00026208442,0.00038482968,0.0003887742,0.00028513637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006582793,0.00022780773,0.00037755622,0.00006290567,0.0007528008,0.00010062772,0.0003502332,0.00014557819,0.00004651003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001566891,0.00018658729,0.00012766918,0.00021464296,0.0008404236,0.00028008057,0.000121250596,0.0002615358,0.000023062827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058790018,0.00013458803,0.0011269215,0.00003211102,0.0000977171,0.0000010150256,0.088316515,0.00006637952,0.0000640589,0.8668904,0.043196052,0.00001550799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032571598,0.00022839768,0.0060837185,0.00008288385,0.000183055,0.000003699595,0.9117812,0.0025240302,0.0010897345,0.006156691,0.067956686,0.0006527474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029055795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037913883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022789181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004077877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969321747","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719002305","title":"Politics with Beauvoir: Freedom in the Encounter. By Lori Jo Marso. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017. 272p. $94.95 cloth, $26.95 paper. - Emancipatory Thinking: Simone de Beauvoir and Contemporary Political Thought. By Elaine Stavro. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2018. 392p. $39.95 cloth.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Media studies; Art; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.013482991534220494,"score_gpt":0.2101981356274396,"score_spread":0.1967151440932191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969321747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46320534,0.019843817,0.00007262761,0.011907878,0.001072496,0.004122705,0.023331057,0.0011886101,0.47525546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710916,0.0034473455,0.00010035174,0.0016518835,0.00072691526,0.000010612663,0.00020594592,0.0001686337,0.022596654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947057,0.00071466644,0.0005772609,0.0012438644,0.00097198115,0.00178653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965268,0.00091809715,0.0003462948,0.0011819511,0.00038711567,0.0006397925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050775317,0.0009345572,0.00097400567,0.00017658542,0.0012384555,0.00032537445,0.0010233916,0.00041586978,0.00013956547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009927514,0.0008084926,0.00026769238,0.00015373756,0.0019869194,0.0010999161,0.00032564762,0.0012319045,0.000030195173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004765673,0.0009615093,0.002699015,0.00013059589,0.0002894813,0.00025604496,0.020758951,0.000023403418,0.000025597534,0.7535357,0.22083849,0.000004660717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003690129,0.0009290712,0.0023101822,0.00016931474,0.00022996897,0.000029862655,0.15904883,0.00032808157,0.000073409166,0.0024073941,0.82971716,0.001066606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053711277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011479097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7511283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013286696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036654584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969914360","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719001920","title":"Force and Contention in Contemporary China: Memory and Resistance in the Long Shadow of the Catastrophic Past. By Ralph A. ThaxtonJr. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 488p. $99.99 cloth, $39.99 paper.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Resistance (ecology); China; History; Art history; Economic history; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021523383755671394,"score_gpt":0.24357027201016143,"score_spread":0.22204688825449004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969914360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.876902,0.01075121,0.00000579337,0.004448538,0.00014469576,0.0006337505,0.00016858458,0.00001644516,0.10692903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961693,0.00033686083,0.000012570046,0.00016428494,0.00011280923,0.0000017801373,0.0000063806924,0.000009507056,0.009738896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985641,0.0004698566,0.00016973617,0.0003052048,0.00026416976,0.00022693051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992624,0.0001914275,0.00014204349,0.00028084638,0.000042377476,0.00008089574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004000391,0.00014926126,0.00022442451,0.000057847792,0.00028506777,0.000031910702,0.0003058262,0.000090311805,0.0000058641963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008457257,0.00011321618,0.000062276966,0.00016954738,0.0006826706,0.00027616372,0.000058780446,0.0002835767,0.00000124324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025769955,0.0001802068,0.029054118,0.00006782944,0.000026188765,0.000010482529,0.08264925,0.0000053171866,0.00018647713,0.8764474,0.011090669,0.000024386669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004808069,0.00030057717,0.811174,0.0005757634,0.00007044701,0.0000061213436,0.10911041,0.000031916683,0.000091595255,0.049420863,0.023695065,0.0007152011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018882537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033707977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022933965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019061814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982627803","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719003402","title":"Democracy versus Security as Standards of Political Legitimacy: The Case of National Policy on Irregular Migrant Arrivals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Normative; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Corporate governance; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02278781833099053,"score_gpt":0.3927881244990058,"score_spread":0.37000030616801527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982627803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6538714,0.0000959121,0.0000042733604,0.026589606,0.0002767599,0.00036118503,0.0010280787,0.00002643706,0.31774637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825084,0.000044123684,0.000025898564,0.0009220158,0.00054354256,0.000004303164,0.0000048702063,0.000011409523,0.00019300579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968664,0.0005658345,0.00032343905,0.0002846454,0.0012433972,0.00071628805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968812,0.0012904985,0.00015624867,0.00031185776,0.0010029279,0.00035727056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014549707,0.00016063335,0.00029665924,0.00017435732,0.00042266896,0.000045691595,0.00032980304,0.00014292415,0.00032841583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004284321,0.00013189667,0.00017896535,0.00041363423,0.0010419931,0.0001321538,0.000048759666,0.00030416914,0.000033822784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012062289,0.0002836258,0.00012618417,0.000029509985,0.000046635465,0.000014921859,0.0402607,0.000009445583,0.0000032616817,0.9583526,0.0006880458,0.000064435204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016919059,0.0011944426,0.001342974,0.000078359066,0.000025657715,0.000043078657,0.22391027,0.00009560716,0.00025349206,0.6965378,0.07453577,0.00029064913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065661795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010287585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34437945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001354732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042811953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94056004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999595175","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719004626","title":"Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Politics; Political science; Legislature; Elite; Compromise; Democracy; Law and economics; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Federalism; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04728064222518964,"score_gpt":0.35337209365556366,"score_spread":0.30609145143037403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999595175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5072437,0.0002575455,0.00018439532,0.12398953,0.0001485616,0.0004441018,0.00009765768,0.00013537079,0.36749914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863504,0.0000353754,0.00004574264,0.008213592,0.0013886685,0.000021225997,0.000002728814,0.000013859017,0.0039284155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749243,0.000564711,0.0003179198,0.0004128674,0.00047396717,0.0007381255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979603,0.0009204278,0.00011673929,0.00018181383,0.00028014908,0.0005405285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043885512,0.00015993984,0.00027638726,0.000028784709,0.00080023904,0.00022060137,0.00015234406,0.00010610148,0.00031196102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003948012,0.0001279986,0.00008759217,0.00037904983,0.0010096555,0.00020024435,0.000056165605,0.00028895878,0.000079064645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022535922,0.000034811696,0.001070721,0.00001185352,0.000035011326,0.0000076207752,0.023866737,6.690405e-7,0.000045014272,0.97334087,0.001542671,0.000021512875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045316713,0.0005538578,0.05191736,0.00017680404,0.00015226095,0.00010478709,0.17948557,0.0004980204,0.0016576252,0.19497328,0.5646039,0.0013448481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013945444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074780674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7783676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021229793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034769598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99262077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008428873","doi":"10.1017/s1537592719004444","title":"Immigration and the Politics of Welfare Exclusion: Selective Solidarity in Western Democracies. By Edward Anthony Koning. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2019. 307p. $67.50 cloth, $29.96 paper.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Immigration; Politics; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Social exclusion; Political economy; Religious studies; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00829083220835487,"score_gpt":0.2623299158718988,"score_spread":0.25403908366354394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008428873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70335966,0.03462415,0.0015299091,0.056483403,0.00068064785,0.003044556,0.0011812246,0.00034397867,0.19875246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988539,0.008346554,0.00012336903,0.00037491182,0.00036601388,0.000005130586,0.000026740918,0.000016398102,0.0022019201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997753,0.0006270118,0.00031335716,0.0004195519,0.00046798086,0.0004190501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987731,0.00023149804,0.00021081272,0.00020624524,0.00037845405,0.00019986964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003731046,0.00022453594,0.00034031703,0.00002145771,0.0009245473,0.00009467153,0.0002807211,0.00019671598,0.00010087932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004277232,0.00019416936,0.00010305348,0.00013071795,0.000783484,0.0009034716,0.00007567187,0.00023721409,0.0000020062228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017156824,0.00017162194,0.003192782,0.000027767244,0.000047761445,0.0000012888838,0.3052801,0.000010751198,0.00012627916,0.6844791,0.0062973197,0.0001936544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002419755,0.00061567867,0.021767447,0.00007851652,0.00013637722,0.0000025042377,0.66121393,0.0014013769,0.0010732776,0.0034182274,0.3072241,0.00064881344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14756921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12483006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012735865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025578734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8911395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033777831","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720000146","title":"Shaping the Metropolis: Institutions and Urbanization in the United States and Canada. By Zack Taylor. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019. 472p. $120.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Urbanization; Political science; Regional science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.021709998413604353,"score_gpt":0.2480400858535102,"score_spread":0.22633008743990585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033777831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237253,0.007629403,0.00017996499,0.19408701,0.00023223035,0.0011523291,0.0054532066,0.00022201157,0.06731851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991352,0.005335207,0.000014772871,0.0025293953,0.00008629436,0.0000015908291,0.000029689763,0.000007871417,0.00064313685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891806,0.00024697886,0.00009376425,0.00021962127,0.0002564188,0.00026518706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993201,0.0003032416,0.00007123802,0.00010698109,0.00008393763,0.00011451987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012568687,0.00010999749,0.00010671866,0.000024249339,0.0008937793,0.000072145696,0.00020377831,0.000049188337,0.000005999461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004137161,0.00008388044,0.0000150757805,0.0003036795,0.0004564427,0.00016471256,0.000037580237,0.00020296258,5.736834e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018103427,0.000043564978,0.0041829115,0.0000084164785,0.000034448138,0.000012517625,0.056831118,0.0002663848,0.0000036892084,0.76988417,0.16869393,0.000020759575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003057406,0.000046421115,0.016899506,0.00001861413,0.00003357665,0.0000010259652,0.2331847,0.00080004404,0.000007445452,0.0004062759,0.7481352,0.00016143029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9644324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30894735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7694779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047643326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001975491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7036626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083986913","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002091","title":"Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Openness to experience; Ideology; Corporate governance; Political economy; Political science; Conservatism; Populism; Democracy; Politics; Public opinion; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05145243570883068,"score_gpt":0.36005235486125886,"score_spread":0.3085999191524282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083986913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28747898,0.00013562407,0.00016543592,0.3099951,0.00047603875,0.0008129693,0.00026502478,0.00018936837,0.40048143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96507484,0.000060044506,0.00059202255,0.01197709,0.0009620046,0.00001306104,0.0000019431277,0.000018328086,0.021300647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854314,0.00010357869,0.00015803993,0.0003758877,0.00040434187,0.00041500933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991101,0.00005965328,0.00007908696,0.00014109092,0.0001546193,0.00045544328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014659856,0.00014347013,0.00021212647,0.000012507515,0.00082975265,0.00033071887,0.0007196673,0.0000943681,0.00018066903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006292134,0.00013619362,0.00007145934,0.00034752552,0.00020198063,0.00027778183,0.00017033952,0.00019883017,0.00031993573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011497354,0.000027029073,0.000924521,0.0000025999325,0.000014275699,0.0000032360754,0.3043317,0.0000060886464,0.000007988202,0.6911624,0.0033456269,0.00016303574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047814325,0.00040395343,0.028305879,0.00006775275,0.0000373506,8.7447194e-7,0.7261056,0.00019251635,0.000113577844,0.050020613,0.19356363,0.0007101612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004119306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014558947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67759585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037694408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001909281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63818705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110945770","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002832","title":"Merging Interests: When Domestic Firms Shape FDI Policy. By Sarah Bauerle Danzman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 308p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Foreign direct investment; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015023917556371915,"score_gpt":0.23870190619219567,"score_spread":0.22367798863582375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110945770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4793923,0.0038939915,0.0035042893,0.07522901,0.0017443263,0.0014785028,0.0014785876,0.0013409023,0.4319381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824282,0.00026212502,0.00011292114,0.004509408,0.0030732057,0.000005077693,0.00015078048,0.000086352695,0.009371957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977405,0.0000297328,0.00032422945,0.0007181606,0.00049386243,0.00069350796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998716,0.00011314051,0.00026667243,0.00034746277,0.00045346975,0.0001032284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011454295,0.00043382327,0.00039365276,0.00031378376,0.0003650881,0.00039513965,0.00071028114,0.000120872246,0.00014899079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044482667,0.0004482026,0.00018884896,0.0004279166,0.00023564578,0.0011061248,0.00042652647,0.00038668813,0.0004025614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011189672,0.00019610533,0.00086178095,0.00014858301,0.000115281815,0.000073210584,0.00050668133,0.00007392658,0.00021063571,0.7722784,0.22527772,0.0001457808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024802196,0.00011575656,0.016852716,0.00024780977,0.00022124479,0.000017020047,0.0078892205,0.028345706,0.00018832066,0.00093516946,0.9413155,0.001391359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010475559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012254176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77134323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046463386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104739425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111340396","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720002704","title":"Crippling Leviathan: How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State. By Melissa M. Lee. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020. 248p. $39.95 cloth.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; State (computer science); LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political science; Computer security; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.029781382908142896,"score_gpt":0.2613281017371312,"score_spread":0.23154671882898833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111340396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08870052,0.003430196,0.0028680074,0.037461545,0.0002736865,0.0010406796,0.0013770622,0.0003119913,0.8645363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98420984,0.0028525002,0.00008672789,0.00073558086,0.0005839008,0.000002349246,0.000019455005,0.000021009479,0.011488657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835885,0.00018258543,0.00013413369,0.0003741017,0.00047699586,0.0004733309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988114,0.00031343455,0.00013280036,0.00018778526,0.00029908432,0.00025546082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022712105,0.0001782598,0.00016460147,0.000028012915,0.00094813807,0.00015410445,0.00047057113,0.000109372995,0.00015200241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043278743,0.0001572445,0.00014592557,0.00025193812,0.000512518,0.00029870332,0.000092110204,0.0003484679,0.00006161038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003162431,0.000059382328,0.00028233652,0.000005700177,0.000049268212,0.000006966143,0.02119197,0.00015381548,0.00003288056,0.92647827,0.051679052,0.000028734616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009764995,0.0003129623,0.0012508524,0.000036174737,0.0001051879,0.0000028201125,0.30195397,0.0055779195,0.00039937044,0.076656856,0.6121376,0.0005897798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002257301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003492519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005332871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016827283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133902933","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720003862","title":"Participation Without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. By Garry Rodan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018. 