{"meta":{"query_hash":"e05726084d17","filters":{"venue":"Philippine Political Science Journal"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e05726084d17","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philippine+Political+Science+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2978906415","doi":"10.1163/2165025x-12340006","title":"Achieving Human Security after a Disaster: the Case of the Haiyan Widows","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philippine Political Science Journal","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Human security; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Focus group; Political science; Socioeconomics; Business; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06122825912674922,"score_gpt":0.35364971408037216,"score_spread":0.29242145495362293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978906415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98466474,0.00037921185,0.00037494762,0.01009855,0.0001163446,0.000060929782,0.000026978056,0.000006097893,0.004272206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956086,0.00056201895,0.00032196398,0.0016280476,0.000050418617,0.000045539175,0.000013241361,0.000004391745,0.0017658566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837923,0.0007430075,0.000037362173,0.000062466,0.00006806964,0.00070985884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843436,0.00043798768,0.00021175912,0.00007724851,0.00014762262,0.0006910351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025355322,0.0005297569,0.00032280714,0.0007911077,0.021908384,0.003768574,0.0014152019,0.0032150063,0.003399792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035958947,0.00044960805,0.00037750456,0.00082599546,0.007729114,0.0024458126,0.006523782,0.004915625,0.00023629687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104743165,0.00025103442,0.03152898,0.00017615728,0.000030798925,0.029650906,0.91003156,0.00020404322,0.0011757553,0.010313541,0.0035397427,0.012992853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039594274,0.00006441404,0.0029834686,0.00007383859,0.0000065010786,0.001205132,0.98850995,0.00008553158,0.00018236421,0.00057870755,0.006292226,0.000013902828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02385388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042061016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02385388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029319727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051884744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04743004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390395636","doi":"10.1163/2165025x-bja10050","title":"ASEAN and the Major Powers in the South China Sea: the Role of Law, Diplomacy, and Deterrence in Moderating Sovereignty Claims","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philippine Political Science Journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Political science; Law; Diplomacy; Sovereignty; China; International law; Arbitration; Politics; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.009537956382536633,"score_gpt":0.2672275419549571,"score_spread":0.2576895855724205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390395636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8723259,0.00063634344,0.0014454016,0.0053496365,0.00004373631,0.00002552328,0.000019610574,0.000005559186,0.12014827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859315,0.000088069726,0.00008966606,0.00019267703,0.000008945734,0.0000067578712,0.0000038482212,0.0000010605734,0.0010158039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656916,0.0018800909,0.00016460223,0.0002806919,0.0007031158,0.0004023215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869866,0.007935191,0.0026188702,0.00036430353,0.0012992332,0.0007958977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006554586,0.0002445786,0.000263699,0.0010251723,0.0027139501,0.006757162,0.00057710824,0.0009604774,0.004778881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012105335,0.00012666709,0.00019736296,0.0010971627,0.008831246,0.003023468,0.0040156734,0.002139809,0.00016139461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028512283,0.00019418754,0.12429068,0.00019022106,0.00014329665,0.0022161533,0.041378003,0.003194802,0.0037212963,0.78745526,0.0021889145,0.03474198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013093575,0.0005284048,0.33763218,0.0011428886,0.00032200146,0.000466885,0.14096905,0.014577663,0.0050760885,0.3921209,0.10686286,0.00017007525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010594583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01916714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010594583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034414334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00454532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034664392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}