300p. $115.00 cloth, $32.95 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03684640036767413,"score_gpt":0.3042481006287189,"score_spread":0.26740170026104476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133902933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3716123,0.004337038,0.0002885945,0.009176299,0.00044076476,0.00079520146,0.0005296472,0.00038549848,0.6124346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942074,0.0005147782,0.00011828369,0.00024819243,0.00042547757,0.00001102009,0.000016094416,0.000040834577,0.004417933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627167,0.0008786952,0.00035646916,0.0007325453,0.00056152086,0.0011991292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804354,0.0006040062,0.00016048992,0.0003626211,0.00036310242,0.00046622052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046489268,0.000322619,0.0005072009,0.000058140253,0.0009410514,0.00012329743,0.00030812796,0.0002513347,0.00025269153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015024683,0.00036515985,0.00016264807,0.000359278,0.0013957918,0.00029830303,0.00012738677,0.0005008165,0.00009395331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008967442,0.00043917872,0.050970726,0.000017547827,0.00011853096,0.00004994769,0.10202549,0.000018408653,0.000036421432,0.8439668,0.002185153,0.000082163206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013143149,0.00012458628,0.042964507,0.00007806145,0.000093717215,0.000002203052,0.90450954,0.0001180474,0.00013383938,0.006722646,0.043408617,0.00052989245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005067373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007945499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8372441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013327543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044186116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135302181","doi":"10.1017/s1537592720004521","title":"The New Twenty Years’ Crisis: A Critique of International Relations, 1999–2019. By Philip Cunliffe. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2020. 168p. $91.33 cloth, $21.27 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Sociology; History; Biology","score_opus":0.009050593770760703,"score_gpt":0.2834923954472745,"score_spread":0.2744418016765138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135302181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031492426,0.005501441,0.0001545685,0.32421097,0.00100725,0.0004892724,0.0021781772,0.00018656864,0.66312253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76573706,0.03918875,0.0002858978,0.0010164272,0.0007490515,0.000003949044,0.00001962779,0.000026726759,0.19297251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982901,0.0003250843,0.0002127175,0.0003358458,0.0004498289,0.00038639622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986677,0.00048640586,0.00013447988,0.000276664,0.00025228967,0.00018243935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018745233,0.00014730287,0.00019725901,0.000033021417,0.0008505556,0.00004525933,0.00036260494,0.00011515674,0.000210681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008041147,0.0001341451,0.00015549976,0.00018445613,0.0005669118,0.00019660608,0.00014769187,0.00024274747,0.00003614395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132303485,0.00009271226,0.00032212446,0.000002508212,0.000111931135,0.0000069054877,0.012108767,0.0000032352777,0.000004439025,0.4999188,0.4873358,0.00007954048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032083588,0.000026147498,0.009394826,0.000023573713,0.000055016604,0.0000013792165,0.12999967,0.000006586986,0.00006125161,0.013311079,0.84665287,0.0001467835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046762165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090917933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7625878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050360285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033334945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95958555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164612247","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721000876","title":"Just Property, Volume Three: Property in an Age of Ideologies. By Christopher Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 344p. $85.00 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Ideology; Content (measure theory); Volume (thermodynamics); Media studies; Economic history; Gerontology; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Law; Medicine; Politics; Physics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027359632239261033,"score_gpt":0.275448121176771,"score_spread":0.24808848893750995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164612247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2372033,0.0066937185,0.00008208334,0.013045917,0.00056785357,0.0012247538,0.0005121293,0.00032799013,0.74034226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8036504,0.009269362,0.00078663847,0.00046640512,0.00043213172,0.000011417702,0.000059454826,0.000038246828,0.18528597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977849,0.0003456865,0.00021703292,0.0005546249,0.00047287825,0.000624838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988874,0.000052387033,0.00011723951,0.00038594613,0.00035616514,0.00020086403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002750606,0.00022317526,0.00034710433,0.000011069024,0.00050457683,0.000074279786,0.0005431397,0.0003296539,0.00041639386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027993676,0.0001607292,0.00016374377,0.00041729293,0.0016513907,0.0004078415,0.00014583283,0.00045150588,0.0000046685896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017816768,0.0027039757,0.036764417,0.00024288717,0.00022362419,0.0003236563,0.31992546,0.000090304675,0.0009240679,0.48750052,0.15028189,0.0008410372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050537346,0.00014948088,0.0033075379,0.000040746105,0.000030962794,0.0000016241102,0.29398793,0.000059749604,0.00019190775,0.0014659473,0.6999615,0.00029726987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006281576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049267337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007590426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050520746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200101919","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721002978","title":"Uncivil Mirth: Ridicule in Enlightenment Britain. By Ross Carroll. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021. 280p. $35.00 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Media studies; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011206935664499566,"score_gpt":0.24931469251699967,"score_spread":0.2381077568525001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200101919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44287407,0.025323914,0.000038735277,0.007986028,0.00072225,0.00057927496,0.0004903172,0.00016160004,0.5218238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89698887,0.011399574,0.00022326113,0.0002802514,0.0005405672,0.000009477951,0.000018629553,0.000022652042,0.090516716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974263,0.0003889074,0.00022944853,0.0006159291,0.0006138078,0.0007256169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890774,0.00020205483,0.00008410634,0.00029435186,0.00023323094,0.00027849316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026354834,0.00022458693,0.00034526535,0.00006770119,0.00072576944,0.00006747825,0.00031053994,0.00013751595,0.00016036381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002866163,0.00023780038,0.00013760915,0.00042366318,0.0005190277,0.00022585482,0.00015934258,0.0003146549,0.000028850856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060892784,0.0014893287,0.008494227,0.00004112955,0.00014559922,0.00039126567,0.17498468,0.000020274569,0.00015105371,0.7723483,0.041174497,0.00069875433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005029733,0.00009069626,0.0028565084,0.000044908684,0.000018507144,0.0000011200776,0.05040796,0.000010238686,0.0003209369,0.000565613,0.9448934,0.00028713228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083460165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001515628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028455097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044287372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200129279","doi":"10.1017/s153759272100267x","title":"Policing Citizens: Minority Policy in Israel. By Guy Ben-Porat and Fany Yuval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper. - Reconstructing the Civic: Palestinian Activism in Israel. By Amal Jamal. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2020. 316p. $95.00 cloth, $32.95 paper. - The Sword Is Not Enough: Arabs, Israelis, and the Limits of Military Force. By Jeremy Pressman. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020. 296p. $36.95 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.015183140757536979,"score_gpt":0.24540363433945767,"score_spread":0.23022049358192068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200129279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78306544,0.17833005,0.000008607904,0.014059105,0.00033460796,0.0019630713,0.0034059975,0.00011337891,0.018719753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7784805,0.21081807,0.00007945351,0.001688379,0.0007994284,0.000025471309,0.00007058081,0.000089970614,0.007948107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245775,0.002130212,0.00089844223,0.0016953225,0.0009841212,0.0018341843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531484,0.0019653102,0.00068991166,0.0011303425,0.00045013663,0.00044944408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012150136,0.0009802245,0.001268814,0.00007699919,0.0017094644,0.00026802247,0.0012582064,0.0005412464,0.000011313616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084228,0.00081816054,0.0003363114,0.0007021163,0.004213566,0.001255577,0.0009797132,0.0015168594,0.0000035531652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030325863,0.0018446236,0.18517977,0.0012571431,0.0020732721,0.00029951727,0.10855638,0.000038324935,0.0023998553,0.20801015,0.47972333,0.00758505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01005703,0.00042970854,0.11752162,0.00087124645,0.00081353006,0.000119753284,0.56675744,0.0003223681,0.0025313906,0.00053192495,0.29754698,0.002496998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21689123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011610479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45820105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008601856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005888472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200414843","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721002309","title":"Good Enough for Government Work: The Public Reputation Crisis in America (And What We Can Do to Fix It). By Amy E. Lerman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. 304p. $82.50 cloth, $27.50 paper.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hendrix Genetics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.019126091932960863,"score_gpt":0.2391829576109721,"score_spread":0.22005686567801125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200414843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45387346,0.010794272,0.00077946234,0.47563002,0.00066813926,0.0019122649,0.0007027272,0.00018001808,0.05545966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074465,0.003166335,0.00015997908,0.004690968,0.00023366827,0.000012700245,0.000034864508,0.000024019275,0.000932826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984019,0.000042931188,0.00024780413,0.00045357106,0.00034534303,0.00050844613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.0001719891,0.00017951705,0.00034029674,0.00022041504,0.00005874574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012491949,0.0002165926,0.0002733922,0.000060859944,0.00022670306,0.0005791515,0.00025751884,0.000081045255,0.0000860384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015590827,0.00019620422,0.00009179814,0.00035829167,0.00024318845,0.0012081815,0.00017596499,0.00018984756,0.000014989984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012031022,0.0004873923,0.00060550834,0.00015185327,0.0001274636,0.000012098291,0.0052331514,0.00010480676,0.00033272046,0.94127333,0.049285192,0.0022661649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007672058,0.00009114382,0.0087993285,0.00017725356,0.000113486916,0.000001961801,0.29752752,0.00012169531,0.0003216895,0.026496712,0.6651346,0.0004473711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019418332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023631164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019019152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008645874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8000975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205983442","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705320494","title":"Just Work","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Identity (music); Constitution; Politics; Sociology; Hegelianism; Work (physics); Maturity (psychological); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03336930429010505,"score_gpt":0.3367301079165405,"score_spread":0.30336080362643547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205983442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06749139,0.0001602714,0.00007093918,0.023256695,0.00016024822,0.00009243071,0.00000903587,0.00012085765,0.9086381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751929,0.00007596051,0.0004739719,0.002709073,0.0019035079,0.000007017063,6.6579224e-7,0.000009162499,0.019627728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989051,0.000073861134,0.00010964718,0.00019625631,0.000158254,0.0005568403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.00020091159,0.000025111562,0.00016003821,0.00005686307,0.0002870052],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019086024,0.000087535365,0.00010644307,0.000058576883,0.00038659494,0.000056582187,0.00017207801,0.00008075003,0.00081604166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039516084,0.00009049421,0.000070215414,0.00011617898,0.00046555646,0.00013415763,0.00002177603,0.00015384897,0.0009956661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029457021,0.00008773387,0.00014324715,9.1548634e-7,0.000007734344,0.0000011207677,0.02169397,0.000003819332,4.794075e-7,0.9743356,0.0022899595,0.001432482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016712815,0.000032420503,0.0020403168,0.00000950018,0.000010055801,4.585048e-7,0.048083562,0.0000069445555,0.000054257533,0.03382368,0.91559243,0.00017923134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037944524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009428545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94051194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045319865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013205045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206977528","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721003029","title":"PPS volume 19 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.021192533642591962,"score_gpt":0.2189267828919214,"score_spread":0.19773424924932945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206977528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039502453,0.0043300474,0.00011452324,0.0027025419,0.0010634211,0.000072744406,0.00077392993,0.000023210112,0.95141715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25347555,0.00040216293,0.00031204708,0.0016400333,0.00021376714,0.0000051925235,0.000005797103,0.000014333227,0.7439311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989381,0.000008700892,0.0002248739,0.0005033302,0.000025960642,0.00029902416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946207,0.000034755863,0.00008164448,0.0002721676,0.000038260692,0.00011109613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000122013895,0.00012607299,0.00027628796,0.00009529027,0.00015076829,0.000120463774,0.00008703224,0.000050048064,0.058667414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102174694,0.00014974657,0.00007421053,0.00005335476,0.00017138118,0.00011702425,0.00010147402,0.00009068042,0.13435559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000481318,0.00010758652,0.0223749,0.000017675893,0.00010659477,0.0000109172,0.008419973,0.00002446418,0.0000014798901,0.3651303,0.6037744,0.000026890088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003501756,0.000024370163,0.017993547,0.0000063985035,0.000007910117,0.0000065126696,0.013568417,0.00028202144,0.000024007855,0.00970484,0.9577998,0.00023198892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014759823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018125456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35542545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018396133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018806073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9421931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220928813","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721003790","title":"All Politics Are God’s Politics: Moroccan Islamism and the Sacralization of Democracy. By Ahmed Khanani. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2021. 230p. $120.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Content (measure theory); Religious studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010824277640327671,"score_gpt":0.24103042207690378,"score_spread":0.2302061444365761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220928813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094679885,0.02520897,0.00036977138,0.08911548,0.0019473985,0.0022976263,0.0017655551,0.0003230725,0.7842922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487242,0.00909365,0.000105613755,0.001629045,0.00066084386,0.0000042935735,0.000025614409,0.000046489018,0.039710216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970511,0.00062592217,0.00031371258,0.00048088742,0.0007079514,0.0008204024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983403,0.00047049084,0.0003339331,0.00039243553,0.00023309987,0.00022972006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040530047,0.0002748105,0.0004408293,0.0001000255,0.0024194184,0.00005478717,0.00052044366,0.00011474076,0.00035350604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036371007,0.00027574535,0.00017813325,0.00026483223,0.0019209567,0.00016657182,0.00025187287,0.00037519573,0.0000033299457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036134963,0.00013007429,0.0004508631,0.000018522378,0.00012956581,0.0000067673,0.081666194,0.000039108145,0.000024820729,0.8477073,0.06975578,0.00003489109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001962379,0.00015298522,0.0013037027,0.000026425056,0.0002372454,0.000003831984,0.34983543,0.00018396422,0.00007575892,0.022142442,0.62361,0.00046584217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118789494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008788807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8540443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020064842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001037892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236509450","doi":"10.1017/s1537592716004072","title":"PPS volume 15 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; York University; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; International Atomic Energy Agency; George Washington University; Australian Government; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; City University of New York; University of Southern California; Yale University; U.S. Department of Homeland Security","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012983426494799378,"score_gpt":0.25599809175217925,"score_spread":0.24301466525737986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236509450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6330241,0.00009361836,0.000031563384,0.0049893796,0.0001083054,0.00014625717,0.000026550548,0.000019109482,0.3615611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85696155,0.000091961374,0.00023879543,0.0011765098,0.00011170825,0.000010118249,0.0000025630948,0.000014636438,0.14139216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990935,0.000014601794,0.00008675562,0.00028769928,0.00017045763,0.00034702194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994269,0.000016628393,0.000049954237,0.00037159576,0.000012271552,0.00012264456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007668401,0.00012438404,0.00011664759,0.000022664599,0.00043173478,0.0001355897,0.00018145183,0.000045175224,0.025985708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005318792,0.00011373313,0.000026640964,0.000012227727,0.0003007544,0.00016388364,0.00026295963,0.00008589974,0.014800278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039370643,0.00035269404,0.5855473,0.000053147956,0.00005355878,0.00012995639,0.06017058,0.000031937132,0.00020530247,0.0042362665,0.34766445,0.0015154069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029047465,0.00006292781,0.7170955,0.000011958546,0.000010646006,0.000008254207,0.015719546,0.0001600629,0.0001774118,0.0017029187,0.26451054,0.0002497544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072876055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016091597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22393742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003913819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008249837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240359696","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715001188","title":"PPS volume 13 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Mathematics; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Mathematical analysis; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.016233764859657093,"score_gpt":0.24608080842542104,"score_spread":0.22984704356576396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240359696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6744514,0.0001864252,0.00006351399,0.0034390818,0.0001075755,0.00015702353,0.000020870957,0.000030168492,0.32154396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85907584,0.000055118508,0.0003787421,0.0022133181,0.00012666408,0.000013080473,0.000005518219,0.000018666518,0.13811304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905324,0.000024469193,0.0000955119,0.00026538468,0.00021931049,0.00034206652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995564,0.000018035555,0.000024914794,0.00016847622,0.00001986425,0.0002122627],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010079774,0.00012295299,0.00011301571,0.00003137036,0.00007884213,0.000043409163,0.00008761287,0.000043701428,0.012691603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040863193,0.000111635156,0.00002081401,0.00004573425,0.00016235244,0.000107777545,0.00015012443,0.000080728976,0.01925975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041770272,0.00032663145,0.22214772,0.000027905497,0.000033085027,0.00008155882,0.116398685,0.00016943214,0.00005663277,0.0020894615,0.658087,0.00054010714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069381297,0.00019946168,0.2064139,0.000013394789,0.000017461518,0.000023237195,0.1095333,0.0005343264,0.0001828795,0.0039517204,0.6779862,0.0004503292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006788866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011595412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18462446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070355705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015765863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244404172","doi":"10.1017/s153759271500314x","title":"PPS volume 13 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Meteorology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01637738156858993,"score_gpt":0.24651200305319731,"score_spread":0.2301346214846074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244404172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.674376,0.00018762126,0.00006410806,0.0034404134,0.0001067758,0.00015754729,0.000020708781,0.00003028539,0.32161653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86414987,0.000054961954,0.00037811373,0.002209662,0.00012491611,0.000013044409,0.000005506046,0.000018608447,0.1330453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990532,0.00002446569,0.000095549476,0.00026541395,0.00021929546,0.00034210927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995567,0.000018073755,0.000024919487,0.00016857445,0.000019459667,0.00021227545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000100886595,0.00012296237,0.000113045004,0.000031386382,0.000078885205,0.00004343452,0.000087683635,0.000043705488,0.012461505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004023653,0.00011165844,0.00002081578,0.000045727833,0.00016238446,0.00010779484,0.00015018726,0.000080726226,0.01883667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042496806,0.0003287411,0.22397633,0.000027828848,0.000033280947,0.00008235345,0.11721041,0.00016782463,0.00005600945,0.0021859596,0.6553459,0.0005428313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007064341,0.00020779627,0.21211642,0.000013733895,0.00001800434,0.000024034129,0.11237266,0.0005485022,0.00018280423,0.0040861666,0.6692628,0.00046063255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067227747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011647641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18977386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007005879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001570101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245770698","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710000599","title":"PPS volume 8 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.021512016791382017,"score_gpt":0.22885569000052658,"score_spread":0.20734367320914457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245770698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013163637,0.0043424154,0.00003109714,0.001023093,0.006970227,0.00021542606,0.0060955225,0.000011840685,0.979994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004034127,0.0018524249,0.00018957366,0.0011140384,0.001237478,0.000014638146,0.00005710331,0.00006182384,0.9914388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784863,0.000011416318,0.00047957,0.001034258,0.000043618486,0.0005824814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998794,0.000055665874,0.0003420136,0.00057915936,0.000056674846,0.00017244552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018245207,0.0003979854,0.0007925331,0.00033809108,0.00020946727,0.00027049397,0.00030209345,0.00037599716,0.59384805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049379698,0.00046056326,0.00017815486,0.00008462606,0.000522082,0.00014727446,0.00020082871,0.00055035297,0.94369316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052489363,0.00006691814,0.00046847606,0.00005203444,0.00013683291,0.0000010251509,0.0024053194,0.0000056407794,3.8588803e-7,0.030574998,0.96627325,0.000009890436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031302214,0.000045247732,0.0007276837,0.000023598266,0.00001447521,0.0000036915258,0.0021487488,0.00006222798,0.00000482326,0.000924161,0.99521255,0.0005197615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000306468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012464205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34984514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024984602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031285446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253663531","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705050279","title":"Counterpoint","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Section (typography); Style (visual arts); Publication; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.03046351387453963,"score_gpt":0.2275458090015227,"score_spread":0.19708229512698305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253663531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029248357,0.001080563,0.00016214351,0.0015497035,0.0006510786,0.000071598384,0.00034757878,0.00005233954,0.96683663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87667906,0.00014811613,0.0004723329,0.0007811573,0.00036529856,0.000006195654,0.0000017400074,0.000012088981,0.12153401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990759,0.0000036265437,0.00024150143,0.00035907127,0.000024428833,0.00029548537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.0000281057,0.00009169888,0.0002491229,0.00002493872,0.00007448716],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017334784,0.00010731575,0.00020407765,0.00013978538,0.00012274257,0.00006183287,0.00014483304,0.000034446057,0.0086985845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007354068,0.00012196706,0.0000914412,0.00006434109,0.00013597526,0.00013013305,0.000043473807,0.00008089161,0.04399233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027316669,0.00008292103,0.0005189343,0.0000018773442,0.000031893935,6.283705e-7,0.0045209303,0.00003879088,6.3501614e-7,0.92558473,0.069170415,0.000045513814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044921512,0.000059051854,0.0022276742,0.00000662456,0.000004148268,0.0000026346918,0.018506838,0.0011035347,0.000046967678,0.027106311,0.9502026,0.00028440804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004811822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022752224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032215271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008743733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256273261","doi":"10.1017/s1537592716000013","title":"PPS volume 14 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.008490782548254019,"score_gpt":0.2288752356387661,"score_spread":0.22038445309051208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256273261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74478835,0.00013742124,0.0002358439,0.010740747,0.00012123595,0.00020098613,0.00005042021,0.00004119073,0.24368379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7821615,0.00014953794,0.00021759704,0.0015814303,0.00009746953,0.000012619151,0.0000014741896,0.000016502832,0.21576191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990539,0.000021524436,0.00009596036,0.00028970858,0.00017405667,0.00036486372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996201,0.000039747876,0.000025536661,0.00017809271,0.000013212132,0.00012330634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006952493,0.00012258795,0.000106021085,0.000030563744,0.00009935284,0.000027013495,0.00008648889,0.00004336917,0.044687144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003623713,0.00008537186,0.000025111667,0.000033464752,0.0002041557,0.00011117968,0.0001342187,0.000049191065,0.023471506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000635725,0.00044911896,0.34240848,0.00004850267,0.00006438609,0.00010217365,0.054226648,0.000012466915,0.0015593837,0.007149238,0.5889409,0.004975098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005912851,0.00012783446,0.32685438,0.000029146204,0.000012974732,0.000014386445,0.015019879,0.00003515867,0.00072747876,0.0032565843,0.6529419,0.00038901687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015926397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054143907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064000934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059693307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000791599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97728884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256596304","doi":"10.1017/s1537592715003163","title":"PPS volume 14 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Climate Change and Sustainable Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Harvard University; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; City University of New York; York University; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.008830143202025327,"score_gpt":0.22942273487088383,"score_spread":0.2205925916688585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256596304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.749394,0.00013532468,0.00024191191,0.010820833,0.0001206947,0.00020174526,0.000051763287,0.00004127726,0.23899247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78353,0.00014487331,0.00022214814,0.0015759445,0.000095599025,0.000012843266,0.0000014624231,0.000016471577,0.21440066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990535,0.000021532363,0.00009591368,0.00028994452,0.00017410396,0.00036500974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996191,0.000040366864,0.000025497879,0.00017846438,0.000013244084,0.00012332575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000069939364,0.00012263028,0.00010599291,0.000030585485,0.000099344936,0.000026949985,0.00008654118,0.0000433689,0.045577146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036718033,0.000085402164,0.000025116942,0.00003349302,0.00020415877,0.00011109703,0.0001342392,0.00004920336,0.023739917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006259743,0.0004397726,0.34664926,0.000047013695,0.000063023224,0.000097122764,0.053030886,0.000012139792,0.0015859121,0.006866784,0.58641917,0.004726316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059522054,0.00012961857,0.33666235,0.000029959474,0.000013210141,0.000014554824,0.015402021,0.000035916433,0.0007427799,0.0032743686,0.6427046,0.00039541902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015753986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053798126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056285426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059674756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007954416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281848607","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722000482","title":"Revealing Schemes: The Politics of Conspiracy in Russia and the Post-Soviet Region. By Scott Radnitz. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 264p. $99.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Media studies; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024093205731615264,"score_gpt":0.27319441145777407,"score_spread":0.2491012057261588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281848607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38980883,0.01919093,0.00011295092,0.08270983,0.00042215525,0.0020314353,0.00059562956,0.0001237164,0.5050045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98343235,0.0042796927,0.00008873505,0.0024704633,0.00017414424,0.0000018469551,0.000009835269,0.000014635119,0.009528284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787307,0.0006198392,0.00029019985,0.00020960197,0.0005184275,0.0004888441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984661,0.0006262595,0.00024409613,0.00033589304,0.00012291565,0.00020474878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007708249,0.00016020976,0.00024467014,0.000082181294,0.0013418123,0.00009859481,0.00047914253,0.0000742684,0.00027782834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089915446,0.00012144614,0.00009416383,0.00037538545,0.0011807772,0.00031658355,0.00015337269,0.00044679354,0.0000020136185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006354152,0.000063075204,0.00019966015,0.000010470877,0.000026812577,0.0000019846325,0.14312375,0.000025508567,0.0000046602713,0.8272418,0.02907964,0.00015909631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011522991,0.00007998722,0.00044772692,0.000025771333,0.000026205958,0.0000045083716,0.5227288,0.00010886074,0.000023804316,0.0031781301,0.47208264,0.00014128175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012444887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012689839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82406366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037671084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075883284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282033905","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722000196","title":"The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation. By André Blais and Jean-François Daoust. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020. 156p. $34.95 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.025270651157026723,"score_gpt":0.2826865342509501,"score_spread":0.2574158830939234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282033905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6422138,0.14022793,0.0006716007,0.0423643,0.00534221,0.0036856683,0.00088543724,0.0008789406,0.16373007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805016,0.0027531718,0.00004997381,0.00045284635,0.00055833627,0.00014932883,0.0000059513513,0.0000202533,0.007959992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980605,0.00028719768,0.00019726076,0.0003214858,0.0005750809,0.0005584702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987823,0.0006586358,0.00009246216,0.00015115771,0.00014165083,0.00017381467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041597267,0.0001517666,0.00017359825,0.000023104847,0.0039668316,0.00015284572,0.00021689068,0.00004847151,0.000040138286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012613916,0.00013924384,0.0000565573,0.00029332284,0.00039885868,0.0001364541,0.00011911748,0.00023155974,0.0000030481938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040333733,0.00017775678,0.0031064502,0.0000065328104,0.000085302105,0.0000033316524,0.1747479,0.00013289173,0.000043078104,0.30060467,0.5199364,0.0011153856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040012566,0.00034068164,0.0035620544,0.000008682395,0.000029794015,2.4080367e-7,0.19387901,0.00024729254,0.0000664353,0.004937431,0.79621935,0.0003089161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015509619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013651344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3458363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088586845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009625817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293835078","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722001530","title":"Undermining American Hegemony: Goods Substitution in World Politics. Edited by Morten Skumsrud Andersen, Alexander Cooley, and Daniel H. Nexon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 235p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Politics; Economic history; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01795722615849247,"score_gpt":0.2886816626608211,"score_spread":0.27072443650232864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293835078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20398083,0.0010002927,0.00056518207,0.00405766,0.0003220201,0.0005546244,0.0009962111,0.00011854307,0.78840464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95337725,0.00060435745,0.00008578746,0.0003841742,0.00045105786,0.0000093749495,0.00007495678,0.000024118752,0.044988915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976846,0.0003280019,0.00024911654,0.0004847185,0.00058821676,0.00066534773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989469,0.00026293503,0.00017439883,0.00021410974,0.00014457462,0.0002570715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030422013,0.00022112628,0.00026311757,0.00043374792,0.0011922492,0.0001044745,0.00027350275,0.000069251066,0.000060406335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017170997,0.00027158434,0.000084546155,0.0007122137,0.0010537991,0.0002960865,0.0001495364,0.00048647745,0.0000044686435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024789393,0.00020604618,0.0037277213,0.000005201243,0.000053731746,0.000029613973,0.00391216,0.00015616708,0.000013969622,0.9658471,0.025964221,0.00005928132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020886245,0.00034208375,0.037095226,0.000050808358,0.00011887342,0.000022410433,0.21699932,0.0049863015,0.00006049219,0.0025580658,0.73471355,0.00096424436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028834455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000731463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021855664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004240702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155308","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002663","title":"What Happened to Civility: The Promise and Failure of Montaigne’s Modern Project. By Ann Hartle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2022. 190p. $100.00 cloth, $30.00 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01385531718372544,"score_gpt":0.2176103678733732,"score_spread":0.20375505068964778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314124,0.036250103,0.000025016452,0.016278805,0.000620958,0.0033943455,0.007273316,0.00015357469,0.104591526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839586,0.000363751,0.000040163548,0.0005300867,0.00013094224,0.000027074506,0.000049939666,0.000030068008,0.0148693975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982221,0.00019925355,0.0002760674,0.0004941683,0.00040150818,0.0004068637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989421,0.00012934368,0.00012538728,0.00049805624,0.00020658597,0.00009857555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016775756,0.00026369802,0.0003909888,0.00012435782,0.0004426146,0.00016800367,0.00037915583,0.00006722667,0.00086182624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004211679,0.00023166955,0.00011105819,0.00010763927,0.0005435049,0.000499322,0.00024747726,0.00041638076,0.0000028413956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022570652,0.00090647023,0.00018785986,0.00019626757,0.00012585355,0.000029105167,0.5610997,0.000051030427,0.00060589676,0.3737637,0.062482685,0.0003256909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010701903,0.0007809099,0.00039808787,0.00014369788,0.000080567996,0.000005784572,0.46075943,0.00041093555,0.00034989754,0.0074478528,0.52815866,0.0003939855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004706162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023839606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46567598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016555616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013820486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155325","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002705","title":"Citizenship in Hard Times: How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat. By Sara Wallace Goodman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.042449408465253864,"score_gpt":0.2882642408829057,"score_spread":0.24581483241765184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24964869,0.0034259525,0.000087402084,0.18198386,0.00065058266,0.0014288393,0.0016122017,0.0003982945,0.5607642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8451262,0.00039869285,0.00022051553,0.0024656293,0.00059241604,0.000016821894,0.000030633557,0.000052110652,0.15109698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949363,0.0013943962,0.00028198853,0.0008853487,0.0010784193,0.0014235358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969385,0.0012731979,0.0001168905,0.0006013226,0.00014329232,0.00092675135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091946893,0.00038644613,0.00051319145,0.00025621825,0.001633071,0.00015963004,0.00094038766,0.0002596825,0.00031935264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00133182,0.00046100497,0.00020427622,0.0009780496,0.0004926786,0.00028846355,0.0003936231,0.0012611483,0.000059423524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019967259,0.00022580322,0.00032406213,0.000020822448,0.00004991117,0.00006211671,0.028517012,0.000040570863,0.00006871558,0.69786197,0.27260274,0.00002659856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030265427,0.0019686588,0.009452043,0.0001500129,0.00024400112,0.000025207706,0.32759273,0.00019150254,0.00023897785,0.27705598,0.37779793,0.002256431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015745165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008214866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5954775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034195308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011417851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002560","title":"Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. By Rochelle DuFord. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Media studies; Economic history; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025632758150779363,"score_gpt":0.2963620235976352,"score_spread":0.2707292654468558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052729785,0.0024593014,0.0002829617,0.007834108,0.00037148935,0.00076894154,0.0024123813,0.00020211213,0.93293893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813404,0.00048474735,0.000046798643,0.0009923615,0.00021465283,0.000013994235,0.000028204493,0.000026774065,0.020058412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960196,0.0011419954,0.00028596376,0.00049575174,0.0009967954,0.0010599017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790376,0.0008935147,0.00011409215,0.0003657329,0.00022018762,0.00050272985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013795472,0.0002525844,0.0003467689,0.00015156326,0.0015977257,0.00007680091,0.0006441962,0.00019107934,0.00043610475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011170183,0.00029949084,0.00013384814,0.00048070002,0.0012526467,0.00028039186,0.00027365904,0.0011879283,0.000018543076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013728064,0.0004109444,0.00021490215,0.000017974296,0.000038618185,0.00003061477,0.045283034,0.00005335491,0.0000090401645,0.94596875,0.0078088576,0.00002664274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007770536,0.00021202116,0.00008835955,0.000011870226,0.000029726685,0.0000016997268,0.258345,0.00020130552,0.000033310414,0.44180626,0.2981334,0.0003599854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091236485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052295096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92540425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029495405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001161177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156100","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003152","title":"Women, Power, and Property: The Paradox of Gender Equality Laws in India. By Rachel Brulé. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 394p. $120.00 cloth, $32.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.027124057727788205,"score_gpt":0.2708318733335281,"score_spread":0.2437078156057399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5741744,0.017999666,0.000010760658,0.012001027,0.0004260448,0.0012792549,0.0010686994,0.0001346127,0.39290553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639333,0.0025825338,0.000032150412,0.0010669058,0.00013779031,0.000011022959,0.0000074432155,0.000014632355,0.032214258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751717,0.0008007305,0.00018741016,0.00038684948,0.00055976876,0.00054808543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913746,0.00019018482,0.00013339656,0.00027314684,0.00006893253,0.0001969027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007791419,0.00016824991,0.00024695077,0.000009254688,0.000997057,0.000053473694,0.00046396593,0.00012549841,0.00025659284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013425588,0.0001266362,0.00009812876,0.0003824024,0.0008459196,0.00017284522,0.00019677123,0.0005251862,0.00000239513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005891063,0.0003193826,0.0013239211,0.000015533371,0.000066600005,0.000005228513,0.32918325,0.000008107759,0.00005501189,0.56105447,0.10784395,0.0000656505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045878824,0.000082521154,0.0046236096,0.000004681903,0.000014826213,0.000001391536,0.52409416,0.000003987239,0.000023947869,0.0011991318,0.4693293,0.00016366754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01017651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009282281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55985534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094028556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045041228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156206","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002584","title":"Normalizing Corruption: Failures of Accountability in Ukraine. By Erik S. Herron. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020. 240p. $75.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Content (measure theory); Language change; Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Art; Literature; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01702599529401734,"score_gpt":0.2697767837591898,"score_spread":0.25275078846517246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95506454,0.0009584308,0.000018535651,0.0012893258,0.00023701532,0.00026469922,0.00027949203,0.000035569137,0.04185239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975578,0.00067559764,0.0001418784,0.000082247774,0.000049016726,0.0000032451455,0.000012284708,0.000008040069,0.0014698947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865735,0.0002180451,0.0002462098,0.00028356072,0.0002974247,0.0002974229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934494,0.0001052425,0.0001713115,0.00019442814,0.00009062128,0.000093435905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059349457,0.000107961634,0.00022567555,0.00006270007,0.00031887527,0.000016844,0.00032378046,0.00005204094,0.0014456057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081350736,0.0001417492,0.00007929449,0.00019374695,0.00039380876,0.0001420107,0.00014673293,0.00019346707,0.0000059517292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003795004,0.0016258775,0.059996888,0.000091772024,0.00010639385,0.000009144144,0.7597415,0.0010779116,0.0004485876,0.17027748,0.004925893,0.0013190969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055099046,0.000089406145,0.036229037,0.000014879484,0.000009914888,8.8008056e-7,0.6933177,0.0001355431,0.000062049134,0.0003370195,0.26904288,0.00020965346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028547581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047710845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084088277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030422118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156235","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002717","title":"Catastrophic Success: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Goes Wrong. By Alexander B. Downes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2021. 424p. $49.95 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Theology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03156450419917367,"score_gpt":0.2705045908904938,"score_spread":0.2389400866913201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05851164,0.0034614701,0.00029337947,0.0040052314,0.00036313635,0.0010563633,0.0038874552,0.0001853813,0.92823595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97357076,0.0010408132,0.000046904912,0.0006227286,0.00072111323,0.00002853009,0.00014041897,0.000029960396,0.023798754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977101,0.00030639078,0.00019489217,0.0004902315,0.00065680954,0.0006415943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882764,0.00019590184,0.00018075592,0.0003145622,0.00024458932,0.0002365302],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030138876,0.000219817,0.00021548945,0.00015758333,0.0014897471,0.000101095444,0.0006079848,0.00011200682,0.0018098224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012959301,0.00024119565,0.00015608307,0.00034886296,0.00059282995,0.00039741007,0.00017996594,0.000414027,0.000055921264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045111436,0.00024308835,0.0015391788,0.00000572141,0.00007031225,0.000015988318,0.012013508,0.00007534466,0.00000855608,0.94485545,0.04108296,0.00004479655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305763,0.0004081419,0.0051190113,0.000024524856,0.00009891244,0.000009078537,0.11220011,0.00079407677,0.000054404034,0.040748753,0.83855367,0.0006835881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022203716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018855695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91505915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001462135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023703469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156324","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002602","title":"The Architects of International Relations: Building a Discipline, Designing the World, 1914–1940. By Jan Stöckmann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 280p. $110.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.013881439923414379,"score_gpt":0.22844444045097906,"score_spread":0.2145630005275647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4657549,0.0165493,0.00061400735,0.17627318,0.0020839362,0.0012982631,0.003185347,0.00026992877,0.33397114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7652682,0.0004648598,0.000039186725,0.00009236532,0.000375456,0.000015758715,0.000021366388,0.000014279063,0.23370852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985537,0.00020912738,0.00022233985,0.0002633263,0.00045516112,0.00029636323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882436,0.0005386504,0.0001847484,0.00020738888,0.00018330502,0.000061522886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022332338,0.00015814095,0.00018548193,0.000075042226,0.008073066,0.000103429666,0.00047026668,0.000016372822,0.0001244421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010945311,0.000103304796,0.00020875644,0.0001487834,0.0006096049,0.00009726268,0.0002924885,0.00041123288,0.000004660326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030043477,0.00010936332,0.00015429371,0.0000042576867,0.0002588217,0.0000030229394,0.052009884,0.00023841084,0.000021294265,0.86544275,0.081662096,0.0000657696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022771381,0.00008340982,0.00022297341,0.000010333099,0.00008961619,0.0000010509068,0.170838,0.0005946303,0.000016870217,0.00058872794,0.82715625,0.0001704533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027419934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045957984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86485404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018897584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037113055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323364702","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722004182","title":"On the Outside Looking In: Ethnography and Authoritarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Exeter; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Insider; Deference; Ethnography; Authoritarianism; Value (mathematics); Incentive; Politics; Conformity; Sociology; Unintended consequences; Respondent; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.1878246696210174,"score_gpt":0.5084751228832902,"score_spread":0.3206504532622728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323364702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5015289,0.00034863892,0.00033331514,0.16677259,0.0002695688,0.0004896446,0.000033042426,0.00018277882,0.33004147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701536,0.0005896606,0.00041948367,0.0005950644,0.00018116755,0.00001773124,5.866329e-7,0.000012081267,0.0011688485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968757,0.0017681343,0.000113456874,0.0002361488,0.0005008628,0.0005057221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993116,0.006480833,0.000028911212,0.00015448748,0.00009447917,0.0001252598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056104176,0.000090082154,0.00011617354,0.0002635367,0.0007763253,0.00010218427,0.00017145406,0.000096951866,0.000035361154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006584555,0.000067225585,0.000054204138,0.0006858474,0.0013441393,0.00006356732,0.000045778834,0.0005775395,0.000044818793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003642974,0.000020130845,0.00029705063,0.000004057952,0.000008414641,0.000005433241,0.22256535,0.000002604163,0.000007796564,0.77647215,0.00026938968,0.0003440035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007351412,0.00006099171,0.0066711665,0.000028797174,0.0000018557464,8.373052e-8,0.38977,0.000050712653,0.000015308797,0.6001785,0.0030800116,0.000069053225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018547965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003911999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49548644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013158326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012321302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7882803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360874977","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003577","title":"Democracy Here and Now: The Exemplary Case of Spain. By Pablo Ouziel. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Democracy; Action (physics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.01265607569210329,"score_gpt":0.28045390526836605,"score_spread":0.26779782957626275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360874977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69368124,0.04265353,0.000034670953,0.0050751735,0.00044474573,0.0007239146,0.0016647482,0.00013479336,0.2555872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774936,0.008339624,0.000025685888,0.00006537474,0.00018062186,0.0000015285651,0.0000021270216,0.000011827822,0.013879626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985574,0.0002485309,0.00016854976,0.00025724946,0.0003200215,0.000448241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878275,0.0004903294,0.00013378047,0.00027158286,0.00013040571,0.00019112775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037748233,0.00012625652,0.00023560812,0.0000052757305,0.00045281954,0.000023223938,0.00024400093,0.000106536965,0.00014545236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027076356,0.000109677974,0.00008450536,0.00006031377,0.000676681,0.00022829957,0.00009517719,0.00010158653,0.000006468667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019953222,0.00013166432,0.0023396814,0.00005922246,0.000066984,0.00007175522,0.038191587,0.0000014230253,0.00006188981,0.9301045,0.028618477,0.0003328467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068189244,0.00024653948,0.018769853,0.00011111175,0.00007051379,0.000023794595,0.45615986,0.00014541746,0.0001406801,0.006796244,0.51650274,0.0003513721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.702839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11697575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92330825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050705025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013726755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89913714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360874989","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003474","title":"Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions. By Kristen Ghodsee and Mitchell Orenstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 300p. $99.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Economic history; Shock (circulatory); Gerontology; Media studies; History; Sociology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04713365040305196,"score_gpt":0.30811956051510836,"score_spread":0.2609859101120564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360874989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112713,0.0067560854,0.000050057035,0.012836972,0.00061760546,0.0016759419,0.0008160148,0.00019918986,0.16577683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902064,0.002382848,0.00021703927,0.000093324685,0.00022589228,0.00000348563,0.000005119636,0.000019262492,0.006846623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977275,0.0006188547,0.00027989424,0.00030263865,0.00057574734,0.00049533055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984321,0.0004695017,0.00041423045,0.00031277782,0.00024152601,0.00012984684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043924787,0.00018367803,0.0003223089,0.00006630156,0.0011387513,0.000043732012,0.00064603455,0.00017562,0.00010506082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007496849,0.00018231299,0.00016102217,0.0006116135,0.0025632877,0.00017048242,0.00029481106,0.00030063544,0.00000222685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054494125,0.00023218662,0.014729578,0.00006477116,0.00021978648,0.0000033120155,0.14638545,0.0000108792665,0.001977444,0.8009206,0.03387386,0.0015276187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001495238,0.00027828812,0.0619335,0.00027511414,0.00022878805,0.0000011766828,0.678582,0.000046306188,0.0016681555,0.03823826,0.21656115,0.0006920374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037134197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014327784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005741379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073474145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9692776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360875780","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003784","title":"The Comparative Politics of Immigration: Policy Choices in Germany, Canada, Switzerland, and the United States. By Antje Ellermann. Cambridge, UK, 2021. 435p. $130.00 cloth, $39.99 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Political science; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Public administration; Political economy; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.012710048138795657,"score_gpt":0.29755814448789164,"score_spread":0.28484809634909597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360875780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995342,0.0035839444,0.0000067917554,0.042497966,0.00025834583,0.00070101256,0.0013398356,0.000041262905,0.05203664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810804,0.0049983608,0.000002407373,0.0010130617,0.0005526449,0.00003141079,0.00002721083,0.000016551328,0.012277945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697036,0.0005650726,0.00047784613,0.0003193118,0.0007133741,0.0009540635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969168,0.0020049606,0.00023580852,0.00032240152,0.00025342184,0.00026666527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006766711,0.0002376184,0.00040246182,0.00013607525,0.0010255539,0.00013284934,0.00040629716,0.00009598268,0.00002081188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054392737,0.00015760094,0.00007472901,0.0010713156,0.0017616082,0.00011236516,0.00008124721,0.0003066968,0.000012778909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025433194,0.00004034877,0.0013860319,0.000013237745,0.000050158138,0.000005605655,0.026459217,0.000037221478,0.000011002613,0.9467938,0.025162017,0.00001593981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015497954,0.00010163351,0.08426783,0.000092353934,0.000028962597,0.000003218358,0.18653727,0.0013962927,0.00010716098,0.010889917,0.7146034,0.0004221618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9679528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63066083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93590385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078127073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011485104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7887835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360876946","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003504","title":"Political Economies of Energy Transition: Wind and Solar Power in Brazil and South Africa. By Kathryn Hochstetler. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 270p. $114.95 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.010652223785055545,"score_gpt":0.22690769691012458,"score_spread":0.21625547312506904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360876946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9108605,0.0042101,0.000039415958,0.007311602,0.0001552805,0.00019907474,0.001048852,0.000086513166,0.076088674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343324,0.0012100185,0.000040718052,0.00017240708,0.00016361062,4.634072e-7,0.000007452249,0.000012802571,0.004959309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873763,0.000099500074,0.00014589555,0.00032296713,0.00018659625,0.00050743046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.0000995657,0.000060571292,0.00012984361,0.00004301327,0.00024528714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010291363,0.00014841834,0.00023627083,0.000052352487,0.00018602774,0.000052272106,0.00013422845,0.000142159,0.000028219127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053257114,0.0001585694,0.0000509997,0.00018059551,0.0006748901,0.00023957789,0.00004479485,0.00014536212,0.0000028089448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041532196,0.00003632709,0.0012039389,0.000014834797,0.00003250342,0.000012550368,0.065963514,0.0000068168906,0.00004244613,0.89425206,0.038363542,0.000029908922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028103576,0.0005087809,0.08760703,0.00012647956,0.00008452276,0.000007299177,0.50614387,0.00010304253,0.0012177831,0.019463032,0.38102278,0.0009049949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060225977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119248565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87478906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001938703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017875448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9104406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378981605","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000531","title":"Asylum as Reparation: Refuge and Responsibility for the Harms of Displacement. By James Souter. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 194p. $119.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Physics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.016350530382329132,"score_gpt":0.33860726863167434,"score_spread":0.3222567382493452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378981605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746237,0.003370473,0.0008716926,0.009966036,0.0005049049,0.0016565734,0.0007488449,0.00016813505,0.008089677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909538,0.0027112912,0.00007991812,0.00028166096,0.00038642937,0.00008701143,0.00007519987,0.000016055907,0.0054086014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825686,0.00026189565,0.0003163181,0.00039109302,0.0004225856,0.00035122863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984008,0.0006819476,0.00016760688,0.00033715396,0.00030590312,0.00010659331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011089843,0.00015914784,0.00020425642,0.000099405,0.0006982616,0.00009917461,0.00017787494,0.000112748145,0.000108600376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013329033,0.00011721766,0.00010627079,0.00028112764,0.00047296792,0.000059941172,0.000030347868,0.00012033814,0.00001971389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016499344,0.000033447755,0.00088237785,0.00002287118,0.000053371157,4.262254e-7,0.08337846,0.0000032688279,0.00041434626,0.90235925,0.012449461,0.00023775345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015401924,0.0014331833,0.019435974,0.00008470617,0.0001288206,0.0000028752665,0.309115,0.0020081694,0.005599885,0.25870726,0.4013044,0.0006395643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016925298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011690859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64365196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017242704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018359596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5370534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378981772","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000178","title":"Legitimation as Political Practice: Crafting Everyday Authority in Tanzania. By Kathy Dodworth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 256p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Tanzania; Content (measure theory); Politics; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019844560579668342,"score_gpt":0.25707906338558845,"score_spread":0.2372345028059201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378981772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0665235,0.00059213536,0.0001050571,0.008536366,0.0008347513,0.00057202973,0.0019315565,0.0005980862,0.9203065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88278335,0.00018103885,0.00004586051,0.000941057,0.0009425112,0.000015457583,0.0002005919,0.00006261686,0.114827506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963022,0.00040944165,0.000516023,0.0007751686,0.0006724091,0.0013247853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975573,0.0009008509,0.00016129103,0.0004532361,0.00037695112,0.00055039325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041468567,0.000423899,0.00048577884,0.00030768273,0.00070276903,0.00024683774,0.00037288023,0.00020311451,0.00010707199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011591157,0.00045402857,0.00020615019,0.00028685495,0.00066818384,0.0009031234,0.00016154101,0.0008398205,0.0004361394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081618695,0.00050765875,0.00011537919,0.000054048523,0.000054216733,0.00017943115,0.0068278606,0.000008340308,0.000013532554,0.9441477,0.047961373,0.00004881918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094565016,0.00038265975,0.00085555547,0.00007466482,0.00008616409,0.000016415917,0.06352782,0.003705183,0.000030493358,0.0030878608,0.92652774,0.00075978844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013108623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009588079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016593277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027315077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014862","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000634","title":"Coalitions of the Weak: Elite Politics in China from Mao’s Stratagem to the Rise of Xi. By Victor C. Shih. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 280p. $87.00 cloth, $32.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Content (measure theory); China; Politics; Political science; Action (physics); Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Law; History; Physics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.013770955572572617,"score_gpt":0.2580783035077306,"score_spread":0.24430734793515796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933596,0.0012764094,0.000022874936,0.015603345,0.0003574455,0.0005890673,0.0077405903,0.000057519923,0.08099316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96173763,0.00204479,0.000036553407,0.00019023733,0.00039614405,0.000004007285,0.000018012111,0.00002192933,0.03555071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980795,0.00024536226,0.0003249846,0.000366858,0.00041394052,0.0005693872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998596,0.00030090692,0.00024107467,0.00057250814,0.00007718442,0.00021229833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033028604,0.00019569974,0.00030713397,0.000060988918,0.0004796245,0.00005429775,0.0008122133,0.00013127156,0.000105080035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025054332,0.0001504305,0.00019599395,0.0004429992,0.00062111503,0.00020227474,0.0001787601,0.00033046698,0.00002053646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002778394,0.00014250218,0.004486037,0.000013179271,0.000059202466,0.0000018067337,0.06535624,0.00011416179,0.00006833645,0.84857994,0.08109558,0.00005524548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009631915,0.000072958,0.24592136,0.00010725191,0.000044327247,3.600851e-7,0.18502104,0.00011849343,0.00020544647,0.007831157,0.55939734,0.00031708286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22967078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058482876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000905244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063185324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77545893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014872","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000543","title":"Native Bias: Overcoming Discrimination against Immigrants. By Donghyun Danny Choi, Mathias Poertner, and Nicholas Sambanis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022. 312p. $120.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Art; Law and economics; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026395623972206374,"score_gpt":0.29268880662569147,"score_spread":0.2662931826534851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65554696,0.0023529476,0.00007395479,0.0049373484,0.0005175854,0.00091835775,0.0008421276,0.0005461784,0.33426455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97576797,0.006929335,0.00016224103,0.00043663324,0.0004455254,0.000013490147,0.00006950414,0.000060977305,0.016114343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964521,0.0004362857,0.00032384804,0.0008324585,0.00083901576,0.0011163189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816847,0.00044581995,0.0002339488,0.0004192924,0.00027098056,0.0004614685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071756414,0.0003917619,0.00040390872,0.00035629305,0.001671733,0.00026217263,0.00051222014,0.00028684532,0.00005089907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005347282,0.00041880453,0.00020285047,0.00084689516,0.0013316156,0.0007614883,0.00023721087,0.00056055014,0.000019709223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057699093,0.00036641152,0.0039306544,0.00007951868,0.00017880932,0.000042339852,0.18213305,0.000013048909,0.0001927973,0.7965295,0.015335146,0.0011410291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012517418,0.00021952414,0.021865735,0.00020144672,0.00009104757,0.000002487578,0.51115996,0.000344404,0.0004661661,0.010353632,0.45312378,0.0009200731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008155549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055352185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78617585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079620833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027317725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379014970","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723000270","title":"Popular Politics and the Path to Durable Democracy. By Mohammad Ali Kadivar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022. 192p. $120.00 cloth, $35.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Democracy; Path (computing); Politics; Political science; Operations research; Media studies; Advertising; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Law; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.013923485892161558,"score_gpt":0.2742417369519205,"score_spread":0.2603182510597589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379014970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36667845,0.00437556,0.00014006118,0.13302048,0.00091119675,0.0029881916,0.0016468137,0.0013588284,0.48888043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95819926,0.0036717015,0.00021150829,0.0013234401,0.0008590637,0.00002945423,0.000016260541,0.000071372524,0.035617914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527806,0.00077829027,0.00035221773,0.00083267427,0.0009992284,0.0017595129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738723,0.0008083341,0.00013438158,0.00061276613,0.00027450992,0.0007827737],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008550386,0.0004216041,0.00057040714,0.00011959368,0.0030540475,0.00022118875,0.0007547533,0.00024080607,0.000112850124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012757909,0.00036842545,0.00021094538,0.0007183222,0.002905793,0.00026769194,0.00048448957,0.00052639813,0.0001521763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004801264,0.00011277313,0.0030805154,0.00002792177,0.00012128838,0.00002600356,0.06044695,0.000004269866,0.000012158794,0.92350984,0.012562604,0.000047638652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014390269,0.0001384676,0.0074953386,0.000073344476,0.0001142739,0.000004852498,0.4098635,0.000049278344,0.00007014094,0.04934086,0.5307565,0.000654451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012361796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001786372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.874169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012780511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027999387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314881","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001846","title":"Dictatorship and Information: Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Communist Europe and China. By Martin K. Dimitrov. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023. 496p. $99.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Communism; Authoritarianism; China; Resilience (materials science); Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Economics; Democracy; Physics; Politics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.020944986318297755,"score_gpt":0.2741020772353039,"score_spread":0.2531570909170061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6814254,0.0026365193,0.000040266023,0.027414558,0.00029753256,0.0013105312,0.00024266196,0.00046340344,0.28616914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985252,0.006345421,0.00018749319,0.00028021948,0.00012486645,0.0000061580195,0.0000243721,0.000021076,0.0077583636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977865,0.000682477,0.00024815055,0.00026745547,0.00041526003,0.00060015457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870527,0.00035212102,0.00014280512,0.0003898278,0.000087459004,0.00032250016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006815567,0.00020293095,0.00023082834,0.00012827328,0.0014222454,0.00024255492,0.00054054207,0.00013973984,0.0000326558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009148711,0.00024148442,0.00003863668,0.00076070416,0.00090040814,0.0010004505,0.0004109433,0.0004963532,0.000011794951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005787326,0.00009492748,0.015814094,0.000025164418,0.00002440708,0.000009702757,0.12114451,0.0000037944062,0.0000128869115,0.84349656,0.018402161,0.00091393414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009391581,0.00018368785,0.14436828,0.00008783049,0.000019599407,9.453925e-7,0.25875172,0.0001392351,0.0000104687115,0.008982079,0.58612084,0.00039616608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042602435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023052776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83451444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005132152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028147548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314887","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001767","title":"Contending Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law. By Geoffrey Swenson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 288p. $74.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03284308120416296,"score_gpt":0.27990432705217866,"score_spread":0.2470612458480157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1746914,0.0088582905,0.000051936255,0.033833757,0.0005006525,0.00056445634,0.00040547113,0.0002329003,0.78086114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868822,0.0041894666,0.000023687466,0.00025904397,0.00027445547,0.0000016540347,0.000004150286,0.0000064145815,0.00835894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989294,0.00011412062,0.00011043846,0.00020304327,0.0002931586,0.00034985258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932986,0.00029142754,0.00007135971,0.00009602736,0.00010973061,0.00010158576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022085774,0.00010783684,0.00019625395,0.000040532297,0.0010448559,0.000051641113,0.00019672052,0.000059199625,0.000023321125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002226319,0.00008824465,0.00007701822,0.00019003618,0.0024993333,0.00013788199,0.00009627259,0.0001349639,0.0000047942685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044950557,0.000023707868,0.00017882366,0.0000029385608,0.000067419234,0.000003326573,0.02767924,0.0000034902955,0.00000907374,0.9603551,0.011583609,0.00004831697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008322331,0.000034899524,0.00077968853,0.000025558105,0.000038357462,6.910572e-7,0.17384979,0.000020042127,0.000035173503,0.036227513,0.78801864,0.00013741931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16632006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010876777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015366887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019064448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386314890","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001366","title":"Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy. Edited by Selen A. Ercan, Hans Asenbaum, Nicole Curato, and Ricardo F. Mendonça. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 508p. $145.00 cloth, $40.00 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Political science; Philosophy; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.050390359269110396,"score_gpt":0.41475802584049487,"score_spread":0.3643676665713845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386314890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6103322,0.004163407,0.000385761,0.038023204,0.0020605074,0.0029697763,0.002201467,0.0008866245,0.33897707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102807,0.039586656,0.0041596983,0.0010969967,0.0037988396,0.000118385884,0.00016685562,0.00018623011,0.040605657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929321,0.0032595058,0.0003557688,0.0007700339,0.0010092126,0.0016734012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939978,0.0042416,0.00012062637,0.00037073198,0.00059801585,0.0006712072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017387635,0.00033119944,0.00050766213,0.0004775644,0.0016519234,0.00017342722,0.0005466308,0.00041653393,0.00016675572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024204624,0.00036866163,0.0001309991,0.0019832316,0.0016594925,0.0004611184,0.00025280158,0.0011049483,0.000017713108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001208429,0.00040655796,0.005755089,0.00004942062,0.00019412585,0.000081100865,0.20364931,0.000017346603,0.0003931528,0.64678645,0.14115837,0.0013882313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069845404,0.00017767245,0.002287368,0.000036764068,0.000034006778,0.0000011883642,0.3772388,0.0002096124,0.0006200857,0.01573027,0.60260856,0.00035717507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013502689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001207967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6310562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015847939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008890117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386318794","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723001731","title":"Support the Troops: Military Obligation, Gender, and the Making of Political Community. By Katharine M. Millar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 304p. $83.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Content (measure theory); Politics; Action (physics); Political science; Gerontology; Law; Medicine; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054392879550988704,"score_gpt":0.30470298319378225,"score_spread":0.25031010364279355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386318794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50759834,0.011942228,0.0001530871,0.043308146,0.00056847185,0.0015073665,0.0007383868,0.0003936264,0.43379033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99140346,0.0020565945,0.000029735276,0.0007742936,0.00025206452,0.000002908693,0.000020150766,0.00001642915,0.005444364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748874,0.00092062907,0.00021758137,0.00024452127,0.0004898524,0.0006386755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984075,0.0007183019,0.000082098355,0.00045820104,0.00017237825,0.0001615094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096175744,0.00017416045,0.00024335843,0.0000787436,0.0014399817,0.000051875333,0.0006450551,0.00011757005,0.000066131375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043588076,0.000134028,0.00013218852,0.0003768968,0.0018927543,0.000106828236,0.00022459007,0.0004623795,0.000004389191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036809914,0.00006668576,0.001199997,0.000019145189,0.00006753532,0.0000020186576,0.1854525,0.0000024403996,0.000004929436,0.79339665,0.019695709,0.000055602693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008294848,0.000082255465,0.010547871,0.0000128700185,0.00007295112,0.0000030612987,0.7488713,0.0001179666,0.000027776674,0.03898943,0.2002746,0.00017042263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029461011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080510287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7544072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020854097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035140922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208659","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002141","title":"The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: A New Interpretive Approach. By Andrew Erueti. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 240p. $99.00 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.015438734379057427,"score_gpt":0.2508503008767505,"score_spread":0.23541156649769304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6548207,0.0010852783,0.00061800645,0.003303876,0.00044029334,0.0020431778,0.00068999355,0.00027705493,0.33672163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740208,0.0045949467,0.000051628962,0.0001583698,0.00032783538,0.000010760064,0.000029011198,0.00002669966,0.020779962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973242,0.0005359153,0.00024093797,0.0004207694,0.000701657,0.0007764678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770844,0.0012337789,0.00022041514,0.0004411557,0.00020632945,0.00018989517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006432379,0.00024624815,0.00025757824,0.00011146919,0.0036672663,0.0001686202,0.0008261344,0.00018743394,0.00007799367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021156031,0.00015201536,0.00017267886,0.0005561252,0.00095941365,0.0001662453,0.000087506734,0.00038593935,0.00001460601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055131637,0.00014031961,0.00006066368,0.0000064909627,0.0000777146,0.0000027011552,0.34826413,0.000014858178,0.000005573591,0.64623874,0.005038024,0.00009565167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033735664,0.00042092532,0.00063914974,0.000050398765,0.000058502555,0.0000015262825,0.5318696,0.00010652047,0.00044537854,0.017595172,0.4481613,0.000314186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019532062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008891975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6286436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068045285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087786344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208662","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002499","title":"On Target: Gun Culture, Storytelling, and the NRA. By Noah S. Schwartz. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 264p. $85.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Art; Narrative; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.006799467701284998,"score_gpt":0.23068085613620679,"score_spread":0.22388138843492178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018942667,0.14545873,0.000020381942,0.0034280652,0.0010128982,0.00078074844,0.0010047522,0.0002594094,0.8290923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43891272,0.2557147,0.00013161647,0.0010974839,0.0011832282,0.000010633393,0.000046291447,0.00007446325,0.30282885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985033,0.000226519,0.0001230583,0.00032156022,0.00042947693,0.0003960628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991112,0.00017324706,0.00009699877,0.00027053256,0.00012548511,0.00022254702],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033827263,0.00013440406,0.00021807567,0.000022394981,0.0013288696,0.000111077046,0.00032701713,0.00013364751,0.0017245552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021035617,0.00014107175,0.000117548385,0.00007501676,0.001984097,0.00030330612,0.000046854366,0.00017597336,0.00004663561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043927877,0.000061262734,0.000015575068,0.000011095914,0.000042857508,0.0000042687197,0.11917187,0.0000055960522,0.000022984064,0.5655397,0.31497547,0.000105379906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046859955,0.00007700649,0.00031753542,0.00001647548,0.000027998245,2.3493277e-7,0.11628952,0.000025369689,0.000008477674,0.002833808,0.87978303,0.00015194234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8422509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7419302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56480753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027701422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033275227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389208722","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002177","title":"The Political Regulation Wave: A Case of How Local Incentives Systematically Shape Air Quality in China. By Shiran Victoria Shen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 161p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper. - Local Politics and Social Policy in China: Let Some Get Healthy First. By Kerry E. Ratigan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 200p. $99.99 cloth.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; China; Politics; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.029772719894777585,"score_gpt":0.3324362893286063,"score_spread":0.3026635694338287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389208722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83907294,0.016940953,0.0010825602,0.1065787,0.0019572056,0.008713874,0.015993211,0.00092201156,0.008738539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857231,0.0029918728,0.000112501366,0.0009562224,0.0014567801,0.00002089968,0.00037488682,0.00014624983,0.008217502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868275,0.004658594,0.0018320429,0.0016216999,0.0013797932,0.0036803952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933491,0.0022316743,0.0009914207,0.0011333141,0.0004574565,0.0018370758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017776727,0.0010519038,0.0018517674,0.0005588422,0.0024799714,0.00010470398,0.0008741659,0.00120274,0.00002761227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011859369,0.0010738192,0.00032506994,0.001442688,0.0019096292,0.00079132884,0.0008175115,0.0025122424,0.000023608824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009872795,0.0005333777,0.001917486,0.0023762295,0.00013829228,0.00021906913,0.01969487,0.000027150356,0.000020513946,0.726045,0.24795125,0.0000894746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017019104,0.0018290146,0.28585267,0.0028278118,0.00045059706,0.00015135718,0.5120225,0.010640156,0.000102041624,0.0042076544,0.16179404,0.003103075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28045675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009582118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72183734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00910877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004559938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390779593","doi":"10.1017/s1537592723002906","title":"“Fit for Purpose?” Assessing the Ecological Fit of the Social Institutions that Globally Govern Antimicrobial Resistance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Global governance; Business; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Biology; Economics; Antibiotics","score_opus":0.07708571670880514,"score_gpt":0.3747353560115798,"score_spread":0.29764963930277466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390779593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248019,0.00016440655,0.00038404443,0.01718895,0.00035144735,0.000441731,0.00036325608,0.000043627566,0.056260627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683845,0.000036799804,0.00022035216,0.0011595329,0.00013409028,0.000003908323,0.0000013635313,0.000009779919,0.0015956999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.00005955267,0.00013417947,0.0002563275,0.00028039905,0.00032912905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995582,0.00017865867,0.000047380836,0.00014871982,0.0000049261403,0.00006212498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015356157,0.0001304866,0.00011587422,0.000009420037,0.000530861,0.00010760947,0.00034296294,0.00006419452,0.00016796832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010151101,0.00007379864,0.00016137469,0.00013787339,0.0013183694,0.00015240927,0.00019858812,0.00019738899,0.000048410006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062197105,0.0018856686,0.009997419,0.00018758693,0.00017927626,0.00002288372,0.007840176,0.0010428478,0.046660457,0.89981973,0.031037988,0.0012637873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009814955,0.00019969477,0.7434908,0.00032317484,0.0003152009,0.000034479086,0.009332148,0.0017553942,0.041785087,0.021064995,0.17998603,0.0007314914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029666879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025271393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87875473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005443918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039177346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48575872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393182744","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000240","title":"Critical Race Theory: How Policy Language Differentially Engages Symbolic Racism and Partisanship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Race (biology); Critical race theory; Sociology; Positive economics; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.028592961433277015,"score_gpt":0.38050639230038263,"score_spread":0.35191343086710564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393182744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878034,0.0060492116,0.0012936741,0.07126055,0.0007351211,0.00036188244,0.00013195454,0.00042510734,0.13193911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98527014,0.00047126762,0.0000856987,0.00025564502,0.0016211603,0.000013955186,0.0000041106723,0.000026784033,0.012251253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800515,0.00059028383,0.000110040346,0.00036662174,0.00035111388,0.0005767663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982341,0.0011828053,0.000019125424,0.0001854643,0.000087584085,0.00029093976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044707017,0.0001568434,0.00016246662,0.00020897941,0.00054517307,0.0006465868,0.0001379849,0.00011450891,0.000095957694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002249897,0.00013964546,0.00008498045,0.00018723591,0.00078852946,0.00017380943,0.00004654833,0.00030368136,0.000033239034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030414828,0.000045252033,0.000103041166,0.000030605115,0.000029737863,0.000018306424,0.18403423,4.2918307e-7,0.0002161991,0.8144585,0.00026127073,0.00079939864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017469721,0.000089675705,0.008500821,0.000066419765,0.000082881284,0.000010610418,0.55372655,0.00013625681,0.0010943088,0.42994714,0.0058351536,0.00033551996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007351101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006175793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38451135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017792106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024615898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6235051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393864622","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000410","title":"The Ukrainian Refugee Crisis and the Politics of Public Opinion: Evidence from Hungary","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central European University; York University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Refugee; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Political economy; Ukrainian; Authoritarianism; Development economics; Democracy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.039917942520744126,"score_gpt":0.34974195374561967,"score_spread":0.3098240112248756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393864622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6508091,0.1074649,0.00085608545,0.18732257,0.0024939575,0.0010048753,0.00024824904,0.00027679588,0.04952344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853645,0.011116087,0.000099047626,0.00033076978,0.0012496781,0.000017111717,0.000004446454,0.0000119168,0.0018064578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981092,0.0006051498,0.00025306924,0.0002602171,0.00045402636,0.0003182917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969291,0.0023049098,0.00007332877,0.00030307446,0.00027644465,0.00011315513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165626,0.00012017403,0.00014784354,0.00007371884,0.0010634913,0.00043806667,0.00029747136,0.00008677963,0.000060803326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024181905,0.00006949152,0.00010302785,0.00023743337,0.001394739,0.00031501576,0.000036847054,0.00022539838,0.00001513219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054092707,0.000012958135,0.0000961682,0.0000062951017,0.00003252943,2.4690388e-7,0.23727842,3.387847e-7,0.0000042857,0.7604332,0.0016755925,0.0004545693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002124834,0.000114411174,0.0028565384,0.00017205397,0.000050665043,0.0000014599542,0.3587556,0.0006542592,0.00012574138,0.17294918,0.46392918,0.0001784598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005763108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021770583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.587484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021282051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038705193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8712133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395044484","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000057","title":"Political Science as a Dependent Variable: The National Science Foundation and the Shaping of a Discipline","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Pennsylvania; American Political Science Association; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Politics; Political science; Variable (mathematics); Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05403394760549243,"score_gpt":0.45257755482440687,"score_spread":0.39854360721891446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395044484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27924663,0.00038157697,0.00095225754,0.115288764,0.0005319733,0.000622831,0.000025053927,0.0000674248,0.60288346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998493,0.00003697844,0.00014887944,0.0003881776,0.0004339529,0.00001983007,3.7946373e-7,0.000003724522,0.0004750482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606687,0.00014972306,0.00015722116,0.000347892,0.0020499753,0.001228327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971343,0.0015009682,0.000029759161,0.0001401123,0.0006655548,0.00052927056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009693229,0.00007594585,0.00008459505,0.00023101424,0.0022226286,0.00078494975,0.0006108614,0.000026266945,0.00008239655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01797609,0.000042150405,0.00003131671,0.0016463341,0.020731231,0.0005759377,0.00015077124,0.00020460796,0.000024301511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062223767,0.000035307075,0.00004796535,0.0000060914563,0.000003979607,1.9221892e-7,0.016912995,0.0000025271147,0.00028142825,0.9824426,0.000012169091,0.00024847762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013808839,0.00005325203,0.005197732,0.000046871337,0.00001082063,0.0000069568764,0.07282775,0.004649046,0.00042086683,0.9155906,0.0009749728,0.00008302823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037357004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048725167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7192464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016717499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008327919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396617179","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000306","title":"American Global Pre-Eminence: The Development and Erosion of Systemic Leadership. By William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 286p. $110.00 cloth, $32.99 paper. - Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders. By Ayşe Zarakol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 313p. $34.99 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Military History and Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"American west; Median eminence; Economic history; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; History; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.014339290346529218,"score_gpt":0.24377735960980887,"score_spread":0.22943806926327964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396617179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8597369,0.07595618,0.00014777458,0.005067054,0.00048088568,0.0016885602,0.0024011862,0.00014408989,0.05437733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569165,0.009450836,0.00003399701,0.0000772407,0.00011462222,0.000005672237,0.0000174802,0.000020949243,0.033362713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688256,0.0007912842,0.00034905836,0.0006681855,0.00066741626,0.00064150034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984947,0.00036494902,0.00025674832,0.0004791934,0.00017641406,0.00022802407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006366709,0.00037550787,0.00041920168,0.00005718769,0.0012547786,0.00007895079,0.00082690676,0.00013640156,0.000018790926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007672648,0.0002618823,0.0001350012,0.00057515444,0.0041585923,0.00042964553,0.00019309614,0.0005159341,9.992334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006812837,0.000640505,0.03090181,0.0008018029,0.0006932657,0.00004340206,0.18019816,0.000076152384,0.00029328594,0.60342187,0.17906931,0.0031791618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042542687,0.0002652134,0.0151584195,0.00032012313,0.00019845841,0.0000094865645,0.39119256,0.00023723052,0.00003937751,0.0000511988,0.5917522,0.0003503545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02053371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004878295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60337067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096009835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005805408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401397071","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000975","title":"From Gender Gap to Gender Gaps: Bringing Nonbinary People into Political Behavior Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Queen's University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Identification (biology); Democracy; Political science; Politics; Gender gap; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14751457061235393,"score_gpt":0.4746492568622696,"score_spread":0.3271346862499157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401397071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72455764,0.00095626403,0.0005833461,0.008170303,0.0010654622,0.00060938916,0.00010191229,0.00028294293,0.26367274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239093,0.000058034584,0.00088577863,0.00033141932,0.0030043025,0.00008422222,0.000017027976,0.00005827515,0.0031700141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568194,0.00046576065,0.00027075436,0.00080282835,0.0012516687,0.0015270303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759036,0.00072438765,0.000020562582,0.00042388705,0.00039201442,0.00084880093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078610255,0.00021388273,0.00021644248,0.00058150943,0.0009420005,0.00053917686,0.00038021582,0.000182176,0.0005088793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005435494,0.00021887421,0.00015588067,0.00066793757,0.00045806277,0.00019453836,0.00019277212,0.00058849796,0.0007210289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045583984,0.0001557503,0.0013031807,0.00002404934,0.00003879238,0.000051253686,0.2531093,0.000007913956,0.0002490162,0.743246,0.0017043877,0.00010574708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016132981,0.00010929824,0.029331466,0.000055092783,0.000065984656,0.0000061341666,0.6540103,0.00025885634,0.00051991973,0.3056639,0.009414941,0.00040276666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033739444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044676018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43758214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015695159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067899417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401976213","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724000963","title":"Deviant Cohesion and Unauthorized Atrocities: Evidence from the American War in Vietnam","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnam War; Political science; Criminology; Cohesion (chemistry); Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0339101263025969,"score_gpt":0.3574002560300491,"score_spread":0.3234901297274522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401976213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948292,0.01145911,0.00011704758,0.027967231,0.0002006427,0.00021026797,0.000082130704,0.000098819255,0.011572735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992822,0.004560382,0.0001431462,0.0008989225,0.00052131206,0.000012055088,6.8528124e-7,0.000011656331,0.0010298658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985077,0.00025077758,0.00014742554,0.00031001683,0.0003438007,0.00044031462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973621,0.0022444387,0.000039351766,0.00016433287,0.0000462796,0.00014350464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035529103,0.00012118884,0.00018234519,0.000042603617,0.00026895397,0.00012910741,0.00017835225,0.0000437572,0.00004036544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014499036,0.00008840443,0.00005971124,0.00028182086,0.0010889323,0.00016127026,0.00004605474,0.00026134992,0.000034203764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001961204,0.000015364274,0.0026907867,0.00000836125,0.000015003875,0.000019448124,0.12133637,6.4018826e-7,0.000052183776,0.87429607,0.00032329015,0.0012228937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037375966,0.00033826876,0.26642567,0.001279587,0.00007599227,0.0000024905728,0.42851457,0.00067194924,0.00019146387,0.15841608,0.1430879,0.00062226737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03252715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019167085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040038308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022028563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97391534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403897715","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001294","title":"Navigating Uncertainty: Rebel Risk Management Strategies during War-to-Peace Transitions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03322042317985938,"score_gpt":0.435790579197102,"score_spread":0.4025701560172426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403897715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78225523,0.0050672716,0.001741034,0.050555877,0.0011450425,0.0019071592,0.0005464101,0.0011382183,0.15564378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916147,0.0018017233,0.0007907562,0.0018575182,0.0007701354,0.0003367423,0.000009292916,0.000051949464,0.0027671964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755144,0.00022848774,0.0004271722,0.00050723716,0.0002868728,0.0009988023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.00041014177,0.000058999707,0.00032712755,0.00014336035,0.00031866043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172914,0.00024312107,0.00026003554,0.00012130964,0.0020748405,0.00003971749,0.0001420627,0.00010064586,0.00012788743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113712995,0.00022117217,0.00010074508,0.00036774995,0.000093057446,0.00011529566,0.00007803798,0.0012811567,0.00066151057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003540536,0.00007942342,0.00024919858,0.0012145553,0.00019144648,0.00006127322,0.5515517,0.00041052978,0.000022059516,0.44342896,0.0010489172,0.0017064955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000492381,0.00016065565,0.007876592,0.00189102,0.00009924299,0.0000028336328,0.9071047,0.0004713081,0.000016030644,0.004614365,0.07692543,0.00034548782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000963107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008535716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4388146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076938694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024313331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404358728","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001804","title":"Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought. By David Myer Temin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023. 288p. $99.00 cloth, $32.50 paper. - Indigenous Peoples and Borders. Edited by Sheryl Lightfoot and Elsa Stamatopoulou. Durham: Duke University Press, 2024. 384p. $114.95 cloth, $30.95 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Decolonization; Politics; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Economic history; Law; History; Ecology","score_opus":0.005604605221820283,"score_gpt":0.2363107472338668,"score_spread":0.23070614201204653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404358728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93470633,0.040511258,0.000042630978,0.0035169001,0.00024007676,0.001311089,0.001023747,0.00023928413,0.018408706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637855,0.03464281,0.00009084369,0.0001253236,0.00019488213,0.0000047696126,0.000041789477,0.000030139852,0.001083891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973851,0.00048516493,0.00026907216,0.00070770783,0.00046366296,0.0006892968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877876,0.00035462898,0.00018781808,0.00024023835,0.00018927296,0.00024930626],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032821525,0.00034038923,0.00045104846,0.00009109684,0.0020117254,0.00014346646,0.00027622518,0.00021426367,0.000048576432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021115228,0.0003198808,0.0000717438,0.0005525754,0.0018377521,0.0005145524,0.0001672215,0.0005085112,0.0000016729998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013901826,0.0007652464,0.015090372,0.0004753565,0.00041831468,0.00006404334,0.80704,0.000008065358,0.00016904561,0.16011171,0.015007653,0.0007112129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007446483,0.0004096609,0.026667552,0.00013317508,0.00028706624,0.000013419974,0.61197984,0.00011992439,0.000038226754,0.00083427806,0.35809913,0.00067308225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008070531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01401224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34309146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007561317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042595377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405006184","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002305","title":"Basic Equality. By Paul Sagar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024. 240p. $35.00 cloth","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.029997635384592082,"score_gpt":0.3279776011930108,"score_spread":0.2979799658084187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405006184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031401552,0.0061876085,0.00006231314,0.01789139,0.001424928,0.0005446402,0.0005228511,0.0006518811,0.94131285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83511,0.010180731,0.00005319168,0.00041320384,0.0024156426,0.000007318404,0.0000083305395,0.00003656094,0.151775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974755,0.0003250919,0.00019988138,0.0005427404,0.0006257611,0.00083102274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.00035782048,0.000069003174,0.00026177458,0.00011995185,0.0002707428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048415142,0.00025272742,0.00029852253,0.00010304447,0.0011980052,0.00019184947,0.00042093493,0.00021321447,0.00010145149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025241185,0.00023065112,0.00020344334,0.00042573517,0.0012299203,0.00028727727,0.00015790413,0.0004447782,0.000083857194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015537275,0.00013536749,0.00024033588,0.000054225693,0.000140182,0.000017265604,0.056317315,0.0000014318617,0.000010742494,0.91030157,0.03241327,0.0003527476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002385283,0.00010815455,0.00083683763,0.000091536014,0.00005656526,0.0000010768355,0.14224966,0.000017294975,0.0001517729,0.019384656,0.8364738,0.00039007934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083054155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033962098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89091694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012260459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046334715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405687395","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001750","title":"Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.028564514916492846,"score_gpt":0.31928076948239925,"score_spread":0.2907162545659064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405687395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78349125,0.002891659,0.0010298431,0.045337822,0.0010759013,0.00065800914,0.00007216077,0.0001504641,0.16529286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167776,0.000013334206,0.0002550518,0.001971721,0.000748867,0.000035810932,0.0000018818404,0.000034358975,0.0052612317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986653,0.0001614743,0.0001804035,0.00039029226,0.00017160774,0.00043096687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987546,0.00044492068,0.00002574131,0.00047754165,0.000083611594,0.00021359204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025474775,0.00018689061,0.00024811993,0.00017143137,0.0000927518,0.00007309876,0.00018163884,0.00008781902,0.00015819899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018129394,0.00013027071,0.00008444546,0.00021881239,0.00021340752,0.00004577614,0.000062024235,0.0002576964,0.0000790052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083786785,0.00006351373,0.00002723306,0.000027400964,0.00008022823,0.000008331023,0.09344904,0.000006425917,0.000094287985,0.89887184,0.0062215175,0.0010663845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019979016,0.0012613378,0.016734432,0.00040300272,0.00020029893,0.00012540315,0.8647402,0.0003791568,0.0040623285,0.06540407,0.043874845,0.00081705407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036743187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003859204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098615186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005182472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53122854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406335568","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724001610","title":"Nation Branding and International Politics. By Christopher S. Browning. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2023. 240p. $130.00 cloth, $39.95 paper.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Art history; Art; History; Sociology; Law; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.017388142836761166,"score_gpt":0.21870420985760922,"score_spread":0.20131606702084806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406335568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009457873,0.0036970694,0.00011132818,0.0074822777,0.0015439737,0.00025686764,0.0036254423,0.00042913356,0.97339606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099701,0.0009801178,0.000027321723,0.000513856,0.0009961446,0.0000046019377,0.000081420854,0.000040759114,0.1873857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984864,0.000069363414,0.00023085406,0.00047789759,0.00030297556,0.0004325371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991687,0.00021692824,0.000051026836,0.00016820033,0.00015086035,0.00024427293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007878665,0.00025523134,0.0002232622,0.00012232442,0.0004963313,0.00026077672,0.00020501892,0.00010103026,0.0005675302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075255935,0.00024790055,0.00012301524,0.000049987026,0.00044864832,0.0004754698,0.000080329584,0.00032292664,0.000050089333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001854683,0.00012555993,0.000015879186,0.000044476976,0.00010481217,0.00002880194,0.0055120927,0.0000025748193,0.000014429572,0.9509719,0.042944897,0.00021604919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035479598,0.00011558012,0.00010603741,0.000065622495,0.000049561302,0.000004406247,0.009810452,0.0016633763,0.0000096960575,0.018315852,0.9691921,0.0003125042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01040307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053819662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93265605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009255297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005873676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670797","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002482","title":"The New Experts: Populist Elites and Technocratic Promises in Modi’s India. By Anuradha Sajjanhar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. 189p. $105.00 cloth, $34.99 paper.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Media studies; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.00853657274951892,"score_gpt":0.2717113364900647,"score_spread":0.26317476374054577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6133181,0.019139618,0.000071268485,0.022315767,0.0010104513,0.0026703936,0.00054474984,0.0004986944,0.340431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87016886,0.00533817,0.00014538779,0.00070627365,0.00024014688,0.000025586198,0.000015383195,0.000035168523,0.12332502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997183,0.00033024457,0.00034057806,0.00069084467,0.0005434838,0.00091180496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847543,0.00044532085,0.00015182974,0.0005127217,0.00011912048,0.0002955714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036487615,0.00034541625,0.000361215,0.00020295728,0.0013932225,0.00035543,0.0007208622,0.00021525587,0.00001741594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084532856,0.00030188504,0.00009694852,0.00059813686,0.001053956,0.0004700813,0.00019127796,0.0004086198,0.0000066705297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006193238,0.00029447168,0.0050097024,0.00003493658,0.00009233927,0.000024584078,0.012883746,0.0000020519094,0.00026959935,0.7747924,0.20602556,0.0005086952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002312209,0.00019164689,0.022881445,0.00034990977,0.00011214808,0.0000028212794,0.22540617,0.00009526091,0.0015445936,0.0066690333,0.7394653,0.0009694863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034514274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014306724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017882838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069933676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670810","doi":"10.1017/s153759272400224x","title":"A Discussion of David W. Blight’s <i>Yale and Slavery: A History</i>.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blight; History; Horticulture; Biology","score_opus":0.014219110527262411,"score_gpt":0.300104203524188,"score_spread":0.28588509299692555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023674525,0.0012645499,0.00027607335,0.008868514,0.0002944264,0.0001374745,0.00005566214,0.000044541026,0.96538424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563261,0.0001723484,0.00023635855,0.00064512895,0.00011785599,0.0000041440358,0.0000015684013,0.0000042442252,0.042492196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915606,0.000095638505,0.00012772872,0.0001787072,0.00019917615,0.00024267292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993953,0.00018451326,0.000055522585,0.00013815488,0.00011829754,0.00010822104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012643888,0.00008714324,0.00015546578,0.000113263464,0.00023021882,0.000012333515,0.000111625086,0.000056595956,0.00008773646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002992738,0.00006765404,0.00005447301,0.000120482444,0.0018515179,0.00006760259,0.000034913926,0.000095416624,0.0000053534905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008019109,0.00007848337,0.0008397267,0.000010834807,0.000016838549,0.0000012095672,0.012432071,7.384453e-7,0.00004924867,0.9829513,0.003523816,0.000087705754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018780703,0.000059420763,0.0011714535,0.00005334096,0.000030977993,6.059577e-7,0.02775032,0.0000070646574,0.00009579637,0.013398922,0.9571333,0.00011097903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019531876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098214514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050988985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013307062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408670940","doi":"10.1017/s1537592724002512","title":"A Discussion of David W. Blight’s <i>Yale and Slavery: A History</i>.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blight; Economic history; History; Horticulture; Biology","score_opus":0.014219110527262411,"score_gpt":0.300104203524188,"score_spread":0.28588509299692555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408670940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023674525,0.0012645499,0.00027607335,0.008868514,0.0002944264,0.0001374745,0.00005566214,0.000044541026,0.96538424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563261,0.0001723484,0.00023635855,0.00064512895,0.00011785599,0.0000041440358,0.0000015684013,0.0000042442252,0.042492196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915606,0.000095638505,0.00012772872,0.0001787072,0.00019917615,0.00024267292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993953,0.00018451326,0.000055522585,0.00013815488,0.00011829754,0.00010822104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012643888,0.00008714324,0.00015546578,0.000113263464,0.00023021882,0.000012333515,0.000111625086,0.000056595956,0.00008773646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002992738,0.00006765404,0.00005447301,0.000120482444,0.0018515179,0.00006760259,0.000034913926,0.000095416624,0.0000053534905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008019109,0.00007848337,0.0008397267,0.000010834807,0.000016838549,0.0000012095672,0.012432071,7.384453e-7,0.00004924867,0.9829513,0.003523816,0.000087705754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018780703,0.000059420763,0.0011714535,0.00005334096,0.000030977993,6.059577e-7,0.02775032,0.0000070646574,0.00009579637,0.013398922,0.9571333,0.00011097903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019531876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098214514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050988985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013307062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409407372","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000246","title":"The Elements of Deterrence: Strategy, Technology, and Complexity in Global Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Political science; Computer security; Law and economics; Political economy; Economic system; Business; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0269509395794265,"score_gpt":0.3658017587664119,"score_spread":0.3388508191869854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409407372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8739886,0.0008185363,0.000030791707,0.0053309742,0.0000954182,0.0001971458,0.00007467035,0.000031124375,0.119432725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998924,0.00045430762,0.00014402563,0.000112842135,0.000025103995,0.0000037325,0.000001284576,0.0000022108388,0.0003324659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988827,0.000101013735,0.00021119897,0.00018100593,0.00019545811,0.00042863138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994573,0.00011390411,0.00005995673,0.00017551312,0.00013420911,0.00005912929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027191904,0.00009488608,0.00014378606,0.00011278497,0.00040911845,0.000055152967,0.00028695763,0.000108121145,0.000003852838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038946857,0.000083072475,0.00003249692,0.0005711971,0.0019990744,0.00004958588,0.00008192559,0.00016403402,0.0000015542129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039209026,0.00008036175,0.048063416,0.0000053409594,0.000013338486,0.0000010322792,0.0027615805,0.000002162354,0.0000014954419,0.9485272,0.00006417778,0.0004759517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023477849,0.00006693654,0.043370962,0.00003203142,0.00000985918,4.2377272e-7,0.18824065,0.00022412722,0.0000086364125,0.7649624,0.0027672702,0.00008195468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038149918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011700279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18547906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042084052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026559777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73656726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409708338","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000611","title":"Platforms are People Too: Social Media Firms and International Relations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Social media; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02643923617701283,"score_gpt":0.2734519860825242,"score_spread":0.24701274990551136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409708338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67914104,0.00006339711,0.000073180614,0.0075613833,0.00032379475,0.00007077512,0.000025948882,0.00009343706,0.31264704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945924,0.000009713945,0.000026277436,0.0019427005,0.00088123756,0.000009739303,0.000018199684,0.0000078898765,0.0025118333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929434,0.000002256859,0.0001426242,0.00019486986,0.0001289373,0.00023699018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956644,0.00009371068,0.000069678885,0.0000871633,0.00016878077,0.000014246078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000052696065,0.00011758368,0.00012509138,0.000205159,0.00026569742,0.0002622527,0.00013106423,0.00006389628,0.00014566342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000273463,0.00010623811,0.000045989676,0.00021150119,0.0001576731,0.0005812146,0.000081650476,0.00014387691,0.00014532762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079866895,0.00004778516,0.010514991,0.00001479203,0.000024923658,0.0000017601095,0.00076143135,0.000005093928,0.000005172291,0.9852686,0.003208934,0.00013852483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027029827,0.0000040074774,0.28916585,0.000026032116,0.000027733033,5.795758e-7,0.037527796,0.00037791664,0.000007722342,0.66692394,0.005525845,0.0001422842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001345771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089515925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31834468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077560435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035850226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43322644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411160654","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000519","title":"Risky Business: Organizational Challenges in International Support for Civilian Self-Protection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Oxford; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; European University Institute; McGill University","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03145243177585923,"score_gpt":0.33107852441367946,"score_spread":0.29962609263782025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411160654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41907814,0.0014641581,0.0138842715,0.17395185,0.008158191,0.00273584,0.00047540438,0.0009913817,0.37926078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956689,0.0011147793,0.00011945096,0.00046082056,0.0007602596,0.000068683315,0.0000108786535,0.000014644341,0.0017815863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985849,0.00009733415,0.00022682452,0.0003668167,0.0002984026,0.000425702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895376,0.00020707869,0.000057327346,0.00015745973,0.0005327444,0.000091612885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003260938,0.00014162427,0.00015797211,0.00029624216,0.00026696138,0.00006722252,0.00029288384,0.00014492426,0.00015817396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094284216,0.0001531466,0.000057835685,0.0003375456,0.00018443406,0.00018250004,0.00003377962,0.00016070466,0.00003120773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030476354,0.00043386215,0.0015376945,0.000043823795,0.000046618024,0.000002641507,0.13359387,0.000008845477,0.000013215561,0.86253506,0.00038701776,0.0013668641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011454483,0.00015442385,0.061412387,0.00018539971,0.000038013142,0.0000021251562,0.7664875,0.00046798433,0.000112105554,0.08814136,0.08142665,0.00042660336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073957216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007052001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77439374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082749553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044007663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6245137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411386715","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725000635","title":"Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Refugee; Autonomy; Negotiation; Political science; Syrian refugees; Law","score_opus":0.015100397017790675,"score_gpt":0.3169128750648675,"score_spread":0.3018124780470768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411386715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84942895,0.00008466783,0.00011732763,0.048660785,0.0005857477,0.0005232861,0.000028888544,0.00011087524,0.1004595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94405967,0.000010093597,0.00035937357,0.00033986205,0.0003942501,0.000050415638,0.000002865311,0.000010290186,0.05477319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886745,0.00021525937,0.00013772373,0.00022423621,0.00020348726,0.00035182017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874336,0.0007533172,0.0000754117,0.00014946325,0.00023100745,0.000047434987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006458628,0.000106303174,0.000103953615,0.0001708625,0.0017546344,0.00028578754,0.00030473372,0.00006238245,0.000019876457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021046994,0.00009181311,0.000074477815,0.00018018053,0.00021288011,0.000121772464,0.000044780572,0.00014237704,0.0000065964814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009885257,0.000025591346,0.00044249892,0.0000070849887,0.000045535395,0.0000010430256,0.046200197,0.0000104491255,0.00008361562,0.9527133,0.0003311292,0.00004068913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012462463,0.00011805279,0.19775918,0.00019750812,0.000053943964,8.052875e-7,0.37211522,0.00026951355,0.0007681251,0.0640572,0.3629109,0.00050330063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046721398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043575012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88865614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012822509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000622216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412468660","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725001100","title":"The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy. By Samuel Ely Bagg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. 284p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Power (physics); Democracy; Dispersion (optics); Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Theology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01499067399875533,"score_gpt":0.3304447967435262,"score_spread":0.3154541227447709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412468660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071238495,0.002437977,0.002549981,0.03287796,0.0007948765,0.0005381524,0.001063734,0.000100246536,0.8883986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877847,0.0028054807,0.00020699634,0.00022931017,0.0000705247,0.0000022470917,0.0000056799054,0.0000120117775,0.008883072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975174,0.00087583216,0.0002891108,0.00033334043,0.00040280525,0.0005814797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924402,0.0064690565,0.00008913038,0.00039085766,0.00043914787,0.00017161279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008141352,0.0001597513,0.00031226245,0.00006504425,0.0008184676,0.000029556018,0.0006067126,0.00022750442,0.000106066116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066530067,0.0001373732,0.00019725245,0.0002440224,0.0058565927,0.0001056185,0.00016240955,0.00034388536,0.0000012910579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014319044,0.00023552182,0.0005152249,0.000028266368,0.00005400972,0.0000028064821,0.011229074,7.557849e-7,0.000045852215,0.97907645,0.008421449,0.00024741446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033276924,0.00022291606,0.0016632685,0.000068907124,0.00010546244,5.5445025e-7,0.326199,0.000024312763,0.00021235632,0.45117682,0.21981928,0.00017436732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018689906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091130096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91654617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046947517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034072046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412769058","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725101825","title":"Making Political Parties Accessible for People with Disabilities: A New Research Agenda","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.200632317684884,"score_gpt":0.5118427040844772,"score_spread":0.3112103863995932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412769058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21669309,0.0001953759,0.0024441492,0.07157253,0.00030476705,0.0014490562,0.00005594474,0.00017821862,0.7071069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633902,0.000015322585,0.00057333324,0.00023492797,0.00050235464,0.0000922548,0.0000034102939,0.0000130182625,0.035175223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976963,0.00027095157,0.00018858728,0.00041666848,0.0005253611,0.0009021621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972196,0.0018713777,0.000029441717,0.000301593,0.00039740256,0.00018058426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062105496,0.00012126825,0.00019907928,0.00016862832,0.0011896432,0.00034112472,0.00028168753,0.00008922028,0.00017951963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020037284,0.000090733236,0.000089532645,0.00048235466,0.0017738307,0.0002316877,0.00005292257,0.00018869728,0.0000140520215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056053363,0.00018885641,0.005593049,0.00005039229,0.000028517745,2.800973e-7,0.09135158,0.000008431148,0.0000020622456,0.89952207,0.0030514784,0.00014720645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002716252,0.00012428185,0.0025917247,0.0000614633,0.000017175376,1.746184e-7,0.5301587,0.000039898296,0.00009321465,0.44242594,0.0241106,0.000105207946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008181732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004985787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74669707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072967046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011304661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413032680","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102089","title":"Against American Ethnic Democracy: White Rule and Black Rebellion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Memphis","keywords":"Democracy; Ethnic group; White (mutation); Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.013526537522255131,"score_gpt":0.3236997240709553,"score_spread":0.3101731865487002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413032680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4609685,0.0010797178,0.00022198432,0.012033422,0.00019726634,0.00018928187,0.000018115375,0.00014048033,0.52515125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683958,0.003415815,0.0006353408,0.0025269717,0.00029354478,0.0000057611105,0.0000019715528,0.000015287475,0.024709502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985415,0.00022257514,0.00014832361,0.00037439854,0.00025641825,0.0004568038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991537,0.00021161677,0.00010077179,0.00023266168,0.00012359009,0.00017771394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002820642,0.00014642175,0.00022980111,0.00011023013,0.00085500017,0.000052714495,0.00018098272,0.00006928708,0.000029399058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000298829,0.00015568722,0.00009972792,0.0005713192,0.0034958306,0.00009477254,0.00003683473,0.00024893894,0.000034855373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002073712,0.0002573814,0.008786976,0.000025042807,0.00009261222,0.000005830364,0.3875686,0.0000192635,0.00013822081,0.57000154,0.020827845,0.012255967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003140191,0.00011418937,0.03748385,0.00004861329,0.000045324574,2.9079254e-7,0.7797137,0.000102593454,0.00004784533,0.012451451,0.16931766,0.00036046148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011580066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017668451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006615686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027622958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413415944","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102661","title":"“Talkin’ ‘bout a Revolution”: Change for Care, and Care for Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08127414213245265,"score_gpt":0.39440308857021666,"score_spread":0.313128946437764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413415944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22965029,0.06571593,0.0038277905,0.0225386,0.007353093,0.0126798125,0.005205489,0.00065459916,0.6523744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928508,0.0005276213,0.00046240256,0.0010495778,0.0016393205,0.0006643411,0.000025122568,0.0000125253755,0.002768322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898726,0.000052546195,0.000116079245,0.0003267916,0.00014342045,0.00037391912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.00019532997,0.000043760567,0.00013803258,0.0004592117,0.000091637514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014093434,0.00011931141,0.00015792306,0.00011590082,0.0008195832,0.000050009443,0.00011282031,0.00011498736,0.000013988236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034963214,0.00012669654,0.00012323105,0.00011429639,0.00031145252,0.00011675908,0.000027748665,0.00007489147,0.0000019730176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020586538,0.000028346574,0.00037686882,0.00011613756,0.000020738953,1.12215666e-7,0.42148754,4.5518725e-8,0.0000023678315,0.5760312,0.0008486468,0.0010673765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004061144,0.00022758674,0.004862989,0.000054102267,0.000037538968,2.5582804e-7,0.7672165,0.000014439667,0.000053976495,0.011732728,0.21525726,0.00013651233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033147093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015485585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76320046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077172165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016860467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63036543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413764077","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102260","title":"On the Decline of Elite-Educated Republicans in Congress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; Haverford College; Swarthmore College; Dartmouth College; Association for Psychological Science; Princeton University; Johns Hopkins University; Pomona College; Vassar College; Harvard University; York University; Northwestern University; Washington University in St. Louis; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Grinnell College; American Political Science Association; Rice University; Yale University; Vanderbilt University; University of Notre Dame; Williams College; University of Southern California; Wellesley College; Georgetown University; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Elite; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02199570611692038,"score_gpt":0.35576618485311706,"score_spread":0.3337704787361967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413764077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35706633,0.0003244153,0.000017488423,0.057979766,0.0005378469,0.0002516683,0.000054946664,0.000039980023,0.58372754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98492867,0.0003132718,0.00002883376,0.003867267,0.0002176383,0.000011459105,0.0000019817137,0.0000075039843,0.010623401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998552,0.00028539813,0.00025571018,0.00020525187,0.0002865379,0.00041506664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976088,0.0017332328,0.000081460516,0.0002896033,0.00020427376,0.00008263276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006599981,0.00010710455,0.00017880894,0.00020778683,0.00019900124,0.00002954328,0.00042567888,0.00013838774,0.00015969538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003992772,0.00008269542,0.00006580259,0.0005495124,0.0010302875,0.00004598195,0.000048179325,0.0003626057,0.000011563082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011169038,0.00015071209,0.0017001149,0.000005773121,0.000016215643,7.2807916e-7,0.022473156,0.000008573424,0.0000064267883,0.9656747,0.00987007,0.0000823765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005949206,0.00010952907,0.011153416,0.00022646696,0.000028917922,4.0080846e-7,0.23144954,0.00010625406,0.0005585184,0.59148586,0.16404791,0.00023826961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054909387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005295899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62786233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034471374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053795596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83006936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414020510","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725101503","title":"Strategic Taxation: Fiscal Capacity and Accountability in African States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Fiscal capacity; Economics; Economic policy; Business; Public economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042027170859852046,"score_gpt":0.2552436489719109,"score_spread":0.21321647811205882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414020510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73852736,0.0002693962,0.00004761937,0.0022409724,0.00007829643,0.00010124847,0.00020739152,0.000018277227,0.25850946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989777,0.00004568669,0.00009379977,0.00043578146,0.00007406386,0.000015054736,0.000004723455,0.000008086241,0.00034509148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988845,0.00002016988,0.00035895623,0.00040630976,0.000018208515,0.0003118652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942726,0.00012750618,0.00013778779,0.0002232842,0.000016332104,0.0000678526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025688385,0.00013694951,0.00028591562,0.0002613284,0.00008497817,0.00007248329,0.000113802605,0.00008541165,0.000060576152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001667724,0.00015991338,0.00004864315,0.00017771673,0.00022238439,0.00013817669,0.00003812012,0.00020175114,0.00004832256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012775732,0.000106791216,0.06640924,0.000022428581,0.000015029892,3.973521e-7,0.0037064585,0.000020366306,7.824411e-7,0.929624,0.00006586731,0.00001585278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028775178,0.000037983285,0.26640135,0.000008298467,0.0000018238303,5.4009166e-7,0.007437664,0.0013489632,0.000017220556,0.723889,0.0004483834,0.000121006175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020444207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018803886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26045036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004055798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021511956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65210783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415788515","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725103356","title":"Migration Governance in North America: Policy, Politics, and Community. Edited by Kiran Banerjee and Craig Damian Smith. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2024. 510p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance","score_opus":0.007299811025917464,"score_gpt":0.25738219957802805,"score_spread":0.25008238855211057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415788515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89064586,0.00049727526,0.000109967434,0.012279063,0.00019083894,0.0005300706,0.0017578595,0.000109684166,0.09387939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789254,0.005701047,0.000072399416,0.00042337566,0.0001585727,0.00000460238,0.00006967899,0.0000108262075,0.014634075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982972,0.00060824095,0.00019771881,0.00028858948,0.00023295738,0.0003752886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901104,0.0002958575,0.00011271244,0.00022912049,0.00019665943,0.00015462148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017507286,0.0001844684,0.00022065295,0.00017655632,0.0010232055,0.000090890986,0.00018532183,0.00012840722,0.000011196247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066731,0.0001987205,0.000039999286,0.00043298665,0.0006393643,0.000348393,0.000049731392,0.00040940128,0.0000013095574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032267468,0.00033740923,0.015657023,0.00003717655,0.00003948933,0.0000022200672,0.0746432,0.000018577386,0.000013642935,0.8891853,0.019384544,0.0006491327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000928283,0.00025661517,0.26958144,0.00009895642,0.000053656087,6.741641e-7,0.18828689,0.0007024972,0.00008936996,0.005372163,0.5342122,0.00041726968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5246308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17720988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88381314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009601591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022307226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8378039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417270926","doi":"10.1017/s1537592725102673","title":"Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men - Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men. By Patricia Owens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2025. 409p.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"World history; Political history; International relations; Intellectual history","score_opus":0.016578105366899513,"score_gpt":0.22854418980015034,"score_spread":0.21196608443325082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417270926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050605666,0.0038880138,0.00040141444,0.0013617886,0.0022076056,0.00036186716,0.0010547517,0.00011893646,0.98554504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42201063,0.0004419277,0.00023486592,0.00030296278,0.00045102692,0.0000075420153,0.0000853737,0.000029815606,0.57643586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975764,0.0001732213,0.00058867317,0.000585406,0.00065685855,0.00041944778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981611,0.0001912237,0.00039996335,0.00044983331,0.00061379315,0.00018412116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018680714,0.0003668368,0.00057834294,0.00036008388,0.00011618487,0.000028843258,0.00074442424,0.00014424826,0.000723247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001452791,0.00036363382,0.00027320988,0.00006445902,0.0011363659,0.00035355575,0.00020069454,0.00043613953,0.000012045819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852797,0.00091643346,0.0017960042,0.00008754911,0.00037209917,0.0000112584385,0.01213109,0.000008480737,0.000101871134,0.86784875,0.11633722,0.00010397234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012007031,0.0001639759,0.00044661103,0.00011283558,0.00014016336,0.0000011862253,0.005096462,0.0015292857,0.0000807435,0.0010532376,0.989831,0.00034383903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024993767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008692869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87349373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069462643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009003001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}